HomeMy WebLinkAboutMS-09-08 - Supplemental - 1398 Hinesburg Road`"'3;`_y
';` 559G PROPERTIES, LLG.
N/F / APPROXIMATE �LOGA TION
PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT/
.AREA. DESIGN AND LOCATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH PRELIMINARY PLAN5
f 1 I LIMITS OF
I I A I I I I I CLA55 ?--I-
�� / . .�• J
�EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARYIM
BE DISSOLVED
YSPAGE DISTK IGT'I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
_ _ _ _ ._ _ _ - NDUS L -OPEN PPOP05EO 5TOKMWATER MANAGEMENT
\ \ WETLAND 1 - 7 RESIDENTIAL -NR AREA. DE51GN AND LOCATION TO BE
\ I m I \\ \\' 1 II -� .,�� _ -' 50' WETLAND _ - f � _E16HBORH000. R I i J - 1 , 'PROVIDED 'W •;TlPRELIMINARY PLANS i
\ I I � � � . `� � �� _ t _ _ 1 _ J'1 i ., � .�•''��2ty- S {„ , -�\ T,.\�.r\
1,1AV15V A
/i f
V I ( I I 1 l v" SPACE DISTRICT' I ::P. v.���" vv
OPEN ___ �T'3aa/ / I
\/ V v DRIVE
INDU5TRIAL' s."TIAL'NR -- :fir./� •`� y
NEIGHOOD RESIDEN VALI0.0�' vv'S \\
II /. (PENDING 5ELEG OARD APPRO \V— // I / Airi 6 A� v `' PROPOSm
�/v�L,�kF I O�� PUMP 5TATION I I A.7 A vA
!��.a
WETLAND + BUFFER l t l �� APPROXIMATE // / �6M ON LAND _��
IMPACT TO REQUIRE - / \ I \ 'LOCATION OF / / L#, AG. _ n r 5 f. _ _ _ - 20' WIDE PAVED
5TATE WETLAND5 PERM ITS I { \ 1 \, EXISTING 12' D.1. j / / -�- / / O PRIVATE DRIVE \
I .III 1 \ \ /1 WATERMAIN // �' - __ O / / O6
^O �06b06
// 0�2 A \ / II `\ \ \SANITARY SEWER 1 / --- t \
IN. 2.5' CALIPER HARDWOOD STREET TREE5/ ) (1 / DUF ER I Q% A(O v ,pro /-- A EA5EMENT I NORM EASEMENT IFv
01 AGv TO BE PLANTED 5E MORE THAN 30' O.G. FINAL I. I II I� / L I - -y \ I tx15T ING HOMF I EGESS INE TO WITH
\
SPECIES TO BE PROVIDED AT PRELIMINARYI I I Y / � / v, � � l"J� 1 TERMINEO WITH
WITH INPUT FROM THE CITY ARDOR15T; I I .' ! -vI / /'� - - , •� 2J REMAIN ) RELIMINAKY DESIGN.
- `\ II I i� � t � - r Location Plan
• .. `� / ' 14\�\ / - � ` %�- / \I 1 if � --- t la h�;N, Y, _ SOUTH DIMLINSTON. VT N.7.5.
17F� -
- `\
TIE INTO EXI5TING I - / / { \/ /
CITY OF SOUTH '� _ I ,2 I I / LINE p d
DURLINGFON WATERMAIN W/ `- � I w � _ 38A'� +. � �� � v 1 �° I / �/':I N/F 1 :� —Legend
<- N/F GATE VALVE v s _ { . 0.30 A�V� ) ! I --��� rRo.,Ecr BOUVDMr
ADJAGFIIT rROPERTT DdlIDMY
EASEMENT tSOIXfJMT
5ETDAGK
I �
I. \ \ � \ \ // ZO 11N DISTRICT DOUNDMY
L\� \\ I \ \ '�\� /1\ \ J`Y---- iIL �ilY�. _..�Y4 LIMITS OF 6LA55 T WETLAND
PROPOSED 8" —ITS of wE LAPD 90' DUFFER
1 I AG PROSEW i 35 PVC- 5EW ER MAIN \' \ / -' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ coNiOuc ure I U.S.6.5. DATUM 1
PROPOSED 30� - � _
AGGE55/UTILITY EA5EMENT D y-/ 0,�6 A \ 4 "i-�
ERA A ^ 1 _ UTILITY roL
{ i \ 1 1 I I /r. •fit / TO APPLEBAUM, CENTERED I 04 /jG FORGEMAIN \ 13 / �B Y� _� �- EXISTINS 51 w LINE
\' I ON FUTURE APPROVED 1
\ I Z I 1 \ TYPICAL HYDRANT , 231 \ \ t, ,
ROADWAY LOCATION ^ PROPOSED 8' GL '►� ��� rRorosED SEVIER LINE
I \ S2 O.I. WA ER MAIN I \ N� MOPOSID FORf,FJMIN
PROP05ED CULVERT I I/ 1 -- ) - I IGOMMO�I LAND \ 1 I \ _y-•-
VE51C7N WITH PRELIMINARY PLANI 1 I \�r�T\ { I. PROP05ED 24 WIDE 4 \, I t-ts /AG. • PROPOSED wnrERMAIN
V' I yl PAVED, NON CURBED, \ ( EACH UNIT SHALL HAVE A I I 5' CINDER / '.�, 1 \ `\ w EXISTING WATIM—N
✓� C { PUBLIC ROAD FRONT PORCH AND A MIN _ } PATH- \ / / ! ' H _ \ \ Ex15TIN /Mor05ED HYDRANT
_
8 FT GARAGE SETBACK. WATER SERVICE W/ / l URB STOP (TYP.I I / 1 \ I a 3 a -� - - Ex15TING sroRM SEwEX
/
/ — — 50IL DOUNDMY
1 T e � _ � /� � /i —� � ,A'\'��m / — 1� \V �8 / v 1 A I I 1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION 'OF - �A / 1 \ \ M 1 T:- ) `':
c\r \ \\ (/ �\ COMMUNITY GARDEN AND GAZEBO AL / -, \ \ F II ,X 1 rRorosED wvcowooD STREET TREE
>T I - ^ / - _ _APPL UMW/ FEATURES. DETAILED INFORMATION
CITY OF SOUTH \ I II / O `N/r f'� TO BE PROVIDED WITH FINAL PLAN5. 0.k r\ _ w �� \\ 0.25\\AG _ f 1. ,�'�� ® "15TI � DUILPI, AMA
BURLINGTON \ ) \ \ I a\ // \ l / �\ Y' -" / \ ='� \I YPIGAL 14
A PROPOSED DUILDING AMA
N/F TREET LIGHT \c
PROP05ED 20'- I /��_ - / \ _ — / c / \�
INGRESS/EGRESS rRarosED rnvED AMA
1 �1 �V / EASEMENT
-/' _ \, \:T91 /^^/ A WETLMD IITAGT AREA
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I / ?' \ V "= rA- .04 22 ih- A 0.2� A* I
EXISTING SEWER FORGEMAIN I / / ' - - \ ' I .O� 2� \
/ PR WIDE PAVED Lq \
PRIVATE DRIVE
/lROPOSED DUPLEX \ L - -- r! \\ Zoning Information
3T
/WPI AL _ — DEEP X 45' WIDE - Q\ ROPOSED` �,K \ \ \
FOOTPKIN EACH 5 51DEWALK EA5MENT \ \ , rARGF1 lDI. 0660-Ou N.77 ACRE5)
1 1 1 , t N - rMGE Ia• 1155 002" lt2 AGMSI
i ! , / , } ' /F / 395 " \ _ \ / E I — — C \ \ \ \ zOIEO. NEI6 1100D RESIDENTIAL ISEQ- Wl
9a^TIC INTO EXISTING\\{
1 / I 1 // •� '- II I \ t t , 1, 1 t I t r ` \ \ MINOMJM�Lt LOT AREAi2.000 s ITS
'TIE PROPOSED SANITARY \ 1�, /WATERMAIN ; 1\ \ jk
SEWER INTO EXISTING (
SANITARY MANHOLE'\ 11IUI 11 1 it BUGKHORN 111111111111 �lIA FR FT 125 FT FKW DAGK OF 5IDEWALKI
A 1 ' \ I ^► / / +- '- \ / GROUP, LLG I 1�1 SIDE- 0 FT
I III REM, 30 FT
ESTHER ABRAMS I� 1 / I N/F ilk///•((l DULDWO GovERASE, ArMOX 5.2- ba.o0o 5fl MOPOSEDl w MAx
TOTAL LOT GOVERASE, M
TRUST III I III / i / / /'� X - - IZOo ACRESI rROP , 00S MM
\N/F �i1 III I '/// MAX. PRO DENSITY 2+ UNITS 122 PROPOSEDI
i ' � i� F'.r 96.07 AG. X a UI1IT5/AGl • 2+.26 UIVITSI
\ HF iR, / \. \ , MAX DUNA>** W1045 FT
20 5EWER (4MQkK$TED TO DE A OVED As FMT OF A rLANlO
/ / / \ � \�, _ 1 / _�_-' __ � '1 �I✓/ �`� I \� � /mac-.\ EASEMENT
PARENT A//
N/F/N/p//1APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFS��l �V[%��'EXISTING 8" D.I. WATERMAIN 4 \ //-
+DARNES /// \ \ - \\ \ \ I/ i• CV GOVINGTON SILTY CLAY (OAS A MN
3 /
2Z / NIF /�(' // /i �\ f ( (I + I \�\I t Ve6 VF]eGFJRRIES cur. 2-6: SLOPES D.62 AGRE51
/. - / BUG ,Pr.J+'LG .\
NOTES:
II PROPOSED WATER AND SANITARY LAYOUT 15 CONCEPTUAL AND 15 SUDJECT TO CHANGE
WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAN5.
2)PROP05ED LAN05GAPING (EXCEPT FOR STREET TREE5) TO DE PROVIDED WITH
PRELIMINARY PLAN5.
3) TH15 PLAN 15 NOT TO DE U5ED FOR PROPERTY CONVEYANCE.
GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
1 inch = a0 fL
Owner
BRADLEY GARDNER
P.O. 60X 21
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY'DIGSAFE' AT GOLGHE5TER. VT 05446
1-888-DIG-SAFE PRIOR MANY EXCAVATION.
Applicant
6ARDNEK CONSTRUCTION, INC.
UO BRADLEY CGARDNER
—
P.O. E50X 21
N'L
GOLGHESTER, VT 05446
��
55RG PROPERTIES. LLG. -//`-`_ `3��
N/F APPROXIMATE�LOCATION OF // (- - ��> \\ \
PROPOSED 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT/ / -;, / - \
AREA. DE51GN AND LOCATION TO BE // �\ EXISTING PROPERTY BOUI�ARY TO _-'1\\��_- C
/ BE DISSOLVED _
PROVIDED WITH PRELIMINARY PLANS -� /' -- 3/i'
__---- --/ / r i-- __c-- .., .-^_.j -_ --f-�__\ \ 1 / 51TE
15?RIGT-103a0 / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
I 1 1 LIMITS OF 5PA6E Q ^ ' - PROP05E0 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT y
1 I 7y I I I I GLA55 2 - _--\`-_� �l -_�� __/w/INDUSTRIAL' NR DIE
-
I \ \ \ I WETLAND S 1 --�- !�//% -\ \\��_ ' _' NEIGHBOKH RESIDENT( -AL I , I AREA. DESIGN AND LOCATION LA 5
r 000- ^/ A PROVIDED WITH PRELIMINARY PLANS
50' WETLAND _ _ _ _?_ _ / / 1 ^ / 1 \� \. 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \
/ \1 \ r �� \I /�I I\\\ 1 / Jam\ ^--_BUFFER /1 I /� /� \ J / \I l \\ \\ \\ \\IDAVIS\ \\ \\ \\ IVE
\\ \ \ \ N/F \ \ OR
\\.` 15TR IGT-10--- / I 1 = - I �� \\
I 1 OPEN 5PAGE D ''-3aa/
\ \
`\ I j 1 I INDOOD RESIDEN pVALI --- \ T`.a.�. ( / \\ `\
\ 1 NEIGHB 5ELECTBOARO APPR \\ \ QQG AG I \I —
_ � a�}A f\G \ PROPOSED
I _ h / / -r PUMP STATION \ //
\ 1 / (PENDING II /� /.. / / // 1 / Q�4 �� \
WETLAND + BUFFER 1 l \ APPROXIMATE / -6MMON LANDw!
1 ! / / 7 -7% r - I 20' WIDE PAVED
IMPACT TO REQUIRE /I\ \ )LOCATION OF / / �' I. �}, AG. r_ / O r -"— — PRIVATE DRIVE \\ STATE WETLANDS PERMITS I \ EXISTING 12" 0.1. / / / --c-- � _ � \
\ I I I' - - \ �\
�p6 6 A 006 AS �.�
V � / / 1 / \ PROPOSED b
/ /- _ —SANITARY SEWER^
( \ I / I Aii O �� A \ I / — \�����1!!!(!! EASEMENT 1 STORM EASEMENT IF
MIN. 2.5" CALIPER HARDWOOD STREET TREE5 \ (\ / BUF ER .Q6 v ..gym _ / ". - / A r- 1V A
1 i II _ 6:41 `AC,.\ \ 1 / /-NECESSARY TO BE \
TO BE PLANTED NO MORE THAN 30' O.G. FINAL I / 1.I — _ - \ \ EXISTING HOME-t 1 / DETERMINED WITH \ �_ Location Plan
SPECIES TO BE PROVIDED AT PRELIMINARY/ I / -` /� - / - - `°' �t / a ) /
WITH INPUT FROM THE GITY AR I 1 / I 1 / `` 1 TO REMA1�� I PRELIMINARY DESIGN\ _- 5OUTH BURLINGTON, VT N.T.S.
m /
- \ `.'� /1 / — —1 / Legend
CITY OF SOUTH TIE INTO EXISTING l \ /C /(\ 12 \ I \\ /1 LINES (` / _'I \1 -�-� rKOJEGT 5UUNDAKY
WATERMAIN W/ 1 38 V-C-- /y y y ,v \ / was I - - ADJAOENT PROPERTY ®amDARY
BUKLINGTON r\ _ / ey \( E1, I \ \/
N/F GATE VALVE �\ D / - - / / \ 0.30 AZiII I I `"f I ( - - EAENT 5OUNOAKY
---/�/ ) \ - \ / �/ // \ „. ^--•\ \\ / I 1 \ / // - - 5ETBAGK
ZONING 015TRIOr BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF GLA55 2 WETLAND
- -.._ _ _ - LIMIT5 OF WETLAND 50' BUFFER
GONTOLR LINE I U.5.6.5. DATUM 1
'Ov I vee — \ .0 AC, M UTILITY rOLE
PROPOSED 30 /�4 f{G / 35 PVG SEWER MAIN \ I \ .(� 1 �/r /¢ M
AGGE55/UTILITY EASEMENT P �' I �\ 0.26 A \\ '}tL ji, B4r�Itig EXISTING SEWER LINE
\ ` '7 \ y—_ 1 PROPOSED SEWER LINE
TO APPLEBAUM, CENTERED 1 3 / '� / / \ rRorosED FORGQAAIN
TYPICAL HYDRANT ON FUTURE APPROVED \ _ \ \
\ I \ \ W PROPOSED WATH]fMAIN
1 (TI I I 1 r" '� / ROADWAY LOCATION 23 PROPOSED 8' GL I I - \ \ W
I { 1 1 52 O.I. WAJEK MAIN ��- 1 \ \ ` EXISTING WATERMAIN
PROPOSED CULVERT I I/ I / / \ I EX1srING/neorosED nrp:ANr
IDE5IGN WITH PRELIMINARY PLANT \ 1 I I PROPOSED 24 WIDE I 1 MON LAND \ yl / \ \
/ ^ I It PAVED, NON CURBED- I EACH UNIT SHALL HAVE A AL. P // / /`J o \ \ \\ �m'� -- EXISTING 5TOKM 5EWEK
C \ PUBLIC ROAD 1' FRONT PORCH AND A MIN- /\-- i / '(' eSA I 1 l% \ \
/ -�r� I �/ 8 FT GARAGE 5ETBAGK. _L/ / > _ \ / WATER 5ERVIGE W/ -1 II _ _ _ _ _ solL BounoARr
\I 1 7D \I \iI, I ( '' --/ \ - - \\ / CUKB STOP (TYP.) \ / I 1 I I PROPOSED HARDWOOD STREET TREE
COMMON AMENITY AREA. DESIGN TO - O - _ I I 1
/ BE PROVIDED WITH PRELIMINARY/FINAL \ 1 I FINKLESTEIN \ I 1 \
_ /1 -17 \ I \ \ 1
\ 1 _l 5UDMI55ION WITH FOGU5 ON PIE- \ �� / A .0 Q' A (\ \ -, p `\/ \) N/F / // ) I
WVl /-/ SHAPED PORTION NEAREST ROAD. r� /\�I '-f l Ex1srING BUILDING AREA
CITY OF SOUTH \ I 1 i� 0�A '`` 0.25\\AGr_ I
\ / - - - --�- 1 \I -\ / rRoroseD BUILDING AREA
BURLINGTON \ \ i f\ /� /� _'r\ w / \ \ \� TYPICAL 14 /' K-^\ \
N/F ll I -J/ \ �.] STREET — LIGHT / - 13 TOTAL( ` PROPOSED PAVED AREA
PROPOSED 20-
INGRESS/EGRESS 7 \` -\ —\\ \/ 1 it WETLAND IWACT AREA
\ /' l EASEMENT-
'� I lO \ / ! / \\ 93 // G Qq A�, �y. _ 22 /-�� \ 0.22 `,AGr\—// \I 1 \\ COMMON AMENITY AREA
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF / ! \ \ - I .0 Q• Al 1 21 \ \ J 1
EXISTING SEWER FOKCEMAIN I I I / / I \' `�I I 20' WIDE PAVED / t� O
l' \ \ PRIVATE DRIVE
I I rn ROPOSED DUPLEX \ L _ \g I \\ \ MCDONALD
l 1 = l \ / YPICAL J 1 — L _ 32' DEEP X 45' WIDE- ROP05ED TxA \ \ \\ N \\
1 \ FOOTPRINT _/ EACH _ 51 DEWALK_ EASEMENT\\ \
1 I / �•\ ;' // HANNON LOT------- Zoning Information
\\\\ I—� rAKGM- IDR, 08a0-01]98 14n AGKE5I
\ _ !•39a" / TIE` INTO EXIS`T'11TG \\\1 ` \ f
%' \�� / y TIE PROPOSED SANITARY 1 I 1 I� /WATERMAIN \\\\1\ \ ` \� - -� L
�' III \ I I </ 1 • 1 1 I11 \ - ZONED- l 165"002D4 E51� AGRAL
1 / / SEWER INTO EXISTING \ Ir I II \
\ / - 1111 11 I 11111 \ ZONED NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL BEo-NRI
`$ANITARY MANHOLE �\ Illl 1 II II BUGKHOKN 111111111 \ \
' J GROUP, LLG 1 1 I 1 11` \_ CONvoR10NAL OIIQ81owIL RPa11/111E3lRfi
/ - MINIMUM LOT AREA 12,000 SF / UNIT
\-_ ESTHER ABRAMS N/F ;izo n1oaF'rr MAX
-/ ^TRU5T III 11 / �/ REAR- 30 FT
/ / / - / \ N/F - .-. I �/ III I) 1 \ \ / i / i / /i! r \ \ BUILD. WVMtAGE- RrKOX 15.2- 140.000 5F1 Ror , 6z MA
I` \ \ \ ` �i - \ \ \\ TOTAL LOT COVERAGE. M X. S - MW AGRE51 MOrOSED� 301 MAX
\ 24
20' SEWER MAX. PRD DENSITY' (Ia O']N NAG. 1X24P UNITS—) • 2425 UNIT51
EASEMENT
MAK IUILDING IEIGNT as FT
TO BE Ar OVED A5 PAKT OF A rLueeD
// DOIG / // PARENT(! /� ) /// / / / I `\ \ / / 1 \ I REs1De1rIAL DEVF.Lormemn
1 WF / / N/F // / / / /1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION' OF/�
^-_--' --/ // \ \ \ '1�. \ // f/„� I EX15TINO 8" D.I. WATERMAIN \ \ 11 I /!
fl \ \ \\ I I I Soil Types
N/F
/ // l l� \ / // /,"\ // _ -/ /ll \ y'// U /UGKHOCRP GROUP, LLG\ 1 \\ I \ I\ \\ \\ \_/ Cv covlNGroN slLrr u.AY Io.as ACRE51
/ ^ / Q \ ` \ \ ♦ - \/c v. VERGE: CLAY. 2-az sLorEs Bat AGItES1 �
Ic ( "/ ! - I/ '/./i/ -r. / // ,1 I NdF \. \ \. I \ ice\ 1 \,
GRAPHIC SCALE
NN
I IN FEET )
l inch = 40 (L
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOPFY bIGSAFE' AT
1-888-DIG-SAFE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.
Owner
13KADLEY GARDNEk
P.O. BOX 21
G0LGHE5TER, VT 05445
Applicant
GARDNER GON5TRUGTION, INC
G/O DRADLEY GARDNER
P.O. 130X 21
G0LGHE5TER, VT 05446
NOTE5
1) PROPOSED WATER AND SANITARY LAYOUT 15 CONCEPTUAL AND 15 5U5JEGT TO CHANGE
WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLANS.
2)PKOPO5ED LAND5GAPING (EXCEPT FOR STREET TREE5) TO BE PROVIDED WITH
PRELIMINARY PLAN5.
31TH15 PLAN 15 NOT TO DE U5ED FOR PROPERTY CONVEYANCE.
03/25/I6 1 REVISE COMMON AMENITY AREA AND MAXIMUM FRONT BUILDING 5ETBAGK DJH
J 0{ YFj �� �oeca
� ocsoecn
IVIL
r 1cERsl? \�� DWH
1" 40
REVISED PER 1/20/I6 STAFF MEETII
E3 A — 0-
0-A, 0 scElcx/LT.'�r
O'LEARY-BURKE
CIVIL ASSOCIATES, PLC
13 COMtxialE�
GARDNER PARCEL
1396 HINE55URG KD. 5OUTH BURLINGTON. VT 2012-84-5]
SKETCH PLAN N 1 A
ray
From: Terry Francis
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 12:39 PM
To: ray
Subject: Wildflower development
Ray:
Notes from Wildflower extension ( Gardner proposal)
Proposed a 22 lot extension off existing road. Development to consisting of 18 SFH and 4 duplex dwellings. All road
side spurs appear to be greater than 150 feet in length off Wildflower Drive, and lack turn around for FD. (NFPA 1-
18.2.3.4.4) . Support hydrant not shown for dwellings on Western spur of Wildflower Dr.
04/07/2016 12:38:39 DC Terry Francis
DC Terence Francis, CFI
Fire Marshal
South Burlington Fire Department
575 Dorset St.
S. Burlington, VT 05403
802-846-4134
Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents
received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing
information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person
upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.
l n g I
ed
southburfintiton
PLANNING & ZONING h
Permit Number SD-
use ont
� Y)
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being
rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please
provide pertinent information only.
1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)
See Attached
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) Bk692 Pg353, Bk1116 Pg37
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Gardner Construction, Inc. (c/o Bradley
Gardner), P.O. Box 21, Colchester, VT 05446 email:brad@Iivingvermont.com;phone: 373-8661
4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple
on Parcel 0860-01398. Purchase and sale agreement on Parcel 1155-00284.
5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) O'Leary Burke Civil Associates
(David Burke), 13 Corporate Drive, Essex Jct., VT 05452. Phone (802) 878-9990
5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS dwburke@olearyburke.com
6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS.1398 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403
7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0860-01398 & 1155-00284.
8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a) General project description (explain what you want approval for):
A 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD, comprised of 1 existing single family home, 13 proposed single family
homes and 4 duplex units. All lots will be served by municipal water and sewer. The owner
has a purchase and sale agreement on Parcel ID #1155-00284. Parcel ID #1155-00284 is
also pending rezoning approval (changing from 10 to NR) from the Selectboard.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Existing
Single Family Home
c) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to
remain)13 proposed single family, 4 duplex units and 1 existing single family home.
d) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)
Proposed 37,100 SF and Existing 2,900 SF to remain.
e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) < 45'
0 Total parcel size(s) Parcel 0860-01398 - 4.77 Acres, Parcel 1155-00284 - 1.29 Acres.
6.07 Acres Total
g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please
note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Subject to Selectboard rezoning approval for
Parcel 1 D# 1155-00284,
9) 9a: SEQ SUBDISTRICT (identify in each)
Acreage Units Existing Units proposed
NRP
NRT
NR 6.07 1 22
VR
VC
9b: Are Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) being utilized? No
If yes, please identify how many and from which parcel (street address)
10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Proposed Wildflower Drive ROW, Sidewalk Easement on
Lot 15, Ingress/Egress Easement for Units 16-22, Sanitary Sewer/SWM easement on Lot 24
11) LOT COVERAGE
a) Building: Existing3.0 %
b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing 8.9
c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 13.7
Proposed 15.1 %
Proposed 35 %
Proposed 22.2 %
Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011
12) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL
FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Proposed sanitary sewer
and watermain extension, proposed Wildflower Drive extension.
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 2016
14) PLANS AND FEE
Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development
Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I 1" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format)
copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paidtothe C itt the time of
submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. 1. //J� //1V4e
NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining
property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application
complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public
hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the
City prior to the start of any public hearing.
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my know
SIGNATU E OF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be:
ETC—Omplete
Adm inistrati
Officer
lete
/ /s
Date
The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply far, and obtain relevant state permits
for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist.
Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011
Gardner - 1398 Hinesburg Road
A 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD
Owner(s) of Record (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #):
1) Parcel 0860-01398 - Bradley Gardner, P.O. Box 21, Colchester, VT 05446
email: brad@Iivingvermont.com; phone: 373-8661
2) Parcel 1155-00284 — SBRC Properties, LLC. (c/o Tim McKenzie), 85 Shunpike Drive, Williston, VT
05495.
Lindsey Britt
From: David Burke <dwburke@olearyburke.com>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:53 AM
To: Paul Conner, Lindsey Britt Charlotte Gardner (charlotte@livingvermontcom)
Cc: Dan Heil; brad@livingvermont.com; gardnerrealestate@yahoo.com; Rich Gardner
(rich @I ivingvermo ntcom)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Thanks Paul. We'll see you on April 5t'
David
rom: Paul Conner [mailto:pconner@sburl.com]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:47 AM
To: David Burke; Lindsey Britt; Charlotte Gardner (charlotte@livingvermont.com)
Cc: Dan Heil; brad@livingvermont.com; gardnerrealestate@yahoo.com; Rich Gardner (rich@livingvermont.com)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Hi David,
Yes, a continuance is ok by us. Only the Board can technically accept a continuance, but they have always accepted the
requests, so consider it done. The fee for a continuance request is $50, whenever you get a moment.
In the meantime, we'll take a look at your updated plans and will be in touch with any additional feedback. Thank you
for your work on this.
One final note: I would characterize the standards as being performance standards and not "grey areas" in the
regulations. But your point about interpreting them is understood.
Paul Conner, AICP, MCIP
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT05403
�conner(a�sburl.com
ww.sburl.com
,802) 846-4106
Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents
received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing
information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person
upon request unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you hove received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.
From: David Burke [naij(�A,yy)zurkQ , yr l2urkes4.m..]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:29 AM
To: Paul Conner; Lindsey Britt; Charlotte Gardner (charlotte(&Iivinavermont com)
Cc: Dan Heil; brad(allivingvermont.com; gardnerrealestate(ftahoo.com; Rich Gardner(ricKblivinavermont.com)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Paul: Thank you for the clarifications; we understand we are in a Regulatory grey area, as it will be subjective as to
whether future detailed Plans for the Common Area satisfy the majority of the Board.
We appreciated the ability to reply prior to Staff Notes to further improve on the project. We are in hopes that
comments on a potential reduction of Units is along the lines of what you suggest below. Such as, "Further details to
address the close proximity of the Common Area to Units 6,7 and 16 -18 will be required with Preliminary Plans to
determine whether the amenities function as a focal point of the neighborhood".
I just spoke with Brad Gardner and as we are both out of Town on March 15"' and the proposal isn't as straightforward
as we feel, we'd like to be continued to the April 5t11 hearing. Brad has previously spoken with the Owners of the two
abutting Hinesburg Road parcels and this will allow him time to talk with them again. Please let us know, ifthe
Continuance request is acceptable.
Thank you
David
From: Paul Conner [mailto:oconner(d)sburl.coml
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 11:04 AM
To: David Burke; Lindsey Britt
Cc: Dan Heil; brad(cblivingvermont.com; gardnerrealestatg@yahoo.com; Rich Gardner (rich i4inovermont.com)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Hi David,
Thank you for taking the time to respond and reply to the various comments and notes.
We appreciate the efforts that you, Brad, and your team have made over the past couple of years on a site that we can
all agree is complex in its layout.
The intent of our feedback is to provide you with help on how staff and the Board have interpreted standards within the
regulations on similar projects in the past and is meant to be constructive for you. All of our comments, oral and
especially in writing, are grounded within the regulations. Any statement that I made around how the Board may look at
an item is to help you prepare for the meeting.
We raised a number of items, which you highlight below. The most important take -away that we were trying to express
is that it will be important that the common space function as a focal point of the neighborhood as you describe. The
placement ofthe community gardens, on their face, has been very close to the backs of some of the units. For this space
to functional, it will be important for users not to feel that they are "invading" the privacy of people living in nearby
units. Most of the rest of the comments, ,regarding number of units, layout of the site, and units 8-10, were a direct
outgrowth this question. In other words, when that area works well, the rest of the project will also. You've noted in
your email a couple of ways in which you're looking to address this concern; thank you for that.
A quick clarification on two items you raised:
1. Staff agrees that the project is within the allowable density for the property. What I was saying is that IF the
common area can't be figured out to be a focal point of the neighborhood, one solution may be to eliminate a
unit.
2. As I noted over the phone, the previous regulations stated that "Buildings should be set back twenty-five feet
(25') from the back of sidewalk." (9.06(C)(2)) The new regulations, effective January 11, 2016, clarify this to state
that "Buildings should be set back a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk." This is a
should, not a shall. This change was made because applicants were unclear as to whether the City was
encouraging houses to be more, or less, than 25' set back from the sidewalk. All of this to say that if you wanted
to be less than 25', it's now ok.
lncerely,
Paul
Paul Conner, AICP, MCIP
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
pconnerOsburl.com
www.sburi.com
(802) 846-4106
Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents
^eceived or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing
,formation relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person
upon request unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.
From: David Burke[mailto:dwburke(obolearvburke.mm]
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 1:51 PM
To: Lindsey Britt; Paul Conner
Cc: Dan Heil; brad(alliviggvermont.mm; gardnerrealestate{yahm.com; Rich Gardner (rich0livinovermont.com)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Lindsey / Paul: I am writing on behalf of Gardner Construction, Inc. as a follow-up to our March 2n° conference call
regarding your initial review comments of our Sketch submittal, scheduled for a March 15`h Development Review Board
hearing.
Please find the following replies to the review items:
Front (Hinesburg Road) single family homeowner's timing / likelihood of re -development: As I responded, it
was Brad Gardner that previously stated he had spoken with the abutting two (2) lot owners. BY way of copying
Brad on this e-mail, I am requesting that he reach out to these Owners again and inquire. Regardless of whether
current owners have any interest and/or timeline for possible re -development, it is in keeping with the
Regulations to provide the proposed easements to these parcels as requested by Paul previously (Off Units 16 —
22) and the floating easement west of Unit 6 per the 1/20/16 Staff Meeting. It was also notes at that meeting
and the 1/20/16 meeting that the easement addressed the 220' driveway length for Units 16 — 22 vs. the 200'
Regulation max. Based on the current Zoning the parcels have re -development potential at three (3) lots each,
so it seems rationale the re -development may occur at some point in the future.
• Common Land / Garden proximity to Units: As proposed, the proposal includes 2.89 acres of common land or
47.6%of the overall land. The location and the amenities proposed for the Common Land are based on the 2012
and 2013 meetings, central to the proposed development. While this area can be further modified based on
DRB Sketch input, the attached Plan has been revised to increase separation to the nearby Units. I note that the
SEQ Regulations the active areas should be a focal point in the neighborhood, to add vitality and allow for
greater surveillance by surrounding homes. At Preliminary, the proposed landscaping will include plantings
between Units 6/7 and 16 —18 and the Community Garden Area to provide for additional privacy.
• Density: Based on the active Common Land comment, you questioned the Density, mentioning the possibility of
eliminating Unit 7. We disagree with the need to eliminate any Units, as 22 Units are proposed as compared to a
maximum Density of 24 Units.
• 25' max. front yard setback: While I don't see this requirement in the City Regulations, the attached Plan shifts
Units 1— 7 closer to the right-of-way. The shift of Units 6 and 7 affords 19' — 32' from the back of Units 6, 7 and
16 —18 to the Community Garden Area.
• Building Elevation / Diversity: The current proposal reflects diversity based on the 2012 and 2013 meetings with
Staff. Units 1-4 are one level duplexes which will have different colors and facades, Unit 5 is h of Units 1-4,
Units 6 —10 and 16 -18 are the same size Units, but will have different colors and facades with Unit 18 having a
wrap around porch for street presence, Units 12 —15 are custom single family lots which will have differing
colors and facades and Units 19 — 22 are two story duplexes which will have differing colors and styles, including
the wrap around porch for Unit 22. The proposal provides for good diversity of Units, with detailed information
applicable at Preliminary.
• Units 19— 22 advantage of South facing portion of roofs: We will provide information regarding utilization of
solar at Preliminary.
• Units 8-10 odd appendage?: From my notes of our 12/20/12 meeting, these Units were acknowledged as a
good use of the land. As such and based on being below the maximum density and meeting District
requirements, we don't see how elimination of these Units is supported by the Regulations.
• Potential Board request for Pedestrian Access to Units 16 — 22: As the proposed drive is 20' wide and only
serves seven (7) Units, , we don't see the need for separate pedestrian access. However, if desired by the DRB,
we could reduce the driveway depths from 24' to 23' and the road from 20' to 18' and propose a 4' walk
adjacent to one side of the drive or we could leave the drive at 20', reduce the drives to 22' and propose a 4'
walk. We will wait for DRB Sketch input as to whether they feel a walk is necessary.
While we greatly appreciate this chance to reply to Staff comments, we request that Staff Notes be limited to the
Regulations, not speculation as to what the DRB may question outside of the Regulations. We fully understand that the
DRB will have questions and comments and we will consider all and incorporate comments and/or make proposal
revisions based on the input received at the Sketch hearing.
We also request that consideration be given that we met on this project on 12/20/12 (Paul, Ray, Brad Gardner, Rich
Gardner and myself), on 3/12/13 (Paul, Cathy Ann, Brad Gardner, Rich Gardner and myself) and most recently on
1/20/16 (Ray, Justin, Chief Brent, Brad Gardner, Rich Gardner, Dan Heil and myself). The current Sketch proposal reflects
revisions based on all three of these meetings and as such, we suggest the Staff Notes should be favorable. When
revising the Sketch Plan based on these meetings, we certainly thought then and feel now, that we should have gained
general Staff support.
As I informed you, I will not be present at the March 15' Sketch hearing. Dan Heil of our office and Rich Gardner will be
the spoke persons. IN order to provide these responses and a revised Plan, the attached Plan is not "cleaned up", in that
you can see where driveways have been shortened, etc.. While this could prove helpful, it is solely due to wanting to
respond to you as soon as possible in the hopes that the Staff Report will reflect the latest. If Dan Heil has time before
the definitive Tuesday (noon) cut-off, a cleaned up Plan will be forwarded. Thank you again for the opportunity to
reduce / limit the Staff concerns.
11-\
oavid W. Burke
From: David Burke
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:55 PM
To: 'Lindsey Britt'
Cc: Dan Heil; brad(alivingvermont.com; gardnerrealestate(ayahoo.com• Rich Gardner (rich(&Iivinavermont.com)
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Lindsey: Thank you for forwarding. I actually met with Dave Wheeler on Wednesday regarding another project and as he
had just received the Sketch Plan for 1398 Hinesburg Road project, we briefly review it. Please note on item 12 a., the
State of Vermont now references their permits as "Wetland Permit, not "CUD".
I see no issue with complying with his review items (most are Standard and a few are Site specific) upon full Project
Design.
On a separate note, I have begun to review the Plans and Regulations in regards to the comments that Paul and you
provided to me in the phone conversation this week. While we are only at Sketch, I intend to provide some follow-up to
you / Paul on Monday.
David
From: Lindsey Britt [mAiltodbritt(asbuH.coml
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:46 AM
To: David Burke
Subject: FW: Gardner Parcel - 1398 Hinesburg Road
Good Morning David,
I'm forwarding you the comments from the Stormwater Section re: the sketch plan for the Gardner Parcel at 1398
Hinesburg Rd.
Have a nice weekend,
Lindsey
Lindsey Britt, MRP
Development Review Planner
802-846-4138
Ibritt@sburl.com
Department of Planning & Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
www.sburi.com
From: Dave Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 10:03 AM
To: Lindsey Britt <Ibritt@sburl.com>; ray <ray@sburl.com>; Paul Conner <pconner@sburl.com>
Cc: Tom Dipietro <tdii)ietro@sburl.com>; Justin Rabidoux <irabidoux@sburl.com>
Subject: RE: Gardner Parcel -1398 Hinesburg Road
Lindsey,
The Stormwater Section has reviewed the "Gardner Parcel -1398 Hinesburg Road" sketch plan prepared by O'Leary -
Burke, dated 1/6/16. We would like to offer the following comments:
1. The proposed project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired
by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
2. The proposed project includes the construction of 2.0 acres of impervious surface. Therefore the project will
require a stormwater permit from the VT DEC Stormwater Division.
3. As the project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of area, the applicant will be required to obtain a
construction stormwater permit.
4. As the site plan proposes more than 0.5 acres of impervious surface, the applicant will need to meet the
requirements of 12.03 of the City's Land Development Regulations, as approved by the Planning Commission on
November 10, 2015. These requirements include infiltration of the WQv on site using Low Impact Development
(LID) practices in lieu of a stormwater detention pond. Stormwater ponds will only be approved if the applicant
can demonstrate that it is unfeasible to infiltrate the volume of stormwater runoff specified in 12.03
(C)(1). Additional requirements listed in the LDRs included, but are not limited to, controlling the post
construction peak runoff rate for the 1-yr, 24-hr rain event as to not exceed the existing peak runoff rate for the
same storm event.
5. Should the applicant utilize stormwater detention practices or infiltration basins, it is the City s preference to
consolidate such stormwater treatment practices into a single, easily accessible location in order to improve
maintenance services.
6. The proposed stormwater management area behind units 3 and 4 does not appear to have any maintenance
access.
7. Consider installation of a drainage swale in the rear of parcels 11-15 to prevent water from flowing onto
adjacent properties to the east.
8. The applicant should provide a drainage area map for the proposed stormwater treatment practices.
9. The Cites minimum drainage pipe size is 15". All pipe in proposed future ROW or City easements must be a
minimum 15" in diameter.
10. In order to confirm compliance with section 15.13.F(3) the applicant must submit modeling for the 25 year
storm event. The proposed culvert located at the intersection of Hinesburg Road must be sized to adequately
convey flow. We have previously observed water pooling in the area to the south ofthe existing road because
drainage through the existing culvert and downstream wetland is poor. The applicant should confirm that
downstream drainage infrastructure, including the existing culvert located within the wetland area, has
adequate capacity to convey discharge from the respective upstream drainage area during the 25 year storm
event.
11. Additionally, natural drainage along the eastern property boundary is noted to be poor and should be taken into
consideration of the design.
12. The project proposes to impact wetlands and wetland buffer areas.
a. Section 12.02(E)(2) of the City's Land Development Regulations indicates that encroachment into Class
II wetlands is permitted by the City only in conjunction with issuance of a CUD by the Vermont DEC.
13. Work in the City Right Of Way (ROW) will require a "Permit to Open Streets or Right -Of -Way'.
.—N
Regards,
Dave
David P. Wheeler
Assistant Stormwater Superintendent
Department of Public Works
City of'South Burlington
I04 Landfill Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 658-7961 Fart. 113
wwtv ssburl.com
Y
Notice-Und.r Ve—ot'x NblicR—ds Act,.II a -mail, —it ottachmonis.s well as paper eopie. ufdocumenfs receivedmp�cparcd lb use in marten umcen,inp City nuxitwsc,--ins
. City ofti.i.1 or atnfl; or c" —i's rcWmt, In City business arc Roby m be repurded es public rocordo which may he inspu6d by any poison u1,o reyucs4 unlc.s otherwise ,ado
coofidootul by law. It you have reecived this ,ess.ge to o please oolity ua immediomly by rota.. entail. Tlwok ynn Por your cooperation.
CI
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 41h day of March, 2016, a copy of the foregoing public notice for
Sketch Plan Application #SD-16-03 was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all
properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-
way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by
the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following
parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington
Land Development Regulations:
List of recipients:
Anthony Parent
55 Wildflower Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Esther Abrams Trust
79 Wildflower Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Buckhorn Group, LLC..
839 Oak Hill Road
Williston, VT 05495
Robert & Faith McDonald
12 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Lon Finklestein
14 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Gary & Nancy Lines
16 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Christopher & Their Davis
18 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
SBRC Properties, LLC.
85 Shunkpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
Jackson Applebaum
1400 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
John Hannon
1402 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dated at Essex, Vermont, this 4 h day of March, 2016.
Printed Name: Daniel J. Heil PE
Phone number and email: (=878-999V email: dheil gear burke.com
Signature: 41_
Date:0 Af2Z l
Remit to: City of South Burlington
Department of Planning & Zoning
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-20I2
"T I me .
1 1 IN / I `\\\ •.\ -- "_� <_ IxovaEo nm rR■_,uRw
I p J I 1 1 `�
LW/S w
It ` RAGE OM ILT
♦ tl I ,fiRW.-OFa I ALOVNJ --\ 'j
-COWON LW
vWhGT TO REQUIRE/ \ 1 `I I` ` TIOx v j /Y I.7+1_AG - '
STATE wcnYos —IT♦ 1 \ 1 \ 1 / .0 ■' RL
YIN as' CALKER IIIROw00o sTUET rR6e \ '6 , I 6 A _ .;
TO BE GIES IJ NO IKRE TIMI T OL. =.,
sreues ro x Movrorn Ar rRs.INIWRr!
W— II Aal M G— AWORISTI
I 1
CITY w SWIH TIE WO M15T 1 / YYf►�' ,�
duMeroN 6AM
,N 6ATE VALVE .lgl„��W
�IlN3
V 1L + 30•
ALLAPPLIM RY E ffl
AMLl6AIAe esm
CElIeN wImM1«RrJrJ01 NNtv�MN 141 I m1T I, I 1RROym
MVx9. Mal GM®. �/ UG1 WIT W SJI A
C 1 McLw R� i FRONT AORAAR A
\ 1 � e rt eARAee seTD
1 •1 -
I
79'
un w sol/m i I _ -V
aaaerrcel , I\ ` > '
NT _
/rneoxMATE LoennaN w 1 10 i --.\`.OA A
EXIST— SEWER fORLfAIAM I C / � \ 1b' i,'0E RA I _
1 ♦ 1 IAA/ / rTTICAI. L
- -/ � �\ uc'1�•+'et 1
�/ 1 I 1 I \ II "' .� _� /-mil - _�..�!•�''_�
1 ; ;'', � J� ' TIE ntOfOSm 5N1rcNcr ` 1,
'"- SCeeee WO IXDTMe
SAMITMY II/l•10.0 `\ 1
1
11{. l� 1 0016 `l111'
1 I _/ / 1 NT __/ /' rwT■R 1, ^♦1`- 'J ///
i / � .,I' I 3. � r ♦_ / / `' 1�`` .. Imo. i'!
I/ � �� pwll■s v / / 1) \ / /i /
All! /
I
\
ac wlac M■D `\\\�'y r
��' 1
MNATR RtIK \
�� 1
rOF
r 'AM 'k.� sratu usocir \ir
L I
♦E6, 0.30 ALA
I]S FVL XM'LR WM \
13 01 \\
ffaro� e' u
' m o.I.wglse Yu
��w Tsi �eleWc�e
-'AM* sra trrr
\mil
3,.
O.2'2, A
�s�ALR usLE■
' 41E rtao EEOTM
• 1 /W �IOWAN
I 1 II III I
/ Ijlll eROV IJ.G
II11lilt
IL
N�
�1 IIII
111\
/ /r AffRaxIWTE LO
1 ERDTM6 e' RL
I \ I vl
`� eII1rA0RMN lROI.I. LLG\\
GRAewc SCALE Owner
Applicant
ORAOLEY 6AROIER
6AR01✓ER CONSTRV-TIOK MG.
M DO% al
WO ORADLEY 6ARONFR
w■ 1e , aR mIMYI■ wu Iwm vyvc n, C41-C ESTOL Vr 05446
P.O. DOx al
O01 GFESTER. VT 05446
,�;I ,6-mf 1. 'S -- I (r=
1 , . _� � __� sa1Rl eAaa■Tw yr RTA
Legend
,Aw, mwY,
I
- 7
® eY w mAa . YY
Y
u rar/u
Y�• Zoning Information
11I1111I \ ♦ Yrr w Av. mm
1111111 \ rt m rt real vu w wAnAu
\` nm Au nl \ w. unv va u
RDT6 20' wwat M��•u,opp� Isn Y rty
\�` I♦� , RAS[IOIT I�IeIM oJ•r'•oril Y N•r s A M1A!
, 1
�I�N i`. � \\, '\ /' � Soil Types
a ES
e ncolrosl9 wnmc uo SANITARY I.\raur Is carx,Ern,AL Aro Is xe..ecr ro uvneE
wlm TIE neLwMNeY rw6.
a rRofo3¢� VJLJS(XIHS excErr faR SrRF£T TRFESI TO AE MovroEo wlm
NeFLIYINMY N.MIS.
]I m13 FLAB IS ROT TO 0E VieD FOR ARCAOeTY GONYETANLE
GARONEK PARCEL
O'LEARY-BURKE
CIVIL ASSOCIATES. PI.0 ..ear Ao >RSR a.aAr _
5KETCH PLAN 1
E
O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC
1
CIVIL ENGINEERING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PREPARATION I LAND SURVEYING I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I LAND USE PLANNING
January 21, 2016
Mr. Ray BeLair°
Zoning Administrator
r �, �'
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VT 05403
City of So. SurE 91.01"
RE: Gardner Parcel
A 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD
1398 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT
Dear Ray:
We are writing on behalf of Gardner Construction, Inc. (c/o Brad Gardner) as a follow up to our
1/6/16 Sketch Plan submission, as well as our 1/20/16 meeting with staff, for a 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD
located at 1398 Hinesburg Road. Please see below for the comments that were brought up at the
1/20/16 staff meeting along with our responses. Included with this submittal please find a revised set
of plans that address the items listed below.
Comment: Revise the appearance of the western facade of Unit #1 as the side of the building has
frontage along Hinesburg Road.
Response: Rich Gardner will be providing further information on the Unit #1 western fagade that has
frontage along Hinesburg Road and we will either forward prior to the DRB hearing or bring
to the DRB hearing.
Comment: Revise the sidewalk for Units 1-4
Response: The sidewalks for Units 1-4, as well as 6 and 7, have been revised to connect directly to the
driveway. Please see attached for the revised Sketch Plan.
Comment: Add "20' Private Drive" label for units 16-22 access. The private drive serving units 16-22
is greater than 200'.
Response: The "20' Private Drive" label for units 8-10 has also been added to the access drive for Units
16-22. The private drive servicing units 16-22 is greater than 200' (the private drive is 223').
We are requesting a waiver to the maximum 200' private drive length as we are proposing a
20' ingress/egress easement to the Hannon parcel. In addition, we are now proposing a 30'
access/utility easement adjacent to the Applebaum parcel and proposed Wildflower Drive
that is centered on the future road location in the event that the private drive is to be
extended through the Applebaum and Hannon parcels. Please see attached for the revised
Sketch Plan.
13 CORPORATE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452
TEL 802 878 9990 1 FAX 802 878 9989 1 obca@olearyburke.com
Comment: Add a grass strip between the Duplex unit driveways.
Response: A Tx 20' grass strip has been added to separate the driveways for duplex units 1-4 and 19-
22. Please see attached for the revised Sketch Plan.
Comment: Revise the proposed 26' pavement width for the Wildflower Drive extension to match the
existing 24' Wildflower Drive pavement width.
Response: The proposed pavement width of Wildflower Drive has been revised to match the existing
24' pavement width per Justin Rabidoux's comment. Please see attached for the revised
Sketch Plan.
Comment: Revise the sidewalk on the southern side of Wildflower Drive to make it more accessible
for the snowplow equipment.
Response: The proposed sidewalk located on the southern side of Wildflower Drive has been removed
as we are already providing a sidewalk on the northern side of the road. A 5' cinder path is
now provided adjacent to Unit 18 to provide access to the community features on Lot 23.
Please see attached for the revised Sketch Plan.
Comment: Examine stormwater runoff on the SBRC property to the north. There have been reports
of water overtopping the storm channel during larger storm events.
Response: Comment acknowledged. During a winter thaw or spring storm event we will examine the
storm drainage patterns on the SBRC property to the north. A preliminary investigation of
the existing contours indicate the runoff from Butler Farms runs from southwest to
northeast. Runoff from our site will outfall into a separate channel on the SRBC property.
Comment: Add preliminary light fixture locations to the plan.
Response: The sketch plan has been revised to show preliminary locations for the light fixtures as
existing Wildflower Drive has minimal street lighting (2 existing lights). Three (3) proposed
light fixtures have been added to the plan, one (1) at the intersection of Hinesburg Road
and proposed Wildflower Drive, one (1) at the intersection of Wildflower Drive and the
private drive serving units 8-10, and one (1) adjacent to Lots 14/15.
Please find the following information for Staff and Development Review Board review and
approval:
1) Five (5) full size and one (1) reduced, 11" x 17" copies of revised Sheet 1, Sketch
Plan;
2) CD with Digital PDF of revised Sheet 1, Sketch Plan;
If you have any questions on the above or attached please call.
rely,
Daniel J. H il, PE
Notes from phone call, 3/2/16
Present: Lindsey, Paul, and David Burke
• David said the road width is 24' because fire requested it to be uniform with the existing
Wildflower Dr., but they are glad to do it wider
• Paul requested the applicant be prepared to tell the DRB about the possibility that the
lots owned by Hannon and Applebaum will be developed in the future —this relates to
the stubby road on which units 16-22 are located and whether the road should be
allowed on the belief that it will someday connect to another road
• Paul mentioned the new storm water standards
• Paul asked for the applicant to give an idea of the housing diversity that will be present
in the development and mentioned that the design of unit 12 was nice
• There was discussion about whether the common land would be truly useable, because
amenities, like the community garden, are located very close to the backs of some units
and would people feel comfortable essentially going into someone else's backyard to
garden
• Paul asked how the applicant planned to take advantage of the southerly exposure of
units 19-22
• It was discussed that the houses could be moved closer to road, which might allow for
the common areas to grow in size
ray
From: Dan Heil <dheil@olearyburke.com>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 7:51 AM
To: ray
Cc: David Burke
Subject: RE: Gardner - 1398 Hinesburg Road PRD
Attachments: Maple brook at 1398 Hinesburge Side Elevation (1).pdf
Hi Ray,
I'm not sure if you received the below email from earlier this week due to issues with the South Burlington server, if you
did please disregard this message. Attached is a PDF of the western elevation of Unit #1. Per staff comments from our
meeting on 1/20/2016 meeting, the western facade has been updated with 2 gables and additional windows to enhance
the architectural features as seen from Hinesburg Road. We're working with Brad on providing colors and/or a photo
which we will be bringing to the DRB hearing.
Thanks again,
Dan
Daniel Heil, PE I O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC
From: Dan Heil
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 4:29 PM
To: ray@sburl.com
Cc: David Burke <dwburke@olearyburke.com>
Subject: Gardner - 1398 Hinesburg Road PRD
Ray,
I'm writing to follow up on Comment #1 from my 1/21/2016 letter pertaining to 1398 Hinesburg Road. Please see
attached PDF for the western elevation of Unit #1. Per staff comments from our meeting on 1/20/2016 meeting, the
western fagade has been updated with 2 gables and additional windows to enhance the architectural features as seen
from Hinesburg Road.
Please let me know if you would like us to deliver any hard copies.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Heil, PE I Project Engineer
O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC
13 Corporate Drive
Essex Junction, VT 05452
email: dheil@olearVburke.com
phone: (802) 878-9990 1 fax: (802) 878-9989
2-8-16
Elevation
GA"NER
CONSTRUCTION INC.
1398 IIinesburge Rd
South Burlington VT
P O.W-1 BUY:(-)Bei- 13
C9LCNESIER,KOSM6 EAA:160111W U,
O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC
CIVIL ENGINEERING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PREPARATION I LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING
January 6, 2016
Mr. Ray BeLair
Zoning Administrator
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VT 05403
RE: Gardner Parcel
A 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD
1398 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT
Dear Ray:
We are writing on behalf of Gardner Construction, Inc. (c/o Brad Gardner) to request
Development Review Board scheduling and review of the attached Sketch Plan for a 7 Lot, 22 Unit PRD
located at 1398 Hinesburg Road.
The project involves two parcels (Parcel ID #0860-01398 & a portion of 1155-00284) totaling
6.07 acres. Bradley Gardner currently owns Parcel ID #0860-01398 and has a "Purchase and Sale
Agreement" for a portion of Parcel ID #1155-00284. We understand the zoning change to the
Neighborhood Residential for the portion to be purchased is supported by the Planning Commission
and has been scheduled for City Council review, thereby allowing scheduling of Sketch review. Parcel
ID #0860-01398 contains an existing single family with access off of Hinesburg Road while the portion
of Parcel ID #1155-00284 that is to be purchased is currently vacant. The proposal is to dissolve the lot
line between Parcel's 0860-01398 and 1155-00284 and subdivide the parcel into 7 lots. A total of 13
single family homes and 4 duplex units are proposed in addition to the existing single family home that
is to remain. Units 1-4 are currently proposed as 1 story units as to minimize the developments visual
impact as seen from Hinesburg Road. There is an existing Class 2 Wetland in the north-west corner of
the property. A portion of the proposed extension to Wildflower Drive and sidewalk will impact the
existing wetland and its associated 50' wetland buffer and require a State Wetlands Permit. Wildflower
Drive is to be extended from the "Summerfield" subdivision to the south and connect back into
Hinesburg Road at the existing driveway location for 1398 Hinesburg Road directly opposite Butler
Drive. The proposed units will be served by connections to existing municipal water and sewer.
This proposal incorporates comments received from the informal meeting with Paul Conner,
yourself, Brad Gardner, Rich Gardner and I based on the desired layout. The key points incorporated
are as follows:
1) Public road sidewalk for all units along the proposed public road;
2) All units along the proposed public road to include "Front Fagade" with porch;
3) Walkway connections from front porches facing the public road to public road
sidewalk;
4) Minimum 25' feet from back of proposed sidewalk to garages;
13 CORPORATE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452
TEL 802 878 9990 1 FAX 802 878 9989 1 obca@olearyburke.com
5) Garages for all units. No proposed parking on lot areas;
6) 20' easement on Private Drive serving Units 16-22 adjacent to the Hannon parcel;
7) Min. 8' setback for garages;
8) Common amenities proposed in a central location;
9) Mixture of unit styles (detailed information to be provided at preliminary submittal).
Please find the following information for Staff and Development Review Board review and
approval:
1) Application for Sketch Plan Review;
2) Sketch Plan Review Application with $1,413 application fee (($350 base + $13
recording fee + ($25 / 1st two units x 2 units) + ($50 / units 3-9 x 7 units) +
($25 / units 10-21 x 12 units) + (50% x $700(per unit/lot fee in SEQ)) _
$1,413 );
3) Five (5) full size and one (1) reduced, 11" x 17" copies of Sheet 1, Sketch Plan;
4) CD with Digital PDF of Sheet 1, Sketch Plan;
5) Abutters List;
6) Purchase and Sale Agreement for a portion of the abutting property to the north
(Portion of Parcel ID #1155-00284).
Please call if you have any questions.
rely,
aniel J. i ,
2012-84 —Gardner - Hinesburg Road
Abutters List
12/30/15
Parcel I D#: 1805-00055 Parcel I D#: 1002-00016
Anthony Parent Gary & Nancy Lines
55 Wildflower Drive 16 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403
Parcel I D#: 1805-00079
Parcel I D#: 1002-00018
Esther Abrams Trust
Christopher & Their Davis
79 Wildflower Drive
18 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
South Burlington, VT 05403
Parcel I D#: 1805-00082
Parcel I D#: 1155-00284
Buckhorn Group, LLC.
SBRC Properties, LLC.
839 Oak Hill Road
85 Shunkpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
Williston, VT 05495
Parcel I D#: 1805-00082
Parcel I D#: 0860-01400
Robert & Faith McDonald
Jackson Applebaum
12 Knoll Circle
1400 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
South Burlington, VT 05403
Parcel I D#: 1805-00082 Parcel I D#: 0860-01400
Lon Finklestein John Hannon
14 Knoll Circle 1402 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403
PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 6th day of April, 2015 by and between SBRC Properties,
LLC, a Vermont limited liability company with its principal place of business in Williston,
Vermont, and the owner of real Subject Parcel located at Meadowland Business Park in South
Burlington, Vermont ( hereinafter referred to as "Seller"), and Bradley C. Gardner, a resident
of Colchester, Vermont (hereinafter referred to as "Buyer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS Seller is the owner of certain land and premises located on Meadowlands
Drive, in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont , which Seller
acquired by Warranty Deed from Munson Earth Moving Corporation, dated October 31, 2011 and
recorded at Volume 11116, Pages 37-38 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, which
land and premises included a Lot 1 of 39.50 acres, more or less;
WHEREAS a portion of Lot 1, comprised of approximately 1.29 Acres more or less,
(adjacent to land owned by the Buyer), is depicted as a shaded area, denoted as "Area: 1.29Ac"
on a plat labeled " Boundary Line Adjustment between: SBRC Properties, LLC & B.C. Gardner"
dated March 18, 2015, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. a copy of which is
attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A. (Such depicted area, of approximately 1.29 Acres, is
referred to below as the "Subject Parcel", and contains no buildings).
WHEREAS the Parties have proposed to jointly pursue a boundary line adjustment
proceeding, that upon approval would result in the transfer of the Subject Parcel from Seller to
Buyer under the terms of this Agreement.
1
WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase the Subject Parcel from Seller and Seller desires to
sell the Subject Parcel to Buyer;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Subject Parcel and the mutual covenants
herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale of Subject Parcel. Subject to and upon the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement, Buyer hereby agrees to purchase from Seller all of
Seller's right, title and interest in and to the Subject Parcel, including all rights, easements and
privileges appurtenant thereto, and Seller hereby agrees to sell and convey to Buyer, all of
Seller's right, title and interest in and to the Subject Parcel, including all rights, easements and
privileges appurtenant thereto.
2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for the purchase and sale of the Subject
Parcel shall be One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).
3. Payment of Purchase Price. Payment of the Purchase Price shall be made by
Buyer to Seller as follows:
(a) $ 2,000.00 shall be paid as a Deposit at the time of the execution of this Agreement.
The Deposit shall be held in escrow by Seller's counsel, Collins McMahon & Harris,
PLLC, or any other escrow agent acceptable to the parties ("Escrow Agent"), (with an
interest -bearing account to be used in lieu of such counsel's IOLTA trust account, if
requested by Buyer), and shall be applied, together with any interest accrued thereon, as
partial payment of the Purchase Price.
The balance of the Purchase Price, $ 98,000.00 subject to customary pro -rations except
as otherwise specifically set forth in this Agreement, shall be paid at closing of sale of the
2
Subject Parcel by wire transfer, attorney's trust account check or certified check in good
collected funds.
4. Title to the Real Subject Parcel. Seller agrees to convey to Buyer by warranty
deed good, insurable and marketable title in fee simple to the Subject Parcel such as will be
insured by a reputable title insurance company, to be selected by Buyer, doing business in the
State of Vermont, at regular rates, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions,
except the "Permitted Encumbrances." Within 30 (thirty) days of execution of this Agreement,
Buyer shall provide written notice to Seller which identifies any objections, which may not
include Permitted Encumbrances, that Buyer may have to the Subject Parcel's title status (the
"Title Objections"). If Seller fails to satisfy the Title Objections at or before Closing after
having been provided notice by Buyer, then at the election of Buyer by written notice to Seller,
all rights and obligations created hereby shall be terminated and the entire Deposit shall be
returned to Buyer. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent Buyer, at Buyer's election,
from accepting such title as Seller is able to convey. For purposes of this Section 4, "Permitted
Encumbrances" shall mean (i) real estate taxes for 2015 which are not yet due and payable, and
(ii) utility easements, roads, highways, and other public rights of way, which are of record as of
the date this Agreement is signed by both Buyer and Seller, and (iv) zoning, land use and other
governmental laws, rules and regulations.
5. Conditions to Buyer's Obligations. Buyer's obligations under this Agreement
are contingent upon and subject to each of the following:
(a) Title to the Subject Parcel. Title to the Subject Parcel being as described in
Section 4 hereof.
3
C
Condition of the Subject Parcel. The condition of the Subject Parcel being substantially
the same as the condition of the Subject Parcel at the time of Buyer's inspection of the
Subject Parcel pursuant to Section 7 below.
(b) Boundary Line Adjustment Concerning the Subject Parcel. The parties' acquisition
of a City of South Burlington Subject Parcel line adjustment permit or approval, and if
applicable State of Vermont Act 250 Permit and other necessary permits, legally convey
the Subject Parcel from Seller to Buyer.
(c) Change in n City Zoning Regulations Regarding Zoning Districts — The adoption by
the City of South Burlington, Vermont, prior to Closing of changes to its zoning
regulations that will changes the zoning district, in which the Subject Parcel is located
from the so-called Industrial -Open District, to a so-called Residential District. (The
parties note that such proposed zoning ordinance changes are under active consideration
by the City as of the date of this Contract)
If all of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied by Seller or waived by Buyer, Buyer
shall have the right and option to terminate this Agreement and the entire Deposit shall be
returned to Buyer.
6. Environmental Assessment. Subject to the time limits set forth in this Section 6,
Buyer shall have the right to perform such environmental due diligence as he deems, in his sole
discretion, to be necessary to evaluate the condition of the Subject Parcel; provided, however that
Buyer shall obtain Seller's consent in advance prior to any destructive testing of the Subject Parcel.
Such due diligence shall be conducted at Buyer's expense and shall be completed not later than
June 15, 2015. The results and conclusions of the environmental due diligence shall be in all
respects satisfactory to Buyer in his sole discretion and notice of such results shall be provided to
4
the Seller not later than July 15, 2015. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the
extent that the results of such environmental due diligence are not satisfactory to Buyer, Buyer shall
notify Seller in writing before Closing ("Environmental Objection Notice"), at which point, Buyer's
entire Deposit shall be promptly returned to Buyer and all provisions herein as between Buyer and
Seller shall be null and void and have no further force and effect.
7. Inspection/Investigation. Buyer may at his own risk and at his sole expense
make such investigations of the Subject Parcel and conduct such testing of the Subject Parcel as
Buyer deems appropriate to ascertain the Subject Parcel's acceptability to Buyer, including but
not limited to a building inspection, environmental assessment and analysis, and any other
inspections and investigations.
Upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours, Seller will permit Buyer, his
agents, contractors, employees or representatives to enter upon the Subject Parcel for purposes of
inspecting it and making surveys, engineering tests,' studies or reports that the Buyer deems
necessary or desirable, but only to the extent that such inspections, surveys, tests and studies do
not materially disturb or unreasonably interfere with the Seller's normal operations. Buyer will
indemnify and hold Seller harmless from, and shall pay on demand by Seller, any loss, cost,
damage, fee, expense, including legal fees and expenses, incurred by the Seller as a result of any
entry on the Subject Parcel by the Buyer or Buyer's agents, contractors, employees or
representatives. Buyer further agrees that in the event the Subject Parcel is disturbed in any way
by reason of such entry, the Buyer shall promptly return the Subject Parcel to the condition that
existed immediately prior to the first such entry, at Buyer's expense and to the reasonable
satisfaction of Seller. All such investigations shall be conducted in compliance with all laws and
5
regulations, federal, state and local and shall be completed not later than sixty (60) days after
execution of this Agreement.
In the event Buyer is not satisfied with the results of his testing and examinations of the
Subject Parcel, Buyer shall have the right, in his sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement
within five (5) days of the completion of his due diligence by delivery of a "Notice of
Termination" to Seller, and in such event Buyer shall receive a full refund of its Deposit. Failure
to provide timely Notice of Termination shall be deemed a waiver of Buyer's right to terminate
this Agreement based on this contingency.
8. Conditions to Seller's Obligations. Seller's obligations under this Agreement
are contingent upon and subject to each of the following:
(a) Purchase Price. Buyer's payment in full of the Purchase Price in accordance with
Section 2 above.
(b) Representations and Warranties of Bum The truth and accuracy of all of the
representations of Buyer contained herein and performance by Buyer of all of its duties
and obligations hereunder. If all of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied by Buyer or
waived by Seller, Seller shall have the right and option to terminate this Agreement.
9. Representations of Seller. Seller hereby makes the following warranties and
representations, all of which shall be automatically renewed and effective as of the date of
Closing and shall survive settlement and delivery of the bill of sale and warranty deed:
(a) Seller is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Vermont, lawfully authorized to do business in the State of Vermont and is duly
authorized to enter into and perform this Agreement in accordance with its terms.
T
(b) The execution and consummation of this Agreement are not and shall not be a
violation of any duties or obligations of Seller, contractual or otherwise.
(c) Sellef has good and marketable title in fee simple to the Subject Parcel and is
capable of selling, conveying and transferring such title to Buyer free and clear of all
liens and encumbrances, except for the Permitted Encumbrances.
(d) Seller has paid or adequately provided for any and all taxes, license fees and other
charges of every kind and description, levied, assessed or imposed upon the Subject
Parcel or any part thereof.
(e) All written notices of violations of orders or requirements issued by any
governmental unit, or actions in any court on account thereof, against or affecting the
Subject Parcel have been complied with by Seller.
(f) To Seller's knowledge, the current use and operation of the Subject Parcel, and
this conveyance, are in compliance with all applicable protective covenants and the Town
of Williston and State of Vermont permits, approvals, laws, rules and regulations. The
creation of the lot to be sold to Buyer will require Seller to obtain a town subdivision
permit and any other required state subdivision permits, however, Buyer will need to
obtain any permits necessary for his use of the Subject Parcel after Closing.
10. Representations of Buyer. Buyer hereby makes the following warranties and
representations, all of which shall be automatically renewed and effective as of the date of
Closing and shall survive settlement until the Closing.
(a) Buyer is a resident of Colchester, Vermont, and has full authority to enter into and
perform this Agreement in accordance with its terms.
7
(b) The execution and consummation of this Agreement are not and shall not be a
violation of any duties or obligations of Buyer, contractual or otherwise.
(c) No broker has assisted Buyer in any aspect of the transactions contemplated
herein, and as such, no broker is due any payments arising from its efforts on behalf of
Buyer.
(d) This Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of Buyer, enforceable in
accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors
generally.
11. Transfer Documents. In exchange for the Purchase Price, Seller shall deliver to
Buyer, at the Closing: (a) limited liability company member resolution (in recordable form, if
desired) authorizing the transfer of title to Buyer and appointing an individual to execute the
transfer documents for Seller; (b) a standard Vermont Warranty Deed, sufficient to convey good,
insurable and marketable title to the Subject Parcel; (c) a completed Vermont Subject Parcel
Transfer Tax Return; (d) full discharge and/or termination statement for any existing mortgage,
security interest, lease, lien or encumbrance on the Subject Parcel; and (e) an assignment of
Seller's right, title and interest in and to any permits or licenses for the Subject Parcel (which
assignment may be included in the Warranty Deed).
12. Riaht of Entry. In addition to the rights granted under Section 7 of this
Agreement, Seller hereby grants to Buyer the right to enter upon the Subject Parcel, upon
reasonable notice, at any reasonable time on or after the date of execution of this Agreement to
inspect the Subject Parcel and to make such examinations, measurements, surveys or tests of or
on the Subject Parcel as Buyer may deem advisable, provided that the exercise by Buyer of
8
C
Buyer's rights under this Section 12 shall not unreasonably interfere with Seller's operations and
activities.
13. Casualty, Loss or Condemnation Prior to Closing. The risk of loss from
casualty or from a taking of all or any part of the Subject Parcel by any public authority under
the power or right of eminent domain (or by the threat thereof); shall be borne by Seller until
Closing. Seller shall maintain adequate fire and casualty insurance and liability insurance on the
Subject Parcel until the date of Closing. If the Subject Parcel or any part thereof is materially
damaged or destroyed as a result of such casualty or is taken pursuant to the exercise of the
power or right of eminent domain prior to Closing, Seller shall immediately notify Buyer and
Buyer may elect to (i) proceed with closing, in which event, Buyer shall be entitled to all
insurance proceeds or condemnation awards payable as a result of such casualty or taking; or (ii)
terminate this Agreement without further liability, whereupon this Agreement shall terminate
automatically upon Buyer's delivery of written Notice of Termination and the Deposit shall be
immediately returned to Buyer in full. If Buyer fails to notify Seller of Buyer's election within
ten (10) days after receipt from Seller of Seller's notice of such casualty or taking, Buyer shall be
deemed to have elected to proceed with Closing pursuant to clause (i) of the preceding sentence.
14. Closing. The closing of the sale and transfer of the Subject Parcel (the
"Closing") shall take place on or before 30 days after all conditions in Section 5 above have
been met, in 2015, in the offices of Buyer's attorney, or at such other time and place as the
parties hereto may agree in writing. The parties agree that the closing date may be extended if
and as necessary for the completion of any bank -required appraisals necessary for Buyer to
obtain his financing, with the understanding such financing and bank -required appraisals will be
promptly sought.
0
15. Possession. Possession of the Subject Parcel shall be delivered to Buyer at the
Closing, in substantially the same condition as on the date of this Agreement.
16. Taxes and Utility Charees. All ad valorem Subject Parcel taxes and
installments of special assessments, if any, shall be paid in full by Seller through the date of the
Closing, with the Purchase Price to be adjusted at Closing to pro -rate such charges, as and if
necessary, through the Closing date. If the Subject Parcel has not been assessed, for real estate
tax purposes, as a separate lot prior to Closing, at Closing the parties will estimate the proper real
estate tax pro -ration, but also agree to provide for any necessary, post -Closing payment(s) to
adjust such estimated pro -ration from Closing against the later final tax assessment that will
apply to the Subject Parcel for the real estate tax proration period.
17. Transfer Taxes. Buyer shall pay any Vermont Subject Parcel Transfer Tax
payable in connection with transfer to Buyer of the Subject Parcel.
18. Default. If any default is made by any party under the terms of this Agreement,
unless otherwise provided herein, the party not in default shall give ten (10) days written Notice
of Termination by registered or certified mail, if such party intends to terminate this Agreement.
The defaulting party shall have ten (10) days following the date such notice is placed in the mail
to cure such default. In the event of a default by Seller which is not cured within said ten (10)
day period, the entire Deposit paid by Buyer as described in Section 3(a) hereof shall be returned
to Buyer, and Buyer may pursue all legal and equitable remedies available to Buyer as a result of
such default, including but not limited to an action for specific performance. In the event of a
default by Buyer which is not cured within the said ten (10) day period, Seller may terminate this
Agreement with notice to Buyer and elect that the entire Deposit paid by Buyer be treated as
10
liquidated damages or, in lieu thereof, Seller may pursue all legal and equitable remedies as may
be provided by law in connection with such default.
19. Assignment; Successors and Assigns. Without the consent of Seller, the rights
and obligations of Buyer hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part or by successive
assignments to any person, firm, partnership, limited liability company or corporation affiliated
with Buyer. Buyer may not otherwise assign this Agreement. Subject to the foregoing, this
Agreement and all the terms and conditions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and shall be
binding upon the parties hereto, their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives or
assigns. Seller shall not assign this Agreement.
20. Amendments and Modifications. This Agreement may not be amended or
modified except by a writing executed by both parties hereto.
21. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
22. Titles. The titles to the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted as
a matter of convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of this Agreement
or the intent of any provision hereof.
23. Notices. Any notices given or made for any purpose under and pursuant to this
Agreement shall be made in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
If to Seller:
Tim McKenzie
South Burlington Realty Company
85 Shunpike Drive
Williston, VT 05495
11
J
C
With a copy to:
If to Buyer:
Michael J. Harris, Esq.
Collins, McMahon & Harris, PLLC
308 Main Street
PO Box 1623
Burlington, VT 05402-1623
Bradley C. Gardner
P.O. Box 21
Colchester, VT 05446
With a copy to:
Donald Maddocks
1 Grove Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452
24. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been made in the
State of Vermont and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Vermont.
25. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the
parties concerning the subject matter hereof, and no representations, inducements, promises or
agreements, oral or otherwise, not embodied herein shall be of any force or effect whatsoever.
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day
and year first above written.
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
(:��itn ss
STATE OF VERMONT
CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS.
'Bradley C. G deer
At Z�� , in said County this 6th day of April, 2015, personally
appeared Bradley Gardner, to me known, and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed
and sealed, to be his free act and deed.
Wi ess
STATE OF VERMONT
CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS.
Before m , 1 1 t'
Notary Public
My commission expires 941 c)` Nq
B �y'c�
Y: �
Its Duly Au ."orized Agent
At U3k� , in said County this 6th day of April, 2015, personally
appeared Timothy McKenzie, the duly authorized agent of SBRC Properties, and he
acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed, to be his free act and deed and the free
act and deed of SBRC Properties, LLC.
Before in
Notary Public
My commission expires:.DA 10. 19
13
xhibi f
Burlington
t Properties, LIP \ y� /
G 1 V.I.273Pg.265 \ f— \ _
% --- --
. 3 V Sphinx Development I, \ _ -
Vol. f039 Pg. 281
lO
Grandview
-3 Lot 1-C / \ Farm, Inc. Greenfield
Rye 1F LLC Area: 3.4 Ac. , ��• / r \ Vol. BOO Pg. 660
Meadows 1 East Mtn. View, 1 Capital, LLC
Vol. 754 Pg. 53 9Q�'j \ 4 S\
/ yA Vol. n0 Pg. 253
Subdiv.
_ - Lo11-D
FOX RUN LANE N82z2'33'W
Lot 1-E \
CEA Properties, LLC Area: 3.1 Ac. a48.21' w y \
�a�saNas�a�myyya
�nPef�f
n6s�e
1 II Lot 1-A 1 // - Curve Table -
Vd. 7l. Pg' 421 S02'S5'46"E Line Ch. Diet. Ch. Bearing Len th Radlue
Rel. Plat 8 2g,01 as+
748.21' .44 2060' Saco 209.0
n 9s�9 CURVE ] N 20'33' 4' 1 9 09.00
_ >
L= 337.12• To Thompson $Ly 76.30 S /826.41 E 77.43 1 143.0
S 02' • W 1 26.34 1 143.0
- nN N3357' -W Ch=337.88' A
n Cs1 Ch S g-W2lmw V
South Burlington S3357'36`E y v
Re C� LLC I 122.92' c C
� 11->•1 J .J-
Va,
SBRC Properties, LLC
77B+o' *12" E
30'31 W
/
h GRAPHIC SCALE
se o s >m eoo
m
1
Lot 1-B
Vol. 1116Pg. 37
SIB
Lot 1
;�
m.l
m a ^�
o c°�°
1 O
Ref.. Plat
40, Area: 29.1 Ac•
^°
IN
inch FEET
It.
2 AA Proposed Area: 7.8 c.
c'
d I eh�9S m �Q
I i SBRC Properties, LLC j �o
Vol. 1116 Pg. 37 e
W — - Legend of Symbols -
SUBJECT PROPERTY UNE
OTHER ROH - PROP. LINE
HIGHWAYY RIGHT-OF-WAY
APPROXIMATE EASEMENT LINE
a SPACF •� -� - _ �.
I m auFw+ _ -- — �' � _ r �-' - , - � � I IRON FOUND
j � _ \tge, %PEyttOD ND (NOTE 4)
c N�•4p'38"E CMF ❑ CONC. MONUMENT FOUND (NOTE
_ T L.A PF/IRF O 0
5221--
NB3'15'tYE 5� oasc � 1 Pennington 1 cM517 CONC. MONUMENT SET (NOTE 3)
mrsax nox - _ _- �� nC
FAFBe'xr _ - G G 1 Z Vol. 209 Po' ' O CAPPED REBAR SE (NOTE John Larkin 1
( _ _ 316']S Vol. 691 Pg. 763 T (NO 3)
1 N go
583 W ao \ 1 I to I I AG / BG ABOVE / BELOW GRADE (FT.)
Area: 1.29 Ac. N �'- \ m� �S A n/f NOW or FORMERLY
m o w I - ca Q N 1
10c Cgo0 I El EASEMENT NOTE
J cla
NBM7� �6 B.C. Gardner 1I t\ mN :3 �� 8
R DRIVE Vol. 692 Pg.
BUTLER _ 2 /)
n/f Wilson, L. G.& N. Lines City of S. Burlington
Vol. 1068 Pg. 61 Vol. 451 Pg. 10 60' R.O. W.
To the best of my knowledge and belief this plat.
consisting of two sheets, properly depicts the results of e
survey conducted under my direct supervision as outlined
in the 'survey notes' above. F 'sUng boundaries shown
are based upon our analysis of physical and record
evidence recovered, and are Insubstantial contace man
with the record unless otherwise rated. This plat is in
substantial compliance with 27 VSA 1403. Statement valid
only when accompanied by my original signature and sea(.
Timothy R. Cowan VT LS 597
Dote ICh'k'dl Revision
Drown by Sell- I Dote MAR• 14 2015
Checked by 7RC Scale 1's 150'
7FeC ' Project No. 14183
Boundary Adjustment between:
SBRC Properties, LLC
& B.C. Gardner
VT RTE 116 3 MEADOWLAND DRIVE
CITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSUCIMES, INC. SHEET
10MANSFIELDVIEWLANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 054a3 ��
802-B6F2323 wee: wwwcoavtcan
DEVELOPMENT REVIE`vV BOARD 3 NOVEMBER 2009
The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on
Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575
Dorset St.
Members Present: M. Behr, Acting Chair; E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, R. Farley, B.
Stuono
Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; J. Larkin,
K. Djonahue, D. Meunier, P. O'Brien, B. Gardner, M. Young, L. Bresee, A. Shalna
1. Other Business & Announcements:
Mr. Belair reviewed a list of administrative site plan approvals he had recently made.
The Chair asked if there were any ex-parte communications members should report
(required by law). There were none.
The Chair asked if there were any conflicts of interest. Mr. Stuono noted that he had
looked at a property that is on this agenda and was not interested in the property. The
applicant had suggested he recuse himself because of a conflict of interest. Mr. Stuono
said he did not see any conflict of interest. He does not know the applicant or anyone in
the neighborhood and is not interested in the property. There was never a legal
agreement regarding the property. The applicant said they exchanged a few e-mails.
Members had no issue with Mr. Stuono hearing that application.
2, Minutes of 23 September and 20 October 2009:
Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 23 September as written. Mr. Farley
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 20 October as written. Mr. Farley
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Miscellaneous application #MS-09-08 of Brad Gardner to alter the existing
grade by adding 300 cubic yards of fill to construct a street turn -around for a
proposed city street, 1398 Hinesburg Road:
Mr. Gardner said the property is being used for a turn -around for the O'Brien subdivision
next door. He had no issues with the request. Mr. O'Brien noted that Pubic Works is OK
with the plan.
Mr. Belair said staff has no issues.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-08 of Brad Gardner
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
3 NOVEMBER 2009
PAGE 2
subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
4. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin to alter the existing
grade by adding 800 cubic yards of fill, 23 Pinnacle Drive:
Mr. Larkin showed the area where fill will go. He said he had talked with neighbors
regarding plantings and drainage concerns. He indicated they will use contours so water
will flow away from the house. Mr. Donahue noted that even if the DRB approves this,
the Pinnacle Board can deny it. He said the Board is concerned with remaining views of
the lake from Pinnacle and wants to keep the view corridor open. Mr. Belair noted that
no landscaping is allowed to grow higher than the house.
Mr. Donahue noted there are sometimes covenants which are more restrictive than city
regulations. He felt there should be a way to coordinate this, possibly asking the
applicants if they are aware of any covenants. Mr. Knudsen said the DRB cannot deny an
application because it conflicts with private covenants.
Mr. Bresee referred to the Spear St. corridor study and suggested the applicant consider
that if a berm is to be built. Mr. Belair said they are 35 feet from city property, so there
are no city issues.
Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-09 of Joe Larkin
subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
5. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-45 of Algimantas & Neringa
Shalna to subdivide a 39,475 sq. ft. parcel into three lots of 13,938 sq. ft. (lot 2A),
12,746 sq. ft. (Lot 2B), and 12, 746 sq. ft. (Lot 2C), 45 Highland Terrace:
Mr. Behr noted that the DRB met with the Planning Commission regarding issues in the
City. The Planning Commission was very clear about having applicants adhere to design
standards in a district relating to density, etc. He noted that lot 2A is not in compliance
with the district regulations as it is being presented.
The applicant showed an alternate plan that does conform. He said it is actually cheaper
to build.
Staff was OK with the applicant going forward.
6. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-63 of Burlington International
Airport to construct two additional parking levels to an existing three -level parking
garage to accommodate 1370 vehicles, 1200 Airport Drive:
Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked to continue the application until 17
1 Arm
1,01
Interested Persons Record and Service List
southburlinagton
J E I M O N i
Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain
administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an
opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate
compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record
of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status.
24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every -
person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon
receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested
persons to the appellant in five wo
rking days. 24 V.S.A.S.§ 4471(c).
HEARING DATE; 0w
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY!
NAME
MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST
Rio
T, 0. 6 ok d'1
2.
tl1vN� I NCLJA`
51
0-�-&-7t'
l- A�NJ4
� S
� --
�
6�s
I
Jo
Y„�
Eosement for i
temporory
turnoround
A\ _ Terrlporory pervious
tumoround until
connection through
odjoining property is
complete. �I _
iSCs T l /7 t1(/ A
5'londscop�
edsement for theY,T
benefit of the City
of South
Burlington. 1
0' 20' 40' 80, 120'
Bor SCOle 1" = 20'
/VO/es
1. Elevatons de based an on NAW 88 datum
2 Me foca on of underground ut 11,es is not warranted to
be exmi or complete. Contoct DIG SAFE prior to any
excavation.
.1 this pion is ,n no way o bounday survey.
4. Contour informohbrn on Gardner Porce/ token from LIDAR
provided by the Vermont Mopping Program.
\
\
\
\
�r lit
—c
0 �
ti\
`\ New rip
\ rap 11.
/ I
See detoit�
/
Approx. Property Line
ov
—W— __D@ K'—
Existing Woler Line/gate w/ve
—W— — 4W—
Poposed Woter Line/gote rofNe
z
Existing Cos Line
New Gas L me
Exlstmg tree fine
�
—f- -S—$
Existing Sewer Line/monhole
0
®� She
Proposed Sewer L%ne/monhole
Existing electricd/telephone
337..5
—Etr ee�
New electricol/feleohone
—sr— sr—p—
Existing Storm Line%ofch basin
4
—ST®Sri-p—
Proposed Storm Line%ofch bosin
¢
-.sthg Contour
Existing 2' Contour from oeriolphotography
— --738 —
Proposed Contour
• —
E istmg fence
a
Proposed rooting *o47
w
Proposed underdron
Power pole
Survey Control Point
E isting hydront
Proposed hydrant
Concrete monument
Iron pipe
Drainage flow
F"nish grode spot elevation
Sign
Light post
a
/. r Imo'f / I
�>j<2
•• 2� � �= iiiYM 21'Siii Ri i fiiiiii Lii M
Me
G 't: �►effeesf-e�e4
M/y
� Miro/i 170N
Underdio%n
subbase and
outlet to
daAght.
Temporary Pervious Turnaround
Cross Section Detoi/
N T.S
RECEIVED
01C 9 0 2 2009
City of So. Burlington
/ DescrOfwr - - Cnecxed Do(a
Swi Temporary Turnaround Plan for Summerfield
MRAISWf
"' I Brod/ey Gardner Porce/
Sept. 28. 2009
KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc.
For Permit Review 164 Main Street, Colchester, i'--mont05446
am
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington City Development Review Board
Fr: Bill Szymanski, City Engineer
Date: October 22, 2009
Re: Comments — Bradley Gardner Parcel Summerfield Temporary Turnaround
1. Provide a short 8 inch stub in sewer manhole at property line.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, V1" 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846 4101 www sbu+l com
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 28, 2009
drb\misc\gardner\gardner_filLdoc Application received: October 16, 2009
1398 HINESBURG ROAD
Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-08
71F%A
Owner/Applicant
Bradley Gardner
PO Box 21
Colchester, VT 05446
Location Map
Meeting date: November 3, 2009
Property Information
Tax Parcel ID 0860-01398
Southeast Quadrant Zoning District
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
ldrb\misc\Larkin\Larkin fill.doc
Brad Gardner, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking miscellaneous approval to alter
the existing grade by adding 300 cubic yards of fill to construct a street turn -around for a
proposed city street, 1398 Hinesburg Road
Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the
plans submitted on October 19, 2009 and have the following comments.
This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations.
The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other
similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except
when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot,
shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review
Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with
the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section
does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction
operation.
Standards and Conditions for Approval:
(1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance
with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A)
above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat
application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed
grade created by removal or addition of material.
The plan submitted by the applicant shows the location and the new grade of the
additional fill.
(2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems
necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
The applicant has noted that this fill will be used to construct a temporary street turn-
around for a proposed city street which begins on an adjacent property to the south. For
this reason, staff does not recommend a time limit on the placement of the fill.
(b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of
the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other
appropriate measures.
The temporary turnaround shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works for its duration. It shall not be removed until the permanent road is
constructed which connects the two properties.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\misc\Larkin\Larkin fill.doc
1 The temporary turnaround shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works for its duration. It shall not be removed until the permanent road is constructed which
connects the two properties.
(c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the
provisions of this Section.
The Board should discuss whether this requirement will be necessary for the subject
application and whether some bonding will ensure that the turnaround remains in place
and maintained until such time as the proper road connection between the two
properties can be constructed.
(d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07,
Height of Structures.
The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the DRB approve miscellaneous application #MS-09-08 of Brad Gardner.
Res ectfully submitted,
Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner
Copy to: Brad Gardner, Applicant
South� tt�rtrtKii t i` tt yy� tt f t {
P" L A N IM.1..N G.....(X....Z 0 N I N CAR
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington City Development Review Board
Fr: Bill Szymanski, City Engineer
Date: October 22, 2009
Re: Comments — Bradley Gardner Parcel Summerfield Temporary Turnaround
1. Provide a short 8 inch stub in sewer manhole at property line.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.845..410E fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl com
No Text
Permit # e-p-08
APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your
application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board.
I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must
appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is
to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Type of application (check one):
( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of
Violation
( ) Request for a conditional use
( ) Request for a variance
(X) Other
PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY):
N/A
WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ?
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #):
Bradley Gardner, PO Box 21, Colchester, VT 05446
802-862-2973 12hone/802-862-1780 fax
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Volume 692, Page 352
3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #)
Bradley Gardner, PO Box 21, Colchester, VT 05446
802-862-2973 phone/802-862-1780 fax
4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name,
mailing address, phone & fax # if different from above):
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1398 Hinesburg Road
6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0860-01398
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate
use):
Residential
B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and
existing uses to remain):
Residential
C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing
building to remain):
6,900 sf
D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing
buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine):
N/A
E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to
remain): 1 ex. unit to remain
F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office
vs. non -office employees): N / A
G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically
requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable):
Temporary turn around for adjacent Summerfield Subdivision.
8) LOT COVERAGE
A. Total parcel size: 218 , 3 2 0 Sq. Ft.
B. Buildings: Existing _ ti+�- %/ 6. 900+/Sq. Ft
Proposed 3.16+/- %/ F, 900+/- Sq. Ft.
C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
Existing 8.64+/- %/ 18, R7o+/-Sq. Ft.
Proposed 10.05+/-%/ 21, 94+/-OSq. Ft.
D. Total area to be disturbed during construction:
Sq. Ft. *
* Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications
for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects
disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation.
9) COST ESTIMATES
A. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A
B. Landscaping $
N/A
C. Other site improvements (please list with cost):
Temporary pervious turnaround $20,000
10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC:
A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out)
B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):
N/A
N/A
C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): N/A
11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION N/A
12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION
N/A
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE Fall 2010
14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting
property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a
separate sheet of paper if necessary): See attached
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been
submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled e.
SIGNATUP,E OF APPLICANT
SIGNATUR O PROPERTY OWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION:
G U�
REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Board
❑ Director, Planning & Zoning
I have reviewed this application and find it to be:
V'COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete
of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date
Bradley Gardner
ABUTTERS LIST
October 12, 2009
Properties — South Burlington, Vermont
Christopher & Teri Davis
18 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 1002-00018
Dean Lepage
1400 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 0860-01400
Robert T. & Faith A. McDonald
12 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 1002-00012
09143: Gardner abutters list 10-12-09
Gary W. & Nancy Lines
16 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 1002-00016
Thomas F. & Ellen O'Connor
1402 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 0860-01402
Munson Earth Moving
85 Shunpike Road
Williston, VT 05495
Lon J. Finklestein
14 Knoll Circle
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 1002-00014
Estate of Robert J. & Ruth L.
Furlong
1404 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington, VT 05403
Tax map: 0860-01404
KREBS & LANSING
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
164 Main Street
Colchester, Vermont 05446
klengineers@comcast.net
(802) 878-0375
FAX (802) 878-9618
TO: PLAY wL
C-'I T y o lc-- 5OLA- r 6L)A�(-4 rA,ea
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
❑ Shop drawings
❑ Copy of letter
❑ Attached
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
dOF F 4� s M l[�u d
OM
Date: 10-16-09 Job No. 09143
Attention: Ray
Re: Bradley Gardner Parcel
El Under separate cover via
El Plans El Samples
❑
the following items:
El Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
-
-
Miscellaneous Permit Application & fee
4
9-28-09
-
Temporary Turnaround Plan (full size)
1
9-28-09
-
11 x 17 of above
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
El For approval El Approved as submitted
El For your use El Approved as noted
❑ As requested El Returned for corrections
El For review and comment ❑
El For Permit Review
El FOR BIDS DUE
El Resubmit
El Submit _
El Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
_ corrected prints
El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
Mailed:
REMARKS:
Ray,
Please find attached the Miscellaneous Permit Application for the Temnorary turnaround to be constructed on the Bradle
Gardner Darcel located north of the Summerfield development. Please contact us with anv auestions or comments. Thank
6MUI
Scott Homsted
COPY TO: Brad Gardner, Patrick O'Brien, Cathy O'Brien SIGNED: 71�1
GUYETTE, John & Nancy
TOUTANT, Arthur
1398 Hinesburg Road
Area zoned S.E.Q. District.
Section 25.00 Area, density & dimensional requirements, minimum
lot 12,000 square feet with 100 foot frontage.
Existing lot 4.5 acres with 50 foot frontage is noncomplying lot.
Proposed - subdivision of parcel into three (3) lots. Two lots
containing 38,850 square feet with no frontage, access off 20
feet private right-of-way. Two hundred and ten feet frontage
along r.o.w.. Third lot containing 2.7 acres with fifty (50)
foot frontage on Hinesburg Road.
Three lots to be connected to City sewer and water.
Requires Planning Commission subdivision approval.
V.
City of South Burlington
Application to Board of Adjustment
It
Date t' c+ Q "2 C 1.S
Applicant IV hn -- lyr uxtj &4-ye-JIL
Owner, leasee, lagentl
Address 14 Ci rti�_ pa, e�;, L-�
Official Use
APPLICATION #
HEARING DATEy��
G/ /I
FILING DATE
FEE AMOUN;?
Telephone # ' , Z-S42,G
Landowner r--44iC- I bu_ft �-Lt Address 1 ?) 92 j?CJ_ Sr
Location and description of property e L �r, C-rc-
Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative
Officer( )request for a conditional use ( t, ) request for a variance.
I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section
4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a
month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal
a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a
hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Provisions of zoning ordinance in question -F , U�� D±
Reason for appeal el,-1' -, AL4 jL o-F ►mil ad,
The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copies)
plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and
any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the
Board.
Hearing Date Signature f Appellant
Do not write below this line
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117,
Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold
a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on
Day of Week
at to consider the following:
Month and Date Time
Appeal of
seeking a from Section-- —
of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission
to
,1 i '
71
r Iz-111Y I
17,
J � ,
,00,
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
October 10, 1995
Mr. John Guyette
14 Circle Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Zoning Appeal
Dear Mr. Guyette:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment
will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices,
Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, October 23, 1995 at
7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance.
Please plan to attend this hearing and be prepared to address the
enclosed review criteria.
Very truly,
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
RW/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Arthur Toutant
5O2ONING NO
In accordance with the l
South Burlington Zoning
Regulations and Chapter
117 Title 24,, V.S.A. the
South Burlington Zonin
Board of Adjustment will
Continued Next Column
hold a public hearing at
the South Burlington Mu-
nicipal offices, . Confer-
ence Room, 575 Dorset
Street, South Burlington,
Vermont on1995 day,at T°00
tober 23,
P.M. to consider the fol-
lowing:
#1 Appeal of Century
Partners, Peter Judge
agent seeking a variance
from Section 25.113
Height of structures' sub
section (b) pitched roof
structures of the South
Burlington Zoning Regula-
tions. Request is for per-
mission to construct
two
35,000 square
story building with roof
gables at a height of fifty
K) feet, located at 100
rset Street
:i
#2 Appeal of Bernadrd
Couiliard seeking a vari-
ance from Section; 26.00,
Non-conformingCuses, ex-
tensions dfr o section
use approval
26.65 Multipple uses of the
South Burlington Zoning
Regulations. Request Is
for permission to operate
an automobile repair shop
(windshield repair and re-
placement) in conjunction
with an,, existing auto-
motive sales R service
business `^ d.b.a: Befnie's
Auto Sales, located ;`;,all;
1150 Williston Road...:;;'+;'
#3 Appeal of Jonathan
and Suan Mclean seeking
a variance from Section
25.00 Dimensional re-
quirements and Section
3.10 Bcundaries of Con-
servaticn-Open Space
District of the South Bur-
lington Zoning Regula-
tions. Request is for
Permission to construct a
24'x3 ' two story at-
tacheO garage with 720
square feet of living area
to within fifteen (15) feet
Of the rear yard and five
(5) feet of the northerly
side yard. Setback from a
minor stream proposed at
thirty-five (35) feet, lo-
cated at 19 Sherry Road.
#4 Appeal of Arthur Tou-
tant, John & Nancy
Guyette seeking a van-
ance from Section 25.00
Area, density and dimen-
sional requirements of the
South Burlington Zoning
Regulations. Request is
for permission to sub -di-
vide a 4.5 acre parcel with
fifty (50) feet of frontage
Into three (3) lots. Two
lots containing 38,850
square feet with zero
frontage (20 toot r.o.w.)
and the third lot con-
ataining 2.7 acres with fifty
(50) feet of frontage, to
cated at 1398 Hinesburg
Road.
#5 Appeal of Ken Des-
mond, Jeff Nick agent
seeking approval from
Section 26.65 Multiple
uses of the South Burling-
ton Regulations. Request
Is for permission to con-
struct a 6465 square foot
building and occupy with
a dual use (general office
and equipment service)
on a lot containing 1.1
acres located at 2 Green
Tree Drive.
Plans are on file with the
South Burlington Planning
and Zoning Office, lo-
cated at City Hall, 575
Dorset Street, South Bur-
lington, Vermont.
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative
Officer
October 7, 1995
%d ,
Q. Zap 1ly7j
✓�-�//' �' �� � !,� P % �-�2Gd (/'� ZIT � l.d�
No Text
I !
f
T
T
k
•
I I
I
I
!
1
�
�
I I i t I
I i •
1 t
-
��
I i !
i
i I
1
J�ll
I
}
f-
---!-- i -�--{---�- t-r - - - -Fl
i-
---� - I--�--->•---�--t--
,- pi
PI
1,95
--
j
I ;Cit f o.
uIllin
Yton-
1
�
I
I
t4i-
_
F-t_
I
--i
i I
�
i
t
No Text
.....-. � aZuw.:,...rs�, »a�... .k� ..a.Me` . �.F .:i h.., .�"� ': •�;5. � !dr.ASu;,.
i
'Sc Vt 10 , q1
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN
Name, address, and phone number of:
a. Owner of record A2+hu.r- C_,. L
f SS k�-i roc S�vc � bi�6DIL (. I
b. Applicant
C. Contact
M ( NYC le I)V `7x,, LLI(('1!g-run Sb2-3L4Z0
Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development,
including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed
use(s).
Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple,
option, etc.
--t-) C yl I l d-+tir,
IJ
Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties
Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such
as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.
1 ��
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of
municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply,
streets, storm drainage, etc. All it ,o
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of
Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission
which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the
dates of such actions:
N c-1 v
8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8} x 11, 8J x 14 or
11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information:
a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant.
b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties.
c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and
graphic).
d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land
belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed
subdivision.
e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type
and location of existing and proposed restrictions on
land, such as easements and covenants.
f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed
streets, structures, utilities, and open space.
g) Existing zoning boundaries.
h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded
areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features.
i) Location of existing septic systems and wells.
j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision
to adjacent property and surrounding area.
k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as
provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations,
shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a
commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project,
planned unit development, or planned residential
development.
(Signature) applicant or contact person
Date
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
October 24, 1995
John & Nancy Guyette
1 Circle Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: 3 Lot Subdivision, 1398 Hinesburg Road
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Guyette:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is a copy of the September 26, 1995 Planning Commission
meeting minutes. Please note that you must submit your application
for preliminary plat within six (6) months.
If you have any questions,
JW/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Arthur Toutant
please give me a call.
Sin erel
L,
oe Weith,
City Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION
26 SEPTEMBER 1995
PAGE 5
with marketability. He also noted the Commission has warned a
public hearing for some zoning changes that would have an impact
on this proposal.
Ms. Crotta asked if streets in the residential area connect to
Oak Creek or Butler Farms. Mr. Zoecklein said one street does
connect to Butler Farms, but Butler Farms does not appear
interested in that connection and it will be removed.
Mr. Strashnick asked if the School Board has commented on the
plan. Mr. Burgess said it has and they have said they still want
that particular site. He emphasized that this opinion was made
without a vote of the School Board. The law requires that if a
developer wants something other than a school on that site, the
Commission can turn the plan down. The city would then have 120
days to put the issue on the ballot to buy the land at fair
market value. Mr. Cimonetti added that the city would first have
to condemn the land.
Mr. Zoecklein then outlined the land included in the golf course
and indicated there would be a tunnel under Dorset St. connecting
the two parts of the course.
Mr. Zoecklein estimated they will have a preliminary plat in
about 30 days.
5. Sketch plan application of Arthur Toutant to subdivide a 4.56
acre parcel with a single family dwelling into three lots of 0.89
acres, 0.89 acres and 2.78 acres, 1398 Hinesburg Rd:
Mr. Guyette said this is family owned property. There is an ex-
isting house and barn. Another house would be built on lot #1.
No development is planned for the other lot at this time.
Mr. Guyette said they need to investigate the location of a sewer
easement. The existing house is on a private septic system, but
the owner is interested in joining the city system.
Mr. Burgess noted that a variance would be required for one lot
because of insufficient frontage.
Mr. Weith said the sewer easement issue will have to be settled
before preliminary plat.
6. Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Century Partners for
a planned unit development consisting of 90,750 sq. ft. of
general office and shopping center use in four buildings, 100
Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way. The application involves a
boundary line adjustment between the subject property and 108
Dorset Street (Anchorage Motor Inn):
- — �. ..�c..e�- _--„�`__�) `� ,�''` mac..,,.--* ��� _ ___ _ --t>
� ..
i�
___
�. Igo � �,�� �
-- _ _
�a�._
,�� ;� r;
� � „� �� .
+� � � 5/, ESA n�.�� ///LY:, l G o-i%�
��
I
1 I
QDI--
i
I
vaz
cool
( .
i
,
I
i
1
t
_
-
I
,
,
C/ Gi
I
_
I
l
I i
J .�
1IOC'4>1 2l
Memorandum -
September 26,
September 22,
Page 5
Planning
1995 agenda items
1995
3. The plan still proposes a north/south local street between Old
Cross Road and Swift Street Extension. This road is not
incorporated into the project.
6) ARTHUR TOUTANT - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN
This project consists of the subdivision of a 4.56 acre parcel with
a single family dwelling into three (3) lots of 0.89 acres, 0.89
acres and 2.78 acres. This project is a major subdivision pursuant
to Section 26.202(a) of the zoning regulations since two (2) of the
lots have no road frontage.
This property located at 1398 Hinesburg Road lies within the SEQ
District. It is bounded on the north by the Green Acres industrial
subdivision, on the east and south by single family residences and
on the west by single family residences and Hinesburg Road.
Access: Access to lots #1 and 2 will be provided by a r.o.w.
across a 50 foot strip of land from Hinesburg Road which is part of
lot #3. The preliminary plat should indicate the width of the
r.o.w. The private roadway serving the proposed lots should be 30
feet in width if on street parking is proposed or 24 feet in width
if on street parking is not proposed. (Section 401.1(k) of the
subdivision regulations). It does not appear that on -street
parking will be needed.
Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet will
be met by all three (3) lots.
Lot #3 will have 50 feet of frontage on Hinesburg Road. The Zoning
Administrator has determined that a variance will be necessary to
create this lot with less than the required frontage of 100 feet.
Lots #1 and 2 do not have frontage on a public street and will be
served by a r.o.w.
Density: The maximum development density for this parcel is 5.5
dwelling units. The number of dwelling units or single family
dwelling lots that may be located within the limits of the
designated development area, which consists of 4.3 acres, is 17.2.
Preliminary plat: The preliminary plat should contain all the
information requirements listed in Section 203.1 of the subdivision
regulations.
5
Memorandum - Planning
September 26, 1995 agenda items
September 22, 1995
Page 6
Development and Restricted areas: The two (2) new lots (lots #1
and 2) are located entirely within the development area portion of
the SEQ District. The only portion of the lot located in the
restricted area is the 50 foot strip used for access.
7) CENTURY PARTNERS - SHOPPING CENTER PUD - FINAL PLAT
This project consists of expanding an existing shopping center in
two (2) phases. Phase I will consist of: 1) constructing a two
(2) story 36,960 square foot building (building "A"), 2)
constructing a 156 space two (2) level parking garage, 3)
constructing a 300 square foot addition to the main building, 4)
converting 600 square feet of unused space to retail use, 5)
razing an 8,736 square foot 603 seat theater building, and 6) a
boundary line adjustment with the adjacent AMI - Burlington, Inc.,
property. Phase II will consist of: 1) constructing a one (1)
story 8,350 square foot building (building "B"), and 2)
constructing a 3,600 square foot one (1) story building (building
"C"). These improvements will result in a total gross floor area
of 90,743 square feet with a total gross leasable area of 86,857
square feet. The preliminary plat was approved on 7/11/95 (minutes
enclosed).
This property located at 100 Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way lies
within the C1 and CD1 Districts. It is bounded on the north by a
commercial building used for personal service and retail, on the
east by the Ramada Inn and undeveloped property, on the south by
the Anchorage Motor Inn and Corporate Way, and on the west by
Dorset Street.
Access/circulation: Access is via a 30 foot curb cut on Dorset
Street opposite the Chittenden Bank access drive at a signalized
intersection. There are also two (2) secondary access drives to
the Greer property to the north. The applicant has previously
recorded a legal agreement which requires the applicant to provide
an access easement to the Greer property when the Greer's provide
the applicant with a similar access easement. A 24 foot wide curb
cut is proposed on Corporate Way. An access to the Ramada Inn
property is also shown. The sidewalk along the north side of
building "A" is being extended to the sidewalk along Dorset Street
to facilitate pedestrian access.
Circulation is adequate.
R.
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
September 22, 1995
John & Nancy Guyette
14 Circle Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: 3 Lot Subdivision 1398 Hinesburg Road
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Guyette:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself.
Comments from Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an
earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday,
September 26, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
,
Joe Weith, 4
City Planner
JW/mcp
Encls
cc: Arthur Toutant
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer
Re: September 26, 1995, agenda items
Date: September 26, 1995
ONE HUNDRED DORSET STREET SHOPPING CENTER EXPANSION
Site plans SP1 for Phase I & II dated 8/25/95 prepared by Trudell
Engineering are acceptable.
TECHNOLOGY PARK (DIGITAL) - KIMBALL AVENUE
1. Lot 15 has little or no buildable area.
2. Lot 8b should remain with Lot 8a since the pond is used for
fire protection for the building on Lot 8a.
3. There should be reserved a 60 foot wide easement to the Tilley
parcel for future street.
4. The street must be rebuilt to city standards.
5. The street lights must be of the type that Green Mountain Power
will accept and maintain.
6. Streets should include a sidewalk.
7. The sewage pumping station shall remain private and maintained
by those it serves.
8. Cul-de-sac shall include a tear drop island.
ARTHUR TOUTANT- HINESBURG ROAD
1. The 20' access drive should avoid the 90 degree bends. It will
be almost impossible to construct an adequate drive within that
r.o.w. 45 degree bends in the easement would be more appropriate.
2. The end should include a turnaround area.
3. The existing buildings should be shown. It appears the large
barn is very close to proposed lot #2 north line.
Preliminary Memo - City Engineer
September 26, 1995 agenda items
September 22, 1995
Page 2
4. To sewer subdivision will require a easement across existing
Ledge Knoll lots to Ledge Knoll Drive. This easement and sewer
will be private maintained by the three lot owners.
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
September 14, 1995
John & Nancy Guyette
14 Circle Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: 3 lot Subdivision, 1398 Hinesburg Road
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Guyette:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project
from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and
myself. Please respond to these comments with additional
information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than
Tuesday, September 19, 1995.
If you have any questions, please
RJB/mcp
Encls
give me a call.
Sinceredyt
R4m J. Belair,
Zoning and Planning Assistant
Preliminary Comments - Planning
September 26, 1995 agenda items
September 14, 1995
Page 2
TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES - 11 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN
--- sketch plan should include name and address of applicant.
--- show C.O. Zone surrounding the two (2) existing drainage
ponds.
--- it appears that lots 15 and Lot 8b will be undevelopable due
to configuration and CO, wetland and floodplain restrictions.
If they are intended to exist as undevelopable lots, some sort
of legal document such as a "Notice of Condition" should be
recorded.
--- it appears that a portion of the proposed cul-de-sac street
will be located in a C.O. Zone. The Planning Commission may
approve this encroachment if it will not significantly affect
adversely the attributes provided in Section 3.503(a) - ( e ) of
the zoning regulations.
--- applicant should reserve a 60 foot r.o.w. connection to the
Tilley parcel.
Preliminary plat: The preliminary plat should conform with the
information requirements listed in Section 203.1 of the subdivision
regulations. The following additional information should also be
submitted:
--- traffic impact analysis if required by Commission.
--- details of existing and proposed street lights (height of
pole, type of lamp, wattage).
--- delineated wetland locations.
--- provide contour lines for lots #9-13.
ARTHUR TOUTANT - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN
--- sketch plan should show restricted areas and development areas
as shown on the SEQ zoning map.
--- sketch plan should show a right-of-way of at least 20 feet in
width serving lots #1 and 2.
--- sketch plan should show the water and sewer lines serving lot
#2.
--- applicant should check with the State Environmental Office
(879- 6563) to be certain that lot #3 will still remain in
conformance with state rules regarding septic systems.
--- applicant should contact Zoning Administrator Dick Ward
regarding the need for a variance to create lot #3 without the
required 100 feet of frontage.
2
Preliminary Comments - Planning
September 26, 1995 agenda items
September 14, 1995
Page 3
--- the private roadway serving the proposed lots must be 30 feet
in width with parking and 24 feet without parking (Section
401.1(k)(2) of the subdivision regulations).
3
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer
Re: September 26, 1995, agenda items
Date: September 8, 1995
ONE HUNDRED DORSET STREET SHOPPING CENTER EXPANSION
Site plans SP1 for Phase I & II dated 8/25/95 prepared by Trudell Engineering are
acceptable.
TECHNOLOGY PARK (DIGITAL) - KIMBALL AVENUE
1. Lot 15 has little or no buildable area.
2. Lot 8b should remain with Lot 8a since the pond is used for fire protection for the
building on Lot 8a .
3. There should be reserved a 60 foot wide easement to the Tilley parcel for future
street.
4. The street must be rebuilt to city standards.
5. The street lights must be of the type that Green Mountain Power will accept and
maintain.
6. Streets should include a sidewalk.
7. The sewage pumping station shall remain private and maintained by those it
serves.
8. Cul-de-sac shall include a tear drop island.
ARTHUR TOUTANT- HINESBURG ROAD
1. The existing water service is privately owned and cannot be used. It may also
be to small to serve two residents.
2. There is no sewer line on Hinesburg Road. There is only a force (pressure) main
from the Ledge Knoll pumping station.
3. Access drive and services to Lot No. 2 should be shown.
f
FAX: (802) 658-4748
t�vutb N urlingtvn +R ire i9epnrtment
575 +i9ornet *treet
tvutb 'Burlington, lgermnnt 05403
TO: South Burlington Planning Commissioin
FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief V
DATE: September 11, 1995
RE: Plans Review for September 26, 1995, Meeting
I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows:
1. 100 Dorset Street Complex
Acceptable
2. Technology Park
Kimball Avenue
Acceptable
3. Arthur Tautant
Hinesburg Road
Acceptable
Dated 9-6-95
Project No. 94022-54
Dated 9-7-95
Project No. 95074-50
Dated 9/10/95
*
(802)658-7960
ZONING BOARD Or �iDrJTUSTME�NT �j
APPEAL tr`
DA'.PE/70
VOTE: YES wo :
I
i
ZONING BOARD 09 ADjUS`I11`41=TT
.APPEAL it
DATE ho
REQUEST OF.:
VOTE: YES/V NO:
ZO ' t?Cr 30,1RD OF
RE 1-ZJ .{i'v 1' 1.%F
MOTE,: YES J : !
?/,d,' v�
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
—The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public
`hearing at the South Burlingyoa High School, Cafeteria II, Dorset -
Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Wednesday, April 1, 1970 at,
7:30 P.M. to consider the fol;o:vinq:
`#1 Appeal of Arthur C. Toutant seeking a variance from Section
5.21 Frontage Requirements of the South Burlington Zoning
Ordinance. Request is for permission to construct a single family
dwelling on a lot containing approximately four and one half
acres with fifty (50) foot frontage, located off Hinesburg Road
one and a half W/2) miles south of Interstate 89.
4
2 Appeal of Harold B. Bensen seeking a variance from Section
12.40 Lots on accepted streets of the South Burlington Zoning
Ordinance. Request is for permission to construct an office type
building on a private road located off Patchen Road.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Albert 1. Reynolds, Chairman
IJD
a
rC�()i
W
M. Pq
29'2 '
OD
FERLANO PROPERTY
7/0'
ACRE
/ ACRE
290,4'
DR/VEWAY
GOODR/C /-/ PROPER T Y
I
TOu TAN r
April 2, 1970
Mir. Arthur Toutant
1128 -'illiston Woad
South Purlington, VT 05401
Dear Mr. Toutant :
This is to inform you that the South Purlington Zoning Board
of Adjustment approved your :,�.riance request.
A plot plan must be submitted upon your request for a building
permit, showing yard requirements etc.
Very truly,
Richard ;,lard
Code Officer
R W/ j
March 27, 1970
Mr. Arthur Toutant
1128 Williston Road
South Burlington, VT 05401
Dear Mr. Toutant:
This is to notify you that the South 1-urlington Zoning
Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on
Wednesday, April 1, 1970 at 7:30 P.1-1A. at the South
Burlington High School, Cafeteria III Dorset Street,
to consider your request f,,r a variance.
Very truly,
P,ichard 11.ard
Code Officer
Rw/j
I
Ile a ring Date Ad-, t.l Date days
-woior to meeting.,
South Burlington Zoning Boac�j of Adjustment
South Bi.)rlington, Vermont
Gentlemen:
I hereby appeal to tiie Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following
variance.
I understand that regular meeting dates are the first and third
Wednesdays of the month at 7:30 p.m. at the South 131),riington High
School.
The legal advertisement shall appear as below., and I agree to pay,
either now or before the ad appears', a fee 01" iP30,,00s which fee is
to offset costs of holding said laearing,
Signatu�e and Address Date
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE
The South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment, will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington High School, Cafeteria II, Dorset
South Burlington,
Streets Verrioni; on 4- 377 0
770nth-a�nd date)
It
'co co-nlsider the following:
(time
Appeal of seeking a variance from
Section of the
(number) -- (title of -,eion l
South I>rlington Zoning Ordinance. Request is for permission
6L
ZON-FING DOAIID OF ADJUSTME'NT
TU4N OF S)OCT'.11"11 BURLI14GTOF41 VERMIONT
11_1 ri -i
SOUTH 13',YRTjI!qIGT0N3 VERMONT
Dear Citt,izen.w
Attached to this sheet is a copy of a legal notice that is to
C.>
:appear -he rzurl-ngton Fr Press.
, ar in, 11. J.
The Board of Selectmen hias instructed that this form be sent
to -.�tjac-alyr. pl,,!operty owners as a method of advising them of
1 -).4- 1 eir property.
a public hearing th I., could or could riot afJ-."(ct -uh
This -is not intended to TiAean that they are either in favor of
0-f- against t'he reqlest. but js -,iierely furnished for your
informational. purposes,
Very truly yours
Administrator
k
RW/j
r�
SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
3
Page 3
MARCH 101, 1970
Many expressed concern over expense of getting addresses changed on mail, deeds, etc.
One mentioned possibility of a child wandering off while riding a bike, lost because
he couldn't recall new street name, or telling his correct address to someone who
could not recognize the new name but who may have been of assistance if the old name
were used. An Airport Parkway resident said his street and Airport Drive, were so
close that if there should be a mixup on an emergency call, the proximitycr-F.correct
street would eliminate the delay. He suggested "freezing" names at present and being
"watchful" of names for new streets to eliminate any further confusion.
ARTHUR TOUTANT SUBDIVISION REQUEST %
Mr. Ward explained request, using plan. Mr. Toutant wishes to divide his 6 112 acre
tract into two one -acre lots, fronting on Hinesburg Road, to sell and reserve the
rest ;for himself. His lot would be at the back of the other two, making it impos-
sible to meet the 150' frontage on an accepted street requirement. Mr. Toutant pro-
poses to request a variance from the Zoning Board to allow him to construct a 50'
wide driveway leading from Hinesburg Road to his premises.
Mr. Toutant and his neighbors oppose Mr. Szymanski's suggested plan for the building
of two roads which would lead to Hinesburg Road. They favor Mr. Toutant's building
his long driveway and, when Green Acres is developed. to build a road which would be-
come an artery between Hinesburg Road and the new route 7 extension, fed by streets
from Green Acres. Mr. Ignazewski made the motion to accept Mr. Toutant's plan on
condition he obtains a variance from the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the driveway
with 50' frontage on Hisesburg Road. Mr. Tudhope seconded and there was unanimous
approval.
REPORT FROM NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE"
Mr. Hill sa committee had started in September, 1966 to work with its technical
team to discover what needed'to be done, with this threefold accomplishment 1) site