Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 0271 Meadowland Drive
P:MF L� •11 ' II I.1 I it .I GRAPHTC SCALE SIN FEET I ------- I i N . 200 (L. PLANNING DATA FQS/'9TF -A, VAI c;vw CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC P.O. BON 4W SHELBURNE, VT 054M ILFAB6Y.41. FAN' EDDEl ' � Y.. 0bpMhW- AWY Dam 1QPPARO`M' aA LOCATION MAP SCALE: , _ 3000 Nn 7R0 cCT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont OWNER & APPLICANT SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 153 SUMMIT STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05407 FONSTRUCTION PLANS 11 DATE I CEECEED I REVISION OVERALL LEGEND SITE ' ' STREET LIGHT SP8 TF HYDRANT SEWER MANHOLE O CATCH BASIN _. .... _. _. _ PLAN SEWER MAIN - - - -�- - - - WATER MAIN - - - -R- - -'I STORM DRAINGE MAN -- (CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ®7 �n.No PRorEcnaN AaEA DAR A�/ �Iy , GWI 5C� DRAIRNO NU R r-2ar SP3 TT.II..�N/'J. YIII/ � , r > /-- I ' �I I BASE LINE — - ~ALLE1 To LINE an9vERn uHE 1 � CONNIX srA TION 5.00 ,.,w ON BASCLINE _�� - `I - I•o /r / L. E® 7•00 L-- --�----- ___ -r FC,-AHN 0 _ _ _-_ - -I ----� rYPC� --- C ANHEe --_ r --PROPOSED 20' WIDE I 100' MOE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT �� / �— CONSERVATION AND vLT .-.- I 70 BE CENTERED ON THE / / OPEN SPACE DSTRICT 'I, NO RECREATON PATH a£iI.AND PRO CTION AR�A�1 / \ F / ' - '¢ SO' EACH 213 F / pa PAN � ��N�111 1-_PROPOSED 20' NtDr PEOE5TRIAH EASEMENT TO BE CENTERED ' ON a(N I � ' �MOPOSEO 50' WFnAryO �' � M02CRLit ARF.L I DIVERT EMSTNG STRCAM CHANNEL INTO -C.LE CNAHHEL SEDIM[N SKI__ M FENCE 370.5 TPI RELOCATE J6' RCP - -CACKLE lrI 25' MOM PROPERTY LINE TO MAINTAIN I: J SLOPE ALONG IOUrANT PROPERTY it T .PROUNOOROPEOBOUOVERLDERS `itr CONCRETE ENO SECTIONS 0 PLANT LIST .1 N 706320 II REr satnnNc NAM[ —OH NAM[ auANnrr azE ccuMENrs cA CORNUS ALBA SIBERICA REDSTEM DOGN000 .50 2'-3' BB IC ILE7 OLABRA INKBERRY JO 15'-IB• B ! R I PSI PINUS SMOBUS YAIITE PINE 62 r - V-5' B!B P52 PINUS SNOBUS YMITE PINE 20 1 f B'-10' B i 9 '.B SAUY SAI ICA WEE%ND WLLUN '71 � 10'-12' B Y B I NOM R* CONSTRUCTION OF RECREATION PATHS WILL NOT BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE DEVELOPER. THE PATH IS SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSES OF N.LUSTRATION. THE WETLAND WILL BE RELOCATED TO THE NEW CHANNEL. N/F TOUT4N.' ♦_, r1151INO S' CHANNEL R BETUND AREA I EROSION CONTROL BLANKET a MTER FABRIC (SHADED AREA) I EL CHANNEL r"" C.A LINE 000NTROL c7PoiNr 2 so L At kk 3r � �HQ►i�s'YCc`"T����111 1 ��rI I 0PST .:WED cNrcME— C>' DROPS FRO. • so tn DAVIS N.r Pt Ook LEDGEKNO I QFVELOPEMENT F:P $ QQ � • d _,F, N 706320 N TRUDELL CONSULTING ! ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Blair Park Road SOK 308 W1Biatom Vt 05495 (802) 879 QREWSE RETLANO BOUNDARY 05/IB/9% 41 Description I Date Revision ♦f OT VEA N 1' "tt151t�° Y f�ICNAL Elfl Project title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Roan So. Burlington, V1 Sheet title Berm / Channel Site Plan Project number 9602292A LRt. Project manager RPT Drawn Date 08103196 scab _ Approved C \DIF\MlT7\9Ll2ATA l-Il-rl 1.4.M .n [fl SPIO NOTES 4*r CONSTRUCTION OF RECREATION PATHS WILL NOT BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE DEVELOPER. THE PATH IS SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSES OF / ILLUSTRATION. THE WETLAND WILL BE RELOCATED TO THE NEW CHANNEL. PLANT LIST (El SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUANTITY 92E C... E. iS iI CA CORNUS ALBA SIBERICA REDSTEM D00N000 450 2'-7 BR y C IO ILEX OLABRA INNBERRY JD I5'-Ia7 B k B P51 PINUS s.oBU5 MATE PINE 52 !'-a' Bk8 P52 PINUS "'Bus MRTE PINE 20 9'-10• B k a SB SALIx BABYLDNICA PEEPING MLLOW ]1 10'-12' B k B INE7LAN0 \ � roWi I 1 / 1 I I I 1 I EXISTING POND ' I I 1 1 I { II I 1 I PEDEI ENT EryENi EAS I 1 I 1 O 1 II I 1 f1 I I 1 I 1 1 — 1 I BASE LINE LOT LINE AiT STA. A. 214 I149l a9 \ 1 1 1 $IL I ' I FENCE—�` 1 I 21ap0 20a00 ��----- _-+- 19a OO F-�-- CHANNEL TYP E 5 'B'OO e 1 J' DROP OVER ITaW N 8377'23- E y-- - 200' CONSERVATION ROUNDED BOULDERS -� ELEV.J4F.O ZONE AND DRAINAGE J 1/2' DROP OVER - 16 i0�-----•�-1�- EASEMENT ROUNOCD BOVLOCRS +..OU ' 1 ELtV J54.0 I - �-~ CHANNEL TYPE 14•L'0 _A-- - 4 +l}=� _ CNA FL TYPE B i �� R 1 - — PROPOSED 20 N1DE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT - CHANNEL TYPE Y I _ _ w- ro BE CENTERED ON THE ono [rtosol'CCONmoL a. RECREATION PATH BLANREr,tSIlADEO AREA) "NE, -c - -� - ak7 J' DROP OVER ROUNDED BOULDERS 1-1/2' DROP OVER POUNDED I \ .( �- - -�_ RECREA I �'' / 1 SL 1oAGK I BWl0ER5 ;' 17 P51 s PSI FENCE , �' I IS, p� DRAI � I PROPOSED STREAM -a •' PINE•'.- __ - - / - REALIGNMENT 0, ® -®_ / 2' DROP OVER Jl ® -Q -®- I / ROUNDED BOULDERS EyISNNG -PINE f/� _. 0 ® 0 ® W 0` 0 0 // L Bk] ! DROP OVER ELEV..337.0 PI E SLD1CHi 1O0 0 F SB P1 ROUNDED BOULDER$ ELEV-J41.0 $ICR155 ND PINE / 52 I _. - ! _ ,.: - „ I - _.. - _ C OPEN ia. .. = 1 $B i* 1d1 ` - 100' E DSTRICT AN AN �� �� OVER i-. ExISFIND SPACE DISTRICT AND F ROUNDED .. I SAN. M.M - - NETLAND PROTECTION AREA (/% BOULDERS I '� ' i / SO' EACH SIDE OF CHANNEL 1) 5� ELEV.Ja0.0 HAYSALC ._ O / h / CHCCIIDAM Z - J OEjj14 f fE. 3I11 DISC 1 E. 371. ..yam. PE1I TON $rl(nrinn . I LUNG ANU VNAINALL EASEMENT TRUDELL C0NSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 blab park Road box 308 VJb8atOrL Vt. 03493 (802) 87 IQ RENSE xElUNO BOUNDARY O6/181 0 Daatrlptbn Dat ROVISIO u E OF VE tip, r. 40 7tCI5lAN •F' fSSIQYAL E' proyect title MEADOWLANL BUSINESS PARE Hinesburg Roa( So. Burlington, Street tide Berm / Chann( Site Plan P70)mt number 9602292A Ext. Project manager_ apr Drawn D.te 06/OJ/96 Sul. Approved SPII 39 38 37 36 FILTERED VIEW _ FILTERED VIEW SCREENED VIEW L L DECK ELEV.379.0 PROPERTY LINE EX. GROUND CHANNEL PATH LIGHT POLE, 20' RiNLEY-DAVIS LOT s SETBACK 0 IQO 200 3qO SECTION l ------- -- -- ___ -- PROP. BUFD11 ROOF ELEW. 3; PROPOSED PARKING 40D 500 390 �80 370 -PROP. BUILDING E ROOF ELEV. 397.9 R IINLEY-DA VIS LOT c SETBACK PROPOSED PARKING I I I` O Iq0 200 300 400 SECTION>, i 1 390 ___.-----'- - ---- - 390 vltw 360 SCREENED VIEW _ 380 - ___-___.--,_____ — 7.� _ 370 —370 360 -360 PROP. BUILDING E DECK ELEV. 375.8 PROPERTY LINE EX. GROUND CHANNEL PATH LIGHT POLE ROOF ELEV. 397.9 HOWELL LOT SETBACK �I. PROPOSED PARKING O 100 2-- 3 300 - 40,0 _SECTION 380 370 360 r-VIEW TO LIGHTS 650' TO EDGE OF PARKING AREA DECK ELEV. 375E _ PROPERTY LINE CHANNEL HOWELL LOT aI 0 00 SECTION 4 PATH 'EX. GROUND SETBACK 200 FILTERED VIEW 300 -------- - -- (�� 370 —360 400 500 I L 90 O 370 -- 360 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 biair Park Road Bw 308 WHIZ —Vermont 05495 (802)879-6: Des0ption Date R-tsl n Pro)ect dde MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt Sheet title Sections 1-4 Pr*Ctnumber 96022 P.Ie.t-n.Ser Kf[)_ KAP Date 4123196 S<ak Pb2 MP -�- -r rLIGHT POLE 20'- - _ �� -- -- - o 390 _ _.... - . - ... --- -- - - - ---_._ --_ -_. -- ---- '.. _....- - ---- i FINISH GRADE ! I — DECK ELEV 379.0 _ - - - ---- -- -- ------ -_- --- ----- -_ ---- _ _- - -- 1-` �- EXISTING GRADE - - P .TR _ - _ T -- PROPOSED 370 _._. ._ _-�-- 1- _. ROOF ELEV DATUM ELEV 36000 0+00 1+00 - 2+00 3+00 1 4+00 5+00 RINLEY-DAv1S LOT SETBACK � PROPOSED PARKING. t SECTION 1 400. _. - _._ __- _ . _ _. _ __ _. _. ....-'I ---. .- -- ----- ----- ------ _ ... _ __. 400 390 _.___. _.... i. _.-.._ ___... _... - .. - �-1- -- _-- _-:FILTERWW �11QLiT PQLE-2R. __ .. _. ... ._._ -_- _ _ -- __. _ _. _ ____ 390 _ VIEW _ .- - - _.FINISH --GRADE__ - _ -- _. _ _.__. - _...__-___ __.._ .._ _ - _. ___ .. _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _- .__ - -_.. _ . _ ._.. __ .. _... - - - . 380 DECK ELEV 379.0 ._ ..I --- __ ItDtNO --------- ---- - ----� - -- - t I--PROI�OSE0-l3H-�=----------- - F _ _ _.. _.. __- ..--.-___ .- _...___. �E%ISTING GRADE -PAIF1 - --- -' - --- --_. `i --- -- - � - - �- - - ---- -'- �— .. 70 - -- ROOFitEV: � 397 g - I � 3 DATUM ELEV 360. 00- --'---..--------- --------. a 0 00 - RINLEY-DAMS LOT 1+00 2+00 3+00: 4+00 5+00 SETBACK PROPOSED PARKING SECTION 2 400 1400 w 390 __ _- -_.. --- --- _._ .ice- -- - - --- -.- ._LIGHT POLE,- jO:- _ pLT�RED VIEW 7�7 380 � ._ _ � . —_ .. - FNISH GRADE -. - .__ . ._-- _ _ -- --_- 0 DECK...ELEV:"3T8:8 - ..- ----- ---_ .-._ --.. _..._ .._- .. _ .__ -- -. --- I' - -.x- ._ _ -_ -i 370 PATH i---- --- - -- _ I --..ROOF ECEV 397.hS----' ---- DATUM ELEV 360. 00--'-------- ------ --- - t t 0 O0 1+00 2+00 + 3+00 4+00 00 HOWELL LOT I SETACK PROPOSED PARKING SECTION 3 400- _ 650' TO EDGE OF PARKING AREA __--._.. _ -- _--_--. - _--- _--___ . ___.. .._ --_._ -- ----_---__- ---. __..--..__ ___. ._.. .. _. _. - '--_._.NG ARE_- -._.. _- --_---._ ... __ _.. - _ -400 390 390 0 380 -_ 'FINISH . GRADE _ FILTERED- VIEW TO LIGHTS DECK- ELEV. 375.8. - ---- -. _- EW_ T0. CARS- --- r 360 =PATH EXISTING GRADE - -_ __-_ — -_--- ._.._. _ .. y"' " i -- -- — — T . - _ 0 --'-- . . � _. 136 DATU,II ELEV' t•- ]I 350.00 - --- - - 1+00 HOWELL LOT SECTION 4 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 � I I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC 400 P.O. BOX 4W SHELBURHE, VT OUN - mt� FAC swa ww, M k a Gwv I .J 390 I Hun+ 380 ACL 370 mcm cam 1Q]PPAAROYm QAV PROJECT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont I OTT[ I �= I REYIHION VIEW SECTION PLAN DA® aunmc NmmBR M sc ra SNw - 20'�,�J P�RO�J. N)0. VIIll 11 30 7C 6( 5C v`V^ "`•SHEAHAN LOT .M nvr`n„ "'•` `^y„yyLr-SETBACK QIIO 200 - 400 - 50 0 � I SECT ION 5 BO 70 60 50 1000' TO SWIFT STREET EXTENSION FVIEW TO LIGHT POLE --- 70 Y - — .J' 70 FILTERED VIEW 6 5 50 ----- DECK ELEV. 371.4 PROPERTY LINE LE X. GROUND CHANNEL PATH SHEAHAN LOT, SETBACK Q 1I0 2I0 300 40,0 500 SECTION 6 610' TO PARKING AREA B 970' TO BUILDING JVIEW 70--.. _ _ —___ _ TO LIGHT POLr__ — — _370 VIEW TO CARS 6 --- ----------- ----- -- 360 5 50 L ' PORCH ELEV. 373.1 PROPERTY LINE CHANNEL PATH EX. GROUND PENNINGTON LOT 14 I SETBACK 'I O 100 200 300 400 500 SECTION 7 RIC- g�clin9ton ®fi Sa 011w TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 81air Park Fond B_308 WIIIIston,Vermant 05495 (802)879-6331 Descdptbn Date B� Revisions Pmlect title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road South Burlington, V1 Sheet title Sections 5-7 Pm)ectnumber 96022 Pm)ect—tager a"P DraWrt_ NAP Date �/2J/95 Scale I". 20' Apo,wed " l /J SP 14 M"a 620' TO PARKING AREA B 990' TO BUILDING J 390r ............ 380 T cw� DESK FLEV. ag-5.8 I ;;e-FINISW - - - - - - - - - - - - -7- - - - - - - - - - PATH XISTING GRADE J— DATUM E1XV - s50.00 1,00 SECTION 5 2+00 390 380 370 360 00 4+00 5+00 1000' TO SWIFT STREET EXTENTION 390 1390 ... ...... . 4 380 - ----- ME W WjLgjjjkD,-- 370 r FINISH GRAD FILTERED MEW --MEW TALQ&tS� - — - - - - - ------ 360 ------- 380 - - — - - - - - - - -=77 �4--Iin�INGGRAU DATUM &EV PATH 350.00 390 0 370 360�- DATUM ELEV 350.00 SECTION 6 SECTION 7 1+00 +00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 610' TO PARKING AREA h 970' TO BUILDING J- 380 -ffY TQ-W _L6LV. 4-OT Par- 370 F1 SH GRADE --BNISH ...... 360 A. -7 F - - -- - - - - - - - GRADE.._ 2+00 4+00 5+00 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC, P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05462 ACL c� DW SAV PROJEcr: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont VIEW SECTION PLAN DATE D.— FEB, r-w SP14 ow No Text No Text �QB'EtL�RIfdISEE: V ERM lNIT ENHANCED 9-1-1 1USA G UPDA TE .CORM Date: 7 M/63 SECTION 1 CHIANGE[UPDATE CONDITION Add/ Change :S/tr/eet Name ❑ Range g ❑ Odd, Even or Both Indicator ❑ Zone (ESN) rilvq- .� 0 ❑ Community Name SECTION 2 SECTION 3 Address Range Currently in Street MSAG Address Range Change or Add Street 0; 41) t.A P J NI)E— Low Range High Range Odd/Even/Both Community/State Low Mange py ' High Range 3 / Odd/Even/Both &6 71 Community/State (e Zone (ESN) Zone (ESN) 33 9 Remarks ** IF Ei1[]E E CY SER CE ZONE (ESZ) BOUNDARIES CHANGE - FILL OUT FSZZ UPDATE FORM ** Signature "`^' Print Name /,U ✓ i �/ Telephone Number �N (T ` �7 lD Date For System Provider Use Only: ,SECTION 4 E911 MSAO Corrected On: Date By-- -- Remarks iAALIL To: Verizon E-911 Data Management Center I Corporate Drive. Floor 2 Andover, MA 0 18 10 or FAX To: 888-770-9548 For Information Call: 800-279-2787 Date: I b 7 1Lo SECTION I CHANGE/UPDATE CONDITION Add ol Change Delete ZLAY ❑ ❑ Street Name ❑ Range ❑ Community Name ❑ Odd, Even or Both Indicator ❑ Zone (ESN) .SECTIO112 SECTION 3 Address Range Currentiv in NISAG Street Address Range Change or Add Streeti��%i".� Low Range Low Range 3 5' High Range Od&'Even/Both _ High Range Odd/Even/Both CI Community/State _ Community/State Zone (ESN) Remarks Zone (ESN) 3 M ** IF EM Y SERV E ZONE (ESZ) BOUNDARIES C GE - FILL OUT ESZ UPDATE FORM ** A"/x Signature Print Name � �!W Telephone Number y"V� y Date/ For System Provider Use Only: SECTION 4 E911 MSAG Corrected On: Date By- — --- Remarks MAIL To: Verizon E-911 Data Management Center 1 Corporate Drive, Floor 2 Andover, MA 0 18 10 or FAX To: 888-770-9548 For Information Call: 800-279-2787 Date: � M16.3 SECTION I CHANGE[UPDAT'E CONDITION Add Change ❑ Cd Street Name ❑ Range ❑ Odd, Even or Both Indicator ❑ Zone (ESN) Delete L ❑ Community Name :SECI'I01V 2 .SECTION 3 Address Range Currently in MSAG Street Address Range ((Change or Add Street Low Range Low Range 3 1 High Range Odd/Even/Both Community/State Zone (ESN) Remarks N W High Range / V _ Odd/Even/Both Q Community/State So, Zone(ESN) ** IF EIM GENCY SERVICE ZONE (ESZ) BOUNDARIES CHANGE - FILL OUT ESZ UPDATE FORD ** s Signatur 9' �tti Print Name / & MIA Telephone Number` uG` 7/y� Date For System Provider Use Only: SECTION 4 E911 TAG Corrected On: Date By_ Remarks MAIL To: Verizon E-911 Data Management Center 1 Corporate Drive, Floor 2 Andover, MA 0 18 10 or FAX To: 888-770-9548 For Information Call: 800-279-2787 — .— — ,PM.V TY" Lar L.+t muxa r �o 7 7j e� xia J ray :raxs 0 ax cv 3 K7I%= ms .ww Overall Park Plan Owner: Summer Ice Joint Venture C/O Davis, 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Applicant: Chase Properties and Development 38 Chase Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Zoning District: I-O FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres. On the 30th day of July, 1996, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of Summer Ice Joint Venture for revised final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres approved on 11/15/94 (minutes enclosed). The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve ( 12 ) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres which was approved on 6/28/94. 2. This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. 3. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #3. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. 4. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 12 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 49.5 acres. The average lot size is 8.44 acres (based on a total of 116.73 acres in the I-0 zone). All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. 5. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto the applicant's property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 733 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Bowdoin Street) branches off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac 1 at the north boundary. This road would serve lots 4-9 and could eventually be used to serve the parcel to the north. Another road 710 feet long (Thompson Street) also branches off to the north and will serve lots 10 and 11. 6. Wetlands: Wetlands have been delineated on the property with the exception of portions of lot U . Wetlands should be delineated on this lot prior to development. 7. Conservation & Open Space Zone: The western portions of lots 7, 8 and 9 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. 8. The center of the relocated stream on lot 1 will be less than 50 feet from the adjoining Toutant property resulting in a CO zone extending onto the Toutant property. The abutting landowner, Arthur Toutant, submitted a letter agreeing to the CO zone encroachment. 9. Recreation paths: The plans show recreation/pedestrian paths as originally approved. The recreation paths will not be constructed by the applicant with the exception of the recreation path located within the 80 foot r.o.w. 10. Traffic: The applicant submitted an updated traffic impact analysis. The applicant assumed 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends at full build. The following intersections were analyzed: Williston Rd/Rte 116; Kennedy Drive/Rte 116; Rte 116/Project Access; Williston Rd/Dorset Street; and Kennedy Dr/Dorset Street. The analysis indicates that all intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS in the design year of 2002 with the project. LOS D will result at Williston Rd/Rte. 116 and Williston Rd/Dorset Street. All other intersections will operate at LOS C. A traffic signal will be warranted for the Rte. 116/Project Access intersection with 20% build -out of the project. Staff recommended similar conditions to those attached to the 6/24/94 approval: a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. 2 d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 11. Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-11 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 19.45 of the zoning regulations. 12. "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural" stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of years ago. The Natural Resources Committee reviewed the details of this stream and found it acceptable. The value of the landscaping along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,710. Plantings will include Redstem Dogwood, Inkberry, White Pine and Weeping Willow. The 6/28/94 approval required the berm to be constructed at the same time the road is constructed. 13. Sewer: A seder allocation of 30,345 gpd was approved as part of the 6/28/94 approval. The length of time that this sewer allocation will remain in effect is tied to roadway construction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years of final plat approval (i.e., by 6/28/04). 14. Sidewalk: Condition #5 of the 6/28/94 approval required the applicant to contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. The Commission waived the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80 foot r.o.w.). due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 15. Landscaping: Condition 42 of the 6/28/94 approval required the applicant to post a landscape bond for the street trees and berm landscaping. The combined values of the proposed landscaping is $47,400 ($14,110 for berm landscaping and $43,690 for street trees). 16. Legal documents: Condition #4 of the 6/28/94 approval required that the legal documents for the easements and the roadway be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recording in the land records prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction. 17. Other: --- on sheet P2 the proposed street trees should be increased in size to a minimum of 21 inches to meet the requirement of Section 412.4 of the subdivision regulations. --- the note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 should be changed to refer to lot 11. 3 DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page 1 entitled, "Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/4/96 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approval and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years from date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including a easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant. shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by 6/28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineers "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner . Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches. b) The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to lot 11. L1 c) Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 12. Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development. 13. Deeds for lots 7, 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three (3) years (i.e., by 7/30/99), this approval shall be null and void. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. Access (i.e., driveways) to lots 4-11 shall be from the side streets, not from Swift Street Extension. 18. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Chairman or Clerk' South Burlington Planning Commission s Date 51 No Text No Text CIVIL EA GAI NEEMI IG AfSOSOC ES, INC. 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 September 3, 2002 Ms. Donna Kinville, City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Conditional Use Determination Application Dear Ms. Kinville: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Pursuant to the requirements of Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 37, Section 906, we are providing notice on behalf of Meadowland Business Park's intention to impact 25,382 SF of Class II wetland and 43,287 SF of Class H buffer area for the construction of a roadway, stormwater management facility and a gravity sewer main in support of the construction of the infrastructure for this project. Enclosed you will find a copy of the completed Conditional Use Determination application. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosure CUD Application cc: M. Neagley (no enclosure) A. Moulaert (no enclosure) J. Severson (no enclosure) P. Spear (no enclosure) \\Dave\c\I Let\O 1117\CLERKnotice.wpd APPLICATION MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK SOUTH BURLINGTON, W. CONDITIONAL USE DETERMINATION Prepared For: Summer/Ice Joint Venture, Inc. OCT. 5, 2001 KENH�Y A4Z c _ . =-- � i LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1' = 3000 feet Prepared By: Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Natural Resource Consulting Services 928 Falls Road 67 West Shore Road Shelburne, Vermont Grand Isle, VT 05488 (802) 985-2323 Fax 985-2271 (802) 878-4800 e-mail dmarshall@cea-vtcom VERMONT WETLAND RULES CONDITIONAL USE DETERMINATION APPLICATION Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 37, Section 905 file number: date received: [ ] complete [ ] incomplete date completed: DEC receiver: ************************* OFFICE USE ONLY INTRODUCTION The following questions must be answered in order for this application to be considered complete. If you have any questions on any portion of this form, please call the Vermont Wetlands Office at (802) 244-6951 for assistance. NAMES 1. Applicant: Summer Ice Joint Venture Address: 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone: (802) 658-6320 Co -Applicant: Burlington Properties Address: P.O. Box 9210 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 860-7200 2. Landowners of involved properties: Same as above Address: Phone: 3. Representative: Natural Resource Consulting Services Address: 67 West Shore Road Grand Isle VT 05458 Phone: (802) 878-4800 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4. Location: (Street Address) Route 116, South Burlington, VT 5. Acres owned by applicant and landowner at project site:116.73 Acres involved in project: 116.73 6. Project purpose: Commercial and liaht industrial lots and Town required access to Vermont Route 116. 3. General project description (include number and size of buildings; number of lots; length of roads; type of sewage disposal; etc.) Commercial lots are proposed. Construction of an approximately 3,600 foot long paved road (32 feet wide) crossing a Class II wetland (containing the headwaters of the Potash Brook and a man-made drainage ditch) once and Class III wetlands twice. The Winooski Conservation District USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) has confirmed that the area we consider Class III wetlands is prior converted cropland (see Attachment 4) which is not subject to Section 404. The project also calls for the installation of a gravity sewer main within a previously issued 20' wide easement from the Summer/Ice Property across lands of Burlington Properties to the existina municipal pump station. OTHER INFORMATION 8. Are there any other federal, state or local permits required for this project, and if so have they been applied for or obtained? Applied Required for Obtained US Army Corps of Engineers Permit [X] [X] [ ] 401 Water Quality Certification [X] [X] [ ] VT Act 250 Permit [X] [ ] [X] VT Stormwater Discharge Permit [X] [ ] [X] VT Lakes and Ponds Permit [ ] [ ] [ ] VT Stream Alteration Permit [] [ ] [ ] Local Zoning Permit [ ] [ ] [ ] Other: State and Local Subdivision [X] [ ] [X] 9. Attach the following information to the application: [X] Location map (project area marked on a USGS topographic map of Vermont Significant Wetlands Map) Attachments 1&2 -2- [X] Site plan(s) including existing conditions, proposed work, erosion controls, and wetland and buffer zone boundaries (see Sections 3.2 and 4.6 of the Vermont Wetland Rules for description of methodology). Attachment 10 [X] Any other narratives or documents that the application intends to rely upon in support of the proposed Conditional Use. Attachment 3 [x] Photos of wetland, if available. Attachment 4 10. List the names and complete mailing addresses of all persons owning property within or adjacent to the wetland or buffer zone in question. Name Mailinct Address with Zip Code Please see Attachment 5 Attach additional sheets if necessary. 11. Complete the following for the entire wetland in question. a. Size of wetland (to nearest 1/2 acres): 18.5 acres plus 12 acres on the Burlington Properties portion of the project. b. Check the dominant type of wetland present: open water marsh X wet meadow shrub swamp forested swamp bog or fen beaver influenced wetland X other (explain): Dug Pond/Ditch C. Name of all streams, rivers, lakes and ponds adjacent to the wetland and approximate distance from proposed activity: The proposed road crosses the headwaters of the Potash Brook which is a Class II wetland. d. Approximate the percentage of each cover types in the area surrounding Class II 10 forested old field lawn commercial or industrial other (specify) -3- of the following the wetland: 90 agriculture open water residential road 12. Complete the following for the portion of the wetland and buffer zone in the area of proposed impact. Class II a. Area of impact in wetland (sq ft): 25,382 Areas of impact in buffer zone (sq ft): 43,287 b. Check the type of wetland present (check all that apply) : open water marsh X wet meadow shrub swamp forested swamp bog or fen beaver influenced wetland X other (explain): Ditch C. Description of dominant vegetation: Dominant vegetation in the area proposed for development is primarily reed canary grass, cat -tail, tearthumb, and sedges (see Attachment 3 for a complete list of species). d. Description of soils in the wetland and buffer zone (from Soil Conservation soil surveys or site investigations): The soils found at this site are primarily Vergennes clay (VeB) and Covington series. Vergennes clay consists of soils that are deep and moderately well drained. The Vergennes clay found at this site falls within the B slope category. These soils maintain a 2 to 6 percent slope and are smooth and uniform. The Covington series are deep, clayey soils which have poor drainage. Covington soils are dark soils that are wet in the fall and spring. e. Check the characteristics of the wetland which apply: flooded most of the time X standing water during at least part of the growing season water impounded by beavers X soils are saturated during at least part of the growing season dry most of the year f. Description of the buffer zone:100 percent agricultural mowed alfalfa/hay field/row crops often raised. 13. Describe in detail all work that is proposed within the wetland or buffer zone, including erosion control measures, referencing attached plan where appropriate: The work proposed is culvert installation fill road construction over the culvert, and utility (and gravity sewer line) S! installation as detailed on Sheets P3, P7, P9 SP 3A 7 and 9-12 of the attached plans. Erosion control will consist of abundantly placed and scrupulously monitored straw bale dams and/or silt fencing, silt traps and other state of the art design features which will minimize the movement of fines from the site. The timing of earth work and scheduling of construction, vegetative stabilization, etc. are detailed on the site plans and will further reduce the chance of any ecoloaical damage from siltation. Culverts have been hydraulically sized to meet or exceed a 25 year rainfall event and therefore will not (statistically speaking) flood up -gradient wetland buffer or upland areas. All spoil materials, with its seed and rootstock bank, will be removed from the floodway, stockyiled and used in restoration. Replanting will utilize indigenous species from local nursery sources. Natural Resource consulting Services' personnel will monitor this work. Specifically the work and associated impacts include: Road Crossing - Wetland Impact_11,917 SF, Buffer Impact 26,822 SF - This impact is required to allow for an east -west crossing of the existing Class II wetland complex. The crossing point was chosen to minimize the amount of impact by crossing at a point of previous disturbance. The impacts are comprised generally of filling to facilitate the installation of a new box culvert to replace an existing culverted crossing 5,402 SF of the buffer impact is associated with the regrading required to facilitate the installation of Detention Basin #2. This impact is the same as that depicted in the original CUD permit. Sewer Main Installation - Wetland Impact 190 SF, Buffer Impact 502 SF - The gravity sewer installation is required at this point to allow for the most feasible and prudent connection of the gravity sewer from this project to the existing municipal collection system. The impacts at this location include the crossing of an existing drainage ditch that, due to its proximity to the main wetland area, is considered to be a Class II wetland. Sewer Main Installation - Wetland Impact 7,218 SF & 5,095 SF, Buffer Impact 2,215 SF & 1,368 SF - Similar to item 2, this section of the gravity sewer -5- installation will create a temporary impact by disturbing and then replacing the A horizon soils. The gravel access road included in the original CUD permit has been reduced in length_to avoid the Class II wetland impacts. Sewer Main Installation Connectinq_Bowdoin Street and Thompson Street - Wetland Impact 962 SF, Buffer Impact 602 SF - This gravity sewer installation runs in the east -west direction and is required to reasonably connect the sewer collection system into the main branch flowing in the northerly direction. This work will again be a temporary impact through the removal and replacement of the upper soil horizon as part of the reclamation efforts. Please note that we found two drafting errors which had erroneously added 4,760 SF of Wetland Impact while leaving out 502 SF or buffer impact. The correct totals of impacts are Class II Wetland Impact 25,382 SF; and Wetland Buffer Impact of 43,287 SF. 14. Before this section is completed it will be necessary to determine for which functions the wetland in question is significant. The functional criteria for evaluating a wetland's significance are described in Section 5 of the Vermont Wetland Rules. The Vermont Wetland Evaluation form is available through the Wetlands Office to help determine which functions may be significant. Demonstrate how the project as proposed will avoid any adverse impacts on each of the functions. Refer to plans and other attached documents as necessary. a. Water storage for flood water and storm runoff: The headwaters of the Potash Brook are a low -gradient perennial stream flowing northerly across the property. Lots 1-3 and 10-12 have a combination of individual and group detention ponds that will result in no significant change in the ability of this floodplain wetland to store floodwaters or handle storm runoff. Lots 4-9 will require no planned detention. There are no known historical flooding problems on this brook in the vicinity of the project. NRCS inspected various topographic maps and aerial photographs, and we M conducted our own visits Using the NWI maps as a base approximately 7 percent of the upstream drainage The broad valley floor and low -gradient at the Potash Brook crossing provides a good natural detention storage. Approximatelyll,917 square feet of Class II wetland and 26,822 square feet of buffer will be filled to construct this particular crossing. The side slopes of the fill have been steepened (1:2 slopes). The effect of this is to substantially reduce the "footprint" of wetland fill. The applicant has designed the minimal width of roadway surface acceptable for the City of South Burlington (32 feet traveled way and grassed shoulder). The only reduction in he amount of the wetland's ability to store and desynchronize flood flows is the 0.11 acre fill (0.0010 percent of the 114.3 acres watershed) at this crossing. We therefore conclude that the amount of lost wetland is small regarding storaae for flood water. The proposed gravity sewer line installation will provide no permanent net change in the flood storage capabilities of this wetland since the installation will be subsurface. b. Surface and ground water protection: The Class II wetland's surface and groundwater protection is greatly reduced from its potential. The poor permeability of the upper soil prevents any significant amount of groundwater from accumulating under the site. According to Sarah Flanagan of the U.S. Geological Survey, the best available information on local aquifer mapping is the Ground Water Favorability Map of the Winooski River Basin, Vermont (published by the Vermont Department of Water Resources and the Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 1967). This map reveals that this property does not lie within an area favorable for the presence of groundwater. Therefore, there is scant need for groundwater protection, as there is little, if any, to protect. As for surface water protection doubtless there is some ability to protect surface water quality. However, this ability is greatly reduced because: 1. The intensive tile (Vossburg) and perforated PVC piping (Goodrich) drainage (thousands of feet) -7- installed by the previous owners hastens surface water movement off the farm. This underground drainage was generally run perpendicular to the slope of the land so as to maximize the ability of the pipe to drain the soil, hence improving agricultural production. The drainage tile/pipe was laid so as to auament the surface ditching, that is, the pipes were laid parallel to but away from the ditches so as to extend the effective radius of both surface and subsurface drainaae features. 2. There is extensive surface ditching across this portion of the farm's land. There are approximately 8,000 feet (1.5 miles) of ditches that have existed solely on this 116.7 acre portion of the farm proposed for development. Air photos reveal that these well defined ditches have existed for generations. The ditches have obviously been maintained and re -dredged frequently because they have not been allowed to accumulate dense vegetation, much less any wood vegetation. Furthermore, the most recent previous owner, Mr. Goodrich, redug all of the major and minor ditches and created a new large ditch (in some locations 10 feet deep) along the southern property boundary. So, the ability of surface water to accumulate on the surface (and effectively absorb nutrients, slow floods, abate sediments, etc.) has been continuously and extensively destroyed. Additionally, all of the main drainage within the project area (the only Class II wetland) which is proposed for development has been drastically and permanently altered from a hydraulic and ecological sense. All of the Class II headwaters in the proposed developed portion is either ditched or is an excavated pond The development seeks to change none of the Class II wetland which is intact ecologically/hydrologically. That is, the Applicant seeks no change to the best functioning portion of the wetland (uparadient of the dug pond). Assuming that all of the drainage between the Interstate and the proiect's southerly boundary was forested wetland (PF01) at one time, only about ten percent of it is intact. All ten percent will remain unchanaed. -8- The ability of these_channelized ditches to treat surface water quality is poor when compared to a naturally occurring, meandering wetland. The specific purpose of these ditches (and they have not been allowed to cloa or culverts to fail, etc. for generations) is to rush water off this property. The goal, misguided as it may have been from a purely wetland standpoint, was to expand aaricultural productivity, and this Goal was aggressively promoted by the agricultural authorities in he state and federal aovernments, and it was successful. Policies not withstanding_ the drainage worked and as ecologists what we observe today is an agricultural field, not a malfunctionina wetland. 3. The proposed gravity sewer line installation will -not create a permanent impact on the wetlands ability to provide stormwater treatment or groundwater protection because the sewer main will be installed underground and the A horizon will be removed, stockpiled and replaced in support of efforts to restore this area to its natural condition. C. Fisheries habitat: Mr. Brian Chipman, Fisheries Biologist, Vermont Fish and Game, was contacted by telephone to determine if any fish reside in Potash Brook. He responded that his a.ency had not conducted any field investiaations on this stream. However, he did say that no endangered or threatened species were known from the area nor were there any species directly dependent upon wetlands for their survival. He postulated that several minnow species might be present. We also talked to Mr. Rich Lundon of the Water Ouality Division and received a list of species found downstream. Blacknose Dace and Creek Chub were found several miles from this point in the drainage. We concur with these conclusions. NRCS observed minnows in the man made pond within the wetland during field work. None were caught and no species were identified. The concrete box culvert proposed for use in the excavated ditch crossing will be partially filled with natural substrate. Therefore there will not be any measurable adverse impact upon fisheries habitat. The immediate area of impact at all wetland crossings does not consist of pools of sufficient depth to retain water. As natural shrubs and trees re-establish along_the stream banks of the natural area following the cessation of hay owing shading will increase We expect that water temperatures will be reduced and less evaporation will occur in the heat of the summer. We expect this event to enhance the stream for fish and invertebrates. We expect the short term (construction period) effect on the biota to be neutral assuming all siltation prevention measures to be closely monitored and there to be no record storm events. In the long term it is quite possible that the habitat change to a bushy and/or treed flood plain will enhance the fish habitat. Since there are no streams in the vicinity of the proposed sewer main installation there will be no impacts on the fisheries habitat. d. Wildlife and migratory bird habitat: The main ditch bisecting the parcel, the headwaters of the Potash Brook, and its associated floodplain already provides a travel corridor for strongly aquatic wildlife in the area. The proposed road crossing will have no serious negative impact on such travel. Through the use of a very wide (much broader than high concrete box culvert and by shortening the linear distance from end to end and by ensuring a level substrate, the design has maximized the probability of use by strongly aquatic animals such as furbearers mink. muskrat) amphibians reptiles and others Such animals have a very low perspective to view their world Wide openings provided by the box culvert are designed to reduce animals' fear of entry thus encouraging them to enter. The broader opening allows for plenty of space for a natural stream channel to exist AND for a dry bank to simultaneously exist across the entire culvert length This means that the animals have a choice to stay in or near water or at least a damp channel (if natural flows are low) or they may opt to stay on the riparian shoulder of the stream Furthermore since the culvert length has been reduced to 65 feet the ends of the culvert will receive ilenty of light and plants will grow at the culvert ends. As a further mitigation measure we proposed to not leave these assumptions to chance. NRCS will sculpt the channel and bank and plant shade -tolerant grasses, forbes and shrubs at the entrances to entice animals into the Potash Brook culverts. This culvert shame was originally designed for improved hydraulic characteristics, i.e., lower staae and velocity at any given discharge rate. This results in less upstream flooding, reduced velocity rates resulting in less downstream channel scouring and erosion, and, with a greater cross section area, lowered probability of being_plugged by debris. Placement of natural substrate in the box culvert. and the encouragement of scrub/shrub riparian vegetation by eliminatina mowing will further encourage wildlife to travel and minimize the impact. This will be especially valuable for small wildlife such as slow moving frogs, turtles and salamanders and strongly aquatic furbearers such as mink, muskrat and raccoon as well as small birds and mammals. Re -growth of woody vegetation in the proposed natural area will definitely enhance the area as suitable habitat for many migratory bird species. Without the project the area will continue to fall under agricultural use which is less conducive to native wildlife than an old field -type habitat. John Austin has determined that the project will not have an undue adverse impact on wildlife. The proposed sewer main installation will be installed under the surface. With the proposed restoration efforts, there will be no significant change in the use of this area by wildlife and migratory birds. e. Hydrophytic vegetation habitat: The impact area will fill 11,917 sq. ft. of hydrophytic vegetation habitat for the proposed road crossing and temporarily impact through disturbance for the gravity sewer installation approximately 15,400 sq. ft. of vegetation. With the access road beina located outside of the Class II wetland area and buffer, there will be no permanent impact associated with this access road construction. The soil profile is generally a silty clay for a depth of 10 feet, covered by a silty clay tolpsoil. The hydrology for the hydrophytic vegetation is supported by the high water table at the base of the valley. The hydrogeology in this area will not be changed due to fact that the existing grades and soil profile will be retained. The exclusion of agricultural crops will favor re-establishment of species that have been extirpated due to past land use practices. The present plant communities include cultivated hayfield, pasture, and some wet meadow. A species list is provided in Attachment 3. f. Threatened and endangered species habitat: No threatened or endangered species were observed during our many site visits. Given the present land use and hay crops, we would not expect to find any rare species. The Vermont Nongame and Natural Heritage Program reports that their data base reveals no known occurrences of rare and irreplaceable natural areas or threatened and endangered animals or plants at this site. g. Education and research in natural science: The upgradient wetland would be suitable for study, however, there are no schools within at least a mile and a half of the site. h. Recreational value and economic benefit: As the area urbanizes, non -consumptive active recreational pursuits such as bird -watching may become important locally. The wetland area is not heavily used for that at this point. i. Open space and aesthetics: The open space in Potash Brook's headwaters area is locally important and will be maintained. j. Erosion control through biding and stabilizing the soil: Whereas the entire drainageway is vegetated at the present time and will remain so except when temporarily exposed during construction there will be little change in the erosion control function. 15. Demonstrate by narrative and reference to plans that the following mitigation measures have been used to achieve no undue adverse impacts to the protected wetland functions. a. Can the proposed activity practicably be located on an upland portion of the site or on another owned, -12- controlled or available to satisfy the basic project purpose? (Explain): No. To access the extensive dry rear portion of the property, the Class II wetland must be crossed. To access the municipal pump station, the most practical means is to install a gravity sewer. Due to the extent of the wetlands on the Burlington properties portion of the site and the limited amount of elevation change, a rerouting of the gravity sewer is not possible. The impacts of the proposed gravity sewer have been reduced by eliminating the majority of the originally planned maintenance access road that was to run along the gravity sewer route. We have enclosed a copy of Sheet SP3B which depicts the existing conditions. The landform slopes down from Hinesburg Road towards the existing wetlands. Due to the amount of elevation change from the main project area to the existing gravity sewer, it is not technically feasible to connect the proposed gravity sewer system to the existing system at this point. b. Demonstrate how all practicable measures have been taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on projected functions, including project redesign or project scale back: Normal sediment and erosion control measures will be taken to insure that no deleterious effects occur during the construction phase of the project and will remain in place until seeded or vegetated areas have stabilized. Straw bales rather than hay are specified for sediment control in order to prevent the introduction of noxious weeds such as purple loosestrife. These procedures are detailed on the engineering_ plans. All disturbed sites will be seeded or revegetated. Side slopes in the fill area will be planted with a conservation mix of grasses supplemented with shrubs beneficial to wildlife. The proposed culvert crossing has been narrowed from the originally proposed in eh original application in 1996 by eliminating the green space between the bike path and roadway. The proposed Gravity sewer line installation has been revised to eliminate the majority of the gravel access road that was originally permitted to run along this route. The wetland soils will be stockpiled and then re -installed as part of the backfilling of the trench -13- to mitigate the long term impacts of the subsurface sewer main installation. C. For wetlands that have been disturbed, what steps will be taken to restore impacted functions (e.g. plantings, seeding, mulching exposed soil, removal of fill, etc.)? Before any construction begins, silt fencing and hay bales will be installed. All excavated materials with its seed and rootstock bank, will be removed from the floodway, stockpiled, and used in restoration Replanting will utilize indigenous species from local wild or nursery sources. 16. Wetland compensation (creating replacement wetlands) is a measure to mitigate adverse impacts on protected functions that will only be possible in rare cases for specific functions (see Section 8.5c of the Vermont Wetland Rules). If a compensation plan is part of this proposal, demonstrate by narrative and reference to plans how the steps in Section 8.5c(1)-(7) will be met. The loss of some wetland functions resulting from the fill of the Class II wetland at the Potash Brook Crossing and the fill of the swale carrying water northeastward across the property will be compensated by the elimination of the originally approved diversion of waters on the south side of the property. Additional wetland habitat will be created through the construction of a shallow detention basin southwest of the proposed wetland road crossing. - 14- lllU l [\1Lv J .�V♦ 17. Submit the original request for conditional use determination to the Wetlands Office, Division of Water Quality, 103 South Main Street, 10 North, 2nd Floor, Waterbury, VT 05671-0408. Notification of receipt will be sent to the applicant once a complete application has been received by the Wetlands Office. 18. After receiving notification of completeness from the Wetlands Office, send a complete copy of the application to the Town Clerk and Regional Planing Commission. Also send copies of the location map, a description of the specific action(s) for which conditional use determination is sought, the supporting narratives, and a listing of where complete copies of the request have been filed to: a. the municipal planning commission and/or conservation commission; and b. all persons owning property within or adjacent to the wetland or buffer zone (item•10 of the application). ter._11 AR 19. I hereby certify that the information provided above or attached to this application is true and accurate to the best of mar knowl�dge . n A $• at oZ. J11323-0200.91 CofApp'licant's Signature — 12 — Date ve Date S, �'®z Date rt SouthBmtretoII 1 ; v Odie Cc n l- •1 •' �.,.. I ' �• l\ �%� --� \ .. `� �, '� `}\..a ,� r �• i i +�' i� fir; i� j � j i — 71 rj �� / � �/• �r! 1 ace-_\ �•, _ r �� , !L 1 : '. ,{ --- _; �' �, �. '� r �1,% ' � ; - ..'ram � � • wind lil _ st PR ION,- • i' • � ��l •I } ' 1 � I i ••• 01 tj 40 If it Ilk �� �� �\}'', �\ � � � � ••�_�,•� } � •� ' (' �•, i � '\ ( � �� � �i •� � ice--. �'t7(imijmtll �/'_�%•� i i 'J71 ' ..r::•-•.• ',\ �.' !I � ''' I �• i 1 � 1 I, /`-'. �, � . II.{ • !i ;':'i'! 1 '1 :j' I • _ /i , ' Il I .1' i� 6 i / 'QasrE �J' j I . �1 • i _ a rt [,-NJ f VIYX IF � - �'' L �, �.. ��'f''' .' .1���. �rw• Al 1 - 1• � ,, . #:, v �� 1 �a 3 1< ys` 1 • �t; ,/� �-- • Ali � a , M! r 1 i I � =AIMell - R fib 10 is A i • 0 1 111 I r MEADOVVALND BUSINESS PARK AW Summer Ice Joint Venture NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPPING SCALE 1 •1• .��11 Engineering Associates, Inc i n ter' W ATTACHMENT 3 TABU 1. Vegetation Typical of Class II and Class III Wetlands and Suffer in the Preposed Suer Ice Develop mnt, South Burlington, VT. SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS TREES (Only in Wooded Class III area in Southeast Corner of Parcel) Box -elder Red maple Speckled alder White birch Gray birch American chestnut American beech White ash Green ash Apple Eastern white pine Big -tooth aspen Quaking aspen Black cherry White oak Northern red oak Northern white cedar Basswood Eastern hemlock American elm Acer negundo FAC+ Acer rubrum FAC A1nus rugosa FACW+ Betula papyri fera FACU Betula populi folia FAC Ca s tanea den to to Fagus grandifolia FACU Fraxinus americana FACU Fraxinus pennsyl vanica FACW var. subintererrima Malus spp. ** Pinus strobus FACU Populus grandi dentata FACU- Populus tremula FACU Prunus serotina FACU Quercus alba FACU- Quercus rubra FACU- Thuja occidentalis FACW Tilia americana FACU Tsuga canadensis FACU U1mus americana FACW- SHRUBS (Only in Wooded Class III area in Southeast Corner of Parcel) Shadbush Silky dogwood Red -osier dogwood American witch -hazel Northern spicebush Japanese honeysuckle Partridge -berry Buckthorn Staghorn sumac Amelanchier laevis ** Cornus amomum FACW Cornus stoloni fera FACW+ Hamamelis virginiana FAC- Lindera benzoin FACW- Lonicera Japonica FAC - Mitchella repens FACU Rhamnus cathartica NI Rhus typhina ** 13 Common red raspberry Blackberry Pussy willow Meadowsweet Steeplebush Witte -rod Arrow -wood Nannyberry Northern arrow -wood Rubus idaeus FAC- Rubus uvidus NI Salix discolor E'A.CW Spiraea Iatifolia FAC Spiraea tomentosa FACW Viburnum cassinoi des FACW Viburnum dentatum FAC Viburnum lentago FAC Viburnum recbgnitum FACW- VINES (Only in Wooded Class III area in Southeast Corner of Parcel) American bittersweet Celastrus scandens FACU- Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia FACU Poison ivy Toxicodendron ra dicans FAC Fox grape Vitis labrusca FACU GROUND COVER Common yarrow Achillea millefolium FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisii folia FACU Burdock Arctium minus ** White milkweed Asclepias variegata FACU New England aster Aster Novae-Angliae FACW- White wood aster Aster divaricatus ** Cooper's milkvetch Astragalus neglectus FACU Blue -joint grass Calamagrotis canadensis FACW+ Bladder sedge Carex intumenscens FACW+ Shallow sedge Carex lurida OBL Fox sedge Carex triangulares NI Daisy Chrysanthemum leucanthemum ** Chicory Cichorium intybus ** Orchard grass Dactylis glomerata FACU Rough horsetail Equisetum hyemale FACW Joe-pye-weed Eupatorium purpureum FAC Buckwheat Fagopyrum sagittatum ** Wild strawberry Fragaria vesca ** Fragrant bedstraw Galium triflorum FACU Wild geranium Geranium maculatum FACU Jewel -weed Impatiens capensis FACW Blue flag iris Iris versicolor OBL Canada rush Juncus canadensis OBL Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW+ Rice cutgrass Leersia oryzoides OBL Sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis FACW 14 Cinnamon fern Creeping wood sorrel Yellow wood sorrel Reed Canary grass Timothy Tearthumb Buttercup Bramble Blackberry Woolgrass Bulrush Canada goldenrod Sphagnum moss Broadleaf meadowsweet New York fern Starflower Cattail Blue vervain Osmunda cinnamomea FACW Oxalis corniculata FACU Oxalis europaea FACU Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ Phleum pratense FACU Polygonum ?? Ranunculus acris FAC+ Rubus spp. ** Rubus uvidus NI Scirpus cyperinus FACW+ Scirpus hattorianus NI Solidago canadensis FACU Sphagnum spp. ** Spirea latifolia FAC+ Thelypteris no veboracensis FAC Trientalis borealis FAC Typha latifolia OBL Verbena hastata FACW+ GROUND COVER (only in Wooded Class III area in Southeast Corner of Parcel) Spinulose woodfern Dryopteris spinulosa FAC+ Mayflower Epigea repens ** Haircap moss Polytrichum juniperinum FACU Sassafras Sassafras albidum FACU- Status abbreviations are listed below: Obligate (OBL) - Always found in wetlands under natural conditions (frequency greater than 99%). Facultative wetland (FAM - Usually found in wetlands (67- 99% frequency) but occasionally found in non -wetlands. Facultative (FAC) - Sometimes found in wetlands (34-66% frequency) but also occurs in non -wetlands. Facultative upland (FACII) - Seldom found in wetlands (1-33% frequency) and usually occurs non -wetlands. A positive (+) or negative (-) symbol is used with the facultative indicator to more specifically define the regional frequency of occurrence in wetlands. A positive sign indicates a frequency towards the higher end of the category (more frequently found in wetlands), and a negative sign indicates a frequency toward the lower end of the 15 category (less frequently found in wetlands). ** = not classified NI = non -indicator Source = Biological Report 88 (26.1) May 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wet a� nc Northeast Reason . "ho fi,^ 1,�ti.4 rL� i ,�� � ' / rY �� ~ ; vY'�r''cI i 1 ���. % � 4 ����. nk� � '7 f `�a 4 'x � �� � 1 I J I /� / !1 t Syr `.�( �� Z� • j q�j � ,,��� � �, i �' i1.� ��y �J� � '��� 4 f- y �. � ,� y ;. .� � I �''''Tw �'`���,r ` � I� r �� �_ � - y, No Text - -" • =tea:-- :. � �'/:. .' ��!; j/Fri; . ,�.;�1 /�� ���t'��"„ _ � !l l i rii,c � t it �. ,.. f a , � , �. ",� , �. �, � —.: .. ' A r ' • .. �� / r��` � � - . 1 r _ - �'� / .\ i� � -. _ ,\ _ _ ` �� _ ds •\ f ;\ `l. �- ..e` \�. � -/tea ��`\ y...`�.� / U-1 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK List of Abutters September 17, 2001 James C. & Sachi H. Rowley Homer & Marie Dubois 1 160 Hinesburg Road 1405 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Green Acres, Inc. 575 Dorset Street P.O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy J. Toutant Burlington Properties, LTD c/o Arthur Toutant c/o Dan Kalman 1398 Hinesburg Road P.O. Box 9210 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Gary W. & Nancy Lines Ann V. Painter 16 Knoll Circle Richard Painter So. Burlington, VT 05403 1060 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher L. & Theri Davis 18 Knoll Circle Willard Malcom So. Burlington, VT 05403 699 Nob Hill Williston, VT 05495 Mark L. & Kathryn M. Boucher 20 Knoll Circle Lexie R. & Arthur H. Rye So. Burlington, VT 05403 1075 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Terrance J. & Nancy G. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Larry W. & Ginette D. Brainard 28 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 ems' A , - NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING SERVICES ' 67 West Shore Road, Grand Isle, Vermont 05458 • 802-878-4800 Ms. Karen Bates Agency of Natural Resources Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 July 10, 1997 RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Karen* As you know, we re-evaluated the edge -of -wetland on this project paying particular attention to the prior converted cropland x upland interface. The wetland was expanded in several areas (as we discussed in' the field and as shown in the Trudell Engineering Plans sent to you under separate cover on June 20, 1997 by Dick Trudell). The.expansion of wetland areas was based largely on subtle change's.in vegetation, especially the presence/dominance of Carex spp:"over Graminaceae. Please compare the new wetland impact table with the previous table. We would like your written concurrence in this edge -of -wetland and wetland classification (you verbally agreed to it on our last site visit). The revised acreage of Class II wetland/buffer affected by the proposal now is 12,879 SF of wetland and 25,088 SF of buffer. The Applicant believes that this project design avoids and minimizes the direct/indirect Class II wetland/buffer effects to the maximum extent possible. The reason the Class III swale (which diagonally crosses the property across Lot 1 [Fields 5, 6, 7, and 8]) is proposed for filling follows: During the permitting process with the City of South Burlington, the Planning Board, the Conservation Commission, landowner and abutters came to consensus agreement about the lands along the southern property line. The City was very interested in linking parts of its green belt and bike path through this area. The abutters wanted abundant screening and distance between their homes and the commercial buildings. The Conservation -Comm ' ission required detailed plans on the bike way, landscap ng,ana"sale relocation (to be sent -to you under separate cover by. Dick Trudell). And, the landowner wanted to broker; compromise which satisfied the various parties while maintai Whig at high quality natural and human environment. A rtf,Y� great of�'cgmpromise, planning, engineering, and consensus buildinr a� e it r into ,this property. The Applicant g part of the S•r belzevesf,: " his' development' option best fulfills the suburban Ms. Karen Bates Page 2 needs of South Burlington while respecting and enhancing the Class II and Class III on -site wetlands. We are again requesting 401 Water Quality Certification for these Class II and Class III impacts. Thank you for your continued help in reviewing this project. If you need additional details or have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, Peter W. Spear, CWB, CEP, PWS, CHEP • Principal PWS/bb cc: Richard Trudell, P.E. Mark Neagley State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES St. Johnsbury Regional Office Department of Fish and Wildlife 184 Portland Street Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation mot, • St. Johnsbury, Vermont 05819 Department of Environmental Conservation. X , i•� State Geologist Telephone, (802) 748-8787 Natural Resources Conservation Council Environmental Conservation Dept. 8/ 2 6/ 9 6 John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Meadowland Business Park South Burlington John: As we discussed, I have reviewed the site plans dated 4/17/96 and 6/4/96. You have proposed installation of two four foot diameter reinforced concrete pipes to cross the stream on the property. I recommend revising the structure to either a reinforced concrete box or arch or pipe arch structure with a single opening of adequate size to pass the 25 year storm. Please revise and resubmit new plans for comment. 1 Sincerely, Barry Cahoon, P.E., Stream Alteration Engineer cc: Vathy O'Brien Andrew Raubvogel Brian Chipman ReQIonal OffICP.c • RarrP/FccPY I,t /Pittcfnrrf/N CnrinnfiPlrf/Ct Inhnet-- rt J In the matter of: Conditional Use Determination Section 8 - Vermont Wetland Rules Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont Application for the construction of a road through a Class Two wetland and construction of commercial and light industrial lots in the buffer zone of the Class Two wetland. South Burlington, Vermont File: # 96-400 DEC ID#:EJ96-0381 The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources received application #96-400 for a Conditional Use Determination. This application has been publicly posted through March 5, 1998 and notice sent to all parties as required by Section 8.3 of the Vermont Wetland Rules. No comments were received during the public -comment period. Findings of Fact After careful examination of this application, the Agency finds: A complete application was received from Natural Resource Consulting Services, representative for Summer Ice Joint Venture, for Conditional Use Determination #96-400 on February 3, 1998. 2. The wetland and adjacent 50-foot buffer zone are located adjacent to Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont. Cathy O'Brien, District Wetlands Ecologist, conducted a site visit to the subject property on October 10, 1996. Lisa Windhausen, District Wetlands Ecologist, conducted a site visit to the subject property on October 24, 1996. Karen Bates and Padraic Monks, District Wetlands Ecologists, conducted a site visit to the subject property on April 22, 1997 with Peter Spear, Natural Resource Consulting Services, Marty Abair, Army Corps of Engineers, and Richard Trudell, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. 4. The subject wetland complex is identified as an open -water wetland (POWH) and a forested wetland (PFOIY) on the Vermont Significant Wetlands Inventory maps and is designated as a Class Two wetland by the Water Resources Board in the Vermont Wetland Rules. Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination #96-400 Page 2 5. The wetland is the headwaters for Potash Brook. A cedar and larch forested wetland flows into an excavated pond which is surrounded by cattails. Potash Brook flows north out of the pond through a ditch in a wet meadow. The wet meadow is dominated by reed -canary grass with lesser amounts of rushes and sedges. Soils in the wetland complex are clay and the buffer zone is composed primarily of agricultural fields with the remaining buffer being forested. 6. This proposal involves substantially modifying a farm road located between the pond and the wet meadow to a 32-ft wide paved road. An additional 30 feet will be filled for utility right-of-ways and one side walk. The original 65-ft long culvert will be replaced with a 65' x 60"x 46" pipe arch. The road will impact 11,917 sf of wetland and 24,492 sf of buffer zone. Much of the buffer zone is the farm road. A pipe to convey wastewater from lots 5 & 6 will be placed across the wet meadow and under the stream, resulting in 962 sf of wetland impact and 596 sf of buffer zone impact. A stormwater pond will impact 7,244 of buffer zone. All spoil materials will be removed from the floodway, stockpiled and used in restoration. Replanting will utilize indigenous species from local nurseries. Natural Resource Consulting Services' personnel will monitor the replanting. Four lots will include approximately 41,000 sf of the buffer zone; however, building envelopes are located outside of the buffer zone and the applicant has not included any plans for disturbance of these areas beyond the installation of the pipe. Total impacts to the wetland are 12,879 sf and to the buffer zone are 32,332 sf. In addition to the application, the applicant has submitted the following site plans by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc.: Sheet SP7 entitled, "Erosion Control Details" dated June 4, 1996 and last revised September 19, 1996; Sheet SP3A entitled, "Wetland Site Plan" dated April 17, 1996" and last revised on December 15, 1997; and Sheet P7 entitled, "Thompson Street Road Profile 0+00 To 11+00." The applicant submitted revisions described in a letter from Richard P. Trudell to Karen Bates, dated February 2, 1997 with a revised copy of Sheet P3 entitled, "Swift Street Extension Road Profile 22+00 To 33+00" dated June 4, 1996 and last revised on February 2, 1998. 8. The protected functions of the wetland in question include at least the following: water storage for flood water and storm runoff (§5.1), surface and groundwater protection (§5.2), fisheries habitat (§5.3), wildlife and migratory bird habitat (§5.4), open space and aesthetics (§5.9), and erosion control through binding and stabilizing the soil (§5.10). The following functions are either not present or are present at such a minimal level as to not be protected functions: hydrophytic vegetation habitat (§5.5), threatened and endangered species habitat (§5.6), education and research in natural science (§5.7) and recreational value and economic benefits (§5.8). 10. The wetland is significant for the water storage for flood water and storm runoff function because it reduces the scouring and erosion of stream banks and maintains the stability of important habitat for aquatic life by attenuating flood peaks and reducing water velocities. Characteristics of the wetland which contribute to providing this function include a constricted outlet, physical space for floodwater expansion and dense vegetation. The project will fill 1.5% of the wetland complex within the wet meadow. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination #96-400 Page 3 11. The wetland is significant for the surface and ground water protection function because the wetland enhances or protects water quality through chemical action, and by the removal of nutrients. Characteristics of the wetland which provides this functions include: a constricted outlet, fine mineral soils; no dead forest or shrub areas, lower water velocity through dense, erect vegetation, and a permanently flooded or saturated hydroperiod. The pond also enhances or protects water quality by the retention or removal of sediments or organic matter. The project will fill 1.5% of the wetland complex within the wet meadow. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. 12. The wetland is significant for the fisheries habitat function because the wetland provides habitat for fish. The consultant identified minnows in the pond and Brian Chipman, State Fisheries Biologist, stated that the wetland could provide habitat for fish. Water leaving the forested wetland would provide cool waters to the pond which would maintain water quality and higher oxygen levels for aquatic species. The pond and the forested wetland will not be disturbed. The pipe arch will be partially filled with natural substrate and the vegetation along the stream will be allowed to return to woody vegetation. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. 13. The wetland is significant for the wildlife and migratory bird habitat function because the wetland complex contains the following conditions indicative of wildlife habitat diversity: 1) three or more wetland vegetation classes are present including: open water contiguous to shallow marsh, and wooded swamp; 2) the dominant wetland vegetation class includes deep marsh, shallow marsh, and wooded swamp; 3) the wetland is located contiguous to a pond and a stream; and 4) fifty percent or more of the surrounding habitat types are a combination of forest, agricultural land and old field. The five-foot wide pipe arch provides space for a natural stream channel and a dry stream bank to exist within the pipe arch. The applicant proposes to have a consultant sculpt the channel and bank and plant shade -tolerant grass, forbes and shrubs at the entrance to encourage animal use of the culvert. According to Peter Spear, Certified Wildlife Biologist, the road crossing will have no serious negative impacts to animal travel between the stream and the pond and forested wetland. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. 14. The pond and the forested wetland are significant for the open space and aesthetic's values because the wetland can be readily observed by the public and has prominence as a distinct feature in the surrounding landscape. The pond and forested wetland will not be impacted by the project. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. 15. The wetland is significant for the erosion control function because there are erosive forces present and forested and emergent wetland are adjacent to the pond and the stream. Any disturbed area adjacent to the pond or the stream will be replanted during restoration of the area. Based on the factors described above, the proposed project will not result in an undue adverse impact to this function. Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination #96-400 Page 4 16. The applicant has minimized impacts by reducing the length of the pipe arch from greater than 100 ft to 65 feet. 17. If the project is constructed according to the specifications of the application and accompanying site plans, and the conditions of this Conditional Use Determination, the resulting wetland filling and alteration is not expected to result in any violations of the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Conclusions of Law Based on information provided by the applicant and their representatives in the application for Conditional Use Determination, the Agency of Natural Resources concludes: Under Section 8 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, effective February 23, 1990, the Secretary may authorize conditional uses in a significant wetland or in its adjacent buffer zone. The Rules state that each Class Two wetland is presumed to serve all of the wetland functions identified in the Rules (Section 4.2b). Protected functions are distinguished from other wetland functions in Section 2.20, as those functions that make a wetland so significant they merit protection under these rules. Under Section 8.5a, the Secretary may only authorize a conditional use when it is determined that the proposed conditional use will have no undue adverse effect on the protected functions, unless the Secretary determines such impacts are sufficiently mitigated. The proposed conditional use cannot practicably be located on an upland portion of the site or on another site owned, controlled or available to satisfy the basic project purpose. All practicable measures have been taken in this proposal to avoid adverse impacts on protected functions. The Agency determines that the proposed conditional use, described in the Findings of Fact and in the Conditional Use Determination application in question, will have no undue adverse impacts to the protected functions of the Class Two wetland, associated buffer zone on this subject property or the adjacent wetland complex. Decision 1. The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources finds, that on the basis of the information provided in the application for Conditional Use Determination, the proposed conditional use will have no undue adverse effects on the protected functions of the significant wetland on this property providing that the provisions of the application are supplemented with the procedures described below. This Conditional Use Determination is therefore approved with the following conditions: Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination 496-400 Page 5 A. All activity shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in accordance with the proposal in Conditional Use Determination Application #96-400 and all submittals listed in Finding of Fact #7 above. No material or substantial changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the Vermont Wetlands Office. �Bj The applicant shall notify the Vermont Wetlands Office in writing one week prior to the start of this project. C. A continuous line of staked hay bales or a silt fence shall be properly installed by the applicant, or their representative, prior to any construction at the edge of proposed work in the wetland and 50- foot buffer zone and shall be regularly maintained. Sediments shall be cleaned out when they have reached half the height of the fence or hay bale, and before major predicted rainfall events. Removed sediments shall be disposed of in a stable, upland area outside the 50-foot buffer zone. All disturbed soils shall be seeded and mulched immediately following final grading. All sediment barriers shall be removed following the successful establishment of vegetation. D. The applicant shall have this Conditional Use Determination recorded in the land records of the City of South Burlington for all affected lands and the applicant shall have this Conditional Use Determination referenced in any deed for the property to be sold as lots 2, 7, 8 and 9 and Field 4. The applicant shall supply the Vermont Wetlands Office with a copy of correspondence with the Town of South Burlington certifying that the restrictions have been recorded within 30 days of the date of this determination. Within 30 days upon completion of the proposed work in the wetland and/or buffer zone, the applicant or their representative shall supply the Vermont Wetlands Office with a letter certifying that the project was constructed in compliance with the conditions of this determination. . F. The construction methods which cause the least disturbance to stream flow and prevents any discharge of turbidity or sediment downstream shall be used. Stream flow at all times shall be diverted from the work area. The contractor's equipment shall be clean and well maintained, free of fuel, hydraulic and gear oil leaks, especially if such equipment is to be used in or adjacent to the water. Pumping from excavation areas shall be discharged to an overland area or settling basin such that the effluent shall be essentially clarified before reentering the stream flow. All areas of stream bank disturbed during construction shall be suitably reshaped and stabilized with stone fill or a vegetative planting prior to completion of the project. Stream work shall be limited to the period June 1 to October 1; and culvert invert elevations shall be installed six inches below the stream bed level. G. This decision shall hereby incorporate all of the terms and conditions of the following permits: 1. Land Use Permit #4C1005 H. All proposed activities in the wetland and adjacent 50-foot buffer zone, carried out in compliance with Condition A, mustblr cdtripleted Withiitthvoaii`fifth"daff#heiditidids� Determination:or.j v�4l.expije. An extension of time may be granted for cause. A request for an extension must be received by the Department at least 30 days prior to the end of the two-year period in order to prevent the expiration of this Conditional Use Determination. A request for extension will be considered a minor modification. Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination #96-400 Page 6 I. The terms and conditions of this decision shall run with the land. The applicant shall monitor the portion of the wetland in question annually during early July for five years following construction for the nuisance plant species purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and common reed (Phragmites australis). All nuisance plants found shall be pulled by hand and disposed of by burial or burning in a non -wetland location. Additionally, the contractors equipment shall be cleaned so as to contain no observable soil or vegetation prior to work in wetlands and buffer zones to help prevent the spread of invasive species. 2. The Agency maintains continuing jurisdiction over this project and may at any time order remedial measures be taken if it appears likely that adverse impacts to the protected functions and values will occur. 3. This Conditional Use Determination does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to comply with any other applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and permits. 4. By acceptance of this Conditional Use Determination the applicant agrees to allow representatives of the Department of Environmental Conservation access to the property covered by the Conditional Use Determination, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont Wetland Rules and the Vermont Water Quality Standards. 5. The Department, by issuing this Conditional Use Determination, accepts no legal responsibility for any damage direct or indirect of whatever nature and by whomever suffered arising out of the project described. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation by: VJAAV,,+ — Wallace McLean Director, Water Quality Division Dated at Waterbury, Vermont this yA day of M, 1998. CED\WM\keb Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Please be notified, as per Section 8.4 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, that the request for a Conditional Use Determination received from Natural Resource Consulting Services, representative for Summer Ice Joint Venture, for the construction of a road through a Class Two wetland and construction of commercial and light industrial lots in the buffer zone of the Class Two wetland has been approved on this II'IAA day of%�C� , 1998. It was found by the Agency of Natural Resources that this conditional use will not result in any undue, adverse effects to the protected functions of the significant wetland located adjacent to Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont. Complete copies of the decision can be obtained by calling the Water Quality Division at 802- 241-3770 or writing to the address below. Any person with an interest in this matter can appeal this decision pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269. Any notice of appeal must be filed (ie: received) at the Water Resources Board, National Life Records Center Building, Drawer 20, Montpelier, VT 05620- 3201 (telephone (802) 828-3309) within 30 days of the date of the decision. aren E. Bates District Wetlands Ecologist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 10 North Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 KEB:pu cc: Distribution List i To • G1� '`per • ,,� h•Ti! 0� l�b Regulatory Branch CENAE-CO-R-61 199603166 —� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ENGLAND DIVISION. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 424 TRAPELO ROAD WALTHAM . MASSACHUSETTS 02254-9141) r,JAN 12 199E Mr. Richard P. Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Trudell: This letter is in reference to your request on behalf of Summer Ice Joint Venture for Department of the Army authorization to place fill in 0.39 acre of headwater wetlands in conjunction with the construction of a 12-lot commercial subdivision off Vermont Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont. That % ork is permitted under Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations. Part 330. Appendix 1. A. No. 26. Nationwide Permits. as published in the December 13, 1996 Federal Register and does not require further processing. For more details on this Nationwide Permit, please contact this office for the current regulations. This authorization is subject to the attached general and special conditions. Our determination was based on a review of your submitted plans in two sheets. entitled "NIEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK VICINITY MAP" (undated) and "NIEADOWLAND B US INESS PARK" (dated " 4/ 17/96 revised "8/20/96", "9/ 12/96", " l 0/ l 5/96"- " 1 ?/4/96", 1 ?/9/96". "04/30/97", "05/08/97", "05/222/97", "08/04/97", " 10/09/97". " 10/38/97 and 1 2/ 15/97")- Federal law requires that. before work can proceed. certification from the state must be received regarding water quality. A state can issue either a generic certification covering all projects that would be performed under the Nationwide Permits or an individual certification for -2- each project. The State of Vermont has denied generic certification for your specific Nationwide Permit. Instead, the state reviews each project proposed under this permit and issues individual certifications. Therefore, authorization for your project is procedurally denied by the Corps of Engineers until the required state certification is received. This means that before you commence with the activity, you must obtain and forward to us a copy of1he state water quality certification for your project. Please contact Karen Bates at the VT Department of Environmental Conservation, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05676 regarding this certification. Once we receive a copy of the state certification or a waiver, you may proceed without further action by us. Performing the work without first obtaining the required state certification or without complying with Nationwide Permit conditions, including those placed on water quality certification, is a violation of federal law. This can result in civil or criminal liability with fines as high as $25,000 or $50,000 for each day of violation. unless the Nationwide Permit is modified, suspended, or revoked, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the Nationwide Permit. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Marty Abair at our Vermont Project Office, telephone 802 655-0334. Sincerely, Michael W. Pratt Lieutenant Colonel. Corps of Engineers District Engineer Enclosures -3- Copies furnished: Mr. Scott Dillon VT Division for Historic Preservation 135 State Street, 4th Floor Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633-1201 Ms. Karen Bates VT Dept. of Environmental Conservation 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05676 Mr. Mark Neagley Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 SPECIAL CONDITIONS SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE PERMIT #199603166 1. Sector III shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. 2. Sector V -'and the area between Sectors V and VI shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. 3. The areas shown as archaeologically sensitive on Lots 7 and 8 shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. 4. Should construction be proposed for any of the aforementioned areas in the future, the following work shall take place prior to commencement of construction: a. A "Phase 1" archaeological study of the aforementioned areas shall be conducted. A scope of work for the study shall be provided for review and approval to the New En.land District Vermont Project Office and the VT Division for Historic Preservation (VT DHP) at least one month prior to the proposed study. b. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 1" archaeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and the VT DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. c. If the archaeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the VT Project Office and VT DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. Special Conditions, page 2 d. If the archaeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps, in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the VT DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account. 1l e. If the archaeological consultant recommends that additional evaluation of archaeological resources found during the initial study is needed (a "Phase 2 study"), the consultant shall provide a scope of work for additional study to the VT Project Office and the VT DHP for their review and approval prior to commencing "Phase 2" work. f. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 2" archaeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and the VT DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. g. ,If the archaeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the VT Project Office and VT DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. h. If the archaeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps, in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the VT DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account_ 5. Any changes in the plans or construction methods must be submitted to the Corps of Engineers, VT Project Office and the VT Division for Historic Preservation for review and approval at least three weeks prior to implementation. 'RLINGTON QUADRANGLE '''"�d VERMONT-CHITTENDEN CO. L• ►... �r ■ MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) '•.� ,—��� ��.� w �� > NW/4 BURLINGTON IS QUADRANGLE ,�_ �`.' _-1� 4,i o ? \�• , 1948 P,iOTOREwVISE D 1 VBi3 \ \ L7 , Co DMA 6172 I N low Project Area H Cn �� ' �. ' • •; Ill - - i I � , , ' j �; GN 276 MILS 1 - 16, _ I Z, MILSILI /• I �/ 1' I _ 1 I UTM GRID AND 1967 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER Of SHEET 1 CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET _ - SCALE 1.24000 1 Q I MIS - 1000 0 1 1000 2000 JQOO 4000 5000 6000 - _ 7000 FEU Figure 1. 1987 7.5' U.S.G.S. Map of South Burlington, Vt. DepictI66 the Project Area.-- 3 k4 I -A i (15 / A)V -55 41A Pr- V !Ct �J ffl� d I>r WAX* ✓o'er �,.��' 'v�i I 1 ...yu,y... � , tl i ---J 7------- _--'------ 1 w°ru � •"',".�_ may: �"�'3�. - uww/wn�xwt .n.rw sr ~ACT T rvwcr rorwu ,M p.....�-.. �..• .. Rwkr.° owrA r..M1 .Y.II . 1 •eo / J� J4 ..0.0 4 Y4 >P[aAl MOR Ir- TRUDELL CONSLILTI W EWJNEiJtS. Ir P ol.ct Ls ,tb.. MEADOWIAn 6USINESS PAR FUnesbur� Ro: C.. ■..Ilww ww Wetland Site Plan SP3jl Eel State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests. Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800.253-0195 Voioe>TDD December 30, 1996 R,�C'E�/ ED Ja N � � 219.9� EAGL CO N COMPqfvy �UcjION Mark Neagley Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Stormwater Discharge Permit #1-1269 Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Neagley, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main St. - Sewing Bldg. Waterbury VT 05671-0405 Telephones (802) 241-3822 FAX: (802) 241-2596 Enclosed is your copy of Discharge Permit 11-1269 which has been signed by the Director of the Wastewater Management -Division on behalf of the Commissioner of the.Department of Environmental Conservation. . Please read the permit carefully and make note of the inspection, maintenance, and reporting requirements. The permit covers the entire park and allocates a discharge flow from each lot and requires that prior to lot development plans be submitted for review and approval. Providing that the lot development properly treats the stormwater and is within the assigned discharge flow (ie. meets the terms of this permit), no futher stormwater permitting actions will be needed. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please feel free to contact Randy Bean at our office. Sincerely, Brian D. Kooiker, Chief Direct Discharge Section Enclosure Essex Jct. Act 250 Office Karen Petterson, Trudell Consulting Chlonne Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Offices Barre'Fssex Jct /Pittsford/Ruland/N Springfield/St Johnsbury File No. 04-14 Permit No. 1-1269 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DISCHARGE PERMIT In compliance with provisions of 10 V.S.A. 1263 and 10 V.S.A. 1264 Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 and in accordance with "Terms and Conditions" hereinafter specified, the above named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge stormwater runoff from the roadways, parking, and roofs from Meadowland Business Park, located on Route 116, South Burlington, VT to Potash Brook. 1. Expiration Date: September 30, 2001. Note: This permit, unless revoked, shall be valid until the designated expiration date despite any intervening change in water quality, effluent, or treatment standards of the classification of the receiving waters. However, any such changed standard or classification shall be applied in determining whether or not to renew the permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. 1263. Re -apply for a discharge permit by March 31, 2001. 2. Revocation: 10 V.S.A. 1267 provides as follows: "The Secretary may revoke any permit issued by him pursuant to this subchapter if he finds that the permit holder submitted false or inaccurate information in his application or has violated any requirement, restriction, or condition of the permit issued. Revocation shall the effective upon actual notice thereof to the permit holder." 3. Transfer of Permit: This permit is not transferable without prior written approval of the Secretary. The permittee shall notify the Secretary immediately, in writing, of any sale or other transfer of ownership of the property from which the discharge originates. The permittee shall provide a copy of this permit to the new owner or tenant and shall also inform the new owner or tenant of his responsibility to make application for a permit which shall be issued in his name. Any failure to do so shall be considered a violation of this permit. Page 2 of 5 Permit No. 1-1269 4. Right of Entry : The permittee shall allow the Secretary or their authorized representative, upon presentation of credentials, to enter the permittee's premises where the effluent sources authorized by this permit are located and at reasonable times to have access to copy any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit or to inspect any treatment device, monitoring equipment, or monitoring method required in this permit and to sample any discharge of pollutants. 5. receiving Waters: Potash Brook. MROMFIRMITITT-74M. W• - SIN 001: Stormwater from the access roadway, lots 1, 10, 11, and 12 after detention and treatment in Detention Basin 1 and or Detention Basin 2 then discharging to Potash Brook. SIN 002: Stormwater from lot 2 after onsite treatment and detention as necessary to meet the discharge limitation specified in Attachment A, then discharging to Potash Brook. SIN 003: Stormwater from lot 3 after onsite treatment and detention as necessary to meet the discharge limitation specified in Attachment A, discharging to Potash Brook. SIN 004: Stormwater from lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 after onsite treatment and detention as necessary to meet the discharge limitations specified in Attachment A, then discharging to Potash Brook. • u • SIN 001 and SIN 004: Stormwater runoff from the roadways, parking, and roofs, after treatment and detention of the runoff in detention basins and by flow through vegetated swales or over vegetated terrain. 8. Volumes Permitted: Such volumes as required by the discharges specified in No. 6 above 9. Frequency of Discharge: As necessary a. Operation as specified in #7 above. For conceptual design on the treatment of stormwater runoff for this project see the Trudell Consulting Engineers Sheets SP3, P1 thru P5 and P7 dated 6/04/96 and supporting information. b. The permittee shall limit discharge from each development area to the volumes allocated on Attachment A. Page 3 of 5 Permit No. 1-1269 c. Prior to any lot development being authorized for coverage under this permit the permittee shall submit to the Agency for review and approval, design plans, discharge calculations, and any other information necessary to document that discharge is properly treated and limited as required. a. The permittee shall maintain as necessary, all basins, swales, and related stormwater devices to design treatment specifications and shall inspect these devices biannually, as a minimum. b. Should any erosional problems occur, the permittee is required to immediately correct all such problems. c. Any sediment removed from the detention basin systems shall be disposed of properly and not within 100 feet of Waters of the State. d. By SEPTEMBER 30 OF EACH YEAR a written report shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Conservation, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05671-0405. This report shall included, as a minimum: i. the dates and details of the cleaning and maintenance operations carried out in the preceding year. ii. a narrative summarizing the results of the inspections conducted in the preceding year. iii. a summary of park development and discharge status to date. e. Any basins, swales or related stormwater devices used during construction for erosion control shall be inspected and cleaned as necessary to design specifications immediately after construction has been completed. f. Paved parking lots and roads should be swept on a regular basis when seasonally practicable to minimize contaminants carried to the treatment device by runoff. 12. Personnel and Training Requirements: Such personnel and training as necessary to fulfill the requirements of #10 above. 13. Monitoring and reporting Requirement: No monitoring required; reporting requirement as specified in #11 above. Page 4 of 5 Permit No. 1-1269 a. Lot development shall be limited to 50% impervious surface. 15. Issue Date of Permit: I, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES William Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BY Marilyn J. D vis, Director Wastewater Management Division Pre red d Reviewed by AX , hereby apply for permission to discharge waste into the waters of the State of Vermont under the provisions of Discharge Permit No. 1-1269, previously issued to Summer Ice Joint Venture. Signed: Address: Telephone: Page 5 of 5 Permit No. 1-1269 Attachment A Allocated Discharge Flows and Treatment Development Area Treatment Discharge Volume Lot 1 Detention Basin 1 (1) Lot 2 Onsite 2.0 cfs Lot 3 Onsite 4.0 cfs Lot 4 Onsite 2.3 cfs Lot 5 Onsite 2.3 cfs Lot 6 Onsite 2.4 cfs Lot 7 Onsite 4.1 cfs Lot 8 Onsite 4.0 cfs Lot 9 Onsite 3.9 cfs Lots 10, 11, 12 Detention Basin 2 (2) Access Road Detention Basin 2 (2) 1. The outflow from Detention Basin 1 discharges to Detention Basin 2 2. The outflow from Detention Basin 2 shall be limited to 6.7 cfs rt ter' 0 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 August 6, 2002 Ms. April Moulaert, Environmental Scientist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 10 North 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 Re: Meadowland Business Park, So. Burlington, VT Sewer Main Location Alternatives Analysis Expired CUD Permit 96-400 Dear Ms. Moulaert: Phone: 902-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E'Ah i1: inail(a,cea-vt.com In accordance with your request, we have completed the alternatives analysis for the sewer main installation from the Meadowland Business Park to the Municipal Pump Sation located behind the Lane Press property in South Burlington, Vermont. The following alternatives were reviewed to determine the feasibility of a prudent alternate route to reduce the wetland impacts. 1. Gravity sewer on straight line from Business Park to the pump station. 2. Gravity sewer on route to west of straight line 3. Gravity sewer to east of straight line 4. Pump station and force main along portion of route. A description of the construction and right-of-way requirements and associated wetland impacts for each option is outlined below. The construction costs are included as part of the "prudent" alternatives test utilized by the Corps of Engineers in assisting in the determination of appropriate levels of avoidance and minimization of impact. Please note that the owners of the Lane Press property have not expressed any support for a relocation of the sewer main onto any portion of their property. We have enclosed a site plan depicting the four alternatives. Gravity Sewer on Straight Line from Business Park to the Pump Station - This option takes advantage of an existing right-of-way granted in 1986 to the property Ms. April Moulaert Page two August 6, 2002 owner previous to the applicant by Burlington Properties Limited Partnership for the exclusive use as the means of connecting the project to the municipal pump station. The sewer line has been designed to run as shallow as possible but still requires that the sewer main be installed at depths of up to 13 feet. The cost of this design is approximately $66,200. The amount of (temporary) wetland impact (20' wide impact area along the gravity sewer installation) is 12,300 square feet with 3,600 square feet of buffer impact.. This design has been modified to reduce the amount of permanent impact by eliminating 900 linear feet of gravel access roadway. In addition, this alignment requires that the A horizon soils be stockpiled and replaced so as to allow the existing vegetation to re-establish itself in a manner consistent with the existing conditions. 2. Gravity Sewer on Route to West of Straight Line - This option reduces the wetland impacts by relocating the originally proposed sewer main route uphill to the west. This relocation results in between 1.0 and 1.5 feet of additional excavation depth. This route is limited as you move in the northerly direction due to the location of the Lane Press property, thereby still requiring some amount of wetland impact. This option requires approximately 50 feet of additional line and raises the invert elevation at the intersection with Swift Street Extension 0.11 feet above the existing conditions, which will need to be made up in the inverts of the manhole structures. The estimated construction cost of this option os $77,200 and will create 7,700 square feet of wetland impact with 7,000 square feet of buffer impact. 3. Gravity Sewer to East of Straight Line - This extent of the relocation has been estimated since a detailed delineation of the wetlands has not been completed on the east side of the stream. However, utilizing photo interpretation of low elevation orthophotography, an estimated wetland boundary was identified and an alternate route was chosen. This route will require the crossing of the main body of the wetlands twice and will require 650 feet of additional sewer main. This change in elevation will require the installation of a pump station to service the eastern half of the project area because the three feet of cover required over the sewer main will not be able to be provided at the roadway wetland crossing. This option is estimated to cost approximately $157,500 to install and will impact approximately 7,200 square feet of wetland with 4,200 square feet of buffer impact. Ms. April Moulaert Page three August 6, 2002 4. Pump Station and Force Main along Right-of-way - This option eliminates the gravity sewer across a portion of the Burlington Properties parcel in favor of a new pump station located at the end of Thompson Street. The force main has been routed around much of the southerly wetlands but is still limited by the Lane Press Property. This option will have a total wetland impact of 3,700 at an estimated construction cost of $121,900 with 9,200 square feet of buffer impact. Recommendation - Because the majority of the identified impacts to the wetlands will be temporary, and the resulting reduction in wetland and buffer impacts will be minimal without exceptional additional cost, it is recommended that, due to the historical nature of the easement and its intended use predating the Wetland Rules, that Alternate 1 be utilized for the proposed sewer main connection route. Pending the submittal of additional information on the relocation of the berm to the south, this route is consistent with the Corps of Engineers' proposed approval. This completes our summary of the alternatives reviewed for the connection of the proposed project with the existing municipal pump station. If you should have any questions, please feel' free to contact me at 985-2323.,' Respectfully, & 4,44 C David S. Marshall, P.E. (1 Project Engineer Enclosures Alternative Site Plan Cost Estimate Spread Sheets cc: M. Neagley (w/enclosures) \\Dave\c\I Let\01 117\moulaert 4JtAna1.wpd MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK WETLAND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS August 5, 2002 Item Description 1 Wetland Protection 2 Erosion Control 3 12" Sewer Main 4 Sanitary Manholes 5 Sewer Connection 6 Cross Country Site Reclamation 7 4" Force Main 8 Duplex Pump Station oad 9 Gravel Service Road lectrical 10 Single Phase Transformer Subtotal 10% Contingency Total Altemate 1 Straight Gravity Run Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 LS $4,000 $4,000 1 LS $3,000 $3,000 1,450 LF $25 $36,250 5 EA $1,800 $9,000 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 1,450 LF $1 $1,450 0 LF $15 $0 0 EA $40,000 $0 550 LF $10 $5,500 11 0 EA $5,000 $0 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK WETLAND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS August 5, 2002 Item Description 1 Wetland Protection 2 Erosion Control ewer 3 12" Sewer Main 4 Sanitary Manholes 4A SMH Invert/Rim Elev. Modific. 5 Sewer Connection 6 Cross Country Site Reclamation 7 4" Force Main 8 Duplex Pump Station 9 Gravel Service Road lectrical 10 Single Phase Transformer $60, 200 $6, 000 $66 200 Alternate 2 West Gravity Run Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 LS $4,000 $4,000 1 LS $3,000 $3,000 1,500 LF $28 $42,000 6 EA $1, 800 $10, 800 4 EA $600 $2,400 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 1,500 LF $1 $1,500 0 LF $15 $0 0 EA $40,000 $0 550 LF $10 $5,500 0 EA $5,000 $0 Subtotal $70,200 10% Contingency $7,000 Total $77,200 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK WETLAND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS August 5, 2002 Item Description 1 Wetland Protection 2 Erosion Control 2A Stream Channel Restoration Sewer 3 12" Sewer Main 4 Sanitary Manholes 5 Sewer Connection 6 Cross Country Site Reclamation 7 4" Force Main 8 Duplex Pump Station Road 9 Gravel Service Road Electrical 10 Single Phase Transformer Subtotal 10% Contingency Total Alternate 3 East Gravity Run Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 LS $6,000 $6,000 1 LS $4,000 $4,000 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 2,200 LF $25 $55, 000 8 EA $1,800 $14,400 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 2,200 LF $1 $2,200 60 LF $15 $900 1 EA $40,000 $40,000 970 LF $10 $9,700 1 EA $5,000 $5,000 $143,200 $14,300 $157 500 II MEADOWLAND BUSINESS: RK �" Po,�'; WETLAND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS August 5, 2002 Item Description 1 Wetland Protection 2 Erosion Control ewer 3 12" Sewer Main 4 Sanitary Manholes 5 Sewer Connection 6 Cross Country Site Reclamation 7 4" Force Main 8 Duplex Pump Station oad 9 Gravel Service Road lectrical 10 Single Phase Transformer 10% Contingency Total Alternate 4 Pump Station & FM Quantity Unit 'Unit,,Pric;e Amount 1 LS $4,000 $4,000 1 LS $3,000 $3,000 1,100 LF $25 $27, 500 3 EA $1,800 $5,400 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 2,400 LF $1 $2,400 1300 LF $15 $19,500 1 EA $40,000 $40,000 300 LF $10 $3,000 1 EA $5,000 $5,000 $110,800 $11,100 $121,900 — — TARY EXISTING / PUMP STAnG _ _LANE PRESS I .. _ . ► 3754 -----ALTERNATE 1 SEWER LINE ROUTE / ALTERNATE 3 SEWER LINE ROUTE (PRESENT DESIGN LOCATION) //I WETLAty ' :..a: ;;., t \ II 4�� ;2ANr v ,�: r S�; �l WETLAND 3vr f PAC-�i 1a68 �nk + R J :SS I/1�WETLAND IMPACT 5095 S.F. lo.- — AL TERNA TE 2 SEWER LINE ROUTE l NSF , + -',• �/ `; 1 \ YAI'S /1, bi'ETLAND BUFFER I DYNAPOWER BURLINGTON PROPERTIES :'r;,gP CTJ 2216 S.F I PARTNERSHIP E LIMITED PA LA'SS'I WETLAND IMPACT7218 D\ 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREAS — FENCIN ' n A S j WETLAND 7,-At,+f? 8i y. r r; TO BE LACED AROUND AREA WITH `` i,A >.�; II WETLAND IMPACT f,^1 S.r. UT, Ay, �' _ SIGNS, (KEEP 0 SENSI 1/E ARE `. S. F. (:�: , MOUNTED ON FENCE. ri ..L� .;.:. : , • ;,LASS It WETLAND IMPACT CCAS� Ili WETLAND IMPACT ) ,' v �- ' Y-X 962 S.F. ?i1� •YLA fe- .BUFF/:R :{. _ , 2].Rk S.F. — PRIOR C NVE47ED \ \ \ IMf'A(: t at 'E;... :i:• :: CL�ArsS: 11:; ffttrr :LASS Il WEl- A.. 0 Cyttx .r ? AND .. iMPACT 01 S. F: - --- 1 \ \ ALTERNATE 4 4 , i \ \ SEWER LINE ROUTE x/ i y Y II .i _ �II �s 1 \ c. may- - + PAi T - - ....r.. N IM \ A D -�' CLASS I YfL I \1 J � Y . 7 1 �• \ �i •� iii \ CLASS' 111 .��- ,_ I t. : V::1 \•'• I; 1 !.R�!!—' ; 1.'i.7....7'. .'.-{'. �.y•r.'4'CJ}�y - 'Ict'' ' �. •�: ... •�. ,':.'.. � � :..::.:: - -�:-�, , _ -_ 1 z 1 1 .t . 1. V�. r . M 1 :.'::.'.'::.............. 777 ,= i .. "......... -- /...r n..% �. 1 t BURLINGTON EXCHANGE 10 TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT ve"zpn N 271 MEADOWLANDS DRIVE PROPOSED ULTIMATE EQUIPMENT LAYOUT B� PROPOSED LANDSCAPING= 10- 30' EASEMENT BOUNDARY THUJA (CEDAR) 6' HIGH B&B ----------------------------------------------, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I } I I I CONCRETE PAD I Q I I I PWR PAD m I ��JB %B � I LITESPAN MESA6 CABINET W 115"W x 46" L x 72" H in I WI " W 0M,75"540OX FDI n\ H 54"W 22"D �II„ I I I �4@ 18' I I L--------------- WE45EMEN-TaQ-U-Wl68Y------------- GRASS AREA PAVED BIKE PATH GRAVEL AREA GRASS AREA CURB CURB MEADOWLANDS DRIVE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 17, 2003 \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc Plans received: August 29, 2003 271 MEADOWLAND DRIVE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-65 Agenda # 7 Meeting date: October 21, 2003 Owner Applicant Summer/Ice Joint Venture Verizon New England, Inc. 153 Summit Street 800 Hinesburg Road Burlington, VT 05401 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Enqineer Property Information Norman Rice Tax Parcel 1155-00271-C Dunroven Associates Volume 387, Pages 439-441 2021 Towne Hill Road 10 District E. Montpelier, VT 05651 116.7 acres Location MaW. p . 4 I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNE"4G & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 9, 2004 Mark Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction 115o Airport Parkway South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 596 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Neagley: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, Ra o(d J. Belau Administrative Officer Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLI GTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 9, 2004 Robert Perry, Esq. 3000 Williston Road PO Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 596 Meadowland Drive - Dubois Dear Mr. Perry: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PIL ANN➢NG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 5, 2004 Mark Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction P.O. Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: 596 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Neagley: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the April 13, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 5, 2004 Robert J. Perry 3000 Williston Road P.O. Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 52 Bartlett Bay Road and 596 Meadowland Drive Dear Mr. Perry: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the April 13, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, C Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 13 APRIL 2004 Mr. Vock showed the area where the berm will be located. $202,000 is proposed for landscaping. Mr. Dinklage said there should be landscaping to shield the massive nature of the facility from the community and ask the applicant to work with staff on this. Mr. Belair asked about security fencing. Mr. Vock said there would be an 8 ft. fence with 3 strands of barbed wire on top, similar to Airport Parkway now. It will be somewhat hidden by landscaping. Mr. Belair asked about lighting, especially at night. Mr. Dinklage said drivers shouldn't be looking into hot spots. Mr. Vock said energy conservation is very important to them. Mr. Belair said dumpsters shouldn't be visible from the roadway. 1 ketch Plan Application #SP-04-15 of Summer Ice Joint Venture and Marie Dubois to mend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 12 lots. The amendment consists of: 1) relocating a 200 ft. wide buffer, which currently runs along the south boundary of 596 Meadowland Dr. to the property to the south, which is owned by Dubois, so that it runs along its northerly boundary line, and 2) connecting the Dubois property to Meadowland Drive with a 60-ft. wide right-of-way, 596 Meadowland Dr: Mr. Marshall showed the location of the project. He noted a piece of property that is appealing to someone looking for property near the Airport. This company has a concern because of the wetland which frames the property and the requirement of a 200 ft. buffer to residential property. The owner is working with the adjacent property owner who said there is a potential to create the buffer on the adjoining property in exchange for an access to Swift Street. Mr. Dinklage asked Mr. Belair if what is shown on the plan is "do -able." Mr. Belair said the question he has is the location of the intersection. He would prefer a 4-way intersection, not an offset. This would also take the road out of the wetland. Mr. Dinklage suggested a possible land swap with the property to the south so they don't have to go through the wetland. Mr. Cobb, representing Dubois, said they are looking for a right-of-way and are amenable to what the applicant needs. Mr. Dinklage stressed the need to be sure that what is on paper is workable. He also said the applicant should meet with the Natural Resources Committee to discuss this plan. Mr. Belair said any wetland on the southern parcel would have to be assessed. He also noted that both properties would be one PUD, if this plan happens. Mr. Dinklage advised the applicant not to use Land Air as an excuse to have heartaches over the wetland issues. -5- C DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 13 APRIL 2004 Mr. Marshall noted an Act 250 requirement for a traffic light when warrants are met. Deliberative Session: Members agreed to hold a deliberative session following the meeting. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the regular meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m Cler c �( Date —6— DEFh1RT-MEiWTi .OF Tyr NZ 1 T111J;G '•L 2GN1 E G 5755 5 I 18211E '1 �� SET S � YL� SO€JTHI-1 ELRLI •(GTON, `,TERVIONT, 05403 (:802) 346-4106 F A2; (802) 846-4101 "emit i uber 'jD--� APPLT -..CATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCHPT L LAN REVIEW !1 information requested on this .application crust be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested irnormation either on this application forin or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF REC'v Rr (NTarne as shown on deed, ?nailing address, phone and fa:c #)27 O � Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction C� 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol 387 page 439-441 �) r .1- ANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Summer Ice Joint Venture same as above 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple z 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and lax -40 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1150 Hinesburg Rd. Lot #3 Meadowland Business Park 7) TAX PARCEL ILA Irrircan be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01150 Lot #3 o) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use currently vacant land b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) NA c) Total 'building square fbotagd on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) NA ') Prc: c -,e;?rt of uildi ag lid applicable) NA vI r'sidential units (if applicable, ne`d'T units and Fisting units to reiriai ) -NA t) Other (list any other inforir_•ation pertinent to this application not spebifiically requested above, .olease dote if Overlay Districts are applicable) Proposal to relocate 200' conservation zone and 20' pedestrian easement from the north side of Lot 3 southerly boundary to south of tHe Lot3 southerly boundaryand to provide a 601 ROW across Lot3 from Swift St Ext to the Dubois property 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% Proposed % c) "r otit bard (alonE each Street) Existing °i° PrQ;oosed 10) T-Z?E OF L.<2STISTG OR PROPOSED EINTCT,2�RANCE ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of ivay, etc.) Conservation zone, Pedestrian easement, Wetland buffer 11) P F G_ OsED -RXTEl TSI{��T, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF tiI-U TICIPA-, F_=ACUITIES (sanitary sewer, loiater suppler. streets. storm drainage, etc.) 12) 0IN- TERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROP=R=S J?-- NLA.ILING ADDRESSES DRESSES (this may be provided on .a separate attached sheet) see attached 13) ESTRAATED PROJECT CONTI ETIOrT DA= immediately upon approval 14) PL ACTS Ai*TD FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Fire (5) regular Size copies and one reduced copy, (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. I herebv certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE O SIGNATURE OF P ANT WNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: _'- Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date EXHIBIT A SKETCH PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Name and address of owner of record and application. o Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Location map showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. o Boundaries and area of all contiguous land belonging to the owner of record. o Boundaries and area of the proposed subdivision. o Existing and proposed layout of property lines. o Type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land (easements, covenants, etc.). o Location, names, and widths of existing and proposed streets or private ways. o Existing zoning boundaries. o Existing watercourses, wetlands. floodplains, wooded areas, ]edge outcrops, and other natural features. o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains. culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Number and location of parking spaces (see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations). o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o All applicable information required for a site plan application shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project. planned unit development, or planned residential development (please see site plan application). APPLICATION FEE Sketch Plan Application S 125.00 Application For The Development Review Board Request for a conditional use Item 14) List of property owners abutting Lot #3 Meadowlands Business Park, 1 150 Hinesburg Rd. South Burlington obtained from City of South Burlington Assessors Office 09/04/03: To the south: \ Dubois, Homer and Marie v 1405 Hinesburg Rd South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the east: Green Acres Inc PO Box 2123 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the west: Summer Ice Joint Venture And northwest c/o Mark Neagley And north Neagley Chase Construction (Lots 2, 7, 10, 12) 1150 Airport Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 To the north: Thomas Chase c/o Neagley, Chase Construction 1150 Airport Prkwy South Burlington, Vermont 05403 ILI DIEFARTI'VI EI-7 OF T NT0 ,A z0NDTG 575 _-D'ORSE'T' S i'EEErr 5O r'T BL-Fs?Jt TO'I Ot i, �' ,E. jo?%f . 05403 (8C2) 346-4106 r.42' (802) 848-4101 Pp.=L it Numbe: SD- - ! Co -Application with Summer Ice Joint Venture A_►1 information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested im`ormation either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejedteCi and a delay in the review before, the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORr' (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Ma r i e Dubois (surviving joint owner), 1375 Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403, c/o Robert J. Perry, 3000 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 179, Page 126 AFPLICPNTT (Narne, mailing address, phone and faw.#) Marie Dubois, c/o Robert J. Perry, 3000 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST 11,T TI-IE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) fee simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (1Tame, mailing Address, phone and fax #) Robert J. Perry, 3000 Williston Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 863-4558 / 862-0937 6)PROJECTSTREETADDRESS: Easterly of Dubois Drive - no assigned street number 7) TAB PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01375 o) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Vacant land b) Proposed Uses on grope --ter (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) None c) T-otal building square footage on propertti (proposed'buildings and existing buildings to remain) d1j P-Gpcsed heizi t !of"buildi is fif applicable) N/A �) � wrnber of _ P.siden-tial =its (if applicable, rivoi -units and existing units to remai, N/A f" Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not suecirically requested above. please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing Rio Proposed. °% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing '/o PrapOsed % c) Front vary? (along each street) Existing tic Proposed % 10) T-11-PE OF =STR IG OR PROPOSED E1dCTU1_N BR,,U ICES O-hT PROPER T Y (easements, c:oven=, ts, leases, rights of way, etc.) Open space buffer (no build zone) at northeast corner of parcel, 200 feet (north/south) by approximately 2,000 feet (east/west) 11) P R GPOSED EX-TE'1 TSION, RELOCATION, OR INIODUMICA TION OF i\ift T1 TICIP.,\_, FACILIT' E S f sani tars sewer, ixater supply, streets, storm drainage, Ltc.) None at this time - future connection of Dubois Drive with Swift Street Extension 12) Ol/Wi TERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPER TIES & NLAE.:IATO ADDRESSES ('this maybe provided on a separate attached sheet) See attached. 13) EST -MATED PROvECT COt✓1PTETIOl-,TDATE Upon Development Review Board approval. 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Fire (51 regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. List of Abutters Southerly Diane J. Wessel 70 Highland Terrace S. Burlington, VT 05403 Southerly & Easterly Green Acres, Inc. PO Box 2123 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Northerly Summer Ice Joint Venture 1150 Airport Parkway S. Burlington, VT 05403 Westerly Dedicated open space for Ledge Knoll Development (owned by Marie Dubois) l I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. :: N , Z L6 coo SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SI NATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 3 O d ;ZW y� t' �+ *% A LL ,C uj t �' tA0149 0m uOf CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\meadowland bus prk\boundary adjst\sketch Summer Ice Joint Venture and Marie Dubois, hereafter referred to as the applicants, have requested sketch plan review to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of twelve (12) lots. The amendment consist of 1) relocating a 200-foot-wide buffer, which currently runs along the southerly boundary of 596 Meadowland Drive, to the property to the south, which is owned by Dubois, so that it runs along its northerly property boundary line, and 2) connecting the Dubois property to Meadowland Drive with a 60-foot-wide right-of-way, 596 Meadowland Drive. The applicant is proposing to relocate a previously -approved 200' wide buffer to create additional developable space on lot #3 of the Meadowland Business Park. During the original approval, the applicant was required to provide a 200' wide buffer between lot #3 of the Meadowland Business Park and the Dubois property directly to the south. The required buffer intentionally went above and beyond the standard 65' wide buffer that is normally required between non-residential and residential uses, as outlined in Section 3.06(I) of the Land Development Regulations. The proposed project would shift the 200' wide buffer from the south of the Meadowland Business park property to the north of the Dubois property. The buffer would be equally effective in the proposed location, as it will still guarantee that at least 200 feet separates any industrial uses that may take place on the Meadowland Business Park property from any residential uses that may take place on the Dubois property. In addition, the previously - approved 20' wide pedestrian easement that falls within the 200' wide buffer will also be shifted from the south of the Meadowland Business Park property to the north of the Dubois property. The relocation of this pedestrian easement will not reduce its effectiveness to serve pedestrians. Thus, staff does not see any issues that should prevent the Development Review Board from approving this project. This relocation of the pedestrian easement should be reviewed by the Recreation Path Committee. The other change that will occur as part of the proposed project is that a 60' wide right-of-way will be provided from Meadowland Drive, through lot #3 of the Meadowland Business Park, to the Dubois property. This right-of-way will be used to access future residential development on the Dubois property. This road should intersect with Meadowland Drive, opposite of Bowdoin Street. Staff notes that this 60' wide right-of-way traverses Class III wetlands on the Meadowland Business Park. While this is not an issue that directly affects the proposed project, it may become an issue during the permitting process for the road. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\meadowland_bus prk\boundary adist\sketch Staff recommends that the applicant submit a combined preliminary and final plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Mark Neagley, applicant Marie Dubois, applicant __ ` I. 1 1• 1. ! I .� Y ., . I / I . . . . . . 1 1 SITE ENGINEER: LI 1 9 22 C6 ,_ rf'. CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, IN .. , _J I ��'i,l' / `. i ��I.IL_— --- '' �-------- PC.SM4ss�MMVTos+ez I.' / C — �msesam Auc�orasary-e:».Aa.� $ DET.---- tir POND COYR6T eoos am \/) G0.NNw`1 ACL — — — — — — — — — — _ cxecRaD DSM -- - rr1i -- 2s oo --_�I -r� - -�._ +( yD-rI - T_OU .28,r -. -• ..-'� ` , .-.\ �I 3_`'_ \ -3 _1_.—__ _ — _ rI—iI1--:-GXII 1' : { . l / APPROVED 30 00 DSM {29 0 OWNER:k2 � r0.� 35� D z4 0 xl-- 0? MEADOWLAND .......... INDUSTRIAL PARK i ~ ' �' \ I ' ... 20' PEDES RIAN Y / ..."�`r .. �`.` i ' / ', 5P_''.., \ 11 EASEMEIV -� \ ( I I I 1 ,\ �— _ I au5FERi.14' •. 1 I I I \ �. i " \. \ I ritoi 999 I ECI: i I fl• I I / I . r /, .. , ,.-.:: i Ills � \� ....i. ....,' �� i�i: % .. ` �.. �. ��' 1 MEADOWLAND +� I , , `: I ,: �r a. T. INDUSTRIAL : v: ��! . 1 moo. r r l•� % PARK t `.�.. .... \\ \..� i�' V i ' i DRA .r r' 1 - �'. 1 I. r \ I'1 i'•'• _ Hinesburg Road .\ .. FOR L C� �— + 2 0'.. f°.E D E S T.61. A N^.. I '/�{. i/' : ^. ^ c c ;� ./; . So. Burlington F' - _:�R„ > 1 _ I 1\ /!Ifl' i FF��.�'J �1 :a. 1. I \ Vermont EAS�KNT \ 1 \ 1 20.I�0..Ac,�, .�: <' I/ I FENCE- 1:r' I /� +-. \ �. (� ,I/ , •>.: •, , .. . .� .1. ./. PR .�.'. .•� . . . . . . .; �:.—..._--I— j I'.�. .�. \ ��\. .I IX I I 11, 1. .(� j .%. .I . . . . . \ / \' Gl ,t na I \ I , f I OF �II + �.. .... ..... PL 0.. ................ � /� / • ,• •�` LOCATION MAP •' • • y' 2PEb.ESTRIAN ;' " : �-f=-' Cy • � � i ' � DATE CHF EED REVI910N " ;Y'—•;-- ; ;may + L �O E�SEMENT\ 1 340 EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY 'I,S'TING 5' CHANNEL WETLAND AREA �� I LOT #3 ECE IVED --- -- --- RI �-----'� SITE PLAN CN MAR - 3 zU u4 1 r .91 N City of So. Burlington I Dry C] ' 1 ATe rviNDFP. o _ V •� O H O O Q O /a (L JAN, 2004 tAPHIC SCALE J 1" - 60' C1 I N0. IN FELT I PROD. I Inch - 60 n. I 03193 �I rva`,E. �j ` ExISrIHD yVRrART ppq srArxaN i� MI1I / I II �1 11 NiT I I Gv�alAp ; � Oh aO. SOC rOR[S1�[DED 1 II hA �� II RON 01QLIE. Dueo�s O 'PiL i hNN.VAN _-w CR �.�•� ' GNECN ACRES INC Lh� n ,3 iJ RA K wv usxur 1 0. KSWL GRAPHIC SCALE D ( IN FEET I 1 awn . zoo ft. SITE ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. am4w Sly VT owes eaa4W= FAX-oaso-un rwa nwrwwtwn orrw DRA.ry ACL eaoa - 11— D DSM �PI'R.IED DSM OWNER: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK PROJECT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont I—m-o , I E I rl LOCATION MAP r-3an DATE CRECIIED REVISION OVERALL SITE PLAN DATE DRA>•— N .8m MARCH, 2004 200' C1 PROD. ND. 03193 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc Verizon New England, Inc., hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting final plat plan approval to construct three (3) telecommunication cabinets on one (1) concrete pad. The total area of the proposed development will be a 45 square feet of telecommunication cabinets mounted on 270 square feet of concrete pad. The subject property contains 116.7 acres and is part of the 12-lot Meadowood Business Park. The property is located at 271 Meadowlands Drive in the Industrial & Open Space District (1-0). PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. I. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. According to the applicant, the proposed structure will only require and average of 1.3 visits per week. Thus, access, circulation, and traffic management is not an issue. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. According to the City's Wetland Map, the subject property contains wetlands. Pursuant to Section 12.02(C) of the Land Development Regulations, all wetland areas require a 50' buffer from development. At this time, staff does not have a site plan that shows the exact location of the proposed structure. The applicant has indicated that the 30' easement that the structure is utilizing is approximately 1,200 feet from the existing wetlands. A site plan showing the footprint of the proposed structure in relation to existing wetlands will be provided to the Development Review Board at the meeting. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning districts) in which it is located. The proposed telecommunication cabinets will be appropriately screened with evergreen trees, so there should not be a significant visual impact on the area. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc (f) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. 2. Newly installed utility lines, services and service modifications shall be underground. (i) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Staff has already noted that newly installed utility lines, services and service modifications shall be underground. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following ,general review standards for all site plan applications. - (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels this criterion is met through the proposed project. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc Staff has already noted that newly installed utility lines, services and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project is part of a PUD intended for industrial uses. Staff feels this criterion is met through the proposed project. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already noted that newly installed utility lines, services and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (d) Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. The applicant is proposing to plant ten (10) 6' high Cedar trees as screening for the telecommunication cabinet. The proposed plantings will provide immediate screening of the structure. According to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require a minimum landscaping cost of $300. However, in order the sufficiently screen the structure, the applicant is proposing $1,366 of landscaping. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc 3. The applicant shall submit a landscape budget prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer indicating that the landscape cost requirement is being met, prior to final approval. 4. The applicant shall post a landscape bond for $1, 366, prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. Pursuant to Section 13.18(B) of the Land Development Regulations, any utility cabinet or similar structure shall comply with the following review standards: (a) The facility shall serve the City of South Burlington and/or immediately adjacent communities. The proposed facility will serve the City of South Burlington. (b) The minimum required lot for a public utility cabinet, substation, or communication relay station may be reduced from the zoning district requirements, at the discretion of the Development Review Board. In the event that the facility shall be erected on property not owned by the utility, the Development Review Board shall require that the facility be located unobtrusively. The applicant is not requesting a reduction in the allowable minimum lot size for this project. (c) If the parcel containing the facility is landlocked, there shall be a recorded easement or permission granting access to the utility or owner of the facility. The parcel containing the proposed facility has frontage on Meadowland Drive. (d) There shall be suitable fencing to protect the public and sufficient landscaping with evergreens of sufficient height and density to screen effectively the facility from surrounding property. The applicant has proposed planting ten (10) 6' high Cedar trees around the proposed structure. Staff feels this is sufficient to comply with this requirement. (e) There shall be adequate off-street parking for maintenance, service, or other vehicles. The proposed structure will only require one (1) vehicle for service on an as needed basis. Staff feels the gravel area between Meadowland Drive and the structure will be sufficient to accommodate this vehicle. (f) The location of the facility shall be shown on all relevant site plans. As noted above, the applicant will be providing the Development Review Board with site plans showing the exact location of the proposed structure in relation to the property at the meeting. (g) The Development Review Board may require setbacks or attach other conditions in order to prevent any hazard to the public or noise nuisance to surrounding property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\verizon\final.doc Staff does not feel the proposed structure will require additional setbacks or conditions. However, the Development Review Board can make this determination when they see the overall site plan at the meeting. (h) A facility that would be a nuisance to surrounding properties due to smoke, gas, heat, odor, noise, or vibration shall not be permitted in any district. The proposed facility will not be a nuisance to surrounding properties due to smoke, gas, heat, odor, noise, or vibration. Staff recommends that the South Burlington Development Review Board approve Final Plat Application #SD-03-65, conditional upon the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report being addressed. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Norman Rice PROPERN-LINE r----' �m VERIZON\SBURLNI 7.D WG \ t,� EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION TYP. \f� 353x8 '•F CENTERLINE 13F 5 UNDERGROUND -- 1 TELEPHONE CONDUITS (3' DEEP*) \ '\ CENTERLINE OF 2 UNDERGROUND \ ELECTRICAL CONDUITS (3' DEEP*) I.R.S. AT STATION 14+15 40.00' LEFT OF CENTERI / sN\\� �z STATION 14+00 Py, �� q 357x3 '\ O O i \ ��n >� N. IRS \\ \ �O/ _ \ STATION 14+50 �q � � S c4P8V4� \ GRAPHIC SCALE w • n » w ( w Fur) 1 Inch - 10 tL N/F SUMMER/ICr JOINT VENTURESOO BMW 397 PAGE;'439-441 LOT NO, 12 353x 4 PROJECT BENCHMARKi TOP OF IRON ROD SET ELF',/• - 354,79' VERTICAL DATUM FROM DESIGN PLANS BY TRUDELL CM"ULTING ENG INC FOR MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK. 10' WIDE PERMITTED UTILITY CORRIDO,t O STON LOCATION MAP SCALE 1' - 4000't LEGEND: -- EASEMENT BOUNDARY — -- - CENTERLINE OF ROAD - ... -- ... - EDGE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ---•-•-•----- TEL AND ELEC. CONDUITS • IRS IRON ROD SET THIS PLAT CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1403 OF TITLE 27 VSA. BEARINGS REFERENCED TO THE 'IERMONT GRID SYSTEM. G�� o THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON ENDENCE NORCI1ANiy FOUND IN THE FIELD AND INFOPMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT I,EEDS. * NO' 4 sy� iaTV sUR r_ VEiRIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE PROPERTY OF SUMMER/ICE JOINT VENTURE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT DUNROVEN ASSOCIATES EAST MONTPELIER , VERMONT PROJECT 0 SCALE DATE VNE 9AABTU DA 2002-10 1' - 10' OCT. 2002 C QED SEP 0 3 2003 City of So. Burlington )DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 OCTOBER 2003 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application 4SD-03-65 of Verizon New England, Inc., to amend a previously approved 12 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of installing three telecommunications utility cabinets, 271 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Boucher recused himself as he is an adjoining property owner. The applicant showed the location which is 1300 ft. from the wetland. The cabinets were constructed before applying for a permit. The applicant promised this would never happen again. Copies of the landscape estimate were provided. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-03-65 of Verizon New England subject to the stipulations as drafted. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Boucher rejoined the Board. 8. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-03-68 of Horizon Heights Condominium Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 76 unit Planned Unit Development. The amendment consists of an after the fact approval for one additional unit, Quarry Hill Road: Mr. Marks said they hired someone to do a survey. Revision are inserted. He then reviewed the history of the application. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application 9SD-03-68 of Horizon Heights Condominium Association subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site Plat Application #SP-03-42 of Tom Peterson (CCTA) to construct a 40 sq. ft. bus shelter south of the Salvation Army Store driveway on Hinesburg Rd., 1333 Williston Road: Mr. Belair noted that the shelter had to be relocated further from the corner. Staff has no issues with the application. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-03-42 of Tom Peterson (CCTA) subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 23, 2003 Norman Rice 2021 Towne Home Road East Montpelier, VT 05651 Re: Final Subdivision Plat Application #SD-03-65 Dear Mr. Rice: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 10/21/03 (effective 10/22/03). Please note the conditions, including that the final plat shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days of this decision, or the approval is null and void. If you,have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely,____ Brian Robertson, Associate Planner DT FA.F�ly, ,, T'' OF "Tr; 112Z 575 DORSET STREET SOS I? BU LiNGTOPIT, VF.Moi*i'1' 05/103 (302) 846-4106 E' 77 (S02) oA6-A101 f✓� . Peniiit Number SD--_ APPLICATION FOR FEN -AL, SUBDIA11SIG T PLAT �S All information requested on this application iiiust ibe completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please prw ide pertinent inf€armation only. l ) ©VT'4ER DF Rl ;CORD iNi ame ass wn on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1-53 T o/ 2) LC( ATIGN OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPUCA1\7 (Name, mailing address, phone and Fax �� ?1 -7 /I ' CC" 164i;' ��T�/ , l�iE"li% �i71,✓ ��3 '� - 117/� 4) C07'4 AA�`-''I' PERSON (Ni arne, mailing, address) -phone ail fax #) /�C O.�Ji rfrli,Fir" l / 3 c' 5) PRO ECT STREET ADDRESS: 71 g9Wye,&,e 61 TAX PARCEL ID # (earl be obtained at Assessor's Office 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size ofecah new use and existing uses to readain) -3 , ��,�ra�r,�r''a s✓��Tio-� �'��iiG',�7S T i.CS f��/e ys 2�) Xi'..Z �/ .t ? c,) Taal building square footage on property (proposed. buildings and existing buildings to remain", !X/ -27® S4.-c1 e-V" A*er d) I?eight of building & nurnber of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain. specify if basement and mezzanine) �✓�� L e) Number of residential units (if applicable, ne-,x units and existing u its to remain) I f/ y4amber v- ;�i3 r pl0ve_-s & corn i-chi ies (d<;:ist g and proposed,ncte o_r -icb versus non -office employees): 4 �4S .ri'�'�O,�O ,�S✓S + g) Other (fist any other iisiorma>on per=ent -o this application not specildically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): el Oi v) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Emstin_g O % .Proposed b). Overall (building, parldmg, outside storage, etc) E:dstin O fl/o Proposed % c) Front :Yard (along each street)" Existing � o Proposed 9) COST E STEVIA TES at��'-si lding (including interior renovations): b) Landscape � /3 k , c) Other ;site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTI AA= TRAFFIC a.) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): ze _-Or Zjr,� / ,, ''e*W b) ,A- IS& Peak hour for entire property (in and oat): c) RM peak hour for enter papery (In and mat): 11) PEAK HOURS OF G ER AITI 1: �.5 .�E,•EO�d 12) PEAKDAYS OF OPE TION: '0415 13) ESTM TED " 1' OJECT C01V21 JETIO DATE: ,2vo.3 14) PISS AND FEE Plat clans shall be submitted which shows the infrmation listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) rcgvlar sm copies and one reduced. copy (I I " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be maid to the City at the time :)f submitting the Enal plat application (see Exhibit A). I ereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SiC'rNA.L F'�F APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PR T OWNED Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: p -�� - V3 1 havereviewed this final plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & .honing or Designee Date I =-HBI7" A FINAL PLAT Uie following information must be shown on the -clans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy 01 " x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following infbrmationwill result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board- If submitting a final plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r. o. w. 3, sidewalks, and public or private street (winames) o Five foot contours (existing and finished) o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks' and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location; names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths,,easernents, parks, and other public opens spaces. o Numerical and graphical scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed correction with existing water supply or -alternative water supply. o Details of proposedconnection with the ex sting aanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. o clans of storm water f 61:ti m ies in the. _- -_ Few of _minagt Plan, • Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. • Location of temporary markers. • All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. • A list of waivers desired (if any). • Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). • A report addressing planned .Tesidential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). • Locationof abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. • Du=ster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.25 3 (b) of -the zoning regulations • If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE 11 Final Plat Application S 85.00* " Includes $10. 00 recording fee A I BURLINGTON EXCHANGE TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT N 271 MEADOWLANDS DRIVE PROPOSED ULTIMATE EQUIPMENT LAYOUT 30' EASEMENT BOUNDARY &I PROPOSED LANDSCAPING= 10- THLIJA (CEDAR) 6' HIGH B&B ^———————————————————————————————————————— — — — — — , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONCRETE PAD I I I PWR I I PAD I LITESPAN MESA6 CABINET I 115"W x 46" L x 72" H I Cn I I�� B I 5400X FDI 75"H 54"W 22"D :4I� I 81 41 I I I 18' I I I �B 7, �B �B �'B� �B �B� I I L--------------- WF-A5EME MTaQU.NDARY------------ PAVED BIKE PATH GRASS AREA GRAVEL AREA GRASS AREA CURB MEADOWLANDS DRIVE N CGUN-iRY LANDSCAPE PAGE 01 .,.cr L:U: LUJL 10; 4:] ii e7Ltl ltlJ:�t7:� NORTH COUNTRY LANDSCAPE & GARDEN CENTER { 135 Talcott Load WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-7272 Fax (802) 878-9303 PHONE DATE >_- We hereby submit spccificaliorrs and estimates for iodscaplr(g as follows: All materlal Is guaranteedlfp be as specified. All work to be com- pleted In a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications Involving extra costs will be done only upon a written change order. The costs will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All elements of this agreement are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. The estimate does not include material price increases, or additional labor and materials which may be required should unforeseen problems arise after the work has started. You, the buyer, may cancel this transaction at any time prior to midnight of the third business day after the date of this trans- action. Cancellation must be done in writing. Page No. LANDSCAPING of Pages PROPOSAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. J013 PHONE NO. J NAM / N.J. JOR ocAmON zl� LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT p . PLANS APPROXIMATE STARTING DATE APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DATE We Propose hereby to turnish� above specifications, for the dollars ($ Payment to be made as follows: in acconimte with by us H not accepted within days. Authon=ed Sipnalure Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. sionatwe Date signature Data 4 State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE 4C1005—B APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) Environmental Board Rule 34(D) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Administrative Amendment #4C1005-B, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A., §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont. This permit extends the construction completion date for roadways and infrastructure from October 11, 2003 to October 1, 2005 and extends the findings of fact for Criteria 1(E), 1(G), 2, 3, 6 and ,9(B) of the Master Plan for five years. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Except as amended herein, all terms and conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and subsequent amendments remain in full force and effect. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this a 41 day of July, 2003. By AJ/ v , � �_- e I � 4// Pet E. Keibel District #4 Coordinator This permit is issued pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 34(D), Administrative Amendments, which authorizes a district coordinator, on behalf of the District Commission, to "amend a permit without notice or hearing when an amendment is necessary for record -keeping purposes or to provide authorization for minor revisions to permitted projects raising no likelihood of impacts under the criteria of the Act." The rule also provides that all parties of record and current adjoining landowners shall receive a copy of any administrative amendment. Prior to any appeal of this Administrative Amendment to the Environmental Board, the applicant or a party is encouraged to file a Motion to Alter with the District Commission within 30 days from the date of this Administrative Amendment, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 34. Any appeal of the Commission's decision on the Motion to Alter must be filed within 30 days of the date of the decision and must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40, including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses, and this decision. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this At% day of July 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT #4C1005-B, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Paul Boisvert Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road, PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney j Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor I Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS: On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this �1 day of July, 2003. % admin4C1005-Bcs/cc rTTst e (Cc mmo, A inis rative Secre ary 879-5660 State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE 4C1005-B APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) Environmental Board Rule 34(D) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Administrative Amendment #4C1005-B, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A., §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont. This permit extends the construction completion date for roadways and infrastructure from October 1, 2003 to October 1, 2005 and extends the findings of fact for Criteria 1(E), 1(G), 2, 3, 6 and ,9(B) of the Master Plan for five years. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Except as amended herein, all terms and conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and subsequent amendments remain in full force and effect. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 41 at day of July, 2003. By JJ/ V-, Pet E. Keibel District #4 Coordinator This permit is issued pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 34(D), Administrative Amendments, which authorizes a district coordinator, on behalf of the District Commission, to "amend a permit without notice or hearing when an amendment is necessary for record -keeping purposes or to provide authorization for minor revisions to permitted projects raising no likelihood of impacts under the criteria of the Act." The rule also provides that all parties of record and current adjoining landowners shall receive a copy of any administrative amendment. Prior to any appeal of this Administrative Amendment to the Environmental Board, the applicant or a party is encouraged to file a Motion to Alter with the District Commission within 30 days from the date of this Administrative Amendment, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 34. Any appeal of the Commission's decision on the Motion to Alter must be filed within 30 days of the date of the decision and must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40, including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses, and this decision. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 44 day of July 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT #4C1005-B, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Paul Boisvert Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road, PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS: On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this U day of July, 2003. 14 C 10 A W;"AdL A Ift,%ad'alm a % admin4C1005-Bcs/cc r st e ommo, AdThitfritivd Secre ary 879-5660 State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO 4C 1005-A APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C 1005-A, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the Permittee as Grantee. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to remove the historic buildings on the west side of the subject parcel (condition #23 of 4C1005) and incorporate new and revised plans and ANR permits. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington. The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project involves the construction of improvements for a commercial purpose on more than ten acres and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3) and Environmental Board Rule ("EBR") 2(A)(2), and the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with: the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and the conditions of this permit. Land Use Permit #4C1005-A Page 2 4. The approved new and revised (listed with Exhibit #s) plans are: Sheet SP2 - "Master Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP3 - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP3A - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Nov. 2001, last revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #33) Sheet P1 - "Plan and Profile Sta 0+00 to 10+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001; (Exhibit #34) Sheet P2 - "Plan and Profile Sta 10+00 to 22+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001; (Exhibit #35) Sheet P3 - "Plan and Profile Sta 22+00 to 33+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #36) Sheet P4 - "Plan and Profile Sta 33+00 to 36+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #37) Sheet P5 - "Plan and Profile Bowdoin Street, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #38) Sheet P6 - "Plan and Profile Lane Press Drive, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001; (Exhibit #39) Sheet P7 - "Plan and Profile Thompson Street, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001, last revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #40) Sheet P8 - "Plan and Profile Cross Country Sewer, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001, last revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #41) Sheet P9 - "Plan and Profile Sta 0+00 to 10+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #42) Sheet SP6 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96, last revision 9/19/96; (Exhibit #45) Sheet SP7 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96; (Exhibit #46) Sheet SP8 - "Miscellaneous Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96, last revision 9/19/96; (Exhibit #47) Sheet SP9 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 2/2/98; (Exhibit #48) Sheet SP9A - "Site Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP10 - "Southern Boundary Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002, last revision 8/16/02; (Exhibit #49) Sheet SP13 - "View Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002; (Exhibit #52) Sheet SP14 - "View Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002; (Exhibit #53) Sheet SP15 - "Preliminary Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002, last revision 8/16/02; (Exhibit #54) Sheet C 1 - "Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext Intersection Improvement Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Oct. 2002, last revision 10/30/02; Sheet C2 - "Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext Intersection Improvement Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Oct. 2002; Sheet EC - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001, last revision 10/31 /02; Sheet EC2 - "Sediment and Erosion Control Narrative, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A Page 3 Sheet EC3 - "Specifications, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated August 2002; and Sheet SOIL - "Overall Prime Ag. Soils Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park," dated April 2002, last revision 5/3/02. 5. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process. 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. 7. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This amendment does not change any of the maximum impacts for the industrial park specified in Condition #6 of LUP #4C 1005. 11. Prior to commencement of construction on any of the commercial or industrial lots, the Permittee and the lot purchaser or tenant shall file an amendment application as co -applicants and shall address each of the 10 criteria of Act 250. 12. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following revised Agency of Natural Resources Permits (other ANR permits have not been revised): Public Water Supply Permit to construct #WSID 5091 issued on 8/6/01 by the Water Supply Division; 1 Conditional Use Determination #2001-398 issued on 10/2/02 by the Water Quality Division; and • Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052C issued on 10/22/01 by the Air Pollution Control Division. Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A Page 4 Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. 13. Prior to the construction of any future buildings on the lots approved herein, the Permittee shall submit a design to the District Commission for a wastewater disposal system by a registered engineer or certified site technician which makes best efforts to meet the standards for sewage disposal in Chapter 7 of the Vermont Environmental Protection Rules. 14. The Permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 15. There shall be no floor drains installed at the facility without first acquiring the required Underground Injection Control Permit from the Water Quality Division of the Agency of Natural Resources. 16. The Permittee and all subsequent owners or lessees shall install and maintain only low -flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings. Any failed water conservation measures shall be promptly replaced with products of equal or better performance. 17. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits #30, #40 and #41 for erosion control. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 18. All mulch, siltation dams, water bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 19. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 20. All disturbed areas of the site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of final grading. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. Between the periods of October 1 to April 15, all earth disturbing work shall conform with the "Winter Construction' standards and specifications of the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites (1987). 21. Prior to the commencement of any future site work the Permittee shall conduct a pre - construction conference on the site with representatives of the District Environmental Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A Page 5 Commission, the Agency of Natural Resources, and the contractor to review the details of the erosion control plan. 22. Prior to construction of the approved work, the Permittee shall complete the following: a) construction limits shall be clearly delineated with flagging or snowfencing; b) diversion ditches shall be placed on the uphill limits of the construction area; and c) temporary siltation controls shall be placed on the downhill limits of the construction. Immediately following the above, the permanent drainage system and/or roads shall be installed after which normal construction can begin. 23. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 24. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A. (§§ 1250-1284) Chapter 47, Vermont's- Water Pollution Control Law. 25. The Permittee shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas except as authorized by the Conditional Use Determination. 26. All stumps shall be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 27. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibits #32 and #47 of LUP #4C 1005, and shall be mounted no higher than (20) feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 28. The Permittee shall not erect additional exterior signage (Exhibits #22 and #32 of LUP #4C1005) without first obtaining approval from the District Commission. Signage includes banners, flags, and other advertising displays, excepting temporary real estate marketing signs. 29. The project shall conform with the Vermont Consolidated Act 250 Energy Guidelines for Typical Commercial and Industrial Buildings promulgated by the Vermont Department of Public Service. In addition to meeting the above referenced guidelines, the Permittee shall incorporate any additional energy efficiency measures that are determined by custom analysis to be cost effective for the project. 30. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heat is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 31. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Subdivision Permit, the Land Use Permit and Amendments and the Findings of Fact before any written contract of sale is entered into. Land Use Permit #4C1005-A Page 6 32. No further subdivision, alteration, and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 33. The Permittee shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 34. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 1 I day of April 2003. By1,44 ff�l L Myron eeler, Act ng d6iaifin this matter District #4 Commission Members participating in this decision: James McNamara The applicant or a party may file a motion to alter within 30 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 31. Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. W:\Act250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4CIO05\4CIO05-A.PMT EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-A Page 1 E I DATE I E I A= Applicant X I R I N I T= Town H I E I T I EC = Environmental Conservation I I C I E I RPC = Regional Planning Commission B I E I R I ANR = Agency of Natural Resources I I I I E I AOT = Agency of Transportation T I V I D I DPS = Department of Public Services E I I VDH = Vermont Department of Health D I I DP = Division for Historic Preservation I I I WMD = Wastewater Management Division N I I B I 0.1 I I Y I Nature of Exhibit and Date Entered 11 1 1/17103 A Letter by D. Marshall, Civil Engineering Assoc. (1/14/03) 2 CUD#2001-398 Issued 10/1/02 3 Letter by John Perreault, Air Pollution Control Division re #AP-90- 052c (10/22/01) 4 Public Water System Permit to Construct Issued 8/6/01 5 Letter by Vt. Div. for Hist. Pres. re Criterion 8 (7/29/02) 6 Letter by Elizabeth Egan, Vt. Housing & Conservation Board re Mitigation Agreement (8/7/02) 7 2/28/03 Cover Letter by D. Marshall (2/28/03) 8 Schedule F - Certificate of Service 9 Act 250 Land Use Permit Application 10 Schedule A - Fee Information 11 Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 12 Project Location Map 13 Letter by Emily Wadhams re Removal of Buildings from State Register w/Photos (5/29/97) 14 Letter by Vt. Div. for Hist. Pres. re Criterion 8 (6/23/97) 15 Letter by City of South Burlington re Barns/Sheds not Historical Structures (2/18/03) 16 Photos of Site 17 1/17/03 Plan: Master Site Plan Drw. No. SP2 (7/01) 18 " Plan: Overall Site Plan Drw. No. SP3 (7/01) 19 14Plan: Overall site Plan Drw. No. SP3A (Rev. 12/20/02) EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-A Page 2 20 It Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P1 (6/01) 21 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P2 (6/01) 22 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P3 (7/01) 23 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P4 (7/01) 24 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P5 (7/01) 25 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P6 (6/01) 26 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P7 (Rev. 12/20/02) 27 Plan: Plan & Frofile Drw. No. P8 (Rev. 12/20/02) 28 Plan: Plan & Profile Drw. No. P9 (7/01) 29 Plan: Stormwater Details Drw. No. SP6 (Rev. 9/19/96) 30 Plan: Erosion Control Details Drw. No. SP7 (Rev. 9/19/96) 31 Plan: Miscellaneous Details Drw. No. SP8 (Rev. 9/19/96) 32 Plan: Stormwater Details Drw. No. SP9 (Rev. 2/2/98) 33 Plan: Site Details Drw. No. SP9A (7/01) 34 Plan: Southern Boundary Plan Drw. No. SP10 (Rev. 8/16/02) 35 Plan: View Section Plan Drw. No. SP13 (2/02) 36 Plan: View Section Plan Drw. No. SP14 (2/02) 37 Plan: Preliminary Intersection Plan Drw. No. SP15 (4/23/96) 38 Plan: Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext. Intersection Improvement Plan Drw. No. C1 (Rev. 10/30/02) 39 Plan: Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext. Intersection Improvement Plan Drw. No. C2 (10/02) 40 Plan: Overall Site Plan Drw. No. EC-1 (7/01) 41 Plan: Sediment & Erosion Control Narrative Drw. No. EC-2 (Rev. 8/16/02) 42 Plan: Specifications Drw. No. EC-3 (8/02) 43 Plan: Overall Prime Ag. Soils Plan Drw. No. SOIL (Rev. 5/3/02) 44 4/15/03 Faxed Copy of Letter by D. Marshall re Comments of Draft Act 250 LUP Amendment (4/15/01) w:4 C 100 5-A. exl ist. cc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I herebycertify on this fy 19 day of April, 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT & SURVEY #4C1005-A, was sent first class mail, postage �! prepaid to: PARTIES: Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 David S. Marshall, PE Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485, 928 Falls Road Shelburne, VT 05482 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Myron Wheeler, Acting Chair/James McNamara 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this ) 7 day of April, 2003. P /hg*v ~ w:cs4C1005-A/cc hristineo o, D i s-t ri f ice Chielerk 879-5670 State of Vermont T LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO 4C1005-1 APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 AMENDMENT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C1005-1, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the Permittee as Grantee. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to regrade lots #3, #4, #5,# 6, #7, #8, and #9 of the Meadowland Business Park with up to 200,000 cubic yards of off -site fill material. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington. The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittee, and their assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 are in full force and effect except as amended herein. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet SP3 - "Meadowland Industrial Park Overall Site Plan," dated July 2001; Land Use Permit #4C1005-1 Page 2 Sheet EC 1 - "Meadowland Industrial Park Overall Site Plan," dated July 2001, last revision 10/31 /02; Sheet EC2 - "Meadowland Industrial Park Sediment and Erosion Control Narrative," dated July 2001, last revision 10/31/02; and Sheet SP7 - "Meadowland Industrial Park Erosion Control Details," dated 6/04/96. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. 8. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A.§§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2004 issued on November 6, 1996 by the Wastewater Management Division; • General Permit for Stormwater Runoff for Construction Sites #3-9001 issued on October 10, 2002 by the Water Quality Division; and • Conditional Use Determinations #1996-400 issued on March 11, 1998 and #2001-398 issued on October 1, 2002 by the Water Quality Division. Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material Land Use Permit 94C1005-1 Page 3 changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. 11. Prior to the construction of any future buildings on the lots approved herein, the Permittee shall submit a design to the District Commission for a wastewater disposal system by a registered engineer or certified site technician which makes best efforts to meet the standards for sewage disposal in Chapter 7 of the Vermont Environmental Protection Rules. 12. The Permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 13. Immediately upon initial roadway clearing grading or excavation a stabilized construction entrance must be installed and maintained as shown on Sheet #SP3 and Sheet EC 1 (Exhibits # 13 and # 14). This entrance must be constructed and maintained in accordance with the specifications as described in the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites (1987). No further clearing or construction beyond station #+00 may occur until the stabilized construction entrance is complete. 14. The Permittee shall comply with Sheets EC 1, EC2 and EC3 (Exhibits # 13, # 14 and # 15) for erosion control. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 15. All mulch, siltation dams, water bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 16. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 17. All disturbed areas of the site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of final grading. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before September 15. Between the periods of September 15 to April 15, no work is authorized. 18. Prior to construction of the approved work, the Permittee shall complete the following: a) construction limits shall be clearly delineated with flagging or snowfencing; b) diversion ditches shall be placed on the uphill limits of the construction area; and c) temporary siltation controls Land Use Permit #4C1005-1 Page 4 shall be placed on the downhill limits of the construction. Immediately following the above, the permanent drainage system and/or roads shall be installed after which normal construction can begin. 19. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 20. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 21. The Permittee shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 22. All stumps shall be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 23. The Permittee shall not erect exterior signage without first obtaining approval from the District Commission. Signage includes banners, flags, and other advertising displays, excepting temporary real estate marketing signs. 24. Should the City at any time agree to accept any private utilities being then operated by the Permittee and/or assigns and successors in interest, the Permittee and/or assigns and successors in interest shall be responsible to improve the same to Town specifications and shall deed all lands involved with said improvements to the City. Such improvements may require a land use permit amendment. 25. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Subdivision Permit, the Land Use Permit Amendment and the Findings of Fact before any written contract of sale is entered into. 26. No further subdivision, alteration, and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 27. The Permittee shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005-1 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 28. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(b) this permit amendment is hereby issued for an indefinite term, as long as there is compliance with the conditions herein. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, this permit shall expire three years from the date of issuance if the Permittee has not commenced construction and made substantial progress toward completion within the three year period in accordance with 10 V.S.A. § 6091(b). Land Use Permit 94C1005-1 Page 5 29. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 9 day of April 2003. By _SW,f )L Myron kheelelr, Acting Chair in this matter District 4 Commission Members participating in this decision: James McNamara The applicant or a party may file a motion to alter within 30 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 31. Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. §6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. WAAct250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C 1005-1\4C 1005-1.PMT EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-1 Page 1 E I DATE I E I A= Applicant X I R I N I T= Town H I E I T I EC = Environmental Conservation I I C ( E 1 RPC = Regional Planning Commission B I E I R I ANR = Agency of Natural Resources I I I I E I AOT = Agency of Transportation T I V I D I DPS = Department of Public Services I E I I VDH = Vermont Department of Health I D I I DP = Division for Historic Preservation WMD = Wastewater Management Division N I I B I 0.1 I I Y I 11 Nature of Exhibit and Date Entered 1 8/20/01 A Cover Letter by David Marshall, Civil Engineering (7/17/01) 2 itProject Overview 3 Act 250 Land Use Permit Application 4 Schedule F - Certificate of Service 5 Act 250 Municipal Impact Questionnaire 6 Schedule A - Fee Information 7 Schedule B - Act 250 Narrative 8 Letter by David Marshall re Stormwater Discharge Permit (7/17/01) 9 Minimum Corner Sight Distances for Principal Arterials 10 Letter by David Marshall re Municipal Impact Questionnaire (7/16/01) 11 Letter by Joe Weith, City of South Burlington (9/8/99) re Enclosed Copy of Findings of Fact & Decision Approved by Development Review Board 8/17/99 12 Letter by David Marshall re Criteria 1, 1(B), 4, 7, 8, 9(A), 9(F), 9(H), 9(J), 10 (7/17/01) 13 Plan: Overall Site Plan Sht. SP3 (7/01) 14 Plan: Overall Site Plan Sht. EC1 (Rev. 10/31/02) 15 Plan: Sediment & Erosion Control Narrative Sht. EC-2 (Rev. 8/16/02) 16 Plan: Erosion Control Details Sht. SP7 (Rev. 9/19/96) 17 8/31 /01 Letter by David Marshall re CUD (8/29/01) 18 " Conditional Use Determination #96-400 (3/11/98) 19 9/25/01 Schedule E - Adjoiner Information EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-1 Page 2 20 7/31/02 64Letter by Vt. Div. for Hist. Pres. re Criterion 8 (7/29/02) 21 4/8/03 it Letter by David Marshall re Discharge Stormwater from a Construction Site Permit (4/4/03) 22 10/23/02 " ANR Entry of Appearance Comments (10/19/01) 23 11/4/02 itLetter by David Marshall re ANR Comments/Entry of Appearance (10/31 /02) 24 Plan: Specifications Sht. EC-3 (8/02) w:4C1055-1.exlist.cc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this I day of April, 2003 a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT #4C1005-1 & SURVEY, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 David S. Marshall, PE Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485, 928 Falls Road Shelburne, VT 05482 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street S. Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Myron Wheeler, Acting Chair/James McNamara 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 1-rnie Christianson, Env. Analyst V ANR, 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 9 day of April, 2003. 1 i '0,8 w:cs4C1005-1/cc hri tine Edmmo, District Office Chief Clerk 879-5670 State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES • '.� T, r~ Department of EnvironmentalConservation Wastewater Management Division Department of Fish and Wildlife Essex Regional Office. Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation 111 West Street Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction, VT 05452 State Geologist Telephone: (802) 879-5656 March 27, 2003 David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Subject: Case #EC-4-2004, PIN EJ96-0381: Summer Ice Joint Venture, LLC — Pump Station, Meadowland Business Park, City of South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Dave: This letter is in response to your letter to me dated January 23, 2003 regarding Condition 47 of Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2003. Condition #7 requested an application, and plans and specifications prepared by a State of Vermont registered professional engineer, for the design of additional storage at the so-called "Lane Press" pump station. This application was to be filed prior to the occupancy of any structure on each lot approved or referenced by Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2004. Summer Ice Joint Venture, LLC filed an application with this office, Case #WW-4-1744, to construct a building on Lot #4 of Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2004. You provided information as part of that application which advised me that the City of South Burlington completed a study of the Lane Press pump station and determined that additional storage was not necessary at this time. This study was forwarded to the State of Vermont for final review and approval. I decided at that time not to require additional storage based on the request of the City of South Burlington and therefore issued Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit #WW-4-1744. Please contact me should there be any questions. Sincerely, n Ernest . Christianson Regional Engineer cc: City of South Burlington Planning Commission Act 250 Environmental Commission #4 State of Vermont ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION 111 West Street *Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 T/ 802.879.5614 • F/ 802.879.3871 http://w-ww.state.vt.us/envboard Memorandum To: District Commissioners and Statutory Parties From: Peter E. Keibel, District #4 Coordinator Date: March 21, 2003 Re: Meadowland Industrial Park 4C 1005-A The Applicant has revised several of the approved site plans and has revised three ANR permits. These revisions are not material or substantial changes and would normally be incorporated via an Administrative Amendment to the original permit. However, since the Applicant has currently proposed amending the permit, Condition #23, we are including the incorporation of the revised site plans and ANR permits as part of this amendment. However, we are not including copies of the revised permits and plans with each distributed application. This has been done to eliminate the waste of reams of paper. Copies of the permits and plans for this project are available for review at the Essex Junction Offices. Thank you • • The Burlington Free Press Saturday, October 4 2003 .eesa Notice Legal Notices Legal Notices Legal Notices Leda Notices Personas I"M royment FT En 10Box 698 1994 approval. The sub- October 21, 2003, at Park District to subdivide XVIII) of the Social Se- RESORT VACATION AUTO TECHNICIAN Cu, ;olchester,VT05446 ject property is located'7:30 P.M. to consider 67.4 acres of land into curity Act), effective Oc- 8 days/ 7 nights. You on 48 Rathe Rd, Tax the following: two (2) lots, 20.1 acres tober 3, 2003. The pick from 100s of resorts Village Mobil in Shel- )ctober 4, 11, 2003 Map 3, Parcel 23. 1. Final plat appli- to be conveyed to the agreement between worldwide. (up to 6 burne has an immediate cation #SD-03-65 of Ve- to be National Guard HEALTHSOUTH Sports people) : $2,100 value, opening for a FT Techni- PUBLIC NEARING Copies of the application rizon New England, Inc. Ave. Medicine and Rehabilita- sacrifice for $900. (best cian. Must be a self mo- are available for anon tion Center -and the Be- offer), (802) tivated individual who COLCHESTER p to amend a previously cretary of Health and enjoys communicating DEVELOPMENT inspection at the Plan- approved 12 lot subdivi- Copies of the applica- Human Services will be TICKETS (2): Train at St. wit hh the public. Comput- REVIEW BOARD ning & Zoning Office in sion. The amendment tions are available for terminated on October 3, Michael's College on.er diagnostic skills and the Colchester Municipal consists of installing public inspection at the 2003 from the Medicare 10/9/03. Asking- face va- ASE certification pre - Road. to Title 24 Offices, 835 Blakely three (3) telecommunica- South Burlington City Hal. Program in accordance lue, $25 `each. Call (802) ferred, but not neces- .S.A., Chapter 117, the Road. tions utility cabinets, 271 L with the provisions of the 8995421 P Y P sary: Benefits package .. olchester Development MeadowlandDrive. Social Security Act. TICKETS and healthy salary for eview Board will hold a Development Review 2 Fil IaC a li- John Dinkla a Chairman UVM Men's hockey the right person. We .0 Board naP pp g + The. Medicare program season reserved tickets. have a great clientele p ablic hearing on Wed- cation #SD•03-68 of Ho- South Burlington Deve- will not make payment Call (802) 872-2708 and are looking for a esday, October 22, October4,2003 rizon Heights Condomi- lopment Review Board. for services furnished to great technician. Call )03 at 7:00 p.m. at the nium Association to patients after October 3, UVM HOCKEY TICKETS Dave at 985-2478 or - eating House, Main PUBLIC HEARING amend a previously ap- October 4, 2003 2003 Reserved seats, center send resume to 3038 _ to hear the following SOUTH BURLINGTON proved plan for a 76 unit ice. For BU game Oct. Shelburne R d , S h e I - quest: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Planned Unit Develop- PUBLIC NOTICE FOR Questions concerning 18th. Two tickets, $15 burne, VT05482. Final Plat appli- BOARD ment. The amendment FACILITY CLOSING patient transfers and each. St. -Francis at Sa- tion of Jeff Myers, on consists of an after the medical records should vior on Oct 26. Two BENTLEYS RESTAURANT, e behalf of Lawrence The South Burlington fact approval of one (1) The HEALTHSOUTH be directed to the gusto- tickets $15 each or all 4 Popular Upper Valley802 50. rthe & Estate of Louis Development Review additional unit, Quarry Sports Medicine and Re- dian of patient informa- for $ ( )655-9618 RestaurWaitstaffNeeds& Bide Bar- tion, Cynthia Valuckas at UVM HOCKEY TICKETS, tenders. Join Our Win- ithe, to amend a pre- Board will hold a public Hill Road. habilitation Center locat- 877-658-4353. 2 reserved seats for 8 ously approved 5 lot hearing at the South Bur- 3. Re -approval of ed at 23 San Remo ning Food. Service Team. games this season. Ask- Call 802 457-3232, or / dustrial subdivision. lington City Hall, Confer- preliminary plat applica Drive, Suite 202 in South October 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in g face value. (802) 288- ( ) ie amendment cons- ence Room, 575 Dorset tion #SD-03-31 and final Burlington will no longer 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, t031 Fax Resume To: s of relief from condi- Street, South Burlington, plat application #SD-03- participate in the Medi- 14.15,.2003 (802)457-3238 f n 4 of the October 26, Vermont on Tuesday, 32 of Winooski Valley care Program (Title Elm St. Woodstock VT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR FACILITY CLOSING SIl[EUIIJIILN13 SUPEUMARK13T ' D� i1 The HEALTHSOUTH wce;eais��nWArs�r.£a A ARE YOU Sports Medicine and Re- FT Bookkeeper Lan '•••'• habilitation Center locat- Attention to detail is a Be, ed at 23 San Remo must for this position. if Neet • Drive, Suite 202 in South you love to balance your Give A person who enjoys the ability to Burlington will no longer checkbook down to the 332' participate in the Medt- last penny & you love work independently? care Program (Title XVIII Employment working with people, this of the Social Security may be the job for you. Sl • A hard worker who strives for results? Act), effective October Employment FT Knowledgge of comput- 3, 2003. The Agreement e r s, Q u i c k b o o k s Del b e t w e e n HEALTH- ADMISSIONS CLERK Microsoft Word, & Excel Must • A morning person who would like to start and SOUTH Sports Medicine also a must. Call Sara cust and Rehabilitation Center Position requires excel- 802-985.8520 ext. t1 rest finish our daybut n. y early? Health and Human Ser sbnal skills, some cleri- BRANCH SERVICE vices will be terminated cal and computer skills. ASSOCIATE Receptionist on October 3, 2003 from Medical billing and needed for fast paced �g� `� the Medicare Program in healthcare background a professional business D IF SO THEN VV G HAVE accordance with the pro- plus. Also need RN/LPN office. Computer nt.Benefisskills In visions of the Social Be- Fri/Sat/Sun Eves. Re- important. Benefits ! curity Act. sumes to: include competitive pay, dr THE JOB FOR YOU...... program Maple Conner paid vacation, medical, of The Medicare ro ram Ma IeLeafFarm 401 (K) retirement plan, PE will not make payment PO Box 120 tuition assistance pro- Pr for services furnished to Underhill, VT 05489 gram and more. Send d patients after SOctober. 3, clare@mapleleaf.org resume to UBS Financial r . An antYv level management 2003. Services, Inc. Attn:40 position Os1t10n lri newspaper EOF•/UW Member Agency entryJennifer Bowen, 60 f Question s c c n c e r n i n www,mapieleaf.org Farrell St. suite 400, C circulation. Compensation includes: Salary, monthly patient transfers and So. Burlington, VT05403 medical records should bonuses based on achieving goals and an excellent be directed to orviaemail:tojennifer. the custo- bowers.@ubs.com UGGLER5' [NOTCH dian of patient informa• SMv•E•R•M•0 N T BROADBRAND TECH DEN' benefits package. Must have a valid driver's license Lion, Cynthia Valuckas at Charter Communications Look 877-658-4353. Plattsburg, NY energ' and a reliable motor vehicle with liability insurance. Request for Proposals- AQUATICS DIRECTOR Perform CATvtions, disconncone installs- posjlE Child and Family ects, and (802 Supports Program service changes for resi• DE .DON T DELAY, APPLY TODAY! Strong leadership, dential and business 0 The Department of So- management, guest customers. E-mail/fax i cial and Rehabilitation service and resume & cover letter: Services (SRS), Division communications skills Please specify position & Send cover letter/resume to: of Social Services, is is- are required for year- location to be consi- T i m, t round operation of dered. suing a Request fop Pro- multiple aquatics Amanda Moses p rouF Human Resources Dept. posal(RFP)forChildand practii p facilities in a Resort NE Recruiter Family Supports Program time setting. Will be Fax: 203 426-0499 for the Rutland District ( ) r i candi The Burlington Free Press responsible for safety, Amosest g Office. and 1 hiring, staffing, training, (��achartercom.com. and programming,water AA/EEO Employer 191 College Street RFPavailable onl0/iby i certiti contacting: Linda Moul- quality, pool acilities 9 including filtration CALL CENTER SALES didatE Burlington, W 05401 ton, SRS,103 South systems and financials. REP. Winooski area. Re- dered. Main St., Waterbury VT Experience with OSHA sume to: Snvernet, P0. caring, 05671-2401; Tel: 802- regulations and Aquatics Box 495, Bellow Falls vt team 241-2131; FAX: 802-241- background preferred. 05101 or fax (802) 463- benefit E-mail: bhart@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com 2407;E-mail:lmoulton@ Certifications in 1712 e-mail: resumes• spe if srs.state.vt.us Lifeguard, Lifeguard @sover.net foring. Fax: 802-651-4804 Requests may be sub- Instructor, WSI, and CARPENTER & CAR- coverlE mitted via letter, FAX, or CPO or AFO a plus. P E N T E R' S HELPER, e-mail. Excellent benefits. Need own tools, most of Hu Submit resume including jobs are out-of-state, Ortnhar 3 d R q 9nn9 salary requirements to: NH. Answerina all ralts- —.__.. r State of Vermont 1 LAND USE PERMIT AMENDMENT CASE NO 4C 1005-3 APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS c/o Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 and Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C1005-3, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439-441, of the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the Permittees as Grantees. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 50-foot wide 550-foot long temporary road on the north side of Lot #6 of the Meadowland Commercial Park to utilize material from the adjacent quarry. The project is located on Swift Street Extension in the City of South Burlington The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project involves the construction of improvements for a commercial purpose on more than ten acres and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3) and Environmental Board Rule ("EBR") 2(A)(2), and the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittees, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. Land Use Permit #4C1005-3 Page 2 3. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with: the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet SP3 - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2002, last revision 11/5/02; and "Typical Section Temp[e]rary Access Meadowland Industrial Park," dated October 2002. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process. 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. 7. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A.§§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirm and agree that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This project is for a temporary road only and thus will have no impact on the allocation of trips generated, parking spaces used or water and wastewater allocation by the commercial subdivision 11. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: Subdivision Permit #EC-4-4-2004 issued on November 6, 1996 by the Wastewater Management Division; and • Conditional Use Determination 2001-398 issued on October 1, 2002 by the Water Quality Division. Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material Land Use Permit #4C1005-3 Page 3 changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. 12. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 13. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 14. All mulch, hay bales, siltation dams, water bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Hay bales shall be incorporated four inches into the soil and equipped with filter fence on the upstream side, butted together and all joints filled with loose hay. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 15. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 16. All use of the road must cease by December 15, 2002. By June 1, 2003, all gravel shall be removed, the topsoil replaced and the area seeded with a conservation mix and mulched. 17. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 18. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittees shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 19. The Permittees shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 20. No exterior lights have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment 21. No signs have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment. 22. At the completion of the restoration work, the Permittees shall have a licensed engineer certify by affidavit that the site restoration have been completed in accordance with this permit pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 32(A). Land Use Permit #4C 1005-3 Page 4 23. The Permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 24. All site work, construction and restoration of temporary roadway shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans by June 1, 2003, unless an extension of this date is approved in writing by the Commission. Such requests to extend must be filed prior to the deadline and approval may be granted without public hearing. 25. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of December 2002. By Pat Tivnan, Chair District 4 Commission Members participating in this decision: Ralph Montefusco James McNamara The applicant or a party may file a motion to alter within 30 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 31. Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. §6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. W:\Act250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C 1005-3.PMT EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005-3 Page 1 E I DATE I E I A= Applicant X I R I N I T= Town H I E ( T I EC = Environmental Conservation I I C I E I RPC = Regional Planning Commission B I E I R I ANR = Agency of Natural Resources I I I I E I AOT = Agency of Transportation T I V I D I DPS = Department of Public Services E I I VDH = Vermont Department of Health D I ( DP = Division for Historic Preservation 1 I WMD = Wastewater Management Division N I I B I 0.1 I I Y I 11 Nature of Exhibit and Date Entered 1 11/8/02 A Act 250 Land Use Permit Application 2 Schedule A - Fee Information 3 Schedule B - Act 250 Narrative 4 City of South Burlington Zoning Permit & Findings of Fact & Decision (11/5/02) 5 Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 6 Hydric Soils Map 7 Drawing of Temporary Access (10/02) 8 Municipal Impact Questionnaire 9 Letter by Peter Spear, Natural Resource Consulting Services re Wetland (10/29/02) 10 Plan: Overall Site Plan Drwg. No. SP3 (Rev. 11/5/02) 11 1 1/18/02 Schedule F - Certificate of Service w:4C 1005-3.exlist.cc CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this q day of December, 2002 a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT #4C1005-3, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to. - PARTIES: Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Munson Earth Moving Corp. c/o James Emerson 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Jim Tolley, Interim Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Patricia Tivnan, Acting Chair/Ralph Montefusco/James McNamara 111 West Street I' Essex Junction, VT 05452 Chair, Planning Commission/Chair, Selectboard i Town of Williston 7900 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of December, 2002. w:cs4C1005-3/cc ristine ommo, District Tffice Chief Clerk 879-5670 C 11 /5/02 MOTION OF APPROVAL Munson Earth Moving, 1150 Hinesburg Road I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-02-71 of Munson Earth Moving to construct a temporary access road across lot #6 (140 Bowdoin Street) of the Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road., as depicted on a plan entitled, "Meadowlands Industrial Park Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 11/2001 with a stamped received date of 10/10/02, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The plans shall be revised to note that the road will cease to be used by 12/15/02 and the topsoil be replaced and the disturbed area seeded by 6/l/03. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4) The temporary road shall be constructed with a minimum of an 8" gravel base. 5) Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION #4C1005-3 and 4CO949-1 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 Notice is hereby given that on November 8, 2002, an application was filed by Summer Ice Joint Venture, c/o Davis 153 Summit Street, Burlington, VT 05401; Green Acres, Inc., 1269 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403; and Munson Earth Moving Corp., 85 Shunpike Road, Williston, VT 05495, for a project generally described as: Construction of a 50-foot wide temporary road on the north side of Lot #6 of the Meadowland Commercial Park to the west side of the Green Acres quarry to utilize material from adjacent quarry for the construction of roads at the commercial park. The project is located between Swift Street Extension and South Brownell Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont The District 4 Environmental Commission will treat this application under Environmental Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications. A proposed permit has been prepared by the Commission and is available at the Commission's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested in writing or the Commission holds a hearing on its own motion. The written request for a hearing must state the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what evidence will be presented at the hearing pursuant to Environmental Board Rules 14 and 51(B)(3)(d). No hearing will be convened unless a party submits a written request to the Commission on or before December 3, 2002, or the Commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission shall determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 51(D). Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 14 day of November 2002. By eter E. Keibel Environmental Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5658 E/ peter.keibel@anr.state.vt.us This is a DRAFT permit; please submit any written comments or corrections by to: Peter E. Keibel, District #4 Coordinator, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 AMENDMENT CASE NO 4C 1005-3 APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS c/o Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 and Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C 1005-3, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This permit amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439-441, of the land records of the:City_of`South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the Permittees as ,drantees. This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 50-foot wide temporary road on the north side of Lot #6 of the Meadowland Commercial Park to utilize material from the adjacent quarry. The project is located on Swift Street Extension in the City of South Burlington The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project involves the construction of improvements for commercial purpose on more than ten acres and thus constitutes "development' pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3) and Environmental Board Rule ("EBR") 2(A)(2), and the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development' pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittees, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions 1. " All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. Land Use Permit #4C 1005-3 Page 2 3. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with: the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet SP3 - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July,2002yAast revision 11/5/02; and "Typical Section Temp[e]rary Access Meadowland Industrial Park ," dated October 2002. 5. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be o" the site at all,timeshrououtthe a construction process..,?w 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. 7. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall,provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. 8. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A.§§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirm and agree that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding:.. upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This project is for a temporary road only and thus will have no impact on the allocation of trips generated, parking spaces used or water and wastewater allocation by the commercial subdivision 11. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: • Subdivision Permit #EC-4-4-2004issued on November 6, 1996 by the Wastewater Management Division; and • Conditional Use Determination 2001-398 issued on October 1, 2002 by the Water Quality Division. Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material Land Use Permit #4C1005-3 Page 3 changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. 12. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/oregetation is fully established to control dust.'`. 13. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sedimentbeyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be pcflodieall cleaned, repla6ed and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas "The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings�and site inspections to review eiogiori 'control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respealo erosion control as it d"e`ems necessary. 14. All mulch, hay bales, siltation dams, water bars and' her teiiiporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas ,,,Hay bales shall be incorporated four inches into the soil and equipped with;filter fence on the upstream side, butted together and all joints filled with loose hay. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks aroundthe base. , 15. Grading shall be phased so that all; exposed, earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 16. All use of the road must cease by December,15, 2002. By June 1, 2003, all gravel shall be removed, the topsoil replaced and the area seeded with a conservation mix and mulched. 17. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 18. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittees shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 19. The Permittees shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 20. No exterior lights have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment 21. No signs have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment. 22. At the completion of the restoration work, the Permittees shall have a licensed engineer certify by affidavit that the site restoration have been completed in accordance with this permit pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 32(A). Land Use Permit #4C 1005-3 Page 4 23. The Permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 24. All site work, construction and restoration of temporary roadway shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans by June 1, 2003, unless an extension of this date is approved in writing by the Commission. Such requests to extend must be filed 'or t deadline and approval may be granted without public hearing. A ' 25. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of Dec Members participating in this decision: Ralph Montefusco James McNamara The applicant or a party may file a pursuant t 3 Rule 31. grounds motionoalter within 30 days from the date of this decision, Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. §6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. W AAct250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C 1`005\4C 1005-3.PMT This is a DRAFT permit; please submit any written comments or corrections by to: Peter E. Keibel, District #4 Coordinator, I I I West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 CASE NO 4CO949-1 APPLICANT Green Acres, Inc. ADDRESS 1269 Spear Street South Burlington, and AMENDMENT VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving Corp. 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby i to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 600 identified in Book 425, Pages 90-93, of the land subject of a deed to Green Acres, Inc., the Perm Amendment 4C0949-1, pursuant nendment applies to the lands South Burlington, Vermont, as the This permit specifically authorizes the Permittees to construct a 50-foot wide, 400-foot long temporary road from west side of quarry to the Meadowland Commercial Park to utilize material from the adjacent quarry. The project is located off South Brownell Road in the City of South Burlington. The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project involves the construction of improvements for a commercial purpose on more than ten acres and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3) and Environmental Board Rule ("EBR") 2(A)(2), and the project is a material or substantial change, to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes"development" pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittees, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: 1. All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C0949 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittees agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. Land Use Permit #4C0949-1 Page 2 3. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with: the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and the conditions of this permit. 4. The approved plans are: Sheet SP3 - "Green Acres Quarry Map" dated September 6,1994, last ievisio&t 1/5/02; and Wye 3 "Typical Section Temp[e]rary Access Meadowland Industrial Park,",dated October 2002. 5. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throughout the construction process.. 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this projectwithout the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate under the Environmental Board Rules. 7. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and, material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. 8. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A.§§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittees confirm and agree that the conditions of this,permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittees and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This project is for, a temporary road only and thus will have no impact on the allocation of trips generated, parking spaces used or water and wastewater allocation by the commercial subdivision 11. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following Agency of Natural Resources Permits: • Conditional Use Determination 1993-099 issued by the Water Quality Division. Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. Land Use Permit #4C0949-1 Page 3 12. The Permittees shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. w�x 13. The Permittees shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. All erosion control devices shall be periodicallO�eaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes az A disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and `site. inspectioi s to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions withrespect to erosion 660tr`ol as it deems - necessary. , 14. All mulch, hay bales, siltation dams, water bars and othertetrporary devices shall be installed immediately upon grading and shall be maintained until alhroads are permanently surfaced and all permanent vegetation is established on all slopes and disturbed areas. Hay bales shall be incorporated four inches into the soil and equipped with f ltex fence on the upstream side, butted together and all joints filled with loose hay. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the exposed earth completely mulched and have siltation checks around the base. 15. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 16. All use of the road must cease by December 15, 2002. By June 1, 2003, all gravel shall be removed, the topsoil replaced,and the area'seeded with a conservation mix and mulched. 17. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on the site at all times during construction. 18. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittees shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittees from compliance with 10 V.S.A. §§ 1250-1284, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 19. The Permittees shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed, naturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 20." No exterior lights have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment 2L' No signs have been proposed or approved by this permit amendment. 22. At the completion of the restoration work, the Permittees shall have a licensed engineer certify by affidavit that the site restoration have been completed in accordance with this permit pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 32(A). 23. The Permittees shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C0949 in all deeds of conveyance and leases. Land Use Permit #4C0949-1 Page 4 24. 25 All site work, construction and restoration of temporary roadway shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans by June 1, 2003, unless an extension of this date is approved in writing by the Commission. Such requests to extend must be filed prior to the deadline and approval may be granted without public hearing. Failure to comply with all of the above co to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this Members participating in this decision: Ralph Montefusco James McNamara da LOS The applicant or a party may mile a motic pursuant to Environmental Board Rule'31. Any,, 10 V.S.A. §6089 and Environmental, Board Rule of the following: notice of appeal, a statement o1 a statement of the issues to be addressed in the'a'. a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. nt alter within 30 days from the date of this decision, ,al of this'decision must comply with all provisions of includirig the submission of the original and ten copies y the'appellant believes the commission was in error, ►peal,''a summary of the evidence that will be presented, Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this ' day of November, 2002 a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 MINOR NOTICE APP (CATION #4C0949-1 & #4C1005-3, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: Munson Earth Moving Corp. c/o James Emerson 85 Shunpike Road Williston, VT 05495 Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 Green Acres, Inc. 1269 Spear Street S. Burlington, VT 05403 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Jim Tolley, Interim Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Patricia Tivnan, Acting Chair/Ralph Montefusco/James McNamara 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 District Conservationist/USDA/Soils Conservation Service 18 Blair Park Road #207 Williston, VT 05495-9406 Y Ij Page 2/COS/#4C0949-1/#4C1005-3 FOR YOUR INFORMATION (Con't) Tom Bushey, District Supervisor, N.R.C.D. 48 Bushey Road Shelburne, VT 05482 County Forester/Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 John M. Austin/ANR, Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 Burlington Free Press/Classified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Christopher Owen/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Michael Russom/Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 Michael Pologruto, Technical Services/VTrans National Life Building, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 Marian White, Policy Analyst/Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 Dan Gaherty/Efficiency Vermont 255 South Champlain Street Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Barsotti, Water Quality Director Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Page 3/COS/#4C0949-1 & #4C1005-3 FOR YOUR INFORMATION (Con't) Chair, Planning Commission/Chair, Selectboard Town of Williston 7900 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this ' Y day of November, 2002. w:cs4C0949-1/#4C1005-3/cc Christine Commo, Di7trict Office Chief Clerk 879-5670 PUMPNSTATION SANITARY STREET EXTENSION y_ �/NAYO R BURLINGITNJ PROPERTIES l�l SWIFT .1IINIIEQ PARTNER5HTP I STREET • \ CLASS Fl REILAND IMPACF 190 SF \ \ \ F _- $ I 'Alma- \ \ \ CLASS !I/ 8E'2AND IMPACT 1,800 S.F. 12 3,12 \ \ \• A N/F I w .i0x3n 447 AA,I Y 110 1 ASNAIENT L- ASS IGLU wrn AN(j !C`3' \ 667 sr: / s \ j If i ! 7 /• \ 3,22 AO, C -: cLv2, e2usTcAnDN ER f CLUSTER / \ �..ti l % CLASS /ll I J ` SURFACE COLLECYL6V 13 _ 1 i , \ „ .. - :: Y TEST PIT I, BA.3 I ( ✓ .� - ,00.r' lh,\ \ /✓ .... -. I -. ate._. _ \\ \ \\\✓li l Ir ,�FASF INf1AN� try/ I l /✓ •4 V... / /`PASSIBLE LAYOUT (1F fNTERIOR ROI7PADWAYDET'ON I I GLASS /1a HES7ERN LRFNDFN7 O(J'/ l / GLASS IN N£TLANO MPACT (XEARANCE OF 1070 SF -' ARGHAEOL OGICAL AREAS I M felF '1i I l 1. 8.00 Ac.. . / I `,�',•,'','. (�NUII. 5URPA AO AL S FENCING TO F D A N REA R1n1.. I I SIGNS, (K OUF SEN AREA); /L.- SECTOR III 9I1</97 MOUN O FFNC / LOCUS SURFACE COLLECTION I THRU 12 ...SEcIOR /V 9/14197 _^ -j1 I J I ,rl 1�- ` _ 9 n L LG HETLA AREA :AM p1ANNEL N/fII ril EMSBNG 5' CHANNEL i REMND AREA r/ IgAINARD .-vy� -- J CLASS 11F REILAND IMPAC! 2960 SF CLASS 11 WTLAND IMPACT' 5095 SF. CLASS If HFTLAND IMPACT 7218 S. F. SS // WE1LgA/0 IMPACT CLASS I S.F' �0118 S. 1 I h N/F t. �\/\ III N£71.AND IMPACT f. - PR/OR CONVERTED -CUss r. - PRO# / 0yw U39 SF PRIOR WpAe,h1E0-' ayV. GU55 "' 7LAN0 IMPpCj " y'-1 7 SF - PRIOR [WtFn 1ATlJ CLASS NI REILAND /MPACT �J •�;':` _�, :_ 507 S.F. CLASS 1l/ NERAND IMPACT -"l 562 S.F. FUTURE CLASS !n HEILAND IMPACT I (' , S.F CLASS AL 4 (NOI APPLIED FOR /N CORPS ..-_ OF £Nf..EETNNG APPLICATION) 11 TO' PEDESTRIAN FASF.MDES EX/SI11VG HETAND BOVA)ARY I 1 I 1 1 I I GRAPHIC SCALE —_, PLANNING DATA --—` TOTAL AREA : 116.73 ACRES I ft.h - 200 31., SITE ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VF 05482 BD2-WILP 23 FAX "PW2271 amen: cae(Nm $-' „nr DRAWN AWYIACL CF�RWECRRD {lW ApPP/R�OYRD VAV R .0 5 � L THE ROAD AUGNMENT BETWEEN ROUTE 116 AND SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE WAS PERMITTED WHEN LANE PRESS AND DYNA POWER RECEIVED LAND USE APPROVAL AND IS GRANDFATHERED. THERE IS A DEEDED 80 FOOT WOE RIGHT-OF-WAY RECORDED IN VOLUME 200, PAGE 71. 2. HISTORICALLY THE DRAINAGE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS PROPERTY FLOWED NORTHEASTERLY ACROSS LOT 1. A NEW DRAINAGE CHANNEL WAS DUO ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO DIVERT THIS WATER AND TO IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE IN THE EXISTING FIELD. THE CITY REQUIRED THE STORMWATER NOT BE REDIRECTED UNTIL A NEW CHANNEL PLAN WAS APPROVED. PRESENTLY BOTH DRAINAGEWAYS TRANSPORT STORM AND GROUND WATER FLOWS. CURRENT PLANS TO RETAIN NORTHEASTERLY CHANNEL ACROSS LOT /1. 3. THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND IS DESIGNATED BY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING SERMCES, 67 WEST SHORE ROAD, GRAND ISLE, VERMON1 05458 (802) 876-4800. TIE LINE IS BASED ON THE EDGE OF A PRIOR CONVERTED CROPLAND LINE AS DETERMINED BY MR. THOMAS GOULD OF THE USDA SOB. CONSERVATION SERVICE ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 PER A LETTER TO PETER SPEARS OF NRCS. NOTE: - NO IMPACT BEYOND THOSE SQUARE FOOTAGES AND LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. USCOE JURISDICTION AREA IMPACT LOT 1 CONNECVR 2960 5095 7 1B0 ISO �RUI�IR(/� � OSSING +�� 1_Q,�yp/y� PC /� O ���95 - LOT 307 250 LOT 5 - PC 11,100-PC LOT 8 - SEWEER-`� 952 LOT lip • 2188 - PC NON PRIOR CONVERTED IMPACTS 31366 PRIOR CONVERTED IMPACTS 3300 / // _L�NIl— •a STREET LIGHT HYDRANT m SEWER MANHOLE O CATCH BASIN -- -- -- SEWER MAIN WATER MAIN -- - -o - - - - STORM DRMNGE MAIN ^ , BUILDING ENVELOPE ,. ?! :•};•y; ; ;{ WEI AND AREA ••� ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREA TO BE PROTECTED BY fENCE PROJECT: INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont OWNER & APPLICANT SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 153 SUMMIT STREET BURLINGTON, VT05401 DATR I CIMXBD I RITMION I I1-02-02 OSM/ACL IREVISID RETLAND BWACT AREAS 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN DD�Ai�F/R�\��� ,A�S��y�/y�4F DM♦R16 M1YDP.R WYV, 20DI r - zar SP3A rno.T. No. USCOE ottn 11 TO' PEDESTRIAN FASF.MDES EX/SI11VG HETAND BOVA)ARY I 1 I 1 1 I I GRAPHIC SCALE —_, PLANNING DATA --—` TOTAL AREA : 116.73 ACRES I ft.h - 200 31., SITE ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VF 05482 BD2-WILP 23 FAX "PW2271 amen: cae(Nm $-' „nr DRAWN AWYIACL CF�RWECRRD {lW ApPP/R�OYRD VAV R .0 5 � L THE ROAD AUGNMENT BETWEEN ROUTE 116 AND SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE WAS PERMITTED WHEN LANE PRESS AND DYNA POWER RECEIVED LAND USE APPROVAL AND IS GRANDFATHERED. THERE IS A DEEDED 80 FOOT WOE RIGHT-OF-WAY RECORDED IN VOLUME 200, PAGE 71. 2. HISTORICALLY THE DRAINAGE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS PROPERTY FLOWED NORTHEASTERLY ACROSS LOT 1. A NEW DRAINAGE CHANNEL WAS DUO ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO DIVERT THIS WATER AND TO IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE IN THE EXISTING FIELD. THE CITY REQUIRED THE STORMWATER NOT BE REDIRECTED UNTIL A NEW CHANNEL PLAN WAS APPROVED. PRESENTLY BOTH DRAINAGEWAYS TRANSPORT STORM AND GROUND WATER FLOWS. CURRENT PLANS TO RETAIN NORTHEASTERLY CHANNEL ACROSS LOT /1. 3. THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND IS DESIGNATED BY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING SERMCES, 67 WEST SHORE ROAD, GRAND ISLE, VERMON1 05458 (802) 876-4800. TIE LINE IS BASED ON THE EDGE OF A PRIOR CONVERTED CROPLAND LINE AS DETERMINED BY MR. THOMAS GOULD OF THE USDA SOB. CONSERVATION SERVICE ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 PER A LETTER TO PETER SPEARS OF NRCS. NOTE: - NO IMPACT BEYOND THOSE SQUARE FOOTAGES AND LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. USCOE JURISDICTION AREA IMPACT LOT 1 CONNECVR 2960 5095 7 1B0 ISO �RUI�IR(/� � OSSING +�� 1_Q,�yp/y� PC /� O ���95 - LOT 307 250 LOT 5 - PC 11,100-PC LOT 8 - SEWEER-`� 952 LOT lip • 2188 - PC NON PRIOR CONVERTED IMPACTS 31366 PRIOR CONVERTED IMPACTS 3300 / // _L�NIl— •a STREET LIGHT HYDRANT m SEWER MANHOLE O CATCH BASIN -- -- -- SEWER MAIN WATER MAIN -- - -o - - - - STORM DRMNGE MAIN ^ , BUILDING ENVELOPE ,. ?! :•};•y; ; ;{ WEI AND AREA ••� ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREA TO BE PROTECTED BY fENCE PROJECT: INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont OWNER & APPLICANT SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 153 SUMMIT STREET BURLINGTON, VT05401 DATR I CIMXBD I RITMION I I1-02-02 OSM/ACL IREVISID RETLAND BWACT AREAS 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN DD�Ai�F/R�\��� ,A�S��y�/y�4F DM♦R16 M1YDP.R WYV, 20DI r - zar SP3A rno.T. No. USCOE ottn I CI I IN P.;R. I �I GRAPHIC SCALE .. _.._ ( IN FEET r � E III J 1 I 1 � I L• 0�.. PLANNING DA'(A ...._L€&SNP STINET LIGHT g N,ONANT w SEWER MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN _,.... - •--.. — SEWER MAN — -- — -R— — — — WATER MAIN — — — — a — — — — STORM DRNNGE MAIN CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICTWE.A NEnAND Preon-cnoN AREA SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P 0. 50%465 SNFLOURNE, VT 06482 W(A-�Avec)313 FA%: RM.RR622)1 smeN: r,Rg®lupetlmr. I,I DRAWN AWY CHECKED cem APPRCM SA` PROJECT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont _,_.QIyKER & APPJ.LGBdL SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 153 SUMMIT STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (;ON TI'IJC F10N 1 1 AI'I July 182O0I , I BATE I CHWCWRB I RIVTBIDN I OVERALL SITE PLAN VATR DMWINC NUMBER DULY, 2001 S r- 1 200' -J. N0. ow - --- ----- -- LEGEND MONI"rORING WELL ' Z PIEZOMETER , WETLANDS PREDICTED DRAWDOWN WATER x TABLE CONTOUR(ELEV. 357 Note: Wetland bounds is approximate t t boundaryisestimated and has not been formally �- �\`--_•, " �. , • � �'' , } \ � �- delineated. Wetland boundary is estima(ed sing field reconnaissance r - (, r � \� "'-�-�_ �_^_._.,:� ��) \ `.� ��,,`�� i , # 1 \ � `-•. ` observations, global positioning system GPS) reference points, mapped )10 topographical features, and SCS sails mapping. A jurisdictional delineation based on soils, hydrology, and vegetation would be necessary to more \ accurately determine the wetland boundary position. The areas to the east ,1 � _ � ; �.� I , .. � ~'� ` \ '�•�, of Muddy Brook and at the southern portion of the drawing have not . been evaluated in the field I --------------- (�tlA2RY �• e� � p---}.�. ,� � �",C l;,t t I ' i � � `� I �, ~ _ �` � � �;.� t It !r, �J i , 1 j• � °' i I ill I �"i�. .� i , � / / ( \ { � �fy ��, t ,.,' ! 1 ! � 1. .J � > .-'•; � i nr7 ��sTgni' f I 1 � I �� i .-. / ? :' (� r ' i'• � i' I \ -� � r°" tit"- , n f •_ , / f � I �.mf � 4� rw �. o : " ,, , I ! t� I ,' /. ! / f,r /...,-,V II �J �1 ,; r •�. 'I� I �; - ... �'�� �\t�V�1\.I ;�'+�A I 1 ��'' - `R... r ( \ 4 % / ! f l /I j ' r J !) ' (/ EA: \,�Z,,' "Yf;r„+ \ •�, � f It �' , /r /; �. \ � \ \ r Ii, ? I (` i !l arsB � L •'t 1.__. �..,�iSi. ,�- - _. � 1 i i f r 1�Iai�i.' d} " },, I "/ � / P21 'Z / \ •� \ •.� \ ) I I I , f/ !�� I�� :I,t `•� '�, \`-.-��\.�' i r ! /� 7 ��.� J • '�.` '1, �. / IfI� r r Is(�: /..,11 i \"j \•� r r j' t 4i,_ �,r' t}6CAr PPLr.. }y .. '00 r 13�'.,F•., •� nw _. ,, ,\ ! i \.. i �, 1.1 I �. 1 `��I '� 1 ', ,',\\ �1 iV ill 4u `MAP MAPGTN,. ram, �,; ' t . (. l/ h f y c a rl• , /� � 1 / 'r' / /+ % \ IP I+rlll I `t !I i '/� / /•• t ]� �0:; f t\�' .•?�f i ( ,,, I I,� ..1( 4" - --. I �,, \( 1, H. -_ . y - � I Illtl I 01 l , , 7 j ' I ` __ � I i- r / �'•` ,.,tit 1, i t � � i � j;,i/ _. fl y; >; r f ! i 1 , ` -... y f r �.�.. .. ,,i •� ' ! ,'� / / �i'If!r ��''�. `-V'S�•/.\ti ://l i/� ``"�. _; .. ..... -_._ ._._.._ /it.. _ -_ ....-.-�:-,1� i 11 J ORIGINAL MAP DRAWN BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, WILLISTON, VERMONT DRAWING #1 GREEN_ ACRES_ QUARRY IVILLI STON, VVITMONT SITE PLAN Wn ner Heinde& and Noves. Inc. cBNsuLnNc saENirsts auB OWNEERS __ - • rdppgwkpy � Ecnb9y • EmBp 6-VR, E*G0T0 drq P.U. BOX 1829 BURLINCiON, VFRMON7 05402 _ ._. _. - EXISTING CONTOUR — 336 PROPOSED CONTOUR - - — PROPERTY LINE J IRON PIN TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS D CONIC. MON. CONCRETE PAVEMENT GRAVITY SEWER LINE BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS-7 CONCRETE PAVEMENT .I FORCE MAIN 1/2" R. 6' 1/4" R. WATER LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 7- - . 11f _. UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 18 --. I -..- ___ TELEPHONE LINE TO000^o^ ^o^o^o^ o a- 'o°<CRUSHEO GRAVEL BASE'. o r♦ �"�"• o"o"o"o o ��� GAS LINE GRAVEL " ---- SEWER MANHOLE SUBBASE MATERIAL MIN. STORM MANHOLE „ HYDRANT TED IN 10' SECTIONS 1' WITH /8- BETTWWEEEN JOONT SECTIONS. ' SHUT-OFF 2. CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED - EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL -'-. POWER POLE CONFORMINGTO A TO M-153 (1/2" DESIGNATION SPONGE T4 CATCH BASIN LIGHT POLE CURB DETAIL DECIDUOUS TREE N.T.S. CONIFEROUS TREE w rYvwv CONIFEROUS TREE --" - - FENCE +-- DRAINAGE SWALE CAST IRON H-20 RATED GRATE ADAPTORS AVAILABLE 4' THRU 18' o DRAINAREA a 98.7 SQ. INCH GRATE HAS H-ZO (HEAVY TRAFFIC) I 4212012120110p❑ DOT RATING ❑ QUALITY: MA1tT8 SHALL Opp Opp CONFORM TO ASTM A48 - CLASS 308 Opp Opp pp 00 PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED 18" INLINE DRAIN 1WTH A 19L ACK PAINT CAST IRON GRATE GRATE COVER IS REVERSIBLE; ONE SIDE STICKS OUT LIKE IS SHOWNNTHE RIGHT. ONE SIDE IS FLUSH LIKE IS SHOWN ON THE LEFT. tN,T RISER 18" HDPE U, STORM DRAIN 18" CAST IRON GRATE TEE DRAW BASIN AND NUNE DRAIN BY NYLOPLAST USA, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL INLINE DRAIN SECTION YARD DRAIN DETAILS N.T,S. SAWCUT EDGE AND APPLY BITUMINOUS TACK COAT ON VERTICAL SURFACE - - `4j0•. - _ - MN9fi0N CURB DURABLE 4" WHITE LINE DURABLE DOUBLE 4" YELLOW CENTERLINE: DURABLE K j �w r 30""� MARKINGS7� �R STOP SIGN (20-30' OFF 50' EXISTING 30 P 6' FROM EDGEMOF SHOULDER) (MIN.) so' 8' TO 24" DURABLE GROUND STOP BAR 1 20' L� - - - -- - - - EXISTING EDGE J CUT EDGE OF EXISTING OF PAVEMENT PAVEMENT Bf.CK A MINIMUM OF 1 FT. CLEAN AND COAT WITH EMULSION PRIOR TO PAVING NOTE: PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND STOP SIGN TO MEET STATE STANDARDS E-120, E-121, E-143, E-1f1, E-192, AND E-193 INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAILS N.T.S. EXISTING EDGE F PAVEMENT l 23' TURNOUT NEW 18" HOPE AT MAIL BOX NV.- 41A50 TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION WITHOUT BITUMINOUS CONCRETE ICJ I pHm NEW 18' HOPE 413.8 ... _ �_4 «- •- � �pO�TE NIN yyAAIILL— USE PORTRSTµDARDB�X I cT SITE DETAIL PLAN SCALE: 1 - 20 T�—oL� \ / VLR.MONT ROUTE 116 I _ _ „ -G-- -- WATER AIN— -- ALL PAVEMENT MARKING WORK IN 2002 SpNO 12?..DI _ �� � i TO BE TEMPORARY PAINT WITH PERMANENT -c- -- R€.— _ •:, .i.�"' cMP Tre-s0 - -- .- _ e WHITE DOTTED LINES (TYP.) DURABLE MARKINGS TO BE INSTALLED IN zoo3. 2' STOP BAR (TYP) —-.410-- - - 4" WHITE LINES (TYP.) DOUBLE 4" YELLOW LINES (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB PROPOSED STREET LIGHT PROPOSED MODULIR TERMINATING CABINET (MTC) FINAL LOCATION T? BE DETERMINED BY GMP y_O• EXISTING EXISTING GROUND --� - SIGN 0 1 i II t11Y � I t ;: I I `-4' CH ALALL, LOAM SEED AND U6 - MIN. MULCH L DISTURBED AREAS 1 NOTE: 'I �. II' EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT I I DITCHES W/PROFILE GRADES STRIPING NA, GRINDING EXCEEDING 5X STAPLE AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. TYPICAL ROADSIDE DITCH N.T.S. 00,_ I � r zG. a , I 11 BBf 1 I%2° PVC sz Z x r� I tat- \\\ x 1 \\ A_ 4' 4• BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 1 1/2• TYPE IV FINISH COURSE 2 1/2• TYPE III BASE COURSE SEE TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION e• wuslEn Tw.oeTA (rNE) 14 °RAKE BASE lMW A _-COMPACTED SUBGRADE-` FILTER FABRIC OR 8" SAND CUSHION TYPICAL PAVEMENT EXTENSION SECTION N.T.S. 2' MIN. WIDTH FOR FIRST DIAGONAL r TRAFFIC FLOW 8" YELLOW LINE � TAPER LENGTH I I TOP OF CURB (SEE PLAN FOR TYPE OF CURB) END TRANSITION SLOPE71 BEGIN TRANSITION FACE OF SLOPE CURB ( '1 flNISHED GRADE OF ROAD PAVEMENT TRANSITION CURB N.T.S. CONSERVATION SEED WX RURAL AREA -SEED MIXTURE X wt. kg/HECTARE NAME PURR GERM% AS PER PLAN 38.0 25 CREEPING RED FESCUE 98 85 38.0 25 TALL FESCUE 95 90 4.5 3 RED TOP 95 90 15.0 10 BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL 98 85 4.5 3 ANNUAL RYEGRASS 95 85 SITE ENGINEER: C E CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 90¢-9867927 FAX 804-98b2271 s-mdt c9e @0getlrer.nelEDMW AWY caBceD APPROYXD 8AV . F05`OI IAL gN �. j1"•. PROJECT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road SO. HllrllrigtOA Vermont OCT 14 UTILITIES DATX CHBCXRD RIiYLNION 1't. 116/S1\t1 1 ST. ice/\1. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT PLAN DATK I DrutrlNr, OCT, 1NDMBER 002 4' YELLOW LINE MEXrwow V2M E 80 020-1 ROAD WOW 500 ..--.—.-V•�. 500, @O WOIK ❑ ® ,, 1 ROAD WORK SOY WR OTC E0 ROAD WOW G20-2A -1x2 AHEAD FAMD j'"1� NEXT t/2 MRE 1 I 1 W —1x2 ROAD � G20-1 I - ROAD WdK 1�WORK AHEAD - x2 WOIB( W2 -,x2 - END RDAD WOW G20-2A _ SITE ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. P.O. BOX 488 SHELBURNE, VY 064a2 8M4*2328 FAX 802-8862271 —.0 cee(g"dww DRAWN Awi 0 CWKED 2�p�� No. so DW APPROVED s�e�EnMAL CaO,� 8AV SAND DRUMS (TW.) �—� 10' DSPACING DRUM � YIiP \74� G20-1 - - LOCATION MAP ..--- — — fl _ SCALE: , t PROJECT: M,A xox I 9 1 XL- MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL -„,_ PARK _ SAND DRUMS (TYP - - ROACaW01K lPACExO•' .-C'-�'".w -e — - — ---"" -- �6 G20-2A MAN "�U -- •b•". HISTING 77' D WATER ..:.V 211-.10 �� E pP v; rn . Hinesburg Road „• Mom 1 _ .___,_—_ "'� �--__ -.. So. Burlington Vermont 31' MAPLE I 'W �R�1'JyM � SIGN x6• M,LL01V raeDwa« 2111.( 1 ypy ,. , NEKt V2 NEE ► ` � \ AM -- ALL SIGNS PER VAOT STANDARDS I(A •ALL SIGNS TO 8E MOUNTED 0 T i } HIGH & 6' OFF EDGE OF ROAD t 1 1 II I I z EA1 / '.I: FIN" 3 H� - O , I�, gb£-- -" "�- '' �'� I .4 - 86£ DATE CHECEED REVISION 96£ 1 9fiF I 9 I _ A I \ 1 1 RT.116/SWIFT ST. EXT \\ ry1 m INTERSECTION ,~ IMPROVEMENT PLAN 4/ UATE DRA![NC NUNDER ( II OCT, 2002 1 I NOTES 1, ONLY LIGHTWEIGHT MAILBOXES MADE OF LIGHT SHEET METAL OR PLASTIC SHALL BE USED, MAILBOXES SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS AND APPROVAL OF THE U,S, POSTAL SERVICE, 2, AN ALTERNATE MAILBOX SUPPORT STRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MAY BE USED AS LONG AS PROVEN CRASHWORTHY AND MEETS GUIDELINES AS SET OUT IN AASHTO'S "GUIDE FOR ERECTING MAILBOXES ON HIGHWAYS". SUPPORT STRUCTURE SHALL ALSO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF THE US, POSTAL SERVICE, 3, MAILBOX TURNOUT SHALL MEET B-17 STANDARD AS SET OUT IN "STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION", 4.. IF THE STANDARD TURNOUT OFFSET CANNOT BE ATTAINED DUE TO RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRAINTS OR OTHER REASONS THE TURNOUT SHALL BE MODIFIED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 3/8 " - 16 x 3/4 " HEX BOLT, 2 -WASHERS, 1-LOCKWASHER, 1 -NUT d=---m----= m 08 - 32 x 3/4 " I I PLATFORM SLOTTED ROUND ® 4EAD BOLT I I ,STOVE BOLT ) BRACKET ?-WASHERS, I-LOCKWASHER, i-NUT 3/8 " - 16 x 4 1/2 iEX BOLT, 2 -WASHERS, WOODEN POST -LOCKWASHER & 1 -NUT EDGE OF SHOULDER 8'-O" OFFSET AND/OR TURNOUT FROM EDGE OF 8 - 12 SEE STANDARD B-17 1,,1, 1,1 FOR TURNOUT DETAILS 4" x 4", OR 4 1/2 " DIA. WOOD POST. POST SHALL BE GIVEN A PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT, 24" MAX, DEPTH TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE GRANULAR MATERIAL. SUPPORT POST SHALL NOT BE SET IN CONCRETE ViM, 1 1/2 " TO 2" O.D. STANDARD STEEL OR ALUMINUM PIPE. 2 LB.PER FOOT FLANGED CHANNEL STEEL POST z Q 8'-12' MAY BE USED, cu cc 24" MAX, DEPTH. TO BE BACKFILLED WITH SUITABLE GRANULAR MATERIAL, ANTI -TWIST DEVICE SUPPORT POST SHALL NOT BE SET IN TO BE USED WITH CONCRETE. POST SHALL NOT BE FITTED METAL POST, DEVICE WITH ANCHOR PLATE SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 10 BELOW 121, GROUND LINE, DIA, REVISIONS AND CORRECTII7NS AUGUST 7, 1995 ORIGINAL APPROVAL APPROVED DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING DESIGN ENGINEER 7" 1/8 " THICK 0 0- 2 112 " 1/2 " 4 1/2 " -L — — - Oj I j� —� \-7/16 " DIA, 1 5/11 "5/16 " ( 4 - HOLES ) ANTI -TWIST DEVICE DETAIL FOR METAL PIPE ANTI -TWIST DEVICE NEEDED WITH PIPE SUPPORTS —NOMINAL 2 3/8 " MUFFLER CLAMP NOMINAL 2 3/8 " MUFFLER CLAMP ANTI -TWIST DEVICE ASSEMBLY FOR METAL PIPES ( USED 4OR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS ) 7/16 " x 1 I 1/4 " 2 3/42"3/4 " 4 SLOTS � 1/2 „ — 3/16Rj " 12'-6" -- - F 1" 1/ r 1 3/16 ' a w —MAILBOX 6" --1— —Ob O O- 3 a I p l A 25' TURNOUT 3 -r= 1/16 AT MAILBOX + h� Y o 7/16 " x 1 U,2 1 3/16 7/8 " 12'-6" 4 SLOTS w 1/4 „ x q 6 SLOTS f 5—� 1/2 " MAILBOX � � —T o r 3/4 " 1/16 c� TURNOUT AT MAILBOX NOT NECESSARY IF SHOULDER WIDTH BEND LINE -� \�— 1/16 " DIA IS 8'-0" OR GREATER, 4 HOLES SINGLE MAILBOX SUPPORT PLATFORM AND BRACKET DETAIL FOR METAL OR WOOD POSTS ( USED FOR SINGLE AND MULTIPLE BOXES ) 15" 1 7 1/2 " ALL SLOTS — 7/16 " x 1 1/2 " (F � - - - - - - - /----- 1/2 9 3/16 ' 2 3/4 " 1/16i 0" _ - 0 1 1 3/16 ' 2 3/4 " j I-0—=II D—o 7/16 " DIA g 8 HOLES j z 3" 2 1/4 '\V2 1/4 "3" 1 1/4 ° SHELF FOR TWO BIiXES ANTI -TWIST —\ DEVICE NEEDED W/ PIPE SUPPORTS nn g GROUND LINE 3'-0" (MIN,) III 3'-0" 1"X 6"X 17" BOARD BOLTED ATTACH BOX TO TO SUPPORT w/ (2) BOARD W/ 3 NO, 1/4 " X 5" BOLTS, NUTS 10 X I" SHEET MTL, & WASHERS SCREWS EACH SIDE 5,_0„ 3' 0„ 311/21 '-8 1/2 ' MAIL BOX n j 1 -0 0 4'-0" 3 1/2 " 3'-0" 'in 8 112 " MAIL BOX TREATED WOOD BRACES I (2) 1" X 6" X 2'-6" I �— HALF LAP NOTCHED. JOINT W/ 3/8 " X 4 1/2 " NAILS EACH END BOLT w/ NUT & 2 OPTIONAL BRACE DESIGN BOTH SIDES WASHERS " 4"X4" TREATED 3 1/2 " 3 1/2 r--� TOP OF POST r---t WOOD POST GROUND LINE 1 3/4 ANTI -TWIST DEVICE I - 2"X 6"X 10" 3 1/2 " 3 112 " TREATED BOARD, ° 1 3/ 2- 16d GALVANIZED NAILS v 1'-8 112 ' OR CRUSHED STONE 8 1/2 i 12" BACK OF ARM TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW OF SUPPORT ARM OF POST CANTILEVER TYPE MAILBOX SINGLE SUPPORT NOTE ALL WOOD DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL SIZE 2� 4"X4" TREATED WOOD SUPPORT + 3 - 8d GALVANIZED +� # 8 - 32 x 3/4 " SLOTTED RD. HD, BOLT ( STOVE BOLT ) 2-WASHERS, i-LOCKWASHER, AND 1-NUT SPACING FOR MULTIPLE POST INSTALLATION (APPLIES TO BOTH SINGLE AND MULTIPLE MAILBOX SUPPORTS) MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAIL (SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SUPPORT) SHELF 3/8 " - 16 x 4 1/2 " HEX BOLT 2-WASHERS, 1-LOCKWASHER, AND 1-NUT SHELF I I PLATFORM i I BRACKET BRACKET I ® I - 4" x 4" WOODEN POST 3/8 16 x 4 1/2 "HEX BOLT ® NOMINAL 2" 2-WASHERS, 1-LOCKWASHER, STANDARD PIPE AND I -NUT OR 3" HEX BOLT (2 3/8 " O.D. ) FOR METAL PIPE FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW MULTIPLE MAILBOX SUPPORT STANDARD State of Vermont / Agency of Transportation 1� National Life Building Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT VTfans working05633 5001 to bet You There October 16, 2002 Mark Neagley Summer Ice Joint Venture Neagley & Chase Construction P.O. Box 2283 South Burlington, VT 05407-2283 Subject: South Burlington VTA 16 L.S. 113+60 — 125+10 Dear Mark: Your application for a permit to work within the State's highway right -of way toexcavate, place pavement widening,drainage improvements, utility relocation,curbing and restriping, at the location indicated, has been processed by this office and is enclosed. Please contact the District Transportation #5 Office, to discuss the permit conditions and to arrange for their timely inspection of the work. The telephone number in Essex Junction is (802) 655-1580. Sincerely, Pete Daye Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit Enclosures cc:Town of South Burlington David S. Marshall,P.E., Civil Engineering Assocviates,lnc. Richard Hosking, District Transportation Administrator #5 www.aot.state.vt.us Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer Summer Ice Joint Venture South Burlington Vt.116 L.S. 113+60 — 125+10 October 9, 2002 SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the conditions on the back of the permit, with particular attention given to the Special Conditions listed below. All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached plan dated October 14,2002. Act No. 86 of 1987 (30 VSA Chapter 86) ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone 1-888-344-7233 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, beginning any excavation at any location. Failure to complete all the work, approved under this permit , by the "work completion date" may result in suspension of the permit (by separate correspondence) until the work is completed and approved by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. A copy of this permit, special conditions and plan will be in the possession of the Contractor selected by the Summer Ice Joint Venture while performing the work approved by this permit. The permit holder shall use methods that will minimize tracking of materials onto state highways. If tracking does occur, it will be immediately cleaned up so that traveling conditions and safety of highway users is not jeopardized. A preconstruction meeting must be held prior to the Permit Holder's employees or contractor beginning work to discuss work to be completed. The Permit Holder is required to notify the District Transportation Administrator five (5) working days in advance of such meeting. The Permit Holder is to have a supervisory representative present any time work is being done in or on the State Highway right-of-way. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the District Transportation Administrator or their staff. Page Two In areas to be grass covered, the turf shall be restored by preparing the area and applying the necessary topsoil, limestone, fertilizer, seed, and mulch to the satisfaction of the District Transportation Administrator. All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on all holidays (which shall include the day before and the day following), during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15, without specific, written permission from the District Transportation Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper protections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of eighteen (18) months after final inspection by the District. Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as-builts" with copies provided to both the Utilities Engineer and the District Transportation Administrator. Upon completion of the work by the Permit Holder, a final inspection will be held. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work allowed under this permit. The Permit Holder shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not constructed satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's ex- pense. In the event traffic from this project increases to the point where traffic signals, additional lanes for turning or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The Permit Holder may be required by the Agency to update or provide a traffic study to determine if additional modifications are necessary. Page Three The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of paved shoulder). "Access maintenance" will include, but not be limited to, the surface of the access, the replacement of the culvert, as necessary, the trimming of vegetation, and the removal of snowbanks to provide corner sight distance. The access (drive) will be paved from the edge of paved shoulder to the highway right-of-way. (The District Transportation Administrator may waive this requirement.) It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appropriate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Transportation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transportation Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. Construction will be performed in such a way as to minimize conflicts with normal highway traffic. Uniformed traffic officers or trained flagpersons, shall be provided when two-way traffic cannot be maintained, and at the request of the District Transportation Administrator whenever it is deemed necessary for the protection of the traveling public. The placement, size, shape, and color of all pavement markings will be in accordance with the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Vermont Agency of Transportation Standards. All existing pavement markings that become disturbed or overlaid with pavement shall be replaced with durable markings when weather permits, until such time the temporary markings shall be paint. All costs of this work and materials shall be borne by the Permit Holder. The Contractor must exercise extreme care when working adjacent to existing storm drainage pipes and drop inlets owned by the State. Any damage caused by the Contractor to the storm drainage system must be repaired using new materials meeting Vermont Agency of Transportation specifications. Repairs must be inspected by th Vermont Agency of Transportation for approval. PERMIT ID# f STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PERMIT APPLICATION -tywns/Applicapf5 Narp� Address &Phone No. Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagfey, Neagfey & Chase Construction, P.O. Box 2283, So. Burlington, VT 05407-228- Co -Applicant's Name dam. & Phone No. (if different from above) The location of work (town, highway route, distance to nearest mile marker or intersection & which side) Route 116, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, South of I-89 overpass at Lane Press entrance. a..1 _ci) Description of work to be performed in the highway right-of-way (attach sketch) Excavation and placement of ca- pavement widening, drainage improvements, utility relocation, intersection curbing, and E o restriping. U 0 Property Deed Reference Book: 387 _ Page: 439 (only required for Permit Application for access) M _CL Is a Zoning Permit required? Yes [XI No ❑ If Yes, # No number. M Q' Is an Act 250 permit required? Yes ff] No ❑ - If Yes, # 4C1005 FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Town 5" 6041 23uRL1,4J6T0A1 Route V . 116 Mile Marker 2. /S — 2. 37 Log Station_ /13+<no - /2-5-4-16 Other permit(s) required? Yes X❑ No ❑ - If Yes, name and # of each Air Pollution Permit AP-90-0526 Date applicant expects work to begin October 15 20 02 Owner/Appli ant_ Summer ce Jo' t Venture - Mark Nea_gley, Partner Signature _ Date - -7 ZOO -- Co -Applicant Signature Date PERMIT APPROVAL This covers only the work described below: Excavation and placement of pavement widening, drainage improvements, utility relocation,intersection curbing,restriping. The work is subject to the restrictions and conditions on the reverse page, plus the Special Conditions stated on the attached page(s). Date work is to be completed By 0, / 2� al, Authorized Repre ntative for Secretary of Tra sportation June 1 2003 Issued Date October 16, 2002 rp NOTICE: This permit covers only the Vermont Agency of Transportation's jurisdiction over this highway under Title 19 Section 1111 VSA. It does not release the petitioner from the requirements of any other statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS No work shall be done under this permit until the owner/applicant has contacted the District Transportation Office at: (802)655-1580 TA 210 10/2000 (All previously dated editions are not valid) CONSERVATION h , V L OPEN SPACE DISTRICTNIF i SURL)IOTON PROPERTIES I ( 1 +, '/ 1� . • > 1 1 WNTED PARTNERSHIP 21` r I �f PAINTER WILES I , r y l( O ` -- 6 \ r J 5/146.6AC. 4 AND ib NIFI �' IJ IM1 STREET EXT / I -DISTRICT L roN SOUTHEAST QUADRANT N/,r Ro DISTRICT N/F DUBOIS i WTT Cr fLoco !. INDUSTRIAL •p SOUTHEASTEmiy�l�� • . •' � g PLANS FOR THIS PROJECT BY TRUDELL CONSULTING H F L ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES "DEL IESE PLANS TO PROVIDE _---- >TRUCTION LEVEL INFORMATION ISTRUCT ABILITY WITHIN OF THE SITE. AEUiAAIS ........... ... ............ ... ......... . ............ . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. ,7 ' I I IIC l� 11 WETLAND IMPACT 7278 S.F. CLASS // KETLAND IMPACT 962 S.F. . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . ...... ... .... .. ... ..... .... :::' ... ..... ..... ........ ....... .. ..... ....... .... .. .... ...... ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREAS - FENCING TO BE PLACED AROUND'AREA WITH SIGNS, (KEEP OUT, SENSIT7Vf AREA), MOUNTED ON FENCE. CLASS /// WETLAND IMPACT 2155 S.F. - PRIOR CONVERTED ....... .... V., ..... .............. ....... .......... ... .......... ....................... .................. .................. ............... ............... * ..... ................... ....... I ............ 'QT N -'- ANQ FA P Rl OR. .......... ........................... ............. .. ... ....... ..... .......... ... ..... ... ............... ........... .............. . w �N711 V0 NUR w ammi - ------ CLASS /// WETLAND IMPACT 307 S.F. 7� -CLASS I// WETLAND IMPACT 562 S.F. fFLf7VRE CLASS /I/ WETLAND IMPACT 2239 S. F. (NOT APPLIED FOR IN CORPS OF ENGINEERING APPLICATION) �naOf 1*1 Igo F. Z-1Z k�.z ........ ... ... e� [A/ �(1 .... ..... ... '.• : � CLASS 0WERAND IMPACT CLASS N WETLAND /AIPAC]r • ' •962 S.F. 7188 S.f. PRIOR CONVERTED _ ................. • Jpj :�� '� '� '��: •':•:�:•'•: � � L. � �ss��i�: ii�'rt�ii�oo�:ni��cr.-.:•::•:::_:.. Ld Ld OWN ii.ATYP.':T-,.*.*.,-*. CLASS CLAD. 562 FU 22. :........4: (N( OF .. ::. SWlFT�$ SET EXT._... 7ES7RU► r :::::::::::::::: r. 1.•. ...... •r ::� "` • 2�..PE�ES7RlltN:•. �� A T y-. ew . %r ay 1 T �: ::::i •::•:•::•:•:•:•. •:::•: :•:::•:':• X::.� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 6, 2002 John Jaeger South Burlington Realty PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05407 Re: Final plat and site plan approval for Munson Earth Moving, Hinesburg Road, and Design Review approval for South Burlington Realty, 40 San Remo Drive. Dear Mr. Jaeger: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approvals on November 5, 2002. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �L Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner The City of South Burlington Abutter List 104 Bowdoin Street Green Acres Inc P.O.Box 2123 S Burlington 05407 0860-R1150 L Burlington Properties Ltd P O Box 9210 S Burlington 05407 MUNSON EARTH=MOVING CORP. 85 SHUNPIKE ROAD • WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 • TEL. 802-863-6391 • FAX 802-863-6395 October 8, 2002 Julie Beth Hoover Department of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Use of Temporary Access — Meadowland Project Dear Julie Beth: We are seeking to complete the infrastructure work east of the Class II wetlands area that we currently are not permitted to disturb. The following outlines our planned use for the requested temporary access. The actual number of trips across this access are not substantial and the frequency inconsequential; except that this access is vital to successfully launch the whole industrial park and essential to the timeliness of keeping a very attractive business in South Burlington. We appreciate your addressing this application with all due haste. 1. Receive storm drain pipe and structures, water and sewer pipe, conduit and road fabric: +/- 10 Trips 2. Receive crushed stone and sand bedding for utility infrastructure construction: +/- 40 Trips 3. Road base gravel +/- 100 Trips These trips will occur primarily during the first two to four weeks following receipt of the permit, with none planned after December 15, 2002. Materials will be used and stored in the right of way of the section of road to be constructed, (see diagram enclosed). We will not transport materials beyond the Meadowland Project. We trust this provides an adequate picture of our intended use. We look forward to the forthcoming scheduled hearing and trust you will inform us of anything we can do to assure this process will go smoothly. Thanking you in advance, 'resident 'gip ( 10 . tg. dz..,. t MUNSON EARTH=MOVING CORP. 85 SHUNPIKE ROAD • WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 • TEL. 802-863-6391 • FAX 802-863-6395 October 7, 2002 Attn: Ray Belair City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Application for Site Plan Review Dear Ray: Please accept the attached application for temporary access on the Meadowland Business Park to the adjacent ST Griswold quarry operation. This access is needed to support timely completion of the infrastructure for the Park. This is vital as one lot is sold with a commitment to turn over a building on the lot by April, 2003. This temporary road will be needed only until the end of this construction season. It is needed because the Army Corp permit that allows crossing the small strip of wetlands to this back parcel has been delayed by three weeks. It is not expected until the last half of the month, at which time construction of designed road will be built. An added benefit of this approach is the reduction of heavy truck traffic on local roads. We consider this to be minor amendments to the existing Site Plans of both Summer/Ice for the Meadowland Business Park and Green Acres, Inc. for the Griswold quarry operation. We are looking for prompt administrative approval. If there is anything we or the owner can do to facilitate the prompt approval we need, please let us know. Thank yoy, p advance, Bohlen, Vice President Copy: Mark Neagley, Summer/Ice Ralph Goodrich, Green Acres Doug Griswold, ST Griswold James Emerson, MEMC CFO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO November 5, 2002 MEETING Other: ® The plan should make provisions for mailbox clusters if needed. The applicant should consult with the post office on mail delivery options and obtain written confirmation of a decision from the post office. The minimum size of the proposed multi -family units should be noted on the preliminary plat plan. ■ The applicant should propose alternative street names for "Old Cross Road Extension," Link Road," and "Condo Road" at final plat. ■ The final plat survey should note base flood elevations. ■ A report should be submitted addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the Zoning Regulations. ® The applicant should provide, for review by the City Attorney, a legal document to be incorporated into the homeowners association documents, which clearly states there will be no clearing of land or disturbance of land within the CO District/wetland buffer except where approved by the DRB, as shown on the final plat plan. 5) AND 6) MUNSON EARTH MOVING, FINAL PLAT AND SITE PLAN, HINESBURG LOAD. Agenda Items 5 and 6 consist of constructing a temporary access road across to lot #6 of the Meadowland Business Park at 1150 Hinesburg Road. The DRB's action would be to amend the final plat for the subdivision (5), and amend the site plan for the quarry operation (6). Comments on the two actions are detailed below. This project consists of constructing of a temporary access road across lot to #6 (140 Bowdoin Street) of the Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road. The site plan was continued from the September 15, 2002 (minutes enclosed) meeting to allow the applicant time to provide additional information, including a complete site plan of the property (this information has not yet been provided). The property is located on the east side of Hinesburg Road just south of the Lane Press. The property lies within Industrial Open Space and Conservation Open Space Districts. It is bounded on the north by I-89, on the west by Lane Press and the Meadowland Business Park, on the east by Muddy Brook, and on the south by Hinesburg Road. The only issue affected in this application is roadway access. Access: The applicant is requesting approval for the creation of a temporary access road to serve lot #6 of the Meadowland Business Park. This access will allow for construction to take place on lot #6 while state permits for a wetland crossing are sought to allow construction of the permanent road. This access is requested to be used through this construction season. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to discontinue use of the road by December 31,2002. 10 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO November 5, 2002 MEETING C. O. District/wetland buffer: The applicant supplied information from a wetland expert (letter enclosed) concerning the portion of the site where the applicant proposes to put the temporary road. The letter states that the area roughly 200 foot wide on either side .of the proposed road does not contain any wetlands or buffers that would be within the C.O. District. Road and conditions: The City Engineer requests that the temporary road be constructed with a minimum of an 8" gravel base (comments included for your review). Staff suggests that a condition be imposed that the topsoil be replaced and the area seeded and covered as soon as use of the road is discontinued. ►. I�� it �i� ►' ., ►� . , `ice I tp.4.. . ■ This project consists of a request for a 5' x 16' addition to the rear of an existing garage. This property located at 56 Bartlett Bay Road lies within the C. O District. The property is surrounded by single-family residential development. The Board may approve in a C.O. District along Lake Champlain, the expansion or reconstruction of pre-existing structures, as conditional use provided the following criteria are met. All of the criteria are met by the application. a) The structure to be expanded or reconstructed was in existence on April 24,2000. The structure was in existence on April 24,2000. b) The expanded or reconstructed structure does not extend any closer to the high water elevation than the existing structure. The expansion does not extend any closer to the high water marl. c) The total building footprint area of the expanded or reconstructed structure shall not be more than fifty (50) percent larger than the footprint of the structure lawfully existing on April 24,2000..." The total building footprint area of the expansion is not more than fifty (50) percent larger than the footprint of the structure. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Conservation Open Space District "to maintain and improve the quality of natural resources such as soil, air, and water and the natural processes by which they are related, and to insure a safe, healthful, and aesthetically -pleasing community," and does not adversely affect: a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities- no effect expected b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses- no effect expected 11 City Engineer Comments 11/5/02 James and Dorothy Hardy 1. Drive to lot #2 is approximately 400 ft in length. It should be at least 18 ft in width for two way traffic. There should also be a turnaround at its end. 2. Size of service mainly water and sewer should be noted on the plan. 3. Site plan should include contours and method of handling stormwater runoff and basement drains. S. B. Collins Shelburne Road 1. Water and sewer services to nes buildings should be shown on the site plan. �,Meadowland Industrial Park Hinesburg Road 1. The temporary access drive should be at least 8 inches of gravel. .ncncsa ,nrna Let crassitieds work CLASSIFIED AD, CALL6383321, for you. Call658.3321 in arn0 n-As .,✓ie will not r 7n iblr, th iI.Int rc lefirse cancel or edit advertising at to inv adlust nrnts � , it s -,ri !h:. !,;Ft � ne • Ou going Any r,redlrs for erlurs vii -.1 ..lirlington ,T'FreCrQgg III, unfiaopab, accordi,:g to the hmpar' •t e error mad on •n'! ad ,•\ I. , - . .. 1- i Quick Minded • �" Have we got a NAUTILUS r11 Pit, BURLINGTON 9 un., SO BURLINGTON LOST CAT, Female place for you'll EQUIPMEN" 'in SUPER GARAGE Sun, "-a.ESTATE SALE. Black ,v ]oliar. Last 'm .Must move out or _a.=.e SALE ? nt:ques i a eat Quality Victorian furniture seen n n 1 0 13 i i Classified meat. Please call 80 tuff Oft Star, Farm and accessories. C o l c h e s t e r a r e a Advertising Sales 372.5523. Rd., past Flynn School. 70Fetcher, Rd. REWARD. Please tali OFFICE EQUIPMENT turn left onto Grev Mea- (802)879-0862 Come join the Buyers' Work station cubic!a. Jowl WAITSFIELD LOST CAT, Female. Digest Team - Desks and mist. Call BURLINGTON black with white bib and For Sale: a• (802) 363.8364 Sat. 10-4, Rain or Shine. aws, in Williston. Mea- Use the telephone to Conlcnt$ of decorator P P d f t ttr«gs sets, desks. ^w Run area, off Route make work * # r * r * * tarnished home. Lots r. tables, Queen size 2A. Call 1802{ 878-5276. OIL TANK 275 ganon ! of tools and lamps. _ You take away. Please couches and mare. For appt, call at LOST CAT, Male Sia- 0 Interesting Students Welcome call (802) 660.8521. (802) 496.4293. m e s e L i n u s. Lost i n 377 Pine St. Shore Rd.,,Leddy Park 0 Fast Paced PIANO HUNTINGINTON � UPRIGHT with piano C 0 L C H E S T ER WILLISTON Sun.. Oct. area. Please call Rona bench, You cant have MOVING SALE Sat. 20. 8-11 a.m. Kid's (802) 652 - 4027 or • Challenging one without the other. clothing, sports equip., (802) 656 - 4086. ^ Id Please tali 802) 863- only 9.5pm. No early toys, & more. 714 Met- LOST CAT Tortoise shell Send your Resume ( birds. Everything 6656. must go! 507 Mills calfDrlve. NOW: o- Female. Medium -large 'd PLASTIC BARRELS Point Road. WILLISTON, Tuscany build. Missing since 50 gallons ea. Used to Stora Gannett Vermont 2) a #422, Ave. A. 10/10 in Mallet's Bay. _ collect ain water. (802) COLCHESTER Sat. 12.5 g No collar. Please call Publishing Sat. 10-1. Penn House Human Resources a62-2272. & Sun. 10.5. Ill Ira cherry wall units. side. (802)859-0875. 191 College Street REFRIGERATOR, Allen Ct. Follow signs at board, bed. maple 4 LOST DOG black & tan Burlington. VT05401L WASHER AND STOVE intersection of Dunkin piece bedroom set, patio Cocker Spaniel Puppy :6 Older. but all work, Donuts. Many items: set, skis. rugs & more. lost approx. 5 p.m. E-mail: bhart® Rain hate Sun 10-' Wed.., tO116 at 5 Maple b/p.burlington/ree i! You take it away. ESSEX,. 2 family barn sw ,...r Tree Lane in Westford. press.com h Call(802)652.9942 sale. 172 & 179 Chapin Legal Notices Femaie, answers to 'Ha - Rd. Sat. 8-2pm. Kitchen a REFRIGERATOR rley'. (802) 878.2113. Fax: 802.651-4804 -'I rabinets, bike stuff, an- bBrovopbi 1l siz yrs old., tique radios & more mist PUBLIC B HEARING LOST KITTEN 5 months Brvwn:'Fvtl size, works SOUTH BURLINGTON EOE fine. Call (802) 864-4764 ESSEX Fri & Sat 9-6pm. DEVELOPMENT old. Female. Medium ` Halloween, sap buckets, REVIEW BOARD length Multi -colored. AUTO DEALERSHIP ROTTWEII,ERISHEPNERD rugs, old sleds, books, Very friendly. Answers to Seeking quality -expe- MIX. 6 mo, old (Oct, 19) name Casey. Lost in the rienced persons to com- ciothing, vintage items & f e m a ! e „,,, all shots , vicinity of Lamoille River Aliment our Parts 8 Ser d currently "Dicker training, much more. 349 Chapin The South Burlington Be-F'r 0 13 d housebroken to an ex- tent 5waeet tempera- d meet. bt is very pos- o sessive of water dish, li tasty toys and paper towel sltissue.Come3 d with all kinds of toys I soft -sided travel crate I Bitter Apple spray, food. treats. The worst of the teething is over, but she ' still "mouths"- We're r moving and she can't come, To an extremely _ attenllhre country home only, one where she can run and play and have lots of attention and off - leash freeaom. Minor leg injury, vet says it'll heal itself, may need vet care in the future. - Dog is free, but. there is a cost to cover price of training, equipment, etc. 18021863.6674 I_, Ing Access, 1 I velopment Review Board 18021893-2732, vice Team.ServlceMa- nager!Writer-Parts Ma - will hold a public hearing - at the South Burlington LOST KITTENS 1 tabby er/Warrran Adminis- na 9 N City Hall, Conference and 1 black 2 free kit- trator- Excellent wage& Room, 575 Dorset Street tens were given away benefits avail. Free Press P.O. Box 10, Bur- South Burlington, Ver- from the Skyview Motel lington VT 05402 Attn: mont on Tuesday, No. (Ferrisburg) New owners vember a, 2002, at 7:30 contact (812) 876-4801. Free Press Box #224 P,M. to consider the fol- Feel free to reverse the Automotive lowing: charges. URGENT. AUTO PARTS ROUTE LOST TOOLBOX Glass SALES II, DELIVERY 1. A p p I i n, a a t o n tools. Very .important. Heritage Ford; Toyota #CU-02-23 of Jen-Fu Reward if found. Call has an immediate open - and Lucia Chiu for c0ndi- (802) 355.7191. ing in its parts depart- tional use approval under Section 26.05. Condi- Personas meat for a route sales and delivery represents- lional Uses, of the South sesesse tative. The primary res- Burlington zoning Regu- NOTOctober's ponsibility of this position ;atmns Request is for birthstone, but Gem is to sell and deliver 'a permission to convert a almost a bust, auto parts on whole - single family dwelling to October 24, 7:30pm. sale basis to new and a three (3) room bed and Call862.1916, existing customers in an _ breakfast, 1560 Spear Merchandise Thrifty established local route. The Street. 2. Final plat apP!i ads: quick, easy, and ideal candidate must be reliable, customer the work 1 cation #SD-02-71 of r great Call service oriented, able to 658.3321. SEWING MACHINE Old ESSEX JCT Sat.from 9-4. Munson Earth Moving work independently, and Corporation to construct UVM HOCKEY TICKETS have a squeaky clean /Antique Singer Sewing 25 yrs including furniture, access road machine in wood cabi- toys, clothes all ages) :cross (2) for balance of sea- driving record. Familiarity net. On metal stand w,r more. 26 Wildwood Dr. across lot #6 (140 Bow- son. S480. Call (802) 658- with the auto parts in - foot treadle. Model # River Rd. to Valley View loin Street) of the Mea- 4951 or 651-7250. dustry a plus. In return, G4701768. (802) 899- Rd .Left on Windridge. dowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road. we offer top pay (base salary plus commission), 1 3222. right on Wildwood Drive. 3. A p p l i c a t i o n great benefits (401(k) SOFA Purple, frame is ESSEX Sat., Early bird #CU-02.24o f George wlmatch, paid holidays good. fabric is faded and TAG SALE 7am-12noon. and Barbara Bowers, Jr. and vacations, health - a few runs. (802) 879. Find toys, TV's, cur- For conditional use ap- /dental;life ins.), and the 7935. tains. holiday decors- proval under Section opportunity to work and STOVE, workin as tions, clothes, furniture, 26.05, Conditional Uses, Is advance In Vermont's stove wj oven. You take and other accessories. of the South Burlington 4th left after Inn at Es. Regulations. largest parts department. if interested, apply in away! Please call zoning away! 864-Ple sex, onto Debra Drive. Request is for permis- �(11u to Employment Person during business p FLETCHER sion to construct a 5' x VOLVO SEDANS 1967 Annual Block Yard Sale: 16' shed addition %, an hours to our Human Re- 'w'"�"'""""""e sources Dept. or send FT Une partially restored 8 Oct, 18, 19, 20th. existing garage 56 Bart- runs. One parts car. Ga- 1 oyment your resume to P.O. Box 8am-4pm. Jett Bay Road. raged. Must take both. Schoolcraft Rd. 1100, Burlington, VT ACCOUNTANT (primary, 05402-1100 or apply on - Call (802)86347p5, Copies of the applies. GRAND 10i18-10,r20 PP take -charge) needed by line at: www.heritagev- ISLE WINDOWS: Most sin le- tions are available for double 9-4pm. 5 W. Shore Rd. local environmental con- t.com salting firm. Duties in. pane -hung. wo 1i2 mile So. of Grand public inspection at the doubles; six singles One South Burlington City Hal- elude automated ac- ������--'7���ff ////// e bay window, Good condl- Isle Ferry on 314. Rain 1, heated. �QYi counting system, cash tion. Soon: Two exterior or shine. management, financials, doors; one exterior with HINESBURG INDOORS John Dinklage, Chairman limited phone, mail. Su. 1600-1620 Shelburne Road sidelights. Replaced dur- Huge moving sale! Sat.& South Burlington pervisory experience a scum Burnngton ing renovation. Take Sun 8am-4pm. Furniture, Development Review plus. Excellent compen- -align package for right Automotive thern away t802) 985- books, clothes, large totY Board. 8087. collection from 1950s & person, H e i n d e I & AUTO SALES 1960s, neat stuff! Rte October 19, 2002 SWEET FAT KITTY to a Noyes, PO Box 64709. CONSULTANT Burlington, VT 05406- Heritage Toyota needs a good home. 3 years old 116 south, left at light. o �� past CVU, follow signs. Lost Foun 4709. seasoned car salesper- affectionate little 'heifer" - Black & white spotted JERICHO, 62 Fitzsi- FOUND CAMERA son to sell from one of ADMINISTRATIVE ASS/ g the ar TANT Immediate opening l 9est selection of new with a black splotch on monds 10118-20 9-4pm. and Found On for an Administrative As- and used vehicles in the her pink nose Loves Queen size futon nC;all ... ^. ...... ..... Burlinntrv,_ ('all sistant for busv retaillo- state. Professiona- 0 mielill ipport Avai The Burlington Free Pi for adult carriers to c areas. If inter( Call (202) South Bux17 6 r, Austin Dr./Dander/S. Imperial Dr. /Scottsdal Baldwin Ave. /Greenin; Hinesburg Rd./Prouty Prospect Pkwy/Ledge Downtown But` e k St. Paul/Howard/Hays Pearl/S. Williams/Lafs Park St. /No. Champlair, N. Winooski Ave. /Lafa Mansfield/N. Prospect' Wlnoosm West/ Hickock Based on current nu Amounts subj ***Routes take between 3) $ iso sign� Purittigto"Itt 4 L 0 e:i FROM : City at So. H FrV NO. : 1 002 658 4748 Oct. W 2002 02-:05PM Dg C71 Y OF 30U BURM INGTON fl�PAF.-mr rr oiF EVG & zor+MIG 575 GORSEr ffr-FiE'-1;T SOUTFI r34`R._1NGTON, VERMONT•05408 (&02) 846•41W F,4 X (30Z-) 846-4101 Permit Nwnbcr SD- , _ - APPI.,ICAMN FOR FLNAL SUBDIVISION FLAT REN'IEW All informgtion rc4u estetl cm this application iinusi be completed in W. Failure to provide the reWesta tnf6mxatiou tither on ails application fonn or on the plaaus will result in your application being rciected aDd a delay in the review before ;he Dewelaprnent Revicw Board For amendmems, please provide pit infonWadon only. OWNER OF RLCORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing actress, phom and fax A) \j-r C>g4()I L4' . `wl3(0 %-x—es: t-03y9(N 2) LOCATI0N OF LAST RECORDED DES) (Book and page #) P'OSY6- 4'31-44 ) 3 APPLICANT(Name, mailing address, phone and fax S S1� -- R om, W'LZ�-'�3' � , V;` 4) CO?,'TACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax i 5) PROJECT STR:EUr ADIIF ESS: h) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Asscssoi's Oiitc:)� 60 7) PROJECT D.ESCRUMON a) 1� Uses on A (including dasrri on and size of each sq�a:ate uscj - b) Proposed Uses on pavperty (mdudc &5aiption and = of eac4 new use and c4 uses to arum) -- c) Total huilding square footage on property (proms bull&w aad adsting buildings to .-careen) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and misting bugdiiugs to remaia, specify if base and me =sloe) (Y i A e) Number `f residential units Ccf applicab1c, new units and existing units to Tvnziw) — f) Number of employees & cornp;Liy vehicles (exi-sting and proposed, note office versus non -office eanplpy"') 0 a'd 9OE9E99a09 9NIAOW iiiNu3 woswnW d23r:10 20 IT a00 Othei (list any other mfonuation peitiaeat to dus application not specifically mquer-ed above, please note if OveTlay Districts are applicable)- 8) LOT COVER&GE - Buildirg Ead�' Proposed Q(- (eyi. b) OvemB. (buildin& paddm& outside stoicV, etc) W Baistin.-0- *,/a Proposed ivv%fv4j':� WII- f�m - GO Poll c) Front yard (along ewh sft-oct) &ist Proposed % 9) COST FM-MkTES a) Building (including interior renovations): k)I-andscapinT- $ G) Offim-sib-- uinpruvememas (Please list with cost Tb Push czrAp uQ) pqDLvit-r, Ck r-A-P-A—MV'-( (ZlQeQ-a� 10) ESTMTED TIRAFFIC a) Av=gc daily Uaffic fQr entire pW"ty (in. and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and q) PM -Peak hour for entire MIxrty (En and out)- 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERAITON. MI -A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPMA-710N. 13) ESUNLUED PROJECT COWIMION DATE: 4) PLANS AM FEE lu pie= &W k xb=MW vd*,h shma The larnmatim HBU:d m Exhffib A, mmchM Frm (5) n**r do won ma m A.%*dhi!i0u appfickfica &m tima be pato ibe �xt the izw if skmirmV& &,a f-pi plo jMBemSm (sae Bdizbit*K)- C-d SGE3C99208 OWIADW HiNU3 woswnw 421,:10 20 TT 400 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 4 YC-A SIGNATURE OF O OWNER Do not WIito below thiS line DATE- OF SUBMISSION: /6f RE -VIEW A=OR.ITY- 0 Development Review Boazjd ❑ Director, PL=ning & honing I have reviewed this site plan application and find itto be: Ll Complete y ❑ incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee b'd 96£OC90209 OWIAOW HINU71 iJ09W)W JC+, : T O 20 TT 100 1p.� IIC M =1 PLAN The fallowing information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17"') of the site play Failure to provide the following information will rcsult in your application being rejected and it delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to sale (20 feet scale if p=-ble) a Survey data (distance and acreage) - o Contours (wdsting and finished) - o Proposed latldsraping schedule (number, variety and size) as.required m Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets; abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing bindings, existing landscaping o Eristing and proposed curb arts, pavement, walkways o .Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Plumber and lc:�ation of Handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26,253(a) of the zoning regl,,la w) , o Locatioa of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Buildmg footprint,. total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan, and date o Exterior Ilghting des (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations- (dumpst= must be screened) . o Bicycle rack as required. under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If R.estamant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron rse but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ New Application . $ 60.00* ' Ei Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee q •cJ GGEOE90200 OWIAOW HINHD woswnw d{.{.: 10 20 IT z00 1 , 49 50 /AC. \ I \ / o O \ o\ \ 00 1� $ 1 h 1 u 36614 Psi11 •/ — l '� . 5 RS21 l\ \\ 1 SB 3 PS? 37O I 8.0,0. Ac: CIVIL ENGINEEIING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 4W SHE BURNE• 1T XM IO: GQS2= FAX Nl?Alt ? M-L 0a0&+pW'rn OWRN ACL Ml- E M1 SAV PROJECT: �___---- / ---- ----- ------ MEADOWLAND ' ' / L~ \\ INDUSTRIAL + ---- l I \ PARK 5' WIDE ~ 17 PS! f ECREATION PATH / Hinesburg Road So. Burlington \ Vermont 2 SB OA 2SO- 386 _ �1ir-__ - = - O 6� 82 5� s Psi - - j 4.0 � O 0 1 se - 1 O O Q-Q- i 1 _ -- - sP� 2-P31 EXISTING 1' PIN _ 11 P,51 V X �s' �F.; , N NF �NIF SHED N [ / I DAVIS __-- BOUGH R I _ _ _ — �--- , \NN_ I� Ni RIMY i s� —0 N/F PLC— ' �— \ \ ' N�F / \\ BRAS RD / 1 1 , 1 � , GRAPHIC SCALE , IN CI' FEI ' I I i cn � 50 ft. I 0 WIDE EDESTRIAN IEASEMENT z AU L/\/J / // V V 340 .� U f-7 M NNEL & WETLAND AREA 1`\ g�cl�n9tOn PLANTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE/CALIPER QUANTITY SB WEEPING WILLOW SALIX BASYLONICA 10' — 12' HIGH 21 PSI WHITE PINE PINUS STROBUS 5' — 6' HIGH 62 PS2 WHITE PINE PINUS STROBUS ILEX GLABRA 8' — 10' HIS 15' — 18' 20 IG INKSERRY 30 o�n I c�c� I ua,�oN SOUTHERN BOUNDARY PLAN. aIZ Nu- FEB. 2DO2 SCAIX f-w Sr 10 PM. NO. ow 1 NIF N/T II R /TULLES_ WI I GRAPHIC SCALE IMM ( IN FEET I I Neb - 200 It PUMPNSTARONIrAar I� A%1�1 J /• I CLASS 111 MEFLANO INPACF 296D IF. I 562 IF. FUTURE CLASS IN WERAND IMPACT 1 12J8 S.F. (NOT APPLIED FOR NYCORPS G, ENGWI.. APPLICATION) \ 2\ \\90r0 \ \ F4 \ \ FUTURE CLASS W NEILAND IMPACT \� \ \ 8990 SF. \ \ \ (NOT APPLIED FOR IN CORPS \ EY ENGWEERING APPUCA DON) \ \ \ \ PLANNING DATA TOTAL AREA : 116.73 ACRES THE ROAD AUGNMENT BETWEEN ROUTE 116 AND SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE WAS PERMITTED WHEN LANE PRESS AND DYNA POWER RECEIVED LAND USE APPROVAL AND IS GRANDFATHERED. THERE IS A DEEDED 80 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY RECORDED IN VOLUME 200. PACE 71. 2. HISTORICALLY THE DRAINAGE FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIS PROPERTY FLOWED NORTHEASTERLY ACROSS LOT 1. A NEW DRAINAGE CHANNEL WAS DUG ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO DIVERT THIS WATER AND TO IMPROVE IHf DRAINAGE IN IN E EXISTING FIELD. THE CITY REWIRED INC STORNMATER NOT BE REDIRECTED UNTIL A NEW CHANNEL PLAN WAS APPROVED. PRESENTLY 807H DRAINAGEWAYS TRANSPORT STORM AND GROUND WATER FLOWS. CURRENT PLANS TO RETAIN NORTHEASTERLY CHANNEL ACROSS LOT 01. 3. THE EDGE OF THE WEILAND IS DESIGNATED BY NATURAL RE ROES CONSULTING SERVICES, 87 WEST SHORE ROAD. GRAND ISLE, VERMONT 05458 (802) 870-4800. THE UNE IS BASED ON THE EDGE OF A PRIOR CONVERTED CROPLAND LINE AS OE7TDRMNIED BY MR. 7MOMA5 GDDLD OF THE VSDA SOIL CONSERVATION BY ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 PER A LETTER TO PETER SPEAR OF NRCS. NOTE: - NO IMPACT BEYOND THOSE SQUARE FOOTAGES AND LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES, USCOE CLASS N JURISDICTION WETLAND AREA IMPACT IMPACT LOT 1 667 CONNECTOR SEWER 2960 2950 5095 5095 721E 7218 190 190 ROAD CROSSING 1800 1800 11917 11917 695 - PC 40T 4 307 250 LOT 5 317 - PC 100-PC LOT 8 - SEWER 962 962 LOT 9 2188 - PC NONPRIORIMPACTS 31J6D9�BN6II88NrrP''' �14r� OCONVERTED IMPACTS ch7 OAR ' l :'% LEGEND �• STREET MONT g HYDRANT • SEWER MANHOLE ❑ CATCH BASIN -+— — SEWER MAIN - - -'- - - - WATER MAIN - - - n - - - STORM DRAINGC MAIN r - - -. - - - - BOILDWG ENVELOPE L_-__--J WEILAND AREA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREA TO BE PROIECTEI :E CLASS II BUFFER IMPACT Ed 25696 602 SITE ENGINEER: A C1YIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX486 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 NR BB}7.VJ fAIC 9024B6Y17t sn•0: cw6NpAtiv.nM AWY/ACL CH LCEEO Dw ;W, PROJECT: MEADOWLAND INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont OWNER & APPLICANT SUMMER ICE JOINT vfNTURE 153 SUMMIT STREET BURLINGTON. VT 05401 DA1H I CRNCOD I RNY191ON i-02-02 091/A0. RENSCO T6RAND IMPACT AREAS OVERALL SITE PLAN DATE DM•ING NI IMBPR NOV, 2W 9r-C� SP3A 2ar PFROOI NO, VTANR VIIIF Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Notice of Issuance of Conditional Use Determination #2001-398 Please be notified, as per Section 8.4 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, that the request for a Conditional Use Determination received from Civil Engineering Associates, representative for Summer Ice Joint Venture for the construction of a commercial and industrial developmgnt that will impact a C ass Two wetland and its 50-foot buffer zone has been approved on this � day of , 2002. It was found by the Agency of Natural Resources that this conditional use will not result in any undue, adverse effects to the protected functions of the significant wetland located to the east of Route 116, and to the south of Interstate 89, South Burlington, Vermont. Complete copies of the decision can be obtained by calling the Water Quality Division at 802- 241-3770 or writing to the address below. Any person with an interest in this matter can appeal this decision pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269. Any notice of appeal must be filed (ie: received) at the Water Resources Board, National Life Records Center Building, Drawer 20, Montpelier, VT 05620- 3201 (telephone (802) 828-3309) within 30 days of the date of the decision. �- April Moulaert, PWS District Wetlands Ecologist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 10 North Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 AJM:pu cc: Distribution List 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, \ T 05482 September 3, 2002 Meadowland Business Park Wetland Abutting Property Owners Re: Meadowland Business Park Conditional Use Determination Application Dear Sir or Madam: G ����our, l's, Phunc: 802-985-2323 Fax: 302-985-2271 E-Mail: 111a610 cea-vtxom Pursuant to the requirements of Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 37, Section 906, we are providing notice on behalf of Meadowland Business Park's intention to impact 25,382 SF of Class II wetland and 43,287 SF of Class II buffer area for the construction of a roadway, stormwater management facility and a gravity sewer main in support of the construction of the infrastructure for this project.. Enclosed you will find a copy of the location map for which the Conditional Use Determination is being sought. Complete copies of the CUD application have been forwarded to the City of South Burlington City Clerk, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, and the Chittenden Country Regional Planning Commission. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosure Location Map cc: M. Neagley (no enclosure) A. Moulaert (no enclosure) J. Severson (no enclosure) P. Spear (no enclosure) \\Dave\c\1 Let\01117WbutterNoOce wpd �+ South Bmlington ,gL _ l � W' 411 "firs' �• 1 / > $ +• Ol F •� / �/� �� I '�% � 'I • ! ' •i `• 1�/� it ``a - In I y T: I X.eq \ i; I 1 •5,i PROJE~ O TIO : rp ir 1 •t I -. ;� 1 IrI' 1 it !' ,�\ � I i '� .:,/_�`,� , i 'I '�� /• I I i ? y.�i � 1 'i \�'r r�--• 1 ' 111 �111(fii}miil r'�/``�. 1• � ,J71 r .1::�- - �� ,',• r � f I i • ' 1 ! ' I• � f`. ° ��, � ' I 10 /74 Ir .•' t r} j f% l i y rl % i / Qae+� Ij I I j. ': �� ,� I. I ' -I � i ,.--�`+P�'�.���,�I'' /f�,•! ) � :! :� � rl�l '1 i 1 1 1i It , I � �y 1 . � ' �-./ J. 1 � / �� /.' f �� ,�.� -il _ ,1 't �, J I - II ' ` �� • '�i i L" (: PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 10 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. Access (i.e.. driveways) to lots 4-11 shall be from the side streets, not from Swift Street Extension. 18. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site plan application of Jeff Nick to increase the size of a multi -use commercial/industrial building from 6465 sq. ft. to 7080 sq. ft. The uses will consist of 2775 sq. ft. of general office use and 4305 sq. ft. of warehouse/distribution use, 1 Green Tree Drive: Mr. Nick said the application was approved by the Commission last fall. Orkin is on the north side of the building. They are now working with a tenant for the south side. They have added 6 parking spaces to the south side and are still within coverages. They are short on landscaping and propose to beef up landscaping along the existing building and near the dumpsters. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer recommends the driveway be re- designed to miss an existing maple tree. Mr. Nick said they propose to move the tree. It isn't very big. If it can't be moved, they will plant another one nearby. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the site Dlan a plication of Jeff Nick to increase the size of a multi -use commercial/industrial building from 6465 sq. ft. to 7080 sq. ft. The uses will consist of 2775 sq. ft. of general office use and 4305 sq. ft. of warehouse/distribution use, 1 Green Tree Drive, as depicted on a site plan entitled "Lot 9 Green Tree Park Gregory Drive South Burlington, VT," prepared by Trudell Consult- ing Engineers, Inc, dated 10/10/95. last revised 7/10/96. with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. CIVIL El IGU ER"R l IG ASOSOOCIAQ 4 UNIC, 928 Falls Road Phone: 802-985-2323 P.O. Box 485 Fax: 802-985-2271 Shelburne, VT 05482 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com May 13, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Subdivision Amendment Approval Dear Mr. Belair: Please find enclosed one set of the mylars required to be filed with the City of South Burlington in association with the recent approval of the modification to the South Berm as a part of the Meadowland Business Park located off of Hinesburg Road. If there are any charges for the filing, please forward them to my attention at Civil Engineering Associates. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosures: Design Plan Mylars Sheets (SP-3A and SP-10) cc: M. Neagley (no enclosures) File 01117 \\Daw\c\I Let\01 117\bclairfiling.wpd ACT 250 NOTICE MINOR APPLICATION #4C1005-A 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 Notice is hereby given that on March 20, 2003, an application was filed by Summer Ice Joint Venture, 153 Summit Street, Burlington, VT 05401, for a project generally described as: the removal of the existing buildings on the west side of the subject parcel and incorporation of revised plans and ANR permits. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. The District 4 Environmental Commission will treat this application under Environmental. Board Rule 51 -- Minor Applications. A proposed permit has been prepared by the Commission and is available at the Commission's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested in writing or the Commission holds a hearing on its own motion. The written request for a hearing must state the criteria or subcriteria at issue, why a hearing is required and what evidence will be presented at the hearing pursuant to Environmental Board Rules 14 and 51(B)(3)(d). No hearing will be convened unless a party submits a written request to the Commission on or before April 15, 2003, or the Commission sets the matter for hearing on its own motion. Prior to convening a hearing, the District Commission shall determine that substantive issues requiring a hearing have been raised pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 51(D). Parties entitled to participate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and persons granted party status pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this a I day of March 2003. By Peter E. keibel Environmental Board District 94 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/802-879-5658 E/ peter.keibeI@anr.state.vt.us W A Act250\D1ST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C 1005-A.NOT This is a DRAFT permit; please submit any written comments or corrections to: Peter E. Keibel, District #4 Coordinator, I I I West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 CASE NO 4C 1005-A APPLICANT Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 AMENDMENT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6092 (Act 250) District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit Amendment 4C 1005-A, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092. This Orriit'amendment applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Pages 439, of the land records of the'City of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the Permittee as Grantee., This permit specifically authorizes the Permittee to remove the historic buildings on the west side of the subject parcel (condition #23 of 4C1005) and incorporate new and revised plans and ANR permits. The project is located on Hinesburg Road (Route 116) in the City of South Burlington. The project is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction because the project involves the construction of improvements for a commercial purpose on more than ten acres and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3) and Environmental Board Rule ("EBR") 2(A)(2), and the project is a material or substantial change to a development over which the Commission has jurisdiction and thus constitutes "development" pursuant to EBR 2(A)(5). Accordingly, a land use permit amendment is required pursuant to EBR 34. The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, are obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: All conditions of Land Use Permit #4C 1005 and amendments are in full force and effect except as amended herein. 2. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. The project shall be completed, operated and maintained in accordance with: the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and the conditions of this permit. Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A Page 2 4. The approved new and revised (listed with Exhibit #s) plans are: Sheet SP2 - "Master Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP3 -"Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP3A - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Nov. 2001-4ast revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #33) Sheet P1 - "Plan and Profile Sta 0+00 to 10+00, Meadowland Industrial PA"�"dated June 2001; (Exhibit #34) Sheet P2 - "Plan and Profile Sta 10+00 to 22+00, Meadowland Industrial Pa kdated June 2061; (Exhibit #35) Sheet P3 - "Plan and Profile Sta 22+00 to 33+00, Meadowland' Industrial Park" d&a d July 2001; (Exhibit #36) Sheet P4 - "Plan and Profile Sta 33+00 to 36+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #37) Sheet P5 - "Plan and Profile Bowdoin Street, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #38) Sheet P6 - "Plan and Profile Lane Press Drive, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001; (Exhibit #39) Sheet P7 - "Plan and Profile Thompson Street, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001, last revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #40) Sheet P8 - "Plan and Profile Cross Country Sewer, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated June 2001, last revision 12/20/02; (Exhibit #41) Sheet P9 - "Plan and Profile Sta 0+00 to 10+00, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; (Exhibit #42) Sheet SP6 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96, last revision 9/19/96; (Exhibit #45) Sheet SP7 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96; (Exhibit #46) Sheet SP8 - "Miscellaneous Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 6/4/96, last revision 9/19/96; (Exhibit#47) Sheet SP9 - "Stormwater Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated 2/2/98; (Exhibit #48) Sheet SP9A - "Site Details, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Sheet SP 10 - "Southern Boundary Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002, last revision 8/16/02; (Exhibit 449) Sheet SP13 - "View Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002; (Exhibit #52) Sheet SP14 - "View Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002; (Exhibit #53) Sheet SP15 - "Preliminary Section Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Feb. 2002, last revision 8/16/02; (Exhibit #54) Sheet C1 - "Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext Intersection Improvement Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Oct. 2002, last revision 10/30/02; Sheet C2 - "Rt. 116/Swift St. Ext Intersection Improvement Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated Oct. 2002; Sheet EC 1 - "Overall Site Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001, last revision 10/31 /02; Sheet EC2 - "Sediment and Erosion Control Narrative, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated July 2001; Land Use Permit #4C1005-A Page 3 Sheet EC3 - "Specifications, Meadowland Industrial Park" dated August 2002; and Sheet SOIL - "Overall Prime Ag. Soils Plan, Meadowland Industrial Park," dated April 2002, last revision 5/3/02. 5. A copy of this permit and approved plans shall be on the site at all times throu&Y t the construction process. 6. No changes shall be made in the design or use of this project without the written approval of the District Coordinator or the Commission, whichever is appropriate undentfie]Environmental Board - Rules. " q V 7. Pursuant to EBR 51(G), the permit application and material representations relied upon during the review and issuance of this permit by the District Commission _shall provide the basis for determining future substantial and material changes to the approved project and for initiating enforcement actions. 8. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained 'in accordance" with the terms of the permit, as provided by 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 and the rules of the Environmental Board. 9. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. 10. This amendment does not change any of the maximum impacts for the industrial park specified in Condition #6 of LUP #4C1005. 11. Prior to commencement of construction on any of the commercial or industrial lots, the Permittee and the lot purchaser or tenant shall file an amendment application as co -applicants and shall address each of the 10 criteria of Act 250. 12. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the following revised Agency of Natural Resources Permits (other ANR permits have not been revised): ! Public Water Supply Permit to construct #WSID 5091 issued on 8/6/01 by the Water Supply Division; i Conditional Use Determination #2001-398 issued on 10/22/01 by the Water Quality Division; and • Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052C issued on 10/22/01 by the Air Pollution Control Division. Land Use Permit #4C1005-A Page 4 Any subsequent nonmaterial changes to these permits shall be automatically incorporated herein upon issuance by the Agency of Natural Resources. Subsequent amendments involving material changes to the Act 250 permit shall not be constructed prior to review and approval of the District Coordinator or the District Commission under applicable Environmental Board Rules. 13. Prior to the construction of any future buildings on the lots appi submit a design to the District Commission for a wastewater di; engineer or certified site technician which makes best efforts to disposal in Chapter 7 of the Vermont Environmental Protection 14. The Permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement established to control dust. 15. There shall be no floor drains installed at the fac Underground Injection Control Permit from the Resources. 16. The Permittee and all subsequent owners or lessi plumbing fixtures in any buildings. Any failed t replaced with products of equal or better perforn 17. The Permittee shall con prevent the transport of herein. All erosion cont: vegetation is permanent the right to schedule hey impose additional condi 18. All mulch, siltation darr upon grading and vegetation is esta exposed earth coi 4-50 he IPermittee shall by a registered dards for sewage is fully the required the Agency of Natural d maintain only low -flow measures shall be promptly # for erosion control. The Permittee shall ediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved vices shall beperiodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until ablished on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. ter bars and other temporary devices shall be installed immediately intained until all roads are permanently surfaced and all permanent 11 slopes and disturbed areas. Topsoil stockpiles shall have the r _, Iched and have siltation checks around the base. 19. Grading shall be phased so that all exposed earth is mulched and water bars are in place at the end of each construction day. 20. All disturbed areas of the site shall be stabilized, seeded and mulched immediately upon completion of final grading. All disturbed areas not involved in winter construction shall be mulched and seeded before October 1. Between the periods of October 1 to April 15, all earth disturbing work shall conform with the "Winter Construction" standards and specifications of the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control on Construction Sites (1987). Land Use Permit #4C1005-A Page 5 21. Prior to the commencement of any site work the Permittee shall conduct a pre -construction conference on the site with representatives of the District Environmental Commission, the Agency of Natural Resources, and the contractor to review the details of the erosion control plan. 22. Prior to construction of the approved work, the Permittee shall complete the following: a) construction limits shall be clearly delineated with flagging or snowfencing; b) diversion ditches shall be placed on the uphill limits of the construction area; and c) temporary siltation controls shall be placed on the downhill limits of the construction.. Immediately'following the above, the permanent drainage system and/or roads shall be installed after which normal construction can begin. 23. A copy of the approved erosion control plan shall be on'the site at all times during construction. 24. In addition to conformance with all erosion control conditions, the Permittee shall not cause, permit or allow the discharge of waste material into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A. (§§ 1250-1284) Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 25. The Permittee shall maintain a 50-foot undisturbed,lnaturally vegetated buffer strip between all watercourses on the project site and any disturbed areas. 26. All stumps shall be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 27. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibits #32 and #47 of LUP #4C 1005, and shall be mounted no higher than (20) feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 28. The Permittee shall not erect additional exterior signage (Exhibits #22 and #32 of LUP #4C1005) without first obtaining approval from the District Commission. Signage includes banners, flags, and other advertising displays, excepting temporary real estate marketing signs. 29. The project shall conform with the Vermont Consolidated Act 250 Energy Guidelines for Typical Commercial and Industrial Buildings promulgated by the Vermont Department of Public Service. In addition to meeting the above referenced guidelines, the Permittee shall incorporate any additional energy efficiency measures that are determined by custom analysis to be cost effective for the project. 30. The installation and/or use of electric resistance space heat is specifically prohibited without the prior written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 31. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Subdivision Permit, the Land Use Permit and Amendments and the Findings of Fact before any written contract of sale is entered into. Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A Page 6 32. No further subdivision, alteration, and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 33. The Permittee shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C 1005-A in all deeds of conveyance and leases. 34. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds foIr permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(c). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of Aprjl 2003 � M By Myron Wheeler, Acting Chair in this matter District #4 Commission Members participating in this decision: James McNamara Ralph Montefusco The applicant or a party may file a motion to alter within 30 days from the date of this decision, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 31. Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of the original and ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. W AAct250\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C 1005\4C 1005-A.PMT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this iX I day of March, 2003, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 MINOR NOTICE APPLICATION #4C1005-A, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 David S. Marshall, PE Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485, 928 Falls Road Shelburne, VT 05482 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. City Planning Commission South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Myron Wheeler, Acting Chair/James McNamara/Ralph Montefusco 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 District Conservationist/USDA/Soils Conservation Service 18 Blair Park Road #207 Williston, VT 05495-9406 Tom Bushey, District Supervisor, N.R.C.D. 48 Bushey Road Shelburne, VT 05482 County Forester/Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Page 2/COS/#4C1005-A John M. Austin/ANR, Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 5 Perry Street, Suite 40 Barre, VT 05641-4266 Burlington Free Press/Classified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Christopher Owen/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Michael Russom/Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 Michael Pologruto, Technical Services/VTrans National Life Building, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 Marian White, Policy Analyst/Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 Dan Gaherty/Efficiency Vermont 255 South Champlain Street Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Barsotti, Water Quality Director Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 1 day of March, 2003. CIA & . 'A w:cs4C1005-A/cc Cris ine ommo, is ric Office hief C erk 879-5670 PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JU LY 1996 PAGE 9 street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to road- way construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by 6 28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engin- eer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regula- tions, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains etcl the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" con- struction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a. Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches. b. The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to lot 11. c. Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 12. Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development. 13. Deeds for lots 7 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations if substantial construction of the project has not started within three years (i.e., by 7/30/99), this approval shall be null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 8 of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed devel- opment will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a. The proiect is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any sub- sequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b. Applicant shall install, Prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to is- suance of a zoning permit. c. Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte. 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d. Each building lot shall be required to pay the appro- priate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Prior to issuance of a zonina permit or start of roadwav or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easement (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 5. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 7 6. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into 12 lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres: Mr. Neagley said this is the plan approved in June, 1994. The only change is the name of two streets. He said that they got the property in December, 1995. They liked this configuration better than the one that was modified after this was approved. Mr. Trudell said that the three lots that had been combined are now not combined. He showed the right-of-way that connects to the road owned by the city . He also showed the route of the water and sewer service. Storm water will be handled on site. There will be a temporary cul-de-sac on one of the north/south roads. The other north/south road will be built to city standards but will not be a city owned road. The city will have a right-of-way to the property line on both north/south roads. A wetlands study is being done now. The applicant said they have been negotiating with Ledge Knoll owners and are happy with how things are going. Mr. Trudell said the Rec Path trail right-of-way will be granted but the path will not be built by the applicant. There will also be a paved 8 ft. path on the north side of Swift St. extension. There will be no sidewalk on the south side. No issues were raised. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previ- ously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, as de- picted on a 25 page set of plans, page 1 entitled "Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/4/96, with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subiect property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD David Marshall Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road PO Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 802-241-3770 Fax #:802-241-3287 March 29, 2002 Subject: Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, Wetlands Project #2001-398 Dear David: I have received and reviewed the new plans you sent me on March 5, 2002 in connection with your client's application for a Conditional Use Determination (CUD) for the above captioned project. As we discussed on the telephone today, the new plans show significantly more wetland impacts than the previously approved plan. We will therefore need the following information before we can consider this application to be complete: 1. The CUD application should be revised to specifically address all new impacts that were not addressed in the previous CUD that was issued for this project, including the sewer line, the stormwater management area in the buffer zone, the pond expansion and any other "new" impacts. For example, Item 13 of the application should be revised to address all wetland and wetland buffer zone impacts that are proposed. Section 14 should be amended to specifically address the impacts of all of the proposed wetland and wetland buffer zone impacts on the functions and values of the wetlands. It appears that the language in the current application was copied from the original CUD, even though impacts have significantly increased. Item 15 should be amended to address why you consider each of the proposed impacts to be unavoidable. According to Section 8.5 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, a CUD can only be issued if it is determined that the use will have no undue adverse impact on protected functions, unless such impacts are mitigated. Mitigation measures include avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts. If any of these impacts are avoidable, then they must be avoided, in accordance with the Vermont Wetland Rules. Several of the proposed impacts appear to be avoidable. Any unavoidable impacts should be minimized. A comprehensive discussion of alternatives should be Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct /Pittsford Rutland'Springfield.;St Johnsbury included for each proposed area of impact that was not evaluated in the previous CUD. 2. All of these proposed wetland and wetland buffer zone impacts should be clearly shown on one plan; it appears that on the current set of plans different plans show different impact areas. This makes it confusing to review. The landowner/s of the parcel where the sewer line is proposed to be installed need to sign the CUD application so that we know that your client has their consent for this project. I have enclosed a copy of the first page of the CUD application which states exactly what type of proof of consent is needed. 4. The current plans show that the Class Two wetland extends off site to the north. However, the wetland delineation is only shown along the proposed sewer line route. Does the wetland extend to the east as well? If so, does the wetland buffer zone extend onto proposed lots 6 and 9? If it does, we recommend that the building area on this lot be amended to avoid any disturbance to the wetland buffer zone, in accordance with the Vermont Wetland Rules. S. An erosion control plan should be prepared. 6. All stormwater should be treated with best management practices (for water quality and quantity) prior to discharge into regulated wetland areas. Please explain how this will be accomplished. Once these issues are addressed your client's application will be deemed complete by this office. If you have any questions I can be reached at 241-1418. Sincerely, April T. Moulaert, PWS District Wetlands Ecologist cc: Marty Abair, Corps of Engineers City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning C 1-UBLIC HEARING r SOUTH BURLINGTON i DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development R-3,i,ew Board will hold a public nearing at the Scum Bur- iington City Hail, Conter- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, Soyth Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 2, 2002, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 1. Application #CU-02.05 of Fletcher A. Downing for conditional use ap- proval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to: 1) apply the R2 Dis- trict zoning criteria to a portion of 133 Westview Drive, and 2) apply . the R1 District zoning criteria to a portion of 99 West - view Drive. 2. Final plat application #SD-02-17 of Fletcher A. Downing for a boundary line adjustment between 99 Westview Drive and 133 Westview Drive. 3.Final plat application #SD-02.18 of Daniel and Leo O'Brien Jr., DBA Fo- rest Park Realty Corp. and The O'Brien Family Limited Partnership for a 107 unit planned residen- tial development consist- ing of 18 buildings and a five (5) lot subdivision, Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive. 4. Application #CU-02.04 of Nextel WIP Lease Corp. DBA Nextel Partn- ers for conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to install 1248 in. high antennas within a pro- posed cupola on the roof top,1776 Williston Road. 5. Final plat application #SD-02-14 of Sumner Ice Joint Venture to amend a previsouly ap- proved 12 lot subdivision The amendment cons- ists of amending previously approved berm at the south end of the property to avoid wetland impacts, Hines- burg Road. 6. Application #CU-02.03 of Champlain Water.. Dis- trict seeking conditional use appproval under Sec- tion 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Bur- 1 ington Zoning Regula- ions. Request is for permission to construct 1) 24,000 sq. ft. of free- ze-dry beds, 2) a 235 sq. ft.. control building, and 3) a 1500 gallon capacity underground pump sta- tion, 403 queen City Park Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall Jonn Dinklage South Burlington Development Review Board March 16, 2002 4�� �]]G� 4/2/2002 MOTION OF APPROVAL SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE —FINAL PLAT APPLICATION, HINESBURG ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-02-14 of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved 12 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of relocating a previously approved landscaped berm to avoid wetland impacts, on four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled "Meadowland Industrial Park Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated November, 2001, last revised on 1/2/02 with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Any change to the plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 3) The final plat plan (sheets SP3A and SP10) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 15, 2002 Dave Marshall Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Final plat application, #SD-02-14, of Summer Ice Joint Venture Dear Mr. Marshall: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on April 16, 2002. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void (8/5/02). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, cb�t� � Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner The City of South Burlington DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 APRIL 2002 PAGE 4 5. Continued Public hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-02-14 of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved 12 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of amending previously approved berm at the south end of the property to avoid wetland impacts, Hinesburg Road: Mr. Boucher stepped down from the Board due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Belair said the hope was to have a natural stream put back where it was, but it is now considered a wetland and can't be moved. He reviewed the history of the area and noted that the berms were designed to address a ditch that had been dug illegally. Mr. Neagley said the action is being driven by the Corps of Engineers which doesn't want to impact the wetland. Mr. Belair said that the new proposal complies with what the Corps wants. Mr. Neagley said they are trying to get the same visual goals. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-02-14 of Summer Ice Joint Venture subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 2 April 2002. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Boucher rejoined the Commission. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-02-05 of Homestead Design, Inc., for an 89 unit planned residential development consisting of.1) constructing 89 multi- family residential units in 27 buildings , and 2) one existing building for use as a community building on 44.5 acres, 895 Dorset St: Mr. Belair said the applicant has asked for a continuance. Ms. Quimby moved to continue the application until 14 May. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to subdivide a 7.88 acre parcel into two lots of 4.52 acres and 3.36 acres, 750 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant if it was clear that the shared entrance between lots A and B will be the only entrance to lot B. Mr. Bouchard said it was. Mr. Bouchard said they just got new information from CWD regarding the waterline issues. He was concerned with having to make changes 2 and 3 times. He agreed to work with staff to locate the waterline and trees. He asked if they can just do a water line for lot A at this time instead of extending to the end of the property. CITY OF SOUTH I URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March z8, zooz Mr. David Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: 117o Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Marshall: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April z, zooz at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. -? Sincerely, C'11/" / aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td f 1TDl�/ 1��hi►��'�Ill l�'::� I : ::: t �-V- Cfl April 2, 2002 MEETING 10) SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE —BERM RELOCATION—HINESBURG ROAD This project consists of an amendment to a 12 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of amending the location of a previously approved berm at the south end of the property to avoid wetland impacts. This project is located on Hinesburg Road within the Mixed Industrial Commercial District. It is bounded by undeveloped land to the east, residential development on the south and commercial development on the west and north. The only issues affecting this application are landscape changes. The previous approval included construction and landscaping of a berm to screen future industrial and commercial development from the residential units to the south (Ledge Knoll), construction of a 5 foot wide recreation path, and relocation and naturalization of a drainage way through the southern portion of lot # 1, because of a previously, illegally constructed drainage way, 30 July1996 (minutes enclosed). The current application is to relocate berms to avoid wetland impacts (the illegally constructed drainage way is now considered a wetland) and no longer construct the "natural" stream corridor because it was never a viable option per the Army Corps of Engineers. 11) AND 12) CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT—CONDUTONAL USE AND SITE PLAN-403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD This project consists of amending a previously approved applications for a 14,450 square foot water treatment facility. The amendment consists of 1) 24,000 square feet of freeze dry beds, 2) a 235 square foot control building, and 3) a 1,500 gallon capacity underground pump station. This property located at 403 Queen City Park Road lies within the Cl and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the north by a Queen City Park Road, on the east and west by Green Mountain Power, and on the south by Potash Brook. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the Commercial 1 District "to encourage the location of general retail office uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area" and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area affected - no adverse effect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to affect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations f:1 4/2/2002 MOTION OF APPROVAL SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE —FINAL PLAT APPLICATION, HIINESBURG ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-02-14 of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved 12 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of relocating a previously approved landscaped berm to avoid wetland impacts, on four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled "Meadowland Industrial Park Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated November, 2001, last revised on 1/2/02 with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Any change to the plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 3) The final plat plan (sheets SP3A and SP10) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 1 Permit Number SD- V 2_ -J4- CITY OF SOUTH BURL,I1 �G` ON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Naive as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street, Burlington, VT 05401 Phone: 658-6320 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) V 387 - Pg 439 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street, Burlington, VT 05401 Phone: 658-6320 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) David S . Marshall, P . E . Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Shelburne, VT 05482 985-2323 Tel. 985-2271 Fax 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Hinesburg Road t110 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use Currently hay production, but approved for commercial/industrial use. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) No change from previous approval. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) None at this time. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) None at this time. No buildings are proposed as part of this application. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) None 0 Number of employees &: company vehicles ;existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): None proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Proposal to modify the berm at the south end of the property so as to avoid wetland impacts. g) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed 0 b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed % *No change from previous % approval. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing o % Proposed 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b)Landscaping-. $ 25,000 (berm onl NA c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Earthwork - no increase from previous avDroval. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No change from previous approval. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): No change from previous approval. c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No change from previous approval. No change from previous approval. 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: No change from previous approval. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2008 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five ($) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). 1) I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF - PLIC SIGNATURE OF PROPEATY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this final plat application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & or Designee Date EXHIBIT A FINAL PLAT The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. If submitting a final plat amendment, please submit only pertinent information. Please provide (on separate sheet) a list of all abutters to the project property and mailing addresses. o Complete survey of property by a licensed land surveyor drawn to scale (20 ft. is preferred). o Name, license number, seal, and contact number of licensed land surveyor & date prepared. o Survey data (acreage, property lines, zoning boundaries, watercourse, base flood elevation, etc.) o Location of easements, public lands, r.o.w.s, sidewalks, and public or private street (w/names) o Five foot contours (existing and finished) o Location and size of any existing sewers (including septic tanks) and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdivided. o Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, _easements, parks, and other public opens spaces. - o Numerical and graphical -scale, date last revised, and north arrow. o Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative water supply. o Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes.r 33rftit ix it, 0 Detafs Of Scorn Water facilities in the. form of a dmime plan, o Details of all proposed bridges or culverts. o Location of temporary markers. o All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and associated conditions. o A list of waivers desired (if any). o Development timetable (including number of phases and start and completion dates). o A report addressing planned residential/unit development criteria of the Zoning Regulations. o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size). o Location of abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Number and location of parking spaces ( see Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (see Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations) o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be downcasting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters roust be screened) o Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Final Plat Application $ 85.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee A CIVIL Ell GAI EEIRIl IG ASOSOCIAM, INC. 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 March 5, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Subdivision Amendment Application Dear Mr. Belair: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com 13ECEIVED MAR - 7 2011 Eta of SO- Burtin�ton After reconciling the original design plans that were prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers with the extent of the improvements included in the original wetland permits granted by the State of Vermont and the United States Corps of Engineers, it was determined that a significant amount of wetland impact required by the proposed berms on the south side of the property and the gravity sewer connection to the north was not properly identified. These issues have been brought to the attention of the regulators and mitigative measures have been proposed to reduce the amount of wetland impact. A summary of those measures are outlined below and are hereby proposed as amendments to the existing subdivision permit. Gravity Sewer Easement Area It is apparent that the original application for this project, and the permit which was eventually issued, did not properly depict the existing wetlands along the proposed gravity sewer corridor that extends northerly from the applicant's property to the existing municipal pump station. This area was delineated by Mr. Jeff Severson this past fall and the wetlands have been field located by CEA. The revised plans depict this information and identify the proposed impact utilizing the full width of the 20' easement area. It should be noted that most of these impacts in this field will be short term in that the sewer trench will be backfilled and the topsoil replaced and the site stabilized. The original plans called for the installation of a 12' wide gravel road from the end of Thompson Street to the pump station. In order to reduce these permanent impacts, we have approached the City of South Burlington about reducing the amount of road that needs to be installed across the wetlands. The City Sewer Department has agreed to allow a reduction in the amount of road to be installed, but the section of road from the municipal pump station to the second manhole to the south will be necessary to allow access for maintenance of the line in case of debris clogging. This revision from the originally approved plans will reduce the permanent impacted area from approximately 9,840 square feet to 1,520 square feet. Mr. Ray Belair Page two March 5, 2002 We have reviewed the alternatives to further reduce the impacts to this line and there do not appear to be any that are prudent. To significantly change the amount of impact would require a realignment. Moving the line further to the west would require a much deeper excavation (the current line is already designed with depths approaching 16 feet) and would require permission from the abutting property owner (who we understand is not willing to reduce their upland area because of a project that they are planning). South Berm Work This component of the project alone, as originally designed by Trudell Consulting Engineers, implied a Class II wetland impact of 29,654 square feet and a buffer impact of 6,845 square feet. The impacts to the existing ditch and interior wetlands and the implied amount of mitigation that would likely result from the improvements were not outlined in the previous plans submitted to the State regulators. After discussing the goals of the originally proposed berming with the yourself and the abutting neighbors (Mr. Terry Sheahan), the proposed berming has been redesigned to meet the overriding goal of screening while avoiding g11 wetland impact in this area. In order to achieve this, the berm has been moved further to the north and the secondary stream channel proposed in the original design has been eliminated since there was no source of water (other than a small amount of overland flow) to maintain the integrity of the design. This completes our summary of the proposed information update and proposed revisions to the approved plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm Enclosures: Application Application Fee ($85) Revised Design Plans Sheets (SP-10, 13 and 14) Original SP-10, SP-11 and SP-13, 14 (for comparison). cc: M. Neagley File 01117 \\navc\c\ I Let\01 I Mbelair nd.wpd CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 28, zooz Arthur & Lexie Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, z I Ad Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer E ncl./td 3-07-2002 12:56PM FROM Z). MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK James C. & Sachi H, Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Strect So, Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy J, Toutant c/o Arthur Toutant 1398 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Gary W. & Nancy Lines 16 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher L. & Theri Davis v 18 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mark L. & Kathryn M. Boucher 20 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 ' Terrance J. & Nancy G. Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Scott L. & Roberta S. Pennington 26 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Larry W , & Ginette D, Brainard 28 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 List of Abutters September 17, 2001 Homer & Marie Dubois ✓ 1405 Hinesburg Road So, Burlington, VT 05403 Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties, LTD c/o Dan Kalman P.O. Box 9210 So, Burlington, VT 05403 Ann V. Painter Richard Painter 1060 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Willard Malcom 699 Nob Hill WIliston, VT 05495 v Lexie R, & Arthur H..Rye 1075 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 3-07--2022 1 2 : 55PM FROM P. 1 r � Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road Phone: 802-985-2323 P.O. Sox 48.5 Fax: 842-985-22'71 Shelburne, VT 05492 FAX COVER SKEET Date: p-4pwlzcet I, 7_4�07_ To- **M IT'S}» Fax 4. 4t o I From: Z)A j ' r"to' " Project: Ab.A i . POW-4< Number of pages including this cover sheet: ';L— ConunenM, Copies to. Hard copy to be sent via: —Regular Mail _Overnight Mail Federal Express Hand Delivered Or: 1�01ax Only 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 July 16, 2001 Mr. Ray Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Phase II - Lot Regrading Municipal Impact Questionnaire Dear Mr. Belair: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: cea@together.net We are preparing an Act 250 Permit Application for the proposed regrading of Lots 1 through 12 of the Meadowland Business Park. We would greatly appreciate it if you would complete the enclosed Municipal Impact Questionnaire. We have also enclosed a copy of the project site plan. The project calls for the placement of up to 200,000 cubic yards of off -site fill material to facilitate the regrading of the lots. If you have any questions regarding the project or need additional information, please call. Thank you for your assistance. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. DSM:pao Enclosures: Municipal Impact Questionnaire Site Plan A AM uni I mpactQues[C ov. wpd ACT 250 MUNICIPAL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire is intended to help applicants gather evidence to submit under Criterion 7 - municipal Services. A letter or narrative from the Town Manager, Selectboard Chair or appropriate official may also serve as evidence. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE: Applicant Name: Summer Ice Joint Venture Municipality: City of South Burlington Title and Cate of Site Plan Submitted: Meadowland Business Park - Lot Regrading, July 17, 2001 TOWN MANAGER, DEPARTMENT HEADS, OR EQUIVALENT TO COMPLETE: a) Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection _Yes _No _ Mun. does not provide this service. Police Protection Yes _No _ Mun. does not provide this service. Rescue Service _Yes _No _ Mun. does not provide this service. Solid Waste Disposal _No — Mun. does not provide this service. Road Maintenance _Yes Yes _No — Mun, does not provide this service. b) If "no", what are the deficiencies? c) If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the service so that the town doesn't have to? d) Would the deficiencies occur without this project? __Yes or _No? If "no", what measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? e) If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to the municipality? _Yes or —No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an impact fee or other means to mitigate any unreasonable burdens? f) Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? _Yes or _No I certify that the above information is trace and accurate to the best of my Knowledge. Name Position - Date STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4 APPLICATION # 4C1005-1 October 19, 2001 ENTRY OF AP PEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its legal staff, Erin Flynn, in the above -captioned matter. COMMENTS Criteria, 1(E) - Streams and 4 - Erosion Control Criterion 4 of Act 250 requires an applicant to demonstrate that its project "will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result." Kim Greenwood, Water Quality Engineer with the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, has reviewed the application for this project with respect to erosion control and finds it lacking for the following reasons: The plans submitted do not indicate the proposed buffers, nor is there a buffer condition in the proposed LUP. 2. The erosion and sediment control plan does not address the specific issues of the site (for example, no phasing plan is presented, nor a construction timetable). 3. The applicant should also provide details for the construction of the "natural stream" to be constructed as well as consult the Rivers section (Chris Brunelle) as to the adequacy of the channel design. This information should be provided prior to issuance of the permit. Ms. Greenwood may be contacted through the Water Quality Division at 241-3770. Application # 4C1005-1 Criterion 1 (G) - Wetlands October 19, 2001 2 April Moulaert, District Wetlands Ecologist with the Water Quality Division, reports that the Wetlands Section will need to conduct a site visit to review both the wetlands delineation and the classification of the wetlands on this site. No information on the delineation was included in the application. The Applicant should contact the Wetlands Section to arrange a site visit. Criterion 8 - Historic Sites Scott Dillon, Vermont Division for Historic Preservation (DHP), has reviewed the application regarding historic sites and archaeological sensitivity. A phase I survey was completed in 1997 and several areas containing prehistoric cultural material were identified. The project was subject to a Corps of Engineers permit, which was issued with conditions relative to the archeologically sensitive areas. The Corps' permit conditions were sent to District 4 Commission with recommendation that similar conditions be placed in the Act 250 permit. The current proposal is to "regrade lot with up to 200,000 cy of off -site fill." It is difficult for DHP to identify if any of the archeologically sensitive areas will be affected without specific information on the location of the grading and fill placement. The DHP needs to compare the site plan with the information in DHP files. Therefore the DHP has requested a site plan from the project applicant. Dated October 19, 2001, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By Erin Flynn Legal Staff Planning Division CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Roger Adams, Administrative Assistant for the Planning Division of the Agency of Natural Resources, sent a copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance and Comments dated October 19, 2001, regarding File #4C1005-1 (Summer Ice Joint Venture) by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit St Burlington VT 05401 David S Marshall PE Civil Engineering Assoc Inc PO Box 485 Shelburne VT 05482 Donna Kinville, S Burlington City Clerk Chair, Selectboard / Chair, Planning Commission 575 Dorset St South Burlington VT 05403 Michael Crane, Exec Dir Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction VT 05453 District 4 Environmental Commission 111 West St Essex Junction VT 05452 Datqd October 19, 2001, at Waterbury, Vermont Roge Adams r September 18, 2001 r,IVI! EIIG,II EEAr II Ir 4NSSOCIFIVE1 II IC, 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowlands Business Park Notification Dear Mr. Belair: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: cea@together.net In accordance with the notification requirements outlined in Condition 9 of the City's Subdivision Permit, please be advised that the Contractor of Record for the construction of the infrastructure improvements will be Munson Earth -Moving Corp. Their contact is Bill Bohlen (863-6391). The Construction Engineer of record will be Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. The contact will be David Marshall, P.E. at 985-2323, extension 310. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 985-2323. Respectfully, David S. Marshall, P.E. Project Engineer \dsm cc: M. Neagley File 01117 \\Dave\61 Let\01 117\belaimotimwpd No Text SEP-14- 001 15:05 NEAGLE'YK-HASE -ONSTR 60226519203149 P.01/01 r A G L Y H A S CON TItUCTiON COM ANY Thi Ray Selaire Ftone Mark R. Neagiey raw 8464101 Pages: 1 Phorw 846-4105 Data: 09l14101 Re„ Named Contractor and Engineer of CC: Record 0 LJm"t for Review :1 Please Comment 13 Please haply x Please Be Advised • t;ar monts: Ray, As requested I'm providing you with the names and contact persons for the Maadowiand Business Park infrastructure construction. CONTRACTOR: Munson Earth Moving Corp. attn: Bill Bohlen, 863-6391 20 Shunpike Road Williston, Vermont 05495 ENGINEER: Civil Engineering Associates attn: David Marshall, 985-2323 Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont ITA82 Thank you for your help. We are going to start mobilization immediately. The engineers V411 be starting the surrey layout next week. Mark Neagley, Partner, Summer Ice Joint Venture/Meadowiand Business Park kLw)-eL— T07 L P.01 STEVEN F. STTIZ.EL PATTI R. PAGE- JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (•ALSO ADUTUED IN N.Y.) STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET PO BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICEITDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 November 14, 1996 Raymond J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Meadowlands Business Park Dear Ray: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER I have enclosed execution ready versions of the three Warranty Deeds, the Offer of Dedication, the Recreation Path Easement, and the respective Vermont Property Transfer Tax Returns, as provided to me by Judy Zullo, Esq., relative to the Meadowlands Business Park transaction. Please have these documents executed by a Duly Authorized Agent of the City of South Burlington. Thereafter, please retain these documents at your office as a Duly Authorized Agent of Summer Ice Joint Venture will be coming to the City of South Burlington Municipal Offices to execute the three Warranty Deeds, the Offer of Dedication, and the Recreation Path Easement. After the documents have been executed by both the City of South Burlington and Summer Ice Joint Venture, please forward me copies of the same, and have the original documents recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Joseph S. McLean JSM/maf Enclosures SON3150.COR STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@AOL.COM) JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED UJ N.Y.) November 8, 1996 Ray Belair, Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER Re: Meadowlands Business Park, City of South Burlington Dear Ray: I have enclosed the original Warranty Deeds and Recreation Path Easement Deed forwarded to me by Judith A. Zullo, Esq. for attachment to the Offer of Dedication in the above -referenced matter. Please review these documents and give me a call if you have any questions. Otherwise, it appears that it is appropriate to permit recording of the documents at this time. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, y Joseph S. McLean JSM/11 Enclosures SON3145.COR STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICEn DD) STEVEN F. STTTZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE' JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (-ALSO ADNnTED IN N.Y.) October 31, 1996 Ray Belair, Zoning & Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Dear Ray: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence and enclosures delivered to our office from Judith Zullo. Sincerely, /- seph S. McLean f JSM/11 Enclosures SON3136.COR OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 PETER M. DOREMUS STEVEN J. KANTOR MATTHEW T. DALY JUDITH L. ZULLO LEGAL ASSISTANT MARY A. HUTTENLOCK Joseph McLean, Esq. Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street Burlington, VT 05401-5210 Re: Meadowland Business Park Dear Joe: MNla0101a&V01N01CC October 24, 1996 Enclosed please find copies of the following documents: 1. Warranty Deed regarding Swift Street Extension; 2. Warranty Deed regarding Bowdoin Street; 3. Warranty Deed regarding Thompson Street; 4. Recreation Path Easement; 5. Offer of Dedication. OC� (802) 863-9603 IFAXI 658-5685 Also enclosed are the accompanying Property Transfer Tax Returns. You will note that the Returns need to be signed by the City of South Burlington. It is our intention to record these documents within the next few days. Please contact me once you have reviewed these documents. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Enclosures J dith L. Zul o, /1023k.1tr WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Swift Street Extension" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23,, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the southerly side of Swift Street Extension and proceeding S 47027'17" E for a distance of 780.34 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 337.04, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 112.24, more or less, to a concrete monument to be set; thence proceeding N 84°53'19" E for a distance of 237.43 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 84053'19" E for a distance of 1331.37 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 07004125" W for a distance of 80.05 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S. 84°53'19" W for a distance of 560.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84*53119" W for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84*53119" W for a distance of 716.53 feet, more or less, to a point marked by 1 Di)s:):ML'S :�1tiOCIATES Al-I-ORNP1:S AT I_10W ONE. TWE LVE 1-',Kr•. STH EET IWIZLINGTON.vron.jos a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing S 84*53119" W for a distance of 169.46 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence deflecting to the right along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 241.24, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence proceeding in a generally northwesterly direction along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 141.50 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 47027117" W for a distance of 712.02 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002136" W for a distance of 105.21 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this;�2,3 '10 day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [- w i t/ n e s] By: 2 SUMMER ICE r OINT VENTURE Duly Authorize' �ge t of NORTHEAST TERRITO I S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Don-limus AssoulA'1-I:S ATI•UHNEYK AT LAB\• I• III' 111.INGTON, \70 .-1.01 (110_) 116 3-960.3 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this-,> 'day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.wd3 Before me, Nota y P bli My Commission 6Pires: 9- 3 DOREmi?S ASSOCIATES .vrrol in-s AT 1_%N%, om, LASIi tiT1tLEf 111TRIA%GTON. \T On401 (Ho_) wm-iwo3 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Thompson Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by a concrete monument to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 5°06'41" W for a distance of 230.27 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006141" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5°06'41" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002136" W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 5006'41" E for a distance of 340.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 500641" E for a distance of 368.33 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 84*53 19" E for a distance of 60.00 feet, to the point or place of beginning. This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer 1 Dom-.mus Associn•r(a 1111HANGTOx. NTu ; )o) (9)02) lSli:S-:)1;03 pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: w i t a s] By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized e t of NORTHEAST TERRITO , INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this 1Z day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj. wdl Before me, Notary' Pub is My Commission Expes: }— /C `I 2 llc)rs:�n v:15tiUCIATIa \'1'1'UlfNlil'1.\'1'le\\�' oNI.:Ix].:i_\rs:til'rra•-r nnrs.sxc ON.\-run-scss (asu_)a;a:s-e)aos OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION Offer made this day of October, 1996, by SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Owner") to the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "City"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, by decision dated July 30, 1996, approved as a planned commercial development and subdivision, 116.74 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres on Hinesburg Road, as shown and depicted on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission obligates Owner to dedicate to the City certain roadways, waterline easements, drainage easements, sewerline easements and recreation path easements as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, the above -described roadways and easements are to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances pursuant to the final approval of said final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered warranty deeds of conveyance to the City for the roadways and easements above - described. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owner, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City the following: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City warranty deeds, copies of which are set forth as Exhibits A-C and an easement, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit D, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time in its entirety or as to any individual conveyance. FI Dora_uus ANSOr.an•a•sti XITORNicYS AT i_\\%• ONE TWi vi, i.:ua, tiraara:r 111-I .axc•roN.oru.->.aoi (au>_) ua.M-ax;us 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner hereby executes this Offer as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: % SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE ///yw i t e s s ] By: Duly Authorize ge t of NORTHEAST TERRITO S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this ��/day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc., and he acknowledged the. within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.off Before me, Notar Pu is My Commission E res: c�C /0 2 Doru.musAssocinTE--S SrrueNEvs:Vri-10%rT 1WHIANGTON.N70.5101 (1102)1163-9603 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Bowdoin Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996 and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 06°19'11" W for a distance of 234.95 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06*19111" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06°19'11" W for a distance of 260.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83°02'06" W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 06°19'11" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019111" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019'11" E for a distance of 253.24 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 84°53'19" E for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly 1 Dr>):):+n s :\ssOc:►,�r�a NITORSEN"S T 1_\\(' (11AMINGTO.N.N705,)01 (so_) 1163-9603 convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, ly its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this �_ day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: T w i n e s s] By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE IA,ial-c- Duly Authoriz g nt of NORTHEAST TERRI ORI S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this :>Z-day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. n Before me, Not. ry P' blic U My Commissio ,/Expires:-• /0 2 Doi. I•: DII1S:VSSO CIIATES A-1-1'UHVia'S.\TI_U1' UVI{9\%')i1.VFI_\FliSPREF--'1- 1117IILIXGTUV,\T0,-101 (I102)IMM-9603 RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Municipal Corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right of way for purposes of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: Twenty feet wide pedestrian easements depicted on a Plat entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Said pedestrian easements and right of way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee,. its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own costs and within a reasonable time. Dc)r,i:an;s.\stiucrnr)eti �rrur�r:�'s:�'ri_�w u�t:���t:�.�'�•:�_�rrsrrit�:'r ittui.�xcro�,�ru iu� (+o02)8G3-7)(;03 Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors, that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that it customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that it has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right of way five feet on each side of said permanent easement and right of way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right of way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right of way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right of way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. Grantee acknowledges that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor assigns shall WARRANT AND DEFEND the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. I)i�ri.�na:ltiscx:_�rta NrrurxEY:tiAT I_%%%oNriwetNE1�%LKr:STREET iu•u1.:Ncruv.N703-101 (9902)1163-9603 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: �2'fd l l+ [ w i t n e s I! By: . STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. VENTURE,Iby its Duly this d� day of SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE �U��4 - Duly Authoriz66 A e t of NORTHEAST TERRITO S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE -dam At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc., and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. Before me, /i Z" L& %Notary ubli My Commission Ex des : lllj.rec Don iimu5 ,Xs SOCIATES AITOWNEYS AT IANV ONE'JIVELVE 1_\KE STH EFT 111uLlu:TON.W0 -101 (uo_) 1163-9603 VERMONT .,OPERTY TRANSFER TtAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) SELLER'S (TRANSFNAME (S) NAMS) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR F' ummer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. Burlington, VT 05401 T.B.D. BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR ity of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) EOOSING Swift Street Extenstion 10/ /96 INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ® FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 112 INTEREST S. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4• ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 8. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACYA +/ U 1 JU BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALLTHAT APPLY). �I--11 1. El NONE S. ❑ BARN 91J STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 8. ❑ MULTIFAMILY WITH ( •rsERT DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER_ ) TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME NUMBER DESCM!! 4. ❑ CAMPNACAT10N HOME S. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( MSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED µ/M BER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION S. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRDE D! Me[ 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 8. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DEscMsE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARYRESIDENCE3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 8. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ETOTHER road DCBCMSE MOM 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 8. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL D[aCNaE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appralsal Programs)? ❑ Yes U No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PP R EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. )f L Transfer municipality TOTAL Ll PRICE PAID FOR N/Arj PRICE PAID FOR N/A N/A PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY f REAL PROPERTY $ IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: O I TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse olds. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS S • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 29 / 95 transfer IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) to municipality TOWN/CfTY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER LISTED VALUE S PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. GRAND LIST OF 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Form PT-1 (12192) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions).........._................................................ 1. a. S b. Value of property enrolled In current use program .................... ................................ _........................ ................................ b. $ c. Value of qualified working farm.........................................................................„........................................................................... c. S d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. S a. Tax rate ......................................... ...............................„..........„......................_....».......»._....»......._.„.............„.........._......... e. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Muttipty Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)...................................................... ................................... . f. S 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Una 0 on front of return ................................................................................................... 2. a. $ b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above .......... ............................................................................................... b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(s)............................................... „.......................................................... _.... _................................. c. $ d. Tax rate .............. ».......... ....................................................................................................... _.».».... ».......... »................................. d. s. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Una 2(d)..._.»...................»....».......».„.».»._._._.»...._.»....„....»....» e. $ 3. Total Tax Due: Add Unes 1M and 2(s) and enter hers and on Una P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES U Buyer(*) and Sellor(s) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(&) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pwUlning to the property may limit signlflcantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. end Is In compliance with sold permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdtvision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel rotained: Exemption Number Number of acres - Please contact the district office In your area to datermins compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further cartlfia as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act ), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the sublect of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: Qist exemption number from instructions) E. That this transfer doss/does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remlttedtothe Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ® 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIRCATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Join> Venture City of South Burlington By: By: I ( Preparer's Signature a ? i'� —� Judith L. Zullo, Esq. Prepared by i Doxemus cia s Asso Joseph McLean, Esq. Preparer'sAddresa -,t12 Lake Street, Burlington, VT Buyer'&Representative Tel. 660-2555 (Print or Type) Keep a copy of tnts return for your recoras. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) SENAME (S) (TRANSFEROR'S) NAMS) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR Ummer 1Ce .Joint Venture 82 Church Street TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. Burlington, VT 05401 T.B.D. BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR city of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING Thompson Street �IO/ /96 INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. [�) FEE SIMPLE 3. ElUNDIVIDED 1t2INTEREST S. ❑ TIMESHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 0. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE acres +/— BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE S. ❑ BARN 90 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( *4EFIT ) DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME "u"8E" oescn�se 4. ❑ CAMP/VACATION HOME S. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ('�q ) UNITS TRANSFERRED CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER El OCCUPIED El RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION IS. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER —fiISMsc Dtcuut 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USER. ❑ INDUSTRIAL OC•CM11 PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCES. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 6. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. U OTHER road DtsClust D150991 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL Descwst IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124.01F 32 V.SA (Agricuttural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appralsol Programs)? ❑ Yes 0 No IF TRANSFER IS EXE PT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. 2, Transfer to municipality TOTAL U PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR - N/A N/A N/A PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE O AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse slds. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS I S 0 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 29 95 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET transfer CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) t0 municipality THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. LISTED VALUE S GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWNNUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK Form PT-1 (12192) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: ■. Value of purchaser's principal re a Ids nce (not to exceed $100,000) (Ses Instruc ions) ................... „....................................... 1. a. S b. Value of property enrolled In current use program ................. „.„................... „............. „............................................................ b. $ c. Value of qualified working farm........................................................................._......................................................................„... c. S d. Add Linea 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. $ a. Tax rate .... ............................................................................. ...................... »................. .... ........ ............................ .... .... e. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property. Muttlpfy Line 1(d) by Line 1(s)................................. „......................................................... 1. S 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Una 0 on front of return .................................................................................................... 2. a. $ , b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above ................... ...... _....... .................................... „.„....................................... b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Una 2(s)........................................................................................................_.......„.„.............................. c. $ d. Tax rate ............... .......... ........................................................................................................ _.... „................ _................................. d. a. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Una 2(d).................................. ................. .... .„............................. e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Una* 1M and 2(e) and enter hare and on Una P on front of return ................................................ „................................. 3. S FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES 0 Buyer(s) end Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(*) advised the buyer(&) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations ponalning to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (sea Inwuctlons for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acre Please contact the district office in your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 25.) S411er(s) further cwtlNes as follows: D. That this transfer of real pprroperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for fhe following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (flat exemption number from Instructions) E That this transfer doadoes not (strike one) result In a partltion or division of land. Note: if It does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certiflea that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): 01. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner _ ; of Taxes in advance of this sale. - ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additlonaf consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIRCATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Joifit Venture City of South Burlington By: t0• �.3 �l L By: Preparer'sSignature 41 Prepared by Judith L. Zullo, Eq. emus Associates Preparer'sAddresa 11 Lake Street, Burlington, F VT Buyer's Representative Joseph McLean, %slq 660-2555 (Print or Type) Keep a copy of this return for your records. VERMONT P110PERTY TRANSFER To-%X RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ffaSELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street T.B.D. Burlington, VT 05401 Rj BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAIUNG ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) DATE OF CLOSING Meadowland Business Park 10/ /96 INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3, ❑UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST S. ❑TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ®EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE S. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE recreation path BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ElNONE 5. ❑ BARN 90 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT ) DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. El MOBILE HOME NUMBER DUC Not 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME S. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER El OCCUPIED El RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION If. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DtitRiBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL xacRlsE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCES. ❑ CAMPNACAnON 6. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9.0 OTHER DEa CRUSE Path DISCWeE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DEscwsE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Aprlcuft_ural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes M No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and O BELOW. #2 Transfer to municipality TOTAL N/A PRICE PAID FOR N/A • PRICEPAIDFOR N/A - PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE O AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: -s- TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reversa side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS I S 0 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 29 95 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET # 10 CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) TO WN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER LISTED VALUE S PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. GRAND LIST OF 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Form PT-1 (12192) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: ■. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1. e_ $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program ................. _..................................... »............................ _.............................. b. $ c. Value of qualified working farm........................................................................._........................................................................... c. S d. Add Linea 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. $ e. Tax rate ............................................ .................... ............................................. _................ ...... ................................... ..... ... e. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)....................................................... 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Una 0 on front of return...._....»....»._...._.»._.»._..».»._........_......._.........._.._._._.».»...._................_.» 2. a. $ , b. Enter amount from Uns 1(d) of Rate Schedule above .......... .............. _..........................................._.......................................... b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Una 2(s).................................................................................................._............._................................. c. $ d. Tax rate .............. »........... ........ ........................................... _................................................. »._._................ _................................. d. a. Tax due on General Rate Property. MuMply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)................................. .................. _._._......... ..................... .. e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines I and 2(e) and enter hare and on Una P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES 0 Buyer(*) and Sellers) cartify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every parry to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(*) advised the buyers) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivislon regulations pertaining to the property may limit slgniffcantlythe use o the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance wtth or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your arse to datermins compliance with Act 250. (Sae map on page 26.) Saller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real pprropxty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for tha following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (fist exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer does does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: if it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ® 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner Of Taxes in advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee Ina foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additlonafconsideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFHRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIRCATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Joint Venture City of South Burlington By: 10• �3•'16 By: Preparer'sSlpnature Doremus Associates 112 Lake Street, Burlington, Preparer's Address Prepared by Judith L. Zullo, Esq. VT Joseph McLean, Esq. Buyer's Representative Tel. 660-2 5 5 5 (Print or Type) rceep a copy or trus return for your records. VERMONT PrAOPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT.NO. Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street T.B.D. Burlington, VT 05401 BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAIUNG ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South ur ington, VT U54U3 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) DATE OF CLOSING Bowdoin Street 10/ /96 INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ® FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2INTEREST 5. ❑ TIMESHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4• ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST S. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE 1.01 acres +/- BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. Q NONE S. ❑ BARN 90 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 8. ❑ MULTIFAMILY WITH ( HSERT ) DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. El MOBILE HOME „VuKR DESCRIBE 4. ❑ CAMP/VACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED HJMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 6. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL OTHER DESCRIBE E RIB 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 8. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE. PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. U OTHER road DESCRIBE DEICIYu 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 8. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL r DcacRlse IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNQER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appralsal Programs)? ❑ Yea ® No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TR,�O 1ySFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTN FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. #2, Transfer to municipaiity TOTAL N/A 10 PRICE PAID FOR N/A • PRICE PAID FOR N/A PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY $ IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: 0 . TAX DUE: Ender amount from rate schedule on reverse slde. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS S • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 29 / 95 - IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET Transfer CONTINUE ON REVERSESID to municipality THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWWCITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. USTED VALUE S GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REOUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Form PT-1 (12)92) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1. a. $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program ................. »..................................... »............................................................ b. $ c. Value of qualified wcrking turn ...................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. $ a. Tax rate ............................................................. ...»......._.........._.........._..........»....».........._....»......._................_................».» e. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property, Muftlpty Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)................................. »....................................................... 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Una 0 on front of return .................................................................................................. 2. a. $ , b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rats Schedule above .......... .............. _.......»....................................._....................................... b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Una 2(s)........................................................................................................».......................................... C. S d. Tax rate .............. .................... ....................... ....................................................................... _._................... ........ .......................... d. a. Tax due on General Rau Property: Multiply Una 2(c) by Line 2(d)................................. ............ _.... _._.»._............................ . e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Unes 1 M and 2(e) and enter hare and on Una P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES I Buyer(&) and Seller(*) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(*) advlsed the buyers) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pwUlning to the property may limit sign)fkantly the use o the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and Is in compliance with said permlt, or 2. This property and any roulned parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel rstainad: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of rui pprroperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for a following reason: 1. This property to the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: 01st axamption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer doesldoes not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: If R does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ® 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate nofrom the Commissioner of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee Ina foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIRCATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Join Venture City of South Burlington By: tD-�3-96 By: Preparer'sSignature Prepared by Judith L. Zullo, Esq. �Doremus Associa )es Preparer'sAddress / 1 ]2 Lake Street. Burlington, VT Buyer's Representative Joseph McLean, fa,q. 660-25 (Print or Type) 5 Keep a copy of this return for your records. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. Summer Ice Joint Venture t 1;1 0�-401 BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. City of South 575 Dorset Street Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Addresa In full) s DATE OF CLOSING Swift St. Extension INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. x❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑UNDIVIDED 1/21NTEREST r- ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED ____% INTEREST ^)U / J ❑ OTHER _ b T /�o FRONTAGE AND DEPTH f�VXF-6 / BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK A � j' 1. N NONE 5. ❑ BARN (A f1`� 9.1:1 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WI j�� �J 10.11 OTHER DESCRIBE 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM W, NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USER. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): �I 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3, ❑ CAMP,NACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. rt OTHER road DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes ® No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and O BELOW. # 2 Transfer to municipality TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR s PRICE PAID FOR N/A N/A N/A PRICE PAID $ PERSONAL PROPERTY $ REAL PROPERTY $ IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: -s- - TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS Fs 0 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 2 9 / 9 5 transfer - IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET to municipality CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER LISTED VALUE $ PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. GRAND LIST OF 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK Form PT-1 (12/92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1. a. $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program...................................................................................................................... b. $ _ c. Value of qualified working farm...................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. $ e. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. e. _ f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)............................................................................................ f. $ — 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return................................................................................................................................. 2. a. $ b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above.................................................................................................................. b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(s).................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. d. _ e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. $ 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines i (i) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Seller(*) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and 4 in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real pproperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Lend Use and Development Law (Act 250), for he following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner Of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Joint Venture City of South Burlington By: By. Preparer'sSignature Preparer'sAddress Doremus Associates 112 Lake St. , Burlington, Prepared by _Judith L. Zullo, Esq. Buyer's Representative Tel. Vr*rintorType) Keep a copy of this return for your records. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYERIDENT.NO. Summer Ice Joint °Z Cri d3-� Venture = BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. City of South 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 -Burlington PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING Thompson Street INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ® FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED ____% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE 0.98 acres +/- BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE 2. ❑FACTORY 8. ❑ DWELLING UNITS MULTI -FAMILY WITH _ ( ) TRANSFERRED 10.❑ OTHER__. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME DESCRIBE 3. El SINGLE 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH INSERTR ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBE CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. 113 OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE8. ❑ INDUSTRIA;. DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ® OTHER road DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes 91 No IF TRANVE IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, ITjE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and O BELOW. �, Transfer to municipa ity TOTAL TT PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID $ A PERSONAL PROPERTY S N/A REAL PROPERTY $ N/A N/ IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N/A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: -s- TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS j $ 0 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 2 9 / 9 5 transfer - IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE to municipality THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. LISTED VALUE $ GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED CLERK DATE Form PT-1 (12/92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions)...... b. Value of property enrolled In current use program................................................................ c. Value of qualified workingform................................................................................................ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c).......................................................................................................... e. Tax rate......................................................................................................................................... I. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)....................................... 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return............................................................................ b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above............................................................. c Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a) ................................................ 1. a. $ ................................................ b. $ ................................................ c. $ ................................................ d. $ .......................... I..................... e. 0.005 ................................................ f. $ - .................................................................................................................................................... d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d).......................................................................... 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................. .. 3. $ 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Sellers) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the sellers) advised the buyor(a) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may Ilmit significantly the use ofi the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and :s In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Sellar(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real pproperty and any development thereon is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Lew (Act 250), for a following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer d does oes not (strike one) result in a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Joint Venture Cit of South Burlington B B 'i Preparer'sSignature Preparer'sAddress DOremus Associate's 112 Lake St. , Burlington, Preparedby Judith L. ZullO Esq. Buyer's Representative Tel. V7prlrrtorType) Keep a copy of this return for your records. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) "SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYERIDENT.NO. Summer Ice Joint Venture r -T- 5-40 ( BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO, OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. of South 575 Dorset Street -City South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) DATE OF CLOSING Bowdoin Street INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. © FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. ❑ EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED % INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE 1.01 acres +/- BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE 2. ❑FACTORY 8. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT UNITSsERr ) TRANSFERRED 10D OTHER __ _ 3. ❑SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑MOBILE HOME NUMBER DESCRIBE 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER _ DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIA;. OEBCR18E PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. El OTHER road - D EBCRIBE 1!8C RISE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes 1?f No IFTRAPSFERIS EXEMPT FR M PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N anu ')BELOW. 2, Transfer to municipality TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR a PRICE PAID FOR N / A N/A N/ A PRICE PAID $ PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL ROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N / A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ONLINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: -e- TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS $ 0 e DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 2 9 / 9 5 transfer - IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET _ CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) to municipality THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TORNA NUMBER DATE OF RECORD RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. IF REQUIRED, ACT250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) LISTED VALUE $ GRAND LIST OF 19 AND TAX PAID. PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. SIGNED CLERK GRAND LIST CATEGORY DATE Form PT-1 (12/92) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's princl pal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1, a. $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program...................................................................................................................... b. $ c. Value of qualified working term...................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. $ e. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. e. 0.005 f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)............................................................................................ f. $ 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Llne O on front of return................................................................................................................................. 2. a. $ b. Enter emount from Llne 1(d) of Rate Schedule above.................................................................................................................. b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a).................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. d. 0.012 s. Tax duo on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. $ 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(*) and Sellers) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated end disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the sellers) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is in compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. _ and is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): e. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b, Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seiler(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act ), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of lend. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration, WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURES) DATE Summer Ice Joint, enture City of South Burlington B f, B Preparer'sSignature Preparer'sAddress DOremus Associates 112 Lake St., Burlington, Preparedby_ Judith L. Zullo Esq. Buyer's Representative Tel. VeintorType) Keep a copy of this return for your records. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYERIDENT.NO. Summer Ice Joint Venture P.J ti �JU Lo vj \IL_Y a13 BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER ID ENT. NO. City of South 573 gorse', 'treet Burlington Sov.t Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING Meadowland Business Park INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2INTEREST 5. ❑TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED __ % INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER _. FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE recreation path BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. © No5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE DWELLING UNITS Ii��i 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT ) TRANSFERRED 10.LJ OTHER_ NUMBER DESCRIBE 3. El SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑MOBILE HOME 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUMBER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL _ DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): recreation 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL_ __ ___ 9. n OTHER Path DESCRIBE DI SCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes Fn No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR N / A N /A N / PRICE PAID $ PERSONAL PROPERTY $ REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE N / A ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: -s- TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS $ 0 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 12 / 2 9 / 9 5 - IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET # 10 CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. LISTED VALUE $ GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWNNUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED CLERK DATE Form PT-1 (12/92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: ■. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See Instructions) ...................... b. Value of property enrolled In current use program................................................................................ c. Value of qualified working farm................................................................................................................ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)......................................................................................................................... a. Tax rate........................................................................................................................................................ f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)...................................................... 2. Tax on General Rate Property: Ent r amount from Line O on front of return ....................... 1. a $ ...................... b. $ .......I .............. c. $ ....................... d. $ ...................... e. ...................... f. $ a. e................................................................................................................................. b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above.................................................................................................................. c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(s).................................................................................................................................................... d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. a. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ 2. a $ o. S c. $ d. e. $ _ 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Una P on front of return................................................................................... 3. S 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the sellers) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdlvlslon regulations ponalning to the property may limit slgn)ftcantlythe use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and ;s In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Sellers) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act ), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Dlsclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes in advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1,) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) I DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE Summer Ice Joint,Venture City of South Burlington B Preparer'sSignature Preparer'sAddress Doremus Associates 112 Lake St. , Burlington, Prepared by Judith L. Zulto, Esq. Buyer's Representative Tel. WTPrintorType) Keep a copy of this return for your records. STITZEL & PACE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STEVENF. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M.EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAII (FIRM2555@AOL.COM) December 24, 1996 Raymond Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Meadowlands Business Park Dear Ray: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.PLETCHER I have enclosed, for your review, a copy of Judy Zullo's December 16th and December 23rd letters to me, together with the enclosures. JSM/maf Enclosures SON406.COR Very,truly yours, J,o eph S. McLean 7 DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET BURLINGTON,VT 05401 PETER M. DOREMUS PHILLIP C. LINTON STEVEN J. KANTOR MATTHEW T. DALY JUDITH L ZULLO December 23, 1996 Joseph McLean, Esq. Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street, 2nd Floor Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Meadowlands Business Park, City of South Burlington Dear Joe: P I DEC 2 TEL (902) $63.9603 FAX: (802) 659.5685 OF C�UPb}L LESLIE S. LINTON IM:ALAS nS MARY A. HLTITENLOCK Enclosed please find the Exhibits A through D to the Offer of Dedication which were inadvertently left out of the package we sent to you last week. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Thank you. Sincerely, dudOI Zalze ith L. Zullo, E Enclosure 1223k.1tr OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION Offer made this 23rd day of October, 1996, by SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Owner") to the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "City"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City of"South Burlington Planning Commission, by decision dated July 30, 1996, approved as a planned commercial development and subdivision, 116.74 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres on Hinesburg Road, as shown and depicted on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page ; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission obligates Owner to dedicate to the City certain roadways, waterline easements, drainage easements, sewerline easements and recreation path easements as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, the above -described roadways and easements are to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances pursuant to the final approval of said final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered warranty deeds of conveyance to the City for the roadways and easements above - described. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owner, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City the following: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City warranty deeds, copies of which are set forth as Exhibits A-C and an easement, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit D, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time in its entirety or as to any individual conveyance. 1 DOItImus :VSSOC7IATES .VI*FO1?NI{YS .DTI_\W ON E. TWE AT. 1_\S F: 1TR 1.1•'P 111'I t 1.1 NGTO N. VTO;- 10 1 (ItO2)H63-O603 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner hereby executes this Offer as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE w i t e�'s s ] By: Duly Authorize& kget of NORTHEAST TERRITO S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this JT/day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc., and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.off Before me, Notary/ Putylic My Commission E res: 4,110 2 DoinF us iLSSOCIATF.S .,a-ron.XrYS:\T 1-'.%V BURIANGTON• \T O3.1O1 (UO2) 1168-9603 EXHIBIT A WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Thompson Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by a concrete monument to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 5°06'41" W for a distance of 230.27 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006141" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006141" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83*02136" W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 5°06141" E for a distance of 340.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 5°06'41" E for a distance of 368.33 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 84*53 19" E for a distance of 60.00 feet, to the point or place of beginning. This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, 1 D( UENJUSASRO(1L1TES .\'1-1'0H\Nl"1.\T1-\\\' U\li"Il\'li1.\'h:l..\laiti"1'ItF:F:I' ltl'Itl.l\(:'fUti,�'1'U;�1<�1 - (Iso_)a(�a-�aos sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s] By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of NORTHEAST TERRITORIES, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj, wdl Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 DO I- NI CS .VSSOCIATE—S ATFORNEYS AT i_\N%' ONE ►_ILKE STREET 111'1?1.u(cru N, -%-r u,aui (no-') ao(a-:)cua EXHIBIT B WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Bowdoin Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996 and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 06°19'11" W for a distance of 234.95 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06*19111" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06°19'11" W for a distance of 260.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002106" W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 06*19111" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06*19111" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06*19111" E for a distance of 253.24 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 84`53'19" E for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. 1 Doi.i m us Assoc x,- rs:s vr1-cnZVla•5.vr i-vw ONE TWELVE 1_kKE SrREP I- s"Aut.iNc: ON,\7 u ; sot (ssu_) tsa:s-:x;ua This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: w i t n e s s By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of NORTHEAST TERRITORIES, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.wd2 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 DUI: LML's .VSSOCIATES .�'rrc nz�rvv .��'t_���' c��r: •i��ia.�•u �_�iu: s•r�a it-r m'm.i.Nc•rux.\•ro;.1ut (802)1163-9603 EXHIBIT C WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Swift Street Extension" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the southerly side of Swift Street Extension and proceeding S 47°27'17" E for a distance of 780.34 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 337.04, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 112.24, more or less, to a concrete monument to be set; thence proceeding N 84*53119" E for a distance of 237.43 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 84°53'19" E for a distance of 1331.37 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 07*04125" W for a distance of 80.05 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 84*53119" W for a distance of 560.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84°53'19" W for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84°53'19" W for a 1 ])(>lt�:?I IJS .\5 Sl)CiATiiS .\TI'ul,NE%'S AT 1_\b' l)X li 'I\Ylii.\'li 1..\1: ��: S'I'Itli 1:'f Itl '1t t.i VG'fU Y, \'1' U :�I UI (710_) 1163-9603 distance of 716.53 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing S 84*53119" W for a distance of 169.46 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence deflecting to the right along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 241.24, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence proceeding in a generally northwesterly direction along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 141.50 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 47*27117" W for a distance of 712.02 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83°02'36" W for a distance of 105.21 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. This warranty deed shall act as a bill of sale and accordingly convey all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines, curbs, together will all associated appurtenances and equipment. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE By: Duly Authorized Agent of NORTHEAST TERRITORIES, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 2 1)(m.l.mus Associ1 vres \'1'fU1: \'Pa :9 .\'I' 1..\\�' ONI{'11Y1i1.\'1: I..\Nl.'R'1'I:lili'I' IR' MINGTON.W07, 101 (80.) M;3-19603 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.wd3 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 D012timuS ASSOCIATES 11LIt1.INGTON.\T03-101 (1102)116:1-9603 EXHIBIT D RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Municipal Corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right of way for purposes of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: Twenty feet wide pedestrian easements depicted on a Plat entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Said pedestrian easements and right of way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own costs and within a reasonable time. Dou Em us :VSSOCIATES A-rruavi:vs A-r1_\\%• u.N]•:•i'\%')'I.\'r:I_\iuc,•rri-a--r aiAMINc: ON,vrunim (nos)mm-m-oa Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors, that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that it customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that it has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right of way five feet on each side of said permanent easement and right of way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right of way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right of way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right of way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. Grantee acknowledges that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor assigns shall WARRANT AND DEFEND the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. Dos: siN us ASSOCIATES A-1-YOHXEiS AT 1_UY ()NETWELVE L"KE 1TREE"1' 11URLIN TON, \T u ; 101 (Isu_) lslia-JliOa IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of October, 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s] By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of NORTHEAST TERRITORIES, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc., and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: lllj.rec Dom.-Niu.sAssoc[n•i•ES B1'R1.iNcr0N'%7o;e.01 (isu.)uas-:x;os DOREMUS ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW WATERFRONT PLACE ONE TWELVE LAKE STREET BURLINGTONXT 05401 PETER M. DOREMUS PHILLIP C. LINTON STEVEN J. KANTOR MATTHEW T. DALY JUDITH L ZULLO December 16, 1996 Joseph McLean, Esq. Stitzel & Page, P.C. 171 Battery Street, 2nd Floor Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Meadowlands Business Park, City of South Burlington Dear Joe: ( RECEIVED DEC 191996 Stitzel & Page, P.C. TEL (802) 863-9603 FAX: (802) 658.5685 OF COl1NSFL LESUE S. LINTON IFGAL AS0-M MARY A. ►iLTITENLOCK Enclosed please find the original Offer of Dedication with Exhibits A through D from Summer Ice Joint Venture to the City of South Burlington. Also enclosed are photocopies of the Warranty Deeds and Recreation Path Deed as recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. Thank you. Sincerely, udith L. Zullo, sq. Enclosure 1212k.1tr ITY CLERK'S OFFICE 3D Receivyd�� 19 at e 9 on page- 3` 1 gton land Recor RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED Margaret A. Picard, City CieA KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Municipal Corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right of way for purposes of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows: Twenty feet wide pedestrian easements depicted on a Plat entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, revised August 27, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. Said pedestrian easements and right of way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the condition that no motorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own costs and within a reasonable time. Doimmus ASSO ,IAT a ATrc�itxt:\'s xr i_\\N UXIi71YEl.\7? 1_U:E tiTIt1i6T BtAtI.I`cTos,\-ron-1u1 (uo_) ama- moa STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this y�� day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.wd3 Before me, J. Nota y P bliq a My Commission6�p ires: Z >' / 3 DOItEmus AssocIATF:S Xr1'0It\lay AT j--,'W ONF n%l{I.%'E LAFI'. STIZFI.7r III 11MINGTON,\'rOn ioi OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION Offer made this 23rd day of October, 1996, by SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Owner") to the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "City"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, by decision dated July 30, 1996, approved as a planned commercial development and subdivision, 116.74 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres on Hinesburg Road, as shown and depicted on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Subdivision Plat" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded October 22, 1996 in Map Volume 386, Page ; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission obligates Owner to dedicate to the City certain roadways, waterline easements, drainage easements, sewerline easements and recreation path easements as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, the above -described roadways and easements are to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances pursuant to the final approval of said final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered warranty deeds of conveyance to the City for the roadways and easements above - described. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owner, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner hereby grants and conveys to the City the following: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City warranty deeds, copies of which are set forth as Exhibits A-C and an easement, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit D, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time in its entirety or as to any individual conveyance. 111A INCTON,X7a.5.io1 (ato )ts��a-ax><rt 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner hereby executes this Offer as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE By: Duly Authorize ge t of NORTHEAST TERRITOA18S, INC. and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this JT�/day of October, 1996, personally appeared Mark Neagley, Duly Authorized Agent of Northeast Territories, Inc., and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Northeast Territories, Inc. and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.off Before me Notar Puicy My Commission E res: 2 Dom--mus ASSOCIATES ).vS V1, 1-vkv 1-\1u•: livi"JAN6TON, N70 , 301 (802) 863-:0:03 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE SUBJECT TO GENERAL PERMIT NO. 3-9001 INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE NOTICE OF INTENT NO. 1. Applicant (Owner): Sump _: .ce •i , Gs:� L _ �: Legal Entity: ❑ Private ❑ State EJJ Other Describe Corporation —ownership is lee Simple 2. Address of Applicant: 153 Summit Street, Burlin8tori, VT 05401 Telephone: 1 "G 678-6320 3. Name of Project: 'Mead.owiand Business nark Description: j.; —Lot Commercial/Industrial Subdivision on 116 Acres off of Hinesburg Kt, 4. Location of Construction Site (include map): See attached USES Location orsiem er U11I De d�irected into an unnamed stream whielz 5. Receiving Water(s) (include map): flows; to t1ae norLb (sew attached fans 6. Estimated Area to be Disturbed (Acres): Approximately 11 .72 Acres 7. Estimated Start Date: / / End Date: 6/ 15/ 02 8. On -Site Plan Coordinator: David harshail, P.L., CF•.A, Inc. Telephone: ( 804 985-2323 9. Application fee enclosed: $100 Date of Application: CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I have read General Permit 3-9001 and agree to abide by its terms. I also certify that an erosion control plan has been developed and will be implemented in accordance with General Permit No. 3-9001 and as Authorized Representative I will inform any agents acting on my behalf of the requirements of this plan and shall ensure that a copy of this plan is available on site at all times. I also certify that concurrent with the submittal of this Public Notice/Notice of Intent to the Department of Environmental Conservation, I have submitted a copy of this Public Notice/Notice of Intent to the municipal clerk in the municipality(ies) in which the discharge(s) occur. 10. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Representative Title Print or Type Name PUBLIC COMMENT Public comments concerning this Notice of Intent to discharge under General Permit No 3-9001 are invited and must be submitted within 10 days of receipt of this Notice by the municipal clerk. Comments should address how the application complies with the terms and conditions of General Permit No. 3-9001. All written comments received within the timeframe described above will be considered by the Department of Environmental Conservation in its final ruling to grant or deny authorization to discharge under General Permit No. 3-9001. Any person may, within thirty (30) days of the final ruling by the Department of Environmental Conservation to grant or deny authorization to discharge, appeal the ruling to the Vermont Water Resources Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269. Send written comments to: VT Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main Street, Sewing Building Waterbury VT 05671-0405 IIA copy of General Permit No. 3-9001 may be obtained by calling (802) 241-2369 or examined at the above address between the II hours of 7:45 am and 4:30 pm. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Department Use Only: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE A determination has been made that the applicant meets the criteria necessary for inclusion under General Permit 3-9001 . Subject to the conditions of General Permit No. 3-9001 the applicant is authorized to discharge stormwater runoff from a construction site as described in Notice of Intent No.,1�40 DEC Reviewer: Effective Date: ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO STATE : ONE COPY TO MUNICIPAL CLERK : ONE COPY FOR APPLICANT INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANT APPLICATION: 1 . Applicant: The applicant is the owner of the property. Legal Entity: If legal entity is not "Private" or "State", please explain. NOTE: Municipal and federal projects are not required to apply foe authorization to discharge stormwater runoff from a construction site under this general permit. 3. Name of Project: eg. Mapleridge Subdivision, Vermontville Industrial Park, XYZ Corp., Champlain Street Extension, etc. Project Description: eg. 10 lot residential subdivision, 24 lot industrial park, widget manufacturing facility, etc. 4. Location of Construction Site: Description must include the Town(s) in which the site is located and the nearest town roads or street(s). A reproduction of a USGS map indicating the location of the site must also be included. (Maps do not need to be submitted to the municipal clerk.) 5. Receiving Water: Include the name of all receiving waters. For unnamed streams, give nearest downstream named tributary. Can use same map as used for 4. 6. Estimated Area to be Disturbed: Disturbance includes clearing, grading and excavation. For phased projects, the disturbed area for all phases of the project must be included. 7. Estimated Start/End Dates: For phased projects give the estimated start and end date of construction for the entire project. B. Name of On -Site Plan Coordinator: The On -Site Plan Coordinator need not be an employee of the applicant. He or she may be the contractor, contractor employee, consulting engineer, etc. The On -Site Plan Coordinator may be changed after the submittal of this Notice by notifying the Department in writing of the change. 9. Application Fee: The application fee is $100.00. 10. Signature of Applicant: The application must be signed by the applicant, his legally authorized representative or an officer in the applicant's business. The application CANNOT be signed by applicant's attorney, engineer, contractor, etc. NOTE: IF THE APPLICATION IS NOT COMPLETED IN ITS ENTIRETY, THE APPLICATION PACKAGE WILL BE RETURNED FOR RE - SUBMITTAL. APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED ON ORIGINAL FORMS; PHOTOCOPIED FORMS WILL INVALIDATE THE APPLICATION. SUBMITTAL: 1. Mail the original and one copy of the application, including the map, with a check made payable to "State of Vermont" to: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main Street, Sewing Building Waterbury VT 05671-0405 2. Mail one copy to the municipal clerk in each municipality where discharges will occur. 3. Keep one copy for your records. If a positive determination is made by the Department that you are eligible for coverage under this general permit, an authorization to discharge will be sent to you. No discharge of stormwater from a construction site is allowed until authorized. INFORMATION FOR MUNICIPAL CLERK Title 10 Chapter 47 § 1263(b) provides for the public notice of an applicant's intent to discharge stormwater runoff from a construction site. Please post this notice in a conspicuous place for 10 days from the date received. If you have any questions, contact the Wastewater Management Division of the Department of Environmental Conservation (802) 241-2369. p:\home\forms\noAatd. f rm 12,96 No Text DEPARTMENT OF PLAT` KING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 19, 2001 Mr. David Marshall Civil Engineering Associates P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Ile: M,e�.dowland Business Park - Street Name Dear Mr. Marshall: This is to tt�llow-up on our recent conversation regarding the need to change the street na_-nr of "Swift Street Extension", located in the Meadowland and Business Park of'Hinesburg Road. Since the time we approved this street name, the City adopted Egii street numbering and naming guidelines. These guidelines state that "duplicate or similar sounding road names must be corrected." "Swift Street" and "Swift Street Extension" are very similar sounding names. Therefore,the "Swift Street Extension" road name must be changed. The procedure for changing the name would be to contact Planning and Zoning Director Juli Beth Hoover and ask to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda to have the Commission approve the name change. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely;; Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer CC: Jul: Beth Hoover Td e�c 0 FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR llll VEHICLE TRIP ENDS �7`� vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax '/ r assessment) 7 �`� units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTIONT(� s.f. ( 5 ) TYPE OF USE ( 6 ) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) FORM NiR-2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE $ 226.00 / vte TRIP ENDS ( From form NR-1) vte BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) $ PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) units CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) $ / unit CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) $ (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ ' / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) $ (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ <-` / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ / (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION r (From Table ST-12) $ (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1 000 / unit r. (From line (8) on Form NR-3) �� . � units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) $ / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) / unit / unit / unit FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 S. f. /S I ( • ) 7 units DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 AUGUST 1999 8. PUBLIC HEARING: Request of Summer Ice Joint Venture for a 2-year extension to the expiration date of a final plat approved on 9/10/96 to resubdivide 116.7 acres into 12 lots, Hinesburg Rd: Mr. Neagley said their submission was made to Act 250 in November, 1996, and they got the approval in May, 1998. The delay was due to historic preservation issues. They started marketing right after they got the approval, but the first buyer didn't work out. Mr. Neagley said that if they get a 2-year extension, they feel they can have the roads in next year. He stressed that they want a quality development, not just a bunch of buildings thrown up. Mr. Belair said staff had no objections to the request. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board extend the three year deadline by which the applicant has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision by two years. The subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) and is known as the Meadowland Business Park located on Hinesburg Road. The subdivision approval shall now expire on 9/10/01. Mr. Roth seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PUBLIC HEARING: Final plat application of O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc., and Daniel O'Brien & Leo O'Brien, Jr., dba O'Brien Brothers, Inc., to reaffirm and confirm the approval of a plat approved on 3/22/88 to substitute five single family units for three duplex units, Hayes Avenue: Mr. Crampton said the plat was not recorded within the required 90 days, and they need to ratify the plan. Mr. Belair said there are no unresolved issues. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board re -approve the revised final plat application of O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. and Daniel J. O'Brien and Leo O'Brien, Jr., d/b/a O'Brien Brothers, Inc., for substitution of five single-family dwellings for the previously approved three duplex units as depicted on a plan entitled "Cardinal Woods Phase II South Burlington, Vermont Revised Final Plat," prepared by Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn, Inc., dated Jan. 1985, last revised 9/28/88, and recorded in plat volume 286, page 40 of the land records, with the following stipulations: 2 "59��5-58 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant kkA)6,J6,1 SIAJkge� e- at-e 2 ) Name of Subdivision�- 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: sso . 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a No e-�. final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required �b e4' under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a maj or,-subdivis ion . (Signature) app 'ic nt or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 8, 1999 Mark R. Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction Company 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Two (2) Year Extension, Hinesburg Road Dear Mr. Neagley: Enclosed is a copy of the August 17, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Onc rely, Jotnning ith, Dire or PI & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 8, 1999 Mark R. Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction Company 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Two (2) Year Extension Dear Mr. Neagley: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on August 17, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JW/mcp 1 Enci CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 13, 1999 Mark R. Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction Company 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Two (2) Year Extension Dear Mr. Neagley: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesdays Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Development Review Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 17, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls 8/ 17/99 MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK NEAGLEY I move the South Burlington Development Review Board extend the three (3) year deadline by which the applicant has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision by two (2) years. This subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) and is known as the Meadowland Business Park located on Hinesburg Road. The subdivision approval shall now expire on 9/10/01. IDNAFI MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK NEAGLEY 8/17/99 I move the South Burlington Development Review Board extend the three (3) year deadline by which the applicant has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision by two (2) years. This subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) and is known as the Meadowland Business Park located on Hinesburg Road. The subdivision approval shall now expire on 9/10/01. 8/17/99 MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK NEAGLEY I move the South Burlington Development Review Board extend the three (3) year deadline by which the applicant has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision by two (2) years. This subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) and is known as the Meadowland Business Park located on Hinesburg Road. The subdivision approval shall now expire on 9/10/01. 6, Daps MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK NEAGLEY 8/ 17/99 I move the South Burlington Development Review Board extend the three (3) year deadline by which the applicant has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision by two (2) years. This subdivision was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) and is known as the Meadowland Business Park located on Hinesburg Road. The subdivision approval shall now expire on 9/10/01. Memorandum - Development Review Board August 17, 1999 agenda items August 13, 1999 This project consists of the termination of protective covenants for a seven (7) lot subdivision approved by the Planning Commission on 1/15/80 (minutes enclosed). These seven (7) lots were subdivided by the Commission on 7/15/97 into 62 lots and resubdivided into 55 lots on 4/28/98. Since the 55 lot subdivision supersedes the seven (7) lot subdivision, these covenants are no longer necessary. The Chairman of the Development Review Board will be required to sign a legal document approved by the City Attorney which terminates the covenants. 8) MARK NEAGLEY - TWO (2) YEAR EXTENSION The applicant received approval on 7/30/96 (effective 9/10/96) for a 12 lot subdivision on Hinesburg Road known as the Meadowood Business Park. This request is to extend the three (3) year deadline by which the subdivider has to construct substantially his proposed subdivision. Section 605 of the subdivision regulations allows the Development Review Board to extend the deadline for up to two (2) additional years if the Board determines that "the developer has, since final plat approval, been diligently and consistently pursuing financing or other approvals necessary for the project." The applicant submitted a letter explaining why he has not been able to begin the project (see enclosed). 9) O'BRIEN BROTHERS AGENCY INC. & DANIEL & LEO O'BRIEN - REAPPROVAL - FINAL PLAT This project consists of the reapproval of a subdivision plat approved by the Planning Commission on 3/22/88 (minutes enclosed). This plan was not recorded within the 90 day period required by 24 VSA § 4416, consequently the approval became null and void (see enclosed permit application narrative by submitted by the applicant). Legal document: Once the plat is approved, the Chairman should sign and stamp the recorded plat and record a document explaining the Board's action. 6 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT P REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington City Hall, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following: 1 ] Application of Derick & Kathy Pepin seeking a variance from Section 25.00, Area, Density and Dimensional Require- ments of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to allow a 10' x 12' deck to project [101 ten feet into the required 30 foot front yard set- back requirement, 2 Sherry Road. 21 Final plat application of Ironwood Partners, LLP & Highland Develop- ment Company, LLC to amend a planned resi- dential development con- sisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of combining 18 single family lots into one [11 lot and constructing 18 duplex buildings, Fairway Drive. 31. Final plat application of O'Brien Brothers Agency, Inc. & Daniel O Brien and Leo O'Brien, Jr., d/b/a O'Brien Brothers, Inc. to reaffirm and confirm the approval of plat approved on March 22, 1988 to sub- stitute five [5] single fam- ily units for three [31 du- plex units, Hayes Avenue. 4] Request of Summer Ice Joint Venture for a two [2] year extension to the expiration date of fi- nal plat approved on 9/10/96 to resubdivide 116.7 acres into 12 lots, Hinesburg Road. 51 Final plat application of Nile & Julie Duppstadt and John and Deborah Alden to terminate the protective covenants of the Paul K. French, M.D. Subdivision approved on 1/15/80 for seven [71 lots, Hinesburg Road and Van Sicklen Road. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. July 31,1999 r PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 July 26, 1996 Mark R. Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Resubdivision, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Neagley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 30, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. erel , Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Karen Pettersen R 11'141aJ9.7' 50.00, 6' . 939. 78 L 216.Of• _ 6-52.2 011 EXISTING 30' WIDE MATCH2INT DRIVE EASEMENT MATCH INTO AND 10' SNOW EXISTING STORAGE EASEMENTS EASEMENT LOCATION (80 TM SIDES) AND --A: 14'34'34" FOP.. EASEMENT R 789.78' FOR SIGN LIGHTING L 200.92' TIE DIST. / L - 66.41' CASEMENT T SIGN L G � 6'37'42" 412.19' L1 105'+J'20'W 2.3500' L2 N8JV2'J6'E 19.62' LJ N36,357. 100.00' L4 S8J10236 'N 1962' 75 S8J'38 WE 20. 00' L5 M1d220'S9 E 194.17' L7 w 12. 00 L9 N0724'JA 8.10.'10-E 247.00' L9 S07V425'E 80.05' L10 SBJ"909'w l94.57' L11 SSJ'27'22'W 281.l I' L12 50516'IJ'E Ul 20 LIJ S84'5J'19•W 2,14' Lr4 S05'58'J7'E 80.01' 05 Nds'5J'19-E 2J7 AJ' L16 S8.'5J,97 '69. 46' L17 58J'1909 lw 288. 09 LIB 18JV2'J6-E 1019' L19 S84'5J'19 W 60.00' L20 .v60,6'01E 5765' 721 5702729 E 67.65 LII NBJV1'J6 E r05.21 CURVE DATA EASEMENT CHART VDSEIJRCJI LANE e0'ROK Ci C2 4925!1' +12,19 J55. 5J l4461 N72^951'.' al L.9155' B- NJ056'IB`W 2299+,4• 75.00 JOO.CS 1J6. J6 SS -6'+1'E CJ -9'25*11' JJ2.19 286.53 217. 7J 512V931•E A2 ARC-119.22' R-15.00' C4 JS'+SV4" 540.15 3J704 JJ160 56519'49'E AJ ARC-51.54' C5 Ir'S4'20 510.'5 11224 112.0A 519V9'Jr'r A. ARC- 11922' C6 17-37'08" 460. 15 I so, IA0.94 s56`5'S 1'E AS L-9r 65' 8- N18�7'S6-E C7 lOV1"6" +50.15 2.1.2. 2J8.A8 S80 V5'JYE A5 L-IBJ 29' 8- N0619'tl•W do'XIOW EXISTING APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LIE THE CITY OF 1 PUMP STATION PARCEL SOUTH BURLINGTON. K. ON THE _ DAY OF 199- ` VOL 176 P Sf0 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION, l V0L 271 P. 107 SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 199_ t '\ �L5 BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERKS OFFICE _ B'r>Qt7A)<4 RECEIVED FOR RECORD L ar 50, 08' _ 1 w I 4oe.er NB39%72 4D7.92' 40.00, it- 1IIMS&3,o7 32-W C,J �I I; � 20' SEVER EASE1IFNT Dli T IIca H ETN SBURG Oi - AOAO pARTNE4 SNLP � �.n �EiEGEr` N/F 1 20, WIDE SEVER BURL TNGTON PROPERTIES EASEMEN To EXISTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PUMP STATr ^I� "I" I. KL 176 P. S10 PLAT Iot. JR I. a °6 VOL 211 P. 107 PROPOSED RELOCATION OF 50' SAC A) EASENVEI CIRCLEO BACKM EASEMENT ro LANE PRESS I ctatt[ ro K caNKKO aAtR m Lors 6 •ND 9 WEN ND LONOEA NEEDED. SEC - REFER ro KL 21% P ISI< 'EASEw'nr CNAWr AM •QA-0C-SAC OETA:L- coA sPEclrrc orME.NsroNs ✓ SW WIDE RIGHT-CF-WAY 60' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY CO SOUTH TO THE CrTTON I� h 1 TO BE CONWYED ro THE VOL 384 P. 104 yN CITY OF SOUTH Bt1RLDNGTON OF I n 1 n AREA : 1.01 ACRES - - a • 3 ,x W WIDE rI aw WIDE ROAD _ } L $ DRAINAGE- R.a WI ro BE CONVEYED TO �I �{ EASf111ENr ) Ipp rn CRY OF SOL BURLINCTCIN \ AREA : a9e ACRES ��L4 -'^' N e SR#E E1,( BQ•OD/ - f I e�V27Q �T © �L22 N83V278- jy� - lull' jo 1.29 Ac. 989.6Y���.-E 400.0� (da i1 tww A. IQ nA P.3U HINESSURG ROAD NORTH SCENIC VIEW E- �I & ti L8 L` PROTECTION 2tTNE--` .6 11 2 I J.11 Ac. 4.47 Ac. N .nn /1C. 3.22 AC. ROKEY _-1_ �� _ .- e0' WIDE ROAD - C VCL 91 P40 2,8.00' ._ R.O.W. ro BE CONVEYED ro i 12'78T wad gu i v O J.06 Ac. H J. 90 �. 11.5e'Ac. r N N eJ-0 E 02'3e' J )6 Ac. ® J. 1, AC. lie. 519 580.00' t B47J'19 E.. an m' S 64WI w si ^_ A.O. 19 at O'dodt minutY m RO$= LOCATION �r and ✓T.CDrdad In Vduma P- AttYt: \p ��l DIROUGH LOPTt2POSEDPEDESTRIAN EASEMENT1D BE COMBINED WITHIXISTDNC EASEMENT - EIDSTINO IS' WIDE PEDESTRIAN CUL-DE-SAC DETAIL EASEMENT I VQ. 17e P. SIO q/ARRY "0 I, VOL P. V` rEMaOa•11 Cu E-.CS AM EASEMENK WILL 6r LWO Al W ENO a .N CITY 51aEEr Nr P.ACn d NIS III oCPtC 20 a✓ LOTS r NaOAar 11 W.3 CONKKO M SL'NNEa WE A 1 KNNn /N W)L J6, A.a .J9 p \ a W Clr• Jf iOUN Wflho" LAND aECCAOS AM COJlS A m1. An. 0• 1.. 1. •CAES. 6 �NIS aAnn IS BASED oN A mrAL $rARON Co141a01 v AK . U I EVIKKI rWM IN IK rfrlD..M (NrprrAROv ABSIRKRD %adl W CON or SWN BUALIO LAM RECCROS Co St.AIMS AM BASED Ol4 W 4R 1 CO Al S✓Srrw FloA SIGRMS IA" ON Ocr. 24. roan raCw SIARON v.A !A xSEr roar•. N Ar2NPr NAS BEEN NAOE m MEN Rry OR OCLINE.2 EA;ENEN IS U F 'ICN 15Or.x LEAP LAND; RENCROAC..Cl , ETC. OBSERKO IN Nr riELD a It.— IWM Il E LAM RECOtoS. A.ol'laNAL 2Z0 ENCUMpAMES MA• E•l$r ANICN ARE MI 3NOM oN N15 111 1 3 P.E .:Roar W 2PK AS SM" is BAY+:PON D:KNSraNS S awKO[D s• NE o"I S WILED a AKARa4 a loCRNG.ON 0m INIEAN A:aPWr AS SCALED Pv rO AERIAL PMrOGR.PNr CO' mr I. I. vlctNrry I.Isar. SOAK✓ Mu�ERS SEr Or NI$ OT7fCl ARE EIN[ CNC :NC of Cr[ a b LREEN ACRES INC 00N PIPE nc rzrr IOml w1Pr 4 KLLO. PL.Sr/C Iu +NICK xAOS. -RN/OELL cONSIr CND•. Ca A roux INC. -An COrCnT NONuw7,r Id R I. IS \ NaEE rill LONG WIN KKLEO lOI EDGES lti tl.l I IY NE R.ON rSOr-W.K ro. Sw1rr Sn c, [rrCNSION. NIcm. VNr. M -ASaUAG4 LANE ARE M K C044K0 m It CI Ir Or • I N8,lY9Af E CITY CF SO. BURL INGTON I C8 L13 }1 O y \ zoom 6r:PLIN°rarr NEST ata4ra-w•✓s w W s -XD O WADOKA o PAACEL COrPAtSE 1.00 ACRES �, OPEN AREA : S01 ACRES �. W[DE-.0 rI I 3 NC WArlWN 9uttollC NrrcNr arsmicna4 a ALL tors Is r SPACE BUFFER O ^ EASEMENT �i POND 10.10 Ac. m ` CA o, " rBr M rcu'AlC rDRMULM DD E RAOpytr CA II N rRI, [ DILOK.G rR E [A0 FlIf CODE CI _ b ) _ 100. Lpp KwNr ON AWT Ra o NE Arnn-E ELE✓A110N a )9JS RIGHT-CF-WAY i I' 49 50 AC. 2 m t -=V�-T1r0 20' WIDE SPACE BUFFER 50' WIDE QQ0 H N I W _ /,_ PEDESTRIAN 1 \ CQ NO L. COOS WIDE CONSERVATION ZONE 20' WIDE 8,00 AC. EASEMENT EASEMENTS - _ • CALWurEO Po:Nr o i °I DRAINAGE N 100' CONSERVA ITCH, - 10' PTOE (SEC D[nfU FASEMNNT -� +'N ZONE AND- AM a _ _ f '.EN r_ _- -, - _ `._T- ` • IRON Prn (1WM) 20' PEDETRIAN 44a 131 _ - EASENENr /) _ __ ` _ _ - _ - f042-s1 o faoN .fac r10 K srO EASDMENT� Y581Y9D91Y�\ �_ _'O-I S82-N78'W 30' WIOE� 1 • ceMP[I[ WONu•rrN. rrWM) '19bY• Lt7 ( ) DRAINAGE ( O Ulf DA' wIAor n m o sEr -8• CEDAR TREE EASE'109r - - Ir1 T00' CONSERVATION ZONE a LrNr o. r• a•ar Rrrzmc[ T. A N. \ - 30' WIDE SEWER ! EASEMENTTR� es cuaw oA rA cNur REFERrNCE ,� DRAINAGE EASEMENT DAVIS ' bI Alldtl I - • - 4 - • - Er157NG rflef LINE P ta. na S ! R. ,ppljl CONE OWNER: SUMMER ICE JOINT KI4TURE Ill JY 'W I. iT ! I..Y L ! 4 yy BRAIN �- fE01tlIhGI➢tl VCL JOa p F AIRPORT SpUT1tORY EDGE 4, 4.7r S82•I070 6 IP. noL Ida i N. TOUTANT R �� M. t K. ►, tO OL'BOIS KL M7 I. J01 KL tit P. Ipt• so I, tat I. 14 '-!1QUQEER WE. 377 IaL. 17% P. I)/ uu 4Wlmrn,., P. 070 RAI tti 197. A .2 .y-� Df a,�r 20' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT -LOCATION ro CENTER ON LEDGE KNOLL OEVELOPEMENT scoiT_ y D RECREATION PATH ALONG INC SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY N AYLOR ' # o. •ee t' Graphic Scale dry( 'E w°o Feet wro 300 0 300 wo 900 1200 tANMwu DAAOtprlOrt D.m 6y P WA DDA MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington. Vt. SM.r �. Subdivision Plat TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. K M•t Put 1-4 6aa 3011 IVWta4l V_' 0449E 6'M-A131 F,,, nu,bw 90022-40 rat OD RAIAa m4- RPT prawn SOT Dare 1/23/96 scam 10-300' MW 6aat 105.152 OMt 1091 N TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Blair Park Road So. 308 W illston. Vt. 05495 (802) 879d331 RECEI . c,. 1996 City of So. Burlington QDescrfptlon Date ey Revlsbns ' ' •. , . i' •; ✓pO P 0 . W J'rcrsllaO SION.I. L�'r� Project title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Subdivision Plat Project number M02210 . Project manager RPr Drawn S=f Date 412V95 Scaln r ''W' Approve��/V���O� SP1 1 CITN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 22, 1999 Mark R. Neagley, Partner Neagley & Chase Construction Company 1158 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Land Air Express Dear Mr. Neagley: This is in response to your letters of June 2, and June 3, 1999 to Joe Weith. It is my understanding that you propose to construct a 21,600 square foot building for Land Air Express in the Meadowland Business Park which is located in the Industrial and Open Space District (I-O). Land Air Express, based on your description, would in my opinion constitute a "warehousing, storage and distribution facility" use which is not a permitted nor conditional use in the I-O District. I disagree with your position that the principal use is the office use and the accessory use is the distribution facility. First of all, the distribution portion of the building is 15,600 square feet or 72.2% of the building square footage. The "principal" use is therefore the distribution portion of the building. Secondly, the term "accessory use" is defined as "a use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use or structure." Land Air Express is a distribution business and the office portion is needed to support the distribution business, not the other way around. A distribution facility is not a use which is customarily incidental and subordinate to a general office use. You have 15 days from the date of this letter to appeal my decision to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. If you wish to do so, you must submit a completed application to the Board together with an $85 filing fee. Since , Raym nd J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp C N E A __aow-� G L E Y C H A S E CONSTRUCTION COM PA N Y Mr. Joe Weith June 2, 1999 South Burlington Zoning and Planning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Mark Neagley, Partner Meadowland Business Park 153 Summit Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning Interpretation Land Air Express Dear Joe, Thank you for seeing me this morning. We appreciate your time in reviewing this interpretation. The proposed use for our Lot#3 is for the Corporate Offices of Land Air Express. Land Air Express a locally owned business that currently handles $30 million /year from it regional terminals in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. The corporate office, currently in Williston, handles all the paperwork for these transactions. We are proposing to build them a new corporate office on Lot#3. This structure will be a one story, 60' x 100', masonry faced office building expandable to two stories for future use. It is their goal to increase sales and thus office needs to $50 million/year. The initial design of the proposed office will include an elevator shaft and stairwells. Behind this masonry office we are proposing to include as an accessory use a distribution facility of equal quality. The materials used would be similar to those found at Lane Press and Dynapower; sandwich panel siding, skylights, radiant floor heating etc. We are very excited about this potential addition to our business park. Please call at your convenience if you have any questions. I can be reached at 658-6320 W or 985- 3528 H. Sincerely, Mark R. Neagley, Partner Meadowland Business Park 1150 AIRPORT DRIVE SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 658-6320 FAX (802) 658-0349 N E A G L E Y C H A S E CONSTRUCTION C O P A N Y Mr. Joe Weith June 3, 1999 South Burlington Zoning and Planning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Mark Neagley, Partner Meadowland Business Park 153 Summit Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning Interpretation Land Air Express Dear Joe, The information you requested follows. I have included a rough initial footprint to give you a sense of the scale. The accessory facility is 260'x60'= 15,600 square feet. Along each side of the building are 15 overhead doors where trucks unload from one side and redistribute into trucks on the other. For the most part the trucks are loaded and gone by 8:00 A.M and return to the facility around 5:00 PM or later. The trucks range in size from full size tractor trailers to small delivery trucks and vans. Sincerely, Mark R. Neagley, Partner Meadowland Business Park 1150 AIRPORT DRIVE SO. BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 ( 8 0 2 ) 6 5 8 - 6 3 2 0 FAX (802) 658-0349 Me 4.'47l1.• �.� i t y�r��1 `�` "Yr� !,.�++i ; � it • ..� .-. Meadowland Business Park FOR SALE 116 HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT Lang R E A LnT O R S HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURL ! NGTON VERMONT LOT 1 LOT 2 49.50 8.00 $ 260,000 40,000 LOT 3 20.20 78,000 LOT 4 3.13 27,500 LOT 5 3.06 29,000 LOT 6 3.29 30,000 LOT 7 3.96 33,000 I i I CLASS If BVrfflz :,.(PACT 295 S-F (rI£LO 6 256 S F) �'tjo ; S-I' T STREET EX ASS AJI K72A 2 SF[ -•-CLASS III IMPAC CLASS Ill IA'PAC^��El�s 307 S.F l 0 Ti1R` AS -i , u Pti Z ,¢� 'k -� Lp �/ A/ 2239 S.F (NOT APPLIED FOP IN �JRoS OF ENGINEERS APPLICATION) �cgr S i NQ-.' APPL E✓ rCP Of ;`;GiNE£°c Apo:; N /F State of Vermont LAND USE PERMIT CASE NO: 4C1005 LAWSIREGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (ACT 250) APPLICANT: Summer Ice Joint Venture ADDRESS: c/o Mark Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction Co. 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 District Environmental Commission #4 hereby issues Land Use Permit #4C1005, pursuant to the authority vested in it by 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151. This permit applies to the lands identified in Book 387, Page 439, of the land records of the Town of South Burlington, Vermont, as the subject of a deed to Summer Ice Joint Venture, the "Permittee" as "Grantee." This permit specifically authorizes the construction of a roadway, utilities, and other drainage and infrastructure improvements for a 12-lot commercial/industrial subdivision on 116 acres of land on Hinesburg Road (Rt. 116) in South Burlington, Vermont. The Permittee, and its assigns and successors in interest, is obligated by this permit to complete, operate and maintain the project as approved by the District Commission in accordance with the following conditions: The project shall be completed, operated and maintained as set forth in Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law #4C 1005, in accordance with the plans and exhibits on file with the District Environmental Commission, and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the District Environmental Commission. 2. The District Environmental Commission maintains continuing jurisdiction during the lifetime of the permit and may periodically require that the permit holder file an affidavit certifying that the project is being completed, operated and maintained in accordance with the terms of the permit. 3. By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations and with this permit. 4. By acceptance of the conditions of this permit without appeal, the Permittee confirms and agrees for itself and all assigns and successors in interest that the conditions of this permit shall run with the land and the land uses herein permitted, and will be binding upon and enforceable against the Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. Prior to commencement of construction on any of the commercial or industrial lots, the Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 2 Permittee and the lot purchaser or tenant shall file an amendment application as co - applicants and shall address Criteria l (Air), l (B),1(C), 4, 7, 8, 9(A), 9(F), 9(H), 9(J), and 10. If a period of five years elapses and the Permittee has not renewed the partial findings of fact issued with this permit, the Permittee shall also address Criteria 1(E), 1(G), 2, 3,5, 6, 9(B), and 9(K). 6. The project is approved for the following maximum impacts: 1,819 vehicle parking spaces; 48,468 gallons per day of water; 51,272 gallons per day of wastewater (including infiltration); 6,773 vehicle trips per day; 830 AM peak hour vehicle trips; 673 PM peak hour vehicle trips. 7. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Subdivision Permit #EC-4- 2004 issued on November 6, 1996 by the Regional Engineer, Division of Wastewater Management, Agency of Natural Resources. 8. This permit hereby incorporates all of the conditions of the Conditional Use Determination #96-400 issued on March 11, 1998 by the Director of the ANR Water Quality Division. 9. The Permittee shall ensure that reasonable precautions are taken at all times to control fugitive particulate matter (dust) emissions from the site including the haul roads, traffic areas, storage piles, exposed surfaces and any site operations such as drilling, blasting, crushing and processing of materials. This shall include the application of water or calcium chloride as necessary to the haul roads, traffic areas and storage piles and the covering of all trucks entering, existing or operating at the site that are loaded with materials that may generate fugitive dust. In addition, the permittee shall not allow the operation of a gravel or stone crushing plant on the premises with a maximum rated capacity (based on the crusher's largest possible setting and maximum throughput, not actual operating rate) of greater than 150 tons per hour, unless said crushing plant has a permit to operate from the District Commission and the Vermont Air Pollution Control Division. 10. The Permittee shall apply and maintain calcium chloride and/or water on all roadways or disturbed areas within the project during construction and until pavement and/or vegetation is fully established to control dust. 11. Stumps shall be disposed of above the seasonal high water table or at a State -approved landfill. 12. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall comply with all of the terms Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 3 and conditions of the Discharge Permit File No. 1-1269 issued by the Agency of Natural Resources on December 30, 1996. 13. The Permittee shall apply to the District Environmental Commission for approval for any change in the use of the future buildings or land which would cause noxious or unhealthy emissions into the air or injection of toxic wastes into the soils. 14. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall install and. maintain water conserving plumbing fixtures in all buildings. The plumbing fixtures shall operate with the following specifications: (1) internal system water pressure of 50 psi maximum, (2) toilets with a maximum of 3.5 gallons per flush, (3) showerheads operating with a maximum of 3 gallons per minute and (4) faucets on sinks and lays shall operate at a maximum of 3 gallons per minute where new fixtures are being installed. 15. The Permittee shall comply with Exhibits 34 - 50 for erosion control. Hay bale dams and silt fences shall be installed as depicted on the plans prior to commencement of construction. The Permittee shall prevent the transport of any sediment beyond that area necessary for construction approved herein. From October 1 to April 15 of any calendar year, all disturbed areas of the construction site shall be mulched until final vegetative cover is established. All erosion control devices shall be periodically cleaned, replaced and maintained until vegetation is permanently established on all slopes and disturbed areas. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 16. Erosion control devices shall be inspected a minimum of weekly and after storm events of %z inch or more. The site contractor or general contractor shall submit weekly erosion control reports to the Permittee or Permittee's designee. Such reports shall state that the erosion control devices have been inspected and shall note specific areas where repair or replacement of erosion control devices is necessary. The Commission reserves the right to schedule hearings and site inspections to review erosion control and to evaluate and impose additional conditions with respect to erosion control as it deems necessary. 17. In addition to conformance with the requirements of the erosion control conditions above, the Permittee shall not cause, permit, or allow the discharge of waste materials into any surface waters. Compliance with the requirements of this condition does not absolve the Permittee from compliance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, Vermont's Water Pollution Control Law. 18. The Permittee shall provided an updated traffic study and a cumulative traffic impact statement at the time each lot is proposed for development. 19. The Permittee and all assigns and successors in interest shall continually maintain the Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 4 landscaping as approved in Exhibits 34 - 50 by replacing any dead or diseased plantings as soon as seasonably possible. 20. The installation of exterior light fixtures is limited to those approved in Exhibit 32, and shall be mounted no higher than 20 feet above grade level. All exterior lighting shall be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 21. The exterior entrance sign shall be installed as depicted on Exhibits 22 and 32. No additional signs shall be installed without the prior written approval of the District Commission. 22. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions relating to the site's archeological resources: a. Sector III shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. b. Sector V and the area between Sectors V and VI shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. C. The areas shown as archeologically sensitive on Lots 7 and 8 shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. d. Should construction be proposed for any of the aforementioned areas in the future, the following work shall take place prior to commencement of construction: 1. A "Phase 1" archeological study of the aforementioned areas shall be conducted. A scope of work for the study shall be provided for review and approval to the New England District Vermont Project Office of the Army Corps of Engineers and to the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation (DHP) at least one month prior to the proposed study. 2. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 1" archeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 5 3. If the archeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the Vermont Project Office and DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. 4. If the archeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps, in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account. 5. If the archeological consultant recommends that additional evaluation of archeological resources found during the initial study is needed (a "Phase 2 study), the consultant shall provide a scope of work for additional study to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for their review and approval prior to commencing "Phase 2" work. 6. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 2" archeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. 7. If the archeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the Vermont Project Office and the DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. 8. If the archeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account. e. Any changes in the plans or construction methods must be submitted to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for review and approval at least three weeks prior to implementation. 23. The Permittee shall not remove the four remaining historic buildings on Lot 1 without Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 6 prior written approval from the Commission. Prior to seeking approval to remove the buildings the applicant must submit a permit amendment application including a plan to mitigate for the loss of the buildings. 24. Prior to commencement of construction, the Permittee shall submit a fully executed Agricultural Mitigation Agreement as set forth in Exhibit 69. The Permittee shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of such agreement. 25. Should the town at any time agree to accept any private utilities being then operated by the Permittee and/or assigns and successors in interest, the Permittee and/or assigns and successors in interest shall be responsible to improve the same to Town specifications and shall deed all lands involved with said improvements to the Town. 26. Each prospective purchaser of any lots shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan, Subdivision Permit, the Land Use Permit, and the Findings of Fact before any written contract of sale is entered into. 27. No further subdivision and/or development of any parcel of land approved herein shall be permitted without the written approval of the District Commission. 28. The Permittee shall reference the requirements and conditions imposed by Land Use Permit #4C1005 in all deeds or leases to said lots. 29. All construction of the roadways and infrastructure for this project must be completed by October 1, 2003. 30. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6090(b) (effective June 21, 1994), this permit is hereby issued for an indefinite term, as long as there is compliance with the conditions herein. 31. Failure to comply with all of the above conditions may be grounds for permit revocation pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Section 6090(b). l Land Use Permit #4C 1005 Page 7, Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this / day of May, 199$.• By _j T mas Visser, air District #4 Commission Members participating in this decision: Susan Wheeler Any appeal of this decision must comply with all provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6089 and Environmental Board Rule 40 including the submission of ten copies of the following: notice of appeal, a statement of why the appellant believes the commission was in error, a statement of the issues to be addressed in the appeal, a summary of the evidence that will be presented, a preliminary list of witnesses and this decision. Decisions on minor applications may be appealed if a hearing was held by the district commission or timely requested by the appellant. STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture Application #4C1005 c/o Mark Neagley FINDINGS OF FACT AND Neagley & Chase Construction Company CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1150 Airport Drive AND ORDER South Burlington, VT 05403 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) I. INTRODUCTION On October 22, 1996, an application for an Act 250 permit was filed by Summer Ice Joint Venture for a project generally described as the installation of a roadway, utilities, and other infrastructure fora 121ot commercial/industrial subdivision on 116 acres of land on Hinesburg Road (Rt. 116) in South Burlington, Vermont. The tract of land consists of 116 acres with 116 acres involved in the project area. The applicant's legal interest is ownership in fee simple described in a deed recorded in the land records of the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Section 6086(a) 1-10. Before granting a permit, the District Commission must find that the project complies with these criteria and is riot detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. je form of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The facts we Decisions must be stated in th j have relied upon are contained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits 1 through 83, and the evidence received at a hearing held on December 10, 1996. At the end of the hearing, the proceeding was recessed pending submission of additional information. The hearing was adjourned on May 7, 1998 upon receipt of the additional information and completion of Commission deliberations. Parties to this application who attended the hearing are: The Applicant by Mark Neagley, Staige Davis, and Richard Trudell. The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Arthur Hogan, Jr., Executive Director. The Entry of Appearance and Pre -Hearing Comments filed by James Caffy, of the Agency of Natural Resources were entered into the record by agreement of the parties. The following persons were either admitted as parties or denied party status as indicated pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B): 1. Will Mikell, Jr., 66 Van Sicklen Road, Williston, VT 06595; Denied: Criteria 1 - Air Page 2 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 Pollution, 5 - Traffic Safety and Congestion, and 8 - Aesthetics. Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(F), the District Commission made preliminary determinations concerning party status at the commencement of the hearing on this application. Prior to the completion of deliberations, the District Commission re-examined and confirmed their preliminary party status determinations. II. FINDINGS OF FACT it Prior to taking evidence with regard to the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A. Section 6068(a), the parties agreed that the Applicant had met its burden with respect to Criteria l (C), 1(D), l (F), 2, 3, 6, 7, 9(C), 9(D), 9(E), 9(G), 9(H), 9(J), and 9(L) by introducing the application into the record. Parties, therefore, waived the taking of evidence at the hearing concerning these criteria. In making the following findings, the Commission has summarized the statutory language of the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Section 6086(a): GENERAL FINDINGS T��risdiction The project requires an Act 250 permit because it involves the construction of improvements for a commercial purpose on a tract of land of 10 or more acres. Environmental Board Rule 2(A)(2). The applicant proposes to subdivide a 116-acre tract of land into 12 commercial/industrial lots and to install 4,800 linear feet of roadway and utilities to serve the lots (Phase 1). Nine of the lots are 3 - 4 acres in size. The other three lots are 8 acres, 20 acres, and 49 acres in size. The applicant also intends to construct commercial/industrial buildings on each lot (the master plan). No buildings are being proposed at this time. Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 21 and the Environmental Board's Master Permit Policy (adopted February 25, 1998), the Commission intends to issue final findings of fact on all 10 criteria for Phase 1. These findings are accompanied by a land use permit authorizing construction of the infrastructure to serve Phase 1. The Commission is also issuing partial findings of fact for the master plan portion of the project Page 3 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 under certain criteria as indicated. These partial findings are valid for five years unless it is clearly shown that there was misrepresentation or fraud or the facts relevant to the matter have so materially changed as to render the findings of fact and conclusions of law clearly erroneous, contrary to the purposes of Act 250 and without basis in fact. Partial findings may be renewed at the end of the five year period. SECTION 6086 (a) (1) WATER AND AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that Phase 1 will not result in undue air or water pollution: SECTION 6086(a)(1) AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that Phase 1 will not result in undue air pollution. i Phase I 1. There will be no process emissions, noxious odors or noise pollution from this project. Exhibit 6. 2. The project is estimated to have 1,819 parking spaces at full build out of all 12 lots. This is above the threshold at which an indirect source permit is required from the Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources. On July 1, 1996 the ANR Air Pollution Control Division issued Amended Air Pollution Control Permit #AP- 90-052b authorizing the applicant to construct 1,819 parking spaces. 3. During construction dust will be controlled through the use of a stabilized construction entrance and through the use of water and/or calcium chloride. Exhibit 6. 4. The applicant did not provide any information regarding the air pollution impacts of any proposed buildings. The District Commission will consider this criterion when permit amendments for the development of each lot are submitted. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(A) HEADWATERS: The Commission finds that this criterion does not apply to Phase 1 or the Master Plan because the project is not located in a headwaters area as defined by this section because it is not situated Page 4 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 in a drainage area of 20 square miles or less, is not above the elevation of 1,500 feet, is not in the watershed of a public water supply, and is not in an aquifer recharge area. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and the Master Plan. SECTION 6086 (a)(1)(B) WASTE DISPOSAL: The Commission finds that Phase 1 will meet applicable Division of Wastewater Disposal Regulations and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful or toxic substances into groundwater or wells. 6. The estimated 51,272 gallons per day of sanitary wastes will be disposed of through connection to the South Burlington municipal wastewater collection system and to the Airport Parkway wastewater treatment plant. A Subdivision Permit has been issued which the Commission accepts as evidence that the disposal of wastes meets applicable Environmental Protection Rules and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful substances into groundwater or wells. Exhibit 56. 7. A Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit will be required prior to the construction of buildings on individual lots. 8. The site is flat to gently sloping with slopes of 5% or less. Stormwater runoff from the roadways and other paved surfaces will be directed into catch basins designed to remove floatable and settleable solids and will then be conveyed through a closed stormwater system into on site stormwater ponds. From there the stormwater will be discharged into existing drainageways. A Discharge Permit has been issued, which the Commission accepts as evidence that the project complies with applicable Department of. Environmental Conservation Regulations. Exhibit 12. 9. The Commission will require that all stumps be disposed of on -site above the seasonal high water table or at a State approved landfill so as to prevent groundwater pollution. 10. The District Commission will consider this criterion when permit amendments for the development of each lot are submitted. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(C) WATER CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that this criterion does not apply to Phase 1 of the project. The Page 5 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 Commission is unable to make a finding for the Master Plan portion of the project due to lack of information. 11. The applicants have agreed to use water conserving plumbing fixtures in each building. 12. The applicants have not provided any information about the use of water for manufacturing or other processes in each building. This information will be provided as each building is proposed. The Commission will review this criterion at the time each building is proposed. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(D) FLOODWAYS: The Commission finds that Phase 1 and the Master Plan of this project will not be located in any floodway or floodway fringe. Therefore, this criterion does not apply to either Phase 1 or the Master Plan. SECTION 6086 (a)(1)(E) STREAMS: The Commission finds that the applicant will, whenever feasible, maintain the natural condition of the stream, and will not endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the public or of adjoining landowners. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial finding for the Master Plan. 13. A tributary of Potash Brook starts in the wetland located in the central part of the site and flows north. The tributary and wetland are Classified as Class Two wetlands. The roadway and utilities will cross this tributary immediately to the north of the existing wetland pond. A conditional use determination (CUD) has been issued authorizing the Class Two wetland impacts, as more fully discussed below under Criterion 1(G). 14. A minor drainageway flows northeasterly across lot 1 and eventually flows into the Potash Brook tributary. This tributary is classified as a Class Three wetland. Another minor drainageway flows across the eastern portion of the site. This drainageway is also classified as a Class Three wetland. The project will involve 5 road crossings of the Class Three wetlands which total approximately 6,000 square feet (sf) of Class Three wetland impact. The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources has determined that the impacts to the wetland will not violate the Vermont Water Quality Standards. Exhibit 80. 15. Original plans for the project called for the channelization and rerouting of the Lot 1 minor drainageway from Lot 1 to the southern boundary of the property. This plan has been Page 6 Findings of Fact 44C 1005 abandoned. Landscaping will be placed along the previously proposed channelized drainageway to screen the view of the project from the adjacent residential development to the south, as more fully described under Criterion 8. 16. A Stream Alteration Permit is not required for the project. SECTION 6086(a)(1)(F) SHORELINES: The Commission finds that this criterion does not apply to Phase 1 or the Master Plan because the project will not be located on any shoreline. j SECTION 6086(a)(1)(G) WETLANDS The Commission finds that Phase 1 and the Master Plan will not violate the rules of the Water Resources Board relating to significant wetlands. This a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial ''. finding for the Master Plan. a i Phase 1 and Master Plan 1 i 17. The project site includes areas of Class Two wetlands. Portions of the Class Two wetlands I will be impacted by the roadway and utility crossing. ' The applicant has received a { Conditional Use Determination (CUD) from the ANR Water Quality Division authorizing impacts to 12,879 sf of Class Two wetland and 32,322 sf of Class Two wetland buffer. Exhibit 80. SECTION 6086(a)(2 & 3) WATER AVAILABILITY AND IMPACT ON EXISTING SUPPLY: The Commission finds that there is sufficient water available to meet the needs of this project and that it will not place an unreasonable burden on an existing supply. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial finding for the Master Plan. i 18. This project will utilize 48,468 gallons per day of water. The Commission accepts the letter from the Champlain Water District as evidence that there is sufficient water available and that the project will not restrict or encumber present users. Exhibit 14. 19. The ANR Water Supply Division has issued "Public Water System Permit to Construct" Project #E-0629 WSID #5091 authorizing the construction of the water main extension to Page 7 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 serve the project. SECTION 6086 (a)(4) SOIL EROSION AND THE CAPACITY OF THE LAND TO HOLD WATER: The Commission finds that the construction of Phase 1, if completed as approved, will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or a reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water. 20. The project site is flat to gently sloping with moderate erosion potential. Temporary measures for soil erosion control are depicted on Exhibits 34 - 50. They consist of the placement of sediment control devices such as hay bale dams and silt fences at the downslope of all disturbed areas and at the inlet to all swales, storm drains, and ditches, as shown on the plans. All stockpiled soil will be encircled with a sediment control device. A stabilized construction entrance will be installed and maintained. After every storm event sediment control devices will be inspected by the contractor for failure or clogging. 21. Permanent erosion controls consist of stone lined ditches, grassed swales, paving, np-rap outfalls and topsoil, seed, mulch. 22. The applicant will address this criterion when applications for development of each lot are submitted. SECTION (a)(5) TRANSPORTATION: The Commission finds that this project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial finding for the Master Plan. 23. The project will use the existing access onto Hinesburg Road. This road currently provides access to the Dynapower and Lane Press facilities. The road will be reconstructed, extended and named Swift Street Extension. 24. The applicant has conducted a traffic study which examines the proposed traffic from the project and the impact of this traffic on area roadways and intersections. As part of the project the applicant will construct improvements to the Swift Street Extension/Hinesburg Page 8 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 Road intersection, including a right hand turn lane and curbs. Exhibit 16. 25. The estimated traffic from the project is 830 AM peak hour trips and 673 PM peak hour trips. The traffic study concludes that at 20% buildout of the project a traffic signal will be required at the intersection of Swift Street Extension and Hinesburg Road. The signal will be installed at the applicant's expense. Testimony of applicant. 26. The Vermont Agency of Transportation (AOT) has reviewed the applicant's traffic study and has recommended that the study be updated each time a lot is proposed for development. The AOT must approve the installation of the signal at the Swift Street Extension/Hinesburg Road intersection. The Commission will require by permit condition that the applicant update the traffic study each time a lot is proposed for development. 27. The applicant's traffic study demonstrates that the project will not negatively impact the j Level of Service (LOS) at any other intersections in the vicinity of the project. SECTION 6086(a)(6) EDUCATIONAL MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The Commission finds that the project will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide educational services. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial finding for the Master Plan. ;I 28. The Superintendent of the South Burlington School District has stated that the project will have no significant impact on the South Burlington Schools. Exhibit 18. SECTION 6086(a)(7) MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The Commission finds that Phase 1 of this project will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide municipal or governmental services. 29. The South Burlington Fire Chief and Police Chief have stated that the services of their respective departments can be provided to this project. Exhibits 19 and 20. 30. The South Burlington City Planner has stated that the project will not present an unreasonable burden on the City's ability to provide municipal services. Exhibit 21. 31. The applicant will construct the public roads and all utilities to town specifications. Exhibit 6. Page 9 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 32. Since no information is available for specific buildings to be constructed, the Commission will require that the applicant address this criterion at the time each lot is proposed for development. SECTION 6086 (a)(8) AESTHETICS, SCENIC BEAUTY, HISTORIC SITES AND NATURAL AREAS: The Commission finds that Phase 1 of the project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. 33. There are no necessary wildlife habitats or rare and irreplaceable natural areas which will be affected by Phase 1 of this project. Exhibits 23 and 24. 34. The present site is 16 acres of mostly open meadow with slopes of less than 5%. The site is bordered by industrial development to the north (Dynapower and Lane Press) and by a residential development to the south. The site can be seen from Interstate 89, which is approximately 1,200 feet to the north of the closest lot, Lot 6. 35. The site provides views of Mt. Mansfield to the northeast. The applicant stated that building height will be limited so as not to obscure views of Mt. Mansfield from Rt. 116. 36. The project roadway will be landscaped as outlined on Exhibits 34 - 42. Landscaping for each lot will be proposed at the time the lots are developed. 37. Exterior roadway lighting will consist of 150-watt, high pressure sodium, cutoff luminaires mounted on 20 foot poles and will be installed as depicted on Exhibits 32 and 47. All fixtures will have concealed light sources. 38. The sign will be located and constructed as outlined on Exhibit 22 and will be internally illuminated. 39. The applicant will construct a berm with landscaping along the southern property line to help screen the view of the project from the adjoining subdivision. The landscaping will include White Pine, Weeping Willow, Inkberry, and Redstem Dogwood. 40. The Division for Historic Preservation (DHP) has identified the site as having high potential for archeological sites. The applicant subsequently conducted a Phase I Archeological Page 10 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 Survey. During the Phase I study, prehistoric archeological artifacts were identified in three sectors. The applicant's consultant concluded that Sectors IV and VI did not contain any National Register -eligible cultural resources. The consultant recommended that unless Sector III and V and the area between Sectors V and VI could be avoided, additional archeological testing to determine site boundaries and integrity be conducted. The applicants have agreed to avoid these areas and have revised the plans. Additional archeological testing has yet to be performed on Lots 7 and 8. The applicants have also agreed to avoid these areas. Based on the testing and the revised plans, and the following conditions, the Division for Historic Preservation has determined that the project will have no effect on any historic or archeological resources: a. Sector III shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. b. Sector V and the area between Sectors V and VI shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. C. The areas shown as archeologically sensitive on Lots 7 and 8 shall be designated on the project plans as an area to be avoided. A temporary snowfence barrier shall be erected around the perimeter of the site during construction activities. This barrier shall remain in place until all construction is completed. d. Should construction be proposed for any of the aforementioned areas in the future, the following work shall take place prior to commencement of construction: '! 1. A "Phase 1" archeological study of the aforementioned areas shall be conducted. A scope of work for the study shall be provided for review and approval to the New England District Vermont Project Office of the Army Corps of Engineers and to the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation (DHP) at least one month prior to the proposed study. 2. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 1" archeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. If the archeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the Vermont Project Office and DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. Page 11 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 4. If the archeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps, in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account. 5. If the archeological consultant recommends that additional evaluation of archeological resources found during the initial study is needed (a "Phase 2 study), the consultant shall provide a scope of work for additional study to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for their review and approval prior to commencing "Phase 2" work. 6. The "End of Field" letter for the "Phase 2" archeological study shall be provided to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for their review within six weeks of completion of the study. 7. If the archeological consultant concludes that no historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register are located in this area, and the Vermont Project Office and the DHP concur with this finding, no further consultation shall be required. 8. If the archeological consultant concludes that historic properties eligible for listing on the National Register will be affected, or that they will not be affected if certain protective measures are taken, construction of the project shall not commence until the permittee is notified by the Corps in writing, that consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and/or the DHP has been completed. This notification from the Corps shall include any additional special permit conditions necessary to ensure that effects to historic properties are taken into account. e. Any changes in the plans or construction methods must be submitted to the Vermont Project Office and the DHP for review and approval at least three weeks prior to implementation. 41. There are no necessary wildlife habitats or rare and irreplaceable natural areas which will be affected by the Master Pland phase of this project. Exhibits 23 and 24. 42. No buildings are proposed at this time. The District Commission will review the impact of Page 12 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 each building on aesthetics and scenic and natural beauty, including any views of the building from the interstate. 43. Lot 1 contains five agricultural buildings which are listed on the State Register of Historic j Places. One of these buildings collapsed during the winter of 1997. The applicant submitted a request to the Vermont Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (the Council) to remove the building from the State Register due to the buildings' severely deteriorated condition. The Council concluded that removal of the building would have an adverse effect on structures listed on the State Register. 44. Following the Council's determination regarding removal of the buildings, the DHP stated that the buildings could be removed if they were first documented using the draft Photographic Documentation Requirements for Historic Structures (the Requirements) developed by the DHP. The applicant conducted the photographic documentation according to the Requirements and sent the archival photographs to the DHP and the South Burlington Community Library, as specified by the DHP. Following receipt and review of the photographs, the DHP determined that the buildings could be removed without any further conditions or documentation. 45. The Commission finds that removal of the four remaining buildings would create an undue adverse effect on an historic site listed on the State Register of Historic Places. Therefore, the Commission will condition the permit to prohibit the removal of the buildings without written approval from the Commission. Prior to seeking approval to remove the buildings the applicant must submit a permit amendment application including a plan to mitigate for the loss of the buildings. SECTION 6086 (a)(9) CONFORMANCE WITH THE CAPABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Commission finds that Phase 1 of this project conforms to the capability and development plan. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(A) IMPACT OF GROWTH: The Commission finds that the municipality will be able to accommodate the total growth and rate of growth that will result from the construction of Phase 1 of this project. The Commission will review the development of each lot under this criterion. 46. The City of South Burlington has identified no undue burdens on any facilities or services. Page 13 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 The applicant anticipates that the 12 lots will be developed over a period of five years. 47. The applicant has stated that the lots will most likely be developed for commercial and industrial buildings but that retail use is possible. 48. No information was presented under this criterion regarding the impact of individual buildings on the commercial lots. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(B) PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that the project will not significantly reduce the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and a partial finding for the Master Plan. Phase 1 and Master Plan 149. The site contains 84.5 acres of primary agricultural soils, all of which would be impacted by full build out of the project. The applicant proposes to mitigate for the loss of the 84.5 acres of primary agricultural soils through a mitigation payment to the Vermont Department of Agriculture in the amount of $169,000. This amount will enable the protection of 169 acres of primary agricultural soils in the vicinity of the project or in Chittenden County. Including the acres of primary agricultural soils to be protected, the total number of acres of involved primary agricultural soils is 253.5 acres. The applicant will convert 84.5 acres, or 33%, of these soils. The Commission finds that a reduction of 33% does not constitute a significant reduction in the potential of the primary agricultural soils. 50. The Commission will condition the permit to require the submission of a signed copy of the Mitigation Agreement with the Vermont Department of Agriculture prior to commencement of construction. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(C) FOREST AND SECONDARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that the soils on the site do not qualify as forestry or secondary agricultural soils. Therefore, this criterion does not apply to Phase I or the Master Plan phase. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(D & E) EARTH RESOURCES & EXTRACTION OF EARTH RESOURCES: Page 14 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 The Commission finds that as no earth resources have been identified on this site, this project does not involve the interference with nor the extraction of earth resources. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and the Master Plan. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(F) ENERGY CONSERVATION: I I The Commission finds that this criterion does not apply to Phase 1 of the project. The Commission will review each building to be constructed in the Master Plan phase of the project to determine whether the building incorporates the principles of energy conservation and incorporates the best available technology for the efficient use or recovery of energy. 51. The Commission will review this criterion for each building proposed for the 12 lots 52. The Commission will specifically prohibit the installation and/or use of electric resistance space heating in any buildings. j SECTION 6086(a)(9)(G) PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES: The Commission finds that there are no private utility services proposed for the project. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and the Master Plan. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(H) COSTS OF SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT: The Commission finds that the project is not physically contiguous to an existing settlement and that the additional costs of public services and facilities caused directly or indirectly by Phase 1 of the project do not outweigh the tax revenue and other public benefits of the development such as increased employment opportunities or the provision of needed and balanced housing accessible to existing or planned employment centers. 53. Because a limited amount of information is available regarding the kind of businesses which would be located on the individual lots, the Commission will review this criterion at the time each lot is proposed for development. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(J) PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES: Page 15 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 The Commission finds that utility service is available to Phase 1 of this project, that an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services, and that the provision of such services has been planned on the basis of a projection of reasonable population increase and economic growth. 54. The Commission accepts the letters from Vermont Gas Co. and Green Mountain Power stating that the project will not place an uneconomic demand on these utility services. 55. Because insufficient information is available regarding individual buildings to be constructed, the Commission will review this criterion at the time individual lots are proposed for development. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(K) DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING PUBLIC INVESTMENTS: The Commission finds that the project will not unnecessarily or unreasonably endanger the public or quasi -public investment or materially jeopardize or interfere with the function, efficiency, or safety of, or the public's use or enjoyment of or access to any adjacent public investments. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and partial finding for the Master Plan phase. 56. The only adjacent public investment is Rt. 116 (Hinesburg Road) which adjoins the project. Phase 1 will not unnecessarily or unreasonably endanger the public or quasi -public investment or materially jeopardize or interfere with the function, efficiency, or safety of, or the public's use or enjoyment of or access to Rt. 116. SECTION 6086(a)(9)(L) RURAL GROWTH AREAS: The Commission finds that this project is not located in a rural growth area as defined by the statute. Therefore, this criterion does not apply to the project. This is a final finding for Phase 1 and the Master Plan. SECTION 6086(a)(10) CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLAN: The Commission finds that the construction of infrastructure improvements to serve the 12-lot commercial subdivision conforms to the 1996 South Burlington Municipal Plan and the 1996 Page 16 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 Chittenden County Regional Plan. Because insufficient information has been provided about the buildings to be constructed within the subdivision, however, the Commission can not make a final finding under this criterion for each lot. As each lot is proposed for development, the Commission will review the proposal for conformance with this criterion. 57. The City of South Burlington Municipal Plan (the municipal plan) was adopted May 20, 1996. The project is located in the northwestern portion of an area designated in the municipal plan as the Southeast Quadrant. The municipal plan states that "industrial and commercial development is currently planned and allowed in the northwestern part of the Quadrant." The plan further states that industrial areas are "intended to consist predominantly of industrial uses, however, may include a mix of commercial and limited residential uses." Exhibit 81. 58. The Chittenden County Regional Plan (the regional plan) was adopted on October 10, 1996. The regional plan identifies the area where the project is proposed as an Industrial/Commercial Area. The definition of Industrial/Commercial Area in the regional plan states that "[t]hese areas consist of those industrial, office and commercial areas not located within growth centers. While further development within these areas can continue, the majority of future industrial and commercial growth should be directed to the designated growth centers. Further development in these areas must have adequate infrastructure j support and consider the land's capability for development. III. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ;i Phase 1 Positive final findings have been issued under all 10 criteria for Phase 1. The following criteria have been found not to apply to either Phase 1 or the Master Plan. The applicant does not need to address these criteria in future amendment applications: Criteria 1(A), 1(D), 1(F), 9(C), 9(D), 9(E), 9(G), and 9(L). The Commission has issued positive findings under the following criteria for the master plan phase of the project: Criteria 1(E), 1(G), 2, 3, 5, 6, 9(B), and 9(K). These findings are good for a period of five years and may be renewed prior to the end of that period. The Commission is unable to issue positive findings for the master plan phase due to lack of sufficient information: 1(Air), l(B), 1(C), 4, 7, 8, 9(A), 9(F), 9(H), 9(J), and 10. The applicant must address these criteria at the time each lot is proposed for development. Page 17 Findings of Fact #4C 1005 IV. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission that Phase 1 of the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit #4C 1005, will not cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 V.S.A., Section 6086(a). V. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Land Use Permit #4C 1005 is hereby issued. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this/4 day of May�-1998. By �� t T/homas Viss Chairperson, District #4 Commission Commissioners participating in this decision: Susan Wheeler EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4C1005 Page 1 E I D R [El A=APPLICANT X I A E IN I T=TOWN H I T C IT I TPC=TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I I E E JE J RPC=REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION B I I JR 1 ANR=AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES I I V JE J AOT=AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION T I E ID I DPS=DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE D VDH=VERMONT DEPT. OF HEALTH [B] DHP=DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION N I ]Y] WMD=WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION 0.1 NATURE OF EXHIBIT DATE ENTERED 1 10/22/96 A Land Use Permit Application (9/23/96) 2 A List of Partners 3 A Project Review Sheet (8/5/96) 4 A Location Map 5 A Schedule A - fee information 6 " A Schedule B - Act 250 Narrative 7 A Schedule D - Subdivision Application 8 A Schedule E - adjoiner information 9 A Table of Design Parameters 10 A Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052-b (7/l/96) 11 A Sewer Allocation - City of South Burlington 12 A Drainage Study 7/1/96 Stormwater Discharge Permit 13 A Reply on Floodways (7/12/96) 14 A Champlain Water District (7/22/96) 15 A City of South Burlington Water Dept. (7/24/96) 16 " A Traffic Impact Report (5/96) 17 " A AOT Review Letter (9/6/96) 18 A South Burlington School District #4C1005/Page 2 19 10/22/96 A South Burlington Fire Dept. (7/25/96) 20 A South Burlington Police Dept. 21 A Municipal Impact Questionnaire (7/22/96) 22 A Project Sign 23 A Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (7/16/96) 24 A Dept. Of Fish & Wildlife (7/19/96) 25 A' Dept. Of Agriculture (8/9/96) 26 A' Vermont State Geologist (8/15/96) 27 A NYNEX (7/17/96) 28 44A VT Gas Systems (7/19/96) 29 A Green Mountain Power Corp. (8/13/96) 30 A Plan: subdivision plat SP1 (rev 10/4/96) 31 A Plan: master site plan SP2 (rev 8/27/96) 32 A Plan: subdivision site plan SP3 (rev 10/9/96) 33 A Plan: wetland site plan SP3A (rev 10/15/96) 34 A Plan: Swift Street Extension Road Profile P1 (rev 10/9/96) 35 A Plan: same as above P2 (rev 10/2/96) 36 A Plan: same as above P3 (rev 9/18/96) 37 A Plan: same as above P4 (rev 10/9/96) 38 A Plan: Bowdoin Street Road Profile P5 (rev 10/9/96) 39 A Plan: Lane Press Drive Road Profile P6 (rev 9/17/96) 40 A Plan: Thompson Street Road Profile P7 (rev 10/9/96) 41 A Plan: Sewer Profile P8 (rev 9/17/96) 42 A Plan: Sewer Profile P9 (rev 10/3/96) 43 " A Plan: Water Details SP4 (rev 9/19/96) #4C1005/Page 3 44 A Plan: Sewer Details SP5 (rev 9/19/96) 45 10/22/96 A Plan: Stormwater Details SP6 (rev 9/19/96) 46 A Plan: Erosion Control Details SP7 (rev 9/19/96) 47 64A Plan: Miscellaneous Details SP8 (rev 9/19/96) 48 66A Plan: Stormwater Details SP9 (rev 10/3/96) 49 46 A Plan: Berm/Channel Site SP10 (rev 10/3/96) 50 A Plan: same as above SP11 51 A Plan: same as above SP12 52 A Plan: sections 1-4 SP13 (4/3/96) 53 A Plan: sections 5-7 SP14 (4/3/96) 54 A Plan: preliminary intersection SP15 (4/23/96) 55 12/10/96 A Letter by Green Acres, Inc. Re: request for party status 56 12/6/96 ANR Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2004 (11/6/96) 57 1/3/97 ANR Document: Stormwater Discharge Permit #1-1269 (12/30/96) 58 11/21/96 ANR Entry of Appearance/Prehearing Comments, ANR (11/19/96) 59 1/9/97 A Letter by Trudell Consulting Engrs w/attachments (12/11/96) 60 Letter by Emily Wadhams to Division for Historic Preservation (5/29/97) 61 8/7/97 same as above (8/1/97) 62 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Emily Wadhams (6/23/97) 63 8/4/97 Letter by Emily Wadhams to District 4 Environmental Commission w/xerox photos (8/1/97) 64 12/17/97 Letter by Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers to Division for Historic Preservation (12/17/97) 65 3/6/98 A Letter by Trudell Consulting Engineers to Lou Borie (3/5/98) 66 Letter by Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers to Trudell Consulting Engineers (1/12/98) #4C1005/Page 4 67 ANR Letter by District Wetlands Ecologist (2/4/98) 68 A Letter Report Cultural Resources Investigation Phase I Identification Study prepared by Werner Archaeological Consulting (9/25/97) 69 Draft Mitigation Agreement/Dept. Of Agriculture, Food & Markets (2/12/97) 70 3/11/98 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Lou Borie (3/5/98) 71 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Emily Wadhams (6/19/97) 72 A Letter by Trudell Consulting Engineers to Lou Borie (2/11/96) 73 A same as above (12/11/96) 74 A Letter by Trudell Consulting Engineers to Division for Historic Preservation (7/12/96) 75 A same as above (7/31/96) 76 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Trudell Consulting Engineers (9/9/96) 77 A Letter by Trudell Consulting Engineers to Kathy Callum, GeoArch (9/25/96) 78 Project Memo from Dick Trudell to File (11/20/96) 79 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Trudell Consulting Engineers (11/25/96) 80 Letter by Mark Neagley, Summer Ice Joint Venture to Lou rt Borie w/attachment CUD File #96-400 (4/2/98) 81 Document: Chapter XV Southeast Quadrant 82 Excerpts from Chittenden County Regional Plan/1996 83 Letter by Division for Historic Preservation to Lou Borie (5/1/98) 4C1005.ex/eb CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE F. I hereby certify that on this day of May,1998 a copy of the foregoing Land Use Permit and Findings of Fact an Conclusions of Law and Order #4C1005 was sent, first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley Neagley & Chase Construction Company 1150 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Richard Trudell/Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Margaret Picard, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Andrew Raubvogel, Esq./Associate General Counsel Aggency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street, 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 Staige Davis 153 Summit Street Burlington, VT 05401 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Visser/Susan Wheeler 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Will Mikell, Jr. 66 Van Sicklen Road Williston, VT 05495 Eric Gilbertson/Sue Jamele Division for Historic Preservation 135 State Street, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633-1201 } Page 2/ #4C1005 Emily E. Wadhams 299 South Union Street Burlington, VT 05401 Ernie Christianson, Regional Engineer ANR/ 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Donna Chandler VT Department of Health PO Box 70 Burlington, VT 05402-0070 Dated at Essex Junction, VT this ///day ofd y,1998. 8v� .' f:cs4C1005.doc/eb die Bowen i ' x:yam:; STATE OF VERyIONT AGENCY OF DEvELOPvIENT AND CONIMUNITY Ai�AIRS DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ?-eserveng '�ermonr's �zisiorec. lrchaec:urai •.ind arcneoiogicat resources OATE : we are .evi,wing -he project ::now as �1lEGi y c locacea proposed bv'i2�ed�%� n ' '`'- F -.4 _ ar:ec- anv 'nistor:c to see ire arcject - ^w ew because the project buildings or st.uctures. We are undertake �c` 25O oermit; state =unds; or Lnvolves one or more or the °oiLowinq: `_ederal =unds, per it or License State ana teaersl aws direct us to comment an such protects. as part ar the _eview, we must determine any buildings or structares r< h_5tor c bu�ldincs may be affected the project area are "historic'. _ any - bv a orojec`, we prier comments and wort: �itl the develooe` co ensure that ;ae ;ustor'c resources wi:i be oreserved In the course at he project ,rnenever possible. Ne .,ould like to consider dour comments as ve complete this=e'r-e'� le to be considered 'historic," a oropertY must oe at least general, in order Architectural nears old, and must retain most or ire historic appearance. siani'icsnce (weather a bui_d_ng is a good example or a sc•ile or type, weather __ has dist,nct_ve decoraci,ie or st_:cturai features) �s_mnor=ant :n :'he histor• of the 'ou — ding (who l-ved there, assessing historic charahZee �nac wnac.events took olace can tell us about,how peaple asea to __vet Ls also an imoortanc cr:ter�a- 'S0 or stars revLew, an "historic" property Ls defined as -or purposes or .act ?laces. -or purposes meec•nq the c_iter:a .or the State Rcerty isode '1edras meeting^ the cr_ter_a of °ederal review, an "histor-c' propel / - for ?br the Naclonal Recister of Histor=c ?laces. 2rooert_cs can be e__gor. the State 3egister or the National Regisner ind�v.dually, or as car-: ac an area that (3uairies as an hiscoric district. .re already have some Lnrormacion about the orocert:y on cpov � s __ ' a attached. Do you have any addit:anal Lnfarma a on about thewarc^.�nether�-�•ey histor f or the buildings) that we shoteld consider _n -ev_e Lag armat_ prooerw Ls 'histor Backe round histary about tie bu�_d,nc, a_ ddVe on its impor-seta=nvlocsl `1istory, and iarormat�on on changes occurred to _::e-uiidinq over ..-.-,e are aspec,ally heip[u�. -< vau want to concr:but_ Our deadll.^.e for t�is review '_5 �er'� s or'. C _ you �eec Noce please contact .s cv tip l /� / ' -nror-:ac_on, he nun c_oa'__t;=esI_es oubt_c :ear_nq�eo -ime, ?lease :ec us ..ncw. - ` _ r ccert;i, lease :et as -,-.ow and _sc-ss t:ie histori_ charactof .e .... arrange one. 7nans you '_or "'Cur _..t _ est ^.c' ._-. . 'STATE OF VERMONT Division for Historic, Preservation Montpelier, VT 05602 HISTORIC SITES & STRUCTURES SURVEY Individual Structure Survey Form ICOUNTY: Chittenden I (TOWN: South Burlington LOCATION: 1100 Hinesburg Rd. COM14ON NAME: ! isham -�Iavor House FUNCTIONAL TYPE: Dwelling OWNER: Huntington & Jane Mavor ADDRESS: 1100 Hinesburg Rd. SURVEY NUMBER: 0414-10 EGATIVE FILE NUMBER: 79-A-339 TM REFERENCES:, Zone/Easting/Northing 18/646636/4922174 .S.G.S. QUAD. MAP: PRESENT FORMAL NAME: Mavor House ORIGINAL FORMAL NAME: RIGINAL USE: Family Residence RCHITECT/ENGINEER: ILDER/CONTRACTOR: HYSICAL CONDITION OF STRUCTURE: Excellent ❑ Good Fair❑ Poor❑ JACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC: _ 1 Yes ❑ No 0 Restricted ❑ STYLE: Greek Revival jLEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE-: DATE BUILT: Local LE StateN National❑ c.1850 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Structural System 1. Foundation: Stone n Brick ❑ Concrete ❑ Concrete Block ❑ 2. Wall Structure a. Wood Frame: '20st &BeamN Balloon ❑ b. Load Bearing Masonry: Brick ❑ Stone ❑ Concrete ❑ Concrete Block ❑ C. Iron ❑ d. Steel ❑ e. Other: 3. Wall Covering: Clapboard N Board & Batten ❑ Wood Shingle ❑ 1 Shiplap ❑ Novelty ❑ Asbestos Shingle ❑ Sheet Metal ❑ Aluminum ❑ .phalt Shingle ❑ Brick Veneer ❑ Stone veneer❑j Bonding Pattern: Other: �. Root Structure ,a. Truss: Wood ® Iron ❑ Steel❑ Concrete ❑ b. Other: 5. Roof Covering: Slate i Wood Shingle ❑ Asphalt Shingle Sheet Metal❑ Built Up❑ Rolled❑ `Tile ❑ Other ` I 6. Engineering Structure: i 7. Other: j I'Appendages: Porches M Towers❑ Cupolas❑ Dormers ❑ Chimneys Sheds Ellsff Wings ❑ Bay Window ❑ Other: Roof Stvle : Gable ❑ Hiof Shed❑ F 1at ❑ .Mansard 1_i Gambrel L:1 Jerkinhead❑ Saw Tooth! With Monitor ❑ With Bellcast! With Parapet❑ With. False Front ❑ Other: Number of Stories: 1`, Number of Says: 3�3 Entrance Location: Front Left Aooro:< mate D i mens i on.s : 30x35 THRE-11T '70 STRUCTURE: No T' rea to Zoning L _ . Roads Development � Deterioration!_ CCAL A` T T-UDES : Positive! Necativeli_^ '?iced Other: J 'AbDITIONAL ARCHITECTU" OR STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIC Temple -fronted L-plan with garage addition and sheds in reau/ Entrance has 4/5-length sidelights, pilasters supporting entablature. Porch with square posts, shed roof, runs along inside of "L". 2/2 sash, molded cornice, modern exterior chimney. ,ELATED STRUCTURES: (Describe) " Ps 1-6 - Variety of small, plan farm outbuildings. 7. Swimming pool. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This small farmhouse features a simple temple front with Greek Revival sidehall entrance. The diminutive scale, vernacular style, and variety of small outbuildings provide the visual effect of a small, prosperous family farm, and thus serves to preserve South Burlington's disappearing agricultural heritage. REFERENCES: 1857, 1869'maps . J n z iicate North _n i r--+ F7� 777 Q2 SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT: Open LandS Woodland E Scattered BuildingsCl Moderately Built Uo❑ Denselv Built Up Q ResidentialM Commercials; Agriculturaln IndustrialC` Roadside Stria. Developments_; i Other: RECORDED 3Y: r I , . Doo ORGANIZATION: Vt. Div. for Historic ?reservation DATE RECORDED: 6/20/79 i OA ' I Apr~ �•MYl � �.. { - .' P � a�,�+'' �y{� f�,�S7 � � 1. y.�,y 1 � ' � 4 I( t _ y ..•+ 5 .. i Q✓,-r, 3F;� Ysb4: � �+ � Kk-'?° tit Y^, � 5 r; I c • PLANNING COMMISSION 7 November 1989 page 2 he had no problem hooking up to the stockade fence so people can't access the -motel pool through the neighbor's property. c Ms. Peacock noted there had been a number of "for sale" cars on the road. Mr. Wilson said they were his cars and are now sold. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Revised Final Plat application of Cooley -Wood Corporation for construction of a ten (10) room, second floor addition as depicted on a plan entitled "Ho -Hum Motel, Site Plan, Proposed 2nd Floor Addition to Back Building," prepared by Cooley -Wood Corporation and dated 9-14-89, last revised 9-29-89, with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant shall post a $6,000, 3-year landscaping bond prior to permit. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to recording to show an 8 foot high stockade fence along the entire length of the rear prperty line (McCarthy) 3. A sewer allocation of 1,600 q d is granted based on 40 qpd bed space (4 bed spaces per room). The sewer fee of $2.50 per gallon shall be paid prior to permit r 4. The REvised Final Plat shall be recorded within 90 days or this approval is null and void. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. a Sketch plan application of 282 acre parcel (260 acres 1 lots in South Burlington) Green Acres, Inc, in South Burlington 01 Hinesburq Road for subdivision of I into 12 lots Mark Sperry identified as an attorney representing the interests of abutting landowners Ms. Pedersen located the parcel south of I-89, east of Hinesburg Rd, below Lane Press and Dyna power. It is in the I-Ag zone which allows 10 acre lots. They will be concentrating the majori- ty of the lots on the west side of the property with a 142 acre lot around the quarry. The lots will access through the road to Lane Press and Dynapower through the middle of the property. There will be 2 cul de sacs, one at lot 11, one at lots 2 & 3. Setbacks from residential zones are met. Mrs. Maher noted that the Environmental Board will request that a certain percentage remain open/farm land and asked if it was the developer's intention that the easternmost lot be used for that purpose. Ms. Pederson said yes, but not all of that lot. Mr. Craig questioned what would happen if those 142 acres got sold PLANNING COMMISSION 7 November 1989 page 3 and the new owner wanted to subdivide again. He also noted that part of the lot is in the Ag-Res District and asked why that is included in the I-Ag requirement calculations for the 20-acre average. Mrs. Maher asked if Mr. Goodrich had any plans for the quarry. Mr Goodrich said no and that he was willing to talk to the city about possibly giving it to the city. Mr. Craig asked if allowances have been made to extend the road to S. Brownell Rd. Ms. Pederson said no. Mr. Goodrich said the City Engineer recommended the plan they are presenting for the road. Mr. Burgesssaid the Commission is interested in that extension. Mr. Goodrich said he would listen to a proposal. Mrs. Maher sug-- gested consulting with Terry Boyle, the City's consultant on the Southeast Quadrant to discuss possible placement of a road. Mr. Sperry presented a letter to the Commission on behalf of residents of the abutting properties. The letter indicated the residents feel the plan does not maximize open space and that the placement of the road down the middle of the property precludes maximizing land for agricultural uses. Mr. Sperry noted the Planning Commission has authority under a PID to modify plans and to make recommendations to the developer for modifications. Mr. Sheahan felt the applicant had lived up to the letter of the regulations but not the spirit. Mr. Burgess replied that the "spirit" was a compromise to allow at least one large lot with smaller lots. Mr. Ready said all of the small lots are right next to the residential area and the open area is away from the homes. He felt the "spirit" would be to flip flop this and leave the open area near the homes. Ms. Anderson asked what will go on the lots when they are devel- oped, specifically from the point of view of traffic, building heights, docking areas, etc. Mr. Goodrich hoped for something like Lane Press and Dynapower. Mr. Sperry stressed they are not trying to stop the project as they recognize the inevitable. They would like to work with Mr. Goodrich and with Terry Boyle and the Commission to come up with something to accommodate his clients' interests. He felt a lot could be done if the road were pushed further north. Mr. Schuele noted that since 1967, the City has listed the Quarry as a recreation/conservation site and he would like to see it kept alive with that designation. Ms. Walton noted this area is a beautiful part of the city and she would not like to see anything that would approximate a second Hinesburg Rd. out there. PLANNING COMMISSION 7 NOvember 1989 page 4 Mr. Abrams asked the Commission to consider the underlying water table when -development of lots comes up. Mr. Craig asked what can be done to Protect views on lots 2 and 3.' He asked if height covenants can be gotten. Mr. Goodrich said the lot slopes so a building could be designed into the hill so only about 10-15 ft. need show. Mr. Craig felt any covenants should be enforceable by the city. Mrs. Maher said she would be willing to reduce setbacks to get building envelopes away from the residential lots. Mr. Burgess outlined the following for the City Planner to follow up on: traffic study, construction of a berm along the residential properties, including of pedestrian trails in any proposals, the designation of a portion of the land as a wetland and the designation of allowable building envelopes on each lot, access to lots 1 & 4 from the cul de sac to reduce curb cuts, the status of the quarry, view protection, connection of the road to S. Brown ell Rd. Commission reaction included the following observations: Mr. Burgess said he tended not to like !:be smaller lots. Ms. Peacock agreed and felt it was not an imaginative plan. She felt the road had to be planned to Williston. Mr. Belter suggested the applicant talk with the State Ag people to see what they will want. Ms. Pennington asked if Terry Boyle will be limited because of this plan. Mr. Burgess said the plan is not so far along that changes can't be made. Mr. Furlong asked what would happen to the large lot once it is used to calculate density for the other lots. Mr. Burgess said the Commission would have to insure via legal documents that the lot could not be subdivided again. Residents again stressed that they hoped the Commission would ask Mr. Goodrich not to put all the industrial lots up against the residential area. 5. Revised Sketch Plan application of Design 1) boundary line adjustment and merger of 3 2.58 and .36 acres, and 2) construction of a idential development on the 2.58 acre parcel Development for a ots into 2 lots of iu-unit planned res- Mr. Burroughs said the concern was that parking was too far from the building, so this has been moved closer. The circular flow of traffic is broken up with landscaped islands. Mr. DeGraff, son of the owner, said they are looking to sell of the diamond shaped pe,ce of property to create the total acreage. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 APRIL 1990 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday 10 April 1990, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock, John Belter, David Austin, Ann Pugh, William Craig Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Dick Trudell, Mark Sperry, Nancy Sheahan, Chris Davis, Terry Sheahan, Pat Reed, Marya Lowe, Don Gilbert, E. Nalette, Ralph Goodrich, Karen Petersen, Maurice Goodrich, Robert Finn, Marcel Lapierre, Thomas O'Connor, Jim Rowler, Mrs. Jeane Anderson, Ms. Jeane Anderson, Bob Furlong, Marc Kutler, Sewall & Gretta Rint, Ginette Brainard, L. Bissett, Roger Dickenson, Wm. Bissonette, Geoffrey Fitzgerald, Greg Dicovitsky, John Jaeger, Larry Brainard, Scott Pennington, Patricia McLean, Kathleen & Michael McNall, Norm Terreri, Carl Cobb, Bill Rowell, Jayne Germain -Smith, G. & B. Beauchemin, L. & _ D. Abbott, Lucia Jean, Paul Duchesneau, Richard Painter, Bill Schuele, Steve Crowley, Haidee Antram 1. Minutes of 13 February 1990 Mr. Craig moved the Mintues of 13 February be approved as written Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously 2. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc, for subdivision of 263 acres off Hinesburg Rd. in South Burlington into 11 lots of 10 10.1 10. 1r. 10.2, 10.3 j, 10.4 F 10.8 12.1, 13.4, and 45.8 acres Mr. Trudell said the property is south of the Dynapower building and consists of 2 parcels of land combined under separate deed. The right-of-way was established when Mitel came in and has been extended. The 145 acre parcel will not be developed at this time. The project would be served by extending the 12' water main. There is a sewer line that can be run into this property and wouldn't require another pump station. The proposed road is 32 ft wide with curbs. Mr. Burgess noted that parcels have to average 20 acres per lot when subdivided and there. may be a problem with the right-of-way reserved. Mr. Weith said the average by his calculations is 23 acres. Mr. Craig said there is a question of whether you count unbuildable parts of lots for acreage. Mr. Weith said that has always been applied to residential developments, not to commercial. Mr. Belter said the developer may end up with a lot he has to put a very small building on, but that's his problem. Mrs. Maher said she would prefer larger lots. PLANNING COMMISSION 10 APRIL 1990 page 2 Mr. Weith noted that wording favors clustering smaller lots to get more open space. Mr. Burgess said he felt the Commission was getting what the regulations allow. Mr. Trudell noted the State wants them to move things up front to preserve prime ag soil in back. He added that it is also cheaper to develop closer to utilities. Members then reviewed items brought up at the November meeting. With regard to traffic, Mr. Trudell said they are in the process of doing one, in addition to another traffic study in conjunction with air pollution. Mr. Craig asked about a berm along the residential properties. Mr. Trudell said there can be a berm in some places. He said they are willing to do something but haven't got plans yet. Mrs. Maher suggested some dense .plantings. Mr. Craig asked about the minor stream. Mr. Trudell said there is some drainage that comes down there. He showed the path of the water. Mr. Craig said there must be a 50 ft. setback from a minor stream. He said that he saw a well-defined channel with a flow. He noted that S. Burlington's regulations also call this a minor stream and added that it drains a great deal of land. Mr. Trudell said they may want to relocate the channel. Mr. Craig said that could be a real sticking point with the Commission and with Act 250. Mr. Trudell said otherwise they would have to relocate a building. Regarding pedestrian trails, Mr. Trudell said there is an easement down the property line. They would be willing to work with the appropriate people to set an exact location. Mr. Weith noted that the Natural Resources Committee has a recommended location. It will have to be put on the final plat. Mr. Craig asked the applicant's intentions regarding the quarry. Mr. Trudell said they have no plans at present. They have had no talks with the city on the quarry either. Mr. Weith said he had heard it would be a liability risk. He noted the city plan calls for getting it deeded to the city. Mr. Wieth said he would meet with Mr. O'Neill and the City Manager and see how they feel about it. Mrs. Maher said she would like to go on record as saying that she recommends that the city should own the quarry. Regarding view protection, Mr. Trudell showed view lines on the plan. He noted buildings would cut into the bank and from Hinesburg Rd. people could see over the buildings to the mountains. Views of the foothills would be blocked. Mr. Craig suggested lower heights for 2 of the buildings to protect the views. He felt the covenants should contain a stipulation that PLANNING COMMISSION 10 APRIL 1990 page 3 buildings can be only 80 ft. high above grade. Mrs. Maher suggested reconfiguring to move buildings further to the east. Mr. Trudell said that might create a problem with frontage. Mrs. Maher said that in such a case the lots should be reconfigured. Regarding wetlands, Mr. Trudell said they have a wetland consultant who will map out .the wetlands for them. He felt there would be enough buildable area left on the lot involved. Mr. Sperry, an attorney representing several properties, located the properties of his clients on the map and asked what uses would be allowed in the proposed buildings. Mr. Trudell said anything allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. He felt it would be primarily light industrial. Mr. Sperry asked about setbacks of the indus- trial buildings from the homes. Mr. Burgess noted that the ap- plicant wasn't proposing any buildings, only a subdivision. Mr. Sperry showed the Commission a map used by Goodrich at the Act 250 hearing on the quarry. He noted that there was an indication that all the soil on lots 1,2,3, and 4 are designated as prime ag and most of lot 6 as well. Everything between the stream and Hinesburg Rd., he said, is prime ag soil. He noted a planned in- dustrial development would have to be created and the Zoning Reg- ulations say they would have to maximize the potential of prime ag soil. He noted the Zoning Regulations also say open space shall be located to maximize view sights from roads and surrounding pro- perties. He did not feel that lots 3,4,and 5 complied with this regulation. Mr. Sperry also noted that the regulations for a planned industrial development require an "innovative" design, and he didn't feel there was anything "innovative" about the proposed design. Mr. Trudell said it's an industrial subdivision, nothing out of the ordinary. Mr. Sperry asked how the Commission would judge "aesthetics" as required under a planned industrial devel- opment if there is no landscaping shown, no building design, no lighting, etc. Mr. Sperry asked if there is anything technical that would prevent the road from being moved further north. Mr. Trudell said there is a curve problem in one place. Mr. Sperry asked if there has been a traffic study or an air pollution study. Mr. Trudell said not yet. Tyler Hart will do the traffic study which will be done later. Mr. Sperry noted there is a criteria that subdivisions will not unduly affect traffic. Mr. Sperry asked if there is any chance storm water will run off onto any of his clients' properties. Mr. Trudell said there is not. Mr. Sheahan the Planning Commission to have the applicant encouraged PLANNING COMMISSION 10 APRIL 1990 page 4 preserve views and to locate homes. He did not feel the addressed and felt that Mr. for homeowners. the road and buildings away from concerns of the neighbors have been Goodrich had not shown consideration Mr. Davis asked if the State had found lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 to be prime ag soil. Mr. Trudell said mostly, except along the drainage swale. A resident asked if there isn't corn growing out there. Mr. Trudell said the land has been leased out f or growing. A resident was disturbed by the big lots on either side and felt there will be pressure for development and that would then present a whole new set of problems. He felt that regardless of what the developer says about not having plans to develop the big lot, they could come in and request to subdivide it. He felt that lot was part of a whole bad design. Ms. Peacock asked about a right-of-way to the Pollack project. Mr. Trudell showed a route. He noted there is a back into this project's road at some Proposal to tie eith Commission had talked about leaving a right-of-wayWbetweented lotsh8 & 9 to make an easier access to the Pollcak land. Mr. Goodrich said they offered that to Pollack but Pollack didn't want it. Mr. Burgess asked if it would be a problem to leave that right-of-way, regardless of what Mr. Pollack wants. Ms. Pugh asked about the cul de sac and noted the subdivision reg- ulations say cul de sacs are allowed only in residential districts. Mrs. Maher said she thought the Commission might have more latitude in planned industrial developments. Mr. Craig felt the matter should be researched. Mr. Crowley noted the quarry has been mentioned ryear as a recreation area potential and noted this has been aarecommenda- tion of the Natural Resources Committee. Mr. Burgess said the Committee will be asked for a recommendation as to whether the city should purchase the land. Mr. Burgess then asked the Commission for comments for the developer. Mr. Craig said he needed traffic answers. He wanted to fight for views on Hinesburg Rd. He wanted a plan. He also felt the city might have to fight theerally state ontter the1` prime ag issue. Ms. Peacock wanted more information on buffering. X She felt views could be protected by restricting building heights. She did want to see building envelopes and height restrictions on at least lots 2 and 3. She was not satisfied with the right of way for Pollack. Ms. Pugh agreed with Ms. Peacock and also wanted to know about the cul de sac. Mrs. Maher did not r PLANNING COMMISSION 10 APRIL 1990 page 5 like the plan and wanted more protection for the residential neighborhood. All members want�ed to see a traffic study. Mrs. -Maher then moved to continue the hearin until -the.a licant comes in -with a Plan that addresses--the.Commission's concerns Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion asked unanimously. 4. Sketch Plan application of South Burlin ton Realty -Company to revise and construct the 11-remainin units of a 50-unit- lanned residential develo ment known as MEado Drive wbrook Condominiums, Jo Mr. Craig stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Dicovitsky showed a drawing of what has been built to date. He then showed a drawing with the added 11 units and a new configuration of carports. Changes were outlined as follows; Previously parking was all to the east of the carports. The Fire Chief asked that the road be reconfigured closer to the building and they have thus looped the road to the west of the carports. The Fire Chief is satisfied. This also resulted in the reconfig- uration of the carports. They have also rethought the buildings and have removed the southernmost unit from G Building and added it to H building. This provides more clearance. Mrs. Maher noted the City Engineer feels the drainage problems should be solved before any more building is done. Mr. Dicovitsky said everything in the drainage report will be addressed. There will drainage swales, culvert improvements, and a second culvert. Mrs. Maher asked that the City Engineer be satisfied that every- thing he wants is in the final motion. A neighbor raised the question of traffic. Mr. Burgess noted that traffic was already addressed in the original approval. 4. Site Plan application -of William -and Lee -for -a_24 seat ex ansion within an existin -2 00 square _foot_buil in A1's French Fries Williston Rd. Mr. Burgess noted receipt of statement of concern from the City Council regarding traffic on Williston Rd, and asked that this be carefully considered by the Commission. Mr. Bissonette said they want to put in 20 more seats in a 14' x 20' space. The footprint of the building will not change. Mr. Burgess noted that according to ITE standards this doesn't PLANNING COMMISSION 6 August 1990 page 2 Mr. Kirk, a neighbor, said he basically supported what Mrs. Maher said. He said if he had his way, he would like the trees to stay as a noise buffer. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of Garland & Helen Withers for subdivision of approximately 42,700 sq. ft. of land into two lots of 15,700 sq ft. and 27,000 sq. ft. as depicted on a plat entitled "Final Plat, Site Plan and Two Lot Subdivision for Garland & Helen Withers," prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors and dated 6/1/91, last revised 6/22/91, with the followinq stipulations: 1. The applicant shall pay the required per unit recreation fee for lot 2 prior to issuance of a zoning permit for lot 2 There is an existing house on lot 1; therefore, a recreation fee is not required for lot 1. 2. A sewer allocation of 450 gpd is granted for lot 2 The applicant shall pay the required per gallon sewer fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit for lot 2. There is an existing house on lot 1; therefore, a sewer allocation fee is not reauired for lot 1. 3. The plan shall be revised prior to final plat submission to indicate whether the existing shed on lot 1 will be removed or moved at least 10 feet from the proposed subdivision line. 4. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed 3-2 with Mr. Craig ab- staining and Mrs. Maher and Ms Pugh voting against 4. Continue Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc, for subdivision of 263 acres off Hinesburg Rd. in South Burlington into eleven lots of 10.1, 10.1, 10.1, 10.1, 10.5, 10.8, 12.1, 12.4, 12.5 and 145.8 acres, Green Acres property: Mr. Jacob outlined the issues: a. View Protection: he said they have solved this with a fomula. Ms. Pedersen explained the formula and Mr. Weith said he is sat- isfied with the angle. Ms. Pedersen noted the buildings would be set into the ground so as not to get into the view area. Mr Weith recommended this apply to all lots. Mr. Jacob said in some areas this might be a non -issue as the land slopes away. He would like to check on this. Mr. Burgess felt the angle should be checked and confirmed. PLANNING 6 August page 3 b. Ditch: COMMISSION 1991 The ditch will be moved 50 ft. from any property line, and will meander. The applicant would put walking paths around the area and would make it a natural setting. There would be no rip - rapping. There will be berms for screening. Mr. Jacob noted that the Natural Resources Committee thinks it's a good idea. They will remove the stream that currently runs diagonally across the lot. The City Council thought it a good idea to continue the right of way to meet the road, and the applicant has no objection to this. They would like to do this as they start developing the first lot. Mr. Jacob then showed the drainage pattern. The City Engineer has not yet approved this. Ms. Pedersen noted they may have to upsize the culverts. Mr. Burgess asked if the applicant has talked with the abutters. Mr. Jacob said they have, and the neighbors like the concept other than part of the path. He noted that if lots 2 and 3 can be sold together, they could move the building envelope another 100 ft. to the north. Mr. Jacob said the home of Mr. Rowley becomes.an "island" of residential property among all the industrial land. They would propose to readjust the property line. This would close 2 curb cuts on Hinesburg Rd. He noted the Davis property next to Rowley's is also for sale and they could close that curb cut as well. Mr. Weith felt there are some legal problems in doing this. The Rowley lot couldn'thave anything done with it as it would no longer be a pre-existing lot,snless the zoning is changed. Mr. Jacob noted they have aligned the intersection of lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 and have eliminated a curb cut there. The applicant would like to build the sidewalk himself. They will put it wherever the city wants. 1260 ft. would be required. Members had no problem with this if it is attached to an existing sidewalk. They would want more than 1260 ft. c. Wetlands: A study has been done, but the report is not available yet. Mr. Jacob said he understood there are no wetlands on lots 5 or 7, exept for the CO Zone land. There is agreement that there is a wetland on lot 7. Ms. Pedersen said they are not required to finish the survey on lot 11. The lot is calculated as 145 acres. This leaves 242 acres for the 10-lot subdivision, and this is within the re- PLANNING COMMISSION 30 July 1991 page 4 quirements. They would defer the survey on lot 11 until there is a request for development of that lot. Mr. Weith noted the sub- division regulations require a survey. Mr. Burgess added he wasn't sure that could be waived. Mr. Weith said this has been done in the past large farm parcels, but the Commission still needs to see a slat of the entire property with a note added that lot 11 still has not been surveyed. Members agreed to this. d. Path Around Quarry: Mr. Jacob said the applicant objects to doing this because of the liability issue. He suggested waiting till something is done with that lot. Mr. Burgess said there could be a reserved right to include this at a later date. e. Traffic: Ms. Pedersen said they don't agree with two of Craig Leiner's recommendations. Mr. Weith noted they are required to include Dorset St/Kennedy Drive in the analysis and to use the 5th edition of the ITE manual instead of the 4th. Ms. Pedersen said they already have a draft air pollution permit based on the 4th edition base information. Mr. Burgess said he wouldn't make a decision until he hears from Craig Leiner on this. Members agreed. Mr. Sperry, representing abutting neighbors, said they would like a 400 ft. setback on lot 5, the same as lot 4. They generally like the plan for the stream. The big problem is lot 3. The building is nearly on top of the Howell and Davis properties. Mr. Sperry noted that zoning regulations require that open space be arranged to the maximum. They ask that lot 3 be eliminated. He felt another lot of 10 acres could be gotten next to lot 10. Mr. Reed said that lots 4 and 5 address the proximity to residents but lot 3 doesn't do this as the building is only 150 ft. away. Residents would see a whole wall of building from their back decks. Regarding the trail, he said he liked the concept but was concerned that this happen in a timely nature. They want to see what landscaping will be done and how it will be configured. They suggest the bike path be located starting across from where it exits Butler Farms. Scott Pennington, an adjacent property owner, said he liked the road, but would like to see buildings as far away from residences as possible. He suggested more development near the quarry. He noted the present plan contains the same number of lots as had been rejected before. Mr. Craig noted the plan hadn't been re- jected but only continued to this time. Mr. Pennington noted that the water level of the wetland has been lowered because of what was done to the ditch. Regarding the footpath, Mr. Brainard said the major concern is .... �_....v..uu....w.�........: ,._........ - .. uW:.• :, .... J.luu�:.:vJ�1�ta:+:.�:�.a:fLT 4:s�_= "�� PLANNING COMMISSION 6 August 1991 page 5 that it's a highway to the quarry and could become a motor bike path. Another neighbor said it would make more sense to put lots 2 and 3 together now instead of hoping it happens later. Mr. Burgess noted that the pedestrian paths will not be designed for motorbike use. Ms. Pennington asked if posts could be put up to prevent motorized traffic. Mr. Sperry said the Commission should -think about how the green area/berms/trail, etc., are assured via a bond to be sure they happen. Regarding traffic, he said he read the report. He had never seen a report in which the levels of service in the building year are so bad they have been blacked out. What is provided is levels with improvements in place. He wanted to know what the levels would be without the improvements and how the gap between the money being provided for the improvements and the im- provements actually being done would be narrowed. Mr. Burgess said the point is well taken. Mr. Reed said the real concern is that this is a large piece of property, and development is being placed where it will have the greatest negative impact on neighborhoods, views, etc. Mrs. Maheer said -she liked the meandering stream and the berms. She would just ask for easements for the path. Ms. Peacock agreed on the stream and likes the idea of the path. Ms. Pugh agreed with Ms. Peacock. Mr. Austin felt the stream was a reasonable idea but didn't feel strongly about the path. Mr. Craig agreed with Mr. Austin. Mr. Burgess said he didn't favor the combination with the Rowley lot. He said it was not an accident that the wording of the regulations doesn't allow creation of 3-acre lots for industrial use and it would not be right to do it here and not allow it elsewhere. All but Mrs. Maher agreed with Mr. Burgess. Mrs. Maher felt it was a good idea and didn't think it would be a problem if it is made clear what is being done and why. She felt there were benefits to doing it. Mr. Craig asked the locationof prime ag soils. Ms. Pedersen outlined these and said there are about 80 acres within this sub- division. Mr. Sperry asked if there is prime ag soil where the buidling envelope for lot 3 is proposed. Ms. Pedersen said there is. Mr. Sperry read from the zoning ordinance on this. Mr. Jacob said the new procedure is to donate money to a fund to maintain prime ag land where it is being used for agriculture. Mr. Austin said he agrees with the residents that the possible future joining of lots 2 and 3 means nothing but a nice gesture. PLANNING COMMISSION 6 August 1991 page 6 Mr. Craig said he needed to know when traffic improvements are due and exactly what will be done. He said the Commission may require phasing. Members wanted new plans for the next hearing. Mr. Craig moved to continue the application until 27 August. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimosuly. 5. Sketch plan application of Southsett partnership to change a 178 unit planned residential development of 63 single family units and 115 multi -family units to a 145 unit planned residential development of 121 single family lots and 24 multi- family units, Village at Dorset Park: Mr. Milot said they have agreed to allow Southsett to complete the multi -family units near the entrance (6 lots). They have 8 or 10 single family lots to build. They feel single family units are better than multi -family on the back lot. There would then be 148 units on the whole site instead of 178. They would continue the architectural style as much as possible. These would be less expensive homes, about $140,000 for a 1700 sq. ft. home. Neighbors concerns are that they paid a lot for their homes and felt the value would decrease with lower priced homes nearby. Mr. Milot said there are to be 2 tennis courts, the pool and ponds are already in. Mr. Burgess said the proposed plan is more dense looking than before. Mr. Llewellyn noted that 30 curb cuts could be eliminated. Mr. Craig had no problem with the plan nor did Ms. Pugh. Mr. Burgess said he had a problem with so many tiny lots. Ms. Peacock said she wasn't crazy about the idea but felt the Com- mission's hands had always been tied on this development. Mr. Austin said he wasn't pleased with the number of small lots but did like the greater mix of housing types within the development. 6. Sketch Plan application of John Larkin to amend the 200 unit hotel (Howard Johnson's) and restaurant planned Commercial Development at 1710 Shelburne Rd. as follows: 1) construct a 1200 sq. ft. lobby/connector addition between buildings 3 and 4; 2) construct a 4708 sq. ft. meeting/banquet facility additon to building 3: PLANING COMMISSION JULY 9. 1991 It was also noted that any subsequent requests for development will always be handled as a PCD with total acreage considered. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Harold Bensen for subdivision of _a 3.63 acre Parcel containing a Planned Commercial Development consisting of two (2) commercial buildings and 16 residential units into two () lots of 1.41 acres (commercial buildings) and 2.22 acres (residential buildings) as depicted on a plan entitled "Prelimi- nary Site Plan for Hal Bensen, No. 1 Executive Drive, South Burlington, Vermont". prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors and dated 5 8 90 with the following stipulations: 1) As expressed by the applicant, the applicant shall replace dead landscaping and install new landscaping as outlined in the letter from Four Seasons dated 6/19/91. The applicant shall post a 3-year bond to cover the new landscaping prior to recording. 21 The applicant shall record a pedestrian easement on lot 1 which allows employees of businesses on lot 2 to walk over lot 1 to access the bank and Post office. This easement shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the Revised Final Plat. The easement shall be shown on the Final Plat. 3 The applicant shall record appropriate legal documents which clarify that the uses on lots l and 2 were originally created as a Planned Commercial Development and that any subsequent review and approvals by the Planning Commission shall take into account the entire 3.62 PCD and uses thereon. 4 The applicant shall submit the Revised Final Plat application within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed C/--/, 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Continued Preliminary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc., for subdivision of 263 acres off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington into 11 lots of 10.1, 10.1, 10.1, 10.1, 10.5, 10.8, 10.8, 12.1, 12.4, 12.5, and 145.8 acres, Green Acres property: Mr. Sheahan stepped down during this discussion as he is an abutting property owner: Mr. Jacob showed the extension of Swift Street on the plan. It would dead end in a cul-de-sac until the remaining land is de- veloped and a road goes through to Williston. ' ....: '�'.:r:.�.:`W.L:a•a)1a��ro ...w.:iu .. �,... "r—s�' ""tii+3v<)U {��.e _� ..t1. — o....y �...._.__e......._,..., PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 9, 1991 Mr. Craig asked the status of the land where the road would go. Mr. Jacob said it is a right-of-way. South Burlington would have a say as to where the road goes. There would be an offer of dedication made. Mr. Craig said he wanted to be sure the City isn't getting into a trap some time in the future. Mr. Jacob noted that the driveways for lots 1-4 would come off the cul-de-sac. He showed the stream whose direction would change to run along this property. Mr. Weith suggested that lot 6 access off the right-of-way. Mr. Jacob said they had no objec- tion to that. A 4-way intersection for lots 7,8, 9, and 10 would be created with lots 7 and 9 and lots 8 and 10 sharing an access aligned across from each other. Mr. Weith has suggested a height limitation. He was not happy with using 39. feet on lot #2 and suggested 391ofeet. Mr. Weith noted they had picked a point even with the tree line in back. He thought it was important to preserve the full expanse of the view. , -- Mr. Austin noted that a PUD requires innovation in design and he wasn't sure this met that requirement. Mr. Craig noted that the large lot would have to remain as one lot because of the terms of the PCD. Mr. Jacob raised the question of planting that might block the view of residents. Mr. Howell said he was not so much concerned with buildings as with lights from the buildings and would like to be protected from that. Mr. Sheahan said he would like to see a berm to the north of the homes. He didn't want it to interfere with their views but should shield them from noise of parking and lights. He asked that sightings be done to determine the height of the berm. Mr. Sheahan also noted the building envelope on lot #3 is very close to three residences. Mr. Sheahan asked if a cul-de-sac is legal in a PCD. He said the regulations allow them only in residential areas. Mr. Jacob said they have been granted all over the City. Mr. Davis noted there is a building almost in his yard and he is already bothered by lights from Digital at night. Mr. Sperry, representing some of the residential neighbors, noted that all land west of the stream is prime AG soils and he was concerned that Act 250 won't allow development there. He also asked if the building envelopes for lots 2, 3, and 4 are "cast in concrete". Mr. Burgess noted they are the maximum allowable. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION DULY 9. 1991 Mr. Reed noted this is the first concern Green Acres has shown for the residential neighbors. He appreciated that and said he would also like to see a berm. Mr. Sperry said he was concerned with lot 5 as no building en- velope is shown. Mr. Brainard noted that the edge of a commer- cial building could be 150 feet from his property line. Mr. Sperry asked if the envelope could be put near the road. Mr. Jacob said they would want to do that anyway. Mr. Brainard said that lot #3 will arouse the most resistance as it is very close to the residences. Mr. Craig raised the question of the ditch. The drainage pattern was outlined. Mr. Jacob said that Dick Ward is satisfied to leave the other ditch as is now that the water has been redirect- ed. Mr. Reed noted that where the old and new ditches meet, there is no obstacle to water running into the new ditch. Any volume of flowing water will go into both watercourses and within a few years water will be flowing back in the ditch. Mr. Burgess stressed that the Commission will be very concerned with what happens to those watercourses. Mr. Craig said he would he happy to see it filled in the way is was previously. vLiic CuIIIll115Sioll members agreed. Mr. Jacob noted they are working with a wetlands expert and will report the findings when available. Regarding the pedestrian easement, Mr. -Jacob showed a possible extension following the brook. The recreation path people want a different route, but the applicant sees a problem with liability with the quarry. Mr. Jacob said they don't want to divide a possible joining of two lots with a recreation path. Mr. Craig felt the Commission should get feedback from the Natural Resource Committee. Mr. Jacob noted the property is located in the Airport noise cone. Mr. Weith noted the Commission needs a survey plat of all eleven lots . Mr. Jacob said this is being done. Mr. Weith said the Hinesburg Road sidewalk policy would require the applicant to pay $27,000. A sidewalk will eventually be put down on Hinesburg Road. Mr. Goodrich asked if they could build it themselves. Mr. Weith said he would check with Sonny Audette. For traffic projections, the applicant has used 1992 as a base year with 1997 as the year of buildout. The intersection would require a traffic light for the "build" phase. Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road would be at capacity as would Williston Road/Hinesburg Road for the design year (1997). Mr. Craig asked if Mr. Leiner had seen the report. Mr. Weith said he has it but hasn't reviewed it yet. Mr. Craig noted that the Swift Street Extension at Hinesburg Road would require a left and right turn lane at buildout and also a signal. He asked if the applicant would bond for the cost of the signal. The applicant felt that would be required by the Agency of Transportation. It was also noted that the air quality report requires that when there are 1000 parking spaces, the left and right turn lanes must be in. Mr. Craig noted that Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road and Williston Road/Hinesburg Road are over capacity today. In 1997, they will become a disaster. He said he had a hard time adding this impact to those two intersections. He didn't feel this development should be responsible for solving it all, but he didn't know what the City's plans are for those two locations. Mr. Weith noted that Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road is in the impact fee plan. Money is being collected to contribute toward the City's share of improvements. He didn't know when those would occur. Mr. Jacob noted this development requires Council approval and felt this issue could be raised then. Mr. Weith said he would check with the State but he didn't think the State had any plans at present. He noted that Williston Road improvements are not being designed by the State. Mr. Poger said that when Corporate Way opens, which should be soon, both of those intersections will become a disaster. Mr. Burgess then outlined the Commissions concerns: landscaping on the property line traffic (Craig Leiner's comments) City Council's reaction to the intersections the elevation of buildings moving the whole development 100 feet or so to the east where water will go on the property (what happens to the ditch) building envelope on lot 5 possibly moving further north Mr. Reed noted that at the last hearing, the developer was asked to come in with a more innovative design. He felt it looked almost like the same thing. Mr. Burgess said it can be debated whether the applicant is meeting the intent of the regulations. Mr. Reed noted the buildings are placed where they have the most impact on visibility. He said his other concern is the largest lot and with people saying zoning can change in the future and that lot can be developed. Mr. Burgess stressed that it is the intention of the Planning Commission that this not happen. Mr. Sperry felt the problems with lot #3 could be solved a number of ways. 1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 9. 1991 Mr. Austin moved to continue the hearing until August 6. 1991. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site Plan application of Thomas Kleh for conversion of a 20,500 square foot building to restaurant (75 seats) and indoor recreation use (miniature golf), 1205 Airport Parkway. Mr. Burgess noted this used to be the Offset House. Mr. Kleh said he would put in a pizza restaurant with a softball batting cage, miniature golf, and driving range, all indoors. Mr. Weith noted there is no traffic overlay in this area of the City. Mr. Kleh said the road is level in front for 200 yards from the hill. There is plenty of visibility. Mr. Kleh showed the location of the dumpster and said it will be enclosed. Ms. Peacock asked if parking spaces will be delineated. Mr. Kleh said he hoped to pave it in the future but it will stay gravel now. The three handicapped spaces will be paved. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan applicaton of Thomas Kleh for conversion of a 20,500 square foot building to a restaurant 75 seats and indoor recreation use as depicted on a plan entitled "Airport Industrial Park. Lots 5 & 6. formerly the Offset House, Site Plan".- prepared by Gunner McCain and dated 6/14/90, last revised 6/19/91 with the following stipu- lations: 1) This approval is conditional on a maximum restaurant seating capacity of 75 seats. Any increase in seating shall be approved by the Planning Commission. 21 The Planning Commission waives the $600.1andscaping require- ment since the site is presently well landscaped and of good appearance. 3) A sewer allocation of 2,250 gpd is granted. The applicant shall pay the $2.50 Per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zon- ing/building permit. 4) The Plan shall be revised prior to permit to address the following: aZ The Plan shall show the gravel embankment on the northwesL side of the building and adjust the parking area accordingly. b) Trie Plan shall show the dunipster location and appropriate screening. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION . 8 October 1991 Page 4 Mr. Goldstein stated that he was told that the proposed use of mobile home sales is not permitted in the zoning district I-C therefore a variance must be obtained from the Zoning Board prior to the review of the Planning Commission. We net with the Zoning Board on October 7th and was told that if the lot could be used for any other purpose,. they would not allow the use of a mobile home dealership. Mr. Burgess stated that the applicant is proposing an amendment to the zone to allow mobile home sales. Procedurally that requires us to hold a public hear- ing. After a _public hearing, we would forward it to the City Council who would hold a hearing and if they adopt it after the prescribed warning periods, then you would have a waiting period to have this zone change go into -effect. You would then no to the Zoning Board and if they give you a conditional use approval, you would then come back to the Planning Commission and we might turn you down for traffic reasons or something else all of which would be unrelated to the zone. Even if ire do amend the zone and it is adopted, that is not a guarantee that there will be subsequent approval by the Planning Com- mission_ Mr. Shumway replied they would like to proceed with this request and withdrew their application. Kr. Weith stated he would warn a public hearing. 5. Continue Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 2G3 acres off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington into 11 lots of 10. ld_ 1, 10.1, 10.2, 10. 3, 10.4, 10.8, 12.1, 12.5, 13.4, and 145.8 acres_ Hr. Sheahan stepped down from this application because he is an adjoining property owner. Hr. Jacob reviewed the October 8, 1991 Memorandum from Mr. Weith to the Plan- ning Commission - a) Pedestrian Path: The path is to serve as a recreational path for the neighbors and for the lots. Both the Recreation Committee and Natural Resources Committee have looked at this and there is a feeling this should be looped around the stream. The Recreational Path people want to connect it through to Butler Farms or Oak Creak. Natural Resources wants a general r.o_w. so the path can be added. We have no objection to giving a right of way on both sides of the stream. There will be a foot path with a foot bridge crossing the wetlands. We will give the City a r.o.v. to this path. Hr. Weith asked about the vetland zone 5 and 7. Mr. Jacob replied they vould prefer to have a foot bridge made of wood over the wetlands area. ..�.,.�..,;.�:rw��rcraaaa�zYr�+m�rtsz?Mra=;�?�;:�?t?��t?r�rt%, -. ---�s��r:r��.raaax�ra+ _-'• - , � _.�, �.,..,^gs�,. M"� j[t �: S t .f' CJ.$�oAd- !taMc 7,�/T`.ay. 6aT�$r%i i •ram ._ frr.`�� •..` �����,�t�.I�t., J". •�r �lii M•J�."i•�-i�.+ ,]$oe. Y "'F'„�I�lt+�"_` :W-00ev f PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 5 .. Mr. Sperry, representing abutting neighbors, stated there are concerns about the foot path and how it might invite motorcycles and 4-wheel all terrain vehicles. He asked if there would be.barricades to prevent this from happen- ing. Mr. Jacob replied his client would have no objection to having bar- ricades. Mr. Craig asked if you can -get to the path from Hinesburg Road. Mr. Jacob replied yeses _ Mr. Sperry stated that his clients have requested that if a path is approved, that there be a condition that wherever it accesses the public, that there be some measures to prevent people from going up and down this path with motor- cycles, all terrain vehicles and noisy bikes. Ms. Peacock stated it would be pre;.:ature for the Planning Commission to say there must be a prohibition against motorized vehicles until we know if there. will be a problem or not. She said it would be a good idea to have the path connected to the rest of the recreation path of the City. Mr. Sperry asked if the applicant is proposing to install the berms and landscaping. Mr. Jacob replied they will landscape after they build the berms.: The landscaping has to be designed and looked over by Natural Resources to get. their approval, the layout has to be approved by them. - The number of trees and the type of trees all has to be done prior to final. -hr. Burgess. --asked if they then were proposing to build the bermsbefore the_ landscaping. Mr. Jacob replied yes. Mr. Weith stated that at the last meeting we talked about whether it should be an unpaved path, a walking path or a paved path. We have two different recom- mendations. The Natural Resources Committee would like to see walking paths on both sides of the stream whereas the Recreation Path Committee would like to some day see a paved facility. At this time they are recommending that we only get the easement in place and staff has recommended that we get the generic easement at least on the north side of the stream connecting to Hines- burg Road and also connecting to the 60 it. r. o. w. at Ledge }moll. When we get to the point of implementation sometime in the future, that is when the exact location would be finalized after public hearing. b) Wetlands: A report has been prepared by Peter Spear, Natural Resources Consulting Service. Mr. Weith stated that he would like to see a foot bridge over the wetlands and asked whether the State would allow a 200 ft. bridge Lo gu through a Wetland. 10 Mr. Jacob said they have not brought this up tG Natural Resources and Will have to go back to them for their thoughts and comments. cam:SY' -. 0'Si T","SS.S,B1'FBRf44G':`it4�ITliWf9f ..'.,�P=+PS'M1•.,SMTN+-1",�.i•,Mv�s'.4'.414v:'��. ' .:iRA9+:+•'�_."?Y .- .... PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Wage 6 c) .Traffic: Mr. Jacob stated that Tyler Hart prepared the traffic survey. Mr. Weith stated the state is going to be doing some minor improvements to the intersection of Rt. 116/Kennedy Drive this fall that will improve it to a level of service E. Mr. Cimonetti stated that the City Council has identified traffic problems at each of the key intersections, Rt. 116/Kennedy Drive and Rt. 116/Williston Road fqr the last five years. We have discussed improvements that would be independent of the impact of this project. The City has a'capital construc= tion schedule just as the state has the 5-year capital plan and in neither case do you have to work on: everything that is already on a list before_ -some- thing else appears on the list nor are those items arranged in any kind of priority nor do any of the things on the list take priority over yet to be identified items that are not yet on the list. Those intersections have got to have improvements. Mr. Craig stated that with his discussions with Sonny he was left with the im- pression that for intersection improvements that that money wasn't necessary under the state's 5-year plan but there was an intersection improvement bucket that they worked out of every year. Mr. Cimonetti replied there are State monies for those kinds of improvements and they don't have to be identified in the capital program. Many of the bond issues that we have passed not only refer to specific street improvements but have language that says 'and other street and intersection improvements•, and there are unexpended bonded funds within the city that can be applied to in- tersection improvements. Mr. Craig said that the City would begin, to look more seriously at these traf- fic problems knowing that such a project was going to happen and it would put more stress on these intersections. he suggested that if the Commission were to pass this, to pass it with still the question of traffic being opened with preliminary. This would give a very strong signal as to where we are going and give both the administration and the Council an opportunity to respond as to what they could possibly do to solve this traffic problem before we get into the position of final approval. Mr. Cimonetti stated he would be amazed if either intersection improvement wasn't then identified and discussed in the budgeting process in preparation 01 the very next review of the capital budget of the City. Mr. Craig asked would there be some feedback as to where the administration and the Council stood prior to final to the Planning Commission. Mr. Cimonetti replied that if there was a preliminary so that there was a strong impetus to the planning process, then you are looking at the next fiscal -+.,�M117M ,.'G'�aErp..-17,111111MR1spa ., WPM PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 'Page 7 J budget process. The process starts next month and becomes public with the hearings starting in January and is over in May. -The effect of those inter- sections would be discussed in that budget. Mr_ Craig stated that he would like to have this discussed in front of the en- tire City Council and have a statement of intent. Mr. Weith stated this will be going to the Council after Planning Commission's approval of the preliminary plat. The Council does have to approve the developments in this district under normal zoning. Mr. Cimonetti stated that the City Council has recommended and it has been added to the official City Map a road that doesn't yet exist that would go from Rt. 116 on Hinesburg Road in the vicinity of the interstate near the in- terchange and would pass to the East of Old Farm Road and vould connect into Kimball Avenue and Shunpike Road and it is intended to be currently on our plans and on the county's plans and it is intended to be a route that would keep traffic away from those two intersections. Mrs. Maher said she never heard of this before. Mr. Weith replied they had discussions about this road before when Pizzagalli came in to put up some office buildings at the interstate there. We had talked about a connector -road. . This was the last discussion about it. This is not on our official map'nor in our plan. Mr. Cimonetti said not to depend on this road relieving the current condition of unsatisfactory services at those two intersections but recognize that it is another thing thatis in "the swiw for --the future as the traffic builds as a result of this kind of development and other developments in that very desirable industrially zoned area of Chittenden County. Mr. Austin suggested ve approve this application with a condition that they can't put more than two structures on these lots until x happens and then x being one of those intersections is improved to a certain degree and then stage it in that fashion. Mr. Craig agreed with Mr. Austin on phasing the project to get the City's at- tention. Mr. Burgess stated Mr. Austin had an interesting suggestion to give this preliminary approval except for traffic and that would give the City impetus to look at the problem or solve the problem knowing it was pending. Mr. Reed stated that Mr. Austin's point should be very vell taken. He feels phasing sakes sense because it is a reasonable approach in handling the traf- fic and making the improvements. ' Mr. Sheahan asked if Mr. Jacob had any maps on the berms. He wanted to see some specifics on landscaping and berm and stream proposals before this project went beyond preliminary. Mr. Jacob replied the reason it hasn't been done so far is because they don't have preliminary approval. This would be very expensive to lay out and plan. After preliminary they make their plans and it has to be approved prior to final. d) View Protection (Building Height): Mr. Jacob stated they want to dig down on lots 2 and 3 about 20 feet to put up a building. It will look like a big bowl. Whey don't know if this is salable but they would like to cove back, and discuss it with the Commission. Mr. Sheahan asked what would happen if you left lots 2 and 3 as open space and move those to the East thereby guaranteeing the view protection corridor. Mr. Jacob replied they would.lose about 52 million dollars in sales if they move those lots. Mr. Jacob stated that there are several things that they would like to try to do but cannot under the present zoning. There is a possibility of cluster zoning where you cluster your buildings, 0 lot lines, or making the parcels smaller. Mr. Burgess asked what is an economical lot size, from a resale and from a purchase point of view. Mr. Jacob replied 3 to 5 acres and up. If you have a ten acre lot you can cluster three separate buildings.. Landscaping and layout are important. e) Berm/Drainageway: This has been answered previously. f) Sidewalk: We will put in whatever sidewalks that are needed. Mr. Craig stated there are two issues to consider: 1) phasing, and we should mention it at preliminary and address it fully at final; and 2) to get some input from the City administration and Council as to what they plan to do to improve the traffic situation. There is also the details of what the berms and landscaping will be. There are several open issues for final. Mr. Reed expressed his concern with the view corridors and he would like the Commission to consider small design changFs in the overall plan. Mrs. Maher asked Mr. Weith if he could do some comparisons with other com- ■unities. One of the reasons the Planning Commission in the past never wanted to have a lot of smaller lots was because of the kind of uses that might be attracted which would be high generated. She asked if smaller industrial lots give you higher traffic generators: Mr. Weith replied he would look into that. f a y� PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 9 Mr. Burgess stated they will talk about smaller lots next week at the work session and if they come to some consensus and get'some agreement on what we want to do, we probably. will include that as part of the zoning ordinance at the public hearing scheduled for November 12._ Mr. Austin moved the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Prelimi- nary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 263 acres off Hinesburg Road into eleven (11) lots as depicted on a 12 page set of p1ar'4 the title page entitled "Subdivision Plat Green Acres Industrial Park, Hines- burg Road, South Burlington, Vermont•, prepared by Trudell Consulting En- gineers, Inc. and dated 9i24/91 with the following stipulations: 1_ In an effort to preserve the spectacular views of the Green Mountains from Route 116 as recommended in the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan the following conditions shall apply: a) Structures and landscaping on all lots and within the public r.o.w. shall be limited to a height above sea level of 393.5 feet plus 5.8 feet for every 1000 feet east of the eastern edge of pavement of Route 116. This restriction shall be attached through proper legal documents to lots created by this subdivision. r) The above restriction does not -apply to the area of lot #1 which is identified on Sheet SP3 as "No Height Restrictions". - c) The restriction specified in (a) -above does not apply to the area of lot 44 which is identified on Sheet SP3 as having a building height restriction of 378.0 d)_ The above restriction does not apply to the 100 foot wide str alJnQ thtc Sv;.L:.c_:. bour.dary of the property from Route ilu east to the northeastern corner 'of the property located at 26 Knoll Circle. e) Sheets Fl thr-Dugh 1.5 shall be revised prior to Final Plat to indi- cate a species or variety of species of street trees which at ma- ture height will meet the height limitations described in (a) above. 22. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, the applicant shall post a 3-year landscaping bond in an amount equal to the value of the proposed street trees and proposed berm plantings. The amount shall to finalized prior to Final Plat review. PLAHHING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 10 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (i.e., utility, sever, drainage, sight-viev, recreation path) and roadway r.o.v.'a (i.e., irrevocable offers of dedications) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot, or start of. roadvay or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, sidewalk, and -relocated stream and berm construction shall be posted. The amount of -bonds shall be approved by the City Engineer. 5. Access to lots 1.2.3 and 4 shall be via Vosburah Lane. Access to lot 6 shall be from the proposed 60 foot sewer/roadvay r.o.v. to the east. Access to lots 8 and 10 shall be provided by one shared curb cut on Swift Street Ex- tension. Access to lots 7 and 9 shall be provided by one shared curb cut on Swift Street. The plans shall be revised orior to Final Plat to indicate this. 6. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the street work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work, the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plan, stipulations and any other requirements and/or change that the City requests. 1 77. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. 8. As expressly represented by the applicant, it -is proposed to relocate the stream over lots 1.2.3 and 6 to a newly constructed stream along the southern property line. The stream shall be designed to aeander and both ap- pear and function as a *natural stream*. The stream shall be located at least 50 feet north of the south property line. It shall be located at least 50 feet from the edge of wetland on lot 5. Detailed engineering drawings for the new stream shall be submitted prior to final plat review. The new stream shall be constructed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any .._lot and within a reasonable time period after start of utility or roadway con- struction. 9. The Planning Commission grants a sewer allocation of 15,000 qpd for the development and shall approve a phasing schedule prior to Final Plat. Each new building shall be required to pay the sewer allocation fee in effect based on the estimate of sewage treatment demand generated by the new building. 10. The final plat submission shall include a full set of plans including typical details and improvement plans for the Route 116/Swift Street Exkension intersection. "btu, m_..x.,.. _ + �7�1• t C S" lt, i w7 ''- f f+H 1 �.p� tire; `• S r �,. �,���. _ "a' rb ��-'h�Wl� _ K ♦'r��,c yi '�/��: '. �� tS'S-"!�� b'wi ��`..t ial:`1'�,T r, PLANNING COMMISSION .., ��• �� { 8 October 1991 Page 11 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant is willing to s4 dedicate to the City a pedestriah/recreation path easement around the Quarry on lot 11 at some unspecified date in the future. This issue shall be ad- ldressed at the time further subdivision or development is proposed for lot 11. 1 12. Manhole and drainage inlets shall be adjusted to grade -u sing prEcast ' risers instead of bricks and mortar. rA 13. Sidevalk-thickness at drivevays shall be 8 inches. 14. The plans shall be revised prior to Final Plat submission to address the following: a. The note identifying the height restrictions on lot #4 on page SP3 shall indicate that the restriction applies to all structures and landscaping. b. The legend on page SP3 should include a symbol for street lights. C. Plan should show recreation path easement on both the south and north side of the relocated stream with connection to 60 foot r.o.w. off Knoll Circle and to Hinesburg Road. The issue of -the applicant funding the construction of a portion of the recreation path shall be finalized at Final Plat 15. Legal documents (irrevocable offer of dedication: for the 80 foot r.o.w. future road connection over lot 11 shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Bur lington-Ia_na-records — prior —to - recording the final plat. ;s?>� 16. A `Notice oZ L.v:,dltion' shaii Oc recol jCu iu i.:.c bvuta Burlington land_ records prior to recording which states that all eleven lots vere created as part of a planned industrial development (PID) and that any subsequent development or subdivision will be reviewed as an amendment to the original eleven lot PID. This notice of condition shall be approved by the City Attor- ney. 17. The applicant shall pursue prior to iinai plat the option of construct- ing a bridge for a future recreation/pedestrian path over the wetland on Lots 5 and 7 The applicant and City Planner shall meet with the Natural Resources Committee prior to final plat to explain the concept and obtain comments and a recommendation from the Natural Resources Committee_ 18. The traffic issue and appropriate mitigation is unresolved at this time. This issue shall be finalized at final plat. Prior to final plat, staff shall obtain an indication from Council on timing and funaino a_ necessary i8tersec-_ tion improvements at Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route lidiWilliston Road. In PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 6 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of Green Acrdes, Inc., for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned Industrial and Open Space into 13 lots ranging in size from 3.06 and 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Rd.: Mr. Burgess stepped down due to a,conflict of interest. Mir. Austin sereved as Chairman for this hearing. Mr. Sheahan also stepped down as he is an abutting property owner. Mr. Jacob located the 113 acres on the east side of'Hinesburg Rd. THe proposed lots would vary in size. Mr. Austin asked about the lot to the far right. Mr. Craig noted that at the last presentation of this plan the whole piece was being used to satisfy the subdivision. Mr. Jacob said they don't have to do that now. He said they do show a right of way across that piece because the Commission requested it. He showed a drainage swale in the area where there is a request for the rec path. He said they are willing to give it if it can be used. Mr. Trudell noted that Dynapower drains toward that swale. There is a 15 ft. easement now. The 5 ft'. for the rec path would be in addition to that. Mr. Trudell also showed the location of national inventory wetlands and other wetlands on the pro- perty. He also located the water connection. I There would be private access drives to individual lots. The main road and one access road would have cul de sacs. Mr. Austin asked if there will be an irrevocable offer of dedica- tion all the way to Muddy Brook. Mr. Trudell said no because they don't know the location for it. Mr. Austin felt this, should be discussed with the City Attorney. He felt the offer could be made now and revised later. Mr. Trudell showed the sewer path. He noted there is a lot of storm water detention on the site. r Street trees on the major street will be changed to accommodate sight lines. The tree choice is yet to be made. They want something salt tolerant. Street 'lighting will be from 20 ft. cut orr luminaires. Members then took a brief recess to review the traffic study just received. Mr. Weith noted in 10/91, the Commission re- viewed an 11 lot subdivision for this site. The traffic study was done then. It reviewed some 'intersections. The applicant wanted to use that study because they already got an Air Qual- ity permit based on it. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 8 said since it is only a 32 ft. road there should be plenty of room. Mr. Teeson felt if they give the 8 ft. which will be asphalted there's enough. Other members agreed. Mr. Crrudell said they would take the asphalt path all the way down in lieu of the sidewalk. Members liked that idea. Regarding the sewer capacity, Mr. Austin asked if there should be a time limit. Mr. Weith said they could pick a number of years or relate it to when the roadways are built. Mr. Trudell said they expect a 10-year buildout till completion. Mr. Craig suggested they would get the full capacity if all the infrastructure was in. The applicant agreed to change the street name of what is proposed as "Green Acres Lane." Mr. Sheahan asked about lot #1. He noted it figures in the total acreage to get the average 8 acre lot. He asked if it can't be further subdivided. Mr. Jacob said they are using the zero lot line concept. The lot won't be legally sub -divided. Mjr. Sheahan said neighbors are concerned with buffering from the residential area. He noted Ledge Knoll sits above this development. Mr. Trudell showed the plan with a berm and showed tree heights and view lines from decks and houses. Mr. Sheahan noted the ditch is still there and the residents want it filled in. He said there is erosion on his property be- cause of it. Mr. Trudell said it will be bermed and filled in. Ms.Peacock moved the Commission_ approve the Preliminary Plat Application of Green Acres, Inc, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned Industrial and Open Space into thirteen lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Enaineers and dated last revised 3/2/93 with the following stip- uilations : 1,. Any previous approvals and stipulations_ affecting the sub- ' 'ject property which are not superseded j?y this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping, and the berm in- stallation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the �l 1'U 11LC11 1u ..JL.UN111y a1UJ 1. U1\l.: a — _`JU c1lance or surviving. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 8 said since it is only a 32 ft. road there should be plenty of room. Mr. Teeson felt if they give the 8 ft. which will be asphalted there's enough. Other members agreed. Mr. (Trudell said they would take the asphalt path all the way down in lieu of the sidewalk. Members liked that idea. Regarding the sewer capacity, Mr. Austin asked if there should be a time limit. Mr. Weith said they could pick a number of years or relate it to when the roadways are built. Mr. Trudell said they expect a 10-year buildout till completion. Mr. Craig suggested they would get the full capacity if all the infrastructure was in. The applicant agreed to change the street name of what is proposed as "Green Acres Lane." Mr. Sheahan asked about lot #1. He noted it figures in the total acreage to get the average 8 acre lot. He asked if it can't be further subdivided. Mr. Jacob said they are using the zero lot line concept. The lot won't be legally sub -divided. Mr. Sheahan said neighbors are concerned with buffering from the residential area. He noted Ledge Knoll sits above this development. Mr. Trudell showed the plan with a berm and showed tree heights and view lines from decks and houses. Mr. Sheahan noted the ditch is still there and the residents want it filled in. He said there is erosion on his property be- cause of it. Mr. Trudell said it will be bermed and filled in. _Ms.Peacock moved the Commission approve the Preliminary Plat Application of Green Acres, Inc, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned Industrial and Open Space into thirteen lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 3/2/93 with the following stip- ulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the sub- ject property which are not superseded 12y this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping, and the berm in- stallation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the ..,_emu l; Rance of surviving. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 9 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed de- velopment will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or un- safe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the a,R- plicant shall be responsible for the following: a) This project is approved for a maximum of 777 AM peak hour trip ends and 743 PM peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent de- velopment of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall re- quire an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection shown on Sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning/building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be war- ranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hines- burg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on PM peak hour trip ends to be generated .12y each Use. Assuming an average building size of 72,000 sq. ft., each lot would be required to contribute .approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribu- tion formula. e) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection 43% , each new building shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area I impact fee based on 43% of the PM peak hour trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal docu- ments including easements (e.q., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc)`land roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in,the South Burlington land records. 5. The plans shall be revised prior to final plat to clearly indicate that 20 ft wide recreation path easement only will be provided and that recreation paths will not be constructed by applicant (except the recreation path along Swift St. Ext- ension). PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 10 6. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans will be revise to show the following: a) limits of all wetlands and CO Zones on the property b) 20 ft. recreation path easement connecting to the 60 ft. r.o.w. serving Ledge Knoll c) the species of street trees between stations 14+00 and 20+00 changed to a species that will not exceed 40 ft. at maturity d) easement for shared driveway between lots 3 & 4 on survey plat e) width of Green Acres Lane r.o.w. on survey plat f) new zoning designation "Industrial and Open Space'f g) different name for street currently proposed to be called "Green Acres Lane" h) sidewalk located one foot away from r.o.w. line i) proposed street lighting j) relocated stream at least 50 ft. from the southern property line unless adjoining property owners agree to less than 50 ft. rii c+-anr•,� k) 8 ft. wide asphalt bike path on north side of Swift Street Extension from Rt. 116 to Vosburg Lane instead of a concrete sidewalk. 8. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit a report ad- dressing each of the _criteria contained in Section 417 of the subdivision regulations. 9. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Rd. sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Rd. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 10. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or Utility conG+-rnr-tion, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the city Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 May 1993 page 11 11. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r,,o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 12. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 qpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this de- velopment shall be completed within 10 years of final plat ap- proval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed within this ten year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 13. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the con- tractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work. 14. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision reg- ulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" con- struction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 15. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant will dedicate to the city a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating right of way over the 146.6 acre parcel adjoining to the east as shown on sheet SP2. These legal documents shall be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 16. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall conduct the ap- propriate studies to determine whether or not there is a wetland on lot #4. 17. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no quarry generated traffic travelling through this subdivision. 18. The final plat plans, including survey plat, shall be sub- mitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Teeson seconded. The motion passed 4-0. Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan rejoined the Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION 29 DECEMBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 29 December 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: G William Burgess, Chairman; William Craig, Mac Teeseon Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Peter Jacob, James Lamphere, Ralph Goodrich, Dave DeSarno, Dave LaRose, B. Duffy, Dick Trudell, Eric Fleggenheimer, Alan Palmer 1. Other Business: a. Mr. Weith noted that all appeals on issues involving the sign ordinance go to the Planning Commission. The Saturn people want two free-standing signs which would be in violation of the Ordinance. The Commission needs to set a date for the public hearing. b. Mr. Weith advised that the City Attorney is working on the Chittenden Bank issue. c. Item #5 on the Agenda has been withdrawn. d. Channel 17 wants to know if the Commission wants an update on the channel's plans. Members felt this was best done at the City Council. e. Mr. Burgess noted he had received a letter from the Fire Chief regarding problems caused by people parking in the street at Dorset Commons. Mr. Weith noted this is not in violation of any rules or stipulations. Mr. Burgess asked Mr. Weith to draft a response to the Fire Cief. Mr. Weith said he had asked the City Attorney to check whether the city can go on private property to enforce a "no parking" sign. 2. Minutes of 1 December and 15 December 1992: Mr. Sheahan moved the Mintues of 1 December be approved as written. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed 5-0, Mr. Craig abstaining. Mr. Craig moved to approve the Minutes of 15 December as written. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed 3-0 with Mr. Sheahan, Mr. Austin, and Ms. Peacock abstaining. 3. Sketch plan application of Green Acres, Inc., for 1) sub- division of 116.7 acres of land into 13 lots ranging in size PLANNING COMMISSION 29 December 1992 page 2 from 3 acres to 47 acres, and 2) construction of a planned unit development consisting of 250,000 sq. ft. of office use in 5 G buildings, Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Burgess and Mr. Sheahan stepped down from the Commission during this discussion due to potential conflicts of interest. Mr. Jacob presented the plan. With the new zoning, they have arranged 9 lots of 3+ acres, one of 47.4 acres, and the re- maining at 10.10 acres. The 47.4 acre lot would be a pud within a pud. Mr. Jacob showed where the pedestrian path would cross the wetland via a bridge. The applicant has no problem giving an easement for this. They are asking for a temporary cul de sac on Vosburg Lane. This would remain a private road. Mr. Weith is going to check whether this is allowable. Mr. Austin asked if a road is put in sometime in the future whether the applicant would be willing to pave it. Mr. Jacob said this would be up to Mr. Goodrich. Paving it would be no benefit to Mr. Goodrich, and he felt the abutting owner should do the paving as Mr. Goodrich is providing the access for the abutter's convenience. Mr. Craig said he would like Mr. Audette's comments on the private road. Mr. Goodrich said the road will be built to city standard but without a sidewalk. Mr Burgess felt if it is built to city standards and the applicant provides an irrevocable offer of ded- ication, it would be OK. Mr. Jacob said they want to show the 47 acre lot as a concept and later come to the Commission with each lot as it develops. They have received an air quality permit and are limited to 1900 cars for the whole development, 1,000 of this number would be for the 47-acre piece. Mr. Weith said the Commission doesn't give con- ceptual approval, but when there is a subdivision, there is a traffic study, sewage study, etc., so it's something along the lines of a conceptual approval. But, he added, there would be a problem giving a blanket conceptual approval. Mr. Jacob said that at approval time, they would have to show traffic, sewer, drainage, etc. Mr Austin didn't feel it could be done a concep- tual basis. He noted that in the case of L&M, there was a full- blown plan which the applicant changes when a new building comes in. After some disuussion, the Commission felt there should be two separate applications on this. Mr. Weith will check with the City Attorney. Mr. Craig stressed that "top of roof" means top of all rooftop aparatus, in order to be consistant with view protection parts of the Ordinance. Mr. Jacob said that the Swift St. Extension will be built through PLANNING COMMISSION 29 December 1992 page 3 to the adjacent Goodrich lot with a cul de sac at the end. Mr. Austin asked if it would be dedicated to the city all the way through. Mr. Weith said he will look into this as the applicant doesn't want to involve the other lot in this application. Members felt it would be good to get the recreation path there. Mr. Jacob noted that accesses will be shared to reduce the number of curb cuts. Mr. Jacob said they don't want to put the bike path on both sides of the stream as was required in the original Preliminary Plat approval. He showed a revised concept which, he said, the Natural Resources Committee endorses. He said they will have to show that it doesn't interfere with the wetlands. Mr. Weith asked if the applicant will build a connection to Ledge Knoll. Mr. Sheahan noted that at present, the neighbors don't want a connection. They fear people will park on Ledge Knoll streets and use this to access the quarry. They prefer a connection after lots are developed, so that it won't be a "road to nowhere." Members asked how close the stream will get to the property line. Mr. Trudell said the closest is 50 feet. Mr. Sheahan said that neighbors feel the configuration and height of the proposed berm is important for screening of the residential area. Mr. Trudell showed the location and heights of berms which, he said, will be up to 10 feet high. Mr. Sheahan said one of the neighbors' concerns is with headlights glaring into their homes. Ms. Peacock suggested pines be planted on berms to add to the screening. Mr. Goodrich said that would mean no view to the north in 5 years. Mr. Sheahan said there is no view to the north now, so that's OK. Mr. Austin asked if the Commission can allow dedication of land for the bike path from around the adjacent property, would the applicant do it. Mr. Goodrich said it may never be used, and he felt there should be a need shown. Mr. Craig said it might very well be used. Mr Weith noted the city had obtained recreation path easements as early as 1970 and they weren't used till last year. Mr. Austin said the issues he is concerned with are: the question of the public or private street, sidewalks, access points, the question of whether 2 separate applications are needed ( pos- sibly at the same time), and effective screening from the res- idential neighbors. Mr. Lamphere asked that the City Attorney be consulted as to whether there can be one application. Mr. Good- rich said he felt the large lot was the most enticing for indus- try coming into the city and he would like to have it available as soon as possible. CITY COUNCIL 18 NOVEMBER 1991 The South Burlington City Council held a meeting on Monday, 18 November 1991, at 7:00 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Michael Flaherty, Chairman; John Dinklage, James Condos, William Cimonetti, Robert Chittenden Also Present: Charles Hafter, City Manager; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Peg Picard, City Clerk; Joe Weith, City Planner; Albert Audette, Street Department; Stephen Stitzel, City Attorney; William Burgess, Mary -Barbara Maher, Terry Sheahan, Planning Commission; Chris Cavin, Jesse Craig, Michael Beaulieu, Jana Taylor, Robin Vanderpotten, Dan Swanson, Brendan Buckley, Geoff Hubette, Dick Trudell, Becky Pastner, Kristin Ely, Peg Strait, Patrick Moody, Dave MacLaughlin, Marta Taylor, Christina Spalding, Mary Spalding, Ralph Goodrich, Bill Robenstein, Norman Terreri Executive Session: Mr. Dinklage moved the Council meet in Executive Session to discuss litigation. Mr. Condos seconded Motion passed unan- imously. Regular Session: 1. Comments & Questions from the Audience (not related to Agenda Items): No issues were raised. 2. Public Hearing on Green Acres 11 Lot Industrial Subdivision, Hinesburg Road: Mr. Weith explained the process and the need for approval of the project by both the Planning Commission and City Council. The plan has received preliminary plat approval from the Commission. If the Council approve, the plan will move to final plat at the Commission; if there are no major changes, the plan can be approved there. Mr. Jacob then explained the plan. They will develop 10 lots now and come back later for the eleventh. The are proposing to eliminate a ditch and put in a meandering stream with a berm on each side. This stream will run into an existing pond. The landscaping bond will cover trees to be planted on the berm. They do not intend to put trees so high they block neighbors' views. Mr. Weith noted the applicant will have to submit a detailed engineering plan of the berm. CITY COUNCIL 18 November 1991 page 2 Mr. Jacob showed the accesses to the lots. The right of way for lots 8 & 10 will be along a dual driveway in order to eliminate a curb cut. The applicant has agreed to a deeded right of way to continue the road to Williston. It will be a movable right of way because the exact location of the road is not yet set. Regarding the pedestrian path, Mr. Jacob said they would rather not discuss the path around the quarry until that lot is up for development. There will be a recreation path easement on both sides of the stream and this will connect to the path off Knoll Circle. He suggested a footbridge over the wetlands to join into the path. Traffic: The intersection of Hinesburg/Kennedy/Williston Rd. is overburdened. Specifications of the Commission approval require the -applicant to consider a phasing plan. Mr. Jacob felt this can be a problem because with a plan this size, they need to build as soon as possible. Mr. Jacob then addressed the view corridor/view protection. They originally felt they could dig down into the lots to build, but the engineering for that won't work. They have brought a zero lot line concept to the Commission which could allow views of mountains between buildings. Mr. Weith noted the Commission will need an indication from the Council as to whether intersection improvements are firmly planned. There -is a requirement for the applicant to contribute to those improvements but the Commission needs to know if the improvements are planned in time to alleviate problems added to by this development. He noted a phasing plan could be required to tie into intersection improvements. Mr. Burgess said the Commission would need a firm position from the Council at the time of final plat. Mr. Cimonetti said he would ask that if any Commission stipula- tions are changed at final approval, the plan come back to the Council. Mr. Burgess felt the two bodies could meet jointly for Final Plat. Mr. Dinklage asked if there has been a professional analysis on drainage. Mr. Jacob said they have a wetlands analysis and will have a drainage plan done by final plat. He added that erosion control plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer. Mr. Dinklage said he didn't feel criteria c & d (drainage and traffic) had been satisfactorily addressed. Mr. Jacob said they have provided a complete traffic analysis. CITY COUNCIL 18 November 1991 page 3 Mr. Sheahan said he had not participated in Commission dis- cussions of the project since he is an abutting neighbor. As a resident, he expressed concerns of landowners that they will see too much of the project and they would prefer much higher berms. He also asked the legality of approving a project that will create a level of service "F". Mr. Hafter felt this was a question for Act 250. Mr. Moody, another neighbor, said he would like to see the project moved further north and east and include the large acreage currently being left open. He felt it doesn't make sense not to push the road through to Brownell Rd. as this would take pressure off Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Sheahan added that he would prefer nothing be built on lots 2 & 3 which would keep a view corridor open. Mr. Jacob said this is a $2,000,000 issue and it is impossible not to build on that land. Mr. Cimonetti moved to close the public hearing Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cimonetti moved to approve the plan as presented with the stipulation that if the Planning Commission changes any stipula tions at Final Plat, the plan would come back to the City Council. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Mr. Dinklage said he is not satisfied that he understands the thinking that led the Commission to approve the plan, especially with regard to conditions b, c, and g. He said he was not com- fortable granting approval with an indeterminate height for the berm. Mr. Burgess acknowledged there are a lot of items where final details are not in place. He said he had no objection to a joint meeting with the Council or to forwarding Final Plat plans to the Council. The motion then passed 4-1, Mr. Dinklage opposing 3. First Reading of Ordinance to Permit Mobile Home Sales as a Conditional Use in the IC District, Schedule Public Hearing: Mr. Weith said he has no problem with the proposal. Mr. Dinklage moved to add to Section 13 20, Conditonal Uses, mobile home sales. Mr. Cimonetti seconded Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Hafter recommended 16 December for the public hearing. CITY COUNCIL 18 November 1991 page 4 5. Legislative Redistricting: Mr. Cimonetti reported that the first of 3 public work sessions was held last week and there will be 2 more this wgek. There will be discussion proposals involving S. Burlington. On 18 December, there will be a public hearing in Montpelier on the committee's plan. He felt it is a misconception to think that in the redistricting process there won't be any districts completely in S. Burlington. He felt there were likely to be 3 completely in the city and then a shared district with some other municipality. 6. Proposed Formation of City Recreation Path committee: Ms. Cavin recommended a city committee to oversee the path. She suggested 5 members and suggested someone from Planning and the Recreation Department. Mr. O'Neill suggested a specific charge be given to the Committee. Mr. Dinklage moved to authorize the City Manager to draw up a charge and by laws and present them to the Council for approval. Mr. Condos seconded. Mr. Condos felt it was a good idea as the path will be a major piece of infrastructure in the city. The motion passed unanimously. 7. Recycling: Mr. Dinklage raised the question of discussions on mandatory recycling and asked for a thorough cost analysis of alternatives. He also asked for a phasing plan. 8. Minutes of 4 November 1991: Mr. Dinklage moved the Minutes of 4 November be approved as written. Mr. Condos seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Review Planning Commission agenda 11/19: No issues were raised. 10. Sign Disbursement Orders: Disbursement orders were signed. 11. Liquor Control Board: Mr. Dinklage moved the Council adjourn and reconvene as Liquor PLANNING COMMISSION 20 SEPTEMBER 1994 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 20 September 1994, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Terry Sheahan, Mac Teeson, David Austin, Mark Crow, Gayle Barone Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Karen Patters,en,Eric Farrell, James Harvell, Amy Wright, Harry Behney, John Jaeger, Paula Mongeon, Ralph Goodrich, Kevin Duffy, Karen Norful, Frank Brock, Esther Cote, Jim McWilliam 1. Other Business: a) Mr. Weith advised that David Kleh is asking for a 6-month extension for the Pizza Putt approval. Mrs. Maher moved to a rove a 6-month extension to the Pizza Putt aPProval . Mr. �Austin Wseconded. WMotion-passed_unanimously. b. Mr. Weith gave members a copy of the memo he had sent to the Council regarding impact fees. c. Mr. Burgess asked for an update on the Net Result request. Mr. Weith said the city has authorized the hiring of an engineer to do further studies. d. Mrs. Maher said she received a letter from Ann Byrnes regard- ing the proposed expansion of Pillsbury Manor. Mr. Weith said the plan will be heard on 10/11. Mrs. Byrnes had noted the dumpster is not where it was shown in the approved plan. 2. Minutes of 23 August and 30 August: Mrs. Maher moved the Minutes of 23 August be approved as written. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs.Sheahan and Austin abstaining. Mr. Sheahan moved the Minutes of 30 August be approved as written. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed 6-0 with Mr. Teeson abstaining. 3. Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Green Acres, Inc. c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdi- vision of 116.7 acres of land into 12 lots Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres: (Messrs. Burgess & Sheahan stepped down due to interest conflict) PLANNING COMMISSION 20 Se tember 1994 page Ms. Pettersen noted the land is zoned Industrial -Agricultural. They originally had approval for a 12-lot subdivision and are now requesting a 10-lot subdivision. Five lots are similar to the earlier plan. Lot one has been changed to take out a 4-acre parcel which is now lot 10 (where the barns currently are). Lots 7, 8, and 9 have been reconfigured (these were previously lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 now combined into 3 lots. The road previously called Malcolm has been removed. Mr. Weith said he is concerned with the right of way proposed to serve lot 10. Access would have to be from Swift St. Extension. This should be a minimum of 24 feet. They have to reconfigure the road to accommodate larger vehicles, trucks, emergency vehicles, etc. Ms. Pettersensaid they would ask to use the right of way on lot 1 when it is developed, if the owners of that lot are agreeable. Mr Weith noted a large part of lot 10 would not be developable because of the required 200 ft. buffer. He wanted the applicant to be aware of this fact. Mr. Teeson suggested extending lot 10 into lot 1. Mr. Goodrich said he would think about it but didn't think he wanted to do this. He wants that lot for a zero lot line industrial park. Mr._ Austin moved the Commission ap rov_e the reliminary plat a placation of Green Acres, Inc, c o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a Erevioulslapproved subdivision ofW116.7 acres of land into twelve lots, Hinesbur'Road The amendment consists of resub- dividinl the 116.7 acres of land into ten lots ran iing in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres as _d_e ip cted_on a thirteen a e set of plans, �pa e one entitled "Green Acres_ Industrial Park South Burlington Vermont re ared by Trudell�Consulting- En in veers and dated last revised 8/29/94 with the following stipulations: blect in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $43 770 landscape bond to cover_ the installation cost �and value of roposed street trees and berm landscaping -The bond shall_ remain_ in effect for three years from the date_of _pl_antin2 to assure that the planted landscaping has taken_ root and has a good chance of survivin The berm installation and_plantin��shall take 212ce_conteaEoraneo2s_1_y with the road construction. -j_ In_ order for the Commission to find that the proposed develop- ment will not cause unreasonable hi hwa congestion or unsafe conditions _with_res ect to use of -the hi hwa the a licant shall be responsible for the followin : PLANNING COMMISSION 20 September 1994 page 3 a) This project is�aWpproved for a maximum of 777�AM—.peak—hour tripWendsWand-743 PM peak hour trip —ends- Anysubsequent de- velopment�of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant�shall�insta11, priortooccupancy of�firstWbuildinq, the cessar lane and tn_e_aper iW� m roveme_nts_at the Route_116/Swift Street W_Ext_e_ns_i_o_nintersection _(shown on sheet_SP15). _V_AO_TWs_hall approve Wthe �design�prior Wto issuance �of�aWzoninq/buildinq�permit. c) Priortosite plan approval for each lot, the signalwarrant analysis shall be —updated.. _ When the signal isWshown to be war- ranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall in- stall signal at specifications ap roved by_tht ity d)_Each Wbuilding lot shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg�Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee, or subsequent impact feeWprogramWthen in effect, based on theWPM _peak hour trip ends to be generated�by_each�use on a�lot, e)_Additionallv,�since a significant_ amount_ of__prodect traffic will be goinothrouoh�the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43.). each new building lot shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee, or subsequent impact fee pE2_gramthen in�effectLWbased_on 43% of the PM peak hour trip, ends to_be_generated by__each use on aWlot. 4. Prior to issuance of a zonin /building permit or start of roadw or utility construction,_ al_l appropriate legal documents includin easements (e.g., utility, sewer, draina e, water,_ rec- reation path, etc.) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the Citv Attorney for_22ELoval and recorded �in�the South Burlington Land Records. 5. The-api2licant shall contribute $26_,_738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of fronta e alon Hinesbur Road. The contribution shall be madeWprior to issuance of a zonin buildiing permit for any lot. 6. Prior _to_issuance of a zonin_ buildin ermit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadwa_y_,_ utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The_ amount of the bond shall —be approved bathe CitsEngineer. 7. The applicant�shal_1_ be�responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as s the s_t_ reet and_ r . o_.w. is a_c__cepted and__ taken over by the City. 8. The Commission_approv_es a It sewer_ allocationof30,345 gpd. The__ applicant shall pay the recLuir_ed sewer allocation fee, rior to PLANNING COMMISSION 20 September 1994 page 4 issuance of a zonin buildLn_q permit. The lengthoftime that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this�devel- oement shall be comuleted within 10 years�ofWthe final 1p at apZ roval ranted on 6/28/94 The sewer allo_c_ation_for any lots servedby_ a roadwavWor portion of roadway —which —is not completed within this ten ear time limit shall be lost unless rea roved bvWthe Plannin Commission. 9. T-he__develope rshall�furnish to_the WCity.,Wat least ? days prior t_o be innin of road construction the name of the contractors__ doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or en in- eer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordancewith section 301.5 of the subdivision regula- tions,- within 14 days Wof-completion of required improvements (e. , streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drain_s,_etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" con- struction drawings certified by a re istered engineer. 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the _a_ pplican_t_ will__ dedicate to th_e_ City a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating_r_ight_of wa over the 146.6 aEE2_parcel,__adj_oininq to the east as shown oe _sheet SP_2_. These legal documents shall be re- corded prior to issuance of a zonin /buildinq permit for any lot. 12. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no auarry aenerated traffic traveling through this subdivision. 13. The plans shall be revised.prior to final plat submission as follows: a. The 50_ foot r.o.w. serving lot #10 _shall be designed to accom- modate a_ minimum 24 foot wide driveway with proper radii for trucks and emergency vehicles. b. All plans shall be revised to reflect that the current owner of this, property iMarble Bank. c. Note #2 on sheet SP3A shall be revised to indicate the revised lot numbers. d. Sheet SPlA shall be revised to show the proposed recreation path easement alonq Muddy Brook located_ out_side of the existing wetland and wetland buffer. 14. Deeds for lots 8 9 and 10 shall reflect the fact that the western_ portions of these lots will be unusablebecause of the Potash Brook CO zone. W�.. PLANNING COMMISSION 20 September 1994 page 5 15. The Plannino—Commission on the south side of the ma the provision of�a number o over the property. waives the_requirement for a sidewalk _n roadway_(i-e80' Wrr. o.w. ) Wdue to..._ :pedestrian/recreation path easements 16. The existtiRg_drainage ditch alono_the_south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with constructionof the new drainage--aa_as_ shown on sheetsWSP10 and SP11_. 17. The fina_1 lat fans shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Teeson seconded the motion which was then passed unanimously. Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan rejoined the Commission. 4. Sketch Plan application of S.D. Mansfield, Inc., to: 1)desig- nate lots 1-16 of an approved 18-lot subdivision as a planned unit development and 2) add 400 sq. ft. of neighborhood community meeting space to an approved duplex on lot #9 as an accessory use to the residential planned unit development, Kirby Rd. and Patchen Rd: Mr. Crow stepped down due to conflicting interests. Mr. Farrell said there are 9 duplex lots and 7 single family lots. The duplex lots are organized as a co-op. The 400 sq. ft. of additional space will serve as community space. It will be on the first floor with a separate access. No parking will be required as the space will be for use of those living in the development. Meetings and small social events (kids birthday parties) will be held in the community space. Mr. Weith said he is comfortable with the plan. Mr. Sheahan asked if the space would be rented to outsiders. Mr. Farrell said it would not. Members had no problems with the project. Mr. Crow rejoined the Commission. 5. Sketch plan application of James Harvell to subdivide a 67,095 sq. ft. lot into three lots of 22,584 sq. ft., 25,093 sq. ft., and 19,418 sq. ft., 1907-9, 1915-17 and 1923-25 Airport Parkway: Mr. Harvell said the land is owned by Marion Dumont and Lori $achmen. It is shown as 3 lots on the tax map. When the owners wanted to sell lot #2, they found the land had not been subdivided. There will be individual driveways for the properties. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 28 June 1994, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock, Terry Sheahan, David Austin, Mac Teeson Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Dick Trudell, Maurice & Ralph Goodrich, Bill Thompson, Frank Naef, Dave Flagg, Sue Wiles, Peter Jacob, Karen.lbttersen Gerry Milot, John Larkin, Merrill Jarvis, Steve Smith, Sherry Daniels 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 7 June 1994 & 14 June 1994: Mrs. Maher moved the Minutes of 7 June be approved as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Peacock moved the Minutes of 14 June be approved as written. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mrs. Maher abstaining. 3. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 13 lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Rd: Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan stepped down during this hearing due to conflicts of interest. Mrs. Maher chaired the Commission for this hearing. Mr. Jacob located the property on the map and pointed out the future road extension to Williston. He said this road will be put where the city wants it. The average lot size requirement for this subdivision is 8 acres, and this has been met. There is a wetlands situation on lot 4 which has not been resolved. The City Planner suggested merging lots 3 & 4 until a determination is met, and the applicant is willing to do this. Mr. Weith said the subdivision will still meet all requirements. Mr. Jacob showed where the Conservation Zone will be. He also noted that some of Mr. Toutant's land will become a CO Zone at Mr. Toutant's request. k, PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 2 The Recreation path will hay it out but the wetlands. will follow a meandering route. The applicant will not put the path in. The path will skirt Mr. Jacob showed the location of the sidewalk. The applicant feels that putting in a sidewalk on both sides is an inconvenience at this time. Mr. Weith noted this is a requirement in the subdivision regulations for arterials and collector roads, and this is a collector road. Ms. Peacock suggested delaying the sidewalk until half the lots are developed. Mr. Austin suggested putting in the sidewalk as lots are developed. Mr. Jacob then showed the location of the berm and indicated the types of trees to be put in when the road is built. Mr. Sheahan asked if the relocated stream bed will be filled in. He noted the neighbors are very concerned about safety. Mr. Trudell said it will be filled in. Ms. Pettersen said there will be a berm on both sides of the road. the pedestrian trail will be to the north side of the stream. Mr. Sheahan asked the height of the berm. Ms. Pettersen said it will be from 8' to 121. Mr. Jacob noted the Fire Chief had requested hydrants be 350' apart. After a conference with the applicant, the Chief has agreed to have them 500' apart. Mr. Jacob said the Chief will probably want hydrants on all the developed lots. The Chief also wanted the water system looped, but Mr. Jacob said there is no place to loop it. Looping will be done when there is a place to do it. The Fire Chief has agreed to this. Mr. Austin asked about temporary turn-arounds for dead-end streets. Mr. Jacob showed where these will be. Ms. Pettersen noted there will be a temporary turn -around at the end of any unfinished portion of a street. Mr. Weith noted there had been a question raised as to who will maintain the streets. Mr. Jacob said Malcolm St. will be private and Vosberg will eventually be a public street. Mr. Trudell said Vosberg will be built to city standards. It won't be dedicated to the city until there is building on the Pollack lot. Mr. Austin then reviewed the engineering points mentioned in the City Engineer's memo. Ms. Pettersen said that all concerns have been met. Mr. Trudell said traffic will be updated each time a new applicant comes in to develop on a lot. They will also look at signal warrants as lots are developed. Mr. Weith said this would be OK. Mr. Sheahan noted that in the preliminary approval there was a PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 3 stipulation that no quarry -generated traffic will be allowed through this subdivision. Mr. Weith said that stipulation will be in the final motion. There will also be a stipulation that the stream be filled in and properly graded. Mr. Weith noted that on sheet SP-lA, the applicant proposes to provide a pedestrian path easement along Muddy Brook; however, the location is within a wetland. He recommended it be moved outside the wetland and outside the wetland buffer. Members then made a decision on the sidewalk issue. They felt that since the applicant was making accommodation for the recreation path that there would be sufficient paths for walking, and the Commission would accept the sidewalk on one side of the road. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Green Acres, Inc, c/o Ralph Goodrich for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into twelve lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres Hinesburg Road as depicted on a 27 page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 6/3/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. Th,, bond shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed devel- opment will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a. This project is approved for a maximum of 777 AM peak hour trip ends and 743 PM peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent devel- opment of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b. Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 4 c. Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hines- burg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming a light manufacturing use with an average building size of 72,000 sq. ft., each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. e Additionally, since a significant amount of protect traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%)each new building shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43 % of the P.M. peak hour trip ends Under the current formula each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4 Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of road- way or utility construction all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g, utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path etc) and roadway r.o.w.Is (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5 The applicant shall contribute $26 738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/ building permit for any lot. 6 Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of road- way or utility construction bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8 The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction The roadways serving this development shall be completed within 10 years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed within this ten year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 5 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision reaulations within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc), the de- veloper shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant will dedicate to the City a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating right of way over the 146.6 acre parcel adjoining to the east as. shown on sheet SP2. These legal documents shall be re- corded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 12. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no quarry generated traffic travelling through this subdivision. 13. The final plat plans shall be revised prior to recording as follows• a. Lots #3 and 4 shall be combined into one lot. b. The note on sheets SP10 and SP11 shall be revised to clearly indicate that all recreation paths on the property will not be con- structed by the applicant, with the exception of the recreation path located within the 80' r.o.w. c. Sheet SP3A shall be revised to relocate the pedestrian easements outside of the wetland buffer zone. d. Sheet SP2 shall be revised to refer to Southeast Ouadrant instead of Agricultural and Rural Residential District under "Total Area" notes. e. Sheets SP10 and SP11 shall be revised to correctly identify the location of the 20 foot pedestrian easement. f. Sheets SP1A and SP2 shall be revised to show the proposed recreation path easement along Muddy Brook located outside of the existing wetland and wetland buffer. 14. Deeds for lots 8 9 and 10 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO Zone. 15. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within PLANNING COMMISSION 28 JUNE 1994 PAGE 6 three years, this approval shall be null and void. 16. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/ recreation path easements over the property. 17. Based on representation by the applicant that the Fire Chief has agreed to a maximum distance of 500' between fire hydrants, the plans shall be revised prior to recording to show fire hydrants at the most 500' apart in locations approved by the Fire Chief. 18. Plans shall be revised prior to recording to show sewer easement along the pedestrian easement on the west side of lot 3 for future relocation of force main from the Ledgeknoll pumping station. 19. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots one and two shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction ofj the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 20 The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan rejoined the Commission following this application. 4. Site Plan application of David and Barbara Flagg to amend a previously approved site plan to expand parking area and make minor site modifications, 10 Gregory Dr: Mr. Flagg said they got variances from the Zoning Board to allow him to exceed front yard coverage. More room was needed in the parking lot and display area because Green Mountain Power put in a pole in the middle of the parking lot. In addition, people are driving over the edge of grassed areas, so these edges have been graveled. In the new plan, 3% more of the front yard will be graveled. Mr. Flagg said they have also gone to lower evergreen shrubs in one area because of wires above. The new Fire Chief wants a hydrant within 300 ft. of the next hydrant, and this has been done. The dumpster area has been moved and fenced. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 October 1994 page 4 Plannin Commission. Mr. Sheahan seconded. -Motion.iDassed_unanimousl,y. 6. Sketch plan application of Germaine LeClair to construct two single family dwellings on a 43,560 sq. ft. lot as a PUD on a lot currently developed with a single family dwelling and a large accessory structure, 185 Patchen Road: Mr. LeClair and Mr. Morin explained that this is the former Melna property. The LeClair lot backs up to Summer Woods. The plan is to build a structure for Mr. LeClair's mother and another house on the lot. They have had a problem getting plans of the Arbor Road area of Summer Woods. They want to tap into water and sewer lines, and they need the plans for this. The applicant is also asking the Commission to waive the 50 ft. setback because the lot is only 100 ft. wide. Mr. Sheahan noted that in a few years the owners will go to the Zoning Board and ask to subdivide. Mr Austin agreed. Mr. Teeson suggested a little less building (cutting off some of the garage). Mr Sheahan and Mrs. Maher agreed. Mr. Austin and Mrs. Maher did not feel the PUD qualifications were met. The only way to meet the requirements would be to reduce the size of the garage. Mr. Burgess asked the City Planner to get "as built" plans. Members agreed there has to be another alternative as a PUD is not workable. Members said they would rather see a 3-unit sub- division. The Arbor Rd. question would also have to be solved. 7. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 12 lots, Hinesburg Rd. This amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 43.98 acres: Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan stepped down due to conflicts of interest. Mr. Goodrich said that since September's appearance, they have enlarged lot 10 which is now 8 acres and reduced lot 1 to 40 acres. The 50 ft. easement to serve lot 10 has been revised to meet staff concerns. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 October 1994 page 5- Mr. Goodrich asked for a continuance so staff can review the new plans. Mr. TeesonWmoved to continue the acplication�to�15�November. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed unanimously. W Messrs. Burgess and Sheahan rejoined the Commission: 8. Public Hearing: Revised preliminary plat application of Han- naford Brothers to amend an approved preliminary plat for construction of a 10 building planned commercial development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of a 64,000 sq. ft. supermarket, 107,806 sq. ft. department store, 79,740 sq ft. of retail space, a 95 room hotel, a 6000 sq. ft. restaurant, and a 2500 sq ft. bank with drive through service. The amendment consists of: 1) the approval of Fayette Rd. and Martin's Drive as private roads subject to detailed conditions and 2) consolidation of the proposed uses (e.g., supermarket, department store, retail, restaurant) into the single use category "Shopping Center," except for the hotel and bank which shall remain separate uses: Mr. Sheahan stepped down during this application due to a con- flict of interest. Mr. White said they are also asking that the super market not be in the Shopping Center category. The overall square footage will remain the same: 202,546 sq. ft. for the shopping center, 46,500 for the market, 8,500 for the future expansion of the market, 2,500 for the bank. Regarding the private roads issue, Mr. White showed the location and routes of the roads in question. They want the roads to be private because they are the lifeblood of the project and they are concerned with maintenance. The want the roads plowed earlier and more often than the city will get to them. They also want to mow more often in summer. The city hasn't the staff to keep coming through the development for maintenance. In addition, if the roads are public, there is an automatic subdivision and there cannot be a sign on one lot that adver- tises a business on another lot. Martin's couldn't have a sign on Route 7 if the road were public. Mr. White said they had worked with the City Planner and City Manager and have a proposed agreement. The road would be built entirely to city specifications and could be inspected at all stages by the city. The road must be maintained to those standards with the city given the right to take over the road if it is not so maintained. PLANNING COMMISSION 15 November 1994 page 11 shall be signed byWthe-Planning Commission WChair �or�Clerk-rp for to recording. 15. The Wentire jproject shall be completedjwithin l0 ears�W�An� ortions�ofythe project which are not com leted within 10 years shall no_longer be -approved un_l_e_s_sr_ e_a_oproved by Plannino Commission. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion which then passed unanimously. Mr. Crow rejoined the Commission. 7. Sketch plan applicatiorof L&M Partnership to amend a previous- ly approved planned unit development to realign approximately 400 feet of Fayette Road to line up with Hannaford Brothers develop- ment to the north, Shelburne Road: Mr. McClellan said this moves the road about 100 ft. Mr. Weith asked if there is a construction agreement. Mr. McClellan wasn't sure. Members raised no issues. 8. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 12 lots, Hinesburg Rd. This amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres: Mr. Burgess stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Goodrich said there are no changes from 2 weeks ago. Members agreed to discuss only the present application. Mr. Weith noted the question of a zoning change would be discussed at the next work session. Mr. Austin moved the Planning C fin_al_plat application of Green to amend a _pr_eviousl_y approved into twelve lots__,_ Hinesburg Roa subdividingthe 116.�7 acres of from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, plans, page one entitled "Green Road,_ So. Burl_ inac ton Engineers and dated_ ulations: ommission approve the revised Acres Inc c/o Ralph _Goodrich, subdivision f 116.7 acres of land d. The_amendment consists of re - land into ten lots ran ing in size as depicted on a five page set of Acres Industrial Park, Hinesburg Vermont,_"_prepared by_Trudell- Consulting ast revised 10 3 94 with the followin sti - 1. Any previous.aEErovals and stipulations affecting the subject 177 propert_y-_ which are not superseded_ bythis approval shall remain in effect. PLANNING COMMISSION 15 November 1994 page 12 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant oW£-r° remain assure chance e take p - andsc_ape bond to cover the —installation osed street trees and berm landsca inq. The bon in effect_for three wears from the date of Dlant ace contemporaneous h the roa shall post a cost and value d shall iag to construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the_2EMosed devel- o ment will not cause unreasonable highway con estion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highway, the applicant shall be responsible for the followinaL a) This ro'ect is approved for a maximum_ of 777 A._M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any sub- sequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall re uire an updated traffic impact anal sis and approval by the Planning_ Commission. b)- A_pplic_a_ nt_ shall install, prior to occupancy of the first building the necessary lane and taper �improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet S_P15) . VAO_T shall approve the design 2rior to is- suance of a zonin buildin ermit. c) Prior to site plan ap roval for each lot the si nal warrant _anal ysis shall be updated. When the si nal is shown t_o be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extensions appli- ----- cant shall install signal at -specifications approved by the City. d) Each buildinq lot shall be required to contribute to the Hinesb rq Road/Kennedy Drive improvement fund, or subsequent impact fee pro ram then in effect, based on the P.M. peak hour tripends to be enerated b each use. Assumin a li ht manufacturin use with an vera e b - ildinq size of 72 000 sa. ft each lot would be required to contribute ap roximately $13,000 to the fund based on -the -current contribution formula. e) Additiionally, since a si nificant amount of project traf- fic will be 2-ing throu h the Williston Road/Route 116 inter- section (4_3%) each new buildin lot shall be re uired to con- tribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee, or subsequent impact fee ro ram then in effect, based on 43 0 of the P.M. eak hour tri ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoninq/buildinq permit or start of roadway or utility construction, a1_1_ a ro riate le a1 documents Pam....._. -- �-- ------ includinq easements (e-.g,_ utility, sewer, drain a e, water, re- W PLANNING COMMISSION 15 November 1994 page 13 cre_ationWoathW_etc)�and �roadway Wr.o.w.'s (irrevocable offerof dedication_) shall _be_submitted to-theWCity Attorney for aMroval and Wrecorded WinWthe South Burlington land records. 5 .The applicant shall_ contribute $26,738-to-the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on_1,260 feet of frontage_2l2n2 Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made priortothe issuance of a Zoning buildiWpermit�for�anyWlotW 6. Prior _Wto_issuance Wof a zoning_/building Permit or start of roadway orW_utilit construction bondsWto cover the costs of - - - - - -- - r ,r - ------ -- - - - -- - - - -- roadway,__uWtility,_and sidewalk construction shall_be posted. The amount of the bond shall _be appro_ved by the City Engineer. The bonds shall remain in effect for - -t- -wo ears - -beyond the date of - -- --- -- -- ------ --- -- -- --- ----- -- --- --- -- -- ---------- -- -- -- ----- ---- ---- ---- -- y--- ------ -- --- comp1_etion of said roadway, utilities and sidewalks. The roa_d- way_s,-_utilities and sidewalks, or portions thereof, shall be com- pleted within four years of the date of posting said bonds. 7. _T_he a_p_plicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. are accepted and taken over by the city. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of�30,345 pd. The ao<plcant _shallpay the -required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zonin buildin ermit. The len th of time that this sewer allocation approvalshall remain i ffect shall be tied to roadway construction. v The roadways s rvinq this devel- opment shall be completed within 10 years of the final plat ae- proval_granted on 6/28 94- _The sewer allocation for any_lots served by a roadway or_portion_of roadway which is not completed within this ten vear time limit shall be lost unless reapproved 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 day_s prior ------ -- - -- to beqinninq of road construction, the name of the contractors ----- doin_q the street and utility work and the architect and/or en sn- eer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision r� 23ula- tions, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e. , streets, water mains, sanitary sewers,.storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City En ineer "as_built"ycon- struction drawings certified by -a registered engineer. 11. As expressl_y represented by the aeplicant,_ the a_ppl_icant_ will dedicate to the City a recreation path easement and 80 foot_ floatin2_.LL2ht-of-way over the 146.6 acre arcel ad'oinin to the east as shown on sheet SP2. The recreation path easement shall be located outside of the wetland and wetland buffer aL22Z Muddy Brook. These 1e al documents shall be recorded prior to issuance PLANNING COMMISSION 15 November 1994 page 14 of a zonLn3yj2LIildin permit for an lot. 12. As e_xpressly represented esented by the applicant, there will be no quarry qenerated traffic traveling through this subdivision. 13. Deeds for lots 7 and 8 shall reflect_ the fact that the western portions of these lots and the eastern portio of lot #9 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Re ulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three years, this approval shall be null and void. r.r. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of_ the main roadway ( i . e, 80' _ r . o .w. ) due to the provision of a number of edestrian recreation _ oath easements over the property. 16. The existinq draina e ditch alonq the south side of lots one and two shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway_as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records__ within 90 days or this a roval is null and void. The lans shall be si ned b the Plannin Commission Chair or Clerk -prior to recording. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Burgess rejoined the Commission. Sketch Plan application�f Senesac Construction Company to construct a 2,436 sq. f . second story addition to a 101,688 sq. ft. shopping center, 861 Williston Rd: Mr. Austin stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Linton and Ms. Howley presented the plan. They indicated that the management corporation will occupy the addition as an office. It will be located in the northeast corner of the building. There used to be an office there, but it was torn down when the building was renovated. The addition will be 42' x 58' and will be of the same architectural style as the rest of the building and in the same colors. Mr. Weith expressed concern that the site is way under the number of parking spaces required and not all the space is now leased. It was noted that the employees who will use the new space already are parking there. Mr. Weith noted that the space down- stairs that is freed up when the office moved upstairs will PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 7 6. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into 12 lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres: Mr. Neagley said this is the plan approved in June, 1994. The only change is the name of two streets. He said that they got the property in December, 1995. They liked this configuration better than the one that was modified after this was approved. Mr. Trudell said that the three lots that had been combined are now not combined. He showed the right-of-way that connects to the road owned by the city . He also showed the route of the water and sewer service. Storm water will be handled on site. There will be a temporary cul-de-sac on one of the north/south roads. The other north/south road will be built to city standards but will not be a city owned road. The city will have a right-of-way to the property line on both north/south roads. A wetlands study is being done now. The applicant said they have been negotiating with Ledge Knoll owners and are happy with how things are going. Mr. Trudell said the Rec Path trail right-of-way will be granted but the path will not be built by the applicant. There will also be a paved 8 ft. path on the north side of Swift St. extension. There will be no sidewalk on the south side. No issues were raised. Mr. Crow moved the Planninq_Commission approve the revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previ- ously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres Hinesburg Road The amendment consists of resubdividinq the 116.7 acres of land into twelve lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres as de- picted on a 25 page set of plans page 1 entitled "Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consultinq_Engineers, Inc, dated 6/4/96, with the followina stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 8 of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed devel- opment will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a. The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip, ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any sub- sequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b. Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to is- suance of a zoning permit. c. Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte. 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d. Each building lot shall be required to pay the appro- priate road impact fee as defined in the South_ Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction all appropriate legal documents including easement (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 5 The applicant shall contribute $26 738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 9 street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to road- way construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by 6/28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04 shall be lost unless reapproved bV the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engin- eer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regula- tions within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers storm drains etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" con- struction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a. Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches. b. The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to lot 11. c. Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 12. Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development. 13. Deeds for lots 7 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations if substantial construction of the project has not started within three years (i.e., by 7 30/99), this approval shall be null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 10 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. Access (i.e., driveways) to lots 4-11 shall be from the side streets, not from Swift Street Extension. 18. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site plan application of Jeff Nick to increase the size of a multi -use commercial/industrial building from 6465 sq. ft. to 7080 sq. ft. The uses will consist of 2775 sq. ft. of general office use and 4305 sq. ft. of warehouse/distribution use, 1 Green Tree Drive: Mr. Nick said the application was approved by the Commission last fall. Orkin is on the north side of the building. They are now working with a tenant for the south side. They have added 6 parking spaces to the south side and are still within coverages. They are short on landscaping and propose to beef up landscaping along the existing building and near the dumpsters. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer recommends the driveway be re- designed to miss an existing maple tree. Mr. Nick said they propose to move the tree. It isn't very big. If it can't be moved, they will plant another one nearby. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan ap- plication of Jeff Nick to increase the size of a multi -use commercial/industrial building from 6465 sq. ft. to 7080 sq. ft. The uses will consist of 2775 sq. ft. of general office use and 4305 sq ft. of warehouse/distribution use, 1 Green Tree Drive, as depicted on a site plan entitled "Lot 9 Green Tree Park Gregory Drive South Burlington, VT," prepared by Trudell Consult- ing Engineers Inc, dated 10 1O/95, last revised 7/10/96, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 27, 1995 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Petersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the November 15, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (February 13, 1995). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, a City Planner JW/mcp pc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 24, 1995 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on November 15, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (February 13, 1995). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, j6-'e- Joe Weithf City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl pc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 29, 1992 agenda items Date: December 22, 1992 3) GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION/OFFICE COMPLEX - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the subdivision of a 116.73 acre lot into 13 lots, and the construction of a planned unit development consisting of 250,000 square feet of office space in five (5) buildings on a 47.4 acre lot. The applicant received preliminary approval for an 11 lot subdivision of this property on 10/8/91 (minutes enclosed). The current application reflects changes made to the subdivision to take advantage of the recent zoning amendment reducing the minimum lot size and allowing general office use. This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space district. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #4. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 13 lots ranging between 3.05 acres and 47.4 acres. The average lot size is 9 acres (based on a total of 116.73 acres in the I-O zone). All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto Green Acres property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 740 foot long road with a 60 foot r . o . w . (Vosburgh Lane) branches A�edetr Planning 1 Dece:aber 29, 1992 agenda items December 22, 1992 Page 2 off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots 5-10 and could eventually be extended to serve the parcel to the north. Another road 400 feet long (Goodrich Lane) also branches off to the north. Staff recommends this road be continued to the north boundary and end in a cul-de-sac. Applicant should propose curb cut locations along Swift Street Extension to minimize the number of curb cuts and also assure that adequate site distance exists.. View Protection Zone: This property is located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. The applicant has calculated the maximum height of each building and has indicated this elevation for each building as the top of roof (T.O.R.) elevation plus the additional height allowed resulting from the building distance from Hinesburg Road. Each building will than be designed to not exceed this height. Wetlands: The applicant had a wetlands report prepared for the previous application (see enclosed). This report concludes that none of the sides of the farm are wetland and that all of the farmed land, other than the main drainage running north -south through the farm, is "prior converted". This term is defined in the report. The applicant will be seeking a permit from the Corps of Engineers to cross the only wetland within their jurisdiction which is the main drainageway. Staff recommends that the plans show all wetlands on the site and -./' that the boundary of the forested wetland on lots 2 and 3 be delineated. Applicant should be certain that the relocated stream stay out of the buffer area as recommended by the Natural Resources Committee. Conservation Zone: Applicant should be aware the western portions of lots 8, 9 and 10 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. Pedestrian Path: The applicant should be made to comply with the previously approved preliminary plat conditions for the recreation path. These are conditions #11, 14c and 17. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 8.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 29% (maximum allowed is 50%). Applicant should provide front yard coverage information. 2 Memorandum - Detember 29, December 22, Page 3 Planning 1992 agenda items 1992 Buildings meet the setback requirements for the I-0 district. Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-12 are located in the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 19.45 of the zoning regulations. Preliminary Plat: The following additional information should be provided for preliminary plat review. --- survey of entire tract by licensed land surveyor. --- updated traffic report --- parking spaces shown --- landscaping and lighting plan with details --- dumpsters shown and screened. --- contours, existing and proposed for PUD --- drainage plan --- detailed engineering drawings for relocated drainageway. 4) NET RESULT - REVISED SITE PLAN - 350 DORSET STREET This project consists of minor revisions to the site plan which increases coverage. Staff discovered the deviation from the approved site plan and requested the applicant apply to the Planning Commission for approval. The site plan was originally approved on 5/21/92 (minutes enclosed). Staff requested, but did not receive, a written statement from the applicant demonstrating that there has been a change in conditions to justify the requested changes and to justify the Planning Commission's reconsideration. This property located at 350 Dorset Street is within the Central District 2 zone. It is bounded on the north by a fabric store and beauty salon (Dorset Street) and a radiator repair shop (San Remo Drive), on the south by Champlain Oil's trucking terminal, on the east by San Remo Drive and on the west by Dorset Street. Access/circulation: No change in access to either Dorset Street or San Remo Drive. The revised plan adds pavement to the north side 3 N E A G L E Y +i C H A S E C O N S T R U C T I O N C O M P A N Y Mr. Joe Weith July 26, 1999 South Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Mark R. Neagley, Partner Meadowland Business Park Summer Ice Joint Venture 153 Summit Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Permit Extension Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Weith, This letter is a formal request asking for a two-year extension for the above captioned project. We have been attentive and aggressive in meeting the demands of our ACT 250 permit but due to a protracted "archeology" clarification our final approvals and actual permit were not available to us until May 15, 1998, (Land Use Permit #4C 1005). Since that time we have been actively courting businesses that are willing to adhere to our construction principles for a "green" park. To date we have been unable to match interest and approved use. We are confident that by staying the course we will bring to South Burlington the kind of development that we can all be proud of. I have no doubt that given a two-year extension we will successfully meet that goal. Thank you for your help in this matter. I can be reached anytime at 802-658-6320 ext. 118. Sincerely, U_Cltlu� Mark R. Neagley, Partner Summer Ice Joint Venture 1150 AIRPORT DRIVE 50. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 ( 8 0 2 ) 6 5 8 - 6 3 2 0 FAX (802) 658-0349 Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1993 agenda items May 7, 1993 Page 8 --- plane do not show all finished contours, i.e. the area behind Building B does not show the finished contours. --- applicant should submit a written report addressing the PUD criteria contained in Section 19.151. --- legal documents (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) for proposed streets and easements should be submitted for review by the City Attorney prior to issuance of any permits. 5) GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of the subdivision of a 116.73 acre lot into 13 lots. The sketch plan for this project was reviewed on 12/29/92 (minutes enclosed). At that time a 250,000 square foot office complex was proposed for lot #1. It is no longer part of this application and may be submitted at a later date under a separate application. This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #4. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 13 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 49.5 acres. The average lot size is 8.44 acres (based on a total of 116.73 acres in the I-O zone). All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto Green Acres property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 735 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Vosburgh Lane) branches Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1993 agenda items May 7, 1993 Page 9 off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots 5-10 and could eventually be used to serve the parcel to the north. Another road 710 feet long (Green Acres Lane) also branches off to the north and will serve lots 11 and 12. Wetlands: The wetlands report submitted by the applicant was provided the Planning Commission at the latest sketch plan meeting. Plans do not show the entire delineated boundary of the forested wetland on lots 2 and 3. A portion is shown on sheet P3 and another portion is shown on sheet SP11. Also, sheet P7 shows only a portion of a wetland protection area. Plans should show all wetland protection areas. Sheet SP2 under the Legend has a designation for "Wetlands (NWI)" but no symbol is provided for this designation. Staff recommends that a plan be submitted that shows delineation of all wetlands and wetland protection areas. Conservation Zone: Applicant should be aware the western portions of lots 8, 9 and 10 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. Staff had requested that applicant show the 50 foot CO zone on either side of the stream flowing north on lots 4-7. Applicant has indicated that he has no intention of showing this CO zone because the stream will be discontinued. The center of the relocated stream on lot 2 will be less than 50 feet from the adjoining Dubois property resulting in a CO zone extending onto the Dubois property. Unless the property owner agrees to the encroachment, the stream should be moved farther to the north to avoid extending a CO zone onto their property. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans at their 5/3/93 meeting (see enclosed memo). The applicant has indicated that he will not design or construct any recreation path. Staff recommends that the recreation path which runs along the relocated stream along the southern boundary be constructed by the applicant at the same time that the "natural" stream is constructed. Applicant should provide information on how the recreation path will connect and cross Hinesburg Road. 0 Memorandum - May 11, 1993 May 7, 1993 Page 10 Planning agenda items Applicant should provide a 20 foot easement Letween the 60 foot )0 r.o.w. off Knoll Circle and proposed recreation path. Traffic: Comments on traffic will be provided at the meeting. �r Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-12 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 19.45 of the zoning regulations. "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural 11 stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of years ago. The Natural Resources Committee reviewed the details of this stream and find it acceptable (see enclosed memo). The value of the landscaping along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,660. Plantings will include Redstem Dogwood, Inkberry, White Pine and Weeping Willow. Sewer: The sewer allocation being requested is 30,345 gpd. The pima" applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Planning Commission should consider a time limit on the (o,,,l� sewer allocation. Street trees: The applicant is proposing approximately 170 street S�vN trees which will have a value, including installation, of $44,200. This property is located in the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone and the trees proposed along the street between stations 14 + 00 and 20 + 00 will exceed the height limits. Street trees proposed between stations 14 + 00 and 20 + 00 should be changed to a species which will not exceed the height limit. ;dry Some acceptable species include:; Ruby Red Horsechestnut; 5 European, Hop or American Hornbeam and Hedge Maple. `� Final Plat : --- survey plat should show easement for shared driveway between lots 3 and 4. --- survey plat should indicate the width of Green Acres Lane at its southern most location. --- plans should reflect the new zoning designations of Industrial 10 Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1993 agenda items May 7, 1993 Page 11 & Open Space District and Southeast Quadrant District. --- applicant should submit a written report addressing each of the criteria contained in Section 417 of the subdivision regulations. --- applicant should propose an alternate name for Green Acres Lane, there is a Green Acres Drive in Burlington and this could cause confusion for emergency response and mail delivery. 6) JOHN LARKIN - HARBOR VIEW AMENDMENTS - FINAL PLAT This application is to amend conditions #7 and #8 of the December 17, 1991 Planning Commission approval for a 250 seat ballroom (see enclosed minutes). These conditions prohibit the use of the ballroom prior to 6:30 P.M. Mondays through Fridays or prior to 2:00 P.M. on weekends and require semi-annual performance reports. The required changes would limit total seating for all meeting/banquet facilities on the property to 250 persons between the hours of 4:30 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. Mondays through Fridays or between 11:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M on weekends. Also being requested is the use of the ballroom to serve in-house guests a continental breakfast. The applicant has submitted a written statement to justify this request (see enclosed). The applicant is seeking to have some flexibility in the use of the ballroom and the meeting space approved on 5/23/89 (minutes enclosed). These two (2) facilities would not be booked for simultaneous use by separate groups. The applicant has submitted a written description of the request (see enclosed). Parking: The applicant indicates that no additional parking would be needed since the meeting room and the ballroom would not be used at the same time. Applicant should update the parking study to confirm this assumption. 11 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Green Acres Subdivision - Traffic Impact Date: May 10, 1993 The applicant has proposed to "build" from the traffic study which was originally conducted in 1991 for the proposed 11 lot industrial subdivision. The preliminary plat for the 11-lot subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission on 10/8/93. The original traffic study estimated that the future development would generate 777 A.M. peak hour trips and 743 P.M. peak hour_ trips. The results of the analysis were as follows: Intersection 1997 build 1997 1992 1997 without build with Base No build improvements improvements Kennedy/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Dorset E F F Kennedy/Dorset F F F The traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant indicated that critical intersections are currently operating at an unacceptable LOS and are expected to continue operating at unacceptable LOS in 1997 under both build and no -build conditions. Substantial improvements (additional approach lanes) are needed at the Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road intersections in order to improve the LOS to "C". Improvements which have been identified as beneficial for the Dorset Street intersection, but not incorporated into this analysis, include signal optimization, adding a northbound on -ramp at Exit 13 and connecting Corporate Way through to Route 116. Prior to the preliminary plat hearing for the original 11 lot industrial subdivision, staff and the applicant met and agreed to propose to the Commission the following traffic impact mitigation package: o Applicant install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on Sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning/building permit. o Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. o Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak our trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. o Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building should be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the P.M. peak our trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. At the preliminary plat hearing held on October 8, 1991, the Commission expressed concern over the timing of development and intersection improvements. Attached are the 10/8/91 minutes. The Commission subsequently approved the preliminary plat application but with the following stipulation regarding traffic: "The traffic issue and appropriate mitigation is unresolved at this time. This issue shall be finalized at final plat. Prior to final plat, staff shall obtain an indication from Council on timing and funding of necessary intersection improvements at Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road. In addition, staff and applicant shall consider a phasing plan tied to specific intersection improvements and/or level of service and present recommendation(s) to Planning Commission at Final Plat". Provided below is an update of what has occurred since the 10/8/91 Preliminary Plat hearing: Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road: The VOAT improved this intersection last year which included restriping to provide left -turn only lanes on each approach, and installing a new controller. The City and State feel that further improvements are needed at this intersection. The City is planning to add this summer, a third right -turn only lane to each approach. These improvements will be funded by developer fees and the general fund. The applicant submitted an updated traffic impact analysis dated 2/16/93 (attached) which analyzes the impact of the project on this recently improved intersection. The results of the analysis indicate that the intersection will operate at LOS "C" with the project. These results seem to differ from earlier analyses which estimated LOS "E" for current conditions. The results also seem to contradict existing conditions where traffic is significantly backed -up during peak periods. Williston Road/Hinesburg Road: The improvement of this intersection is planned to be done as part of the Williston Road improvement project currently being designed by the VAOT. The City's matching funds will be partially funded through developer impact fees (i.e., Williston Road Area 1 Improvement Fund). The City's 5-year Construction plan has this improvement scheduled for 1995/96. However, this is dependent on the State's construction plan. The State has not yet included this project in this 5-year plan. Other: The City will be upgrading the Williston Road/Kennedy Drive intersection this summer. Also, the Dorset Street project will be complete by fall, 1993. Staff Comments/Recommendations: o Any approval should include a condition that this development is approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. o Any approval should include the mitigation package agreed to and proposed earlier by staff and the applicant. This mitigation package is discussed earlier in this memo. Memorandum - Planning June 14, 1994 agenda items June 10, 1994 Page 5 5a, 5b and 5c are in R7 not CD3 and the r.o.w. is in CD3 not R7. Sheet SP1 --- plan should note that dumpster storage areas are to be screened, indicate type of screening to be used. --- identify which is building A and which is building B. --- lot 5 is noted to have 0% building coverage yet there is a gazebo and a canopy on this lot. --- nursing home building shows two (2) Phase I's and a Phase III but no Phase II (this should be corrected on all plans). Sheet SP2 --- there are only 14 spaces along westerly row of spaces in parking garage of the northerly office building, note on plat shows 15 spaces (correct on all plans). nthPr- --- provide all exterior building mounted lighting details. --- provide details for all exterior lighting. All lighting must be downcasting and shielded and not cast light beyond the property line. --- the plans should be revised to show the portion of the existing turn -around at the end of Oakwood Drive which is on the applicant's property. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that lot 3 and 4 be combined into one lot since both lots are proposed to be used for one purpose. Also, since there are a significant number of corrections which need to be made to the plans and since there is still some missing information which has been requested, staff recommends that a decision not be made until the plans are complete. 5) GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT This project consists of the subdivision of a 116.7 acre lot into 13 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 49.5 acres. The preliminary plat was approved on May 11, 1993 (minutes enclosed). k Memoradnum - Planning June 14, 1994 agenda items June 10, 1994 Page 6 This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #4. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 13 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 49.5 acres. The average lot size is 8.44 acres (based on a total of 116.73 acres in the I-O zone). All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto Green Acres property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 735 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Vosburgh Lane) branches off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots 5-10 and could eventually be used to serve the parcel to the north. Another road 710 feet long (Malcolm Lane) also branches off to the north and will serve lots 11 and 12. The applicant will be granting the City an 80 foot wide floating r.o.w. across the 146 acre parcel to connect this project with the Williston Town line. Wetlands: Condition #16 of the preliminary plat approval required the wetland delineation of lot #4. This information has not been submitted. The applicant requests that development of lot #4 not be permitted until the wetlands on this lot are delineated. Staff recommends that lot #3 and 4 be combined into one (1) lot seeing as how the applicant has chosen not to delineate the wetlands on lot #4. Conservation & Open Space Zone: The western portions of lots 8, 9 and 10 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. 0 Memorandum - Planning June 14, 1994 agenda items June 10, 1994 Page 7 The center of the relocated stream on lot 1 will be less than 50 feet from the adjoining Toutant property resulting in a CO zone extending onto the Toutant property. The abutting landowner, Arthur Toutant, has submitted a letter agreeing to the CO zone encroachment. Recreation paths: Condition #5 of preliminary plat approval required the plans to be revised to clearly indicate that a 20 foot wide recreation path easement only will be provided and that recreation paths will not be constructed by the applicant (except the recreation path along Swift Street). Sheets P1 - P4 show the `` bikepath along Swift Street and sheets SP10 and SP11 contain a note 14 which states that "construction of the recreation path will not be VO undertaken by Green Acres, Inc.". This note should be revised to clearly indicate that all recreation paths on the property will not be constructed by the applicant. The applicant is providing a 20 (� foot easement between the 60 foot r.o.w. off Knoll Circle and thej c proposed recreation path as required under preliminary plat. The pedestrian easement on either side of the pond has been relocated outside the wetland buffer zone. Sheet SP3A should also be revised to reflect this change. Applicant has agreed to grant pedestrian easements on the adjoining 146 acre parcel for future recreation paths. r 5 Traffic: The following conditions relating to traffic were attached to preliminary plat approval: a) This project is approved for a maximum of 777 AM peak hour trip ends and 743 PM peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on Sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning/ building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. 7 Memorandum - Planning June 14, 1994 agenda items June 10, 1994 Page 8 d) Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot would be require to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. e) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the P.M. peak hour trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-12 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 19.45 of the zoning regulations. "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural" stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of years ago. The Natural Resources Committee reviewed the details of this stream and find it acceptable. The value of the landscaping along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,710. Plantings will include Redstem Dogwood, Inkberry, White Pine and Weeping Willow. Preliminary plat approval required the berm to be constructed at the same time the road is 4 constructed. Sewer: A sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd was approved as part of preliminary plat approval. The length of time that this sewer allocation will remain in effect is tied to roadway construction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years of final plat approval. Condition #7 of preliminary plat approval required the applicant to evaluate the capacity and emergency storage of the existing pumping station and provide evaluation results to the City Engineer. This report was submitted, reviewed and found acceptable by the City Engineer. Assessment of Development Impacts: Condition #8 of the preliminary plat approval required the applicant to submit a report addressing each of the criteria contained in Section 417 of the subdivision Memorandum - Planning June 14, 1994 agenda items June 10, 1994 Page 9 regulations (see enclosed). Sidewalk: Condition #9 of preliminary plat approval requires the applicant to contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. A sidewalk should be constructed along the south side of Swift Street Extension. Section 401.1(10) of the subdivision regulations require sidewalks on both sides of major and secondary streets. Landscaping: Condition #2 of preliminary plat approval requires the applicant to post a landscape bond for the street trees and berm landscaping. The combined values of the proposed landscaping is $47,400 ($14,710 for berm landscaping and $43,690 for street trees). Development deferral: Applicant is proposing to defer development of lot #4 until such time as wetlands on this lot are delineated. Staf f recommends that lots 3 and 4 be combined into one (1) lot seeing as how the applicant has chosen not to delineate the wetlands on lot #4. Legal documents: Condition #4 of preliminary requires that the legal documents for the easement be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building of roadway or utility construction. Other: plat approval s and the roadway jlp<; recording in the permit or start --- "Total Area" notes on sheet SP2 still refer to Agricultural and Rural Residential District, this should read Southeast Quadrant. 6) ROBERT AUDETTE - SITE REVISIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of making some minor site revisions to a site plan approved on 8/24/93 (minutes enclosed). Staff discovered that the applicant had not implemented certain aspects of the approved site plan and requested that the site plan be implemented as approved or obtain approval from the Planning Commission for revisions. This property is currently being used for auto sales and service, real estate office, take-out restaurant, mini - warehouse and equipment rental. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: August 9, 1994 agenda items Date: August 5, 1994 3) GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved 12 lot subdivision by resubdividing six (6) lots into three (3) lots and one (1) lot into two (2) lots resulting in two (2) fewer lots for a total of 10 lots, Hinesburg Road. This is the resubdivision of a 12 lot subdivision approved on 6/28/94 (minutes enclosed) . Access: No change in access proposed. Lot #10 is proposed to have frontage only on Hinesburg Road. This lot lies partially within the 200 foot buffer strip required along Hinesburg Road which prohibits access drives. Therefore, the applicant must provide access to lot #10 from Swift Street Extension. This alternate access must be shown on the final plat. Minimum lot size/frontage: The three (3) acre minimum lot size and eight (8) acre average lot size requirements will still be met. All lots will also meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Buffer strip: Section 16.303 of the zoning regulations establishes an open space buffer strip, 200 feet in width, along Hinesburg Road. This buffer strip must be kept free of buildings, structures, parking facilities and access drives. Approximately one half of lot #10 lies within this buffer strip. This lot has multiple detached farm buildings, some of which lie either partially or entirely within the buffer strip. Since a good portion of this lot is undevelopable, applicant should demonstrate that this lot can be developed in conformance with the zoning regulations without the need of variances. View protection zone: Portions of proposed lots #1, and 10 are located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. Applicant should demonstrate that lot #1 can be developed in conformance with the view protection zone requirements and the buffer strip limitations as noted above. Other: --- Sketch plan must show existing and proposed water and sewer lines. 4) JANET AND DAVID DESARNO - PARKING & ACCESS MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of parking and access modifications to two(2) adjacent lots owned by the applicant. The reason for these modifications is to provide access M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: September 20, 1994 agenda items Date: September 16, 1994 3) GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved 12 lot ,y subdivision by resubdividing six (6) lots into three (3) lots and one (1) lot into two (2) lots resulting in two (2) fewer lots for it a total of 10 lots, Hinesburg Road. This is the resubdivision of I a 12 lot subdivision approved on 6/28/94. The sketch plan was reviewed on 8/9/94 (minutes enclosed). This project now consists of the subdivision of a 116.7 acre lot into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres. This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #3. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 10 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 45.53 acres. The average lot size is 11.05 acres. All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto Green Acres property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 733 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Vosburgh Lane) branches off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots #4-8 and could eventually be used to 1 Memorandum - Planningf September 20, 1994 agenda items September 16, 1994 Page 2 , c� serve the parcel to the north. Lot #10 will be served by a 50 foot r.o.w. crossing lot #1 and connecting with Swift Street Extension. The applicant will be granting the City an 80 foot wide floating r.o.w. across the 146 acre parcel to connect this project with the Williston Town line. The 50' r.o.w. serving lot #10 should be designed so that it can accommodate a minimum 24' wide driveway with proper radii for trucks and emergency vehicles. The City Engineer does not feel the Q' easement in its current proposed configuration would accomplish this. Wetlands: Most of the wetlands on the property have been identified and are shown on sheet SP3A. Some of the wetlands on 3 lot #3 have not been identified. These wetlands should be 1�? identified at the time this lot is developed. Conservation & Open Space District: The eastern portion of lot #9 and the western portions of lots #7 and #8 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook C.O. zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. Recreation paths: Recreation paths are being proposed by the applicant. These paths have been approved by the Recreation Path Committee. The only path to be constructed by the applicant is the one along Swift Street. No changes proposed to the recreation paths. Traffic: This project was previously approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant is responsible for the following: 1) install the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street intersection, 2) update signal warrant analysis prior to development of each lot and install signal if warranted, 3) contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on trip ends generated by each use and 4) contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee. Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-9 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 26.45 of the zoning regulations. "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural" stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of K Memorandum - Planning September 20, 1994 agenda items September 16, 1994 Page 3 i years ago. The value of the landscaping along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,710. Sewer:; A sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd was previously allocated. The length of time that this sewer allocation will remain in effect ` is tied to roadway consruction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years. No changes proposed. Sidewalk: The applicant is required to contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. No changes proposed. Landscaping: The applicant was previously required to post a landscaping bond for the street trees and berm landscaping. The elimination of Malcolm Lane has reduced the value of street trees to $29,050. The berm landscaping remains at $14,716 for a combined total of $43,766. Buffer strip: Section 16.303 of the zoning regulations establishes an open space buffer strip, 200 feet in width, along Hinesburg Road. This buffer strip must be kept free of buildings, structures, parking facilities and access drives. Approximately one half of lot #10 lies within this buffer strip. This lot has multiple detached farm buildings, some of which lie either partially or entirely within the buffer strip. The applicant represented at the sketch plan meeting that he will be able to develop lot #10 in accordance with the buffer zone requirement and other standards of the zoning regulations. Access to lot #10 will not be allowed from Hinesburg Road and must be provided from Swift Street Extension. View protection zone: Portions of proposed lots #1 and #10 are located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. Other• --- all plans should be revised to reflect that the current owner.) of this property is Marble Bank. --- note #2 on sheet SP3A should be revised to indicate the revised lot numbers. 4) S.D. MANSFIELD, INC. - COMMUNITY MEETING SPACE - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of: 1) designating lots 1-16 of an approved 3 Memorandum October 25, October 21, Page 6 - Planning 1994 agenda items 1994 Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement provision applies to the new dwellings. The estimated cost of these structures should be submitted. The preliminary plat should contain a detailed landscape plan. Coverage: Building and overall coverage information should be included with the preliminary plat application. Sidewalk: A sidewalk should be provided along Patchen Road in an area approved by the City Engineer. Other: The preliminary plat, in addition to including the information mentioned above, should include the following: --- a report addressing the PUD criteria contained in Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. --- all information required for a preliminary plat under Section 203 of the subdivision regulations. --- applicant should indicate the use of the garage/barn. Recreation fee: The applicant will be required to pay the recreation fee in effect at the time of issuance of a zoning/building permit for the new dwellings. Sewer fee: tearooms in allocation. Applicant should indicate the proposed number of the new dwellings in order to calculate sewer 8) GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved 12 lot subdivision by resubdividing six (6) lots into three (3) lots and one (1) lot into two (2) lots resulting in two (2) fewer lots for a total of 10 lots, Hinesburg Road. This is the resubdivision of a 12 lot subdivision approved on 6/28/94. The preliminary plat was approved on 9/20/94 (minutes enclosed). This project now consists of the subdivision of a 116.7 acre lot into 10 lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 43.98 acres. This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is 1.1 Memorandum October 25, October 21, Page 7 - Planning 1994 agenda items 1994 bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot U . A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 10 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 43.98 acres. The average lot size is 11.05 acres. All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto Green Acres property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 733 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Vosburgh Lane) branches' off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots #4-8 and could eventually be used to b' serve the parcel to the north. Lot #10 will be served by a 50 foot r.o.w. crossing lot #1 and connecting with Swift Street Extension. The applicant will be granting the City an 80 foot wide floating r.o.w. across the 146 acre parcel to connect this project with the' Williston Town line. The 50' r.o.w. serving lot #10 was revised since preliminary plat approval so that it can accommodate a minimum 24' wide driveway with proper radii for trucks and emergency vehicles. Wetlands: Most of the wetlands on the property have been ;;�•�"��+�d 3 identified and are shown on sheet SP3A. Some of the wetlands on r, lot #3 have not been identified. These wetlands should be identified at the time this lot is developed. Conservation & Open Space District: The eastern portion of lot #9 and the western portions of lots #7 and #8 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook C.O. zone. Deeds for these lots should reflect this restriction. 7 Memorandum October 25, October 21, Page 8 Recreation applicant. Committee. one along paths. - Planning 1994 agenda items 1994 paths: Recreation paths are being proposed by the J These paths have been approved by the Recreation Path The only path to be constructed by the applicant is the^,��r� Swift Street. No changes proposed to the recreation Y Traffic: This project was previously approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The applicant is responsible for the following: 1) install the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street intersection, 2) update signal warrant analysis prior to development of each lot and install signal if warranted, 3) contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on trip ends generated by each use and 4) contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee. Airport Approach Cone: Lots #2-9 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 26.45 of the zoning regulations. "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural" stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of years ago. The value of the landscaping along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,710. Sewer: A sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd was allocated at preliminary plat approval. The length of time that this sewer: allocation will remain in effect is tied to roadway consruction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years. No changes proposed., Sidewalk: The applicant is required to contribute $26,738 to the°\ Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. No changes proposed. Landscaping: The applicant was previously required to post a landscaping bond for the street trees and berm landscaping. The elimination of Malcolm Lane has reduced the value of street trees to $29, 050. The berm landscaping remains at $14, 716 for a combined . total of $43,766. Buffer strip: Section 16.303 of the zoning regulations establishes an open space buffer strip, 200 feet in width, along Hinesburg Road. This buffer strip must be kept free of buildings, structures, parking facilities and access drives. Approximately E:3 Memorandum October 25, October 21, Page 9 - Planning 1994 agenda items 1994 one half of lot #10 lies within this buffer strip. This lot has multiple detached farm buildings, some of which lie either partially or entirely within the buffer strip. The applicant represented at the sketch plan meeting that he will be able to develop lot #10 in accordance with the buffer zone requirement and other standards of the zoning regulations. Access to lot #10 will not be allowed from Hinesburg Road and must be provided from Swift Street Extension. Since preliminary plat approval, lot #10 has increased in size from 3.97 acres to 5.52 acres. View protection zone: Portions of proposed lots #1 and #10 are located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. Other: --- all plans were revised to reflect that the current owner of this property is now Marble Bank. --- note #2 on sheet SP3A was revised to indicate the revised lot numbers. 9) LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP - NOWLAND II REVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending the landscape plan for the 73 lot Nowland II PRD approved on 8/10/93 (minutes enclosed). This amendment is to comply with a condition of approval from the Vt Agency of Natural Resources to construct a roadway through a Class Two wetland and construct a bike path and stormwater pond in the 50 foot buffer zone. This decision required the applicant to plant a line of northern white cedar along the 50 foot wetland buffer zone on the western side of the wetland adjacent to lots #33 - 45. In addition, the applicant is required to install a four ( 4 ) foot high wooden fence along the buffer zone adjacent to these lots on the western side of the planted cedars. Landscaping: This is the only aspect changing. The landscape bond should be street trees and common area trees. d of the project that is increased to $133,779 for Memorandum - November 15, November 10, Page 10 Planning 1994 agenda items 1994 8) GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This application was continued from the 10/25/94 meeting to give the applicant the opportunity to revise the size of lots #1 and 10. Lot #1 was decreased in size from 43.98 to 40.94 acres and lot #10 was increased in size from 5.52 to 8.56 acres. Please refer to staffs' memo for the October 25, 1994 meeting for our comments (see enclosed). Enclosed is a letter from Karen Pettersen of Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. requesting the applicant to grant a temporary access for lot #10 from Hinesburg Road until such time as Swift Street Extension is constructed. As has been explained by staff at previous meetings, the zoning regulations do not give the Planning Commission authority to grant any kind of access, whether temporary or permanent through the 200 foot buffer zone along Hinesburg Road. As an alternative, staff suggests the applicant and Planning Commission consider granting of a temporary private road/driveway over the Swift Street Extension r.o.w. until such time as Swift Street Extension is constructed to a full City standard street. 9) SENESAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - OFFICE ADDITION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 2,436 square foot second story addition to a 101,688 square foot shopping center. The last review of this site was on 10/26/93 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 861 Williston Road lies within the Commercial 1 District. It is bounded on the south by undeveloped property which is part of the Quarry Hill Club and Burlington Tennis Club, on the east by I-89, on the west by the Chittenden Bank and Spillane's Mobil station and on the north by Williston Road. Access/circulation: Access for the property will not change. Access is currently provided by a 65 foot wide signalized curb cut at the west end of the property which has two ( 2 ) lanes for ingress and three (3) lanes for egress. Also existing is a 20 foot curb cut which is located 220 feet east of the main access. This smaller curb cut provides egress only for those vehicles proceeding in a easterly direction (i.e., right turn only). Circulation is adequate. 10 Memorandum - Planning July 30, 1996 agenda items July 26, 1996 Page 5 Traffic: No additional traffic is anticipated since the building square footage in the PUD is not increasing. Lighting: Exterior lighting for the bank will consist of the following: --- nine (9) - 150 watt high pressure sodium lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 16 foot poles. --- four (4) - 70 watt high pressure sodium lamps mounted on the building. --- 15 - 70 watt high pressure sodium lamps recessed under the canopy and the building entrance area. --- nine (9) - 70 watt high pressure sodium wall wash ground flood lights. These lights shall be placed in a manner, or surrounded by shrubbery, to ensure that glare is not visible from adjacent roadways. --- one (1) - 70 watt high pressure sodium flood light lighting flags on top of flag poles. This light does not comply with Section 26.105(e) of the zoning regulations which requires that lights be downcasting shielded fixtures. Building height: The proposed bank building (including the architectural detail on top) will have a height of 45 feet which is five ( 5 ) feet higher than the 40 foot limitation for a pitched roof structure. The Planning Commission may allow an increase in height up to 45 feet if the Commission determines that a taller structure meets the criteria contained in Section 25.113(i) - (iii) of the zoning regulations. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations requires additional setbacks for each foot of additional height. This requirement is being met. 6) SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres approved on 11/15/94 (minutes enclosed). The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres which was approved on 6/28/94 (minutes enclosed). This property located on the east side of Hinesburg Road lies within the Industrial and Open Space District. The property is bounded on the north by Dynapower, to the east by a large 5 Memorandum - Planning July 30, 1996 agenda items July 26, 1996 Page 6 undeveloped parcel owned by the applicant, on the south by residences in the Ledgeknoll development and on the west by Hinesburg Road and several single family residences. The site slopes downward from Hinesburg Road. Most of the site is open with fields with a wooded portion located in the southeast corner on lot #3. A stream (beginnings of Potash Brook) runs north -south in the center of the property. Two small tributaries lead into this stream. Minimum lot size/frontage: The zoning ordinance requires a three (3) acre minimum lot size, however, the average size of all the lots must equal a minimum of 8 acres. The plans show 12 lots ranging between 3.06 acres and 49.5 acres. The average lot size is 8.44 acres (based on a total of 116.73 acres in the I-0 zone). All lots meet the minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet. Access: The plan shows an 80 foot wide r.o.w. with 32 foot wide paved road extending south-easterly from the Lane Press/Dynapower Road over the western portion of the Dynapower property onto the applicant's property and then extending eastward through the middle of the property and ending in a cul-de-sac at the easterly boundary. A 733 foot long road with a 60 foot r.o.w. (Bowdoin Street) branches off to the north ending in a cul-de-sac at the north boundary. This road would serve lots 4-9 and could eventually be used to serve the parcel to the north. Another road 710 feet long (Thompson Street) also branches off to the north and will serve lots 10 and 11. The applicant will be granting the City an 80 foot wide floating r.o.w. across the 146 acre parcel to connect this project with the Williston Town line. Wetlands: Wetlands have been delineated on the property with the f1ti.-/'P? exception of portions of lot #3. Wetlands should be delineated on ";.- c' this lot prior to development. Conservation & Open Space Zone: The western portions of lots 7, 8 and 9 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. Deeds 1,' for these lots should reflect this restriction. lw The center of the relocated stream on lot 1 will be less than 50 feet from the adjoining Toutant property resulting in a CO zone extending onto the Toutant property. The abutting landowner, Arthur Toutant, has submitted a letter agreeing to the CO zone encroachment. 9 Memorandum - Planning July 30, 1996 agenda items July 26, 1996 Page 7 Recreation paths: The plans show recreation/pedestrian paths as Vl originally approved. The recreation paths will not be constructed by the applicant with the exception of the recreation path located within the 80 foot r.o.w. Traffic: The applicant submitted an updated traffic impact analysis (see enclosed). The applicant assumed 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends at full build. The following intersections were analyzed: Williston Rd/Rte 116; Kennedy Drive/Rte 116; Rte 116/Project Access; Williston Rd/Dorset Street; and Kennedy Dr/Dorset Street. The analysis indicates that all intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS in the design year of 2002 with the project. LOS D will result at Williston Rd/Rte. 116 and Williston Rd/Dorset Street. All other intersections will operate at LOS C. A traffic signal will be warranted for the Rte. 116/Project Access intersection with 20% build -out of the project. Staff recommends similar conditions to those attached to the 6/24/94 approval: a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. Airport Approach Cone: Lots 2-11 are located within the Airport Approach Cone. Applicant will be subject to the limitations provided in Section 19.45 of the zoning regulations. 7 Memorandum - Planning July 30, 1996 agenda items July 26, 1996 Page 8 "Natural" Stream: The applicant will be constructing a "natural" stream with berms and landscaping along the southerly boundary to replace an adjacent drainage way illegally constructed a couple of years ago. The Natural Resources Committee reviewed the details of N' this stream and find it acceptable. The value of the landscaping V,4 , along the stream including plant material and installation is estimated to be $14,710. Plantings will include Redstem Dogwood, Inkberry, White Pine and Weeping Willow. The 6/28/94 approval required the berm to be constructed at the same time the road is constructed. Sewer: A sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd was approved as part of the 6/28/94 approval. The length of time that this sewer allocation will remain in effect is tied to roadway construction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years of final plat approval (i.e., by 6/28/04). Sidewalk: Condition #5 of the 6/28/94 approval required the applicant to contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund. The Commission waived the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80 foot r.o.w.). due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. Landscaping: Condition #2 of the 6/28/94 approval required the applicant to post a landscape bond for the street trees and berm landscaping. The combined values of the proposed landscaping is $47,400 ($14,710 for berm landscaping and $43,690 for street trees). Legal documents: Condition #4 of the 6/28/94 approval required that the legal documents for the easements and the roadway be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recording in the land records prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction. Other: --- on sheet P2 the proposed street trees should be increased in size to a minimum of 21 inches to meet the requirement of Section 412.4 of the subdivision regulations. --- the note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 should be changed to refer to lot � 11. June 9, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: In reference to our land behind Ledge Knoll off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington. I do intend to pursue sub- division of this parcel in the relatively near future. Our concern is access to the property. We have always left a 60 foot right of way to adjoining properties as part of the approval process. We would expect that this be taken into consideration by the South Burlington Planning Commission when reviewing the Green Acres sub- division. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sin rely, Homer L. DuBois HLD/lb City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 19, 1996 Joe McLean, Esquire Stitzel & Page, PC P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1507 Re: Legal Documents, Meadowland Business Park Dear Joe: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are copies of legal documents for the Meadowland Business Park and a reduced copy of the subdivision plat. This subdivision is scheduled for final approval on September 10, 1996. Please review these documents and forward me your comments at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SincetEAy, Ra n,d J. Belair, ZonjrA & Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encls OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION Offer made this day of 1 1996, by SUMMER J,`fl4E JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of IAD-usiness in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Owner") to the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Ve�j---mont (the city") W I T N E S S E T H WKEREAS, the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, by decision dated 1 1996, approved as a planned commercial development and subdivision, 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres on Hinesburg Road, as shown and depicted on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June 1996 in Map volume Page and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission obligates Owner to dedicate to the City certain roadways, waterline easements, drainage easements, sewerline easements and recreation path easements as shown on said plan; and WHEREAS, the above -described roadways and easements are to be dedicated to the City free and clear of all encumbrances pursuant to ,-.he final approval of said final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered warranty deeds of ,onveyance to the City for the roadways and easements above --- described. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of 'Ten Dollars paid by the City to the owner, and for other good and N/aluable consideration, Owner hereby grants and conveys to he the following: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City warranty deeds, ;,-(,-)pies of which are set forth as Exhibits A-C, attached hereto, ,-aid. delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by Llie City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication. by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time in its entirety or as to any individual conveyance. 1, 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner hereby executes this Offer as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE [ w i t n e s s By: Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE S","ATR OF VERMONT CHIL'I"TENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of 1996, personally appeared / Duly y Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act, and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. 11- 1 i . 0 f If Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 EXHIBIT A WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Thompson Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume , Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by a concrete monument to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 5006141" W for a distance of 230.27 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006141" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006141" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002136" W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 5006141" E for a distance of 340.01 feet, more or :Less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 5006141" E for a distance of 368.33 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general northeasterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, to the point or place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. 1 Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE [ w i t n e s s By. By: Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of , 1996, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. 111j. wdl Before me, _ Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 EXHIBIT B WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Bowdoin Street" on a plan entitled "Mea.dowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume , Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 06019'll" W for a distance of 234.95 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06019'll" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06019'll" W for a distance of 260.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 06019111" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019'll" E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019'll" E for a distance of 253.24 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general northeasterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway 1 improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: w i t n e s s By. By. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of 1996, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. 111j.wd2 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 EXHIBIT C WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Swift Street Extension" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the southerly side of Swift Street Extension and proceeding S 47027117" E for a distance of 780.34 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 337.04, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 112.24, more or less, to a concrete monument to be set; thence proceeding N 8405311_911 E for a distance of 237.43 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 84053119" E for a distance of 1331.37 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 07004125" W for a distance of 80.05 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 84053119" W for a distance of 560.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84053119" W for a 1 distance of 716.53 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing S 84053/19/1 W for a distance of 169.46 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence deflecting to the right along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 241.24, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence proceeding in a generally northwesterly direction along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 141.50 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 47027,171, W for a distance of 712.02 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002/36/1 W for a distance of 105.21_ feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE By. Duly Authorized Agent of and 2 SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of _ , 1996, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 111j.wd3 3 RECREATION PATH EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor., in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to it. paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Municipal Corporation existing under the laws of the State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, C_L"7_Y OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right of way for purposes of constructing and maintaining a recreational pathway for public use over, on and through property in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont., described as follows: A strip of land twenty feet (20') in width as depicted as 1120, Wide Recreation Path Easement" on a Plat entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume Page _ of the South Burlington City Land Records. Said easement and right of way shall be used by the public as a recreational and bicycle pathway subject to the conditio-1 that no ri,otorized traffic, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, trail bikes and snowmobiles, shall be allowed to use the pathway, except motorized vehicles used by the Grantee, or its agents, for the purpose of maintaining or patrolling the pathway. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said recreational pathway, including all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts and ramps, at its sole cost and expense. Grantee further agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this easement and temporary construction easement shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at its own costs and within a reasonable time. Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors, that it will indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that it customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right of way not attributable to acts of the Grantor. Grantee, by the recording of this easement, acknowledges that it has been donated to the City, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantor shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right of way five feet on each side of said permanent easement and right of way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right of way shall expire once construction is completed and the recreational pathway is open to the public. The within Grantor, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the right of way and easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of said right of way, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said easement and right of way which shall prevent or interfere with the within Grantee's ability to use said easement and right of way. Grantee acknowledges that the construction and maintenance of improvements necessary to provide access to Grantor's property shall not be inconsistent with the use of this easement by the Grantee. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deed and the records thereof_, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for itself and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the rights as aforesaid and that Grantor, and its successor assigns shall WARRANT AND DEFEND the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of 1996, personally appeared _ , Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 111j.rec I WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Thompson Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt11 prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume , Page _ of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by a concrete monument to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 5006/41/1 W for a distance of. 230.27 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006/4111 W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 5006/4111 W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002/36/, W for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 5006/4111 E for a distance of 340.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 5006/4111 E for a distance of 368.33 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general northeasterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, to the point or place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. 1 Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it: hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. 1N PRESENCE OF: ^---- [ w i t r. e s s --] --- - By: By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this day of 1 1996, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. 111j. wdi Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 WARRANTY DEED ]KNOW AT;L PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, :SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in. Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Swift Street Extension" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt" prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume _ Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the southerly side of Swift Street Extension and proceeding S 470271171, E for a distance of 780.34 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 337.04, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a generally southeasterly direction along a curve having a radius of 540.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 112.24, more or less, to a concrete monument to be set; thence proceeding N 84053119" E for a distance of 237.43 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 84053/1911 E for a distance of 1331.37 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding N 07004,25" W for a distance of 80.05 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 84053119" W for a distance of 560.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.01 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 84053119" W for a distance of 716.53 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a 1 concrete monument to be set; thence continuing in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence continuing S 84053/1911 W for a distance of 169.46 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a concrete monument to be set; thence deflecting to the right along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 241.24, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence proceeding in a generally northwesterly direction along a curve having a radius of 460.15 feet, more or less, and a length of 141.50 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 47027/17/1 W for a distance of 712.02 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 83002/36/1 W for a distance of 105.21 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. Being a. portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint: Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City .Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that Until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner_ aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all _lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this _ day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: iw i t n e s s SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE By: Bv: Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this _ day of 1996, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. 111j.wd3 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, with its office and principal place of business in the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality in Chittenden County and State of Vermont, Grantee, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a strip of land situated easterly of Hinesburg Road, said strip of land depicted as "Bowdoin Street" on a plan entitled "Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt', prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated April 23, 1996, and recorded June , 1996 in Map Volume , Page of the South Burlington City Land Records, and more particularly described thereon, as follows: commencing at a point marked by an iron pipe to be set, located on the northerly sideline of Swift Street Extension and proceeding N 06019111" W for a distance of 234.95 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06019'll" W for a distance of 240.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing N 06-19,111, W for a distance of 260.00 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general southwesterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, mare or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 06019,111, E for a distance of 2.39.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019/1111 E for a distance of 239.89 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence continuing S 06019111" E for a distance of 253.24 feet, more or less, to a point marked by an iron pipe to be set; thence turning to the left and proceeding in a general northeasterly direction for a distance of 60.00 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. Also conveyed are all improvements located on, over and under said property, including, but not by way of limitation, roadway 1 improvements, sidewalks, storm drainage system, water pipelines, sewer pipelines and curbs. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Summer Ice Joint Venture by Warranty Deed of Marble Bank, dated December 29, 1.995 and recorded in Volume 387, Page 439 of the South Burlington City Land Records. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid; that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets his hand this day of 1996. IN PRESENCE OF: [ w i t n e s s By: By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE Duly Authorized Agent of and SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE At Burlington, in said County and State, this _ day of 1996, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of and Summer Ice Joint Venture. lllj.wd2 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: F, STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 I. Application #4C 1005 Preheating Conference Report and Order 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) Introduction On October 22, 1996 an application for an Act 250 permit was filed by Summer Ice Joint Venture for a project generally described as a 12 lot industrial/commercial subdivision located on 116 acres on Hinesburg Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. A prehearing conference was held on this project on November 20, 1996. Chair John Drake explained the purpose of the prehearing conference and identified issues under the 10 criteria. III Party Status The following persons who attended the prehearing conference have statutory party status: 1. The applicant by Dick Trudell. 2. The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Arthur Hogan, Jr., Executive Director. to Issues The Chair has identified the following relevant issues, on which the applicant and all parties should be prepared to discuss or submit documentary evidence at the hearing: 1. Criterion 1(B), regarding stormwater and wastewater disposal for the project. 2. Criterion 1 0, regarding impacts to the tributary of Potash Brook. 3. Criteria 1 ,G)/8, regarding the impact of the project on significant wetlands. 4. Criterion 4, regarding erosion control measures for the project. 5. Criteria 5 and 9(K), regarding the impact of traffic to be generated by the project. 6. Criterion 8, regarding impacts to historic sites and the aesthetic impact of the project, Prehe.,?--ing Conference Report and Order #4C 10x)5 Page 2 including signage, lighting, and landscaping. Criterion 9(A), regarding impact of growth. Criterion 9B1, regarding impacts to primary agricultural soils located on the site. 9. Criterion 9ff/J), regarding energy conservation and public utilities. 10. Criterion 10, regarding the conformance of the project with the local and regional plans. IV. Order Based on the above, the Chair issues this Preliminary Order which is subject to Board Rule 16. In addition to the filed application, the applicant must address or submit evidence on the issues identified under III. 1-10. All parties must be prepared to go forward at the hearing and present all their evidence on the criteria under which they have been admitted. 4. The hearing for the project is scheduled for December 10, 1996 at 6:00 PM at the office of the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, 66 Pearl Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. A site visit will be held on December 10 at 8:00 a.m. 5. The District Commission will deliberate on this application as soon as all required information has been submitted and will issue a decision within 20 days of final deliberations. If all required information has not been submitted within 30 days of the final hearing, the Commission will begin deliberations on the application and will issue a decision based on the existing record. If the applicant wishes to continue the hearing in recess beyond 30 days following the hearing, it must notify the District Commission in writing on or before the 30th day. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 3 day of December 1996. by Louis Borie District Coordinator District 94 Commission CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Edie Bowen, Administrative Secretary for the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing PREHEARING CONFERENCE REPORT AND ORDER #4C1005, by U.S. Mail, postage paid on this 3 day of December, 1996 to the following: PARTIES Sumner Ice Joint Venture c/o Mark Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Richard Trudell/Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Chair, City Council Chair, Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Hogan, Jr., Executive Director Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Andrew Raubvogel, Esq./Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main Street, 2 Center Waterbury, VT 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission John Drake, Chair/Thomas Visser/Susan Wheeler 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Stuart Slote, Energy Eng/Department of Public Service Energy Efficiency Division State Office Building Montpelier, VT 05620 Michael Russom/Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Dated at Essex Junction, Vthis 3 day/ 4ecember, 1996. CS4C1005 Edie Bowen I STATE OF VERNIONT AGENCY OF DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Preserving Vermont's historic, architectural and archeological resources TO:50 , _60r- 11'rnq �!� DATE: abV• QS P ( `JJ C We are reviewing the project know as %)V proposed byT2Ged_,01 F-il$ , located to see if e project wi'lcf affect any historic buildings or structures. We are undertaking s re 'ew because the project involves one or more of the following: an Act 250 permit; state funds; or federal funds, permit or license. State a—�— e saws direct us to comment on such projects. As part of the review, we must determine if any buildings or structures in the project area are "historic". If any historic buildings may be affected by a project, we offer comments and work with the developer to ensure that the historic resources will be preserved in the course of the project whenever possible.. We would like to consider your comments as we complete this review. In general, in order to be considered "historic," a property must be at least 50 years old, and must retain most of its historic appearance. Architectural significance (whether a building is a good example of a style or. type, whether it has distinctive decorative or structural features) is important in assessing historic character. The history of the building (who lived there, what events took place there, what it can tell us about how people used to live] is also an important criteria. For purposes of Act 250 or state review, an "historic" property is defined as meeting the criteria for the State Register of Historic Places. For purposes of federal review, an "historic" property is defined as meeting the criteria for the National Register of Historic Places. Properties can be eligible for the State Register or the National Register individually, or as part of an area that quaifies as an historic district. If we already have some information about the property on file, a copy is attached. Do you have any additional information about the architecture and history of the building(s) that we should consider in reviewing whether the property is *historic"? Background history about the building, information on its importance in local history, and information on changes that have occurred to the building over time are especially helpful. Our deadline for this review is very short. If you want to contribute information, please contact us by _ !)4,6. (el / 9 � Je If you need more time, please let us know. If the municipality desires a public hearing to discuss the historic character of the property, pleasn let us know and we will arrange one. Thank you for your interest and help. Sincerely, Suzanne Jamele 135 State Street. Drawer 33, Montpelier. Vermont 05633-1201 (802) 828-3226 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Divisions for: * Community Development * Housing * Planning Pavilion Building 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609-0501 Telephone: 802-828-3211 800-622-4553 Fax: 802-828-2928 * Historic Preservation 135 State Street Draiver 33 Montpelier, VT 05633-1201 Telephone: 802-828-3226 Fax: 802-828-3206 C STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OFCOMMERCEAND COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT November 25, 1996 John Pitrowski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Meadowland Business Park, So. Burlington. Pre -Act 250. Dear Mr. Pitrowski: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced project. Please consider these comments preliminary. The Division is reviewing this undertaking for purposes of Criterion 8, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250). Project review consists of evaluating the project's potential impacts to historic buildings, structures, historic districts, historic landscapes and settings, and known or potential archeological resources. The purpose of the Division's review is to provide the District Environmental Commission with the necessary information for them to make a positive finding under the "historic sites" aspect of Criterion 8. The proposed project involves subdivision of a 116 acre parcel into 12 lots with approximately 4800 feet of new roadway and related utilities off of Route 116 in South Burlington. There are four farm buildings located on the parcel which will be demolished as part of the project. These buildings, and a related farmhouse which is under separate ownership, are listed on the State Register of Historic Places. A copy of the Vermont Historic Sites and Structures Survey form for these buildings is enclosed for your information. Generally, removal of historic structures is considered an adverse effect. Based on photographs submitted to this office, it appears that the farm buildings have not been maintained for a number of years and have deteriorated. It is unclear from the photos if the buildings have deteriorated to a point where they are no longer eligible for the State Register. In order to determine if this is the case, a contractor with experience working with historic buildings should evaluate the condition of the buildings to be removed. provide cost estimates for renovation, prepare photographs illustrating structural deterioration and submit this information to the Division. C J. Pitrowski Page 2 November 25, 1996 Please let the Division know if after evaluation of the potential wetlands on the parcel, it is determined that an Army Corps permit is required. Application for this permit would trigger the need for a Section 106 review of the project by the Army Corps of Engineers. Sincerely, DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Townsend H. Anderson C, State Historic Preservation Officer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Marty Abair, Corps GeoArch City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 3, 1996 Richard Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Evaluation of Lane Press Pump Station Dear Mr. Trudell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The City Engineer has requested that the Lane Press Pump Station be re-evaluated based on the new allocation of 51,272 gpd for the Meadowland Business Park. Specifically, he would like you to evaluate the need for additional storage and/or pump capacity. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si cerel , t Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. April 1,1994 Mr. William Szymanski, P.E. City Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Evaluation of Lane Press Pump Station Dear Bill: Green Acres Industrial Park has received preliminary approval from the Planning Commission. Condition #7 of that approval requires that the emergency storage and capacity of the Lane Press pump station be evaluated. I have evaluated the existing pump station and new sewer proposed for Green Acres. With the existing and proposed design flows from Green Acres an additional 10523 gallons of storage is required. The design pumping rate is 299 gpm and the existing pumping capacity is 310 t0 350 gpm. Therefore, the pump capacity is adequate. While doing this evaluation, I recalled the long range plans for this area involved diverting sewage flows from some developments away from the Lane Press pump station to the new Dorset Park pump station. This will relieve the need for more storage and eliminate the Butler Farms and Oak Creek pump stations. I understand that about 1200 feet of new gravity sewer on City property, and some planned improvements to the Dorset Park pump station will be needed. I have prepared a sketch showing the capacities and relative layout of these sewerages. If you have any questions please call. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING Ty/1 r Hart, P.E. cc: Joe Weith ENGINEERS, INC. P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 I:' (Ir ( TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston. VT 05495 DWG: 86091 VEOUED: 11:40 A.M., 4/1/94 Bl': MAM J06...... GREEN ACRES SHEEP NO. DWC 86091-5` DRAWN BY MAM DATE 4101194 CHECKED BY JTH DATE 41011-4 SCALE - 2000 wl<<I PUMP STA. ON - -- CAPACITY . 600-850 G.P.M. I 8" GRAVITY --� ♦♦`♦ f S= 0.004 ��,5' CAPACITY ♦♦`♦♦ s`♦` 422 G.P.M. 2 OrA o ♦♦ y�� L I Y'F NNkU'( E :G. P.M. M 89 DORSET PARK I HILL 'WIf T SO. BURL. PROPOSED GRAVITY- — °s ~' SEWER OAK CRUX A VI TY — SEWER PUMP STA. CAPACITY 180 G.P.M. cr ` n 0 _ � � IC% Q ci .� m m __PROPOSED 6" FORCEMAIN A Z DIGITAL INTFR� lq IE- PUMP STA. 'co - - - CAPACITY 310-350 G.P.M. N.E.T. ---'S " --� ' LANE PRESS 8" GRAVITY SEWER FM PUMP STA. -- CAPACITY 175-180 G.P.M. I BUTLER ARMS FM V TIT 7 / v v o TD o/ 1 16) JOB :5—ez� SHEET NO. OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CALCULATED BY // DATE— P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 CHECKED BY DATE o^.r ....p.... ...............{..... ... �. L _ :.r ........._:..............._�:....r..�..1"1..��......__D�......,E.E............�:��F�.n!l.._...;.............q_�..... 1"' '.,........{.CJ....p ,L/i. � �.. ,.. .... ? .r'�• { E { £ ...........................i............E.........._: ............................... ..... ..... .....E ...... ..... { E I/ s { ...... ......' I € y�/y y€y/� E :...........:..........:............... £ : !, w 61 LG ...... .. €...........'..............,..........._��....?.U...............'.•...-.................:..........._........ Z.........,�rnun.............9 ?Ql�B p q ? ? E { ? I/ 1 i i j." tT7� ............x.......... +....,...[.fw:.........lS."'.....I.........j......}!•.•if.V..1�..i.............}.............o..........._�..............iy...... 1 € j il : ....._:........:....................... .............,.............,..............{.............,.................... , �, ✓.._...�...Z- ? ? 3.... ._ ....E......}.... { { ? { I I i:.............. :... ..... ......... .......... r.............:.............,..........................`.................................... •.............. _ i............. d................................... . i j € � 1l i I j E 4; 'N i Ir ....1 ... ...... ..... ...... j CJ, i ? i i i• { .... �....... .............a ............. E.•..........•.,..............,............. i............. .............. {............. :........................................ I € �.... I } ..... �... 1... ............i............7............... ..... ..... ?........ .... ......................... .............. .................... ...... ......... ........{: ......... ........._............ ............... ...... ...............`i '.............i f { i E ......... E .../ .. ........................................./Va............ ? ? , ? 3 j f j S ? : r i ' € i i , F ..............�i/�/'V... £..........i........._......... ......................_..,.E •'01 ........ ...1.... ....i... } q.... .... ............... .....•.......q:E....._.......pii: Ay/.........;..............€'............_€•.../.O....7l. i1•:................... .ai .... ....FC.9/' ..�,FJ`{f'.i ............ ........... ..'/....•............... :.. •....y......i...................... i I9-...... .._.._........... ....... : D............................:........,j € E• i ......... ...._— .:............._.............. i { i.............J............ ..............�............. r £ ...II�_ it E zv: F :i ........... %a56 y £ i � £ { /� j f t j j : € r I € .. 19 I. I { € i € I i i i € i i i .........i I I ' : £ ! f i C € a i I E j t .�(�� /�� ' E 4 3 • I! ..• ...... ....d..... } i .... .........q.... ............ ................y.. ..f..r......... ,............e[ .11.. .•! Tr !' j € i / € j . {. ?............... { E T... i E j yy ....17 € 11 £ J i ........ ? € j E j E : , } t i i ......._.._............ ,......... ..... ..........E .... ./....,€ .....�...^.....i ..............E .€( ..Z... ...... .r. . j ................s �./. ....................... ............a : t...... /.,,,/,� ................. . .._. ..._.... }............. ........ 9 . .,....................... ................_.....................T. .,{ ..........................:i ............._€ .............i ...................._. ................... Ii _..............r�€i� �- 117 O y l ..... { ..... .. ...•.. ...... .......IE/ ... ... € ................ . .... ...... ...... ........... i;€i ................... .....................:jj l�? i............i.............. .... . I: €3 ....... ..... ...... .... ..... ....... 33j { :'{ .............. ... iss ' : f/ , E i{:s 9 { i ....... 4 E € € j :. i .............. 1..........•...,............. T.............�.............,................ ; /.1 �..3 9. ,............. �. ......... ... % �.c .... .... ..1� i I i I i PROOIICT204.1 (Single Sheets) 205 1 (Padded) i as Inc., Groton, Mace. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE 1-8*225-6W �T f TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 PRODUCT 204.1 (Siftgb Sheets) 205-1(Padded) ®® Inc., Grow, Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE 1 8*225 6380 JOB L : %� 7F'�A" i^ _�-y air-_ SHEET NO. � ! OF CALCULATED BY /7 DATE CHECKED BY Sr:A1 F DATE State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800-253-0195 Voioe>TDD November 19, 1996 City of South Burlington Attn: Margaret A. Picard, Clerk 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. Picard, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main St. - Sewing Bldg. Waterbury VT 05671-0405 Telephone: (802) 241-3822 FAX: (802) 241-2596 Enclosed are copies of a public notice regarding the public comment period for a discharge permit proposed for issuance to Summer Ice Joint Ventures for the discharge of stormwater from the proposed Meadowland Business Park. One of these notices is information for local officials. Would you please post the other in a public place for disseminating this information to local residents ? We are also sending copies of this notice to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, Brian D. Kooiker, Chief Direct Discharge Section enclosures(3) cc. Board of Selectman (w/enclosure)/ Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VT 05671-0405 NOTICE: Draft Discharge Permit PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: 1-1269 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: November 25, 1996 through December 24, 1996 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: Summer Tce Joint Venture PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 PERMIT NUMBER: 1-1269 FILE NUMBER: 04-14 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated Stormwater VOLUME: Unspecified RECEIVING WATER: Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: DESCRIPTION: September 30, 2001 This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to Summer Ice Joint Venture for the discharge of treated st,Dr-jnwater runoff. The d? schcarge iv frOIll tie r'leadawlarid Business Park, Route 116, South Burlington, VT to Potash Brook. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be impled on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of�the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. Page 2 FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file; and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies of the permit may be obtained by calling (802) 241-3822; cost of copies is 10 cents per page. Office hours are 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Public comments on the proposed permit are invited. Comments should be submitted in writing, to the address listed below. Anlsubmitted comments should include the permit number next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of comments. The comment period will close at the end of the business day December 24, 1996. Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 103 South Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0405 Any person, prior to the above date, may submit a written request to this office for an informal, public hearing to consider the proposed permit. A hearing will be held only if response to this notice indicates significant public interest. All comments received prior to the deadline date listed above will be considered in formulations of the final determinations. Once a final permit has been issued, following a public hearing and notice of this fact given, any person may, within thirty (30) days after the issuance of such notice, appeal the issuance of the permit to the Vermont Water Resources Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, §1269. William C Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 APPLICATION #4C 1005 November 19, 1996 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources, State of Vermont, by and through its attorney, Andrew Raubvogel, Esq. , in the above -captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS Criterion 1(B) - STORMWATER DISCHARGE Randy Bean, Environmental Engineer with the Wastewater Management Division, reports that a Stormwater Discharge Permit application was submitted on July 19, 1996 and that a draft permit is currently on public notice. Mr. Bean can be reached at 241-3825. Criteria 1(G) - WETLANDS Cathy O'Brien, Assistant Wetlands Coordinator with the Water Quality Division, reports that a Conditional Use Determination application for this project has been received which has been determined to be technically incomplete. Attached is her November 14, 1996 Ietter to tl:e applic a's consultant. Ms. O'Br1Pn can be reached at 241-3762. Criteria 2 and 3 - WATER SUPPLY Greg Bostock, Regional Engineer with the Water Supply Division, reports that a Water Supply Permit has been issued for this project. Mr. Bostock can be reached at 241-3428. Application ##4C1005 Summer Ice Joint Venture Criterion 5 - TRAFFIC November 19, 1996 Page 2 Melissa Webster, with the Agency of Transportation Utilities Section, reports that a Letter of Intent was issued on September 9, 1996 for this project. Dated November 19, 1996, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency o atural Resources By s A. Caffry, Esq. F, xj�r Mate of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife _ Department of Forests, Parks and RecreaGor, - — Department of Environmental Conservation (,OT'D L-);iTE II State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED i �' 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800-253-0 1 95 Voioe>TDD .�JS,'E(VD U ..'. rye...... Peter W. Spear Natural Resource Consulting Services 67 West Shore Road Grand Isle, VT 05458 RE: Summer Ice Joint Venture Conditional Use Determination #96-400 Dear Peter: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 FAx 802-241-3287 nL 802-241-3770 November 14, 1996 I have reviewed the application you have submitted on behalf of Summer Ice Joint Venture for a Conditional Use Determination for a 12-lot commercial and light industrial development and access road on Route 116 in South Burlington. Based on this review I have determined the application to be incomplete. The following issues must be addressed in order for the application to be considered complete: 1. It appears from the site plans that the boundaries of both the Class Two and Class Three wetlands were determined by the boundary of prior converted cropland. Delineation by this method is not valid for Class Two wetlands. The exemption for prior converted wetlands only applies to Section 404 review and not to the Vermont Wetland Rules. Please provide documentation of field determination of the Class Two wetland boundary as shown on the plans, or submit a revised site plan with a revised Class Two wetland boundary. 2. Attachment 4, the letter supporting prior converted status for the wetlands on this property, needs a map corresponding to the field references within the letter. It is unclear where exactly the letter refers to. The letter is also over 5 years old, dated September 3, 1991. A more current confirmation concerning the prior converted status for this project is needed. 3. Please include building envelopes on the site plans for all lots that contain wetlands. All building envelopes should lie outside of the Class Two wetland and its associated 50 foot buffer zone. 4. Please provide detailed plans for the stormwater detention pond if it is located within the Class Two wetland or its associated 50 foot buffer zone. Chlorine Free 100 / Recycled Paper Summer Ice Page Two 5. Please elaborate on whether or not the Class Two wetland is significant for surface and groundwater protection and demonstrate more clearly how the project will not adversely impact this function for the entire life of the project. I will request comments from stream alteration engineer, Barry Cahoon, and a fisheries biologist concerning the stream crossing. We will inform you as to their concerns in the near future. Please feel free to call me with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Catherine L. O'Brien Assistant Wetlands Coordinator cc: Barry Cahoon, Stream Alteration Engineer Mike Adams, Army Corps of Engineers co\sumerice.inc A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Christian Sleeper, Secretary for the Planning Division of the Agency of Natural Resources, sent a copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance and Pre -hearing Comments dated November 19, 1996, regarding File #4C1005 (Summer Ice Joint Venture), by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Summer Ice Joint Venture Mark Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Richard Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 South Burlington City Clerk & Chair, City Council & Chair, Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County R.P.C. PO Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Dated November 20, 1996 @ Waterbury, VT d i Christian Sleeper TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. October 22, 1996 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Weith: Transmitted herewith are the following documents related to Meadowland Business Park: 1. Recordable mylar of SP 1 2. Recordable mylar of SP2 3. Recordable mylar of SP3 4. Three full of sets of the plans 5. 1 copy of the Act 250 application for the City council 6. 1 copy of the Act 250 application for the Planning Commission Please note for item #4 above, there were minor typographical or drafting changes (shading etc.) made to a large number of the sheets. These changes mainly related to wetlands and storm drainage. Rather than make copies of the individual sheets, I have provided three copies of the entire package. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Richard P. Trudell cc: Mark Neagley UA96022L 11. sam P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 State of Vermont Case #: PIN : Applicant: Address: SUBDIVISION PERMIT EC-4-2004 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED EJ96-0381 Environmental Protection Rules Summer Ice Joint Venture Effective September 10, 1982 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 This project, consisting of a ten lot commercial/industrial subdivision identified as lots 2 and 4 through 12 ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 8.00 acres (lots 1 and 3 described in the application are each greater than 10 acres in size but are included in the total sewer allocation for the project) located off Route 116 in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C1005. GENERAL 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Sheet SP1 "Subdivision Plat" dated 4-23-96; Sheet SP3 "Subdivision Site Plan" dated 4-17-96 revised 8-27-96; Sheet P1 "Swift Street Extension" dated 6-04-96 last revised 8-8-96; Sheet P2 "Swift Street Extension" dated 6-04-96 last revised 9-12- 96; Sheet P3 "Swift Street Extension" dated 6-04-96 revised 9-18-96; Sheet P4 "Swift Street Extension" dated 6-04-96 revised 9-17-96; Sheet P5 "Bowdoin Street" dated 6-4-96 revised 9-18-96; Sheet P6 "Lane Press Drive" dated 6-04-96 revised 9-17-96; Sheet P7 "Thompson Street" dated 6-04-96 revised 9-17-96; Sheet P8 "Sewer Profile" dated 6-03-96; Sheet P9 "Sewer Profile" dated 8-20-96; and Sheet SP5 "Sewer Details" dated 6-03-96 revised 9-19-96 prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. Subdivision Permit EC-4-2004 Page 2 2. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 3. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. 4. Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. 5. This project has been reviewed and is approved as an industrial/commercial subdivision. Prior to construction of a structure on each lot, each lot owner shall apply for and obtain a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from this office. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 6. A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Wastewater Management Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. Subdivision Permit EC-4-2004 Page 3 7. The owner shall provide a complete application, application fee and plans and specifications prepared by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, to the Wastewater Management Division for the additional storage facilities to be constructed at the so-called Lane Press pump station. The application and related information shall be submitted and the storage facilities constructed prior to the occupancy of any structure on the approved lots including lots 1 and 3. 8. The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Airport Parkway wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 51,272 gallons of sewage per day. WATER SUPPLY 9. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources' "Public Water System Permit to Construct" Project #E-0629 WSID #5091 to Mark Neagley dated November 12, 1996. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 6th day of November, 1996. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Eriiesif P. Ch istian on Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Water Supply Division Dept. of Labor and Industry Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 10, 1996 John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Additional Sewer Allocation, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on September 10, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S'nc rely, Jo eith, Ci Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 9, 1996 Dick Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Sewer Allocation, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Trudell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on September 10, 1996 granted an additional sewer allocation of 20,927 gpd for a total allocation of 51,272 gpd for the Meadowland Business Park owned by Summer Ice Joint Venture. This property is served by the Airport Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. sf'n'erely J e Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. August 5, 1996 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Meadowland Business Park - sewer allocation Dear Joe: As I told you on the phone, the applicant is now requesting a sewer allocation of 51,272 gallons per day (gpd), instead of the previously approved amount of 30,345 gpd. You indicated that this request would have to go before the Planning Commission. Please allow this letter to serve as our formal request. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 John P. Pitrowiski cc: Mr. Mark Neagley docs\96022\96022L05.sam P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 ...ti -•—� �.-`-..wti5 >--�:.�;Ufa.i3.o..c.:,a`rJ%..►r,::.,,w, .__ �d`L3:,.aa�:,.�,.�_. _•._._zitSllstatiF2„r?sn - °'�a: C � M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments May 11, 1993 agenda items Date: April 19, 1993 BROWN'S ANIMAL HOSPITAL. CALKINS COURT 1. Water service must be at least 10 feet from the underground power service. 2. Plan should show contours both existing and proposed especially in the fill area. 3. The main sewer is located in the center of the street and is maintained by the City. Each property is served by a service directly to the main. The plan shows the new building and the existing building to the east as connected together and then connected to the main. GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK, HINESBURG ROAD 1. The temporary Lurnaround should be shown at the end of Green Aces Lane as is shown on Vosburgh Lane. 2. Power and telephone lines should be outside of the street r.o.w. 3. Sidewalk should be constructed one foot away from the r.o.w. line so it could remain when the road is widened in the future. 4. Final plans shall include street lighting. 5. Existing sewerage pumping station shall be evaluated for capacity and emergency storage. 6. Sewer manhole inverts may be poured concrete instead of brick. 7. Light standard and fixture must be acceptable to Green Mountain Power who will maintain them. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: June 14, 1994 agenda items Date: May 23, 1994 GREEN ACRES - INDUSTRIAL PARK - HINESBURG ROAD 1. Dead end streets that will be continued on adjacent property shall have temporary turnarounds. 2. The pedestrian easement along the west lot line of Lot No. 3 shall also serve as a sewer easement. This will allow for the future relocation of the force main from the Ledgeknoll pumping station to connect to the new sewer on Swift Street Extension. This would considerably reduce the force main length resulting in a power savings. 3. The sewer manhole No. 8 on Swift Street Extension shall include a stub so that the sewer can be extended easterly. 4. Sewer M.H. No. 11 serving Lots 6 & 7 should terminate in the center of Vosburgh Lane with service stubs to each lot. 5. Sewer manholes not located in streets must be accessible by mobile cleaning equipment. This is not possible with M.H. 10 & 11 and M.H. leading to pumping station. 6. Sheet P9 Green Acres Lane should read Malcolm Lane. 7. Sewer pumping station shall be evaluated for capacity, storage and any improvements necessary to accommodate the additional flow. Head of Sewer Department Don Whitten shall be consulted. 8. City Water Department shall review the water system layout. BARRY TRANSMISSION - GREGORY DRIVE Plan dated May 17, 1994 prepared by Chittenden Construction & Design is acceptable. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 September 12, 1996 Mark R. Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Resubdivision, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Neagley ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on July 30, 1996. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (10/29/96) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' erely Joe Weith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Karen Pettersen AG�rSTATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 NSpGRjP September 6, 1996 Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Post Office Box 308, 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Subject: Meadowland Business Park -South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: We have completed a review of the Traffic Impact Study for the above -referenced project and offer the following comments. The study does not show the method used for determining DHV or AM volumes from the raw data. This information would have been very helpful in reviewing the study. We agree with the calculated trip generation as well as the distribution of trips in/out of the project's access drive. Existing condition base volumes at the access point and at the VT 116/Kennedy Drive intersection look reasonable. We concur with the traffic volumes as posted on Page 3 of the study. All scenarios appear reasonable and reflect turning movement data that you conducted. The LOS at this intersection as provided by the study for unsignalized analysis is as follows: International LOS* Area of Concern 1997 AM No -build A 1997 AM Build 20% A 1997 DHV No -build A 1997 DHV Build 20% A 2002 AM No -build A 2002 AM Build 100% F SB Lefts & Access 2002 DHV No -build A 2002 DHV Build 100% F Access Approach (*Study appeared to use HCS v 2.1. The 2.1 c patch is now available.) Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Subject: Meadowland Business Park - South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT September 6, 1996 Page Two Although the study indicates that a signal is warranted in the 1997 build 20% scenario, this does not necessarily mean that a signal must be installed. Per MUTCD, "...satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is not in itself justification for a signal". (Also, reference "Guidelines for Traffic Engineering Issues".) We recommend the monitoring of this intersection for signalization be conducted by the developer in order to determine when signalization will be justified. If the access intersection with VT 116 is determined to warrant a separate left turn lane sometime in the future, then the proposed design of the left turn lane will need to be brought up to today's standards (i.e., not to have a bypass lane, but a separate left turn lane, especially if signalization is contemplated). This issue should be addressed as soon as additional development within the complex is contemplated. The VT 116/Kennedy Drive intersection: In general, we agree with your total trips in and out of this intersection for the no build scenarios (1997 and 2002) for both AM and DHV conditions. However, our field data reflects a different distribution of the movements within the intersection. (This could be due to the fact that we used the Vermont Agency of Transportation turning movement for distribution and your study may have used something else.) Our analysis indicates that right turns on the North and East approaches are approximately 2 times what you calculate. Also, the signal timing data sheets for this intersection indicate an exclusive PED phase. Your study does not reflect this and should do so in future analyses. Signal timing/ phasing data may be obtained for signals under Vermont Agency of Transportation jurisdiction by contacting this Agency's Traffic & Safety Section at (802)828-2724. Although your analyses indicated that overall intersection LOS was favorable in both the 1997 and 2002 conditions, you did not include exclusive PED phase in design. This could significantly affect the LOS of an intersection. In conclusion, you should provide us with an updated traffic study whenever you intend to develop an individual lot within the project complex. The information we need should include the following: Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Subject: Meadowland Business Park - South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT September 6, 1996 Page Three - For signal warrant analysis: You need to provide at least a 12-hour turning movement (to include the 0600-1800 hours at a minimum) showing distribution of all moves within the intersection. Volumes should be factored to reflect the average weekday condition. - For LOS analysis and geometric improvements: You need at a minimum AM (0700-0900) and PM (1500-1800) peak periods surveyed. The analysis should use DHV's. I have also attached a copy of two Agency publications which should be followed for any future traffic impact studies submitted to the Agency. If you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2653. incerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Attachments cc: Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Louis Borie, District Environmental Coordinator #4 PLANNER 658-7955 Mark R. Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 05401 August 30, 1996 Re: Resubdivision, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Neagley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to correct an error in my letter to you dated August 5, 1996. The 90 day deadline for recording the final plat plans is October 29, 1996 not December 27, 1996 as previously indicated. If you have any questions, JW/mcp please give me a call. i �cere , Jo Weith, Ci y Planner City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 5, 1996 Mark R. Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Resubdivision, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Neagley: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 30, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (12 n7/96) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please giveine a call. rely, J Weith,' C y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Karen Pettersen MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK TABLE OF DESIGN PARAMETERS Last Revised: April 22. 19% LOT ACREAGE { BUILDING SIZE P) anned Actual # (1) EMPLOYEES Planrmd Actual (2) PARYLING Planned AccftW (3) TRAMC-AVTE Planned Actual (4) AM PEAK Planned Actual (5) WASTEWATER Plan"d AcWW (6) STORMWATER Planned Actual (7) i 49 SCE 54 74 6A t090 } 10°,3 ) 3055 376 17424 23.7 8.00 ef>479 177 j 1fi; 444 61 3654 6 3 20:20 223410 , 447 422 1247 163 TI02 t2 4 3A3 34617 j 69 65 193 24 2039 6.5 5 3.06 33843 68 64 169 23 2015 63 C 6 1.29 36387 73 69 203 25 2092 6.8 7 3.96 43797 { 8$ { 83 244 30 2314 42 8 3.90 43134 86 i 81 241 31) 2294 4.2 9 3.88 42912 86 j# 81 240 29 2287 52 10 3.22 35613 ! 71 1 67 199 24 2068 2.8 11 3.12 34507 69 65 193 24 2035 5.7 12 4.47 49438 1 99 93 276 34 2483 8.2 Road 7.00 52 Infiltration 28CA `T� !Total 116.73 1 1213WI O 2427 0 2290 0 6M 0 833 0 51272 0 97 O NOTES: P.M. Peak 673 (1) 25.34% cx vsrage (ITE Code 130 ) (2) 2.0 employees/1000 st (ITE Code 130 ) (3) 1.06 employees / parking space (17: Code 130) (4) Average vehicre trip ends proportioned on lot size (T = 4.95M+766 ) ITE Code 130 t X Is total bufWing square footage for park ) (5) AM Peak hour proportioned on lot size ITE Code 130 { AM Peak LnT - 0.818Ln(X) + 0.916 } { PM Peak T = 1/[(1.027M + 0.000641 } (6) 15 gpd / employee + 1000 gpd / Iot process water + Infiltration* (7) Determined by TR35 methodofogy • Infiltration based on 3POO lt of 8' and 2200 ft of 12' (300galionsfinch diameter/mile/day) meadowtd.wg2 r Post -it" Fax Note 7671 W'P 46 pages� } From ' CoJDept_ Co. F � �79 33 Fax s Fax.' AGENCY OF NATURAL -\ESOURCES (ANR) AND ENV!ROMMEN r,- BOARD (ACT 250) PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERh11T TOTAL #DEC PERMITS RESPONSE DATE _ PENDING APPLICATION # �C -- a Ley DISTRICT T OWN S T/J PIN # & -per? Q OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: NAME: SUVMMIE14 ICE .101M< VCOJiuleE ADDRESS: 9-a CD ICU k eo ST. /11X4 W UA/(? 74W 1!T O S`1/r7 ( TELEPHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: W A►Q !l J)r,4C L 1E y ADDRESS: -• TELEPHONE: %S P-VIVA X /1 Based on information provided by :72 t1Ett Of , iE on_7�� Z�S�o a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of I / % acres, located on 14/4 4,fAuI9r4 . �14 The project is generally described as: Ct•i 64-f/Da1 ©f- /a Ld-tJ ra/� !/llydQdfle/�4L/ Nt�E�C�F}C REV. �.Z Coil = /D�/�Ci2�J, AAUA1l(?If3A - itiA-TC41/3 �� c % ltJGi[ r"rilit� /'0 PIa,a i4,0CA (1UCAk3C-uLA1J6 t3" 43CSS OK) Prior Permits From This Office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISD!CTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of new/improved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED:___� YES NO: Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO COMMENTS: ! L)RiU46-M 94. 6. & S SIGNATURE: �,� DATE: G DR _ IF DIFFERENT): i i i VWMT M14EE (Qsziciawra District Coordinator Telephone ESSEX JUNcnON VT a54S2 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED �-YES NO Water Supply 8 Wastewater Disposal Subdivision Wor Exemption Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED:jS� AGEW Of NATURAL RESOURCES OW Of fNtItRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SIGNATURE: A' DATE 7�ADDRESS: 111 WEST STREET Environmental Ass tance Division ESM JUNCTION, VT 05452 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802) 879-6563 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION / 33. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-2413822) Contact:-75;'d(Z,& [,c&4c4l "isb f Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal L—Stormwater permits Indirect discharge permit Residuals management sludge disposal (OVER) ( )THER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED: (Contirf 41 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: 09-g --Construction/modification of source Waste oil burning b Open Burning Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines ('_ 200 bHP) P WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Contact: /Lt,q Underground injection control (Floor Drains) Well head protection areas Bottled Water 4--Construction Permit, water system improvements Permit to operate New Source (J WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Use of chemicals n State waters(241-3777) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) v Wetlands (241-3770) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) ,Stream Afteratio (748-878 86-5906� Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WAS tMANAGEMENT DIVISION, AN Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) 8. FAC!L!T!ES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3737) Co Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) Municipal water/sewer Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access Boilers and pressure vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Child care facilities (241-2158) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Contact: Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2049) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Golf courses (828-2431) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Contact: Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Animal shelters/kennels/livestock dealers (828-2421) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Oleo/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER. VT 05446 (655-0334) OTHER: REVISION DATE: 8/23/95 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK ACT 250 APPLICATION & EXHIBITS Item Ref. 1. Land Use Permit Application 2. List of partners 3. Project Review Sheet 4. Location Map 5. Scedule A - Fee Information 6. Schedule B - Act 250 Information 7. Schedule D - Subdivision Application 8. Schedule E - Adjoiner Information 9. Table of Design Parameters 1, 113, 2, 5 10. Air Pollution Control Permit AP-90-052b 1 C 11. Sewer Allocation - City of So. Burlington 10-09-96 1B 12. Drainage Study 7-01-96 1B 13. Reply on Floodways 07-16-96 1D 14. Champlain Water District 7-22-96 2,3 15. City of So. Burlington Water Dept 7-24-96 2,3 16. Traffic Impact Report 5-96 5 17. Agency of Transportation Review Letter 9-06-96 5 18. So. Burlington School District 6 19. So. Burlington Fire Dept 7-25-96 7 20. So. Burlington Police Dept 7 21. Municipal Impact Questionnaire 7-22-96 7 22. Project Sign 8 23. Nongame & Natural Heritage Program 7-16-96 8 24. Dept of Fish & Wildlife 7-19-96 8A 25. Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Markets 8-09-96 9B 26. Vt. State Geologist 8-15-96 9D&E 27. Nynex 7-17-96 91 28. Vt. Gas Systems 7-19-96 91 29. Green Mountain Power 8-13-96 9J 96022Undex.sam Act 250 LAND USE PERMIT Be number date received APPLICATION . [ ] complete [ ] incomplete init. 10 VSA, CHP. 151 date completed .coordinator or clerk signature: NAMES: ..............OFFICE USE O-1-4LY ....................... Applicant(s) name: Summer I .. Joint Venture c/o Mr_ Mark N .agl, env Address: 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Legal form: [ ] individual [x] partnership (attach list of partners) [ ] corporation: date formed 12/95 place formed Burlingfon, VT date reg. in Vt. 12/95 [ ] municipal gov't [x] state gov't Legal interest in land: [x] ownership in fee simple [ ] lease agreement. [ ] contract to purchase [ ] other 2. Landowner(s) name: Same as applicant (Summer Ice Joint Venture) Address: Same Phone 658-8142 ext 118 GContact person Richard r • of •ell Conquiting Engineers, • •• ' i•. 309 Williston, VT Phone979-6331 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4. Type: [x] new project [ ] expansion of project previously exempt from Act 250 [ ] amendment of existing Act 250 project (permit # ) [ J permit condition modification (permit # ) General description (include number and size of buildings; use of buildings; number of lots; length of roads; etc. This project is a propmed 12 lot industrial/commercial 6. Construction duration: The roadway and related utilities could take several construction seasons. Duration of Permit Request: 20 years_ LAND: 7. Total acres owned or controlled by applicant and landowner at project site: 116.74 Acres in additional easements or rights -of -way: 3 07 owned by City of So Burlington Acres committed to this project: 11981 Location: town: So. Burl road: Hinesburg rd route no.: 116 Nearby landmark: Lane Press Bldg Direction from landmark: South 8. Deed(s): grantee's name as recorded: Summer Ice Joint Venture recorded: book(s): 387 page(s): 439 date: town: So- Rurl_ county: Chittenden OTHER INFORMATION 9. ire 1, o currently,applyin`g for a Water Supply and WasltNNNater Disposal Permit, a Subdil Non Perriut� or any other permit from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natura�fiesources [X]yes []no 10. Have you received local zoning and!or subdivision approval? [X] yes [ ] pending [ ] none needed 11. Attach the following unless waived by the District Coordinator: [x] location map (U.S. Geological Survey map preferred) [k] site plan or plot plan (see instructions) [ ] building floor plan(s) (excluding single-family homes) [ ] building elevation drawings (excluding single-family homes) [x] Schedule A - fee information [x] Schedule B - Act 250 information (see instructions) [ ] Schedule C - Water. Su ply and Wastewater Disposal Permit information (if concurrent application}p [Y� Shedule D - Subdivision Permit information (if concurrent application) k] Schedule E - adjoiner information [ ] Schedule F - certification of service [�g supporting documents as recommended in Schedule B or as needed M Act 250 fee (payable "State of Vermont") ] Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal or Subdivision application fee (payable tate of Vermont) (it concurrent application) SIGNTATURES: 12. I hreby swear th t the informat n provided above or attached to this application is true an accuracte to t e best o - my owledge. Signature of applicant(s) date 9/23/96 13. I hereyb certify that I urtd rstand that I must not comma nce, c nst> action demolitioQn re(( llode n r commerct lus ppf the ro ert as descra�ed in�Eoviro ental Bo rd Aule 6083�a�ttl Er receive an�Act 25� Lapnd Se Perrrut as required $y 10 VSA Sec. Signature of applicant(s) date 9/23/96 14. I herby auth rize the proce sing of this application for the above roj ct pn and(s) that I own, control, or have significant property Interes (Attach lettPer If easier. Signature ofLandowner(s) date 9/23/96 DISTRIBUTION: 15. SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL AND FIVE COPIES TO THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR- 16. SUBMIT TWO ADDITIONAL COPIES TO THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR IF YOU ARE ALSO APFLYING FOR PERMITS FROM THE PROTECTION DMSION. 17. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL COPIES TO THE MUNICIPALITY. MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION. REGIONAL PLANNING_COMMISSION. AND TO ANY ADJOINING ZAPERMITIP 250SANI IMEAD0WLAND BUSINESS PARK List and Addresses of all partners of Summer Ice Joint Venture; 1. Northeast Territories Inc. a. Mark R. Neaglev 12 Heritage Lane Shelburne, Vermont 05482 b. Staige Davis 153 Sum.;ut Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 2. GrandNiew Farms Inc. a. William B. Mauer 257 West Shaw Hill Road Stowe, Vermont 05672-4613 b. Morris Goodman 8400 Darnlev Road T011n of Mt. Royal, Quebec Canada H4T 1M4 B0.,VRD �;-.C1 P OJECT RE\1iEVV SKEET S IS NOT „ i'r.:R'.'.IT TOT ;L h�C iILi:'':Il ESPO':SE DA i E AI- LICATION ;7 D!STRICT T CV,!, Q C -7774 PIN n G/ -21 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: NAM,�E: ICE JOinl-T VER/'uP'E ADDRESS: NU i2e� ST. 6,,;I ur✓� Te*J V-I" CS-1/0 I TELEPHONE-. Af'PLL-i,&A?.l4: Gn REPRESENTATIVE: NAt,rE: 1yA4)l lJc9a( F ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Based on information provided by on -z� S(o a project eras reviewed on a tract tracts of land of / 1'7 acres, located on The project is generally described as: 0-4264.77o.,J eF LozJ /-�2 eN�adr�ae/i�'��r���Ee,�e /REV. �� Cads - /04X49Er.kue j,e,P,4L- liATEQ/5cwE2 (NC.A►3cu;(-Au6 &-44JESS FK) Prior Permits From This Office: 1A-r7-r N.Uzk[,c,` l— Y PERMiiTS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE _ PRIOR TO COMIM,,ENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION e 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISD!CTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) YMTHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of newlimproved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? Whentwherelm of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED. YES NO: Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO COMN TENTS: � '•1• :•� !1 •� '�1�^ sue, DtsMGM SIGNATURE: ,4� DATE: DR IF DIFFERENT): I 1 I WEST STET District Coordinator Telephone eSS JUNGTm. VT [ S2 2- WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRED "ES NO Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal subdivision Blor Exemption Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground. Motile Home Park Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: AGM Of NATURAL RESOURCES 0n Of EWIROWENTAL CONSERVATION SIGNATURE: O—Aj--�- DATE? 1 ADDRESS: III WEST STREET �nvironmentalAss tanceDivision (g02) 879 A- EM JUNCTION, VT 05452 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED PRIOR.TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION , 6�- WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: i Q? hc_c IQ �1l - �� 6 9 Discharge Permit pretreatment permits: industrial, municipal L Siormwater permits Indirect discharge permit Residuals management sludge disposal (OVER) 4! AIR POLLUTION CONTROL L,:visIO;J, A,,'R (502-241-3540) Contact: �ConsLuc;io ,.no ;`-c:..:on of _.,. cc �'� sle ell burning V Open turning - Furnace Boiler Convcrsion.'Lr;;;:!!: ;ion industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines L 200 bHP) WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Contact: Underground injection control (Floor Drains) Well head protection areas Bo -Jed Water -'Construction Permit, water s� stem improvements Permit to operate New Source D WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact:., dIA6A l . _ I Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Use of chemicals In State waters(241-3777) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) v Wetlands (241-3770) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) I tream Atteratio T748 878 86-5906) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WAS E MANAGEMENT DIVISION, AN Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) I Hazardous waste handler notifica5on requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilties, drop off (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) 8. FACIUTIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-2413737) Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. fL)(241-3451) Municipal water/sewer r 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTUNE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241.3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Off ice# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access Boilers and pressure -vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: I Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial , 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES . Child care facilities (241-2158) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Contact: I Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept of Aging & Disabilities) Therapeutic Community_Residence-(241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2049) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651). Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (UtiHes. Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Uselsale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing faclities (828-2433) Animal shetters/kennels/livestock dealers (828-2421) - Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Mlk/Meat/Poultry/Oleo/Class `C" Pesticides (828-2436) I 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) ' Hydro projects' Sells water to 1 or more persons , 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites I 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/sofid waste 1K)LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. BLDG 10-18. CAMP JOHNSON. COLCHESTER. VT 05446 (655-0334) OTHER: REVISION DATE: =31 I i" 300 13 ( •I �� � � � - -' ' _�.._\ � 1 • f •' i (. � ,' 1. ' �+ lo Brooke �� •• PROJECT i / Win mill I l` - ,• % .. II - ` (� j I �r /^\ 1, (^� '' �` •J J ` I 4 Ruarry 15% ij ' I 1 / ; , :r, •` � � it :` � 1 I�i a 973 711 1 I �Nindmill I .r zi- it 1 Roins Quar 00 \` 1 • i •� I i j - . I 1. \1. �� -� LOCATION MAP SCHEDULE A Fee Information ACT 250 Submit with the application a check payable to the "State of Vermont". h,furucipal and State agency projects are exempt. Not -for -profit are not exempt. Calculate the fee using the following table: 0 Number of lots to be created 12 x $50.00 = $600.00 Gravel Pits: $.10/cubic yard of the established annual extraction rate Construction costs (include only common facilities for subdivisions): Site preparation Buildings: a) sq. ft. b) $ per sq. ft. total (a x b) Roads and parking 600,000 No parking Utilities 435,000 Off -site improvements 43,500 Landscaping 111,000 Other Total costs 1,189,500 x 0.00425 = Total Fee = $5,655.38 * * Minimum fee of $100 for new applications Minimum fee of $25 for amendment applications Treat expansion of approved projects as new applications $5,055.38 SUBDIVISION PERNUT/WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT Submit with the application a check payable to the "State of Vermont" if you are concurrently applying for a Subdivision Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit from the Protection Division of the Department of Environmental Conservation, Agency of Natural Resources. Calculate the fee from the following table: Subdivisions: one lot under 10 acres two to five lots under 10 acres six to ten lots under 10 acres more than 10 lots under 10 acres each deferred lot 10 lots under 10 Acres x 150 Public Building, Camp- $150 per ground, Mobile Home lot Parks: (waste water flows)* $.36 per gallon of $50 design flow with $100 minimum Fee attached $1,500.00 * Contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection Division if uncertain. I attest by my signature that the above is true to the best of my owledge. (signature of applicant o6get)) Z:JPERAIrrT-250A.SAM SCHEDULE B ACT 250 INFORAZATION Criterion 1: Air Pollution a. If the project involves manufacturing or industrial processes, describe any process air emissions, odors, or sources of noise and measures proposed to control them: At this time the project does not include any specific buildings. When each lot is developed, the developer of that lot will be required to conform to the air pollution rules for direct source emissions. b. If building will be heated, describe the fuel source and the heating system: It is anticipated that future buildings will be heated by either oil, propane or natural gas. Any future buildings will require an amendment application. c. Is an air pollution control permit from the Agency of Natural Resources required for a) or b) above? X Yes or _ No? (Contact the Air pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-8731 if you are uncertain). If yes, what is the status of your application? Refer to Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-0526. d. Indicate how dust will be controlled during and after construction: Dust during construction will be controlled by either water or calcium chloride. Dust after construction will be controlled by permanent measures such as paved roads and grassed lawns. e. Indicate what restrictions will apply to the hours of construction and/or operation and how noise will be controlled, especially in residential areas: The hours of construction will be from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturdays. Normal construction will not occur on holidays or Sundays. f. If the project involves any of the following, check them and contact the Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-8731 for further directions: [X J parking for more than 1000 vehicles (existing and proposed), [ ] fuel burning equipment with over 10 million BTUs/hour, [ J coal burning equipment: g. If the project involves radioactive materials, check here [ J and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. N/A Criterion IA: Headwaters a. Is the project located in a headwaters area as defined in the statute? (See instructions) _ Yes or X No? If the answer is yes, be certain to indicate how the project meets the applicable water quality regulations under the criteria IB (waste disposal), IE (streams) and 4 (soil erosion). Criterion 1B: Waste Disposal a. Describe airy method of sewage disposal to be used and how sewage will be treated and isolated from ground waters. (Show location of treatment systems and piping on site plan). The project is served by municipal sewers. The sewage will be in an underground pipe network. All of the sewage will flow to an existing pump station near the Lane Press building with eventual treatment at the Airport Parkway plant. b. How many gallons of sewage per day will the treatment system be designed and/or approved to handle? 51.272 gpd* (Contact the regional engineer for the Protection Division in your district for assistance). *including infiltration. C. If the on -site sewage treatment system is to be shared by more than one owner, indicate how it will be maintained and who will be legally and financially responsible for its eventual replacement? (Attach copy of deed restrictions, etc.). N/A d If a municipal system is to be used, provide the name of the municipal sewage treatment plant and demonstrate that the plant has the capacity to accommodate your project. (Attach a letter from the municipality). Airport Parkway - City of So. Burlington. Refer to letter from the City of So. Burlington. e. Is a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit or a Subdivision Permit required from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources for the sewage disposal system? X Yes or _ No? ( Contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection Division or the District Coordinator if in doubt). IF YES, AND YOUARE APPLYING FOR THAT PERMIT WITH THIS APPLICATION, BE CERTAIN TO ATTACH SCHEDULE "C" OR 'D ", THE NECESSARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION LISTED ON THEM, AND THE ADDITIONAL FEE TO THIS APPLICA TION AND SUBMIT TWO ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE APPLICA TIONPACKAGE. (Contact the Regional Engineer for the Protection Division if you need assistance). f. Are you relying on a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit or a Subdivision Permit to satisfy this criterion? X Yes or _ No? IF YES, NO DECISION WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL THAT PERMIT IS OBTAINED AND FORWARDED TO THE COMMISSION. IF NO, AND YOUR PROJECT INVOLVES SEWAGE DISPOSAL, CONTACT THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE ON iVHATADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SUBMIT. g. Indicate how stormwater runoff will be disposed of without causing undue water pollution from litter, oil, salt, pesticides, and the like. (Show grass swales, ditches, catch basins, culverts, and other drainage improvements on site plan). Refer to design drawings and Drainage study. Storm drainage is treated in detention ponds with eventual discharge over grassed swales. On site detention and treatment for selected lots is anticipated. h. Is a Stormwater Discharge Permit required from the Water Quality Division of the Agency of Natural Resources for the discharge of the stormvater into a stream, river, lake, or municipal storm drain? X Yes or _ No? (Contact the Water Quality Division at 244-5674 if you are uncertain). If yes, what is the status of your application? Pending. If the project involves manufacturing or industrial processes, describe what they are, indicate how any wastewater generated will not contaminate ground or surface waters, and indicate whether all necessary discharge permits have been obtained (Show location of any discharges on site plan). What is the status of your application? No building is proposed at this time. At the time a building is proposed, this criteria can be addressed. j. If storage of oils, fuels chemicals, cleaning fluids, solvents, batteries, pesticides, or other hazardous materials are associated with this project, indicate what measures will be taken to protect against spills and leaks, especially in a sensitive area such as a municipal watershed or near wells or streams. (Show location of storage on site plan and include details of storage containers, fill pipes, leak detection equipment, containment structures, employee training, etc.). Oils or fuels may be temporarily stored on -site during construction. These are typically stored in metal containers and are removed at the end of each working day. k. Is a permit from or registration with the Hazardous Materials Division of the Agency of Natural Resources required for the storage listed in j)? _Yes or X No? (Contact the Hazardous Materials Division at 244-8702 if you are uncertain). What is the status of your application? Indicate how construction debris, including stumps will be disposed of without creating water pollution. Construction debris will be placed in a dumpster and/ or recycling bin and picked up by a local hauler and delivered to an approved recycling center or landfill. The only stumps for this project will be generated when lot 3 is developed. These stumps will be buried on site above the seasonal high ground water table or at a landfill. Criterion 1C. Water Conservation: a. Would you agree to a permit condition which read. • "The permittee and all subsequent owners shall install and maintain only low flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings, including toilets with flows not to exceed 3.5 gallon per flush, faucets with flows not to exceed 3.0 gallons per minute or which have automatic shut off valves and showerheads with flows not to exceed 3.0 gallons per minute. " X Yes or _ No? If no, indicate why and what water conservation measures will be taken. Normal low flow toilets are now 1.6 gallons per flush. b. If the project involves significant use of water for manufacturing or other processes, indicate what measures will be taken to conserve water (include recycling, efficient machinery, etc) No buildings are proposed at this time. At the time a building is proposed, this criteria can be addressed. Criterion 1D. Floodways: a. If any portion of the project is in or adjacent to the 100 year floodway as identified on the National Flood Insurance Maps (on file with your municipality) demonstrate that the project will not involve any filling or construction within the floodway. (Show location on site plan). The 100-year floodway of Muddy Brook is shown on the Master Site Plan. The project will not involve any filling or construction within the floodway. b. If any portion of the project in or adjacent to the 100 year floodway fringe as identified on the National Flood Insurance Maps, demonstrate that the project will not cause a significant increase in the peak flood levels of the river or stream. (Show location of flooA,ay fringe plan). No portion of the project will be within the floodway fringe of Muddy Brook.. c. If any fill, structures, storage of materials, or other operations are to be located in the floodway fringe, demonstrate that they will be floodproofed consistent with the National Flood Insurance Program. (Contact the Floodplain Management Section of the Water Quality Division of the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-6951). N/A Criterion lE Streams: a. Indicate the name and location of streams, drainageways, or riparian wetlands on or near the project site and the distance to the closest construction disturbance. (Show precise location of streams and construction limits on site plan). The Muddy Brook is located to the south and east of the project. The distance to the closest construction disturbance is about 1600 feet. A tributory of Potash Brook starts in the wetland located in the central part of the project. b. If a stream is located within 100 feet of a disturbed area of the project, indicate how the stream and the lands along the stream will be maintained in their natural condition. (Show undisturbed buffers, revegetation plans, erosion controls, isolation distances to any sewage systems, and the like on site plan). The project does involve the roadway and related utilities crossing a stream. The details of this crossing are shown on the design drawings as well as the erosion control methods to be used. c. If a section of a stream must be crossed, relocated or modified, demonstrate that there are no reasonable alternatives and then indicate how the crossing or new stream channel will be constructed in a stable and naturalized condition. (Show details of the construction on site plan). (Contact the District Fisheries Biologist). The existing stream runs north / south disecting the property. The road crossing runs perpendicular to the stream in about the center of the property. Drainage through the western portion of the project will be diverted as part of a conservation/open space and wetland protection area. d. Is a Stream Alteration Permit from the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources required for any work in a stream? _ Yes or X No? (Contact the Regional Engineer with the Protection Division of the Agency of Natural Resources). If yes, what is the status of your application? e. If the project involves the withdra►ral of water from a stream, river, pond, or lake, check here [ J and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. N/A Criterion IF Shorelines a. Indicate the name and location of any river, lake, pond or reservoir on or near the project site and the distance to the closest disturbance. (Show location on site plan). The nearest stream is Muddy Brook which is about 1600 feet from the closest construction disturbance. Also a small pond exists on lot 3 with a small stream running to the north, which is a tributary to Potash Brook. b. If the project is located on: or near a shoreline then answer i) through iv) below: i) Indicate how the shoreline will be maintained in its natural condition. (Show undisturbed buffers, erosion controls, and the like on site plan). N/A ii) Indicate how and where any existing public access to the water body can be reasonably maintained. (Show details on site plan). N/A iii) Indicate how the vegetation will be provided or retained to screen the project from the water body. (Show details on site plan). N/A iv) Indicate how the shoreline will be stabilized from erosion with vegetation. (Shaw detail on site plan). N/A Criterion 1G Wetlands a. Indicate the location of any wetland areas on or near the project site and the distance to the closest disturbance. (Contact the Wetlands Biologist with the Agency of Natural Resources at 244-6951 for assistance in identifying wetland areas). (Show location on site plan). Refer to information prepared by Mr. Peter Spear shown on Sheet SP3A. b. Indicate how any wetlands and the lands along the wetlands will be maintained consistent with the Water Resource Board regulations, if applicable. (Show undisturbed buffers, erosion controls, isolation distances to any sewage systems, etc. on site plan). (Contact the Wetlands Biologist for assistance). Refer to information prepared by Mr. Peter Spear. A Conditional Use Determination is pending for the Swift Street Extension crossing. c. If the wetland regulations do not apply to any wetlands associated with your project, be certain to address the value of the wetlands under applicable criteria including IE (streams), IF (shorelines), 4 (soil erosion), 8 (scenic beauty), and 8A (wildlife habitat). Criteria 2 & 3: Water Supply a. Describe the source(s) of domestic water which will be utilized for the project. (Show location of wells, springs, piping, etc. on site plan). The project will be supplied by the City of South Burlington Municipal System. b. How many gallons of water per day will be needed? 48.4 58 GPD How was this figure determined? Estimated water usage for each lot based on project employee levels. c. Demonstrate that the source listed in a) will be of sufficient quantity to meet the daily needs (include nearby well information, pump test results, letter from municipal or private water company, hydrologic study, etc.). A letter from Champlain Water District is enclosed. d If a domestic water source is to be shared by more than one owner, indicate who is legally responsible for its maintenance and possible replacement. (Attach copy of deed restrictions or other evidence which will ensure continued maintenance). N/A e. Is Health Department approval necessary for a shared water system or extension of a municipal water line? X Yes or — No? (Contact the Regional Engineer with the Protection Division or the Health Department at 863-7220.) If yes, what is the status of your application? Pending. f. Describe the source of any commercial or industrial water supply (if different from above) and demonstrate that water exists in sufficient quantity for the needs of the project. (Show details on site plan). N/A g. Demonstrate that the use of any of the water sources listed in a) or f) above will not restrict the flow of water to other existing users. (Include location and distance to nearby wells or springs, nearby well it formation, pump test results, letter from municipal or private water company, hydrologic study, etc). The letter from Champlain Water District indicates that there will be sufficient quantity for this project. h. If there are any community wells nearby (for example, in mobile home parks, condominium projects, high density subdivisions, etc.) which might be affected by your project, contact the Health Department at 863-7220 to see whether their review is necessary. If their review is necessary, attach a review letter if available. N/A Criterion 4: Soil Erosion a. Describe the topography of the project site, the proximity of sloping lands to water bodies and property boundaries, and the potential for soil erosion. (Show contours on site plan in five foot intervals.) (Show precise limits of soil disturbance on site plan). The property consists largely of Covington soils with slopes of 5% or less. The design plan indicates the erosion control measures and details. Also design drawing SP7 shows the calculation for the erosion control potential, which is "medium". b. Indicate what erosion control measures will be taken during construction to prevent eroded sediment from reaching a water body or adjoining property. (Include hay bale dams or silt fences, daily mulching, diversion ditches, sediment basins, etc.). (Show details on site plan). Erosion control measures include stabilized construction entrance, inlet protection, silt fence, temporary sediment trap and hay bale checkdams. c. Indicate what permanent erosion control measures will betaken after construction to stabilize the site from continued erosion. (Include stone -lined ditches, grassed swales, paving, rip -rap, seeding mixtures, etc). (Show details on site plan). The permanent erosion control measures include stone -lined ditches, grassed swales, paving, rip -rap outfalls and topsoil, seed and mulch. d. If exterior site work or earth moving will occur between October 1 and April 15, indicate what special erosion control measures will be taken to stabilize bare soils through the winter months. Winter construction will be done in accordance with the procedures outlined on the design drawings (sheet SP7). e. How frequently will the erosion controls be inspected during construction and who will be accountable for their maintenance? The temporary erosion control measures will be inspected after each major rainfall event, by the contractor. f. Indicate what percentage of the project site will be covered with buildings, roadways, parking areas, or other areas impervious to water. (Show on site plan). The proposed roadway and sidewalk are approximately 2% of the property (2.8 acres). The development of each lot will be reviewed under separated amendment applications. The drainage study was based on 50% coverage of the lots. g. Demonstrate how the increased rate of stormwater runoff from these areas will not create a dangerous or unhealthy situation for adjoining property owners or downstream areas due to streambank erosion or flooding. (Show drainage swales, culverts, and retention basins on site plan). Refer to the drainage study. The post development flows have been detained to pre development levels by use of detention ponds. h. If the project involves the construction of a permanent dam, check here J and contact the District Coordinator for further guidance. N/A. Criterion 5: Highway and other Means of Transportation a. Indicate where vehicles will have access to a state or local highway from this project. (Show location on site plan and on site location map). Vehicles will access this project from the existing access point off Route 116 that is the entrance to Dynapower and Lane Press. b. Describe the design of the driveway(s) or road intersection(s) and demonstrate adequate safety (include number of lanes, traffic controls or signals, approach grades, sight distances in each direction along the state or local highway, legal speed limits, etc.). (Show details on site plan). Refer to the traffic study and preliminary design drawings that have been submitted to the Agency of Transportation. c. Is a permit required from the Utilities Division of the Agency of Transportation for commercial or residential access onto a state highway? X Yes or _ No? (Contact the Utilities Division of the Agency of Transportation at 828-2653 if you are uncertain). If yes, what is the status of your application? Pending. d. Is a permit required from your municipality for access onto a town or city highway? _ Yes or X No? (Contact the zoning administrator, town manager, or road commissioner). If yes, what is the status of your application? Subdivision plans have been approved by the Planning Commission. e. If a roadway is involved, indicate the length of the road and the maximum gradient. (Show road location, profile, and cross sections on site plan unless waived by District Coordinator). The length of the roadway is about 4300 feet with a maximum grade of 5%. f. If a subdivision roadway is involved, is it likely to be turned over to the municipality? X Yes or _ No? If yes, will the road be built to municipal specifications? X Yes or _ No? Is the municipality likely to accept the road? X Yes or _ No? (717clude letter from the municipality confirming this.) IF YOUANSWERED NO TO EITHER QUESTION, BE CERTAIN TO ADDRESS CRITERION9G (PRIVATE UTILITIES). g. Demonstrate that emergency vehicles and trucks will have sufficient access into the project site and can easily turn around. (Show details on site plan). The roads will be constructed in accordance with city standards to allow for easy emergency access and turn around ability. h. Demonstrate that adequate parking for peak periods will exist for the project. (Show details on site plan). Parking for this project will be limited to the figure indicated in the Air Pollution Permit (1819 spaces). If at 50% buildout the number of parking spaces exceed 909 a new air quality study will be commissioned. i. Demonstrate that the traffic associated with the project will not create unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on nearby highways or nearby intersections (include traffic counts during peak hours, measurements of delays in entering intersections, recommendations of traffic engineer, etc.). (Contact the District Coordinator for guidance and to determine if a traffic study is necessary). Refer to the traffic report. At 20% buildout, a traffic light will be needed at the intersection of Rt. 116 and Swift Street Extension. j. If the project involves or may affect a railroad, airport or other means of transportation not addressed in a) through i) above, check here J and contact the District Coordinator for guidance. N/A Criterion 6: Educational Services a. If the project is residential or involves the creation of jobs, estimate how many school age children will likely result from the project and how that figure was determined The project is not residential. b. Demonstrate whether the local schools can accommodate the additional students listed under a) without significant hardship (include school impact form attached to application, letter from school district, estimates of student capacity at local schools, location of existing bus routes, etc. Refer to letter from the Superintendent of schools. C. Indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized with the project to offset any significant hardships on the local schools indicated above (include impact fees, phasing schedules, etc.). No mitigation measures will be necessary. Criterion 7: Municipal Services: a. Demonstrate that the local fire department can provide protection services without significant hardship (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from fire department, etc.). A response from the Fire Chief is included. b. Is a Public Building Permit for electrical wiring and fire protection required by the Department of Labor and Industry?_ Yes or X W (Contact the regional Labor and Industry office). If yes, what is the status of your application? c. Demonstrate that the local police department, constable or state police, can provide police services for the project without unreasonable burden (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from the police department, etc.). Refer to the municipal impact form and the letter from the So. Burlington Police Dept.. d. Demonstrate that sufficient solid waste disposal capacity exists at a local landfill, transfer station, or incinerator to meet the needs of the project (include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from landfill operator, copy of state landfill certification, etc.). Refer to the municipal impact form. e. Demonstrate that the municipality, or a volunteer organization serving the area, can provide rescue services for the project without significant hardship. (Include municipal impact form attached to the application, letter from rescue squad, letter from town, etc.). Refer to the municipal impact form. f. Indicate what mitigation measures are proposed with the project to offset ally significant hardships on the municipal services indicated above (include impact fees, phasing schedules, etc.). Road impact fees have been assessed. g. Describe any potential impacts to services provided by adjacent municipalities as well as appropriate mitigation measures. No mitigation measures will be necessary for adjacent municipalities at this time. When the lots are developed this issue could be re -visited. Criterion 8: Scenic Beauty, Historic Sites, Natural Areas a. Describe the visual appearance of the project site and surrounding area as it exists without the project (include open areas, wooded areas, mountains, ridgelines, wetland, streams or shorelines, existing structures nearby, etc.) (Show existing features on site plan). The project site is 116 acres of mostly open meadow with gentle slopes. A tributary to the Potash Brook runs through the property. The property is bordered on the south by a residential development and on the north by Dynapower and Lane Press. b. Demonstrate that the project's visual appearance from a highway, community center, or nearby residences is consistent with the visual appearance of the existing area as described in a) above: A moderately dense residential area exists to the south and west. Large lot industrial development exists to the north. The project will provide a visual transition between the two. i) Demonstrate that the project use (residential, retail, industrial, etc.) is consistent with the existing or planned land uses in the area. Will the project generate any significant noise related impacts during and/or after construction? If so, what mitigation efforts are being proposed. The project is consistant with the industry to the North (Lane Press and Dynapower). The area is zoned for industrial open space. Any future buildings will have to comply with So. Burlington's ordinance on noise. ii) Demonstrate that the building size, density, and location are not out of character with the terrain of the site, the size of nearby buildings, surrounding vegetation, and nearby scenic vistas from highways or community centers. (Show details on site plan). There are not any buildings planned at this time. A building height restriction exists to allow views of Mt. Mansfield. iii) Demonstrate that the architectural style and building materials and colors are not out of character with the style of area buildings (provide drawings of building). There are not any buildings planned at this time. iv) Demonstrate that parking areas are designed to minimize their visibility from the highway or nearby residences. (Show on site plan). There are not any buildings planned at this time. v) Demonstrate that any project signs are designed to minimize their visual impact on the surrounding area (include size, illumination, and colors). (Show location on site plan). A project sign is proposed. Refer to attached sketch. vi) Demonstrate that any exterior lighting is designed to minimize its visual impact on the surrounding area at night, and that it will not glare into the highway or nearby residences (include size, wattage, fixture style, and pole height). (Show location on site plan and include manufacturer's specification sheet). Street lights are planned for the intersection of Thompson Street and Bowdoin Street and are in accordance with So. Burlington's standards. vii) Demonstrate that any utilities (propane tanks, trash dumpsters, electric distribution lines and poles, etc.) are designed to minimize their visibility from the highway or nearby residences There are not any above ground utilities planned at this time. viii) Indicate what additional landscaping will be added to the project site to minimize any of the visual impacts discussed above. (Show details on site plan.) The design drawingsindicates street trees along the new roadways and trees for the proposed berm located on the southern boundary (refer to Road Profiles and Berm Plans). ix) Indicate if any restrictions on tree cutting or earth disturbance will be used to minimize any of the visual impacts discussed above. (Show details oil site plan). The only tree cutting might be on lot 3. The development of the wooded portion of this lot is not proposed at this time. C. Will the project have a significant impact on a historic site identified by the Division of Historic Preservation? _ Yes or X No? (Contact the Division for Historic Preservation at 828-3226 for guidance.) If yes, what measures will be used to minimize or mitigate the impacts? d. Will the project have a significant impact on a designated rare or irreplaceable natural or fragile area on or near the project site? (Contact the Vermont Natural Heritage Program at 244-7340 for assistance in identifying natural or fragile areas.) Refer to letter from Nongame & Natural Heritage Program. Criterion 8A Wildlife and Endangered Species a. Indicate whether any critical wildlife or endangered species habitat exists on or near the project site (include deer wintering areas, bear feeding areas, pristine rivers or streams, wetlands or the like). (Contact the District Fish and Wildlife office for assistance in identifying wildlife habitat). (Contact the Vermont Natural Heritage Program at 244-8711 for assistance in identifying endangered species habitat.) (Show areas on site plan). Refer to letter from Nongame & Natural Heritage Program and from Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. b. If critical wildlife habitat exists on or near the project site, indicate how the project will not destroy or imperil that habitat, or indicate what mitigation measures can be taken to minimize the impact (prepare response to the subcriteria of Criterion 8(a). (Show details on site plan and attach review letter from the Department of Fish and Wildlife). N/A Criterion 9A: Impact of Growth a. If the project is residential in nature, indicate how marry additional people may live in the project, what portion may be seasonal, and what percentage of the total (Include population or housing statistics, etc). The project isn't residential. b. Does the municipality have the financial capacity to accommodate this additional population growth or indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized to offset the financial burdens on the municipality (include letter from municipality, reference answers to criteria 6 and 7, fiscal impact report, etc.)? The additional population growth due to the project will more than be offset by the taxes paid to the municipality by potential industries. Criterion 9B Primary Agricultural Soils a. Does the project site contain primary agricultural soils? If so, indicate how many acres. Has the project been designed to minimize the impact oil the future agricultural use of the soils. (Contact the District Soil Conservationist with the Natural Resource Conservation District or the Land Use Planner with the Vt. Department of Agriculture at 828-2504 for assistance). (Show agricultural soils oil site plan or attach soil map). There are 84.5 acres of primary agricultural soil on the site. b. If the project cannot avoid significant reduction in the potential of the primary agricultural soils as identified in a) above then answer i) through iv) below: The property does have primary agricultural soils. An agreement to mitigate has been established and is included with this application. i) Demonstrate that there is no other use of the site which would have less impact on the primary agricultural soils, but would still provide a reasonable rate of return on the fair market value of the project lands taken as a whole, including a scaled down version of the proposed project (include financial analyses of alternative designs of the project and alternative projects which show returns on the fair market value of the land including the investment). ii) Demonstrate that there are no other non primary agricultural soils owned by the applicant or coapplicant which are reasonably suited for this project. iii) Demonstrate that the project has been clustered or otherwise designed to minimize the reduction of primary agricultural soils in order to retain the better soils in larger, farmable units under unified ownership. (If a subdivision is involved, attach deed restrictions which assure common ownership or control of the reserved agricultural soils). (Contact the Land Use Planner with the Vt. Department of Agriculture at 828-2504 for assistance). iv) Demonstrate that the project will not significantly interfere with or jeopardize the continued agricultural use of adjoining lands or reduce their agricultural or forestry potential. Criterion 9C Forest and Secondary Agricultural Soils a. Indicate whether the project site (acreage owned by applicant or coapplicant) contains soils which have long term commercial forestry potential as identified by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, or by the State County Forester. (Contact the District Soil Conservationist with your Natural Resource Conservation District or your state County Forester for assistance). (Show forest soils on site plan). There are no forest or secondary agricultural soils on the property. b. If the project site does contain forest soils, indicate how the project has been designed to minimize the impact on the future forestry use of the soils. N/A c. If the project cannot avoid a significant reduction of the forest soils as identified in a) above, the answer i) through iii) below: N/A i) Demonstrate that there is no other use of the site which would have less impact on the forest soils, but would still provide a reasonable rate of return on the fair market value of the project lands taken as a whole, including a scaled down version of the proposed project (include financial analysis of project and alternative projects which show returns on the fair market value of the land as a whole). ii) Demonstrate that no other non forest soils owned by the applicant or coapplicant which are reasonably suited for this project. iii) Demonstrate that the project is clustered or otherwise designed to minimize the reduction of forest soils and to retain the better soils ill larger, manageable units under unified ownership. (If a subdivision is involved, attach deed restrictions which assure common ownership or control of the retained forest soils.) (Contact your County Forester for assistance in designing projects). Criteria 9D and 9E Earth Resources: a. Does the project site have a high potential for extraction of mineral or earth resources? _ Yes or X No? (Contact the State Geologist at 244-5164.) Refer to letter from State Geologist. b. If yes, then indicate how access to the resource can be maintained in the future. c. If the project involves the extraction of earth resources for commercial sale, or involves extensive use of borrow material from on site or nearby, answer i) through iv) below: (Contact the District Coordinator if you need assistance). i) Demonstrate that any proposed blasting will not damage nearby water supplies or structures, and will be limited in duration and size so as to not be a continual nuisance for nearby residents, (include blasting plan, insurance information, notification process, hydrogeologic reports, etc.). N/A ii) Demonstrate that any trucking of excavated material will not unduly damage area highways, and will be reasonably limited in duration and frequency so as to not be a continual nuisance for nearby residents (include trucking plan, hours of operation, extraction rates, vehicle trips per day, etc.). iii) Describe the reclamation plans for the extraction area and how those plans can be financially assured (include final contours on site plan, landscapingplan, future land uses, bonding plan, escrow contribution schedule, etc.). Criterion 9F Energy Conservation a. If the project involves commercial, institutional, or industrial buildings, indicate what measures will be used to conserve energy (include details on insulation, windows and doors, heating and ventilation, lighting, etc). (Contact the Public Service Department at 828-2393 or at 1-800-642-3281 for assistance). There are no buildings planned at this time. b. If the project involves commercial, institutional, or industrial buildings, demonstrate that electrical use has been limited to those uses for -which no alternative energy source is reasonably suited. C. If the project involves a residential subdivision or condominiums, would you object to a permit condition which read. • "The permittee and all subsequent owners shall install and maintain energy conservation measures in any heated structures, including insulation with a R-valve of at least R-19 in the exterior walls, at least R-38 in the roof or cap and at least R-10 around the foundation or slab, with double pane glass or storm windows and insulated doors. " _ Yes or _ No? If no, indicate why and what energy conservation measures will be required. d. If the project involves a residential subdivision, condominiums or a commercial development, would you agree to a permit condition which read: "The installation of electric resistance space heating equipment in any building is expressly prohibited without prior District Environmental Commission approval"? X Yes or _ No? If no, indicate why and why more efficient forms of enerSy cannot be used for space heating. Criterion 9G Private Utility a. Indicate whether any of the utilities (road, water system, sewer line, septic system, etc.) will be controlled by more than one owner, and if so, indicate who will be legally and financially responsible for ongoing maintenance and eventual replacement. All of the road, water and sewer lines will be owned by the City of South Burlington. b. If a private utility will likely be transferred to the municipality, indicate how it will meet municipal specifications. The new road and related utilities will be installed in accordance with both local and state standards. C. If a private utility will not be transferred to the municipality, indicate how the utility will continue to be maintained so as to not become a burden for the municipality at a later date. (Attach copy of deed restrictions or other evidence which will ensure private maintenance and eventual replacement of the utilities). N/A. Criterion 9H Scattered Development a. Indicate whether the project site is physically contiguous to an existing settlement (be certain to include site location map). The project has been zoned for an industrial subdivision. Other industrial property exists to the north and residential projects exist to the south and west.. b. If the project is not contiguous to a settlement, demonstrate that the additional tax revenues and other public benefits of the project outweigh the additional costs of providing municipal services to the project (information generated under criteria 5, 6, 7, and 9A). N/A c. Indicate what mitigation measures can be utilized with the project to offset any excessive costs for the municipality indicated above which are not offset by additional tax revenues or other public benefits (include impact fees, phasing schedules, etc.). The City of South Burlington has assessed impact fees for the project. Criterion 9J Public Utility a. Indicate what governmental services or public utility services are needed and demonstrate that such services can be provided without undue burdens. The public utilities needed for this subdivision include electric, telephone and gas. b. If the project involves commercial, institutional or industrial uses, indicate how electrical use will be minimized during peak periods of energy demand in the service areas for the utility (include major sources of energy usage, letter from the utility serving the project, etc.). Letters from the utility companies are included. C. If any utility lines cross the project site other than along the highway, demonstrate that the utility lines will not be significantly affected (include letter from utility company). (Show utility lines on site plan). Criterion 9K Public Investments a. If any public facilities or lands are located adjacent to or oil the project site demonstrate that the project will not significantly affect those facilities (include highways, parks, schools, fire stations, sewer lines, etc.). There are no public facilities or land adjacent to the project except those addressed above. Criterion 9L Rural Growth Areas a. To the extent that the project parcel or any area within the parcel is identified as a "rural growth area"; indicate how the project has been clustered or otherwise designed to provide for reasonable population densities and rates of growth to economize on the cost of roads, utilities and land usage. (Contact the District Coordinator if you need assistance). The property is not located in a "rural growth area". Criterion 10: Local and Regional Plans a. Is there a duly adopted town plan? If so, explain how the project conforms to that plan with regard to land use, goals and objectives, and comments from local authorities (include copy of plan's land use map, relevant plan language on appropriate land uses or building densities, letter from the planning commission, etc.). The city has reviewed this project under its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations and has approved the project. b. Indicate what type of land uses are encouraged or allowed on the project site under the regional development plan if one exists (include copy of plan's land use map, relevant plan language on appropriate land uses or building densities, letter from the regional planning commission, etc.). (Contact your regional planning commission for assistance). The regional plan indicate the project area as an industrial/commercial area. c. Does the municipality have a capital program? If so, indicate how the project conforms to that program. (Note: contact your town planner or planning commission for assistance). South Burlington has a capital program. The project does not require any additional infrastructure not forseen in the plan. 96022pOl.sam Rcv. 5126193 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOLRCES FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEPARTI%ENT OF ENVIRO',' MEN`TAL CONSERVATION Pcrmit PERMITS, COMPLIANCE & PROTECTION DIVISION Date Application Received .APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PERMIT (Pursuant to Section 3-08 of the Environmental Protection Rules) (Schedule "D" of Nlaster Act 250 Land Use Perrtut Application) LAINTDO\VNTER NAME: Summer Ice Joint Venture PHONE: c/o Mark Neagley 658-8142 e-,t 118 (As shoNAm on deed) I% AILIINTG ADDRESS: 82 Church Street Burlington VT 05401 (Town) (State) (Zip) CONSULTANTS NAME: Trudell Consutling Engineers, Inc. PHONTE: Richard Trudell 879-6331 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 308 Williston VT 0549 (Street) (ToNNm) (State) (Zip) 1. Location: (Enclose United States Geological Survey Map or Toi�m Highway Map showing (subdiNision location). ToNim: South Burlington Road: Hinesburg Road Ro ite 1 l6 Deed to this property is recorded in Book, 387 Page: 439 2. Description: Number of lots: 12 Size of lots: 49 5__ 8 20 2 311 3 06 29 3 96 3 9 1 89 3.12&447 3. Purpose: Single-family residences X other (i.e. boundary line change, change to wastewater and/or eater supply, construction of commercial building) Industrial I commercial lots Type of Neater system proposed: Number of lots connected to water supply This water system sen,esh;lll serve 2 or more buildings or lots. Indh ideal drilled Nvell; on -site off -site _ Dug well or spring: on -site off -site _ Other (Reservoir&ake) Name Connection to municipal system (name municipality and attach a letter authorizing water allocation to that System). X Municipality: Connection to a non -municipal community water system. How many lots are now connected to this system? Who owns it? 5. Type of Sewage Disposal System Proposed: Septic tank system; with site modifications? Connection to a non -municipal community disposal system. Owner's Name _X }o sewage to municipal system (name municipality and attach a letter authorizing seage allocation to that Municipality _ City of South Burlington Other 6. How much land will remain adjacent to the subdh ision being applied for? —0 (Do not include land across a public highway from the lot or under separate deed). If less than 10 acres, is the remaining lot improved? Yes No With what structure? 7. List any prior Environmental or Act 250 Permits issued on the same tract of land. List all permit numbers g, Present use of neighboring property (residential, agricultural, etc.) Show this information and locations of n•atcr supplies and sewage disposal systems on plot plan. 9. Are any of the lots exempt? Yes x No Ityes, explain i_ I otc 1 and z -ire over 10 acrec If either proposed lot or remaining lot is imp e with a prima ry single-fanuly residence, or a public building N�ith scNvage flows less than 300 gallons per day, and was under construction prior to March 5, 1973, the lots may be considered exempt if: I a• the structure is served by a public water supply approved by the Department of Health or a private water supply which ha been tested and meets the drinking water quality standards in Chapter 21 of the Environmental Protection Rules; andl b. the structure is served by a municipal sewage disposal system approved by the Department; or has a functioning on -site sewage disposal system not causing apparent pollution or a health hazard „ith the disposal field at least 100 feet fro an: property boundary created by the conveyance. If the sewage disposal system is an outhouse or other system not requtl interior plumbing and conventional subsurface disposal, the 100 feet NNUI be measured from the location where a II subsurface disposal system would likely be installed. 10. If the remaining land or proposed lot meets items 9.a and 9.b above, you should complete a Request for Exemption uni r Section 3-04 of the Em7ronmental Protection Rules. 11. Act 250 Number of lots (of any size) created by appli cant/] andoNimer NAithin a five mile radius of this subdiNision or I nithin the environmental district NNiNn the last five years? Will any of the roads have to be constructed to give access to or Niithin this subdivision? Yes (If applicant/landowner has created more than 10 lots in response to question number one, or if you answer "yes" to se� question, you must obtain a project reNiew sheet regarding Act 250 jurisdiction from the District Coordinator before submitting this application). APPLICATION FEE: S 150.06 PER LOT-, Amount Enclosed S 1500.00 1 (Signature of Landoivnt s�oiNm on Deed)" (Date) THERE IS TO BE NO SITE WORK OR CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED ON THIS PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. ------------------------------------------------------------ CONSULTANT'S STATEMENT REGARDING FLOOD PLAINS (Section 3.08. A.7) ��� • • . III oil•. t .•. t. ♦• ••� •i . •. u • • 11 i• . • (Signature of Consultant) -7-17-9C� (Date) I CERTIFY THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN FOR EACH WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH ENVIR01\ NTAL PR TECTION RULES. i� 7-17- 176, _ (Signature of Consultant) (Date) Z:%PERMITTP 250D.SAA1 SCHEDULE E ADJOINER INFORMATION LIST OF ABUTTERS Burlington Properties Ltd. Partnership Box 9210, 1020 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 1100 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Nancy Toutant 1398 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 James and Sachi Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond Ploof 1943 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher and Theri Lyn Davis 18 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mark and Kathryn Boucher 20 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Terrance and Nancy Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Larry and Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle So. Burlington, VT 05403 Scott and Roberta Pennington 29 West Birch Lane Williston, VT 05495 City of South Burlington Municiple Offices Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Green Acres, Inc. 96022\abuttem sam MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK TABLE OF DESIGN PARAMETERS Last Revised: April 22, 1996 LOT # ACREAGE BUILDING SIZE Planned Actual (1) EMPLOYEES Planned Actual (2) PARKING Planned Actual (3) TRAFFIC - AVTE Planned Actual (4) AM PEAK Planned Actual (5) WASTEWATER Planned Actual (6) STORMWATER Planned Actual (7) 1 49.50 547464 1095 1033 3055 376 17424 23.7 2 8.00 88479 177 167 494 61 3654 6 3 20.20 223410 447 422 1247 153 7702 12 4 3.13 34617 69 65 193 24 2039 6.5 5 3.06 33843 68 64 189 23 2015 6.3 6 3.29 36387 73 69 203 25 2092 6.8 7 3.96 43797 88 63 244 30 2314 4.2 8 3.90 43134 86 81 241 30 2294 4.2 9 3.88 42912 86 81 240 29 2287 5.2 10 3.22 35613 71 67 199 24 2066 2.8 11 3.12 34507 69 65 193 24 2035 5.7 12 4.47 49438 99 93 276 34 2483 8.2 Road 7.00 5.2 Infiltration 2864 Total 116.73 1213601 0 2427 0 2290 0 6773 0 833 0 51272 0 97 0 NOTES: P.M. Peak 673 (1) 25.39% coverage ( ITE Code 130 ) (2) 2.0 employees/1000 sf (ITE Code 130 ) (3) 1.06 employees / parking space ( ITE Code 130 ) (4) Average vehicle trip ends proportioned on lot size ( T = 4.95(X)+766 ) ITE Code 130 ( X Is total building square footage for park ] (5) AM Peak hour proportioned on lot size ITE Code 130 { AM Peak LnT = 0.818Ln(X) + 0.916 } { PM Peak T = 1/[(1.027/X) + 0.00064] } (6) 15 gpd / employee + 1000 gpd / lot process water + Infiltration* (7) Determined by TR-55 methodology * Infiltration based on 3000 ft of 8' and 2200 ft of 12" (300gallons/inch diameter/mlie/day ) meadowid.wg2 v� !jam '.j State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests. Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1.800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800.253-0195 Voice>TDD July I, 1996 Mr. Mark Neagley, Partner Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Subject: Amended Air Pollution Control Permit=.-%P-90-052b Dear Mr. Neagley: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department or Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division Bldg. 3 South, 103 South Main Street Waterburn Vermont 05671-0402 Tel. (802) 241-3840 Fax (802) 241-2590 The Air Pollution Control Division ("APCD") has completed its review of Summer Ice Joint Venture's request to amend Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052a ("Pernut"). The amendment was requested in order to rellect changes in ownerslup, name, and project plans for the development formerly known as Green Acres Industrial Park. The APCD has approved this request in accordance with the enclosed Amended Permit. Note that the APCD has taken this opportunity to update the conditions of the Permit. The following changes were made to the conditions of the Permit: I) Condition (3) concerningz, ambient air monitoring was eliminated. (2) Three new conditions (3-5) were added requiring the performance of traffic monitoring and the subnvttal of traffic data for the year 2003 (anticipated one year after full buildout of the development), (3) Condition (4) and (5) of the existing Permit was revised and renumbered (6) and (9), respectively, (4) Conditions (7) and (8) of the Amended Permit were added to identify the Agency's contact for written reports and the length of time records must be retained, and (5) The Agency's standard conditions (6-11) of the existing Permit were revised and renumbered (10-17). - Also note that the construction completion date has been extended to December 31, 2003. - Should you have any questions regarding this letter or the Permit, please feel free to contact me at (802) 241- 3856 Si cerel VohnL. Pe cult, P.E. Air Pollution Control Division Enclosures PC: R. Trudell, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Ap:jq, Indirect Source SW - Meadowland Business Park (formerly Green Acres Industrial Park) Weadosurc - Chlorine Free.100% Recycled Paper I Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/N. SpringfieldfSt Johnsbury DEC# E,196-0351 State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation non co., Air Pollution Control Division Waterbury, Vermont 41AP-90-1152b AMENDED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERN111 This Amendment Issued: July 1. 1996 First Amendment Issued: February 4. 1994 Oriinnal Permit Issued: Au<_ust 19. 1991 Owner/Operator: Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlin<_.,ton, Vermont 05401 Source: Meadowland Business Park (formerly known as Green Acres Industrial Park) Hinesburg Road South Burling(,ton, Vermont FINDINGS OF FACT j (1) 'On January 15, 1991, Green Acres, Incorporated submitted plans and specifications to the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division (hereinafter "Agency") requesting approval to construct and operate the Green Acres Industrial Park. The project was proposed to consist of a ten lot subdivision ', for mixed commercial and industrial type development. The project was planned to be 1 located off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The proposed development involved plans for the use of_approximately 110 acres of land, and the construction and j operation of parking capacity for 1,819 motor vehicles and. 960,000 square feet of building space. ^ (2) Development project~ which satisfy the criteria for an indirect source under Section 5- 503(2)(a) of the Vermont Air Pll1111tiO17 Control Regulotions (hereinafter "Re,tdatlons"). are classified as a source of air contaminants under Section. 5-401 of the Re,idatiuns. Consequently, pursuant to 10 V.S.A §556 and Section 5-501 of the Re, ulutions, the owner or operator of such a development is required to obtain approval from the Agency in the form of an Air Pollution Control Construction Permit prior to cornillencill`(T the COi1Stl-LICtioll Ol all indirect Source. (3) The proposed Green Acres Industrial Park was determined to be subject to this Agency review and approval. On August 19, 1991, the Agency issued an Air Pollution Control Construction Permit approving the proposed project. On February 4, 1994. the Agency issued an Amended Air Pollution Control Construction Permit approving an extension of the construction deadline for the Green Acres Industrial Park. 1 i (5) On June 4, 1996, Summer Ice Joint Venture submitted an application requesting_ an adminstrative amendment of the Amended Air Pollution Control Construction Pernlit for the Green Acres Industrial Park. The land and proposed project were now under the ownership of Summer Ice Joint Venture. The project was renamed Meadowhin'd Business Park and included alterations to the construction schedule and layout of the proposed development. Project completion was now anticipated to be the year 2002. The shapes and sizes of loLs were modified, and the overall project size increased to 1.200.0(x) square feet of building space. Based on the most recent version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition). traffic oeneration rates and parkin_ capacity were increased. However, Summer Ice Joint Venture proposed to limit its approved parking capacity to 1,819 spaces (The same amount permitted for Green Acres. Incorporated - Sommer ice Joint Venture will be required to submit a new indirect source review prior to commencin- the construction of additional parking capacity in excess of 1.819 spaces.) It has been assumed that since the development type (mixed commercial/industrial) and parking capacity will remain the same as the original pl-oject, the conclusions of the original indirect source analysis have not been affected by the above modifications. Based on the above findings of 'fact, the Agency's review of the proposed' project, and subject to the following permit conditions, it is determined that Meadowland Business Park will meet all applicable state and federal air pollution control regulations: Therefore, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §556, as amended, the Agency hereby issues a permit approving the construction and operation of- Meadowland Business Park, ' as described in the above findings of fact, subject to the following: PERMIT CONDITIONS (1)_ The Meadowland Business Park (formerly known as Green Acres Industrial Park) shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the -Agency on June 4, 1996 and in accordance with the conditions of this Permit. The Meadowland Business Park shall consist of commercial/industrial development, and shall provide for a maximum parking capacity for 1,819 motor vehicles. Page 2 of 7 - Traffic Network Improvements - (2) Improvements at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Swift Street shall he implemented prior to completion of 1,000 parking spaces. The improvements shall consist of (see Figure 1): (a) Widening the Swift Street approach to two lanes in order to provide dedicated right and left -turning lanes, (b) Widening of the northbound approach (Hinesburg Road) to provide a through lane and dedicated left -turning lane, and (c) Install and operate a traffic control,signal. - Traffic Monitoring - (3) Summer Ice Joint Venture shall perform a field observation of the traffic generation rates from the Meadowland Business Park in order to satisfy the I-CLIUirCI11C11LS of Condition (4) of this Permit. Said monitoring shall he performed within ninety (90) days 'of the date the report will be submitted to the Agency as required by Condition (4) of this Permit. At least sixty (60) days prior to conducting the traffic study required by this condition, Summer Ice Joint Venture shall provide the Agency with a description of the methodology►y which will be used to conduct the traffic monitoring. If necessary, Summer Ice Joint Venture shall revise its methodolooy based oil the Agency's written comments. (4) (5) During the year 2003, Summer Ice Joint Venture shall submit a report to the Agency summarizing the trip generation rates (both P.M. peak hour and eight highest consecutive hours) of motor vehicles exiting and entering the Meadowland Business Park. Summer Ice Joint Venture shall attempt to coincide the traffic monitoring study with the anticipated peak traffic generation periods for the Meadowland Business Park. Should the results of the traffic monitoring required by this Permit indicate that actual trip generation rates exceed 673 and 241 vehicles per hour (PM peak hour and eight highest consecutive hours, respectively);' then the Secretary of the Agency may consider this � finding as cause to reopen this Permit pursuant to Condition (1 U) herein. ! - Record Keeping and Reporting - (6) , By June l; 1997, and by the.same date each year thereafter until 2003, -Summer Ice Joint Venture shall submit a written report to the Agency which includes the following data for -the ,previous year: (a)_: Progress . report on the construction of the development, including 'associated parking; and (b) Degree of use and occupancy of each project constructed. Page 3 of 7 (9) The above data shall he summarized using the format contained in attached Table I. All records, reports, and notifications that are required to he submitted to the Agency by this Permit shall he submitted to: Field Services Section Air Pollution Control Division D.E.C., Agency of Natured Resources 103 South Main Street. Bldg 3 South i waterhurv, Vermont 0�h71-0402. • �r All records shall be retained for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date of record and shall he made available to the Agency upon request. - Standard Conditions - i' Issuance of this Permit shall not relieve any person from compliance with those portions of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations requiring approval prior to the construction of any stationary source of air pollution. Nor shall issuance of this. Permit relieve any person from any other state or local requirements to obtain approval prior to construction of this development. These Permit conditions may be modified for cause upon the filing of a written request With the Secretary of the Agency (hereinafter "Secretary") or upon the Secretary's own motion. Any modification shall he granted only with the written approval- of the Secretary. If the Secretary determines that modification is appropriate. only the conditions subject to. modification shall he re -opened. The filing of a request for modification does not stay any terms or conditions of this Permit. The Secretary may provide opportunity for public comment on any proposed modification of these conditions. .If public comments are. solicited, the Secretary shall follow the procedures set Furth in 10 V.S.A. Section 556 as revised. I1 Approval to construct or modify under this Permit shall become invalid if construction ' or modification is not commenced within thirty (30) months after issuance of this Permit, if construction or modification is discontinued for a period of thirty (30) months or more, i or if construction or modification is not substantially completed by December 31, 2003. The Agency may extend any one of these periods upon a. satisfactory showing that_ an I extension is ,justified. The term "commence" as applied to the proposed construction or `modification of a source means that the owner or operator either has: (a) Begun, or catised to bejin, a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification.of the source; to be completed within a reasonable time; or (b) Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations, which cannot be. canceled or modified without substantiate loss to the owner or. operator, to undertake a continuous program of actual on -site construction or modification of the source to be completed within a reasonable time. Page 4 of 7 (12) This Permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights. (13) By acceptance of this Permit, the ow-ner and operator agree to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the properties covered by the Permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental and health statutes and re<-ulations and with this Permit. (14) All data, plans, specifications, analyses and other information submitted or caused to he submitted to the Agency as.part of the application for this Permit, or an amendment to this Permit, shall be complete and truthful. Any such submission which is False or misleading shall he sufficient grounds for denial or revocation of this Permit. -and may result in a fine and/or imprisonment under the authority of Vermont statutes. ( 15) These Permit conditions shall he hindin<g upon, and enforceable against. the current Owner and operator and all subsequent owners and operators of the source. (lh) The provisions of this Permit are severable. If any provision of this Permit. or its application to any person, entity, or circumstance is held invalid. illegal, or unenforceable by court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity shall not apply to any other portion of i; this Permit which can he given effect without the invalid provision or application thereof. (17) The conditions set forth above Supersede all conditions contained in the Agency's Air Pollution Control Permit #AP-90-052a granted to Green Acres. Incorporated on February 4, 1994. The Agency's issuance of this Air Pollution Control Permit relies upon the data. judgement, and other. information supplied by the facility owner and/or operator. The Agency makes no ' r 1 assurances that the facility approved herein will meet performance objectives or vendor I Ularantees supplied to the facility owner and/or operator. It is the sole responsibility of the ! owner and/or operator of the facility to operate the facility in accordance with the conditions herein and with all applicable state� d federal standards and regulations. Dated this day of 1 996) in the town of Waterbury, county of Washington, state of Vermont. i Agency of Natural Resources William' Brierley, Commissioner Departm nt of ironmental Conservation y• ! ich• rd A. Valentinetti, Director Yr Air PolkdM Control Division IPage 5 of 7 I Hinesburg Road 9 I To Gre'en Acres Site Intersection' Geometry Tech Rnvlm mentA Inc. f or Hinesburg Road 8cale: 1"=40' and- SW'ift- Street 1996-:., Build . I Fig1 - 'FABLE I: hORMAT I'OR ANNUAL SUBN,1H'FAI. OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS REQUIRED BY CONDITION (6) 01- AMENDED AIR POLLUI-ION CONTROL PERMIT #AP-90-052b Land Use Peril it ..: Dute La11d Usc Project Name Lot Number(s) VlltllbeC " Permit Issued TOTALS 1 id Use lltitted $puCeS I Citv of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 October 9, 1996 Dick Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Sewer Allocation, Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Trudell: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on September 10, 1996 granted an additional sewer allocation of 20,927 gpd for a total allocation of 51,272 gpd for the Meadowland Business Park owned by Summer Ice Joint Venture. This property is served by the Airport Parkway Wastewater Treatment Plant which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. n erely J e Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp DRAINAGE STUDY FOR AlEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Prepared by: Kevin Dragon, Tyler Hart, Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Date: July 1, 1996 File: 96022dra. sam (T� TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. July 9, 1996 Todd Sternbach Division of Permits, Compliance and Protection 103 S. Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 RE: Meadowland Business Park Dear Todd: Enclosed is a Stormwater Discharge Permit Application for the above project, located in South Burlington. As part of the application, I've included a check for a421.25 and a Drainage Study with 3 maps showing the drainage area for the pre, post and post -development with detention. The fee is based on 3.37 acres of pavement, which is the amount involved with constructing Swift Street Extension, Bowdoin Street and Thompson Street. The proposed project consists of subdividing the parcel into 12 lots for commercial and industrial use. As each lot is developed the developer will have to submit an application complying with the allocation assigned to that lot listed in Table 1 of the study. There are two stormwater basins designed for the park. The basin on lot 1 (Pond #1) is a dry pond, while the basin on lots 7 and 8(Pond 142) will have 8 feet of standing water. Pond #1 will discharge into Pond 42, along with the roadway and lots 10, 11 and 12. The study's calculations were based on TR55 and a 2 year/ 24 hour storm. If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Karen Ann Pettersen Project Manager cc: Mark Neagley E:196022ts.sam P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 v u l JI, f Ukt1UC nItJ I C law/�1 STATE Gf VERMCNT yf;�t_' AENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Of ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PERMITS, CCr1PLIAN'CE, AND PROTECTION DIVISICN Chapter 47 of Title 10 V.S.A. 1. Applicant: Summer Ice Joint Venture Legal Entity Joint Venture 2. Hailing Address: 82 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 3. contact: Karen A. Pettersen Telephone: 879-6331 4. Name of Activity: Meadowland R114inpcc T)arl, Location: So. Burlington Industrial- Park 5. Type of Activity: 6. Nature of haste: Sanitary X Industrial Coancrcial Drainage Other (Describe) Stormwater runoff from roadway, 3.37 acres 7 Receiving Water: Potash Brook 8. Status of Discharge: X Proposed 9. The applicant hereby applies for a: Existing (Permit Number: ) X Discharge Permit Indirect Discharge Permit Emergrncy Pollution Permit Pretreatment Discharge Permit to discharge wastes, directly or indirectly, into water of the State from the above na.^xd activity as described in this application, its attached schedule(s), plaris and specifications. 10. Application is for X Original Permit _Permit Renewal. If this is for a permit renewal, is original application still valid in all respects 7 if not, attached schedule s) for major changes. Minor changes may be doctmented by letter. 11. Enter below, using a separate serial rxrlber (S/N), to identify each independent discharge which will result from the activity described in Item 4. Attached separate schedule for each discharge identified below. S/N 001 Potash Brook Drainage Way 004 002 005 003 006 25 8 12. Application Fee Enclosed i 125 x 3.37= $421.Date of Application 13. �A� R. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (PR TITLE SIGNATURI INSTRUCTIONS 1. Applicant (name) b legal entity (individual, corporation, partnership, firm, state agency, municipality, etc.) 3. Contact Person to contact regarding this application 4. Name of Activity (John Doe residence, XYZ Corp.., Clear Lake State Park, Green Motel, etc.) 5. Type of Activity single family residence, paper mill, state Park, motel, etc.) 6. Nature of Vastes:SanitarY (Domestic Sewage only), industrial/Coatnercial/Industrial (process wastes, cooling water, rinse water, laboratory wastes, etc.) Drainage (stormwater, roof drains, pond overflows, foundation drains, return flows, etc.) 7. Receiving waters For unnamed streams, so state and give named tributary. 8. Coaplete as appropriate; provide permit rxnber, if any, for existing discharge. 11. Identify and describe each separate discharge point to waterc of the c.,re. Q. Submit application fee in accord with fee schedule. FORM WR-82 (REV. 5/90) STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES I DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SCHEDULE D: DRAINAGE (INCLUDING STORMWATER) D-T APPLICANT: CHAPTER 47 OF TITLE 10 V.S.A. Summer Ice Joint Venture DATE: July 17, 1996 ACTIVITY: Industrial Park D-2 DISCHARGE SIN: sin 001 DESIGNATION: Potash Brook D-3 EXACT LOCATION ON RECEIVING WATER (DESCRIBE AND LOCATE ON MAP): South Of I — 8 9 D-4 HOW ARE WASTES CONVEYED TO RECEIVING WATER?: Overland f retention pond. D-5 TYPE OF DISCHARGE: STORMWATER RUNOFF: SOURCES (IN ACRES): PAVED ROADS: 3, 3 7A. UNPAVED ROADS: O A. PAVED PARKING LOTS: A. UNPAVED PARKING LOTS: �_A. ROOFS: �_A. NATURAL TERRAIN: 2 93, 6 3 A. OTHER (specify): A. TOTAL: A. I PRE -DEVELOPMENT PEAK FLOW: 51 CFS POST -DEVELOPMENT PEAK FLOW: 102 A. i RECEIVING STREAM WATERSHED AREA (sq. miles) ABOVE DISCHARGE POINT: .46 sq. miles RATIO OF STREAM WATERSHED AREA (sq. miles) TO AREA OF ROAD AND PARKING LOTS (acres): .136 PROPOSED TREATMENT (check all that apply): 1 GRASS OR STONE LINED SWALES: X , CATCH BASINS: X , OVERLAND FLOW ACROSS VEGETATED TERRAIN: X , I DETENTION POND (attached design details): X SEDIMENTATION BASIN (attach design details): , OTHER (specify and attach design details): GROUNDWATER AND RETURN FLOWS: SOURCE (check all that apply): I FOUNDATION DRAIN: , CURTAIN DRAIN: , SPRING: , WELL: , MINE: QUARRY: , POND: , WATER WHEEL OF TURBINE: FILTER BACKWASH: , OTHER (specify): DISCHARGE: - I ESTIMATED DISCHARGE: CFS, FREOUONCY: , DURATION: PUMPING REQUIRE?: , CONTAMINANTS PRESENT (specify): , .I PROPOSED TREATMENT: D-6 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: FORM WR-82-D (12/89) TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE Page 1 METHODOLOGY Page 1 PRE -DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Page 1 POST -DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Page 1 CONTROL OF PEAK RUNOFF Page 2 TREATMENT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF Page 2 MAINTENENCE Page 2 LOCATION MAP Page 3 SOILS MAP Page 4 ALLOCATED RUNOFF BY LOT (TABLE 1) Page 5 MAP SP 1 Page 6 PRE -DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED (TABLE 2) Page 7 PRE -DEVELOPMENT TIME OF CONC. (TABLE 3) Page 8 PRE -DEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPH Pages 9-15 MAP SP2 Page 16 POST -DEVELOPMENT WATERSHED (TABLE 4) Page 17 POST -DEVELOPMENT TIME OF CONC. (TABLE 5) Page 18-19 POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROGRAPH Page 20-29 MAP SP3 Page 31 POST -DEVELOPMENT WITH DETENTION Pages 32-91 DETENTION POND #1 Pages 92-106 DETENTION POND 42 Pages 107-116 POST -DEVELOPMENT WITH DETENTION HYDROGRAPH Pages 117-119 Page 1 l 10 Stormwater runoff from the Meadowland Business Park discharges into Potash Brook. For purposes of this study, stormwater runoff was evaluated at the northerly property line of Meadow Land at Potash Brook. This point is designated discharge point S/N 001. The purpose of this study is to determine stormwater runoff at this point before and after development of Meadow Land Business Park and insure that post -development runoff from the Park does not exceed pre -development runoff for a 2 year/24 hour storm event. This study will also address requirements of the Water Quality Regulations for treatment, control and maintenence. METHODOLOGY Pre -development and post -development runoff was determined using the" Quick TR-55" computer model by Haestad Methods. The watershed was divided into appropriate sub -areas and watershed parameters were entered into the program. A composite hydrograph was output by the computer model. Runoff into the closed pipe network in the road was determined using the Rational Method. Capacity of each pipe segment was determined using Mannings Formula. The capacity of each major road culvert was determined using the "Flowmaster" computer program by Haestad Methods. PRE -DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Pre -development runoff was computed to be 51 c.f.s. at the 12.8th hour from 298 acres including the offsite drainage area above the project. Table 2 shows drainage sub -areas and associated watershed data. Table 3 shows time of concentration input data for each sub -area. Drainage areas DA1 and DA2 represent the offsite contributions, which is 28 c.f.s. at the 12.8th hour from 181.27 acres. There is an additional 7.5 acre piece on the east side of the project that is offsite but is included in the onsite calculations. POST -DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF Post -development runoff was computed to be 102 c.f.s. at the 12.8th hour from 302 acres. Table 4 shows the input data for sub -areas and associated watershed data. Table 5 shows time of concentration input data for post -development runoff. Again the offsite drainage areas are designated as Page 2 DA1 and DA2. CONTROL OF PEAK RUNOFF Peak runoff from Meadowland Business Park will be controlled to pre -development levels by use of detention basins. Table 1 lists the allocated peak runoff from each lot. There will be a detention basin on lot 1 to partially attentuate the stormwater runoff from that lot. Another detention basin on the west side of lots 7 and 8 will reduce the runoff from the first 2900 feet of roadway, lots 10, 11 and 12, and the residual from lot 1. Lots 2 and 3 will most likely need detention basins to comply with their allocations. It is assumed that the remaining lots (4 through 9) may not need to detain their runoff to meet their allocation. TREATMENT OF STORMWATER RUNOFF Runoff within the Park is treated by use of overland flow, grass swales and a retention pond (Pond #2) following discharge from pipe outlets and before entering waters of the State. A 25 foot buffer will be designed around all paved areas. A ratio of 100 linear feet of swale per acre of parking lot will be maintained. The basin on lot 7 and 8 provides treatment of runoff from the roadway. There is a 50 foot wetland protection buffer on either side of the main stream and the relocated drainage swale, and around the existing pond. MAINTENENCE All treatment devices, structures, and facilities will be maintained in good operating order at all times and will be cleaned, as necessary, to maintain treatment. Paved roads and parking lots will be swept on a regular basis, when seasonally practical, to minimize contaminants carried to treatment devices. Page 3 '•` (•^\'� \ PROJECT z Win mill (/ 00 � 1 a Quarry ox* I s [ LL aLLSJ � 116 if 400 / ;I 1 ,, % • •fit \ �• � / i �i�' ; �,'� ' ..� r( - • — �i — � l r Windmill ! Rins. Quarr FIT tz ou afn • _ -- - / , r � / '• �, :: .' 1�( �i li }y/I ^`aY a i, n i •'' r �r I \1 q ` / � \ `j�.J �• Ioa/ ,�,lllr �\�\��•' ; J; '/44`rlR :p�. I• 1 �� � ., r i / I • ', ,`• _ it ( � t. \. + 1, ` 1 ; -y4`; �-;'1 /r `,r {/,f J� • if 1..,� I r N� • 116• , I\ �.i�f4��'1 / +r N I - _ j� ; (�1 ��� �� ♦, l i� } _ \\ Ilp�•. .. �\ t J ••.' •, _ '\;�\as s�Ct`���, \ 1 �, i f � _`was,'`--7�!'+y+ r 'r'r' / � 1( :.�; :� ��.:�• ;`.•.Y r _- �k� ° T' ��'vl:.l '- •1 't LI i >�. i _rat s • {,� a`� coo ,, m m ,l�... ��'• f wit mi`,rt{r• �'> a` �. .�• ..x a r� ~ _uj. Ax ir •I m r -r' m iw ,�. Q \ I r`=I �•".:.. R'R .,t ,� •1! ` ,' I•r i (/i j ��. ,� 1 od •�, y) tis ' W H SN• > ,�`.. , :.y i�iY:, .. '+.'♦ 10 TAt �, �F �'<r •Y' J i _ a• ' m �� M`- j � 's:, ti 5 Cti,. 'r � � .�?, mom[/\, .• y; -) t�1•-� ( Q' iJ... •�• ,�• 'A. ,.1�f r� < j.> v.� lr• .: �•..y I,. • •}• m f4 R /�1 !tom ..i, v- ar:,�,. -rA �G � .j 'fJ •t�h1�V !t !i. •`A. f•Il�d.\ U� W iJ � I �� ^ � h/�r n 'f O • !�� \ � W k �j�� V. .� .•,.Ay iT`n� ' ,�j, i f �. ).Y r• ° •..��Q > 'lpo + cri lot ��_J • f ! ` ..� � !* W , F ♦ � .1 �,, r..r,r. � 1` ,,v. .per 3 i ,Li � U' � W .� 1• It•'� ra l � � rC � •^ � � � 4 ��` '' ° tyi•�, 7i',�53.s ' .S� '� ','�"' m �f'� nN.: � ^, (�• r�7'1'\. �(r � ''Uk• � �i"r '�..y' - � _ �'.ti. ��� .�r.�y' ; t r-•� `- .' �.. m..`•�'�' yam,•„ 1' r r^ �^* t�� %�DC � � ��: !. '���(r.,.�.R�IrCK-/'t�„ ��y `y rr •� � .Y y�f oaoq 'r �'r •�y�;'f��.r �+i M• •Ai�Z� r � '.�. i '� .f'�y , > �- ,r 1' � 4 �;r f_ (r'•���!,. rl��JF:lf�j�� ����/'rr y�+y `.'1' p' , �' • o• � �- • ��,J.rQ.,�C.'/ {,C'r1tt�. r L v m • r ' �, �. - . , J.•�' - . . m (i' / l %I }\ }�..Y ( ` _ l.t• •.1'1C'. r. . l ¢F{". , ! K,f ii - :�1"-I'fil r•' Y M-�' 7 kf%Y`!� > s .• y� • •. • . r ,. 4'r, S � � �i k ` � ' �,.� m r ` A't �i't t rt r'.F,. 5 t ,! A ` .♦� , , `�J.S � . Sv.+t 401:.., m +��A� <!'� j'd!�`"i ;; �... �r•.� ,.1 •�..�, v't„rJ, -�.04� ( ` C'���yf" .. �f,'.,� ' � \� \ 1 •�'•�::; r o � -Y. s •k� j:�i w,�."�'• ,.. i�.r ��> . � s 1., er';,7 t•�' •` � Tay- ''�r ti['h4i ' r• .T:�.'r: �AiT� �-v�,�y'•r•-T� ! �����' `� yr" S � .�.r,•. r`� J ��I �j' l� : r � `��.�) �, •1 � { � • 'i 4 ••.' - � .•1 •, t•• •. • ��1 .l. dt.r 4 y +�1�F� -f ���.5. ��' .�? �. I`% "^ .'yv:1� �1 T �/ ,i'� t �,. *Xw r,� i .IM1 C! !: ?' '...•.n • � � l; �' T�11tF�.'M!•y`:Y�' j?i '�.if, :.r - .t--� �;---�� •�7? . f il� r r0 („) f,t r- c 1.j�1"'�i;. •.;v µ `f ,� fJ�.f•�' �.gH7'•i"j `ri+r l�; .�"-•-� f ,r`'^ �f In �'� ` -pF t' •> � A . '+ ar4�', � irr � � � ` ki . 3»Yri�'1 7.J. .��', f9�� w M:' > 1 m r 5 �, 1 _ > •• �� S\� r / l Ji. 1�'m� i �.t7 (,'•%9 {. • i•�l t ' m �•A 1�0• ,. ��'• -^�� �� • ,'f•r` ^T,~ � � � 4 t+� (��.yl�Rq?c- !{+F S 1 � Y Y �X � �-3•;iJ• lip y-+G �}'Y' ('- I�U.��• • L r+ �1 r 'aS'yXA 3.�; .a � ••'�--�' •-�. m Yj r .� '. , `, • ', . F ' I•u� ,,.�t '.' y '1 N`fli'' �r. S',(ywf,'b _ R . • ' �'� .i '.�` 1. �— _ ` r�s r- ` n 3�rd ' � � rm . �:-: yr _ •.� � .. ), �aa�► •J_ �l a.' A �'.i !' �•L� `/�:��i ` �t.�} ,r •r•R••m�� �., �rr/if ''` .1.1,j5 ,'� %.r �: a xr'i, �r r •4,) �.+' -`� f IN m 7 •T�v ., �, tip:• v � 1'�dr'lt' i .� 1F� �'i• f�•I al „�,.�'�. iJ .�4'� f r��'�'� •.�: I �` ' ; fy r, N�;�r-_,g' y ( � y.�.y'4" 4.: j.+-{�����ti� / 'r, �: \ -i� fi �'"�� Z:,� ;!A m •-•r l� s �JP .. •.: �• + � •'S{, ��T1t� v'� �'�.%d•. r "ot ail( .l•'!M'• � ' � k1 •.,�G t.� ,�� ! ~ `�'t(e � ,th y , f* r :•, '.. ( � ►s 1 't Page 5 TABLE 1 Allocated Runoff by Lot Pre -development 51 cfs Post -development 102 cfs Post-developme with detention 50.7 cfs Description Acres Allocated Notes Runoff Lot 1 49.50 17.34 * discharge from detention basin #1 Lot 2 8.00 2.0 2 cfs maximum Lot 3 20.20 2.0 4 cfs maximum Lot 4 3.13 2.0 2.3 cfs maximum including offsite contribution Lot 5 3.06 2.0 2.3 cfs maximum including offsite contribution Lot 6 3.29 2.0 2.4 cfs maximum including offsite contribution Lot 7 3.96 2.4 4.1 cfs maximum Lot 8 3.90 2.3 4.0 cfs maximum Lot 9 3.88 2.3 3.9 cfs maximum Lot 10 3.22 1.8 * discharge to retention basin #2 Lot 11 3.13 1.7 * discharge to retention basin #2 Lot 12 4.47 2.5 * discharge to retention basin #2 Roadwav 1 7.80 1.0 * dischar e to retention basin #2 Totals 116.74 23.7 DA12 (offsite) 27.0 GRAND TOTAL 50.7 at the 13.Oth hour *contribution to retention basin #2 which discharges 6.7 cfs at the 13th hour 96022tbl.wb 1 Page 5A Meadow Land Business Park Pre -Development DAlax DAlbx DA2bx DA2cx DA2dx DA2ax DM ax DA31 SN001 , OAK CREEK , 2 14 , E 89 � � o , , "LANE PRESS b , w DYNAPOWER DISCHARGE_ POINT, - --- - ; S/N 001 j: QUARRY ; DA 3ax DA 4ax i DA 3bx O „ , DA 2ax DA 2bx LEDGE KNOLL r I . -- DA 1 ax : DA 1 bx DA 2cx t , JTLER FARMS o 1 o v o r Graphic Scale 300 0 300 600 900 1200 ' v hO v�0 DA 2dx 3v O 3 1' m 0 ti ° ROAD VAN SIOKLEN Page 6 1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. It Prokct Loc M MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hlnesbur3. Roa IPre-Developn SPI , , t 1 OAK CREEK 11� 1 1 1 111 I � INTE-RSTq T o 1 / / LANE PRESS Q to � 1 ' f I DYNAPOWER / DISCHARGE POINT; S/N 001 t � r QUARRY ' DA 4dp ' ' DA 3dp DA 4cp ; 1 , DA 3ap DA 4ap DA`4bp DA 3bp DA 3cp - O I 1 O' 1 1 I ;I I', DA 2bp i DA 2dp LEDGE KNOLL ` , 1 DA lap DA 1 by i ` , 1 - DA 2cp 1 , BUTLER FARMS of Q a oQ ' Graphic Scale 300 0 mo 600 900 1200 DA 2ap ; 1 0 AN S;CkLERDaD N rl Page 16 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Y Y.IM IW M. n wLew K OYN Yoil lM Project Location --- MNa. tN. MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg, Road So.Burlington. Vt. Post -Development Drainage Areas SP2 in 4? fRSTATC 89 ^"i I 1 / LANE PRESrn to o' c i DYNAPOWER DISCHARGE POINT 1 1 S/N 001 1 I 1.' .—rl fit J 1 a 4 r�o DA 3ap 1POND! �2l �' �' I ,-- n, ti 1 (D POND 11 1 Ilk O ; DA 4ap DA 3bp DA 4bp ! I i1 i , OAK CREEK � I I I i I LEDGE KNOLL ` , 1 DA 12 POST'. It BUTLER FARMS 1 I � b ' � Graphic Scale 300 a 300 600 900 1200 ctC�LENi Page 31 o'F �o 0 ,v- TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. 1......,..«. ... n. wr... , — mn .nal Protect Location MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesbur3. Road 5o.Burlington. Vt. —1— Post -Development With Detention Drainage Areas n ao.a.4 5P3 h b Sr4TF 89 i h'' . - r • / i i � i ' '' i � ° i 'LANE PRESS o `i M DYNAPOWER DISCHARGE_ POINT'. r SM 001 `, 1 ; i, QUARRY r DA 3p DA 4cp , DA 4dp ;' i' 11 , .{y DA 3apI It - 1 r DA 4ap o0 D�;p DA 4op / DA 3hp _ 0 OAK CREEK 0 y0. DA Zap o ' DA 2bp DA 2dp 3� LEDGE KNOLL �\ v , DA lap DA 1 by ' DA 2cp 1TLER FARMS 0 0 , Graphic Scale 100 600 900 t200 RpAO VAN 51CKLEN Page 16 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. IN, Proiect Location GREEN ACRE Hinesburg. Rc ' Post-Developri, n—I..... A— SP (Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. July 12, 1996 Mr. Carl Jurentkuff Floodway Management Section Water Quality Division 103 So. Main Street Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 RE: Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Jurentkuff: Nv-ic y�,kC WA Curl J, un �k 1►,atc4id *w+ lssvc Srncc -fk 41,ild 7(4111 �s drd` ►w+- -Cir.cl r� wczs r►cLrssq-e y i�w ?hones or1 t L"q4 rS q /lon ci ref{cr We are preparing the Act 250 application for Meadowland Business Park. This is an industrial/commercial subdivision located off of Route 116 in South Burlington. I would greatly appreciate your review and response on this project, for purposes of the Act 250 permit process. The project involves subdividing a 116 acre parcel into 12 lots, with approximately 4800 feet of new roadway and related utilities. There is no proposal at this time to develop any of the lots. Development of the lots will be handled with future Act 250 amendment applications. The project owner is Summer Ice, Incorporated (c/o Mark Neagley). They would like to submit an Act 250 application in early August 1996. I would appreciate your response at your earliest convenience. I have enclosed copies of the site plans to aid you in your review. If you need anymore information or if you have questions please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. John P. Pitrowiski Encl. cc: Mr. Mark Neagley 96022101.sam P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT Dedicated to Quality Water & Service John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. PO Box 308 - 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-7454 July 22, 1996 Fax: (802) 864-0435 RE: Act 250 Review: Meadowland Business Park, Route 116, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: In response to your request for information regarding the Champlain Water District's capability to supply water to the referenced proposed project, we submit the following: 1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via a 24" transmission main. 2. Adequate water storage is located south of Dorset Street and Swift Street intersection, as provided by a 1,500,000 gallon water storage tank. 3. Your estimated demand of 50,000 gallons per day for this proposed project could be furnished by the Champlain Water District without restricting or encumbering its present users on the CWD supply system. 4. Capability of the local water distribution system must be verified by the local water system official. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT ni -4 .,-r Richard A. Pratt Chief Engineer cc: J. Fay J. Choate P. Jacob C. Hafter CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 QUEEN CITYPARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. 864-436I John Pitrowiski July 24, 1996 Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: Meadowland Business Park, Route 116, So. Burlington, VT. In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the sfsfdsfced proposed project we submit the following: 1. The estimated demand of 50,000 gallons per day can be met by the existing water distribution system without encumbering the existing users. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT John Choate Manager CC: J. Fay D. Pratt J. Weith TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Prepared by: Tyler Hart, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 In -conjunction with: Joseph Oppenlander, P.E. Trans/Op Inc. P.O. Box 29 Williston, VT 05495 Developer: Summer Ice Joint Venture, Inc. do Mark Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Date: May 1996 D=s M22TF.saM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Purpose of Report 1 Project Description 1 Report Procedure 1 Existing Traffic 1 Project Traffic Distribution 1 Traffic Volumes 3 Check Signal Warrants 8 -Safety Evaluation 9 Accident Characteristics Table X Lane Configurations 10 Unsignalized Intersection Performance Summary Table Al Unsignalized Intersection Performance Summary Table A2 Signalized Intersection Performance Summary Table A4 to Table E6 Conclusions 11 Level of Service Descriptions 12 Glossary 14 References 16 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to evaluate the impact of changes in traffic patterns associated with development of the Meadowland Business Park in South Burlington, Vermont. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site entrance is located at the intersection of U.S. Route 116 and Swift Street Extension in South Burlington, Vermont. This entrance is the one presently being used by Lane Press and Dynapower, Inc. The land is the former Vosburg Farm and it is presently undeveloped. Portions of it are being used for passive agricultural purposes. The total land owned by Summer Ice Joint Venture, Inc. is 116.7 acres. The project consists of the development of 12 lots for industrial use. The 121ots will be served by a proposed road extension of 3,500 feet. Build out of this project is estimated as starting in 1997 and being completed in 2002. REPORT PROCEDURE The procedures used in this report are similar to those suggested in publications of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Traffic counts were provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation and Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) at five locations; Williston Road/ route 116, Kennedy Drivel Route 116, mute 116/ Swift Street Ext., Williston Road/ Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive/ Dorset Street. Two hour short counts were conducted at the Route 116/ Swift Street Ext. intersection by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project traffic was determined using the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual (Fifth Edition). Project traffic is based on a proposed 25.39 percent building coverage for each lot. The five intersections listed above were evaluated for traffic conditions for four scenarios (1997 Without, 1997 With 20% Build, 2002 Without, and 2002 With Full Build). This was done for both AM and PM peak hours. EXISTING TRAFFIC Traffic on the existing street network, which will be impacted by this project, was determined from the Vermont Agency of Transportation counts, and counts made by CCRPC. Traffic at Swift St. Extension is based on counts done by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Based on our AM. and P.M. peak hour counts, we determined that truck traffic was less than 5 percent of the peak hour traffic. Truck movements were therefore included with the vehicle movements. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Traffic generated by the project was distributed on the existing street network by analogy to the patterns obtained from the traffic counts. Page 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC Site traffic will be generated by estimating a 25.39 percent building coverage of each of the proposed industrial lots. The I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual (Fifth Edition) was used to develop traffic estimates for the project. For Land Use Code 130 (pages 150 and 151) and the estimated total project building coverage of the 1,213,601 square feet, the A.M. peak hour is 830 and the P.M. peak hour is 673. Using the same land use code the average weekday trip ends are 6773. The following tables contain the estimated peak hour project traffic entering and exiting for 1997 and 2002. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC (YEAR 2002) LAND USE CODE 130 A.M. Peak Hour entering (82%) 680 Trips exiting (18%) 150 Trips Total 830 Trip Ends P.M. Peak Hour entering (21%) 141 Trips exiting (79%) 532 Trips Total 673 Trip Ends TABLE 2 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC (YEAR 1997) (20% of 2002 Traffic) A.M. entering exiting Total P.M. entering exiting Total 136 30 166 Trip Ends 29 106 135 Trip Ends Page 2 Vt. Rt. 116 and Project Dr. - A DHV 1997 W/O DHV 1997 W DHV 2002 W/O DHV 2002 W DHV 1997 W/O DHV 1997 W TRAFFIC VOLUMES Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L 0 171 58 41 0 10 28 570 0 0 0 0 0 171 153 62 0 19 69 570 0 0 0 0 2002 DHV Morning 0 -189 64 45 0 11 31 629 0 0 0 0 0 189 542 150 0 56 236 629 0 0 0 0 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L 0 538 7 85 0 40 2 293 0 0 0 0 0 538 27 162 0 71 11 293 0 0 0 0 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 0 594 7 94 0 44 2 323 0 0 0 0 DHV 2002 W 0 594 107 472 0 198 43 323 0 0 0 0 Page 3 Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. - B Meadowland Business Park 1997 g DHV Morning I North App. East App. South App. West App. I R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 113 170 32 27 347 22 34 311 151 35 344 157 DHV 1997 W 113 225 32 27 347 29 36 323 157 68 344 157 I 2002 DHV Morning I DHV 2002 W/O 125 -188 35 30 383 24 38 343 166 39 380 173 I DHV 2002 W 125 461 35 30 383 65 47 403 202 203 380 173 I 1997 DHV Afternoon I North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 129 237 52 45 524 71 36 264 132 153 523 223 DHV 1997 W 129 250 52 45 524 73 46 313 150 158 523 223 I 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 142 262 57 50 579 79 40 291 146 169 577 246 l DHV 2002 W 142 326 57 50 579 91 89 530 236 193 577 246 I Page 4 I Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and Williston Rd. - C Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 8 188 126 53 613 36 62 175 216 106 727 9 DHV 1997 W 8 192 126 53 613 39 63 176 226 151 727 9 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 9 208 140 58 677 40 68 193 238 117 803 10 DHV 2002 W 9 228 140 58 677 54 71 198 287 343 803 10 DHV 1997 W/O DHV 1997 W DHV 2002 W/O DHV 2002 W 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L 12 285 76 123 912 110 110 312 173 173 685 15 12 286 76 123 912 111 111 316 215 184 685 15 2002 DHV Afternoon 14 315 84 136 1007 121 121 345 191 191 756 16 14 319 84 136 1007 122 127 361 398 246 756 16 Page 5 Trans/OD Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and I189 Ramps - D Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 76 89 284 209 378 139 215 166 41 DHV 1997 W 76 89 295 211 380 141 226 166 41 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 84 -' 98 313 231 418 154 238 183 45 DHV 2002 W 84 98 367 243 430 166 292 183 45 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 175 257 379 233 415 240 213 162 14 DHV 1997 W 175 257 380 239 421 246 214 162 14 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 193 284 419 257 458 265 235 179 15 DHV 2002 W 193 284 427 283 490 297 243 179 15 Page 6 West App. R T L 12 295 73 12 306 73 13 325 80 I 13 379 80 I West App. 1 R T L 13 .404 169 13 407 1 169 14 446 187 14 454 187 Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and Williston Rd. - E Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 19 3 21 11 974 100 96 2 339 460 1057 12 DHV 1997 W 19 3 21 11 983 100 101 2 339 461 1097 12 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 21 4 24 12 1075 110 106 2 374 508 1167 13 DHV 2002 W 21 4 24 12 1118 110 133 2 374 514 1365 13 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 27 4 10 15 1259 291 248 3 957 1073 788 25 DHV 1997 W 27 4 10 15 1294 291 248 3 963 1075 797 25 DHV 2002 W/O DHV 2002 W 2002 DHV Afternoon 30 5 11 17 1389 321 274 30 5 11 17 1564 321 274 Page 7 4 1056 1185 869 27 4 1088 1193 916 27 Trans/Op Inc. CHECK SIGNAL WARRANT VOLUMES SWIFT ST./ROUTE 116 TIME SUM MAJOR MINOR WARRANT APPROACH (VEH) APPROACH (VEH) SATISFIED MORNING AWV 1997 W/O 749 46 1997 W 885 76 2002 W/O 827 51 2002 W 1510 201 11,11R AFTERNOON AWV 1997 W/O 760 113 1997 W 789 221 11R 2002 W/O 839 125 2002 W 980 657 11,11R Signal warrant 11 is peak hour volume. Signal warrant I I is reduced peak hour volume for community under 10,000 pop. and speeds over 40 mph. ( Fig. 4.6 MUTCD) Page 8 SAFETY EVALUATION Accident characteristics on Vermont Route 116 were analyzed for a distance of 0.10 mile on both sides of the project driveway. Traffic accidents, as presently listed in the State Highway Sorted Accident File for the five year period from 1990 through 1994, are summarized in Table X according to numbers, rates, causes, types, and severities. This section of a major collector in a rural area is not currently classified as a high accident location by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. A general guideline for the indication of a safety problem at the intersection or a short section of roadway is the average occurrence of five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period. The three mishaps that were reported over the five years result in a frequency of 0.60 accidents per year, which is less than the criterion for an accident prone situation. Another measure of relative safety is provided by a comparison of actual and critical accident experiences per one - million vehicle miles. Again the actual accident experience is below the critical value that is indicative of a safety problem. In general, causes of the reported traffic mishaps are attributable to driver errors. The accidents are not related to any elements of highway design and/or traffic control. Therefore, the study roadway is summarized as a non -accident-prone location. However, all collisions are classified in the severity category of person injury. Speed may be a contributing actor in the severities of these accidents on this roadway section with a speed of 45 mph. Sight distances are adequate at the Swift Street Extension Route 116 intersection. Page 9 TABLE X ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS Vermont Route 116 at Project Driveway 1990-1994 Total accidents 3 Average accidents per year 0.60 Accident rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 1.03 Critical rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 2.30 Accident causes Excessive speed 2 Careless and negligent 1 Accident types Left roadway 3 Accident severities Fatal 0 Personal injury 3 Property damage only 0 Conclusion: non -accident-prone location. Trans/Op Inc. LANE CONFIGURATIONS (Revised 5-21-96) 1996 1997 EXISTING (BUILD) Route 116/ Swift Street NB 2 lanes (T&R) 2 lanes (T&R) SB 2 lanes (L&T) 2 lanes (L&T) WB 1 lane (L&R) 1 lane (L&R) Route 116/ Kennedy Dr. NB 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) SB 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) EB 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) WB 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) Route 116/ Williston Road NB 2 lanes (L&TR) 2 lanes (L&TR) SB 1 lane (LTR) 1 lanes (LTR) EB 2 lanes (LT&TR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) WB 2 lanes (LT&TR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) Kennedy Drive/ Dorset St NB 2 lanes (LT&R) Same SB 3 lanes (L,T,R) Same EB 4 lanes (2L,T,R) Same WB 3 lanes (L,T,R) Same Dorset/ Williston Rd NB 3 lanes (L,LT.R) Same SB 2 lanes (LT,R) Same EB 4 lanes (2L,T,TR) Same WB 4lanes (R,T,T,L) Same Page 10 TABLE Al UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Shared Average Level of Capacity Capacity Delay Service (pcph) (pcph) (spv) Wo W WO W WO W WO W 1997 Morning DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L- 889 850 - - 4.4 5.3 A B Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 338 255 565 475 7.3 10.0 B B Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 712 712 Intersection 0.7 1.5 1997 Afternoon DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L-1240 1228 - - 2.9 3.0 A A Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 343 326 616 609 8.9 16.7 B C Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 984 984 Intersection 1.2 3.6 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Capacity (pcph) WO W Shared Capacity (pcph) WO W 2002 Morning DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L- 831 664 - - Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 298 11 513 33 Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 665 665 Intersection Average Delay (spv) WO W 4.7 40.0 8.3 0.8 1684.6 2002 Afternoon DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L-1200 1147 - - 3.0 3.5 Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 306 234 568 499 10.8 Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 950 950 Intersection 1.4 898.4 * Calculated delay greater than 999.9 sec. Level of Service WO W A E B F A A C F Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) With With Vt. Rt. 116 Vt. Rt. 116 Project Dr. Intersection Sequence Vt. Rt. 116 Vt. Rt. 116 Project Dr. Intersection Sequence 2002 Morning DHV - North App. 6.1 South App. 3.8 East App. 15.1 6.0 11 2002 Afternoon DHV - North App. 15.5 - South App. 10.8 - East App. 11.1 12.8 11 B A C B C B B B Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio With With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH 6.1 South App. RT - TH - East App. LT-TH-RT 15.1 Intersection 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH 15.5 South App. RT - TH - East App. LT-TH-RT 11.1 0.64 0.16 0.54 0.52 0.53 0.75 0.03 0.50 0.78 Intersection 0.69 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue (ft) With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH 118 South App. RT 25 TH 197 East App. LT-TH-RT 130 2002 Afternoon DHV North App.•- LT-TH 194 South App. RT 25 TH 176 East App. LT-TH-RT 250 Storage (ft) Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. Approach South Burlington, Vermont Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 8.3 7.9 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 11.9 10.9 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 10.8 12.0 B B Kennedy Dr. - West App. 12.2 13.3 B B Intersection 11.1 11.3 B B Sequence 14 14 1997 Afternoon DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 9.9 9.4 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 13.7 14.0 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 12.8 14.1 B B Kennedy Dr. - West App. 15.7 17.9 C C Intersection 13.5 14.6 B B Sequence 14 14 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.14 0.14 TH - - 0.34 0.40 LT - - 0.25 0.21 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.04 TH 12.5 - 0.57 0.52 LT - 12.6 0.51 0.58 East App. RT - - 0.05 0.06 TH - - 0.55 0.59 LT 12.8 13.3 0.07 0.10 West App. RT - - 0.07 0.15 TH 11.3 12.8 0.58 0.63 LT - - 0.49 0.53 Intersection 0.47 0.48 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.16 0.16 TH - - 0.49 0.47 LT - - 0.33 0.38 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.05 TH - - 0.52 0.56 LT 18.7 20.7 0.68 0.74 East App. RT - - 0.08 0.08 TH - - 0.74 0.77 LT - - 0.23 0.24 West App. RT - - 0.28 0.30 TH 16.2 19.1 0.81 0.85 LT 19.6 21.4 0.71 0.74 Intersection 0.59 0.62 Trans/Ou Inc. TABLE B3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT 44 42 268 TH 103 128 268 LT 25 25 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 184 180 500 LT 89 87 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 193 201 500 LT 25 25 200 West App. RT 25 40 130 TH 192 200 530 LT 109 111 530 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 52 50 268 TH 143 145 268 LT 31 30 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 160 183 500 LT 80 88 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 272 280 500 LT 48 50 200 West App. RT 81 86 130 TH 277 285 530 LT 155 156 530 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. Approach South Burlington, Vermont Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 8.3 26.7 B D Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 12.4 15.6 B C Kennedy Dr. - East App. 11.4 30.9 B D Kennedy Dr. - West App. 13.1 11.5 B B Intersection 11.7 20.0 B C Sequence 14 33 2002 Afternoon DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 9.8 21.3 B C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 16.2 13.1 C B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 15.4 44.6 C E Kennedy Dr. - West App. 22.0 12.4 C B Intersection 17.0 21.5 C C Sequence 14 33 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.16 0.18 TH - 33.6 0.37 0.95 LT - - 0.29 0.24 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.06 TH - - 0.62 0.47 LT 13.4 35.2 0.58 0.87 East App. RT - - 0.06 0.09 TH - 34.8 0.60 0.93 LT - - 0.08 0.53 West App. RT - - 0.08 0.24 TH 12.3 - 0.65• 0.55 LT 16.1 25.8 0.56 0.76 Intersection 0.51 0.64 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.18 0.20 TH - 28.9 0.51 0.88 LT - - 0.39 0.48 South App. RT - - 0.05 0.13 TH - - 0.54 0.66 LT 27.4 22.8 0.80 0.77 East App. RT - - 0.09 0.16 TH - 49.7 0.82 1.44 IT - - 0.27 0.76 West App. RT - - 0.31 0.20 TH 23.3 - 0.91 0.75 LT 27.9 22.5 0.83 0.77 Intersection 0.66 0.79 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT 49 56 268 TH 112 281 268 LT 25 25 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 201 177 500 LT 97 148 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 213 254 500 LT 25 43 200 West App. RT 25 69 130 TH 212 191 530 LT 121 129 530 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 57 65 268 TH 154 214 268 LT 34 37 100 South App. RT 25 42 130 TH 172 248 500 LT 86 163 150 East App. RT 26 33 200 TH 303 381 500 LT 54 60 200 West App. RT 90 52 130 TH 308 268 530 LT 173 170 530 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 9.5 10.0 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 7.4 7.7 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 11.4 11.5 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 11.5 11.5 B B Intersection 10.4 10.6 B B Sequence 11 11 1997 Afternoon DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 19.8 22.3 C C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 14.7 15.9 B C Williston Rd. - East App. 16.3 19.5 C C Williston Rd. - West App. 7.1 7.4 B B Intersection 13.7 15.6 B C Sequence 11 11 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spy) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 9.5 10.0 0.59 0.61 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.39 0.41 East App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.62' 0.64 West App. LT-TH-RT 11.5 11.5 0.63 0.66 Intersection 0.57 0.60 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 19.8 22.3 0.80 0.84 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.72 0.77 East App. LT-TH-RT 16.3 19.5 0.91 0.94 West App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.54 0.56 Intersection 0.75 0.78 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and Williston Rd. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 142 145 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 98 102 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 178 177 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 215 224 500 1997 Afternoon DHV North App.'- LT-TH-RT 202 200 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 160 171 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 221 225 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 169 174 500 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 11.7 15.7 B C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 7.8 8.8 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 13.0 14.8 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 12.3 15.4 B C Intersection 11.5 14.0 B B Sequence 11 11 2002 Afternoon DHV -Patchen Rd. - North App. 14.6 26.8 B D Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 11.0 12.2 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 34.7 38.5 D D Williston Rd. - West App. 11.1 21.8 B C Intersection 20.6 25.9 C D Sequence 11 11 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With I2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 11.7 15.7 0.69 0.78 South App. LT-TH-RT - 0.44 0.52 East App. I LT-TH-RT 13.0 _ 0.73 0.80 West App. LT-TH-RT - 15.4 0.70 0.85 IIntersection 0.66 0.76 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 14.6 26.8 0.75 0.91 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.65 0.79 East App. LT-TH-RT 34.7 38.5 1.32 1.62 West App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.71 0.92 IIntersection I 0.94 1.14 I I 1 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 158 173 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 108 125 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 196 193 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 236 285 500 2002 Afternoon DHV North App.' LT-TH-RT 195 175 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 155 185 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 288 321 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 220 260 500 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE Dl SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and I189 Ramps Approach South Burlington, Vermont Stopped Delay Level of Service ,(spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Dorset St. - North App. 13.0 13.4 B B Dorset St. - South App. 6.5 6.3 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 17.3 17.7 C C I189 Ramps - West App. 13.5 13.6 B B Intersection 13.3 13.5 B B Sequence 14 14 1997 Afternoon DHV Dorset St. - North App. 17.0 16.1 C C Dorset St. - South App. 5.9 5.8 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 22.5 24.0 C C I189 Ramps - West App. 14.8 14.9 B B Intersection 16.8 17.0 C C Sequence 14 14 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. TH-RT - - 0.23 0.23 LT 16.1 16.7 0.73 0.75 South App. RT - - 0.23 0.24 LT-TH - - 0.31 0.30 East App. RT - - 0.48 0.48 TH 18.3 18.8 0.73 0.74 LT 19.4 19.7 0.53 0.54 West App. -TH-RT - - 0.29 0.31 IT - - 0.14 0.14 Intersection 0.46 0.47 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT - - 0.60 0.59 IT 25.0 23.3 0.88 0.86 South App. RT - - 0.22 0.22 LT-TH - - 0.26 0.26 East App. RT - - 0.56 0.57 TH 24.9 25.8 0.84 0.86 IT 25.0 28.4 0.76 0.81 West App. TH-RT - - 0.43 0.43 LT - - 0.27 0.28 Intersection 0.59 0.59 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Lane 90-P Queue (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. TH-RT 81 80 LT 140 144 South App. RT 70 73 LT-TH 102 101 East App. RT 128 129 TH 231 233 LT 101 102 West App. TH-RT 93 96 LT 26 26 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT 213 211 LT 187 185 South App. RT 65 65 LT-TH 87 86 East App. RT 144 148 TH 256 260 LT 165 171 West App. TH-RT 129 130 LT 58 59 Storage (ft) 400 200 240 240 170 370 308 300 400 200 240 240 170 370 170 300 300 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Stopped Delay A spv ) Without With 2002 Morning DHV Dorset St. - North App. 16.6 23.8 Dorset St. - South App. 6.2 5.5 Kennedy Dr. - East App. 20.7 27.0 I189 Ramps - West App. 14.0 14.8 Intersection 15.4 19.2 Sequence 14 14 2002 Afternoon DHV Dorset St. - North App. 23.6 31.1 Dorset St. - South App. 5.7 6.4 Kennedy Dr. - East App. 33.7 33.5 I189 Ramps - West App. 15.4 14.9 Intersection 22.6 24.9 Sequence 14 14 Level of Service Without With C C B B C D B B C C C D B B D D C B C C Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and I189 Ramps South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay North App. TH-RT LT South App. RT LT-TH East App. RT TH LT West App. fiH-RT LT Intersection North App. TH-RT LT South App. RT LT-TH East App. RT TH LT West App. TH-RT LT Intersection (spv) Without With 2002 Morning DHV 22.2 32.4 23.0 33.7 23.0 24.6 2002 Afternoon DHV 39.5 50.6 - 19.6 39.3 - 40.0 21.0 V/ C Ratio Without With 0.24 0.23 0.84 0.93 0.25 0.29 0.33 0.31 0.54 0.61 0.83 0.92 0.65 0.70 0.33 0.42 0.17 0.16 0.52 0.58 0.63 0.73 0.97 1.18 0.23 0.24 0.29 0.33 0.63 0.71 0.96 1.05 0.91 0.73 0.48 0.50 0.32 0.23 0.66 0.71 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach North App. South App. East App. West App. - Lane 90-P Queue (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV TH-RT 86 LT 148 RT 76 LT-TH 108 RT 142 TH 258 LT 114 TH-RT 103 LT 29 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT 227 LT 200 South App. RT 70 LT-TH 93 East App. RT 160 TH 286 LT 185 West App. TH-RT 144 LT 65 83 168 88 104 154 273 122 123 29 250 224 71 102 178 308 192 147 60 Storage (ft) 400 200 240 240 170 370 170 300 300 400 200 240 240 170 370 170 300 300 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.2 Dorset St. - South App. 15.4 Williston Rd. - East App. 6.9 Williston Rd. - West App. 17.5 Intersection 12.7 Sequence 32 1997 Afternoon DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 15.2 Dorset St. - South App. 19.8 Williston Rd. - East App. 15.2 Williston Rd. - West App. 24.1 Intersection 18.7 Sequence 32 13.3 15.6 6.8 18.3 13.1 32 15.3 20.3 15.8 24.5 19.2 32 B C B C I: C C C C B C B C it1 C C C C Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.07 0.07 LT-TH 13.2 13.3 0.08 0.08 South App. RT - - 0.10 0.11 LT 18.7 19.0 0.70 0.70 East App. TH-RT - - 0.51 0.51 LT 14.7 14.7 0.20 0.21 West App. TH 17.6 18.4 0.88 0.89 LT - - 0.10 0.10 Intersection 0.65 0.66 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.11 0.12 LT-TH 15.1 15.1 0.05 0.05 South App. RT - - 0.22 0.22 LT 24.2 24.8 0.93 0.93 East App. TH-RT - - 0.83 0.85 LT 20.6 20.7 0.68 0.68 West App. TH 24.5 24.8 0.90 0.91 LT - - 0.22 0.22 Intersection 0.81 0.82 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 35 37 550 LT 123 123 250 East App. TH-RT 198 198 600 LT 36 36 310 West App. TH 298 306 500 LT 25 25 150 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 74 74 550 LT 304 306 250 East App. TH-RT 342 351 600 LT 116 116 310 West App. TH 272 275 500 LT 25 25 150 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.4 15.2 B C Dorset St. - South App. 18.4 19.1 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 6.9 6.9 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 19.9 22.2 C C Intersection 14.2 15.6 B C Sequence 32 32 2002 Afternoon DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.2 13.2 B B Dorset St. - South App. 31.2 31.4 D D Williston Rd. - East App. 15.0 24.2 B C Williston Rd. - West App. 37.8 37.9 D D Intersection 25.5 29.4 D D Sequence 32 32 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.08 0.09 LT-TH 13.5 15.2 0.09 0.10 South App. RT - - 0.12 0.16 LT 22.4 24.0 0.80 0.80 East App. TH-RT - - 0.55 0.54 LT 14.9 16.7 0.23 0.26 West App. TH 2O.1 22.3 0.92 0.95 LT - - 0.11 0.12 Intersection 0.69 0.71 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.11 0.11 LT-TH 13.1 13.1 0.05 0.05 South App. RT - - 0.25 0.25 LT 38.6 38.6 1.26 1.30 East App. TH-RT - - 0.88 0.99 LT 17.5 17.5 0.64 0.64 West App. TH 38.6 38.6 1.02 1.08 LT - - 0.22 0.22 Intersection 0.93 1.00 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 40 59 550 LT 136 148 250 East App. TH-RT 213 225 600 LT 40 44 310 West App. TH 321 377 500 LT 25 25 150 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 76 76 550 IT 335 345 250 East App. TH-RT 337 379 600 LT 115 115 310 West App. TH 280 295 500 LT 25 25 150 Trans/Op Inc. CONCLUSIONS The impact of Meadowland Business Park will result in a change of traffic levels at the project access driveway and intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project. The intersection of Swift Street Extension and Route 116 will warrant a signal in 1997 with completion of 20% of the projected buildout. All of the other intersections can accommodate the changes in traffic without any improvements through the year 2002. Page 11 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF STOPPED STOPPING RATIO OF TOTAL CRITICAL SERVICE DELAY N SERVICE VOLUME MOVEMENT (sec/veh) TO CAPACITY (vpMane) A <5.0 <50 0.00 - 0.45 - B 5.1 - 15.0 51 - 67 0.46 - 0.60 - (under) C 15.1 - 25.0 68 - 76 0.61 - 0.75 1200 D 25.1 - 40.0 77 - 83 0.76 - 0.90 - (near) E 40.1 - 60.0 84 - 93 0.91 - 1.00 1400 F >60.0 94 - 100 > 1.00 > 1400 (over) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF DELAY TO MINOR RESERVE CAPACITY STOPPED DELAY SERVICE STREET TRAFFIC (pcph) (sec/veh) A Little or no 400 <9.0 B Short 300 - 399 9.0 -12.0 C Average 200 - 299 12.0 - 18.0 D Long 100 - 199 18.0 - 36.0 E Very long 0 - 99 > 36.0 F Extreme - - LEGEND sec/veh - seconds per vehicle vph/lane - vehicles per hour per lane pcph - passenger cars per hour Page 12 LEVEL OF SERVICE URBAN AND SUBURBAN ARTERIALS LEVEL OF QUALITATIVE AVERAGE LOAD SERVICE DESCRIPTION TRAVEL SPEED FACTOR QAPH) A Free flow > 30 0.0 B Stable flow > 25 < 0.1 (slight delay) C Stable flow (acceptable delay) 1 D Approaching unstable flow E Unstable flow iF Forced flow ILEGEND MPH - miles per hour 1 I 1 1 RATIO OF SERVICE VOLUME TO CAPACITY < 0.60 < 0.70 >20 <0.3 <0.80 > 15 <0.7 <0.90 >10 <1.0 <1.00 <10 - - Page 13 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Average Daily Traffic (ADT) - The average number of vehicles passing a specified point during a 24 hr. period. Some examples are as follows: Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADDT) - Denotes daily traffic averaged over one year. Annual Average Weekday Traffic (AAWDT) - Denotes that the specified period includes only weekday, Monday through Friday. Design Hourly Volume (DHV) - The 30th highest hourly volume of the year. Capacity - The maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and control conditions. Capture Rate For Pass -By Traffic - Proportion of trips attached to the development from traffic normally passing -by the site. Gravity Model - A trip distribution technique. The gravity model is based on the hypothesis that the number of trips between two areas is directly related to the amount of activity in an area and inversely related to the spacial separation between the areas, represented as a function of travel time. Level Of Service (LOS) - A set of qualitative and quantitative criteria that describes the degree to which an intersection, roadway, weaving section or ramp efficiently serves peak hour and/or daily traffic. Peak Hour - The hour during which the maximum amount of traffic occurs. Sight Distance - The length of roadway ahead visible to the driver. The minimum sight distance available on a road should be sufficiently long to allow a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. Traffic Assignment - The process of determining route or routes of travel and allocating the zone -to -zone trips to these routes. Trip - A single or one -direction vehicular trip with either the origin (outbound) or destination (inbound) or both inside the study area. Each trip has two trip ends. Trip Distribution - The process by which trips originating in one portion of the study area are distributed to the other portions of the study area. Page 14 GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Cont.) Trip End - A trip origin or a trip destination. Trip ends for a location are the summation of origins and destination. A trip has two ends, the origin and the destination. A site which has over some period of time, 2,000 trips entering and 1,800 trips leaving, has 3,800 trip ends associated with it. Trip Generation - Estimating the number of vehicle tips which may be generated by a specific building or land use. Page 15 REFERENCES 1. "Highway Capacity Manual, (Third Edition) 1994", Transportation Research Board, SR209, 1994. 2. "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", FHWA, 1988. 3. "Traffic Engineering Handbook", Institute of Transportation Engineers 2nd Edition, 1992. 4 "Trip Generation (Fifth Edition), An Informational Report", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991. 5. "Volume Warrants For Left -Turn Storage Lanes At Unsignalized Intersections", M.D. Harmelink, Department of Highway, Ontario. 6. "Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice", Prentice -Hall, Louis J. Pignataro. 7. "State of Vermont Sign Post Design Guideline", Engineering and Construction Design division, A.O.T., 1986. 8. "State of Vermont Pavement Marking Placement Guide", Engineering and Construction Design Division, A.O.T., 1988. 9. Sample Plans For Traffic Signs and Pavement Markings, A.O.T., 1996. 10. Regression Analysis For Traffic Projection, A.O.T., 1995. 11. Automatic Traffic Recorder Grouping Study, A.O.T., 1995. 12. "Traffic Access and Impact Studies for Site Development", ITE, 1991. Page 16 c.� \1 AGES, 'Aq�SPOR� P�� STATE OF VERMONT _ - AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION M 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 September 6, 1996 Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Post Office Box 308, 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Subject: Meadowland Business Park -South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: We have completed a review of the Traffic Impact Study for the above -referenced project and offer the following comments. The study does not show the method used for determining DHV or AM volumes from the raw data. This information would have been very helpful in reviewing the study. We agree with the calculated trip generation as well as the distribution of trips in/out of the project's access drive. Existing condition base volumes at the access point and at the VT 116/Kennedy Drive intersection look reasonable. We concur with the traffic volumes as posted on Page 3 of the study. All scenarios appear reasonable and reflect turning movement data that you conducted. The LOS at this intersection as provided by the study for unsignalized analysis is as follows: International LOS* Area of Concern 1997 AM No -build A 1997 AM Build 20% A 1997 DHV No -build A. 1997 DHV Build 20% A 2002 AM No -build A 2002 AM Build 100% F SB Lefts & Access 2002 DHV No -build A 2002 DHV Build 100% F Access Approach (*Study appeared to use HCS v 2.1. The 2.1 c patch is now available.) Telecommunicadons Relay Service 14800-2S3-0191 , Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Subject: Meadowland Business Park - South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT September 6, 1996 Page Two Although the study indicates that a signal is warranted in the 1997 build 20% scenario, this does not necessarily mean that a signal must be installed. Per MUTCD, "...satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is not in itself justification for a signal". (Also, reference "Guidelines for Traffic Engineering Issues".) We recommend the monitoring of this intersection for signalization be conducted by the developer in order to determine when signalization will be justified. If the access intersection with VT 116 is determined to warrant a separate left turn lane sometime in the future, then the proposed design of the left turn lane will need to be brought up to today's standards (i.e., not to have a bypass lane, but a separate left turn lane, especially if signalization is contemplated). This issue should be addressed as soon as additional development within the complex is contemplated. The VT 116/Kennedy Drive intersection: In general, we agree with your total trips in and out of this intersection for the no build scenarios (1997 and 2002) for both AM and DHV I conditions. However, our field data reflects a different distribution of the movements within the intersection. (This could be due to the fact that we used the Vermont Agency of Transportation turning movement for distribution and your study may have used something , else.) Our analysis indicates that right turns on the North and East approaches are approximately 2 times what you calculate. Also, the signal timing data sheets for this intersection indicate an exclusive PED phase. Your study does not reflect this and should do so in future analyses. Signal timing/ 1 phasing data may be obtained for signals under Vermont Agency of Transportation 1 jurisdiction by contacting this Agency's Traffic & Safety Section at (802)828-2724. Although your analyses indicated that overall intersection LOS was favorable in both the 1997 and 2002 conditions, you did not include exclusive PIED phase in design. This could significantly affect the LOS of an intersection. In conclusion, you should provide us with an updated traffic study whenever you _ intend to develop an individual lot within the project complex. The. information we need l should include the following: Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Subject: Meadowland Business Park - South Burlington, VT 116, L.S. 118+00 RT September 6, 1996 Page Three - For signal warrant analysis: You need to provide at least a 12-hour turning movement (to include the 0600-1800 hours at a minimum) showing distribution of all moves within the intersection. Volumes should be factored to reflect the average weekday condition. - For LOS analysis and geometric improvements: You need at a minimum AM (0700-0900) and PM (1500-1800) peak periods surveyed. The analysis should use DHV's. I have also attached a copy of two Agency publications which should be followed for any future traffic impact studies submitted to the Agency. IIf you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2653. 1 incerely, I Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT I Bruce C. Chattman Superintendent OFFICE: South Burlington High School SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403-6296 550 DORSET STREET Tel. 802/658-9050 FAX 802/658-9029 J John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 re: Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Pitrowski, Please accept my apologies for not responding sooner. Summer schedules and reductions in support staff have led to a delay in the receipt and response to correspondence. Your proposed business development will have no significant impact upon the South Burlington Schools. At such time as the development of the lots becomes a proposal, the impact upon the schools will need to be revisited. I understand that this would result in an Act 250 amendment application. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bruce C. Chattman c: impact file f FAX: (802) 658-4748 July 25, 1996 i�lvutb i13 urlitigtou ;Fire Department -575 -43nrrrt trrrt ;r ~uutb T6urlin tun. 11rrmnnt 05403 1"a (802)658-7960 Mr. John Pitrowski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Pitrowski: The South Burlington Fire Department provides fire protection and medical services to all portions of the City. Advanced medical treatment and all patient transport is provided under contract through UVM Rescue. I have reviewed the site plans for Meadowland Business Park. Should that development materialize, I can foresee no significant impact on the City's fire and rescue services. As with any municipal growth, there is always some service increase to be expected. However, I expect that this project will present no demands which would overtax our current resources. Sincerely, Wallace Possich Fire Chief SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT July 30, 1996 \� CE E A Nationally Accredited Agency John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P. O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: I have reviewed the site plan for Meadowland Business Park off of Route 116, South Burlington. This project should not be an unreasonable burden on our ability to provide police services. If I can be of further assistance, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ealand H. Graham Chief of Police LHG:mc 575 DORSET STREET • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 Dispatch: 658-1050 • Administration: 658-7971 • Detectives: 658-7969 • Fax: 658-7968 Lealand H. Graham, Chief ACT 250 KUNICIPA.L BiPACT QUFSTION?:AIRE Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name Municipality 6 i r y oi- !o✓%y Title and Date of Site Plan Reviewed ;/l ,-/.-/cx'%r Town Manager, Department Heads, or Equivalent to Complete: a. Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection? es or No? Police Protection? T-�Yes or No? Rescue Service? ✓�es or No? Solid taste Disposal? t/4es or No? Road Maintenance? 714es or No? b. If "no", what are the deficiencies? c. that the town doesn t have to? (IPA77 fi�SRO!/ If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the servic s1 d. Would the deficiencies occur without this project? _Yes or _No? If "no", what measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? e. If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to a municipality? _Yes or No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an -impact fee or other means to' mitigate any unreasonable burdel-s I certify that the above information is true an" curate to the best of my 1 knowledge. Name Position Date Are you available, after sufficient notice, to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? i4e- s or _No? 3/89 : MUNQUES.DOC IN7-0rZ1crF-- L( T— /,)`l7Z^/-,JCr S )C-/ T�Pr x LrGKr 13oX The ,�Jo pTz�p $TLDh/Z� %Dhl� Meadow VM rNUrn BUSINESS PARK WHri� �3=aNX9=5"x � 0 % LEX4N AC2,r/F Grre,�n STo -L r T- � yg',�tuMrNvm SAME F4 S Ar3ov� p a (HDc_c,Ov�) trf\! ' State of Verniont �t1�4 Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist John P. Pitrowiski Trudell consulting Engineers, Inc. PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 103 South Main Street, 10 South Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0501 Tel.: (802) 241-3700 TDD: 1-800-253-0191 Nongame & Natural Heritage Program July 16, 1996 Re: Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, VT Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: I am responding to your request for our review of this site. A search of our database reveals no known occurrences of rare and irreplaceable natural areas or threatened or endangered animals or plants at this site. For your information, our program has not made a biological evaluation of this area. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Everett J. Marshall Biologist/Data Manager Tel: 802-241-3715; Fax: 802-241-3295 Email: earshall@fpr.anr.state.vt.us Equal Opportunity Employer Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rudan&N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Mr. John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Mr. Pitrowski: r AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE I ❑ 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 878-1564 ❑ RR 41, Box 33 N. Springfield, VT 05150 (802) 886-2215 Pit Academy Pittsford' V T 055763 (802) 483-2172 ❑ 324 N. Main Strect 1 Bane, VT 05641 I (802) 479-3241 ❑ 180 Portland Street St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 I (802) 748-8787 VT Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 I appreciate your request for comments and recommendations concerning potential impacts to critical wildlife habitats associated with the proposed Meadowland Business Park. Based upon the information submitted, it appears that a small wetland exists along the southern portion of the property and extends into the center of the property. According to your design plans, a 50 foot wide buffer strip will be retained along the perimeter of the wetland. Also, some lands are proposed for open space. Therefore, the Department finds that there will be no undue adverse I impact to the wetland habitat associated with this proposal. Please feel free to contact me at 479-3621 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Respectfully, John M. Austin Dist. Wildlife Biologist Dept. of Fish & Wildlife soburl5.96 Chlorine Free 1001h Recycled Paper STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD & MARKETS OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ANIMAL & DAIRY INDUSTRIES DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY, LABORATORIES & CONSUMER ASSURANCE August 9, 1996 Mr. Richard P. Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: Meadowland Business Park, So. Burlington; Primary Agricultural Soils Mitigation Dear Mr. Trudell: Thank you for your letter of August 7 outlining Meadowland Business Park's proposal for off -site mitigation, which you, Mark Neagley and I discussed during our July 19 meeting. I agree with the proposed mitigation arrangement, which is as follows: 1. The tract contains 84.5 acres of primary agricultural soils. 2. The mitigation payment will be calculated consistent with other off -site mitigation arrangements recently approved by the District #4 Environmental Commission. That is, a $2,000 payment will be made for each acre of primary agricultural soils developed. We agree that when fully developed, the Meadowland Business Park will fully convert the tract's 84.5 acres of primary, agricultural soils requiring a total payment of $169,000. 3. $7,000 will be paid for the development of each of Lots 4 through 12, totalling $63,000 for those lots. Upon development of any of Lots 1, 2 or 3, regardless of the sequence of their development relative to Lots 4 through 12, a payment of $106,000 will be required. This $106,000 payment will fully compensate for the primary agricultural soils converted by Lots 1 through 3. In this case, I support a phased payment schedule. Even if the project is abandoned after partial development, the infrastructure and lot development sequence will ensure that the majority of the primary agricultural soils will remain undeveloped in a size and shape ���c sit of QLu+urr DEFT. OF AGRICULTURE 116 STATE STREET DRAWER 20 MONTPELIER, VT 05620-2901 (802) 828.2500 FAX: (802) 828.2361 Richard P. Trudell, P.E. Page 2 August 21, 1996 available for commercial cultivation. Alternatively, the mitigation payment will be sufficient to compensate for the conversion of the majority of the primary agricultural soils. The O'Brien land (the former Chapman farm), which lies in the floodplain, is not acceptable off -site mitigation land. This land is self -protecting. I discussed the mitigation payment schedule/phasing with Lou Borie and he indicated he thought the District Commission would be receptive to this approach. Sincerely, Amy Jestes Llewellyn Agricultural Land Use Planner •motit State of Vei Depanment of Fish and Wldlife Department of Forests. Parks and Recrea5on Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1.800.253-0195 Voice>TDD Mr. John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P. O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 Re: Meadowland Business Park Rte. 116, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Vermont Geological Survey 103 South Main Street Center Building Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 August 15, 1996 Thank you for your letter of July 12 in which you request comment from the State Geologist's Office regarding and Act 250 application for the above mentioned project. We have reviewed the project with respect to Criteria 9D and 9E, which refer to the extraction of earth resources, and have the following comments- - 1. Based on data from the "Sand and Gravel Resources Map of Vermont," 1993, published by the New England Governor's Conference, Inc., the parcel in question is not located on an area of known sand deposits. Please be advised that the parcel just the east of your proposed project lies an area of known sand deposits. A limestone quarry lies in the middle of the sand deposit. This limestone was crushed for rip -rap during the construction of Interstate 89. 2. Since the project does not involve the extraction of minerals or earth resources, Criterion 9E does not apply. I hope this answers your questions. If you need further information, please contact me at 802-241-3496. Sincerely, Laurence R. Becker Vermont State Geologist Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pi ttsford/Rutland/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury Nl1%1A IIO Bov44,).BuilTti��u' NYNEX Engineering/Construction 1 Wednesday, July 17, 1996 Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Attention: Mr. John Pitrowiski Project: Meadowland Business Park South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Pitrowiski: NYNEX - New England Engineering Department received notice of the proposed 12-lot Meadowland Business Park off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington, Vermont. Telecommunication services to this project would be delivered via new underground cables placed in your conduit to the lots. NYNEX welcomes the opportunity to provide telecommunication services to new customers. Our commitment is to provide quality and timely public access to the local and long distance telephonernformation network. Please provide me with your schedule when it is finalized. I can be reached at 802-863-0823, weekdays. Thank you. Sincerely, Gary S. Sundberg Burlington Exchange Engineer - NYNEX Attachment cc: Outfile H. Norton 9 NYNEX Recycles I N71 Vemiont Gas P.O. Box 467, Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-863-4511 July 19, 1996 Mr. John Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Ability to Serve Letter Proposed Meadowland Business Park VT Rt. 116 South Burlington, VT Dear John: With regard to the proposed twelve (12) lot Meadowland Business Park to be located off of VT Rt. 116 South Burlington, Vermont, please be advised that natural gas facilities closest to this proposed project presently are located on VT Rt. 116 (Hinesburg Road) in front of the project, on the east side of the road. Please consult the enclosed Vermont Gas Systems' Hinesburg Road - Rt. 116 sheets 5 of 8, and 6 of 8, and 7 of 8 asbuilt drawings for the approximate gas facilities location. A feasibility study may be required to determine what contributions in aid of construction, if any, will be required for this project, and natural gas availability will be contingent upon entering into mutually acceptable construction agreements reflecting the outcome of the feasibility study, and acquiring necessary permits. If all of the previously stated conditions are met, Vermont Gas Systems can serve the additional load of the proposed twelve (12) lot Meadowland Business Park without affecting our present firm customers. We strongly recommend the use of high efficiency equipment for all uses of natural gas, and cost-effective thermal envelope measures for all new construction. To encourage this, our HomeBase and WorkPlace New Construction Demand Side Management programs encourage energy efficiency by providing technical assistance and financial incentives to builders/developers of energy efficient new construction, which will use natural gas for fuel. Enclosed please find information about the Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. recycled paper HomeBase and WorkPlace New Construction Programs. We invite and encourage all builders and developers (of buildings that will use natural gas) to participate in the HomeBase and WorkPlace New Construction programs . Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions. Sincerely yours, Michael A. Russom New Construction Engineer HomeBase New Construction Program Manager Enclosures GI:I IN M(It \' 1.\I\ PkI\ 1= • 11.0. BOX ��:;O • .'�111 ! !! : �I Id I\1' 111N\ T CiyO?--G,�jO • �\0,��(��}-� � j l August 13, 1996 Mr. John P. Pitrowiski Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Williston, Vermont 05.195 Dear. : 'Mr. Pitrowiski We have reviewed your letter of July 12, 1996, which requests Green Mountain Power's ability to serve the electric load for the proposed Meadowland Business Park on Route 116 in South Burlington. As you know, our comments are required so that a meaningful assessment can be made under 10 VSA Section 6086 (a) (9) (J). When load data is not available, Green 'Mountain Power Corporation forecasts an average use for each structure. You have informed us that this project will consist of 116 acres divided into 12 lots. Our review of this project assumes that average lot coverage for buildings will be 20% and that building use will be split evenly between commercial/light industrial and warehouse distribution. Our review also assumes that all three phase motors larger than 10 H.P. and all single phase motors larger than 5 H.P. meet the requirement for reduced voltage starting unless written approval has been received from Green Mountain Power, and that none of the proposed buildings will have electric space heating. Based on this information and other developments with similar parameters, it is estimated that the electrical panels will be rated three phase four wire, grounded wye, and the total project as described will result in an estimated peak demand of 3,300 KW. This requirement can be supplied from Green Mountain Power's existing and planned generation sources. if this estimate is not consistent with your load projections, Green Mountain Power Corporation should be made aware of the situation for planning purposes. We have evaluated the transmission and distribution system that will be used to serve your project's requirements and have determined that existing facilities are adequate for that purpose. We do not anticipate that your addition will require distribution or transmission improvements at this time or accelerate routine system improvements planned for the near future. Any new line extension construction necessary to provide service will be administered under GMP's line extension tariff. This tariff provides that line extensions will be installed in a right-of-way granted by the customer. GIMP requires that these rights -of -way be unencumbered, a minimum of 10' wide and be protected by a legally binding easement. In view of these facts, we conclude that the proposed development will not put an excessive or uneconomic demand on Green Mountain Power's facilities provided that development takes place in an orderly fashion over 10 or more years time. Mr. John P. Pitro\%iski I August 13, 1996 Page 2 Details concerning service size, scheduling, costs, etc., should be discussed vvith Glenn Ghostlaw of the Colchester District Office. Very truly yours out Fonte Director of Engineering LAFcd cc: Eng. File J. Ehrler, Energy Planning D. J. Gaherty G. S. Morgan P. C. Tousley T. G. Cecchini G. M. Ghostlaw TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Prepared by: Tyler Hart, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 In -conjunction with: Joseph Oppenlander, P.E. Trans/Op Inc. P.O. Box 29 Williston, VT 05495 Developer: Summer Ice Joint Venture, Inc. c/o Mark Neagley 82 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Date: May 1996 Docs196022TF.SAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Purpose of Report I Project Description I Report Procedure I Existing Traffic I Project Traffic Distribution I Traffic Volumes 3 Check Signal Warrants g Safety Evaluation 9 Accident Characteristics Table X Lane Configurations 10 Unsignalized Intersection Performance Summary Table Al Unsignalized Intersection Performance Summary Table A2 Signalized Intersection Performance Summary Table A4 to Table E6 Conclusions 11 Level of Service Descriptions 12 Glossary 14 References 16 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to evaluate the impact of changes in traffic patterns associated with development of the Meadowland Business Park in South Burlington, Vermont. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site entrance is located at the intersection of U.S. Route 116 and Swift Street Extension in South Burlington, Vermont. This entrance is the one presently being used by Lane Press and Dynapower, Inc. The land is the former Vosburg Farm and it is presently undeveloped. Portions of it are being used for passive agricultural purposes. The total land owned by Summer Ice Joint Venture, Inc. is 116.7 acres. The project consists of the development of 12 lots for industrial use. The 12 lots will be served by a proposed road extension of 3,500 feet. Build out of this project is estimated as starting in 1997 and being completed in 2002. REPORT PROCEDURE The procedures used in'this report are similar to those suggested in publications of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Traffic counts were provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation and Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) at five locations; Williston Road/ Route 116, Kennedy Drive/ Route 116, Route 116/ Swift Street Ext., Williston Road/ Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive/ Dorset Street. Two hour short counts were conducted at the Route 116/ Swift Street Ext. intersection by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project traffic was determined using the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual (Fifth Edition). Project traffic is based on a proposed 25.39 percent building coverage for each lot. The five intersections listed above were evaluated for traffic conditions for four scenarios (1997 Without, 1997 With 20% Build, 2002 Without, and 2002 With Full Build). This was done for both AM and PM peak hours. EXISTING TRAFFIC Traffic on the existing street network, which will be impacted by this project, was determined from the Vermont Agency of Transportation counts, and counts made by CCRPC. Traffic at Swift St. Extension is based on counts done by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Based on our A.M. and P.M. peak hour counts, we determined that truck traffic was less than 5 percent of the peak hour traffic. Truck movements were therefore included with the vehicle movements. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Traffic generated by the project was distributed on the existing street network by analogy to the patterns obtained from the traffic counts. Page 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC Site traffic will be generated by estimating a 25.39 percent building coverage of each of the proposed industrial lots. The I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual (Fifth Edition) was used to develop traffic estimates for the project. For Land Use Code 130 (pages 150 and 151) and the estimated total project building coverage of the 1,213,601 square feet, the A.M. peak hour is 830 and the P.M. peak hour is 673. Using the same land use code the average weekday trip ends are 6773. The following tables contain the estimated peak hour project traffic entering and exiting for 1997 and 2002. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC (YEAR 2002) LAND USE CODE 130 A.M. Peak Hour entering (82%) 680 Trips exiting (18%) 150 Trips Total 830 Trip Ends P.M. Peak Hour entering (21%) 141 Trips exiting (79%) 532 Trips Total 673 Trip Ends TABLE 2 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC (YEAR 1997) (20% of 2002 Traffic) A.M. entering 136 exiting 30 Total 166 Trip Ends P.M. entering 29 exiting 106 Total 135 Trip Ends Page 2 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Vt. Rt. 116 and Project Dr. - A Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 0 171 58 41 0 10 28 570 0 0 0 0 DHV 1997 W 0 171 153 62 0 19 69 570 0 0 0 0 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 0 - -189 64 45 0 11 31 629 0 0 0 0 DHV 2002 W 0 189 542 150 0 56 236 629 0 0 0 0 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 0 538 7 85 0 40 2 293 0 0 0 0 DHV 1997 W 0 538 27 162 0 71 11 293 0 0 0 0 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 0. 594 7 94 0 44 2 323 0 0 0 0 DHV 2002 W 0 594 107 472 0 198 43 323 0 0 0 0 Page 3 Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. - B Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 113 170 32 27 347 22 34 311 151 35 344 157 DHV 1997 W 113 225 32 27 347 29 36 323 157 68 344 157 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 125 .188 35 30 383 24 38 343 166 39 380 173 DHV 2002 W 125 461 35 30 383 65 47 403 202 203 380 173 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 129 237 52 45 524 71 36 264 132 153 523 223 DHV 1997 W 129 250 52 45 524 73 46 313 150 158 523 223 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 142 262 57 50 579 79 40 291 146 169 577 246 DHV 2002 W 142 326 57 50 579 91 89 530 236 193 577 246 Page 4 Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and Williston Rd. - C Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 8 188 126 53 613 36 62 175 216 106 727 9 DHV 1997 W 8 192 126 53 613 39 63 176 226 151 727 9 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 9 .208 140 58 677 40 68 193 238 117 803 10 DHV 2002 W 9 228 140 58 677 54 71 198 287 343 803 10 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 12 285 76 123 912 110 110 312 173 173 685 15 DHV 1997 W 12 286 76 123 912 111 111 316 215 184 685 15 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 14 315 84 136 1007 121 121 345 191 191 756 16 DHV 2002 W 14 319 84 136 1007 122 127 361 398 246 756 16 Page 5 ... Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and I189 Ramps - D Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 76 89 284 209 378 139 215 166 41 12 295 73 DHV 1997 W 76 89 295 211 380 141 226 166 41 12 306 73 2002 DHV Morning DHV 2002 W/O 84 ' 98 313 231 418 154 238 183 45 13 325 80 DHV 2002 W 84 98 367 243 430 166 292 183 45 13 379 80 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L DHV 1997 W/O 175 257 379 233 415 240 213 162 14 13 404 169 DHV 1997 W 175 257 380 239 421 246 214 162 14 13 407 169 2002 DHV Afternoon DHV 2002 W/O 193 284 419 257 458 265 235 179 15 14 446 187 DHV 2002 W 193 284 427 283 490 297 243 179 15 14 454 187 Page 6 Trans/Op Inc. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and Williston Rd. - E DHV 1997 W/O DHV 1997 W DHV 2002 W/O DHV 2002 W DHV 1997 W/O DHV 1997 W DHV 2002 W/O DHV 2002 W Meadowland Business Park 1997 DHV Morning North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L 19 3 21 11 974 100 96 2 339 460 1057 12 19 3 21 11 983 100 101 2 339 461 1097 12 2002 DHV Morning 21 4 24 12 1075 110 106 2 374 508 1167 13 21 4 24 12 1118 110 133 2 374 514 1365 13 1997 DHV Afternoon North App. East App. South App. West App. R T L R T L R T L R T L 27 4 10 15 1259 291 248 3 957 1073 788 25 27 4 10 15 1294 291 248 3 963 1075 797 25 2002 DHV Afternoon 30 5 11 17 1389 321 274 30 5 11 17 1564 321 274 Page 7 4 1056 1185 869 27 4 1088 1193 916 27 Trans/Op Inc. CHECK SIGNAL WARRANT VOLUMES SWIFT ST./ROUTE 116 TIME SUM MAJOR MINOR WARRANT APPROACH (VEH) APPROACH (VEH) SATISFIED MORNING AWV 1997 W/O 749 46 1997 W 885 76 2002 W/O 827 51 2002 W 1510 201 11,11R AFTERNOON AWV 1997 W/O 760 113 1997 W 789 221 11R 2002 W/O 839 125 2002 W 980 657 11,11R Signal warrant 11 is peak hour volume. Signal warrant 11R is reduced peak hour volume for community under 10,000 pop. and speeds over 40 mph. ( Fig. 4.6 MUTCD) Page 8 SAFETY EVALUATION Accident characteristics on Vermont Route 116 were analyzed for a distance of 0.10 mile on both sides of the project driveway. Traffic accidents, as presently listed in the State Highway Sorted Accident File for the five year period from 1990 through 1994, are summarized in Table X according to numbers, rates, causes, types, and severities. This section of a major collector in a rural area is not currently classified as a high accident location by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. A general guideline for the indication of a safety problem at the intersection or a short section of roadway is the average occurrence of five or more reported accidents within a 12 month period. The three mishaps that were reported over the five years result in a frequency of 0.60 accidents per year, which is less than the criterion for an accident prone situation. Another measure of relative safety is provided by a comparison of actual and critical accident experiences per one - million vehicle miles. Again the actual accident experience is below the critical value that is indicative of a safety problem. In general, causes of th'e reported traffic mishaps are attributable to driver errors. The accidents are not related to any elements of highway design and/or traffic control. Therefore, the study roadway is summarized as a non -accident-prone location. However, all collisions are classified in the severity category of person injury. Speed may be a contributing factor in the severities of these accidents on this roadway section with a speed of 45 mph. Sight distances are adequate at the Swift Street Extension Route 116 intersection. Page 9 TABLE X ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS Vermont Route 116 at Project Driveway Total accidents Average accidents per year Accident rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles Critical rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles Accident causes Excessive speed Careless and negligent Accident types Left roadway Accident severities Fatal Personal injury Property damage only Conclusion: non -accident-prone location. 1990-1994 3 0.60 1.03 2.30 2 1 3 Trans/Op Inc. LANE CONFIGURATIONS (Revised 5-21-96) 1996 EXISTING Route 116/ Swift Street Route 116/ Kennedy Dr. NB SB EB WB Route 116/ Williston Road NB SB EB WB Kennedy Drive/ Dorset St NB SB EB WB Dorset/ Williston Rd NB SB EB WB 2 lanes (T&R) , 2 lanes (L&T) 1 lane (L&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 2 lanes (L&TR) 1 lane (LTR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) 2 lanes (LT&R) 3 lanes (L,T,R) 4 lanes (2L,T,R) 3 lanes (L,T,R) 3 lanes (L,LT.R) 2 lanes (LT,R) 4 lanes (2L,T,TR) 4 lanes (R,T,T,L) Page 10 1997 (BUILD) 2 lanes (T&R) 2 lanes (L&T) 1 lane (L&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 3 lanes (L&T&R) 2lanes (L&TR) 1 lanes (LTR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) 2 lanes (LT&TR) Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same TABLE Al UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Shared Average Level of Capacity Capacity Delay Service (pcph) (pcph) (spv) WO W WO W WO W WO W 1997 Morning DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L- 889 850 - - 4.4 5.3 A B Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 338 255 565 475 7.3 10.0 B B Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 712 712 Intersection 0.7 1.5 1997 Afternoon DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L-1240 1228 - - 2.9 3.0 A A Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 343 326 616 609 8.9 16.7 B C Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 984 984 Intersection 1.2 3.6 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Capacity (pcph) WO W Shared Capacity (Pcph) WO W 2002 Morning DHV Vt.Rt.116- N App. L- 831 664 - - Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 298 11 513 33 Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 665 665 Intersection 2002 Afternoon DHV Average Level of Delay Service (spv) WO W WO W 4.7 40.0 A E 8.3 * B F 0.8 1684.6 Vt.Rt.116- N App. L-1200 1147 - - 3.0 3.5 A A Proj. Dr.- E App. L- 306 234 568 499 10.8 * C F Proj. Dr.- E App. R- 950 950 Intersection 1.4 898.4 * Calculated delay greater than 999.9 sec. Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) With With 2002 Morning DHV Vt. Rt. 116 - North App. 6.1 B Vt. Rt. 116 - South App. 3.8 A Project Dr. - East App. 15.1 C Intersection 6.0 B Sequence 11 2002 Afternoon DHV Vt. Rt. 116 - North App. 15.5 C Vt. Rt. 116 - South App. 10.8 B Project Dr. - East App. 11.1 B Intersection 12.8 B Sequence 11 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio With With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH 6.1 0.64 South App. RT - 0.16 TH - 0.54 East App. LT-TH-RT 15.1 0.52 Intersection 0.53 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH 15.5 0.75 South App. RT - 0.03 TH - 0.50 East App. LT-TH-RT 11.1 0.78 Intersection 0.69 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE A6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Vermont Route 116 and Project Drive South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue (ft) With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH 118 South App. RT 25 TH 197 East App. LT-TH-RT 130 2002 Afternoon DHV North App...- LT-TH 194 South App.- RT 25 TH 176 East App. LT-TH-RT 250 Storage (ft) Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. Approach South Burlington, Vermont Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 8.3 7.9 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 11.9 10.9 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 10.8 12.0 B B Kennedy Dr. - West App. 12.2 13.3 B B Intersection 11.1 11.3 B B Sequence 14 14 1997 Afternoon DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 9.9 9.4 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 13.7 14.0 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 12.8 14.1 B B Kennedy Dr. - West App. 15.7 17.9 C C Intersection 13.5 14.6 B B Sequence 14 14 Trans/Op Inc. 1 TABLE B2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.14 0.14 TH - - 0.34 0.40 LT - - 0.25 0.21 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.04 TH 12.5 - 0.57 0.52 LT - 12.6 0.51 0.58 East App. RT - - 0.05 0.06 TH - - 0.55 0.59 LT 12.8 13.3 0.07 0.10 West App. ITT - - 0.07 0.15 TH 11.3 12.8 0.58 0.63 LT - - 0.49 0.53 Intersection 0.47 0.48 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.16 0.16 TH - - 0.49 0.47 LT - - 0.33 0.38 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.05 TH - - 0.52 0.56 LT 18.7 20.7 0.68 0.74 East App. RT - - 0.08 0.08 TH - - 0.74 0.77 LT - - 0.23 0.24 West App. RT - - 0.28 0.30 TH 16.2 19.1 0.81 0.85 LT 19.6 21.4 0.71 0.74 Intersection 0.59 0.62 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT 44 42 268 TH 103 128 268 LT 25 25 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 184 180 500 LT 89 87 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 193 201 500 LT 25 25 200 West App. RT 25 40 130 TH 192 200 530 LT 109 ill 530 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 52 50 268 TH 143 145 268 LT 31 30 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 160 183 500 LT 80 88 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 272 280 500 LT 48 50 200 West App. RT 81 86 130 TH 277 285 530 LT 155 156 530 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Stopped Delay (spv) Without With 2002 Morning DHV Level of Service Without With Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 8.3 26.7 B D Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 12.4 15.6 B C Kennedy Dr. - East App. 11.4 30.9 B D Kennedy Dr. - West App. 13.1 11.5 B B Intersection 11.7 20.0 B C Sequence 14 33 2002 Afternoon DHV Hinesburg Rd. - North App. 9.8 21.3 B C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 16.2 13.1 C B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 15.4 44.6 C E Kennedy Dr. - West App. 22.0 12.4 C B Intersection 17.0 21.5 C C Sequence 14 33 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.16 0.18 TH - 33.6 0.37 0.95 LT - - 0.29 0.24 South App. RT - - 0.04 0.06 TH - - 0.62 0.47 LT 13.4 35.2 0.58 0.87 East App. RT - - 0.06 0.09 TH - 34.8 0.60 0.93 LT - - 0.08 0.53 West App. R;r - - 0.08 0.24 TH 12.3 - 0.65 0.55 LT 16.1 25.8 0.56 0.76 Intersection 0.51 0.64 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.18 0.20 TH - 28.9 0.51 0.88 LT - - 0.39 0.48 South App. RT - - 0.05 0.13 TH - - 0.54 0.66 LT 27.4 22.8 0.80 0.77 East App. RT - - 0.09 0.16 TH - 49.7 0.82 1.44 LT - - 0.27 0.76 West App. RT - - 0.31 0.20 TH 23.3 - 0.91 0.75 LT 27.9 22.5 0.83 0.77 Intersection 0.66 0.79 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE B6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Hinesburg Rd. and Kennedy Dr. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT 49 56 268 TH 112 281 268 LT 25 25 100 South App. RT 25 25 130 TH 201 177 500 LT 97 148 150 East App. RT 25 25 200 TH 213 254 500 LT 25 43 200 West App. RT 25 69 130 TH 212 191 530 LT 121 129 530 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 57 65 268 TH 154 214 268 LT 34 37 100 South App. RT 25 42 130 TH 172 248 500 LT 86 163 150 East App. RT 26 33 200 TH 303 381 500 LT 54 60 200 West App. RT 90 52 130 TH 308 268 530 LT 173 170 530 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 9.5 10.0 B B Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 7.4 7.7 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 11.4 11.5 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 11.5 11.5 B B Intersection 10.4 10.6 B B Sequence 11 11 1997 Afternoon DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 19.8 22.3 C C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 14.7 15.9 B C Williston Rd. - East App. 16.3 19.5 C C Williston Rd. - West App. 7.1 7.4 B B Intersection 13.7 15.6 B C Sequence 11 11 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 9.5 10.0 0.59 0.61 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.39 0.41 East App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.62 0.64 West App. LT-TH-RT 11.5 11.5 0.63 0.66 Intersection 0.57 0.60 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 19.8 22.3 0.80 0.84 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.72 0.77 East App. LT-TH-RT 16.3 19.5 0.91 0.94 West App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.54 0.56 Intersection 0.75 0.78 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 142 145 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 98 102 24+0 East App. LT-TH-RT 178 177 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 215 224 500 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 202 200 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 160 171 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 221 225 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 169 174 500 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 11.7 15.7 B C Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 7.8 8.8 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 13.0 14.8 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 12.3 15.4 B C Intersection 11.5 14.0 B B Sequence 11 11 2002 Afternoon DHV Patchen Rd. - North App. 14.6 26.8 B D Hinesburg Rd. - South App. 11.0 12.2 B B Williston Rd. - East App. 34.7 38.5 D D Williston Rd. - West App. 11.1 21.8 B C Intersection 20.6 25.9 C D Sequence 11 11 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 11.7 15.7 0.69 0.78 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.44 0.52 East App. LT-TH-RT 13.0 - 0.73 0.80 West App. LT-TH-RT - 15.4 0.70 0.85 Intersection 0.66 0.76 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 14.6 26.8 0.75 0.91 South App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.65 0.79 East App. LT-TH-RT 34.7 38.5 1.32 1.62 West App. LT-TH-RT - - 0.71 0.92 Intersection 0.94 1.14 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE C6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Patchen Rd., Hinesburg Rd., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 158 173 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 108 125 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 196 193 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 236 285 500 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. LT-TH-RT 195 175 300 South App. LT-TH-RT 155 185 240 East App. LT-TH-RT 288 321 500 West App. LT-TH-RT 220 260 500 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service ,(spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Dorset St. - North App. 13.0 13.4 B B Dorset St. - South App. 6.5 6.3 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 17.3 17.7 C C I189 Ramps - West App. 13.5 13.6 B B Intersection 13.3 13.5 B B Sequence 14 14 1997 Afternoon DHV Dorset St. - North App. 17.0 16.1 C C Dorset St. - South App. 5.9 5.8 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 22.5 24.0 C C I189 Ramps - West App. 14.8 14.9 B B Intersection 16.8 17.0 C C Sequence 14 14 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. TH-RT - - 0.23 0.23 LT 16.1 16.7 0.73 0.75 South App. RT - - 0.23 0.24 LT-TH - - 0.31 0.30 East App. RT - - 0.48 0.48 TH 18.3 18.8 0.73 0.74 LT 19.4 19.7 0.53 0.54 West App. ..-TH-RT - - 0.29 0.31 .LT - - 0.14 0.14 Intersection 0.46 0.47 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT - - 0.60 0.59 LT 25.0 23.3 0.88 0.86 South App. RT - - 0.22 0.22 LT-TH - - 0.26 0.26 East App. RT - - 0.56 0.57 TH 24.9 25.8 0.84 0.86 LT 25.0 28.4 0.76 0.81 West App. TH-RT - - 0.43 0.43 LT - - 0.27 0.28 Intersection 0.59 0.59 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) ( ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. TH-RT 81 80 400 LT 140 144 200 South App. RT 70 73 240 LT-TH 102 101 240 East App. RT 128 129 170 TH 231 233 LT 101 102 370 West App. TH-RT 93 96 17 308 LT 26 26 300 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT 213 211 400 LT 187 185 200 South App. RT 65 65 240 LT-TH 87 86 240 East App. RT 144 148 170 TH 256 260 370 LT 165 171 170 West App. TH-RT 129 130 300 LT 58 59 300 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service A spv ) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Dorset St. - North App. 16.6 23.8 C C Dorset St. - South App. 6.2 5.5 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 20.7 27.0 C D I189 Ramps - West App. 14.0 14.8 B B Intersection 15.4 19.2 C C Sequence 14 14 2002 Afternoon DHV Dorset St. - North App. 23.6 31.1 C D Dorset St. - South App. 5.7 6.4 B B Kennedy Dr. - East App. 33.7 33.5 D D I189 Ramps - West App. 15.4 14.9 C B Intersection 22.6 24.9 C C Sequence 14 14 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and I189 Ramps South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Critical Delay (spv) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. South App. East App. West App. Intersection North App. South App. East App. West App. Intersection TH-RT LT 22.2 32.4 RT - - LT-TH - - RT - - TH 23.0 33.7 LT 23.0 24.6 'TH-RT - - LT - - 2002 Afternoon DHV TH-RT LT 39.5 50.6 RT - - LT-TH - - RT - 19.6 TH 39.3 - LT 40.0 21.0 TH-RT - - LT - V/ C Ratio Without 0.24 0.84 0.25 0.33 0.54 0.83 0.65 0.33 0.17 0.52 0.63 0.97 0.23 0.29 0.63 0.96 0.91 0.48 0.32 With 0.23 0.93 0.29 0.31 0.61 0.92 0.70 0.42 0.16 0.58 0.73 1.18 0.24 0.33 0.71 1.05 0.73 0.50 0.23 0.71 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE D6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Dorset St., Kennedy Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont I189 Ramps Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage (ft) (ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. TH-RT 86 83 400 LT 148 168 200 South App. RT 76 88 240 LT-TH 108 104 240 East App. RT 142 154 170 TH 258 273 370 LT 114 122 170 West App.. TH-RT 103 123 300 LT 29 29 300 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. TH-RT 227 250 400 LT 200 224 200 South App. RT 70 71 240 LT-TH 93 102 240 East App. RT 160 178 170 TH 286 308 370 LT 185 192 170 West App. TH-RT 144 147 300 LT 65 60 300 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 1997 Morning DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.2 13.3 B B Dorset St. - South App. 15.4 15.6 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 6.9 6.8 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 17.5 18.3 C C Intersection 12.7 13.1 B B Sequence 32 32 1997 Afternoon DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 15.2 15.3 C C Dorset St. - South App. 19.8 20.3 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 15.2 15.8 C C Williston Rd. - West App. 24.1 24.5 C C Intersection 18.7 19.2 C C Sequence 32 32 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay (spv) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT - - LT-TH 13.2 13.3 South App. RT - - LT 18.7 19.0 East App. TH-RT - - LT 14.7 14.7 West App. TH 17.6 18.4 .LT - - Intersection North App. South App. East App. West App. 1997 Afternoon DHV RT - - LT-TH 15.1 15.1 RT - - LT 24.2 24.8 TH-RT - - LT 20.6 20.7 TH 24.5 24.8 LT - - V/ C Ratio Without 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.70 0.51 0.20 0.88 0.10 0.11 0.05 0.22 0.93 0.83 0.68 0.90 0.22 With 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.70 0.51 0.21 0.89 0.10 191W.' 0.12 0.05 0.22 0.93 0.85 0.68 0.91 0.22 Intersection 0.81 0.82 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E3 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane 90-P Queue Storage I. (ft) (ft) Without With 1997 Morning DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 35 37 550 LT 123 123 250 East App. TH-RT 198 198 600 LT 36 36 310 West App. TH 298 306 500 LT 25 25 150 1997 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 74 74 550 LT 304 306 250 East App. TH-RT 342 351 600 LT 116 116 310 West App. TH 272 275 500 LT 25 25 150 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E4 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.4 15.2 B C Dorset St. - South App. 18.4 19.1 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 6.9 6.9 B B Williston Rd. - West App. 19.9 22.2 C C Intersection 14.2 15.6 B C Sequence 32 32 2002 Afternoon DHV Holiday Inn Dr- North App. 13.2 13.2 B B Dorset St. - South App. 31.2 31.4 D D Williston Rd. - East App. 15.0 24.2 B C Williston Rd. - West App. 37.8 37.9 D D Intersection 25.5 29.4 D D Sequence 32 32 Trans/Op Inc. TABLE E5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STATISTICS Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and South Burlington, Vermont Williston Rd. Approach Lane Critical Delay V/C (spv) Ratio Without With Without With 2002 Morning DHV North App. RT - - 0.08 0.09 LT-TH 13.5 15.2 0.09 0.10 South App. RT - - 0.12 0.16 LT 22.4 24.0 0.80 0.80 East App. TH-RT - - 0.55 0.54 LT 14.9 16.7 0.23 0.26 West App. TH 2O.1 22.3 0.92 0.95 -LT - - 0.11 0.12 Intersection 0.69 0.71 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT - - 0.11 0.11 LT-TH 13.1 13.1 0.05 0.05 South App. RT - - 0.25 0.25 LT 38.6 38.6 1.26 1.30 East App. TH-RT - - 0.88 0.99 LT 17.5 17.5 0.64 0.64 West App. TH 38.6 38.6 1.02 1.08 LT - - 0.22 0.22 Intersection 0.93 1.00 Trans/Op Inc. 1 TABLE E6 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Holiday Inn Dr., Dorset St., and Williston Rd. Approach Lane South Burlington, Vermont 90-P Queue ( ft) Without With 2002 Morning DHV Storage (ft) North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 40 59 550 LT 136 148 250 East App. TH-RT 213 225 600 LT 40 44 310 West App. TH 321 377 500 LT 25 25 150 2002 Afternoon DHV North App. RT 25 25 50 LT-TH 25 25 50 South App. RT 76 76 550 LT 335 345 250 East App. TH-RT 337 379 600 LT 115 115 310 West App. TH 280 295 500 LT 25 25 150 Trans/Op Inc. CONCLUSIONS The impact of Meadowland Business Park will result in a change of traffic levels at the project access driveway and intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project. The intersection of Swift Street Extension and Route 116 will warrant a signal in 1997 with completion of 20% of the projected buildout. All of the other intersections can accommodate the changes in traffic without any improvements through the year 2002. Page 11 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF STOPPED STOPPING RATIO OF TOTAL CRITICAL SERVICE DELAY (%) SERVICE VOLUME MOVEMENT (sec/veh) TO CAPACITY (vph/lane) A <5.0 <50 0.00 - 0.45 - B 5.1 - 15.0 51 - 67 0.46 - 0.60 - (under) C 15.1 - 25.0 68 - 76 0.61 - 0.75 1200 D 25.1 - 40.0 77 - 83 0.76 - 0.90 - (near) E 40.1 - 60.0 84 - 93 0.91 - 1.00 1400 F >60.0 94 - 100 > 1.00 > 1400 (over) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF DELAY TO MINOR RESERVE CAPACITY STOPPED DELAY SERVICE STREET TRAFFIC (pcph) (sec/veh) A Little or no 400 <9.0 B Short 300 - 399 9.0 -12.0 C Average 200 - 299 12.0 - 18.0 D Long 100 - 199 18.0 - 36.0 E Very long 0 - 99 > 36.0 F Extreme - - LEGEND sec/veh - seconds per vehicle vph/lane - vehicles per hour per lane pcph - passenger cars per hour Page 12 LEVEL OF SERVICE URBAN AND SUBURBAN ARTERIALS LEVEL OF QUALITATIVE AVERAGE LOAD RATIO OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION TRAVEL SPEED FACTOR SERVICE VOLUME (MPH) TO CAPACITY A Free flow > 30 0.0 < 0.60 B Stable flow > 25 < 0.1 < 0.70 (slight delay) C Stable flow > 20 < 0.3 < 0.80 (acceptable delay) D Approaching > 15 < 0.7 < 0.90 unstable flow E Unstable flow > 10 < 1.0 < 1.00 F Forced flow < 10 - - LEGEND MPH - miles per hour Page 13 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Average Daily Traffic (ADT) - The average number of vehicles passing a specified point during a 24 hr. period. Some examples are as follows: Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADDT) - Denotes daily traffic averaged over one year. Annual Average Weekday Traffic (AAWDT) - Denotes that the specified period includes only weekday, Monday through Friday. Design Hourly Volume (DHV) - The 30th highest hourly volume of the year. Capacity - The maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and control conditions. Capture Rate For Pass -By Traffic - Proportion of trips attached to the development from traffic normally passing -by the site. Gravity Model - A trip distribution technique. The gravity model is based on the hypothesis that the number of trips between two areas is directly related to the amount of activity in an area and inversely related to the spacial separation between the areas, represented as a function of travel time. Level Of Service (LOS) - A set of qualitative and quantitative criteria that describes the degree to which an intersection, roadway, weaving section or ramp efficiently serves peak hour and/or daily traffic. Peak Hour - The hour during which the maximum amount of traffic occurs. Sight Distance - The length of roadway ahead visible to the driver. The minimum sight distance available on a road should be sufficiently long to allow a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. Traffic Assignment - The process of determining route or routes of travel and allocating the zone -to -zone trips to these routes. Trip - A single or one -direction vehicular trip with either the origin (outbound) or destination (inbound) or both inside the study area. Each trip has two trip ends. Trip Distribution - The process by which trips originating in one portion of the study area are distributed to the other portions of the study area. Page 14 GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Cont.) Trip End - A trip origin or a trip destination. Trip ends for a location are the summation of origins and destination. A trip has two ends, the origin and the destination. A site which has over some period of time, 2,000 trips entering and 1,800 trips leaving, has 3,800 trip ends associated with it. Trip Generation - Estimating the number of vehicle tips which may be generated by a specific building or land use. Page 15 REFERENCES 1. "Highway Capacity Manual, (Third Edition) 1994", Transportation Research Board, SR209, 1994. 2. "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", FHWA, 1988. 3. "Traffic Engineering Handbook", Institute of Transportation Engineers 2nd Edition, 1992. 4 "Trip Generation (Fifth Edition), An Informational Report", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1991. 5. "Volume Warrants For Left -Turn Storage Lanes At Unsignalized Intersections", M.D. Harmelink, Department of Highway, Ontario. 6. "Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice", Prentice -Hall, Louis J. Pignataro. 7. "State of Vermont Sign Post Design Guideline", Engineering and Construction Design division, A.O.T., 1986. 8. "State of Vermont Pavement Marking Placement Guide", Engineering and Construction Design Division, A.O.T., 1988. 9. Sample Plans For Traffic Signs and Pavement Markings, A.O.T., 1996. 10. Regression Analysis For Traffic Projection, A.O.T., 1995. 11. Automatic Traffic Recorder Grouping Study, A.O.T., 1995. 12. "Traffic Access and Impact Studies for Site Development", ITE, 1991. Page 16 w1 t7 State of Vermont T, , Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist July 31, 1996 Summer Ice Joint Venture 82 Church Street Burlington VT 05401 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Essex Junction Regional Office I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 Re: EC-4-2004 -- 12 lot commercial/Industrial subdivision, 2 lots greater than 10 acres , municipal water and sewer,50,000 gpd located on Hinesburg Road/Route 116 in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on July 18, 1996, including a fee of $1,500.00 paid by check number 0116. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the permitted time of 45 days in-house, please contact this office at (802) 879-6563. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you also should check with town officials regarding any local requirements you may need to meet. For the Division of Wa water Management rene�Loberge Administrative Secretary cc: city of South Burlington Trudell Consulting Engineers 7/30/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final p733 application �� o11 of Summer Ice .joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten ( 10 ) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve ( 12 ) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page 1 entitled, "Meadowland Business Park, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/4/96 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approval and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years from date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) The project is approved for a maximum of 830 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 673 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Rte 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to pay the appropriate road impact fee as defined in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by 6/28/04. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed by 6/28/04 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineers "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner . Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) Sheet P2 shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed street trees to a minimum of 2.5 inches. b) The note on sheet P7 referring to Thompson Street being a private road serving lot 12 shall be changed to refer to lot 11. 2 c) Sheets SP3 and P7 shall be revised to show a fire hydrant in a location approved by the Fire Chief. 12. Wetlands shall be delineated on lot 3 prior to development. 13. Deeds for lots 7, 8 and 9 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of t,lese 'Lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three (3) years (i.e., by 7/30/99), this approval shall be null and void. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots 1 and 2 shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. tZ&4*VP 4- 14e /Z4/ys-t K M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for July 30, 1996 Agenda Date: July 18, 1996 I have reviewed the listed site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Meadowland Business Park Dated 6/12/96 Project No. 96022-40 A hydrant needs to be located on Thompson Street; otherwise, acceptable. 2. South Burlington Landfill Drop Off Facility Acceptable 3. Southland (Chittenden Bank) Shelburne Road Acceptable 4. Lot 9, Green Tree Park Gregory Drive Acceptable 5. Light Manufacturing Building Ethan Allen Drive Acceptable Dated 6/8/96 Project No. 2V129.02 Dated 6/26/96 Project No. 92085 Dated 6/5/96 Project No. 95046- 50 Dated 5/28/96 Preliminary Memo - City Engineer July 30, 1996 agenda items July 18, 1996 Page 2 MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK - HINESBURG ROAD Plans prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated 6/4/96 are acceptable. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 31, 1996 Irene Roberge Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sewer Allocation, Meadowland Business Park, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Roberge: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on 6/28/94 allocated 30,345 gpd for a 12 lot subdivision known as Meadowland Business Park owned by Summer Ice Joint Venture. The length of time that this sewer allocation will remain in effect is tied to roadway construction. The roadways in the development must be completed within 10 years of the approval (i.e., by 6/28/04). This property is served by the City's Airport Parkway Treatment facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. cerewl e Weith,I ty Planner JW/mcp cc: John Pitrowiski (T� TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. July 16, 1996 Mr. Ed Blake, General Manager Champlain Water District 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Act 250 Review for Meadowland Business Park Dear Mr. Blake: We are preparing the Act 250 application for Meadowland Business Park. This is an industrial/commercial subdivision located off of Route 116 in South Burlington. I would greatly appreciate your review and response on this project, for purposes of the Act 250 permit process. The project involves subdividing a 116 acre parcel into 12 lots, with approximately 4800 feet of new roadway and related utilities. There is no proposal at this time to develop any of the lots. Development of the lots will be handled «7th future Act 250 amendment applications. However, the anticipated demand at full buildout is in the range of 50,000 gallons per day. The project owner is Summer Ice, Incorporated (c/o Mark Neagley). They would like to submit an Act 250 application in early August 1996. I would appreciate your response at your earliest convenience. I have enclosed copies of the site plans to aid you in your review. If you need anymore information or if you have questions please feel free to call me. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ?IolnP. Pitrowiski Encl. cc: Mr. Mark NTeagley Mr. Joe Weith 96022101.sam P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 65803321 .,ASS_11-M'D Toll Free 1-800-427-3125 • Fax Number 802-862-56 tr f kplment.w7�� s� M'�gM% For a complete listing of opportunities, please see classifications I2, I2A in- ing ed. NI- ex- Jto ab- ,air Idi, :)a - We as, in Ws ich- opt. ow. ser- Ss8- RD oard. July m at Bur- tol- d: ation Cop- ation II will upon ice of Cot- ,rling- aste sal Solid cent - one solid aosal, struc- & D) Jispo- The prpoeex- t C&D ough Mid- osals 1996. call COLLECTION POSIT -IONS Seeking 2 highly moti- vated company dedicated individual. Experience helpful. Offering excellent work environment, 401 K, profit sharing, insurance, competitive compensa- tion. COLLECTOR Some evenings required. Fast paced, optional PART TIME also avail- able. MARKETING REPRESENTATIVE Vermont territory. Mileage allowance. Goal oriented. Send cover letter and re- sume to CBS of VT, Attn: RM, PO Box 56, Burling- ton, Vt. 05402. LEGAL NOTICES 1 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTOP PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burligntor Planning Commission wll hold a public hearing a the South Burlington Cit) Hall, Conference Room 575 Dorset Street, Soutt Burlington, Vermont or Tuesday, July 30, 1996, a 7:30 PM to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat appli cation of Christophei Bishop, Chittenden Bank to amend an approved ter (10) building planned unit development on a 38.E acre lot consisting of 202,546 square feet of shopping center use, a 55,000 square foot super- market, or 95 room hotel, and a 2,500 square fool bank with drive -through service, 981 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the drive -through bank to 3,585 square feet, decreasing the size of the shopping center use to 201,461 square feet, and other minor modifications including landscaping, building footprints, and -circulation. 2) Revised final plat appli- cation of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend previously approved sub- division of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hi- nesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.05 acres. ,W od o-d I Continued Next Column CARPENTERS/DRY WALL HANGERS Famil- iar w/steel framing, pay commensurate ability. Ap- plyy in person weekdays 7- lam, East Shore Dry Wall Inc. 14 Berard Dr, So Burlington. EOE sau.." Ii rn,'"', WITH A CI ASSFM AD. Gil 656-3321 CLERICAL/RETAIL For photographer. Must be able to travel. Starts im- mediately. 482-3123. GET EVEN MORE ATTENTION! RE AItOR USE GRAPHICS LEGAL NOTICES 1 Copies of the application; are available for publi( inspection at the Soutt Burlington City Hall. William Burgess, Chair- man South Burlington Planning Commission July 13, 1996 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The Fletcher Free Library is seeking proposals from area business to provide a library coffee shop for patrons of the library. The two locations being con- sidered are inside the Li- brary on the second floor in the Fletcher Room (1,156 sq. ft.) and or a cart located on the front lawn of the library. The library is located at 235 College St. in Burling- ton, just one block off the Church St. Marketplace. Approximately 700 to 800 people visit the library each day to borrow materials, use the refer- ence collection or attend meetings and programs. Library Open Hours - Monday 8:30 AM-6:00 PM • Tuesday 8:30 AM-6:00 PM • Wednesday 8:30 AM-9:00 PM • Thursday 8:30 AM-6:00 PM WFrida30 ALF 30 PM • Saturdayy 9:00 AM- :30 PM In addition to these hours the library is open on Sunday from September thru May 12:00 PM-6:00 PM Continued Next Column COOK/BAKER Reliable, organized, neat person to join our team. Experience & references req'd. Apply at: Shelburne Restaurant & Bakeshop, 14 Falls Rd. Shelburne. 985-2830 Customer Service CIRCLE ME Can you travel? Excellent 1st job! No experience necessary! We provide transportation & job training! Must be over 18. START NOW! Call 9am-7pm 1-800-505-8185 "Sold the First Day". We hear this every day from successful advertisers. Frse Press Classifieds work. Coil us at 658-3321. We can help you make your ad work. GAS STATION ATTEN- DANT Full service island. Weekend hours, may more. Must be neat • dependable. 862-3073. GET EVEN MORE ATTENTION! US GRAP ICS hospitality NIGHT AUDITOR Fri, Sat and other shifts. FRONT DESK CLERK All shifts including week- ends. Experience pre- ferred. Apply at Econolodge, 1076 Willis- ton Rd., So. Burlington. LEGAL NOTICES 1 I ABSOLUTELY FREE 2 For more information or to look at the locations, please call Marge Scott 865-7214. July 13, 14 & 15, 1996. Ad MUTELY FREE 4 auto, able 7 days/wk Free Junk car removal Cash for good ones. Dan A Sons 893-3893 auto A FREE JUNK CAR REMOVAL Some cars worth cash Greater Burlington area. Rotthe's Salvage Tues- Fri 8-5. Sat 8-12 655-0651 DOG Beautiful 10 mo. fe- male Akita, AKC regis., all shots, free to loving, country home. 865-2753. DOG Sharpei, 3 year old. Fixed female. Call 872-0799. DOG 2 yr. old, neutered, male Lab Mix. Not ggood with cats. Call 893-7607. Need to sell your car? Give us a call at 658-3321. ABSOLUTELY FREE 2 ELECTRIC baseboard HEATERS one each of 3 ft, 8 ft, 10 ft. Three 4 ft. Also 4 wall thermostats. All working. 899-3423 GREY SLATE For floor. Approx. 200 pieces. Pick up at 13 Biscayne Heights, Colchester. RABBITS Small Holland Lop teenagers. M/F, solid & spotted. Essex. Call 899-1187 SOFA BED Full size, brown & beige, great for camp. You take it away. Cell 863-1460. WOLF HYBRID DOG 2 yrs. old. To country home only. Call 893-1353 LOST AND FOLM 5 FOUND CAT All white, big blue eyes, approx. 6 mos- 1 yr old, female, very af- fectionate. 862-3339 FOUND: CAT at What's Your Beef July 7. Grey & black tigger cat. Call Kim 482-6009. Watch your business grow. Advertlse In our daily "Ser- vices" Directory. Call 658- 3321 or 1-800-427-3125. FREE WOODEN SKIDS Contact Bob Peeters At The Burlington Free Press 802-660-1801 KLINGER$ BREAD CO NIGHT OWL Bread Bag- ger, 2+ days/wk., hrs. ap- prox. Fri 1-5am, Sat 12- 5am. Great working envi- ronment. Must be accu- rate and dependable. RETAIL Seeking counter help 10-35 hrs./wk for our fast growing European style bakery/cafe. Great working environment and very flexible scheduling. Must be outgoing, friendly and have previous retail experience. SANDWICH MAKER Hrs. approx. 5-10am, M- F; food service experi- ence desirable. All positions $6/hr. to start. Stop by Klingers for applications., corner of Swift and Farrell Sts. 860- 6322 LOST & FOUND 5 FOUND CAT Black long haired, declawed in front paws female, in the vicini- ty of Faith St, Burlington. 7/9. 862-3546 FOUND CAT Lg. long- haired black tiger, white feet/nose, red collar. 7/12, Jericho area. 899- 4605 FOUND CAT Male, brown/black tiger, young adult. Williston, IBM plant area. Call to identify, 878- 4174. FOUND CLASS RING Howard Bruno Fauntry III. Call to identify. 377-3821 FOUND DOG Intact male Boston Terrier, North Ave., area wearing black collar, no tags. Found on 7/8. Cali 865-3642 or 434- 6411. FOUND DOG in Jericho area, Shepherd mix, fairly small, 40-50 lbs. Very black, tan paws, white tri- angular chest patch, fe- male. Very good dog! If not claimed, free to good home. Found over a week ago. 860-4941. FOUND DOG Male Pit -bull in Burlinggton on 7/10. Call 985-2248. FOUND: Eyeglasses & contact lense case in leather mohogany case. Found on West Allen St, Win6oski.655-1468 LOST CAT long hair grey W w/y! eyes, EARING flea collar, in Everest Rd area Milton 893-3663 LOST: CAT White, with grey on forehead. Neu- tered. Lee River Rd area in Jericho. Lost since May. Call 899-1314. Need to fill a posltlon? Give us a call at 658-3321. RECEPTIONIST Full or Part-time. M-F. Busy design studio seeks receptionist to answer multiple phone lines, light typing, and other office tasks. Parking. High inten- sity, friendly work -place; ond pay and benefits. Sed resume and cover letter to: Barbara Marks, HR Mgr, Jager Di Paola Kemp Design, 47 Maple St. Burlington, VT 05401. EOE. SHEET METAL ME- CHANICS, Journeymen & Apprentices. Clean Driver's License required. Apply in person, Mountain Air Systems, 60 Ethan Al- len Drive, So. Burlington. SaL "IDL[ ITtA1S" Wn11 A C:ASS*= AD. GLL 638-3321 LOST & FOUND 5 LOST CAT Williston/Rich- mond areas, orange tabby male, double front paws. Reward. Call 4344553. LOST JONSERED brush - cutter, between Exit 12 (Williston) & 17 ((Chimney Corners) on 1-89. About 5:30-6 PM 7/10. 868-5820 LOST KITTEN 4 mo old, black & white male, on Cottagge Grove, Burlington 65,214. LOST LHASA APSO PUPPY Golden brown with white markings, pink collar with tags. Answers to the name of Min. Last seen on Bennet Rd. in Monkton on 7/10. 425-3680.Reward. LOST WALLET Black, bank cards, license, mon- eyy On Shelburne Rd 985-8810 LOST WEDDING BAN- D/ENGAGEMENT RING Diamond & emerald, about 6 wks ago. Reward. 660-2488 PERSONALS 6 ADOPT, A nurturing, fun loving couple dream of sharing the wonder of family life with your pre- cious newborn. We will offer a lifetime of love, kisses, and all a baby wishes. Your concerns are important to us. We will listen. Sue & John, 1-800-283-9841. ADOPTION Your baby will blossom in our loving, se- cure home. Can pay ex- peses. Call Marge & Norm, 1-800-799-0768, code 36, "Sold the First Day". We hear this every day from succseaful advertisers. Free Press Classifieds work. Call us at 668-3321. We can help you make your ad work. Plod od r you, won «N PEI AD4 fan nee pa at cN try Me 79' AD4 Me net dac r &f BAI FC na! $1; CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. 864-4361 John Pitrowiski July 24, 1996 Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: Meadowland Business Park, Route 116, So. Burlington, VT. In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the sfsfdsfced proposed project we submit the following: 1. The estimated demand of 50,000 gallons per day can be met by the existing water distribution system without encumbering the existing users. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT John Choate Manager CC: J. Fay D. Pratt J. Weith Soul, Burlington Water Departmu.It Fire Flow Test Report Date: // - ?4 l Time: Pest Location: F� r% �4 e, Test Performed By: MEASUREMENTS: USE A 2'/z" HYDRANT OUTLET (Indicate if other than 2'/2") FLOW HYDRANTS: FLOW HYDRANT STATIC PRESSURE: Hydrant 91 psi Hydrant 92 psi FLOW HYDRANT RESIDUAL PRESSURE: Hydrant 41 Si (P) Hydrant 42 Sip(P) FLOW READINGS: (Use Formula 91 To Calculate Flows (Q) ) Hydrant 41 GPM(Qj) Hydrant #2 Hydrant 43 psi Hydrant 43 Sip(P) GPM(Q2) Hydrant �3 Total Flow (Q 1 +Q 2+Q,) f%?D (QF) RESIDUAL HYDRANTS, - RESIDUAL HYDRANT STATIC PRESSURE: GPM(Q) Hydrant 91 psi Hydrant 9-2 psi Hydrant #3 psi RESIDUAL HYDRANT RESIDUAL PRES SURE: (Residuals Must Be At Least 10 psi Below Static) Hydrant 91 psi Hydrant 92 psi Hydrant 93 psi DISCHARGE AT 20 psi RESIDUAL FORMULAS: �— 2) , An Q = 29.33 C d2 V ` Q = Discharge in GPM C = Hydrant Coefficient (SEE BACK) d = Diameter of outlet in inches P = Vel. Pressure in psi. GPM (Q2o) (Use Formula 92 below) 0.54 Q20 = QF IIR HF Q2o = Discharge at 20 psi QF =Actual Test Discharge(total flow) (Use the worst case residual hydrant info. for the following values) HR = Drop from original static pressure to 20 psi residual HF = Pressure drop during test in psi Draw Sketch and Other Information On Back (ie: tank, tank level, pumps, ex...) RkAMIPROTIREFLOW.SAM 10/30/95 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, July 30, 1996, at 7:30 PM to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat application of Christopher Bishop, Chittenden Bank, to amend an approved ten (10) building planned unit development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of 202,546 square feet of shopping center use, a 55,000 square foot supermarket, or 95 room hotel, and a 2,500 square foot bank with drive -through service, 981 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the drive -through bank to 3,585 square feet, decreasing the size of the shopping center use to 201,461 square feet, and other minor modifications including landscaping, building footprints, and circulation. 2) Revised final plat application of Summer Ice Joint Venture to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.05 acres. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission 1) 2) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT Name of Applicant _ Name of Subdivision Sal kK A/\ C tZ -_Vcle S0 i Vl-T" \l6 N TLk KE gCAbbWL-h?-zt B(A51 VWS5 PARX� 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plzlt designer since preliminary plat application IJE W Dui o e 2: S U M kk6 R SCE "S 0 '► v-,'f q e Q-m�r--E N60 r\AAAE : Ml; DOw CiUS i v1�55 FAF-K 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 1JE� Ov�v\�� �hPPI�tLkry� SEEK��G t�PPRc)yM. Ft�K �'c P�,Ac► DEy�I �P��T T i n&C-Tk- L e Se1'T. kill - 2Z,?vZ. 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and cgntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a majors subdivision. iL (Signature) 0 Ias- 352.16 - rl�q µe or contact person Date p - :a'aa76" R - BJ9.78' L 216.01' 50.00' EXISTING JO' WIDE S66'S2'2B•E DRIK EASEMENT MATCH IN iO EXISTING ANO 10' Show EASEMENT LOCA RC STORAGE EASEVENR (BO1N SIDES) AND p - Id']4]4' 10' ELEC. EASEuE.Vr R - 789.78' FOR SIGN LICNTING L - 100.92' L-- - - �- TIE DIST �l L - 66.41' T� -10' EIUEC rRICAI EASE EnI ro SICN� )/ p - 6'57'a2" R - a12.19' L - 50.08' \ _.Qua C,7 / /�d f CO SE 20'NER EASEMENT' VOL E203 P. 472 -- �- O OI I If00 NIN cFr LPr2 -• ROAD P HINES I ua n4 A. Ja SC ROAD NORTH NORM SCENIC VIEW .. \ L8 o .. L, PROTECTION ZONE-- Ll 105'AJ'20 2J5.go' L2 N8Z02''ZVF 19. 62' L3 N061057'W 100,00' L4 S8J02'JB W 19.52' L5 SdJ1J6'16'E 20. 00' L6 182-2059'E 19417 L7 707i434 'W 11.00' L8 NSJ04'40'E 24700' L9 SO704'25'E 80.05' LID 58.11909"W J9457' L11 S8i'27'2YW 281. 31' L12 60516''J'E 13120' LI! S84'5J'19'W 2.74' L 11 S05'58'J7'E 80 01' 715 N875319 E 237.43' Lib S84'5J'19`. 169.A6' L17 SElJ•19'09'. 288.09' LAB NeJ02'J6'E 20. 79' 04 S84'SX19'W 60. 00' L20 1601607'E 67.65' L11 570'2919•E 6755' L22 N8J02'J6 E I105. 21 CURVE DATA EASEMENT CHART WSSURGH LANE 80' R.O.W.11 a9.25'1" art. 19 15553 isa 61 I72-9'51"W .J L-91.5 8- N.3055'1d'A' r.2 2291424• 75.00 300.08 1J6. 36 5:i O6'41 E CS 19,251" J32.19 286. 51 27773 57Z095CE A2 AFC-I'9. 22' R-75. 00' CA J54504' 5A0. 15 JZ704 JJ1.60 565�9'49'E 43 ARC-61.61' R-75.00 C5 C6 il'5470 Il'!7'OB' 54015 45013 112.24 14'.SO' 112.04 140. 94 S890931•E 53605'5I"E Aa ARC.119. 22' R-75. 00' C7 J00215' a60.15 2A1 24' 2J8.48 Sd005'3J'E AS L-9r.55' 9- N1817'S6'E / ��' A6 C-:BJ 29' 3- N0609'11 •'W 601,100' EXISTING PUMP STATION PARCEL VON. 176 P. 510 VCL 211 P. 167 Ls 1 APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT. ON THE _ DAY OF 199_ SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 199_. BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK N/F '�- 20' WIDE SEVER BUM 7NcidE PROPERTIES �I EASEMENT TO EXISTING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ) PUMP STATION 510 56. rn A 250 VOL 17P. mAr 1*_ 3 IM I. e I ! VOL- 111 P. 167 67 rl TUR0.vARY E. SEUEni FOR CUL -0E -54C OF 50' EASEMENT PROPOSED RELOCATION TOLANE PRESS r]il I� CIRCLE M 8E CON'.Er'EO SAC. 10 Lors e Roan ID VOL. 219. P. f62 AND a AMEN IO LONGER NEEDED. SEE < li 'EASEVEnr CNARr AND -CUL-0E-SAC DETAIL' FOR SRECIFTO Of.ENSICIS i - 80' WIDE RIONr-OF-MAY 1 60' WIDE RIOITLCF-WAY CONVEYED TO THE CITY 1,4 W �� To BE CONVEYED TO THE SOUTH VOOL 3844 P. 104 GiDN VI H .� k CITY OF SOUTH BURLONGTON n AREA : 1.01 ACRES -, N W WIDE ROAD DR *ME }� ORADIAGE-r l BE CONVEYED ro 1� \ E EASEMENT CITY TO CITY of Sn BURLINCTOI CRY{ \ LI r I ; i AREA : 0.98 ACRES \�) ii �I� 60.00y 83 L16 ��iii N �V274 L2� j�l "d O \ 989.8Y•E 400.00 1_' �1 law 4� er h. m t 12 A 1,17 AC.nn/V � 6O' WIDE ROAD - VOL 97, YP.49 r 216.00' - - R.O. ro BE CONVEYED TO C. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERKS OFFICE 'EtrrA 1E RECEIVED FOR RECORD -� •-0. 19 dt Odock and recorded In Volume rni-tee m PROILCT LOCATION - Pa" 4 Atf-t City park - 711ROUGH LOT 6. I_ PROPOSED s' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT TO BE COMBINED WITH E7CIS7ING EASEMENT - EXISTING is' WIDE PEDESTRIAN CUL-DE-SAC DETAIL EASEMENT VOL 176 P. 510 QUARRY VOL 211 1'P 170 ,. L ` T .PORARY -,DE -.CS AND— rS .'ILL 3E ISED Al r END OF ANY Ct1Y SrREMEr R,RCEI LYI IS RL.Ar Dv cf 9Y LOrs , MROUCN r2 AS ' COI RE- TO S1.-c. IC[ ,A7tNr YEN _E IN v , 2e7 RACE Ala E CITY D. S N 3URLINGrON LAND RECORDS AID CON-NS A ` 1. ARLA? rre, )A ACRES AC. io 1NISLR.RCEL IS e.SED ON A MrAL surrON CO.ma rR..EvzE. y N E�IIDEVCE FOUND fI m[ FIELD. AND :NFORUARCI ABS'RAC TD IROW E C11 a 00 SL-11- LAID RfCOROi 1' E N 1 9EARINGS ARE OASED CI ME EQ.CN1 COCROINAT SYSTW YRC. SIGNINGS -AGE CN OCI. 25. 19 5 FRO. 51ArtON'NR 99 AMI 1911- 1216r w-m g �10 g v rJ F AN Alrtwr NAS MEN .40E ,O fOENYIFY OR OEL:NLAT EAU ENrq A N isp O ]. D6 AC- H u aIG. rS_ RAY. LEASE LANOS ENCROACN.ENR E CBSERWD M ML J. 90 AC, O I. OR R(AD— Fq,NO In rNE LAND RECORDS ADOIRCN4 556.56D ' \ ENCU.RRANCES WAY E.ISr A CN ARE Wt SNCNI ON NIS 0. r. 11.56' N &J-02'36' E \ Ll NE A;RRJRr .R-OACI tONE AS 5N IS 3ASE0 LRCI Of 51ONs RA 1I.CE0 aY r C OC-1 OfRE OF A Ar OF aLRLING:ON J. 96 AC. ® J.IS RC. \ S } IrvI IIPIAI AIRRORI AS SCALED JNID AERIAL R.01(x/IA-1 OF rNE vlCfnl fY II r961. j 560� wR12I PEA.RRERS SET 9Y rN IS OFFICE ARE Ef N'R A ON' :NCI DfAWE TR n-531 LL�� IRON R1NAff FEE, LC.0 wIM A rrLLOw ALAS rIc RLLC +MICR READS 1847319' r 60.01' S 84-19' V' .R EN ACF S N 1 r 11L CO.wI INC', OR A FOUR ,NCH SOLANE COICRET .GIL.EIr �vlCafr�' QT1 1 ]f ] wL Ie. P � in E IEEI LONG w eEKlEO - EOGE. V N84'S319'E N tR II; /. IY 'nE RICI rSA7F-wA rS Fdr SAIII SNIEEI E.TNII- D11M. 490-ICE CITM OF 50. BURLINGTON ra . .nE..ID wseuRGWNEVANE ARE ro ar conOL.EI rD 1 Crrr or I N8.3' I .� 1 E..OA.. IR:raCCL CCu S[ rip ACRES AREA a weomorD AREA : 101 ACRES - PAC OPEN '' �- ( 3 o ENE .A.I-. eL ,.- Nn RrsrRrc rta. CI - Lars IS DRAINAGE p0+0 ? DLTRWrNFD eY SPACE BUFFER O I t 20. 10 Ac. m 1 x ODax n.Es 'EWEFDIs rAwI�C[ �a w +�.E ADD c x 4 RCID _ nW EASEMENT u I j I _ �.E .c.Enr C« RauT rra ro rWE RErtREncE ELrv. rlav or 29Js RId11-0E-WAY z a9 50 AC O �^ j� TWO 2d WIDE SPACE BUFFER _ 50 WIDE $ v 41 �'�/�\ APEDESTRIAN .j- - DRAINAGE ` LECE!10 i64�1�CCNSMVATiON ZONE ORA AIN CE hw 8.00 4c.EASEMEN/S- - EASEMENT A Tl I 11 200' CCYISiRVATIOY- 20 ATDE CALCULA TD vornr, (SEE OE1AfL) rRON afof (FOUND) y, ,I EASEMENT ;o`V ZONE AND -DRAINAGE a -sE�E _ - - -- LtJ- [ 20' PEDESTRIAN 440.IY ^T-EASEMENT jji� _ Q L - �a2S1 o lnoN RIRe (r0 9E sr r) y i EASEMENT - _ 58]1909'W�� J, rr - 19T)9 w_i°. I•N18'W \ • cenLRET .onu.Enr (FounD) Q5y,eJ'� . L17 , DRAINAGE fll o cO.CRfT .ONL.ENI I' ee Vr) _ - BY CEDAR TREE L2 LINE DA rA CNARr Rrr[RE.vcr QL' T. ! N. F -� • 0' WIDE SEVER t 100' CONSERVAT20N ZONE CASEMENT PEDESTRIAN Cs CLAP. JA 1A CIA- REFEREIcr DAVIS �"dv� .� IDRADJAGE EASEMENT .-.-.-ExfSRIG FE`r LIRE i � as S 3 R. DONE OWNER. SUMMER ICE JOINT VENTURE 'W'g . A. BR IN.� O PENNINGTON SpU1HERLY EDGE OF AIRPORT APPRDOt 414.7Y 5821070 TI L ems' a N. a 1 N- 7T71/TANT „ PLOOF I M. ! K. LA I. W DUBOI S JOT I. Dal Mi TS -- BOVCNFR IrliuirRrinrrn F. M.aD I. 1H ►. H �. 4770 PLArin Val. I�/iI. 4e =g 20' PEDESTRIAN EASFJMENT LEDGE KNOLL DE OP M NT y 5C1T ; LOCATION TO CORER ON OL RECREATION PATH ALONG A :R THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY 3 Graphic Scale !7 <.''Ev �. Feet �T' mnu.nm 300 0 300 60o 900 1200 Rtvlrbne DAecrprbn I n.b aY 1 3.22 AC, Projtct ant MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. SM.r otl. Subdivision Plat TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MR.r Pt R W eta rae WERt- V4.1Ra.M o549e e79-Mi Da 96022-40 [at 00 Proltct my. "1 Drawn SOT Dart 4/23/96 S„b. lw=300F ,., a_k 10 152 pyL '091 a TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Blair Park Road Box 308 WIIILstom VC OS495 (802) $79-6131 QDescrlptlon Date By Revlalons ' V 1 N - OF 9egt, _ r �'ci5•c'E s}' ^.r'rTONAL E`" Project title MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Subdivision Plat Project number 96022-A0 Project manager RRr Drawn = Data A/231 96 xaia1 L. ,00. Approve����� SP] �T r TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LIETTLf OF TURSO UL P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 (802)879-6331 5 7 S�i�� > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via DATE I JOB NO. ����7• �f L ATTEN N RE: _ the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order � 2 l HP4jtL) COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION L- E Lolal: N iQ i) Asm 2 P 3 S �-p to 1 S t TF PuA THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use > ��As requested El For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 4 40/ Pre -Consumer Content •10%Post-Consumer Content SIGNED: PRODUCT240-2 n e im, Groton, Mass. 01471. if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Districts #1 & #8 RR #2, Box 2161 Pittsford, VT 05763 (802) 483-6022 Districts #2 & #3 RR #1, Box 33 N. Springfield, VT 05150 (802) 886-2215 Districts #4, #6 & #9 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 January 17, 1995 A, Gregg H. Wilson Kolvoord, Overton & Three Main Street Essex Junction, VT 40 STATE OF VERMONT Environmental Board District Environmental Commission Wilson 05452 El District #5 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 (802) 479-3621 District #7 184 Portland Street St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (802) 748-8787 Environmental Board Office 120 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-3201 (802) 828-3309 RE: Advisory Opinion )#4-111, Marble Bank/Green Acres Property, South Burlington Dear Gregg: This is an advisory opinion regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over a proposed subdivision of land by the Marble Bank. You have requested this advisory opinion on behalf of Green Acres, Inc., the former owner of the property. For the reasons set forth below, I have determined that the subdivision of land by the Marble Bank requires an Act 250 permit. By copy of this letter I am advising the Marble Bank of my decision. 1. The Marble Bank (the Bank) is the record owner of a 116.7 acre tract of land on Rt. 116 in the City of South Burlington (the property). The tract is located east of Rt. 116 and south of the Dvnapower and Lane Press buildings. 2. The Bank accepted title to the property from Green Acres, Inc. (Green Acres) by quit claim deed dated June 27, 1994. The property was deeded to the Bank in lieu of foreclosure by Green Acres, which has defaulted on a loan made by the Bank. 3. Prior to transferring the land, Green Acres had received final plat approval from the City of South Burlington (the City) for a 13-lot commercial subdivision of the property. This 13-lot subdivision is depicted on a site plan by Trudell Consulting Engineers entitled "SP 2, Green Acres Industrial Park, Master Site Plan," dated last revised 1/28/93. Advisory Opinion #4-111 January 17, 1995 Page 2 4. On November 15, 1994 the South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval to Green Acres to amend the previously approved subdivision of the property to include 10 lots instead of 13. This amended subdivision is depicted on a site plan entitled 11SP3, Green Acres Industrial Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 10/3/94. 5. The Bank proposes to subdivide one lot from the 116.7 acre property. This lot is shown on an undated site plan by Weimann - Lamphere Architects entitled "Goodrich Green Acres, South Burlington, Vermont." The lot depicted on the site plan has -frontage on Rt. 116 and appears to be the same lot depicted as Lot 10 on the revised Trudell Plan. 6. The Bank intends to sell all or a portion of the property in order to recoup the debt owed by Green Acres. If the sale of a portion of the property by the Bank generates sufficient funds to satisfy the debt, the Bank may transfer the remaining property back to Green Acres. Conclusions It is apparent from my examination of the site plans that the location of the lot depicted on the Weimann - Lamphere site plan corresponds to Lot 10 of the revised Trudell Consulting Engineers site plan. Although the Weimann - Lamphere plan does not include a reference to a lot number, the dimensions and size of the lot correspond closely to Lot 10. An Act 250 permit is required prior to commencement of construction for a "subdivision." Sec. 6081(a). Environmental Board Rule 2(B) defines "subdivision" as follows: "Subdivision" means a person's partitioning or dividing a tract or tracts of land into ten or more lots including all other lots which that person has created through subdivision within an environmental district ... within any continuous period of five years after April 4, 1970. . . . A subdivision shall be deemed to have been created with the first of the following events. (1) The sale or offer to sell or lease the first lot within a tract or tracts of land with an intention to sell, offer for sale, or lease 10 or more lots. A person's intention to create a subdivision may be inferred from the existence of a plot plan, the,person's statements to financial agents or potential purchasers, or other similar evidence; Advisory Opinion #4-111 January 17, 1995 Page 3 (2) The filing of a plot plan on town records; Environmental Board Rule 14(A) (iii) defines "person" to include "individuals and entities affiliated with each other for profit, consideration, or any other beneficial interest derived from the partition or division of land." It is my opinion that Green Acres, Inc. and the Marble Bank are one "person" as defined by Board Rule 14(A)(iii). Although these two entities may have no legal association, they are operating in consort to achieve the subdivision of the 116.7 acre property. While the Bank's interest may only be to recoup funds owed by Green Acres, it is pursuing this goal by subdividing the first lot of what is planned to be a 10 lot commercial/industrial subdivision. More specifically, the lot which the Bank proposes to sell was created through an amendment to the original Green Acres Industrial Park plan. This amendment, which created Lot 10, an 8.6 acre lot on Rt. 116, was applied for by Green Acres, Inc. after it had transferred the property to the Bank. This is evidence of the affiliation of these two entities, whether this affiliation is legally recognized or acknowledged by either party. It is also my opinion that an Act 250 permit is required prior to the subdivision of Lot 10 by the Marble Bank, pursuant to Rule 2(B)(1) and (2). Green Acres and the Marble Bank have a plot plan on file with the City of South Burlington which depicts the subdivision of 10 lots. The Marble Bank is proposing to sell the first of these lots. I should also point out that if the Marble Bank applies for a permit to subdivide Lot 10, the District Commission would review the impacts of the entire 10 lot subdivision. This is an Advisory Opinion and, as such, may be appealed to the Environmental Board pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 3(C). Any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of this opinion and should be directed to the General Counsel, Environmental Board, 58 East State St., Drawer 20, Montpelier, VT 05620. Sinc y, Louis i� District #4 Coordinator cc: Service List CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Edie Bowen, Administrative Secretary for the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing ADVISORY OPINION #4-111 (Marble Bank/Green Acres) to Gregg H. Wilson, Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson and all interested parties, by U.S. Mail, postage paid, on this 18 day of January, 1995 to the following: PARTIES; Gregg H. Wilson Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson 3 Main Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-3199 Mitchell Moore Marble Bank 47 Merchants Row Rutland, VT 05701 Ralph Goodrich Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123, South Burlington, VT 05403 Chair, City Council Ray Belair, Planning Commission Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, Vermont 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION: District Commission: John C. Drake/Thomas D. Visser/Peter Clancy 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 Michael Zahner, Director of Administration Environmental Board 58 East State Street/Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 Dated at Essex Junction, Ver nt, this 18 day of January, 1995. f `,# A04-111/eb Edie Bowen KM fl4BLI1lGIflY =a TO: Margaret A. Picard, CMC, City Clerk 575 Dorset Street, So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 I;f� 199� Dee $ Deed 3� 100 - i.E Attachments Copies: Uncertified copy Certified copy Hxamination of Records by Clerk Rxamination of Records by Others UCC as TOTAL ` �T SQM BURLINGTON S;iIY MM �n�uY1�, . , b�•D3 TO: Margaret A. Picard, CMC, City Clerk 575 Dorset Street, So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 1990 Deed .--3 %Y AOCCn $ r a.1)0 Attachments Copies: Uncertified copy _ Certified copy Bxasination of Records by Clerk Hxamination of Records by Others UCC TOTAL �• CRAP 11/15/94 OA4 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREEN ACRES, INC. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 40.94 acres, as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 10/3/94 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $43,766 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highway, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a. This project is approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis:71rl� b. Applicane shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive improvement fund, or subsequent impact fee program then in effect, based on the P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming a light manufacturing use with an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. e) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building lot shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee, or subsequent impact fee program then in effect, based on 43% of the P.M. peak hour trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. The bonds shall remain in effect for two (2) years beyond the date of completion of said roadway, utilities and sidewalks. The roadways, utilities and sidewalks, or portions thereof, shall be completed within four (4) years of the date of posting said bonds. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within 10 years of the final plat approval granted on 6/28/94. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed within this ten year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved 2 by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work . 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as - built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant will dedicate to the City a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating right-of-way over the 146.6 acre parcel adjoining to the east as shown on sheet SP2. The recreation path easement shall be located outside of the wetland and wetland buffer along Muddy Brook. These legal documents shall be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 12. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no quarry generated traffic travelling through this subdivision. 13. Deeds for lots 7 and 8 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots and the eastern portion of lot #9 will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 14. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three (3) years, this approval shall be null and void. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots one and two shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 3 Districts #1 & #8 RR #2, Box 2161 Pittsford, VT 05763 (802) 483-6022 Districts #2 & #3 RR #1, Box 33 N. Springfield, VT 05150 (802) 886-2215 �i Districts #4, #6 & #9 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 January 17, 1995 I Gregg H. Wilson Koivoord, Overton & Three Main Street Essex Junction, VT STATE OF VERMONT Environmental Board District Environmental Commission Wilson 05452 trict #5 324 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 (802) 479-3621 District #7 184 Portland Street St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (802) 748-8787 Environmental Board Office 120 State Street Montpelier, VT 05620-3201 (802) 828-3309 RE: Advisory Opinion #4-111, Marble Bank/Green Acres Property, South Burlington Dear Gregg: This is an advisory opinion regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over a proposed subdivision of land by the Marble Bank. You have requested this advisory opinion on behalf of Green Acres, Inc., the former owner of the property. For the reasons set forth below, I have determined that the subdivision of land by the Marble Bank requires an Act 250 permit. By copy of this letter I am advising the Marble Bank of my decision. Facts 1. The Marble Bank (the Bank) is the record owner of a 116.7 acre tract of land on Rt. 116 in the City of South Burlington (the property). The tract is located east of Rt. 116 and south of the Dynapower and Lane Press buildings. 2. The Bank accepted title to the property from Green Acres, Inc. (Green Acres) by quit claim deed dated June 27, 1994. The property was deeded to the Bank in lieu of foreclosure by Green Acres, which has defaulted on a loan made by the Bank. 3. Prior to transferring the land, Green Acres had received final plat approval from the City of South Burlington (the City) for a 13-lot commercial subdivision of the property. This 13-lot subdivision is depicted on a site plan by Trudell Consulting Engineers entitled "SP 2, Green Acres Industrial Park, Master Site Plan," dated last revised 1/28/93. Advisory Opinion #4-111 January 17, 1995 Page 2 4. On November 15, 1994 the South Burlington Planning Commission granted final plat approval to Green Acres to amend the previously annroui-c] gtthri i vi gi nn of the r,rnr,orty to `l include 10 lots instead of 13. This amended subdivision is depicted on a site plan entitled 11SP3, Green Acres Industrial Park, Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 10/3/94. 5. The Bank proposes to subdivide one lot from the 116.7 acre property. This lot is shown on an undated site plan by Weimann - Lamphere Architects entitled "Goodrich Green Acres, South Burlington, Vermont." The lot depicted on the site plan has frontage on Rt. 116 and appears to be the same lot depicted as Lot 10 on the revised Trudell Plan. 6. The Bank intends to sell all or a portion of the property in order to recoup the debt owed by Green Acres. If the sale of a portion of the property by the Bank generates sufficient funds to satisfy the debt, the Bank may transfer the remaining property back to Green Acres. Conclusions It is apparent from my examination of the site plans that the location of the lot depicted on the Weimann - Lamphere site plan corresponds to Lot 10 of the revised Trudell Consulting Engineers site plan. Although the Weimann - Lamphere plan does not include a reference to a lot number, the dimensions and size of the lot correspond closely to Lot 10. An Act 250 permit is required prior to commencement of construction for a "subdivision." Sec. 6081(a). Environmental Board Rule 2(B) defines "subdivision" as follows: "Subdivision" means a person's partitioning or dividing a tract or tracts of land into ten or more lots including all other lots which that person has created through subdivision within an environmental district ... within any continuous period of five years after April 4, 1970.'. . . A subdivision shall be deemed to have been created with the first of the following events. (1) The sale or offer to sell or lease the first lot within a tract or tracts of land with an intention to sell, offer for sale, or lease 10 or more lots. A person's intention to create a subdivision may be inferred from the existence of a plot plan, the, person's statements to financial agents or potential purchasers, or other similar evidence; Advisory Opinion #4-111 January 17, 1995 Page 3 (2) The filing of a plot plan on town records; Environmental Board Rule 14(A) (iii) defines "person" to include "individuals and entities affiliated with each other for profit, consideration, or any other beneficial interest derived from the partition or division of land." It is my opinion that Green Acres, Inc. and the Marble Bank are one "person" as defined by Board Rule 14(A)(iii). Although these two entities may have no legal association, they are operating in consort to achieve the subdivision of the 116.7 acre property. While the Bank's interest may only be to recoup funds owed by Green Acres, it is pursuing this goal by subdividing the first lot of what is planned to be a 10 lot commercial/industrial subdivision. More specifically, the lot which the Bank proposes to sell was created through an amendment to the original Green Acres Industrial Park plan. This amendment, which created Lot 10, an 8.6 acre lot on Rt. 116, was applied for by Green Acres, Inc. after it had transferred the property to the Bank. This is evidence of the affiliation of these two entities, whether this affiliation is legally recognized or acknowledged by either party. It is also my opinion that an Act 250 permit is required prior to the subdivision of Lot 10 by the Marble Bank, pursuant to Rule 2(B)(1) and (2). Green Acres and the Marble Bank have a plot plan on file with the City of South Burlington which depicts the subdivision of 10 lots. The Marble Bank is proposing to sell the first of these lots. I should also point out that if the Marble Bank applies for a permit to subdivide Lot 10, the District Commission would review the impacts of the entire 10 lot subdivision. This is an Advisory Opinion and, as such, may be appealed to the Environmental Board pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 3(C). Any such appeal must be filed within 30 days of receipt of this opinion and should be directed to the General Counsel, Environmental Board, 58 East State St., Drawer 20, Montpelier, VT 05620. Sinc ly, Louis i'� District #4 Coordinator cc: Service List CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Edie Bowen, Administrative Secretary for the Environmental Board, sent a copy of the foregoing ADVISORY OPINION #4-111 (Marble Bank/Green Acres) to Gregg H. Wilson, Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson and all interested parties, by U.S. Mail, postage paid, on this 18 day of January, 1995 to the following: PARTIES: Gregg H. Wilson Kolvoord, Overton & Wilson 3 Main Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-3199 Mitchell Moore Marble Bank 47 Merchants Row Rutland, VT 05701 Ralph Goodrich Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123, South Burlington, VT 05403 Chair, City Council Ray Belair, Planning Commission Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission PO Box 108 Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - 2 Center Waterbury, Vermont 05676 FOR YOUR INFORMATION: District Commission: John C. Drake/Thomas D. Visser/Peter Clancy 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 Michael Zahner, Director of Administration Environmental Board 58 East State Street/Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 Dated at EsseX Junction, Ver nt, this 18 day of January, 1995: A04-111/eb Edie Bowen City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 7, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc., Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the October 25, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any ques ons, please give me a call. in ere , Joe Weith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Proposed Amendment - Industrial & Open Space District DATE: August 31, 1994 At their meeting of 8/30/94, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal by Ralph Goodrich to amend the zoning regulations by eliminating the requirement for a 200 foot wide buffer strip along a portion of Hinesburg Road in the Industrial and Open Space District. Section 18.303 provides that "an open space buffer strip, 200 feet in width, shall be maintained along Hinesburg Road, and along the SEQ and Parks and Recreation Districts. The buffer strip must be kept free of buildings, structures, parking facilities and access drives, and shall be suitably landscaped with dense evergreen or other suitable plantings to provide adequate screening. The buffer strip along Hinesburg Road does not apply to pre-existing lots of less than 3 acres." Ralph Goodrich indicated that he proposed the zoning change in order to increase the potential for the Rowley lot on Hinesburg Road, which is only about half an acre in size, to be developed and/or sold for industrial/commercial purposes. He feels that the lot is too small to accommodate significant commercial development In addition, because of the 200 foot buffer strip, he feels there is no incentive for anyone to purchase the Rowley lot and incorporate it into a larger lot for industrial/commercial development. The buffer strip provision was incorporated into the zoning regulations a couple of years ago when the I-O district was amended to allow smaller lots, increased density and an expanded list of permitted uses. The intent of the buffer strip is to: a) provide an appropriate separation and buffer between potentially incompatible uses (i.e., industrial and residential or Industrial and passive recreational land), b) prohibit new driveways along Hinesburg Road which is consistent with the City's policy of minimizing access points along high -volume arterial roadways, and 3) push development back off Hinesburg Road in order to maintain the aesthetic quality and open character in this portion of the SEQ. The Planning Commission decided not to change the zoning as requested for the following reasons: 1. The buffer strip was seen as an important compromise when the I-O district was amended a couple of years ago to allow increased density and more permitted uses. The Commission feels the buffer Memorandum - City Council Industrial and Open Space District August 31, 1994 Page 2 strip is an integral part of the district as it helps protect the existing adjacent residential neighborhoods from adverse impacts of industrial/commercial development. In addition, the buffer strip promotes traffic safety by prohibiting new driveways from opening on Hinesburg Road. The intent is to serve new development from Swift Street extension. Eliminating a portion of the buffer would severely compromise the goals and policies which the buffer is attempting to implement. 2. The zoning ordinance as written allows reasonable economic use of the Rowley lot. Section 18.303 exempts pre-existing lots of less than 3 acres from having to abide by the 200 foot buffer. Therefore, the lot in its current configuration could continue to be used and improved for residential use, or it could be developed with industrial, office, or research and testing uses. 3. The Commission is concerned that eliminating only a small portion of the buffer might be considered illegal spot zoning. Therefore, in order to avoid a spot zoning challenge, the City should consider eliminating the buffer zone along the entire length of Hinesburg Road or at least a much larger portion than that which is proposed. However, the Commission feels that eliminating a large portion of the buffer would be detrimental to the City as it would go against the goals listed above. 4. The Planning Commission feels that even with the 200 foot buffer, there is still an incentive for the lot to be sold and incorporated into a larger lot as the land area of the lot could be counted toward density and coverage. 5. The Planning Commission feels the buffer zone represents an important balancing component in the City's efforts to encourage well planned industrial/commercial development and protect established residential neighborhoods, promote safe and efficient highways, and preserve the aesthetic character of the SEQ. cc: Chuck Hafter South Burlington Planning Commission (cc8-31) DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the r vi ed final plat application of L&M Partnership to amend an pr ved planned commercial development consisting of 150 reside ial units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 square foot movie theat r (1 000 seats) a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recre tion building, a 3,500 square foot restaurant with drive- rough service, and a bank with drive - through service, locate on She burne Road. The amendment consists of adding a second acc ss to t e underground parking facility as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "L&M Park, Site & Utilitie Plan" epared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. with a last revision dat of 7/12/94, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals nd stipulationsrich are not superseded by this proval shal remain in effect. 2. Pursuant to Se tion 19.103b of the zoning egula ons, the Planning Commissio approves a urb cut of 63 feet in width to accommodate the ne access. It s the Commiss'on's op pion that allowing a curb ut greater t an 36 feet width will not compromise vehic lar safety on ayette Road ue to theone-way nature of the acc s to the under round parki g facilit . 3. The final pla plans shall be ecorded in the South B rlington land records with n 90 days or this approval s null and oid. The plans shall be si ned by the Chair r Clerk o the Commiss on prior to recording. 4. Any changes to the final plat plans hall require Planning Commission appro al. 5. The plan sha 1 be revised prior Ap re ording to show he one- way driveway ac ess to the undergro nd Parking facilit in the correct —location. 6. Prior to receding the final plat, t e applicant shall submit a signage plan f r the PUD which encou a es theater goers o park and fill the theater parking lot prio to overflowing in o the parking area north of Fayette Drive. The signage plan shall require approval of the City Planner and shall comply with the sign ordinance. . V Chairmatn -or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission C f%c-crc�7� � lSs� Date T� 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 10, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 15, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore please give e a call. S.nc rel , J e Weith, City Planner �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. November 8, 1994 South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Planning Commission Vermont 05403 RE: Green Acres Subdivision Dear Members: On behalf of our client, Ralph Goodrich, we are requesting a reconsideration of the driveway access to lot 10 of the Green Acres Subdivision. This request asks for your approval of a temporary driveway access from Route 116 across the 200 foot buffer zone on lot 10 until Swift Street Extension is constructed to station 15+00. Station 15+00 is located on the Green Acres property approximately 175 feet from the property line. After Swift Street Extension is constructed to that point the driveway access to lot 10 will be relocated to the access easement across lot 1 of the Green Acres Subdivision as shown on the site plans. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Karen Ann Pettersen Project Manager cc: South Burlington City Council Ralph Goodrich gracsobA tr P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 GIN IqcoS - w o _ C � vw �•1 T H Lf1 N � -- --- ----- - --- ---- .� _ _o_ -, OwIff- New L �No 27 (T i TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. L[ETT9,_ of MUM900-T-MU. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vr 05495 (802) 879-6331 > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via DATE JOB NO. ATTR"TI ON Y RE. ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ..4 e =kA ECEIVEOD' C� , S 1994 City o o. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO � n 40 % Pre -Consumer Content • 10 % Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: s PRODUCT 240-2 1n e 1M., Grd., Mass. 01471. if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 26, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on September 20, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Ald� J e Weith, ity Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 27, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the September 20, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si erely, �1 Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 21, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc., Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 25, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 6-.1weith,i-6 City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore C 0 O 200 oPE,. SaA(E 91.FTFR rAapl# SCSI. -- ,.. 200 O 200 400 600 DW cxrst STATION FtnLP sr.rtaN � I IT I J W% WETLAND DELINEATION NOTE . 7 A TEMPORARY LWAVEL TWNAROUNO WILL BE CONSTRUCTED A/ IRE FNO OF ANY UNFLNSHED PORTION OF A CITY STREET. ♦ RECREATION PAINS WILL NOT BE L;ONSRLIC.FED WITHIN PEDESWtIAN EA-;EWNTS BY ME DEVELOPER EXCEPT FOR WLE BYCYCLE PAIN WITHIN THE SWIFT STREET FXIFNSI(W RICNri,W-WAY. PLANNING DATA ,- TOTAL AREA . 1 116 /S ACRES DEN.'ilrY ALLOWED . F ACRE': / LOT MIN. 7 ACRE LOT NUMBER OF LOTS ALLOWED 1 46 LJfi NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED . 10 LOT; i II RECEIVED OCT' 0 4 1994 City of So. Burlington x _ OWNER MARBLE BANK 47 MERCHANTS ROW / RUTLAND. VT LEGEND —W awl SPB { BM NXINAN/ • SE11F/1 MAMMp1E • CA, BASIN SERER MAIN WAIER MAN STOOT ORA/N()F MAIN CYNYA—w AND P WA- [T—lri `Ap TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 !1•k Mc Row Itm NO VIOWbw% Vt 094" ({o4 gvW&. ....T,,... ..,,moo..".. Q6EIIlIQD NLMeER oli Lom N to lolwl/ .E JAI ---* — 1— s RWWInt• ,� OF lrE k NO. "I k VS1"t to. GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road South Burlington Vt skeet tat• Subdivision Site Plan Ro)ett m...W _ AM V1&Vm MAN SP3 Y 1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. LIEUA", (OF uQummuzu 181 P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 TO �- U i� I I Q � 1 � p ��I `� Z6y) (Mires 5�'s-Do(-S(2 - WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ DATE /, JOB N I ATTENTI.fT(J I(i/_ RE: ,S the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION C IXL%w -r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US � . _ � [1 � � ��� ILL! � � .' � �? /. � r�l � • COPY TO * 40/ Pre -Consumer Content •10%Post-Consumer Content SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-2 Ja I., Gmtm, mass. 0ian. It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 12, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc., Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments, if appropriate, with revised plans and/or additional information no later than Tuesday, October 18, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, R ym"nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore Preliminary Memorandum October 25, 1994 agenda items October 12, 1994 Page 2 GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- sheet SP1A has not been revised to show the proposed recreation path easement along Muddy Brook located outside of the existing wetland and wetland buffer (condition 13d). --- a full set of drawings is needed for final plat. HANNAFORD BROTHERS COMPANY - PRIVATE ROADS - REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT --- revised plans not needed for this application, plans should be revised for final plat to address Fire Chief's comments. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: October 25, 1994 agenda items Date: October 7, 1994 SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES, INC. - SHELBURNE ROAD The proposed streets should be City streets maintained by the City. Police and Fire service will have to be provided so the City should be responsible for proper maintenance to provide this service. GREEN ACRES - HINESBURG ROAD Plans with latest revisions dated 10/3/94 prepared by Trudell Engineering are acceptable. SBC, INC. - WILLISTON ROAD 1. Plan should show lot dimensions, storm water system existing and proposed, water and sewer services. 2. Sidewalk must continue across relocated driveway and curb returns stop at sidewalk and not go through it. LECLAIR - CRAM PROPERTY - KIRBY ROAD 1. Plan should show contours through the subdivision including the drainageway. 2. Existing adjacent houses should also be shown. NOWLAND TWO - SPEAR STREET Landscape plan with revision dated 3/23/94 prepared by FitzPatrick- Llewellyn, Inc., is acceptable. urlingtun ifire ig rVartinent 575 Voroet street *outb Nurlington. Vermont 05483 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief 9 DATE: October 5, 1994 RE: Plans Review for October 25, 1994 Meeting I have reviewed the following plans and my comments are attached: 1. Sherwin Williams P1azd Project No. 94803 370 Shelburne Rd. Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 2. Nowland Two Project No. 92045 Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 3. Brown Animal Hospital Calkins Ct. Dated 9-30-94 Acceptable 4. Former Arbie's Restaurant Project No. 7167 Williston Rd. Dated 9-28-94 Site -Plan Acceptable; however the building will not accommcldate an occupancy load of 150. For assembly areas with tables and chairs code requirements would allow for 15 sq. ft. per person. After deducting bar space, storage, restrooms, etc. the occupancy load will ,be well below 100. Labor & Industry can advise after review of building plans. S. 110 Kirby Rd. Dated 9-26-94 Acceptable 6. Green Acres Industrial Park Projrct No. 86091-56 Hinesburg Rd. - Acceptable Dated 10-4-94 7. Southland Project No. 92085 Shelburne Rd. Dated 4-19-93 Two additional hydrants are recommended to be located at west ends of buildings 'A' and 'C' (at corners), especially if these b ldim s are to bb sprinklered. Also Fire Lanes -will be required. Ottierwie acceptable. • • mail to: tree rretis uid it3llleU t a l uuuuye oireCr, ru mA i u OW linytun v i uu4ve-uu I V FREE PRESS CLASSIFIED CALL 658.3321 OR (800) 427.3125 SSIFIED 658o3321 Toll Free 1-800.427-3125 • Fax Number 802-862-5622 Pre -gay rhono-You 4 DAYS 4 LINES rr, For all merchandise vclued up to $10,000. No businesses, please. ,E► 7 I 7=Ei [W X3 EM EM !N BOARD EMPLOYMENT MERCHANDISE MERCHANDISE RENTALS REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE TRANSPORTATION =D►REaOP'--=,j 12 Employment 16 Boats, Supaiies 25 Comouters 39 Wanted to Rent 49 Condominiums 6i Farms F > xi" Hdovy Equipment 151-225 Sery utely Free 13 Fart -Time Work 17 Sports, Equipment 26 Home Entertainme2,, 40 Rooms for Rent 50 Realtors 62 Realty Services 72 Aviation 162 Build/Remoaei uncements 14 Business 18 Guns, Ammo 27 1a"V rt 41 Roommates Wanted 51 Brokers 63 Out-ofStoie Property 74 RVs, Trailers 179 Excavating Icare Needed Opportunities 19 Tools & Machines 28 Miscellaneous 42 Unfurnished Apts. 52 Homes For Sale 64 Camps & Comosiies 75 Work Trucks 180 Firewood/Fuel Icare Offered 15 Work Wanted 20 Business Equipment Merchandise 43 Furnished Apts. 55 Lakeshore Property 65 Lots & Acreage 76 Motorcycles 185 Home Services & Found 21 Building Materials 29 Pets & Supplies 44 Houses for Rent 57 Grand Isle Co. 66 Real Estate Wanted 77 Automotive and more... mals 22 Household 30 Fuel & Stoves 45 Condo Rentals 60 Custom Homes 67 Commercial 79 Cars '75 & Older 230.253 On The Farm oy Ads Goods 31 Wanted to 46 Vacation Rentals 68 Mobile Homes 80 Clossic Cars 233 Farm Animals �toinment/Adult 23 Collectibles Buy/Swap 47 Business Rentals 81 Vcns 235 Farm Employment fiction 24 Musical Items 33 Auctions 48 Other Rentals 82 Auto Services/Parts 236 Farm Equip. lciol 34 Photography Real Estoie listincs can be round in home in 241 Feed, Fodder less Services 35 Goraae Sales Vermont section on Saturdays. and more... )TICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 GAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES LE K Environmental be converted on or before ified contractors to pro- the South Burlington City of Spear Street opposite as private roads subject on will treat this November 3, 1994. vide snow plowing Hall, Conference Room, Deerfield Drive. The to detailed conditions, and i under Environ- services at two municipal 575 Dorset Street, South amendment consists of 2) the consolidation of the oard Rule 51-- Parties entitled to partici- building locations. Con- Burlington, Vermont on revising the landscape proposed uses (e.g. su- Applications pate are the muncipality, tract documents may be Tuesday, October 25, plan to include cedar permarket, department d effective the muncipal planning obtained, free of charge, 1994 at 7:30 P,M, to con- trees and a four (4) foot store, retail, restaurant) t proposed per- commission, the regional at the Town Office Build- Sider the following: high wooden rail fence into the single -use cat - lien prepared by planning commission, ing at 172 Blakely Road, along the 50 foot wetland egory "Shopping Center", nission and is state agencies, adjoining Colchester. A site inspec- 1) Revised final plat appli- buffer line behind lots 33 - except for the hotel and at the Commis- property owners, and per- tion will be held on Mon- cation of Green Acres, 45. bank which shall remain ce. Findings of sons granted party status day, 10/17/94 at 1:00 Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, separate uses. Conclusions of pursuant to Board Rule p.m., beginning at the to amend a previously ap- ot be prepared 14 (B). Colchester Town Office proved subdivision u ublic hearing is Building. All prospective 116.7 acres of land into ,The .# nest Dated at Essex Junction, bidders are encouraged twelve (12) lots, Hines - in writlingg with Vermont, this 6th day of to attend. The deadline burg Road. The amend - why a heaNnq October; 1994. for submitting proposals m e n t consists o f 1 and what adds- is 10/26/94. Contact Col- resubdividing the 116.7 Bence will be By. Faith Ingulsrud chester Parks and Recre- acres of land into ten (10) District Coordinator ation at 655-0811. lots ranging in size from 111 West Street 3.06 acres to 43.98 acres. ig will be con- Essex Junction, Vermont, I October 8, 9 & 10, 1994 Bess, on or be- 05452 Ter 20, 1994, a 879-6563 ies the Commis - he Commission October 8, 1994 natter for hear- NOTICS iwn motion. If a tring request is The Town of Colchester is the hearing will requesting bids from qual- ixt Copmm I Continued Next Column PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at Continued Next Column 2) Revised final plat appli- cation of Larkin-Mtlot Partnership to amend an approved planned resi- dential development con- sisting of 73 single-family lots of 66.7 acres of land located on the east side Continued Next Column 3) Revised preliminary plat application of Hanna - ford Brothers to amend an approved preliminary plat for construction of a ten (10) building planned commercial develoment ona 38.5 acre lot consist- ing of a 64,000 square foot supermarket, 107,806 square foot department store, 79,740 square feet of retallspace, a 95 room hotel, a square foot restaurant, nd a 2,500 square foot 'bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of: 1) the approval of Fayette Road and Martin's Drive Continued Next Column Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission October 8, 1994 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Reggulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning I Continued Next Column I Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Mu- nicipal Offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, Oc- tober 24, 1994 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: #1 Appeal of Brian and Tami Candib . seeking a variance from Section 26.00 Non -complying structures, sub -section 26.002 Alterations of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to reno- vate an existing single family dwelling to include a 16 x32' two story addi- tion to a structure non- complying to the minimum setback requirements, lo- cated at 12 Maplewood Drive. #2 Appeal of Robert Au- dette and Patrick Sullivan seeking approval from Section 15.20 Conditional Conthwed Neil Column uses, sub -section 15.212 resaurant and Section 26.65 Multiple uses of the South Burlinton Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to operate a 6) seat restaurant in conjunction with five (5) other existing uses (real estate office, take out food service, automotive repair, equipment rental and torage facility) on a lot containing 2.1 acres locatei at 1900 Williston Road. #3 Appeal of Ruth Trevi- thick eeeking a variance from Section 25.00 Di- mensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to subdivide a five (5) acre parcel inio three (3) lots, with one lot containing one & one half acres (tfh) with less than the mini- mum frortage required (150 feet proposed) Lo- cated at 1751 Spear Continued Nest Column Street. Plans are on file with tl South Burlington Plannii and Zoning Office, I cated at City Hall, 5 Dorset Street, South Bi lington, Vermont. Richard Ward Zoning Adr ative Officer October 8, 1994 THE BURLINGTOI PUBLIC WORKS Trait Division is looking f qualified bidders for snc removal and salting of t municipal parking lots a the Market Place Garac All interested bidders c obtain the necessary formation during norn w Leinn hn„re AAnn-Fri Burlington Public Work 33 Kilburn Street Burlington, VT 05401 Deadline for submissi of qualifications is: Oc, ber 13, 1994 October 8, 1994 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant Green Acres, Inc. 2) Name of Subdivision Green Acres Industrial Park 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application Record owner changed to Marble Bank, 47 Merchants Row, Rutland, VT. All other information is the same. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Lot 10 has been enlarged to 5.52 acres and the access easement alignment has been moved. 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal under Section 202.1(11) and (12) of regulations for a minor subdivision 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. ignature) applicant or contact person documents required the subdivision and under Section lU ate WS6\FORMS\SOBURLFI 4�z , A L{Y J MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Proposed Amendment - Industrial & Open Space District DATE: August 31, 1994 At their meeting of 8/30/94, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal by Ralph Goodrich to amend the zoning regulations by eliminating the requirement for a 200 foot wide buffer strip along a portion of Hinesburg Road in the Industrial and Open Space District. Section 18.303 provides that "an open space buffer strip, 200 feet in width, shall be maintained along Hinesburg Road, and along the SEQ and Parks and Recreation Districts. The buffer strip must be kept free of buildings, structures, parking facilities and access drives, and shall be suitably landscaped with dense evergreen or other suitable plantings to provide adequate screening. The buffer strip along Hinesburg Road does not apply to pre-existing lots of less than 3 acres." Ralph Goodrich indicated that he proposed the zoning change in order to increase the potential for the Rowley lot on Hinesburg Road, which is only about half an acre in size, to be developed and/or sold for industrial/commercial purposes. He feels that the lot is too small to accommodate significant commercial development In addition, because of the 200 foot buffer strip, he feels there is no incentive for anyone to purchase the Rowley lot and incorporate it into a larger lot for industrial/commercial development. The buffer strip provision was incorporated into the zoning regulations a couple of years ago when the I-O district was amended to allow smaller lots, increased density and an expanded list of permitted uses. The intent of the buffer strip is to: a) provide an appropriate separation and buffer between potentially incompatible uses (i.e., industrial and residential or Industrial and passive recreational land), b) prohibit new driveways along Hinesburg Road which is consistent with the City's policy of minimizing access points along high -volume arterial roadways, and 3) push development back off Hinesburg Road in order to maintain the aesthetic quality and open character in this portion of the SEQ. The Planning Commission decided not to change the zoning as requested for the following reasons: 1. The buffer strip was seen as an important compromise when the I-O district was amended a couple of years ago to allow increased density and more permitted uses. The Commission feels the buffer Memorandum - City Council Industrial and Open Space District August 31, 1994 Page 2 strip is an integral part of the district as it helps protect the existing adjacent residential neighborhoods from adverse impacts of industrial/commercial development. In addition, the buffer strip promotes traffic safety by prohibiting new driveways from opening on Hinesburg Road. The intent is to serve new development from Swift Street extension. Eliminating a portion of the buffer would severely compromise the goals and policies which the buffer is attempting to implement. 2. The zoning ordinance as written allows reasonable economic use of the Rowley lot. Section 18.303 exempts pre-existing lots of less than 3 acres from having to abide by the 200 foot buffer. Therefore, the lot in its current configuration could continue to be used and improved for residential use, or it could be developed with industrial, office, or research and testing uses. 3. The Commission is concerned that eliminating only a small portion of the buffer might be considered illegal spot zoning. Therefore, in order to avoid a spot zoning challenge, the City should consider eliminating the buffer zone along the entire length of Hinesburg Road or at least a much larger portion than that which is proposed. However, the Commission feels that eliminating a large portion of the buffer would be detrimental to the City as it would go against the goals listed above. 4. The Planning Commission feels that even with the 200 foot buffer, there is still an incentive for the lot to be sold and incorporated into a larger lot as the land area of the lot could be counted toward density and coverage. 5. The Planning Commission feels the buffer zone represents an important balancing component in the City's efforts to encourage well planned industrial/commercial development and protect established residential neighborhoods, promote safe and efficient highways, and preserve the aesthetic character of the SEQ. cc: Chuck Hafter South Burlington Planning Commission (cc8-31) 9/20/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres as depicted on a thirteen (13) page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 8/29/94 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of consruction, the applicant shall post a $43,770 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highway, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a. This project is approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b. Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve the design prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building lot shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee, or subsequent impact fee program then in effect, based on the P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use on a lot. e) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection ( 43%) , each new building lot shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee, or subsequent impact fee program then in effect, based on 43% of the P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use on a lot. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.Is (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within 10 years of the final plat approval granted on 6/28/94. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed within this ten year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work . 10. In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant will dedicate to the City a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating right-of-way over the 146.6 acre parcel adjoining to the east as shown on sheet SP2. These legal documents shall be r recorded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 12. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no quarry generated traffic travelling through this subdivision. 13. The plans shall be revised prior to final plat submission as follows: a. The 50 foot r.o.w. serving lot #10 shall be designed to accommodate a minimum 24 foot wide driveway with proper radii for trucks and emergency vehicles. b. All plans shall be revised to reflect that the current owner of this property is Marble Bank. C. Note #2 on sheet SP3A shall be revised to indicate the revised lot numbers. d. Sheet SP1A shall be revised to show the proposed recreation path easement along Muddy Brook located outside of the existing wetland and wetland buffer. 14. Deeds for lots 8,9 and 10 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 15. The Planning Commission waives the requirement for a sidewalk on the south side of the main roadway (i.e., 80' r.o.w.) due to the provision of a number of pedestrian/recreation path easements over the property. 16. The existing drainage ditch along the south side of lots one and two shall be filled in contemporaneously with construction of the new drainageway as shown on sheets SP10 and SP11. 17. The final plat plans shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. (7 ( TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 (802)879-6331 •�mom i MICA, 31 LIE -Tut- orsuinumrnm DATE z JO ATTEN N 1 RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU '. Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints x Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ .•DESCRIPTION OEM M1. i 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use As requested For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 40 % Pre -Consumer Content • 10 % Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: PR00001240-2 Jdes im., ciutM, Man 01471_ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. i R?I �4 p G� rr✓`-�c.C,41 II s n_ s cam... City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER A1A-7Q.ri.4; September 16, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 20, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. cerely J Weith, C y Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Mitchell Moore Just loathe category 8 Entertainment/Adult 23 Collectibles Buy/Swap you're irrested in, 9 Instruction 24 Musical Items 33 Auctions look up conespoi. 10 Financial Classifieds. 11 Business Services 34 Photography number the 35 Garage Sales rya/� I LEGAL NOTICES 1 I LEGAL NOTICES 1 I LEGAL NOTICES 1 I LEGAL NOTICES I r periled by a Bid SeCUrity of 5% of the bid amount in the form of a Bid Bond or certified check made payable to the Owner. LEGT NOTICES 1I AVNIMSEMENT FOR BIDS Wiroskl Housing A 83 anow Street WDoski, Vermont 05404 Srarate sealed BIDS will lot received for the WI- nrsklggeeHousing Authority DinV36aP Improvements W 90893 be I(ated at 83 Barlow Feet in Winooski, Ver- rint. The project will (ns+st of the Installation i new storm drain lines, itch basins, and regrad- g of lawn areas. Ids will be received by is Owner at their offices t 83 Barlow Street in Anooski, Vermont until :00 PM (local time), Mon- day, September 19, 1994. Nds will be publicly )pened and read aloud. 3lds m_y not be modified, Nithdrewn or canceled for 30 days. The Owner re- serves the f to reject any or all b s and the right to waive any Infor- malttles in the bid submis- slons. The CONTRACT DOCU- MENTS may be examined at the following locations: Winooski Housing Au- thority, 83 Barlow Street, Winooski, Vermont. The Office of the Engi- neer, Chenette Engi- neering, 50 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont. Associated General Contractors of Vermont Plan Room, c/o Reprogra- phics of New England, Inc., 4049 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont. Associated General ;ontractors of Vermont Plan Room, 5 East Creek 31aza, 80 Belden Road, 3utland, Vermont. Works in Progress Plan loom, Suite 6, 4049 Wil- iston Road, South Bur- ington, Vermont. F.W. Dodge Plan looms, 80 Farrell Street, i0uth Burlington, rermont. Dodge SCAN ;opies of the CONTRACT )OCUMENTS may be ob- 3ined at Blueprints Etc., 0 Farrell Street, South lurtington, Vermont,, upon ayment of a $4.00 harge for each set. Pay - lent to be by cash or tied( payable to Winoos- Housing Authority. A )fund of $20.00 will be !kid upon return of Con - act Document sets in ean, complete and usea- e condition within 10 sys of the bid opening. tch bid is to be accom- ttinued Next Column The successful BIDDER will be required to provide a Payment and Perfor- mance bond for the full contract amount or a Let- ter of Credit for 25% of the contract amount. A pre -bid meeting will be held at the offices of the Winooski Housing AuMor- Ity, 83 Barlow Street, Wi- nooski, Vermont at 8:15 AM on Tuesday, Septem- ber 13, 1994. The Engl- neer will be available for questions and clarifica- tions. All prospective BID- DERS are urged to attend. Ed Willenbaker Executive Director Winooski Housing Author - fly Sesptember 2, 3 A 4, 1994 INVITATION FOR BIDS The City of Burlington, Vermont, Public Works Sealed bids for the pro - lest described below will be received by the De- partment of Public; Works at 33 Kilburn Street, P.O. Box 849, Burfington, VT 06402-0849. Bids will be pubi" opened on Friday, SSeeptember 16, 1994 at 3:00 PM at the address shown above for. Marine work to install chemical feed pipes vAth- In a 30- raw water intake line at the F.J. O'Brien Water Treatment Plant. This project generally consists of pipe bundle fabrication using three (3) V HDPE pipes and stain- less steel cable, and in- stallation in approximately 4200' of intake pipe. Only bids from contractors who have experience In the fusion welding and under- water installation of a minimum 1500' of HDPE pipe will be considered. Contract Documents for this project will be avail- able for bidders at the Department of Public Works. Ouestions regard- ing this contract should be directed to Steve Roy at (802) 863-9094. A pro - bid meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, September 8, 19U at 9:00 AM at the F.J. O'Bri- en Water Treatment Plant, Lake Street, Burlington All prospective bidders are encouraged to attend. September 2, 3, 4, 1994 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING ACT 250 MINOR APPLICATION I4C0767-10 10 Y.S.A., CHAPTER 151 Continued Next Column Notice Is hereby given A that onugust 9, 1994, an application was filed by Frank J. Mutter Construc- tion, 200 Weeks Hill Meadow, Stowe, VT 05672 and Vermont Fed- eral Bank, 282 Williston Road, Williston, VT 05495, for a project generally de- scribed as the construc- tion of a four story, 60,000 square toot office building and associated site improvements on Lot B-27 of the previously ap- proved Watertower Hill Business Park on Routes 2 and 7 in Colchester, Vermont. The District Environmental Commission will treat this application under Environ- mental Board Rule 51 — Minor Applications emended effective /l/64). A proposed per- mit has been prepared by the Commission and is available at the Commis- sion's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested. The request shall state in writing with specificity why a hearing is required and what addi- tional evidence will be presented. No hearing will be con- vened unless, on or be- fore September 12, 1994, a parry notifies the Com- mission or the Commis- sion sets the matter for hearing on its own mo- bon. It a timey hearing request is received, the hearing will be convened on or before September 19, 1994. Parties entitled to partid- pate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and per- sons granted party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(B). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 26 day of August, 1994. By Louis Borie District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 879-6563 September 3, 1994 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND HEARING ACT 250 MINOR APPLICATION #4CO388-A-13-E 10 V.S.A. CHAPTER 151 Notice is herebyy ggiven that on Auuggust 12, 1994, an applicator was filed by Judge Development Corp., 288 Williston Road, P.O. Box 515, Williston VT 05495-0515, to construct a relocated, 2,560 square foot, 2 story farmhouse adjacent to Route 2A at Taft Comers for office Continued Next Column and retail use. The project will be served by access and parking facilities for the previously approved Interstate Corporate Cen- ter and will be connected to municipal water and wastewater disposal fa- cilities. The District Environmental Commission will treat this app4"",,oi, under Environ- mental Board Rule 51-- Minor Applications (amended effective /l/'84). A proposed per- mit has been prepared by the Commission and Is available at the Commis- sion's office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law will not be prepared unless a public hearing is requested. The request shall state in writing with specificity why a hearingg Is required and what addl- tional evidence will be presented. No hearing will be con- vened unless, on or be- fore September 13, 1994, a part notifies the Com- mission or the Commis- sion sets the matter for hearing on its own mo- tion. If a timely hearing request is received, the hearing will be convened on or before September 23, 1994. Parties entitled to partid- pate are the municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, state agencies, adjoining property owners, and per- son granted party status pursuant to Board Rule 14(B). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 29 day of August, 1994. By Faith Ingulsrud District Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 879-6563 September 3, 1994 PUBLIC NEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 20, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: Preliminary plat applica- tion of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously ap- proved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots, Hines- burg Road. The amend- ment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres. Continued Next Column Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burling ton Planning Commission September 3, 1994 PUBLIC NOTICE Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Solid Waste Management Division Issuance of Draft Findings of Fact Casella Recycling Facility - Burlington Public notice is hereby provided of the issuance of Draft Findings of Fact by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conser- vation, Solid Waste Man- aggement Division ('Department") with re- spect to the application filed by the Casette Waste Management, Inc. ('Casel- In' for Certification of the "asells Recycling Fa- cility - Burlington ('Fa- cilityl, in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Sections 6601 eLseq., and the Solid Waste Management Rul- es. The Facility Is located at 175 Lakeside Avenue In Burlington, VT. The Fa- cility is planned to be op- erated as a processing facility for bads of va- rious source -separated recyclable materials, with a processing capacity of Up to 45,569 tons per year. The application for Certifi- cation and Draft Findings of Fact are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Burlington City Clerk's office (658-9300), at the Casella business offices in Montpelier (223-7045) and at the Department offices in Waterbury, VT (please call 241-3444 for an appointment). Copies of the Draft Findings only are available at the Chit- tenden Solid Waste Dis- trict (872-8100), the Town/City Clerk's offices of all Chitterxien County municipalities (except Un- derhill and Bolton), the District #4 Environmental Commission (879-6563) and the Chittenden Coun- ty Regional Planning Commission (658-3004). Written public comments regarding the Draft Find- ings of Fact are being solicited by the Depart- ment and must be re- ceived by the end of the business day on Mon- day. September 19, 1994. These written com- ments will be taken into consideration when the Department develops the Fact Sheet for the Facility, Continued Next Column PITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received UAA& 3 1 193/ at_� Recorded in Vol.4' __B�j on page So. Burlington and Recor Attest: �, �QUIT CLAIM DEED Marga t A Picar�Wle#_L MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREEN ACRES. INC., a LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD,OVERTON & WILSON 3 MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452-3199 Vermont Corporation with offices in South Burlington, Vermont in the County of Chittenden, Grantor in the consideration of TEN OR MORE Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by MARBLE BANK, .a Vermont Bank organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Vermont, in the County of Chittenden, c tee have REMISED, RELEASED, AND FOREVER QUITCLAIMED unto the said MARBLE BANK and its successors or assigns, all right and title which GREEN ACRES. INC. or its successors or assigns has in, and to a certain piece of land in Williston, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Green Acres, Inc. by warranty deed of Malcom P. Vosburgh and Florence M. Vosburgh dated April 19, 1968 and recorded in Book 91 on Page 26 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Also being all and the same lands and premises described in a Mortgage from Green Acres, Inc. to Marble Bank dated May 5, 1992 and recorded in Book 323 on Pages 605-615 of said land records. To said deed., plan and the records thereof, and to all deeds and records therein referred to, reference is hereby made in aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all its right and title in and to said (quit -claimed premises, with the appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, MARBLE BANK and its successors and assigns forever. AND FURTHERMORE the said Grantor, GREEN ACRES. INC. does for fits successors and assigns, covenant with the said Grantee, MARBLE (BANK and its successors and assigns, that from and after the ensealing of these presents the said Grantor will have no right, in, or to the said quit -claimed premises. Vol. Pa 7 ;1 Vo 3? �a e 7P 3 LAW OFFICES OF KOLVOORD,OVERTON & WILSON 3 MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452-3199 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and seal this 27 day of JUn/E A.D., 1994 In Presence Of: GREEN ACRES. INC. By: t�����1 Duly Authorized Agen't, STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At this 27 day of %-%UNE A.D., 1994, RALPH G. GOODRICH, President of GREEN ACRES. INC. personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of GREEN ACRES, INC. Before me, A-Vtary Public Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V. S. A. Chap. 231 - ACKNOWLEDGENIEW - F ETII rY RFCD -TAX PAD - BO= OF MA011 CEAT. REM VT. IN:D USE 6 DEVU.OPMW F`yM r,CT. G_P.T. RECD Return No. , Clerk deed\greenacr.gcd Date END OF DOCUMENT ti O Z 'OPEN WACE BUFEER Craptdc Sc•N mppK— Fect i00 0 200 400 600 _.. 000 IMA1P rA r1TAI DPREss i I ri WEILAND DELINEATION NOTE . 7 A TEMPORARY GRAVEL TURNAROUND WILL BE CONSTRUCTEO AT THE END OF ANY UNFINSHED POR LION OF A CI fY ShOIT. k RECREATfON PATHS WILL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WI MIN PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS BY THE DEVELOPER EXCEPT FOR THE BY('YLU PATH WITHIN THE SWIFT STREET EXTENSION RIGHTUF-WAY PLANNING DATA TOTAL AREA 116.73 ACRES DENSITY ALLOWED . A AMS / LOT MIN. I ACRE LOT NUMBER OF LOTS ALLOWED 146 LOTS NUMBER OF,LOTS PROPOSED . 10 LOTS 1 :rod Y■AI.X --� I I RECEIVE['. aura o issa City of So. Burlingwii X OWNER !APPLICANT GREEN ACRES, INC. / P.O. BOX 7123 50. BURLINGTON. VT OW3 LEGEND a �• snatri ualr SPe ■ N1D. N,tMANi • stWEw MArW,D1t ■ CATCH BASM a SEMCR MAIN • WAIFR MAIN • 1. DRAMOE MAIN DOEIS mnm AND O N SPAC£ 015IRICi LLiGLLLLfCLCLILO/ TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, IN<- 14 KO auk K—d R•s 308 vimwm VL OS495 (BO:' PROECT LOCA TIM Project Location R•Wl�u OF yE O NO. 3"091 �ItNAt �' GREEN ACRE' INDUSTRIAL PA Hinesburg Roz South Burlington -Sh-4tid. Subdivision Site Plan P-1-t 111 rabf _.. _ 65OW1-76 Fit Roiact ttrirS•r KAP _ Dm— Dab B/29/94 -- S[•te Approved SP3 11"10 Vol, - 71 FORM 901 VERMONT • WARRANTY DEED [� Tu78�nNX RL t, PublIs U9PPT OIFICE Page 26J Tur!/eLrZwPiinl,Pubbshers,Rul/andN ling UK, ^., I "bat We, MALCOLM P. VOSBURGH and FLORENCE M. VOSBURGH, husband and wife, both Of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantor s , in the consideration of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ten and more - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars paid to our full satisfaction by GREEN ACRES, INC., a Vermont corporation with principal place of business in Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantee , by these presents, do freely 0Ibe, Grant, bell, Conbep anb Confirm unto the said Grantee, GREEN ACRES, INC. its successors and / ii�xand assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in th-e i County of Chittenden and State of. Yermont, described as follows, viz: A farm of land located on the easterly side of Hinesburg Road together with barns and out buildings thereon. Being a portion of the farm of the within Grantors conveyed to them by the following conveyances: 1. Warranty Deed of Grace A. Vosburgh, dated September 19-, 1942, and of record in Volume 13, at page 361 of the Land Records of the Town of South Burlington. 2. Warranty Deed of Grace A. Vosburgh, dated December 7, 1946, and of record in Volume 22, at page 62 of the said South Burlington Land Records. The premises herein conveyed are all and the same land and premises described in the aforementioned Deeds with the exception of: 1. The premises described in a Mortgage from Malcolm P. and Florence Vosburgh to the Burlington Savings Bank, of record in Volume 77, a page 289 of said South Burlington Land Records, consisting of a lot of land located on the easterly side of Hinesburg Road having a frontage thereon and a uniform width of 240 feet, more or less, and a uniform depth measured at right angles to Hinesburg Road of 423 feet, more or less. 2. A lot of land abutting the easterly sideline of Hinesburg Road with tenant residence thereon having a frontage on Hinesburg Road and a uniform width of 106 feet and a uniform depth of 216 feet. Said parcel is bounded on the north by a line running at right angles to -the easterly sideline of TTinesburg Road, and distant 20 feet north of northern foundation of said residence. ,s vol. 71 Page 27 The within Grantee agrees to assume and pay a mortgage of the within Grantors granted by the Federal Land Bank of Springfield, dated September 7, 1967, and recorded at Volume 87, pages-176-7 of said South=Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned Deeds and to their records, and to the deeds and records mentioned therein, in further aid of this description. WIASM?lp o RETURN No. __-- j l Q y 7 _ to CL.'RK DATE- RFC�(VED Z0 babe anb t0 bOlb said ¢ranted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee , GREEN ACRES, INC. , its successors 36d= and assigns, to their own use and behoof forever; Xnd we the said Grantor s, MALCOLM P. and FLORENCE M. VOSBURGH for ourselves and our heirs, executors and administrators, do covenant with the said Grantee , GREEN ACRES, INC., and its successors xlxeixs and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents we are the sole owner s of the .premises, and have good rijht and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid,, that they are -free. f rom eberg encumbrance; except for a mortgage to the Federal Land*Bank of Springfield as aforesaid; rol. 91 ?age 28 and we hereby endaLfe to 2 arrant anb 3Def enb the same against all lawful claims, whatever, except as aforesaid; 35n we hereunto set our hands and seals this �q day of April .1. D. 19 68. �Jltpre5eltte o Jli�P� MALCOLM P. VOSBURGH '^E LUF�ii CE-1q-VQSBt1�R�H t, r 1'-ate of Vermont, fig. .4t , i re., this CHITTENDEN Countp IelA-L� day of April .4• D. 19 68� MALCOLM P. VOSBURGH and FLORENCE M. VOSBURGH personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be `their free act and deed. Before me Notary -Hula, Received for record May 1, 1969 at 11:25 A.M. Attest TOWN LERK lit CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 ) Name of Applicant Green Acres, Inc., P.O. Box 2123, So. Burlington. VT 0 ,03 2 ) Name of Subdivision Green Acres, Inc. 3) Submit Subdivision Fee 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) : Industrial and office subdivision, consisting of '•0 lots on 116.7 acres located east of Hinesburg Road and south of the Interstate. 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: No change 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Karen Pettersen, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., P.O. Box 308, Williston, Vermont 05495 878-6331 b. Surveyor Marcel Meilleur, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 c. d. Plat Designer 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: No major changes since sketch plan approval. 1 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties • See attached list of abutters. 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application: Green Acres, Inc. plans consist of sheets SP1 through SP 3 and P1 through P9. Designers include Karen Pettersen, John Pitrowiski and Richard Trudell. 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings None proposed. b ) Landscaping $66,800 c ) A l l other site improvements (e.g., curb work est. $1 ,175 , 000 (5200' of road w/utilities, 2400' sewer outside of road, 2500' storm channel & detenti( $1,040,000 $60,000 $50,000 pond) 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- $25,000 family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out): A.M. Peak hour 777 Average daily traffic 5504 P.M. peak hour 743 % of trucks less than 5 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City.- b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 2 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) : Estimate starting construction in fall of 199 and completing 1999. 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: None u 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if -the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. (Signature) applicant or contact person i 4 LIST OF ABUTTERS South Burlington Sue and Linus Wiles 42 Long Meadow Drive Shelburne, Vt 05482 Richard and Ann Painter 106 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties Ltd. Partnership Box 9210, 1020 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 James and Sachi Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Toutant Et. Al. 1398 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Richard and Madlyn Morrissey 1400 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Norman and Patricia Terreri 60 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark and Marsha Abrams 50 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 William Wessel 36 MacIntosh Ave. South Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond Ploof 1943 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher Davis and Lisa Ringey 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 David and Catherine Howell 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Terrance and Nancy Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott and Roberta Pennington 29 West Birch Lane Williston, VT 05495 Larry and Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Municipal Offices Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 Y TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DIE'TUL, VF TRUSEUTKU P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 � � III►'1 ►. • i ► c WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via DATE JO NO ATTEN I N RE: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections 4 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 40% Pre -Consumer Content •10% Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: 7 PRODUCT 240-2 n s Inc., Groton, Mess. 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 6 , 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc- Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, September 9, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymodd J. Belair, Y Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: September 20, 1994 agenda items Date: August 24, 1994 MUNSON DEVELOPMENT - 2069 WILLISTON ROAD A sidewalk along the Williston Road frontage should be included. This section of Williston Road is maintained by the State and will require a permit from them. PERRY'S FISH HOUSE - SHELBURNE ROAD As built plan dated 7/8/94 prepared by Lawrence Atkin, Architect is acceptable. GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK - HINESBURG ROAD Plans with latest revision dated 8/29/94 prepared by Trudell Engineering are acceptable. O§uutb +ISurlingtun Nire Department • 575 11orset street �auth Nurlingtnn, lRermnnt 05403 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief VP DATE: August 31, 1994 RE: Plans Review for September 20, 1994 Meeting (802)658-7960 The following plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. Commerce Square Williston Rd. Acceptable 2. Perry's Fish House Shelburne Rd. Acceptable 3. 2069 Williston Rd. Acceptable 4. Green Acres Industrial Park Hinesburg Rd. Acceptable Project No. 86141 Dated 8-17-94 Project No. 881 Dated 8-2-94 Project No. 94053 Dated 8-15-94 Project No. 86091-42 Dated 8-30-94 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 1, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen : ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the August 9, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note that you have six (6) months from the sketch plan review to submit an application for preliminary plat approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 5' c /ijewegith, Planner JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Y le TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. [Lin.-TIL (IF mumano-TuL a P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via DATE �7y JOB NO. ATTEN N i RE: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION G� 4:1A " S P rE!, V IMA'o THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections City of So. Burlington ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO * 40% Pre -Consumer Content • 10 % Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: PRODucr2402 Ees la., Gmmn. Ma 01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify ud at once. C g Pr- A�4 C-Er1I'A 6r- L 'F1 3-c> -_-Z�-- ..�.. -7/ -A- !_ i PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 20, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Preliminary plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, to amend a previously approved subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into twelve (12) lots, Hinesburg Road. The amendment consists of resubdividing the 116.7 acres of land into ten (10) lots ranging in size from 3.06 acres to 45.53 acres. Copies of the application is available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission September 3, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary Plat application of Dorset Land Company to amend a previously approved planned commercial development consisting of 156,000 square feet of medical office, general office, cafe/deli, and retail use in five (5) buildings on 11.64 acres of land, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing 88,740 square feet of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nursery/convalescent home in three (3) buildings on 11.64 acres. 2) Final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into 13 lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Road. 3) Revised final plat application of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3,100 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building elevations of the proposed 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 28, 1994 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: August 9, 1994 agenda items Date: July 13, 1994 L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD The latest revision to the site and utilities plans dated 7/12/94 prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc., are acceptable. VON TURKOVITCH - SPEAR STREET A lot line within a driveway should not be allowed unless the new lot will be served by this driveway and not a new one. RICE HIGH SCHOOL - PROCTOR AVENUE Plan submitted prepared by Thermo Consulting Engineers with a revised date of 6/3/94 is acceptable. DESARNO PROPERTY - 344 DORSET STREET 1. The new shared driveway should have a dimension. It scales at 50 feet. This is above our standard maximum of 36 feet. 2. Site drainage should be shown on the plan. GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK - HINESBURG ROAD Site plan revising lot layout dated 6/3/94 prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers is acceptable. I 4tAb N urlington .dire i9epa," ment 575 Varset #treet mutt Nurlingtun. ]iermunt 054O3 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief //n DATE: August 2, 1994 v RE: Plans Review for August 9 Meeting The following plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. L & M Park Project No. 88047 Fayette Rd. Dated 7-12-94 Acceptable 2. Rice High School 99 Proctor Ave. Dated 7-18-94 Acceptable 3. Subdivision 260 Spear St. Dated 7-21-94 Acceptable 4. Green Acres Industrial Park Project No, 86091-42 Hinesburg Rd. Dated 8-1-94 Acceptable S. Champlain Oil Co. 344 Dorset St./35 San Remo Dr. Dated 82-94 Acceptable City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 5, 1994 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Inc. Resubdivision, Hinesburg Road Dear Ms. Pettersen ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 9, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob please give me a call. S' c rel , UV Jo Weith, City Planner COr 'VATION & OP ,PACE DISTRICT N;4 1100 HfNESBURG ROAD PARTNERSHIP N/f PAINTER / WII FS I-1 LANE PRESS I bWa W � D YNAPO WER i I CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT N/I BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 50' WIDE R.O. W r4.o3� O c. 1 16. 74 AC. t VOL. 91, P. 26 � 49r.5ed AL. � N/f ---.�--•--�"--- E. O ROWLEY Fl `I 20'PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT LOCATION TO CENTER ON RECREATION PATH 20' PEOESTRIAN EASEMENT — 20' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT - — PROPOSED 5' WIDE ------ PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT THROUGH LOT I1 ONLY TO BE COMBINED WITH EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING 15'-- PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ---I j 3.34 Ac. © O f( 4.01 A,. W 9 II70 O -t O 3.06 Ac. 11 20' WIDE 15.33 Ac. EAESEvtNl Z ii I 60' G R.O.R O W Q 3.09 Ac. 20' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT 4.02 Ac. - - _ SWIFT O11 x 11 �1 20' PEDESTRIAN I 20.48 Ac. f14CE TASEMENT 11 -NCE I L--- EASEMENT'W 2 ,, /\ 50 'DRAINAGE 8.00 Ac. �L EASEMENT EASEMENT NIF RI A P SOuTHEAI SIC GRANT --• PN/F 13RAINARD � T � A HO/f 1 N/F SHEAHgII A DUBOIS 100'CONSERVATION Y AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ( SEE "9UB0IVI5ION PLAT- FOR DETAILED SURVEY INFORMATION) ►ROF..CT LOCATION ---J Graphk Scak Feet 300 O 300 600 900 1200 JA; OF VF P�Un, 'y b EL O Wig' n A. 21 s MEILLEUR x* MR 5M N/F W£SSEL N F TER ERI ' N/F ABRAMS 146.6 AC. ± VOL. 96, P. 129 VOL. 213, P. 168 \~Sf0 \RY \ INDUSTRIAL & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SOUTHEAST QUADRANT LIMITS OF 100 YEAR FLOOD N/I MIKEII ( WILLISTON ) GOODRICH ( WILLISTON ) �j% Tv rmE �tEm� unroll — i N/F LACASSE ' OA ( WILLISTON ) WILLISTON / SOUTH BURLINGTON TOWN LINE 20' PEDESTRIAN EA SEMEN T LOCATED WITHIN CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AND 50' AWAY FROM EDGE OF WETLANDS hoWA tMe GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. Shoat d" Sketch Plan I�r TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Di" rwt Road box 306 VML%ton Vermont 05495 079-6ml CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 100'FROM CENTERLINE OF BROOK OWNER GREEN ACRES INC. P.O. BOX 2123 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. 05403 Prolact _b, 86091-49 ", 005 holact my. "AP/RPorawn MSS Date 08/04/94 $Cab 1-=300' fk&d Book 105 Obk 42-01 DECEIVED i i AY of So. Bur;"---- ., �T I TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. i ����rn �,v,� �n L IET M E A V F� Ln1 U,� U V S tl�/IJ � U �G�.� L❑ PO. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vr 05495 (802) 879-6331 TO � S . 1F)U tij'j WE ARE SENDING YOU l Attached ❑ Under separate cover via Li Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans DATE JOB NO. �� I ATT NT N RE: ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I {I L7 I 1 (I '1 n Azpatcniam THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO-1�, 10h C21�-I r L 0 h s' 40/ Pre -Consumer Content •10% Post -Consumer Content SIGNED: �� •���l�' PRODUCT 240-2 ee5 Inc., G,&a . Mea. 01471, If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify Us at once. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKE'IC'H PLAN 1) Name, addr-ss, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05402 b. Applicant Ralph B. Goodrich, Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05402 c. Contact person Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 13 lot industrial subdivision on 116.7 acres on Route 116. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Fee 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties See enclosed list. 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Proposed 80' wide and 60' wide street right-of-way and 10' wide utility right-of-way, 20' wide and 15' wide pedestrian easements, 20' wide sewer easements, 50' wide drainage easements. 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 4200 1.f. of 32' wide city street, 6550 1.f. of 8" P.V.C. sewer line, 4700 l.f. of 8" DI. water main, storage tank at exiStinQ municipal pump station. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: Planning commission approval of quarry operation site plan 2/24/87 and extensions on 8/11/87 and on 2/23/88 planning commission approval of industrial subdivision on 6/24/94. 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signature) applicant or contact person ___ da to LIST OF ABUTTERS South Burlington Sue and Linus Wiles 42 Long Meadow Drive Shelburne, Vt 05482 Richard and Ann Painter 106 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties Ltd. Partnership Box 9210, 1020 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 James and Sachi Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Toutant Et. Al. 1398 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Richard and Madlyn Morrissey 1400 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Norman and Patricia Terreri 60 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark and Marsha Abrams 50 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 William Wessel 36 MacIntosh Ave. South Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond Ploof 1943 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher Davis and Lisa Ringey 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 David and Catherine Howell 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Terrance and Nancy Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott and Roberta Pennington 29 West Birch Lane Williston, VT 05495 Larry and Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Municipal Offices Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 /ji- LANE PRESS 20 PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 84I D ' PROPOSED 5• WIDE Sri I PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT I \� So I THROUGH LOT II ONLY I 11 TO BE COMBINED WITH DYNAPOV+ER I, EXISTING EASEMENT CONSERVATION do EXISTING 15' ENT \\\�\ OPEN SPACE DISTRICT' PEDESTRIAN EASEMI 1 30'DRAINACE l EASEMENT MI BURL MC TON PROPERTIES �' j 1100 NINESBURG __ROAD PAR MERSNIP- / LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I ') �/ NIF PAIN R / WIt S / I '� 146.6 AC. t R.O.W. -� 3.d8 AC.. VOL. 96. P. 129 LJ ® O _ _ �• Amy 6.15 AC. �i VOA 213, A 168 % _ O yIILNI 4.47 Ac. 3.13 AC. R l + /�Y+p 1`1k IJ I AC 80' WIDE / E,yp O ROW 41 AC. 1 A � 3; NI - - ROWLEY 36.4 AC. _ 20•PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT LOCATION TO CENTER ON A RECREATION PAIN �I 7o'K rAN •--�•} /7 1 N/f' RINIEY N/E I CONSERVATION do OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Al lF.QS z 3.90 AC. I➢ ITa nor D Z a.ta.0 _ In O YVENt ® R.DW I2 J 96 Ac. `v- 3.22 AC. EXT, 1 SWIFT STREET P TOTAL116.74 AC. VOL. 91, P. 26 , m' arusln.N _ 1' I 20.2 Ac. .\� SO' DRAINAGE &00 Ac. % � __ 20' SEWER EASEMENT - EA T a✓_ .. \ ra\ TRICT NDU$ & EN SPACE1\IDIS ` \ \ 1... TRIAL \ NF/ ADRANT uNITs or- / N/F SOUTMEAS DFLnAl DISTRICT Ot FLOWro _ •'1 BRAINARO I NOWfLI\ 1 Nor I ! INDUSTRIAL dr S#417AHAN DUBOIS OPEN SPACE _ I d DISTRICT 100' CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ( SEE SUBDIVISION PLAY FOR DETAILED SURVEY INFORMATION) 'I SOUTHEAST IOUADRANT J t OISrRiC.T / PROJECT LOCATION - Craphlc Scale Feet 300 0 300 600 900 1200 p.Na,aaNa��a 3�C' OF Vf4y 'e �$l tWCR OL'i N s '*s„Cy1'rcrsrtR'� pH4mw '�xaNMx a`k. MfSYL � / TEeIERI 11 N/F J ABRAMS N/F GOODRICH ,( WILLISTON ) N tACASSE ( WILLISTON ) WILLISTON / SOUIN BVRLINGTON - TOWN LINE — CONSERVATION k OPEN SPACE DISTRICT too, I". CEN WMIK (X BaO ( 20• PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT LOCATED OWNER WITHIN CONSERVATION a OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GREEN ACRES INC. AND 50' A WA Y FROM EDGE P.O. BOX 2123 OF WETLANDS Soun4 BURLINGrON, VT. 05403 N/F MIXEl l ( WILLISTON ) Pt.o., am GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. ah.t ay Master Plat �Z, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 WY park tees so, 3" Wabten Ve.e o o3493 f"4"l PIMOU hUmbOr 6409"l EAL 005 pMI,, NAP PT DreWr1 NAM Dare 61019, Stay r^. 300' rl.11 leek los Dtt11 42d1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Blab Park Road Bo. 308 Wllllston, Vt. 05495 (802) 8796 ® oMrr OK for a Vow Pro. EAsr. a/ot/94 aPt EMIM 013MICr NAME. EASfWNM oe/03/94 a ® iMtNC OlSMICT NAI( m/oT/9. aaa m OF CMrIOIRAR(Al 2/01/93 A AOArSr tOr IAMLF t/n/97 XAP QDescrlptlon Date By Revisions 0r lrQti Epp ♦. ti' a f N0 3091 e a �'r•DMl OI' Prolect title GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Sketch Plan Prvrat number 6609t-47 ERL 005 PIo)ect manager NAP/AP/ Dra— NAN Datc__9/:./3� Soak I_Jao Approved SPIA City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 1, 1994 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 12 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days of the approval. If you have any questions, 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob please give me a call. S nc rely Joe Weith, City Planner Preliminary Memorandum - Planning September 20, 1992 agenda items August 31, 1994 Page 2 SOUTH BURLINGTON REALTY - MIXED USE BUILDING - SITE PLAN --- plan should show a sidewalk along Williston Road in a location approved by VAOT. --- a bike rack should be provided. --- 87 parking spaces required and 81 spaces are being provided. Applicant should submit a shared parking study to justify a reduction in parking requirements. --- a conditional use permit must be obtained for the proposed uses. --- there should be a f ive ( 5 ) foot green strip between the access drive and the westerly boundary for snow storage. --- dumpster should be screened and so noted on the plan. POMERLEAU REAL ESTATE - RETAIL ADDITION - SKETCH -PLAN ---. the two (2) parking spaces being added are located in a C.O. zone, this is not permitted. --- plan should show limits of C.O. .zone (50 feet from centerline of stream). --- parking spacesmust be at least nine (9) feet. in.Vidth, Planning Commission has not adopted the "general parking principles --- plan does not accurately depict parking spaces striped on the property. Problem areas include along Hinesburg Road, behind Bolton Block, along east side of motel, along front of Grand Union building and in the rear of the. building. Plan must accurately depict all -site conditions. --- plan should. show all dumpsters' because many of them are located in parking spaces shown on the plan. --- this item will not be placed on the Planning Commission agenda until an accurate plan is submitted. GREEN ACRES, INC. - RESBUDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT --- eliminate 20 foot pedestrian path easement along southerly boundary of lots #1 and 2 on Sheet SP1. --- provide metes and bounds information for 50 foot r.o.w. serving lot #10. --- Sheet SP3A does not show lot #10 and "Planning data" states that 12 lots are proposed. --- the pedestrian easement shown on sheet P7 must be relocated outside of wetland protection area. Preliminary Memorandum - Planning September 20, 1994 agenda items August 31, 1994 Page 3 --- Sheet SP3A does not show lot that 12 lots are proposed. --- the pedestrian easement shown outside of wetland protection #10 and "Planning data" states on sheet P7 must be relocated area. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 18, 1994 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 12 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 28, 1994 Planning Commission minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that final plat be plans be recorded within 90 days of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. inc rel Jo Weith, Ci y Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob t-.e e/ ( 6/14/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL GREEN ACRES, INC. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c/o Ralph Goodrich, for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land into thirteen t13) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Road, as depicted on a 27 page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 6/3/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a $47,400 landscape bond to cover the installation cost and value of proposed street trees and berm landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years from the date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. The berm installation and planting shall take place contemporaneously with the road construction. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) This project is approved for a maximum of 777 AM peak hour trip ends and 743 PM peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. b) Applicant shall install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning building permit. c) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. d) Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming a light manufacturing use with an average building size of 72,000 1 square feet, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. e) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building shall be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the P.M. peak hour trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by the City. 8. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required sewer allocation fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within 10 years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by a roadway or portion of roadway which is not completed within this ten year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 9. The developer shall furnish to the City, at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utility work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work . 10. In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" E d !: construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant will dedicate to the City a recreation path easement and 80 foot floating right of way over the 146.6 acre parcel adjoining to the east as shown on sheet SP2. These legal documents shall be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 12. As expressly represented by the applicant, there will be no quarry generated traffic travelling through this subdivision. i 13. The final plat plans shall be revised as follows. a. Lots #3 and 4 shall be combined into one (1) lot. b. The note on sheets SP10 and SP11 shall be revised to clearly indicate that all recreation paths on the property will not be constructed by the applicant, with the exception of the recreation path located within the 80' r.o.w. C. Sheet SP3A shall be revised to relocate the pedestrian easements outside of the wetland buffer zone. d. Sheet SP2 shall be revised to refer to Southeast Quadrant instead of Agricultural and Rural Residential District under "Total Area" notes. e. Sheets SP10 and SP11 shall be revised to correctly identify the location of the 20 foot pedestrian easement. f. Sheet,a P1-P4 sha show ' five-(5) foot wide side on he . souIrly s d of�Swift Stre9� Extension rom H'�ree f the street in�.� location rov d the � p, pp City-, Engineer. g! Sheets SP1A and SP2 shall be revised to show the proposed recreation path easement along Muddy Brook located outside of the existing wetland and wetland buffer. 14. Deeds for lots 8,9 and 10 shall reflect the fact that the western portions of these lots will be unusable because of the Potash Brook CO zone. 15. As provided in Section 605 of the Subdivision Regulations, if substantial construction of the project has not started within three (3) years, this approval shall be null and void. 3 �I s�� or l� 3 ao_ 4e 10 c�� s CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS SECTION 417 Assesment of Development Impacts a. Will not result in undue water or air pollution. In making this determination the Planning Commission shall at least consider (1) the availability and capacity of municipal sewer facilities or the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to support waste disposal adequately. The project will be connected to the municipal sewer system which has sufficient capacity to handle the additional 30,350 gallons per day projected sewage use. A study was conducted to evaluate the pump station just south of the Interstate and was submitted to the City Engineer. (2) the elevation of land above sea level and in relation to the flood plains, The lowest elevation on the project is 334 and there are no 100 year flood plains within the property as indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The maps indicated a 500 year flood plain within the banks of the tributary of Potash Brook within the project property. The flood plain will not be impacted because it is located within the Conservation and Open Space Zone. (3) protection of ground and surface waters, and Ground and surface waters will be protected from contamination by the use of the municipal sewer system, grassed swales and grassed slopes to remove parking area contaminants and restrictive covenants pertaining to the proper disposal of hazardous wastes. (4) all applicable regulations of the health department and other State agencies. The project will be required to receive a permit from the State Health Department prior to construction of the water system. An Air Pollution Control Permit has been issued for the number of parking spaces requested. A Stormwater Discharge Permit will also be required by the State. b. Does have sufficient water available for the reasonably foreseeable needs of the development. The anticipated flows for this project are approximately 30,350 gallons per day. There should be sufficient capacity at the Champlain Water District facility to provide the water needed for this project. A hydrant test was conducted on a nearby hydrant to determine if there is adequate pressure in the: line. There is adequate pressure. c. Will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result. The project will be divided into construction phases. The first phase will be the construction of the road, utilities and the berm/ channel alone the south property line. The successive phases include the construction on each lot as they are developed. The plans and details show the erosion control measures that will be used for the first phase of construction. The individual lots will be reviewed for adequacy of their soil erasion control measures when the developer applies for ACT 250 and City permits. The temporary erosion control measures include haybale check dares, silt fences, catch basin inlet protection, temporary sediment traps, and a stabilized construction entrance.. The permanent erosion control me_ sures include rip rap in the clv4nrnel , rip rap at the culvert outlets, mulch and seed on all disturbed slopes. A detention pond will be constructed in the first phase to attenuate the increased storm�tater runoff from the road. d. Will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, existing or proposed.. A traffic study was completed for this project. on June 14, 1991. The Agency of Transportation completed their review on August 3.2, 1991. Additional information was submitted to the City, as requested, on February 16, 1993. The various improvements and contributions that will be made to make other additional road improvements will provide for safe and uncongested highways. e. Will not cause an unreasonable burden on the ability c:f the City to provide educational services and facilities. The project will not directly add additional school aged children to the C'_ty school systeia; however, there will probably be an impact on the school system because this project will attract 000ple to move into the City. In general, the: local taxes generated from this industrial park will more than offset the tax burden created by more school aged children. f. Will not cause an unreasonable burden on the ability of the City to provide municipal or governmental services and facilities. The road through the project will be built to City standards for arterial streets with an 80 foot right-of-way. Fire hydrants will be periodically placed along the street, and lights will be placed at the street intersections. There will be a cul-de-sac constructed at the end of Vosburgh Lane for the City snow plow to turn around. g. Will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, is aesthetically compatible with existing buildings and site characteristics, and will protect rare and irreplaceable natural areas and historic sites. The project is within the Hinesbury Road -North View Protection Zone. The height of all proposed structures and amenities will be restricted by the use of a formula which will maintain the view of Mt. Mansfield and the foot hills from Hinesburg Road. The surrounding land uses include industrial/manufacturing to the north and east, and residential to the south and west. There will also be berming and plantings placed along the common property line with the Ledge Knoll residential development to scene those lots that are adjacent to the houses. The setback from Hinesburg Road and the height restrictions will provide visual protection for the housing development across Hinesburg Road. There are no irreplaceable natural areas or historic sites located on the project property due to the former agricultural use of the land. h. Will provide housing types, costs, and characteristic approppriate to the housing needs of various social and economic groups. The project will not be providing housing. i. Will provide convenient allocation and distribution of common open space in relation to proposed development and will conform with the City's recreation plan. There will be no open space allocated within the project, however, the project will be providing pedestrian easements along the southern property line and will construct a bikepath along Swift Street Extension. Two pedestrian easements will connect the easement along the southern property line to Swift Street Extension on either side of the existing pond. In addition, a pedestrian easement will be granted along the perimeter of the adjacent Green Acres, Inc. property to the east. j. Will provide efficient layout and high -quality installation, construction and maintenance of streets and public facilities and will conform with the City's utilites plan. The design of the City streets and utilities within the project are in conformance with the City standards and meet with the approval of the City Engineer. k. will provide for cooperation with adjoining properties in the extension of roadways, drainage facilities, and utility lines. Road right-of-ways will extend from the ends of Malcolm Lane, Vosburgh Lane and Swift Street Extension to the property lines for future expansion of the street system, if needed. Water and sewer line can be extended along Swift Street Extension and Malcolm Lane within the right-of-way. There is a new gravity sewer main that crosses Burlington Properties Limited Parnership for future sewer connections. 1. will maximize potential for energy conservation and solar energy use via appropriate site layout and use of building materials. The individual lot designs will not be determined until the lots are sold. In general, the project is exposed to the south and is mostly open. The future lot owners will have ample opportunity to take advantage of the solar exposure. M. Will conform with the City's comprehensive plan. There are many references in the Comprehensive Plan to the industrial area in this part of the City and the Southeast Quadrant. The Green Acres property has been zoned industrial for many years and has become a planned entity in the City's future. Through the years that this project has been developing, the critical issues have been identified and accomodations have been made to preserve the scenic views, screen the project, maintain the wetlands, and provide for public, pedestrian access. C- 10 W 0 O 200 WEN SPACE OLFTER G10*- c Scala — 200 0 200 400 600 800 C Ir.n reA: sMR MRr--�. vum srANw ' w: Q I y' WE1WlD OEL MEA IlUN PLANNING DA rA TOTAL AREA . 116.73 ACRES IN NSI TY ALLOWD N A(RE" / IOr MIN. 7 ACRE LOT HUNKER OF LO15 AU,WW T) ie6 lilt: NUMBER OF LOTS PRO, 14 12 LOT:; PLUS 1 DEFERRED LOT RECEIVES MAY 11 1994 City of So. Burlington I / OWNER k APPLICANT PREEN ACRES. INC P.O. BOX 2123 SO. BURUNDION, VT 05403 1pr LEGEND a �+ slRrrr uwr pa i Nro N,ORANr � SCWR Y AMNtl£ ■ GArCN . .--- SEWR MAIM • -- WARR PAIN --. --- SrONN URA(NCE MAIN /, cu.scRrA naN ANo aRLN PAQ orsmrcr TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. �U"P-k� ba 300 V Vt D3495 (802) ff?"13 PR"Cr LXAHM F-)-t 00. GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Starr Farm Road So. Burlington Vt. �. Subdivision Site Plan rn.�ect umber _enur :w __ �_au5 VMWn kAP MAN Date 5�29/91 _ __- scaM 1=_ SP3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 24, 1994 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 28, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S erely, tt- J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: June 28, 1994 agenda items Date: June 24, 1994 3) GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT This item was continued from the June 14, 1994 meeting due to the lack of a quorum. The staff memo on this item prepared for the last meeting is enclosed. 4) DAVID FLAGG - SITE REVISIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of making some minor site revisions by expanding the parking area. The 4,608 square foot building is used for auto service and auto/marine sales. This site was last reviewed by the Planning Commission on 5/25/93 (minutes enclosed). The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 6/27/94 will be hearing a variance request from the applicant to increase front yard coverage. This property located at 10 Gregory Drive lies within the I-C District. It is bounded on the east by an auto service and repair facility, on the south by Muddy Brook, on the west by a vacant lot and on the north by Gregory Drive. Access/circulation: Access is provided by two (2) curb cuts. The easterly curb cut is for egress only and the westerly curb cut is for ingress only. Minor changes were made to the access drives. The 5/25/93 approval required the applicant to install "enter" and "exit" signs, these signs have yet to be installed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 4.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 22% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is being increased from 39% to 42% (maximum allowed is 30%). The applicant obtained a variance to allow the 39%. coverage and is seeking another variance to allow an additional 3% increase to 42%. Setback requirements are being met. Parking: This project requires a total of 10 parking spaces for employee and customer parking and 23 spaces are being provided City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 10, 1994 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 61c 1j, 6 Joe Weith,176 City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files &b From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, June 14, 1994 agenda items Date: May 16, 1994 GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT --- notes on sheet SP1 should be revised to replace name of Green Acres Lane to Malcolm Lane. --- sheets SP1A, and SP2 should be revised to show the new zoning designation of Agricultural & Rural Residential District as Southeast Quadrant District. --- the recommended street tree list from the Vt. Department of Forest, Parks & Recreation indicates that the Amur Corktree has a maximum height of 45 feet, the maximum allowed is 40 feet. Applicant should substitute a different tree or provide documentation that this tree will not exceed 40 feet in height. --- note on sheet P7 and P9 stating that "Private road to serve lot 12 to be built to town standards ... " should be changed to refer to "City" standards. --- Green Acres Lane on sheet P9 should be changed to Malcolm Lane. --- pedestrian easements should be relocated outside of wetland and wetland buffer areas. --- condition #16 of the preliminary plat approval required wetland delineation of lot #4, this information has not been provided. --- plans do not clearly indicate that a 20 foot wide recreation path easement only will be provided and that recreation paths will not be constructed by the applicant (except the recreation path along Swift Street Extension). This was a requirement of condition #5. DORSET LAND COMPANY - GENERAL/MEDICAL OFFICES & NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOME - PRELIMINARY PLAT Subdivision Plat --- metes and bounds information must be provided for lots 5a, 5b and 5c. --- a note should be added to indicate that lot 5 is to serve as the r.o.w. to lots 5a, 5b and 5c. --- applicant should propose name for new City street. Choot QD1 --- planning data notes indicate that lot 1 is in the R7 District, it is in CD3 District, lot 2 is in R7 not CD3, lot 3 is in CD3 not R7, lot 4 is in R7 not CD3, lot 5 is in R7 not CD3, lots 5a, 5b and 5c are in R7 not CD3 and the r.o.w. is in CD3 not R7. --- plan should note that dumpster storage areas are to be screened, indicate type of screening to be used. --- identify which is building A and which is building B. --- lot 5 is noted to have 0% building coverage yet there is a gazebo and a canopy on this lot. --- nursing home building shows two (2) Phase I's and a Phase III but no Phase II (this should be corrected on all plans). --- provide front yard coverage information for lots 2, 4 and 5. Sheet SP2 --- there should be street trees along the west side of the new City street between the access to lot 2 and access to lot 5. --- there are only 14 spaces along westerly row of spaces in parking garage of the northerly office building, note on plat shows 15 spaces (correct on all plans). Other: --- provide all exterior building mounted lighting details. --- provide the number of bedrooms in the nursing home. --- provide estimated cost of all buildings. --- provide gross square footage of nursing home. --- provide traffic impact analysis. --- explain reason for lot #4. --- indicate whether building heights have changed for the office buildings and provide elevations for the nursing home building. --- if the applicant is proposing north bound left turns into the new City street, applicant should show a revised Dorset Street that allows these turning movements. BRUCE BARRY - DRIVEWAY & PARKING REVISIONS - SITE PLAN --- plan should show a screened dumpster area, indicate type of screening. --- there is outside storage behind the building in an area shown as grass, plan should be revised to show this area as covered. --- there are only six ( 6 ) maple trees along Gregory Drive not seven (7) as shown. --- provide details and locations of all exterior lighting. --- plan should provide drainage information. �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. May 31, 1994 Ray Belair So. Burlington Planning & zoning 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Green Acres Subdivision Dear Ray: Enclosed are revised sheets: Title, SP1, SP1A, SP2, SP3, SP3A, SP5, P1-P5, P7, P9, SP10 & SP11 which address the comments dated 5/23 by Bill Szymanski and 5/26 by the fire chief. The following are my responses to the specific comments you made on 5/16/94. 1. SP1 - Green Acres Lane has been changed to Malcolm Lane in the notes. 2. SP1A & SP2 - The new zoning designation has been added. 3. P2 - I have enclosed fact sheets indicating that the Shademaster variety only reached 40 feet tall and additional information that this variety is available. 4. P7 & P9 - The note has changed to read "City". 5. P9 - The road name has changed to Malcolm Lane. 6. SP1, SP2, SP3, SP3A, etc. - The 20' pedestrian easement on either side of the existing pond has been relocated outside the wetland buffer zone. The pedestrian easement located within the construction limits of the berm / channel along the south property line will remain in the same location. A C.U.D. will be needed to make the berms & realign the channel. The pedestrian trail will be included in the C.U.D. even though the gravel base and finish coat will be added at a later date. 7. Lot 4 will not be permitted to be developed until the wetlands have been delineated. 8. SP10 & SP11 - A note was previously added to these sheets which has been enlarged to make it clearer. P. O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 Responses to Bill Szymanski's comments on 5/23/94: 1. A note has been added to provide for temporary cul-de- sac's at the end of any temporary City street terminus. 2. The sewer easement has been added to the west side of Lot 3 in the pedestrian easement. 3. A stub has been added to MH #8. 4. MH #12 has been moved to the center of Vosburgh Lane. 5. Gravel service drives have been added within the sewer easements where the manholes are located outside of the City road R-O-W's. 6. P9 - The road name has been changed to Malcolm Lane. 7. Tyler Hart has evaluated the pump station and sent a letter to Bill Szymanski on April 1, 1994. Responses to Fire Chief Possich's comments on 5/26/94. 1. The hydrant locations have been changed to be 300 feet apart. 2. A hydrant was added to Malcolm Lane and to Vosburgh Lane. 3. There is the ability to loop the water system through Knoll Circle once Lot 1 is developed and also Burlington Properties Limited Partnership once the eastern portion of their property is developed. It would be premature to put those lines in now since those plans have not been developed. Very truly yours. �-4!�?Q Karen A. Pettersen Project Manager KAP/nad cc: Ralph Goodrich 86091L02.ws6 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary Plat appli- cation of Dorset Land Company to amend a pre- viously approved planned commercial development consisting of 156,000' square feet of medical office, general office, caf- e/dell, and retail use In, five (5) buildings on 11.64 acres of land, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing 88,740 square feet of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nurs- ery/convalescent home in three (3) buildings on 11.64 acres. 2) Final plat application of Green Acres, Inc., c o Ralph Goodrich, for su� division of 116.7 acres of land Into 13 lots ranging In size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Hinesburg Road. 3) Revised final plat appli- :.ation of Gregg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial de- velopment consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, 20,000 square foot movie theater (1,000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retell/in- door recreation building, a 3,100 square foot fast - Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 food restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of revising the approved building eleva- tlons of the proposed 22,500 square foot res- taurant/retail/indoor rec- reation building. Copies of the applications are available for public Inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission 1 Shademaster Amur Corktree Ph am Sh Phellodendron amurense `PNI 455 a' trademarked Heights Width: Hardiness zone: Crown. - Foliage: Flowers: Fruit: Description: Advantages: Limitations: Site and Culture; 35' to 40' (35' at age 30) 35' to 40' (35' at age 30) 3to7 broadly ovate, moderately spreading, rried;um texture compound, 21/2" to 41/2" leaflets, lustrous dark green, yellow in the fall male, inconspicuous fruitless The species is native to northern China and Japar), and typically has low, spreading, massive branches. 'Shademaster', selected in New Jersey and introduced in 1991, is a fruitless male clone that has an improved branching habit. Like the species, Its bark Is rugged and corklike. The growth rate Is miedlum. Withstands difficult planting sites, where there is arnple space for the spreading roots. The Improved branching habit makes it suitable for spaces that are too restrictive for broader corktrees grown from seed. As a male t-:e, It does not produce the fruit that can cause a litter problem and stain sidewalks, It is unusually pest free. The root system is shallow and spreading, requiring adequate space for good develop• ment, Availability Is limited in some regions. Recovers gradually after transplanting, so BC-B stock planted in the spring Is suggested. Tolerates alkaline or acid soils, wet soils, and drought. Observations on pollution tolerance are contradictory. Little maintenance is needed aftc r pruning for clearance and to establish desired branch structure, ©1993 by The Pennsylvania State University. Municipal Tree Restoration Program, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 Price:.t20.00, Including shipping Order from: Publications Office 112 Agricultural Administration Bulldln9 University Park, PA 16802 Alt rights reserved, No part of this publication may be reproduced, In any form or by any means, without written permission from Henry D. Gerhold, School of forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. PubI1sh:.1 with the support of, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State E Private Forestry Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Forestry Pennsylvania Electric Energy Research Council Pennsyluarta Nurserymen's Association PENNSTATE College of Agricultural Sciences Penn State Is an affirmative action, equal opportunity university. � 1993 by The Pennsylvania State University Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 93.72203 ISBN 1.883956.00.5 UML r1h,* In 11111N1 IJU4i 1-9-. 10-49 50-249': PARTHENOCESSUS trimLspidata'Veitchii 4W-50' (7.one4) Boston ivy After a long search we have finally located the original strain ofPartheno ciasus `Veitchii' with the duck glossy leaves which made it so popular, _- Propagated vegetatively to perpetuate the large leaves and immunity to leaf spot defoliation 31h i1L Pot ............ _ .......... , ... _ 3w►0 3.25 Z76 PEUUWDENDBON amumnse: 25'-30' (Zorw 4) Amaroorictree A rapid growing tropical appearing twee, useful for city sites. Glossy fohW and interesting, corny bark. (Bate root whip sfzes available fyom 6' to 9`.) 1 to 15G irk, &K 18.06 15.76 14.00 l y', to 1'/z in, fi`R_ .................... 23.00 20.25 18.90 . 12 to 14 ft-, 2i'2 too 3 in., R & B ...... 1311)0 ... ... 13 to 15 fi..:3 to:31? in., B & B...... 281.W ... ... 14 to W tL, 3l`2 to 4 ia-, 13 & B...... -17.00 ... -- - Sbadem.sterO. W 35' (Zone 3) cv. PNI 4551 Shadcnaxter@' Amur coratree Averystmnggrowingselection of this trugh tr_ ee that will withstand diffx:uit plarrtingsit> 8haxicmas' r�i:amate selection,therefore ftwr11not prod ace the fruit that is common on regular Amur ocrktree. (Raze root whip s:.zes anallahle from 6' to 9'.) 1 to lY. in., BR... . ................. 19M 17.00 1.525 lf: to 13T in., Ra..................... 24..50) 21M 19bi1 10 to 12 fL, lY4 to 2 in., B & B.......... 77.00 - 71.00 11 to 13 ft., 2 to 2'h in, B & B .......... 98.00" l 2 tA3 14 R , 2Yz to 3 in, B & B .......... 131.00 . . 13 to l5 ft, 3 to 3% ln. B & 8 131.00 14 to 16-ft, 3Vz t0 4 to l3& B, --. 237.00 PHII ADEI,P` CN X 3eweinei'Bel a RkAe. 6'-6' (Zone 6) _ Wile Etude' Star -shaped f � aped ragrarit white flowers in Mayand June. Blooms are 2y6 inches across Branches have a graceful, arching habit X virghudis 71-3" (ZOOC rr) virgJt> mocl[oraugr Our strain is the lrue vir&ali4 and blooms all summer. Its semi Wubie flowers are fret and it is not to be cc"-txscd with the inferior variety which is offered by many. - - `SUver Sbawera'. 3'-6! (Zom 6) `Sih er 1Sb8"`era' Graceful arching branches covered with fragrant white flowers in June. - ALL OF THE ABOVE YAR.IE'T1ES Unit Prig in QuanUtias 1-9 10-49 50-249 PICEA abies (eacelsa). 80`-100' (Zone 3) NomV spm" Dark green foliage. Rapid growth- One of the most versatile and durable 2to3ft, B&B ........................ 122°r 11.25 9.75 3 to 4 fL, B & B ... ..:................. 15.00 13.75 12.00 4 to 5 fi„ B & B ......................... 27.b0 25LO 22.00 5 to 6 ft B & B ........................ 57.00 53.00 46R00 6 to 7 fL, B & B ........................ 75.00 69.00 60.00 7 to 8 ft-, B & B ........................ %' .00 79.00 67.00 8to9fL, R&B .115-00 --- ... --+glawca SConicx'. 4`-6' (Zoae 4) dwarf Alberta spruce A dwaft slow-grovcng spntce with blue-green nee4hes developing into a dense names pyr arnid. A perfect miniature of a forest tree.. Very popular. 18 to 24 in., #2 can ............. . ... _ 1425 15.W 13.00 21z to 3 ft, B & B .................. 51.00 47.00 41.00 _ 3 to %i ft, B & B ............ 67.fD0 '_ 3%to 4 fL, L;&B_`.................. 86.W. 76.00 4 to 4'h ft, B&B. .... 103.00 90M ... 41AUt 5 ft., B&B. ............. 12R.00_ 109.00 - 5 to & ft, B tla B ......... . ......... 160.00 ... omorilra_ 6W-W (Zone4) - Serbimspraoc Many pW twnen con.side r this species to be the tarot beautifu I of all spruom Forms a narrow pyrunid of cascading branches. Dark green needles are ' sitver on the sender surface.. . '3 to 4 ft, R& B _ ... _ ..... _.......... 31.75 27.50 '' 24.00 _ 4 to 5 ft, ft &. B 47,50 4126 35.76 5to6ft.'R&B ................... ....'. -79.00 ... - -6to7ft,B&B .. 103.00 ..: t7to8R,B&B ...--- - -. ....... 120.00 .. t I- PUAgMS. £0-W (7Ame 3) Colorado spntce i Dmrgrep.n. Branches ind-;itinctwhorh,formingahan(l%zneiawRspecimen . 2 to 3 ft., B & B 17,W 16.00 14.00 3to4ft.,B&B ......................... 21.W 19.50 17.M 4to5ft, B&B ......................... 38.75 33.75 _ 5to6fk,R&B ......................... 69-00 50M .................... 6&00 - - 9bLaca. 60'-70' (Zane 3) Cokma+io btaie sprace These seedling planes have been Fpersficall3• selected for their We color and I = transplanted on wider spacing to allow for full devebpment btoGft,B1ic13........................ 69.00 6ta7fi B&B`..... w w \ Nl' rAJFo IN ' 1 \ I CONCRETE SIDEWALK I � \ TYPE B C8/10 I ROADWAY ' \ r-357.77 Y 1 i, :, -351.25 ` i ,.,-351.00 I CONCRETE CURB. TYPICA4 ` CUP END SECTION i=354.00 MECHANICAL JOINT Q7 / TYPE B CB/11 CAP AND THRUST BLOCK , , r=357.77� I I i-351.55 b WATER SERVICE ` STORM1'STORM \ ti STORM 15" 1-332.80 WATER/STORM CROSSING `% SUM 18" i=354.73 1 / WATER i-360-00 (SERVICE BELOW STORM) 1 STORM i=362.40 1 -t�--o--o--o�--o---t�---o--o-�--c�-�--vim,--a--zo---0--o �-a- - -� r�- t�- 364 362 - . 360 -� \ \ hOQ UETC ° _ - 300'-15"PVC S0R35 STORM MAIN ` 5=0.040 12+00 13+00 SWIFT o ham° �_. w 7 THRUST BLOCK, TYPICAL EP4 TWO 10- GATE VALVEST- INLET PROTECTION ' S TYPICAL FOR ALL HAYBALE SP7 NEW CATCH BASINS — CNECKDAM, a-- 3 FLUSHING \ TYPICAL SP7 SP6 BASINS EACH SIDE/ / TYPE E CATCH BASIN inlet i-359-50 1 1= 355.25 _ H- f 2 -- / INLETS ON NOR � d' / qto \ t/ 10 5' WIDE BY /,# 10' LONG TYPE I RIP- RAP USHING 10UTILITIES BASINS�EASE►ENT1 EACH SIDEh_ 356 — r��8 30 .00 STREET 28'-12"PVC I�SDR35 \ \ ti ( \ /( 15-PVC SOR35 STORM MAIN 5=0.014 15+00 EX TENSION D.1 WA" MAIL! 362 8" VALVE -_ \ \ \ FUTURE \ _- —� R ZATER j J/ \ DRIVEWAY \ -- SEWFF 1=346.60 SP4 \ WATER i-349.00 \ \((TYPICAL) \ \ 4 WATER SERVICE \ \ $P4 i AT CAP-351.0 1 L HYDRANT SP4 BURY EL.-359.0 I � 16+00 i-351.00 , SEWR MH/1A � r-355.00 \ \ i=346.70 9 \ (DO NOT \ FORM INVERT) 1 ' 3 INLET PROTECTION TYPICAL FOR ALL SP7 NEW CATCH BASINS - TYPE B C13/12 \ r-354.45 �,�" PVC t 7 - 346.95 its = 346.70 SOR .35 STORM/SEWER- STORM i-347.85 / SEWER/STORM — SE WIER i- 344.24 / SEWER i— 338. 55 TYPE B C8/13 STORM 1-344.50 r-354.45 S-- i-34 7. 20 -a --t UETC— S TREE T TREES MARSHALL'S SEEDLESS ASH 2 I/2 CALIPER 60 FT ON CENTER PLANT 1 FT. OUTSIDE R.O.I. 1 / \ SP8 ON GREEN ACRES PROPERTY / SEWER MH/2A TYPE B C8/15 \ — PLANT 1 F. T. INSIDE R.O.W. r-350.94 r=348.90 I THROUGH DYNAPOWR PROPERTY t,,,-338. 90 i-343. 95 / rOb NOT 75 S TORM/SEWER \ EN TIRE FORM INVERT) STORM i-343-87 SEVER i-337.30 \ 0 n A - 47*39 25' / R - 500.00' YA CAA TER SERVICE340 5 TYPE B CB/14 -- r-348.90 ! 1,,, -343 80 1.1-343.45 / L�/ti �1 1 , _ N 01 ±► I - 220.82' / L — 415.89' 'PVC / 300--15"PNC WR35 S-0.010 —17 00 o - - ^� 295 18+00—►`�, 11" PVC S SOR 35 19+00 ac � 0 10" D.I. WATER MAIN -- WATER/STORM FLUSHING BAST WATER i=347-80 HYDRANT STORM i=350.70 BURY ELEV-352.0 \ / g TEMPORARY �7 SEDIMENT TRAP 1 � � 1 � Jsl e SP6 1 UNOERORAIN STATION 10+00 TO 15+50 BOTH SIDES 1 I t 0 r WATER MAIN 7 (TYPICAL) SP4 • i / UE TC g" PVC 21+00 0 00 _ SEWER 0 r 12 PVC \ MAIN Q y i SOR 35 — W ; SE-WR/WA TER SEWER J-337.66 WATER i-340.25 WA TER/S TORT/ _ WATER i-344.3 STORM i-344.10 ` SEWER Mw/z SP5 r-350.94 i,-338 50 i_t-338.35 1 1 Vail- W 1 WATER SERVICE --I 1 t AT CAP-339.31 1 1 S� Project title GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK UETC E J P O T U G G Project num Project mqr Design by C � i�l 5�'�%, 1f'mun / — I — /\ t. ��� q�p=, ice. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 31, 1994 Karen A. Petersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Petersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from Fire Chief Wally Possich. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, /;?,j 9 �bjaL" Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB /mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich CITY OF SOUrH BURLI%7ION Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant GREEN ACRES, INC. C/O RALPH GOODRICH 2) Name of Subdivision GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: NO CHANGE 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: THE NUMBER OF LOTS HAS DECREASED FROM 13 LOTS TO 12 LOTS. S) Submit feer copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit tfo draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 25, 1994 Karen A. Peterson Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 12 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Peterson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Comments from Fire Chief Wally Possich will be forwarded to you as soon as they are available. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, June 3, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich { �5-outb Nurlington Nire Department 575 +Bvrvet t3treet t)vutb 1.1urlingtnn. Ifermant 05,103 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: W. Possich, Fire Chief o RE: Plans Review for June 14 Meeting DATE: May 26, 1994 The following site plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. Mini -Storage Facility 1900 Williston Rd. Acceptable 2. Green Acres Industrial Park Hinesburg Rd. Dated 6-16-93 Project No. 86091-40 Dated S-11-94 (802)658-7960 Hydrants shown are at 400-600 ft. intervals. Hydrants need to be located 300 ft. apart. No hydrant is shown on Malcolm La.; recommend one there. Also water mains as shown are dead-end. Recommend looping the system either via Knoll Cir. or within Green Acres Park system. 3. Dorset Land Co. Inc. Dorset St. Project No. 86090-41 Dated 5-18-94 Access is needed for fire apparatus on north side (rear) of lot SB/5C. Canopy over front entrance of 5A should be at least 12 ft. high to allow clearance for fire apparatus. Hydrants shown are at aprox. 400 ft. intervals. Hydrants need to be located no more than 300 ft. apart (travel distance) . 4. BRUCE BARRY 6 Gregory Drive Acceptable Drawing NO. 94047 Dated 5/17/94 M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files &b From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, June 14, 1994 agenda items Date: May 16, 1994 GREEN ACRES - 13 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT --- notes on sheet SP1 should be revised to replace name of Green Acres Lane to Malcolm Lane. --- sheets SP1A, and SP2 should be revised to show the new zoning designation of Agricultural & Rural Residential District as Southeast Quadrant District. --- the recommended street tree list from the Vt. Department of Forest, Parks & Recreation indicates that the Amur Corktree has a maximum height of 45 feet, the maximum allowed is 40 feet. Applicant should substitute a different tree or provide documentation that this tree will not exceed 40 feet in height. --- note on sheet P7 and P9 stating that "Private road to serve lot 12 to be built to town standards ... " should be changed to refer to "City" standards. --- Green Acres Lane on sheet P9 should be changed to Malcolm Lane. --- pedestrian easements should be relocated outside of wetland and wetland buffer areas. --- condition #16 of the preliminary plat approval required wetland delineation of lot #4, this information has not been provided. --- plans do not clearly indicate that a 20 foot wide recreation path easement only will be provided and that recreation paths will not be constructed by the applicant (except the recreation path along Swift Street Extension). This was a requirement of condition #5. DORSET LAND COMPANY - GENERAL/MEDICAL OFFICES & NURSING/CONVALESCENT HOME - PRELIMINARY PLAT Subdivision Plat --- metes and bounds information must be provided for lots 5a, 5b and 5c. --- a note should be added to indicate that lot 5 is to serve as the r.o.w. to lots 5a, 5b and 5c. 6. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: ✓gL) Limits of all wetlands and CO Zones on the property. , ,-b) 20' recreation path easement connecting to the 60' r.o.w. serving Ledge Knoll. c) The species of street trees between stations 14+00 and 20+00 changed to a species that will not exceed 40 feet at maturity. d) Easement for shared driveway between lots 3 and 4 on survey plat. e) Width of Green Acres Lane r.o.w. on survey plat. f) New zoning designation "Industrial and Open Space". g) Different name for street currently proposed to be called "Green Acres Lane". h) Sidewalk located one foot away from r.o.w. line. i) Proposed street lighting. j) Relocated stream at least 50' from the southern property line unless adjoining property owners agree to less than 50 foot distance. k) 8 foot wide asphalt bike path on north side of Swift Street Extension from Route 116 to Vosburg Lane instead of a concrete sidewalk. 7. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall evaluate the capacity and emergency storage of the existing pumping station and provide evaluation results to the City Engineer. 8. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit a report addressing each of the criteria contained in Section 417 of the subdivision regulations. 9. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot. 10. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 7 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 16, 1993 Karen A. Petersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Petersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved on May 11, 1993. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be submitted within 12 months of the date of approval. If you have any questions, 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob please give me a call. cerel , J e Weith, City Planner April 1, 1993 Mr. Ralph B. Goodrich Green Acres Inc. 625 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vt. 05402 Dear Ralph: I have reviewed the plans for the drainage ditch adjacent to my property and ask that you do not move the ditch 50 ft. from my property line. I have been helped by the present location of the ditch as it has dried up my land. I do not want to lose this benefit. I understand that a conservation zone will exist on my property, defined as 50 feet from the ditch on both sides and I have no problem with that. You may use this letter in your application to the City and to the State. Sincerely, MAY93.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee r RE: Green Acres Industrial Park DATE: May 4, 1993 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, May 3, 1993. The Committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Green Acres Industrial Park and made the following recommendations: 1. The developer should construct an 8' wide bike path on the north side of Swift St. Extension from the point where it intersects Hinesburg Rd. to the point where it meets the site to be developed. 2. The developer should donate a 5' easement along the north border of the property from the point where Swift St. Ext. meets the property, eastward to the back of Lot #7. This, combined with the existing 15' easement along the south border of the adjacent property to the north, will provide the desired 20' easement for a future path. The extent of wetlands in this area could not be determined from the information provided to the Committee. If wetlands would prevent the future construction of an east -west path in this area, the Committee would appreciate being notified so it can modify its recommendations. 3. The developer should donate a 20' wide easement along the south border of the property from Hinesburg Road, eastward to the back of lot #4. Within this easement, the developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path from Hinesburg Rd to the N-S 200' wide drainage easement, and extending N in this 200' wide drainage easement to the intersection of Swift St. Extension and Green Acres Lane. 4. The developer should construct an 8' wide path in the 60' wide easement connecting the property to the Ledge Knoll neighborhood to the south. 5. When the eastern portion of the property is to be developed, the developer should donate 20' wide easements, as shown on the sketch plan, along Muddy Brook, along the south side of I-89, from the NE corner of Lot #7 to I-89, and from the SE corner of Lot #4 to Muddy Brook. 1 MAY93.MEM There are several rationales for these requests: providing access to the industrial site for commuters while staying off -road as much as possible and taking advantage of an existing easement, connecting the Ledge Knoll neighborhood to the existing path network via a safer crossing of Hinesburg Road, connecting to the new City Park'; and existing path segments via Swift Street as it is extended toward Hinesburg Road, eventually providing access from Butler Farms and existing portions of the path to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, eventually connecting to Williston as part of a regional network of paths. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 11, 1993 Karen A. Petersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Petersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the 5/11/93 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that the final plat plans be submittd within 12 months of the date of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in er 1 , "t WA - J _ Weith, Cjty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob MOTION OF APPROVAL GREEN ACRES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned Industrial and Open Space into thirteen (13) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page one entitled "Green Acres Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated last revised 3/2/93 with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall post a landscape bond to cover r_ne installation cost and value of proposed street trees and perm landscaping. The bond shall remain if effect for three i3) years from the date of planting to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) This project is approved for a maximum of 777 AM peak hour trip ends aria 743 PM peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot cr loLs which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic.- impact analysis. b, Applicant /install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on Sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve desiqn prior to issuance of zoning/building permit. C) Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. dJ Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak our trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. V-) Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building should be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the 1'.M. peak our trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., utility, sewer, drainage, water, recreation path, etc) and roadway r.o.w.'s (irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 5. r t. t 6. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: � Co a) limits of all wetlands Ion the property b) 20' recreation path easement connecting to the 60' r.o.w. serving Ledge Knoll. c) the species of street trees between stations 14+00 and 20+00 changed to a species that will not exceed 40 feet at maturity. d) easement for shared driveway between lots 3 and 4 on survey plat. e) width of Green Acres Lane r.o.w. on survey plat f) new zoning designation "Industrial and Open Space". g) different name for street currently proposed to be called "Green Acres Lane". V. 107 i) sidewalk located one foot away from r.o.w. line. j) proposed street lighting. k) relocated stream at J_east 50' from the southern property line.- v� loss �rc�---P Fu �� �,..�L�o,r,�� `,,�pa�-+� ar�-•� 7. Prior to final play., the apgiicant shah evaluate the capacity and emergency storage of the existing pumping station and provide evaluation results to the City Engineer. B. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit a report addressing each of the criteria contained in Section 417 of the subdivision regulations. 9. The applicant shall contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. The contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot^ 10. Prior to issuance of a coning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, utility, and sidewalk construction shall be posted. The amount of the bond shall- be approved by the City Engineer. 11. The applicant snail be responsible for maintaining the new street until such time as the street and r.o.w. is accepted and taken over by r.he City-. 12. The Commission approves a sewer allocation of 30,345 gpd. The applicant shall pay the required setie-, allocation fee prior to issuance of a zon. ng/building permit. rr 1 13. The developer shall furnish to the Ci.-cy, at least 7 days prior to beginning of roa3 construction, the name of the contractors doing the street and utili�.y work and the architect and/or engineer who wi_l ,take out and supervise the work . 14. In accordance w-th section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, wit::in 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.c., strects, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as-buil"' cons-c-ruction drawings certified by a registered engineer. The final plat fans, including survey plat, shall be submitted within 1.2 months or this null and void. (mo-green) VVL l ee /D V � �rlz&crw� s to-O . ir —Mo, / k 0- Sure- lAr4-aAgAr cr �? TZeL 1. vATi iz o ., s-/iL//v ka February 16,1993 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Green Acres Traffic Study Dear Joe: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1. The traffic study done for this project estimated 777 AM peak hour trips and 743 PM peak hour trips. These are the numbers that were accepted by the A.O.T. The 250,000 s.f. building on lot 1 would generate about 389 peak hour trips and the remaining 354 peak hour trips would be divided up on a per acre basis. 2. I have done a capacity analysis for the Kennedy Drive/Route 116 intersection. The analysis was done for existing conditions with improvements which were made since the original report. These improvements include the addition of exclusive left turn lanes on all four legs and installation of a new signal controller which is fully actuated on all lanes. The controller is an econolite ASC - 8000 with eight phase settings. It is currently set for three time of day programs. Current signal timing allows for the minimum green time on any movement based on actual traffic demand. The minimum and maximum green times vary with time of day. The results of the analysis indicate that the intersection will operate at level of service C or better for both the no build and build scenario for 1997. If you have any question please call. Yours very truly, TRUDE L CONSU TING Tyl r Hair , P.E. ENGINEERS, INC. P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: Green Acres Subdivision - Traffic Impact Date: May 10, 1993 The applicant has proposed to "build" from the traffic study which was originally conducted in 1991 for the proposed 11 lot industrial subdivision. The preliminary plat for the 11-lot subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission on 10/8/93. The original traffic study estimated that the future development would generate 777 A.M. peak hour trips and 743 P.M. peak hour trips. The results of the analysis were as follows: 1997 build 1997 1992 1997 without build with Intersection Base No build improvements improvements Kennedy/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Dorset E F F Kennedy/Dorset F F F The traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant indicated that critical intersections are currently operating at an unacceptable LOS and are expected to continue operating at unacceptable LOS in 1997 under both build and no -build conditions. Substantial improvements (additional approach lanes) are needed at the Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road intersections in order to improve the LOS to "C". Improvements which have been identified as beneficial for the Dorset Street intersection, but not incorporated into this analysis, include signal optimization, adding a northbound on -ramp at Exit 13 and connecting Corporate Way through to Route 116. Prior to the preliminary plat hearing for the original 11 lot industrial subdivision, staff and the applicant met and agreed to propose to the Commission the following traffic impact mitigation package: o Applicant install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on Sheet SP15). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning/building permit. o Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifications approved by the City. o Each building shall be required to contribute to the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak our trip ends to be generated by each use. Assuming an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund based on the current contribution formula. o Additionally, since a significant amount of project traffic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%), each new building should be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the P.M. peak our trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot would be required to contribute approximately $4,000. At the preliminary plat hearing held on October 8, 1991, the Commission expressed concern over the timing of development and intersection improvements. Attached are the 10/8/91 minutes. The Commission subsequently approved the preliminary plat application but with the following stipulation regarding traffic: "The traffic issue and appropriate mitigation is unresolved at this time. This issue shall be finalized at final plat. Prior to final plat, staff shall obtain an indication from Council on timing and funding of necessary intersection improvements at Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/'nilliston Road. In addition, staff and applicant shall consider a phasing plan tied to specific intersection improvements and/or level of service and present recommendation(s) to Piannina Commission, at Final Plat". Provided below is an update of what has occurred since the 10/8/91 Preliminary Plat hearing: Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road: The VOAT improved this intersection last year which included restriping to provide left -turn only lanes on each approach, and installing a new controller. The City and State feel that further improvements are needed at this intersection. The City is planning to add this summer, a third right -turn only lane to each approach. These improvements will be funded by developer fees and the general fund. The applicant submitted an updated traffic impact analysis dated 2/16/93 (attached) which analyzes the impact of the project on this recently improved intersection. The results of the analysis indicate that the intersection will operate at LOS "C" with the project. These results seem to differ from earlier analyses which estimated LOS "E" for current conditions. The results also seem to contradict existing conditions where traffic is significantly backed -up during peak periods. Williston Road/Hinesburg Road: The improvement of this intersection is planned to be done as part of the Williston Road improvement project currently being designed by the VAOT. The City's matching funds will be partially funded through developer impact fees (i.e., Williston Road Area 1 Improvement Fund). The City's 5-year Construction plan has this improvement scheduled for 1995/96. However, this is dependent on the State's construction plan. The State has not yet included this project in this 5-year plan. Other: The City will be upgrading the Williston Road/Kennedy Drive intersection this summer. Also, the Dorset Street project will be complete by fall, 1993. Staff Comments/Recommendations: o Any approval should include a condition that this development is approved for a maximum of 777 A.M. peak hour trip ends and 743 P.M. peak hour trip ends. Any subsequent development of a lot or lots which exceeds this limit shall require an updated traffic impact analysis. o Any approval should include the mitigation package agreed to and proposed earlier by staff and the applicant. This mitigation package is discussed earlier in this memo. (Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. February 16,1993 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Green Acres Traffic Study Dear Joe: 1. The traffic study done for this project estimated 777 AM peak hour trips and 743 PM peak hour trips. These are the numbers that were accepted by the A.O.T. The 250,000 s.f. building on lot 1 would generate about 389 peak hour trips and the remaining 354 peak hour trips would be divided up on a per acre basis. 2. I have done a capacity analysis for the Kennedy Drive/Route 116 intersection. The analysis was done for existing conditions with improvements which were made since the original report. These improvements include the addition of exclusive left turn lanes on all four legs and installation of a new signal controller which is fully actuated on all lanes. The controller is an econolite ASC - 8000 with eight phase settings. It is currently set for three time of day programs. Current signal timing allows for the minimum green time on any movement based on actual traffic demand. The minimum and maximum green times vary with time of day. The results of the analysis indicate that the intersection will operate at level of service C or better for both the no build and build scenario for 1997. If you have any question please call. Yours very truly, TRUDE L CONSU TING ENGINEERS, INC. Tyl r Hair , P.E. P. O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Roast Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 � `1985 HCM: -� RSECTIONS � ^ SUMMARY REPORT K ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..Kennedy Drive/Route 116 AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... TH DATE..........02-08-1993 TIME .......... Pm 1997 Build COMMENT....... ..... ..... ..... ..... __... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... VOLUMES ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... : .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... GEOMETRY ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SE LT 211 104 228 266 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 486 699 569 361 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 24 60 129 24 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR �� 0 0 '�O\: 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ^ : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... : _ 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _.... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ... ..... .... ..... ..... .... GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 WB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 O N 19.8 3 NB -1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 3.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 �..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... .... .... �.... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... SIGNAL ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... �..... ... ..... ... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... SETTINGS ..... ... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... CYCLE LENGTH ..... ..... .... .... � = .... ..... ..... .... 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 P11-2 1:",H-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X )< TH ` X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X X TH ` X TH ' X RT X RT X PD PD ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... �..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... __ ... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ..... ... LEVEL OF SERVICE ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... __..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.824 0.633 27.4 D 16.7 C TR 0.881 0.550 13.6 1"i WB L 0.000 0.633 0.0 A 12.0 B TR 0.884 0.550 13.6 B NB L 0.475 0.633 5.4 B 19.9 C TR 0.964 0.467 24.7 C SB L 0.638 0.633 8.5 B 13.9 B TR 0.879 0.467 16.3 C _..... ..... .... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... .... INTERSECTION: .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... Delay ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... = 15.7 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ... ..... (sec/veh) V/C = ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... .... __________ 1.212 LOS = C. / ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED ERSECTIONS � SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION -Kennedy Drive/Route 116 AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... TH DATE .......... 02-08-1993 TIME .......... AM 1997 No Build COMMENT ....... _... ..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... Project ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 86091 .... ..... .... VOLUMES ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... : ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... GEOMETRY ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 132 38 193 54 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 436 505 326 206 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 85 37 93 179 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... _..... ..... _.... ..... ..... : ..... .... 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... _..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ..... .... ..... ..... .... __________________ GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T FB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 WB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 NB -1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 3.00 _..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... _ 4.00 ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... N 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... 0 0.90 O ..... ... ..... _____..... ..... ..... ... ... ..... ..... ..... N __ 19.8 3 SIGNAL .... .... ..... ..... .... SETTINGS ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ... CYCLE LENGTH __..... ..... = ..... ..... ..... ..... _ 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 P1 i-4 PH-1 1"'H-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD _..... ..... ... .... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ____.... X ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... PD ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ... ..... ..... ... .... .... .... ..... .... ..... LEVEL OF SERVICE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.660 0.550 12.0 B 13.7 B TR 0.811 0.417 14.2 B WB L 0.190 0.550 5.2 B 14.3 B TR 0.832 0.417 15.0 B NB L 0.625 0.417 13.0 B 11.2 B TR 0.652 0.417 10.3 B SB L 0.195 0.417 8.5 B 10.0 B TR 0.635 0.417 10.2 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.770 LOS = 8 5 � ~ � 0 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION -Kennedy Drive/Route 116 AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST ....... TH 1)ATE..........02-08-1993 TIME .......... PM 1997 No Build COMMENT....... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ... ..... VOLUMES .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... : ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... GEOMETRY ..... ..... ..... __... ..... ..... ..... ..... __..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 211 65 113 266 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 486 699 290 266 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 189 60 60 242 3 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ... : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... ..... _.... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... __..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ___ GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm NJ::-; Y/N min T EB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 WB 1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 NB -1.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SB 3.00 4.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 55.0 PH-1 1:::'H-2 1-:11-1-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 P1 I-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD ..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... PD .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LEVEL ..... .... ..... ... .... _.... ... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... OF SERVICE ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... _ LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.683 0.600 13.6 B 13.8 B TR 0.876 0.509 13.9 B WB L 0.000 0.600 0.0 A 19.3 C TR 0'955 0.509 21.0 C NB L 0.494 0.418 10.2 B 8.8 B TR 0.538 0.418 8.3 B SB L 0.782 0.418 17.5 C 15.6 C TR __..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... 0.837 ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... 0.418 ..... ... 14.6 B INTERSECTION: Delay ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... .... .... = 15.0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... (sec/veh) ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... _..... V/C = ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... 0.988 ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... LOS ..... .... .... ..... = C .... ..... .... ..... .... -�. w C-;: �,-A TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR GREEN ACRES, INC. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Prepared by: Tyler Hart, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 Developer: Date: Revised: Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, Vermont 05407 May 1990 June 14, 1991 per A.O.T. comments of 12-10-90 TABLE OF CONTENTS Map of Project Locations Project Description Report Procedure Project Traffic Existing Traffic Project Traffic Distribution(Table 1 hist. Traffic Distribution (map) Project Traffic (map) Traffic (Maps-1992-1997no build,1997 build Check Signal Warrants Lane Configurations Summary of Levels of Service Level of Service Descriptions Accident Summary Conclusions Glossary References Appendix A (Intersection Capacity Page 1 2 3 4 5 traffic) 6 7 & 8 9 & 10 11-16 17,18 19 20 21 & 22 23 24 &25 25 & 26 27 Summary Reports) a \ rO PROJECT LOCATION rnt�e�r■ ■ !'A ►If �t�T►t!` r►1/`�►Ir rift ■►t/' -1- PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site entrance is located at the intersection of U.S. Route 116 and Swift Street Extension in South Burlington, Vermont. This entrance is the one presently being used by Lane Press and Dynapower, Inc. The land is the former Vosburg Farm and it is presently undeveloped. Portions of it are being used for passive agricultural purposes. The total acreage of land owned by Green Acres, Inc. is 286.1. The project consists of the development of ten lots for industrial use. The 10 lots will be served by a proposed road extension of 5,000 feet. The total acreage of the land being developed is 117.5. Build out of this project is estimated as starting in 1992 and being completed in 1997. -2- REPORT PROCEDURE The procedures used in this report are similar to those suggested in publications of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Peak hour traffic counts were made at two locations (Route 116 and Swift Street Extension and Route 116 and Kennedy Drive) on Tuesday, May 15, 1990. Daily traffic counts were taken on the same day by Tech Environmental, Inc. for purposes of an Air Pollution Study. Traffic counts were also provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation at three locations. ( Williston Road/ Route 116, Kennedy Drive/ Route 116, Route 116/Swift Street J Ext.) Project traffic was determined using the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual (Fourth Edition). Project traffic is based on a_proposed 20 percent building coverage for each lot which is th maximum allowed in the zoning district. L7}'4F The three intersections listed above were evaluated for traffic conditions for three senarios (1992 Base Year, 1997 No Build, and 1997 Build). AADT was obtained for each leg of the three intersections to be studied. These AADT figures were projected to 1992 and 1997 using a 3.2% per year growth rate. DHV's were determined for each leg of each intersection using the A.O.T. "Grouping Study and Regression Analysis" for 1990 data. AM peak hour traffic was determined as a percentage of DHV based on the peak hour turning movement counts available for each intersection. This was done for AM and PM(DHV) for 1992(base), and 1997(no build) senarios. Other approved development traffic and Green Acres traffic was then added to 1997 (no build) to get 1997 (build) senario. These intersection volumes were used to check capacity using the latest computer Highway Capacity Software based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. -3- PROJECT TRAFFIC Site traffic will be generated by estimating a 20 percent building coverage of each of the proposed industrial lots. The I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual was used to develop traffic estimates for the project. For Land Use Code 130 (pages 150 and 151) and the estimated total project building coverage of 957,449 square feet, the A.M. peak hour is 777 and the P.M. peak hour is 743. Using the same land use code the average weekday trip ends are 5,504. The following table contains the estimated peak hour project traffic entering and exiting. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAFFIC A.M. Peak Hour entering (82%) exiting (18%) Total P.M. Peak Hour entering (21%) exiting (79%) Total VJ use ®cn -4- LAND USE CODE 130 637 140 777 156 587 743 EXISTING TRAFFIC Traffic on the existing street network, which will be impacted by this project, was determined from the Vermont Agency of ?. Transportation counts and from new counts taken at two Gam^ intersections being studied. Traffic counts were taken for all the turning movements of the Route 116 and Swift Street Extension intersection, and for the Route 116 and Kennedy Drive intersection. Counts for the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection were provided by the Agency of Transportation. Truck traffic was counted separately from vehicle traffic. Based on our A.M. and P.M. peak hour counts, we determined that truck traffic for both intersections listed above was less than 5 percent of the peak hour traffic. Truck movements were therefore included with the vehicle movements. -5- PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Traffic generated by the project was distributed on the existing street network by analogy to the patterns obtained by the traffic d counts. The charts on pages 7 and 8 show percentage of traffic ` distribution at -each intersection. TABLE 1 HISTORICAL AND FUTURE ESTIMATED TRAFFIC 1 AADT 1988 1989 1990 1992 1992 1997 AM PM AM PM (no build) Route 116/ Swift Ext. N Leg 8080 9164 981 1066 1069 11,641i S Leg 8080 9164 939 1026 1027 1124 E Leg 100 100 100 100 1 Route 116/ Kennedy Drive N Leg 10020 10671 821 1207 935 1335 S Leg 7240 7711 820 880 941 1031 E Leg 12420 14088 955 1421 1163 1689 W Leg 16170 17221 1328 1608 1530 1887 Route 116/ Williston Road N Leg 8500 9342 893 950 1012 1068 S Leg 10620 12046 1107 1340 1326 1526 E Leg 19360 21960 2007 2328 2392 2710 W Leg 22780 25839 2224 2464 2478 2874 Note: 1992 AADT figures are based on a 3.2% per year growth rate. -6- IF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blalr Park Road Wllllston, VT 05495 4 c� x z A 0 ' ST. EXT. A, M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION - 7- v TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. a i P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road WIIliston, VT 05495 x r1 Z �7 0 3X .„,, R0.`0 ST. EXT. P.M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION -8- `;tom TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. wc.�N UUO 12 90 N� tot') 1MLU51()N ROAD s6, \ / ` � J 72 i 6g �19 r 5 �I swrT ST. EXT. N PO. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 A.M. 1992 BASELINE TRAFFIC IV, �.. � V TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. -o D Cl fn Y Z Z11 v 8pp 9 OLLj51� sop,[) Jl 28 1128 191 win ` O� 0� a� � 19 19, Q 436 ; 9J6 C5 85 A.M. 1997 NO BUILD 3.290 /YR GROWTH P.O. Box 308 14 Blalr Park Road Wllllston, VT 05495 (T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. -v D 2 Z A 0 01 809 MLLISION R �p.D J� iv 117 IL _ —47 fSWFr Sr. Exr. o� P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston. Vr 05495 J A.M. 1997 BUILD 3.29a /YR GROWTH PLUS PROJECT — r3— R ,ML1ST0►r ��O `T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SHIFT ST. EXT. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 P.M. 1992 BASELINE TRAFFIC -14- V TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. v D n x m Z A 0 `6o'ow�� RpAp J� 112p YALLISTON 30 ' WNW S / bbh S / i86 i�Jo 189 - �60 27 1fSMFr Sr. Exr. wu w ao 1 12 F a P.M. 1997 NO BUILD 3.2% /YR GROWTH PO. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road I Iston. Vr 05495 -15- v r1 z A �o Tarn Rpp`0 J ✓ j6 i 0 0`L1StON I 5 TRUDELL CONSUMNG ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 1 M �— 6 394 a�0 ! 4ji 86 89 241 09 477 r 197 �I swrr sr. EXT, u+ aw d b4' La= O + P.M. 1997 BUILD 3. 29: /YR. GROWTH PLUS PROJECT -16- 01 CHECK SIGNAL WARRANT VOLUMES LOCATION TIME SUM MAJOR MINOR WARRANT PERIOD APPROACH (VEH) APPROACH (VEH) SATISFIED SWIFT ST. EXT. 1 HH 1118 87 No ROUTE 116 4 HH 2657 149 No EXISTING 1992 8 HH 6442 289 No SWIFT ST. EXT. 1 HH 1309 97 No ROUTE 116 4 HH 3111 174 No (1997 no build) 8 HH 7542 351 No SWIFT ST. EXT. 1 HH 1478 674 Yes 10&11 ROUTE 116 4 HH 3151 1133 Yes 9 (1997 Build) 8 HH 7640 1934 Yes 1,2 HH - Highest consecutive hours,1 Note. AWDjT is assumed to be 1000 veh/day on Swift Street Ext. for 1992 and 199,7-no build. Warrant 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume: The calculated hour volumes of 1118 (1992),and 1309 (1997) are above the minimum of 600 vehicles per hour for a major street. The calculated hour volumes of 87 (1992), and 97 (1997) are below the 150 vehicles per hour for a minor street approach._ If this intersection is upgraded to two lanes exiting the project, the requirement increases to 200 vehicles per hour for a minor street. The warrant is not met for 1992 and 1997 no build, but is met for 1997 build senario. Warrant 2 - Interuption of Continuous Traffic: The minimum number of vehicles per hour required under the warrant is 900 vehicles per hour for a major street and 100 vehicles per hour for a minor street. The calculated hour volumes of 1118 (1992), 1309 (1997 no build), and 1478 (1997 build) are above the minimum number for the major street. The minor street hour volumes of 674 (1997 build) is above the minimum of 100 vehicles per hour for 1997 full build out of project. -17- CHECK SIGNAL WARRANTS (Cont.) ve, Warrant 3 - Pedestrian Volume: Not Applicable 4 / 7l ' Warrant 4 - School Crossing: Not Applicable Warrant 5 4 Progressive Movement: Not Applicable Warrant 6 - Accident Experience: In a five year period only one accident was reported at this location. Five per.year are needed to satisfy the signal warrant. Warrant 7 - Systems Warrant: Not Applicable Warrant 8 Combination Warrants: Not Applicable Warrant 9 - Four Hour Volumes: -� Using Figure L-7 in reference 2j this warrant is satisfied for the 1997 build senario. Warrant 10 - Peak Hour Delay: This warrant is met for the 1997 build senario. Warrant 11 - Peak Hour Volumes: Using Figures 4-5 in reference,_2,�this warrant is met for 1997 build -18- LANE CONFIGURATIONS 1992 1997 EXISTING (BUILD) Route 116/ Swift Street NB 2 lanes (T&R) 2 lanes (T&R) SB 2 lanes (L&T) 2 lanes (L&T) WB 1 lanes (L,R) 2 lanes (L&R) Route 116/ Kennedy Dr. NB 2 lanes (LT&R) 2 lanes (L&TR) SB 2 lanes (LT&R) 2 lanes (L&TR) I�tk EB 2 lanes (L&TR) 2 lanes (L&TR) WB 2 lanes (L&TR) 2 lanes (L&TR) ,V / Route 116/ Williston Road NB 2 lanes (L&TR) 3 Lanes (L&T&TR) SB 1 lanes (L,T,R) 3 lanes (L&T&TR)( C k EB 2 lanes (LT&TR) 3 lanes (L&T&TR)1 WB 2 lanes (LT&TR) 3 lanes (L&T&TR) �-S Pwc-4" L Left T Thru R Right -------- LT Left and Thru TR Thru and Right �,a e V S [ G ( vrz., C ce •�,, -19- .4 r ke 1X r G� SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE, UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION 1992 1997 1997 Baseline No Build Build A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. ,With Signal ROUTE 116 SB LT. B A B A SWIFT STREET EXT. RT. A A A A C B Shared C D C D _ LT. D E E E .� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION _ KENNEDY DR. EB L Using the existing signal L C C TR timing and lane configurations TR D C volumes exceed capacity. WB L L D B TR TR C C ROUTE 116 NB L L C C TR TR C D SB L L B D TR TR C D WILLISTON ROAD EB LT ���� L B B TR aj� ' t TR E B WB IT a���sw L C D TR TR D $ ROUTE 116 NB L L C D TR TR C D SB LTR L C B /) LEGEND NB - North bound RT - Right SB - South bound L - Left EB - East bound TR - Through Right WB - West bound LTR- Left Through Rights - 2 0- A 5 S VAW �i LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL STOPPED STOPPING RATIO OF TOTAL CRITICAL SERVICE DELAY (o) SERVICE VOLUME MOVEMENT (sec/veh) TO CAPACITY (vph/lane) A <5.0 <50 0.0 - 0.45 - B 5.1 - 15.0 51 - 67 0.46 - 0.60 - (under) C 15.1 - 25.0 68 - 76 0.61 - 0.75 1200 D 25.1 - 40.0 77 - 83 0.76 - 0.90 - (near) E 40.1 - 60.0 84 - 93 0.91 - 1.00 1400 F >60.0 94 - 100 >1.00 >1400 (over) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF DELAY TO MINOR RESERVE CAPACITY STOPPED DELAY SERVICE STREET TRAFFIC (pcph) (sec/veh) A Little or no >400 <9.0 B Short 300 - 399 9.0 - 12.0 C Average 200 - 299 12.0 - 18.0 D Long 100 - 199 18.0 - 36.0 E Very long 0 - 99 >36.0 F Extreme - - LEGEND sec/veh - seconds per vehicle vph/lane - vehicles per hour per lane pcph - Passenger cars per hour -21- LEVEL OF SERVICE A B C C E F LEVEL OF SERVICE URBAN AND SUBURBAN ARTERIALS QUALITATIVE AVERAGE LOAD DESCRIPTION TRAVEL SPEED FACTOR (MPH) Free flow > 30 0.0 Stable flow > 25 < 0.1 (slight delay) Stable flow (acceptable delay) Approaching unstable flow Unstable flow Forced flow LEGEND MPH - miles per hour > 20 > 15 -22- RATIO OF SERVICE VOLUME TO CAPACITY < 0.60 < 0.70 < 0.80 < 0.00 < 1.00 n ACCIDENT SUMMARY The Vermont Agency of Transportation accident records were reviewed for the intersection of Route 116 and Lane Press Drive, the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Route 116 and the portion of Route 116 between the two intersections. A tabulation of the accidents by year and cause of accident is listed below. There is a total of twenty six accidents, thirteen injuries and 1 fatality for the period on record. The primary cause of accidents at these locations is operator error. The total number of accidents during 1987 exceeds the general guideline of five or more accidents in one general location per year indicating a safety related problem. The rate of accidents dropped in 1988. YEAR NO. OF ACCIDENTS INJURIES FATALITIES RT. 116 / RT. 116 / RT. 116 LANE PRESS DR. KENNEDY DR. 1984 1 4 4 3 1 1985 0 2 1 2 0 1986 0 4 2 1 0 1987 0 5 2 5 0 1988 0 1 0 2 0 1 16 9 13 1 CAUSE OF ACCIDENT Careless pedestrian Following too close Liquor citated Operator cause (inattention) Excessive speed Slippery road Failure to yield R.O.W. Improper passing Stoplight / sign violation 1 (resulted in fatality) 3 3 5 1 1 5 1 5 -23- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 116 AND SWIFT STREET EXTENSION This intersection presently consists of a by-pass lane on the right of the southbound lane (Route 116), and a right turn lane off the northbound lane (Route 116). The by-pass and right turn lane were constructed by Mitel in 1981. This intersection geometry is sufficient for 1992 baseline traffic. Full project build out is estimated for 1997. The L.O.S. for these W�^JJ traffic volumes is F for two of the A.M. turning movements and E and F c for two of the P.M. turning movements. W a rrV .� The signal warrant volumes were determined and compared with warrants �6 contained in reference 2. The results indicate a signal will be warranted in the 1997 build senario. 1. A signal will be required when traffic volumes for a signal are met. 2. A right turn lane should be built on the Swift Street Ext. approach. INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 116 AND KENNEDY DRIVE This intersection is presently signalized with two lane traffic in all �✓`k directions. This intersection geometry and signalization is,� wa insufficient for 1992 traffic volumes. This intersection will require IY"P three approach lanes on all four legs of the intersection by 1997. PM 1,6 C61 .3 1997 traffic, will require two through lanes on all four approaches. Left turn lanes on all four approaches will require a separate signal phase. These improvements are required as a result of normal growth in �•� \� traffic. INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 116 AND WILLISTON ROAD This intersection is presently signalized with two lanes on three approaches. The SB approach is stripped for one lane. To accomodate 1997 traffic three approach lanes will be required on all four legs of the intersection. Protected left turn phases will be required on the EB and WB approaches. These improvements are required as a result of normal traffic growth. If these improvements are made the L.O.S. will be D and C respectively for AM and PM traffic. -24 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Average Daily Traffic (ADT) - The average number of vehicles passing a specified point during a 24 hr. period. Some examples are as follows: Annual Average Daily Traffic (ADDT) - Denotes daily traffic averaged over one year. Annual Average Weekday Traffic (AAWDT) - Denotes that the specified period includes only weekday, Monday through Friday. Capacity - The maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and control conditions. Capture Rate For Pass -By Traffic - Proportion of trips attached to the development from traffic normally passing -by the site. Gravity Model - A trip distribution technique. The gravity model is based on the hypothesis that the number of trips between two areas is directly related to the amount of activity in an area and inversely related to the spacial separation between the ares, represented as a function of travel time. Level Of Service (LOS) - A set of qualitative and quantitative criteria that describes the degree to which an intersection, roadway, weaving section or ramp efficiently serves peak hour and/or daily traffic. Peak Hour - The hour during which the maximum amount of traffic occurs. Sight Distance - The length of roadway ahead visible to the driver. The minimum sight distance available on a road should be sufficiently long to allow a vehicle traveling at or near the design speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. Traffic Assignment - The process of determining route or routes of travel and allocating the zone -to -zone trips to these routes. Trip - A single or one -direction vehicular trip with either the origin (outbound) or destination (inbound) or both inside the study area. Each trip has two trip ends. -25- Trip Distribution - The process by which trips originating in one portion of the study area are distributed to the other portions of the study area. Trip End - A trip origin or a trip destination. Trip ends for a location are the summation of origins and destinations. A trip has two ends, the origin and the destination. A site which has over some period of time, 2,000 trips entering and 1,800 trips leaving, has 3800 trip ends associated with it. The 3,800 total trips to and from the site represent a total of 7,600 trip ends. Of these, 3,800 occur at locations other than the site in question. Trip Generation - Estimating the number of vehicle tips which may be generated by a specific building or land use. -26- REFERENCES 1. "Highway Capacity Manual, 198511, Transportation Research Board, SR209, 1985. 2. "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", FHWA, 1978. 3. "Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook", Institute of Transportation Engineers 2nd Edition, 1982. 4. "Trip Generation (Fourth Edition), An Informational Report", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987. 5. "Volume Warrants For Left -Turn Storage Lanes At Unsignalized Intersections", M.D. Harmelink, Department of Highway, Ontario. 6. "Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice", Prentice -Hall, Louis J. Pignataro. 7. "State of Vermont Sign Post Design Guideline", Engineering and Construction Design Division, A.O.T., 1986. 8. "State of Vermont Pavement Marking Placement Guide", Engineering and Construction Design Division, A.O.T., 1988. 9. Sample Plans For Traffic Signs and Pavement Markings, A.O.T., 1988. 10. Regression Analysis For Traffic Projection, A.O.T., 1988. 11. Automatic Traffic Recorder Grouping Study, A.O.T., 1988. -27- 220 D m Z TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 v 20 5 j f ��EISTON ROw q 14 obi * '4) 69 SWIFT ST. EXT. mWill A.M PEAK HOUR ENTERING 82X 637 £XI TING 18X 140 TOTAL 777 PROJECT TRAFFIC A.M. PEAK HOUR —9— 238 63 m Z 0 5 18 �)51.O 0N ROA i r f, 1`77 y �0 100 54 27 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1:0. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 I SIMFT Sr. EXT. o '^ r� + P.AI PEAK HOUR ENTERING 21X EXI TING 79% TOTAL 156 587 743 PROJECT TRAFFIC P.M. PEAK HOUR 0 i STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633 August 12, 1991 Mr. Tylar Hart Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Blair Park Road Post Office Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: South Burlington, VT 116 L.S. 116+00 - Green Acres Dear Mr. Hart: We have completed a review of your revised traffic analysis for the above referenced project and offer the following com- ments. 1. Because you have not proposed a formal phasing plan for this project, we have analyzed the proposed geometrics based on full build -out traffic in 1992. Taper and storage lengths are shown on the attached plan sheet and are based on our latest sample plans and SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDELINE FOR DECELERATION/TAPER LENGTHS FOR TURN LANES, dated 9/90. 2. The plan you submitted ent. led "Preliminary Intersec- tion Plan" needs considerably more d tail including typicals, any drainage and/or utility revisions, cross -sections @ 50 foot intervals, a baseline which can be reproduced in the field, right-of-way limits for the west side of VT 116, and all other details shown on our sample plans. 3. We concur with your conclusion that a signal will be warranted sometime prior to 1997. We will require the permit applicant to periodically monitor the traffic at this intersec- tion and to install a signal when the appropriate warrants are met. 4. The intersection of VT 116 and Kennedy Drive, as cur- rently timed and configured, will probably operate at LOS F by 1992 (see attached memorandum from Susan Scribner to John E. Wood). Apparently, District 5 plans to restripe VT 116 and retime the signals sometime this summer. We analyzed 1997 fig- ures based on this reconfiguration and, given further retiming we Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. i 1 9 4 1 Mr. Tylar Hart Trudell Consulting August 12, 1991 Page Two Engineers, Inc. estimate that for 1997 DHV no -build conditions, this intersection will operate at LOS E. With the additional traffic generated by a fully developed Green Acres Industrial Park, this intersection will most likely operate at LOS F in 1997. The Hinesburg h Road Traffic Impact Study calls for three lanes on each app roaleft, one through and one right) with a four -phase signal by 1994 to achieve LOS C. Your study claims that this intersection will not only require three lanes per approach, but will require two through lanes per approach by 1997, as a result of background traffic only. It is our a understanding futuret south improvements ntto nthis been collecting impact fees intersection for sometime. With the addition of the Green Acres project, improvements must be made to preserve an acceptable level of service. If the City is going to administer these improvements, they should be developing plans and submitting them to the Agency for approval. If not, then we will expect the Green Acres project, applicant to include this intersection in its improvements. In regard to the intersection of VT 116, Williston Road and Patchen Road, the level of service is currently LOS F for DHV conditions. The signal timing favors Williston Road, with both approaches operating at LOS B. It may be possible to retime this ve for signal to achieve a slightly better overall level of se eometric present conditions, however, without some sort of g improvements, the intersection will most likely to be LOS F for 1997 DHV conditions. Since most of this intersection is not under State jurisdiction, you should contact the City for their requirements. We will await detailed construction plans for the VT 116/Swift Street Extension project and a resolution as to who will be responsible for the VT 116/Kennedy Drive project before proceeding with this project. Sincerely, &Ca4f IMA"� Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Attachments cc: Chuck Hafter, City of South Burlington Louis Borie, District Environmental Coordinator #4 EVE , Aotf L 0 7— /%Ii4X �5/Zc e,"// A. ,Y Is-V.) _ %// .Oo 7-/{,/0s -t, Co DE %/9 /CNT ,INS. -9l T91toS a, cf-06- 71y - Gaff. #'"OuA72C OFFicc 0.9a 3 ej 0 1-4 GT FEE - 3 0jo we- g 7kl,-::Ff 3 hod �,. LoT- Memorandum - Green Acres November 14, Page 3 City Council 11 Lot Industrial Subdivision 1991 Pedestrian Path: The plans show a recreation path easement around the perimeter of the property. The applicant has agreed to providing an easement on both the north and south side of the proposed new stream along the boundary of the Ledgeknoll develop- ment. There shall be a connection to the 60 foot r.o.w. leading to Knoll Circle. There has been discussion of the applicant funding part of the construction of the recreation path in the vicinity of the Ledgeknoll development. This is to be resolved prior to final plat. The plans show the recreation path easement going through the wetlands on lots 5 and 7. The applicant has suggested building a footbridge through the wetland. This may be difficult and will most likely require a 404 permit and wetlands permit from the State ANR. The City should be assured that this footbridge will be allowed prior to approving the final plat. Wetlands: The applicant had a wetlands report prepared. This report concludes that none of the sides of the farm are wetland and that all of the farmed land, other than the main drainage running north -south through the farm, is prior converted. The term "Prior converted" is defined as wetlands which were both manipulated (drained or otherwise physically altered to remove excess water from the land) and cropped before December 23, 1985, to the extent that they no longer exhibit important wetland values. The applicant will be seeking a 404 permit from the Corps of Engineers to cross the only wetland within their jurisdiction which is the main drainageway. Traffic: The following is a summary of LOS impacts at area intersections. The applicant's traffic analysis did not assume any development on lot 11. 1997 build 1997 1992 1997 without build with Intersection Base No build improvments improvements Kennedy/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Rt. 116 F F F C Williston/Dorset E F F Kennedy/Dorset F F F 3 morandum - een Acres vember 14, ge 4 City Council 11 Lot Industrial Subdivision 1991 The traffic impact analysis submitted by the applicant indicates that critical intersections are currently operating at an unac- ceptable LOS and are expected to continue operating at unaccept- able LOS in 1997 under both build and no -build conditions. Substantial improvements (additional approach lanes) are needed at the Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road intersections in order to improve the LOS to C. Improvements which have been identified as beneficial for the Dorset Street intersection, but not incorporated into this analysis, include signal optimization, adding a northbound on -ramp at Exit 13 and connecting Corporate Way through to Route 116. The State District Engineer was contacted for information on the State's plans for improvments to the Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road and Williston Road/Hinesburg Road intersections. The State plans on restriping the Hinesburg Road approaches so that there will be a left turn only lane and shared through/right turn lane. A new controller will also be installed and an advance left turn will be programmed in. These improvments are to be done this fall. He also indicated that the Williston Road/Hinesburg Road inter- section is not within the State/s jurisdiction and would therefore not be making any improvements to it. However, other State officials have indicated that this intersection could be incorporated into the Williston Road improvement project. This project is in the conceptual design phase and no construction start date has been specified. City staff has met with the applicant to discuss appropriate mitigation. The applicant and staff has agreed to a mitigation package and offers this for the Commission's consideration: o applicant install, prior to occupancy of first building, the necessary lane and taper improvements at the Route 116/Swift Street Extension intersection (shown on Sheet SP10). VAOT shall approve design prior to issuance of zoning/building permit.. o Prior to site plan approval for each lot, the signal warrant analysis shall be updated. When the signal is shown to be warranted at Route 116/Swift Street Extension, applicant shall install signal at specifica- tions approved by City. 4 �morandum - -een Acres )vember 14, age 5 City Council 11 Lot Industrial Subdivision 1991 o Each building shall be required to contribute to the 14inoobu7rg Road/Kennedy Drive impact fee based on P.M. peak hour trip ends to be generated by each use, Assuming an average building size of 72,000 square feet, each lot will be required to contribute approximately $13,000 to the fund. o Additionally, since a significant amount of project traf- fic will be going through the Williston Road/Route 116 intersection (43%) , each new building should be required to contribute to the Williston Road Area 1 impact fee based on 43% of the P.M. peak hour trip ends. Under the current formula, each lot will be required to contribute approximately $4,000. Therefore, each lot will be con- tributing approximately $17,000 to the City for impact fees. The traffic issue and appropriate mitigation is unresolved at this time. This issue is to be finalized at final plat. Prior to final plat, staff is to obtain an indication from Council on timing and funding of necessary intersection improvements at Route 116/Kennedy Drive and Route 116/Williston Road. In addi- tion, staff and applicant are to consider a phasing plan tied to specific intersection improvements and/or level of service and present recommendations to Planning Commission at Final Plat. Sewer: Estimates indicate that this subdivision will require 15,000 gpd of sewer allocation. This is based on an average of 100 employees per lot with each employee requiring 15 gpd (this does not include lot 11). Berm/Drainagewav: The applicant has submitted plans for a " stream natural" type with berms and plantings along the souther- ly boundary adjacent to the Ledge Knoll residential project. Details of the stream, berms and plantings will be required prior to Final Plat. Sidewalk: The applicant will be required to contribute $26,738 to the Hinesburg Road Sidewalk Fund based on the City's sidewalk policy - Hinesburg Road. 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 Mr. Tyler Hart Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: Green Acres Traffic Study Dear Tyler: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 February 2, 1993 I received your letter dated January 13, 1993 regarding the above referenced traffic analysis. In that letter, you propose to "build from the traffic study already done'.' in reviewing the new subdivision application submitted by Green Acres, Inc. (i.e., 13 lot subdivision and 250,000 square foot office complex on lot #1). At this point I do not see a problem utilizing the original traffic study in assessing potential traffic impacts, however, I suggest the following be done: 1. The original study, I believe, assumed a full -build, p.m. peak hour trip generation of 791 trip ends resulting from the project. An approval for the current application will most likely include a condition that the subdivision and future development be limited to a maximum p.m. peak hour generation of 791 trip ends. The applicant should provide an estimate of the level of development on each lot based on this 791 trip end limit. My preliminary estimates indicate that the proposed 250,000 square foot office complex on lot #1 will generate roughly 400 trip ends during the p.m. peak. This leaves roughly 400 p.m. peak hour trip ends for the remaining 12 lots. Is this reasonable? Mr. Tyler Hart Green Acres Traffic Study February 2, 1993 Page 2 2. The analysis should be re -run to determine the existing LOS at the Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection, as well as, future impacts of the development on this intersection. The analysis should incorporate the recent lane striping and signal phasing improvements which were installed at the intersection since the original traffic study was conducted. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. S" cerely, e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob M r Z Memorandum 44t RESOUVL TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: The Natural Resources Committee RE: Green Acres Development DATE: 22 April 1993 (802) 658-7955 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT, 05403 The Natural Resources Committee commends the developers of Green Acres for their efforts in designing a plan that preserves and improves the stream on that property. The objectives of effectively developing land and at the same time preserving or improving both water quality and the intangible aesthetic appeal of a stream are well met in this project. The stream design of the Green Acres project is a model of what can be accomplished in resource preservation and improvement when a developer makes a commitment of time, resources, and money to preserve our natural resources. Respectfully yours, Bill Laliberte Secretary Al • •' - -''t :.r+.1 *...�'�"_ -�"•$t xis• '��_,�c PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 4 hr. Goldstein stated that he was told that the proposed use of mobile home sales is not permitted in the zoning district I-C therefore a variance must be obtained from the Zoning Board prior to the review of the Planning Commission. We met with the Zoning Board on October 7th and was told that if the lot could be used for any other purpose,. they would not allow the use of a mobile home dealership. Mr. Burgess stated that the applicant is proposing an amendment to the zone to allow mobile home sales. Procedurally that requires us to hold a public hear- ing. After a _public hearing, we would forward it to the City Council who woulde hold a hearing and if they adopt it after the prescribed warning periods, then you would have a waiting period to have this zone change go into -effect. You would then go to the Zoning Board and if they give you a conditional use approval, you would then come back to the Planning Commission and we might turn you down for traffic reasons or something else all- of which would be unrelated to the zone. Even if 'we do amend the zone and it is adopted, that is not a guarantee that there will be subsequent approval by the Planning Coa- mission. Mr. Shumvay replied they would like to proceed with this request and withdrew their application. Mr. Weith stated to would warn a public hearing. 5. Continue Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 2G3 acres off Hinesburg Road in South Burlington into 11 lots of 10. 10.1, 10.1. 10.2. 10.3. 10.4. 10.8, 12-1. 12.5, 13.4, and 145.8 acres. -- --- --- -- tr. Sheahan stepped down from this application because he is an adjoining property owner. Mr. Jacob reviewed the October 8, 1991 Memorandum from Hr. Weith to the Plan- ning Commission. ai Pedestrian Path: The path is to serve as a recreational path for the neighbors and for the lots. Both the Recreation Committee and Natural Resources Committee have looked at this and there is a feeling this should be looped around the stream. The Recreational Path people want to connect it through to Butler Farms or Oak Creak. Natural Resources wants a general r.o.w. so the path can be added. We have no objection to giving a right of way on both sides of the stream. There will be a foot path with a foot bridge crossing the wetlands. We will give the City a r.o.v. to this path. Mr. Weith asked about the wetland zone 5 and 7. Mr. Jacob replied they would prefer to have a foot bridqe made of wood over the wetlands area. ; wr t � • �. -•t .,pper� y' �y... �,�'*T'�:' i• +'t9�S °�'F���� •k*T ^' :� 't � ^'mil � a+ a� PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 5 Mr. Sperry, representing abutting neighbors, stated there are concerns about the foot path and how it might invite motorcycles and 4-vheel all terrain vehicles. He asked if there would be.barricades to prevent this from happen- ing. Mr. Jacob replied his client would have no objection to having bar- ricades. r - Mr. Craig asked if you can. get to the path from Hinesburg Road. Mr. ,Tacob replied yes. Mr. Sperry stated that his clients have requested that if a path is approved, that there be a condition that wherever it accesses the public, that there be some measures to prevent people from going up and down this path with motor- cycles, all terrain vehicles andnoisybikes. Ms. Peacock stated it would be prw;.:ature for the Planning Commission to say there must be a prohibition against motorized vehicles until we know if there. will be a problem or not. She said it would be a good idea to have the path connected to the rest of the recreation path of the City. Mr. Sperry asked if the applicant is proposing to install the berms and landscaping. Mr. Jacob replied they will landscape after they build the berms.. The landscaping has to be designed and looked over by Hat ural Resources to get, their approval, the layout has to be approved by them. • The number of trees and the type of trees all has to be done prior to final. -- -Mr. Burgess --asked if they then were proposing to build the berms before the landscaping. Mr. Jacob replied yes. Mr. Weith stated that at the last meeting we talked about whether it should be an unpaved path, a walking path or a paved path. We have two different recom- mendations. The Natural Resources Committee would like to see walking paths on both sides of the stream whereas the Recreation Path Committee would like to some day see a paved facility. At this time they are recommending that we only get the easement in place and staff has recommended that we get the generic easement at least on the north side of the stream connecting to Hines- burg Road and also connecting to the 60 ft. r.o.v. at Ledge Knoll. When we get to the point of implementation sometime in the future, that is when the exact location would be finalized after public hearing. b) Wetlands: A report has been prepared by Peter Spear, Natural Resources Consulting Service. dr. Weith stated that he would like to see a foot bridge over the wetlands and asked whether the State would allow a 21a0 ft. bridge to gu through a wetland. Mr. Jacob said they have not brought this up to Natural Resources and will have to go back to them for their thoughts and comments. N PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 rage 6 c) .Traffic: Mr. Jacob stated that Tyler Hart prepared the traffic survey. Mr. Weith stated the state is going to be doing some minor improvements to the intersection of Rt. 116/Kennedy Drive this fall that will improve it to a level of service E. Mr. Cimonetti stated that the City Council has identified traffic problems at each of the key intersections, Rt. 116/Kennedy Drive and Rt. '116/Williston Road fRr the last five years. We have discussed improvements that would be independent of the impact of this project. The City has a'capital construcE tion schedule' just as the state has the 5-year capital plan and in neither case do you have to work on. everything that is already on a list before_ .some- thing else appears on the list nor are those items arranged in any kind of priority nor do any of the things on the list take priority over yet to be identified items that are not yet on the list. Those intersections have got to have improvements. Mr. Craig stated that with his discussions with Sonny he was left with the im- pression that for intersection improvements that that money wasn't necessary under the state's 5-year plan but there was an intersection improvement bucket that they worked out of every year. Mr. Cimonetti replied there are State monies for those kinds of improvements and they don't have to be identified in the capital program. Many of the bond issues that we have passed not only refer to specific street improvements but have language that says 'and other street and intersection improvements', and there are unexpended bonded funds within the city that can be applied to in- tersection improvements. Mr. Craig said that the City would begin to look more seriously at these traf- fic problems knowing that such a project was going to happen and it would put more stress on these intersections. he suggested that if the Commission were to pass this, to pass it with still the question of traffic being opened with preliminary. This would give a very strong signal as to where we are going and give both the administration and the Council an opportunity to respond as to what they could possibly do to solve this traffic problem before we get into the position of final approval. Mr. Cimonetti stated he would be amazed if either intersection improvement wasn't then identified and discussed in the budgeting process in preparation of the very next review of the capital budget of the City. Mr. Craig asked would there be some feedback as to where the administration and the Council stood prior to final to the Planning Commission. Mr. Cimonetti replied that if there was a preliminary so that there was a strong impetus to the planning process. then you are looking at the next fiscal s . - -' �21:'�r��`s• mil. "-�f�i�}_ $ .. ♦ . _ -- PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 `Page 7 budget proceas. The process starts next month and becomes public with the hearings starting in January and is.over in May. -The effect of those inter- sections would be discussed in that budget. Mr. Craig stated that he would like to have this discussed in front of the en- tire City Council and have a statement of intent. Mr. Weith stated this will be going to the Council after Planning Commission's approval of the preliminary plat. The Council does have to approve the developments in this district under normal zoning. Mr. Cimonetti stated that the City Council has recommended and it has been added to the official City Map a road that doesn't yet exist that would go from Rt. 116 on Hinesburg Road in the vicinity of the interstate near the in- terchange and would pass to the East of Old Farm Road and would connect into Kimball Avenue and Shunpike Road and it is intended to be currently on our plans and on the county's plans and it is intended to be a route that would keep traffic away from those two intersections. Mrs. Maher said she never heard of this before. Mr. Weith replied they had discussions about this road before when Pizzagalli came in to put up some office buildings at the interstate there. We had talked about a connector road. . This was the last discussion about it. This is not on our official map *nor in our plan. Mr. Cimonetti said not to depend on this road relieving the current condition of unsatisfactory services at those two intersections but recognize that it is another thing thatis in -the svin for -the future as the traffic builds as a result of this kind of development and other developments in that very desirable industrially zoned area of Chittenden County. Mr. Austin suggested ve approve this application vith a condition that they can't put more than two structures on these lots until x happens and then x being one of those intersections is improved to a certain degree and then stage it in that fashion. Mr. Craig agreed with Mr. Austin on phasing the project to get the City's at- tention. Mr. Burgess stated Mr. Austin had an interesting suggestion to give this preliminary approval except for traffic and that would give the City impetus to look at the problem or solve the problem knowing it was pending. Mr. Reed stated that Mr. Austin's point should be very veil taken. He ieels phasing sakes sense because it is a reasonable approach in handling the traf- fic and making the improvements. a go a PLAHHIXG COMMISSION -8 October 1991 Page 8 Mr. Sheahan asked if Mr. Jacob had any maps on the berms. He wanted to see some specifics on landscaping and berm and stream proposals before this project went beyond preliminary. Mr. Jacob replied the reason it hasn't been done so far is because they don't have preliminary approval. This would be very expensive to lay out and plan. After preliminary they make their plans and it has to be approved prior to final. d) View Protection (Building Height): Mr. Jacob stated they want to dig down on lots 2_and 3 about 20 feet to put up a building. It will look like a W big bowl. hey don't know if this is salable but they would like to come back, and discuss it with the Commission. Mr. Sheahan asked what would happen if you left lots 2 and 3 as open space and move those to the East thereby guaranteeing the view protection corridor. Mr. Jacob replied they would -lose about $2 million dollars in sales if they wove those lots. Mr. Jacob stated that there are several things that they would like to try to do but cannot under the present zoning. There is a possibility of cluster zoning where you cluster your buildings, 0 lot lines, or making the parcels smaller. Mr. Burgess asked what is an economical lot size, from a resale and from a purchase point of view. Mr. Jacob replied 3 to 5 acres and up. If you have a ten acre lot you can cluster three separate buildings.. Landscaping and layout are important. e) Berm/Drainageway: This has been answered previously. f) Sidewalk: We will put in whatever sidewalks that are needed. Mr. Craig stated there are two issues to consider: 1) phasing, and we should mention it at preliminary and address it zully at final; and 2) to get some input from the City administration and Council as to what they plan to do to improve the traffic situation. There is also the details of what the berms and landscaping will be. There are several open -issues for final. Mr. Reed expressed his concern with the view corridors and he would like the Commission to consider small design changr-s in the overall plan. Mrs. Maher asked Mr. Weith if he could do some comparisons with other con- munities. One of the reasons the Planning Commission in the past never wanted to have a lot of smaller lots was because of the kind of uses that might be attracted which would be high generated. She asked if smaller industrial lots give you higher traffic generators: hr. Weith replied he would look into that. its PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 9 fir. Burgess stated they will talk about smaller lots_ next reek at the work session and if they come to some consensus and get some 'agreement on what ve want to do, we probably will include that as part of the zoning ordinance at the public hearing scheduled for November 12. Mr. Austin moved the South Burlinaton Plannina Commission approve'the Prelimi- nary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 263 acres off Hinesburg Road into eleven (11) lots as depicted on a 12 page set of plaKs,` the title page entitled 'Subdivision Plat, Green Acres Industrial Park, Hines- burg Road,— South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Trudell Consulting,En- gineers, Inc. and dated 9/24/91 with the following stipulations: 1_ In an effort to preserve the spectacular views of the Green Mountains from Route 116 as recommended in the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan, the following conditions shall apply: a) Structures and landscaping on all lots and within the public r.o.v. shall be limited to a height above sea level of 393.5 feet plus 5.8 feet for every 1000 feet east of the eastern edge of pavement of Route 116. This restriction shall be attached through proper legal documents to lots cteated by this subdivision. b) The above restriction does not •apply to the area of lot #1 which is identified on Sheet SP3 as 'No Height Restrictions'. c) The restriction specified in (a) -above does not apply to the area of lot #4 which is identified on Sheet SP3 as having a building height restriction of 378.0 elevation._ d_)_ The above restriction does not apply to the 100 foot wide strip aionq th,& touridary of the property from Route iit, east to the northeastern corner 'of the property located at 26 Knoll Circle. e) Sheets P1 tnrouga P5 shall be revised prior to Final Plat to indi- cate a species or variety of species of street trees which at ma- ture height vili meet the height limitations described in (a)_ hfl.,o 2_ Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit or start of roadway or utility construction, the applicant shall post a 3-year landscaping bond in an amount equal to the value of the proposed street trees and proposed berm_ plantings. The amount shall i:,e finalized prior to Final Plat review. ���.Y#�;?�li�"f.i�3"`.�YA�"r'C*`F-x�"�^r�i,,'�J�+t.�' ..3.-�.yrs'!r�."'�"..-"pr`�1• �y4'; +.s. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 10 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning vermit for any lot. or start of roadway or utility construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (i.e., utility, sever, drainage, sight-viev, recreation path) and roadway r.o.v.'s (i.e., irrevocable offers of dedications) shall be submitted .to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 4. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for any lot, or start of, roadway" or utility construction, bonds to cover the costs of roadway, -utility, sidewalk, and -relocated stream and berm construction shall be posted. The amount of -bonds shall be approved by the City Engineer. , 5. Access to lots 1,2,3 and 4 shall be via Vosburqh Lane. Access to lot 6 shall be from the proposed 60 foot sever/roadway r.o.w. to the east. Access to lots 8 and 10 shall be provided by one shared curb cut on Swift Street Ex- tension. Access to lots 7 and 9 shall be provided by one shared curb cut on Swift Street. The plans shall be revised prior to Final Plat to indicate this. G. The developer shall furnish the City with the name of the contractors doing the street work and the architect and/or engineer who will stake out and supervise the work at least 7 days prior to beginning of road construction. Upon completion of the work, the architect and/or engineer shall certify that the work is in conformance with the approved plan, stipulations and any other requirements and/or change that the City requests. 7_ The applicant shall contribute 526,738 to the Hinesburg Road sidewalk fund based on 1,260 feet of frontage along Hinesburg Road. 8. As expressly represented by the applicant, it is proposed to relocate the stream over lots 1,2,3 and 6 to a newly constructed stream along the southern property line. The stream shall be designed to -meander and both ap- pear and function as a 'natural stream'. The stream shall be located at least 50 feet north of the south property line. It shall be located at least 50- feet from the edge of wetland on lot 5. Detailed engineering drawings for the new stream shall be submitted prior to final plat review. The new stream shall be constructed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for any lot and within a reasonable time aeriod after start of utility or roadway con- struction. 9. The Planning Commission grants a sever allocation of 15,000 qpd for the development and shall approve a phasing schedule prior to Final Plat. Each new building shall be required to pay the sever allocation fee in effect based on the estimate of sewage treatment demand generated by the new building. lid. The final plat submission shall include a full set of plans including typical details and improvement plans for the Route 116/Swiit Street E)atension intersection. Y. . t C: flit 'L. •v. '. `PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 11 11. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant is willing to idedicate to the City a pedestriab/recreation path easement around the Quarry on lot 11 at some unspecified date in the future. This issue shall be ad- dressed at the time further subdivision or development is proposed for lot 11. 12. Manhole and drainage inlets shall be adjusted to grade -using precast risers instead of bricks and mortar. 13. Sidewalk -thickness at driveways shall be 8 inches. 14. The plans shall be revised prior to Final Plat submission to address the following: a. The note identifying the height restrictions on lot i4 on page SP3 shall indicate that the restriction applies to all structures and landscaping. b_ The legend on page SP3 should include a symbol for street lights. C. Plan should show recreation path easement on both the south :and north side of the relocated stream with connection to 60 foot r.o.w. off Knoll Circle and to Hinesburg Road. The issue of -the applicant funding the construction of a portion of the recreation Path shall be finalized at Final Plat 15. Legal documents (irrevocable offer of dedication: for the 80 foot r.o.w. future road connection over lot 11 shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burl ington--la_n-d records- prior —to— recording the final plat. 16. A `Notice oZ t.uadltion' sham Or recJl acu iu Li.& JOuLa burlinaton land records prior to recording which states that all eleven lots were created as part of a planned industrial development (PID) and that any subsequent development or subdivision will be reviewed as an amendment to the original eleven lot PID. This notice of condition shall be approved by the City Attor- ney. 17. The applicant shall pursue prior to iinai plat the option of construct- ing a bridge for a future recreation/pedestrian patn over the wetland on Lots 5 and 7. The applicant and City Planner shall meet with the Natural Resources Committee prior to final plat to explain the concept and obtain comments and a recommendation from the Natural Resources Committee. 18. The traffic issue and appropriate mitigation is unresolved at this time. This issue shall be finalized at final plat. Prior to iinai plat, staff -shall obtain an indication from Council on timing and funaina of necessary intersec- tion improvements at Roue 116/Kennedy Drive and Route lieiWilliston Road. In MAY93.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee L- RE: Green Acres Industrial Park DATE: May 4, 1993 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, May 3, 1993. The Committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Green Acres Industrial Park and made the following recommendations: 1. The developer should construct an 8' wide bike path on the north side of Swift St. Extension from the point where it intersects Hinesburg Rd. to the point where it meets the site to be developed. 2. The developer should donate a 5' easement along the north border of the property from the point where Swift St. Ext. meets the property, eastward to the back of Lot #7. This, combined with the existing 15' easement along the south border of the adjacent property to the north, will provide the desired 20' easement for a future path. The extent of wetlands in this area could not be determined from the information provided to the Committee. If wetlands would prevent the future construction of an east -west path in this area, the Committee would appreciate being notified so it can modify its recommendations. 3. The developer should donate a 20' wide easement along the south border of the property from Hinesburg Road, eastward to the back of lot 14. Within this easement, the developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path from Hinesburg Rd to the N-S 200' wide drainage easement, and extending N in this 200' wide drainage easement to the intersection of Swift St. Extension and Green Acres Lane. 4. The developer should construct an 8' wide path in the 60' wide easement connecting the property to the Ledge Knoll neighborhood to the south. 5. When the eastern portion of the property is to be developed, the developer should donate 20' wide easements, as shown on the sketch plan, along Muddy Brook, along the south side of I-89, from the NE corner of Lot 17 to I-89, and from the SE corner of Lot #4 to Muddy Brook. 1 MAY93.MEM are several rationales for these requests: providing access to the industrial site for commuters while staying off -road as much as possible and taking advantage of an existing easement, L - connecting the Ledge Knoll neighborhood to the existing path network via a safer crossing of Hinesburg Road, connecting to the new City Park and existing path segments via Swift Street as it is extended toward Hinesburg Road, eventually providing access from Butler Farms and existing portions of the path to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, eventually connecting to Williston as part of a regional network of paths. 2 l City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 7, 1993 Karen A. Petersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Ms. Petersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 11, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si erely, Vl Jo Weith, Ci y Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob F� o.Nrc she r•u E00 O 7D0 •OO 600 am �SY11rMr— sr.nw QO. e LAW PIEW I d. PLANNING DATA TOTAL AREA - 116. 73 ACRES DEWWrV ALLOT . 6 ACRES / LOT AIM JAM LOT M•mT OF LOTS ALLOEM 14.6 LOTS /RGmt OF LOTS PROPOSED lJ LOTS I MAR 11 1993 City of So. Burlington \V 1 \ D.A!• ....t.fJ.1T QED/ Amm K P.O = r" �/ICTOI r amm �rJ 1 fQlf) • EO ,,,,.1QI • uA7. ra. • Ea r•1 re, ••w • s1•r wua r.r mAo 'Sle AM TRUDELL CMSUL1 ING EMINEERS, INC. »w Pr Err r O Uffimmee, YM. MODS 870!1 LOCO aw Q •a At.maa L•1Au w Ov!1•� O.h a E OE Y r F �A)•L P-W mm GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vt. S1...t tft Utilities Site Plan Pr•Act .•nbw 0011lO Ext. —922,_ Pmpct m unow .Av Or •u1 Doh 11it•iv1 kyW 1" - 7m SI'3 MEMORANDUM TO: Project Files FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant DATE: April 19, 1993 RE: Preliminary Comments - May 11, 1993 Agenda Items GREEN ACRES, INC. - 13 LOT INDUSTRIAL PUD & OFFICE COMPLEX - PRELIMINARY PLAT Subdivision: - plans should indicate the number of street trees proposed - if subdivision is to be constructed in phases, plans should show what is included in each phase inuic�ating roads and utilities, number of street trees, etc. - survey plat should show easement for shared driveway between lots 3 and 4 - the boundary of the forested wetland on lots 2 and 3 should be delineated - plans should rho,,- CO zone on either side of stream flowing north on lots 4 - 7 - the 50' wetland protection area which runs east -west along the northerly property line is shown on sheet page P7 continuing onto lots 7 and 12 but this is not shown on any other sheet - the center of the relocated streauk on Lot 2 will be less than 50' from the adjoining Dutc'__- property rp-1 1- i — in a CO zone extending onto the Dubois property - details of recreation path should be provided - plans should reflect the new zoning designations of Industrial & Open Space District and Southeast Quadrant District - survey plat, Sheet SP1, should indicate the width of Green Acres Lane at its southern most location - applicant should respond to the memo from the Recreation Path Committee to the Planning Commission dated 1-5-93 - applicant must propose street trees which when mature will not exceed the height limitation of the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. The proposed Green Ash trees can reach a height of 55 feet the applicant should provide a 20 foot easement between the 60 R.O.W. off Knoll Circle and the proposed recreation path. - applicant should submit written report addressing the PUD criteria contained in Section 19.151 of the zoning regulations. plans should show how recreation path will connect and cross ;:inesburg Road indicate on the plans which sections of t-"e recreation path will be constructed by the applicant �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. April 30, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Municipal Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Green Acres Industrial Park Dear Mr. Weith: We received the review comments on Green Acres Industrial Park noted in a memorandum from Mr. Raymond Belair dated April 19, 1993. We offer the following response to these comments: 1. The intent of street tree placement is to put 2 trees every 50 feet of roadway. This amounts to about 204 trees (based on 5,100' roadway/50 x 2). We will add this information on our final drawings. 2. We are not proposing the project to be phased. The applicant would like to allow the market to dictate construction. 3. We will add the easement for lots 3 and 4 shared drive onto the plat on our final drawings. 4. The plans show the wetland designation. The copy the Town received was slightly faded and apparently the delineation did not show up. We will improve our quality of printing for the final drawings. 5. It is not the applicants' intent to show a 501CO zone along either side of the drainage ditch that flows north on lots 4 through 7. This ditch was constructed to aid the farmer who formerly leased the property and will be discontinued. 6. The 50' wetland protection area shown on sheet P7 is a continuation of the protection area shown on sheet P2. The review comments noted lots 7 and 12. I believe this should have noted lots 7 and 10. 7. The center of the existing stream on Lot 2 is closer than 50' from the adjoining DuBois property. The final plans will be revised to have the lower section 50 ft. away from P O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-6331 Page 2 the property line unless Mr. DuBois agree to it being closer. The stream was relocated along the Ledge Knoll development to be 50 feet from the property line to accommodate a request by those neighbors. Mr. Toutant has requested the ditch be closer to his property and understands there is a CO zone that will extend on his property. 8. The applicant has no plans to design or construct the recreation path. The applicant is only offering an easement for this use. 9. The final plans will be revised to reflect the new zoning designations. 10. The final plans will be revised to include the R-O-W width at the southern most location of Green Acres Lane. 11. The memo for the Recreation Path Committee is addressed to the Planning Commission and not to the applicant. The applicant would be happy to provide testimony on any questions related to this project at the next hearing. 12. The trees proposed at Station 14+50, which is at the edge of the view zone, will grow to 46 feet before blocking the view. It will take about 30 years for this to happen. At Station 19+00 trees can grow to 52 feet before blocking views. The remaining proposed trees will not have any impact. 13. The final plans will be revised to show a 20 foot easement between the 60' R-O-W off Knoll Circle and the recreation path easement. 14. The intent of this project is to comply with all the standards outlined in Section 19.151 of the zoning regulations. 15. The applicant is not proposing to design or construct the recreation path. In response to the memorandum from Mr. William Szymanski dated April 19, 1993, we offer the following: 1. Green Acres Lane is intended to be a private road built to Town standards. 2. The proposed power and telephone lines are shown in the R-O- W based on previous discussions between Mr. Szymanski and Mr. Karen Pettersen. The main reason for this is the Page 3 applicant is unable to obtain an easement outside the R-O-W adjoining Dynapowers' property (Mr. Peter Pollack). The utility company has agreed to this. 3. Due to the location of the utilities noted above, the sidewalk location was also adjusted. 4. Street lighting is shown on SP3 and will be shown on the final road plan/profile sheets. 5. The existing sewage pumping station has been evaluated for capacity and emergency storage. Attached is a preliminary design brief that was done by our office in 1990. Prior to final approval we will update this design brief. 6. We will continue to show sewer manhole inverts done with brick unless you prefer poured concrete. 7. The light standard and fixture will be done in accordance with Green Mountain Power. Thank you for your review comments. We would like to hold off on making any revisions to the design drawings until we receive all review comments from State and local authorities, to avoid duplicate effort. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. John P. Pitrowiski JPP/j iv Encl. cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacobs weith.ltr TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINtr.RS, INC. 14 Blair Park Road, P.O. Box 308 WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 It s 6fz_,r_-J A - JOB SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE .............. ... .......... ... . ..... .. ....... ... OF - DATE 0 - DATE I/ ............. mommi W., Imilm Mw 01471. TRUDELE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Blair Park Road, P.O. Box 308 WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 ......... .......... .............. ............. f Is T-t P.I. C.- r1l JOB (0 e.*, I SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE f 0 pel I 2-1 PWW 2061 Inc.. GmW. Mau. 01471, -3 REV. 1-25-85 PUMP STATION CAPACITY 600 - 850 G.P.M. 8 r GRAVI OUTS' 2 S=•O04 CAPACITY I l0"GRAVITY S=.004 422 GPM. (CAP. 658 GPM) 1(ENNEDY DRIVE Q cr- DIGITAL. LL NT �RST4TF 69 87GRAVITY PUMP STA. CAPACITY SEWER 310.350 (CA PAC ITY 437' GPM)>' PUMP STA. CAP. GREEa Ac,RES 180 GPM ' F.M. ' DUBOIS BUTLER �- FARMS um STA. CA PAC l T Y cc 0 71-180 0 • � BAN SIC Kl1N RD• _ -7 (A) o 25 9893/09 6g g e a@lmEgg lSgQg 26 a ge KS' gI glace] @ B2 &IRIS &a O@@A ae a/ # Na] 10819al ga g]@ 9 @§Qg§ ma K33 210iAMU @e ee 721 O 2z K Ea2lal G 092 K1 3993 a gKa#aG @eG@ e2lG 29■ g Ea2IaI g #e K5 2#3S 5 Ea§»r d a21 G -/�>�yg a ��� N5 £#2 ± Agg Am G aG Rgz . 231 O 9g @EaJbq @ G &! #5 39aM35 @ . ]g@2glE &e a29 k21 G 2 S K Eh2I2I g g!3 Nala■]G b aa]g2g2 . Ka NOSH «q#% 3 g]w 3N9 £ se e3 AS>g25Ggn 2#2 QIa§ g2a# w#gwla� a ti I II. DESISN FE4 FLOW RATES i) BUTLER FARMS ENPO 4VZ7 PUMP L 42' TDH = 'r LEDGEKNOL_ NPOA RNELL 40T PHP @ 93'TDH = 3) OAK CREEK: / � (4,.,4,Tl.-1 ydr.- 31 LANE PRESS P.F. = 5.0 5.0 1 4955 6PD/1440 = 4) DvNAPOWER P.F. = 5.0 5.0 1 2477 6PD(1440 = PRESENT DESIGN PEAK DEMAND 5) GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION P.F. = CO 4.0 1 30345 GPD/1440 = WORST CASE PUMP STATION PEAK DEMAND 18o GPM 175 GPM 5PM 17 GPM 9 GPM 301 GPM 84 GPM 465 GPM AWL . { 73&E«JL mg«SSbe� wR I...I L a aim REM ACRES R BASIS 7 DESIGN R BEWARE Rae b aw« &a 3 a » ; @IS ggg CREDIT E RI WILL NOT R APPLIED FOR 9S PROJECT e !«S9QgNFOR gQRYHbSS.- ° A «� t THE7Sa RaF2 91S 9@EIE: S THE PEAK RR RATE IS R SgR a.,I-.4 #gye9 DESIGNER ;EE 116854 9a 11665.4 eD b IS Fla MAIN DIAMETER 2; & INCHES S THE FORCE #R SG9 IS TER Rg STHE SDRENATTHE PUMP INTAKE e: 21.85 eg R THE p ELEYATION AT E BLi 22#RO KIR S1R FEET E IK Fae DOSE VOLUME 15 ; 29 &J c � t M 2a:eE§ 2E 3 RR E 9lm; 93 g97.\': NUMBER 7 Q9Ig§ < Ee e9&eE SLOPE GLOP e 10.00 . §qLE 9yE e %y ! @a§9G<9RE 2 ss § a2 etJ _ 25 2! B9#Ae SE 1.80 7,2 S4..N»QE52 a2 e gaga[ 9 EKE 2 29 a§ &gene p ELBOW2 J9 2 2aa6It 2 ELBOW 9 20 A §2ae ENLq£ENT § 1.00 § Qee CONTRACTION (dG:.2} n a0 @ SUDDEN eg&S2N42=2§ @ z9 9 RR S2 ! 600 ! 5a OF THE mQRLS@SEE2m8: 235 � y.j83M SR [aR % 93'gslR5932e SeE25l= 14 .0 STATIC g22a RL2Ry e@R QS #E£2y HEAD 2@ 4Q [SES TER RR! !R@ (FE2 (RE) EE9 (FEET) 'FEET) 2S3 t 9 V Q 25M ag 22! 473; 0,2 aS 5733 2Ey tg' Sd! a.@ %a §7 gJ! 95M §s DZ! 834 0.2 4.9 6837 256 to RZ§ 0 GTE S2 17437 @SET 2 RZ! 64&2 G# mR &.q 30 4,9 11,11.15 8a6 t2 bg SJ! 4=S3 56 1 o25 %a! %# a# eJ§ 4Sg S2 Rz! E34 GQ 769 0033 s 6E WILLIAMS 922Q COEFFICIENT =lS eq 9gE 7EQe VELOCITY MINOR PATE SLCCI9 . R6 LOSS HEAD LS#§ DH 7M (7@ 7E9 (FEET) EEO /ES FRET} 15M e9 Da! 2.! t2 3.2 2uB 25M %g MZ§ 2.2 0.2 ag R23 95,00 §g 1135 2J6 to 42 %Ji 77c Ra DTI! 32§ GTE 79 y2B .I. t9 S3> 22! GTE S2 gJ/ /a.m §5 DZ! @J! Cg %r 5J8 etd t9 &2§ #&a c2 £a gz! @SR 9;5 Sz! 5 0,20 GA 7 g.e ety32a No Text B City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 863-2891 Station%�'JL �,,,,7. (' ., r sTa� Date / c/& r7 Time Q 1 30 Wet well gal. per inch 31 `3 ? 1 Pump Minutes pump 6n Inches wet well pumped down + 0 Inches inflow into wet well at inches pumped aTotal inches pumped x 3I3 Wet well gal. per inch 2- Minutes pumped # 2 Pump _� Minutes pump on 4'/z Inches wet well pumped down + D Inches inflow into wet well 942 Total inches pumped -3-2 pump capaci 9.� Total inches pumped z 31.3 Wet well gal. per inch =� pump capacity Minutes pumped 313 G-PM Pumps calibrated by ��--'--'-"-=---- s, FAX: (802) 658-4748 G TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 447nutt +,Burlington Nire Department *nutb Nurlingtnn. 'Vermont 0540 Y s (802)658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE MAY 11,1993 AGENDA ITEMS TUESDAY APRIL 13,1993 BROWN ANIMAL HOSPITAL CALKINS COURT LOT#G THE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE IS WITH ONLY ONE WAY INTO THE PROPERTY THE ROAD WAY MUST BE NO LESS THE 30' BEHIND THE PARKING SPACES TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT IN AND AROUND TO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. 2. GREEN ACRES PARK PROJECT #91070 HINESBURG RD./ SWIFT STREET EXTENTION THE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THERE IS PROBLEMS ON ACCESS TO BUILDINGS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT AND MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THE WATER SYSTEM AND HYDRANT LOCATION FOR THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS ON THE LOT. -rt 11, � Sri (y2 Pe., Mr� - ----T krrv� — �i -?,/ et (U -i'd s4,tp- s*,-4-La OD �« o ( N4CS PPS _ roc.dw .��- -- G� Q evit 4-J." "4 /e z 6 I -op /.�S w v(W4"/ "4 6tn�f < � mite &v;uA 'ex4�7d S�r� 1z1;"1fZ, ? c co i _ �,� v A t I c i N.=6�5�8-M332 or toll free 1-800-4minimum; each additional tin!�7�11251 I ABSOLUTELY FREE 2 LEGAL NOTICES 1 LEGAL NOTICES 1 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING Burlington Planning FREE DOG AND CAT . 2 yr. old,'/z Greyhound, Yi female. All South In accordance with the Black Lab mix, - Commission South Burlington Zoning shots. Prefer home with - The South Burlington Regulations and Chapter 117 Title 24, V.S.A. the out kids. Also, 1 yr. old female indoor cat, short Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hair, white w/ brown patches. 860-1342 after the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, ere hold a public hearing at 5 PM ONLY! KENMORE 575 Dorset Street, South thl Sou th Burlington Mu Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 11, 1993 at nicipal Offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset ELECTRIC STOVE 30', white, working 7:30 p.m. to consider the Vermont out Burls 9May 899.1990 KITTENS — 4, cute and 8 following: 10, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. to i. Preliminary Plat appli- consider the following: bouncy. Also, two month old tigers (have cation of Hannaford Appeal Green . All box trained. shots). Brothers Company for a (12) building Acres, Inc. Ralph Good- Acres, Ca11879-3035. twelve planned commercial de- rich and Doug Griswold seeking approval from MALE HUSKY MIX 2 yrs old, all shots, and velopment consisting of a 64,000 square foot Section 19.35 Removal of fixed. Needs room to run. new supermarket, new and filling with earth prod- 849-2358 after 4:30pm 107,806 square foot de- ucts of the South Burling- 6 YEAR OLD LOVABLE partment store, 79,740 ton Zoining Regulations. Request is for permission CAT Spayed female. square feet of new retail new 95 room to opeate a commercial Needs loving home. 658-3264 space, a hotel, a new 6,000 square stone quarry, estimating the removal of 2.5 million %«,,9 a Free Press CWs�foerdd foot restaruant, a new 2,500 square foot bank cubic yards from an area Y 40 acres from a parcel 40 acres ad is easy. We'll help y yo+r ro + s Ifie resolis you with drive through serv- g of containing 300 acres, leiy°w 9 vlsA ice, an existing 6,014 square foot restaurant cated at1150-1170 Hines - burg Road, bounded by and existing 6,150 square foot fast food restaurant lands of Lane Press, 30 - 60 GALLONS— of with drive through serv- Green Acres Inc., Inter- 89 and the Town of fuel oil. Must supply con - ice, on 41.9 acres of land, state tainer. 658-4671 Southland, Shelburne, Williston. CHILD CARE 4 Road. #2. Appeal of Ernest Le - AFFORDABLE Wee Care t. Preliminary Plat appli- vesque seeking a vari- ance from Section 19.10 Childcare. Structure, nur- cation of Green Acres, Home occupation of the turance. Transportation. Inc. for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned South Burlington Zoning Williston. 879-9698 AFFORDABLE HOME Industrial and Open Regulations. Request is Space into thirteen (13) for permission to operate a wood working shop DAYCARE Has openings for children 6 Wks to 5 lots ranging in size from from an existing 28'x28' yrs. Flexible hours. Call 3.06 and 49.5 acres, Green Acres, Hinesburg detached garsge and dis- Laura 655-5414. CHILD CARE NEEDED Road. play products from a resi I rt located at I Copies of the application pp are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. dem a props y 195 Hinesburg Road. #3 Appeal of William Dunn anpd Bret Kernoff in m Colchester home y for my 2 children, ages 3 & 1. Call 879-6269 ESSEX JCT — Newly Only 1 seeking a variance from licensed center. Section 19.00 Non com- infant & 3 pre-school slots William Burgess plying structures sub sec- remain. Affordable, lots of Chairman, South Burlingtor, tion 19.002 and Section 19.65 Multiple uses of the experience & structure. Near IBM. 879-1191 Planning Commission South Burlington Zoning MOTHER OF 1 has day Aoril24,1993 Regulations. Request is for permission to con- care openings. Toddlers to school age children. SELL "IDLE ITEMS" WITH A struct a second story ad- References & experience. CLASSIFIED AD. CALL 658-3321 dltlOn (24'x50') t0 a Burlington, 658-5716 SEALED BID SALE structure non complying to the rear and side yard NANNIES NEEDED Sealed bids will be ac- 4/27/93 to requirements a lot Lon Island Beach com- cePted on P 4/28/93 from 9:00 am un- 0 containing 9600 square feet located at 1197 Willis- b /NYC. Salary, room board. 516-324-4497 til 4:00 pm for the follow- ton Road, and and ing: LOST AND FOUND 5 Security Cabinet- two Richard Ward ZoningAdministrative Of- FOUND: Beagle pup, door, 591/2 (H) x 40'12" (W) ficer female, wearing black col X 271/4" (D) with eight lar & flea collar. North Ave interior compartments. April 24, 1993 in Burlington, March 31 Safe is turquoise over the Please call 864-9657. orginal black. Interior has ABSOLUTELY FREE 2 FOUND orginal markings, United States Safe Co. Eliza- BEAUTIFUL — Purebred, Ger- Black, male cat, white do neck. Hydl beth, PA 1907. Interior all white, 1 year old Shepherd. All pa- on (Shaved) St. area. 863-8829. doors both bear hand- painted serial number man pars. Only home with FOUND — brown fram, "l266-3". Safe is on TLC. Call 879-3035. eyeglasses in brown cas wheels. BEAUTIFUL 4 YR on South Union St nee OLD— calico cat. Memorial Auditorium o Place Spayed, all shots, indoor 4/14. Call 865-7176 US Postal Service cat only. 482-2903 FOUND 4 New England Drive ESCALATORS Female black lab puppy Essex Jct., VT 05482 Four working escalators. Burlington on 4/2 Must be removed during 985-2248• Postal employees may surplus USPS renovations to former de- A lost or found pet? purchase material, providing they downtown Burlington partment store. Take Call Pettinders weekda s 9am to 5 pm are not connected in any declaring the them away and 1-80�-666-LOST way with material excess or ap- they're yours, free of Contact Robert LOST CAT — 2 yrs of charge! ..1-1 ,,,Han wparinn DL gal expenses PPaid. 'lease, call Jeff & Eliza- Ieth at 1-800-947-0379 NXIOUS TO ADOPT au iewborn. A young, loving me ;Duple will be devoted er )arents providing warmth, co sappiness, a lifetime., ifetime of an ove & security. Expenses mi )aid. Call Lil & Tom, to: 800-432-6012 RE CARBUR'S LATE — NIGHT HAPPY HOUR S.99 wings, pizza, French onion soup or shrimp. SUN.-THURS., 9:30-11:30pm. Brand new, late night menu! C GEESE FL Sherlock's favorite read- tI( ing material-- the newspa- st per. April 27, 7:30 p.m. a: Countess of Morcar pi si LONG DISTANCE Ic al NORTH to is proud to support p Vermont ETV. fe MAHSALAMAH rL Daughter of Gibran, who 0 smilingly nurses to health it the children of the Queen, a have you forgotten your li chattering fellow traveler p from the other side of the C spiritual universe? 0 Respond, minfadlak, to 1 Dream Director, Late V Finish; P.O. Box 51, C Barnet, VT 05821. NEEDED: Couches, mat- tresses/springs, kitchen tables & chairs, easyy chairs. COTS 864-7402 ON AND AFTER this date, April 24, 1993 1 shall not be responsible for any bills incurred by anyone other than myself. Signed: Blanche LaFrance SINGLE VERMONTERS The successful modern way to meet singles state- wide. 802-326-4715 HAPPY_ ADS HAPPY 21ST BIRTHDAY SHANNON WE LOVE YOU From the Staff of New England Entertainment Unttd and all your friends. OPEN HOUSE 25th Anniversary Dick & Sandy Cioustre Sat. April 24 2-4pm at their home, 66 Barnum Street, Milton, VT ENTERTAINMENT 8 THE HOTTEST New England Entertainment Unitd We provide the very best in dancers for your bach- elor or bachelorette party. Birthdays & strip-o-grams too! Dependable, reliable. Guaranteed 882-1086. HARDBODIES ENTERTAINMENT & UNINHIBITED n Have Merged to Bring You the Best Dancers from Florida to Montreal! Quality dancers/rates. 800-370-BABES (2223) rtTt*FANTASY* Entertainment Inc. Hottest Fe/Male Dancers Best Quality -Best Price k- OP IR AGGR Heavy pany gate 0 experi manac aspect severa Vermc clude perso transp the m opera' media rear-n with a tions inquir,. confi( candil RJt 2( W Sot Long al fire ence one Estal mark Desi! cane Musl certi' and San( App' [)or, a 5 y pros Anc Rd. ASH Imr cer ker wo. net qui n., M E M O R A N D U M To: Recreation Path C "tee From: Raymond J. Belair ing and Planning Assistant Re: Green Acres Industrial Subdivision - Hinesburg Road Date: April 26, 1993 Green Acres, Inc. will be appearing before the Planning Commission on May 11, 1993 seeking preliminary plat approval for a 13 lot industrial subdivision. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plan at their 1/4/93 meeting and submitted a memo to the Planning Commission. In this memo, the Committee raised several questions which the developer was requested to submit a response. No response has been submitted to date. Please review the latest plans and submit your comments to the Planning Commission. I am attaching a reduced copy of the plan for now. Bruce will have a full sized set of drawings for you to review at your next meeting. �fa11G Y1[n - y run nAna - ►Artm -' CONSERVATION k OPEN SPACE DISTRICT r � CONSERVATION \ \ ! \ ZV OPEN SPACE DISTRICT N/E�- ./m r _ - 7 I � aD®c _ I 146.6 AC. 3.1s Ac RQI IPUSTRI� ' •Ac AGRICULTURAL ft 7` � 0//QL'l(RIamD`L6\1a♦1 � • �O us AaeSt\ ® fN' DISTRICT _ t . i / ' O♦ ^ �$ ./ .St i / ' 39s IAc - — I / RURRE$ C � SII Ac ,. - - --- �� DISTRICT �lsaso AC A AWFAZY �, I is �r • -a - ,' -- nral•c O a67 Aa: il_. \ \ / NA \� ,.r. AA we ou�ewTEDN/� 1 Tar 1 AL DISTRICT I - �`- ;- � \ � RRIpLj$IW / 701ISr �1ARI.SC1aV lour LSE N _ _ kAL RURAL 5 / N ' N/ AGRRII ULTO DISTRICT E N� >eer� � mlAl - �— oaxvAna+ t S1FefNd �07m- AGRI(XILTURAL . �'I OPEN PACE DISTRICT DISTRIC AGRICULTURAL AL � DI TTRRIC aEs �� �-• AdE'S R1F PRYF AfJtt ■ a< AREAc -- PRGFERrY / LOT LSE ❑1 QI AGES _ 'WE C EEN ACRES MC. \ �. PA SM 7123 V ❑ 9017M SL4Kjmc T9i T. 2 In1 ASS MGM201WC DISIITtC7 RRIOISDAMr N/T i O 231 ACRES -� N/r TOTAL AREA cnwlRDs fl•R1) 0 16.7 ACRES- - I , 706.1 AGES t _ O N ,' (9musmNU M.1 AGES L AREA ,N RDLIS W 22.8 AGES t t`-------- _-� PRSE A1ptIR]Eruw. AREA © 13.1 ACRES Il0 ACRES ^"�`�� �+++rr+NIF 1 \� AREA SI SOUIN SLIkMMN I633 ACRES t -i ❑7 ABkAuc t b is CC--ZaE 12.9 AGES �- M R AREA IN AOtlaALRAW A 11 ACRES t c..Lc.ca -� �� RMAL RILSWENTIM DISEWT 7.3 AGES AREA IN RAWMAL 4.919c ifs 2.7 ACRES / ;i AGPICLILRM M DISTRICT 242.3 ACRES t 140-7 ACRES I / E C t '� �I E D no O ]DO i0o ypp IIDp MAR 1 1 1993 City of So. Burlington i TRunEi.l. CC*MLTING ENGINEERS, INC. Y NO At 6W a- 1O VAIrR•y VL am spwdm r cr la:: - to= GYP © rs for u,sr .AN. A. bArl•n S Ai•�L �' »..�• GREEN ACRES MUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington. Vt. 9wt fN.r Master i Site Plan ft-Wt -1-6- •Y•.�1 Eri m5 I P1•Ft �,� AAv d� AAAA1 D•t. 9/7.M ScA•. .'..too' Rlpp SP2 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 11, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary Plat application of Hannaford Brothers Company for a twelve (12 ) building planned commercial development consisting of a new 64,000 square foot supermarket, new 107,806 square foot department store, 79,740 square feet of new retail space, a new 95 room hotel, a new 6,000 square foot restaurant, a new 2,500 square foot bank with drive -through service, an existing 6,014 square foot restaurant and existing 6,150 square foot fast-food restaurant with drive-thiuuy,i service, un 41.9 acres of land, Southland, Shelburne Road. 2. Preliminary Plat application of Green Acres, Inc. for subdivision of 116.7 acres of land zoned Industrial and Open Space into thirteen (13) lots ranging in size from 3.06 to 49.5 acres, Green Acres, Hinesburg Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission April 24, 1993 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 ) Name of Applicant Green Acres, Inc., P.O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 2) Name of Subdivision Green Acres, Inc. 3) Submit Subdivision Fee 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) • Industrial and office subdivision, consisting of 13 lots on 116.7 acres located east of Hinesburg Road and south of the Interstate. 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: No change 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Karen Pettersen, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., P.O. Box 308 Williston Vermont 05495 878-6331 b. Surveyor Marcel Meilleur, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. u n R.- qnR_ Williston. VT 05495 c. d. Plat Designer 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: No major changes since sketch plan approval. I 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties • See attached list of abutters. 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application: Green Acres, Inc. plans consist of sheets SP1 through SP13 and P1 through Pg. Designers include Karen Pettersen, John Pitrowiski and Richard Trudell. 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings None proposed. b ) Landscaping $66,800 c ) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work est . $1 ,175 ,000 (5200' of road w/utilities, 2400' sewer outside of road, 2500' storm channel & detention $1,040,000 $60,000 $50,000 p $25,000 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out): A.M. Peak hour 777 P.M. peak hour 743 Average daily traffic 5504 % of trucks less than 5 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City.' b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. d) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. e) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdi- vided. f) Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately main- tained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. g) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of exist- ing ground elevation will be five feet or more. h) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. i) Numerical and graphic scale, date and truce north arrow. j) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. k) Details of proposed connection with the existing sani- tary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 1) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. m) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. n) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culvert which may be required. o) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless on existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. p) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 3 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start 14) and completion dates) : Estimate starting construction in fall of 1993 and completing 1997. List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: None I 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. (Signature) applicant or contact person 4 LIST OF ABUTTERS South Burlinaton Sue and Linus Wiles 42 Long Meadow Drive Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Richard and Ann Painter 106 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Burlington Properties Limited Partnership Box 9210, 1020 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 James and Sachi Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Arthur Toutant Et. Al. 1398 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Richard and Madlyn Morrissey 1400 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Raymond Ploof 1943 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Christopher Davis and Lisa Riley 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, Vermont 05403 David and Catherine Howell 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Terrance and Nancy Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Scott and Roberta Pennington 29 West Birch Lane Williston, Vermont 05495 Larry and Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, Vermont 05403 City of South Burlington Municipal Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLii:GTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 19, 1993 Karen A. Petersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, 13 Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Rabinowitz: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, April 30, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ply, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob JAN9,3.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: proposed developments DATE: January 5, 1993 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, January 4, 1993. The committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Green Acres Industrial Park. The committee had several questions and recommendations: a. questions: 1. Are there any regulated wetlands (or other restrictions) on or near the property that the committee should 'be aware of? 2. Will the developer be constructing Swift Street Extension as drawn on the sketch plan (including the portion between Hinesburg Road and the north boundary of the developer's property)? Will it include sidewalks or bike paths? When will the portion of Swift Street Extension between its current terminus at the Village at Dorset Park and Hinesburg Road be constructed? Will, it include sidewalks or bike paths? b. recommendations: 1. The developer should donate a 5- easement along the north border of the property from the point where Swift St. Ext. meets the property, eastward to the back of Lot #7. This, combined with the existing 15' easement along the south border for the adjacent property, will provide the desired 20' easement for a recreation path. Within this easement, the developer should build a paved 8' wide recreation path. This will provide a connection between sidewalk or paths along Swift St. Extension and easements in the eastern section (undeveloped) part of the property. Access to the path from the north ends of the proposed Goodrich and Vosburgh Lanes should be provided. There are several rationales for this request: connecting to the new City Park and existing path segments via Swift Street as it is extended toward Hinesburg Road, 1 JAN93-MEM providing access to the industrial site for commuters while staying off -road as much as possible and taking advantage of an existing easement, eventually providing access to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, and eventual connection with Williston as part of a regional network of paths. 2. The developer should donate a 20- wide easement along the south border of the property from Hinesburg Road, eastward to the back of lot #4 - Within this easement, the developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path. Thereare several rationales for this request: eventually providing access from Butler Farms and existing portions of the path to the conservation and open space district along Muddy Brook, and eventual connection with Williston as part of a regional network of paths. 3- It is the Recreation Path Committee's understanding that the developer will donate 20' wide easements, as shown on the sketch plan, along Muddy Brook, along the south side of 1-89, from the NE corner of Lot #7 to 1-89, and from the SE corner of Lot #4 to Muddy Brook. Eventually a path can be constructed in these easements providing access to Muddy Brook and possibly connecting to Williston. O'Dell Parkwav The committee questioned the advisability of a 6' wide bike lane on O'Dell Parkway, which it had requested previously. Upon reconsideration, the committee feels that an 8' wide bike lane (if possible) would be safer and more desirable- 2 Preliminary Memo - May 11, 1993 agenda April 19, 1993 Page 2 GREEN ACRES, LOT #1 City Engineer items International road system shall include a sidewalk. WIEMANN LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS COLCHESTER BUSINESS PARK • 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE a COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 PHONE (802) 655-5020 • FAX (802) 655-6567 Gentlemen: We are sending you the following items Date Project No. Project dherewith under separate cover No. Description Remarks w r MAR 2 6 1993 City of So. Burlin ton Items transmitted as follows: F1Approved Approved as noted Not approved ❑ Resubmit for approval Furnish corrected copies For your files Items sent by: Our messenger Your messenger By: class mail 2M SETS QCP 992 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 18, 1993 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Office Complex Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the December 29, 1992 Planning Commission meetin; minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' c r ly, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 8, 1993 Karen A. Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Office Complex Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 For you information, enclosed please find a copy of a memorandum dated January 5, 1993 from the Recreation Path Committee to the Planning Commission. This memo contains questions and recommendations with regards to your proposed development. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ly, R ym d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob (T ) TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. r P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vr 05495 (802) 879-6331 • r _ li�l 1 r'� � • > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter DATE, JOO I ATTE TION RE: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Specifications NE IFE •s�1�7 L� �:' '� 1! 'u ► �1 ME �. ,A 71KqE • __■_ • • 1101 MINE! THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use > ❑ As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections City of So. Burlington ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS WED�)066. R�E U01 L:-MAvu0---I RtEca eL#O W I LIL. CIF COPY TO t nt •to t- ot40/ Pre onsumed SIGNED: J; � PRODUCT 240-2 Ees Inc., Groton, Mass. 014n. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at �once. CITY OF SOUTH BUPLINGION Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Green Acres, Inc. P.O. Box 2123 So Burlington VT 05403 b. Applicant Green Acres Inc. P.O. Box 2123 South Burlington, VT 05403 862-6431 c. Contact person Karen A Pettersen Trudell Consulting FnginPPYs, Tnr_ P.O. Box 308 Williston Vermont 05495 879-6111 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). -Industrial and office subdivision onnsicting ref 13 lets QP JjQ.Q—ae�es located east of Hinesburg Road and south of the Interstate. P.U.D. Site Plan of Lot 1 within subdivision. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) fee simple 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties see attached list 5) 'Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 80' wide R-O-W for Swift St. Fxt_ - proposed 20' wide pedestrian easement - proposed two 60' wide R-0-14 for Vosurrgh and Goodrich Lanes - proposed 50'wide drainage PasemPnt nrrnss various lots 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Extension of Swift Street, sanitary sewer and water supply. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: Planning Commission approval of Preliminary Plat on October 8, 1991 for 11 lots on 253 acres. 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of. existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) 'Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Signature) applicant or contact person date LIST OF ABUTTERS South Burlington Sue and Linus Wiles 42 Long Meadow Drive Shelburne, Vt 05482 Richard and Ann Painter 106 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington Properties Ltd. Partnership Box 9210, 1020 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1100 Hinesburg Road Partnership 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 James and Sachi Rowley 1160 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur Toutant Et. Al. 1398 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Richard and Madlyn Morrissey 1400 Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Homer and Marie Dubois 1405 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Wessel 70 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Norman and Patricia Terreri 60 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark and Marsha Abrams 50 Highland Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 William Wessel 36 MacIntosh Ave. South Burlington, VT 05403 Raymond Ploof 1943 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Christopher Davis and Lisa Ringey 18 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 David and Catherine Howell 20 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Terrance and Nancy Sheahan 24 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 Scott and Roberta Pennington 29 West Birch Lane Williston, VT 05495 Larry and Ginette Brainard 28 Knoll Circle South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington Municipal Offices Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 TOTAL LOT AREA = 50.44 ACR S AREA OF FRONT YARD = 59246 SF 017J4POM!'R 30X OF FRONT YARD = 17774 SF AREA OF BUFFER m 516,076 SF 8.2% BLDG COVERAGE s 180,000 SF 19.1 X PARKING 418,929 SF 27.3X TOTAL COVERAGE 598,929 SF 27.3 1 AT OAOIII\Ili - 1!/1!1 NUILDING BLDG. AREA USE PARKING RiO'D A 40.000 OFFICE 160 B 80,000 OFFICE 200 C 42.800 OFFICE 170 D 28.000 OFFICE 100 E 42.800 OFFICE 170 260.000 1000 PAWM BBE$ J r — — — — — — — 1100 MJESOM I ®RM V 33 17 42 51 J n 200' am 2� R F c 1-:,w " v ",a U NOV 13 1992 City of So. Burlington NO. I DATE A SITE PUN GREEN ACRES WNIUMI — LA PHOW. AROHffW 8. M M 30 SCUM PARK ORNE COLC1ESM. VCRYONT SCALE 1^ - 100'-O" DRAWING NO. DATE 11-09-G2 DRAW BY CHECKED WY DWW PROJECT G1G70 r. N/F PAIN IER N/F PAfN IFR / WfI FS ti 200' srM— scabs 61e9mle%� few in 0 m 4" ON m00 PLANN[NG VA rA _ I01AL AREA : 119.91 ACRES ROAD AREA : 10.22 ACRES REMAINING AREA 109.69 ACRES DENSI r ALLOWED : 8 ACRES / LOT WIN. S ACRE LOT NUMBER OF LOTS ALLOWED : 13 7 LOIS NUMBER OF IOTS PROPOSED 13 LOrS 1GN lIWKx -+� II TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. M WILY ►Art WnN Wgi we WMIti Vt 0"" 67461R L p S' i I I I I i C7710 F, tfi VED Nov isa 1992 City of So. Burlington I oucptwe gal• ey I iProject title GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vt. i Sketch Plan Project number .SOM & Ext. ._ 1 Pralllct monager. NAP Dra+rt MAO Ilol� —_ 11/iw/vl Scale 1_- 200 . I SP3 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington e eation Path Committee _ ; From: Raymond J. Belair, oning and Planning Assistant Re: Green Acres Subdivision - Pedestrian Easement Date: December 28, 1992 The Planning Commission will have reviewed the attached sketch plan by your January 4th meeting, nevertheless, staff would like your input on the proposal for the next level of review. This property is located on the east side of Hinesburg Road just south of the Dynapower building and east of the Oak Creek and Butler Farms developments. The proposal is for a 13 lot industrial subdivision with a 250,000 square foot office complex on lot #1. The Planning Commission has previously reviewed development plans for this property and with suggestions from Chris Cavin the developer has proposed some pedestrian easements for the property. The current proposal does not include the 145 acre parcel to the east which is also owned by the applicant. Under a previous proposal it was included in development plans and if you look carefully you can see a pedestrian easement which completely encircles the property. Since this property is no longer part of the application, we can not obtain pedestrian easements until it is developed. Bruce will have larger copies of these maps at the meeting for you to review. Please direct any comments to the Planning Commission. INA HINEyjyE�RGHIN 1100 _ ROAD PARTNERSHIP P� I J�Si 12 SHIPj�jlP— N/T PAMlFR / YIIEs Ll L� I LANE PRESS I k <��DYNAPOWER IS N/T OINCI���TfC — LfMI�OPAR�ER�IPPAR�ER�IP _ R.aw _ 13 12 _. 4.47 Ae. J.I2 Ac. Ml' WIDE _ 11 R.O.w - 1 20" PEDEsTRIAN I EASE'AIENT N CONSERVATION & I ji OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 1 I EXISTING 15' 1 PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT 50'DRAINAGE EASEMENT v �0 J.29 Ac. / 187 Ac. 60. l\! R.aW. S 06 3.05 Ac. I 3.90 AC. D th �� / ® Ihl 3.12 Ac. 145.8 AC. t -Ax 96. P. 129 VOL. 213. P. Ifi6 CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 7'bTE.P / 69 O1 116.73 AC. 4740 AC. VOL. 91. P. 26 [XIS T040 O 10.10 AC. 10.10 AC C. \ / 10.10 AC. 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT / A�yp4iISICT— _20' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT /00' CONSERVATION x ZONE 7 INDUSTRIAL A 1 \ \ 20' PEDESTRIAN I / EASEMENT AGRICULTURAL &RURAL uYrrs nr V KAP RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1 L —r�L N/F I INDUSTRIAL °UO1S 1 AGRICULTURAL I DISTRICT ( SEE SUDDIVISION PLAT- FOR DETAILED SURVEY INFORMATION) AGRICULTURAL & RURAL RES. DISTRICT/--"' FROPCT LOtATIM --I Graphic Scmb a.e 300 0 700 A00 900 sm NAF �B�BL A9V.S 111 N 0 of �Qti 4$t SSyN A L� Cq��cala�gQ. N/F wCyEIL. ( WILI.ISION ) tY]OIw� ( WILLISTON ) 1AFA NSF ( WILLISTON ) WILLISTON / SOUTH MALINGrON NW LINE CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 100 EAW UK OF 07I MPLIW OF &WW 20'PEDESTR/AN EASEMENT LOCATED OWNER WITHIN CONSERVATION A OPEN SPACE DISTRICT GREEN ACRES INC. P.O. BOX 21 _ 3 SOUTH OI/RLINCrON. VT 05403 rmp- ,l. 003 GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK M09141 " Hinesburg Road So. Burlington. Vt. ,,.peft ie ty2t! a.— NAM !Ir wY Master Plat TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC w'" "'` 105 — ol. 42-01 M Y TH bM N no WiwwA V—.0 1111111,11011111 fq ALl A DEC 0 3 1992 City of So. Burlinj TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. N MW M Read Its 700 Wile W alm @794m © LOT CO/lIQ/ .. 11/74/T2 MAP AOJISI LOI uYd/I P/A/112 NAP CD..clvuon oat. By Re�me Project title GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington, Vt. Sheet title Master Plat Project numbs fMO91 s/ Oa 000 Project menoger NAP/RPT Drier YAY Date _ Y/24/91 _ Seel. I�JW Approved SPIA C IO• 11w, LASrMfN1 G■p k kAy Feet No 0 2w 400 600 am EXISTING WIT Il+IIYp STA TIOY LANE PRESS I PLANNING DATA TOTAL AREA 11:." ACRES ROAD AREA : 6.94 ACRES REMAINING AREA : 109.79 ACRES DENSITY ALLOWED : 8 ACRES / LOT MIN. J ACRE LOT NOMWR OF LOTS ALLOWED I.51 LOTS I zao g IMAu —� It DECO 3 1992 City of So. Burlington I \ / GREEN ACRES. INC. P.O. Box 2121 SO. BURLMc / 1aN. v1 03403 LEGEND ■ MW]RANT • $E,ER MANIOE ■ uIa ,A;w SEWN MAIN •AIM MAGI SrO ORAINQE MAIN OONSDNANON LONE r TWI� CX MMNG ENGINEERS, INC. M fluff tiA "" tie = ■I■m!m K 05m 07was LOCUS YAP Project title GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK Hinesburg Road So. Burlington Vt. S~-t title Sketch Plan Pro pact number 8609I30 E.L m_ Project ma 9a KAP o- MAU Date II/09/91 Seale 1� = SOI SP3 NWBER OF LOTS PROPOSED 13 W)S S ,?FT STREET DITENSION PANZER / Wil ES I r— — — — — —— — —— — —— 110o trorEselAto I _p \ PAW 33 14 VIATO I -mac--J 1y4 1I�—T�7 I r 66MDI .r arau TL"'J� Rowltr38� I 1 eT I G � • 1E � 16 T.OR +2.5a kv m / 38 cl 101 J1 fL 2J fl 200' CONSERVATION BUFFER I � 8.7% BLDG COVERAGE 180,000 SF 20.3% PARKING — 418,929 SF 29.OR TOTAL COVERAGE = 598,929 SF TOTAL LOT PARKING = 1000 T.O.R. — MAXIMUM TOP OF ROOF F.F. — MAXIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 3 j zoz xi r WAM r 6c oII / i' 2 6101e1 / M / 30 / / SU I LD INO 6LD0. AREA USE PARK I NO REO'D A 40.000 OFF ICE 160 6 50.000 OFFICE 200 C 42.500 OFFICE 170 D 25.000 OFFICE 100 E 42.600 OFFICE 170 260.000 1000 DEC6, too 0 7 ISS4, Oty Of SO, Sri:alb: 100 700 FEET OOAPMC SCALE' b N T/ O N C1 �. b 1 5 S O U T H fie B U R L I G T N PROJECT LOCATION City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 22, 1992 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Office Complex Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were forwarded at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 29, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erel1y, J Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Ralph Goodrich Peter Jacob Dennis Webster of NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING SERVICES 67 West Shore Road Grand Isle, Vermont 05458 802-878-4800 Mr. Ralph Goodrich Ralph B. Goodrich Construction Co., Inc. P. G. Box 212=1 South Burlington., VT 05401-2123 RE: Green Acres Development September 2'-:�,, 1991 Dear Ralph: This letter reports an a series of investigations that Natural Resource Consulting Services (NRCS) performed at the above referenced site in South Burlington, Vermont. At various times in May and June 1990, and again variously the fall of 1990 and July and September 1991, various NRCS ecologists and soil scientists visited the proposed Greer, Acres development east of Vermont Route 11E. in South Burlington, Vermont. We performed a number of wetland investigations an the site. Wetlands at this site were delineated to Corps of Engineers (CUE) and Vermont st.andards as defined in the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, January 1989. Section, 404 of the Clean Water Act defines wetlands as "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal cir-cumstances does support, a prevalence of vegetation, typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Three parameters are diagnostic for wetlands: the presence of hydric (wet -land) soils, a preponderance of hyd-rophytic. vegetation (plants adapted for growth in saturated conditions), arid wetland hydrology. To tie considered a wetland all three- c.riteriZ, must be met on undisturbed sites. This site has been disturbed by farming for generations. Recently the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regional office advised us that vu- may ut.:Llize the 1987 CUE Manual in determining, wetland boundariE•_: if we wish. In this case, because of CUE determinations of Prior Conversion of farmed areas in the fall of 1990, we have opted to stay with the 1989 Federal Manual. The standard reference for determination of whether or not a plant spe•r•.ies is in fact a wetland species or not is: Reed, Porter El., Jr. 1938. National List. of Plant Species- that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). Biological Report 38 USDI Fist, .,.rid Wildlife Service, Research and Development, Washington, DC:. This report classifies all plants into five indicator categories based upon, their f f equency of occurrence in NEW HAMPSHIRE ADDRESS: 31-A Fayette Street, Concord, NH 03301 603-228-4600 Mr. Ralph Goodrich September 25, 1991 Page 2 various habitat types. As shown on the accompanying map, I believe -the entire cropped portion of the site, other_ than the main drainage ditches, is up and as defined by the COE, especially r- egarding their- - ------ _ -- previously curiverted--c-r-uFrl�ds deterrninatior,s, as detailed in Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 90-7, dated September 26, 1990. Under normal circumstances such as those under which the farm has been operated for generations and as now defined by the Corps of Engineers most of your land is prior converted cropland. Prior converted cropland' is defined by the SCS (Section 512.15 of the National Food Security Act Manual, August 1988) as wetlands which were both manipulated (drained or otherwise physically altered to remove excess water from the land) and cropped before 23 December- 1985, to the extent that they no longer exhibit important we -Iues. Specifically, prior converte crop and is inundated for no longer than 14 consecutive days during the growing season. Prior converted cropland generally does not include pothole or playa wetlands. In addition, wetlands that are seasonally flooded or- ponded for 154 or more consecutive days during the growing season are not considered prior converted cropland." US Army Corps of Engineers, RGL No. 90-7, 26 September 1990. In order to get a formal determination, from the COE regarding their prior converted cropland status, we filed a form 1026 with the U.S. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) on August 6, 1991. Filing this document enabled the ASCS to request the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS) to make the formal determination. You qualify for this determination because many times during the period 1981- 1985, as well as previously and subsequently, you raised corn and other row (commodity) crops, including soybeans, on the property. This is a technical determination and is simplified somewhat by this capacity of the land to grow these crops. The COE does not formally make the determination of prior converted cropland, they rely on their sister federal agencies to make the determination. We have worked at some length and have used the offices of both the SCS and ASCS. On September 3, 1991, we received notification from the District Conservationist of the Soil Conservation Service (the letter from Thomas Gould is attached) that the subject 102.8 acres of field "are considered prior converted." As a consequence, the attached map contains our approximations of tt,e locations of the only remaining wetlands on the site, which NATURAL. RESOURCE CONSULTING SERVICES Mr. Ralph Goodrich September 25, 1991 Page 3 are either ditches or the dug pond. The SCS apparently made their determination based on aerial photographs arid the corn and soybean planting record at the farm. They did not re -visit the site. Had they seen the extent of the drainage efforts at the farm, including ditches and subsu-r-face drains, they probably would have concluded, as we have, that: 1) none of the sides of the farm are wetland, and that 2) all of the farmed land, other than the main drainage running north -south through the farm is prior converted. Our next step should be to notify the COE that we are seeking a Nationwide 26 permit to cross the only wetland within their jurisdiction on the farm- -the aforementioned main drainage. I will need an up-to-date roadway crossing plan, which I will photo reduce to fill the COE's requirement.. By copy of this letter I am seeking this from Trudell Engineers. Because caf Lhe prier converted status of the adjacent area, I do not believe the COE will require data sheets for the road way crossings. If you have any questions regarding our findings or the next step, contact me. Thanking you in advance for your continued cooperation on this important project, I -remain, Very truly yours, Peter W. Spear, CWB, CEP, CHEF Principal PWS/pjw Attachrnent�& cc: Richard T-rudell, P. E. NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING SERVICES Winooski onservation District RR 4 Box 2292 Comstock Road Berlin, VT 05602-6927 (802) B28-4493 Mr. Peter W. Spear Natural Resource Consulting Services 67 West Shore Road Grand Isle, Vermont 05458 Dear Mr Spear, 12 Market Place unit 9 Essex Junction, VT 0:3452 (802) 951-6423 September 3, 1991 As per your request to receive a personal letter from the Soil Conservation Service regarding the wetland statute of Green Acres, [nc., I have enclosed a copy of the "AS1:5 F i e I d History" sheet and aerial photograph of Gruen Acres. The "field sheet" as found in ASCS's records show only the %aord "corn" under the year "81." I placed checks under oti-,t, years denoting when corn was planted and where - arcor-ding to ASCS records. If ASCS records are accurate, the 102.8 acres found in fields 1 through E3, as depicted on the enclosed informaLluoi, are considered prior converted. I hope this letter and enclosures answer your concern. Sincerely, 0rv1 Tom Gould District Conservationist Soil Conservation Service W 00 4 - X -A NI° TURAL RESou aCE C 0OJSuLT 1NG SER V %CE5 t, -7 w E's s �votl set. ,M►� :k,vr osys8 (,J�O� Sw��S otx QFO)�y WaLA, iS O w kpP rc �T I TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. L iErutid W MUSADTUQL P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston. Vr 05495 (802) 879-6331 JJ I Z=4p WE ARE SENDING YOU L1 Attached ( I Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings LI Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter I Change order ❑ DATE v Z. JO NO. I ATTENTION RE 02 the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications DATE DESCRIPTION DEC o3 199Z city of So. Burlington THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS — I I Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit _copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints LI PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO 09 111.Pre nsumerC tent •10% Pos onsumerCont n SIGNED: G � PRODUCT240-2 ses la[.•Gmton,Mmo1471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 1, 1992 Karen Pettersen Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Green Acres, Office Complex Dear Ms. Pettersen: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Wednesday, December 16, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ely, �7 Raymond J. Belair Y .� ;oning & Planning Assistant RB/peh MEMORANDUM TO: Project Files o(� FROM:. Raymond J. Belaif Zoning and Planning Assistant DATE: December 1, 1992 RE: Preliminary Comments - December 29, 1992 Agenda Items GREEN ACRES - 11 LOT PUD & OFFICE COMPLEX - SKETCH PLAN --- this property is located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. Applicant should provide detailed information on the allowable height of each building within the development. plan SP3 should show the wetland protection areas shown on the approved preliminary plat. sheet SP3 indicates that lot #1 is 47.4 acres and sheet S-lA indicates this same lot is 50.44 acres, which is correct? applicant should propose curb cut locations along Swift Street Extension to minimize number of curb cuts. the proposed office buildings do not conform with the building setback from the southern boundary which was approved at preliminary plat. traffic study should be updated. provide front yard coverage percentage. A. NET RESULT - REVISED SITE PLAN - 350 DORSET STREET coverage information located in box titled "Zoning Information" should be revised to reflect current application. a condition of the 5/21/92 approval required that the plantings along San Remo Drive be setback at least 32 feet from the San Remo Drive centerline, this setback should be indicated on the plan. plan indicates pavers along the south side of the building but there are no pavers here, instead a concrete sidewalk was constructed, this should be indicated on the plan. dumpsters are not located on the concrete slab as shown on the plan, these dumpsters must be placed on the slab behind the fence. fire hydrant located at the southeast corner of the site should be shown on the plan. a new tree was planted along San Remo Drive between the access drive and the sign which is not shown on the plan. MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer RE: Preliminary Comments December 29, 1992 Agenda Items DATE: November 30, 1992 BARRY'S TRANSMISSION (Former Subaru), WILLISTON ROAD 1. Plan should include a title. 2. A concrete sidewalk should be constructed across the entire frontage. E.M.A. INC., 350 DORSET STREET 1. Plan dated 4-16-92 is acceptable. GREEN ACRES, HINESBURG ROAD 1. Vosburgh Lane shall be a private street. 2. Swift Street Extension should include turning lanes for entrance and exit for Lot No. 1 and Goodrich Lane. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 2. 3. *uutb N urliugtnu Nire Department 575 +ll nrset street ,96auth JiSurlingtnn. Vermont 05403 (802)658-7960 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY DECEMBER 29,1992 AGENDA ITEMS MONDAY NOVEMBER 23,1992 GREEN ACRES INDUSTRIAL PARK HINESBURG ROAD PROJECT # 86091-50 PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT ON THIS PROJECT. AT THIS TIME I FEEL THE LAY OUT OF THE BUILDINGS WITH THE PARKING LOTS COULD BE DESIGNED DIFFRENT TO . ALLOW BETTER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY. I ALSO NEED INFORMATION ON THE WATER SYSTEM AND HYDRANT LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL IS GIVEN. 350 DORSET STREET SITE PLAN JOB NO. NET 92 PARKING AND ACCESS CHANGE PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR GIVEN EMERGENCY PROTECTION ON THE CHANGES THEY ARE REQUESTING TO MAKE. LOT # 9 WILLISTON ROAD PLAN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND ONLY PROBLEM I CAN SEE IS CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE FOR BETTER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT TO THE SIDE NEXT TO THE OLD PLYWOOD CITY BUILDING. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 19, 1992 Karen Petterson Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Green Acres, Office Complex Dear Ms. Petterson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are some preliminary comments on the above referenced project. Please respond to these comments with revised plans as soon as possible. Responding to these comments will assure you a spot on the December 29, 1992 Planning Commission agenda. Additional comments addressing the specific proposal will be forwarded as soon as they are available. Please call if you have any questions. Since ly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belaiii; Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - December 29, 1992 agenda items Date: November 17, 1992 GREEN ACRES - 11 LOT PUD - SKETCH PLAN Additional information required on sketch plan (SP3). --- name and address of the owner of record. --- boundaries of all contiguous land belonging to the owner of record (Section 201.1 of subdivision regulations). --- type of, location and approximate size of existing and proposed utilities. --- location map. Additional information required on sketch plan (S-lA). --- name and address of the owner of record and applicant. --- type of, location and approximate size of existing and proposed utilities. --- graphic scale --- location map.