Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee - 10/12/2022 AGENDA South Burlington Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee Library Digital Lab at 180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Participation Options: In Person: Library Digital Lab – 180 Market St Assistive Listening Service Devices Available upon request Electronically: https://meet.goto.com/SBCity/bike_ped_committee_10-12-2022 Join By Phone: +1 (872) 240-3412 Access Code: 671-765-445 6:15 PM Wednesday October 12, 2022 1. Welcome, Virtual Meeting Instructions, Gratitude – Havaleh (6:15 PM) 2. Changes or additions to the agenda – Havaleh (6:20 PM) 3. Comments from the public not related to the agenda – Havaleh (6:25 PM) 4. Consideration of minutes from September 14, 2022 – Havaleh (6:30 PM) 5. Presentation from VHB on I-89 Bike/Ped Bridge Concept – Aaron Guyette (6:35 PM) 6. ***Updates from the City – Erica (7:05 PM) 7. ***CCRPC Active Transportation Plan Pedestrian Recommendations – Erica (7:20 PM) 8. ***CIP – Review and approve revised document – Havaleh (7:40 PM) 9. ARPA funds recommendations – Havaleh (8:00 PM) 10. Updates Ongoing Committee/Liaison Work: (8:20 PM) 1. DRB Update – Donna 2. DPW Items to relay to Erica 3. Bike Friendly Community Planning/Greenway progress – Nic 4. Chair updates/comments – Havaleh 5. Climate Action – Donna 6. Communications/Outreach – Cathy, Donna, Havaleh 7. Safety (review recommendations for DPW) – Dana 8. Mapping – Amanda, Nic 9. Signs – Nic, Donna, Dana 11. Confirmation: Next meeting Wednesday November 9, 2022 @ 5:30pm 12. Adjourn (by 8:45 PM) *** Attachments Included 104 Landfill Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 www.southburlingtonvt.gov tel 802.658.7961 To: South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee From: Erica Quallen, Deputy Director of Capital Projects and Staff Liaison Date: October 12, 2022 Re: DPW Updates to Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee Since our committee meeting on September 14, 2022, I have the following updates to report on behalf of Public Works and City staff: • Nearly all right-of-way license agreements have been acquired for construction of 2 crosswalks on Williston Road. Construction for these crosswalks with RRFBs will begin next spring and end before the close of FY23. • A study looking at connections from the I-89 bike/ped bridge to the City’s existing infrastructure has been kicked off with the CCRPC and Toole Design. This will be a roughly 10-month study and feedback from the committee will be solicited over the life of the project. • The City has begun working with the CCRPC and VHB to develop the Climate Action Implementation Plan for the Transportation Sector. • A public meeting presenting 60% plans of the shared use path and boardwalk in City Center Park will be held at City Hall on October 27th at 6:30pm. • The third and final public meeting/workshop for the I-89 bike/ped bridge will be held at City Hall on October 13th at 6:30pm. The preferred concept will be presented at this meeting and then brought to Council for consideration and ask for approval on November 7th. Updates and all project materials can be found at: https://www.southburlingtonvt.gov/residents/city_center_tif_district/east- west-crossing.php MEMORANDUM September 15, 2022 To: Bryan Davis Organization: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC) From: Jacob Stein and Michael Blau Project: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Active Transportation Plan Update Re: Milton and South Burlington Pedestrian Network Recommendations – FINAL Pedestrian Network Recommendations Background The purpose of this task is to leverage the pedestrian trip potential results for Milton and South Burlington to guide pedestrian network improvements and provide guidance on how to replicate this process for other communities in the county. CCRPC staff selected Milton and South Burlington for additional analysis to understand pedestrian trip potential in those communities. These two communities were selected because they are two of the fastest growing communities in the state (according to US Census data 2010 and 2020), both are home to populations historically excluded from the planning process, and neither has an adopted comprehensive walk/bike plan. Note, however, that South Burlington has an active Bicycle & Pedestrian Committee which successfully advances active transportation projects in the City, and Milton has an adopted Recreation Master Plan that includes active transportation facilities and calls for the development of an active transportation plan that comprehensively considers walking, biking and trail connectivity in Milton. Methodology The pedestrian network recommendations for Milton and South Burlington include about 17 miles of pedestrian facilities and seven miles of traffic calming recommendations. These improvements would allow users of all ages and abilities to enjoy safer and more connected walking environments in the two communities. The pedestrian recommendations also include 21 spot improvements such as high visibility crosswalks, median islands, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs). The project team developed the network based on information gathered from previous tasks, including the Trip Potential Analysis, Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) Analysis, Strava activity data, public input, CCRPC’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) project locations, and important destination locations. The project team overlaid the Trip Potential Analysis, Strava data, and LTS results to manually develop local pedestrian networks for the Milton and South Burlington areas. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the networks. Table 1 and Table 2 include the project ID, facility type, project extents and rationale for each of the projects shown on the maps. The Town of Milton and City of South Burlington both cover fairly large areas and it is beyond the scope of this project to provide detailed recommendations for the entire network in each community. Recommendations for the Town of Milton focus on the Village of Milton. South Burlington recommendations include several focus areas selected based on trip potential, density of priority populations, and level of traffic stress with a focus on identifying spot improvements to improve the existing pedestrian network. The project team relied primarily on aerial imagery and Google Street View to identify the gaps and barriers in the pedestrian networks in Milton and South Burlington. Overlaid with the pedestrian and bicycle usage data from 2 Strava and the LTS data, these sources provided a relatively accurate picture of the existing network. The project team created linear recommendations by looking for opportunities to make connections between existing sidewalk segments and to proposed new facilities where there is strong usage but also high levels of traffic stress. The spot improvements focus on high-stress, high usage intersections where new pedestrian safety countermeasures could improve safety for vulnerable users (i.e., children, older adults, mobility impaired individuals) and/or where the existing facilities are not working optimally. Examples include crossings near schools or parks that are not stop controlled or have a standard crosswalk. Recommendations also address long crossings across busy roads. Figure 1: Milton Pedestrian Network Recommendations 4 Figure 2: South Burlington Pedestrian Network Recommendations 5 Table 1: Milton and South Burlington Linear Projects PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE STREET NAME TERMINI 1 TERMINI 2 RATIONALE L-1 Milton Sidepath East Road Main Street Town Limits High usage, high-stress (based on the LTS analysis) road requires a separate facility. This recommendation coupled with L-7 creates a safe pedestrian route through the Town. L-2 Milton Sidewalk Railroad Street/US 7 Centre Drive Middle Road Fills gap between two sidewalk segments along a high-stress street. This recommendation is important because a user of the Railroad Street sidewalk would have to travel a relatively long distance out of the way (extra .4 miles) to reach commercial locations at Centre Drive if this sidewalk is not constructed. This helps connect the residential and park land uses to the east to the heart of the Village of Milton. L-3 Milton Traffic calming Railroad Street Middle Road Main Street Increases safety along a high-stress, medium use (according to Strava activity data) corridor with residential land use. L-4 Milton Sidewalk Railroad Street Barnum Street North of Railroad crossing High-stress, medium use corridor that lacks pedestrian path. Fills small gap in pedestrian network between two sections of sidewalk. L-5 Milton Sidewalk River Street Milton Square Shopping Center Railroad Street Currently, a poor-quality asphalt path exists. Upgrading the path would greatly improve pedestrian connectivity. L-6 Milton Sidewalk Main Street Railroad Street East Road/North Road Fills gap in pedestrian network along a high use, high stress corridor by connecting two existing sidewalk sections. L-7 Milton Traffic calming North Road Main Street County Line High-stress corridor with residential land use along a substantial portion of corridor. Sidewalk exists along southern portion of corridor, so reducing speeds along the corridor could support more pedestrian activity. L-8 Milton Sidewalk North Road Rowe Road County Line Fills pedestrian network gap between county line and existing sidewalk, which will connect residential land use to the town center and open space (Quarry Lane Open Space). L-9 Milton Sidewalk River Street Mackey Street Cherry Street Fills sidewalk gap on west side along high-stress major arterial and will connect Milton High School to River Street 6 PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE STREET NAME TERMINI 1 TERMINI 2 RATIONALE Park. Closing this gap has the possible impact of increasing pedestrian activity between these two trip attractors. L-10 Milton Sidewalk US 7 and Milton Road Clark Falls Road Nancy Drive Fills pedestrian network gap and connects large multifamily housing complex to the Village of Milton via existing sidewalk. Would improve access along a medium- to high-stress road which has moderate usage. L-11 South Burlington Sidepath Spear Street near UVM South Burlington Recreation Path PFG Road Informal footpath exists and public input requests formalizing it. Creates a safe path connecting South Burlington Recreation Path to center of UVM campus. Corridor is moderately stressful L-12 South Burlington Traffic calming Williston Road City Limits/East Terrace City Limits/Palmer Court High- stress, High usage corridor that passes through areas with concentrations of priority populations. Corridor has high trip potential and thus is also has a recommendation for a bike facility. The project team understands that a future pedestrian/bicycle bridge at Exit 14 (to be completed in 2025/26) will take users around the I-89 junction but traffic calming along the rest of the corridor and especially at the junction would increase safety now. L-13 South Burlington Sidepath/traff ic calming Hinesburg Road Williston Road City Limits at Cheesefactory Road High -stress corridor with high usage in certain sections. Selected for bike facility due to large concentration of priority populations and trip potential. L-14 South Burlington Pedestrian bridge Hinesburg Road Bridge over I-89 N/A Identified as barrier by public. Existing bridge does not offer an opportunity to improve pedestrian safety so the alternatives are building a parallel bridge or wait for bridge replacement in the long term. 7 Table 2: Spot Recommendations PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE LOCATION RATIONALE S-1 Milton RRFB or overhead pedestrian signal River Street at Milton High School School crosswalk currently has no stop control. S-2 Milton High visibility crosswalks and add Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) Middle Road/Railroad Street/River Street intersection Creating safer crossings across high-stress (based on the LTS analysis) roads with moderate usage. Skewed intersections reduce sight distances for all users and increase crossing distances for pedestrians. Wide angles create large curb radii, which encourage high-speed turning movements. These conditions reduce the likelihood that drivers will yield to crossing pedestrians. The new crosswalk will go across River Street and will require a PHB as the oncoming traffic is not stop controlled. S-3 Milton PHB and high visibility crosswalk River Street at Cherry Street/River Street Park Connects River Street Park to residential land uses and the transit stop at this intersection. This combination of trip attractors makes this location potentially high use if safety was increased. S-4 Milton High visibility crosswalk River Street at Milton Square Shopping Center Adding a high visibility crosswalk across parking lot entrance would increase pedestrian safety at a major commercial hub and along a high-stress corridor. S-5 Milton High visibility crosswalk River Street at Barnum St Returns high visibility crosswalk removed since 2018. This intersection has a transit stop as well as a school crossing so this project will improve safety for priority populations. S-6 Milton High visibility crosswalk US 7 at Main Street It appears that a crosswalk was installed across Main Street but it has completely worn away. Reinstalling the crosswalk with high visibility markings rather than stamped brick pavers would improve safety for residents along Main Street. S-7 Milton Move crosswalk and add PHB US 7 at Boysenberry Drive Crosswalk currently is placed inside turn lane which is a conflict point. Moving the crosswalk forward to be in line with Boysenberry Drive and moving the turn lane back removes this conflict. Corridor is high-stress and high pedestrian usage, with the location also having a transit stop. 8 PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE LOCATION RATIONALE S-8 Milton Pedestrian safety devices Railroad crossing on Main Street Currently, no passive or active safety devices exist to prevent pedestrian-train interactions. Study of best device/strategy for this location will need to be done.1 MTP is currently improving the rail crossing on Cherry Street and the same improvements being added there could be utilized here. S-9 Milton High visibility crossing Main Street at Sawmill Road Crosswalk has been completely worn away, creating an unmarked crosswalk. S-10 Milton High visibility crosswalk Railroad Street at Barnum Street and railroad crossing Sidewalk exists south and north of this intersection (with a gap that L-4 will fill in) but on alternate sides of the road. This results in the need for a high visibility crossing to allow for safe travel between the sidewalk segments. S-11 Milton Pedestrian safety devices Railroad crossing on Railroad Street near Barnum Street Currently, no passive or active safety devices exist to prevent pedestrian-train interactions. Study of best device/strategy for this location will need to be done.2 MTP is currently improving the rail crossing on Cherry Street and the same improvements being added there could be utilized here. S-12 Milton High visibility crosswalks Main Street at North Road/East Road Crossings with curb ramps were installed without marked crosswalks. Major high-stress, high usage intersection. S-13 South Burlington High visibility crosswalk and median islands Kennedy Drive/Airport Drive and Williston Road Both roads are wide and high-stress but see high pedestrian usage as well. Improving safety would improve the lives of a large concentration of priority populations as well as accommodate high walk trip potential. S-14 South Burlington Median islands Hinesburg Road/Patchen Road and Williston Road Adding median islands to both crossings across Williston Road and the Patchen crossing would lower the stress of these crossing for all users. 1 For further resources on noteworthy practices for pedestrian/bicycle crossings see: https://www.transportation.ohio.gov/working/engineering/roadway/manuals-standards/multimodal/11 2 Ibid 9 PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE LOCATION RATIONALE Both roads are wide and high stress but see high usage as well. Improving safety would improve the lives of a large concentration of priority populations as well as support the high trip potential. S-15 South Burlington Pedestrian signals and high visibility crosswalk Williston Road at White Street and Midas Drive Intersection is offset and skewed which creates a complicated traffic pattern. Crosswalk across Williston would provide the greatest benefit but adding signals on Midas and White would also improve safety greatly. S-16 South Burlington Median island or reduced turn radii/curb extension Williston Road at White Street In addition to the new crosswalk and pedestrian signals, reducing the crossing distance across White would make the pedestrian network much safer for the large concentration of priority populations along this corridor. S-17 South Burlington High visibility crosswalks and median islands, study and adjust signal timing Williston Road at Doubletree Hilton and Staples Plaza Very wide crossing distances and high-volume turning movements. Crossings have pedestrian signals, but the crossing distances may prove difficult to navigate for mobility impaired users. High-stress corridor with high-stress crossing. S-18 South Burlington Median island and adjustment of curb ramps Kennedy Drive at Dorset Street Median island across Dorset on southern leg would improve safety at this high-stress/high usage intersection. Several curb ramps appear to require a wheelchair user to maneuver in roadway to make crossing. S-19 South Burlington Widen median islands and improve crossing angles for curb ramps, study and adjust signal timing Kennedy Drive at Hinesburg Road/ Route 116 Median Islands across Kennedy are too narrow for mobility impaired users and given the crosswalks are angled on both legs, this makes the crossings very difficult. S-20 South Burlington RRFB, reduce turn radii/curb extension Kimball Avenue at Shunpike Road High concentration of priority populations and existing crosswalk with no stop control. Would make accessing transit stop and job opportunities safer and easier. S-21 South Burlington High visibility crosswalk US 7 at Holmes Road and Idx Drive Crosswalks across Holmes and Idx have been worn down so replacing them should be a priority as this is a key corridor for accessing job opportunities and north/south travel for priority populations. 10 PROJECT ID COMMUNITY TYPE LOCATION RATIONALE S-22 South Burlington High visibility crosswalks and pedestrian signals US 7 at Saturn Way and Baldwin A crossing of US 7 at this location would improve access to jobs and services as well as two transit stops and shorten the block length between the crossings at Hannaford Drive and at Fayette Drive. Local Pedestrian Trip Potential The pedestrian Trip Potential Analysis identifies areas where connections between land use factors, including commercial activity, employment, K-12 schools, parks, population, and transit, support pedestrian activity regardless of current infrastructure. It is useful both for identifying where the existing pedestrian network is likely to support high activity or where improvements in infrastructure would be expected to increase activity. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the results for Milton and South Burlington. The project team used trip potential results as a starting point for developing pedestrian network recommendations. Figure 3: Milton Composite Pedestrian Trip Potential 12 Figure 4: South Burlington Composite Pedestrian Trip Potential 13 Public Input, Existing Sidewalk network, MTP, and Other Destinations After taking trip potential into account, the project team refined the pedestrian network routes by examining desired and actual connections to existing sidewalks, which ensures that the recommendations lead to a connected network of safe and comfortable pedestrian facilities across both communities. Two recommended locations in Milton were at train crossings on Main Street and Railroad Street where it appears that no safety measures are in place to prevent pedestrian and train interactions. Potential for conflict here may prove insignificant based on the volume of train traffic, but further study could be warranted, especially as the MTP has a project on Cherry Street to improve the railroad crossing which is in between the two recommendations along the rail line. Next Steps The project team brought significant expertise to bear on the development of pedestrian network recommendations, along with a thorough and data-driven approach. However, CCRPC staff and/or the project team should conduct ground truthing to ensure assumed conditions of current infrastructure and proposed improvements are accurate and appropriate. This memo should also be shared with local agency staff, who hold a more nuanced understanding of infrastructure conditions and needs on the ground. Beyond the specific recommendations for the Town of Milton and City of South Burlington, the hope was that this project identification process could serve as a model for other local communities. A few policy measures that could help with this effort are: • A sidewalk and crosswalk inventory to identify where existing facilities exist and their state of repair. • The project team used the data provided by CCRPC on key commercial and employment locations, schools, parks, and transit stops to identify key corridors for pedestrian activity. These data should be kept current as conditions evolve. • Doing periodic pedestrian and bicycle counts would give staff the data to determine which corridors are seeing the most use currently; when coupled with traffic and speed counts these data would help identify locations where traffic calming would have the most impact. Additional policy and program recommendations are being developed under Task 4.2. OVERVIEW OF GENERAL FUNDCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCECIP DEPARTMENT OVERVIEWDepartment:Bicycle/PedestrianContact:Erica QuallenSUMMARY FINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 135                    30                      75                      60                       ‐                     10                      10                      110                    75                      0505                   Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 50                      10                       ‐                     10                       ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                     35                      0105                   Construction 500                    850                    1,125                775                    850                    250                    225                     ‐                     450                    4005,425               ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated CIP Costs:685                   890                   1,200               845                   850                   260                   235                   110                   560                   400                   6,035               Funding Sources:General Fund‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                     0‐                    Secured Grants 500                    250                    100                     ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                     0850                   Anticipated Grants‐                     150                    450                    375                    550                    150                    150                     ‐                     385                    3252,535               Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 185                    290                    450                    320                    175                    100                    85                      110                    150                    751,940               Recreation Impact Fee‐                     200                    150                    75                      50                       ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                     0475                   Highway Impact Fee‐                      ‐                     50                      75                      75                      10                       ‐                      ‐                     25                      0235                   Developer Contributions‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                     0‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated CIP Funding:685                   890                   1,200               845                   850                   260                   235                   110                   560                   400                   6,035                GENERAL FUNDOPEN SPACE PROJECTS OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURECIP PROJECTS OVERVIEWDepartment:Bicycle/PedestrianContact:Erica QuallenMajor Department Updates:SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Projects:Dorset Street Shared Use Path 510000000000510                  Spear Street Shared Use Path 100 500 3500000000950                  Dorset Street and Songbird Road Crosswa 5 200000000025                     Spear Street and Pheasant Way Crosswalk5150000000020                     Hinesburg Road and Dubois Drive and But5150000000020                     Airport Pkwy Sidewalk Phase 1 00300275000000575                  Queen City Park Road Shared Use Path 0 0 0 50 10000000150                  Kimball Ave Shared Use Path 60 340 4750000000875                  Shelburne Road Shared Use Path000000060160200420                  Airport Pkwy Sidewalk Phase 2 000000050400200650                  Allen Road Shared Use Path00000260235000495                  Hinesburg Road Shared Use Path 0 0 75 520 750000001,345               ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   Total Estimated CIP Expenditures: 685                  890                  1,200               845                  850                  260                  235                  110                  560                  400                  6,035                GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Dorset Street Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 1010                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction 500500                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:510                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    510                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants 500500                   Anticipated Grants‐                    Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 1010                     Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:510                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    510                   N/AEstimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Construct 10' shared use path on Dorset St between Old Cross Rd and Sadie Lane.Improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity by closing an existing gap in the Dorset St shared use pathEstimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Project is undergoing ROW phase and negotiations. Design to be complete in FY23, potential construction to begin in FY23, and finalize construction in FY24.Winter snow removal, periodic repavingMinor increase to staff workload with additional path to plow, but near existing path which already gets plowed. GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Spear Street Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Estimated Annual Operating Cost:Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 5050                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 5050                     Construction 500 350                    850                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:100                   500                   350                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    950                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants 250 100                    350                   Anticipated Grants‐                    Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 100 100 150                    350                   Recreation Impact Fee 150 100                    250                   Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:100                   500                   350                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    950                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:Minor increase to staff workload with additional path to plow, but connects gap in path network which is already being plowed.STATUS: Conceptual design is complete. Final design and ROW will continue through the remainder of FY23 and FY24 for construction in FY25.DESCRIPTION:FINANCIALS COMMENT:Construct 8‐10' shared use path along Spear St between Swift St and UVM Forsetry buildingClose gap between Swift St shared use path and shared use path at UVM forestry building to improve bicycle and pedestrian access in a frequently used area.Winter snow removal, regular restriping of crosswalk at UVM Forestry Building, and periodic repavingN/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Dorset Street and Songbird Road CrosswalkJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 55                       Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction 2020                     ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:5                       20                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    25                     Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants‐                    Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 5 2025                     Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:5                       20                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    25                     Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Design and construct crosswalk across Dorset St at Songbird RoadThis is a high priority crossing for pedestrians and bicyclists who use Songbird Road as a connection between Spear St and the Dorst St shared use path.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Being studied as part of a multi‐site crosswalk assessment through CCRPC's FY23 UPWP. Final design and construction to occur in FY24/FY25.Restriping of crosswalks, periodic updates to RRFBsNone GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Spear Street and Pheasant Way CrosswalkJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 55                       Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction 1515                     ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:5                       15                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    20                     Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants‐                    Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 5 1520                     Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:5                       15                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    20                     Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION:Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Being studied as part of a multi‐site crosswalk assessment through CCRPC's FY23 UPWP. Final design and construction to occur in FY24/FY25.NoneRestriping of crosswalks, periodic updates to RRFBsN/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Hinesburg Road and Dubois Drive and Butler Drive CrosswalkJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 55                       Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction 1515                     ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:5                       15                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    20                     Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants‐                    Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 5 1520                     Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:5                       15                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    20                     Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION:Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Being studied as part of a multi‐site crosswalk assessment through CCRPC's FY23 UPWP. Final design and construction to occur in FY24/FY25.Restriping of crosswalks, periodic updates to RRFBsNoneN/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Airport Pkwy Sidewalk Phase 1JUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal‐                    Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction300 275                    575                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                    300                   275                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    575                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants 200 100                    300                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 100 175                    275                   Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                    300                   275                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    575                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Construct 5' sidewalk from end of existing sidewalk north of Kirby Road to Berard Drive.Continue expanding pedestrian access along Airport Pkwy through a phased approach. Airport Pkwy connects low‐income and senior housing to other parts of South Burlington.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Final design complete since July 2020 with most recent cost estimate in 2022. Temporary construction agreements have been signed by property owners. Construction was stalled due to increased cost estimate from retaining walls.Winter snow removal and periodic repairsMinor increase to staff workload with plowingN/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Queen City Park Road Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 50                      50                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction100                    100                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                     ‐                    50                     100                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    150                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants25                      50                      75                     Penny for Path Debt Proceeds25                      50                      75                     Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                     ‐                    50                     100                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    150                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Design and construct approximately 400' of 10' shared use path on the south side of Queen City Park Road between rail bridge and Central Ave.Improve current bicycle and pedestrian conditions which force all users to share the road. Implement preferred alternative from Scoping Study.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: CCRPC Scoping study completed in 2022 with preferred alternative of shared use path. Final design to be completed in FY26 with construction in FY27.Winter snow removal, periodic repavingStaff workload increase with plowing new path where no pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure currently exists. Potential for maintenance agreement with Burlington where they own the majority of path on this roadway.N/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Kimball Ave Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 60 3090                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 1010                     Construction 300 475                    775                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:60                     340                   475                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    875                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants 150 250                    400                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 60 140 125                    325                   Recreation Impact Fee 50 50                      100                   Highway Impact Fee 50                      50                     Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:60                     340                   475                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    875                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Design and construct 10' shared use path between end of O'Brien Development path to existing shared use path west of Community Drive. Includes Potash Brook crossing.Pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the vicinity are intermittent and inconsistent.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Scoping Study completed in 2022. Design not yet started.Winter snow removal, periodic repavingMinor increase to staff workload with additional path to plow, but near existing path which already gets plowed.N/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Shelburne Road Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal60                      60                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition10                      10                     Construction150                    200350                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    60                     160                   200                   420                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants85                      125210                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds60                      75                      75210                   Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee‐                    Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    60                     160                   200                   420                   N/AEstimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Replace existing 5' sidewalk with 10' shared use path on the east side of Shelburne Road from Imperial Drive to McIntosh Ave.Improves safety for bicyclists not comfortable riding on Shelburne Rd between neighborhoods and in the vicinity of Orchard School.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Not started.Winter snow removal, periodic repavingNone GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Airport Pkwy Sidewalk Phase 2JUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal50                      75                      125                   Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition25                      25                     Construction300                    200500                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    50                     400                   200                   650                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants300                    200500                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds50                      75                      125                   Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee25                      25                     Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    50                     400                   200                   650                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Construct 5' sidewalk from Berard Drive to the existing sidewalk on Lime Kiln Road.This continues the Phase 1 sidewalk project and fully closes the gap in pedestrian infrastructure along Airport Parkway between Berard Drive and Lime Kiln Road.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Not started.Winter snow removal and periodic repairsMinor increase to staff workload with plowingN/A GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Allen Road Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal10                      10                      20                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition‐                    Construction250                    225                    475                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    260                   235                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    495                   Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants150                    150                    300                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds100                    85                      185                   Recreation Impact Fee‐                    Highway Impact Fee10                      10                     Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    260                   235                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    495                   Estimated Revenue Per Year:DESCRIPTION: Install 1700' of new shared use path from Shelburne Road to Farm Stand Apartments. Replace 400' of sidewalk with shared use path from Farm Stand Apartments to existing shared use path.Estimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT:STATUS: Not startedWinter snow removal, periodic repavingMinor increase to staff workload with additional path to plow, but near existing path which already gets plowed. GENERAL FUND ‐ OPEN SPACECAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITUREPROJECT:Hinesburg Road Shared Use PathJUSTIFICATION: Operational Impacts:DEPARTMENT: Bicycle/PedestrianCONTACT: Erica QuallenFINANCIALS  (in $1,000)FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33Total:Estimated Costs:Studies, Design, Eng, Inspection, GC, Legal 75                      10                      85                     Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition10                      10                     Construction500                    750                    1,250               ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Costs:‐                     ‐                    75                     520                   750                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    1,345               Funding Sources:General Fund‐                    Secured Grants‐                    Anticipated Grants250                    500                    750                   Penny for Path Debt Proceeds 75                      120                    125                    320                   Recreation Impact Fee75                      50                      125                   Highway Impact Fee75                      75                      150                   Developer Contributions‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    Total Estimated Funding:‐                     ‐                    75                     520                   750                    ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                    1,345               Estimated Revenue Per Year:STATUS: Not started.Winter snow removal, periodic repavingChange to workload by requiring large plow for path, rather than sidewalk but in the vicinity of currently paved pathsN/ADESCRIPTION: Scope, design, and replace existing 5' sidewalk with 10' shared use path on Hinesburg Rd between Williston Rd and Kennedy DrImprove pedestrian and bicyle safety on Hinesburg Rd and make connection between future shared use path on Williston Rd and existing shared use path on Kennedy DrEstimated Annual Operating Cost:FINANCIALS COMMENT: