The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0102 Allen Roadsouthb,-- 7 i. n'n PLANNING & ZONING December 1, 2015 Re: #SP-15-76 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ly, /ayiond J. elair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 5 { �► southbudiIII��..on PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- x, (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft NFI 30 Airport Rd. So.Burlington VT 05403 Kathy Pettinqill 802-658-39241018 802-658-6216 Kathy Pettingill@nafi.com 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page ft 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Goldfield Construction Mgmt. 41 IDX Dr. Ste. #270 South Burlington VT 05403 802-862-1997 802-862-9600 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Mike Goldfield 802-373-9629 msg@together.net Goldfield Construction Management 41 IDX Dr. Ste.#270 So. Burlington VT 05403 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: msg@together.net cc goldfieldmanagement@yahc 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: NFI 100 Allen Rd. So. Burlington 05403 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0040-0010 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Relocate dumpster enclosure b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Group home c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Use unchanged d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 5300 sq. ft e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 29ft• f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 6 g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 6 h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): n/a Site Plan Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 { 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 224334 Existing % Proposed % / Sq. Ft. :: b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % / 25439 Proposed 0 % / 25439 c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed % / d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 16 ft. x 18 ft. sq. ft. sq. ft, sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $ 2800 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 8:30 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30- 8:30 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday throuqh Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12/01 /2015 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. " 1 /1 " � # /� Administrative site plan applications require hree ( regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 { NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT A ATURt Oe PRO RTY OWNER PRINT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Inc r1plete dministrative Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application form. Rev. 12-2011 I — — 1 i '1 1 I 1-----_---- 1 1 1 Np�ai J ;f �, K44A On south urfi gto �. PLANNING & ZONING December 8, 2014 Re: #SP-14-66 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, Rayd J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south -ti .in ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- r/ - (officeuse only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 0 Administrative C3Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): NFI 30 Airport Rd. So. Burlington VT 05403 Kathy Pettingill 802-658-3924 x1018 fax 802-658-6216 KathyPettingill@nafi.com Chuck Meyers 802-658-3924 658-6216 ChuckMeyers@nafi.com 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Goldfield Construction Mgmt. 41 IDX Dr. Ste.#270 So. Burlington VT 05403 862-1997 fax 862-9600 goldfieldmanagement@yahoo.com 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Mike Goldfield 802-373-9629 msg@together.net Goldfield Construction Management 41 IDX Dr. Ste.#270 South Burlington VT 05403 862-1997- fax 862-9600 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: msg@together.net cc goldfieldmanagement@yahi 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: NFI 100 Allen Rd. South Burlington VT 05403 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0040-0010 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com NEW GABLE ROOF OVER STAIRWAY EXTENDS OFF EXISTING (AND EXPANDED) 3rd FLOOR ROOF EAVE. 2"x6" RAFTERS AT 24" O/C do 2"x4" CEILING JOISTS AT 24"O/C. EXISTING 3rd FLOOR DOOR EXTEND EXISTING 3rd FLOOR DORMER ROOF TO COVER NEW FLOOR LANDING. MATCH EXISTING NEW GABLE ROOF OVER SECOND FLOOR ROOF DETAILS, FACIA, SOFFIT ETC. LANDING &c 3TAIRWAY. ROOF EXTENDS OFF EXISTING HO SE AT 2nd FLOOR DOOR. 2"x6" RAFTERS AT 24" O/C do 2"x4" CEILING 6x6PT POSTS JOISTS AT "0/C. TYPICAL RAIL: 2x6 RAIL CAP A 42" AFF. 2"x6" SUB -RAIL, 2"x2" BALUSTERS 5 1/2-O/C 2"x6" BOTTOM RAIL 4" OFF DECK, 2"x6" BOTT014 SUB -RAIL (ALL PT). HANDRAIL 04 n STAIRS MOUNTED ON SUBRAIL. I n NEW 3rd FLOOR LANDING A SAME ELEVATION AS EXISTING LANDING NEW 3rd FLOOR LANDING, OUTSIDE EDGE ALIGNS WITH EXTERIOR WALL OF DORMER. 2"x10" PT JOISTS AT 16" O/C RUNNING N/S. TRIPLE RIM ON LONG SIDE, DESIGN LIVE LOAD OF 100#/SF NEW LANDINGS AT SAME 5'-0" ELEVATION AS EXISTING LANDINGS NEW 2nd FLOOR LANDING. -- -- - - -- --- -- --- OUTSIDE EDGE ALIGNS WITH - - - - - - -- - - EXTERIOR WALL EDGE. SEE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS OF LANDING. 2"x10" PT JOISTS AT 16" O/C - - -- -FLOOR-------- - - - - -- 6x6 POSTS SUPPORTING 3rd - - - - - 6x6 INTO EXISTING SHED - _ / "QED ARC" C/YjT , RUNNING N/S. TRIPLE RIM ON _ - -- - - _ - _ _ - _ cl OOIDSF DESIGN LIVE LOAD - - - - ROOF ADDITIONS EXTERIOR - - - -WALL TO SOLID BLOCKING IN - -- -- --- -- -- R. N4F Fir OF - - ATE +/ R -- WALL. - - - - - - -- - �� F�PN s « STAI FmNEW STAIR CONSTRUCTION: - - - - - ---- - - --- --- - - -- - -- 2"x12" PT SKIRT WITH 2"x12" --- - - - -- - -- -- --- -- - - - --- - - - --- -- - - - CARRIAGE EACH SIDE PLS ONE - -- - - 2"02" CENTER CARRIAG PT TREAD, MAXIMUM 7" RISER. - --- - - - - - - ----- - - I A,�� fOF .4 �' _! 6x6PT POSTS I I I I I I 6x6PT POSTS I I I I I I I I I I 100 ALLEN BROOK ROAD FINAL DESIGN CONCRETE PIER 'BIGF00T' DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION I I I I I I I I STAIRWAY, NORTH ELEV. - DRAWING 12/7/12 r SCALE: 3/16"=1'-O" L — L _ , L _ , L — L — STEVE GUILD DESIGN, LLC DROW NO. 100 ALLEN BROOK ROAD ONE STEELE STREET, BURLINGTON, yr 05401 S BURLINGTON, VERMONT NORTH ELEVATION A5 PHONE: 802-363-1482 EMAIL: steve®steveguilddesign.com 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 224334 Existing 4% % Proposed 4% % / Sq. Ft. 8824 sq. ft. 8824 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 11.19 % / 25107 sq. ft. Proposed 11.33 % / 25439 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $ 14765.00 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 38 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30- 8:30 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 8/25/2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the t'm of submitting the site plan applicatio in accordance with the city's fee schedule. JJW /�� 41 f %l l i �� `S l q, ✓V, 1 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 f NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S,A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE 6P APPLICANT P/ . D , c-c r l e-S Q , xt-J'Orqx! SIGNATURE OF MOPERTY OWNER PRRtF NAME �ne��,nc_ ��f�orl�fF7 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ©Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Inco let 6 �/ Y/// *nistrative Officer Da# The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identl&, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 YYY...YYYY.��YYYY��I�I.I YY• Yk� southburingto. PLANNING & ZONING November 18, 2014 NFI Vermont, Inc. c/o Dr. Chuck Myers 30 Airport Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Zoning Violation — 102 Allen Road Dear Dr. Myers: It has come to my attention that you have constructed a deck addition to your house at 102 Allen Road. A review of our records indicates that no zoning permit has been issued for this land development. Therefore, you have 10 days from the date of this letter to apply for all the necessary approvals and permits which are required for the improvements you have made. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, �A I R ymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Corporations Division ( Page 1 of 1 i Business Information Business Details Business Name: NFI VERMONT, INC Business ID: 0047316 Business Type: Domestic Non-profit Corporation Business Status: Active Business Description: CHARITABLE Date of Incorporation / Registration Date: 06/02/1986 Principal Business Office Address: 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA Mailing Address: 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA Citizenship I State of Incorporation: Domestic/VT Last Annual Report Year: 2013 ...._....._ _ ........... �____ _ _ .. __._ ................... Principals Information 1 { Name/Title, Physical Address. I STEPHEN MILLER President 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA DANIEL NAKAMOTO Treasurer 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA f SHEILA GORSKI Secretary 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA If I i ? Registered Agent Information Name: DR CHUCK MYERS Physical Address: 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA Mailing Address: 30 AIRPORT ROAD, SO BURLINGTON, VT, 05403, USA i i j Trade Name Information —_—__— ' E Trade Name Business ID Business Status NFI ALLENBROOK 0160548 Expiration Pending rI L https://www.vtsosonline.comlonline/BusinessInquire/BusinessInformation?businessID=4... 11 / 17/2014 11/17/2014 C,.y of South Burlington Grand /_st Page 1 of 1 12:58 pm Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 0040-00100. NFI VERMONT, INC Name NFI VERMONT, INC 30 AIRPORT ROAD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 Location (A) ALSO 102 ALLEN RD 911 100 ALLEN RD Desc. 2.A GROUP HOME Codes: (1) (Category)R1 (Equipment) (Owner)C Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 705,800 90,800 615,000 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 705,800 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 705,800 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 705,800.00 0.00 0.00 Misc: Status: N Updated: 07/14/2014 Last sale was: Invalid on 07/29/2009 for $0 recorded on 883/250 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) SPAN: 600-188-17208 MMW�W AR 9111-1, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING February 11, 2013 Re: #SP-12-59 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer , Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com vjill;4 �Iwi -� 4 ONO.', southb u r l i It o o 111 PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- I V - (office use onl APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW /Aministrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all cospondence trom Staff. Include name, address, phone_& fax „; 1. ;', � •" �' �` J �'. ` 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: C�`` �% f 1 l �- �' ) f 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: �' C% (, j� �, �� ('��''l. f iyr� LL A1� 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office):(3 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General' project description (explain what you want approval for): i". u ry ! c 1 r ! b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): i r G S r# I o c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): r r't t ' i 1S"; C - g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): FX h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 2 Site Plan Application Form Rev. 12-2011 M E M 0 R A N D U Mi To: The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Allenbrook Stream Culvert Date: 9/27/79 The culvert must be sized to accomodate the maximum anticipated runoff; this would be at least the size of the culvert that is under Allen Road. The length must be long enough to accommodate the road width and the side slopes that are to be constructed on a 1:2 slope. Fill must be clean free of stumps and trees. Fill slopes must be top soiled and seeded to prevent erosion. Disturbed slopes of existing ditch must be regraded and seeded. t, , NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNA U E OF APYLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERYY OWNER Do not write below this line NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION:( fiE REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewe this site plan application and find it to be: Comp' The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits ,for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev 12-2011 south PLANNING & ZONING November 17, 2010 Chuck Myers NFI Vermont, Inc. 30 Airport Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the revised (project address) Findings of Fact and Decision of the enclosed project approved by the City of South Burlington, Administrative Officer on November 16, 2010 (effective 11/16/2010). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.coin f k ON I Interested Persons Record an �-", d Service List south urfington JEflM 4TT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117,'' he Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must bean opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon persons to the appellant in fiv��e``working days. 24 HEARING DATE: IV61)6U '/ PI S.A. § 4471(c). 1��bl PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY. NAME MAILING ADDRESS (Y 7-0s qD 9A11 Si ZAb1A)E C', zz e- C,441-t C tij(,, 30g S N. ae_ tau m, d�� z z 3 FF-- rh-4; 5tes PROJECT OF INTEREST R4-- 5 1 roq k 1 YFo-1 so -�5P(4h0Y� Z6-4 N z3 Y-I V4 11 -A v-v- Ck 4c w� SOLD bn l.tq PLANNING & ZONING December 22, 2010 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoninq permit must be obtained within six (61 months If you have any questions, please contact me. A---& e .SincerBelalr Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP/0 - � / - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD ame(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #):��✓� vn6 v 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 4 C ? gG'� (c3t� iz a. Contact e-mail address: ti.L1, k1l Q 11 CA 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: I o o C( j 1 e 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): C) f) (-/ D ._ t) O l 0 C 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description �(_explain what you want a )roval for): o.o�s,.. () (� (r' ,.�. L �} '� c ti) �a,,,z4 � �21 5 talu 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b. Existing Uses on Property (including ion and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description nd size of each new use and existing uses to remain): r-c� {� �L'S' C1 iv1• ��—. It loo d. Total building square footage on properrty (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 4 , SOU —,;N Yi- --- /(� L— al0 / f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): --ff Cl Y — 1 CLL f of ` I C, kcl`lf I . -4—' /00 - & C&I-t : c ccc 1-•..,. � ee, -e / b -L - k- r k'. t t, (9 e -- < J rx_ A' r A-Ilt- g. Number of employees (existing and pro _ osed, noteo ice versus non -office employees): .N - _ f .- , __ 111 /u L i / _ . tic', c kwve h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: ,;�2 q 33k(t Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing , (, % :2— sq. ft. Proposed % / Z Y sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / 02G, `y�� sq. ft. Proposed 1 % / ` 5 sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed % / d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * sq. ft. sq. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $ / J Ck.c? C C^ J S $ U !)ct_0 C0S a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): C1 , f ► © LAJ +v 3 0" 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: � °' 0 3 % ►-�-�- -� 1 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 3. 0 0 3 , ,3 L 0 j ; �. 4 � .�, � 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: aq J of O 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 3 Slte Plan Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN O PLICANT SIGNATURE 0V P9OPEF9Y OWNER Do not write below this line i� el (- / / PRINT N DATE OF SUBMISSION: U REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Comp I I Site Plan Application Form, Rev. 9-2010 SCALE 1" = 10' PLANTING SCHEDULE r.� Qty Code Scren!ifrc Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 4 AW PGER x kaarrismi VWmn Stan Autumn Bless Maple 2"al. B&B 1 AGAB ANIELANCHIER x grancif re'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Servicabeny 7-Ht B&B multi -stem, 3.4 scans 5 CCR CRATAEGUScrusgalkr.'Crusadee Crusader Hawthorn 2"al. B&B tree form, single sm. 2 GTI GLEDITSIAtl'Helk.' Hake H... A cust 2"al. B&B 6 TCN THUJA—dlenuks'Nigri Dark Amen —Arborvitae 5'Ht B&B 3 TC TSUGAanadoinme Canadian Hemlock 5"Ht B&B Ah—h. Qty. Coda Sdiemibd Name Common Name Size Spec 2 AM ARONAmelanourfps Bleck Chokebary 1. 05 Cant 1 HV HAMAMELISvi mane Common Wilchhaasl 4'Ht B&B 23 JCS JUNIPERUSchinensis —sa nbi Viridm Green Sargent Juniper 18-24" #3 Cont 5 RB RHODODENDRON'Bo... ulf Boursoult Rhododendron 24" B&B 3 RR ROSArugosa Rugose Ross 24" #3 Cont 4 SBAW SPIRAEAx bumelda'Anthony Waterer' Anthony Vhhow Spires 18-24" #3 Cont 1 SP SYRINGApetule'Mlss Kim' Little Miss Kim 4Ht B&B t 1 THE TAXUS.mad..'Ehd—' E.dow Yew 24" Ht I 888 Groundcovers 6 Perrenials l4 pia Existing Vegetation Romwal and 1.) Removal of Buckthorn stems and Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec 38 HHR HEMEROCALLIS Nappy Returns' Happy Retums Daylillies #5 #5 Cont 4 PQ PARTHENOCISSUS quinquaklie M gina Creeper #5 #5 Cont 20 WT WALDSTEINbltaman I Barren Skewbarry #1 #1 Cont Clump landscape architects. planning consultants 301 college street- burlington a vermont. 05401 802o 658*3555 http:l/—.4b.yi..mm 1 ids 02103120101NFI tl�ASSHOWN Al Road �j�bt tj�b Planting A Site Plan L-10 em Interested Persons Record and Service List southburftuggon IM F N M0 'IT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working day s. 24 V. .A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: S r P 1Tolz> PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST r , 2.0 Y1104WOW z-G Ave CoZ J o Apf•+ /Y F-r- — IoD A/ tfttm IAA I C' -S S 'n4oW DgA&orJ J C7 a-V eo. 1 RuE k fz - 5.13okI,rM6-(-6j I r 1 J44!�'PAe-`7r o ,�;4 s I ail mill %j�oLI 17 ', 'en, 5'p 1 O — / P B'_t 0-53%S�F- y�ifj� ! -C �'1 � v C GI -12-/ Pe SeJ l �'h/l c/ �G/' • . . !/��c d- � `V- r ��- �-- A south ugl jn-gtoi ': f-P.ICVT Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested Lpersons to the appellant in five workinggf �daays. 24 V.S.A. §§ 4J47711((c). HEARING DATE:^! PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST AVe C 0 P P/Av�l lk z7o W�in IOLL leg 0�N9 �D A>n--;elA 'J*�c-vm Lin - V,,,..1. r 2, v%-vr.,Lt c� � N �13 K(LZ uI�t pox k q 10-�g1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 12, 2010 \drb\sit\NFIVT_AIIenRd_sp10-77_cu10-10.doc Plans received: October 27, 2010 100 ALLEN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-10-10 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-10-77 Agenda #4 and #5 Meeting date: November 16, 2010 Owner/Applicant NFI Vermont Inc 30 Airport Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Propertv Information Tax Parcel 0040-00100 Allen Road Zoning District Location Ma ' r Subject Property f; •A 1! r' e iT JJ .i NFI Vermont, Inc, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval to amend a previously approved group home use. The amendment consists of expanding the length of the handicapped ramp, 100 Allen Road. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a group home. The amendment consists of expanding the length of the handicapped ramp, 100 Allen Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 27, 2010 and have the following comments. Pursuant to Section 13.12 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, "any group home proposed to be located within 1,000 linear feet in any direction of another existing or permitted group home shall be reviewed by the DRB as a conditional use." The standards are as follows: CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The Allen Road Zoning District encourages residential land uses which exist compatibly with light commercial, light industrial, and other non-residential uses. Residential uses are encouraged at high densities, up to 12 units per acre. Staff finds that the proposed changes are in keeping with this planned character of the area. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The existing use and proposed changes is for a group home. Proposals for new or expansions to existing group homes within 1000 sf other group homes require conditional use review. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. 2 { (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with the character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. Staff notes that the use is already in existence without any complaints or problems, and the single family look and feel of the property is below allowable densities and creates less impact than the allowed commercial uses in the zoning district. Therefore, the proposed site modification, lengthening the handicap access ramp, will not have a significant or adverse impact on the planned character of the area. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. Again, this use must be regulated as a conditional use as it falls within 1000 sf of another group home. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. Staff does not believe that the proposal will have an adverse affect on general public welfare or the health of the surrounding public. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the proposed project will not have an impact on the transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The proposed site modification will be compatible with the existing structures. Adequate walkways will be provided from parking areas to the buildings. The SBLDR's require one space per bedroom plus two spaces. Even if each occupant were to have their own bedroom, the parking requirement is being met with the 18 spaces provided on site. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is located entirely to the side and rear of the building. 3 (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The existing building is below the height limitations for the district. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not submitted changes to the elevations of the building. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. The Board may request more information if they find it necessary. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not submitted changes to the elevations of the building. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. The Board may request more information if they find it necessary. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. 51 I Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no needs to revise the site plan with respect to this criterion. The existing dumpster is screened. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Because the subject use is treated as a single family residence, there are no requirements for additional landscaping. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. There is a separate ingress and egress, each unidirectional. There is sufficient access around the building. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-10-10 and Site Plan application #SP-10-77. Respectfully submitted, I -I *�,P. A �. VAthy t n LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Kathy Pettengill, Contact N1 elak southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit #a- /0 - to CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ,Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): 1 T 2 rWti�tit 11�1�G � Al r tl r� F . �� 1/��1 "_e �1� \I / 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) Y�y (PSG'—tw(V 4) CONTACT PERSON (person w1io will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address phone & fax #, differe t from above): r © a lk /O/Y 14, a. Contact e-mail address: �t�.., ��1f�. q �� C� '�ar Ca'''� 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1 ,5'V �f� � � . S �, VT d J / o '� 000 — 0 0 / 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: d @ fQ — d 0 0 0�10,{a -- oa�tiZ 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe hat you are proposing): iE x f� c1l, b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): (a"U /f Ile,., , s',, I ro r vC — 6x v— -p (t bywL t-fl r %VA S 71 �errv�w A C'en S . a.'C-� c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Nv _r e-5 tp 11Aws-t LLse—s a.cr"Pr'c'ya d. Total buildin square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): /�0 e_ , *19 _ // 81 .S-P -_:P 1 QO t7SD s ';L /oz -ZM ��rK = Z?�� 5.�. �4�G.F.�4 r1 �D��• eC /�,,d;c.,rPe.Q ,row. p 4-re,.-_ "f*rV" e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): f�3U 3 I r s 65 �, /U 'Z %Y� f �sw+ Z (o �r lrr h - 1�{►— t h , 9 C4n.411i cs ; h 6� f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain); j o � d4� I .Y. ram. (� l f . Ia2 g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): / ivy' k', vcwl -0-x LC --. 1--q & W � &-,, Z ti �J k. , j2 SA" A aw 4--. � n . q k h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: b. Buildings: Sq. Ft. ( r, I S & Ve_ S) Existing % l I7Z- Sq. Ft Proposed t- f % / —TSq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % l Zc7 Sq. Ft. Proposed 11 • I % l l --Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 7 , 1 % / /& ee-o ±- Sq. Ft. Proposed 7 , 1 % / 1 � oof + Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: 1 2-R--) Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ e b b. Landscaping c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: IV, a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 5, W '-?, 3v / 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION - 3y '8•'3y 7 :— ` � f°�-d = % 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION a 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE_ t)1 - 14) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 3 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 15) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF AOLICANT ?4 . Q , c lip-L d le s R , 1 �� SIGNATURE OF PR(WERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I U/Jj ffd I have reviewed this application and find it to be: 07-OMPLETE ❑ Incomplete I)--- I f--) I trative Officer Date NAME 4 Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT o south PLANNING & ZONING October 29, 2010 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a notice for an upcoming public hearing of the South Burlington Development Review Board. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Z�ynbdJ. ly, Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com s©uthburlin ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- I/O - �7 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 6a �O 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #):.- 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will rece'v all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): V vs-y ot S-f -o 1i 6 a. Contact e-mail address: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: I D a AA, ow�f(j _-00(�Cr 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): bn4-0'-604-5 L Gogp •-paldr—C 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): )'v �9 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com I I b. Existing Uses on Propert (includin description and size of each / PO �� .r, N-s-�-...� 4, ate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use uses to remai): e-o Qd f IL2 Lx d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 4�- / " ' 17S-I) Sw- • 4- a � �Q ��i �. �-;g Gs 4 s-P * C/ r 1 )02 & -A-KK,� ll�� Z-0a6 S!-� t e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): - 3 / V b 571,+ Z _ ; v'o ek,- & d� �azn v►� -,�. lie, I't d Z4f�. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): `�q& % �' '� Ott ► my ro f Q J .� 1 a Z - C� ; /",4 1 �"Y- , g. Number of employees (existing and plr/oYjNlosed, note office versus non,�- /ogjffice em ployees) S X., W l I '/`c"!`j h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size. % Sq. k S-' a. Building: Existing '3 • % / 0 7 Z sq. ft. Proposed _% / �'f �-Y sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / Zo sq. ft. Proposed I/ . ( % / � ,yam(= sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 t c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed 7 , I d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) A ' sq. ft. —'— sq. ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 3. ,`&v - 3 ,' 3D % t^ � Z6 IV 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7 : 3 J _ rr % 3 o 7 cA TO- -44 ` `j 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 77 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). ;-,,. 14 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. I ) Z P4- p SIGNATURE OF KPPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: lot � 7 Ild REVIEW AUTHORITY: F I Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: LS Complete ❑ c m e I (), A d v71,, A mmistrative OtYicer ate (� , t - AME 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 9-2010 f 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT NFI Allen Road - Planting Cost Estimate Prepared by T.J. Boyle Associates, LLC PLANTING SCHEDULE Trees October 27, 2010 Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes wholesale installed 4 AxF ACER x freeman 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2' cal B&B $ 107.00 $ 1,070.00 1 AGAB AMELANCHIER x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Bnlliance Serviceberry 7- Ht. B&B multi -stem, 3-4 stems $ 110.00 $ 275.00 5 CCR CRATAEGUS crusgalli i.'Crusader Crusader Hawthorn 2" cal B&B tree form, single stem $ 13300 $ 1,662.50 2 GTI GLEDITSIA U. 'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2" cal. B&B $ 175.00 $ 875.00 6 TON THUJA ocadentalis 'Nigra' Dark American Arborvitae 5' Ht. B&B $ 4500 $ 675.00 3 TC I TSUGA canadensis Icanadian Hemlock 5' Ht. B&B I $ 90.00 $ 675.00 sub -total $ 5,232.50 Shrubs Qty, I Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec wholesale installed 2 AM ARONIA melanocarpa Black Chokeber 36' #5 Cont. $ 23.50 $ 117.50 1 HV HAMAMELIS vir iniana Common Witchhazel 4' Ht B&B $ 3900 $ 97.50 23 JCS JUNIPERUS chinensis var. sar entn 'Vindis' Green Sarclent Juniper 18-24' #3 Cont. $ 2500 $ 1,437.50 5 RB RHODODENDRON'Bousault' Boursault Rhododendron 24' B&B $ 30.00 $ 375.00 3 RR ROSA rugosa Rugosa Rose 24' #3 Cont. $ 13.25 $ 99.38 4 SBAW SPIRAEA x bumalda'Anthony Waterer' jArythony Waterer Spirea 18-24" 1 #3 Cont. $ 20.00 1 $ 200.00 1 SP SYRINGA patula 'Miss Kim' Little Miss Kim 4' Ht. B&B $ 40.00 $ 100.00 1 THE TAXUS x media'Evedow' Everlow Yew 24' Ht. B&B $ 34.00 $ 85.00 sub -total $ 2,511.88 Groundcovers & Perrenials Qty. I Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec wholesale installed 38 1 HHR I HEM EROCALLIS'Happy Returns' IHappy Returns Daylillies #5 #5 Cont. $ 4.00 $ 380.00 2 1 PO IPARTHENOCISSUSquinquefolia IHappy Returns Daylillies #5 #5 Cont. $ 4.00 $ 20.00 20 1 WT IWALDSTEINIAtemata I Barren Strawberry #1 #1 Cont. Clump Is 4.50 $ 225.00 sub -total $ 625.00 Existing Vegetation Removal and Pruning 1. Removal of Buckthorn stems and roots as shown on plan and in photo A & B Is 700.00 1 $ 700.00 2. Limb up 2 maple trees to 10-12' above the ground Photo C Is 300.00 1 $ 300.00 3 Prune 2 Lilacs Is 100.00 1 $ 100.00 sub -total Total: $ 9,469.38 ~\ Page 1 of 1 ( CV—icy—c r 0 �i southhur i too. PLANNING & ZONING August 24, 2010 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the September 7, 2010 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting and public hearing. It includes an application for development on or that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802 A"` " - Permit # cu - to - C) 0 APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPM All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. 1 agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation (Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) OWNER OF RECORD as shown on deed, mailing address, — 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) & fax #): �: 'S-eo 2-1(.0 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 3, 2010 \drb\sit\NFIVT AIIenRd sp10-60 cu10-08.doc Plans received: August 11, 2010 100 ALLEN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-10-08 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-10-60 Agenda #7 and #8 Meeting date: Se tember 7 2010 Owner/Applicant NFI Vermont Inc 30 Airport Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0040-00100 Allen Road Zoning District Location Ma ?�.ehi 'itCi�'t3{e •,vl•••Jt'"'• ie� E. i I, nor' r. Subject Property 4. t •Y NFI Vermont, Inc, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval to amend a previously approved group home use. The amendment consists of: 1) adding five (5) parking spaces, 2) extending sidewalks, and 3) altering traffic flow, 100 Allen Road. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a group home. The amendment consists of: 1) adding five (5) parking spaces, 2) extending sidewalks, 3) altering traffic flow, and 4) other minor site modifications, 100 Allen Road., 100 Allen Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on August 11, 2010 and have the following comments. Pursuant to Section 13.12 of the South Burlington group home proposed to be located within 1,000 existing or permitted group home shall be reviewed standards are as follows: CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Land Development Regulations, "any linear feet in any direction of another by the DRB as a conditional use." The Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: I. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The Allen Road Zoning District encourages residential land uses which exist compatibly with light commercial, light industrial, and other non-residential uses. Residential uses are encouraged at high densities, up to 12 units per acre. Staff finds that the proposed changes are in keeping with this planned character of the area. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The existing use and proposed changes is for a group home. Proposals for new or expansions to existing group homes within 1000 sf other group homes require conditional use review. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. 2 (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with the character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. Staff notes that the use is already in existence without any complaints or problems, and the single family look and feel of the property is below allowable densities and creates less impact than the allowed commercial uses in the zoning district. Therefore, the proposed site modifications will not have a significant or adverse impact on the planned character of the area. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. Again, this use must be regulated as a conditional use as it falls within 1000 sf of another group home. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. Staff does not believe that the proposal will have an adverse affect on general public welfare or the health of the surrounding public. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the proposed project will not have an impact on the transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The proposed site modifications will be compatible with the existing structures. Adequate walkways will be provided from parking areas to the buildings. The SBLDR's require one space per bedroom plus two spaces. Even if each occupant were to have their own bedroom, the parking requirement is being met with the 18 spaces provided on site. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is located entirely to the side and rear of the building. 3 l (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The existing building is below the height limitations for the district. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has not submitted changes to the elevations of the building. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. The Board may request more information if they find it necessary. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has not submitted changes to the elevations of the building. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. The Board may request more information if they find it necessary. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. 4 { Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no needs to revise the site plan with respect to this criterion. The existing dumpster is screened. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Because the subject use is treated as a single family residence, there are no requirements for additional landscaping. Still, the applicant has submitted an adequate landscaping plan. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. There is a separate ingress and egress, each unidirectional. There is sufficient access around the building. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-10-08 and Site Plan application #SP-10-60. Res ectfully submitted, Cathyan La Rose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: Kathy Pettengill, Contact 5 PHOTO A PHOTO R EXISTING 1 SPRUCE uolBuiung •OS 7o /94!0 EXISTING -� SCOTCH PINES � 11 / C13AI303U AxF 4 PROPOSED PARALLEL ! PARKING SPACES I RELOCATE HORSESHOE PITS ' REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLAN \. (RED CLOUDED AREA) I i N, i LANDSCAPELEGEND EXISTING TREES i PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE 0 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE y PROPOSED CONIFEROUS SHRUB OPROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB PROPOSED GROUNDCOVER/ PERENNIAL MASSING SEE BLOW UP OF WEST ENTRY IN UPPER RIGHT CORNER PHOTO C i / LAWN/ / 0/ ar3 DUMPSTE 1(8) TZ/__PROPOS ASPHALT 1 � EXI NO ASPHALT r�oa appaodaa D ^ 10 220 40 / EXISTING BASKETBALL HOOP 0 LIGHT b —REMOVE BUCKTHORN BRUSH AND REPLACE WITH HEMLOCKS (REFER TO PHOTOS A 8 B) f r� 1 10PROPOSED rt 't'IZ I t'i I � PARKING SPACES II>�o I� POOL r I I I I .' l it $ p 1 I. ROPOSED PROTECT TREE R TS , ; ..;-?^', I SBA a) I:..'.... PICNIC TABLE ' \•.:.:,,, I I �BIK RAGK I C� I( ..... ::, I RELOCATE - EXISTING S IRS4•;; •• I j LIGHT t I I EXISTING LIGHT AXF (TO BE RELOCATED) I �• TMD • o e. —HHR(5) \I Z z o I EXISTING PARKING e+ I � G i m / I LIMB UP 2 TREES (REFER TO PHOTO C) t R� G� i0 PLANTING AND SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 20' "J PROPOSED WALK EXTENDING 4 RISERS @ -1- 7 TO SIDE DOOR BLOW UP SCALE 1" = 10 PLANTING SCHEDULE Trees Oty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 4 AE ACER xfreemani'Autumn Bl—' Autumn Blam Maple 2-cal. B&B 1 AGAB AAELANCHIERxgrandi8ora'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance SerAmberry 7-Ht. B&B multi -Stem, 3-45tems 5 CCR CRATAEGUS crosgalli i.'Cmsader Crusader Hawthorn 2"cal. B&B tree form, s ingle stem 2 GTI GLEDITSIAt.i.'Halks' Halka Honeyfocust 2"cal. B&B 6 TON THUJAoccidentalis'Nigm' Dark American AboMtae 5'Hl. B&B 3 TC TSUGAcanadensis Canadian Hemlock FHL B&B Chnrhe Oty. Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec 2 AM ARONIAmelanocarpa Black Chokeberry 36" #5Conl. 1 HV HAMN"ELISHrginiana Common Witchhaml 4'Ht. B&B 16 JCS JUNIPERUS chinensis gar. sargenai Vridis' Green SargenlJuniper 18-24" #3 Cont. 5 IRS RHODODENDRON'Bousaulf Baursault Rhododendron 24' B&B 5 RR ROSArugosa Rugosa Rose 24" #3 Cont. 4 SBAW SPIRAEAxbumalda'Anthany Waterer' Arthony Waterer Spirea 18-24" #3 Cont. 1 Sp SYRINGApatula'Mss Kim' Little Miss Kim 4'Ht 88... 3 THE TAXUSxmedia'Eerlow' Eledow Yew B&B 1 TMD TAXES x media'Densitormis' Dense Yew 24"Ht. BBB sabmaon - ammo - landscape architects . planning consultants 41 a. NFI Allen Road T - l oo Submsson: rlamP n,miam —010 --- -- -- - - - - L - 301 college Street • budingtott • VBrrrt0ld • 05401 802 e858 e3555 htglJhMw.gDoyle.com — aueydtn �A$ SHOWN planting and Site Plan Show and tell. �+� '.. Open 24/7/365. Extra! EXtrE SEVEN DAYSVT.COM/CLASSIFIEDS » ' view and post up to {} Post &browse ads �11` There'sno limit 6 photos per ad online. �►" at your convenience.' ad length online use the library feed' tte5 The ce d'reetvfsBr low enforcernent Officers seettan [ll Firstoffense. Any violation of any provi- sion of subsection (al above shall be deemed a civil offense and shall be punishable by a penalty of a minimum fine of fifty dollars (S50.001 to a maximum fine of five hundred dollars (S500.001. The waiver penalty for purposes of the municipal complaint fovil ticket) shall be fifty dollars f550 OO)The co - directors of the Fletcher Library, supervisory staff and all law enforcement officers are authorized to issue a municipal complaint for a violation of this section and the recipient shall not be permitted within the library for the balance of the day on which the alleged offense occurred f21 Second offense. The co -directors of the Fletcher Libra supervisory staff and all law enforcement officers are authorized to issue a municipal complaint for a violation of this sec- tion In addition the co - directors of the Fletcher Librarysupervisory staff and all law enforcement are authorized to issue an order of no trespass prohibiting the recipient from entering the library for a period of up to 90 days commencing immediately upon said Issuance Any violation of any provision of subsection (a) above by an individual who has within the preceding six �15) months violated any provision of subsec- tion (a) above shall be deemed a civil offense and shall be ounlshable by a penalty of a mini- Pursuant to 24 V.S.A. mum fine of one hun- dred dollars ( 100.001 to a maximum fine of five hundred dollars ($500 00) The waiver penalty for purposes of the municipal complaint (civil ticked second of- fense shall be one hun- dred dollars (�00 001• payment of which shall also be deemed accep- tance of the no trespass order. Both the fine and the no trespass order may, at the discretion of the prosecuting official be waived in whole or in part upon the'suc- cessful completion of a restorative or reparative iustice program through the Community Justice Program. (3) Third and subsequent offense. Theco-directors ofthe Fletcher Library. supervisory staff and all law enforcement officers are authorized to issue a municipal complaint for a violation of this section. In addition to the mu- nicipal complaint. the co - directors of the Fletcher Library, supervisory staff and all law enforcement are also authorized to issue an order of no trespass prohibiting the recipient from entering the library a period of up to one (11 year com- mencing immediately upon said issuance. Any violation of any provi- sion of subsection (a) ivi above by an inddual who has on two or more occasions within the precedingswelve (121 months violated any pro- vision of subsection (al above shall be deemed a civil offense and shall be punishable by a penalty of a minimum fine of one hundred fifty dollars ($150 001 to a maximum fine of five hundred dollars (S500 00). The Waiver penalty for purposes of the municipal complaint (civil ticket) third or subsequent offense fifty dollars (S150.00): payment of which shallp also be deemed acce- tance of the no trespass order Both the fine and the no trespass order at the discretion of the prosecuting official, be waived in whole or in art upon the suc- cessful completion of a restorative or reparative lustice rogram through the Communitv Justice Program (c) Protection of library property; penal- ties: As written. ' Material stricken out deleted "` Material underlined added. OPENINGS BURLINGTON CITY COM- MISSIONS/BOARDS On Monday, September 13, 2010, the Burlington City Council will fill vacancies on the follow- ing City Commissions/ Boards: Cemetery Commission Term Expires 6/30/11 One Opening Design Advisory Board Term Expires 6/30/11 One Opening Fence Viewer Term Expires 6/30/11 One Opening Planning Commission Term Expires 6/30/11 One Opening Board of Tax Appeals Term Expires 6/30/12 One Opening Applications are avail- able at the Clerk/Trea- surer's Office, Second Floor, City Hall, and must be received In the Clerk/ Treasurer's Office by 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, September 8, 2010. Applicants must be nominated by a member of the City a position; a list of Council members is also available at the Clerk/ Treasurer's Office Please call the Clerk/Treasurer's Office at 865-7136 for further information. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on September 7, 2010 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-10-26 of Pizza- galli Properties, LLC for a planned unit develop- ment to construct a 50,000 square foot general office building, 119 Tilley Drive. 2. Conditional use ap- plication #CU-10-08 of NFI Vermont, Inc. seek- ing approval to amend a previously approved group home use. The amendment consists of: 1) adding five (5) parking spaces, 2) extending sidewalks, and 3) alter- ing traffic Flow, 100 Allen Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Devel- opment Review Board Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. August 18, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Burlington Compre- hensive Development Ordinance PROPOSED ZA-11-03 Wetland Conservation Zone §4441 and §4444, notice is hereby given of a public hearing by the Burlington Planning Commission to hear comments on the follow- ing proposed amend- ments to the City of Bur- lington's Comprehensive Development Ordinance. The public hearing will take place on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 be- ginning at7:00pm in the Conference Room #12, City Hall Ground Floor, Burlington VT. Pursuant to the require- ments of 24 V.S A. § 4444(b): (1) The purpose of the proposed amendments is to revise the City's zoning regulations to: a) Remove reference to class 1 and 2 wetlands and refer to the up- dated/proposed Natural Resource Protection Overlay District map. (Modify Section 4.5.4 (b)2A); (2) The proposed amend- ments in their entirety affect the City of Burling- ton as a whole (3)The proposed amendments affect the following sections of the Comprehensive Develop- ment Ordinance: See references in #1 above. The ful I text of the Bur- lington Comprehensive Development Ordinance and the proposed amendments are avail- able for review at the Department of Planning and Zoning, City Hall, 149 Church Street, Burlington Monday through Friday 8:00 a m to 4:30 p.m. or on the department's webslte at www.cl.burlington.vt us/ planning. mental Conservation APPLICATION FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY DRAFT CERTIFICATION Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) Compost Facility 1022 Redmond Road, Williston, Vermont The public is hereby noti- fied that the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources has issued a Draft Certification and Fact Sheet for the Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) Compost Facility located on Redmond Road in Williston, Vermont. This draft is in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Section 6601 et. Seq and the Vermont Solid Waste Management Rules. The Drafl,Ceffification is for the purpose of construc- tion and operation of a compost facility. Copies of the application, the draft certification and fact sheet are avail- able for public inspection during normal working hours at the Solid Waste Manage- ment Program office, located at 103 South Main St., Waterbury, Vermont, CSWD Offices in Williston, and the Wil- liston Town Office. The Agency has sched- uled a public meeting for 5:00 pm on Thursday, September 2, 2010 at Chittenden Solid Waste District Offices,1021 Red- mond Road, Williston, Vermont. The Agency will accept written comments on the draft certification and fact sheet until 4:00 PM on Septemberl6, 2010. sued. Ifthe application AGE/SEX/FIXED: 8-year-old neutered male REASON HERE: He became stressed in his active home BREED: Domestic shorthalr :SPECIAL CONSIDEI( ONS: Special diet SUMMARY:•Tizzy is a sensitive guy With a very big heart. He can get ,.,�el'i ied;yyiierl"th"T ice+'^^'^^..^t•+.'ir't �.,�+„ -+rr,A him 4 thntc inch\i it is rPr'rlrYlrr'1Pnr1Pr1 i-1P. .SEeir. OlSt' am emeilClVs+'; does not conform to Rules, a denial shall sent to the applican along with the reasc for the denial. Comments regardin application, draft int certification, and fac sheet should be directed to: Carey Hengstenber€ Vermont Solid Wast Management Progr, 103 South Main StfE Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0404 (802) 241-2653 Carey. hen gstenberg state.vt.us STATE OF VERMOI, SUPERIOR COURT Chittenden Unit CIVIL DIVISION Docket No. S0318-( Cnc PHH Mortgage Corl tion, Plaintiff V. Zlatan Vallevac, Ajl Vallevac and Occup residing at 67 Kim Lane, Miltor Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in ex tion of the Power a contained in a cert mortgage given by Mortgage Corporal to Zlatan Vallevac December 7, 2006 recorded in Voium, Page 444 of the La Records of the Tov Milton, of which m gage the undersig the present holder breach of the cone of said mortgage the purposes of fo ing the same will t at Public Auction, P.M. on Septembe 2010, at 67 Kim La Milton, Vermont a singular the prem described In said r gage: { Permit # cu - 10 - a 0 APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation (V✓ Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): 14 t-Z V Pir M n v-v4- . r . . Q .-r-o,i ,-- O J -i,�-a-00-LtQ —C-0-?- &-Sir-0-1 (o 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5 -U s�- 0 2-1 Le r 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing aldress, phope &,fax # if different from above): 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: !(3O C, I `..e , K 4 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: U24-2 -- 001 0 Q 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): a v V to .r (b , --X B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and / existing uses to remain):. , - i v *-t&'A S ', 2 C C. Total building square building to remain):Xis--i D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): 1/0 C,(--e,—,�-� .� -+r/UZ = 2PrS 1, ✓"�'+-a10111i4k , -e (vu ��idVS �.fSS. ^ E. Number of residential Units (if applicable new units & existing units to r---L ng 5 3i& 4'%00 -/7S-0 S. {' . Ct G5b5•f A,)o i� C - remain): Uri 1Cw-.-H-- 2 cl'� I a *IoZ. - ( ac,'c-� .-A r0 u to 0� ock:— i- 1 a c , F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing .& proposed note office vs. non-offic employeAes): I YVI c,k Oa-44 rl GCa� S ' -- aV, �2 ;-1 �f G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overla districts are applicable): /A w # YJ� 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: -Qag33of Sq. Ft. C$ /S 4 (W) B. Buildings: Existing 3 . to % / q � Sq. Ft Proposed A Sq. Ft. f f C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing �. y % l ,�0, �115 T Sq. Ft. Proposed_% L/ 95- Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Sq. Ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ '300 C CCU r B. Landscaping $ qi / (a 2- C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 2 -30 - C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): J 0J-3 30 / ,-v\ f 3 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 4 4-M - 9P M 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION mah d4 - F 164 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE /Ziol 0 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): axe 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT I I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OP APPLICANT 9 . !'4',0 SIGNATURE OPfPROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have review d this application and find it to be: COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete Page 1 of 2 ray From: Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT) [KathyPettengill @nafi.com] Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:04 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Placard --100 Allen Road The changes to the site are: 1. Reverse the traffic flow pattern due safety concerns (blind spot when pulling out on the upper driveway). This also changes the placement of the dumpster area. Shifted the layout of the parking behind the house. 2. continue the existing walkway (asphault) from the front steps to the new handicap accessible walkway and add stairs to the handicap entrance off the walkway. (people are going to go to the front door to access the building but that is only going to be an emergency exit and they will be directed to the handicap entrance - this saves them needing to walk around the property to access the door) 3. Add additional parking spaces on the west side of the driveway (4 spaces) and at the end of the handicap ramp (1 space). (Since the handicap entrance is the main entrance we need more spaces for visitors to park closer to that entrance) 4. Change the handicap ramp from a graduated two level ramp to one continuous ramp. (not sure the terms to describe this). (With the excavating that was completed we can eliminate the need for such a Ion ramp with fill). 5. Modify the landscaping plan to accomodate the changes above. From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Fri 8/13/2010 8:48 AM To: Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT) Subject: RE: Placard --100 Allen Road Hi Kathy, I have just read your 2 applications forms and can not find where you describe the reason for your application. In other words, I find no description of the site changes you want to make to the property. Please send me a detailed description of the changes so I can attach them to your application forms. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 802-846-4106 From: Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT)[mailto:KathyPettengill@nafi.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 1:34 PM To: ray Subject: RE: Placard --100 Allen Road I will have someone pick up and hang at Allen road From: ray [mailto:rbelair@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:27 AM To: Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT) Subject: Placard --100 Allen Road Hi Kathy, Please have someone stop by our offices to pick up the placard to be displayed on the property. This is to let the 8/13/2010 southburlinoon PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- /D - 66 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): r I 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Dame, mailinq address, phone and fax #): 4. CONTACT PERSON (pers address, phone & fax #):_ ude name, a. Contact e-mail address: 14-a2'i Vet V4,W oA ; l / (oi V „A--r—,T-- r() ►,-1 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1av �II�r�. Q 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): b 0 90 O 0) 00 � 00LID-0009e 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0 0 L40 _ 00 I �Z a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): 1 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Site Plan io b. Existing Uses on P operty (including description and size of each separate use): jva ' t viM - r-Or" 8 f�pn ]ALA ;n n a I LP ,n r A Fn.- v_ Harr,-, A4 A M P U // ,i n .✓► 4- c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and uses to remain): v1 S (. a k e 6► i C. .-,14-- 0 0 ip ILZ tiA, Y'tILAe 400 6 .i z �- lat. ti• G1.! 2� cP _ d. Total building square footaVoevrr pro hrty (proposed remain): i-,. 1 � ! �« ragkk Sa 1� �a -r, ") 6 Ida s� of each new use and existing /o2- -k) r Q ur 4h C/11 A U I J Adu („, to US / s buildings and existing bui dings to n 00 Hr- _!'� CPU " e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildirips o remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): �2-0(-S F f. Number of res JiGt) ICI -Av I A1,1 k ential, units (if applicable, new units and c g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and oSice employees): —I - rni l4Q g�ti!rf �/ Fx,s sting units to -remain): nosed, note office versus non- h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: �22y,3,W ± Sq. Ft. ci- / S a. Building: Existing uf % / �/ 7 � sq. ft. Proposed % 2-k' sq. ft. b. Overall impervious"` coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing% / a IIJKI sq. ft. Proposed 1 1. I % l a y� sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing '7• J % / sq. ft. Proposed -7_ 1 % I Uo�'�' sq. ft. 2 d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 300 Q b b. Landscaping: $ I 22 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): o Lr � + Ik 13r b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): T- 30 - d'3 0 c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 3 ' 00 p 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: i A/v, — �Ira✓� 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Ov, f ,-" 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: IdQ/Q 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. P SIGNATURE OF PR SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ;,2), TY OWNER Do not write below this line zg-�,11, p PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete r of VIVning & Zoning or Designee 4 I Page 1 of 2 Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT) From: Jeffrey D. Szatkowski [Jeff@tjboyle.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:43 PM To: msg@together. net Cc: Terrence J. Boyle; msg@together.net; Goldfield Management; Kathy Pettengill (NFI VT) Subject: NFI Allen Road: Site and Planting Plan (Final for Submission) Attachments: 2010-08-02 L-100.pdf; 2010-08-02 Allen Road School Planting List.pdf Mike, Please find the attached final plan and cost estimate for submission to Ray Belair. Below is the revised description explaining the changes for Ray. Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey Szatkowski Landscape Architect T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 802.658, 3555 www.tjboyle.com From: Jeffrey D. Szatkowski Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:38 AM To: 'kathypettengill@nafi.com' Cc: Terrence J. Boyle; 'goldfieldmanagment@yahoo.com'; 'msg@together. net'; 'fguillot@sover.net'; I 'Doug Viehmann' Subject: NFI Allen Road: Site and Planting Plan Changes Kathy, We have altered the planting and site plan based on our conversation last week. We met with Mike from Goldfield Construction yesterday regarding these changes and used 100' as the assumed FFE to derive the spots shown on plan. The vehicular circulation has been reversed and the parking has been modified at a 60 degree angle. We adjusted the handicap parking to allow for auto accessibility directly to the ramp. We added 5 parking spaces to the west of the proposed addition (4 parallel spaces and 1 additional space by the ramp). The horse shoe pits will have to be re -located. We have modified the ramp connection to the parking lot and extended the length of the ramp 29' away from the landing. We increased the width of the north -south portion of the ramp from 4' to 5' to allow for handrails in concrete. We removed the retaining wall by locating the ramp 2' to the east towards the building. This increased distance allows for a max. slope of 1:2.5 at the landing and then tapers down north to a 1:4 north towards the parking. The slope on the ramp away from the door is 1.6% and then 2%. From the landing the slope down to the parking lot is a 1:12. The parking lot slope would be 2%. 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 2 We have extended the walk way in front of the building to the side door of the proposed building. The proposed asphalt sidewalk is 4' wide. There will be 4 risers at +/-7" to the side door porch. We removed some of the proposed dogwoods, russian cypress, hostas, and summer sweet plants on the previous submitted plan and added spiraea shrubs, daylilies and green sergeant juniper around the new ramp design. We have also adjusted the plantings for the proposed extension of the 4' front walkway. The proposed planting cost is approximately $9,100, which is similar to the previous planting. We also propose a small picnic table in the shade behind the building and reoriented the dumpster for the new one way drive loop. We re- located the hawthorns along the road on to the property to avoid conflicts with the possible extension of the sidewalk in the city R.O.W. Please give me a call if you need anything else. Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey Szatkowski Landscape Architect T. J Boyle Associates, LLC 301 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 802.658.3555 www.toboyle.com 8/3/2010 NFI Allen Road - Planting Cost Estimate Prepared by T.J Boyle Associates, LLC PLANTING SCHEDULE Trees August 2, 2010 Qty. I Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes wholesale Installed 4 AxF ACER x freemani 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2" cal B&B $ 10700 $ 1,07000 1 AGAB AMELANCHIER x grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7- Ht B&B multi -stem, 3-4 stems $ 11000 $ 27500 5 CCR CRATAEGUS crusgalli i 'Crusader Crusader Hawthorn 2" cal B&B tree form, single stem $ 13300 $ 1,66250 2 GTI GLEDITSIA t i 'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2" cal B&B $ 175.00 $ 87500 6 TON THUJA occidentalis'Nigra' Dark American Arborvitae 5' Ht B&B $ 4500 $ 67500 3 TC TSUGA canadensis ICanadian Hemlock 5' Ht B&B $ 9000 1 $ 675001 sub -total $ 5,232.50 Shrubs Qty Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec wholesale installed 2 AM ARONIA melanocarpa Black Chokeberry 36" #5 Cont. $ 2350 $ 11750 1 HV HAMAMELIS vir iniana Common Witchhazel 4' Ht B&B $ 39.00 $ 97.50 16 JCS JUNIPERUS chmensis var sargentii'Vindis' Green Sargent Juniper 18-24" #3 Cont $ 2500 $ 1,00000 5 RB RHODODENDRON 'Bousault' Boursault Rhododendron 24" B&B $ 3000 $ 37500 5 RR ROSA rugosa Rugosa Rose 24" #3 Cont $ 1325 $ 16563 4 SBAW SPIRAEA x bumalda'Anthony Waterer Anthony Waterer Spirea 18-24" #3 Cont $ 2000 $ 20000 1 Sp SYRINGA patula'Miss Kim' Little Miss Kim 4' Ht B&B $ 40.00 $ 10000 3 F1 THE ITAX US x media'Everlow' Everlow Yew 24" Ht B&B $ 3400 $ 25500 TMD JTAXIJS x media'Densiformis' Dense Yew 24" Ht B&B $ 2700 $ 6750 sub -total $ 2,37813 Groundcnvers P Perrenials Qty. Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec wholesale I installed 28 HHR I HEM EROCALLIS 'Happy Returns' Happy Returns Daylillies #5 #5 Cont $ 400 $ 28000 15 1 WT WALDSTEINIA ternata 113arren Strawberry #1 #1 Cont Clump $ 450 $ 16875 sub -total $ 446 /S Existinn Venetation Removal and Pruning 1. Removal of Buckthorn stems and roots as shown on plan and in photo A & B $ 70000 $ 70000 2. Limb up 2 maple trees to 10-12' above the ground Photo C $ 30000 $ 30000 3. Prune 2 Lilacs $ 10000 $ 10000 sub -total Total: $ 9,159.38 Page 1 of 1 how and tell. SEVENDAYSVT.COM/CLASSIFIEDS»0,!,ewandpostupto Open 24/7/365. Post &browse ads Extra! Extra! There's no limit to 6 photos per ad online at your convenience ad length online troleum contamination Li burl,ngton vt us NOTICE OF SALE STATE OF VERMONT or respond to commu. by HFI herein VERIFIED COMPLAINT of$1,04222, which de- Theproposed site plan CHITTENDEN COUNTY, nications from HFI The NOW COMES The He- linquent property taxes includes a man-made Date February 10, 2010 By virtue and in execu- ss. Lavees are sell listed as DATED at Burlington Ing Foundation, Inc are now a lien on the wetland that will process tion of the Power of Sale CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR the record owners ofth,s Vermont this 19th day of ("HFI"(, by and through property storm water, plant- PUBLIC HEARING contained in a certain COURT mobile home with the January, 2070 Its counsel Nadine L b The Housing Founda- Ings and re -grading to SOUTH BURLINGTON mortgage given by Docket No 560-10 CnC Town of Milton Subek, and hereby com- bon, Inc has a lien on promote soil regenera- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW American Mortgage 6 The following security Nadine Subek Est, plans as follows the mobile home under tion'and mitigation of BOARD Network Inc to Lianne IN RE ABANDONED ,oterl mortgages, Attorney For The Housing 1 HFL a Vermont non. the Purchase Subsidy brownfields issues W Burleson dated July MOBILE HOME OF FRANK liens and encumbrances Foundation, Inc profit corporation with Program in the amount -The purpose of the The South Burlington 19, 2006 and recorded &LAURA LAVEE appearof record with a principal place of of $4,OD000 proposed encroachment Development Review In Volume 693, Page respect to the mobile DATED at Montpelier, business in Montpelier, 7 Chuck Bolton Auc- intothe wetlandsand Board will hold a public 733 of the Land Records VERIFIED COMPLAINT home Vermont thisl9th dayof County of Washington, tioneer,isaperson dis- Floodplalnarea istofa- hearing in the South of the Town of Essex, NOW COMES The Hous- a Through January 79, January, 2010 State of Vermont is the interested in the mobile cdrtate public access to Burlington City Hall ofwhich mortgage the ing Foundation, Inc 2010, Owners Lavees are By Doreen Phillips, Duly record owner ofa mobile homeand the mobile and use afthe shoreline Conference Room, 575 undersigned sthe pres- ('HFI'), by and through in arrears on obligations Authorized Agent for The home park known as home park who is able to for recreation purposes Dorset Street, South ent holder, for breach of its counsel Nadine L to pay property taxes Housing Foundation, Inc Mountain View Mobile sell the mobile home at Burlington, Vermont on the conditions of said Scibek, and hereby com- to the Town of Milton, Home Park(the'Park") apublic auction There are three primary Tuesday, March 2� 2010 mortgage and for the plains as follows Vermont in the aggre- VERIFICATION located in the Town of 8 Mobile home storage purposes for this notice at 730PM [,consider purposes offoredosing 1 HFI, a Vermont non- gate amount of$46470, Hinesburg, Vermont fees continue to accrue First people who may the following the sale, ill be "I' at profit corporation with plus current tax year of STATE OF VERMONT 2 Karen Lavalette at the rate of $346 00 be affected by activities Public Auction at 9 00 a principal place of $407 58 which are not WASHINGTON COUNTY, ('Lavalette") is the per month Rent, storage in lloodplams and those 1 Final plat application AM on February 23, business in Montpelier, due until May, 2010 The SS record owner ofa certain fees and late charges who have aninterest #SO-10-03 of RobertL 2010, at 134 Main Stteet, County of Washington, delinquent property mobile home, described due HFI as of January 19, ,n the protection of the Provost for a planned unit Essex, Vermont all and State of Vermont, Is the taxes are now a lien on On this 19th day of as a 1987 Titan Cham- 2010 total $2 429 37 See natural environment development on a 057 singular the premises record owner of a mobile the property January, 2010, Doreen pion, Model FK3, bearing attached should be given an acre parcel developed described in said mort- home park known as b TO Bank, N A, PO Phillips, duly authorized Serial No C23743 (the Court costs and attor- opportunity to express with a singlefamily dwell- gage Birchwood Manor Mobile Box1377, Lewiston, ME agent ofThe Housing 'Mobile Home"), located hey5fees per the Judg- theirconcerns and pro. Ing The proposal consists Home Park (the "Park") 04243.1377 Foundation, Inc, owner on Lot$15, 29 Bear Lane mentfrom the eviction vide information about of. 1) adding an accessory TO Wit located in the Town of 7 Chuck Bolton, Auc- ofthe Birchwood Manor in Hinesburg, Vermont action total $1,630 42 these areas Second an e,dantial unit to the Being Unit 1, located on Milton, Vermont bonder, is a person dis- Mobile Home Park in ('Lot") The total amount of adequate public notice existing single family Lot C, as depicted on a 2 Frank &Laura Lavee interested in the mobile Milton, Vermont, being 3 Lavalette leased a the unpaid debt,, program can be an dwelling and 2) adding plan entitled 'Condo. (the "Lavees ) are the re- home and the mobile first duly sworn, made lot in the Park from HFI $4.059 79 important public ed uca- a second single family min,ums, Robert LemIre, cord owners of a certain home park who is able to oath that she has read pursuant to a written 9 FIRsentwrittenno- tionaltool Thed,ssem,- dwelling, 27 Birch Street 734 Main St, Essex Jct, mobile home, described sell the mobile home at the foregoing Complaint, lease On September 23, Lice by tertifed mail to nation of,nformation Vermont' dated April 13, as a 1992 Redman apublic auction and that the facts con- 2009 this Court issued the Town of Hinesburg about 8o,dplans can 2 Conditional use 2006, prepared by David Manufactured Home, B Mobile home storage tamed therein are true a Judgment for eviction and the Delinquent Tax facilitate and enhance apphcaton#CU-10-02 A Tudhope and recorded 14'x 72, bearing serial fees continue to accrue costs, and attorney Collector for the Town of Federal efforts to reduce of NFl Vermont Inc to at Map Slide#429, of number 12223466(the at the rate of$27400 Before me, niomas fees against Owner Hinesburg on December the' as soc,a[etl ns[ruc[ a1,560sq the Land Records of the 'Mobile Home 'J, located per month Rent, storage Young Lavalette in the matter 23, 2009 of HFI sntent with the occupancy and It add pion too group Town of Essex on Lot*43, Birchwood fees and late charges Notary Public The Housing Foundation, to commence this aban mod,fcation of these home located with 1,000 Manor Mobile Home due HFI as of January 15, My Commission Expires Inc v Lavalette, Docket comment action See spec ialareas Third, ass feet ofan.1h.r group Terms of Sale Park, 101 West Milton 2010 total $1,915 00 See 2/10/11 No 50213-09CnC The attached matter of fairness when hoh l00 Allen Road $10,00000 tobspaid Road in M,Iton,Vermont attached Court issued a Wntof WHEREFORE,HFI re - the Federal government in cash by purchaser at (the'Lot') 9 HFI sent written STATE OF VERMONT Possession to HFI on spectfully rtquests that determines It willpar 3 Conditional use ap- the time of sale, with the 3 The Lavee, leased the notice by Certified mail CHITTENDEN COUNTY, S eptember 23, 2009 and the Honorable Court en- uclpateinactions taking pl,cabon#CU-10-03 of balance due at dosing Lot in the Park from FIR to the Town of Milton s5 HFI completed the evic- ter an order as follows place in fioodplans, it Venzon Wireless to 1) Proof of financing for the pursuant to a written and the Del,nq uentTax CHI7TENDEN SUPERIOR t,on and took possession 1 Declare tha[the must inform those who replace six (6) of the 12 balance of the purchase lease Collector for the Town COURT ,fthe Lot on October B, mobile home as been may be put at greater or existing antennas, and to be provided at the 4 The Lavees last known ofMilton on November Docket No 56010 Cri 2009 abandoned, continued risk 21 add three (3) 700MHz time ofsale Thesale mailing address is PO 73. 2009 of HFI', intent 4 Lavalette', last known 2 Approve the sale of antennas, 850 Hines- is subject to taxes due Box 791, Milton, Vermont to commence this aban- IN RE ABANDONED mailing address,s 29 the mobile home at a Further information on burg Road and owing to the Town 05468 donment action See MOBILE HOME OF FRANK Bear Lane, Hinesburg, public auction to be m this determination is of Essex 5 The mobile home has attached & LAURA LAVEE - Vermont 0546) held within 30 days of vai1able at http//www John D,nklage, Chairman been abandoned The WHEREFORE, HFI re- S The mobile home has the date ofjudgment, cetloburlinglen org/wa- South Burlington Dever- The mortgagors last known residents spectfullyrequeststhat ORDER FOR HEARING been abandoned The pursuanttolOVSA§ terfront/moran_plant/ opment Review Board entitled to redeem the of the mobile home the Honorable Court en- last known resident of 6249(h) In moran_plant- redeveI- premises at any time were Frank Laves and ter an order as follows A hearing on HA's Veri. the mobile home was 3 Grantjudgmen[ in 3 opment him Written Copies of the applica- prior to the sale by pay- Laura Lavee The Lavees 1 Declare that the fied Complaint to declare Karen Lavalette Laval- favor of HFI and against comments must be tins are available for ing the full amount due moved out of the mobile mobile home as been as abandoned the ette was evicted from the mobile home for received by the city at public inspection at the under the mortgage, home in June, 2009 abandoned; mobile home of Frank the Park for non -pay- past due and unpaid the following address South Burlington City including the costs and They have removed all of 2 Approvethe sale of Lavee III Laura Lavee ment of rent Lavalette rent and mob, le home on or before February Hall expenses Lithe sale their personal property the mobile home at a and authorize the sale has removed all of her storage charges through m 25, 2010 Community from the mobile home, public auction to be by auction has been set personal property from the date ofjudgment, & Economic Develop- February 10, 2010 Other terms to be an- and utility services have held within 30 days of for March 4, 2010 at 830 the mobile home and togetherw,th HFI', court o ment Office, 149 Church nounced atthe sale or been terminated They the date ofjudgment, am at the Ch,ttenden utility services have costs, publication and Street, Room, Burlington, STATE OF VERMONT inquire at Lobe &Fortin, have made no effort or pursuant to lO V S A§ Superior Court, 175 been terminated Owner mailing costs, auction. VT 05401 and(802) CHITTENDEN COUNTY, 30 Kimball Ave, Ste attempt to remove the 6249(h), Main Street, Burlington Lavalette has made eers costs, winterization o 865.7173, Attention 5S. 306, South Burlington, home from the Park HFI 3 Grantjudgmentm Vermont 05401 no effort or attempt to costs, HFI', counsel fees Nick Warner, Special CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR VT 05403,802660- learned in September favor of HFI and against Jill C Mongeon, Deputy remove the home from incurred jr) enforcement Projects Manager, during COURT 9000 that he Lavees had the mobile home for Court Clerk the Park ofthe lease and, ncon- the hours of830 AM DOCKETNO 50915-08 vacated the mobile past due and unpaid Date 1/2fi/10 6 Thefollow,ng security necb,n with [his matter 4 30 PM Comments Chic DATED at South Burling- home and contacted rent and mobile home Interests, mortgages, and any other costs 2 m may also be subm,Ited ton, Vermont this 20th TO Bank the l,enholder storage charges through STATE OF VERMONT liens and encumbrances incurred by HFI herein via email at nwarner@ [,,,Mortgage, Inc, day ofJanuary,2010 On November 13, 2009, the date ofjudgment CHITTENDEN COUNTY, appear of record with Plaintiff HFI', counsel spoke togetherw,th HFI', court SS_ respect to the mobile DATED at Burlington, [,,,Mortgage, Inc with Frank Lavee and costs, publication and CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR home Vermont this 19th day of LlanneW Burleson And heconfirmed that they mailing costs, auction- COURT a Through January 19, January, 2010 Occupants residing at By Joshua Lobe, Esq had Vat Led the mobile eers costs, wntenza- Docket No 561-10 CnC 2010, Owner Lavalette is 134 Ma,n Street, Essex, Lobe & Fortin, PLC home in June, 2009 as tion costs, lot cleanup in arrears on obl,ga- Nadine L Subek, Esq, Vermont, 30 Ki m ball Ave, Ste 306 theycould no longer charges HFI's counsel IN RE ABANDONED nonsto pay property Attorney for The Housings Defendants South Burlington, VT afford the mobile home fees incurred in connec- MOBILE HOME taxes to the Town of Fountlahon, Inc 05403 TO Bank has failed to bon with this matter and OF KAREN LAVALETTE Hmesburg, Vermont in - • communicate with and/ any other costs incurred the aggregate amount �Ia , r291 southburl ngto'a PLANNING & ZONING February 12, 2010 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 Re: 100 Allen Road Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802 846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www,sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: February 26, 2010 \drb\sit\NFIVT AllenRd_siteplan_cu.doc Plans received: February 8, 2010 100 ALLEN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-10-02 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-10-14 Agenda #6 and #7 Meeting date: March 2, 2010 Owner/Applicant NFI Vermont Inc 30 Airport Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0040-00100 Allen Road Zoning District Location Ma 1, Subject Property 4 .1 NFI Vermont, Inc, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking conditional use approval to construct a 1,560 sq. ft. addition to a group home located within 1,000 feet of another group home, 100 Allen Road. The applicant is also seeking site plan approval to construct a 1,560 sq. ft. addition to a group home on a property with two (2) other group homes, 100 Allen Road. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on February 8, 2010 and have the following comments. Pursuant to Section 13.12 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, "any group home proposed to be located within 1,000 linear feet in any direction of another existing or permitted group home shall be reviewed by the DRB as a conditional use." The standards are as follows: CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The Allen Road Zoning District encourages residential land uses which exist compatibly with light commercial, light industrial, and other non-residential uses. Residential uses are encouraged at high densities, up to 12 units per acre. Staff finds that the proposed expansion is in keeping with this planned character of the area. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. The existing use and proposed expansion is for a group home. Proposals for new or expansions to existing group homes within 1000 sf other group homes require conditional use review. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff believes that the proposal will not adversely affect municipal services. li (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with the character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. Staff notes that the proposed addition is barely over 1000 SF, the use is already in existence without any complaints or problems, and the single family look and feel of the property is below allowable densities and creates less impact than the allowed commercial uses in the zoning district. Therefore, the proposed addition will not have a significant or adverse impact on the planned character of the area. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposal will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. Again, this use must be regulated as a conditional use as it falls within 1000 sf of another group home. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposal will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. Staff does not believe that the proposal will have an adverse affect on general public welfare or the health of the surrounding public. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the proposed project will not have an impact on the transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The proposed addition will be compatible with the existing structures. Adequate walkways will be provided from parking areas to the buildings. The SBLDR's require one space per bedroom plus two spaces. Even if each occupant were to have their own bedroom, the parking requirement is being met with the 18 spaces provided on site. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is located entirely to the side and rear of the building. 3 (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The existing building and expansion are both below the height limitations for the district. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant did not submit elevations of the proposed addition. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. The Board may request more information if they find it necessary. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant did not submit elevations of the proposed addition. However, staff does not have any concern that these criteria will be met, or if unmet, will cause any visual disruptions. The buildings are largely shielded from the roadway. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. 0 Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are no needs to revise the site plan with respect to this criterion. The existing dumpster is screened. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Because the subject use is treated as a single family residence, there are no requirements for additional landscaping. Still, the applicant has submitted an adequate landscaping plan. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. There is a separate ingress and egress, each unidirectional. There is sufficient access around the building. OTHER Pursuant to 13.12B, Group Homes shall also be reviewed under the supplemental review standards in Section 14.11(c)(4). This includes, in summary, providing a copy of licensing, operating certificates, correspondence between the applicants and the State of Vermont with respect tot the facility, and projected social and economic integration plans (please see attached for complete list). Staff has contacted the applicant with respect to these criteria and hopes to have the information by the time of the hearing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-1002 and Site Plan application #SP-10-14. Respectfully submitted, "'X Rose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy'%: Kathy Pettengill, Contact 11 C ARTICLE 14 SITE PLAN and CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW 14-13 (3) In addition to all other normally required items of information, the following additional documentation shall also be submitted with the conditional use or site plan application, as applicable: (a) A copy of the operating certificate issued by the appropriate state department or agency. (b) Copies of all correspondence between the applicant and the State of Vermont with respect to the proposed facility. (c) A complete statement of the proposed type, number, age and permanency of residence of the persons to be cared for, and the number and qualifications of both resident and nonresident adult supervisory personnel. (d) A complete statement of the applicant's plans for the social and economic integration of the projected residents into the community, including their educational, employment and recreational needs, transportation and service requirements and any other such information as may be relevant and determined necessary by the Development Review Board. (e) A vicinity map indicating the location of the proposed facility in ,,.,relation to other existing group care facilities or other similar types of care facilities within a radius of two (2) miles of the subject site. D. Convenience Store in Coniunction with a Gasoline Filline Station/Service Station. A service station that is a primary use on its lot may be allowed to have a convenience store as an accessory conditional use, subject to the following: (1) The proposed convenience store shall be an accessory use located on the same lot as primary use service station. (2) Such store shall have retail sales of convenience merchandise, prepared foods, and pre -packaged foods for personal or household consumption. (3) Minimum lot size. The primary use shall have a minimum lot size of thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. (4) Location of primary use. The service station shall have a minimum street frontage of one hundred (100) feet on an arterial road. (5) Maximum floor area. Such store shall have a gross floor area of no more than ten percent (io%) of the lot area. (6) Maximum height. Such store shall be no more than one (1) story high. (7) Hours of operation. The consumer convenience center shall be accessory to the primary use and as such shall be open for business during the same hours as the pumping operation of the service station. (8) Parking. Parking spaces shall be provided proximate to the store, at the rate of one (1) space per one hundred fifty (150) square feet of consumer convenience center floor area. Where parking is located near a residential district boundary, the applicant shall provide landscaping, and/or fencing or screening in the mandatory setback. (9) Lighting. The applicant shall demonstrate to the Development Review Board's satisfaction that the proposed lighting plan will adequately light the store exterior and related parking area and will not shed light onto abutting residentially zoned land. South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective January 11, 2010 PHOTO A PHOTO B PHOTO C ° I°, � �° M A! LT PROPOSE ASPHALT GT1(2) 1 Y1 10PROPOSED A' PARIONG SPACE! PLANTING PLAN SCALE 1' m 20' SCALE 1' = 10' ALLOT ROAD ECHDOL- PWITNID ECMPJ111LE CNY Cod{ ScYmWk Nr Common N{mP lli. sp.NW.. 2 NF ACE0. atraam•N'ALWm n ll.s' Av4mn&.awpl. 2'wL µB 1 A6.! ANEIMCHTNxyr.nOMon'Aubmn Br10Yrc! AUWmn RIM.nw 6sMcs Miry T-HL B{B mulWY m,ld sum• { CCR CRATAEWlcru.plA l.'Cm..M� Dm.idar H.wXom 2'w1 no M. brm, slnpY .Ym OTI IGLFDMVAU NOW N.IL. H.nsYuw.t 2'ul µB TON UJAoeWnYIY NIpn' O.m Nn.rsan NMMYs s'NL us µB TC TlUGL un.d•nsY C.n.dun HsmucL s'HL cMd N.— Common AA— Sln 2 AN MONK..umw eYcs Chol.M {{' MCom 1 CAL CLETHRAWWAs 6ummsnw.st •'Ht Y{B 1 CA CCRNUl.IYm{.IY NYNRY Lss1 Do wOoO s'XL M. 1 HV NA{IALELI! nuns Commsn VAthhsml s'HL µB s Rs flHODODEND110N'Mus.uR lOYw.YRflMd.d•nWM 2•• µS { RR ROSAmE..• RW... Ro.. 24' Cont 1 SP !Y'R NW p.bY YAPS YOm' LSM NY•pm •'HL C.M 10 TMO AINlxmsdY 9.n.Rormu' Dome Yew 2.'ML µB G...dc.ww { p.—.l.b N c l 1s GO GAUIINaanNn svA•1NYSIMmn 1wlii-cNI 3,M Cypr... ou�Yln Gn.. Ymn lk.wMrry f![Istl V• •{stl.n lMm.WI.M Prunln 1 R•mmM of Bue{tlrom /ums .1n1 mel. as 0— on .n .rul In W A { B 2 Umb u 2 m. • R.n W 70.17.bos. tM and PhoW 3) P1urm 2 LIYes RECEIVED FEB 0 8 2010 amity of So. Burlington DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 MARCH 2010 PAGE 3 piece. Mr. Provost drew a line showing what a subdivision would look like. Mr. Dinklage suggested the applicant continue this discussion with staff. Mr. Knudsen suggested a possible configuration which would solve the coverage problem. But the accessory apartment issue would still remain. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-10-03 of Robert Provost until 6 April 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Conditional Use Application #CU-10-22 of NFI Vermont, Inc., to construct a 1560 sq. ft. addition to a group home located within 1,000 feet of another group home, 100 Allen Road: and 7. Site Plan Application #SP-10-14 of NFI Vermont, Inc., to construct a 1560 sq. ft. to a group home on a property with two other group homes, 100-Allen Road: Mr. Myers said NFI is taking over the whole property. They will continue the use as a group home for teens. They need to expand the building so all bedrooms will be on the same floor to allow for better observation of the youths. The building is currently vacant. Mr. Belair said there were no previous complains about the use. He said staff will need a copy of the license. Mr. Myers said they can't get that until they have the approval. Mr. Dinklage stressed that any changes to the plan must come to the DRB. The approval motion was changed to require the copy of the license prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-10-22 and Site Plan Application #SP-10-14 of NFI Vermont, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Conditional Use Application #CU-10-03 of Verizon Wireless to: 1) replace six of the existing 12 antennas, and 2) add three 700MHz antennas, 850 Hinesburg Road: and - 9. Site Plan Application #SP-10-15 of Verizon Wireless to: 1) replace six of 12 antennas, and 2) install three 700 MHz antennas, all within the Stealth silo extension not to exceed 85 feet in height, 850 Hinesburg Road.: Mr. Dreher said the antennas are located inside a fiberglass cap. They will not be visible to anyone. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-10-03 and Site Plan r i► K4, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING March 3, 2010 Kathy Pettengill, Director of Operations 10 Airport Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 100 Allen Road Dear Ms. Pettengill: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of, Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on March 2, 2010 (effective 3/2/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT: 7009 0820 0002 2430 2634 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tot 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburI.com `".`ls, '11 IVE south ` . . PLANNING & ZONING March 3, 2010 Mike Goldfield 174 Avenue C Williston, VT 05495 Re: 100 Allen Road Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com Ifft V Interested Persons Record and Service List 48h M, ON, Under the 2004 revisions to Ghaptet 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person -wishing to achieve interested -person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria: 24 V:S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of -the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b).-A-copy of any -decision rendered by -the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appear4ng-and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to -the environmental court, the DRB must supply a- fist of interested persons to the appellant in five work-ing_days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PL8ASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME �u MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST u,�'�3I b4olZ DAMP- \.✓��r�G VI 5 �o ft�rrorf- P-4 ( -&-, l�TSkx- 1),, '�`•\ �r'�� W vl I 1t s Y \ wow J �ItG4, .� lbi�t� s W 1 \V yA van U � onyGi �ar�ie�Y w mat S}-y �- TTI r TI] SDlflU4 gVdin VT Cw° 6e-sLA& WU I`�, rK 2 g�+ t'u-1but-lue UT r Permit # C 4 - to - d APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation VRequest for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, F -r- Vie,,, f I- e- J o /k ; r r+ 9 R 44, 3 w 8oz rosy -C-&_ + (8020 &S-k --e216 4-x 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) & fax #): 17 q T USt%07 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Al F�T- Vycm,cwv4 Li- ,. 045rg'14 ,Sr.Iq-tl4'Lt'k1V T- c>!;4 aj rv4) &S-r—or-y6 v,%c-, /'YG'2� IaSY —G1-16 rC.-t _14k 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailinj� address, phon�' & fax # if different from above): /1 q. T'� V- p3"y03 GS-P '0o0q'0 -C' 1:")e 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: /Dc> /411r-g Road 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: &OL/0 "- OCR IOU C. 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate cnv;..- h 7, 0' R4 B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): , , l4?i Fv'�r�+�-cr`Jto yZup C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to re gyro sy..F�.) ►az(z¢4� .�4 , &I'A (z,41 s4 .�f, f'r��-,>X�t Add; f,w.:I Lsti �.�. rt"a �� t ; 1?29 s� k.4 D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing 2F)r buildirn s to jremain, specify if basement & mezzanine): Nn <- uL a -ties �kv'• , k} 4 i (`� r� ` �g - �'bc�sm�w'�� Y.�,;�'lt�`�IOZ=Z�irs'�-�5rw`%. LIv�I:R� ;'�)A0 3�,�.'�"6swv`1'. Z'�C'�'�;q�t-. Illo Il�re•.so �..�ciilrs� E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to } remain): A. c6ti j : *qg , lcin�la(++/aP.. l l ,-#-toz=$c�.l�+cr.� ladw(�� #/oo �-6 Ck4J,,, 1A,�tin,l4_. F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office ( vs. non -office employees): I K&R a,ss.vann G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, pleasenote if overlay districts are applicable): ca Ale c C � {� t1 eG r/".i o I- e-C ct' �dCtiv� Tz 6 Q $PY Y C� g�ex cn n zvro• s t+ ,_va.i ",,L4F 4-ie5 . 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: Z4, 33� ± Sq. Ft. (1, )St Ae'res, B. Buildings: Existing 3. L % / $ t 7l Sq. Ft Proposed 4 % / g 2 8 Sq. Ft. C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 9, L4% / a 0� q, J= 5t Sq. Ft. Proposed 1J, i % / ," js / 2�: Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ 3 D o r n o d B. Landscaping $ fq / C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 7.3 o - i . 3 v 7 ik 4' 2 o q C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 3' yo , 3.' 3 D / i vi �' 3 0-4- 7b 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION S' h-v-v\ — k� 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION VIA Uv 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE `3 �� ®f 0 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): 9L { 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: U 4 v REVIEW AUTHORITY: 2 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning have revie ed this application and find it to be: COMPLETE %❑ Incomplete r of Planning & Zoning or Designee bate Site Plan Application Permit Number SP-- N APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): -/o S-Q-0o 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phonend fax #): U (L Vyi v f. f c XP Ut 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who wi I receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #):� rP ( *30 aQ._ Dq --toTT- 36t�� a. Contact e-mail address: �A ,t�-2,' y 1•ia ; �1 n �'�-1-'i_O r� PRO,_•ELTSTf,=ET ADDRESS: 1 Ob 1 a .K78 *(oZ 4 v. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 00g0-C6f00C_ 00 4_o - 566-76 c_ 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 00 4 0 -0010 2, C- a. General project description (explain what you want ap roval for): �Ck1��1y ✓\ �U 1 ` Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including r r00TA (A0Me 601W- ©c A'' .. IVl©01 C, lescription and size of each separate use): c9l 4- 1 o4Q*-gF (i 77 x 44'$ i:A-1 Vex % a��Ik c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): v e•< mwk t. f Z-%e e4: 418 c-uA A10Z.-io vemmiVlAeeG 100 6e. w. &,cV, feu- e C, 0'A00-C' 0 &A'f overct #1a0 +&W Side �0 6$ ;�,urr 5i f 5bv� #ba.to o3tf.smrj- d. Total building square footage on prope (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain):'TV.?, * i©,z, e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine):* T&« 2-91ej1a (©u ' 3jtvt + bsqt zit'(,, 6,5 , 6` �$�kv' i �. f"�' ins Ilk_ � �o Wk6v w`�it L4Dt ;keFe�N, 6.ezgq ,t ov, f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): .4T7A: 1 clnr,« -E- i cLAci�kk �*1n©: a et,AAve ,-E 1 a&p�t -*qoz,, &ctCkjrea-+- 1 aAuk41- g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): i wt.u1 ' vcx.n. I~x�,14:;t �ltr�,�+�35� ,�.%�-� : `i dace 3 v►�e�'t" h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. :_OT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Z_ 'i,154 !, Sq. Ft. t t�t acY(::�) a. Building: Existing % / 6172- _sq. ft. Proposed_% / E328 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing I.ZIr % / Za 4 B l� sq. ft. Proposed 11. i % / 2tcj5rj ;r. sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing D % / 1 (of Oe© t- sq. ft. Proposed 7. i % 6 c o *- sq. ft. OAI C Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 0O, D00 b. Landscaping: $ `J 14D2. (bee &CxJf t*t:w.o_ke;� c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 101 a,st Tote 38 b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): T -10 J 8: 3b 7: w 2 o�'f T� c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): :3<<AD --3: 50 a _ i 3ev� TACL\:,' 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: a 4N\ - e) 11 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14, ABurrERS (plea: a list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address..:so in;;lu7e t1hose across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 I 100 Allen Road S. Burlington, VT List of abutting landowners: 0780-00020 (20 Harbor View Rd): John Larkin Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00090 (90 Allen Rd): John Larkin Inc, 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT 0040-00095 (95 Allen Rd): Ascension Lutheran Church, 95 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00120 (120 Allen Rd): Joseph & Angela Zagurski, 120 Allen Rd, S. Burlington, VT 0040-00150 (150 Allen Rd): Allen Road Land Co. Inc., 410 Shelburne Rd, Burlington, VT ( t Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF AP LICAN P4. D, SIGNATURE,.. OFPRG'ERTY OWNER (f 4,&,- t P t !, . Do not write below this line rer3(?k• 6 . RINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: /�/�) REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have review d this site plan application and find it to be: Completes _ ❑ Incomplete E01A-� aM �lb irector of Plaffifing & Zoning or Designee ate 5 ALLEN ROAD SCHOOL: PLANTING SCHEDULE T- Qty. I Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes wholesale installed 3 AxF JACER x freemani 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2" cal. B&B $ 107.00 $ 802.50 1 AGAB AMELANCHIER x grandi6ora'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Servicebery 7- Ht. B&B mufti -stem, 3-4 stems $ 110.00 $ 275.00 5 CCR CRATAEGUS crusgalli i. 'Crusader' Crusader Hawthom 2" cal. B&B tree form, single stem $ 133.00 $ 1,662.50 3 GTI GLEDITSIA Li. 'Halkd Halka Honeylocust 2" cal. B&B $ 175.00 $ 1,312.50 5 TON THUJA occidenlalis'Nigra' Dark American Arborvitae 5' Ht. B&B $ 45.00 s 562.50 3 TC TSUGA canadensrs lCanadian Hemlock 5' Ht. B&B is 90.00 s 675.00 sub -total $ 5,290.00 Shrubs Qly, Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec wholesale installed 2 AM ARONIA melanocarpa Black Chokebe 36" #5 Cont $ 23.50 $ 117.50 1 CAL CLETHRA alnrfolia Summersweel 4' Ht. B&B $ 35.00 $ 87.50 1 CA CORNUS aftemifolia Altemate Leaf Dogwood 5' Ht. B&B $ 55.00 $ 137.50 1 HV HAMAMELIS virginiana Common Wftchhazel 4' Ht. B&B $ 39.00 $ 97.50 5 RB RHODODENDRON'Bousauft' Boursault Rhododendron 24" B&B $ 30.00 $ 375.00 8 1 RR 1 ROSA rugosa Rugosa Rose 24" 1 ont. $ 13.25 $ 265.00 1 1 Sp ISYRINGA patula'Miss Kim' Little Miss Kim 4' Ht. Cont. $ 40.00 $ 100.00 10 1 TMD JTAXLIS x media 'Dens'dorms' Dense Yew 24" Ht B&B $ 27.00 $ 675.00 sub -total $ 1.855.00 Groundcovers 3 Perrenials -Qty. Code I Scientific Name Common Name Size S wholesale installed 15 GO IGALIUM odoratum Sweet Wooddruff #1 Cont. $ 6.15 $ 230.63 5 HHR HEMEROCALLIS'Happy Retums' Happy Retums Daylillies #1 Cont. $ 4.00 $ 50.00 5 HM HOSTA'Minuteman' Minuteman Hosta *2 Cont. Clump $ 8.25 $ 103.13 7 MD MICROBIOTA decusatta Siberian Cypress 24" S3 Cont. $ 24.00 $ 420.00 3 PA PENNISETUM aiGpecuroides Fountain Grass 1 gal. Cont. Clump $ 6.00 $ 45.00 15 Wf WALDSTEINIA temata I Barren Strawberry *1 Cont. I Clump 1 $ 4.50 $ 168.75 sub -total $ 1,017.50 Existina Veaetation Removal and Pruning 1. Removal of Buckthom stems and roots as shown on plan and in photo A & B s 700.00 s 700.00 2. Limb up 2 maple trees to 10-12' above the ground Photo C s 300.00 s 300.00 3. Prune 2 Lilacs Is 100.001 $ 100.00 sub -total I• Total: $ 9,162.50 -N Page 1 of 1 GENERAL PLAITING NOTES I PRIOR TO PLNTM TIE LOCATION OF AI L TREES A S16 M SHALL SE rT D FOR APPRWAL EY 111E PRO.IlC!LAlpSCAPEARCHT CTOREOUAL 2MECONTRACTOR SMALLLOUTSNDVERNYTHEEXISTENCERAILUTLITESP TO STARTING WORK 1 TNECONTRACTORl SUM_YALLRA TERMLNWANTRIEESUFFICIFMN COMPLETETHEPUWPN SHOWNMN.LDRAWINGS Alp CONIRESPONDING RANT LISTS A. ALL FMLEIWL SMALL CONFpW TO THE OLROEUNES ESTABLISHED BY TiE CURRENT AMlRIT STNWTIS FOR NURS--I—) PUBQSHED BY TIC u.Fs'lr runseRr AND LNUSTAPE ASSOCKDON. S ALL RANTS S1SE NSTNIFD K PER pETAAS ANO THE CONTRACT SPECIFI(U,TONS CW SHEETSL2W AlAM p lD1 E MPLAM .EPUTMOMEmmmauF RO1roHCRA05N31WBEM Mr1ED AND APPROVED BY THE FRONECT ARCHITECT OR EWAL I ALL RANTS SHALL BEM THE SAAC RlLATONSNF TO FNMNED (TRADE K THE PWlTS ORDINAL GRADE B601RE dOONa A ME LANOSCARi 1XYTaACTM Sf WL PROVDE FLL K PER ME CONTRACT SPECIFIGTKMS ONIAt. S ALL PUNRANO STAKES SKIM. BE SET PLUNB UNLESS OTIERWLTE SPECFB31. 10 ALLPUNTSSHALL aE BALLEDANDYIIIAP®d1 COHTAINEIR GRUANN YECFEO. NO CONTAINENI O STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF R IS ROOT Bally CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1R OF VINE BASIaT EXCEPT TNT WHICH M UNDER THE IROOt BAIL LEAVE NNO BMW FROM THE TOP IR M ROUT BALL F BURLAPS MADE OUT OF NATURAL FBEIL F BURIN B nASTR: aR TRFATEp, CUT AND RlNOVE ALL aU1 THAT WMa1IS UNDER THE ROOT aAIL 11. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK THE CONTANER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER SALL SHALL BE an TH.— THE SVFRACE N TWO VE-RTCAL LOGTIONS 12 TIE LANa1TAPE C TRACT R SHRLL REFER TOTHE PLANT LMT FOR 5EK REQUREMENTS RELATED TO THE THE OF P 1NO 13 ALLPLNTS SHALLBESPRAYEDWITIIANANTDESSIUNTNACCOROWCEWTMTHE CONTRACT BPECFKATONS ON LW 14ALL PLANTSSMALLMWATEREDNACCaR MMWASHCONTRACTSPECSHUTIONSaN Lmt 15 THE LANOaCAPE CONTRACTOR BNNl REFER TO THE CONTRACT SPECMA110MB FOR AOdTT1NN. REOUBC Ml PLANT I} Y FINE GROUND SARI( MULCH. DO HOT RACE MUCH DIRECTLY AQANaT TRUNK oR LTEM W TOPSOIL AND I D COMPOST LINTER TO I F DEPTH 1_ NyiC i 1 �i. PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD L CROSSING BRANCHES. USE WADE BELT TYPE TES ON EACH MAJOR STEM ALL MANOR STEMS SHOULD BE BELTED TOGETHER DO NOT USE ROPE OR WARE N HOSE SLEEVES ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE). 2'. 3' FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE, DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST STEMS. 2' EARTH SAUCER 2' X 2' X 1r HARDWOOD STAKES 3 PER TREE DRIVEN INTO GROUND. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING,) MEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO TO A' UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND ` UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SDL I CUT L REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, EXCEPT . F j :I . 1 1 �. . 1 7 TMAE9 THAT WHICH ISUNDER THE ROOT BALL. LEAVE NO 1` DAMETER OF FOOTBALL BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP T2 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP IS MADE OF NATURAL FIBER. IF BURLAP IS PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE 7 5 ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT SALL _ TYPICALGROUNOCOVER PLANTING MULTISTEM PLANTING L200 NTS L200 NTS SPBdnB 'D' Rw 'A' N,,bw of Me WA,m UnIt a' D.C.5r r 0.0 &95' &ai 2.8 I Sa FT. 1r as LBr 1.66 1r O.C. 10.4' 1.15 15 as 1r at IN. . 7.30 S.12 10 Sa R. 24' 0.a tar 2-11 r a 3s .36' O.C.3ar rir 1.56 1.25 I 5' D.C. '3r A.SI 100 SOL FT. r O.C.Lr 3.2 B. UC 10. O.C. a&V Car 1.B 1.1E 1 15' 0.0 Ar S IDOO 5a Fl 20' O.0 17.r 2.BB 25' O.C. 30' O.C. 21.65' 2L0' 145 t.20 a' as 340 7.22 0A00 Ba 0.0 - ON CINTER FOR USE &HEN PLANTS ARE 314OM1 EQUIDISTANT PLAINT SPAQNO CHART FROM EACH OTHER (AS SHORAN) / 6 \ PLANT SPACING CHART L200 PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. INSTALL TREES AND STAKES PLUMB. USE WIDE BELT -TYPE TREE TIES; DO NOT USE ROPE OR WARE IN HOSE SLEEVES. N REUSABLE PERFORATED PLASTIC TREE WRAP (TO BE A ! REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING) 3 2' X r HARDWOOD STAKES 113 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MN. OF 72'. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF IT BELOW ' UNDISTURBED GRADE (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PUNTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE). 2'J' FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE 00 NOT PUCE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK I- MIN _ y r EARTH SAUCER - SCARIFY _ SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO A' AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED. BREAK UP 1a' w - _ - --_ CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. CUT L REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, I EXCEPT THAT WHICH 9 UNDER THE ROOT BALL ;. LEAVE NO BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL 3 TIMES SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1l2 DIAMETER OF OF ROOT MLI. IF BURLAP IS MADE OF NATURAL ROOT BALL FIBER. IF BURLAP IS PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AMD REMOVE ALL BUr THAT WHICH IS UNDER 4 DECIDUOUS TREES � 3' CALIPER ON SLOPE THE ROOT BALL L2DD NTS f�OO Gi QPPGiC��/L^.16 0�/0�3/�309 0 s PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. INSTALL TREES AND STAKES PLUMB. USE WIDE BELT -TYPE TREE TES, DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES. ATTACH AT 2/3 HEIGHT OF TREE 3 -T X r HARDWOOD STAKES 113 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF r. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF 1 T RELOW UNDISTURBED GRADE (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANNING.) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE} 2•- 3• FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK T EARTH SAUCER v MN AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO A' I' UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND. 3 TIMES CUT L REMOVE ALL OF THE HARE BASKET. EXCEPT DIAMETER OF THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL LEAVE NO ROOT BALL BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURF ACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 112 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP IS MADE OF NATURAL FIBER IF BURLAP IS PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE /�'�� r 3 1 CONIFEROUS PLANTING ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL. L200/ NTS • PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD& CROSSING ,.. ,.� BRANCHES TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SAME HEIGHT AS PREVIOUSLY GROWN 1. r FINE CHIPPED, PINE BARK MULCH, HOT -.. MORE. DO NOT PLACE AGAINST PLANT STEM 2' EARTH SAUCER AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP .II.rl . CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES ,Ni REMOVE BURLAP FORM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL _ ` i NEVER LEAVE BURLAP EXPOSED HOVE 501E IF CONTAINER GROWN, REMOVE POT COMPLETELY. 3 TIMES — DIAMETER OF LOOSEN ROOT MASS TO PREVENT GIRDUNa ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND. L \DECIDUOUS SHRUB PLANTING L200 NTS PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. INSTALL TREES AND STAKES PLUMB. USE WIDE BELT -TYPE TREE TIES; DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES REUSABLE PERFORATED PLASTIC TREE WRAP (TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING), 3-r X r HARDWOOD STAKES 113 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF 72'. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF 12' BELOW UNDISTURBED GRADE. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING.) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE), ram'FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH. NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK 2' EARTH SAUCER. AMEND BACKFILL N SPECIFIED. BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO 4- 3 TIMES CUT L REMOVE ALLOF THE WIRE BASKET. EXCEPT THAT DIAMETER OF WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL LEAVE NO BURLAP ROOT BALL EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOL SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1R OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP IS MADE OF NATURAL FIBER IF BURLAP 15 PLASTIC OR TREATED. CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL. / I \DECIDUOUS TREES <3' CALIPER L� NTS RECEIVED FEB 0 8 2010 City of So. Burlington T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC Rw.. m ^"M" Owner AddroSa Yn0aaP••rch"°di'planning CODM a'"'"!d= Wa 02103n010Auen Road Group Home T City, Stale ZIP 3010DNBpaatl t.WrMOton,v oM.05101 802.658.3555 MroTA1wM tlInW.mm tJ0 Na Planting Details L—�0o SECTION 02955: TREES, PLANTS, AND GROUND COVER PART I GENERAL 1 DI Scope A Preparnoo of work uodm Out worm shall ben shown on the drawings, m speel fled herem, and as needed. meet the regturem-ta of -the Coo rm, D.--ts S Provide all labor, materials, equipment, and seances necessary to perform the work of this scum including I Topsoil heddmg 2 New Imes, plants and groudcover 3 Mulch and ferhheir. a Mo..,.- 1 02 RELATED SECTIONS A Section 02923 - lad-spe Gndtng Prcpantian and placem-t of ropsod . prcpeeum fro the work of this Section 105 REFERENCES A FS O-F-N I - Fernhzem. Mixed, Com ormal B ANSI Z60 1 - Nursery Stock C ASNS - American Standard for Nursery Stock, 19N or latest edition. Ammeu Nunnery and landscape Association 106 DEFiMTIONS A Weeds Include Dandehon, Jimsonweed, Qumkgrass, Horsetail, Morning Glory, Rush Grease, M.urd, Lambsepuner, Chmkweed, Crass, Crobli Caused— Thistle, Nwgreu, Blackberry, Taney Roijorm, Bemud. Ones, Johnson Gnu, Poison Ivy, Nu, Sedge, Nimble Will, Bindweed, Be., Gross, Wild Conic, Perennial Smmel, and Bmme Grua B Plante. Living rem, plants, and ground cover specified in this Swim, and dmmbd ,n ANSI Z60 I 1 07 MAINTENANCE DATA A Submit under provisions ofthis concoct. B Operaion dots Submit for continuing Ownmmumenanee. C Munte.nce Data Include wrung add tru m ing method; types, mpphcanon, fiequancy and recommended mvertge of krubw 1 03 QUALITY ASSURANCE A Provide rope --cad tanng for vmfymg seceptabnhly of pl.0 sad W qL--Y of topml 109 QUALIFICATIONS A. Nursery Company spcianang In g—hiS sad W.—mg the plum wild five years npanom. B Instiller Company apenaheing m re"Img and planting the plants C Maintenance Soven Pufonnd by hnWler 110 IEGULATORYREQUIREMENTS A Comply witb regulolorya{anna for f lam and hob -de compnemon B Provide tertihnk ofcompuanm from wthmnry hanngjmsmctt-.mealmg approwl ofplanu, femti><• and bemude mmrtn C Plant M.,—I. C-dted by fdW dep.rtmenl of apcW.rc Do —bed by ASTM Z60 I, f ofdncase or hando.,n—b 1 11 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A- D.I,—. a— promo and handle products . aste order provumv of th. con rm, B Deliver dry, free Boron{, fendder in —1 mol, unopened waterin—f bags Showing weight, diem,ul mmlyas, and name of mmufeturu C Deliver plead materW, smndomely pram. place m dt. Keep pint, metal and pact-ol. D If decaduo. bcea or s imbe n moved . fall kaL spray with aids-0csiceant to nursery before moving and spray again two wade after plan.{ Apply um - desiccant anog power spray. provide adequate film over hooks, brewsm. stems, mange it flop E Plains in cowmen shill row the nendands cat forth m ASNS nmu mR be gmw m aubland m emmie m which they will be dl,v.r d for a jest emghl (1) vorrths ban rot more Wear twisty -foe f14) .orW ynw b fivl plvtovg Planta Sbell hsve well esbbl%h<d root sYslmm b,A Shall not be mot bawd Plants with oSekd or bmkm both of cmb when taken from comvom shad] not be planted uuas appmvd by the Landman Arcweed. Do not life w any contamer Plants by the tops, atoms, or trunkso any nine. F Ben root plans shall mast the snnduds as forth in ASNS. Plun all be nnvd only when dorsou, and will be handled at W tome, to Prmvem drying of room. G Ralled and Budapped plum dull mac the assailants sea forth . ASNS Bello will be fimly wtopped with b d p ad bo.d with hums, mid, or roue mesh where neea,sary to prcvmt cnckmg of bat dumg planug, a whin nee aceeds s" caliper, Satin ball to plU r„L 112 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS A Do nil install plun whin ambient mos eco ame may drop below 35 degrees For Wow 90 degreo F B Do ow msWl plenta wb.. send velocity exceeds 30 mph 1 13 COORDINATION A- Cowdidete work ender p hies. of dens emmmt. B Coneduate mth mfWlnmafuderground whims, piping.d wecnag heads 1 19 GUARANTEE A Guasala al mlsab for a mmwn of oro f It. sou to be rove and m a vrgesrw grown{ coodnum a the ed of the gea.ntee pmod No hmit w plasm r-IaummL except for the tear lied m D below B Remove oncusfwory, plum and rcplw .rah plum of the saner kind quality, cad a— a specified . the Schedule of Place Mammals C Guarantee all pint nplaanwnu to be live and ,n vigorous cond.on tea year after replacement D Costs shall be home by Cmtmwr, except for possible replux-enta resuh.g from (I) remavl, (2) lose or damage due m occupancy of pmjw in my Part or (3) wndalum E Make plent nplacerouts under the guen otee as nquued Replace plmta that me dwmg a sewn unbvanble for planting during the find mouth of the veal &—his pleauag sewn 115 MAINTENANCE SERVICE A Eepn mum-mca inmadismly aRer each plan is metalled and commie w mambm inn the end o! the am (t) yev gturnilee peril Garnm e starts in the completion ofpleming and when suthond in wdung by the L-dscaps AmhdcL B Mi-mrs—to..hek I Cultivation and wedmg pint beds and tree pits 2. Apply no herbicides for wad control Remedy damage mulling from we ref hrhmdes 3 Remedy damage from use of insecticides. s Imganog suff'um to sa.mte mot Y,- 5 Pruning, Including rum,.l ofdd or Inch— branches and uatmem of purr ed Imes or other --do 6 Disease mewl 7. M---Ag lox ries, and auks Adjust veer is. to keep right. Rep.0 or replace —so— rob. requsnd IP G3 L%PPIRWLM 0�/0 3/2@90 PART21PRODUCTS 2.01 ACCEPTABLE NURSERIES (Nat used) 202 TREES, PLANTS, AND GROUND COVER A Trans Plante and Ground Cover Species and sere Aminfiable In plant schedule, pow in chrome condition suudar to thou in locality of thc Work. B Nomenclttue. Names ofplmu required under due contract coot to those per- m Hontur M. 1976. C Quality sd I— Nursery grown, bob,, oflinwth this a nom it fro the specs, sound, beahhy, ,,g... sad fi- from —.-M di— .it injuries, equal . in exceeding meuumnmb specified m plant list Plan% memured bet pnmmg wish branches in normal P-hon Sias and methods ofhmdling weordrng to the code of standee. mcommended by ASKS, bell sizes as Indicated in the Schcduk of Plant Materials on Drcwmga D Subsuwl,o. Up..brosu,ou of proof tha a plot i. me obmi mble, the Lmdsc.pe A.hitmt wdl spee,fy a wbwmw plain of the nearest equwlan ran ad variety hsnag the etsem.l chuaetenatrcs of the mgreal rim. 2.03 SOIL MATERIALS A Topsoil On Sim. Contractor shall um all row pdd toped first bcf supplying ddd,onl rr amnal. Topsoil onion shall be fine of subsml, c1.y or debr o ad.hat be wnfiably mnbta u prtduca vnble plsawg mil Toped dull be seskd and amended a mmtmum pH value of 5 5 and maximum 6 5; minimum apoic roam, 15% a it dried manure A Topsoil Come -le, Supplied Fertile, agricultural tod, typical fro locdrry, capable of satarung vigorous plan growth, taken from droned I., flee of wbsoul, cl.y w nmpinnes, ptana wxads rid inn%, mmnnum pH wluc of 5 5 and mm,mn 6 SY., -n-um oagamc eontms 15Ya 2 Oa SOIL AMENDMENT AND OTHER MATERIALS A Foulor FS O-F-241, Type 1, Grade A; with I OVA percent of the elements hnvd !loin organic sources, of propm,on neceasuy m ehmmal any defict-era oflop rid, m indicatd m analysis by ustmg f hey R Manure Comoam.11y produced dehydrated cow manum free from u sects, diseases, finip and weeds C lama Ground bmeowa, delomn. type, and mmin— 95 percent mboata D. Phosphate Rost Grounder. dry, free Dow.& mina Phosphsm Rak (local phosphate 30%). del —col In ongwL —peal bop E. Ano - denccmt. Emulun type, film looming agent designed to permit trmspusnon, ban r-rd exesome loss of mounire from plants such as "W,lt P.P or app..d equal. F Wiser Clem, flab and here of as,bamrces w manse that could ,ndntal v,go.us growth of plan¢. O Compost L iarvWe Compou w approved rqua (IM-662.49e3) Compost shall cmum mpme meaner, or mama of a K-unlly humor .nae cap.ble of s.mmmg du g.wnb ofwgmhm, withoo admcenne w rewm w maternal mxic. plant gmmh la shall be here hoes smog, lumps or smiler objects larger duo ["or greater In diameter, mot. and bmsh Compost, that have been d-ved from orgemc wens such u food and agdeWtueal ra,duea, and animal manure t1W mat the above regWremenu and n rypm d by the Safe Emnee mental Agency, one acceptable sources of compos, 205 PESTICIDES A Gmenl Organc —,erials only of ins type nvies.ed and spp.vd by Organ„ M.tmats Review Luna. (OMRI) 2 06 MULCH MATERIALS A Mulching Material Fl.ly ground b.rk undyed dark brow in color, pm,cle, p—I ly 1" in sin, fit of jttow'th or pmuutmn inhibiting Ingredients 2.07 ACCESSORIES A Wrapping Materials Reusable perfumed plmuc tree wrap E SW- 2" X 2-' X 72" mimmum rough sawn hardwood sukra, pointed end C Wide beti type tea tee of suRment amenph to -thud wad pressure and raulemn, moven ter, of plant life 2.O8 TESTS AND SAMPLES A Piov de amipu of empwM and exmmg iopsod urdcr pmvisiom of th,s a [m L R A.IYea to iceman Percentage ofmtmgen. phaphoros, Jtoessh, soluble salt and organic miner, PH Win and organic content C Submt min== 10oz maniple of toped propose,- Forward sample w sating ta►ontnry in naut comemm to proven, ... mommmorL D Tesmmg is rot mclimed drcunn tots tee awilable far oopond topsoil Subr di them .st mum w thc toting Isbmwy fro approval Indicate, by test resider mfmmadon necessay in determine witudity PART 3 EXECUTION 3 01 EXAMINATION A Within Meaty (20) rckrdm days of receipt of algaed contract for the work, asbmit to the Landscape Ambled a proposed dme aebdale laa.dag dim for eemmeaaemeat cad ..plot.. of the folbwbg opentbaa - Purchase of plant camomile) - PmP—oa.fwpsod - Survey and srdmg of glut locums - Dcbvery of topmil ad other material. - Digging oil ptepndm ofplsat pus sM beds - Delivery ofttm to the aste - Dcltvery aother plots b the tau - Planting of tnea - Planting orothr plan% - Guying. snaking and mulching Complahon of Projw for ram of gasneme period B. Porehow of Major Maemals. Within twenty (20) calendar days of maeeTt ofugd contract, for the landscape work submit 10 the Ludscspc Aiclumet a list ofplw material soured. All dermal shall be ofspcmfrcd standard and sue C Verily dust prepared subsol .. ready . moeiw work D Verify the required underground mdttas ire ma prcmn, m srev to be planned 302 PREPARATIONofSUBSOIL A Aa ,p—find on S-,on 02923 - L dsape Gndmg 303 BED PREPARATION A Pie, topsoil in arias plaming w thmlmo. as wbeddod Pia topsoil dung dry weather B F,oe gook topsoil ehmmating rough or low aeaa Musim profile and connur of subgnde. C Rcomc room, weeder reeks and mmisn mammal while opening D Mentally spread topsoil close W rem plants and building his prevent daage. E Lightly compact placed topsoil. F Remove surplus subsoil -d,op-d fiom tote G I-,. s..kp la — it sto cksa amd eaked, ready to recave landscaping H Computed toped duckxm in We fol —mg area 3 O/ PLANT PROTECTION A Prow Isudee pIn{ ad other es featurremommg asfeel work B Protect -.,ivg sometimes, tenor, sidewalks, anima. Paving and curbs 305 FERTILIZING AND MULCHING A- B Do sat fenthm a the time of planting C Mu thoroughly mlo the upper 2 mchesof toped D Lightly weer to s,d the d—pabon of fenluer 3 06 PLANTING A Prepare avandd beeLfrll for plant pus and beds Backfill shall be cormawed by Acedduag or layering gadf B generally shag he mud m f.B.-with u1juammrlt u required for speeilm plants I Topsoil and coupon as described m ram 2 03A d 2 04G M. ante of 113 comport to N3 topsod, plus 120 ft mamue and 9 cups phaphataevek for esoh cubte yard cf-I ma 2 Fendens. limestone a rvUhr m comply with soil toss mcommeaduces, when iwmd eau dw cod ofthe guarmta period B Time of Planting Begin to pepn wpm] for plmt pre aneordmg to approved wbeduk. Therrahercord iet plm1mg op -moron under h—bk weather .odmom during sew. which —moral for such work, as de tinsem rl by sectptd Prison. to locality ofrbe project. At the option and - the Poll responsibility ofd. Contractor. planting open uom may be conducted under t::s:...ale c-dri s Nihnut sddm..W compossahon Darduo. plain measured shall be Planted during the di man period calm approved by the landscape architect C Lemon of Plan¢ Locate new planning by flagging where show an plans except where obstructorns, below ground arc 9rman,cred or where changes haw been ode . the coi.truct,an; than make v ses.ry dju m m s as upmvd by Landscape Arch— landscape Arewtax m approve hod Daggmg and 1-moo of ill plan metena Plant m plmtmg, except gmmduver, closer than 19 inches to pavwnanta and structures Necessary clonjo m location mesa be approved in writing priors planning D Finished Grades. L Topsoil depths art ss estimated in 3 03 Bad Prepmlim Section 02955-7 2 So all pint msemal in ire Wien to proposed finished grades E PI-d.S- General. I Dig ban ptu ad have ..it muwrc for pint.{ ready before plants n dehvemd Exi—m ocular pin Remove exces. excavacd numcnal hoes site DIss—kr of pit. ford Ines egaW (3) three time the aametear err tY rna ball. Depth of pin ( Iron Shull h su.cian m ex,mmvdene hsm or ion¢ whin nee ta se, m me tech above finlehd grade Mowing a >rx meh roomed of und,surbed mbwd m cnmpuid rod mu in the bottom of gal u shomm in planting decals. 2 So plants upnght and faced so give the hot appearance or rclsaochmp to djamu •trimmers or walks 3. B.Ikd and burlappd (6RR) planet. Remove or.11 bwk and .over mth ml nauml fiber b der fiom the top I/2 of be ran, b.11 Cu1 and —mve all bat lYat wosleY Is wader he roes ball wYet W map Y of • ryaNslle w trrtd Ober. Lerv. ao brrlp a0ore ell rvrhm Cal cad rcmme by ifi or rose win bukas. e Bn not plmu Speed roota a a mind p,,a.m Cw all bmken w hayed room off cleanly 5 Contemn 1mw, Remow plat from container teed tease mob [rWm Far mws which are be{immg w circle the turn ball .rid cave rmt or mver completely. When slow "lease pellets ara presml, remove the Fell- and mu into backfi0. Dorm la ,hem f II into die planting hle ARer plant u metaled but before mulch m applied. wmrr peli- evcuy on sop of the soil. Remove inn-0Iodepsdable rant coouincn 6 inn rod pN and djat bakfill u required, rmxmg Ivan wish rky rod Pmmt lime hoes eeinuetmg roots of mid loom{plena 7 Ehouute W soda ad clods from b.ckfdL Amend bckfiB with manure, cormpwL ao phcaphae rock, n dmecled . throe rpc,ficanons l3 GSA). g Forpreandtrenchypebckfill,innpiamngsodpdwmbwkfilling.W rtoekpJe-.ise 9 water ilea berm of the plant pre bet Insullmg Ora plan BackflB with nmded rod and watt m well u the hot u ba,,,f Fll led, hen{ sun oo wank rot any art pakeb ad being urcwl w avod injury to roes¢ Alter ground unles, fill with addm-.I backfill to almost level of finished grade, but leave. ohgh, depression ,o hold water v show¢. hee plemu,g de WI F Planting hero; Where applicable, plant „ter hot mwrmdmg mailer plants and {rourdcover are in place P.,mm loaner u rd,-md. the dnvngs. Notify the Landscape Architect for approW of locmon before mottling G Planting Shrubs. Remove ourtmg restenal, as required ad dup. of. with kcal coda and on.%— Plus - colas as cad— d with spoemg adjusted d.cas.ry, his evenly, fill bad mount, specified quantity of plain. H Planting Geouodeover Ramose exuton{ mak ruds a required and dupon of m aceadann mth local coda and ordine—se Plant m cant- as indicated with %-.g adjusted Htaeesa.ry, . evany fill bad using sp-fed q.mty ofplmu I Apply sah -d eac.N usong power spay to provide adequate Nm over tnok; wnchea stems. mega and mtiage. If dacidua noes err rbtiths tee Ygfl Innerd f, sprwith ormerant at nonery bet ram moving and spray again weeks after plu.�RJ ng RECEIVED E C E I V E D 3 07 PLANT SUPPORT - Staining at the dsurcdon of the counwor A Support irm immediately other Planting Bruce places wmcaly with tree lies and stakes at show in Oa dr—S. to the followmy schedule. Tree Cai— Tire Sumon Method FEB 0 8 2010 1 Inch 1 nuke soh ore tea 1". 13N" 2 suka with two nee 2 "- 3-1/2" 3 stakes with here tees B. Wmppmg-p.mptlyaftrplmnngwrop whofdasdwunmspiralyfm gr,,dlme,ohm{htof.-dbnahm City 3 01 PRUPM40 AND REPADI of So. Burlington A. Upw rumplenw of wmk coda der Conuwk prime and mpau m9 w m tees Limit rmmml of pnuning to minimum ncoeary to rmose dead a u)ured wmp dew• m such a roomer esnot to obangen•t ral bebtt or shape of pWit Make cuss Bush midi umermost edge of hr-ch wllar lis.-I tote soil. On all sou our 3H inch in dinner and h.¢u or seen on beak trace the mjurd c.mbtum back to living nos. roil remove; amemh sad rhapa wounds so u mr to retain warm, do row coat with wound deco ng. 309 INSPECTIONS FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK A Acceptance of errors olmunteoanuw The Coed wr shall noufy the LndwW Awlut l m anmg of complmm of maw,coum Wiih,e 15 days ,her m copletton of work an ,wpwwn our acceptance . start the maintenance period will begin and continue =at find acceptance D Finl Acapmor .the Coohuror diaB me y Ne landscape Arcmuct wmhm ]D deye of Wes d.a t M.1 inspecvm a th•.od of.• muou.nn pemd.od u nospeen- will be—sedwish, 15 days of 1h. dean B.t find accepbnco, tbe reins of irk Plmt O.omtm rrruct be met and du project stu menu bem the condition stipulated tinder Maintenance Operations C Landscape Architect reserves the right m reject pint material how the ate ehrough media planting oil gunmen period the, don rot mra ANSI witu uds 3.10 MAINTENANCE A At lean twenty (20) days before nut of the guarantee Mind submt a schedule of propound mdnic.nc• opersaou indicating the comber of.mlTbeu¢ contemplated far each operation by scoson during union. winter. spring and summer. B Spray . nest . ,.W d. keep con. and.hmb free of msau rid duets• C Needy.. pint. where necessary, mmmedotely remove chppmg. of -ramming D Wow a often a required a mamu t capillary wafer within 2 mchas of the soil surfie rested plum F. Control growth ofwado by hand or modus, aI weeding, mplmuhm{ mulch as required O. TIO. anNor nPoll bee ties m keep but emu and supported wnhom damage. but most plots M proper grades or uptpd positron if necessary H Apply antihsrccare as ngwred to retard maspranon I ]kept-- ofpmnm required by der Plan, 0—.-on • regW.r monthly bun order F vonblc weather eonddrma .nest. for scat work u determined by accepted practice in the locality of the project J Submit m i menubw rod too. testing laboratory and rimy, landscape architect of the mwWb and a schedule for appldsnon of kmlim prior to fiat acesple— K Rcmow all sukmg, NYm{ appusma, cad tree wrap n d of mante.ncc nod i„arsatee prod T. J. Boyle Associates, LLC tee. a b sea bsndsnps architect . planning co.ulhsnt. tp Jda 02/03/1D Allen Road Grote Home T "/'/� 1 301collopostreet.bullmoon.vsrmonl.O5MI 102.6M.M55 nwjm IFoW ow Ns tjb Na T _2O 1 Planting Specifications I r. 1. 2010 11:48PM hlo.IV, 338 P. 3 NFI Vermont, Inc. Conditional Use Approval Request As requested, here are responses to Article 14, (3) a-e. a. At this time 1NFI does not have an approved license from the State of Vermont for the locution at 100 Allen Road, S. Burlington, VT. We have notified the state of our intent to move our program to this location and will comply with all requirements and recommendations to ensure licensure for a Residential Child Care Facility License. We currently hold a license with the Department of Children and Families for our current location at 486 Main Street, Winooski, VT. b. All of the correspondence with the state has been verbal up regarding the new location. c. The proposed program to occupy the Site will be a 6-7 bed short-term Mental Health crisis stabilization program that serves Vermont adolescents between the ages of 10 and 18. The average length of stay is 7-10 days. The youth are screened by local mental health screeners. The youth has to be determined to be iii tlir, miiNI i+f n mrnlAl htAlth crisk and in tlx need of ltabilizttion, wa49amgn1 and treatment planning. The clinical oversite and supervision is provided by a licensed Psychlauist, a lleensed Psychiatric Nurse duel a Licensed ManW Heultll Counselor. They are supported by Bachelors level residential counselors. The staff to client ratio is 3:6. d. The clients served in this program do not have any community involvement so no additional requirements are necessary. e. See the map attached with the site plan. a f�Q p ^26-2010 10:55A FROMCITY OF j,'!TH SURLIN 8028464101 P.1 l ll \0 ARTICLE 1. SrM PLAN. and CONDITIONAL, USE REVIEW 14-13 (g) rn addition to all other normally required items of information, the following additional documentation shall also be submitted with the conditional use or site plan application., as applicable: (a) , A copy of the operating certificate issued by the appropriate state department or agency. (b) Copies of all correspondence between the applicant and the Stato of Vermont with respect to the proposed facility. (c) A complete: statement of the proposed type, number, age and permanency of residence of the persons to be cared for, and the numbef and qualifications of both resident and nonresident adult supervisory personnel. (d) A completestatement of the applicant's plans for the social and economic integration of the projected residents into the community, including their educational, employment and retional needs, transportation and service requirements and any other such information as may be relevant and detcruisned necessary by the Development Review Rnard. (e) A vicinity map indicating the location of the proposed facility in ...relation to other existing group care facilities or other similar types of care facilities within a radius of two (2) miles of the subject site. D. CQmmience Stare in QuJymcfion Atka +bgoline Filling StationlSer�ee Station. A service station that is a primary use on its lot maybe allowed to have a convenience stare as an accessory conditional use, subject to the following: (1) The proposed convenience store shack be an accessory use located on the same lot as primary use service station. (2) Such store shall have retail sales of convenience merchandise, prepared foods, and pre -packaged tools for personal or houschold consumption, (S) Minimum lot sire. Tlie primary use shall have a minimum lot size of thirty thotisand (go,000) square feet. (4) Loeati*n of primary use. The service station shall have a ininimum street frontage of one hundt-ed (-Loo) feet on an arterial road. (5) Maximum floor area. Such store shall have a gross floor area of no more than ten percent (io %) of the lot area. (6) Maximum height. Such store shall be no more than one (1) story high. (7) Hours of operation. The consumer convenience center shaft be accsozy to the primary use and as such shall be open for business during the same hours as the pumping operation of the service station. (8) Parking. Parking spaces shall be provided proximate to the store, at the rate of rmP (*) xparp per nnP. finnrlred fifty C-vSn) wpiare fpt of rAiTmimer mnvenienee enter floor area. Where parking is located near a residential district boundary, the applicant shall provide landscaping, and/or hneing or (9) Light' Po*it' Fex Mot Review Board's satysf; MI °i��' it the store From ce. pates► comma. Pi14ryd k Ptaw A Fax f • FQx 11 mouth ID rlingtan Lama Dava apmant RagulatiWW Rffc va JAMIAry 1.1, 201n City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 28, 1993 Tyler Scott Shelter Design 20 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Allenbrook Home Addition, 100 Allen Road Dear Mr. Scott: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 9, 1993. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the date of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, i %v ex Z)�V . Joe Weith,1'91& City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 Tyler Scott Shelter Design 20 Main Street Essex Junction, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Vermont 05452 December 9, 1993 Re: Allenbrook Home Addition, 100 Allen Road Dear Mr. Scott: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the November 9, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months of the approval date. If you have any questions, 1 Encl JW/mcp please give me a call. 7n ere y J Weith, C ty Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 9 NOVEMBER 1993 PAGE 5 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall pay the required fee for the williston Road Area 2 Improvement Fund based on the p.m. peak hour trip ends to be generated by the development as determined by the City Planner. 7. The Planning Commission grants a $2,400. landscaping credit for the property. 8. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line. Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 10._ Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of rllenbrook- R6mb for Y°etfth, Inc, for construction of a 1044 sq. ft. addition to a group home on a 5.0 acre lot containing 2 group homes, a single family residence and 2 accessory structures, 100 Allen Rd: Mr. Burgess noted the Zoning Board heard this item last night but continued the hearing without making a decision. He said that whatever the Planning Commission does should not pre-empt the Zoning Board's full hearing of this matter. Mr. Scott said they are proposing a small addition to the east side of Jarrett House on the north side of the lot. There will be no additional bedrooms or staff and no added parking. Mr. Austin noted the addition is proposed on the side of the building not affecting the CO Zone. No other issues were raised. Mr. Aust_ n moved the Planninq- Commission approve the site plan application of Allenbrook Home for Youth, Inc, for construction of a 1044 sq. ft. addition to a crroug home on a 5.0 acre lot containing two group homes, a single family residence and two accessory structures as depicted on a plan entitled "Allenbrook Homes for Youth, Jarrett House Addition," prepared by Shelter Desicrn, dated 10/5/93 with a last revision date of 11/3/93. with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 NOVEMBER 1993 PAGE 6 2. This approval is conditioned on the granting of a variance by the Zoning Board of Adjustment for extension of a nonconforming use. If such a variance is not granted, this site plan approval shall be null and void. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six months or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the addition. 5. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. 6. Site plan application of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc, to construct additional parking spaces on a lot containing offices and operations center, 85 Swift St: Mr. Sullivan showed the location of the proposed additional four parking spaces. This area is now a grass strip with no trees. Mr. Weith requested an accurate landscaping plan from the applicant. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site Plan ap- plication of Vermont Gas Systems, inc, to construct additional parking spaces on a lot containing offices and operations center as depicted on a plan entitled "Vermont Gas Systems, Inc, Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont," stamped "received" on 9/9/93 and prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects with the following stipulations:_ 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall plant evergreen trees along the east property line to fill in the gaps where cedar was planted but died. 3. The plan shall be revised to accurately depict landscaping on the site. 4. Three copies of the approved revised plan, which shall be better quality prints than previously submitted, shall be submitted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six months or this approval is null and void. 11/9/93 MOTION OF APPROVAL ALLENBROOK HOME I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Allenbrook Home For Youth, Inc. for construction of a 1,044 square foot addition to a group home on a 5.0 acre lot containing two (2) group homes, a single family residence and two (2) accessory structures as depicted on a plan entitled "Allenbrook Homes for Youth, Jarrett House Addition" prepared by Shelter Design, dated 10/5/93 with a last revision date of 11/3/93, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This approval is conditioned on the granting of a varience by the Zoning Board of Adjustment for extension of a nonconforming use. If such X varience is not granted, this site plan approval shall be null and void. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the addition. 5. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. (mo-mcp) PLANNER 658-7955 Tyler Scott Shelter Design 20 Main Street Essex Junction, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Vermont 05452 November 5, 1993 Re: Allenbrook Home Addition, 100 Allen Road Dear Mr. Scott: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 9, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, Encls JW/mcp please give me a call. 9oe cerely, Weith, City Planner Memorandum November 9, November 5, Page 2 - Planning 1993 agenda items 1993 standards. As shown in the table below, the proposed mix of uses will meet parking, traffic and sewer standards if the applicant can show that the woodworker's warehouse will generate a need for only 12 parking spaces and not 25 as the City's standard would require. The estimated need of 21 spaces for the Martial Arts use is based on staff's recommendation of one space per 150 square feet. Square Parking Sewer P.M. Use feet required required Peak Trips Speedy Auto 3,300 7 45 15 Glass Woodworkers Warehouse 5,440 121y 45 26 r Martial Arts Center 3,070 21 225 23 Unleaseable 260 -- -- -- Office 2,650 11 165 8 14,720 7S,+ 480 72 Staff recommends approval of the application if the applicant can present convincing information showing that 12 spaces will adequately serve the woodworker's warehouse use. The applicant will be submitting additional information prior to Tuesday's meeting. 5) ALLENBROOK HOME - ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 1044 square foot 2-story addition to a group home. This group home consists of a complex of buildings consisting of two (2) group residential homes, a single family residence, a barn and an unused building. The number of residents will not increase as a result of this addition. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on November 8, 1993 will hear the applicant's request for a variance to expand a nonconforming use. This approval must be obtained before the Planning Commission can proceed with site plan review. 2 Memorandum November 9, November 5, Page 3 - Planning 1993 agenda items 1993 This property located at 100 Allen Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the south by Allen Road, on the east by a residence and undeveloped land, on the north by a community care home and on the west by undeveloped land. Access/circulation: Access is provided via two (2) existing curb cuts on Allen Road. No changes proposed to the access. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 6.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 12.7% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 5.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). The proposed addition will meet the side yard setback but the building onto which the building will be added to lies within the C.O. zone. This building is therefore a nonconforming use subject to Section 19.003 of the zoning regulations. The building located at the southeast corner of the site does not meet the front yard setback from Allen Road. This structure is a noncomplying structure subject to Section 19.002 of the zoning regulations. No changes proposed to this structure. Parking: No additional parking required. Dumpster: The dumpster location is shown and it will be screened. Bartlett Brook Watershed: This site is located within the Bartlett Brook watershed. Bill Szymanski is not recommending a review of this project by Wagner, Heindel and Noyes since the impact on the watershed will be insignificant. 6) VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS - PARKING ALTERATION - SITE PLAN This project consists of expanding the parking area for a 7,500 square foot office and operations center. This facility was approved on 12/18/84 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 85 Swift Street lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the north by Swift Street, on the east by an office building, on the south by Farrell Park and on the west by a vacant lot, a residence and a body shop. 3 Ralph O'Mara Garcia S( H E L T E R D E S I G N Architecture Planning Design Mr. Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT. 05403 Dear Ray, Per your request, here are the corrected site area figures for the Allenbrook application; A. Buildings coverage 6.5% B. Buildings, walks,& roads coverage 6.2% Total 12.7% C. Landscaped area coverage 87.3% Also attatched as part of this submission is a revised site plan indicating the location of the dumpster and that it is our intent to screen it with a fence that would be higher than the dumpster. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincere eer Scott, A.I.A. 3Iter Design, Inc. 20 Main Street Ewer ]unction. VT 05452 Tyler M. Scott Tel. (802) 879- 515 3 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 15, 1993 Tyler Scott Shelter Design 20 Main Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Allenbrook Home Addition, 100 Allen Road Dear Mr. Scott: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans by no later than Friday, October 29, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 4' �7'bJ4-' % Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp I Preliminary November 9, October 15, Page 3 Memo - Planning 1993 agenda items 1993 previous hearings. However, this option may not be possible due to CO zones and Floodplain zones. --- the expanded parking area and addition will result in the loss of several large bushes. Will these bushes be relocated to another location on the site? If so they must be shown. --- details of existing and proposed exterior lighting must be submitted. --- the depth of angled parking spaces must be a minimum of 19.8 feet with an aisle width of 14.5 feet. --- provide front yard coverage along Williston Road for the bank lot. --- the legal documents providing the 40 foot easement across the Mobil lot must be submitted for review by the City Attorney. --- plan needs to show the lot lines for the Mobil lot. --- coverage information should be provided for the Mobil lot since coverage will be affected by adding the proposed driveway. Specifically, front yard coverage should e submitted. If either coverage is currently being exceeded or if the driveway will increase either coverage beyond the limits, the Planning Commission will not be able to approve the driveway. --- proposed landscaping is short $1526 from the $2610 minimum requirement. Applicant should either increase size of plant material or propose more plantings to makeup the short fall. PETER JUDGE - RESTAURANT/RETAIL - SITE PLAN --- plans must be revised to show location of hydrant as recommended by Public Works Superintendent Sonny Auddette. ALLENBROOK HOME- ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- plan should show existing dumpster and it should be adequately screened. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: Preliminary Comments November 9, 1993 Agenda items Date: October 15, 1993 O'BRIEN BROTHERS - 1855 WILLISTON ROAD Plan dated March 1991 prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. is acceptable. ALLENBROOK HOME - ALLEN ROAD The approximate 500 square foot addition will contribute an insignificant amount of storm water run-off to the Bartlett Brook watershed area. I don't see a need to study the effect. VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS - SWIFT STREET Plan received by City September 9, 1993 prepared by Jim Lamphere is acceptable. 100 DORSET STREET - PETER JUDGE DEVELOPMENT Plans received June 10, 1993 prepared by Dunn Associates are acceptable. MYERS 8 LOT SUBDIVISION - DORSET STREET 1. Lot No. 1 & 2 front on Indian Creek Drive which is a private street. An agreement between the Indian Creek home owners association will have to be entered into. 2. Dorset Street curb cuts should be limited to two. A suggested combination is lots 3,4,5 for one and lots 6,7,8 the other. � � �� °°m�� Ni �� mm��o�o�� /�� Department 575 l9arset ftect *uutb Nurlington, lRermant 05403 FAX. (80e)658'4748 (e02}658'7960 FR//M: �.:-HIEr GODDE7TE WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 1�, 4. My EFS PR�PERTY DORSET STREE[ 5U�DlVlSl�N PLAN HAS BEEN REVlEWEU ON THE 8-LOT SUBDlVlFOR SINGLE HOMES AND AT THIS T[ME I DO MOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR EMERGENl-Y SERVICE. ENTERPRlSE CAR RENTAL FROJECT 93(.)53 HARBOR VIEW ROAD PLAN WAS REVIEWED ON THE 25 SPACE PARKING FOR THl6 PROPERTY AND I DO NOT FEEL IT' WOULD EFFECT EMERGENCY SERVICE. O'8�IEN BROTHERS AGENCY PRUJECT # 130 WlLLISTON ROAD THE ADDITION FOR THIS PROJECT W[LL HOT EFFECr EMERUENCY PqOTECTION IF APPROVED. VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS INC. SWlF7 STREET AODITION OF PARkING SPACES THE CH�NGES BElNG REQUESTED cOR By V�R�ONT �AS �[LL NOT �E A FOR OUF. DEPARTMEN� F/�P B1ERGE�|C� FH'��E/��lO� lF PE�UES�ED. 1'0 TREET �SE CHAMGE MOV[E THE�TER STHIS PL�N 8EEN E FOR THE ��ILDING WILL NUT EFFECT EME�GEMCy P�OTE�TIUN IF NEEDED FORM OUR DE�A�TMENT. 8. ALLENBROOK HOMES ADDITION 100 ALLEN ROAD THE ADDITION FOR THIS PROJECT WILL NOT EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF APPROVED. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone Z;�Iw .G;7 r 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) -aotP as .ApVh A " 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: JO 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) �t6 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES *10- G10 bLdg. �apbls , 9) LOT COVERAGE: buildings landscaped areas .y building, parking, outside storage D % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ kzf-jbCO , Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with -cost) $ /,Lwc 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:_ M3�1 04- 12 ) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( in and out) 1 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: — /J%14 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATIO DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING ri PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 toot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires sepa- rate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot. #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2 ALLENBROOK HONE FOR BOYS 100 Allen Road Area zoned C-2 District Section 8.00 Permitted Uses Present use: group home under variance February 7, 1977 (see minutes) Proposed use includes a group home for girls Under Section 8.00 residential, included boarding houses or instituions are prohibited See general description of program submitted by Allenbrook ALLENBROOK HOME FOR YOUTH, INC. 100 Allen Road Area zoned R-2 District. Existing use two group homes, 8 students and two adults per home. Use is non -conforming within R-2 District. Section 19.00 Non -conforming uses and structures, sub section 19.003 extension. Proposed addition 22'x27' to the Jarrett House. Addition conforms to all setback requirements. Lot contains 5.0 acres with 358 feet of frontage. `\ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 10, 1993 Mr. Mark Johnson 84 South Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 Re: Allenbrook Zoning Appeal Dear Mr. Johnson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the zoning appeal of Allenbrook Home for Youths has been tabled to the next regular scheduled meeting. That meeting is Monday, November 22, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. Enclosed is a copy of the variance criteria, please review them. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 26, 1993 Allenbrook Home for Youth, Inc. 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Sir/Madame: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, November 8, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your zoning application. Please plan to attend and be prepared to address the criteria enclosed. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative officer 1 Encl RW/mcp SOUTH a11RNNGTOK' ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zon- Ing Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A.. South Burlingy- ton ZBoard of Ad- IIuatm will hold a public hearing; at the South Bur- lington 'Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street,,South Our-+ linor, Vermont on Mon- dey, November 8, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following:' , 1 Appeal 'of Allenbrook Homes for Youth, Inc. seeking a varlanee from Section 19.00 Noncon- forming uses, sub -section 19.003 extensions of the South Burlington oning Regulations. R t la for permiaakxt, con- struct an atftfitlot ' con- taining apN60 square feeoo rrett House Group Home, lo- cated at 100 Allen Road. 2 Appeal of Gary Barrett seeking s variance from Section 19.00 Non- conforming uses - sub section 19.003 extension of the South Burlington ZoninG Regulations. Re- quest Is for permission to construct a 46'x55' addl- tion (repair shop and stor- age area) plus a 14'x30' second story addition to an office area on a lot containing approximately 1.5 acres. Property occu- pied by two single family Continued Next Column dwellings and a commer- cial use d.b.a. Barrette Tres Service, located at 376 Patchen Road. 3 Appeal of Andrew and Patricia Rickard welt= ing a variance from 3eai tion 18.00 Dimensions( requirements of the South Burllnyton Zoning Regula'' tlona. Request Is for pens mission to construct 24'x30' attached 0ara6' to within ten (10) feet ot; the northerly rear prlldraT arty line, located at iT White Place. Twin Oaks Assoclath seeking approval 'fro Section 10.39 Condltlor uses sub -section 10.21 Day care centers al Section 19.65 Muft uses of the South Buft ton Zoning Regulatkx Request Is for permis to operate a day as center maximum of chikfrah In' conlund l pwith existing medical sl o on lot containing i 8ai cn located at 200 Twin Oal Tema. Appeal of Chills Benk, Donald Mart a nt g a varlan from 18.00 Are densky dimensior require of the Sou done.'R misskm existing merclal 4suu re test) common land parcel talning four (4) acre cated at :1223 Shall Road. Plans are on flit the South Bur10 Planning and Zonin face, located at City 575 Dorset Street, I Burlington, Vermont. Richard 1 Zoning Adminlst C October 23, 1993 1 City of South Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Applicant Aulp� PF&I _ l 9m, fJV UJI� ,, Owner,leasee agent T Address V?, AJ4.F_ 2P Telephone # vrficial Use �f APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Landowner ,►, Homt, fvF- Address I6D{}1 p1 i 1o; h.fUey4ur j Location and description of property IM AIg4 Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer( )request for a conditional use ( ✓) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. ON. b4 Hearing Date gnat re of Appellant Do not wr' a below this line ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on 7i 'Ote? Day of W ek _?'QIV""" OL`�" "-'?i !/�S at �'.�a/ '1f'e ' to consider the following: Month and Date Time Appeal of seeking a from Section _W-�, Q r - /� c e�^ e� .. / 14r , rJ z.'7 ,& _'4-4 ` � "C2._ r of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to �- Q_-•n�GC-- C-t...n.4..% � � ..L-./ti'� ,�" c.,.s-t wc.,, - G1i. y�i�''L.ffi,/��.L..x•''��,�' k '. APLCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMIT NO ........... ICATION FOR ZONING PE w1IT lat. Copy CODE OFFICER 2nd. Copy CITY ENGINEER Zone.. ...,,, 3rd. Copy CITY ASSESSOR 4th Copy APPLICANT Date ....... �.�............................ l9:l... The undersigned hereby applies for permission to make certain building Improvements as described below. (Plans to be submitted If required by Building Inspector.) All construction to be completed In accordance with the Zoning Laws and Building Regulations of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont, and con- form to the Regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and any and all Federal Regulations now in effect. CONSTRUCTION NUMBER • Apartment No. Fam. ©�■■■■ ■�■■■■ PrivateSEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public El Septic Tank E] Permit * ■L�■Li■ ROAD O ELEC. WIRING: Underground 0 Overhead El Permit * . .• ■ 0©©Plot to scale Lot and Building Improvements, showing width of Front, Side and Rear yards. •■■■■ ■■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I Concrete Block ■■■■ ....................CC................... �� pIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Clapboards o ■............................................ ------------------- Wide.., .................... ........................ .............................................. ■ ■ ............■ ................................. .............................................. C .............................................. .............................................. IN � MEN MIN M11 Solid Brick Stone Veneer ■ ■ .■■..........■■■■.....Z..■...■ ................ Conc. or Cind. BI. .............................................. .............................................. Vitrolits NO ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Wootherstri. ■ ■PROPERTY Demolition 0 Utilities closed 0 �r r • � , . ROOFING Asph. Shingles ■>, ■ Wood Shingles■TILING Asbes. Shingles ■ ■Remarks Slate■ Toilet ■ Tile■ Metal■Electric■�■ Composition ■ No Lighting Roll Roofing .OF ROOMS ■Bsmt. 2nd. ■®3rd. L.. VQ A94W '_ I -57P -&Wk LWOOK4 SIGNATURE of OWNER or BUILDER•a• OWNER APPLICATION: REJECTED ❑ APPROVED ❑ ISSUED TO Date — 19 SIGNATURE OF CODE OFFICER PERMIT VALID FOR SIX MONTHS PERMIT SUBJECT TO APPEAL WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MARCH 27, 1989 The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on Monday, March 27, 1989 at 7:00 PM in the Conference Room, City Hall, 57 Dorset Street. Members Present John Thibauit, Jim Condos, Dan King, Joe Randazzo, Don Graf Members Absent Fred Blais, David Boehm Others Present Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator, Sidney Poger, The Other Paper, Mike Donoghue, The Free Press, Jerry McDougal, Mark Johnson, Amy Mikell, Nancy Simson, David Simendinger, Bill Simendinger, John Hodgson, Wendy Copp, David Akin, Frank Mazur, Mary Mazur, Gino Todisco, Ed Slayton, Zoe Hart, Alan Brusoe, Gail LeBlanc, Bruce Alvarez, Craig Anderson, Helen Eldred, Shirley Bowley, Steve Libby, William Orleans No. 1 Appeal of Allenbrook, 100 Allen Road to amend a condition of approval granted September 1981. Mr. Ward stated this appeal was tabled two weeks ago because of a problem with my office. I received a letter from Nancy Simpson, president of the group home's board of directors. We granted a variance in September 1981 and the board stipulated that 14 youths would be the maximum amount of students allowed and since that time, for the most part, one of the buildings on the site has not been used. They are requesting that you remove the stipulation and I thought it was appropriate to do that. Ms. Simpson stated the building had been leased out. Mr. Graf asked if they would be using the three buildings for students. Ms. Simpson said we'll continue our planning process to see if it is even feasible. Mr. Graf said I would like to make a motion that we approve rescinding of the restriction of occupancy capacity of September 8, 1981 to allow the capacity to be increased to the maximum of 20. This was seconded by Mr. Randazzo and all voted aye. This was approved unanimously. No. 2 Appeal of Frank Mazur Appeal of Frank Mazur seeking a variance from Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements. Request is for permission to remove an existing 21' x 31' camp and construct a 28' x 36' single-family dwelling with a 28' x 28' attached garage to within thirty five (35) feet of the front yard, eighteen (18) feet of the westerly side yard and twenty one (21) feet of the easterly side yard, on a �f(� lot containing 12,187 square feet, located at 40 Bartlett Bay Road. Allenbrook Mr. Dick Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT Dear Mir. Ward: Board of Directors Allenbrook Homes for Youth, Inc. 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 February 17, 1989 Allenbrook Homes for Youth, Inc., operates two homes for fourteen boys and girls under the provisions of a variance from the City of South Burlington. Presently, Allenbrook is considering plans to increase the number of children served from fourteen as presently allowed to a maximum of twenty. In order to undertake this expansion, Allenbrook requests an amendment to one stipulation of the original variance to allow Allenbrook to serve up to twenty children. This expansion would not require the building of any new buildings on the property. Children now reside in only two of the three homes on site. The third home has not been used for program purposes since 1982. This proposed expansion would necessitate moderate renovations for cosmetic and programmatic reasons, and would be made according to all pertinent fire and safety codes. Almost all renovations made would be to the interior of the existing building. Exterior changes would include the building of a new external stairs to allow for egress from the second and third floors. Allenbrook believes it has complied with all provisions of the zoning variance under which it operates, and enjoys an excellent reputation in the community including the neighborhood, the police department, and the South Burlington schools. This proposed expansion would allow Allenbrook to diversify its program in order to serve youth who currently need services in this community based setting. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely N nc Si son, 'ew" .� Pr dent Grimes House and Jarrett House The Allenbrook Teaching Family Homes September 8, 1981 South Burlington Zoning Board City Hall Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Attention: J. Everett Reed, Chairman Dear Mr. Reed: Thank you for attending the August 26 meeting at South Burlington Midu'le School concerning the Allenbrook Croup P.ome. For the record, those in attendance included: .John Schillhammer and Dom Marabella, representing the Allenbrook board; Tom Cloutier and Dale Wolfe, the Allenbrook teaching parents; Mark Johnson, Tom Moore, Jacki Tashman, and John Burchr.rd of SRS, Pat Davison, Pat Irish, Hal Benson and An-elo Pizzagalli, representing th,2 Allen - brook neighborhood; Dave Kaufman and .Jeanne Kennedy, South Burlington legislators; Senator Esther Sorrell and Ron Crisman representing the study com:,.ittee on juvenl',:� .rime. Summarizing briefly, discussion revolved around the Allenbrook program and the ty.. .r child that should participate in it. It was agreed that Allenbrook should con- tinue to exist to serve the needs of troubled youth. It was also agreed that Allen— brook is not nor ever will be a secure detention facility, nor will Allenbrook be: required to accept youths it does not feel are appropriate for the program. it was the consensus of the group that the following guidelines and/or objectives be established for the Allenbrook home: 1. Ar least one and preferably two neighborhood residents sit permanently on thr Allenbrook Board of Directors. 2. The Allenbrook board will compile a list of names, addresses and phone numbers of Al lonbroo'c `)oard no7,',c-_ and others af- app ropriatt: .,7ho may be contacted for purposes of answerinf; questions or in emergency. The boar` will provide this list along with a letter of explanation to neighbors within the immediate area of Allenbrook. 3. A n.aximum of 14 youths in addition to staff will reside at Allenbrook. 4. Th( Allenbrook program wi l l be monitored for a period of 10 month~ (throu��, June 30, 1982). .)uring the last month of this period a questionnaire ct-1- piled by the board will be distributed to neighbors. The results of this questionnaire will be m:idc available to the neighbors and will be used by the Allenbrook h(,ard for : irposes of program evaluation. 5. At the conclusion of the 1Q ,.ionth period and following compilation of t`.�. questionnaire, the Allci,:;ro„k h .ird will meet with the neighbors to determine whether the progr:_�i h.:s met ,'esired criteria and to discuss the program's future. C South Burlington Zoning Board South Burlington, Vermont September 8, 1981 Page 2 of 2 6. Commissioner of Social and Rehabilitative Services, John Burchard, will draft a letter to the Zoning Board, which may be attached to the SRS contract with Allenbrook stating that Allenbrook is recognized as a non -secure facility f(,r troubled youths, and that SRS under current manage- ment has no intention of converting Allenbrook to a secure facility. Having reached consensus on the above topics, Allenbrook, the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services, and representatives of Allenbrook's neighbors recommend that the South Burlington Zoning Board approve the group home's operation under the conditions specified above for a period of 10 months. After this time it is recommended the Zoning Board review the status of Allenbrook with its Board of Directors and community to determine whether or not the permit should be continued. Thank you for your consideration and time. Sincerely, ,John Sc illhammer Pat Davison For the Allenbrook Home For Allenbrook's Neighbors /John Burchard For the Department of Social and Rehabilitativ. Services LAW OFFICES MIKELL & MIKELL, P.C. 444 SOUTH UNION ST P. O BOX 587 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0587 WILLIAM E MIKELL' ANDREW D. MIKELL JACOUELINE T LAMARCHE OFFICE MANAGER JULIA C. BURKE LEGAL ASSISTANT 'ALSO ADMITTED IN MASS Charles Hafter City Manager 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Allenbrook sewer connection Dear Chuck: April 21, 1992 AREA CODE 802 TEL. 658-3337 FAX 658-4293 Believe it or not, we are near the final stages of paperwork on the new sewer connection for Allenbrook. With any luck, we can begin construction in a week or two. I have been requested by Jesseann Wyman of the District #4 Environmental office to provide documentation that the City has allocated appropriate sewage capacity for the project. I enclose a copy of her letter for your assistance. We have estimated that the maximum flow will be 1275 gallons per day. Additionally, the State office has no record of City approval of the sewer connection which occured in or about 1983. That is when the house in the back of the property was connected to Bartlett Bay and the connection runs through Pillsbury Manor. At the time an easement was obtained from John Larkin. Accordingly, we need the City to provide Allenbrook with a letter of approval for sewage capacity as to the current project and retroactive approval for the previous sewer connection. If it is easier for you, I have added a signature line to the bottom of this letter and enclose two originals. A city official's signature would indicate approval. If appropriate, please sign one original and return it to me. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your continued assistance. Very tr y yours, 1�111 An ew D. ikell, Esq. ADM/ct Enclosure cc: Sam Hoar City o So. B rlington Allenbrook President '' JI f -- by: l !, Agent �tl � r, k� t State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Gill Barlow Knight Consulting Engineers P.O. Bow. 29 Williston, VT 05495 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Esse>: Jct. , VT 05.152 Phone =18021 879-6563 April 17, 1992 RE: Allenbrook, Allen Road, South Burlington. Dear Gill: I am writing in response to your letter dated 1/9/92 regarding the abo-ve mentioned project. Encloseo is a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit application form. It must he signed by the landowner. The fee is $.22 per gallon per clay total design flow. Since I cannot find any record of our office approving the connection of the back building to municipal_ sewer, that will need to be included in the application also and the fees would be based on flows for the three buildings. We will need municipal approval_ letter from the City of South Burlington allocating the required set.age capacity for the two existing buildings that wil 1 be connected to municipal sewer. The letter should also indicate that they had approc°ed the existing connection for the back building that, was connected se%-eral years aclo. We will need 2 sots of complete engineering plans for the connection to muni.cinal sewer includin, details, specifications, materials, construction and testing notes. Assuming easements trill be required, the easements will need to be shown on the platys and we will need copies of the easement agreements, or• written riot i_fication from the property- owners that the,,- are granting the easenretrt �.. Regional Offices - Bade/Essex Jct /Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnshuly Gill Barlow April 17, 1992 Page 2 Based on the performance standards for our office, we would have 45 days time to review a project of this scope. However, because the existing sewage disposal system is a health hazard, I will give the project priority and to expedite the process , once I have done an initial review 1 will call you with any comments or additional information that is required. Sincerely, Jessanne Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer Enclosure CC: Andrew Mil:ell No Text September 8, 1981 South Burlington Zoning Board 'ity Hall "corset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Attention: Everett Reed, Chairman Dear Mr. Reed: Thank you for attending the August 26 meeting at South Burlington MidLle School concerning the Allerbroo?c Croup P.ome. For the re,ord, those in attendance included: Jo',, -.a Schillhammer and Dom M.irabella, .:-.presenting the Allenbrook board; Tom Cloutier and Dale Wolfe, the 1llnbrook t!aching parents; Mark Johnson, Tom Moore, Jacki Tashman, and John Burchccd of SRS, :at Davison, Pat Irish, Hal Benson and An,;elo Pizzagalli, representing ft-, Allen - brook neighborhood; Dave Kaufman and Jeanne Kennedy, South Burlington legl3lators; Senator Esther Sorrell and Ron Crisman representing the study con,_itcee on juven_ .rime. !mmarizing briefly, discussion revolved around the Allenbrook program and t'rle ty.,,. .z child that should participate in it. It was agreed that Allenbrook should con- tinue to exist to serve the needs of troubled youth. It was also agreed that Allen, - brook is not nor ever will be a secure detention facility, nor will Allenbrook be required to accept youths it does not feel are apnropr=ate for the program. �t was the cor:census of the group tha~ r1-o .`ollowing guidelines and/or objectives bc:- establ sho(i for the Allenbrookc 1. A: least one and pref(.•rably t%.o -_eighborhood residents sit perm._:iently on th, Allenbrook Board of Directors. 1. The Allenbrook board will compile a list of names, addresses and phone numbers of Allenbrook board momber:: and others as appropriate who may be contzc.ted for purposes of answering questions or in emergency. The board will Frovide this list along with a letter of explanation :o neighbors wi:.hin the immediate area of Allenbrook. 3. A i._,ximum of- 14 youths in addition to staff will reside at Allenbrook. 4. The Allenbrook program will be monitored for a period of 10 months (thrf,u?+ . June 30, 1982). curing the last month of this period a questionnaire piled by the board will be distributed to neighbors. The results of thi- questionnaire will be made available to the neighbors and will be used b,t the. Allenbrook beard for ;Srposes of program evaluation. 5. At. 4he conclusion of the 10. ,nonth period and following compilation of t':,z questionnaire, the Al.lc,3';:o„k b and wil'_ meet with the neighbors to determine whether the prcgrc_:n _s mL.t ;ie:.fired criteria and to discuss the program's future. k South Burlington Zoning Board South Burlington, Vermont September 8, 1981 Page 2 of 2 6. Commissioner of Social and Rehabilitative Services, John Burchard, will draft a letter to the Zoning Board, which may be attached to the SRS contract with Allenbrook stat4ng that Allenbrook is recognized as a non -secure facility fc,r troubled youths, and that SRS under current manag,. ment has no intention of converting Allenbrook to a secure facility. Having reached consensus on the above topics, Allenbrook, the Department of SociuI and Rehabilitative Services, and representatives of Allenbrook's neighbors recommend that the South Burlington Zoning Board approve the group home's operation under the conditions specified above for a period of 10 months. After this time it is recommended the Zoning Board review the status of Allenbrook with its Board of Directors and community to determine whether or not the permit should be continued. Thank you for your consideration and time. Sincerely, John Schillhammer Pat Davison For the Allenbrook Home For Allenbrcok's Neighbors �lohn Burchard For the Department of Social and Rebabilitativ, Services September 15, 1981 Allenbrook, Inc. Mr. Dale Wolfe 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Wolfe: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a variance of July 27, 1981. The Board approved your request based on the six guide lines and/or objectives stated in a letter of September 8, 1981 to the Chairman of the Board. This office request that a copy of condition #2 be forwarded to us, and that iJ the results of condition #4 also be forwarded upon completion. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Y Very truly, "i 's Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RK/mcg 5• , 0 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SEPTEMBER 14. 1981 Appeal of Gerald Divincenzo, 9 Wooderest Dr. (tabled August 24, 1981) No one was present to present the appeal, so Mr. Dinklage moved to table the item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Blain seconded the motion and all voted for it. Appeal of Allenbrook Home for Boys. 100 Allen Drive (tabled July 27, 1981) Mr. Ward said the Allenbrook representatives met with neighbors to discuss concerns raised at the last meeting. Messrs—Blais and Campbell had not been present at the last meeting on the subject, and asked if anyone objected to their voting on it. There were no objections voiced. The board had received a letter dated September 8, listing 6 recommendations for the Allenbrook home (copy of the letter on file with Zoning Administrator) and Mr. Dinklage asked if the board of directors of the home agreed with them. Mr. Marabella said the recommendations were acceptable. A representative of Allenbrook said they were licensed to have 14 children. Their current contract calla for 13. There are 3 houses on the land and they will have two programs, each with 7 youths. Mr. Marabella said that at the board of directors' meeting on August 19, a resolution was passed stating that they would have a maximum of 14 resident students. The directors are discussing using the 3rd house as a residential day school, or an administrative building. Mr. Reed said he had received a letter from Mr. Burchard of SRS, stating that it was not their intent to have the group home serve as a secure treatment facility for adolescents. He read the letter and a copy is on file with the Zoning Administrator. Mr. Dinklage moved to vote on the appeal with the stipulation that the 6 recommendations contained in the letter dated September 8, 1981 and addressed to Mr. Reed be complied with. This implies a review in 10 months. Mr. Blais seconded the motion and all voted for it. Mr. Blais said it was fantastic that the neighbors and directors had been able to work out the situation. He felt it was commendable. Mr. Guyette noted that since female students were to be allowed at Allenbrook, perhaps the name should be changed to be consistent everywhere. The appeal was granted unanimously. Appeal of Gerald Divincenzo. 9 Woodcrest Dr. (tabled August 24, 1 81) Mr. Divincenzo had come in during the last appeal, and Mr. Dinklage moved to reconsider item P7 on the agenda. Mr. Blain seconded the motion and all voted aye. Mr. Ward said the garage had been relocated to the rear of the property and turned 90°, so the driveway would come off the other side. The existing front yard setback will be maintained. The side yard setback is -now 14' and will remain at that distance. There were no comments from neighbors. The appeal was approved unanimously. Appeal of William Dunn Mr. Dunn had not come in, so Xr. Dinklage moved to table the appeal IING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 JULY 27, 1981 2 Appeal of Allenbrook Home for Boys, Dale Wolfe agent, seeking a variance �m Section 8.00 Permitted uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request for permission to amend an existing use permit, permitting a group home for boys, to allow for a program which will include a group home for girls, at Allenbrook, 100 Allen Road. Mr. Ward explained to the members that in 1977 Allenbrook was granted a use variance allowing a group home for boys. Father Baffa was the director at that time, and the home was originally located at 1690 Shelburne Road. Father Baffa has been before the Board requesting to relocate additional houses. The property has three houses and has served as a group home for orphaned or abused boys. Allenbrook is requesting a change in the program to include females. Mr. Wolfe, a director at Allenbrook explained the program to the members. The new program "teaching family" is two years old in Vermont. A married couple serve as directors, they live with the children in a home atmosphere. The children attend public schools, hold jobs and are involved in community affairs. Presently Allenbrook has two directors. Allenbrook is licensed by the State for a maximum of thirteen children. They have a contract with the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services. Approximately mid January the Board of Directors at Allenbrook requested the teaching family program. Mr. Wolfe stated that they were unaware of the fact that they needed permission to include girls within the program and that presently they have two. The program is conducted in two separate homes, one home has five children and the other four. The third house is presently being remodeled. Mr. Copp inquired as to the change in the program. Mr. Marabella, Assistant Principal of the Middle School spoke of the changes. Stating that he has been a director of Allenbrook since 1970. Over the years, Allenbrook has been under contract with S.R.S., the children are referred to Allenbrook. The children are from the Burlington, St. Albans and Vergennes areas. After Father Baffa resigned in 1979, the Samacans Fathers took over, the program changed and the Samacans Fathers were experiencing problems. In January the Board of Directors checked into the "teaching family program." For approximately three months Allenbrook was having its troubles. The police were involved in about ten incidents. Presently ten children reside at Allenbrook and the program is operating without problems. The type of children at the home are from broken homes and are not juvenile delinquents. The children are of the same type which the State would place in a foster home. Mr. Bergeron commented that one could interpret the hand out from Allenbrook to mean that the State could refer juvenile delinquents to Allenbrook. The neighbors are very concerned about the type of children which are housed at Allen - brook. Mr. Marabella and Mr. Cloutier the second director of teaching family explains the use of the screening committee that reviews every referral. Mr. Cloutier explained )NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 3 JULY 27, 1981 1 that he and his wife with their son live at Allenbrook and that for his family's protection he would not permit a hard core child into the program. The type of child that is referred to Allenbrook is the main cause of concern by the neighbors. Mary Smith stated that neighbors are opposed to Allenbrook becoming a home for juvenile delinquents. Mr. James Briggs, a director at Allenbrook informed those present that the wording in the contract is the same for all group homes and that they have had a contract with S.R.S. from the beginning. Mr. Guyette stated that the original variance has changed and that the program is not the question. Mr. Pat Irish, 125 Allen Road told of harassment on the school bus by children at Allenbrook. Stating that in the past two years that environment at Allenbrook was changed. John Nyberg an ex resident of Allenbrook for seven years explained the different control of the students under the administration of Father Baffa. The changes took place when he left. The kids have no control under the new program and in his opinion mixing the children has caused problems. The different administration created trouble due to lack of supervision. Mr. Briggs explained that under the different administration that Allenbrook has had its problems. The Board is very concerned and they hope that the new program will end the troubles. If the teaching program does not work Allenbrook may be closed. The main concern of the neighbors was that the State may use Allenbrook as a re- placement for Week's School, that hard core kids would be referred to Allenbrook by the State. The neighbors wanted assurances that this would not take place. Mr. Pizzagalli suggested that the track record of Allenbrook be reviewed and that the neighbors see the contract between Allenbrook and S.R.S. Mr. John Schillhammer, President of the Board of Directors agreed that in the past three years, Allenbrook has had its problems, the teaching family program is the last resort, if it fails Allenbrook would be closed. He stated that the directors were unaware of the neighborhood concernsand felt that they could be worked out. Mr. Dinklage stated that the goal of Allenbrook should be to meet certain objectives and to prevent problems for the people living in the area. It was suggested that no more females be referred to Allenbrook until a variance is considered by the Board. The requirements of S.R.S. were discussed, it was noted that an 85% occupancy is required, otherwise the contract is reviewed by S.R.S. Mrs. Davidson and Mrs. Calkins voiced objection to Allenbrook being a replacement for Weeks School. Mrs. Davidson stated that she talked with a Mrs. Tashman of S.R.S. and was informed that the hard core child may be referred to Allenbrook. It was suggested that the neighbors and members of Allenbrook meet in order to discuss the concerns. That the documents between the State and Allenbrook be available for review. c C ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 4 JULY 27. 1981 Mrs. Maher and Mr. Kaufman, as representatives, would be involved in the meetings. The Board also wanted to see a copy of the contract with S.R.S. On a motion by Mr. Dinklage and seconded by Mr. Guyette the appeal was continued until the second Monday in September (September 14, 1981) all members were in favor. Other business Mr. Ward informed the Board that Mr. Pappas had formally withdrawn his appeal. The Minutes of July 13, 1981 were approved. The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 P.M. July 14, 1982 Dominich N4arabella Allenbrook, Inc. 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Marabella, On July 12, 1982 the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment the extension of the variance fro Allenbrook, Inc., previously grant trail period beginning last September. There is now no time limit on as long as the current use is in -continuous operation. granted Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DHS/mcg approved for a the approval SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE` In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, July 27, 1981 at 5:00 P.M. day of week(month and date time to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Robert Haves and Dwight Churchill .r seeking a variance from Section 11.00 , Dimensional requirements & Section 11.80 Dwelling standards of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 18'x32' addition to within twelve (12) feet of the westerly side yard, 4End to within 25' of the rear yard, and convert existing structure and proposed addition into a two fam 4y, lot contains 8,864 square feet and one dwelling will contain 576 square feet, at (J4 Dumont Avenue. #2 Appeal of Allenbrook Home for Boys, Dale Wolfe, agent seeking a variance from Section 8.00 Permitted uses of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to amend an existing use permit, permitting a group home for boys, to allow for a program which will include a group home Eor girls, at Allenbrook, 100 Allen Road. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer July 11, 1981 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT / Name, address and telephone # of applicant A44C- J-2IQ'0B^ Name, address of property owner too muc-J 'ROA-D Property location and description Zoo 1 C4,7vrAo,4D - 6jaowo 74-omE fpX- I�oYS ''' G IR(S, I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , , at (day of week) month and date) time to consider the following: l Appeal of seeking a Burlington Regulations. n from Section C7 e', r,,�„c - �< �(' t,i�,� ✓ Request is for permission to of the South 1 July 13, 1981 li Allenbrook Home for Boys Mr. Dale Wolfe 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning hearing Dear Mr. Wolfe: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the Municipal Office, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street — ` on Monday, July 27, 1981 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your variance for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg State of Vermont Commissioner's Office Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division Division of Services for the Blind and Visually Handicapped ,♦ Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit Telephone No. 828-3401 Dear Sirs: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Main Office: Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Please reply to: 107 North Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 July 17, 1981 This letter is to support the philosophy that the Allenbrook Group Home facilities remain open to a co-ed population. The philosophy of the teaching family model is a unique program and particularly effective with certain youngsters, both male and female. There is no reason to limit this resource to youngsters of one sex. The facilities at Allenbrook (specifically bedroom and bathroom) are such that a mixed population of male and female residents can be adequately separated and supervised. When both males and females live together, this offers additional instructional opportunity both in exploring social roles and in forming friendships with other teens of the opposite sex. I have had a male juvenile in placement at Allenbrook who was placed while there was a female resident also in placement. While there were difficulties in the home at that time, sexual behavior between the residents was not a problem. The screening of youngsters prior to placement helps to assure a "workable" group in terms of personality and presenting problems which each new youngster would bring to the home. The ability of a child to benefit from such a placement remains a paramount concern and all presenting problems are thoroughly discussed prior to placement. This helps to assure the compatibility of the group and the ability of the individual youth to successfully utilize the program. Surely, the sex of a youngster would be a consideration in the referral process, as would other, equally important information such as school abilities, degree of self-control, parental involvement, etc. Because the program does offer realistic, helping opportunities to teenagers and because the physical facilities can accomodate both sexes, it would seem discriminatory if both sexes could not be offered equal placement opportunity. Sincerely, Gretchen Mandernack Social Worker -Juvenile Services Barre District Office GM/mea lc.I 0 1 C-k jo. Aqwua Ll. ..,x. / / A# A r-M W-SAO A St Uf 1740 1 Tt b WARw®r to-11 �AW.�WAW - - Pam _S -- ------ &YA- 400 m_i_ ICYf��'•xa..a,-ram.... . STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This contract made and entered into by and between the State of Vermont, Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (hereinafter called "State"), and Allenbrook Home For Boys, Inc of South Burlington, Vermont 05401 (hereinafter called "Provider"), is as follows: I. TERM OF CONTRACT The term of this Contract shall commence January 1, 1981 and terminate December 31, 1981. II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED Provider will provide or arrange for suitable care, treatment, and supervision for the benefit of placed children as described in Appendix A entitled, "Program Services Description". Provider wil-l.provide or arrange for regular visits by parents, relatives, and friends, subject to whatever restrictions State may impose. Provider will not limit visitation privileges of placed children for reasons of discipline. Provider will provide or arrange for educational experiences appro- priate to each child's needs, including transportation if necessary. Each child's education plan will be discussed with and agreed to by State. Provider will work toward integrating placed children into the affairs of the local community. Provider will obtain for placed children regular optical, dental, and medical examinations for preventive purposes and treatment as necessary. Provider shall not obtain psychiatric treatment for placed children without prior written approval of State. When an examining physician has recommended psychiatric treatment, Provider shall obtain a copy of the examiner's report and recommenda- tion and forward same to State. Provider shall obtain the recommended treatment only upon receiving from State written authorization to do so. Regular optical, dental, and medical care shall be secured from persons approved for payment under'Title XIX of the Social Security Act. In no event shall Provider secure medical, dental, or optical care beyond the coverage of Title XIX without prior written authori- zation from State. Provider will obtain emergency medical, optical, and dental care as needed. To.the extent that circumstances allow, Provider will secure such care from persons approved for payment under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Provider will notify State and appropriate authorities immediately when it is determined that a child has run away, been in an accident, or appears to have a serious illness. III. ADMISSIONS Provider will accept into its care those children referred by the State who are determined jointly by State and Provider to be appropriate for placement. Provider will not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, creed, religion, or national origin, or in any other manner violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964. � 1 1 1 3 IV. DISCHARGES Provider will discharge children in accordance with the following procedures: A) Planned Discharge: The decision to remove a child from the program will be made jointly by State and Provider by application of State's Task Based System of Case Management and Supervision (TBS). The decision will be based upon the child's attainment of results specified in the TBS case plan, or the inability to obtain in the program those results. In the event of disagreement between State and Provider concerning actual date of discharge, the party insisting upon the earliest discharge date will give written notice to the other party fifteen (15) days prior to discharge. B) Unplanned Discharge: Emergency: Child is in danger of doing serious physical damage to self and/or others and must be removed immediately to Waterbury Unit. Non -Emergency: Child is destructive to program, and is substantially and adversely affecting other children. Social and Rehabilitation Services Social Worker will be notified immediately, a staffing arranged and an appropriate alternative living situation found as soon as possible. 4 V. METHOD OF PAYMENT 1. The maximum amount of this contract will not exceed $155,388.00. For its part, in consideration of the services delivered by Provider pursuant to this contract, State agrees to make payment based upon the following table: Rate Per Uniform Monthly Uniform Monthly Individual Mo/Child Cash Flow Cash Flow Less 10% Ceiling $1,177 $12,949 Capacity is 13. $11,654 $155,388 Rate per month/child is computed at 85% capacity. Rate includes $10 allowance and $25 for clothing. Uniform Monthly Cash Flow represents approved operating budget - 12. Uniform Monthly Cash Flow Less 10% is approved budget - 12 months less 10%. Ceiling represents approved budget and the maximum that may be paid under this contract. Percentage to be applied for FFP on CC children will be 60% of each monthly rate for services and 40% for maintenance. 2. Provider will bill State on or about the first of each month for services provided during the previous month. The invoice will be in such form as may be required by State and will contain at a minimum, the following: a) A listing by name of individual children served; b) Indication of the number of days of service per individual; c) Statement of the amount charged per child and the total amount billed for the month. 61 3. For services rendered from January 1, 1981 through June 30, 1981 State upon receipt of the monthly invoice will pay Provider monthly the Uniform Monthly Cash Flow ($12,949) identified in Article V Table. 4.a. For services rendered from July 1, 1980 through December 31, 1980 State upon receipt of the monthly invoice will compute through its present computerized system the group home payment on a per child basis. This computation will generate a computer printout and a check. The method of computation will be at the per month per child rate specified in Article V Tab -le, pro -rated over the number of days each child is actually present. Pro -ration occurs on the assumption that each month contains (30) days. Payment is made for the day a child enters the group home, but not the day(s) he leaves. The State will verify the occupancy rate prior to the scheduled release date of this check, which shall be on or about the 15th day of each month following the month in which service is provided. Payment shall cover all services rendered and allowances attributable to the previous calendar month. b. Upon receipt of Provider's invoice the State will determine each group home's occupancy rate for the month by comparing the printout to the invoice And applying the following: Verified Total # of children present each -day of the month 30 day month x capacity c. At a monthly occupancy of 85-100% (11-13 children) the checks, computed and generated under the procedure delineated in Article V (4) above, will be released. --=.a,t'�, - �=Ltiy.��"'Str"5�.: .w�•ww..,.m,,�r«.a,ad4: - rmn.aE...-+.�.....� �w '''�*..:.��i1.'z.��—,--_ ._s....is.. - aw...:y.ri...��„ [w.i R d. At -a monthly occupancy rate below 85% the check, computed and generated under the procedure delineated in Article V (3), will he released. If that check is less than the Uniform Monthly Cash Flow Less 10%, a check representing the difference will be generated manually (AAF-23). e. State will notify Provider monthly, in writing, of the verified occupancy level and the amount of check or checks issued. f. If for any three consecutive months or for any four of six consecutive months, occupancy is below 85% this contract shall terminate at a date convenient to and to be determined by State. State must give Provider 30 days notice in advance of that termination date. VI. RECOVERY OF FUNDS If the contract is terminated because occupancy is below 85% and a renegotiated agreement has not been signed, the Provider will reimburse the..State all monies in excess of the amount reflecting the Uniform Monthly Cash Flow Less 10% received by Provider during the effective period of this Contract. VII. MEDICAL EXPENSES State shall assume responsibility for the payment of medical, optical, or dental care for placed children where the cost of such care is not covered by Title XIX of the Social Security Act. VIII.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS Provider agrees to comply with all requirements of Section 504 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, relating to discrimination against handicapped persons, and Title 21 V.S.A., Chapter 5, Sub -Chapter 6, relating to fair employment practices, to the extent applicable. II 7 Provider agrees to comply with the provisions of 45 CFR 228 relating to services provided under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Provider agrees to comply with the provisions of 45 CFR 228.73 relating to the disclosure of the names of owners, agents, or managing employees who have been convicted of offenses relating to involvement in programs under Title VIII, XIX, or XX of the Social Security Act. IX. RECORDS, REPORTS AND ACCOUNTING Provider will maintian all books, documents, payrolls, papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred under this agreement and to make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the period of this agreement and for three years from the date of the expiration of this agreement for inspection by any authorized representative of the State and copies thereof shall be furnished, if requested. If any litigation, claims, or audit is started before the expiration of the three year period, the records shall be retained until all litigations, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. Provider will prepare and submit to the State quarterly reports describing the current progress and circumstances of each placed child, together with such further reports pertaining to the subject matter of this contract in the format required by State, as described in Appendix 8 entitled, "Financial Report Requirements" within 45 days of the last day of each budgeted quarter. No further payments will be made without receipt of these reports. 19 Provider, in anticipation of contract renewal, will submit to State such budgetary and financial information as State may require to negotiate a new contract. Such information'shall be submitted not later than 90 days before the termination of this contract. X. EVALUATION AND MONITORING State, through any authorized representatives, will have the right at all reasonable times to inspect, or otherwise evaluate, the work performed or being performed hereunder. XI. INDEMNIFICATION Provider will act in performing the -,provisions of this contract, as an independent Contractor, and not as an employee of the State. Contractor will indemnify, defend and hold the State harmless for all claims, suits, Judgements or damages arising from any and all of Provider's operations and activities under or pursuant to this Contract. XII. SUBCONTRACTS No subcontracts are permitted under this contract without prior written approval of State. XI II. TERMINATION In addition to termination of this Contract as provided in Article V, METHOD OF PAYMENT, Section 9, this Contract may be terminated by either party within its specified term by giving written notice'at least thirty (30) days in advance. XIV. AMENDMENTS No changes or amendments to this Contract will be effective unless they are in writing, and signed by the duly authorized representatives of both parties. 9 XV. COMMENCEMENT DATE This Contract will not be binding on either party unless and until it has been certified by the Attorney General's Office under the provisions of 3 V.S.A. §311 (a) (10), approved by the Governor or his designee on form AA-14, and signed by the authorized person of the Contracting agency. In the event this Contract is executed by the parties prior to these prerequisites, but such conditions are subsequently met, the commencement date set forth in this contract shall control. XVI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter. All prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and understandings are superseded hereby. APPROVED ^^.7"t t....l !' of dirtim..i rutioa� D. . DEC 1 7 IKO _........_....._.......___.....�......,.,, APPROVED AS TO/ ALLEN ROOK HOME FOR BOYS, INC. BY:Alj,(Xa,�2 I TITL Ao U o h ADDRESS: try) (Soc. Sec. p oyer STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND CITATION SERVICES By. mm ss oner DATE: ALLENBR00K Relicensing - 1981-82 The following report is based on information gathered from the course of a day- long site visit to Allenbrook on April 9, 1981. During the course of the day, I interviewed Mr. and Mrs. Richard Boshe, Mr. and Pars. Thomas Cloutier, the houseparents, Dale Wolfe, the trainer from the Teaching Family Training Center, Linda Mastrianni, the assistant to Mr. and Mrs. I3oshe, and seven of the nine residents, both individually and in two groups. In addition, I reviewed records of two of the residents. Before the site visit, I contacted two S.R.S. case- workers in the Burlington office to elicit their opinions about the effective- ness of the current program. A further word of introduction is perhaps appropriate so that the reader of this report can view the current program in proper perspective. Allenbrook, in the past few years, has gone through several difficult periods of upheaval, resulting in three major changes in program approach in the past three years. The new program, based on the Teaching Family model, has been operating at Allenbrook since January of 1981. Because of the infancy of this current pro- gram, the critical element of evaluation in a licensing; report will he of specu- lative nature. A thorough program review will take place in six months time as part of the 1981 relicensing. 1. ADMINISTRATION AND ORGANIZATION A. Governing Body The Board of Directors of Allenbrook is comprised of 20 members. Allen - brook is incorporated as a non-profit corporation. The governing body has adopted, and periodically reviews written by-laws and policies. There are three proposed changes to the by-laws attached to the current reapplication. In the past year, this Board of Directors has become remarkably active in making necessary changes in the Allenbrook program. There remains a hard-working, active group of Board members to provide the ongoing support to the Teaching Family program. The Board is responsible for the financial status of Allenbrook, contract negotiation, budget writing, and administrative role such as support to the Teaching Family program. With the Teaching Faq yprogram.. an important function of the Board'be- ` comes that of l;aison,;-wigh the Teaching Family training personnel;, whoil, in turn do _the gngoiri supervision of he, teaching; parents.' ' Wh,4he this ,` r Al , provides another layeV of supervision, ,the Board recognizes its ultimate ' responsibility as,the'..governing body and authority of the Allenbrook Corporation. _ _ n { rq B. Program Description Attached to the 1981 reapplication, is a lengthy program description of the Teaching; Family model. Since this is a model that has been developed for several years, there's a good deal of written material, and a very Y ALLENBROOK Page 2 highly structured program model for implementation support, etc. C. Fiscal ranagement The board of Directors oversees the program's fiscal management, and pro- vides the appropriate information to S.R.S. for contract negotiations. D. Records The residents' records are in locked files and are maintained appropri- ately. Each child has a written record which includes administrative treatment and educational data from the time of admission until the time the child leaves the facility. The content and format of these records does not appear to be as uniform within the facility. Since this is a period of transition, Rick indicated that they will be turning their attention, shortly, to developing, a consistent comprehensive record -keeping system with the help of the Teaching Family Training Center. Currently, referral information and important background information is not readily accessible on a well -designed facesheet. There is good medi- cal background information, but there is not an ongoing record of incidents of medical visits, etc. Reflecting the two -week assessment period each resident goes through as he enters the program, are assessment cards that explain which skills are being emphasized with the youngster. In addition, there are, on file, assessment cards that reflect the points earned by the residents. These records do not contain updated notes on counseling that the staff has pro- vided to the youngster, nor a clear-cut status report indicating the long- range behavior goals that an individual would be working on, and the final measurement of success that the youngster is striving toward. There are school notes on file reflecting the tracking of the resident's behavior in school. What they did not reflect was a resident's scholastic achievement status at any point in time. 2. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY A. Department of Labor and Industry report is on file. Both houses were re- viewed by the Safet� Ins ec4or, and were found to be in full compliance i B. Health Review Ia. �:,►, f �. There were no. obvious h th hazards, . They bedroom space and the b 0 rootp , space were adequatee, although the smaller of the two houses is Less come:` fortable regarding these.'two areas. C. General Environment and A _ �pearance The physical facility, both indoors and outdoors, continues to be an attractive one. It is very well maintained and reflects very high standards. .r�:wY��•:�>�_ '�:i, �"'�.'��'��er�t,r�rw�4hrJr rr:tirY..�d-s•�..r ALLENBROOK Page 3 Both the staff and the residents Participate in the ongoing household chores and maintenance, and pride in the physical facility is encouraged. The sleeping areas were well -lit and comfortable, and the residents were able to decorate to reflect their personal tastes. There seems to be adequate provision for privacy, and there is a good blend of public and quiet rooms available for both the residents and the staff. The kitchens in both houses are essentially the huh of the activity. They are bright, clean, and well-equipped. Each house has recreational space indoors, and both houses share the surrounding outdoor recreational area; The outdoor area includes a swimming pool, a pond, a barn with several animals, an orchard, etc. The surroundings, outside,_provide for a good variety of recreational activities on -grounds. 3. STAFF A. Staff Evaluation and Development The orientation, training, and supervision of the staff at Allenbrook, is provided by the Teaching Family Training Center in Waterbury. These train- ers act as consultants to the program, and maintain ongoing support and supervision to the facility. There's a well -designed training and monitor- ing program that eventually leads to certification of the staff. B. Personnel Policies and Practices The written policies and practices for the Teaching Family model are exten- sive and thorough. The model is designed and is carried out at Allenbrook in the following fashion: Richard and'Ellen Boshe are the houseparents of the larger house. Linda Mastrianni is the assistant teaching parent. In this capacity, she is the relief person for the Boshes every other weekend. She also does evening and late afternoon work during the week days. Tom and Cindy Cloutier are the teaching parents of the smaller house. They are in the process of try- ing to hire an assistant teaching parent for the relief staff. The emphasis in this program is establishing a family -like atmosphere; there- fore, the teaching parents are the role models as parents in a medium to larg,*- sized family-. The � y are, an duty, as it were, 24 haura a day, �od,.,no one, in , �fi this program: is , r,ef erred ,Go as staff, I ;he' emphas�,o is on the, teaoing, paren �" 3 to reflect not: o 1y xth# i�emily-li.kp' atmosphere the3rlre striving to achkevw but to em ha #' r: ' I 4 , p s qze ° h ndu Berm teaChe;sR of ski s to th r onto, r .� `# G C. Personnel File! Y„ I� • i' ,. � �' may,; Personnel 'main � s noel files 'are maintained on each staff. References for the Teaching ; Parents are on file with the application. ;4, D. Staff/Child Ratio The staff/child ratio appears to be adequate, with the exception of the ALLENBROOK Page 4 weekend coverage by the assistant Teaching Parent. Unless there are resi- dents on home visit status, there is a 7 to 1 staff/child ratio. This does not seem adequate, and Linda did say that the Board is looking into hiring another person for the weekend duty. E. Staff Communications and Support Although the two households are run as very separate entities, they are both provided support by the Teaching Family Training Center. The con- sultant is readily available to provide ongoing supervision and support. Also, on -grounds, the Boshes and the Cloutiers are available to each other for daily support. They have all gone through the same training, and are implementing similar programs on the same site, so they are good resources for each other as they strive to develop this program. F. External Professional Services The program does not routinely employ outside professional services such as psychiatric or psychological consultants. It is conceivable, accord- ing to Rick, that residents could be referred for counseling, but it is not likely. 4. QUALITY OF LIFE A. Family Involvement The Teaching Family model has a clear written description of its approach to family involvement. There's a strong emphasis on developing a good relationship between the Teaching, Family program, and the natural family of the residents. The family is involved as much as possible from the point of intake through discharge.. As they say in their program descrip- tion, the family resource is important for the goal of eventually having the youth return to his natural home., This goal can be achieved when the family resource is willing to supervise the youth on weekend home visits, holidays, and when they are willing to learn alternative new methods of dealing with the youth's problem behavior. There is a well -designed struc- tured home visit note that is used to monitor the youth's behaviors during his weekend home visit. One of the goals of this home note is to develop a linkage between the program goals, and the goals a parent might have in seeing their youngster's behaviors improve. The Teaching PareAts enVuaga, as much v,ia ding; wi a h famil as:� os i,onz ' Ths also eQ o s e a 4 on weekends and_ vacat y g P gent• ;t4 visit `the, pr; f gram, and the, st her ke he " r:5.. s � t it a iv tcr. dev e o good", am v prow e atii►" ' x onahiPs:; ,k n. Community Interaction t, J�, ti' _ it'C � k "yiR �' i i ' 'LIS ' . . �" • 1 t' More community interaction is a goal for the Teaching Family model.', It comes slowly, but they think that as the youngsters in residence are able to develop adequate social skills, that successes in the community will be forthcoming and the interactions will also increase. As it is, they take the youngsters out for dinner, movies, roller-skating, etc. as part of the community interaction experience. They also encourage the youngsters to ALLENBROOK Prge 5 participate in school activities in work and job experiences, also. C. Daily Routine The program tries to establish as close a family atmosphere as possible. Therefore, the structure of the daily routine is that that would encompass any large family. The youngsters are supervised leaving for school, and returning from school, and there is an appropriate amount of free time along with structured time, such as evening tutoring study hour, super- vised dinner with the family unit, etc. It seems to be a daily routine that reflects a good combination of structured activities and free time for the residents to pursue individual interests. D. Children's money The Teaching Parents keep an account for the youngster's clothing and allowance. For clothing, the Teaching; Parents go Rhopping with the resi- dents. H. Work and Employment 'I'Ita rpoiWattta ara ant:ttttraKvti ti, mia iuttaltla antlituytttattt. 'fire oWor onam aru able to du do to a limited degrea. TI►id would be more of an emphasis in the summertime. F. Recreation and Leisure Activities The Teaching Parents have the responsibility of providing on -grounds and off -grounds recreational opportunities. As I said above, the youngsters are encouraged to participate in school activities. There is one recre- ational activity planned each week that the program pays for, and the residents decide on. The location of this facility affords some extra recreational activities such as swimming, biking, etc. The residents are encouraged to have friends from school, or the community visit at the home. They are allowed to have friends for dinner if it's planned ahead of time. This is developing slowly, however, since the resi- dents have not taken advantage of the opportunity to any great extent. a G. Religion I + 1 ` There are nova lxiovfl,qu, rsmai�4 41 • programi ;The , esi,dgntl ms = � r i OV1 � l ,�l� a�pl►xO�a�� 4u its, A .�o nc Larytoll, r }y y The'hourapar� 1A4 wou4"d;provida tlr .nppo.rtuitity if a'Youngfitar, Wa�tted'�oj' `' pursue' a raligious,;°affUi' tion at his :owta; choosin ;, ll ft ft $•. i E"1, ja . �1��'�' +�. '� t. 1��+�•t� H. Personal Care and Ii - YY + iii 664 + F This is an area that -the program emphasizes. The youngsters are encouraged l not only to develop skills in social interaction, but also in presenting oneself, positively, to the community in order to develop positive relation- ships and achieve success. So, personal care and hygiene is well covered in this program. ALLENBROOK Page 6 I. Food and Nutrition The houseparents, along with one of the residents, do the weekly shopping. Both houses are run separately as in any family situation. The residents take turns cooking and planning the meals, and inherent in this is some teaching of nutritional information, etc. J. Health Care The teaching of good health habits, and health care, is inherent in the program. All of the houseparents expressed their belief in the importance of sex education for the residents. They try to provide it on an individual basis, and also in the group meeting, setting. It is not formal, but they feel that it's covered effectively in a family atmosphere. K. Medical and Dental Care The maintenance of routine medical and dental care for the residents is satisfactory. The staff recognizes the importance of ongoing monitoring of this, and does so. L. Problem Management/Discipline The point system for the majority of residents, is the crux of the disci- plinary system. In addition to this, natural consequences are employed. Emphasis in this program is on teaching, and discipline would presumably be applied when the resident hasn't learned the appropriate skill. M. Passive Physical Restraint All the staff are aware of the times when passive physical restraint is allowable. They do not think that they need any more than is allowed. When there is an incident necessitating physical restraint, the first order of business is to have all of the other residents leave the room, and the individual in question is dealt with on a private basis. There have beena few incidents when restraint have been necessary, and Rick reports that he has written them up and they are on file at the facility. 5. DIRECT SERVICE MANAGMIENT `. A. Refarral Process'4 JThire r F is a .w47.-d";Lgne4 hotbuRl l��f er pxocea that begs M ' 1A' 4 w receipt-ofT,an� od a�.onr eket tQ he ;Cas anc ac eniog ;comnti.Ct atC,' , A].lenbrook,;'#'They ao+mgit eek? is compai d 'rot; 4 Bo 'rd m4ember, the TaAchinp, ' Parent, a representatives o..W :S.R.S. e"dea gn of the "admissions ` icke .•- ;' 'that Allenbroolc requests; pia very thorough and should provide ;the facility A} i. with enough information for them to make the determination for acceptance. B. During the admission process, an identified family resource is designated for the youth. This person or family unit will be the aftercare placement resource for the youngster. ki � f� F v `r ALLUIBROOK Page 7 During; the first two weeks, the resident is involved in an assessment system. There is a strong emphasis on teaching the youngster exactly what skills the staff will be expecting him to wort: on during; his stay at Allenbrook. There is an appropriate way of asking permission, inter- acting with people, making phone calls, etc., etc. It is the goal of the first two weeks for the staff to explain these thoroughly to the youngster, rating him daily during; this period of time. This is an intensive teaching experience for the youngster. After the first two weeks, there is developed a teaching treatment plan, and long; and short-term goals are established for the resident in the program. C. Treatment Philosophy The Teaching family model is a Highly designed, elaborate system. Under- neath all of the design, is, I think, a philosophy that emphasizes that a youngster must develop the essential skills --social academic .and self -Help --in order to achieve success as an adult. The premise is that the youngster did not develop these skills in their early home environment, and therefore, they are lacking these skills. The emphasis on a family atmosphere seems to be important in order to provide an atmosphere as close to normal as possible in which the youngsters will currently develop these skills before they enter the outside world as independent adults. D. Service Planning, and Child Management - Croup Level The emphasis in this program is not on a group atmosphere, but rather on a family atmosphere. Obviously, a youngster's behavior is monitored in its relationship toward other members of the group or family, but the emphasis is more on the individual developing his own individual skills. There is a daily family meeting that can be used to address complaints, problems, ex- hibit a teaching interaction, etc., but it is not group therapy in any tra- ditional sense. E. It's at the individual level that this program focuses. The emphasis is on developing individual skills within a family group. While the group is important, the emphasis is on skill development for each individual youngster. On a daily basis, a youngster meets with one of the teaching; parents to assess either the points they've earned or lost that day, or assess general behaviors if the youngster is not on a point system. This interaction provides an opportunity for individual counseling;. r. Discharge and Aftercare The average stay of a youngster in this kind of program is about one year. The staff and the youngster would know that the resident was ready to leave when he or she had worked their way through the levels of the program. In essence, when the youngster achieved an appropriate level of skill in the . designated areas, they would be. ready to leave. Part of the planning for,;.., discharge would be'working with the farm y resource to help develop an .#, acceptable atmosphere there: 4 1* , ; _ z . �r 9 •� I }� •. rt � .k. E. ; ,Y{ T - R ALLENBP.00K Page 8 There's no formal aftercare component at this Point in time. It is, how- ever, a question that is being discussed now. John Nyberg is a very long- time resident of this program. Ile will he graduating from high school in two months and going on to live at St. Michael's College. He has requested that Ile be allowed to stay in the small building for his last two months so that he will be experiencing; a limited degree of independent living„ while still participating; on a daily basis with the program. It seems to be almost a weaning of John out of the structured household toward independent living at college. They haven't decided fully on this yet, but it is a possibility that may be a resource that they would like to build into the program. 6. EDUCATIO14 There is a very close liaison with the school for each individual. The youngsters, for the most part, bring home a school note that monitors their behaviors and skilled development in school. This close liaison and monitoring of the youngster in school helps to focus on the development of educational skills. This program recognizes that success in school is an important measure of success for children this age, and therefore, it is strongly emphasized. 7. SUMMARY EVALUATION Obviously, since this is a brand new program that has come on board after a long period of turmoil, there will be a period of adjustment and development; this is what the Teaching Family program is going through now. Since it is such a highly structured program, and the Teaching Parents are new to it, at the present time they are in the process of developing their comfort and their skill in order to impose upon the model the essential humanness and flexi- bility that it needs in order to be successful. A review in six months will better reveal whether or not the staff has been able to develop this kind of flexibility. It is almost as if the Teaching Parents take the model and breathe life into it, reflecting their own personalities and skills. This is a movement in that direction, but it will take some time. In the mean- time, the program can appear to be a rigid program emphasizing only surface skill development, such as telephone and table manners. Hopefully, in six months time, the more complex issues that these youngsters need to deal with, can be addressed within this program. This model has had a good track record in other areas, and ' at this point, the no. n to believ that it w 11 nqt be succo sfu ..at Alleabrook.,f +ai ; 'J ,' '` i i � ;1 J �1 I .j ��' 1'�: 4! •'. r M with any sew, pogCaml,-{ sun tqu�tbe attu!,>:hq youe�geterswlio have` t t i, f it 1 o w i' r` 3C f gone through .tha .cha e.: Bata E, :se s Xaco�nize -tie,, vulneiab t q 'thes, f .residents;' and'arehgop to`.miniiaiae t e over rate for these young;at a as y 1 I! the program' changes:' a, In talking with the youngsters, comments ran'the gamut from not liking the pointK�;' system, to feeling that the point system wasn't anything abnormal and likening it to a system of being; grounded by regular parents. There were no serious complaints from the youngsters that needed to be addressed as licensing; issues. I addressed the issue of the record -keeping, above, in detail. In six months, I State of Vermont Commissioner's Office Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division Division of Services for the Blind and Visually Handicapped .o. Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit Telephone No. 828-3401 Dear Sirs: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Main Office: Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Please reply to: 107 North Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 July 17, 1981 This letter is to support the philosophy that the Allenbrook Group Home facilities remain open to a co-ed population. The philosophy of the teaching family model is a unique program and particularly effective with certain youngsters, both male and f(-nialo. `l'hore is no reanon to limit this resource to youngsters of one oex. The facilities at Allenbrook (specifically bedroom and bathroom) are such that a mixed population of male and female residents can be adequately separated and supervised. When both males and females live together, this offers additional instructional opportunity both in exploring social roles and in forming friendships with other teens of the opposite sex. I have had a male juvenile in placement at Allenbrook who was placed while there was a female resident also in placement. While there were difficulties in the home at that time, sexual behavior between the residents was not a problem. The screening of youngsters prior to placement helps to assure a "workable" group in terms of personality and presenting problems which each new youngster would bring to the home. The ability of a child to benefit from such a placement remains a paramount concern and all presenting problems are thoroughly discussed prior to placement. This helps to assure the compatibility of the group and the ability of the individual youth to successfully utilize the program. Surely, the sex of a youngster would be a consideration in the referral process, as would other, equally important information such as school abilities, degree of self-control, parental involvement, etc. Because the program does offer realistic, helping opportunities to teenagers and because the physical facilities can accomodate both sexes, it would seem discriminatory if both sexes could not be offered equal placement opportunity. Sincerely, Q Gretchen Mandernack Social Worker -Juvenile Services Barre District Office GM/mea N September 8, 1981 South Burlington Zoning Board City Hall Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Attention: J. Everett Reed, Chairman Dear Mr. Reed: Thank you for attending the August 26 meeting at South Burlington Middle School concerning the Allenbrook Group Home. For the record, those in attendance included: John Schillhammer and Dom Marabella, representing the Allenbrook board; Tom Cloutier and Dale Wolfe, the Allenbrook teaching parents; Mark Johnson, Tom Moore, Jacki Tashman, and John Burchard of SRS; Pat Davison, Pat Irish, Hal Benson and Angelo Pizzagalli, representing the Allen - brook neighborhood; Dave Kaufman and Jeanne Kennedy, South Burlington legislators; Senator Esther Sorrell and Ron Crisman representing the study committee on juvenile crime. Summarizing briefly, discussion revolved around the Allenbrook program and the type of child that should participate in it. It was agreed that Allenbrook should con- tinue to exist to serve the needs of troubled youth. It was also agreed that Allen - brook is not nor ever will be a secure detention facility, nor will Allenbrook be required to accept youths it does not feel are appropriate for the program. It was the concensus of the group that the following guidelines and/or objectives be established for the Allenbrook home: 1. At least one and preferably two neighborhood residents sit permanently on the Allenbrook Board of Directors. 2. The Allenbrook board will compile a list of names, addresses and phone numbers of Allenbrook board members and others as appropriate who may be contacted for purposes of answering questions or in emergency. The board will provide this list along with a letter of explanation to neighbors within the immediate area of Allenbrook. 3. A maximum of 14 youths in addition to staff will reside at Allenbrook. 4. The Allenbrook program will be monitored for a period of 10 months (through June 30, 1982). During the last month of this period a questionnaire com- piled by the board will be distributed to neighbors. The results of this questionnaire will be made available to the neighbors and will be used by the Allenbrook board for purposes of program evaluation. 5. At the conclusion of the 10 month period and following compilation of the questionnaire, the Allenbrook board will meet with the neighbors to determine whether the program has met desired criteria and to discuss the program's future. South Burlington Zoning Board September 8, 1981 South Burlington, Vermont Page 2 of 2 6. Commissioner of Social and Rehabilitative Services, John Burchard, will draft a letter to the Zoning Board, which may be attached to the SRS contract with Allenbrook stating that Allenbrook is recognized as a non -secure facility for troubled youths, and that SRS under current manage- ment has no intention of converting Allenbrook to a secure facility. Having reached consensus on the above topics, Allenbrook, the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services, and representatives of Allenbrook's neighbors recommend that the South Burlington Zoning Board approve the group home's operation under the conditions specified above for a period of 10 months. After this time it is recommended the Zoning Board review the status of Allenbrook with its Board of Directors and community to determine whether or not the permit should be continued. Thank you for your consideration and time. Sincerely, . John Sc illhammer Pat Davison For the Allenbrook Home For Allenbrook's Neighbors mlc ohn Burchard For the Department of Social and Rehabilitative Services I State of Vermont Commissioner's Office Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division Division for the Blind and Visually Handicapped ♦ Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES 789 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 Telephone: 863-2331 February 122, 1982 Dick Ward South Burlington Zoning Administration City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Dick, Main Office: Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 I have investigated the allegations Mr. Robert St.Amour has made against Allenbrook Group Home regarding the alleged rape of his daughter while in residence. I have discovered no evidence which would substantiate this claim. On February 3, 1982 Robert and Nancy St. Amour were in my office for a meeting. At that time Robert admitted in front of my supervisor and me that his daughter had not been raped. If you need further information or documentation please contact me at the above address. Sincerely, 4' Lori A. Rue,AMd. Social Worker cp ALLENBROOK, INC. 100 Allen Road SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT October 19, 1981 In compliance with a joint written communication drafted by Allenbrook, Inc., the Neighborhood Organization, and the Department of Social Rehabilitative Services, dated September 8, 1981, and specifically Item 2 under guidelines and/or objectives, the following information is made available to the citizens of South Burlington, Interested South Burlington citizens should feel free to contact any of the individuals (designated by asterisk) listed below should they have any questions or concerns relative to the Allenbrook Home. ALLENBBAOK,_INC.t BOARD OF DIRECTORS - 1982 Executive Boards * Mr. James F. Briggs, President, 17 Juniper Ridge, Shelburne, 985-8752 * Mr. Dominick A. Marabella, Vice -President, Underhill Center, Vermont, 899-3966 * Sister Martha 01Brien, 100 Mansfield Avenue, Burlington, 863-6835, Secretary * Mr. James L. Washburn, 19 Sandalwood Drive, South Burlington, 863-3781,, Treasurer Teaching Family Parents: # Mr. and Mrs. Dale and Nancy Wolfe, Grimes House, 100 Allen Road, South Burlington, 658-1605 Mr. and Mrs. Tom and Cynthia Cloutier, DeForge House, 100 Allen Road, South Burlington, 658-1433 South Burlington School District Personnel Associated With Allenbrooks # Miss Anne Corley, Teacher, S.B.H.S., 80 Kirby Road, South Burlington, 864-6306, Board Member Mr, Leo 7FC�urs, G_ idance Director, S.B.M.S., Raceway Road, Cericho, 899-3261, Board Momb-i- * Miss Linda McMaster, Teacher, S.B.H.S., 43 Clark Street, Burlington, 863-1280, Board Mer,',er Mrs Dominick A. Marabella, Ass It Principal, S.B.M.S., Underhill Center, 899-3966, Board Member # Pir. Gordon Oatman, Teacher, S.B.M.S., R.D. #2, Williston, 878-4749, Board Member # Mr. Robert Walsh, Teacher, S.B.H.S., 21 Maplewood Drive, South Burlington, 862-36870 Board Member Teaching Fami4 Training_Center: # Mr, and Mrs. Marc and Betty Johnson, Vermont TeachingFamilyTrainin Center Irc., F.O. Box 545, Waterbury, Vermont 0 76, 1-2 -21 South Burlington Police Department Personnel: Mr. Jay Fish, Mountain View Manor, Williston, 878-8224y Board Member Mr. Ernest Rheum, 23 Mountain View Road, Vergennes, 877 -377 ,Member Board Members - 1982 - Allenbrook Home: Mr, Anthony R. Bove, Lakewood Parkway, Burlington, 863-4134 Mr, Robert Erdmann, 200 Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont, 864-9380 Mr. Gordon Fischer, 1811 Spear Street, South Burlington, 864-4198 Mrs. Theresa Grimes, 10 Holt Street, Burlington, 862-1847 Mrs. Evelyn L. Jarrett, 101 Spruce Street, Burlington, 864-1506 Mr. Michael Pearo, 2 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, 863-4973 Mrs. Joan Picard, 1 Na4land Streetj*4South : BurlJmkton, 862-4310 Mrs. Patricia Pizzagalli, Spear Street, South Burlington, 8627551 Mrs. Catherine Shea, 3275 Shore Road, Burlington, 862-2806 Mrs. Mary Smith, 7 Quail Run, South Burlington, 862-7935 Mr. Richard D. Wheatley, Blakely Road, Underhill, 899-2331 Mrs. Rebecca Watson, 200 Van Sickl*n Road, South Burlington, 862-4026 I August 12, 1981 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator Town of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Ward; It has been reported to me by several residents of South Burlington who attended the July 27, 1981 meeting of the Zoning Board that the following statement was made by one of Allenbrook's Board of Directors: "The Board of Directors asked Fr. Baffa to resign as he was under investigation for allegedly beating one of the boys." This is a blatant lie. The Board of Directors were given 15 months notice of my resignation as can be documented by my letter of appointment from Bishop John A. Marshall dated June 6, 1978, Contact with the Somascan Fathers who replaced me was made on September 19, 1978 - one full year before I left. It was also reported in "The Other Paper" that there were only three residents at Allenbrook when T left but the fact is that there were seven. I request, therefore, that this letter be read at the September 14th. meeting of the Board or that copies be made and distributed to those present, It is unfortunate that these inaccuracies occured and I sincerely hope that those responsible for the misinfomation abounding be more cautious in the future. Yours truly, W Rev. Robert J. Baffa 3-_ ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEB RUA RY_ZL No. 2. APPEAL OF REV. FOBERT J_BAFFALSIXTEEN NINETY SHELBURNE ROAD, INC. ___.--- Appeal of Rev. Robert J. Baffa, Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Road, Inc., seeking a variance from Section 8.00. Permitted uses, of the South Burlinaton Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to relocate a structure presently accepted as a Group Home for Boys at 1690 Shelburne Road and to continue operating as a Group Home on a parcel of land, containing 5.6 acres, located at 100 Allen Road. Vice Chairman Martineau asked to have the record show that he was abstaining from participating in this appeal but he was reserving his right as an Interested party. He stated he was abstainir„g because he is a part owner of a corporation that has adjoining property. Mr. Fayette presided at the hearing of this appeal. Mr. ward stated the appeal had been presented last Fall but was withdrawn. They have since had a survey and are submitting a second plan. The property in question is located in Business Planned Development District and the proposed use would not be an allowable use; therefore a use variance would have to be requested. They are now located at 1690 Shelburne Road and would relocate their structure to this property and would also keep all the existing structures, barns, shops, etc. along with the one they are relocating. They would have a complex to operate a Group Home for from 10 to 16 students. They have been operating here since February, 1972. Mr. Sylvester asked if the warning read approximately 10 to 16, or where did Mr. Ward get that terminology. Mr. Ward said that is what he was told. Mr. Sylvester asked if he was told it would be from 10 to 16, and Mr. Ward replied Yes. A letter of objection to this appeal was presented, a Mail-o-Grata received from Mr. Bartlett of Monterey, California. He owns property to the north of this property. Mr. Sylvester asked what was on Mr. Bartlett's property now, and Mr. Ward replied nothing is there. ��..- Asked by Mr. Sylvester how the land Is zoned, Mr. Ward said it is Residential. B p0 Mr. Sylvester asked if Mr. Bartlett was an absentee landowner, and Mr. Ward said Yes. Mr. Bensen said he had heard from the "rumor factory" that Mr. Bartlett was trying to sell his property, and Mr. Ward added that he understood there was a land contract with Stuart Ireland. Mr. Martineau said the letter from this individual and the weight of it should be judged by the Board. There was no first hearing of the appeal because it was withdrawn because of a boundary dispute. No one participated. Mr. Sylvester said he still didn't know where this person's land is. .r. r,13rd explained he has a strip of land that would be on the north side of' the Fiat dealership and goes all the way up to the area where the water tz_ne" is, about 50 or (0 acres. Mr. ;,yl-vester asked how much frontage on Shelburne Road. ':r. Ward said he didn't know, but probably 20Q feet. Mrs. Maher suggested there was a ravine separ4ting the properties in question. Mr. Reed said he thought the old house was th,p Bartlett house at one time. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEBRUA RY7L1977 Mr. Fayette said he had a question about the legitimacy of this particular letter in this hearing, but the individual did express himself so the letter should be honored. He proceeded to read thel letter aloud. then said he would like to continue with the presentation of facts. He said the presentation did not clarify to him what the relocation was going to entail. Mr. Ward pointed out the existing house, shop, and barn on the drawing; also the large white structure at 1690 Shelburne Road. Everything will stay on the property and be used as well as the 1690 house to be moved. Mr. Fayette asked where this use is permitted. Mr. Ward said the closest would be the Residential Districts. Numbers like this, would not be allowed but anyone could say the ordinance would allow up to five people. Technically speaking, Mr. Ward agreed there is no particular area zoned for this use. Mr. Fayette asked about 1690 Shelburne Road, how many acres it has. Rev. Baffa replied about 3 to 3� acres. Mrs. Maher explained quite a bit of that is frontage and unuseable for recreational use. Mr. Fayette explained the fact that with only three members of the Board participating inthis hearing, in order for this appeal to be approved there would have to be a unanimous vote of all three members. This he said does not often happen, but any negative vote would deny the appeal. He then asked Rev. Baffa to make a presentation. Rev. Baffa said the reason they are asking for this is that they own the house they are presently using and the land on which it is located is owned by Green Mountain Power. They wish to sell and his group has a lease to the effect that if and when the land is sold they have 90 days to move the present structure or lose it. So -for three years they have been looking for a suitable place because they had put $35,000 into repairing the house and they came across this property on Allen Road and it is feasible to move their structure to that land. They want to stay in South Burlington. he said, because their children attend South Burlington schools and have good relationships there and the vast majority of their Board of Directors are residents of South Burlington. They are governed by a 21 member board. They have 10 children right now and in this move they would have 14, so there is more than adequate room. Rev. Baffa said he felt some people were und,pr a misconception of the kind of children they deal with. Tney do not dea'� with drug addicts nor delinquents. but all their children have beep either neglected or abused or unwanted. At the age of 18 they would have to leave but presently are 16 or under. There is no place in the State for these children to reside and nobody wants them; they would have to be placed at the Weeks School for lack of any other place to put them. He said they had run this home for 4 years, and have had no objections from any of their neighbors or property owners. The school system has been most cooperative. He said if this fits in with all the legal things. they would like to move there and continue the program as it is now. He referred to Mr. Marabella as Vice President of the Board of Directors and also Vice Principalof Middle School, also to Mrs. Maher and to Dr. Kupic as members of the board. Mr. Sylvester asked Rev. Baffa if he meant tj? suggest that these kids are "neglected, abused, and unwanted." L. ZONING BOARD OF' A DJUDTME;NT FE:BRUA RY 2j I Rev. Baffa gave an example of extreme abuse of a bov legally adopted 1,.. a -' wealthy family which went on for months until the neighbors took it to court. This is the type of boy they have, he said, who has nothing to do with drugs or crime. Mr. Sylvester asked Rev. Baffa if he was presently aware of complaints that his children were over -extending their boundaries or riding motorcycles on adjacent land and scaring cows. :tev. Baffa said they have no motor vehicles; the boys have no drivers• licenses. Mr. Sylvester asked if,anyone had ever complained about these things. and Rev. Baffa replied No, 'Fever. Mr. Sylvester said he wa's very happy to hear that. Mrs. Maher said the use variance if granted would in no way change the character of this house; it would not affect, the neighborhood. The house is a gracious looking building. Vr. Sylvester said he had never heard any direct complaints or seen any- thing person4lly, but the reason he asked toe question was because he had heard, strictly on hearsay. that some of thfl kids were going on other people's land. driving motorcycles, scaring cows, and raising hell, and he was happy that Rev. Baffa had received nci complaints. Rev. Baffa explained there are kids who come) behind their house with all kinds of motorbikes; kids who have even shot, 22's towards their area, but they are not kids from the home. Mr. Sylvester asked if he could represent tei this Board that his kids were not involved. Rev. Baffa stated they are not involved, absolutely not at all. Mr. Fayette asked what the experience had been with the present operation. Mr. Ward said there had been no problem. Mr. Sylvester said he was probably as close as any landowner and he had not seen or heard anything. Mr. Fayette said that had been his experience as well. If people were objecting, he had hoped they would be here and explain their problems. Rev. Baffa said they have a structured program and three counselors, and the boys don't have the opportunity to go off on their own to do anything like this. They had tried to get a barricade up by the University Farm because of the parties coming in with drinking and drugs and motorcycles because it was affecting their place. Mr. Sylvester asked if he was suggesting his home was being blamed. Rev. Baffa said people would come down with their motorcycles and ride them through their garden so they had to call the police on two occasions because neighbors were thinking it might be his boys and he didn't want to get that reputation. Mr. Sylvester asked if any vehicles were owned by these kids. and Rev. Ba f fa replied No. ' Dr. Kupic described taking some of the boys out in a motorboat in the middle of the lake and letting them drive it. but in no way would he dare to let them handle it near shore. If they were just learning to handle the wheel of a boat, they could never be able to drive a motorcycle. They just wouldn't know how. Mr. Marabella said he had worked with these kids for four years and it had been a labor of love. Some are in advanced groups; others are getting the 8 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEBRUA RY 7. MZ kinds of special help they need. He has had them in his home in Underhill. The main thing they lacked was love and affection and he believed they were getting that now and appreciated it. Mr. Martineau said that as an adjoining property owner he would be directly affected and wanted to know if they had any written policies in the organiza- tion limiting the number of kids, do they have a policy of 14 as a limit. Rev. Baffa explained that in order to receive the license from the State the :state determines how many they can have in a particular building. When they move, the State will say this is what we are allowed to have. Mr. Martineau asked -if they would be prepared to accommodate as many as they would be allowed under the State rule. Rev. Baffa said No, because they wouldn't want more than 141 when you hit 15 you get into another category. Asked about plans for fencing, Rev. Baffa said there is some fencing there now; he hadn't planned any. Mr. Martineau said he had no real objection to the use, but he didn't quite agree that it is not going to change the character of the neighborhood, but at the same time he did not object or oppose it in any way. Mr. Fayette asked if anyone in the audience had any opposition, saying the only opposition received so far was the Mail-o-Gram. He asked if Rev. Baffa could address himself to a few of the comments from Mr. Bartlett concerning cultivated and open fields and wooded areas and possible erosion damage, also the danger of personal injury by kids going out to these areas owned by Mr. Bartlett. He assumed the home had rules but youngsters in that age group would naturally want to be out around. Rev. Baffa said there is more room here than where they are presently so there is no need to go beyond the boundaries of this new property, so that man wouldn't have to worry about erosion. Mr. Fayette asked what changes were made from the previous appeal. was it a different pattern or much the same. Mr. Ward said he just had.a little different language. Mr. rylvester said there may be two or three houses that are .closer than the proposed variance and he didn't see any change in the particular use of the property at all. He wanted to say that this was a great idea and more people should get involved in things of this nature. Mr. Fayette asked if this property would be bought by the corporation. Rev. Baffa replied Yes. Mr. Sylvester asked Rev. Baffa if this appeal was approved and he ever received any inkling that these remarks were true. the complaints that were rumored, that he would put a stop to it. Rev. Baffa said he would. The Board voted unanimously by the three members participating to approve this appeal. State of Vermont DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SF:R%'fC ES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Commissioner's Office Alcohol and DruR Abuse Division Division for the Blind and Visually Handicapped ♦ Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit July 16, 1981 Zoning Administrator Hunicipal Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Sir: Main Officer Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 97 MacDonough Drive Vergennes, Vermont 05491 I am writing in support of Allenbrook Group Home. It is my under- standing that there is a scheduled zoning hearing concerning the population there. I firmly believe that the group home should house both boys and girls. Allenbrook is providing a very healthy, structured environment for the adolescents who are living there. It is important that adoles- cents learn to deal with members of the opposite sex in an appro- priate manner. At Allenbrook the boys and girls are living together in a normal way much as in a family situation. I have supervised a placement of a girl named Lyn who has been at Allenbrook since early March. Lyn has done well there. She has made a commitment to the program and is in the process of striving toward a more independent living situation. Vermont needs many more group homes where Juveniles can learn to feel better about themselves and the world around them. Sincerely, Gail 3'.� Woodbury Social Worker rgm N =1��►L OF TIDE I1►IB�isb.f:.Z I: CONCEPTION '' I 1 F • BURL IN(;-107- ITHMONT OS401 802-658-4334 July 22, 1981 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: Although no longer a resident of South Burlington, I am the Founder of Allenbrook Home for Boys and responsible for its present location and the permits granted for its use. Many local residents still refer to Allenbrook as "Fr. Baffa's Home" - not realizing that I am no longer connected with the Program. In addition, they are under the mistaken impression that Allenbrook was owned by the Roman Catholic Diocer,e of Burlington who turned the property over to the State of Vermont. The Diocese never had any interest in Allenbrook as it is a private non-profit corpora- tion owned and operated by the present Board of Directors. As a result of the mis- information abounding, I have been called repeatedly by neighbors who are extremely upset by the activities allegedly happening on the premises. It would appear that the frequent presence of the South Burlington Police has a disturbing effect on the area residents and their families. I have been asked to attend the meeting scheduled for July 27, 1981 but will be out of State at that time and that is what prompts this letter. While not in a position to make a judgement on the aforementioned allegations I am, however, sufficiently aware of juvenile needs as to render an opinion on its probable cause. 1. It is extremely impractical and idealistic to believe that you can house older street -wise teenagers of both sexes in the same building and attempt to create a family atmosphere. Jealousy, contention, competition and general disruptive behavior are the byproducts of such a forced and artificial "family." 2. Since January 1981, Two couples have come and gone and now a third couple is directing the program at Allenbrook. This lack of stability has again de- emphasized the entire idea of "family". 3. Utilizing the various buildings as separate programs only serves to disunify the residents and staff thereby creating a competitive atmosphere rather than a "family" one which should be maintained for success. One of the main fears expressed by the area residents is that were Allenbrook permitted to become a Group Home for both boys and girls, the next logical step would be the State maintaining it as "THE FACILITY" for the hard core delinquents who are now housed temporarily at the Waterbury Detention Center. This is not within the realm of conjecture and would be extremely unfair to the many good people of South Burlington who supported Allenbrook since its inception both financially and in donated time and services. 2. Allenbrook was not founded for delinquents in need of rehabilitation Home to prevent the possible delinquency of those children who were neglected or unwanted. It was for this purpose that the use variant granted and for which the South Burlington Community responded favor would strongly urge the Members of the Zoning Board to heed the desi neighboring residents and act accordingly. Sincerely yours, 0�' . s i�� Rev. Robert J. Baffa but as a abused, e was originally ably. I res of the P- State of Vermont Commissioner's Office Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division Division of Services for the Blind and Visually Handicapped .,� Social Services Division Vocational Rehabilitation Division Disability Determination Unit Telephone No. 828-3401 Dear Sirs: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Main Office: Osgood Building Vermont State Hospital Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Please reply to: 107 North Main Street Barre, Vermont 05641 July 17, 1981 This letter is to support the philosophy that the Allenbrook Group Home facilities remain open to a co-ed population. The philosophy of the teaching family model is a unique program and particularly effective with certain youngsters, both male and female. There is no reason to limit this resource to youngsters of one sex. The facilities at Allenbrook (specifically bedroom and bathroom) are such that a mixed population of male and female residents can be adequately separated and supervised. When both males and females live together, this offers additional instructional opportunity both in exploring social roles and in forming friendships with other teens of the opposite sex. I have had a male juvenile in placement at Allenbrook who was placed while there was a female resident also in placement. While there were difficulties in the home at that time, sexual behavior between the residents was not a problem. The screening of youngsters prior to placement helps to assure a "workable" group in terms of personality and presenting problems which each new youngster would bring to the home. The ability of a child to benefit from such a placement remains a paramount concern and all presenting problems are thoroughly discussed prior to placement. This helps to assure the compatibility of the group and the ability of the individual youth to successfully utilize the program. Surely, the sex of a youngster would be a consideration in the referral process, as would other, equally important information such as school abilities, degree of self-control, parental involvement, etc. Because the program does offer realistic, helping opportunities to teenagers and because the physical facilities can accomodate both sexes, it would seem discriminatory if both sexes could not be offered equal placement opportunity. Sincerely, Gretchen Mandernack Social Worker -Juvenile Services Barre District Office GM/mea July 22, 1981 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: Although no longer a resident of South Burlington, I am the Founder of Allenbrook Home for Boys and responsible for its present location and the permits granted for its use. Many local residents still refer to Allenbrook as "Fr. Baffa's Home" - not realizing that I am no longer connected with the Program. In addition, they are under the mistaken impression that Allenbrook was owned by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington who turned the property over to the State of Vermont. The Diocese never had any interest in Allenbrook as it is a private non-profit corpora- tion owned and operated by the present Board of Directors. As a result of the mis- information abounding, I have been called repeatedly by neighbors who are extremely upset by the activities allegedly happening on the premises. It would appear that the frequent presence of the South Burlington Police has a disturbing effect on the area residents and their families. I have been asked to attend the meeting scheduled for July 27, 1981 but will be out of State at that time and that is what prompts this letter. While not in a position to make a judgement on the aforementioned allegations I am, however, sufficiently aware of juvenile needs as to render an opinion on its probable cause. 1. It is extremely impractical and idealistic to believe that you can house older street -wise teenagers of both sexes in the same building and attempt to create a family atmosphere. Jealousy, contention, competition and general disruptive behavior are the byproducts of such a forced and artificial "family." 2. Since January 1981, Two couples have come and gone and now a third couple is directing the program at Allenbrook. This lack of stability has again de- emphasized the entire idea of "family". 3. Utilizing the various buildings as separate programs only serves to disunify the residents and staff thereby creating a competitive atmosphere rather than a "family" one which should be maintained for success. One of the main fears expressed by the area residents is that were Allenbrook permitted to become a Group Home for both boys and girls, the next logical step would be the State maintaining i't as "THE FACILITY" for the hard core delinquents who are now housed temporarily at the Waterbury Detention Center. This is not within the realm of conjecture and would be extremely unfair to the many good people of South Burlington who supported Allenbrook since its inception both financially and in donated time and services. 2. Allenbrook was not founded for delinquents in need of rehabilitation Home to prevent the possible delinquency of those children who were neglected or unwanted. It was for this purpose that the use varianc granted and for which the South Burlington Community responded favor would strongly urge the Members of the Zoning Board to heed the desi neighboring residents and act accordingly. Sincerely yours, AZ''S *0.� Rev. Robert J. Baffa but as a abused, e was originally ably. I res of the SIXT' ".'N SHELBURNE ROAD, INC. 100 Allen Road Area zoned B.P.D. District. Proposed use: Group Home for Boys - not allowable in BPD District. Structure 241 x 401 presently located at 1690 Shelburne Road to be relocated to 100 Allen _Load. Existing house, barn and shop to be occupied and used along with the home presently being used. 10 to 16 students. Variance originally granted to 1690 Shelburne Road, Inc. on February 7, 1973. SOIITH B17RLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, '1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on l+,onda June 27 1977 at 5:00 p.m. to consider the day of week month and date) time following: Appeal of Rev. Robert J. Baffa, Sixteen Ninety ShelbureneTRd..seeking a Variance , from Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements of the South Burling ton Zoning -Regula- tions. Reauest is for permission to relocat-- a structure from 1090 Shelburne Road to 100 Allen Road, structure to be located %%7ithin sixty-one (61) feet of the south--;est front yard line, as cer clan on file v%,ith the Zoning I cmi ni strator, City Officers, 117� Y;i 1is ton P.cad Ri chard A. 1::yette Chairman 7_onina Board of djustr,Ent South Burlir:oton, Vermont O F dfj r/� I 1 Norman 'Pl. Peduyzz+ii 658-7,070 s,I ,e Ei..Y JAYPJ � 9.✓b f .,i ALLENBROOK, INC. 100 Allen Road Area zoned C-2 District Section 8.00 Permitted uses prohibits day care facilities proposed use is conditional use in residential districts Section 11.15 Multiple uses "more than one use per lot" existing use group home for boys & girls proposed use careday center would occupy two of the buildings, group home would occupy other two buildings March 29, 1982 �-- Ms. Joan G. Sweet Ethan Allen Child Care Center .-� 3i3 600 Dalton Drive Winooski, Vermnt 05404 " Zoning variance Allenbrook Dear Ms. Sweet: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, April 12, 1982 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this hearing. Very truly, Richard Ward. Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg 1 � April 13, 1982 Ms. Joan Sweet Ethan Allen Day Care Center 600 Dalton Drive Winooski, Vermont 05404 Allenbrook Dear Ms. Sweet: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. �J The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. Prior to occupying the buildings involved please contact this office for a ' certificate of occupancy. �N Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer ALLENBr700K, INC. DEFORGE HOUSE GRIMES HOUSE CYNTHIA & THOMAS CLOUTIER NANCY & DALE WOLFE Co -Directors Co -Directors 102 ALLEN ROAD 100 ALLEN ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (802) 658-1433 (802) 658-1605 March 23, 1982 Ethan Allen Child Care Center, Inc. 600 Dalton Drive, Fort Ethan Allen Winooski, Vermont 05404 Dear Ken: After reviewing your proposal, Allenbrook, Inc., is pleased to offer to lease to you two of our buildings. We strongly believe that you would make an excellent tenant for South Burlington and complement to our program. We will assist you in obtaining the necessary permits and certificates. Our Buildings and Grounds Committee and Finance Committee will work with you on property use and operating expenses. We look forward to having you as neighbors. 'Please call me if you have any questions. Yours truly, ames F. Briggs, rsident JFB:r TEACHING FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES ALLENBROOK, INC. DEFORGE HOUSE CYNTHIA & THOMAS CLOUTIER Co -Directors 102 ALLEN ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (802) 658-1433 March 25, 1982 Joan Sweet, Co -Director Ethan Allen Day Care Center, Inc. 600 Dalton Drive Winooski, Vermont 05404 Re: Zoning Dear Joan: GRIMES HOUSE NANCY E DALE WOLFE Co -Directors 100 ALLEN ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (802) 658-1605 This letter is our authorization for you to proceed on behalf of Allenbrook, Inc., to petition the City of South Burlington for a zoning variance to operate a day care center on part of our property on Allen Road in South Burlington. Yours truly, a/yw IIJmes F. Briggs4Prdent I JFB: r TEACHING FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES ethan alien child care center inc. 600 dalton drive fort ethan allen winooski, vermont 05404.656-?648 March 23, 1982 South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjuatment South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Members of the Board, Ethan Allen Child Care Center (EACCC) is an independent, private, non-profit child care center licensed by the State of Vermont. Formerly, the University of Vermont Home Enrichment Center, EACCC was established as a separate corporation on July 1, 1975 with a Board of Directors made up of parents, staff and community members. We provide a well-rounded developmental program of quality care to children from a wide variety of socio-economic backgrounds. Children are accepted on a non-discriminatory basis. The large majority of our children come from families of working parents. We are asking the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjust- ment to grant a variance for the use of what is currently part of the Allenbrook, Inc, group home on Allen Road. Specifically, we are interested in leasing the home, "chapel", and barn as well as outside playground space for use as a day care center. We hope to be able to move from our current location at Fort Ethan Allen, Winooski to the Allenbrook property by June first, nineteen eighty-two. We hope the following details will provide you with the information you need in order to make a de- cision on the variance we are requesting. Allenbrook, Inc. currently has a zoning variance for use of this property as a group home. Because of the nature of their program, the Allenbrook Board is interested in leasing some of their property, which has become available, to what they feel t� ethan alien child care center inc. 600 dolton drive -fort ethan alien winooski,vennont 05404.656.2648 is a compatible organization. The Allenbrook Board feels that EACCC, as a day -time use facility is very compatible with their program. EACCC has been actively searching for a new site for over a year. The building we currently occupy is leased from UVM. They wish to turn their property into student housing as of June first, nineteen eighty-two. Finding a new site that is both appropriate for our needs and financially manageable proved to be an extremely difficult task. Our Board of Directors feels that the Allenbrook property will be an excellent new home for, our Center. Both the buildings and the outside play area meet the ldcensing requirements of the State of -.Vermont for the 45 children we will have enrolled. The TACCC hours of operation are monday through friday, 7130 am to 5,30 pm. We foresee occassional use of the buildings for evening committee and Board meetings. Our enrollment will not exceed 45 full time equivalent children and 12 staff. Twenty-six of our children will be transported to and from the center on our van. The remaining children arrive between 700 am and 9130 am and depart between 300 pm and 5130 pm. The arrivals and departures over these 2 hour periods mean that there is not -a significant amount of traffio at any given time. There are rarely more than three or four staff cars parked at our center all day. Our pattern for use of the play area will vary according to the season. Our children are always supervised by teachers when they are outside. PI ethan alien child care center inc. 600 dalton drive • fort ethan alien '" winooski, vermont 05404. 656.2648 We are not proposing any construction other than a covered walk -way between the house and the "chapel" to allow the children easy access to both spaces,and fencing in an outside playground of approximately 3500 square feet. We hope our long search has finally come to an end and that we may continue offering our valuable service to the greater Burlington community at our new home at ♦llenbrook. We would appreciate your support in making this possible. Sincerely, i Joan G. Sweet Co -administrator I r,LL_ i,L) } )I - I PARKING 39, LOT J' CHAPS_ INTENDED -L• GCNSTP;ICTInN ALLENBROOK, INC. DEFORGE HOUSE GRIMES HOUSE CYNTHIA & THOMAS CLOUTIER NANCY & DALE WOLFE Co -Directors Co -Directors 102 ALLEN ROAD 100 ALLEN ROAD SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05401 (802) 658-1433 (802) 658-1605 March 23, 1982 Ethan Allen Child Care Center, Inc. 600 Dalton Drive, Fort Ethan Allen Winooski, Vermont 05404 Dear Ken: After reviewing your proposal, Allenbrook, Inc., is pleased to offer to lease to you two of our buildings. We strongly believe that you would make an excellent tenant for South Burlington and complement to our program. We will assist you in obtaining the necessary permits and certificates. Our Buildings and Grounds Committee and Finance Committee will work with you on property use and operating expenses. We look forward to having you as neighbors. Please call me if you have any questions. Yours truly, ames F. Briggs,V dent JFB:r TEACHING FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES >r ZMXG BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MATING DFC FR 17, 1973 APPEAL OF BERNARD AND ROSALIE HAPMD, CONTINUED Mr. 1he ry Victory, representing the Hammonds, explained that while it would be possible to purchase land out in back, it wouldn't help; neither would it be practical to build a house any smalleri will be a ranbh house. There is adequate area for sewage. Mrs. Hammond said they had owned the land and paid taxes on it long enough but could never afford to build before. Mr. Hammond said the lot is now a jungle and an eyesore and would look much better to have a house on it. The Board voted unanimously to approve the request for variance. IPPRAL OF THRESHOLD HOUSE Appeal of Threshold House seeking a variance from Section 8.10, Use regulations of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission to operate a private institution, offering accommodations for approximately twenty-five persons, at the Durgin property, 100 Allen Road. The Chairman announced that this request has been withdrawn. APPEAL OF BERT J. PECOR Appeal of Bert J. Peoor seeking a variance from Section 8.10, Use regulation (Subsection 2) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission to establish a mobile home sales and service business on a lot located at 3060 Williston Road. Request read aloud by Chairman Myette. Mr. Ward stated area is zoned Business District B. Proposal is to relocate his „0 �t1 r sales from Dorset Street and Williston Road to his Williston Road property ,~,W *+w.werw,.newr.r..„rn,�,_ ' � SMMMw . r0 "MWMs".WC r 400" 1. aa.n.V.,,. located easterly of 3060 Williston Road. Would relocate a 30' x 26' building to o-,r N i 4-J in �C: U >� C) O O LO M M CD 00 N O 00 E O LO O r�- C N O 0) CO CO Cnielnoia November 15, 1973 Zoning Administrator 1175 Williston Rd South Burlington, Vt. Dear Mr. Ward: Threshold is a counciling and rehabilitation program designed to help adolescents from the state of Vermont who have had trouble in school, at home or with drugs. We would like to establish a residence in South Burlington. Such a facility would house twenty five young people and a full time staff of three. As a residential program we would make no major alterations to any buildings nor would we be placing our clients in the South Burlington school systems. We would like to apply for non conforming use of the property owned by Mrs. Beth Durgin on Allen Road which is currently zoned commercial. As such we would like to be placed on the agenda for December 5th. Thank you for your courtesy. Sincerely, Mark rby Resident Director December 11, l9?3 ThreshoLl House 61', °"ain Street Burlington, VT 05+01 Attention: Per. Mark Yer y :ear %ir. Yerl-y: This letter is to inform you that the South Burlington Zoning Poard of. .^,.d justment will hold a public hearing at the City Halls Conference Room, 1175 Williston road on Monday, December 17 1973 at 5tOO p.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly s Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer RW j J � Hearing Date Pit. 7{ W; Advt. Date Advertise 6 days prior to meeting. South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment South Burlington, Vermont Gentlemen: I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following variance. I understand that regular meeting dates are the first and third Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 p.m. at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertisement shall appear as below, and I agree to pay, either now or before the ad appears, a fee of $30..00 which fee is to off -set costs of holding said hearing. ignature a ess Date SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING NOTICE The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on /y�a.vo'gv , v£r, Ii day of week at to consider the following: month and date time ¢ Appeal of / Lseeking a (name) variance from Section �� , !./-a-� -� *��-� of number title o section the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission to 014.,tl � .�,,,.�' �(/iTiOGfiZ�e.t.(�- �"�d � .r'...-4"....� ti+s �.y},q d«!7'�','i4•'x'�., /-&7, ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT J --�---- ------------'---�r--------' ------'---------' ------- r----'------�----�^--------------'- -'-��------------------ ------------------'-------- --'_-_-�.---_--'__--------_-- ---- _~ _-_-__--_-___--_-_'----_-__ \ ^ | � ' ��--�-|-'- --'��---�-'-------'-------------'----'------------------------------ �~eu.�� - - - � ' --------------------------------- --------'-r------�----- ------------�-�'------- ----------' �� i ^ _----_-__^_- -----------__- ._-__--' ------__--__-__--------_'--------__-___--_-_____'__-_-------__---__ � � -----�-�--r------------------- --------------------------------------�----------- � City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD - f SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 M.. ,», . �•' TEL. 863-2891 June 13, 1977 Smith & Bell 1.;r. Richard A. h;yette 102 South Winooski Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear h;r. 1,4yette: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjust- ment will hold a special public hearing at City Hall, Con- ference Room, 1175 Vv'illiston Road on 14onday, June 27, 10,77 at 5:00 p.m. to consider the appeal of Reverend Robert J. Baffa of Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Road, Inc. Section. 11.00 Dimensional requirements sub -section 11.001 requires of set back of seventy-five (75) feet. The building will have a set back of sixty-one (61) feet on the south-t-,jest corner and approximately eight (80) feet on the opposite corner. Please plan to attend: Very truly yours, Richard V,ard Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg cc to all Board members NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby- appeal to , the - Zoning Board of Ad jus tment for the following: conditional use, vaarriance l decision of administrative officer. Property Owner Property location & description lll0- /VIW Variance of Section 9 number title of section) Basis of appea I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference -Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing._ Hearing Date Signatufe of Appellant SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117 Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, '1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday June 27 1977 at 5:00 p.m. to consider the day of week month and date) time following: Appeal of Rev. Robert J. Baffa, Sixteen Ninety Shelburene Rd., I,,- seeking a Variance 1 from Section 11.00 1 Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to relocat,; a structure from 1690 Shelburne Road to 100 Allen Road, structure to be located within sixty-one (61) fe.et of the south-west front yard line, as per plan on file with the Zoning Administrator, City Officers, 1175 �1,4i? liston Road . Richard A. Prlyette Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustment South Burlington, Vermont REV.ROBERTJ.BAFFA Executive Director MICHAEL W.DEFORGE Assistant Director OFFICERS Rep. Evelyn L. Jarrett President Dominick A. Marabella Vice President Harris T. Cushing Treasurer Rita Corneau, S.P. Secretary BOARD MEMBERS Everett C. Bailey Joyce Barrett, R. S. M. Joseph E. Corbett Sarah T. Fitzgerald James J. Fish, III Samuel Gladstone Sen. T. Wesley Grady Paul C. Grimes Evelyn Harrington Frank J. Heinrich Dr. Edward A. Kupic Rep. Mary Barbara Maher Ruth McKenzie Patricia Poulos John R. Schillhammer Sgt. John M. Welsh PROFESSIONALLY LICENSED GROUP HOME FOR BOYS 1690 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 802/658-1605 October 26, 1976 Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Ward: Due to the uncertainty of the boundaries on the Allen Road Property we are requesting that our application for Zoning Variance be Tabled until the above information has been de- termined. pie will contact you as soon as we have received the proper information. Sincerely yours, `, Reverend Robert J. Baffa hXecutive Director !ZJB/gb NO ONE STANDS TALLER THAN WHEN HE STOOPS TO HELP A BOY RAYMOND LEBLANC 100 Laurel hill Drive Area zoned R-4 District. Section 11.00, Dimensional Requirements Rear yard requirement 30 feet - proposed 20 feet. Proposed addition 18' x 30' family room. Lot 60 foot frontage - 100' rear line,125 foot average depth. KENNETH & PATRICIA CHERRY 37 Airport Parkway Area zoned R-4 District. Section 11.00, Dimensional Requirements Side yard requirement 15 feet - proposed 4 feet. Proposed 16' x 30' detached garage and workshop to within 41 of the southerly side yard line. Lot 701 frontage, 125' depth. SIXTEEN NINETY SHELBURN-, ROAD, INC. Rev. Robert Baffa 100 Allen Road Area zoned B.P.D. District. Proposed use: Group Home for Ibys not allowable in BPD District. Structure 24' x 40' presently located at 1690 Shelburne Road to be relocated to 100 Allen Road. Existing house,barn and shop to be occupied and used by Sixteen Ninety - 10 to 16 students. Variance granted to same organization on Feb. 7, 1973- DAVID & RITA HOLPL S 5 Elizabeth Street Area zoned R-4 District. Section 11.00, Dimensional requirements. - 2 - Side yard requirement 15 feet - proposed 12 feet. Existing side yard 12 feet. Proposed addition 24' x 28' to rear of existing dwelling to within 12 feet of side yard. GULF OIL C O . G . N . S',,"ETT 1041 Shelburne Road Multiple uses Section 11.15. Operate a dairy product retail business allowed under 7.004 (a) in conjunction with a gasoline service station. Variance granted I•Iarch 1, 1976 to construct existing kiosk building. Proposed to sell dairy products and gasoline. Approximately 80 square feet of floor area for display cases and coolers. Building size 7' x 281. October 21, 1976 "h,--,lburne -',oLd, Inc. i,ev. ',I.obert J. !,'a'fa c-uth jurlington, VT 05401 Dear 'Ov. Taffa: S Te advised that the 'outh 'urlington .oning 'oarC, of -,,-Just- r-,-nt �,J7_1 ),),old ?. nublic hea-in- at th--� "outh Ti)--'ington City 17n, I onferr-e T C 0!,,, , 11'75 ",'i"liston '-,oad on -on��ay, - 7 3. 7 "76 5 :CC, n.r- o to cnsi,,er your request for a zoning variance. lease plan to, T-1c, Jr -tti-r-(nncc. trm*'.y, iAchar(i nr6 January 26, 1977 ,�ixyeen TSincty -,nelburne .oad, Inc. .�,v. ' obert J. , affa 16".0 �`Ji�elburne oad ,out'ri l ur- iim-ton, 0 401 r � I T 'r ,ev. r'a fa PA advised that the L�outn - u-ling ton ;:.oning oard of 11d just= ment will hold a public hearing at "'out-l: -url i.n�-,ton �:ity :iall, Cc:.nferencc- i,com, 1175 l,-'illiston Coad on °,�onday, ,�obruar� 7, 1977 at 5:00 p.- . to consi,'Fr your recu-st "or a zonin<- var. i'Ance. ?1:�_,se plan to be in at -enhance. Very truly, ichard r,rd :,onin� i,.'minis t,rative ".C.icer VJ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference --Room, 1175-Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont --on Monday, February 7, 1977 , at :CO p.m. to consider the day of week month and date) (time) following: #1 Appeal of _Green Mountain Power Corporation seeking under a conditional use , ft6fii Section 10.101 and Section 13.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to construct a substation within the. GBIC Industrial Park, south of Shunpike Road and to relocate transmission lines within said Park area, as per plan on file with the Zoning Administrative Officer. #2 Appeal of Rev. Robert J. Baffa, Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Road., Inc. seeking a variance , from Section 8.00 , Permitted uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to relocate a structure presently occupied as a Group Home for Boys at 1690 Shelburne Road and to continue operating as a Group Home on a parcel of land containing 5.6 acres, located at 100 Allen Road. Richard A. Myette, Chairman South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision -of administrative officer. 'rProperty Owner Mrs. Durgin ✓Property location & description 100 Allen Road, South Burlington. 5.6 acres consisting of house, barn, showroom and -swimming pool. Variance of Section number title of section Basis of appeal Sixteen Ninety Shelburne Road, Inc. seeking a variance I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference -Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum -of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the .costs of advertising and- the hearing. Hearing Date Sig ature of Appe,lant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on • ,.at .to consider the. day of week month and date time following: 0. #a Appeal of Zseeking a t ��.�, �,._s x from Section '. of �*•�e,rell,,, ' . ,le,e v,1,� of the South Burlington. Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission. ��° �o °' ' �'" A .r, 'y G, /i'„a` ' w ...4�,. M1 d [. r .4„e Z..r N /1',w/'r.^ i '1 .' H •�++ Y�"'" ✓ ,� .'�"at..# IV ^YO'Y Ff a as • //!/ v .— L!<.. .,!, -.I �. f f,. - I' 'Nn !'w .�.+,sV//L.—'.t.'al-� 0 Request is for permission to purchase the Durgin property at 100 Allen Road, South Burlington for the continuation and expanision of the Group Home presently located at 1690 Shelburne Road, South Burlington which will be moved to the above named location. We are petitioning for a variance from its present zoning of Business Plan Development to Residential and as such the character of the neigh- borhood will not be changed. _ _ r+-, a �"'J'M:✓.."h� 'S'�A�. r'i4•r;.Y.r ; i', �; �.^�'r � 7" W',� ;;y'� I ALLENBR00K Page 9 will review the system that they Have developed. Rick had suggested putting braces on the windows so they could only he opened less than the width of a body. This was in response to several incidents of residents climbing out onto a roof. I told Rick he should check this out with Labor and Industry people to make sure that this was acceptable in terms of fire safety. lie said that he would do that before implementing braces. In discussions with the residents about why they were in the program, the issue which most often came up was school. They recognized that being at Allenbrook is important to them so that they can achieve success in school. They were not as clear about knowing what other problems they were working on, or at least they were not as articulate about it. This may be an area that the staff would want to check out and make sure that the residents are aware of the philosophy and goals behind this new program. In general, I think that Allenbrook has taken a positive step toward developing a viable program. It's been a commendable effort on the part of the Allenbrook Board. Their ongoing involvement will he important as this program is implemented in the next several months. 8. RECO111ENDATION I recommend a regular group home license to care for 14 youth. LCA: it 4/22/81 Lucy C. Abair, Foster Care Specialist I �" � ','S, u��"=�K`T.ni �"� .7ix'::45 ,•�G�..'�'�V.. "�i''�F'�,�"A �(": q'i:?:'M, �S.,� _.�M', '�l` if!, r�5ar'�"' Y"A �;'�'A ii�s � #'a ,� r�"��:�;� Allenbrook 100 Allen Road South Burlington, Vermont General Description Allenbrook, Inc. is a private,nonprofit corporation licensed by the State of Vermont as a professional group home for juveniles. The stated purposes of the corporation are to provide group home settings for boys under the care and supervision of the Department of Social Rehabilitation Services (S.R.S.). Youths referred to Allenbrook, Inc. are considered to be either delinquent or in need of care and supervision and are unable to function adequately in either their natural families or in foster homes. Allenbrook, Inc. presently operates two group homes for boys at 100 Allen Road in South Burlington, Vermont. Under this proposal, Allenbrook would implement two Teaching Family programs open to both boys and girls. The timetable and steps necessary to make this transition would be worked out cooperatively between the present Board of Directors of Allenbrook and the Vermont Teaching Family Training Center. The homes will use the treatment modality described in literature published.by the National Teaching Family Association. The married couples, their assistant, and the youths who live with them comprise the Teaching Family. The Treatment Program at Allenbrook One important goal of any residential treatment program should be to return youths to their natural environment whenever and wherever possible. By providing youths with opportunities to acquire the skills needed to survive in their parents homes, foster homes, or in the community at large, we hope to assure their continued success. Often the youths who need residential treatment display a lack of skill in various areas, which usually has led to removal from their environment. Youths who come to live at Allenbrook are taught a variety of social, academic and self-help skills designed to meet their individual needs. These skills are taught in a family style fi setting by highly traimed couples whose own skills are rigorously! z:; evaluated. Youths area prpvided with opportunities to try these',i newly acquired skills ihrqugh supervised experiences and inter 4s1 actions in he c I such as,at; school., in athletics in c7��tba LV ,_:,, ''.; and in many cases on part time jobs. The community becomes the' ryt youth' a ' classroom and the Teaching Parent becomes the facilitator. !qw' of learning and growth.' Other youths who comprise the Teaching ,:....: Family learn to support these newly acquired successes. `� Y 2. Screening and Admissions As vacancies occur in either Teaching Family at Allenbrook, the Case and Screening Committee reviews applications for admis- sions. The Case and Screening Committee includes members of the board, Teaching Parents, and a representative from S.R.S. Because of their proximity to Allenbrook, priority for admissions is given to youths referred by the three closest S.R.S. district offices. These are the Burlington, Vergennes, and St. Albans district offices. Allenbrook will accept referrals from any S.R.S. district office. Because of our desire to return youths to their families when we can, contact with parents and siblings becomes crucial for youths and Teaching Parents. As the youth acquires new skills, the oppor- tunity to practice them in the natural home becomes important. So, too, does the ability for Teaching Parents to interact with the youth's parents, since they will be needing new parenting skills. These new skills will help ensure the continued success of the youth after he returns home. Consequently, contact between parents and Teaching Parents becomes quite difficult if the youth's home is too distant from Allenbrook. Youths who are considered for admission to Allenbrook should be boys and girls between the ages of 12 and 17 and should have an I.Q. of 80 or above. Exceptions may be made for youths whose I.Q.'s fall below 80, based on the following factors: developmental history, present level of functioning (math and reading levels no less than three years below grade level), motor skills, social and emotional maturity, and the availability of special resources. Youths should exhibit no major physical handicap or medical problem that would prevent participation in routine group home activities. For example, a youth confined to a wheelchair would be unable to utilize a base- ment family room or second floor bedroom. A youth with unstabilized diabetes or unstabilized epilepsy would require skilled medical supervision not available in most residential settings. Youths referred to Allenbrook should be capable of attendance at a school near their parents home if it is within reasonable com- muting distance, or at a school situated near the group home. If a referred youth is to be transferred from his original school district to the school district in which Allenbrook is situated, the referring agency will be responsible for any tuition and fees incurred. Since one goal of residential treatment at Allenbrook is eventual return home, it is preferable to have a referred youth remain in his original school, so that any problems which may have occurred there can be dealt with constructively by the Teaching Parents. Youths shouearn,to solve school related problems ' instead of avoid.ng th through further trouble making or truancy. � 8 8 X ;.;•;fit; , ? Teachers who -'observe 44;behavior growth �n a positive direction may �nr•, • q become strong advocatag for that youth, where once they may have'; .� �.`. disliked him. k f An identified family resource for the youth is hTortant, if ' referral is to be made to Allenbrook. This family resouce may be the natural parents, another relative, a guardian, or a foster family. The family resource must be willing to learn alternative new methods of dealing with youth problem behavior. They must be willing to supervise the youth during home visits approximately ..aY'&i�SCA.Sl. �s�tsr•rzfiai�ra-f"k+of:"r-au'ra�i�ST YS.'�'3xP17-3'�C9�17�"'!P"`�.a�l:'"��'.iS'�c�".ns�f`.�twP�i .,`'-`•3L''e'.u:cWi�:S" C 3. two weekends per month and on holidays. The family should also agree to work toward the goal of eventually having the youth return home to live, usually after approximately one year's stay at Allenbrook. Youths whose history of offenses include incidents of violent behavior, (such as murder, rape or aggravated assault); sexual deviance (such as child molesting or overt homosexuality); medically diagnosed dependence on drugs (such as inhalants, halucinogins, stimulants, or depressants); or a diagnosed severe behavior dis- order (such as paranoid schizophrenia, organic brain syndrome, or multiple personality) are usually excluded from consideration. However, the merits of each youth will be considered individually and some youths may be conditionally considered for placement. Caseworkers wishing to refer youths to Allenbrook who meet the previously stated criteria should complete and return an Allenbrook admissions packet to the Case and Screening Committee. The admis- sions packet should include a completed admissions form, a statement of the reason for referral, the youths social history, juvenile court records (including the youths present legal status, and a statement of who has custody or guardianship), school records (including I.Q. and achievement testing, and grades and attendance for three previous school years), psychological evaluations, family social history, and any recent medical records. These records are required at referral since they include information which may validate the need for place- ment. Additionally, experience has shown that records not made available at referral are difficult for Allenbrook staff to obtain later. The Case and Screening Committee cannot adequately consider youths for placement whose referral packets do not contain complete information. The Teaching Family at Allenbrook The Teaching Family approach is based on the belief that one cause of emotional disturbance and delinquent behavior in youth is that their past environment has not provided the instructions, examples, and feedback required to develop appropriate behavior. Youths may become dependent upon a deviant peer group which provides inappropriate instruction, role models and reinforcement that further the behavior problems. A Teaching Family approach addresses this- cycle of rein- forcement by providing family -style, professional treatment in a small (6-8 youths) group, which allows the Teaching Parents to interact extensively with each youth, thereby producing change in a short r' period of time. Teach arentadesign, �S►g._� desi gn, and car ry' out treatment and, procedures to correct qpblem,behaviors to teach alternative#� appropriate be�hav�ors t;p �,a xouthi. they;supervise youths''activr; rand 1, " ities at home and schoo .,^ .a the: community at the, group home. Working relationships aFe_established and maintained with agencies y ' such as the juvenile court, Social Rehabilitation Services, schoels,'"3t, civic organizations and persons directly associated with the youths d" themselves such as parents. Teaching Parents direct the treatment, program, live with the youths and act as program administrators in terms of generating community resources to benefit the youths in the program. �fi.':*- n(...a='.G,.`._ i -A4:, c�..�u,.y .•,p' .:s�^ r?r-�'x "w''W "Y. ..9i r'�:v'^;W!,: �^'w":i .biliu.,, ...,,s�,: rvwi-,r.'iGA:Ai. ,y'..� Allenbrook's Teaching Family approach emphasizes client centered, goal oriented treatment planning tailored to each youths specific needs. A general goal of this approach is to improve the youths' social, academic and self-help skills sufficiently to make them successful citizens who can hold a job, stay out of trouble with authorities and lead a pleasant life. Some immediate social behavior goals targeted might include teaching the youths to cooperate, help others, greet adults, have good manners, discuss issues without arguing or fighting, resolve problems by helping each other, carry out instructions, smile in the face of adversity, display a good sense of humor without hurting others with practical jokes or cruel teasing, and get along in a family situation without being rowdy, threatening others, pouting or sulking, lying, cheating or stealing. Academic behavior goals include keeping the youth in school and improving grades. Some self-help behavior goals addressed are household, personal hygiene and time management skills. Teaching Parent Training, Consultation and Evaluation A key requirement for quality assurance and program implementation is the systematic training, consultation and evaluation services provided to both Teaching Families at Allenbrook by the Vermont Teaching Family Training Center.. Teaching Parent training begins with a seventy hour preservice workshop, based on approximately 900 pages'of required reading, and focused on intensive skill teaching. During the workshop, Teaching Family Training Center staff members provide detailed descriptions of Teaching Family style treatment, utilize videotape sequences and provide intensive practice sessions for each trainee. During the workshop, twenty skill areas are taught. The preservice workshop concentrates on the information,motivation techniques and Teaching Parent social behaviors the trainees need to establish a new program and to operate it for the first few months; and on the procedures they need to establish good relations with important agencies. Following the preservice workshop, inservice programs are scheduled throughout the year in order to assist Teaching Parents in program implementation. These workshops and seminars are frequently one or two days in length, focusing on advanced skills and knowledge. Inservice training frequently includes techniques used to assist youths in developing critical and complex social skills, procedures to &fine the self government system and methQ¢s; for fading artificial.4ivation systems so that each youth bec__ a s increasingly 'sucr,essf pximaril throe h�naturally occurrin events in his,environ ent`. It is throe,gk,jinservice training thin, F each trains s ! � ng center ;�pdates'kn�wledge, techniques and procedure for Teaching Parents and their assistants (( } Systematic consultation is critical•to maintaining quality control, solving problems and providing support to Teaching Parents " and their assistants. The consultation format involves one or two trainers spending one to four hours observing Teaching Parents in the group home. These observation sessions are followed by 5. lengthy feedback sessions during which trainers and Teaching Parents review their observations, make suggestions for program improvements, teach problem solving techniques and provide support. Structured feedback sessions are also provided to review the progress of each youth. Teaching Parents are taught to specify problems, arrive at treatment options, decide on implementation strategies and establish times for evaluating their effectiveness. Consultation over the telephone is used to solve specific problems as they occur. Evaluation services occur concurrently throughout training and consultation activities. Several types of evaluation are employed, ranging from informal feedback sessions to professional and consumer evaluations designed to assess competency and serve as a basis for certification of Teaching Parents. Evaluation is important for previously trained and certified couples as well and recertification occurs annually throughout the Teaching Parents career. � ��• -� �4 ' S , j _�. .I�: �� }a N �.! M• i' .h� " •F �1 �•F �it r,IiL " �. i r BYr -I A',I,S ALLKM LrtUCf'LI i C APYTC1.401 I Of flees Section 1.1. Principal Office. The principal office of the corporation in the uta;a of Ven on�t shall be located at Allenbrook, Tt:� , 100 Allen R•,)ad, Soath Burlington, Veimont, or at such other playa as may be designated from tIm3 to time by the Board of Directors. ARTICLE II Mtubers Section 2.1, Eerberehip. Any person eighteen (18) years of age or oldor may, upon pronor election at the annual meeVng, became a director of the board of All.enbrook, Inc. �- Section 2.2. Arnusl Meeting. The annual meeting of directors shall be hold in January of each year at a tjme, date and place to be sper,ified in the notice. The sccratavy shall ser7e notice of sane personally o= by mail no less than one week or more than three wosks before the date of the meeting. Notica may be dispensed with fer any d.Lrert•or if that director, on or before the date of -the mnetit_g, !.n writing waives notice; and at any time notice may be w3lved and the p;-oceedings of a meeting may be ratified in writing by a d:-cc-4or. Section 2.3. Reguler Mnet.i gs. In addition to the annual meeting tao directors shall hold Yrmetings no less than five tLmes eap, i year In f•iny, July, Septsmber and November. Notice of the date., time and p12.ce of a regu tar meeting shall be served personally or by mail no. 1F 3 -� than one week before the date of the regular meeting. Notice rAy bxi wJ tb for any director if that director,• on or before the da1..a of the meeting, in writing waives notice; and at any time nc'; :-i.: m-ny be waived and the proceedings of a meeting may be ratified in w::Yj ;,i::g by a director. Section 2.4. Special Meetings, Special meetings may be called at any tjm3 at the request of two or more directors. Notice of the date, time and place of a special meeting shall be served personally or by mail not less than one week before the date of the special m: a tin ;. Notice ma.y be dispensed with for any director if that .- d3xoctor, on or before the date of the meeting, in writing waives notice; ind at any time notice may be waived. Section 2.5. Place of 14ent,inf,„ ' i_sY Hoard of Dire, -tors may designal-,e any pla^e tl a of Vernont, as the place of naet:ing for any a meal meeting of the Board oC L rectors or for any sr, : ,.Ial meetin;; called by th3 Doai•1 of Directors. If n3 dssign t-_on is made or if a upecial mceting be otherwise called, thn place of mee-�:Lzg shall be the registered office of the corporation in the State of Verment. Section 2.6. 11otice of Meeting. 11ritten or printed notice stat:Lng the place, day and hour of -i a meeting and, in case of a special meeting, the purpose or parpocos for which the m•:9ting is calked, shall be delivered not less than ton (10) or more than thirty (30) days before the date of the meeting, Father personally or by mail, by or at the discretion of the president or the secretary or the officer or persons eal].irg the meeting, to each director. Section 2.7. Quoriun. The presence in person of one third of the d3rectiors shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the trans- action of business at all meetings. ARTICLE III Board of Directors Section 3.1. General Powers. The business and affairs of the corporation shall ba managed by its Board of Directors. Section 3.2. Ym. bar. Tenure. and Qualifications, At the ann al meeting in 1975, seven directors shall be elected to a term of one () year, eeven directors shall be elected to a term of two (2) years and seven (7) directors shall be elected to te-ms of three (3) years. The te=..,s of all directors elected at the azmual meetings, in 19i6 and thereafter, shall be thrse (3) years. At each annual meeting, new djr3stors will be elected. A simple majority shall be necessary for to membership. Vacancies in the membership shall be filled at the regular meeting next following in the same manner and under the satyr conditions as if the elections were at the annual meeting. A pn:-9•)a so elected to membership shall fill only the unexpired por*,-ion of the term of the director whose vacancy he or she is f': l,s:t • �111 cltreoto. s shall have the right to be notified of and attend+ till armuril, special and regular meetings of the membership, to verse at said meetings, to address directors at said maetJmgs in an orderly fashion, and to examine at any reasonable time all the ledgers, books and records of Allenbrook, Inc. The number of directors at any one time shall be no less than twenty (20) and no more than thirty (30), Section 3.3, Vacancies. Vacancies shall be noticed for that purpose., -'and officers so elected mxpire-1 portion of the tent of the officer whose is f=- ng. filled at any meeting shall fi7.1 only the vacancy he or she 2 r SAct.ion 3.4, P reslimpt .on of Assert. A dlx3.tor of tho ccrporat1:n bbo is present at a heeting of the Board of WxF ctors at which action on any cor_ocrate rr..nl-ter is takF_n shall be pr�;sumcd to have aoss3ASd to the action taken unless his/her dissent shall be entered in the minutes of the rreet1 g or unless he/she shall file his/her written dissent at such action with the person acting as the secretary of the meeting before the adjoin went thereof. Such right to dissent shall not apply to a director who Toted in favor of such action. Section 3.5. aecutive Committee. The Board of Directors may establish an executive cam'Uttee of nine members. The president, vice- president, secretary, treasurer, and five board directors shall constitute the executive committee. Said ccunittce may meet at stated tiy:es, or on notice to all by any of their own number. During the intervals between meeting: of the Board such corrmiittee shall. advise m-nd eid the officers of the corporation in all matters concerning its interests and the management of its business, and generally perform such duties and exercise such powers as may be directed or delegated by the Board of Directors from time to time. Vacancies in the member- ship of the committee shall be filled by the Board, of Directors at a regular meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose. The executive committee shall keep regular minutes of its proceedings and report the same to the Board when required. Section 3.6. Removal of Directors. At a meeting of the directors called expressly for that purpose, any director may be removed, with or without cause, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the directors entitled to vote at a{n election of directors. Section 3.7. Voting. At all meetings of th3 directors all questions shall be determined by vote of a simple majority of the directors present in person, except as may be otherwise required by ARTICLE, IV Officers Section 4.1. Number. The officers of the corporation shall be a presiaaz;t, a vie -President, a secretary, and a treasurer. Section 4.2. Election and Term of Office. All officers named herein shall be elected at the annual meeting, by a majority present and voting, for a term of one year. Each officer shall hold office until his/her successor shall have been duly elected and shall have qualified or until his/her death or until he/she shall resign or shall have been removed in the manner hereinafter provided. K Section 4.3. Woioval. Any officer elected or appointed by the Board of Directors muyU"'removed by the Board of Directors whenever in its judgraent the best interests of the corporation would be served thereby, but such removal shall be vithout ,prejudice to the contract rights, if any of the parson so removed. Section 4,4, Vacancies. A vacancy in any office because of death, resignation. removal, disqualification, or otherwise, may be filled by the Board of Directors for the unexpired portion of the term. Section 4.5. The pruoident shall be the principal executivo officer of the corporation and, subject to the control of the Board of Directors, shall in general supervise and control all of the business and affairs of the corporation. The president, shall, when present, preside at all meetings of the directors and of the Board of Directors. He/she may sign all instruments which the Board of Directors has authorized to be executed and in general shall perform all duties incident to the office of president and such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors from time to time. Section 4.6. Vice -Pre sident_ In the absence of the president or in the event of his/her death, inability, or refusal to act, the vice- president shall perform the duties of the president, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be subject to all the restrictions �-- upon, the president. Section 4.7. Secretary. The secretary, in addition to statutory duties, shall: (a) keep the minutes of the directors' and the Board of Directors' meetings in one or more books provided for that purpose; (b) see that all notices are duly given in accordance with the prcvisions of these By -Lasts or as required by law; (c) be custodian of the corporate records and of the seal of the corporation and see that the seal of the corporation is affixed to all documents the execution of which on behalf of the corporation under its seal is duly authorized. Section 4.8. Treasurer. The treasurer shall: (a) have charge and custody of and be responsible for all funds and securities of the corporation; receive and give receipts for moneys due and payable to the corporation from any source whatsoever; and deposit all such moneys in the name of the co oration in such banks, trust aru�panies, or othr depositaries; and (bb in general perform all of the duties as fray bias to time may be assigned to him by the president or by thw Board of Directors. k ARTICLE V Ca mittees Section 5.1. Committees. The Board of Directors may establish various ca miittees including 'gilt not limited to a nominating, committee, executive committee, finance committee, personnel committee) case and 4 W screening committee, building and grounds (site) committee, and public relations and fund raising commil'.tee. .each director shall sit on at least one standing committee. The president shall be a member ex- offi.cio of all committees. Section 5.2. Special Carnittees. Special committees may be appointed by the president as the need arises. Section 5.3. Committee Duties. Duties of all standing ccmmittees are enumerated in the Allenbrook, Inc., Board of Directors Manual. Section 5.4. R_elort n,.&, All standing committees shall report, at each meeting of the Board of Directors. As a result, standing committees are required to meet during the interim period prior to Board meetings. ARTICLE VI Assets Section 6.1. Distribution of Assets. Upon dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, all assets remaining at that time after satisfaction of all remaining obligations and liabilities shall be donated to the State of Vermont, Department of Social Rehabilitative Services. ARTICLE VII Amendment Section 7.1. Amendment of By -Lawn. By-laws may be Emended, repealed, or added at any regular or annual meeting by a majority of directors present in person and voting at that meeting, when and only when the notice of that meeting has stated exactly the proposed amendment, repeal, or addition. r__ 5 ALL& AWK IiM F .�R BOYS, INC. 100 Allen Road South Burlir,gUgs Vermont 1. Change the nape of the organization from The lllenbrook Hine For Boys,. to Ai.LSKWQX, INC. This would necessitate a change In the Artiolee of Inoorporation. 2. Paste 3. ARTICLE In., WARD OF DIR=RSi,Se�tian�'1 �, &-ocati.ve C_Om UAG, The Board of Directors may establisb an ezecutive xffimittae of nine members. The president, vice -.presidents secretary, treasurers and five board members ebal1 constitute the executte-i comodttee. CBANOS T0: 3. Page 5. ARTICI.$ ASSETS SBCTIM 6 Distribution of Assets. Upon diseclutimin or firAl liquidatim of the borporat on, all assets rmi3,aing at that time after satisfaatloo of all r m$mIng obligations and liabilities shall be donated to the State of Yonmt, Department of Social Rehabilitative Services. A Proposal For The Coapletion Of A Continu= of Residential Services For Juveniles Presented to the Senate Institutions C=mittee, February 17, 1981 C On of go IN my, Mae) arill's 2", � go sop" A Proposal For The Completion Of A Continuum Of Residential Services For Juveniles The purpose of this paper is to describe the next phase in the development of a comprehensive system for juveniles in Vermont. The paper will be divided into the following parts: part I. Introduction. This part will include a definition of the system for juvenile services and a descrip- tion of how it relates to the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services and the Agency of &nan Services. Part II. A Brief History of the Development of the Service System for Juveniles. This part will include a S historical description of the planned transition from a system which relied heavily on an institu- tional program to a network of unity based services. Part III. An Overview of Current Residential Programs for Juveniles. This part will include a description of the network of residential programs which presently exist. Part IV. The C=vletion of a Continuum of Residential Services. This section will include a proposal for two sma11, secure residential programs for juveniles who engage in serious and/or repeated delinquent/criminal behavior and a saa.11 expansion of the secure detention program. The addition of these program will provide a more complete continuum of juvenile services. l -1- PART I. TNw=UC rIC q The Agency of Human Services is comprised of the following departments or offices: Agency of M man Services 6-�_ wn-.-�. wu-• Social Welfare Office on Department Aging State Economic Opportunity Office Social and Rehabilitation Services Department Comprehensive Employment I I Rate Setting and Training Office ` Division Vermont Developmental I Disabilities 4