Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - City Council - 03/16/2020 - UPDATED
UPDATED AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Regular Session 6:30 P.M. Monday, March 16, 2020 1.Pledge of Allegiance. (6:30 – 6:31 PM) 2.Instructions on exiting building in case of emergency. Kevin Dorn (6:31 – 6:32 PM) 3.Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items. (6:32 – 6:33 PM) 4.Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda. (6:33 – 6:43 PM) 5.City management response to COVID-19 threat. (6:43 – 6:58 PM) 6.Consent Agenda: (6:58 – 7:00 PM) A. *** Consider and Sign DisbursementsB.*** Approve minutes for November 18th & February 3rd & 18th C.*** Authorize settlement of claims in the matter of Beaupre v. O’Conner, Docket No. 2:14-cv-00256 7.***Presentation of Earth Economic report relating to monetizing the value of natural resources andpresentation by John Stewart regarding financial costs and revenues deriving from developedproperty. (7:00 – 8:00 PM) 8.Public hearing on proposed Land Development Regulation amendments: ****THIS AGENDA ITEM WAS NOT PROPERLY WARNED AND SO THE PUBLIC HEARING WILLBE DELAYED UNTIL A TIME PRESCRIBED BY THE CITY COUNCIL****** A.LDR-19-13A: Modify existing Inclusionary Zoning requirements and extend applicability to include all lands that underline the Transit Overlay District, all lands within the City Center Form Based Code District, and all lands in the vicinity of Hinesburg Road and Old Farm Road that are north of I-89 and are outside the Transit Overlay District. B.LDR-19-13B: Modify Affordable Housing Density Bonus standards as follows: (1) reduce applicable area to only those areas not subject to proposed Inclusionary Zoning standards [LDR-19-13A], and; (2) adjust requirements for income eligibility and continued affordability for all remaining parts of the City. 9.*** Presentation by Bill Shearer on matters related to zoning. (8:00 – 8:15 PM) 10.POSTPONED *** Common Roots Presentation/Update - Carol McQuillan (8:15 – 8:35 PM) 11.POSTPONED Interview applicants for vacancies (4) on South Burlington boards, committees, andcommissions. (8:35 – 8:50 PM) 12.POSTPONED*** Council consideration of a policy related to gifts and donations to the City. (8:50 –9:10 PM) 13.*** Council consideration and possible approval of a letter to the Vermont Agency of Transportation toconsider reducing speed limits on State Hwy. 116 (Hinesburg Road) (9:10 – 9:25 PM) 14.Reports from Councilors on Committee assignments (9:25 – 9:35 PM) 15.***February Financials - Tom Hubbard (9:35 – 9:45 PM) 16.***Convene as the South Burlington Liquor Control Commission to consider the following Applications: (9:30 – 9:35 PM)Barnyard, First class & third class restaurant/bar license & Outside consumption permit;Bourne’s Service Center, Second class license; Catering By Dale, First class & third classcommercial kitchen license; Champlain Farms, Second class license; Champlain Farms-Exxon,Second class license; Champlain Farms South Burlington, Second class license; Charlie’s on Fire(Chicken Charlies), First class restaurant/bar license; Comfort Suites (1712 Shelburne Road), First class & third class restaurant/bar license and Outside consumption permit; Dave’s Cosmic Subs, Firstclass restaurant/bar license; Doubletree by Hilton, First class & third class restaurant/bar license andOutside consumption permit; Green Mountain Suites Hotel, First class restaurant/bar license;Hannaford Supermarket (on Shelburne Road), Second class license; Higher Ground, First class &third class restaurant/bar license and Entertainment license application; Homewood Suites, First,second & third class restaurant/bar license and Outside consumption permit; #105 Jolley Williston Road, Second class license; Kinney Drugs #55 (Williston Road), Second class license; Kotorestaurant, First class & third class restaurant/bar license; Marco’s Pizza, First class restaurant/barlicense; The Mill Market Deli, Second class license; Moose Lodge #1618, First class & third classrestaurant/bar license and entertainment license; The Pour House, First class & third class restaurant/bar license; Pulcinella’s @LakeView (1710 Shelburne Rd), First class & third classrestaurant/bar license and Outside consumption permit; Simon’s Store & Deli (Shelburne Rd), Second class license; Smokey’s Low ‘n Slow, First class & third class restaurant/bar license; TraderJoe’s #527, Second class license; Vermont National Country Club (#3944-1), First class & third classrestaurant/bar license; Vermont National Country Club (3944-2), First class & third classrestaurant/bar license; Vermont National Country Club (#3944-3), Second class license 17.Councilors updates and City Manager’s Report (9:45 – 9:55 PM) 18.POSTPONED Possible executive session to consider appointments to South Burlington boards,committees, and commissions. (9:55 – 10:10 PM) RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 19.POSTPONED Council appointments to South Burlington boards, committees, and commissions. (10:10 – 10:15 PM) 20. Adjourn (10:15 PM) Respectfully Submitted: Kevin Dorn Kevin Dorn, City Manager *** Attachments Included South Burlington City Council Meeting Participation Guidelines City Council meetings are the only time we have to discuss and decide on City matters. We want to be as open and informal as possible; but Council meetings are not town meetings. In an effort to conduct orderly and efficient meetings, we kindly request your cooperation and compliance with the following guidelines. 1.Please be respectful of each other (Council members, staff, and the public). MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council FROM: Andrew Bolduc, Esq., South Burlington City Attorney DATE: 3/12/2020 RE: Settlement of Claims for Kevin Beaupre v. Jack O’Conner and Edward Soycheck Docket No. 2:14-cv-00256. Background Kevin Beaupre, pro se, filed a lawsuit a number of years ago regarding allegations that the South Burlington Police Department sold impounded evidence without his consent. On the City’s behalf, VLTC-PACIF hired Kaveh Shahi, Esq. who filed various dispositive motions until this went to pre-trial mediation in late February. During mediation, the parties finalized a settlement agreement that will be provided in your materials confidentially for your consideration. The costs of litigation above our deductible amount and the consideration referenced in the settlement agreement have all been covered through our insurer. Recommendation VLCT-PACIF and I recommend the City Council accept this settlement agreement for the sole purpose of avoiding further costs of litigation. If any questions arise during your review, feel free to contact me any time prior to the regular meeting. March 6, 2020 Version: Final draft of the report (2020.03.06) Title Natural Capital Valuation of Interim Zoning Open Space Parcels for the City of South Burlington, VT Purpose to inform the City of South Burlington about the natural capital value of parcels selected for conservation Audience the City of South Burlington Authors Olivia Molden, Angela Fletcher, Ken Cousins Acknowledgements Earth Economics - Cheri Jensen, Corrine Armistead, and Maya Kocian The City of South Burlington - Kevin Dorn, Paul Conner, Melanie Needle, and Amanda Holland Earth Economics 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 4 VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ........................................................................................................................... 4 CATEGORIES OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ................................................................................................................................ 5 ECONOMIC VALUE OF NATURAL CAPITAL ............................................................................................................................ 6 STUDY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 7 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 STEP 1. IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF LAND COVER CLASSES WITHIN PRIORITY PARCELS ................................................ 8 STEP 2. IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES GENERATED BY PRIORITY PARCELS ........................................... 10 STEP 3. ASSESSMENT OF ANNUAL VALUE AND TOTAL ASSET VALUE OF PRIORITY PARCELS ............................................................ 11 VALUATION RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................... 11 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 12 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX A. STUDY LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX B. VALUE TRANSFER STUDIES ............................................................................................................ 16 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Earth Economics 3 Executive Summary Nature provides water, clean air, food, timber, and other vital ecosystem goods and services that support human well-being and sustain communities. Though their full value is not always reflected in market prices, ecosystem services are fundamental to a functioning economy. Knowing where to develop or invest—identifying cost-effective and resilient means of managing natural capital and protecting built infrastructure—requires the most complete economic information available. Recognizing the value of ecosystem services, the City of South Burlington has sought to account for the value nature provides. This study aims to assist decision-making in the City of South Burlington—regarding the City’s interim zoning bylaw—by accounting for the value of natural capital for twenty parcels identified as top priorities for conservation by the City’s Open Space Interim Zoning Committee (OSIZ) over the past year. Overall, this study finds that the non-market value of ecosystem services provided by these open space interim zoning parcels falls between roughly $5 to $16 million in benefits each year. Since ecosystem services will provide an ongoing “flow” of value well into the future, the cumulative values over the next twenty years is conservatively estimated at $73 to $240 million with a 3% discount rate. Table 1 highlights the values of individual OSIZ parcels and additionally highlights the grouping of parcels (OSIZ id. 34, 142, 35, 27, 146, 133) in the Great Swamp area. Table 1. Summary of natural capital values for the City’s Open Space Interim Zoning Committee (OSIZ) priority parcels OSIZ No. Range of Natural Capital Values in $/year ($ 2017) Net Present Value Over 20 Years (Discount Rate of 3%) Low Estimate High Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate 7 $143,000 $473,000 $2,186,000 $7,235,000 10 $180,000 $541,000 $2,747,000 $8,287,000 11 $366,000 $897,000 $5,596,000 $13,737,000 14 $446,000 $1,570,000 $6,831,000 $24,047,000 27 $156,000 $785,000 $2,382,000 $12,026,000 34 $1,205,000 $3,956,000 $18,459,000 $60,609,000 35 $61,000 $358,000 $920,000 $5,486,000 37 $60,000 $381,000 $919,000 $5,833,000 39 $218,000 $648,000 $3,335,000 $9,930,000 53 $205,000 $497,000 $3,130,000 $7,611,000 60 $154,000 $408,000 $2,358,000 $6,241,000 67 $78,000 $276,000 $1,195,000 $4,217,000 74 $165,000 $546,000 $2,527,000 $8,358,000 76 $366,000 $1,067,000 $5,602,000 $16,346,000 90 $416,000 $1,482,000 $6,366,000 $22,704,000 101 $101,000 $286,000 $1,547,000 $4,380,000 128 $30,000 $49,000 $453,000 $743,000 133 $16,000 $35,000 $241,000 $537,000 142 $264,000 $759,000 $4,039,000 $11,630,000 146 $111,000 $640,000 $1,700,000 $9,804,000 Great Swamp $1,811,000 $6,532,000 $27,740,000 $100,090,000 Earth Economics 4 Introduction The Southeast Quadrant of South Burlington, Vermont encompasses are variety of natural capital assets, including forests, wetlands, streams, and agricultural lands. The open space ecosystems of South Burlington provide critical goods and services, including clean air and water, fish and wildlife, aesthetic beauty, and outdoor recreation opportunities. As the region’s economy expands, so does the need to safeguard natural places. Understanding the contributions of natural capital to human well-being in the area will be critical to planning that succeeds in maintaining South Burlington’s quality of life. The City of South Burlington has temporarily adopted an interim zoning bylaw to allow time to assess the costs and benefits of continued growth in various parts of the City, including the Southeast Quadrant. While typical cost-benefit analyses exclude benefits and costs that are not captured by market prices, the non-market benefits produced by open space and natural capital assets—including environmental, recreational, and educational benefits—are real benefits, and should be incorporated into decision- making processes. A natural capital valuation of priority open space parcels within the City will provide a more comprehensive picture of what residents and officials of the City of South Burlington stand to gain or lose under different zoning and development scenarios. This project has produced a natural capital valuation of twenty parcels of land identified as top priorities throughout the City for conservation by the City’s Open Space Interim Zoning Committee, to inform potential decisions about zoning and open space conservation. Valuing Ecosystem Services Earth Economics has over twenty years of experience conducting comprehensive benefit-cost analyses that incorporate the non-market economic value of natural capital assets. Natural capital is defined as naturally occurring ecosystems such as wetlands, forests, and pastures, as well as the plant and animal communities they support. The benefits derived from the ecosystem functions produced by natural capital are known as ecosystem goods and services, such as water supply, carbon sequestration and storage, and flood-risk reduction (see Figure 1). Following the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, twenty- one ecosystem services can be categorized into four main categories: provisioning services, regulating services, information services, and supporting services as described in Table 2. Figure 1 Capital Functions Over the past half century, scholars specializing in environmental and natural resource economics have developed a diverse toolkit of primary valuation techniques to assess the economic contribution of ecosystem goods and services. In some instances, this value is partially captured by markets; consumers buy products directly provided by nature, such as water or fish. For these goods and services, formal markets can reflect their contribution to human well-being. Yet there are also benefits for which markets do not exist. To estimate the value of these “non-market” benefits (e.g., clean air, aesthetic appreciation), Earth Economics 5 economists must apply other techniques, such as travel cost analysis, hedonic pricing, and contingent valuation. Broadly speaking, ecosystem services describe the benefits people receive from natural capital. Natural capital refers to resources like plants, animals, soils, minerals, and energy resources. Like other forms of capital, natural capital provides a flow of goods and services. These goods and services are the basis of all other economic activity as they provide clean water, breathable air, nourishing food, flood risk reduction, waste treatment, climate stability, and other critical services. For example, during storm events, natural capital like grasses and trees capture and store excess storm water runoff, reducing flood risk to human life and property. Categories of Ecosystem Services Ecosystem services are often grouped into four categories: • Provisioning services, which provide the physical materials which society uses. Community gardens grow food. Rivers provide drinking water as well as fish for food. • Regulating services are benefits obtained from the natural control of ecosystem processes. Intact ecosystems provide regulation of climate, water quality and delivery, and soil erosion prevention. They also keep disease organisms in check. • Supporting services provide the habitats which support food webs and all life on the planet. • Information services allow humans to interact meaningfully with nature. These services include providing spiritually significant species and natural areas, natural places for recreation, and opportunities for scientific research and education. Table 2. Definition of ecosystem services relevant to this report Service Economic Benefit to People Provisioning Energy and Raw Materials Providing fuel, fiber, fertilizer, minerals, and energy Food Producing crops, fish, game, fruits, and foraging foods Medicinal Resources Providing traditional medicines, pharmaceuticals, and assay organisms Ornamental Resources Providing resources for clothing, jewelry, handicraft, worship, and decoration Water Storage Providing long-term reserves of usable water via storage in lakes, ponds, aquifers, and soil moisture Regulating Air Quality Providing clean, breathable air Biological Control Providing pest, weed, and disease control Climate Stability Supporting a stable climate at global and local levels through carbon sequestration and other processes Disaster Risk Reduction Preventing and mitigating natural hazards such as floods, hurricanes, fires, and droughts Pollination and Seed Dispersal Pollinating wild and domestic plant species via wind, insects, birds, or other animals Soil Formation Accumulating soils (e.g., via plant matter decomposition or sediment deposition in riparian/coastal systems) for agricultural and ecosystem integrity Soil Quality Maintaining soil fertility and capacity to process waste inputs (bioremediation) Soil Retention Retaining arable land, slope stability, and coastal integrity Water Quality Removing water pollutants via soil filtration and transformation by vegetation and microbial communities Water Capture, Conveyance, and Supply Regulating the rate of water flow through an environment and ensuring adequate water availability for all water users Earth Economics 6 Navigation Maintaining adequate depth in a water body to sustain traffic from recreational and commercial vessels Supporting Habitat Providing shelter, promoting growth of species, and maintaining biological diversity Information Aesthetic Information Enjoying and appreciating the scenery, sounds, and smells of nature Cultural Value Providing opportunities for communities to use lands with spiritual, religious, and historic importance Science and Education Using natural systems for education and scientific research Recreation and Tourism Experiencing the natural world and enjoying outdoor activities Economic Value of Natural Capital While the economic contribution and value of natural capital are critical to human well-being, decisions impacting the environment have historically overlooked the economic benefits of nature1, 2. The language of budgets, costs, and return on investment is just beginning to incorporate these benefits into decision- making, but the effect has been significant. Because ecosystems are living systems, natural assets are often more resilient and less costly to maintain than built infrastructure. Without these systems, many of the benefits societies receive for free would need to be replaced by built infrastructure, at greater cost for construction and ongoing maintenance, as well eventual replacement3, 4. Acknowledging the economic value of natural capital demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of nature-based solutions, while raising awareness of the long-term connections between people and these natural assets. Primary Valuation Methods In the same way that economists can determine the value of real estate as a private asset, economists can also determine the contribution of ecosystem goods and services as public assets. For instance, although timber is bought and sold in markets, those prices usually ignore the contribution that trees provide to nearby communities, such as water filtration, wildlife and pollinator habitat, or flood risk reduction. Such economic contributions are known as non-market benefits. Because the full benefits of a given resource are not always included in market prices, economic value must sometimes be assessed indirectly, using a range of valuation techniques. These include: •Replacement Cost: The cost to replace services provided by functioning ecosystems with built infrastructure (e.g. levees and dams to replace natural floodplain protection). •Avoided Cost: The losses which would be incurred if a natural ecosystem were removed or its function were significantly impaired (e.g. flood extent reduced by wetlands and riparian buffers). •Production Approaches: Ecosystem services which enhance market outputs (e.g. moderate, regular rainfall can increase crop productivity). •Travel Cost: Where benefiting from natural ecosystems requires travel, the willingness to incur such costs implies the level at which those services are valued (e.g., recreation and tourism). •Hedonic Pricing: Property values vary by proximity to certain ecosystem services (e.g. homes with water views often sell for higher prices than similar homes without such views). •Contingent Valuation: Estimates derived from surveys of the values assigned to certain ecosystem services (e.g., willingness-to-pay to protect water quality). The valuation of most ecosystem services is well-understood and straightforward. However, for ecosystem services that are difficult to quantify or value, benefits are often better described qualitatively. Earth Economics 7 Benefit Transfer Methodology To value ecosystem goods and services, Earth Economics employs the benefit transfer method (BTM), in which estimates of economic value are based on primary valuation studies of similar goods or services produced in comparable conditions (e.g., climate, terrain, soils, species). BTM is often the only practical, cost-effective option for producing reasonable estimates of the wide range of services provided by ecosystems. The application of BTM begins by identifying critical attributes of a landscape that determine ecological productivity and expected benefits. Primary valuations of similar ecosystems, geographies, and communities are then identified and assessed for their comparability with land cover types within the South Burlington study area. Estimates from primary studies are then standardized (i.e., adjusted to common units, correcting for any inflation between the period of research and the present) to ensure “apples-to-apples” comparisons. In this sense, BTM is similar to a property appraisal, in which the features and pricing of similar properties nearby are used to estimate value prior to a sale. While each process has its limitations, they are rapid and efficient approaches to generating reasonable values for making investment and policy decisions. Interest in certain ecosystem services and land cover types has generated a substantial body of research. Therefore, multiple estimates can be found for given combinations of land cover types and ecosystem services. In these instances, Earth Economics report both low and high per-acre value estimates. Other ecosystem services and land cover types are less well-researched. For cases where Earth Economics have been unable to identify a study suitable for transfer to the South Burlington study area, no value is included (see table 3). It is important to understand that this decision simply reflects the limitations of valuation research, not that those natural assets provide no value. To apply BTM for a full set of ecosystem service/land cover type combinations, this analysis used Earth Economics’ Ecosystem Service Valuation Toolkit (EVT). Studies within EVT have gone through multiple reviews and are standardized for use in BTM. Our analysts used several criteria to select appropriate primary studies for the South Burlington study area, including geographic location and the ecological and demographic characteristics of the original primary study sites. Study Overview Study Area The City of South Burlington Vermont in Chittenden County is adjacent to Lake Champlain and is a part of the larger Burlington metropolitan area. As shown in figure 2, the twenty Open Space Interim Zoning Committee (OSIZ) selected parcels are distributed throughout South Burlington and include areas adjacent to the airport, major roads, Lake Champlain, housing developments, golf courses, the University of Vermont, and other conservation parcels. Over a total of 1040 acres, these parcels range in sizes from 22 to 181 acres. Estimated from recent land cover spatial data, the parcels contain around 307 acres of wetlands, 285 acres of forests, 415 acres of grassland and shrubland, and 34 acres of built and bare land. The steps below explain the procedures for estimating land cover areas and associated ecosystem service values. Earth Economics 8 Figure 2. Conservation parcels5 Step 1. Identification and quantification of land cover classes within priority parcels The first step in conducting a natural capital valuation is to identify the range of land cover classes found within the study area – in this case, the twenty priority open space parcels identified by the City’s Open Space City of South Burlington. The project team first conducted an inventory of existing natural capital in the study area by quantifying the spatial extent of different land cover classes. The City of South Burlington provided a shape file and spreadsheet with information on the select parcels for the interim zoning ordinance. Accessing recent high-resolution land cover data in the Vermont Open GeoData Portal6, this study extracted Vermont-specific land cover data for the study area to calculate acreage of each land cover class present in the study parcels. Specifically, land cover values come from merging 2016 0.5-meter resolution rater base land cover data with wetland specific land cover vector data from rom a combination of 2013 - 2017 LiDAR and 2016 orthoimagery data, including emergent, forested, and shrub/scrub wetlands. Figure 3 shows the reclassified map of land cover areas utilized in this study7, 8. As the combined land cover data shows, wetlands are abundant in the study area. Additionally, given that wetland values were the most abundant data sources for the study, this study calculated ecosystem service values according to emergent, scrub, and forested wetland land cover types. The land cover categories of buildings, roads, rail, bare soil, and other paved surfaces are not applicable to this analysis. Earth Economics 9 Figure 3. Study area land cover values Earth Economics 10 Step 2. Identification and valuation of ecosystem services generated by priority parcels The next step in the process analyzed the ecosystem services provided by each land cover identified within the study area. The project team identified ecosystem services relevant to each land cover type found within each parcel of the study area and then assigned those ecosystem services an economic value, using the benefit transfer method (BTM). BTM is a well-established approach within the field of ecological economics for indirectly estimating the values of ecological goods and services by utilizing existing data on ecosystem services from other areas and applying them to a study area. The team used Earth Economics’ proprietary ecosystem service valuation toolkit (EVT) to conduct a benefit transfer analysis (BTM) of the identified lands. BTM begins with the identification of peer-reviewed valuation studies for locations similar to the study site of South Burlington, Vermont. Earth Economics has been analyzing and cataloguing relevant studies into our Ecosystem Valuation Toolkit (EVT) for over a decade, which today includes more than 4,900 ecosystem service value estimates, each tagged with a specific subset of more than 100 contextual variables (e.g., climate, elevation, urban proximity). Table 3 presents a gap analysis of existing transferrable EVT values for the South Burlington study site. Table 3: Gap analysis of ecosystem service values for each land cover type Ecosystem Services Agricultural Forests Water Wetlands Grasslands/ Shrubland Information Science & Education O O O O O Aesthetic Information O X O X O Cultural & Artistic O O O O O Recreation & Tourism O O O O X Provisioning Genetic Resources O O O O O Ornamental Resources O O O O O Medicinal Resources O O N/A O O Food O X O O O Water Storage O O O X X Energy & Raw Materials O O O O O Regulating Air Quality O O O O O Biological Control O X O O O Disaster Risk Reduction O O O X X Soil Retention O X O O O Water Capture, Conveyance, & Supply O X O X X Water Quality O X O O X Climate Stability O X O O X Erosion Control O O N/A O O Pollination O O N/A O O Waste Treatment O O O O O Supporting Habitat O X O X X Biodiversity O O O O O Earth Economics 11 X Ecosystem service is produced by land cover type and has been valued in this analysis O Ecosystem service is produced by land cover type but cannot been valued in this analysis N/A Ecosystem service is not produced by this land cover type Step 3. Assessment of annual value and total asset value of priority parcels This study calculated annual ecosystem service values by land cover and reported those services as a per- acre/per-year value where data is available. The annual value of ecosystem services represents the flow of benefits derived from natural assets each year. To calculate the total annual value for the twenty priority parcels, all ecosystem service values were summed by land cover type and then multiplied by the area of the twenty parcel study area. These total annual values by land cover are then aggregated, generating a total dollar value associated with ecosystem services provided by the open space parcels per year. This total annual value is presented in a disaggregated table, to allow for parcel-by-parcel analysis. Finally, Earth Economics estimated the total asset value for each of the twenty parcels. The asset value of built capital, such as a road, levee, home, or business, can be calculated as the net present value of its expected future benefits. In the same way that a home holds value year after year, natural capital also provides value over time. The annual flow of ecosystem services generated by the open space parcels will continue into the future. As such, analogous to built capital, the study calculated the asset value of the priority open space parcels. The asset value is a snapshot of current land cover and available valuation literature and provides a measure of the expected benefits flowing from the study area’s natural capital over twenty years, assuming the open space parcels are preserved. The net present value of the open space parcels was computed using an agreed upon 3% discount rate (see table 4). Valuation Results Table four summarizes the natural capital values for each parcel and the value of those parcels over the next twenty years with a 3% discount rate. Values (calculated in 2017 dollars) for parcels range from $16,000 to $3,956,000. To account for the combined natural capital of adjacent parcels as one larger open space, this study additionally considers the collective value of parcels (OSIZ no. 34, 142, 35, 27, 146, 133)which are clustered together in the Great Swamp area. area left intentionally blank Earth Economics 12 Table 4. Summary of Natural Capital Values for the OSIZ Parcels Priority Parcels Range of Natural Capital Values in $/year ($ 2017) Net Present Value Over 20 Years (Discount Rate of 3%) OSIZ No. Parcel ID Low Estimate High Estimate Low Estimate High Estimate 7 1290-00600 $143,000 $473,000 $2,186,000 $7,235,000 10 1380-00000 $180,000 $541,000 $2,747,000 $8,287,000 11 1810-01076 $366,000 $897,000 $5,596,000 $13,737,000 14 1460-00000 $446,000 $1,570,000 $6,831,000 $24,047,000 27 0570-01575 $156,000 $785,000 $2,382,000 $12,026,000 34 1640-01840 $1,205,000 $3,956,000 $18,459,000 $60,609,000 35 0570-01675 $61,000 $358,000 $920,000 $5,486,000 37 0040-00201 $60,000 $381,000 $919,000 $5,833,000 39 0085-00197 $218,000 $648,000 $3,335,000 $9,930,000 53 0860-00160 $205,000 $497,000 $3,130,000 $7,611,000 60 1260-00200F $154,000 $408,000 $2,358,000 $6,241,000 67 0860-RR750 $78,000 $276,000 $1,195,000 $4,217,000 74 1700-00150 $165,000 $546,000 $2,527,000 $8,358,000 76 0860-00835 $366,000 $1,067,000 $5,602,000 $16,346,000 90 1540-01195 $416,000 $1,482,000 $6,366,000 $22,704,000 101 1640-01340 $101,000 $286,000 $1,547,000 $4,380,000 128 0860-01499 $30,000 $49,000 $453,000 $743,000 133 0570-01475 $16,000 $35,000 $241,000 $537,000 142 1640-01720 $264,000 $759,000 $4,039,000 $11,630,000 146 0570-01505 $111,000 $640,000 $1,700,000 $9,804,000 Great Swamp OSIZ # 34, 142, 35, 27, 146, 133 $1,811,000 $6,532,000 $27,740,000 $100,090,000 Additional considerations The results of this study underestimate the value of ecosystem services provided by each parcel given gaps in the literature and classification of land cover types (see table 3). Given the GIS data analyzed and gaps in the EVT database, this study did not calculate the ecosystem services of agricultural lands and agricultural soils. As outlined below, adjacency9, connectivity10, social cohesion and well-being11, 12, and equity13 which are associated with, and extend from, the ecosystem services of the priority parcels provide additional consideration for decision-making that are beyond the scope of this study. Adjacency and Connectivity – This study recognizes that OSIZ parcels are adjacent to conserved lands, open spaces, parks and trails, and other landscape features with additional ecosystem service values, which are beyond the scope of this analysis. Table 5 provides a basic qualitative summary of parcel adjacency. This study also recognizes the connectivity of OSIZ parcels ecosystems to broader ecosystem services, for example those associated with lakes, streams, rivers, and riparian areas that extend through or along the boundaries of parcels. Several parcels are also part of larger forest blocks, corridors for wildlife, and surface water protection areas. Figures 3 and 4, for example, show the OSIZ parcels in relation to surface water protection areas and BioFinder priority areas, which identify “Vermont's lands and waters that support important ecosystems, natural communities, habitats, and species. 14” Earth Economics 13 Table 5: Adjacency considerations OSIZ No. Parcel ID Considerations 7 1290-00600 Within Muddy Brook and the Winooski River watershed. 10 1380-00000 Within Muddy Brook and the Winooski River watershed. Adjacent to Muddy Brook Park. 11 1810-01076 Within Muddy Brook and the Winooski River watershed. Adjacent to Centennial Woods. 14 1460-00000 Within Muddy Brook and the Winooski River watershed 27 0570-01575 Within the Great Swamp. Contains Muddy Brook. Conserved areas adjacent. 34 1640-01840 Within the Great Swamp. Conserved areas adjacent 35 0570-01675 Within the Great Swamp. Conserved areas adjacent. 37 0040-00201 Trails adjacent. Contains Bartlett Brook. 39 0085-00197 Conserved areas adjacent. 53 0860-00160 Resurrection Park Cemetery. Contains Potash Brook. 60 1260-00200F Contains Potash Brook. 67 0860-RR750 Contains Potash Brook. 74 1700-00150 Contains Potash Brook 76 0860-00835 Contains Potash Brook. Adjacent to Wheeler Park. 90 1540-01195 Adjacent to Shelburne Bay/ Lake Champlain and Red Rocks Park. 101 1640-01340 Contains Potash Brook 128 0860-01499 Adjacent to a pond and golf course 133 0570-01475 Within the Great Swamp. Conserved areas adjacent. 142 1640-01720 Within the Great Swamp. Conserved areas adjacent. 146 0570-01505 Within the Great Swamp. Conserved areas adjacent. Figure 3. Surface water protection areas15 Earth Economics 14 Figure 4. BioFinder Priority Areas Social Cohesion – Analysis of an exit poll from South Burlington 2018 midterm elections16 found that 80% of respondents indicated they would be willing to pay an extra $100 in property taxes for supporting the construction of more affordable housing and for permanently preserving more open and undeveloped land. The same study analyzed 78 responses about changes in the Southeast Quadrant and found that 50 referenced dislike around “too many houses,” “too much growth,” “too much sprawl,” or “loss of open spaces” in the Southeast Quadrant. Equity – The City is working to balance concerns over the availability of affordable housing and the need to conserve open space. The City has a population of around 19,486 with 94.1% of the population percent of persons above the poverty and a median household income of $71,01717. In South Burlington and Chittenden County, access to affordable housing is lacking in part due to a lack of availability. As a 2014 study found, “The high share of area residents paying a disproportionately high share of their income towards housing costs is likely due to a lack of affordable housing.18” Conclusion The City of South Burlington has sought to acknowledge the economic value of natural capital of identified priority open spaces. Using Earth Economics’ proprietary ecosystem service valuation toolkit (EVT), this study conducted a benefit transfer analysis (BTM) of the land cover areas in open space interim zoning parcels. Through this ecosystem service valuation, Earth Economics found that the non-market value of ecosystem services provided by these priority parcels, amounts to between $5 to and $16 million in benefits per year. These benefits provide an annual flow of value and will do so well into the future, as such, Earth Economics estimates that the cumulative values over the next twenty years of ranges from $73 to $240 million. Table 4 summarizes the natural capital values for each priority parcel. Given gaps in the analysis, there are additional ecosystem service values within and extending from ecosystems in the parcel areas that are not accounted for in this study. Earth Economics 15 Appendix A. Study Limitations The benefit transfer method (BTM), used in this study to value ecosystem services, has limitations. Yet, these limitations should not detract from the core finding that ecosystems produce significant economic value for society. Some limitations include: •Every ecosystem is unique; per-acre values derived from another location may be of limited relevance to the ecosystems under analysis. •Even within a single ecosystem, the value per acre depends on the size of the ecosystem; in most cases, as the size decreases, the per-acre value is expected to increase, and vice versa. (In technical terms, the marginal cost per acre is generally expected to increase as the quantity supplied decreases; a single average value is not the same as a range of marginal values). •Gathering all the information needed to estimate the specific value for every ecosystem within the study area is not currently feasible. Therefore, the full value of all of the shrubland, grassland, et cetera in a large geographic area cannot yet be ascertained. In technical terms, far too few data points are available to construct a realistic demand curve or estimate a demand function. •The prior studies upon which calculations are based encompass a wide variety of time periods, geographic areas, investigators, and analytic methods. Many of them provide a range of estimated values rather than single-point estimates. The present study preserves this variance; no studies were removed from the database because their estimated values were deemed too high or too low. In addition, only limited sensitivity analyses were performed. This approach is similar to determining an asking price for a piece of land based on the prices of comparable parcels (“comps”): Even though the property being sold is unique, realtors and lenders feel justified in following this procedure to the extent of publicizing a single asking price rather than a price range. •In response to the study by Costanza et al. (1997) of the value of all of the world’s ecosystems, critics objected to the absence of imaginary exchange transactions. However, including exchange transactions is not necessary if one recognizes the purpose of valuation at this scale—a purpose that is more analogous to national income accounting than to estimating exchange values.19 This report displays study results in a way that allows one to appreciate the range of values and their distribution. It is clear from viewing the tables that the final estimates are not precise. However, they are much better estimates than the alternative of assuming that ecosystem services have zero value, or, alternatively, of assuming they have infinite value. Pragmatically, in estimating the value of ecosystem services, it is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong. Earth Economics 16 Appendix B. Value Transfer Studies 2010. The Economic Benefits and Fiscal Impact of Parks and Open Space in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, New York. Trust for Public Land. Adusumilli, N. 2015. Valuation of Ecosystem Services from Wetlands Mitigation in the United States. Mayer, Audrey L (ed.) Land 4: 182-196. Anielski, M., Wilson, S. J. 2005. Counting Canada’s Natural Capital: Assessing the Real Value of Canada’s Boreal Ecosystems. Costanza, R., Wilson, M., Troy, A., Voinov, A., Voinov, A., Liu, S., D'Agostino, J. 2006. The Value of New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Gupta, T. R., Foster, J. H. 1975. Economic criteria for freshwater wetland policy in Massachusetts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(1): 40-45. Hill, B. H., Kolka, R. K., McCormick, F. H., Starry, M. A. 2014. A synoptic survey of ecosystem services from headwater catchments in the United States. Ecosystem Services 7: 106-115. Lant, C. L., Lant, C. L., Tobin, G. A. 1989. The economic value of riparian corridors in cornbelt floodplains: a research framework. Professional Geographer 41(3): 337-349. Mullen, J. K., Menz, F. C. 1985. The effect of acidification damages on the economic value of the Adirondack Fishery to New-York anglers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(1): 112-119. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., Dwyer, D. F. 2002. Compensatory Value of Urban Trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture 28(4): 194-199. Pimentel, D. 1998. Economic and Environmental Benefits of Biological Diversity in the State of Maryland. Therres, Glenn D (ed.) Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Ribaudo, M., Epp, D. J. 1986. The importance of sample discrimination in using the travel cost method to estimate the benefits of improved water quality. Land Economics 60(4): 1-15. Shafer, E. L., Carline, R., Guldin, R. W., Cordell, H. K. 1993. Economic amenity values of wildlife - 6 case- studies in Pennsylvania. Environmental Management 17(5): 669-682. Thibodeau, F. R., Ostro, B. D. 1981. An economic analysis of wetland protection. Journal of Environmental Management 12: 19-30. van Vuuren, W., Roy, P. 1993. Private and social returns from wetland preservation versus those from wetland conversion to agriculture. Ecological Economics 8(3): 289-305. Watson, K. B., Ricketts, T., Galford, G., Polasky, S., O'Niel-Dunne. 2016. Quantifying flood mitigation services: The economic value of Otter Creek wetlands and floodplains to Middlebury, VT. Ecological Economics 130: 16-24. Young, C. E., Shortle, J. S. 1989. Benefits and costs of agricultural nonpoint-source pollution controls: the case of St. Albans Bay. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(1): 64- © Earth Economics 2020 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Earth Economics 107 N. Tacoma Avenue | Tacoma, WA 98403 | (253) 539-4801 |eartheconomics.org References 1 Liu, Shuang, Robert Costanza, Stephen Farber and Austin Troy. 2010. “Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for transdisciplinary synthesis.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185, 54-78. 2 National Research Council. 2005. Valuing ecosystem services: toward better environmental decision-making. National Academies Press. 3 National Research Council. 2011. Sustainability and the US EPA. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. See page 101. 4 US EPA. 2012. The Economic Benefits of Protecting Healthy Watersheds (No. 841- N-12– 004). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 5 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. 2019. Natural Resource Inventory for South Burlington. http://ccrpc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=3e15d51b0e694f08a07e2f3907a02b7f 6 State of Vermont Open Geodata Portal. (2019). Landcover. https://geodata.vermont.gov/pages/land-cover 7 University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory. 2019. LandLandcov_BaseLC2016. [remote-sensing image]. https://geodata.vermont.gov/pages/land-cover 8 University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory. 2019. LandLandcov_Wetlands2016. [vector digital data]. https://geodata.vermont.gov/pages/land-cover 9 California Department of Fish and Game, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service. (2007). Ecosystem Restoration Program Conservation Strategy: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun Marsh and Bay Planning Area. 10 Abel, T. D., Pelc, J., Miller, L., Quarre, J., & Mork, K. 2011. Borders, Barriers, and Breakthroughs in the Cascadia Corridor. Border Policy Research Institute, Western Washington University. 11 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2010. Leading change for healthy communities and successful land reuse. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. 12 Kazmierczak, A., & Carter, J. 2010. Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure. A database of case studies. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 13 Puget Sound Regional Council. 2018. Regional Open Space Conservation Plan. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, WA. 14 State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. 2020. BioFinder. https://anr.vermont.gov/maps/biofinder 15 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. 2019. Natural Resource Inventory for South Burlington. http://ccrpc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=3e15d51b0e694f08a07e2f3907a02b7f 16 Bolduc, Vince. 2019. South Burlington Exit Poll Midterm Elections November 6, 2018 [Power Point slides]. 17 US Census Bureau. 2019. Quick Facts: South Burlington city, Vermont. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/southburlingtoncityvermont 18 Bowen National Research. 2014. Chittenden County Housing Needs Assessment. http://accd.vermont.gov/sites/accdnew/files/documents/Housing/H-Research-HousingNeedsChittenden.pdf 19 Howarth, R., and Farber, S. 2002. Accounting for the Value of Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics 41(3), 421-429. 1 Report on the Additional Revenues Generated from New Housing Developments vs. the Additional Costs to the City March 12, 2020 John K. Stewart 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page #’s Introduction 1 Revenues 1 General Fund 2 Butler Farms & Orchard School/Laurel Hill Drive area 3 – 4 Revenue Projections – Proposed Developments 5 - 6 Expenditures 7 Planning & Zoning costs and expenditures 7 - 8 Impact Fees collected and expended 8 Fire and Electrical Inspection fees 9 Incremental operating costs of proposed developments 10 Police Department 10 Streets & Highways/Parks Maintenance 10 Fire & Emergency Medical Services Department 11 Enterprise Funds 12 Long-Term costs of upkeep and replacement of infrastructure 13 Analysis of Spear Meadows and Dorset Meadows Projects 10 - 12 Comparison of additional revenues vs. costs in new developments 14 ATTACHMENTS Maps – Existing Neighborhoods #1 Dorset Meadows Overall Site Plan #2 Spear Meadows Sketch Plan #3 Planning and Zoning Fee Schedule #4 South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance (excerpt) #5 Infrastructure Components – Residential Developments #6 3 Introduction: When the South Burlington City Council adopted Interim Zoning Bylaws in November 2018, it acted to temporarily preserve land from development in a good portion of the City. It’s intent was to study and seek analysis in four separate areas. These related to an analysis of undeveloped spaces, a study of planned unit developments, the analysis of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR’s), and a cost-benefit analysis of hypothetical development. This focus of this report is the cost-benefit analysis in new development, with a focus on the Southeast Quadrant. The task at hand is to develop a model that projects additional ongoing revenue sources and streams against the costs of services and infrastructure provided. The end result would then be used to assess whether or not a development covers its costs, generates more revenue than additional costs, or requires funding from other sources and parts of the City to cover services provided there. The intent is that it could be used as another source of information upon which to base decisions on whether to develop or not develop land in a particular area of the City. The primary focus will be on two developments, Spear Meadows and Dorset Meadows. Is there a simple answer to the question “Will new development in the southeast quadrant pay for itself, either in the short-run, or the long-run, or both?” No there is not. There are hundreds of variable and decisions to be made in developing residential housing that keep this from being a simple analysis. But, “Are there some relevant questions and data available as guidelines that can be utilized to more fully inform decision makers in providing light on that question?” Yes, there is data to assist with this purpose. In designing the financial structure of a municipality, revenue systems are generally meant to generate funds from a variety of sources for the entire community, not just portions of it. This is true for the City of South Burlington operating budgets, as they are based upon revenue from many sources to finance services for the community as a whole. There are more than a few types of revenues and funding sources needed which are typically used to fund City operations. Some taxes and fees are directly charged to all property owners based on quantifiable laws or rules. On the other hand, some revenues are charged directly for services provided. The section on revenues below delves into this distinction. Revenues - The most recognizable revenue source in this regard is the collection of property taxes that are based on the assessed value of the property. They are assessed to provide funding for the general City operations. However, they are not directly assessed for services provided to the home or business owner. But rather, the costs of most services provided are shared by its citizens in the tax assessment. On the other hand, a different example is the assessment and payment of ambulance fees. These are billed to a citizen as the direct result of a call for service provided. This illustrates one of the challenges that there is in building the cost-benefit model that can fit any scenario. There are more than 90 sources of revenues listed in the budget book for the general fund, as well as another 10 in the enterprise funds such as the water, wastewater, and storm water funds. However, for this purpose, the major ones are identified, with a highlight on those areas that could increase, and are measurable, with new growth. Refer to the table on the following page. 4 5 Revenues (continued) As highlighted in this table, the only material, readily measureable, and direct ongoing revenue source is the property tax. It is based on the assessed value of a housing unit, built on the property tax rate recommended by City Council, and approved by the citizens as part of the budget approval process on City in March. It is the largest source of funding in the current FY 2020 budget listed at $16,169,369 and is just under 66% of the general fund revenues generated. In a new subdivision, new units are built, and the property is assessed using consistently applied principles. Taxes are assessed annually, which provides a steady and predictable flow of funds to the City to fund its operations. In this table, there are also a number of categories which generate revenue on a one time basis, which relate to the property being developed, and which fund the costs of reviewing the projects, and expanding the capacity of City facilities and infrastructure to handle this growth. These include planning and zoning fees, impact fees, and inspection fees. These will be covered in Expenditure Section 1 called Initial City Administrative Costs to establishing a New Development. There are a number of revenues that can be generated by residents in the new developments if and when City services are utilized. In fact, it is highly probable that residents in these new areas would use restaurants in the City and be subject to the Local Option Meals Tax. However, these receipts cannot be tied to a particular property. Finally, there are revenue sources to the City, which have no correlation at all to services provided, and which don’t consist of payments made by residents in new neighborhoods. Therefore, revenue would not directly grow if any additional housing units were built. Examples of property taxes assessed in two mature neighborhoods (Butler Farms & Orchard/Laurel Hill Drive) So far, it has been shown that property taxes are the only material, measurable, and direct ongoing revenue source associated with new neighborhoods in the general fund. With that being the case, how are property taxes now being applied in existing neighborhoods? For this analysis, two separate areas were reviewed against the current FY 2020 budget to show how property taxes are applied. These areas are the Butler Farms neighborhood and the Orchard Elementary School/Laurel Hill Drive section of town. (See maps and boundaries of these areas in attachment #1 at the end of this report). These developments were approved and built in the past under different rules of development, open space, City laws, etc. and don’t match the current requirements. For example, there are no multi-unit dwellings in either neighborhood, but were built as single family homes. There are no open spaces built in. However, it is helpful to see how the property taxes assessed and collected from these properties are utilized in this years’ budget. The Butler Farms area has 257 parcels, with an average acreage per parcel of .38. The average amount of City taxes* per property is $2,148 and $552,199 is the total city tax assessment here. This represents 3.42% of the assessed value of taxable City property and the total Tax levy of $16,126,369. * This report analyzes the City portion of the tax bill only. Refer to the section of Municipal vs. Education taxes on page 6 later in this report. Revenues (continued) 6 The Orchard School/Laurel Hill Drive area has 280 parcels, with an average acreage per parcel of .26. The average amount of City taxes assessed per property is $1,467 and $410,690 is the total city tax assessment here. It represents 2.55% of the assessed value of taxable City property. Butler Farms and Laurel Hill Drive (continued) Note: In the Grand List dated December 2019, there were 7,603 parcels in the City. Of these, 3,775 are primary residences, 3,056 condos, and 772 are commercial/other. The average City tax bill per parcel is $2,121. The average city tax bill in Butler Farms is $2,148 and in the Orchard/Laurel Hill area, the average is $1,467. 7 Revenues projected from proposed developments in the Southeast Quadrant There are two developments proposed which will be analyzed in this section. These are the Spear Meadows and Dorset Meadows projects which will be looked at in the context of City finances only. That is, what would be the expected new revenues received by the City, against the additional costs to manage City responsibilities in these new neighborhoods? In the tables which follow, there is information about estimated City property tax revenue based on the mix of housing that has been proposed. These developments have not been approved. Therefore, it is necessary to find comparable values of similar units recently built in other parts of the City as a basis for estimates. Thus, the projections are based on currently available assessed values of comparable units in the City and will vary if and when any development takes place here. If these projects are fully completed, the annual estimate of City property taxes on these properties amounts to about $369,400 for Dorset Meadows and $117,400 for Spear Meadows, for a total of $486,800. The taxes currently assessed on these properties amounts to about $9,000. (Also refer to maps of these areas – attachments 2 & 3). Note: The estimated average City tax bill in Dorset Meadows would be $2,399 ($369,387/154 units). For Spear Meadows, it is estimated to be $2,447 ($117,438/48 units). Dorset Meadows - Projected Municipal Property Tax Revenue 95 single family, 24 units duplexes, & 35 units in 3 - 5 plexes Division of Land Area Acres Division of Land Area Acres Total Land Area 69.86 Roads (full ROW's)8.50 Park Space 5.30 Actual Streets 4.25 Additional on-site open spaces 38.23 Off-site open space 59.00 (71 TDR's x 0.83)PRO JEC TED Comparable South Burlington Average Sqft. Assessed Value City Property Type Units Structures per unit per unit *Taxes @ .5427 a Single Family (1)23 23 1,904 513,945$ 64,124$ b Single Family (2)70 70 2,409 517,828$ 196,634$ c Single Family (3)1 1 2,137 475,000$ 2,577$ d Single Family (4)1 1 1,650 425,000$ 2,305$ e Duplexes (1) Condos 4 2 2,662 444,554$ 9,646$ f Duplexes (2) Condos 10 5 2,462 470,242$ 25,509$ g Duplexes (3) Condos 10 5 1,940 393,820$ 21,364$ h 3 - plexes 3 1 1,294 253,624$ 4,128$ i 4 - plexes 12 3 1,294 239,390$ 15,583$ j 5 - plexes 20 4 1,208 253,624$ 27,517$ Totals 154 115 68,064,704$ 369,387$ City taxes (current)1,193,600$ 6,478$ 8 It should be noted again, that this is an estimate based on plans as they stand now. It also assumes that the units in these developments are fully built out, which would take a number of years to complete. Municipal vs. Education Taxes - The analysis focuses only on the FY 2020 municipal portion of the property taxes which would be assessed on these properties. It does not include the homestead education tax which is also billed by the City and shows on the tax bills as well. The Education portions of taxes are first calculated in the same manner as the City, that is the assessed value times the approved tax rate. However, many may be adjusted for the household income level of those living in these dwellings. Also, education taxes are based upon home site values, which could be different than the value assessed for City Taxes. That said, here is an example of the total taxes to be assessed on a single-family house in Dorset Meadows, with no adjustment for income sensitivity: Spear Meadows - Projected Municipal Property Tax Revenue 19 single family, 14 units in flat duplexes, 6 in two story duplexes, 9 units in 3-plexes Division of Land Area Acres Division of Land Area Acres Total Land Area 25.93 Roads (full ROW's)2.80 Park Space 6.80 Actual Streets 1.40 Additional on-site open spaces - Off-site open space 14.11 (17 TDR's x 0.83)PRO JEC TED Comparable South Burlington Average Sqft. Assessed Value City Property Type Units Structures per unit per unit *Taxes @ .5427 Single Family 19 19 2,409 517,828$ 53,372$ Duplexes - 2 story 6 3 2,462 470,242$ 15,306$ Duplexes - flats 14 7 2,000 479,000$ 36,378$ 3 - plexes 9 3 1,294 253,624$ 12,383$ Totals 48 32 21,639,625$ 117,438$ City taxes (current)1 465,000$ 2,524$ *Comparables were provided by City Assessor for current values of existing units. Combined Totals 202 147 89,704,330$ 486,825$ Estimated Tax Rate per Type Assessed Value $100 Value Tax Bill Municipal Tax 513,945$ 0.5427$ 2,789.18$ Education Tax 513,945$ 1.6030$ 8,238.54$ Totals 2.1457$ 11,027.72$ 9 Expenditures – For the same reasons as noted in the revenue section above, the services provided by a municipality, like South Burlington, cover the entire area of the City. When a new development is approved, completed, and then placed in service, the additional work is then rolled into the operating budget and resource needs are evaluated. A new Police Officer or Snow Plow Driver is not automatically hired and assigned to this new area. But using quantitative methods and being cognizant of budget constraints can make decisions made as to how best to handle this new, ongoing workload. These costs will be split into three categories for this analysis: 1.Initial administrative costs to the City of establishing a new development a.Planning & Zoning - upfront b.Impact Fees - after final inspection c.Fire and Electrical Inspections - prior to occupancy 2.Incremental Costs of operations stemming from new housing developments. This includes new City costs of operations, maintenance, and repair costs needed on an ongoing basis as the result of the additional development. 3.Longer-term capital costs of upkeep and replacement of major infrastructure for the housing in the development. 1 (a). Initial Costs to the City of Establishing a New Development budgeted in Planning and Zoning Planning and Zoning plays a major role in the success of managing and in the administration of development within the City. Its stated mission, “is to help the community, as it evolves, to meet its vision through strong community engagement; long-range planning across the community; and consistent, transparent, and timely development review. We strive to provide clear, friendly customer service to all.” In doing so, it performs a number of functions required under State law, City Charter, City land development regulations, among others. There are also many citizens involved who donate their time and effort in this process to make it work. A key question then becomes, do the fees charged by the department for these services generate sufficient revenue to cover its direct costs? First of all, the permit review fee schedule is revised periodically, with the last update made on August 5, 2019. (See attachment #4 at the end of this report). A review of the results over the past six fiscal years shows that more revenue has been generated from fees charged than the direct costs of providing the services by $134,156. Because there are various stages in the review of developments, the flow of revenues in does not always match the department’s costs. Therefore, there is a variance in the results from year to year. However, generally speaking, the costs have been covered in the long run. It also should be noted that Planning and Zoning does more than only development review. This analysis is of the whole department to show that it is generally self-sustaining from the fees that it collects. See the table on the next page for a quick look at this area. 10 Expenditures (continued) 1 (b). Impact Fees collected and expended Impact Fees - The City of South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance was first adopted in 1995. There have been numerous amendments; the most recent was adopted in May 2014. The ordinance was established so that impact fees would be used to pay portions of the cost of constructing capital facilities for new development in the City that will be served by such facilities. To the extent that new capital facilities are necessitated by new development and such facilities benefit the new development, it is appropriate that the new residents and owners bear an appropriate portion of the costs of constructing the new facilities. The permission to charge such fees under the SB ordinance is pursuant to the specific authority granted on impact fees contained in 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131. The rules for administration and collection of fees are set forth in the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance as amended on May 19, 2014. (See excerpt of this ordinance on attachment #5 at the end of this report). As shown in the table below, Impact Fees are collected for the following purposes; Fire Protection, Recreation, Highway, Police, Road Opening, and Field Use. The unexpended balance of all fees collected was $2,629,271 as of June 30, 2019. In the past five fiscal years, $2,003,980 has been expended in this category. A recent example of an authorized expenditure is the $116,000 spent from Fire Protection fees that was used to cover improvements to Station 2, as prescribed in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Source: Audited financial statements. Planning/Development Review Revenue vs. Expenditure History FY14 - FY19 Totals Category FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Past Six Years Revenues 417,869$ 399,897$ 381,828$ 258,359$ 434,624$ 370,994$ 2,263,571$ Expenditures 304,907$ 289,180$ 302,907$ 350,492$ 413,960$ 467,969$ 2,129,415$ Net 112,962$ 110,717$ 78,921$ (92,133)$ 20,664$ (96,975)$ 134,156$ Source: City and School District Budget Books Impact Fees Status for Fiscal Year 2019 (per the draft audit report) Opening Amount Amount Ending ID #TYPE Balance Received Expended Balance 203 Fire 115,953$ 47$ 116,000$ -$ 220 Recreation 1,003,098$ 157,010$ 10,614$ 1,150,094$ 221 Highway 1,150,358$ 333,406$ -$ 1,453,110$ 222 Police -$ 133,109$ 133,109$ -$ 234 Road Opening 16,000$ -$ -$16,000$ 251 Field Use 34,396$ 50,065$ 74,394$ 10,067$ FY19 Totals 2,319,805$ 673,637$ 334,117$ 2,629,271$ Amounts Expended over the Past Five Fiscal Years FY 19 FY18 FY17 FY16 FY15 5 Year Total Total 334,117$ 397,510$ 477,627$ 211,410$ 583,316$ 2,003,980$ 11 Expenditures (continued) 1 c. Initial Costs/Fees from Fire and Electrical Inspections Fire and Electrical Inspection Fees - The South Burlington Fire and EMS Department provides inspection services for: fire code compliance, building inspection, plans review, time of sale and electrical safety. By authority of Vermont State Statute, the City of South Burlington has written inspection agreements in place with the Vermont Department of Public Safety Division of Fire Safety, to provide these services within the boundaries of South Burlington. The SBFD Fire Marshal and City Electrical Inspector provide these services. The fees collected and shown in the table below are not limited to new construction only. Over the past five years, the amounts collected for inspections were as follows: This function is funded as part of the Fire Department budget and which supports the work of these two key employees who directly perform this service. The direct costs amount to about $190,000 in the current fiscal year. FIRE AND ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Revenue History FY15 - FY19 Five Year Category FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Total Fire 551,116$ 471,924$ 166,660$ 434,277$ 560,590$ 2,184,567$ Electrical -$ 21,098$ 24,861$ 55,633$ 57,804$ 159,396$ Total 551,116$ 450,826$ 141,799$ 378,644$ 502,786$ 2,025,171$ Source: Budget Books 12 2.Incremental operating costs of proposed new housing developments The question to be examined here is a simple one – What direct services, responsibilities and additional work will the City incur to maintain these new neighborhoods? Will more personnel be needed? Will the vehicles currently in the fleet be sufficient to carry out the anticipated additional workload? Are the projected incremental revenues lower or equal to these anticipated additional costs? This report will focus on the three major General Fund departments that would provide direct services here. These are the Police Department, Streets & Highways/Parks Maintenance, and the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department. The other City Departments, such as Recreation, Library, Finance, City Clerk, etc. provide services to the entire City, not specifically for and in these developments. Police Department In reviewing the expected additional needs for Police Services, I reviewed the size and location of the proposed developments in light of additional department needs. 1.In a discussion with our Police Chief, there are no uniform national standards in place for the number of Police Officers needed per number of people served. As each community is unique, staffing levels are determined based on the needs of each community and the ability to pay for them. In South Burlington, officers are scheduled 24 hours per day to cover each of the three sections of the City now. When looking at these proposed developments, with a combined total of about 200 new units, the personnel needs would remain at the same level with the addition of about 200 housing units. This would not need to be changed or increased due to this level of development. 2.No new facilities would be necessary. Impact fees are now being used to cover the debt service for the Police Department facility located on Gregory Drive. The distance between this station and Dorset Meadows (4.5 miles) and Spear Meadows (4.0) is within an acceptable range. (Refer to attachment #6 the chart at the end of this report). 3.No additional vehicles would be needed to service these areas. 4.Given the assumptions made in points 1 – 3 above, there would not be a direct increase in costs. However, an estimate is included to cover potential increased overtime tied to these areas. Streets & Highways/Parks Maintenance With the addition of new housing developments, the work performed by Public Works will increase. Streets and sidewalks will have been built to standards by developers but will require maintenance, repair, and eventually will need to be replaced. 1.The South Burlington Public Works Department utilizes a Pavement Management System which is an ongoing process of maintaining, upgrading, and operating a pavement system cost effectively, based on a continuous physical inventory and condition assessment of streets and roads. This takes place over the expected life of these streets, which is expected to be twenty years. Other work includes traffic signs and lights, line striping, fuel and repairs to service vehicles, tree care, road salting and sanding, tree care, and street sweeping. The cost per parcel to fund the public works/parks maintenance operations amounts to $373/parcel in the current FY 20 budget. Therefore, by applying this amount/parcel, the estimated annual cost of maintaining Dorset Meadows is $57,442. For Spear Meadows, the estimate is $17,907. Dorset Spear Estimated FY 2020 # Parcels in Cost per Meadows Meadows Budget Grand List Parcel 154 48 Police Overtime 298,000$ 7,603 39$ 6,036$ 1,881$ 13 2.There will be additional effort involved in plowing the new streets and sidewalks in these developments. The overall workload would be shared with other existing developments. This includes a .5 FTE for sidewalk plowing, and a .4FTE for street plowing working for four months/year. Also needed is a sidewalk plow at an estimated cost of $180,000, and a snow plow truck at $200,000. The distribution of these costs is shown in the table on the next page; 3.Included in this analysis is an allowance for street reconstruction. The projected life span of these streets is twenty years. Per the Director of Public Works, the current estimated cost to repave streets is $1.50 square foot. When projected over 20 years, this rate is expected to grow to $2.71 per square foot, at an annual rate of increase of 3%. The projected cost for both developments is shown in the table below; Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department In looking at the costs of this department, and how they may be affected by additional development, it is important to look at how the overall growth of the City affects the department. For example, the department now faces pressure due to the increased number of Emergency Medical Services calls received. In the most recent year, 700 calls had to be rerouted to units in other jurisdictions. Citizens were served, but not by the South Burlington Department. One solution would be to add an additional ambulance and the personnel and supplies to support this. The pressures for additional services and capital costs would come from the cumulative growth of needs across the City. Another challenge which causes pressure is the amount of Public Works - Cost per parcel Dorset Spear FY 2020 # Parcels inCost per Meadows Meadows Budget Grand List Parcel 154 48 Streets & Highways 2,836,371$ 7,603 373$ 57,451$ 17,907$ SNOW PLOWING Split with Dorset Spear Existing Meadows Meadows Service Provided Cost Areas 154 Units 48 Units Street Plowing Additional Snow Plow 200,000$ 50%76,238$ 23,762$ (amortized over 8 years)9,530$ 2,970$ .4 FTE @ 4 mos/year 9,240$ 50%3,522$ 1,098$ Total Streets 209,240$ 13,052$ 4,068$ Sidewalk PlowingAdditional Snow Plow 180,000$ 50%68,614$ 21,386$ (amortized over 8 years)8,577$ 2,673$ .5 FTE @ 4 mos/year 11,550$ 50%4,403$ 1,372$ Total Sidewalks 191,550$ 12,979$ 4,046$ Total Snow Plowing 26,031$ 8,114$ Road Repaving Projection - 20 year life Annual Square Current $Projected $Projected Cost Feet Square Ft. Square Ft.Cost Basis Dorset Meadows 185,130 1.50$ 2.71$ 501,702$ 25,085$ Spear Meadows 60,984 1.50$ 2.71$ 165,267$ 8,263$ Totals 246,114 666,969$ 33,348$ 14 overtime worked by individuals necessary to meet the requirements for emergency response. Another is the need to maintain a level of service to maintain standards of the National Fire Protection Association and National Fire Protection Association. There are demographic changes, such as an aging population which place pressure on the department. And there is some significant other new development in the City, outside of the Southeast Quadrant, which applied upward pressure on the department. Fire Station #2 needs to be upgraded with extended ramps and other upgrades. The additional services in the proposed developments are not the key drivers here. A key general question that should be asked is, are the stations close enough to these areas to provide for adequate protection and emergency response to these residents? Is there a need for an additional station due to these developments? In a recent survey, done by graduate students at Michigan State University, the allowable distance was set at 4.5 miles. Dorset Meadows is 2.3 miles from Fire Station #1 and 2.9 miles from Station #2. Spear Meadows is 1.8 miles and 3.0 miles respectively from these stations. Therefore, the location of these stations is appropriate. Will additional personnel be needed to provide service to these developments? In the context of additional workload for about 200 new homes, additional services may not be necessary. However, an estimate is included to cover potential increased overtime tied to these areas. Will the vehicles currently in the fleet be sufficient to carry out the anticipated additional workload? The vehicles which service the City are large capital purchases with replacement schedules in place. No additional vehicles will be required to service these districts. Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds are required to be used to account for operations for which a fee is charged to external users for goods or services and the activity. The City has three such funds which account for services provided for Water Quality, Sewer, and Storm Water utilities. The impact on these developments is shown below: Dorset Spear Estimated FY 2020 # Parcels in Cost per Meadows Meadows Budget Grand List Parcel 154 48 Fire Overtime 364,804$ 7,603 48$ 7,389$ 2,303$ PUBLIC WORKS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Fees Projected Add'l Fees refer to page 83 of budget book 154 units 48 units Avg. Annual Dorset Spear Homeowner Meadows Meadows Stormwater Fees ($6.96/mo)83.52$ 12,862$ 4,009$ Sewer Fees ($41.38/1,000 cf)331.95$ 51,120$ 15,934$ Water Fees ($30.59/1,000 cf)245.36$ 37,785$ 11,777$ Totals 660.83$ 101,768$ 31,720$ Costs - Operating & Capital Projected Add'l Costs Derived from FY20 budget Operating Capital Total 154 units 48 units Cost per Cost per Cost per Dorset Spear Parcel Parcel Parcel Meadows Meadows Stormwater 267.99$ 149.28$ 417.27$ 64,260$ 20,029$ Sewer 337.11$ 27.62$ 364.73$ 56,168$ 17,507$ Water 163.69$ 463.90$ 627.59$ 96,649$ 30,124$ Totals 768.79$ 640.80$ 1,409.59$ 217,077$ 67,660$ Net (115,309)$ (35,940)$ 15 3.Long-Term costs of upkeep and replacement of infrastructure There are some expensive long-term infrastructure obligations assumed by a city when it approves a development and accepts the new streets. This includes street and road replacement, storm sewers, and mater mains. The estimated life span of streets and roads can range from between 20 – 40 years. The South Burlington Public Works Department assumes a 20 year life as shown previously under Streets and Highways in the General Fund analysis. Sewage systems have a life span of 50 or more years, and water mains may last between 75 – 100 years. Because of increasing water quality standards, the South Burlington storm water system has an estimated life span of about 30 years. With this in mind, there is a considerable cost coming in the future. Very few municipalities include this as an accrued liability, but pay for it when needed by additional rate increases and bonded debt. The cost to replace these systems is not isolated for a certain development, but will be part of a larger operation in the City. The Accounting Policy of the City of South Burlington, as stated in the annual audited financial statement says that “Infrastructure assets include roads, bridges, underground pipe (other than related to independently owned utilities), traffic signals, etc. These infrastructure assets are likely to be the largest asset class of the City." The policy also states that Infrastructure Assets have a useful life in the range of 50 – 100 years. The City maintains an ongoing analysis of capital projects that are built into the rates Water, Sewer and Stormwater systems. This is ongoing and is part of the analysis of the annual budget. In this regard, these proprietary (enterprise) funds had significant fund balances of $4,259,827, $6,735,631, and $8,376,051 respectively in the Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater funds as of the June 30, 2019 audited financial report. The Stormwater Capital Project Plan Cost analysis, shown below, illustrates the projects planned or in progress. Stormwater Capital Project Cost Estimating Last updated on 11/22/19 by TD Estimated Expenditures Estimated Revenue Estimated Net Estimated Expenditures Estimated Revenue Estimated Net Estimated Expenditures Estimated Revenue Estimated Net Kennedy Drive Pond 2 317,020.00$ 126,808.00$ 190,212.00$ 126,808.00$ (126,808.00)$ -$ -$ -$ Kennedy Drive Pond 3 220,943.30$ 73,648.00$ 147,295.30$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 73,648.00$ (73,648.00)$ Kennedy Drive Pond 5/6 85,500.00$ 72,675.00$ 12,825.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Kennnedy Drive Pond 7 25,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 57,000.00$ 45,600.00$ 11,400.00$ 375,000.00$ 220,000.00$ 155,000.00$ Picard Circle 500,000.00$ 229,600.00$ 270,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Pinnacle at Spear -$ 185,500.00$ (185,500.00)$ -$ 48,000.00$ (48,000.00)$ -$ -$ -$ Deane St / Woodcrest 302,500.00$ 121,000.00$ 181,500.00$ -$ 121,000.00$ (121,000.00)$ -$ -$ -$ Bartlett Brook North 60,000.00$ -$ 60,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ BBSTS Expansion 29,349.00$ 17,000.00$ 12,349.00$ 469,650.00$ 375,720.00$ 93,930.00$ -$ -$ -$ Muddy Brook Culvert 174,857.00$ 157,371.30$ 17,485.70$ 2,000,000.00$ 1,150,000.00$ 850,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ Village at Dorset Park -$ 96,000.00$ (96,000.00)$ -$ 48,000.00$ (48,000.00)$ -$ -$ -$ Lindenwood 48,665.00$ 38,932.00$ 9,733.00$ 11,335.00$ 9,068.00$ 2,267.00$ 305,000.00$ 275,574.00$ 29,426.00$ Helen Avenue Investigation 10,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Hort Farm Pond 60,000.00$ 42,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 250,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 50,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ Spear Street and BCC 40,000.00$ -$ 40,000.00$ 310,000.00$ 255,750.00$ 54,250.00$ -$ -$ -$ Bartlett Bay Road Culvert -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000.00$ -$ -$ Pine Tree Terrace Drainage 38,000.00$ -$ 38,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000.00$ -$ 180,000.00$ Other Projects Per FRP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 470,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 220,000.00$ Total 1,911,834.30$ 1,186,034.30$ 725,800.00$ 3,097,985.00$ 2,379,946.00$ 718,039.00$ 1,430,000.00$ 819,222.00$ 610,778.00$ FY21 FY22 Project Name FY20 16 Additional estimated revenues generated from development Vs. additional estimated costs to the City The table below shows the estimated additional revenues directly associated with housing units in the planned developments. The page #’s references show where these have been explained previously in the report. Then, the estimated new discrete costs are shown and referenced in the additional expenses section. This assumes that all units have been built out and is for one budgetary period, using Fiscal Year 2020 as the basis. In both cases, the estimated new revenues exceed the estimated additional costs of maintaining these areas. I would like to thank the following City employees who helped me to secure and analyze data for this report: Todd Leblanc, Marla Keene, Paul Conner, Sue Dorey, Celine Ingalls and Justin Rabidoux. Dorset Spear Page # Additional Revenues Meadows Meadows Reference Property Taxes 369,387$ 117,438$ 4 & 5 Utility Fees 101,768$ 31,720$ 12 Total 471,155$ 149,158$ Additional Expenses Police Overtime 6,036$ 1,881$ 10 Streets & Highways Services 57,451$ 17,907$ 11 Snow Plowing 26,031$ 8,114$ 11 Road Repaving 25,085$ 8,263$ 11 Fire overtime 7,389$ 2,303$ 12 Utility Operating Costs 118,394$ 36,902$ 12 Utility Capital Costs 98,683$ 30,758$ 12 Total 339,069$ 106,128$ Net (Revenues - Expenses)132,086$ 43,030$ Shearer Audi/Acura – City Zoning Change History 2013-2020 January 2013 Shearer submits request to Conner re: considering lot coverage in commercial areas March 2015 Submit request to Planning Commission for increased impervious area in the C1, C1-Auto and C2 Districts with rationale and citations March-May 2015 Meet and discuss options with P. Conner May 2015 Meet with Planning Commission (5/12/15) May 2017 Meet w/P&Z to discuss Oct 2017 Emails w/P&Z re: process Nov 2017 Submit second request to Planning Commission, including rationale and impact fee solution Dec 2017 Meet w/LaRose to discuss alternative to impact fees, quality open spaces. Meet w/Planning Commission (12/12/17) Dec 2017 -Feb 2019 Email correspondence w/P&Z re: next steps and PC plans. Feb 2019 Email from LaRose: 18-month work plan is on hold while PC works on Interim Zoning. At least 9 more months. May 2019 Meet with Dorn and Conner to discuss history and issue July 2019 City proposes plan to form PC subcommittee to take up short-term issues; Needs to vet with PC chair Aug 2019 Dorn meets with Shearer on-site. Understands issue, but Interim Zoning to be extended another six months. “No capacity to get at non- stated zoning problems until after Interim Zoning ends.” Nov 2019 Shearer calls Dorn’s office for meeting or update Conner emails Clarke 11/26 afternoon informing that PC meeting 11/26 evening to review all proposed zoning changes and timing for PC. PC directs staff to work on language “to consider this with the open space matrix with a goal of creating incentives for quality open space” as long as… a)He has time, b)It “doesn’t bump the other things the Commission is working on in order to meet the requirements of Interim Zoning” and c)The “smaller projects don’t consume the time needed by the Commission or staff to complete the Planned Unit Development project” Conner emails Clarke “ it would be no sooner than February but likely afterwards as they indicated they would see it when there’s a gap in their work, again, prioritized behind the IZ work” Jan 2020 Conner emails Clarke “Planning Commission gave us our direction on their priorities on the subject of site-level lot coverage/open space – to look at only after we’re done with the Interim Zoning mandate or if there happens to be some down time while we’re waiting on products from consultants. We’ve been at full effort completing projects and expect to be for a while.” Feb 4, 2020 Meet with Conner with specific proposed zoning amendment language. We would prefer if he could review and advance with Planning Commission, but without prompt attention, we will bring to City Council. Conner promises to be in touch by Feb 10, 2020. Feb 10, 2010 Conner emails saying other priorities arose and will be in touch by end of week. We ask for response by 2/13. Feb 14, 2020 Have not heard from P&Z. Shearer – Zoning Amendment Proposed Language 1/31/20 5.01 COMMERCIAL 1 - C1 (F) Additional Standards (4) “Where multiple structures exist or are proposed, lot coverage may exceed the maximum shown in Table C-2, Dimensional Standards by up to 10% if the additional impervious area is not located within 100’ of a public street.” March 10, 2020 Mr. Ian Degutis, P.E., P.T.O.E., Traffic Operations Engineer Vermont Agency of Transportation 219 North Main Street Barre, VT 05641 Re: State Route 116, Hinesburg Road – Speed Limit Review Request Dear Mr. Degutis: The City of South Burlington is requesting a speed limit change on State Route 116, Hinesburg Road, along its entire route in South Burlington. Historically, Route 116 was a commuter route in and out of South Burlington, however in the past 20 years this area has seen significant residential growth, changing the land uses and creating more of a neighborhood where one previously did not exist. Residential development is planned to continue along each side of 116, further changing the character of this section of the city. The prevailing high speeds along Route 116 create a border between neighborhoods on each side of the road, discouraging connecting access via car, bike and walking. As more development occurs and new origins and destinations are created, the demand for a safer Route 116 corridor, and slower vehicle speeds, will only increase. Our understanding of this process is staff of the State’s Traffic Committee will conduct a traffic and engineering study of this location and present their findings to the Traffic Committee at an open meeting, in which the city will be notified and invited, to present their testimony before a ruling is determined. We welcome the opportunity to share our thoughts at this meeting and look forward to getting this process underway. Please let me know if additional information is needed from the City of South Burlington to assist in this request. Regards, Helen Riehle, South Burlington City Council Chair Cc: Mr. David Blackmore, VTrans District 5 Administrator Expenditure Report-February, 2020 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Total CITY COUNCIL $134,855.00 $119,662.21 $0.89 $15,192.79 $2,000.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $5,035,026.73 $2,148,616.28 $0.43 $2,886,410.45 $294,583.98 Total CITY MANAGER $483,938.92 $343,337.53 $0.71 $140,601.39 $43,697.43 Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $315,163.57 $218,406.53 $0.69 $96,757.04 $33,157.80 Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $1,101,596.88 $553,404.48 $0.50 $548,192.40 $49,731.17 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $235,854.89 $162,584.58 $0.69 $73,270.31 $15,385.80 Total CITY CLERK $242,313.58 $154,133.52 $0.64 $88,180.06 $18,127.43 Total ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE $340,514.08 $236,015.58 $0.69 $104,498.50 $24,657.62 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $420,590.71 $282,325.81 $0.67 $138,264.90 $26,285.50 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $448,200.00 $468,719.00 $1.05 ($20,519.00)$20,519.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$8,758,054.36 $4,687,205.52 53.52%$4,070,848.84 $528,145.73 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $3,089,614.32 $2,227,313.47 $0.72 $862,300.85 $235,883.64 Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $10,850.00 $9,475.27 $0.87 $1,374.73 $271.20 Total AMBULANCE $151,750.00 $82,101.62 $0.54 $69,648.38 $16,609.41 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $5,106,686.82 $3,509,784.09 $0.69 $1,596,902.73 $492,955.91 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $8,358,901.14 $5,828,674.45 69.73%$2,530,226.69 $745,720.16 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $881,000.00 $854,729.27 $0.97 $26,270.73 ($709.02) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,566,339.89 $1,959,127.79 $0.76 $607,212.10 ($89,206.79) Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $316,277.51 $227,043.02 $0.72 $89,234.49 $29,692.76 Total PROGRAMS $30,000.00 $18,699.56 $0.62 $11,300.44 $3,168.03 Total RED ROCKS PARK $8,450.00 $5,907.44 $0.70 $2,542.56 $183.47 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Total FACILITIES $327,300.00 $11,836.66 $0.04 $315,463.34 $703.46 Total LEISURE ARTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $140,200.00 $80,404.02 $0.57 $59,795.98 $1,399.08 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $545,555.62 $343,497.00 $0.63 $202,058.62 $41,732.51 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $245,031.10 $195,013.71 $0.80 $50,017.39 $20,872.72 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,612,814.23 $882,401.41 54.71%$730,412.82 $97,752.03 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $745,293.00 $571,513.53 $0.77 $173,779.47 $0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL $1,085,610.30 $723,589.00 $0.67 $362,021.30 $0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST $558,737.00 $116,540.62 $0.21 $442,196.38 ($153.77) Total All Funds $24,566,749.92 $15,623,781.59 63.60%$8,942,968.33 $1,281,548.34 Expenditure Report-February, 2020 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. CITY COUNCIL General Expenses $3,000.00 $3,192.21 106.41%($192.21)$0.00 Housing Trust $50,000.00 $50,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Advertising $3,000.00 $3,391.00 113.03%($391.00)$0.00 G.B.I.C.$5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 V.L.C.T.$22,505.00 $22,505.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Chamber of Commerce $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00 Social Services $15,000.00 $2,000.00 13.33%$13,000.00 $2,000.00 CCTV-Clickable Meetings $20,000.00 $20,500.00 102.50%($500.00)$0.00 Councilors $7,750.00 $7,750.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Liquor Control $500.00 $500.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Front Porch Forum $4,500.00 $4,824.00 107.20%($324.00)$0.00 Total CITY COUNCIL $134,855.00 $119,662.21 88.73%$15,192.79 $2,000.00 ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE Salaries $130,773.03 $72,472.62 55.42%$58,300.41 $4,920.30 Payment to Sickbank Fund $125,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$125,000.00 $0.00 EAP Services $6,000.00 $3,000.00 50.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Wellness/Fitness $13,400.00 $495.96 3.70%$12,904.04 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $13,000.00 $2,732.36 21.02%$10,267.64 $307.41 FICA/Medicare $10,004.14 $5,645.51 56.43%$4,358.63 $391.56 Vision Plan $11,226.92 $7,387.55 65.80%$3,839.37 ($1.98) Short Term Disability Pla $24,888.13 $31,567.07 126.84%($6,678.94)$4,264.82 Disability Insurance $10,965.00 $4,280.69 39.04%$6,684.31 $4,280.69 Group Health Insurance $2,197,563.00 $1,323,099.95 60.21%$874,463.05 $284,983.27 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Bank - Benefits $20,000.00 $628.00 3.14%$19,372.00 $119.00 Group Life Insurance $20,276.00 $29,498.93 145.49%($9,222.93)$7,215.94 Group Dental Insurance $117,696.02 $83,096.68 70.60%$34,599.34 $10,311.32 Pension $1,410,959.57 ($37,693.07)-2.67%$1,448,652.64 $0.00 ICMA Match $196,175.89 $130,165.45 66.35%$66,010.44 $21,391.58 Advertising $1,000.00 $1,389.25 138.93%($389.25)$0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,115.00 $1,320.00 118.39%($205.00)$0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $390,000.00 $237,926.34 61.01%$152,073.66 ($39,964.38) Property Insurance $242,154.03 $200,897.09 82.96%$41,256.94 ($8,709.80) Bonding Insurance-Officer $6,030.00 $6,030.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 VLCT Unemployment Insuran $15,400.00 $5,173.00 33.59%$10,227.00 $0.00 Deductibles/Coinsurance $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00 Hiring-required testing $1,200.00 $1,401.50 116.79%($201.50)$163.00 Payroll Services $26,000.00 $24,999.62 96.15%$1,000.38 $3,203.56 Contractual Services $28,200.00 $7,644.88 27.11%$20,555.12 $1,675.00 Travel and Training $6,000.00 $5,456.90 90.95%$543.10 $32.69 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $5,035,026.73 $2,148,616.28 42.67%$2,886,410.45 $294,583.98 CITY MANAGER City Mgr.Salaries-Perm.$364,179.21 $281,660.18 77.34%$82,519.03 $28,937.29 Leave Time Turn-In $4,900.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,900.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $27,859.71 $20,247.88 72.68%$7,611.83 $2,362.16 Office Supplies $3,000.00 $1,438.36 47.95%$1,561.64 $188.13 Advertising $10,000.00 $7,142.21 71.42%$2,857.79 $783.00 Telephone $3,100.00 $2,358.58 76.08%$741.42 $277.87 Postage $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,900.00 $3,816.51 131.60%($916.51)$363.97 Printing $3,000.00 $2,053.56 68.45%$946.44 $750.00 Consulting Fees $55,000.00 $20,695.11 37.63%$34,304.89 $9,631.98 Travel & Training $8,000.00 $3,925.14 49.06%$4,074.86 $403.03 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Total CITY MANAGER $483,938.92 $343,337.53 70.95%$140,601.39 $43,697.43 LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY FICA/Medicare $14,139.07 $13,603.49 96.21%$535.58 $13,561.95 Dues and Subscriptions $5,200.00 $3,231.63 62.15%$1,968.37 $391.73 Appeals/Abatements $8,000.00 $1,502.57 18.78%$6,497.43 $1,487.57 Gen Govt. Actuaries/Pensi $23,000.00 $22,250.00 96.74%$750.00 $0.00 Gen Govt. Audit/Accountin $28,000.00 $25,900.00 92.50%$2,100.00 $400.00 Legal/Labor/Suits $50,000.00 $31,263.38 62.53%$18,736.62 $15,485.70 Legal Costs $184,824.50 $120,620.46 65.26%$64,204.04 $1,830.85 Professional Development $2,000.00 $35.00 1.75%$1,965.00 $0.00 Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $315,163.57 $218,406.53 69.30%$96,757.04 $33,157.80 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Salaries $242,951.12 $163,495.91 67.30%$79,455.21 $19,828.71 FICA/Medicare $18,585.76 $12,849.02 69.13%$5,736.74 $1,552.02 Muni Bld Cleaning Supplie $1,500.00 $540.32 36.02%$959.68 $160.54 Vehicle - Maintenance $1,700.00 $1,198.49 70.50%$501.51 $50.15 Office Equipment Fees $12,000.00 $6,438.64 53.66%$5,561.36 $724.59 Branding and Outreach $25,000.00 $384.00 1.54%$24,616.00 $384.00 Digital Media $19,000.00 $16,821.42 88.53%$2,178.58 $0.00 Muni Bld Cleaning Service $30,000.00 $20,413.88 68.05%$9,586.12 $2,602.82 City Hall Maintenance $20,000.00 $11,968.87 59.84%$8,031.13 $338.30 Contingency Fund-Infrastr $140,000.00 $25,526.61 18.23%$114,473.39 $0.00 Energy Efficiency $40,000.00 $10,608.90 26.52%$29,391.10 $9,973.77 HVAC Maintenance $1,600.00 $3,544.50 221.53%($1,944.50)$0.00 Positive Pay Fee $800.00 $683.24 85.41%$116.76 $57.60 Archives and Digitalizati $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$25,000.00 $0.00 Electricity-City Hall $30,000.00 $19,685.80 65.62%$10,314.20 $2,860.14 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Utilities-City Hall $17,000.00 $7,135.46 41.97%$9,864.54 $2,418.20 Street Lights $144,000.00 $80,334.75 55.79%$63,665.25 $12,036.14 Stormwater User Rent $317,460.00 $162,279.36 51.12%$155,180.64 $709.92 Emergency Mgmt Center $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint.$1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Council/Board Secretary $13,000.00 $9,495.31 73.04%$3,504.69 ($3,965.73) Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $1,101,596.88 $553,404.48 50.24%$548,192.40 $49,731.17 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT Staff $141,507.93 $95,195.33 67.27%$46,312.60 $10,949.55 IT-Overtime $2,121.60 $79.99 3.77%$2,041.61 $26.59 FICA/Medicare $10,825.36 $7,322.65 67.64%$3,502.71 $834.88 Computer Software $26,000.00 $23,859.95 91.77%$2,140.05 $2,010.00 IT Utility Services $14,900.00 $9,847.90 66.09%$5,052.10 $945.39 Computer Hardware $35,500.00 $24,286.86 68.41%$11,213.14 $619.39 IT Service $5,000.00 $1,991.90 39.84%$3,008.10 $0.00 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $235,854.89 $162,584.58 68.93%$73,270.31 $15,385.80 CITY CLERK City Clerk Salaries-Perm.$192,228.14 $134,166.20 69.80%$58,061.94 $16,086.00 Leave Time Turn-In $3,225.53 $0.00 0.00%$3,225.53 $0.00 Overtime $300.00 $16.94 5.65%$283.06 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $14,619.91 $10,354.44 70.82%$4,265.47 $1,245.57 General Supplies $2,200.00 $1,680.98 76.41%$519.02 $489.80 Animal Control $5,700.00 $2,063.28 36.20%$3,636.72 $0.00 Election Expenses $7,200.00 $910.84 12.65%$6,289.16 $0.00 School Election Expenses $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Telephone $400.00 $135.28 33.82%$264.72 $16.86 Postage $1,200.00 ($122.85)-10.24%$1,322.85 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Dues and Subscriptions $390.00 $350.00 89.74%$40.00 $35.00 Printing $350.00 $203.45 58.13%$146.55 $0.00 Board of Civil Authority $2,700.00 $248.49 9.20%$2,451.51 $0.00 Election Workers $2,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,600.00 $0.00 BCA Appeals/Abatements $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Office Equip Maintenance $2,000.00 $845.26 42.26%$1,154.74 $0.00 Travel & Training $3,700.00 $2,283.01 61.70%$1,416.99 $0.00 Photocopier Lease Prin $1,500.00 $998.20 66.55%$501.80 $254.20 Total CITY CLERK $242,313.58 $154,133.52 63.61%$88,180.06 $18,127.43 ASSESSING/TAX Assessing/Tax Sal.-Perm.$297,896.32 $203,931.07 68.46%$93,965.25 $22,407.97 Overtime $800.00 $566.90 70.86%$233.10 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $22,567.76 $17,006.54 75.36%$5,561.22 $2,058.26 Office Supplies $1,700.00 $2,647.25 155.72%($947.25)$89.15 Tax Sales Advertising $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Telephone $300.00 $178.47 59.49%$121.53 $22.24 Postage $6,400.00 $2,969.59 46.40%$3,430.41 $0.00 Dues and Memberships $950.00 $275.00 28.95%$675.00 $25.00 Printing $4,000.00 $3,031.95 75.80%$968.05 $0.00 NEMRC/APEX $1,400.00 $4,361.19 311.51%($2,961.19)$0.00 Travel & Training $4,000.00 $1,047.62 26.19%$2,952.38 $55.00 Total ASSESSING/TAX $340,514.08 $236,015.58 69.31%$104,498.50 $24,657.62 PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW Planning Salaries-Perm.$297,273.27 $223,975.54 75.34%$73,297.73 $22,908.05 Overtime $6,300.00 $2,424.25 38.48%$3,875.75 $201.99 FICA/Medicare $21,817.44 $17,765.03 81.43%$4,052.41 $1,846.76 Office Supplies $2,500.00 $1,652.63 66.11%$847.37 $94.91 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Public Meeting Advertisin $3,500.00 $1,522.24 43.49%$1,977.76 $397.00 Telephone $300.00 $94.59 31.53%$205.41 $11.79 Postage $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,500.00 $770.50 51.37%$729.50 $0.00 Document Printing $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Consultants $55,000.00 $22,534.43 40.97%$32,465.57 $825.00 Committee Support $2,900.00 $1,069.06 36.86%$1,830.94 $0.00 Payment for GIS Services $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,500.00 $0.00 PC/DRB Stipends $9,000.00 $9,185.42 102.06%($185.42)$0.00 Travel & Training $5,500.00 $1,315.10 23.91%$4,184.90 $0.00 Special Projects $10,000.00 $17.02 0.17%$9,982.98 $0.00 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $420,590.71 $282,325.81 67.13%$138,264.90 $26,285.50 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT Ambulance Department $155,000.00 $155,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Fuel Pump Reserve Fund $8,200.00 $8,200.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Open Space Reserve Fund $285,000.00 $305,519.00 107.20%($20,519.00)$20,519.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $448,200.00 $468,719.00 104.58%($20,519.00)$20,519.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$8,758,054.36 $4,687,205.52 53.52%$4,070,848.84 $528,145.73 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Salaries-Permanent $1,869,299.90 $1,372,097.33 73.40%$497,202.57 $153,531.02 Fire Salaries-EMT $71,813.42 $57,354.91 79.87%$14,458.51 $6,887.14 Holiday Pay $190,344.00 $293,271.00 154.07%($102,927.00)$30,072.84 Fair Labor Standard O/T $141,804.23 $217.49 0.15%$141,586.74 $0.00 F/D Overtime - Fill-In $173,000.00 $112,389.41 64.96%$60,610.59 $5,181.04 F/D Overtime - Training $38,500.00 $39,543.94 102.71%($1,043.94)($4,327.77) Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February F/D Overtime - Emerg Call $11,500.00 $3,787.62 32.94%$7,712.38 $472.09 Wellness/Fitness $13,000.00 $12,003.21 92.33%$996.79 $0.00 Fire-Off Duty Outside Emp $1,000.00 $1,050.00 105.00%($50.00)$0.00 New Employee Training $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $10,000.00 FICA/Medicare $203,952.77 $149,108.89 73.11%$54,843.88 $16,049.57 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $985.92 49.30%$1,014.08 $319.68 REHAB Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Station Operating Supply $3,000.00 $98.84 3.29%$2,901.16 $0.00 Maintenance Tools $350.00 $1,756.90 501.97%($1,406.90)$106.59 Uniforms-Career $32,500.00 $23,957.87 73.72%$8,542.13 $6,550.50 Firefighting Clothing $36,800.00 $25,306.54 68.77%$11,493.46 $277.93 Vehicle Tools $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Gas Chief's vehicle & rei $2,500.00 $1,426.56 57.06%$1,073.44 $161.11 Diesel Fuel $18,000.00 $11,453.11 63.63%$6,546.89 $1,411.93 Oil $600.00 $0.00 0.00%$600.00 $0.00 Films and Books $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Fire Prevention Materials $1,500.00 $305.62 20.37%$1,194.38 $0.00 Fire Extinguishers $600.00 $515.00 85.83%$85.00 $515.00 Airpacks Maintenance $10,000.00 $1,514.48 15.14%$8,485.52 $586.78 Telephone $12,000.00 $7,513.52 62.61%$4,486.48 $907.64 Postage-Tool Shipping $450.00 $115.57 25.68%$334.43 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,700.00 $2,507.60 147.51%($807.60)$2.99 Contractural Services $4,500.00 $3,400.00 75.56%$1,100.00 $0.00 Fire Station Maintenance $25,000.00 $28,566.74 114.27%($3,566.74)$1,193.85 Laundry and Bedding $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00 Radio Repair $2,000.00 $2,273.39 113.67%($273.39)$1,825.89 Vehicle Maintenance $18,000.00 $13,225.97 73.48%$4,774.03 $407.53 Vehicle Repair $30,000.00 $10,044.23 33.48%$19,955.77 $0.00 Equipment R & M $8,500.00 $7,397.76 87.03%$1,102.24 $22.64 Truck Tires $10,000.00 $576.00 5.76%$9,424.00 $0.00 Computers Contract ACS $4,500.00 $6,115.59 135.90%($1,615.59)$0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Conferences $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Training Schools $6,500.00 $12,299.76 189.23%($5,799.76)$181.88 Training Equipment $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00 Recruiting & Testing $4,000.00 $3,097.29 77.43%$902.71 $425.00 Fire Station #2 Heat/Elec $20,000.00 $10,658.75 53.29%$9,341.25 $2,507.55 Fire Safety Equipment $32,000.00 $1,049.10 3.28%$30,950.90 $480.06 F/D Furniture/Equipment $67,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$67,000.00 $0.00 Firefighting Equipment-ho $5,200.00 $327.56 6.30%$4,872.44 $133.16 Capital Leases Prin $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $3,089,614.32 $2,227,313.47 72.09%$862,300.85 $235,883.64 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Uniforms-Electrical Insp $500.00 $277.93 55.59%$222.07 $0.00 Vehicle-Gas and Repairs $9,600.00 $8,970.19 93.44%$629.81 $44.05 Dues and Subscriptions $250.00 $120.00 48.00%$130.00 $120.00 Training Schools-Electric $250.00 $107.15 42.86%$142.85 $107.15 Equipment Purchase $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00 Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $10,850.00 $9,475.27 87.33%$1,374.73 $271.20 AMBULANCE Office Supplies $2,000.00 $912.00 45.60%$1,088.00 $0.00 Medical Supplies-Disposab $49,000.00 $6,793.85 13.87%$42,206.15 $4,501.34 Medical Supplies-Oxygen $3,000.00 $1,562.79 52.09%$1,437.21 $214.08 Medical Equipment Replace $7,500.00 $18,650.99 248.68%($11,150.99)$0.00 Uniforms-Career $7,000.00 $595.00 8.50%$6,405.00 $0.00 Diesel Fuel $6,500.00 $3,632.85 55.89%$2,867.15 $410.04 Training Films and Books $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Telephone $7,000.00 $4,216.65 60.24%$2,783.35 $497.05 Billing Postage $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Radio Repair $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Vehicle Repair $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Equipment R&M $1,250.00 $986.90 78.95%$263.10 $986.90 Office Equip Maintenance $500.00 $192.11 38.42%$307.89 $0.00 Billing Software/Upgrades $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,000.00 $0.00 Med Equipment Maintenance $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,200.00 $0.00 Training Programs $8,000.00 $2,082.50 26.03%$5,917.50 $0.00 Training Equipment $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 To Reserve Fund-Training $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $10,000.00 EMS Patient Care Discript $35,000.00 $32,475.98 92.79%$2,524.02 $0.00 Total AMBULANCE $151,750.00 $82,101.62 54.10%$69,648.38 $16,609.41 POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Salaries-Permanent $3,283,357.67 $2,061,604.97 62.79%$1,221,752.70 $235,735.95 Police Salaries-Overtime $298,000.00 $283,646.35 95.18%$14,353.65 $21,681.21 Holiday Pay $168,710.88 $163,604.73 96.97%$5,106.15 $19,261.38 Automatic Corporal $0.00 $20,074.14 100.00%($20,074.14)$0.00 Shift Differential $52,750.69 $34,985.92 66.32%$17,764.77 $3,934.11 Off-Duty Police Salary $10,000.00 $4,196.25 41.96%$5,803.75 $450.00 Fitness $10,000.00 $7,475.00 74.75%$2,525.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $278,321.17 $195,974.10 70.41%$82,347.07 $21,317.30 Office Supplies $10,500.00 $8,870.20 84.48%$1,629.80 $839.85 Range Supplies $13,000.00 $12,711.99 97.78%$288.01 $210.00 Radio Equipment-Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Investigative Supplies $8,120.00 $5,609.64 69.08%$2,510.36 $257.53 Youth Services Supplies $5,000.00 $1,040.05 20.80%$3,959.95 $929.00 Traffic Unit Supplies $2,000.00 $2,475.00 123.75%($475.00)$0.00 K-9 Supplies $4,000.00 $790.99 19.77%$3,209.01 $214.36 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Janitorial Supplies $3,200.00 $1,276.96 39.91%$1,923.04 $0.00 Uniform Supplies $38,500.00 $26,780.23 69.56%$11,719.77 $4,140.63 Tires $9,800.00 $10,174.08 103.82%($374.08)$0.00 Gas and Oil $60,000.00 $32,447.19 54.08%$27,552.81 $4,965.17 Community Outreach $44,000.00 $11,822.50 26.87%$32,177.50 ($9,392.50) Telephone $30,000.00 $24,485.78 81.62%$5,514.22 $2,486.69 Postage $2,200.00 $1,301.92 59.18%$898.08 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,000.00 $1,975.00 98.75%$25.00 $0.00 Towing Services $1,000.00 $75.00 7.50%$925.00 $0.00 Crime Prevention Supplies $2,000.00 $375.00 18.75%$1,625.00 $0.00 Building Maintenance $15,000.00 $4,996.17 33.31%$10,003.83 ($290.00) 3rd Floor Lease $183,826.41 $162,050.58 88.15%$21,775.83 $149,054.70 Uniform Cleaning $15,000.00 $7,575.95 50.51%$7,424.05 $1,061.75 Office Equip. Contract $6,000.00 $832.36 13.87%$5,167.64 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint $800.00 $0.00 0.00%$800.00 $0.00 Radio Equip. Maintenance $2,000.00 $2,524.50 126.23%($524.50)$19.00 Vehicle Repair $55,000.00 $45,357.80 82.47%$9,642.20 $7,230.26 Computer Connections Syst $8,800.00 $7,333.25 83.33%$1,466.75 $1,918.25 Equipment Maintenance $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00 Records Management System $11,000.00 $10,150.00 92.27%$850.00 $0.00 Consulting Services $26,300.00 $19,802.16 75.29%$6,497.84 $1,902.80 Animal Control Contracts $25,500.00 $15,458.84 60.62%$10,041.16 $2,308.20 Conferences $6,000.00 $6,657.68 110.96%($657.68)$0.00 In-Service Training $32,500.00 $28,730.60 88.40%$3,769.40 $4,844.00 Recruiting & Testing $3,700.00 $915.00 24.73%$2,785.00 $365.00 Electric-Police Dept.$60,000.00 $33,517.62 55.86%$26,482.38 $4,520.53 Heat/Hot Water $5,500.00 $1,672.81 30.41%$3,827.19 $52.87 Radio Installation Utilit $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Building Common Area Fees $65,000.00 $41,823.00 64.34%$23,177.00 $0.00 Cleaning/Building Service $35,000.00 $21,602.75 61.72%$13,397.25 $2,695.00 Vehicles and Equipment $108,000.00 $143,603.10 132.97%($35,603.10)$7,039.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Vehicle Equipment $5,000.00 $5,270.00 105.40%($270.00)$0.00 Office Equipment $5,000.00 $1,424.62 28.49%$3,575.38 $207.76 Taser Replacement $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,500.00 $0.00 Police Computerization $89,000.00 $34,712.31 39.00%$54,287.69 $2,996.11 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $5,106,686.82 $3,509,784.09 68.73%$1,596,902.73 $492,955.91 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $8,358,901.14 $5,828,674.45 69.73%$2,530,226.69 $745,720.16 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT To undesignated reserve f $21,000.00 ($5,270.73)-25.10%$26,270.73 ($709.02) To Capital Improvements $860,000.00 $860,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $881,000.00 $854,729.27 97.02%$26,270.73 ($709.02) STREETS & HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Highway Salaries-Perm.$722,351.53 $570,808.10 79.02%$151,543.43 $52,201.64 Highway Salaries-Overtime $31,000.00 $41,074.65 132.50%($10,074.65)$8,177.59 FICA/Medicare $56,788.36 $46,122.52 81.22%$10,665.84 $4,812.25 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,278.89 63.94%$721.11 $155.69 Traffic Light Supplies $30,000.00 $23,337.19 77.79%$6,662.81 $184.00 Sign Supplies $7,500.00 $6,884.30 91.79%$615.70 $686.56 City Highways Material $35,000.00 $18,258.75 52.17%$16,741.25 $1,511.03 Road Striping $20,000.00 $24,049.69 120.25%($4,049.69)$0.00 Winter Salt $120,000.00 $115,852.03 96.54%$4,147.97 $22,636.29 Winter Sand $300.00 $377.04 125.68%($77.04)$0.00 Winter Liquid Deicer Addi $14,000.00 $11,556.80 82.55%$2,443.20 $6,222.32 Building Supplies $1,400.00 $146.60 10.47%$1,253.40 $0.00 Uniforms $20,000.00 $16,609.05 83.05%$3,390.95 $1,195.80 Vehicle Repair Parts $75,000.00 $72,126.95 96.17%$2,873.05 $9,603.04 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February School Bus Parts $35,000.00 $35,596.83 101.71%($596.83)$2,769.72 Gasoline $20,000.00 $18,543.77 92.72%$1,456.23 $2,435.93 Oil $6,000.00 $1,794.25 29.90%$4,205.75 ($96.56) Diesel Fuel $32,000.00 ($5,998.35)-18.74%$37,998.35 $5,920.26 Diesel/Gasoline Non City $125,000.00 $91,123.02 72.90%$33,876.98 $11,882.11 Fuel Station Maintenance $1,500.00 $207.00 13.80%$1,293.00 $0.00 Telephone/Internet $7,000.00 $3,809.27 54.42%$3,190.73 $491.45 Building Maintenance $71,000.00 $17,831.68 25.12%$53,168.32 $1,428.59 HVAC Maintenance $4,500.00 $1,566.66 34.81%$2,933.34 $124.00 Generator Prevent Maint $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,500.00 $0.00 Tree Care $58,500.00 $6,434.61 11.00%$52,065.39 $0.00 Consulting Services $20,000.00 $21,954.09 109.77%($1,954.09)$6,808.90 Equipment Rental/Purchase $1,500.00 $2,163.44 144.23%($663.44)$0.00 Office Equipment Maintnce $1,500.00 $1,008.17 67.21%$491.83 $121.18 Travel & Training $9,000.00 $3,342.28 37.14%$5,657.72 $60.00 Utilities - Garage $18,000.00 $7,358.49 40.88%$10,641.51 $1,295.47 Utilities-Garage Heat $13,000.00 $6,059.39 46.61%$6,940.61 $2,299.51 Traffic Lights $20,000.00 $12,498.08 62.49%$7,501.92 $1,866.44 Vehicle Replacement $195,000.00 $167,846.31 86.08%$27,153.69 $0.00 Highway Paving $625,000.00 $607,715.47 97.23%$17,284.53 ($234,000.00) Curbs and Sidewalks $5,000.00 $103.98 2.08%$4,896.02 $0.00 Facilities Stewardship $75,000.00 $9,686.79 12.92%$65,313.21 $0.00 Spc Prjcts/C Beautifictn $85,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$85,000.00 $0.00 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,566,339.89 $1,959,127.79 76.34%$607,212.10 ($89,206.79) Total STREETS & HIGHWAYS $2,566,339.89 $1,959,127.79 76.34%$607,212.10 ($89,206.79) CULTURE AND RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Rec.Admin.Salaries-Perm.$258,687.89 $191,535.51 74.04%$67,152.38 $20,884.98 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February FICA/Medicare $19,789.62 $14,355.15 72.54%$5,434.47 $1,596.66 Office Supplies $3,300.00 $931.10 28.22%$2,368.90 $189.12 Telephone $2,000.00 $604.67 30.23%$1,395.33 $80.45 Postage $350.00 $0.00 0.00%$350.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,700.00 $1,849.00 108.76%($149.00)$395.00 Scholarships $0.00 ($6.00)100.00%$6.00 $0.00 Printing $16,000.00 $9,468.98 59.18%$6,531.02 $5,896.98 Software/Printer Contract $5,850.00 $4,612.00 78.84%$1,238.00 $0.00 Travel & Training $5,000.00 $1,357.62 27.15%$3,642.38 $345.00 Lease Printer and Copier $3,600.00 $2,334.99 64.86%$1,265.01 $304.57 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $316,277.51 $227,043.02 71.79%$89,234.49 $29,692.76 PROGRAMS General Supplies $11,000.00 $3,405.48 30.96%$7,594.52 $442.00 Advertising $5,000.00 $4,395.89 87.92%$604.11 $485.75 Special Events $11,000.00 $10,898.19 99.07%$101.81 $2,240.28 School Use $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Total PROGRAMS $30,000.00 $18,699.56 62.33%$11,300.44 $3,168.03 RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Park Salaries $6,100.00 $5,437.67 89.14%$662.33 $0.00 General Supplies $1,500.00 $137.74 9.18%$1,362.26 $0.00 Clothing $200.00 $0.00 0.00%$200.00 $0.00 Telephone $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00 Utilities $400.00 $332.03 83.01%$67.97 $183.47 Total RED ROCKS PARK $8,450.00 $5,907.44 69.91%$2,542.56 $183.47 FACILITIES Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Park Salaries $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Supplies $9,500.00 $1,007.92 10.61%$8,492.08 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $3,500.00 $538.72 15.39%$2,961.28 $0.00 Fuel-Gas $1,500.00 $664.06 44.27%$835.94 $216.51 Facilities Maintenance $2,500.00 $1,006.90 40.28%$1,493.10 $0.00 Port-O-Lets $4,600.00 $4,270.00 92.83%$330.00 $0.00 Recreation Path materials $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Electric-Jaycee Park $1,600.00 $1,197.05 74.82%$402.95 $0.00 Electric-Dorset Park $2,500.00 $1,543.65 61.75%$956.35 $394.11 Electric-Overlook Park $300.00 $172.05 57.35%$127.95 $48.81 Electric-Tennis Courts $300.00 $168.88 56.29%$131.12 $44.03 Facilities Improvements $32,500.00 $1,267.43 3.90%$31,232.57 $0.00 Capital Items $265,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$265,000.00 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $327,300.00 $11,836.66 3.62%$315,463.34 $703.46 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Adult Programs $23,000.00 $8,824.35 38.37%$14,175.65 $985.95 Special Events $0.00 ($1,800.00)100.00%$1,800.00 ($1,800.00) Swim Lessons-Sport/Fit Ed $3,000.00 $2,250.00 75.00%$750.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $30,000.00 $12,179.09 40.60%$17,820.91 $25.00 Driver's Education $33,000.00 $12,275.00 37.20%$20,725.00 $0.00 VRPA Discount $9,600.00 $8,328.00 86.75%$1,272.00 $0.00 Ski Programs $11,000.00 $10,165.00 92.41%$835.00 $0.00 Chorus Director $4,000.00 $4,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $2,000.00 Great Escape $0.00 $0.00 0.00%$0.00 $0.00 SoBu Night Out $25,000.00 $23,447.34 93.79%$1,552.66 $96.52 Telephone $1,600.00 $735.24 45.95%$864.76 $91.61 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $140,200.00 $80,404.02 57.35%$59,795.98 $1,399.08 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Salaries $357,706.10 $224,527.77 62.77%$133,178.33 $25,644.20 FICA/Medicare $27,364.52 $17,991.48 65.75%$9,373.04 $2,038.45 Library Supplies $5,800.00 $2,638.74 45.50%$3,161.26 $389.63 Books - Adult $18,000.00 $9,819.95 54.56%$8,180.05 $647.00 Books - Children $9,000.00 $6,457.88 71.75%$2,542.12 $0.00 DVDs/CDs-Adult $6,000.00 $3,192.26 53.20%$2,807.74 $400.98 DVDs/CDs-Children $2,000.00 $579.81 28.99%$1,420.19 $0.00 Program Supplies-Arts/Cra $2,300.00 $1,218.41 52.97%$1,081.59 $219.56 Young Adult/Graphic Nov $2,500.00 $1,827.63 73.11%$672.37 $0.00 Bookmobile Maintenance $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Postage $1,400.00 $890.99 63.64%$509.01 $18.80 Inter-Library Delivery $1,700.00 $936.00 55.06%$764.00 $171.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,600.00 $421.57 16.21%$2,178.43 $303.00 Online & Print Subscripti $14,500.00 $13,604.20 93.82%$895.80 $2,585.00 Community Programs $6,150.00 $3,393.21 55.17%$2,756.79 $934.44 Custodial Services $16,335.00 $10,806.09 66.15%$5,528.91 $1,357.65 Repair/Maintenance Librar $16,000.00 $8,912.40 55.70%$7,087.60 $1,605.80 Building Lease $45,000.00 $30,800.00 68.44%$14,200.00 $3,850.00 Computer Software $200.00 $0.00 0.00%$200.00 $0.00 Computer Hardware $1,000.00 $22.47 2.25%$977.53 $0.00 Travel & Training $1,500.00 $1,238.44 82.56%$261.56 $0.00 Library Equipment $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00 Computer Program Fees $3,600.00 $2,803.55 77.88%$796.45 $1,567.00 C/L Photocopier Lease Pri $2,400.00 $1,414.15 58.92%$985.85 $0.00 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $545,555.62 $343,497.00 62.96%$202,058.62 $41,732.51 CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE Park Maint.Salaries-Perm.$199,555.30 $161,590.12 80.98%$37,965.18 $15,784.38 Park Maint.Sal.-Overtime $0.00 $6,658.23 100.00%($6,658.23)$754.59 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February FICA/Medicare $15,175.80 $13,031.16 85.87%$2,144.64 $1,286.85 Park Supplies $30,000.00 $12,754.93 42.52%$17,245.07 $3,332.88 Cemetery Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Homestead at Wheeler Park $0.00 $979.27 100.00%($979.27)($285.98) Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $245,031.10 $195,013.71 79.59%$50,017.39 $20,872.72 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,612,814.23 $882,401.41 54.71%$730,412.82 $97,752.03 OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES County Court $146,000.00 $140,350.86 96.13%$5,649.14 $0.00 Winooski Valley Park $59,086.00 $59,086.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 C.C.T.A.$504,403.00 $336,272.67 66.67%$168,130.33 $0.00 Regional Planning $35,804.00 $35,804.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $745,293.00 $571,513.53 76.68%$173,779.47 $0.00 Total OTHER ENTITIES $745,293.00 $571,513.53 76.68%$173,779.47 $0.00 CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS Public Works Facility $98,550.00 $98,568.00 100.02%($18.00)$0.00 Kennedy Dr Reconstrction $22,493.70 $22,508.00 100.06%($14.30)$0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $22,494.00 $22,508.00 100.06%($14.00)$0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-PRINCIP $362,081.00 $0.00 0.00%$362,081.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $29,991.60 $30,005.00 100.04%($13.40)$0.00 Police Headquarters $360,000.00 $360,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Communication Equip-CB $190,000.00 $190,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS $1,085,610.30 $723,589.00 66.65%$362,021.30 $0.00 CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Public Works Facility $8,335.00 ($17,487.27)-209.81%$25,822.27 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Recnstrction $6,080.00 $1,836.22 30.20%$4,243.78 $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $6,080.00 $1,836.22 30.20%$4,243.78 $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-INTERES $298,867.00 $0.00 0.00%$298,867.00 $0.00 Sewer Note-Solar Array $12,004.00 $0.00 0.00%$12,004.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $8,153.00 $2,447.83 30.02%$5,705.17 $0.00 Emergency Center $0.00 ($153.77)100.00%$153.77 ($153.77) Police Headquarters $189,882.00 $98,424.00 51.83%$91,458.00 $0.00 Communication Equip-CB $29,336.00 $29,637.39 101.03%($301.39)$0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS $558,737.00 $116,540.62 20.86%$442,196.38 ($153.77) Total GENERAL FUND $24,566,749.92 $15,623,781.59 63.60%$8,942,968.33 $1,281,548.34 Total All Funds $24,566,749.92 $15,623,781.59 63.60%$8,942,968.33 $1,281,548.34 Expenditure Report-February, 2020 Sewer Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. Salaries-Permanent $524,356.83 $341,585.92 65.14%$182,770.91 $40,791.78 Payment to Highway-wages $280,454.00 $288,265.15 102.79%($7,811.15)$1,061.48 Leave Time Turn-In $7,446.05 $0.00 0.00%$7,446.05 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $38,000.00 $67,388.84 177.34%($29,388.84)$5,511.81 Payment to Sick Bank Fund $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00 Payroll Svc & Testing to $700.00 $700.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 PAFO Certification $13,800.00 $0.00 0.00%$13,800.00 $0.00 Sick Bank Payouts $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $41,685.37 $32,318.81 77.53%$9,366.56 $3,720.10 Payment to Highway-FICA/M $22,944.00 $22,944.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Vision Plan $960.12 $416.40 43.37%$543.72 $0.00 Disability Income $258.23 $3,473.05 1344.94%($3,214.82)$853.96 Long Term Disability Insu $3,117.50 $0.00 0.00%$3,117.50 $0.00 Group Health Insurance $141,773.87 $121,326.98 85.58%$20,446.89 $25,287.86 Benefit Reimbursed to Hig $97,768.75 $97,768.75 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $1,328.81 $1,085.18 81.67%$243.63 $264.48 Group Dental Insurance $8,492.16 $4,497.74 52.96%$3,994.42 $612.26 Pension $58,551.53 $47,958.28 81.91%$10,593.25 $0.00 ICMA Match $22,305.70 $11,615.98 52.08%$10,689.72 $1,198.43 Pension Payment to Highwa $106,897.50 $106,897.50 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Pension Note Payment $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $1,250.00 $715.73 57.26%$534.27 $0.00 Plant Supplies $87,500.00 $80,509.49 92.01%$6,990.51 $8,595.66 Polymer $72,500.00 $38,689.00 53.36%$33,811.00 $0.00 Sewer Line Maint/Supplies $22,500.00 $27,484.27 122.15%($4,984.27)$1,784.60 Pumping Station Supplies $23,000.00 $77,298.50 336.08%($54,298.50)$21,420.19 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Laboratory Supplies $11,500.00 $12,672.07 110.19%($1,172.07)$1,039.73 Caustic Soda and Lime $75,000.00 $65,677.08 87.57%$9,322.92 $14,315.02 Alum $87,500.00 $90,237.54 103.13%($2,737.54)$12,694.56 Water-Airport-B/B-Pump $1,400.00 $822.88 58.78%$577.12 $30.59 Generator Preventive Main $7,500.00 $1,300.04 17.33%$6,199.96 $0.00 Clothing Supplies $3,750.00 $3,072.19 81.93%$677.81 $71.99 Truck Parts $6,500.00 $8,710.54 134.01%($2,210.54)$3,056.86 Gas - Diesel Fuel - Oil $10,000.00 $8,334.49 83.34%$1,665.51 $1,055.60 Fuel - Airport Parkway $57,000.00 $27,205.32 47.73%$29,794.68 $7,849.90 Fuel - Bartlett Bay $5,500.00 $2,507.39 45.59%$2,992.61 $1,129.57 Telephone and Alarms $5,000.00 $4,060.58 81.21%$939.42 $509.72 Postage $50.00 $0.00 0.00%$50.00 $0.00 Memberships/Dues $500.00 $940.00 188.00%($440.00)$480.00 Discharge Permits $15,000.00 $5,950.00 39.67%$9,050.00 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $15,000.00 $65,649.78 437.67%($50,649.78)$30,783.37 Property Insurance $41,000.00 $29,940.18 73.02%$11,059.82 $6,840.16 Safety $7,500.00 $15,754.21 210.06%($8,254.21)$1,148.70 Billing Payment to CWD $45,000.00 $24,825.00 55.17%$20,175.00 $0.00 Soil/Sludge Management $125,000.00 $65,690.50 52.55%$59,309.50 $5,562.37 Landfill Fees $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,500.00 $0.00 HVAC Maintenance $15,000.00 $41,536.71 276.91%($26,536.71)$12,535.62 Auditing $6,214.00 $6,214.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Engineering/Consulting $25,000.00 $18,519.13 74.08%$6,480.87 $0.00 Landfill Engineering $15,000.00 $8,934.58 59.56%$6,065.42 $1,824.25 PMT TO STORMWATER-GIS $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,000.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Contract $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Wireless Communication $0.00 $207.50 100.00%($207.50)$0.00 Administrative Services $150,336.00 $150,336.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 IT Service $0.00 $405.08 100.00%($405.08)$0.00 Travel & Training $7,000.00 $1,857.75 26.54%$5,142.25 $1,292.75 Utilities-Pumping Station $75,000.00 $56,924.18 75.90%$18,075.82 $10,280.34 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Utilities--L/Fill Station $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Electric-Airport Parkway $180,000.00 $114,155.93 63.42%$65,844.07 $18,662.87 Electric-Bartlett Bay $100,000.00 $79,283.81 79.28%$20,716.19 $12,042.44 Replacement-Vehicles $90,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$90,000.00 $0.00 Building Improvements $5,000.00 $621.94 12.44%$4,378.06 $0.00 Pumps Replacements $60,000.00 $54,791.20 91.32%$5,208.80 $0.00 Pump Repairs $40,000.00 $26,346.28 65.87%$13,653.72 $0.00 Bartlett Bay Upgrades $100,000.00 $62,345.84 62.35%$37,654.16 $28,534.20 Hadley Sewer Project $225,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$225,000.00 $0.00 Loan for Airport Parkway $1,272,059.74 $0.00 0.00%$1,272,059.74 $0.00 Bartlett Bay Bond Replace $245,000.00 $245,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $245,000.00 Scope BTV/SB Sewer $0.00 $493,164.20 100.00%($493,164.20)$0.00 Total W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS.$4,771,575.16 $3,166,933.49 66.37%$1,604,641.67 $527,843.22 Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.$4,771,575.16 $3,166,933.49 66.37%$1,604,641.67 $527,843.22 Total All Funds $4,771,575.16 $3,166,933.49 66.37%$1,604,641.67 $527,843.22 Expenditure Report-February, 2020 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS Salaries-Permanent $542,664.29 $373,480.54 68.82%$169,183.75 $50,154.53 Salaries-Overtime $12,000.00 $17,013.05 141.78%($5,013.05)$3,391.65 Payroll Svc & Testing to $880.00 $480.00 54.55%$400.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $41,422.30 $31,684.39 76.49%$9,737.91 $4,337.01 Vision Plan $760.33 $307.93 40.50%$452.40 $0.00 Disability Income Insuran $1,488.41 $4,336.42 291.35%($2,848.01)$1,083.34 Group Health Insurance $123,501.87 $88,463.08 71.63%$35,038.79 $20,783.14 Reimburse to Highway Bene $10,429.00 $10,429.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Health Insurance FICA $1,259.96 $0.00 0.00%$1,259.96 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $1,336.62 $1,280.26 95.78%$56.36 $320.82 Group Dental Insurance $6,287.85 $3,507.61 55.78%$2,780.24 $632.33 Pension $78,363.57 $0.00 0.00%$78,363.57 $0.00 ICMA Match $27,390.90 $17,136.32 62.56%$10,254.58 $1,952.34 Pension Note Payment $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $1,750.00 $742.68 42.44%$1,007.32 $639.44 Small Equipment/Tools $2,800.00 $1,535.87 54.85%$1,264.13 $35.28 Uniforms/Supplies $7,500.00 $4,199.39 55.99%$3,300.61 $44.98 Vehicle Parts $0.00 $14.85 100.00%($14.85)$0.00 Gasoline $2,500.00 $1,707.94 68.32%$792.06 $141.68 Oil $300.00 $90.75 30.25%$209.25 $9.68 Diesel Fuel $5,200.00 $2,746.62 52.82%$2,453.38 $176.47 Permit Requirement-Educat $10,000.00 $6,000.00 60.00%$4,000.00 $0.00 Telephone $2,300.00 $1,238.83 53.86%$1,061.17 $155.84 Postage $125.00 $0.00 0.00%$125.00 $0.00 Membership/Dues $300.00 $180.00 60.00%$120.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits Renewal $24,000.00 $14,776.00 61.57%$9,224.00 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Workers Comp Insurance $19,000.00 $23,533.87 123.86%($4,533.87)$9,181.01 Property Insurance $13,000.00 $8,673.74 66.72%$4,326.26 $1,869.64 Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,000.00 $0.00 GIS-Fees/Software $38,000.00 $45,677.78 120.20%($7,677.78)$720.00 Sediment & Depris Disposa $650.00 $0.00 0.00%$650.00 $0.00 Water Quality Monitoring $35,000.00 $17,830.45 50.94%$17,169.55 $0.00 Building/Grounds Maint $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $6,000.00 $2,566.36 42.77%$3,433.64 $38.00 Storm System Maint Materi $45,000.00 $29,152.37 64.78%$15,847.63 $3,095.92 Printing $100.00 $50.16 50.16%$49.84 $0.00 Legal Services $5,000.00 $7,513.66 150.27%($2,513.66)$1,072.95 To GF-Audit and Actuary $0.00 $3,555.00 100.00%($3,555.00)$0.00 Engineering-Watershed $60,000.00 $46,800.02 78.00%$13,199.98 $9,809.68 Engineering-Nghbrhd Asst $0.00 $385.00 100.00%($385.00)$0.00 Billing Payment CWD $49,000.00 $24,825.00 50.66%$24,175.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintena $2,000.00 $1,241.24 62.06%$758.76 $197.31 Equipment Rental $750.00 $0.00 0.00%$750.00 $0.00 Administrative Services $134,392.00 $134,392.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Conference/Training Expen $8,500.00 $929.00 10.93%$7,571.00 $30.00 Training $0.00 $228.00 100.00%($228.00)$0.00 S/W Bldg Utilities $3,500.00 $1,466.02 41.89%$2,033.98 $392.79 Stormwater Pumps Electric $300.00 $566.32 188.77%($266.32)$20.94 Vehicles/Equipment $200,000.00 $9,000.00 4.50%$191,000.00 $9,000.00 Stormwater Capital Projec $1,582,000.00 $1,336,587.30 84.49%$245,412.70 $43,529.50 Office Furniture/Equipmen $7,500.00 $1,394.00 18.59%$6,106.00 $0.00 Flow Restoration Plan Ana $10,000.00 $9,150.18 91.50%$849.82 $0.00 Reimbursement to Highway $18,773.00 $18,773.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS $3,172,535.10 $2,305,642.00 72.68%$866,893.10 $162,816.27 Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $3,172,535.10 $2,305,642.00 72.68%$866,893.10 $162,816.27 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2020 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid February Total All Funds $3,172,535.10 $2,305,642.00 72.68%$866,893.10 $162,816.27 Revenue Report-February, 2020 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Total PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $16,361,329.92 ($12,040,619.55)73.59%$4,320,710.37 ($1,494,450.00) Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,790,000.00 ($2,607,399.73)68.80%$1,182,600.27 ($1,078,418.92) Total TAX REVENUE $20,151,329.92 ($14,648,019.28)72.69%$5,503,310.64 ($2,572,868.92) Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $284,000.00 ($126,859.31)44.67%$157,140.69 $589.72 Total CITY MANAGER $458,862.00 ($388,873.94)84.75%$69,988.06 ($13,674.28) Total CITY CLERK $189,600.00 ($199,758.95)105.36%($10,158.95)($27,957.05) Total PLANNING & ZONING $383,700.00 ($327,933.88)85.47%$55,766.12 ($154,183.70) Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $411,000.00 ($280,724.15)68.30%$130,275.85 ($3,341.86) Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $60,000.00 ($37,165.23)61.94%$22,834.77 ($2,980.50) Total AMBULANCE $782,000.00 ($585,464.31)74.87%$196,535.69 ($38,016.98) Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $464,275.00 ($193,630.05)41.71%$270,644.95 ($9,629.50) Total PUBLIC SAFETY $1,717,275.00 ($1,096,983.74)63.88%$620,291.26 ($53,968.84) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $999,443.00 ($856,233.85)85.67%$143,209.15 ($175.00) Total RED ROCKS PARK $0.00 $0.00 0.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $12,000.00 ($2,419.00)20.16%$9,581.00 ($641.00) Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $363,600.00 ($144,588.07)39.77%$219,011.93 ($12,252.00) Total RECREATION $375,600.00 ($147,007.07)39.14%$228,592.93 ($12,893.00) Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $6,940.00 ($5,591.54)80.57%$1,348.46 ($1,689.70) Total GENERAL FUND $24,566,749.92 ($17,797,261.56)72.44%$6,769,488.36 ($2,836,820.77) Revenue Report-February, 2020 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February TAX REVENUE Tax, Current Budget $16,126,329.92 ($11,918,523.39)73.91%$4,207,806.53 ($1,494,450.00) VT Payment in Lieu of Tax $170,000.00 ($122,096.16)71.82%$47,903.84 $0.00 Taxes, Reappraisal/ACT 60 $65,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$65,000.00 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $16,361,329.92 ($12,040,619.55)73.59%$4,320,710.37 ($1,494,450.00) LOCAL OPTION TAXES Local Option Tax-Sales $2,780,000.00 ($1,887,822.54)67.91%$892,177.46 ($801,820.78) Local Option Tax-Rooms/Me $1,010,000.00 ($719,577.19)71.25%$290,422.81 ($276,598.14) Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,790,000.00 ($2,607,399.73)68.80%$1,182,600.27 ($1,078,418.92) Total TAX REVENUE $20,151,329.92 ($14,648,019.28)72.69%$5,503,310.64 ($2,572,868.92) INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX Penalty, Current & Prior $125,000.00 ($91,239.42)72.99%$33,760.58 $0.00 Interest, Current & Prior $50,000.00 ($32,446.34)64.89%$17,553.66 $3,763.27 Attorney Fees $2,500.00 ($3,173.55)126.94%($673.55)($3,173.55) Fee to Collect State Educ $93,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$93,000.00 $0.00 Current Use $13,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$13,500.00 $0.00 Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $284,000.00 ($126,859.31)44.67%$157,140.69 $589.72 CITY MANAGER Administrative Services-W $47,500.00 ($47,500.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Administrative Services-S $134,392.00 ($134,392.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Administrative Services-W $150,336.00 ($150,336.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From Sewer-Audit & Actuar $6,214.00 ($6,214.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From SW-Audit & Actuary $3,555.00 ($3,555.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Wellness Payment $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-WPC $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-SW $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00 From Water-Audit $2,100.00 ($2,100.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From WPC-Payroll, Testing $700.00 ($700.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From SW-Payroll, Testing $480.00 ($480.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Interest on Investment $22,000.00 ($33,870.43)153.96%($11,870.43)($12,092.84) Solar Credits $14,900.00 ($8,364.87)56.14%$6,535.13 ($357.02) Miscellaneous $1,500.00 ($1,361.64)90.78%$138.36 ($1,224.42) Total CITY MANAGER $458,862.00 ($388,873.94)84.75%$69,988.06 ($13,674.28) CITY CLERK Recording Fees $120,000.00 ($138,773.35)115.64%($18,773.35)($14,346.50) Photocopy Fees $26,000.00 ($17,841.30)68.62%$8,158.70 ($1,581.55) Photocopies-Vital Records $6,000.00 ($22,150.00)369.17%($16,150.00)($2,313.00) Pet Licenses $23,000.00 ($10,848.30)47.17%$12,151.70 ($5,307.00) Pet Control Fees $2,000.00 ($760.00)38.00%$1,240.00 $0.00 Beverage/Cabaret License $9,000.00 ($7,715.00)85.72%$1,285.00 ($4,315.00) Entertainment Permits $0.00 ($25.00)100.00%($25.00)$0.00 Marriage Licenses $1,200.00 ($1,070.00)89.17%$130.00 ($60.00) Green Mountain Passports $300.00 ($216.00)72.00%$84.00 ($10.00) Motor Vehicle Renewals $600.00 ($360.00)60.00%$240.00 ($24.00) School Reimburse-Election $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Total CITY CLERK $189,600.00 ($199,758.95)105.36%($10,158.95)($27,957.05) PLANNING Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Building & Sign Permits $250,000.00 ($84,521.60)33.81%$165,478.40 ($1,872.03) Bianchi Ruling $10,000.00 ($12,618.00)126.18%($2,618.00)($1,201.00) Zoning and Planning $95,000.00 ($228,664.28)240.70%($133,664.28)($151,110.67) Sewer Inspection Fees $2,500.00 ($1,650.00)66.00%$850.00 $0.00 Peddlers' Permits $1,200.00 ($480.00)40.00%$720.00 $0.00 Transfer in-Solar Credits $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$25,000.00 $0.00 Total PLANNING $383,700.00 ($327,933.88)85.47%$55,766.12 ($154,183.70) FIRE DEPARTMENT Outside Employment $1,000.00 ($2,143.50)214.35%($1,143.50)$0.00 Misc.Revenue-Fire Dept.$0.00 ($955.00)100.00%($955.00)$0.00 Fire Inspection Revenue $410,000.00 ($277,625.65)67.71%$132,374.35 ($3,341.86) Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $411,000.00 ($280,724.15)68.30%$130,275.85 ($3,341.86) ELECTRICAL INSPECTION Electrical Inspection-Rev $60,000.00 ($37,165.23)61.94%$22,834.77 ($2,980.50) Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $60,000.00 ($37,165.23)61.94%$22,834.77 ($2,980.50) AMBULANCE Tax Revenues $155,000.00 ($155,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Ambulance Service Billing $610,000.00 ($423,003.78)69.34%$186,996.22 ($37,321.69) Grand Isle Billing $5,000.00 ($2,942.03)58.84%$2,057.97 ($695.29) Miscellaneous Income $12,000.00 ($4,518.50)37.65%$7,481.50 $0.00 Total AMBULANCE $782,000.00 ($585,464.31)74.87%$196,535.69 ($38,016.98) POLICE DEPARTMENT Vermont District Court $30,000.00 ($6,358.52)21.20%$23,641.48 ($561.50) Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Traffic Safety Grant $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00 Sale of Cruisers/Bequest $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Police Reports $6,000.00 ($281.76)4.70%$5,718.24 ($69.91) I.C.A.C.$3,500.00 ($5,264.41)150.41%($1,764.41)($2,657.78) SHARP $34,000.00 ($1,160.85)3.41%$32,839.15 $0.00 Drug Task Force Grant $115,000.00 ($80,726.54)70.20%$34,273.46 $0.00 Parking Tickets $0.00 ($4,923.36)100.00%($4,923.36)($15.00) Alarm Registrations $10,000.00 ($3,290.00)32.90%$6,710.00 ($270.00) Alarm Fines $2,500.00 ($3,265.00)130.60%($765.00)($340.00) Off Duty Police $10,000.00 ($7,405.21)74.05%$2,594.79 $0.00 Bullet Proof Vest Grant $2,400.00 ($7,655.00)318.96%($5,255.00)$0.00 Police Impact Fees $110,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$110,000.00 $0.00 3rd Floor Lease Revenue $103,000.00 ($60,369.05)58.61%$42,630.95 ($8,624.15) Solar Credits $1,375.00 ($771.10)56.08%$603.90 $3,898.84 Miscellaneous - Police $8,500.00 ($12,159.25)143.05%($3,659.25)($990.00) Xfer In-Fund 207 $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$20,000.00 $0.00 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $464,275.00 ($193,630.05)41.71%$270,644.95 ($9,629.50) HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Road Opening Permits $90,000.00 ($43,536.00)48.37%$46,464.00 $0.00 Overweight truck permits $2,000.00 ($305.00)15.25%$1,695.00 ($175.00) Highway State Aid $225,000.00 ($338,396.67)150.40%($113,396.67)$0.00 Fuel Pump Surcharge $6,000.00 ($3,489.82)58.16%$2,510.18 $0.00 HazMat Facility Lease $23,000.00 ($10,571.68)45.96%$12,428.32 $0.00 School Bus Parts Reimbure $32,500.00 ($38,176.16)117.47%($5,676.16)$0.00 School gas/diesel reimbur $125,000.00 ($65,336.65)52.27%$59,663.35 $0.00 School vehicle repair pay $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$20,000.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-WPC $280,454.00 ($280,454.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 FICA Reimbursement-WPC $22,944.00 ($22,944.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-SW $18,773.00 ($18,773.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Benefits Reimbursement-SW $10,429.00 ($10,429.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Reimburse from Fund 265 $8,343.00 ($8,343.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Highway Impact Fee-RT 2 $85,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$85,000.00 $0.00 Hgwy Misc Revenue $50,000.00 ($15,478.87)30.96%$34,521.13 $0.00 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $999,443.00 ($856,233.85)85.67%$143,209.15 ($175.00) FACILITIES Donations $12,000.00 ($2,419.00)20.16%$9,581.00 ($641.00) Total FACILITIES $12,000.00 ($2,419.00)20.16%$9,581.00 ($641.00) SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Great Escape Ticket Sales $9,600.00 ($7,945.00)82.76%$1,655.00 $0.00 Aternoon Skiing/Middle Sc $16,000.00 ($15,797.00)98.73%$203.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $74,000.00 ($53,115.07)71.78%$20,884.93 ($6,328.00) Adult Evening Classes $26,000.00 ($15,186.00)58.41%$10,814.00 ($2,569.00) Recreation Impact Fees $170,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$170,000.00 $0.00 SoBu Night Out $41,000.00 ($26,170.00)63.83%$14,830.00 ($140.00) Driver's Education $27,000.00 ($26,375.00)97.69%$625.00 ($3,215.00) Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $363,600.00 ($144,588.07)39.77%$219,011.93 ($12,252.00) Total RECREATION $375,600.00 ($147,007.07)39.14%$228,592.93 ($12,893.00) COMMUNITY LIBRARY Grants $140.00 ($682.50)487.50%($542.50)$0.00 Library Lost Books $0.00 ($798.34)100.00%($798.34)($343.73) Fines and Fees $3,800.00 ($1,205.91)31.73%$2,594.09 ($447.02) Non-Resident Fees $800.00 ($1,052.10)131.51%($252.10)($310.00) Conference Room Rental $0.00 ($75.00)100.00%($75.00)($25.00) Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February Libriary Copies and Print $2,200.00 ($1,777.69)80.80%$422.31 ($563.95) Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $6,940.00 ($5,591.54)80.57%$1,348.46 ($1,689.70) Total GENERAL FUND $24,566,749.92 ($17,797,261.56)72.44%$6,769,488.36 ($2,836,820.77) Total All Funds $24,566,749.92 ($17,797,261.56)72.44%$6,769,488.36 ($2,836,820.77) Revenue Report-February, 2020 Sewer Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February CHARGES FOR SERVICES W.P.C. User Fees $3,674,265.16 ($2,555,897.94)69.56%$1,118,367.22 ($262,380.81) W.P.C. Truck Charges $20,000.00 ($7,426.50)37.13%$12,573.50 $0.00 Connection Fees $325,000.00 ($177,049.76)54.48%$147,950.24 $0.00 Total CHARGES FOR SERVICES $4,019,265.16 ($2,740,374.20)68.18%$1,278,890.96 ($262,380.81) BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS Colchester A/P Pkwy Pmt $742,310.00 $0.00 0.00%$742,310.00 $0.00 Total BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS $742,310.00 $0.00 0.00%$742,310.00 $0.00 MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Rev.-W.P.C.$10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00 Operating Transfer In $0.00 ($82,140.92)100.00%($82,140.92)$0.00 Total MISCELLANEOUS $10,000.00 ($82,140.92)821.41%($72,140.92)$0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS IN $4,771,575.16 ($2,822,515.12)59.15%$1,949,060.04 ($262,380.81) Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.$4,771,575.16 ($2,822,515.12)59.15%$1,949,060.04 ($262,380.81) Total All Funds $4,771,575.16 ($2,822,515.12)59.15%$1,949,060.04 ($262,380.81) Revenue Report-February, 2020 Stormwater Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2020 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-February S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE Intergovernmental Revenue $935,591.68 ($506,464.15)54.13%$429,127.53 $0.00 S/W User Fees - Water Bil $2,281,335.41 ($1,487,026.80)65.18%$794,308.61 ($167,497.67) Credit Application Fees $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Systems Takeover App Fees $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Payment from GF re: GIS $38,000.00 ($18,000.00)47.37%$20,000.00 $0.00 Pmts from other towns $50,000.00 ($18,709.65)37.42%$31,290.35 $0.00 Land Owner Payments $0.00 ($196,987.37)100.00%($196,987.37)$0.00 Stormwater Miscellaneous $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE $3,306,927.09 ($2,227,187.97)67.35%$1,079,739.12 ($167,497.67) Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $3,306,927.09 ($2,227,187.97)67.35%$1,079,739.12 ($167,497.67) Total All Funds $3,306,927.09 ($2,227,187.97)67.35%$1,079,739.12 ($167,497.67)