Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1000 Hinesburg Road (3)4y� 1 i STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM NOTIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY 1. Name of facility,site or activity: Mitel Semiconductor Mom., fin+ nv n-F 4—k-4,4 minv.nn�nr+v+nnir riv.ni1c 2. Mailing address: Air Guard Road, Bldg. 880, South Burlington, Vermont 05401 3. Principal activity: (4 digit SIC number or written description) Assemble hybrid electronic circuits SIC # 3674 4. Name and telephone number of principal contact:. _ David R. Martell (802) 658-5039 5. Type of hazardous waste activity„(written description): Trichloroethane III used in a vapor degreaser for gleaning elPrtrnnir rirriiitc_ a. generation X b. transportation _ c. treatment d. storage e. disposal 6. Description of hazardous waste and Process by which generated: Description Process _ Monthly volume or wt. Thichloroethane III Valor De rg easer 4 55 gallon drums 7. Method of disposal currently *employed for each waste stream listed above. Thichloroethane III will be reclaimed via our supplier._ Fields Point Chemicals, Essex Junction, Vermont. To Anachemia Chemical Limited, Champlain, N.Y. 8. Plan for achieving compliance with Hazardous Waite Regulations and Guide- r r li'nes (Generators whose total hazardous waste generation never exceeds 220 pounds in any one month, need.not complete this secrion). Attach additional material if necessary. I am enclosing_a copy of our waste analysis for reclaimirlg_purRoses. _ * I am requesting an EPA number thru your department. I will also need a supply of manifest forms. 9. Certification I hereby certify that the information provided herein is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I understand that all information contained in this notification will be made available -to the public unless the Secretary certifies such information as proprietary upon reouest. I am authorized to sign official documents for my,oroanization. David R. Martell, Production Manager SIGNATURE David R. Martell NAME AND TITLE November 21st 1980 DATE NOV 19 REC'D LI to INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE. 75 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401, TELEPHONE (802) 658-1074 November 18, 1980 Mr. David R. Martell Production Manager Mitel Microelectronics -Burlington Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Airguard Road - Building 880 South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Martell: Enclosed are the results on the analysis of the waste solvent sample submitted to our laboratory on October 9, 1980 Component Nitromethane 0.7 Tetramethylsilane 2.4 Epoxy Butane 0.7 Methyl ethyl ketone 2.6 Toluene 2.7 Oil and Grease 0.3 1,1,1 Trichloroethane 90.6 If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Josep K. Comeau, Ph.D. Laboratory Director JKC:rdh Hydrographic Studies and Analyses a Water Quality Studies - Analytical Laboratories Ecological Studies 0 Aquatic Nuisance Control Industrial Waste Surveys April 30, 1981 ILCharles Thweatt MITEL Air Guard Road Building 880 South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Chuck, I am enclosing a letter from the State regarding landfill disposal. Our landfill operator will be advised of the procedures for Polyset 410B Epoxy Ujs Novalac as outlines in the second paragraph. You should also be aware of this procedure so as to identify this material to the landfill operator for disposal. Thank you. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DS/mcg 1 Encl MIT L Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 June 16, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner 575 Dorset Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Dave: Further to the Planning Commission's minutes of June 9, 1981, stipulation 2 on page five does not accurately reflect the correction as suggested by Mr. Woolery who stated that the words "shall insure" should be deleted from the stipulation. Mr. Poger's statement does imply that Mitel would not be responsible for the design: to preclude any future mis- interpretations and to accurately reflect the discussion that persued I respectfully request that stipulation 2 be corrected. to eliminate the words "shall insure." Sincerely, �,( C,jl_ Charles A. Thweatt\, Assistant Vice -President CAT/daa 5. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1981 Continuation of warned public hearing on application by GBIC for preliminary plat anproval of a 55.7c;0 sq. ft. building for a light'mnnufacturing operation on Hinesburg Road south of Interstate 89 Mr. Trudell said the building color had been changed to brown. The back of the building will be the same color. Mr. Trudell went over the proposed landscaping. Berms along the road (one of which may have to be cut into when the Swift St. Extension is built) will. be created and trees planted on them. He told the Commission where the various trees would be planted and said they planned to put in Austrian and white pine, ash, linden, red oak, red maple, willow, sugar maple, flowering crab, and cherry trees. The berms will be various helphts above road level - one will be 4' and another will be 6', Mr. Trudell said. There will be a 30 sq. ft. sign at the entrance with a brick base and a white background. Mr. Trudell showed the Commission and the audience the light fixtures which are proposed. These will direct the light down so there will not be glare from the sides. Mr. Brisson, a Hinesburg Road resident, felt the people in that area should look at the front, not the back of the building. Mr. Ewing asked about the nitrogen tank and was told it would be 15' high, 5' in diameter, and placed on the parking lot side of the building. It will be the same color as the building. Mr. Walsh felt the location of the building on top of the knoll needed to be addressed. He opposed the location. Mr. Poger felt traffic should be discussed first. Mr. Poger noted that a letter from traffic engineer Bruce Houghton had been sent to the residents' attorney, Mr. Schmucker. Mr. Trudell showed a proposal for a turning lane, bypass lane, and a deceleration lane in front of the entrance to the project. He felt an acceleration lane would cause as many problems as it would solve, and the Af;ency of Transportation at, rees. Mr. Trudell said the figures used in the traffic study came from the Agency of Tr;insportation and that if figures were available from an updated source, they would update their traffic report to include them. Mr. Spitz noted that Bruce Houghton had been hired to do a traffic study of the triangle area bounded by Williston Road, Kennedy Drive, and Dorset Street during interim zoning. A preliminary report was given to the city in June of 1979 but the final report is not in. Because of the time which has elapsed since the preliminary report, the firm has done spot checks in two areas, and these checks show a traffic growth greater than the 2j the Agency of Transportation uses. Mr. Spitz expected the final report shortly. Mr. Levesque said he had voted no for the traffic study of the triangle area based on the reliability of the firm in question, and he questioned the reliability of any report from that firm, based on the delay the city has experienced in getting final figures. Mr. Trudell repe%ted that when the figures were available, they would be incorporated. He said that right now it seems that what is needed is widening on the north leg both sides of 11ine3burg Road plus an ridditional lane on the south leg, of Hinesburg Road. Who would pay for the improvements was discussed. Mr. Poger felt they should be done at the time the project gets started. Mr. Trudell noted that the project would generate 3200,O110 a year in taxes for the city and he felt the improvements would cost 46,000. He suggested that the city take some of those taxes to improve the intersection. Mr. Poger noted that history showed that if the city were to do it, it would not be done. He wanted to be sure the improvements were made, regardless of who paid for them. 6. PLANNING COMIdISSION MARCH 24, 1981 Ms. Luj_;inbuhl iiol-cad who would decide wh-ther the proposed improvements were adequate and was told the Commission would decide, with expert advice. Mr. Spitz said the improvements would depend on projected traffic volumes, but he suspected that they would cost more than 16,000. Mr. Ewing felt the City Council would have to be consulted as to who would pay for the road. Mr. Levesque reminded the Commission of a project on Dorset Street which had not been built until the road was upgraded. Mr. Krassner mentioned "No Through TrRffic" signs for Old Farm Road as a possibility. Mr. :;chner did not feel developers should have to maintain existing city streets. Mr. Poger agreed it was the city's responsibility to fix many of these intersections, but he said he did not make that determination. Zr. Schner suggested that the Commission make a recommendation to the Council on this point, perhaps in a joint session. ;,Ir. Mona added that the Commission had done what Mr. Schner suggested in its proposals for entry into the Capital Budget of the city, but its recommendations have in the past been ignored. Mr. Schner felt that tax generators like this should not be asked to upgrade intersections which are already disintegrating. He felt this was a city problem. hr. Poger said the Commission agreed in theory and that he did not object to a joint meeting to discuss it. Mr. Brisson suggested a second access, for fire protection, but it was noted that the land has no access to another road. In response to a question raised at the last meeting, it was noted that Digital's elevation is 34b' and this will be 376'. Mr. Trudell said they estimated 5-6 van -type trucks per day and 1 semi per month. Mr. Kransner felt that was an optimistically low fij-ure. Mr. Poger e++tid that at final plat the applicnnt could be asked to submit some kind of schedule of shipments in and out. The building location was discussed. Mr. i-?ona was not as concerned about the location as the appearance. Mr. Woolery agreed that this color blended in better and the location did not bother him. Mr. Walsh did not like the location. Mr. Ewing said the building could be moved southeast off the knoll and still maintain the view. Other than that, he felt it was a good plan. Messrs. Poger, Mona, Jacob and Levesque had no problem with the location. Mr. Walsh asked the Commission to consider the location from the Interstate. The building will be high and the most prominent feature in the entire area. He felt that was not good for the area. Regarding access, the Commission spoke about the entrance road for the project. Mr. Trudell said the proposed location had been chosen because there was more space between the houses on the road at that point, and therefore, less interference with those driveways. He added that the proposed site had better sight -distance, it was a good location for the Swift Street Extension, and it gave the company a better chance to do something with the entrance road other than make it straight in. As far as safety in the event of an accident, it was noted that the road is 30' wide and there will be no parking on it. Regarding the design of the entrance, Mr. Mona expressed concerns about the shortness of the passing and deceleration lanes. Mr. Trudell said 5-6 cars could stack in the lane and the standards indicated room was needed for 3. Extending the lane would bring it closer to the Brisson driveway. The deceleration lane is 50' of full pavement and 180, of taper. Mr. Poger felt that was adequate. Mr. Mona was not sure and he thought 5 stacked cars was a small amount. Mr. Trudell said copies of the design standards would be submitted. Lowering the speed limit on the road was mentioned by Ms. Hurd and Mr. Poger said perhaps it could be set at 7. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1981 35 until one was past the plant. Mr. Jacob asked that the City Council be requested to recommend that to the State. Mr. Krassner asked about a double lane on the exit so right turning cars could get out while left turning ones waited. It was noted that the road would be wide enough for that. Mr. Spitz felt major off -site improvements could be resolved at the end of preliminary plat and he felt that should be stipulated. He felt the Interstate interchange with Hinesburg Road should be given renewed interest and that the city should pursue it with the :hate. As far as sewers, Mr. Spitz felt the oversized force main but not the oversized pump station should be installed. If oversized improvements are put in the Commission must recommend that to the Council and the Council will take action on it. There are three possible easements to be considered here. One is for the swift Street Extension. Mr. Spitz felt the need for this or. the east of Hinesburg Road was questionable. The second is for sewer easements to abuttors on Hinesburg Road and the applicant will give those. There should also be a pedestrian trail easement. Mr. Poger said the Natural Resources Committee would be asked to fix a location for that. Mr. Trudell said power lines on the land would be buried. Mr. Poger noted that since the Commission had decided to make no decision on the application until the new zoning in that area becomes effective, the public hearing should be continued until such time, which will be April 7. The proposed motion on the application will be sent to the members so they can look it over. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the preliminary plat application of GBIC until two weeks from tonight, April 7, at City Hall at 7:30 pm Mr. Mona seconded the motion and all voted for it. Mr. Spitz stated that the City Council, in its deliberations on the zone change for the property, had reduced the acreage involved from 145 to 111 acres. They also want action to take place as soon as possible on the new industrial provisions and they suEgested that input be sought from residents on Hinesburg Road. Mr. Woolery moved that we concur with the City Council recommendation to modify the zone change request from 145 acres to 111 acres as proposed at the City Council meeting of March 16. Mr. Mona seconded the motion. Mr. Woolery felt the entire 500 acres should have been done in the first place. Mr. Poger felt very sensitive about spot zoning in this case and he demurred. The vote was 6 yes and 1 no, with Mr. Poger dissenting. Discussion of traffic review procedures for development applications Mr. Spitz said this item related to the traffic review of the project just discussed and others. It also relates to past performance of contractors and potential future contractors and he felt this sort of business should be conducted in executive session. Mr. Woolery moved to go into executive session to discuss specific personalities and contracts on traffic and at the conclusion of the executive session, to adjourn. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. At 11:10 pm, Mr. Woolery moved to come out of executive session and adjourn. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion and all voted for it. The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 pm. Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 1981 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, March 17, 1981 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present George Mona, Vice Chairman; Ernest Levesque, James Ewing, Kirk Woolery, Robert Walsh Members Absent Sidney Poger, Chairman; Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Richard Trudell, Lowell Krassner, Carl Cobb, Ethel & William Schuele, Viola Luginbuhl, Roberta Coffin, Robert Furlong, Ann Painter, Walter Bruska, Chuck Thweatt, George Baron, Debbi & David Martell, Gerald DiVincenzo, Vermont Agency of Environmental Conservation; James Johnson, Peter Dakin, Tony Petermann, Michael Hogg, Thomas O'Connor, J.C. Rowley, Thomas Chittenden, Vernon & Judy Hurd, Sue & Linus Wiles, David Furlong Minutes of March 10, 1981 The minutes were deferred until next week. Continue warned public henring, on application by GBIC for preliminary plat approval of a 55,700 sq. ft. building for a light manufacturing operation on Hinesburg Road south of Interstate 89 Mr. Woolery arrived at this time. Mr. Chuck Thweatt gave an overview of the company. He said they had received an enthusiastic welcome in the foreign trade zone and that they had operations in Canada, Hong Kong, New York, Florida, etc. They hope to start construction by June 1 and he expected to have an operation which would meet area standards and enhance the area. The people in the present operation in the Burlington area are, with one exception, all Vermonters, and Nitel hopes to grow in this area. They have a clean, high technology operation. Dave Martell, production manager of the operation presently in the area, explained the present use, storage and reclamation of chemicals (copy of letter on this on file with Planner, dated March 13, 1981). The major chemical is 92.5% Chloroethane plus 7.5% Butyl Alcohol. The company uses 4 55 gallon drums per month in its degreasing operation. The chemical is reclaimed and its shipments are followed with a manifest system controlled by the Hazardous Waste Department in Montpelier. Another chemical used is Isopropyl Alcohol, used for cleaning silkscreens. They will store 5 gallons of this per month. Kimwipes absorb this chemical and the wipes are sent out so the precious metals used in the process can be reclaimed. This is a closed loop system and both OSHA and the National Fire Prevention Association have inspected the plans. The above chemicals are presently used in the Foreign Trade Zone. They, plus others, will be used in the proposed building. An additional chemical to be used will be 40% denatured Ethanol, 40% Isopropanol, and 20% Naptha. They will store 1 55 gallon drum per month and use it to clean screen printers. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 1981 Kimwipes will also be used here and they will be recycled to reclaim the precious metals. Plastic for packaging will also be used. Storage of this will be 1500 lbs, per month stored in an 8' x 8' walk-in freezer. Most of this will be used in the process. It is Morton Polyset 410B - Epoxy Novolac/silica filled. :fir. Pete Dakin said the Burlington plant would start out with silicon wafers, saw them into chips and put these chips in plastic packages. The leads will be cleaned. He explained the steps which would be taken at the new plant. Wax is used for mold release. This is inert. To clean the mold another type of plastic is used. This is also inert. 24 lbs. of that is used per month and it will be disposed of at the landfill. The leads are cleaned in an acid dip. 20 gallons of this are used per month, but the acid is neutralized with a chemical of which they use 55 gallons per month. As the usefulness of the acid diminishes with each time it is neutralized, it is eventually sent out to a company to dispose of it. Mr. Dakin explained that the company wanted a non -aqueous system so they would not have to dispose of water. They do, however, use de -ionized water to cool the saw which cuts the silicon. Regarding, chemical evaporation, Mr. Dakin said a consulting firm had come to the Quebec plant and taken air samples. Of all the chemicals used, there were only 3 that the firm used as examples - the others were present only in trace amounts. The 3 which showed up were in quantities of 16 parts per million, 4 parts per million, and .04 parts per million, and none of them will be used at the South Burlington plant. Mr. DiVincenzo noted that he would be concerned with hazardous waste management - he would inspect the industry on -site and would deal with the hazardous waste manifests. Mr. Mona asked whether emissions into the air would be only in trace amounts and was told that was correct. Mr. Walsh asked whether the 3 chemicals found at the Bromont, Quebec plant would be introduced at this plant at a later date. He was told that those chemicals were used in the front end of the process and the back end of the process would be going on in this area. At this time they do not plan any front end work here and it was noted that if those processes were added in South Burlington, they would have to start the entire procedure again. Mr. Levesque asked about filters to remove trace amounts and was told that if they reached threshhold values, they would be filtered. Members of the audience asked specific questions about the chemicals to be used. Mr. Schuele noted that the recent laws regarding hazardous waste made a company responsible for its waste even after it was given to a reclaimer, and Mr. Thweatt said they would get information on the procedures of the reclaimer. Mr. Mona asked that when the Act 250 hearings came up, the area residents' attorney be informed so people could attend. Mr. Thweatt said he would see that it be done. The question of spills came up. Mr. Thweatt said that in the normal operation groundwater would not be affected. Mr. Krassner mentioned a safety net in case of accidents. Mr. Mona said he would like to know the degree to which there is control over a spill, and if there is a spill, he wanted some comment on what the effect might be. He J' .� �`, g gave the example of a� rum falling off a truck and being totally absorbed into the ground. He also wanted to know the possibility of unpolymerized materials being sent to the landfill. It was noted that the plant would receive that material already mixed and the heat of the process 3. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 1981 would polymerize it. Mr. Krassner wanted to know how it would be handled if it were not polymerized. After a short break, the Commission discussed site appearance. Mr. Hogg said the building would be about 60,000 sq. ft. in size with 10,000 sq. ft. on a second floor. He went through a plan of the areas within the building set aside for the various operations. The office area will be 25' high and the production area 15' high. The outside will be prepainted off write flush metal panels. What windows there are will be bronze. Roof equipment will be screened (there will be 11 units), as will the garbage compactor. There will be 2 8' x 8' loading doors. Mr. Linus Wiles broached the subject of color - he felt the white would stand out and he suggested an earth tone, which would blend in better. At this point, slides of other Mitel buildings were shown. Some were brick and some were the white metal proposed here. Mr. Ewing agreed that white would make the building stick out. He asked the elevation of this plant compared to the Digital plant. The question of the roof screens was discussed. Mr. Hogg said the screens would be 4' high and most of the roof equipment was 4-5' tall. The plant elevation is 3761, or 396' to the top of the screen. At the road entrance to the property, the elevation is 415'. Mr. Hurd felt he would be looking down onto the roof of the plant. Ifs. Mona pointed out that it would be 2000' away. Mr. Hogg said that the stacks would be at most 2' above the screen. Ms. Luginbuhl suggested putting the plant on the other side of the knoll where it would not be visible from Hinesburg Road. Mr. Wiles requested an alternate color for the siding and the roof. He was told the screen would block about 75% of the roof, but the gravel on the roof would probably be gray. Mr. Mona said the Commission could not decide the color. Slides of the area for the proposed building were shown. Mr. Trudell showed all the restraints on the site from zoning restrictions, easements, setbacks, etc. All together, they leave 3 areas open, of 14, 15, and 24 acres. This is a permitted use and zoning requirements will be met. The chosen site allows for excellent bearing capacities and drainage. It is a short distance to the pumping station and excavated rock can be used for parking lot construction. They can screen the parking area, and Mr. Trudell noted that the building site was the only part of the land not formerly used for farming. It will also allow Mitel to use the rest of the land for future development. Mitel wants visibility from a major highway, the view from the site is spectacular, and the company wants to be away from existing and proposed development. He said that the building would be visible anywhere on the land, since it is all open. Mr. Walsh recognized all these considerations, but felt that this was a beautiful view and that the plant was in the wrong spot. He felt the light color would disrupt the beauty of the area. Mr. Mona agreed the color should be addressed. Mr. a'oolery said he would prefer a toned -down color. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the public hearing on the preliminary plat application of Mitel until next Tuesday, March 24 at City Hall at 7:00 pm. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion. Mr. Spitz said there were two sketch plans and two site plans for review next week and it was noted that these applicants would have to be reviewed before the Mitel review continued. The motion passed unanimously. .01 PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 3, 1981 The South Burlington_ Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, March 3, 1981 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Robert Walsh, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing, George Mona, Ernest Levesque, Peter Jacob Members Absent none Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Edward & Ann Emery, Roberta & L.H. Coffin, Nancy & John Boyd, Thomas Chittenden, Joan Nadeau, Elizabeth Horton, Vi Luginbuhl, Lois & Donald Kerwin, Sam & Ruth Bogorad, Judy Hurd, Madlyn Morrissey, Charles & Marilyn Dunn, Donald & Bernice Brisson, Gwendolen Rye, Sachi Rowley, Rendol Barlow, Elaine & Normand Lavoie, Robert Furlong, Thomas O'Connor, Mikyung Kwon, Bruce Horton, David Bogue, Linus Wiles, Ronald Schmucker, Bruce Ladeau, Richard Painter, William Schuele, Lowell Krassner, Fran Reiman, Ruth Poger, The Other Paper; Walter Bruska, Carl Cobb, Richard Trudell Minutes of February 24, 1981 The February 24, 1981 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Ewing, a second by Mr. Mona and a positive vote, with one abstention by Yr. Poger. Continuation of warned public hearing on application by GBIC for preliminary plat aoproval of a 55,700 square foot building for a light manufacturing operation on Hinesburg Road south of Interstate 89 The Commission had received letters from GBIC and from the City Attorney. Mr. Bruska read the letter from GBIC and told the audience that the company's name would be announced at a press conference at 1:30 pm tomorrow at the Ramada Inn. Mr. Foger then read the City Attorney's letter. (Both letters dated March 3; 1981 and attached to these minutes. Mr. Poger said that after he had read the letter he would like the Commission to discuss how it wanted to proceed on the application. Mr. Schmucker asked if he could address the Commission before it ruled on its procedure. Mr. Poger asked him to wait until the Commission discussed the City Attorney's advice. Messrs. Walsh, Ewing and Jacob favored letting Mr. Schmucker speak, Messrs. Mona and Levesque and Woolery favored discussing the letter first, and Mr. Poger cast the deciding vote that on this legal issue he would ask Mr. Schmucker not to speak. Mr. Poger stated that the City Attorney had said that what the Commission has done is legal even if the zoning law does not apply yet. He was not sure whether the final public hearing referred to by the Attorney meant the final hearing on the preliminary plat or the final plat. He recommended that since the parties were here, the Commission listen to the presentation and ask questions on factual matters. Then the hearing can be continued until after the Council has acted on the zoning amendment. Mr. Mona noted that the application was complex and that it would take some time before the Commission would be ready to take action on it. Mr. Walsh agreed with the 2. ?LANNING COMMISSION 'MARCH 3, 1981 Attorney's position and added that with the GBIC statement that they were Trilling to postpone the hearing, he felt it was logical to gait until the zoning change was resolved. Hr. Poger said the Commission had always put everything out on the table and he felt it was not productive to have a lot of people come out for a hearing and send them all home again, since that drags out the process. He preferred to take testimony tonight. Mr. Walsh pointed out that the people who had come for the hearing might not want it to proceed tonight. Mr. Woolery said that the Commission was on record as favoring the change to industrial zoning, so the discussion here should not be an argument of the merits of that zone, but of the merits of the specific application. Mr. Ewing felt the Commission should take information but not make a decision until the final zoning is approved. Mr. Spitz noted that the day after the zoning became effective was 4 weeks from tonight. The Commission voted 6-1, Hr. Walsh dissenting, to proceed. Mr. Schmucker, responding to the City Attorney's letter, said he wished the Commission to decide that today this application is not in conformance with the zoning ordinance. He added that he was not asking the Commission to dismiss, but only to stay the hearing. He did not think the Commission was administering a bylaw here, since it is not in existence and he said he was asking the Commission to determine early on whether the application was in conformance with the zoning ordinance. Ins. Bogorad questioned the warning of this meeting and he was informed of the warning procedure followed. Mr. Trudell said they had received information on the airport approach cone, which now shows the building falling outside it. He showed the site plan and some views. cvs. Trudell then addressed traffic. He said the impact on Old Farm Road had been evaluated. Morning peak counts had been taken at the entrance to the park, at both ends of Old Farm Road, and at both entrances to Digital. Digital's first shift is 770 employees. During the am. peak there are 439 trips in and out to handle those employees, or about 2 people per trip. The peak 15 minute period had 136 vehicles. Using a peak shift change for the proposed plant of 260 people, they expect 130-150 trips in the a.m. peak and 30-40 at the peak 15 minute period. They projected that 10.4% would use Old Farm Road, for an extra 15 cars during the peak hour. Information on how that would affect the two intersections is not finalized yet. Mr. Trudell said the Agency of Transportation had also suggested a turning lane for traffic coming from the north, and the design is being finalized. The west side of the road will be widened for southbound cars to pass left - turning cars. The 24" CWD water main will be tapped and a 12" mai4 brought on the frontage of the property. 3 hydrants will be put in. Water will feed both sides of the building and the building is fully sprinklered. 3,000 gallons per minute is needed for fire flows and they can only get 2500 gpm, but CWD has said that in the event of an emergency some valves can be closed to direct water flow and the required gallonage can be obtained. This can be done over phone lines, with a call to CWD's office. Mr. Poger read the fire chief's letter on this application (copy attached). Ms. Trudell then read a letter from CWD. Mr. Trudell said the pump station had been approached from 3 directions. It can be built to handle this facility only, to handle this facility only, but with a force main adequate to handle future development, or the size can be increased,for future development,of both the station and the force main. The Council has been asked which way they Would like it built, but until that question is answered, they are assuming they will put in a pump station sized only for this facility and a force main„for future development. Mr. Trudell said SitecL 3. P1A "WING COMMISS ICN MARCH 3. 1981 the force main could serve 600 acres of land in the Quadrant. The main will go under the Interstate through a sleeve and eventually connect to Kimball Ave. The control panels for the station will be mounted on a piece of ledge. Mr. Trudell showed the road and building and pointed out where burms and landscaping would go. The ledge will be cut 3-8' for a level site for the building. There will be catch -basins in the parking lot which will drain to the retention pond. This pond will catch and treat the first 1/2" of rater. It is sized for a 25 year storm. The surface will be grass except during storms. Mr. Trudell said erosion controls would include hay bales, slope stabilization, and sediment barriers. He did not have specifics yet of the landscaping, but said there would be plantings on the burros and plantings in other areas would be clustered. The building will be brick, glass and metal. Ventilating equipment on the roof will be screened. Roads will be paved 30' wide. Mr. Trudell read a letter which had been submitted, which dealt with chemicals to be used (copy attached). A low level entrance sign is proposed and there will be a logo on the front of the building. The lights will be on 25' poles directed downward. In response to questions from Mr. Walsh, Yx, . Trudell said the fire chief would be informed about the phone call to CWD to obtain the 3,000 gpm, and that the metal part of the building would be broken up with plantings. Mr. Mona was told that the 600 acre figure was if the city wanted the station and force main up -sized, they would be able to handle 600 acres. He was also told there were 200 parking spaces plus about 18 for the handicapped. Mr. Mona noted that a question yet to be answered is the improvement to the Kennedy Drive/116 intersection. What will be done, by whom, and when? He did not want Old Farm Road to bear a traffic burden if it could be avoided, and said he would like to be sure traffic could flow freely by the site of the plant's entrance. He asked about discharges into the air and was told that the plant would assemble components, so some of those discharges would not be present here. Mr. Poger was told the left turn lane would be 10' wide and the passing lane would be 12' wide. He felt that traffic on that road would get heavier and that it might be good to have a right turn lane for slower traffic. The present speed limit is 50 mph. He felt the percentage of cars which would use Old Farm Road according to the projection (10.4%) sounded small and he suggested looking into ways to discourage traffic from using that road. He asked if using a 25 year storm was normal and Mr. Spi.z said he would check. Mr. Ewing liked the project, but he felt it would be very visible set Up on the knoll. Mr. Trudell said that was what the company wanted. ,Ir. iioolery was told the actual length of new paving at the entrance would be 1301. The radii are 50'. Mr. Poger felt the Commission would favor a proposal with a deceleration lane to get in and an acceleration lane to get out. Xr. Krassner asked for a guarantee that organic solvents would not get into the sewer system and thence to the lake. Mr. Trudell said a company chemist could attend the next meeting to discuss such concerns. Mr. Poger said the question was what would happen in the event of a breakdown in normal procedures for handling these chemicals. Mr. Schmucker said his clients were participating in the hearing under protest because since so little was known about the company to go on the site, intelligent questions could not even be formulated. He asked whether a traffic expert would be hired to review the traffic information presented 4. PLANNING COIiMISSION MARCH 3, 1981 and was told that had not been decided. Mr. Trudell was asked about high structures and said there would be a 4' x 10' storage tank for hydrogen. He was asked to screen roof units so they would be hidden from people looking down on them. Mr. Emery asked about trucks and was told there would be 3-4 panel trucks per day and a semi once a month. It was noted that 300 people was the most the building could handle. Mr. Ewing asked whether the Commission had the power to move the building for esthetic reasons and was told they could, with a liberal interpretation of the regulations. Mr. Schuele felt the estimate of trucks was low and he suggested that be looked into. Mr. Boyd asked about sewer plant capacity and was told there were about 115,000 gallons per day left and this use would take 9,000 gallons per day. Mr. Linus Wiles stated he had written a letter to the Commission regarding the access road and he requested that they read it as soon as possible. Mr. Mona wanted to address the question of keeping chemicals out of the ground water. It was suggested that a representative from the sewage treat- ment plant attend the next meeting. Mr. Schmucker asked whether the company could be asked to submit to a review process every time it changed its chemical process and Mr. Bogorad asked whether the Health Officer or someone else knowledgeable could assess the health hazards involved here. Mr. Spitz said that if the zoning passed March 9, it would become effective March 30. Mr. Mona moved to continue the public hearing on this application until March 10 at 7:30 pm at City Hall for the sole purpose of gaining more information on the project and not for taking any action. Mr. Levesque seconded the motion. Mr. Woolery questioned whether GBIC would have more information ready by next week. The motion failed with Messrs. Mona, Levesque and Ewing voting yes. Mr. Walsh then moved to continue the public hearing on this application until March 17 at 7:30 pm at City Hall for the sole purpose of gaining more information on the project and not for taking any action. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion and it passed with Mr. Poger dissenting. He stated that he felt it would be better to wait until March 31. Other business The Planner was directed to have the conference room warm at 7:30 for the neat meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 pm. Clerk r. r 4. FEBRUARY 24, 1981 at the nearest traffic lid-ht and how many cars would be turning left into the lot from the south. He mentioned a sidewalk and some sort of wide area to pull out in on the side. r. Yona said the concern was not counts, but what happened in terms of left and right turns. iie warred the applicants that the Commission might want them to rearrrin;;e the road in front of the property and suggested again that they talk to the State Highway Department. Mr. Ewing moved to continue the public hearing on this application until two weeks from toniL±,_� at City Hall _at 7:3U pm. Mr. Walsh seconded the motion and all voted for i t . Application of GF3IC for preliminary plat approval of a 55.700 sq. ft. building for a liy,ht manufrecturineoerrrtion on Hinesburg: Road south of Interstate 69 Mr. Ronald Schcucker sJtid he represented 23 property owners and understood thAt tnere was presently no zoning ordinance under which this proposal could be considered. Fie stated that he felt this was an illegal and unwarranted meeting. Mr. Mona replied that there was a warned public hearing set for March 9 before the City Council at which time the zoning change to industrial in this area will be revicwe;d and acted upon. He said the Commission was proceeding simultaneously with the review of the application. Yr. :;chziucker felt it was almost .ns tl.-i;h the Commission was sponsoring this project and he felt this was the first time anything like this had occurred. Mr. Spitz said that when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November it identified this area as industrial, which it is felt gives the Commission the basis to start the process simultaneous with the zoning change. Final approval cannot be given until the zoninv chAn;-e is in effect, but preliminary work can be done. He added that he hnd discussed the situation with the City Attorney, but would now ask for a written opinion from him, but he did not feel that should interfere with tonirPub's hearing. Mr. Mona said the Commission would proceed to review the application, Mr. Schmucker said he and his clients would participate under prejudice, and Mr. Walsh noted his exception to the Chairman's ruling. Ho felt Mr. ';chmuckor had raised a problem based on the law and that it would be proper to have a written opinion from the City Attorney before the Commission proceeded. Mr. Woolery felt the board should take no action but that it could proceed and take testimony. Messrs. Ewing and Levesque favored proceeding and Xr. Jacob felt it did not matter one way or the other to him. Mr. Mona snid the Commission would proceed. Mr. Trudell represented G13IC in this matter. He showed the area in question. The size of the airport approach cone on the drawing- was questioned and Mr. Mona r„eked that it be accurately drawn for the next meeting. The building, size ij now being; finalized, but it will be 57,000 to 60,000 sq, ft. in size and will be located on top of a rocky knoll. The entrance will be located on the ens;t side of the Hine burp, Road frontn6-e, where the flip-ht-distfince is best - 1;110' north and over 3000' south. Water will be brought across the full frontage of the property and fire hydrants will be added on the property. A pump station will be constructed and an easement given to serve the arer,:i south of the project with sewers. The entrance road will be burned and l,,ndscaped and the parking area screened. Mr. Trudell said that the building would not block the visibility of either the top or bottom of Mount Mansfield from Hinesburg Road. Traffic was discussed, Census data from 1970 and 1960 was taken and projected forward to 1966 and based on population studies, akfs of the cars would come from or go to the north on Hinesburg Road, while the other 11% I� 5. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 24, 1981 would be from the south. For the report, the figures 9Tf and 1U% were used. based on 300 employees, the average daily traffic to be generated here would be 90U vehicles. Mr. Trudell looked at the Kennedy Drive/route 116 intersection and he showed present traffic counts, projected counts in 1986 without the project and projections in 1986 with the project traffic. He had submitted a traffic report which is available in the Planner's office. Once turning movements were determined, the intersection capacities were analyzed. Based on today's figures, the intersection is not adequate in two areas and should be widened on Hinesburg Road approaching the intersection going southeast and approaching it going northwest. This improvement is needed today, in 1986 without the project, and in 1986 with the project to maintain level of service C at the intersection. The road should be widened and an additional turning lane put in. In addition the road should be striped and the cycle time changed slightly. Ms. Fran Reiman said many people took a shortcut over Old Farm Road and she predicted a conflict with Digital traffic on Kimball Avenue and Mr. Mona Suggested they look at this intersection. An audience member asked about those figures when another building on the site was erected. He was told that approval would have to be given for another building and traffic would again be studied at that time. They would have to come back even for an expansion of the present building, and unless it is a minor expansion, they will be subject to the same review criteria that they are subject to now. Mr. Schmucker said area residents wanted to know what company was plAnning to locate here. Mr, bruska said the company wished to remain anonymous and that the applicant here was GBIC. He told a little of what the firm would be involved with and said it would be compatible with the area. He felt that perhaps the name might be announced after the zone change, if approved, was formalized and he believed the name would be known before final plat approval. He added, however, that he would have to discuss this with the firm. Mr. Mona urged him to tell the firm of the public's concern and to move the date the name will be revealed to as close to March 9 as possible. It was 10:18 and Mr. Mona polled the Commission as to how long they wished to discuss this. Mr. Trudell said he could finish on traffic, but would not be able to cover specifics of grading, storm drainage, water, sewer, erosion eontro landscaping, and the nature of materials to be used on the site. Mr. Trudell said that present traffic on Hinesburg in front of the site was level of service A and it would be that also in 1986 without the project. With the project in 1986 it would be close to B, so they are calling it level of service B at that time. Going north, a vehicle will come along an average of 1 every 12 seconds, and going south it will be 1 every 10 seconds, which is enough time to turn without a stacking lane. Mr. Trudell felt the city's traffic consultant should look at the report submitted. The question of who will pay for the Kennedy/116 intersection improvements has not been decided. Mr. Woolery warned that the Commission might ask for some road improvements in front of the site as well as at the Kennedy/116 intersection. Mr. Mona agreed a turning lane might be required. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the application of GBIC for preliminary plat approval until next Tuesday, March 3, 1981 at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Walsh, however, wanted the date of the next hearing to be after the Council's March 9 meeting and he moved to amend the_motion_tQ._zake__the date March 10. The motion, however, died for lack of a second and the original motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 pm. Jerk 4. �!: is CoY-1SSICN JANJARY 26, 1981 stay instead. 111r. Walsh was not sure, saying he did not strongly object to a Spear street access and Mr. Jacob agreed. i•ir. Levesque favored another Speer :street entrance. The Commission was thus 4-3 in favor of Pheasant Way. It w.,;s noted also that if access were given to Pheasant Way, that would provide a second access for Meadowood. >Ir. ,foolery asked Mr. Spitz to find out what he could about were the court action regarding Pheasant Way stood. Regarding the recreation fee/land, Mr. Spitz said about 2 acres would be involved in this case. It was noted that lots 22-24 comprised about 2 acres of land. Regarding density, Mr. Mona felt the real issue here was esthetics, not density. Mr. Poger felt that having 7 lots on Pheasant fay would provide a better transition.. He asked the members whether they preferred lor_g narrow lots on Spear Street, or these wider lots with more room between the houses. Mr. Ewing favored more room between houses but Ar. Jacob felt there should be large backyards for family activities. Whether having a second row of houses behind the first row would block the views was discussed. It was decided to discuss this application more next week, since the hour was late. Application bj GB!q,-- or sketch pinn review of a 50,000 square foot bu~Iding for li,fnt manufacturing located easterly of Hinesburg Road and southerly of 1-89 Mr. Peter Judge represented GBIC. He said the proposal was to construct ..;: ,cturirg facility building on the land for=erly the aright farm. This is the first choice location of the client. Application has been made to rezone the land. The firm is a semi -conductor manufacturing company also involved in telecommunications. It is a high technology firm. The present plan is for a 30,000*to 60,000 sq. ft. building with an initial employment of up to 300 people. It might later expand to 100,000 sq. ft. �4r. Tr udell said tr.e site was 141 acres on the east side of Hinesburg Road. A Champlain Water District water main runs near the site and t':;ere is sewer on Kimball Avenue. The site is partially under the airport approach cone. Water will come from the CWD main and sewage will go to a puxp station ar:d force main, under the Interstate and to Kimball Avenue. There is an easement across the Digital land for the sewer. Er. 1'oger noted that the proposal would involve extending sewers into the Southehst Q;aadrarit, and if that we,,e done, the pipes would have to be large enough to service an area larger than just this plant. Mr. Truiell said that would be considered. Cn the conceptual plans, any building expansion would be to the south. 250 parking spaces are shown, which is over the requirement. Storm water will go to a retention pond and then into a swale. There will be burms along the entrance road, which will have good sight distance in both directions on Hinesburg Road. It will be about 1500' long. The building will be one story, about 15-20' tall, with office space in a second story over part of the building. The firs intends to retain all the acrer:ge now and Yr. ;foolery warned that if they decided to subdivide the laind, it might be difficult to get approval. Common ownership of the land with two buildings on it would be no problem. It was also noted that swaales and drainagewRys on the property could not be disturbed. Mr. ,Mona noted that when the Commission had considered this area for industrial uses, it had thought about shared access for all the land. He 5. PLANNING CON',1ISSTOP1 told the applicants they might be asked to provide access for the 10 acre piece, via the bend in the entrance road nearest that land. A right of way for such a future road could be provided. The firm might be asked to bring that road bend closer to the 10 acre parcel. The Swift :street Extension road was mentioned. It was suc,-e3ted that that may extend no further ti,an Hinesburg Road. It was noted that the Goodrich parcel behind this site could supl,ly its own access. Yr. Ewing mentioned a city street with a cul-de-sac, which would then give access to all the pieces of land in this area, or perhaps just an easement of some sort. It was rioted that perhaps the start of the entrance road as proposed now could be public and the company road could come off it. The Commission did not want the entire entrance road to be public. An acceleration/deceleration lane in the entrance road area was mentioned. Projected traffic figures were given to the Commission. This prcpcsal will not lower the level of service C now at Kennedy Drive. Mr. Woolery mentioned addition of a right turn lane at the Kennedy Drive-116 intersection. The facility may add 4-10 van -type trucks per day to the traffic. A sidewalk or bikepath along 116 to this location was mentioned. Mr. Krassner hoped any toxic waste generated would be handled carefully to keep it out of the septic system. The meeting was adjourned at 11:20 pm. Clerk Pwr go ,so • I'll, kp, � I State of Vermont 40 AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Division of Protection Natural Resources Conservation Council April 24, 1981 Mr. David Spitz So. Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering I am pleased that agency personnel were helpful in the Planning Commission's review of the Mitel application. The Solid and Hazardous Waste Staffs have reviewed the chemicals that Mitel will be disposing at the South Burlington landfill. Our review shows that the following wastes are non -hazardous and acceptable for disposal at a certified sanitary landfill: (1) Polymide Adhesive - 7.5 oz./mo.; (2) Mold Release Agency (Carnauba Wax) - 24 lb./mo.; and (3) Mold Cleaning Agent (Melamine - Formaldehyde Resin) - 24 lb./mo. This waste must be sent to a certified sanitary landfill and in accordance with state regulation will not have to be manifested. Polyset 410B Epoxy Novalac is used in pellet form; there is never waste liquid epoxy resin. This material is also non -hazardous. However, handling of this material can create a dust which is irritating and has the potential of being a worker -related problem. It is recommended that the utmost care should be taken in the disposal of this material at the landfill. The waste should be kept containerized and buried either separately from the municipal refuse or at the toe of the landfill lift so it is covered with greater quantities of municipal refuse. It has been assumed by my staff that this material will be disposed of at the City of South Burlington sanitary landfill. Though this opera- tion has not been certified as of this date, the City has made reasonable progress toward that goal, and is under a consent agreement to provide the information needed by the Agency to determine the site approval. It is the Agency's opinion that the above -mentioned materials in the quantities stated in Mitel Semiconductor's letter to you dated March 20, 1981 will not create any"significant environmental problem during this interim period and will be considered as acceptable disposal practice. If there are additional questions or we can be of future assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, RAV/car Richard A. Valentinetti, Director cc: Ray McCandles Air and Solid Waste Programs William Szymanski MIT L Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 April 2, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: Re: Handling of Accidental Spillage The on site accidental spillage will be controlled and handled as follows. The storage of chemicals and the operations of this storage area must meet the standards and requirements of Section 6-609(2) of the Hazardous Waste Management. This includes the use of an impermeable base with sufficient freeboard labeling and dating the containers, inspection, maintaining a diagram of where the wastes are located, and the use of compatible containers. This storage area must have the capability of containing the volume of the largest tank, plus sufficient freeboard to allow for contaim- ation of precipitation resulting from a twenty-four hour, twenty- five year storm. The off site accidental spillage will be controlled as follows. 10 V.S.A. para 6606 requires the secretary of hazardous waste to certify all transporters of hazardous waste, while 10 V.S.A. 6607 states that the Vermont Agency of Transportation is responsible for developing rules concerning The Transportation of Hazardous Waste. Transportors must still follow all applicable provisions including the manifest requirements of Section 6-610, the reporting requirements of Section 6-611, and emergency clean- up provisions of Section 6-613. Section 6-613 states; In the event of a spill or other damage of hazardous waste during transport, the transporter of such waste must take immediate action to protect human health and the environment including emergency spill containment measures and clean up operations. Each transporter has an emergency toll free number, 800-424-9300 (Chemtrec) which he can call to request help to contain or clean-up accidental spills. Whenever there is any unintentional release of a hazardous material during transportation or temporary storage related to transportation, or certain incidents occur during transportation of hazardous materials, the carrier is required to report the incident to the Department of Transportation. (Secs. 171-15, 171-16). Sincerely, � %�L�' 41 � 2 ,GC'z� David Martell Production Manager DM/bt MITEL Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 April 2, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz; Re: Ensuring proper recycling of Chemical Waste. The process to ensure proper recycling is controlled by the Hazardous Waste Management Section of the State of Vermont. Vermont Statute; Title 10, Chapter 159. The procedure is as follows: Mitel Semiconductor is registered with this department as a generator •of hazardous waste with EPA ID number VTD037370046 assigned. Under the guidelines of Title 10, chapter 159, we are required to file a manifest for each shippment of hazardous waste to a reclaimer. We will be manifesting to our distributor.Folino Inc. of Essex, Vt. Folino Inc. is registered as a supplier, storage and transportater of hazardous waste an assigned EPA # VTD000790766. Folino Inc. is governed by the Hazardous Waste Management Section of Vermont Statute; Title 10, Chapter 159; also CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 49, parts 100 to 199 and Federal Motor Carrier Regulations Parts 390-399. From Folino Inc. this hazardous waste will be manifested to Anachemia Inc., 11 Butternut St., P.O. Box 87, Champlain N.Y. 12919; under the same strigent guidelines and Regulations. Anachemia's recycling facility is located in Montreal therefore, this waste will be recycled at that facility. To ensure proper handling and reclaiming I have arranged with Folino Inc. to inspect their facility in Essex, the facility at Champlain N.Y. and Anachemia's facility in Montreal. Si,nfrereIy, David Martell Production Manager DM/bt TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. t'arch 23, 1981 Mr. David H. Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel Dear Dave: ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 Transmitted herewith are two documents relative to our site plan review that you have requested: 1. Letter from Mitel indicating that no hazardous wastes will be entering the sewer. 2. Outline of chemical use that was presented at the March 17, 1981 hearing. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Richard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures MITEL Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 March 20, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: Re: Addition to Preliminary Chemical Report This is a back up report on Peter Dakin's presentation given at the March 17 planning meeting. Figure I is a list of chemicals that will be used at our new facility for the manufacturing and packaging of integrated circuits (I.C.'s). Item 1. Polyset 410B epoxy novolaG is the epoxy resin used to incapsulate our I.C. devices. As can be seen from Figure 1 approximately 616 lbs. will be manifested to a certified sanitary landfill facility. This resin will be polyernized and therefore nontoxic. Item 2. Polymide adhesive will be used to bond our Die to a lead carrier. There will be approximately 7.5 oz of waste mani- fested to a certified sanitary landfill facility. Item 3. Tin lead solder used to tin the leads of our I.C. Our control of contamination.will be a barrier of peanut oil over our wave solder machine to reduce the emission to an undetectable amount. Approximately 2.2 lbs. will be manifested to a certified reclaimer of precious metals. Item 4. Alpha nickel wet 994 used as a neutralising rinse to remove oridation from lead prior to solder application. This product is contained by the lead frames through the soldering process. Therefore, there will not be any disposal required, Item 5. Alpha Reliarrinse #2441 is used to neutralize the nickel wet this prepares the leads for the flux application. We will generate (1) 55 gallon drum of spent reliarrinse that will be reclaimed through Field Point Chemicals. Item 6. Alpha Hydrosolve is the flux used to prepare the lead frames to accept solder. This flux is dissipated in the solder and vapor degreaser operation, therefore, there will not be any disposal. Item 7. Chloroethane used and reclaiming is covered in my preliminary report to the planning commission. Item 8. Barrier oil is used to provide a barrier over the wave solder machine to reduce the tin lead emissions. There will not be any disposal required. Item 9. Mold Release'Agent used on the plastic transfer molding press to prevent the plastic from adhering to the mold. There will be approximately 1 lb. to be disposed of by manifesting to a certified sanitary landfill facility. Item 10. Mold Cleaning Agent used to clean the mold cavities between molding operations. There will be approximately 24 lbs. to be disposed of by manifesting to a certified sanitary landfill facility. This report combined with my preliminary report to the planning commission is a complete report of the chemicals and there uses and disposals for our proposed facility. Sincerely, David R. Martell Production Manager Mitel Semiconductor DRM/daa Enclosure ?ATA TER PRINCIPAL PROCESS CONTA I N1tENT i AL SUPPLIER INGREDIENTS c DISPOSAL TOTAL EMISSIONS METHOD.• � QUANTITi I DISPOSAL { METHOD. USED / IIONTH QLANTITY/.1:C �1. Polyset 410B Diorton ^,henical Epoxy Resin N/A N/A Epoxy novola �mpany Sanitary landfill 616Kg (13551bs) 23G Kg 616 L I j . ,6m3-5.4f t3 2. Polymide Amicon Grp. ' Polymide Resin 1-methyl Ventilation � (adhesive.' j Venting 1.5 1(.4 U.S. gal) 225:.,1 (7.5oz, c927-42-1 1-Methyl 2-Pyrrol 2-pyrrolidinone Idinonc Silver 3. Tin -Lead ! Koster ,Solder' Tin -Lead 73-37go ! solder Company ! N/A Barrier .oil Dross Reclamation 9kg (20 lbs.) ; :i;g (2.2 lbs ! via supplier 4: Alpha nickel Alpha Metals inc. .k Hydrochloric acid N/A ! wet *994 Neutralising N/A 76 1 (20U.S. gal): ,N/q rinse ; 5. ha Al ! ' P Alpha hitals Inc. i Buffered ammonium N/A ( ` reliarrinse. N/A ! *2441 t hydroxid ! IH at discard Point; 209 1 .(55 U.S.gal) 209 I (55 U.S.; 16.2-6.4 i discard via Field ! --- ---- liPoint Chemical I G. Alpha 1 i — Alpha ;,totals Inc. ,Methyl alcohol I? hydrosolve I , :,Ieth}'1 alcohol Ventilation. �Va or dc_ > « f P Icasin j 76 1 (20 L',5,-=al) b , Venting �� ?, Chlorocthane Anachemia chemical; 1, 1, 1 1'richloro Trichloro Vapor containment � Reclamation via '380 ! LTD. ethane Iethane + 1 (1000,S.gal) 350 (100 G.S. ' tt by refrigerated ' supplier I I condensation coil ventilation Field Poi ntChem 8. Carrier oil Local food store Peanut oil i Oil odor Ventilation Vapor degreaser 20 1 (5 U.S.gal) N/A PRINCIPAL PROCESS CONTAINMENT DISPOSAL TOTAL QUANTITY DISPOSAL hLaTERIAL SUPPLIER ( INGREDIENTS EMISSIONS METHOD METHOD- USED/hiONTH QUANTITYP-:0. 9. Mold Release Krass Corporation Carnauba Wax N/A N/A Sanitary Landfill .5Kg (1 Lb) I .5::g (1 Lb) Agent I 10. Mold Cleaning Plascon products i Melamine -formal Ammonia formal Ventilation Sanitary Landfill 11Kg (24Lbs) 11Kg (24Lbs) Agent Inc, dehyde Resin dehyde • I MIT L Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 March 20, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City Of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spitz: Re• Disposal Into Sanitary Sewer This letter is to inform you that in our proposed facility we will not discharge any chemical or hazardous waste into the sanitary sewer system. The only discharge into the sanitary sewer will be the normal domestic waste. Si 'a erely, David R. Martell Production Manager Mitel Semiconductor DRM/daa Enclosure 1. MITEL Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 TO: Whom It May Concern DATE: Marc FROM: David R. Martell i^cdkCt"', H,*n,? M/TFL SUBJECT: Chemical Use & Storage h 13, 1981 Fof'eVh;rra4',►7r- Foreign Trade Zone present use, storage & reclaiming of chemicals: 1) 92.5% Chloroethane plus 7.5% secondard Butyl Alcohol a) Used in vapor degreaser. b) Storage four 55 gallon drums per month. c) Flash point - none Chloroethane Butyl Alcohol - 970FTOC. d) Reclaiming: This process is controlled by the Hazardous Waste Department in Montpelier. Process is as follows: I have submitted in writing notification to this department that our facility is a generator of hazardous waste. (exhibit A) Their department then assigned us a Federal EPA Number - VTDO37370046. This process takes approximately eight to ten weeks. With this accomplished I am now in the recycling mode. This consists of the following: Field Point Chemicals of Essex deliveres four 55 gallon drums per month. At which time they pick up four 55 gallon drums of spent liquid. In order for then to do this I fill out a Hazardous Waste Manifest and shipping paper. (7 copies) Sample shown Figure 1. This manifest tracks the hazardous waste from craddle to grave. Field Point Chemical then using their EPA Number manifest this to a re- claiming facility. The reclaiming facility recovers approximately 90% of the chloroethane and Butyl Alcohol. This recovered chemical is then resold to us at a reduced cost. The complete process is tracked by the Hazardous Waste Department through their copies of the above mentioned manifest papers. 2) Isopropyl Alcohol a) Used in general cleaning of solder print screens. b) Storage five gallons per month. c) Flash point - 53°F closed cup. Page 2 Chemical Use & Storage d) Disposal. N/A Alcohol is absorbed in the Kimwipes used for cleaning solder paste which are then recycled to reclaim the silver content. Items 1 & 2 that are presently used have been inspected by OSHA and NFPA. The NFPA required.a metal storage building for chemicals which I had already provided. To further protect our environment and personnel, I have installed .a closed loop fill and drain system from our chemical building to our vapor degreaser. In respect to OSHA prior to construction of this assembly facility I invited them to our facility to discuss our intent.' Working with Martin Johansen I was able to design and meet OSHA requirements. Upon completion of our assembly facility Martin returned for a follow up visit and inspection. Figure 2 shows the results.of'this inspection. Figures 3,4, and 5 are the material safety data -.sheets for Items 1 & 2. 3) Our proposed facility will utilize these same chemicals plus some additions. The previously used chemicals will be handled in the same cautious and protective manner. 4) Additional chemicals used for our -Hybrid Assembly will be mixture by volume. 40% denatured Ethanol, 40% Isopropanol, and 20% Naptha (VM & P) a) Used in cleaning of precious metals and solder print silk screens. b) Storage one 55 gallon drum per month. c) Flash points - 95% Denatured Ethanol = 50OF closed cup 99% Isopropanol = 53°F closed cup Naptha (VM & P) = 530F closed cup d), Disposal - quantity used will be absorbed by Kimwipes. The disposal will be to a reclaim of precious metals. Therefore there will not be a fluid reclaiming or disposal process. Figures 6 and 7 support item 4. 5) Our use of Item 1 will be the same. Our quantities will increase to five -eight 55 gallon drums per month. The same reclaiming process or an inhouse closed loop reclaiming process will be used. Use of item 2 will remain the same and quality will remain the same. 6) Chemicals to be used for our semiconductor manufacturing and packaging operation. AgNob► Page 3 Chemical Use & Storage Morton Polyset 410B - Epoxy Novolac/Silica filled a) Use - incapsulating integrated circuits (I.C.'s). b) Storage 1500 lbs. stored in an 8' x 8' walk in freezer. c) Flash point - None.• d) Reclaiming or Disposal - None Required. This product is used for packaging I.C.'s therefore it is consumed and becomes part of our finished product. e) Figure 8 - material safety data sheet for Polyset 410B. f) Figure 9 - is a controlled study performed by Rosner- Hixson Laboratories on the above mentioned polyset 410B. 7) Our new facility will comprise of the same activities presently performed at our division in Bromont, Quebec. Figure 10 is an independent study on the gaseous emissions at Bromont conducted by Guy G. Racine, Director of Air Improvement and Waste Disposal utilizing Nenniger & Chenevert Inc. as the Surveyor. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST AND SHIPPING PAPER' U UU2lU b'y i c� - ;', y + a , r• ,� r.- s ►. y. !;: -MANIFEST NUMBER NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER STATE/E.P.A. LD. NO. GENERATOR . , • ....; '. :. W PRIMARY TRANSPORTER -/' 1 rn� f-o O W QZa W< r.fL CONTINUING TRANSPORTER ,• - f �t Ur WE / 4t •9I: i a'. s;• J O W Z W H.W. F. . r , z �rwq ' t a, , - "• ao V I< Q Olt 1 rtw t '' `rbr F �al. s1 IL u H O 1�l ► LI IF MORE THAN ONE MANIFEST/ ?TDTAC,'kO.OF•:'� "� ;,-THIS FORW. MANIFESTNO.Or-IF�IF,3ST:FORM pAT pp �'�� "°.� ppY~ ' �j�jjT , �„p t(�' !� � IXW OU u� '1r _ ,• „ , .. +. n r.lNa* S w.'N!ey gip•., .,,. • ti.- +i^ Q a w L SHIPPING PAPER IS USED: ' FORMS ARE NO. IS �•� '*Xa�'«' 'Tx'�,'ir�v�r._ t DAT , �'- "" JZ Q ►- V o D.O.T. HAZARD U.N. / N.A. UNIT CONTAINER E.P.A. WASTE DESCRIPTION OR WASTE Q W IX 3W U.S. D.O.T. SHIPPING NAME W T. /VOL•. UNITS ¢ Ir w Q :. CLASS NO. CODE N0. TYPE NO. ANALYSIS IF WASTE IS N.O.S. W Q Ira cow laW,C)z a Y �cZ �• Z. a > �• a �. :,t i .4". .,r 'y �i _ } "•.,� .�v, 'S• Sv f -r y. 1 aQ Id-i:iir.i-"`' .'4 it �n•t n a ,n~•'Y. 1GA ' 7i.. ..� ti "ate i �j.r�a,.'a- ;n • Z,2 ' ice• 4.8 p}_ Ll •! 4Lc x+C.. /�,c-. ;. ca• •1e �sn t,rt« •a = x.':t•' �. ) r.i-.l, 4 ,.l` . at .� . r.. �'.,..; P1+i. ~ _� �' :-�%�' _ �:- 1 -+.. •r -" +`•.. Y f'.1 L: _ Y r. J • �x� ,�.�i"Y t F"'�{ Cd� �s,. �-/.c.'4'z Y '•� �k14+ •.�• �``J'Q� Q O.-::� _ � s�'�,. r, - w R ;%.■*.>" i ...ytt J•� , a,?,y,.?tj''Iy? :/.. � -.w ,y. t . ,:7�j(e# - -fa �-.�. . r +y,; :�y'.Ca ^�k a �„�. � �,�"�+w.- Q � � 2:. "•t._ C . 1+. .� : • s b _. `�'� _ .. � fir•'" " x +•: s= � ; � r - i� � - t '` . �-- � .ti#t � i r'a�t i .r a.�- '�:; �r$,.�r�. � Zp �• Q ;-,ter.' O sy - •`• t - �. r ..S J - - e* _ (q:�.. '•.� : -t �,K" s.._ -`y�► . . q�„Q O ':c' 1. `� C � a_ �.•�1G +:' _t. 4 ti. �■.,e.�;t a `R .ti .,,t;f; t - y�,q_ .� .a. `iti _ Z;3 F� 6- T'" - : f. :i 2 �>;:: ,�>s•iCi;� =,�7C,M=+,jM.d 'fact t',�+ltt- ♦.' i�.fs 7C it. -. •. - _ - .....` agar ,•• Yii •Lr i->. .=: 4-5 ,,; SP.ECIA HANDLING INSTRUCTIONSINCLUDING ANY, CONJA(NER-EXEMPTIC%;�AND.EFytERGENCY RESPONSE iNFQRMATION .:r •' ■ t..;''` ' err ,:• <�* _ = � Q �� x ;4 � �` •'_` i t. +.s.'_ t� 'a -t 1. �. �.•.. _ -ry,." t-O7 �}y► �'.-..F P i ate- t ,,�,e! _ �i 1' «,., veat. •rL'+.�r -� S •.� '^+C . i •t 'y s. '.�T-- �+f ,y. .4.^ i v'i�- 'o.� b •"�' •+. cat y_? :•.+' �,,G' _ 7 wt "-?bS — •i', 1ai3, S. �.• _ .t. ,'� Kam- Z•' r 'C �'.' ''• •'�'•�• :^ :[+Yl�?/y!!r : i�`.� .3 _ •+�." cr +' >. •er e� . Y } '' Fa 'iir +s`cy:!! •�r ,ry 1�+ y_ k «. - :�.. '��rc.ti�„ ,= r.•,?' *,;*. '� si+i' e_.sa - LyYi+�t.: i�i f4 f-%�- x :�: •.. --,t. •r - J #F�t"� �y r, gee �� •tom•., ,i - "4,, - - ) � ..r. :{fit :•y i •"w`; �k. .- � .{r +" •d - .Y' } it .�,. 'Yi. s la st. :i -p'. _� •" —�•Z Ix Tc W K Ia INTHE EVENTOFA SPILL,CONTACT THE NATIONAL' RESPONSECENTER,U.S. COASTGUARD 1-800-424-8802 ~ ~O OATS SHIPMENT ACCEPTED,:; 1 r ATE OF OELIVER1f REQUIRED LABELS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT IAMTFiE PRIMARY 1� , y .STATE ?;'&iIPANYNO FOR TRAILER ; �� i�ONTH '' DAY YEAR`. 4� ti SMARINE OR RAlL y aa. MOtyTH;�OAY YEA TRANSPORTER AND HAVE ACCEPTED THE � f y + ❑ DESCRIBED SHIPMENT IN PROPERCONDITION °•• j,�iW FOR TRANSPORT TO THE IDENTIFIED H.W.F. rL J YES NO SIGNATURE OF TRANSPORTER DATE SHIPMENT ACCEPTED DATE OF DELIVERY )a PLACARDS REQUIRED THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE CONTINUING -' STATE MPANY NO. FOR�TRAILER■ t i, !� TRANSPORTER AND HAVE ACCEPTED THE MOWTrH t -•DAY _ YEAR; yGLE �wt MARINE OR RAI a a �i�'K rf3MON U-77, EpDESCRIBED SHIPMENT IN PROPER CONDITION,tr '. §i '�ty�p FOR TRANSPORT TO THE IDENTIFIED H.W.F.= SIGNATURE OF TRANSPORTER Irm '^ INDICATE ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MANIFESTAND SHIPMENTAND LIST REJECTED MATERIALS, INDICATE DISPOSITION OF REJECTED SHIPMENT �t•' ``�''�"'�"`"''" -�` :::J .i - .A: �}ry ' a . t''4.`'a . 4. a.- . .A• i" - , i , « � )'r ... , ^_, •.+t'.• ,. !.( 1�+' c 'sy �`-L . /�J CERTIFY THAT THE DESCRIBED WQSTE(S) WAS DELIVERED BY -THE AFOREMENTIONED DELIVERING rkANSPO_ RTER AND THAT THE Tf�N ON;THFS •' , . :a. .+t.r i,I�3• •:• :e'. �' `! ... Yr: r ?v �a4.'ya-t w.er t �:at. �'a 77u' •< •rr' ♦ M' « ., y�.� .t..•_.t... 4 .r ,i' y.r ,.n�"'- _ �.+•" r :'� F.S':'t' -ii, '; y.,a '1•u Ts�(! a, i ark :;''. :�, =i c_`..-'+•t, ,,.- „}`' JC '^-,'�' l „•` � �'��. �S r �` II,IANIFF,ST 1$.CORRECT :t. dry TO THE BEST OF MY�kNOWLEDGE: '` 'w` 04 �` i • ;c +�►d�::.,� -. e,-`.'$F:;t ae:�1Y..,lis i tr:'.it .tcf .c r{lS,.e:.`2.�c j.... . h •,'� !f• ,..+s },si,iIONATURE -0� lf �.• t . �,•+r„ +M, .lit •�a+ia 'I.rS : WfiMr ...r.. - .r►.:...-. • _,....... a f F F B 0 4 HLUB U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Required under USDL Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repairing, Shipbuilding, and Shipbreaking (29 CFR 1915, 1916, 1917) ,--- rJ 3 orm ADotov�0 OMB No. 44•R1Ja7 SECTION 1 MANUFACTURER'S NAME EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NO. Vulcan Materials Company, Chemicals Division 316-524-5751 ADDRESS (Number, Street, City, State, and ZIP Code) P. O. Box 7689 Birmingham a-bama 'I C E IC -NAME SYNONYMS TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS ,�,� Trici�oroethane - Methyl Chlorofo Solvent 111 CH ICAL,FAMILY ORMULA Ciiorinated Hydrocarbon CHI - CCL- SECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES, & SOLVENTS % TLV I ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS PIGMENTS BASE METAL CATALYST ALLOYS VEHICLE METALLIC COATINGS SOLVENTS FILLER METAL PLUS COATING OR CORE FLUX ADDITIVES OTHERS OTHERS HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA BOILING POINT (OF.) SPECIFIC GRAD 2 162-190 GRAVITY (H O=1) VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hg,) 200. C, PERCENT, VOLATILE 100 BY VOLUME (%) VAPOR DENSITY (AIR-1) EVAPC fAN RATE 4.6 eLfleW&r SOLUBILITY IN WATER oderat APPEARANCE AND ODOR Colorl PCC SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLASH POINT (Method Wad None to ClOS FLAMMABLE LIMITS EXTIN UISHING M QIA C lot a p icable SPECIAL FI E FIGHTING PRO E URES Selt-contained-reathin e ui ment should be used k building where 1,1,1 trichloroethane is stored* tJNL;5 L FIRE AND EXP OSION HAZARD Keep Va ors can be i niM b high energy ignition sourc with fire or hot surfaces to acidic gases & other high s an ce . PAGE (1) (Continued on reverse side) La I % I �TLV % I (unLits) 1.3 0.4 WI ly toxic sub - Form OSHA-20 Rev, May 72 SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD DATA THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE --y 350 Ppm as listed in Part 1910.1000 of CFR, Title 29) EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE Overexposure can cause vomiting, nausea, drowsiness, unconsciousness and even death in extreme cases.. EMERGENCY AND FIRST A14 PROCEDURES Move to fresh air. Remove contaminated clothing. If breathing has stopped, administer artificial resr)iration.___Keep warm and quiet. Call physician. Eye contact --wash with copious amounts of water. Never a minis er ArirpnAnnn SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY UNSYABLE CONDITIONS TO AD Contact wiV It�c�o en flame hot surfaces or STABLE X emissions from welding arc. INCOMPATABILITY (Materials t to avoid) HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS -Hydrogen chloride hos ene and other highly toxic substance. HAZARDOUS MAY OCCUR CONDITIONS TO AVOID POLYMERIZATION WILL NOT OCCUR X SECTION,VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED e h ar a ventilate, id rea in vapor or coming in contact with liquid. Clean up area (wear protective clothing) con-. tain transfer b mopping WASTE DISPOSAL ME Consult man-u-facturer or local,Pollution or with absorbent material to storage control agency. SECTION VIII - SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION RESPIRATORY PROTECTION (.Specify typell None uir d when use13 with adequate ventilation VENTILATION L C xA HUST urricient to maintain below TLV SPECIAL MECHANICAL (General) OTHER PROTECTIVE GLOVES EYA PROTECTI N , Neoprene, viton, P.V.C-. coated hemica� safety goggles OTHER PROTECTIV1heaEpUIPMENT Protective d ear & apron when splashing is a problem SECTION IX SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORING Avoid act with skin and avoid vapors Pipe vents outdoors. Store in cool dry ventilated area OTHER PRECAUTIONS moil air from enterin stora e. No smoking in presence of vapors. PACE (Y) ono 034.110 —. Form OSHA-20 Rev. May 72 FEB 0 4 ..IV F, A.- -J N P\/LA 6-7 % (Approve d by Deparlinorit of Lnbor "Essontially Similar- io I oiin I !,it -i) f V Soction- I Amsco Division, Union Oil Company Californii 1 1345 North .Beacham Road CITY. STATE. AND ZIP CODE Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 TE-EPHONE NO. transportation, Fire, Safety ONLY (800) 424-9300. Ilealtli and Poison ONLY 60/+-2171 CHEMICAL NKME AND SYNONYMS TRADE NAME _(21 3)__ Butanol Butyl Alcohol Butanol CHEMICAL FAMILY T FORMULA_ Alcohols C41190H J." PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES, & SOLVENTS PIGMENTS TLV % I I TLV (Dolts) (Units) 100 100 CATALYST ADDITIVES Vr -OTHERS' HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES TLV % (Units)' 'E x i. Ai 0:4,V1 oOILING POINT ff.) 244 SPECIFIC GRAVITY (1­1110=11) -. 1. .... ".::, - . 0.81 'APOR PRFSSURF ('Wn Mo.) 0 20 C 4 2.5 PERCENT VOLATILE BY VOL.UME..(%).-,n.- W 100 APOR DENSITY (AIR=11) 0.5 .'ANno OLU91LITY IN WATER 200C 8% PPEARANCE AND ODOR Clear, colorless i (LLij _d - dual odor. .A' -,POINT (!.I---TmOO USED), 0 FLAMMABLE LIMITSLet Utt 97 F. T6C i.._UISHING MEDIA A166hdl" fcam. ,'TCTAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURLS o) Tzo,ne--` ...................... r —I-- A _TD_iiP S614 4Ai I46i TUSUWC F I iE Ni I None I 100 PP-1 15 F OVER 10F,.HE IYT J t 1))-o.-II VERGENCY AND Fi?ST A16-f7k—OCLDWFAES Remove to fresh air. if -swallowed, indoce vomI.H.iig"and call a 0.iysiclll Flush skin andt!yye contact with water Get, medical 64rq ft�y cXer;.— STABILITY U )STABLE. CONDITIONS TO AVOID STABLE x None NCOMPATABILITY (Alaccrials to avoid) St one iniiieral iAZANDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS None CONDITIONS TO AVOID IAZAnDOuS MAY OCCUR OLYMERIZATION WILL NOT OCCUR 'None' TEPS 10 BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RCLEASED OR SP•ItLED- Fliminate all sources of i,,,nition. Flush with large ru-ilount-s of water. 1ASTE DISPOSAL WETHOD Atomize into an incinere.t6r. ESPIRATORY PROTECTION (Specify type) All-purpose canister mask.. Chemical cartridge respirator. LOCAL EXHAUST SPECIAL ENTILATION Preferable J1,11CHANICAL (General) OTHER Acceptable 101ECTIVE S LOVE [Yf PROTECTION -Rubber P-loxies Face shield GLOVES rF,ER PROTECTIVE ECUIPM.ENT one V 1 IECAUTIONS 70 BE T A � 1. N IN HANDLING AND STORING - Avoid contact with eyes Avoid breathing of vapor. Kee irks. rind fires_ Use with ide'quate ventil.,it.ion-- Keep container closed. OILR PRECAUTIONS Case of contact with 'eyes, iii-imediately flij,si with plenty of water for at least - 1.5 Ininutes; get medical attention. Isopropyl AlF� page 2 0t 3 SECTION V ••HEALTH IIAZARD DATA T►/nr-rWJLD I rMlT VALUE 400 pprn�, or approximately 980 mg per cubic meter of air. Eff UVLliLx1'�UIIE Inhalation: flushing, headache, dizziness, nauseayomitiZ _ Eye:_ Irritant. Skin: absorbed through skin adding to effect of inhalation CMI n•.1 ricY nr�U r MIST AID PIIOCLOUNCS ' In,mlaLlon: remove to fresh -nor. Keen warm and comfortable_ (Coll a phvaicia for coma). If breathing is inbored, give artificial respiration. If conscious give black coffee., Eyes: wash with water. Skin: remove soaked clothinr;. SECTION VI • REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY UNSTABLE CONDITIONS TO AVOID STABLE X INC041PATAUILITv (.11al�rlo t !u ora, j II drogen-palladium com_t�in1,tion; nirrnfnrm: N ,BAR IOUS r Ot COr1-O IUN PPOh IC TS e �ave no sturi'�es on LIis product. fnr Alrnhal-- �Q CO and CO and possibly aldehydes would be NATAr10005 POLYMERIZATION MAY OCCUR CONDITI NS TO AVOID expected. P WILL NOT OCCUR X SECTIONI VII •'SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEPS TO BC TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED Use personal protection equiQment. Se also V'3 WASj� ttll uJ,'XO AL ►IL T►iOP iVdporatc with authority approval. (2) Sewer with authority approval. (3) Reclaim internally or by outside chemical disposal contractor licensed for thi SECTION VIII • SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION nC',14RA VIiV P1401I C71r;IJ ���r Cl/r rrrlrl Por jeaks and spills, types: see Ref. (a) VENTILATION LOCAL I x I U51 • SPLCIAL generally required. LOCAL (Golercl) OINER PROTCCTIVE GLOVI5 EYE PnOTECTION Not generally required. Safety glasses. OT0IE11 PPOTLCTIV EQUIr1.IENT Not generally required. SECTION IX • SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS PR( CAVTION! TO UL IAK NAN 11ANUl.ING AND 510F ING See Reference M.- Corrodes rubber - use neorrene. Avoid ignition sources and hot spots. Use Underwriter -approved explosion proof electrical systems, formal o111uI rrlr •/\UIIUNy at Z�[i[f3 prose urc. Sec Re�crence (a), including personnel training. PAGE121 "Lola is designated a "skin" value by ACGIH • Form OSt IA•20 Rev. Nov. , 1977 F.C.H. a U.S. ULI'A{1 110 LN I ' t)1= LACUffi ''°'" ""°'"•`° mac...' 16- OMU No. A4 n13s7 FEB 01 RECT Occupational Safety nntl Health Adininistrntio(� Farrell Chotiflcal Corp. � MATHIIAL SAFETY DATA S111-- T 110 To tE(``I`inq°St. Wlnoo<<I. VT 05301 Required under USDL Safety and Health Rern ilations for Ship fen�rinJ�(802) 655-0300 _ Shinbuildin�, and Shillhreaking (29 CFn 1915, 1916, 1017) - SECTION 1 Allied Chemical Corporation EMERGENCY TLLEPHONE NO. _Specialty Chemicals Division 1(201) 455-2000"''' Ao4),I� s Box 108711, Morristown, NJ ":47960 CIILMICAL HAMF. AND SYNONYMS TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS f, ISnroryl A1r.QJio1,-1&Dp=Iso r &py 1 Alcohol CHLK'I( AL I A'-11LY FORMULA. Aliphatic Alcohols (Cll ) Cl{oH SECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS N.A. PAINTS. PnESEnVATIVES, & SOLVENTS X Tn t ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS % (Unvi) PIGMCNTS BASE METAL CATALYST ALLOYS VEIIICLE METALLIC COATINGS SOLVENTS FILLER METAL PLUS COATING On CORE FLUX ADDITIVES OTHERS OTHERS HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OT14ER LIQUIDS, SOLIDS. OR GASES % TLV (Umlt) SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA SOILING POINT (°F•) 180eF (82.5%) SPECIFIC GRAVI:Y (1-120•1) (Liquid) 0.785 VAPOR PRESSUnE (mm 1,49. e o At 20 C (68 F . 33 PERCENT, VOLATILE BY VOLUME V.) 100 VAPOR DENSITY (Alq•l) 2.1 EVA OItAT1ON RATE (n PUIMC .11 (Time to evaporate) <1 SOLUDILITY IN WATER [complete APPEARANCE AND ODOR Colorless liquid; slight odor, resembling a mixture of acetone alld eL11.11101 SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA Fl Sk1 6.01 ♦ V-1i1^od mrpl LAWIM TILE LIMITS L I el 2Clost.d cur) 53eF (11.7%) �y Voiunle E�T u,;.vI�I 11frG L�LDIn Alcohol foam, orb. Water may be ineffective. SPLCIAL f 11IE FIGHTING PnOCE IIURES breathing. appnrntuct approved by NI0S11. Use Water to cool _neighboring containers. UKIIWAL EIr7L NO E XI•LOSION HA2ANDS k'e know o? none. PAGE III Form OSHA-20 ft.., Nov., 1977 ! Supersedes Mar., 1975 ,�, _ •_,:�.-�-. 4 F E B 0 4 REC'D ,i �� D039!:5 / ETHANOL PROPRIETARY 19n P "12 4 PAGE=�,��,e 1 MATERIAL SAFEIY DATA SIIFFT r! ACC.rPTI'D f1Y U.S.H.A. AS ESSENTIALLY SIMILIAR To O. S.H.A. FORM 2.0 ifX ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO,ENVIRONMENTAL60CCUPATIONAL SAFETY DL-I,Itt3Jx 2219PCOLUMBUS•OH4321 k 24—HOUR EMERGENCY TELEPHONE: 606-324-113.3 (LOCATED AT ASHLAND, KENTUCKY) ASHLAND PRODUCT NAME: ETHANOL PROPRIETARY 190 P 3224 05 50 074 3335151-001 FOLING INDUSTRIES DATA SHEET 40: 0104289-001 PO BOX 218 LATEST REVISION DATE:,()7/79-79200 WINCOSKI VT 05404 PRODUCT: 7430000 INVOICE: 550672 INVOICE DATE: 09/14/80 '+ TC: FGLINO INDUSTRIES ^' r 11 MORRIS DRIVE ATTN: PURCHASING/SAFETY DEPT. ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 R****##*####*###aa*a#*#*# SECTION I —PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION ####*###*#**#********* 'ENERAL OR GENERIC ID: SOLVENT BLEND •IAZARO CLASSIFICATION: (33) FLAMMABLE LIQUID (173. 115) +*************#h* ******* SECTION 11—HAZAR-DOUS COMPONENTS #*#*####*************** INGREDIENT PERCENT TLV 1 EXONE METHYL ALCCHOL 1.00x 1-5 % 10 210 P P 4 RPM •'I :THYL ACETATE < 1 % 400 PPM :THYL ALCCHOL 85-90 z 1000 PPM i sr i#**a�*******#*#***•x******#* SECTION III —PHYSICAL CATA PROPERTY -------- REFINEMENT ---------- MEASUREMENT ----------- INITIAL BOILING PCINT IAPOR PRESSURE ►APOR DENSITY ;PECIFIC GRAVITY 'ERCENT VOLAT ILES VAPORA I I CN R4 TF -FOR PRODUCT 176.00 DEG F l ( 80.00 DEG 0 @ 760.00 MMHG ----------------------------------------------------------�- F CR PRODUCT 46.00 MMHG , 68.00 DEG F` C 20.00 DEG CV ------------------------------------------------------------ AIR = 1 1.6 " ---------------------- ----------------------------------- . 812 @ 6 8.00 DEG F ( 2 0.00 DEG Cl, ----------------------------------------------------------- 100.00 X n ..--r-------..—..—r—r—r--rr--------------------rr-------------. SLOWER THAN ETHER' • t CGNTINUED ON PAGE: 2 ETHANOL -PROPRIETARY 190 P 3224 PAGE: 2 •**a##a*##*a*#* SECTION IV -FIRE AND EXPLOSION DATA .,N POINT(CLCSED CUP) 57..no DEG F f ( 13.88 DEG C) )WER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (LOWEST VALUE , OF COMPONENT) 3.3 Z t; (TINGUISHING MEDIA: ALCOHOL FOAM OR WATER FOG OR CARBON DIOXIDE OR DRY. CHEMICAL IZARCOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: MAY FORM TOXIC MAT*ER IALS:, CARBON DIGXIDE AND CARBCN MONCX I DE. , ETC. PECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS WITH A FULL FACEPIECE OPERATED IN PRESSURE DEMAND OR OTHER POSITIVE PRESSURE MODE.. g' IUSUAL FIRE F. EXPLOSION HAZARDS: VAPORS ARE HEAVIER THAN AIR AND MAY TRAVEL ALCNG THE GROUND OR MAY BE MOVED BY VENTILATION AND IGNITED BY PILOT ' LIGHTS, OTHER FLAMES, SPARKS, HEATERS, SMOKING, ELECTRIC MOTORS, STATIC ).r DISCHARGE, OR OTHER IGNITION SOURCES AT LOCATIONS DISTANT FROM MATERIAL HANDLING PCINT. NEVER USE WELDING OR CUTTING TORCH ON OR NEAR DRUM (EVEN EMPTY) BECAUSE PRODUCT (EVEN .JUST RESIDUE) CAN IGNITE EXPLOSIVELY. SECTION V-HEALTH HAZARD.CATA******#y>k* RRESFOLD LIMIT VALUE: NOT ESTABLISHED FOR PRODUCT. SEE. SECTION II. FECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: FOR PRODUCT' ---------------------- ES - CAN CAUSE SEVERE IRRITAT ION,'.REQNESS, TEARING, BLURRED VISION. ? IN - PROLONGED OR REPEATED CONTACT'CAN CAUSE MODERATE IRRITATION, DEFATTING, DERMATITIS. wr EATHING - EXCESS IVE INHALATION OF VAPORS CAN CAUSE NASAL I-)R ITATI04; F t' DIZZINESS. WEAKNESS, FATIGUE, NAUSEA, HEADACHE, POSS i f3LE UNCONSCIOUSNESS, '. ANC EVEN ASPHYXIATION..{i ALLOWING - CAN CAUSE GASTROINTESTINAL IRRITATION, NAUSEA, VOMITING, DIARRHEA. +fig IST AID: ON SKIN: THORCUGHLY WASH EXPOSED AREA WITH SOAP AND WATER. REMOVE CCNTAMINATED CLOTHING. LAUNDER CONTAMINATED -CLOTHING 3EFORE RE -USE. IN EYES: FLLSH WITH LARGE AMOUNTS OF WATER, LIFTING UPPER AND LOWER LIDS �. OCCASIONALLY. GET MEDICAL ATTENTION. SWALLOWED: GIVE TWO GLASSES OF WATER;• INDUCE VCMITING IMMEDIATELY BY STICKING FINGER'DOWN THROAT. CALL'A PHYSICIAN. NEVER GIVE ANYTHING BY MOLTH TO AN UNCONSCIOUS PERSGN. r BREATHED: IF AFFECTED, REMOVE INDIVIDUAL TO FRESH AIR. IF BREATHING IS P x DIFFICULT ADMINISTER OXYGEN. IF BREATHING HAS STGPPEU, GIVE ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION. KEEP PERSCN WARM, QUIET, AND GET MEDICAL ATTENTION. r` CONTINUED ON PAGE:. 3 "'' ETHANOL PROPRIETARY 190 P 3221. PAGEt SEC TION.•Vi-REACTIVITY DATA *##******#*************** HAZAR000S POLYMERIZATICN: CANNOT OCCUR STABILITY: STABLE I,NCCMPATABILITY: AVOID CONTACT WITH:, STRONG OXIDIZING AGENTS. SECTION VII—SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES***************#*# STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: ---------------------------------------------------------- SMALL SPILL: AHSGRB LIQUIC ON PAPER, VERMICULITE, FLUOP ABSORBENT, OR OTHER i ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND TRANSFER TO HOOD. i 'LARGE SPILL:•ELIMINATE ALL IGNITION 'SOURCES (FLARES, FLAMES INCLUDING PILOT LIGHTS, ELECTRICAL SPARKS). PERSONS NOT WEARING PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM AREA. OF. SPILL UNTIL GLEAN —UP HAS GEEN COMPLETED. STCP SPILL AT SOURCE, DIKE AREA OF SPILL TO.PREVENT SPREADING, PUMP LIQUID l TO SALVAGE TANK. REMAINING LIQUID MAY BE TAKEN UP ON SAND, CLAY, EARTH, FLOOR ABSORBENT OR OTHER ABSORBENT'MATERIAL AND SHOVELLED INTO CONTAINERS. 4 PREVENT RUN—OFF TO SEWERS, STREAMS, OR OTHER BUDI ES OF WATER. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: --------------------- SMALL SPILL: ALLCW VOLATILE PORTION TO EVAPORATE IN -FOR VAPORS TO COMPLETELY CLEAR HOOD DUCT WORK. BY BURNING IN AN IRON PAN. HOOD. ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME DESTROY �E:MAINING MATERIAL LARGE SPILL: DESTROY BY LIQUID INCINERATION. CCNTAMINATEO ABSORBENT P1AY BE DEPOSITED IN A LANDFILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ! LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATICNS. +`p1 ****************'***,SECT MN VIII—PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TO BE USED a x RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: IF TLV OF, THE PRODUCT OR ANY•COMPONCENT IS EXCEEDED, NIOSH/MSHA JOINTLY APPROVED AIR SUPPLIED RESPIRATOR IS ADVISED IN ABSENCE CF PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. OSHA REGULATICNS ALSO °ERMIT OTHERi<, 4, NIOSH/MSHA RESPIRATORS UNDER 'SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. (SEE YOUp SAFETY �!'EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER). -ENGINEERING OFF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO REDUCE EXPOSURE. a VENTILATICN: PROVIDE SUFFICIENT MECHANICAL (GENERAL AND/CR LOCAL EXHAUST) VENTILATION TO MAINTAIN EXPOSURE BELOW TLV(S). '. PROTECTIVE GLOVES: WEAR RESISTANT GLOVES SUCH -AS:,,- NATURAL RUDBER, POLYVINYL , CHLORIDE EYE PROTECTION: CHEMICAL SPLASH GOGGLES IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS ARE ADVISED; HOWEVER, OSHA REGULATIONS ALSO PERMIT OTHER TYPE SAFETY GLASSES. (CONSULT YOUR SAFETY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER) DTHER. PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: TO PREVENT REPEATED OR PROLONGE,) SKIN CONTACT, WEAR IMPERVIOUS CLOTHING -AND BOOTS. CONTINUED ON PAGE: 4 tiHANUL PRUPRtLIARY 190 P 3224 PAGE: 4 SECT ION I X—SPECIAL PRECAUT IONS OR OT ITR L(:MMFNTS *#************#A _NTA INS METHANOL. •o^' y' ,CANNOT BE MADE NCN—POI SONGUS. CONTAINERS OF THIS MATERIAL MAY BE''HAZARDOUS WHEN EMPTIED. SINCE EMPTIED CONTAINERS RETAIN PRODUCT RESIDUES (VAPOR, LIQUID, AND/JR SOLID), ALL ' HAZARC PRECAUTIONS GIVEN IN "THLS DATA SHEET MUST BE OBSERVED. �•, ��!` �E THE INFORMATION ACCUMULATED HEREIN IS BELIEVED TO'BE ACCURATE BUT IS NOT WARRANTEC TO BE WI —ETHER ORIGINATING WITH ASHLAND OR NOT. RECIPIENTS ARE' ADVISED TO CCNFIRM IN ADVANCE OF NEED THAT THE INFORMATION IS CURRENT, APPLICABLE, AND SUITABLE TO THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES. st> r . LAST PAGE --SEE ATTACHMENT PAGE ENCLOSED --LAST PAGE <'7 DEB 0 4 RECd 1" 7 19,77 �•. r .' r, rr r Ir rY r a... r . T AE �tY 3zI 01 o n 1% Z' A14SCO niviuion, Union Oil Company of Cal.lfurp.[ri � 1.345 North 11oacham Road •m, ataTl, «>o zlr cone - ____ _ ---------------------------- _ >(Amunilmrg, I].I i.nois G0196 4 � 'transportation, Fire, SafeLy ONLY (800) 42-4-0300,_Health anti ON11,Y (213) 66/ _21_21 + TH4UC ll ifle ti AT/ Not Applicable AMSC0 Solv 1101, Special I�'aphtholite 66/3',_•.- rlY1CAL rAL+ILY Mex,IULA — — Ifi Petrolew-a Ilyd-rocarbon Fraction blot Ap-ol.icnble _ ll�ll� �li!� _ -_ -__ •� - r ,��,�.lii� i.5r-dion 11 HAZARDOUS ING RED I. �Y5 ' ''I�I' ''1 11► I(!III,i'' �! PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES. A VOLVcNTfi -- — —, r• (tTl^L �) uuv tlTs % n v (t)w 10O 400 pp 1 0 Solvent rr NFPA 704M .ATALYiT I ADDITIVES 4 s S ` ' oTN1'Rs HAZARDOUS MIXTUPES CP OTHEn LICUIDS, SOLIDS, 08 CIAOES rInrl.`. s r I �1 T,�►I s,�?�1J,li !I;�I(;nflon 111 __ PHYSICAL DATA I! ►!���i'� ��.,I�il;;!i;;,;i;il1��+��i+►-�����!�I1111i �1� )ILI" Yol)iT ('i.) -- --- 250-300°1'(121-149oC) 13F't01FIc GKAYITY (/4,0-1)_Q._ f5r_^_ , 1 PI!:lSIfFG (`++* M/•) c� 12 " C 8OF 200C) 'BY 'PEAVM.UME0 %) ILE 1 C fl �1 ;,CA U£MBITY (AIN_t) 4-1-; VAPGRAT r. � KATE; U;9IL1TY IH WATE11 --^---~ — n Negl_igibl.e`, Clear, colorless charucLeristic P...ltiabId 3.4 W:... I�II �iHISection 1!/. FIRE ND EXPL-_�_—``_�, IIA7 �D D •'R A E, OS 0, �r�.s _ ETA FLALIMA21.2 LIMITS — j— ► 1 lw _ 50OF (1.00C) • TCC- Fot nn Cog, dry chemical, .w ter spray �CuL YIr.E hIO�TIMCI Pmocz- ,UH;N s Wear self-contained breAthi" apppsatus� WAter ray be unsuitable except +a.s a coaling nrdWra a,4 l„•UAL 1'it•1 i,hfl LYXPL.'•1(:r( H.vL�./.G>) __ —---------- `". 1`'Il�l�1il�{l�lllllll�illiii{{�{'Section V. HEALTH HAZARD DATA L%.AIT VALUE _ ----- 400 Lpn► r s`o OVEF-1 x'0SuRF _ Ercessi e i.nha? :,,t son .�Y=-tr�,e nry_ing of skin. T;;y_e irritation. - Ylearl �cYle dizziness,^..usea., Taper rc ::�, 1 LI>ry i z ri t/sLi.on. ---i r nesthesia, 9GENCY AND FIRST AID PNOCLGURES — —tiZ� �—� respiration if nt ce. ;nry call a h hat ation: Remove to fresh air, apply a.rtific__ — - - a mild skin � cream in severe cases contiiet j•IF,h I•rith mild soap and t•rater, apP -Y �- - :in contact:. --_--- --- ---' Physician. In(Sr.sti�n: Cal_1-liysician._- i�Pici an. e contact: Flush N•ri_th waters c�211_rL P}lys_-- _---------- � il�'i li Section V REACT IV ITY DATA�lll►1�1!1�►��i1��11111,1,IIlIi_11�It111{I��l{IIIIIUUIII{; 111{1{11�11iil1li{11>i11�{iH I1111111i1,If(I,i11111f� s..ct.an I - ____.._..�.,� .� .�.._..__...r....NEA r,._„ _._.... CeN�1TIOHs To AVOID ZILITY UNSTA::LE -- STATLIE X L heat, sparks, open�fJ_,^i ire — Z ,FVPATAWLITY (14"IRrio1r t f avu:dJ 2nts ----- C L; enjrLF)"l.1dl'I.]nf; ,ZA000S DiCOAJPOSITIOH F•ODCTS `i'hi'c-.�zr� Flecom osit;ion Tn(>,y yield carr rbon ono:xi.c7e_1'rd ctlrhon dio�{-1 e HtiU XZARDOUS - ILY►.IERIZAIION MAYOCCU-3 WILL NOT OCCUR 1. ' X CONDITIONS TO AVOID _-' or F D u ��r s gl�llll{I{!f 1{II�11111111�1i111!1111�1� 1111111►I11�111111�{1�i1111i1{{1{I1111�{�II Section V I I ''SPILL 01i LEAK_P Ig_ 'CPS TOME --- TAxEN IN CASE I,IA7ERIAL IS iIELEASEO O>• SPILLED - _��� { r} Flush with water into retaining area or contt;finer_!+void spar'.cs, --- . fire or hot metf�l surfacts. STn031 quantities may be absorbt�to an I r� • + IT,-oroprl.atc ab sorbant. rcc�rd�:rce with MriTi DISPOSAL L+E moodispose— Inei-nerate under safe' conditions or of in _ -preI - zllieable local, state and federal at �ionn . ---__.__— -- - - rAi I ON I111i11(I1JUT tion VI1 I. -SPEC 1AL�ROTLCTION_IN-INASer for tESY19ATORY I' 10TECTION ($r,tc(fy tT of ___.]-- -L — bcper.s en concentration''abo�ve time Frei hs1�d1� i�V �:;v triT?.�e resvlra ! OCnL EXHAUST ,VENTILATION iT t3tever is sufficient to keep "work oTl--Ep �.; NECNANICAI (Generuff ^ J" concentr(�tion below the— ' EYE PnOTECTION ,r-� 'IsAO1ECi1 E GLOVES Ch-mic 11-_r;(', _ Tl-mermeable - - - QTNETIVi EOVI.f.IFMT __.� II:Inermeable uFran or„,g, c� _-tllrr` Harrier cream -- ----- - t - - -�+ �'�i i section ! x -- S PFC I AL PRECAUTIONS- i�UT ! OiJ S_I ;Ii11111i1 illll.111f1401111lllll_ �MMIR MIM15,11,11iiiiii1q,�1,1,41M1,1 t d� r}uatc ventT lati \" F•PECAViIUHS TO Cas TnxEN I�•1 HANDLING AND STORING.s of ignition. _ _-- 4_ Y.eep cool ' and away from source un�_ T1:�=iti.i-�+ GTNEiI PNECAUTIO%IS �.r rE oc• _personal contn-ct,____--. �' I0t+W x r . ►�I1� ('l I ..1:I3 1 fir r��aI 1 6. �,t +-)I 111I1 I nri('1uf.I.., Apo.o..d ►-. ►.. uv, O.."D No. 44-R138i Occupational Safety and Hsalth Administration DATA SHEET Required under USOL Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repairing, Shipbuilding, and Shipbreaking i29 CFR 1915, 1916), 191 7) SECTION I MAIVUFACTVAHq•S NAM! MORTON CHEMICAL COMPAE:::�����EMERCENCV,, TELEPHON?-NO. 8-1800 ADDRESS (N27.t*I,♦Sf/M1- Oh.STR T ZWOODSTOCK IAYN? ILL: 60098 CHEMICAL NAIMQ Silica SYNONYMS I TRADE NA.'VIN g Filled Epoxy � CHEMICAL FAWilLyORMUTA Epoxy Novolac/Silica Fi led SECTION 1) - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES, & SOLVENTS % TLV ALLOYS AND MK7ALLIC COATINGS y. TLV (uT") PIGMgjvTS 13ASE MiTAL CATALYST ALLOYS VEHICLE METALLIC COATINGS SOLVENTS FILLER METAL PLUS COATING OR CORE FLUX AOOITIVES OTHERS OTHERS HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OR OTHER LIQUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES x TLV tur:ti) SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA BOILING POINT t°�.) N/A SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H;0•1) 1.8 VAPOR PRESSURE (mmHg,) N/A PcRCIiNT, VOLATILE BY VOLUMK (N) N/A / VAPOR DENSITY (AIR-1) N/A EVAPORATION RATE t >) N/A SOLUBILITY IN WATER Insoluble APPEARANCE AND ODOR SECTION IV FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLASH POINT (M.thod usod) N/A FLAMMABLE LIMITS N/A Lei UN EXTINGUISHING MEDIA Water or CO . SPECIAL. FIRE FIGHT1140 PROCEOURES UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS H 1 PAGE (t) , orm Z18 FOSHA•2Q' .N/As Not applicable For I 40 1 r: 02 L3 [11 M I TEL SEMI. BRON INT F-ANADH . . SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD DATA THRES►,OLD LIMIT VALUE Not established Ci-PIECTS 010 i5vEndxpatuRp `- ..-- -- —'---- Pro lonzecL_inb§Ll,1` QMQRGENCY AND PIRST A10 PROCEDURES T Not likely to be required. SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA STASILITY _. _ - CONPITIONS TO AVOID STABLE X INCOMPAT.I.BILITY (MVI"XIS to cvo d) HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION MAY OCCUR CONDITIONS TO AVD1D WILL NOT OCCUR X ' SECTION V11 - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL' IS RELEASED OR SPILLED Vacuuming recommended WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD Bury in a sanitary landfill. SECTION VIII - SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION R SPIRATORY PRO ECTION (Speciff W10 If dust control is not *available, use a NICSH/MSHA appr VENTILATION LOCAL XFIAUST Reguirgd-vented outside the .work area SPECIAL Vapor exhaust at the MECHANICAL (General) Sufficient to remove respirable'dust fro OTH• R work area. PROTECTIVE GLOVES Cloth gloves EYE PRO a 71ON �acfety Masses OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SECTION 1X - SPECIAL. PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS TO B£ TAKEN IN HANDLINC. AND STORING Avoid inhalation of dust and/or vapor. OTHER PRECAUTIONS �y p -'.PAGE (2) 1 nSNA•70 ? 't -9 NU 1L 115 1 VI •JtL Kj I J r1i.. '� H ri H V H :. loAO • WARM• M*VPC0 Q r 3370 North Avondale ilventie . Chicago, Illinois 60e.IR . Pbonc (i 17) S 1,4 Y ;OU r r (J r� / .I �j 1 �✓ "Al f ;r Vn R�H' r. Laboratory No. CLIENT: Horton Chemical Company of Woodstock, Illinois. SAMPLE: Polyset 410B,1date received 2/10/77. TESTS PERFORMED:� Eye Irritation; test ran 3/7 thru 3/12 Primary Skin Irritation; test ran 3/1 thru 3/4 Skin Irritation (repeated); test ran 3/14 thru 3/18 Acute Oral Toxicity; test ran 2/19 thru 3/17 Inhalation Toxicity; test ran.3/17 thru 3/31 METHOD AND RESULTS: Eve Irritation ii�gtrilGci SritG+tl`j�.G1 lei ►ItJJJ In•• , r •r r ter, n, r r. ,.r ,, A. bd 1JY 1 {•, rl , J• ; .J l 1. Cy l: V 1 l,: U %_ �rI Ur J �. WIC t•lild].IIJ.Iilj U11 L:rC!a Uca to serve as control. Observations of ocular lesions were made on the rabbits' eyes after 24, 48, and 72 hours. At these intervals the extent and degree of irritation were scored. The gene ill technic of evaluation and scoring followc� the recom- nendations of J. H. Draize, c,. Woodard, and li- 0. Calvery,, Journal of. Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 82, p. 377 (1944) and Sec. 191..12 of Federal ]hazardous Substances Labeling Act Regulations Guide for Grading Eye Irritation. The scores. obtained are• sho%en in Rabbit `rye Irritation Table. See Appendix for Scoring on Eye Irritation Test. Instillation of sample .into the eyes of rabbits produced no positive eve irritation reactions indicating that the sample is not all eye irritant. continucd- 'I rules 111(J�,; I, BORATORIES Client: Morton Chemical. Corn );,,,\, Fej�ort . a0GV I Skin Irritation The hair was, clipp*ad from tho abdomen of six male albino rabbits;' "and two areas of the abdomen, approximately ton centimeters apart, were des- ignated for appliCtlLj.ol,' of UVQ pcitrhe:;. A one inch square site an the right :;icic ,,1;; abraded, while a similar git(, abraded. on the: Ieft rcnl.Iincc! uII- The test sample pj *milliliter) Was placed or: the skin under a small square of cotton gauze and maintained in contact with the skid under a larger square -of polyethylene f.illn and anchored to the skin with strips of adhesive tzIpe. A square of flannel cloth was. then taped around the trunk -of the animal to further protect the patches from being dislodged. After 24 hours the vest and. patches were ro- moved and the skin axamined for signs of ir- ritatioll (erythema and or edema). L•'xarninat.io11 was made after 72 hours. t Irritation scores are shown in RahVit Primary Skin Irritation T4ble. See Appendix f��i Evaluation of Skin Reaction.; in Primary Ir- ritation Test. Application of sample to ir3tact anil tIL���cic:d skin of rabbits produced a primary Shin ir- ritation score of 0.04, in(la.c;Iti.ny th;IL Lhc sample is not a skin irritant. Shin Irritation (repeatc:cl anplicati.on) Tile hair w js clipped from the backs of rlalc albino rahh.it.s; and Lwo .rr'c:,, oI., tl:;: boc:1; appro.Kimately ton centimeters ap'Irt, ignated for application of the part,c.�sc'rc"cles- enc inch scju.lre site on Lhr. right. r while a similar site on the lct!Lc,r em�Ii nc !11 unr-d abraded. The` to t Sample , ! minili Lcr) �:�� ;,1�ced c,n CllU skin daily for 5 consecutive iltry:c and a1lclwcd to remain for 8 hours' after iihich it wl's w;Ishcd frol:v the skin. Amer 24 hours the Vent and moti►rd and the skin examined Cor til.cJr►5 of ir- ritation (erythema i-tnd/or edenna) . Exzj:n i. r.a t ior. Was made after 72 hours. -COil L 1 nu(�(I- btM l . AROMONT CANADA Client: morto„ Chamical Com 5n lteport : 7�g7 -3- Irritation scores are shown in R��bbit Primar Skin Irritation (repeated a See appendix for rvaluationPPlication) Table. Primary Irritation' Test. skin Recictions in Repeated application for 5 produced a'primary skin irritation o e of zero, indicatingcore of irritant b that the sample is not a skin Y.'re.peated application. Acute Oral Toxici.t The sample was administered to night fasted male albino rats ofrthPs of over- Dawley strain. The oral administthesS rwase- performed by the use . of a 17 Of need lesys�aneoralhfa modified tube. The animals were observed Or feeding ng g and over a subsequent fourtee g ere period. At the conclusion the survivoz were weighedn day ohscrv- autopsl.,, sacrificed, and subjected s . ' to a gross Calculation of'tile LD- limits was -Performed Inc] 95", conidencc averages, uthe by the method of 9 the tables constructedmovinc3 (1aci1, C.S.: Tables by �•Jcil Of A10dian Rffectivc� poxeConvc�`�i.c:nt (:alculation Instruction in Their (I.IJ-5o `"'(] [.'L)-ro) (1952) . use. iliomet.ric-s, a, 249 i table. I:esults obtained'are shown ill an ac:compE'11Y i n9 The acute oral LD-50 was than y weight. 20 gm/kg body found to be greater . Inhalation Toxicity Ten male rats weie ' The test sampleP1prayaced in into enclosed chamber. yield a c ent was sprayed into the chamber to oncentration of 200 mil�i rams in the �r�iiospliere. � J Z r concc,:n trci L l c>>1 w ;; Per liter t��inc�c] i`nr �� E�eriod of (1os11�•ci tho �11111n.11.q w�, one f1o111:. 1'��llo��•inc) r.;- weeks. Xr lt� 1d Fc�r t) !��'►'.i.acl of The animals .Were waic�hcc] before. l%-•C) and at the end of the exposure vatiozls crcre made re t�°� weeks. Cross obser _ dur.illg the two Wee holivedintl�cri�oir a1el]'_being and at. autc�pSy. continued- Clie»t; RDA Morton Chemical Rrgort: 706 Co. n n Y -----� RQsu1L•sarQ ^� shown in all accom The inhalation Pany�.ng table. �00 lation LC-5� 9/L of atmosphere fou"d to be SUI`>rU1RY AND Phere for a greater than• CONCLUSION: one hour period, Morton Chemical company was tested fore sar�f,le Of , repeated a Ye irritation I °Iysc,L �110-b toxicity PPl1cation skin primary skin ' and inhalatsk irritation irri,a�ion, n torictl. acute oral Based on the results of With Federal these tee z regulations Hazardous `'ts ar�d in this sample Sus no,,- Substance, Labe accordance c irritant, nor is it PIe is ling Act inhalation. no` an eye o toxic by oral r a skin ' ittgcstion or by a April 19, 1977 ROSVER-III xso:. LABORATORIES k s "lichael Kuku . Chief linski l31U1C)- L r 7 !1 � � N � 1 • 1 1 r 1 1 LIN I M i I I=L �_:)Hr"1 i. bKl PILIPA I GHNHOH APPCNNDXX 1~OR RYE ? RRITATION` err_ ; p GRADES rOR OCULAR LESIONS CORNEA IJo ulceration or opacity•• „ •.�,,.•,....•.. Scattered or difused areas of opacity (other than :light. dulling or normal luster), de -a" s of iris clearly visible•.,,, . Easily discernible translucent area, detailsof. iris '••.• slightly obscured.., .............. Nacreous areas, no details of iris visible, size of•pupil• barely discernible .......... Complete corneal opacity, iris not. discernible..•.,,,..... IRIS Normal.....,, Markedly deepened folds, congestion,'swellinca,.moJera4e. circumcorneal injection (any of these of coinbi7lation of any thereof), iris still.reactirig to light (sluggish reaction is positive) ...... .. No reaction to light, hemorrhage, gross d(,:;traction (any or all of these)...: ................... 1 2 3 4 0 2 CONJUNCTIVAE Redness (refers to palpebral and bulbar conjuncti%!ae er.cludin cornea and iris). S Vessels normal.... Some vessels definitely in)"ected. ... . Diffuse, crimson red individual vessels rlot.casil}, ..•.. discernible. Diffuse beefy red ...... ...... .. .... CHEMOS I S t:o sv.elling.. 1:n5• swelling above normal (includes ,nictitating membrane_) . Ob'.•icus swelling 'with partial eversion of 1 i c] ., . • SO11 ing With lids about half closed...... ... ...... St•o11. ny Win lids more than half closed ................. . 0 1 2 3 O • 1 2' 3 0 4 L) 1 5 L3111 P11 I tL btMl. 8NOMUN I CHNHIM lMNl-.'R-jlIXSON LAWRATIOI� ----------------- TES 1,2rL: 70687 Cl iont: �brtojj ClIcnlical Can pahv MMIT EYE IRRITATION POLYSET 410B 'A ?A A Rabbit Number 2 HOUrs After 3 Trcatm-_nt 24 48 — — L2 96 168 24 48 72 Cornea 0 0 96 168 24 48 72 96 168 Iris 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ConjLln,:tivae: 0 0 0 0 0 Erythen-a 1 0 0, 0 0 Chemosis 0 0 0 0 0 Rabbit Number 4 Hoilrs After 5 6 Trcablicnt. 24 48 72 96 168' 24 48 72 Cornea 0 96 168 77-- — 24 48 72 96 16e 0 0.- 0 0. 0 0 0 0.- 0 0 Iris 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conjunctivae: 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 la�'tl Duna 0 0, 0• 0.- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'iiuSt L �1t1' E ONABORATORIES �Cf'11 . tiKUf IUF� i �.;tiF�l1L�H APPENDIX FOR PRIMAL -SKIN IIIRI1'AT1(N Tf:ST• EVALUATION OF - SKIN REACTIONS A. Erythema and Eschar Formation Value* Very slight erythema (barely perceptible)...... Well defined erythema..., • •• 2 Moderate to serve erythema........... Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation .(injuries in depth)...,,, 4 B. Edema Formation Very slight edema (barely perceptible)......... 1 Slight edema (edges of area well defined by definite raising).. „ Moderate edema (area raised Iapprox. 1 mm)...... 3 Severe edema (raised more than I nim ar.(i extending beyond area of exPosur.c)...... 4 *The value.recorded for each rcadinq is the average value of the animals subject to the -test . t • CALCULATION OF PRIMARY IRRITAT10N SCORES Average values for erythema and eschar f'Drmatiori at 24 hours and 72 hours for intact skin are added to .values; on -abraded skin at 24 hours and 72 hours (4 values for edema formation at 24 hours and 72 hours" �fora .intactland abraded skin are added (4 values).' , The total of the 8 values is divided by 4 to give the primary irritation score-. A primary skin'irritant is a substance which "'eSults in an empirical primary irritation scoro of 5 ur more. 1`1 / IJ 4 1) 1 ( ; 1 -0 U'li bKOVIlil'ti il l,NHL)h J, A I lk) 61('� R X E S acjnrt 70607 Client: Morton Chemical. Co. RABBIT PRIMARY SKIN IRRITATION SAMPLE: POLYSET 410B Rabbit UNABRADED L4 HOURS ABRADED Number EE)L-tge—ma —Edema Brythen-i-a-T7ema 183 0 0. 0 184 0 0 0 185 0 0 0 186 1 0. 0 187 0 0 0 188 0 0 .0 Average: 0.16 0.0- 0.0 0.0 .Primary Irritation Score: 0.04 72 HOURS UNABRADED ABRADEd, TL:a—th-01,1 —Edema Erythema -l-ai 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 4 „SM/04D 17: 17 GMT M I. L rM I-.s, ARO MCNT CANADA • RAUbf T PRiMARY SKIN IitltI inT70* a' N SAMPLE: POLYSET 410n Rabbit '4 }_� URS 48 i-106RS Number 72 llc�lll;S 9G llo uRS 120 lid ER ED ER Rp . - -- i_l2 £ f) 3251 p - - 1_R ED r:P 326I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3271 p 0 0 0 0. . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 328A p 329A p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 330A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Average: p 0 0 0 t 0 ;. 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 Primary Skin. Irritation :;yore: 'Lcro I Intact Skin A =;Abraded Skin ER = Erythema ED =.Edema *Repeated Application t/04U 17:18 EMT..AITEL SEMI. EROMONT rAf';9��ort: /0687 r —Ajc -. _•_._-._ Orton Chemical ComE�,,ny ACUTE ORAL -TOXICITY -IN RAI,.s SAMPLE: POLYSET 410B Animal Body Weight Dose Dose Dose llci-ght Gain Days in Grams am., Gm` /j(q Grams tfillilit:ers in lq to 328 ___. Dam Death 212 5 1.06 4'24 90 .� 329 214. 10 Survived .2.14 8.56 75 330 216 Survived , 20 4.32* 17.28 * 75 461 216 Survived 20 4:32* 17.28 93 462 250 Survived ' 20 5.00* •20.00 107 Survived 463 243 20 4.86* 19' 44 4G4 252 72 Survived 20 5:04*' 20.16* G7 r� ur.vived Autopsy: Organs of thorax and abdomen normal. Of sample found as hard mass exec in ;;t c t tha L part + Acute oral LD50 is greater than 20 9111/kq body height. . *administered suspension in 3 doses over in 6 )lour period as a 25� water., u .,,3M/04D 17:20 GMT MITEL •SEMI BRCMONT CANADA 11OSNI.*r--11IXSON LABOkATORIFS Re ,ort: 70687 client: Morton Chemical • Coniuciny INHALATION TOXICIu,y IN RUTS SAMPLE':. POLYSET 410B Animal BodyWeight 9 ~`'eight rain in 1.4 pay Number Crams Days Grams to -------- D e a t h 509 262 97 :survived 510 280 37 Survived 511 297 56 Survived 512 351 417 Survived 513 • 315 54 Survived S14 311 64 Survived 515 291 43 Survived 516 260 62 Survived 517 321 73 Survived 518 298 5 Survived( Autopsy: Organs of thorax and abdomen normal. The than acute inhalation 200 mg/I, of - LC is gr.eatcr atmospl1Qre hour period. for a ()rrc, SNC 1 Complex(: P:O. Box 10 Montreal, Quebec H5B 1C8 Telephone: (514) 282-9551 December 24, 1980 Mitel Corporation 18 Airport Blvd. Bromont, Quebec Attn. Jacques Bernier: Subject: Pollution Study Your Order 9580 N/Ref.: 4666 Dear Sir: We are pleased to'submit to you three copies of our pre- liminary report on the gaseous emissions at your plant in Bromont. We hope that this preliminary study will be of use to you and intend to follow up on our mandat at the beginning of January. Thank you for your collaboration. Sincerely, i Guy G. Racine, In. Director Air Improvement & Waste Disposal Environmental Division PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE GASEOUS EMISSIONS AT THE PLANT IN BROMONT MITEL CORPORATION CONTRACT 4666 SURVEYOR: NENNIGER & CHINEVERT INC. DECEMBER.1980 r 1.0 INTRODUCTION Following your authorization from November 6, and your order MS-9580 from December 4, we proceeded on December 1 and 2 -to take a number of air samples outside (24" roof stack) and inside the plant. From the products originally selected for sampling only three were retained. The others were eliminated because of their negligible small amounts used in the process. The three products retained were: Phenol (C6 H5 OH) Xylene (C6 H4 (CH 3)2) and Phosphine (PH3). 0 14 k 2.0 RESULT PRODUCT SAMPLE (ppm) Xylene1 2 7 14.6. 16.3 8.5 Phenol 4 6 .0.008 4.0 Phosphine 3 5 0.016 0:047 1 NOTE: 1,6 and 7 are from inside. 2,3,4 and 5 are from the roof outside. Y 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 OUTSIDE EMISSIONS. For the three products sampled, the concentrations are very low and represent no air pollution problem. Providing that: a) The production of this part of the plant will not increase substantially. b) The new expansion under construction operates in a similar fashion. Mitel should have no problems to meet the existing regulations of the Ministry of Environment of Quebec. 3.2.1 XYLENE The permitted concentration for Xylene in a working atmosphere in Quebec -is 100.1ppm average and 150 ppm maximum. The measured concentrations of 8.5 and 14.6 ppm are well below."the limits and found acceptable. 3.2.2 PHENOL The presence of phenol in the work environment could present a possible problem. The permitted concentrations in Quebec are 5loll and 10 ppm. Our sampling found one concentrate of 4 ppm, close to the limit of 5 ppm. This low margin of safety leads -to the possibility that the limit of 5 ppm could be reached and on occasions be exceeded. �9 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Presently Mitel should have no apprehension about the emissions on the outside of the plant. The emission of Phenol in the work environment should be monitored and corrective measures under taken. In the second phase of 'our mandat, which will begin in January, we will, with the cooperation of your technical staff, make the.recommendation for the necessary modifications. SIGNED: Guy G. Racine, Eng. Director Air Improvement and Waste Disposal Environmental Division Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 STATEMENT ON ENERGY CONSERVATION Mitel Semiconductor, South Burlington Mitel Corporation buildings are designed with due consideration to Energy Management and Conservation. The following is a general statement of considerations to be incorporated/studied during final design. A. SITING Due to the high amount of internal heat gain from equipment and processing, the building has been orientated north/south with glazing limited to office areas on the north and east elevations. B. BUILDING ENVELOPE The exterior walls shall have a R Valve of not less than R 15. The roof envelope shall have a R Valve of not less than R 22. The envelope shall contain a continous vapor barrier/air seal to prevent air infiltration/exfiltration. Foundations will be insulated to 3" - 6". C. DOMESTIC HOT WATER All tanks will be insulated to ASHRAE 90-80 and incorporate night set -back timers. Pipework shall be insulated and low -flow fixtures will be employed. D. LIGHTING Lighting will be high efficiency lamps and ballasts to a design standard of not more than 4 watts/s.f. Where possible, task lighting will be used to reduce main lighting levels. Exterior lighting shall be on magic eye operation. Exterior lighting shall be switched. E. OPENINGS All glazing shall be double glazed in thermally broken frames with vestibules at primary entrances. All exterior doors will be weather- stripped and loading doors will be insulated. F. HVAC Due to the heat gain from equipment, a reduced factor for heating will be employed. By utilizing ceiling plenums as a return and minimizing fresh air make-up, internal heat gains will be a major contribution to "free" heating. Night set -back to heating and cooling units will be employed. Process exhausting will be by manual switching to reduce make- up air quantities. The control of temperature and humidity in the building is critical to operations. Heating system fuel will be oil or natural gas and consideration will be given to a microprocessor control system. OGI LVI E& NOGG ARCHITECTS 130 Albert Street • Suite 1715 Ottawa • Ontario • K1 P 5G4 613-232-4253 May 4, 1981 Project No. 8101 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 U.S.A. Attention: Mr. David H. Spitz City Planner Re: Mitel Corporation South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Spitz: Your letter of April 20, 1981 to Dick Trudell has been passed to me for action, your item 2. I attach four (4) sets of elevations and 2nd floor plan indicating screening. Please note that the screen as shown on plan will be detailed using the identical prepainted steel and colour as proposed for the exterior walls. Final heights of the screen will be detailed when roof equipment configurations are known. With respect to a coloured rendering or perspective, only one copy as submitted to your committee for approval has been made. This copy may be borrowed at any time by calling Chuck Thweatt at Mitel. I have included one print of the perspective as presented for your records. I trust the attached and the foregoing information meets with your approval. Yours sincerely, r M.R.M. Hogg, M.R.A.I.C. OGILVIE AND HOGG, Architects MRMH:ik attachments cc. C. Thweatt R. Trudell Freeman, French, Freeman R. BeILLLett TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 April 14, 1981 Mr. David H. Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel Dear Mr. Spitz: Transmitted herewith are four sets of plans and supporting documents for final plat review of the Mitel project. As we have discussed previously, we are submitting these plans concurrently with our Act 250 submission. As such, I am considering that two of the four sets submitted meet our obligation under Title 10 VSA, Section 6084 to provide a full copy of the Act 250 submission to the Council and Planning Commission of South Burlington. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1GL R chard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT I Name of Applicant Mitel Semiconductor II Name of Subdivision .Mountain View Industrial Park III Indicate any changeslto name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur- veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: Change of applicant from GBIC to Mitel Semiconductor, Division of Mitel of Delaware, Inc.; Air Guard Road, Building 880, South Burlington, Vermont 658-5039 IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application Mitel Semiconductor will purchase entire parcel from Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation. V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the following information: (1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name, license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale (numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow. (2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations, easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use. (3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine readily the location, bearing and lenoth of every street line, lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the ground. Where applicable these should be tied to reference points previously established by the city. MEMORANDUM ON THE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS OF THE SITE To Whom It May Concern: Certain Assumptions have to be made 1. New buildings including houseing will have to be built 2.. Purchaser would haveto have at least 20% downpayment 3. At least 60 cows would have to be maintained on the farm 4. Farm would have to be retooled with outside equipment as well as milking and barn equipment. 5. Farm would be operated mainly with family labor and only one hired hand. Cost of Setup Purchase of 111 acres @ $1500.00 per acre $166,500.00 Purchase of 60 cows & bred heifers at $1600 each 96,000.00 Construction of barn to house 60 head & young stock 90,000.00 Construction of House 55,000.00 Purchase of machinery -mostly used tractors, wagons, balers, chopper, plows, harrows, seeders 105,000.00 Total $512,500.00 20% Downpayment 102,500.00 Total Financed $410,000.00 If the purchaser were able to maintain a rolling herd average of 14,000 of 3.5 milk at $13.85 per hundred, it would provide the farm with a milk income of $116,340.00. To this would have to be added livestock sales of approximately $10,000 from all cows ar.d calves, for a total farm income of $126,340.00 Various state agencies publish figures for expenses which are readily available for public use. The following figures were taken from the 1978 E1 Fac Dairy farm-btsiness analysis of 75 farms averaging 66 cows per farm. Labor $9,054.00 Dairy Concent. 31,540.00 Fertilizer & Lime 5,259.00 Capital Purchase 16,798.00 Other Expenses 37,871.00 Tot. Oper. Exp. $100,522.00 The difference between income and expenses is $25,818.00. These figures do not include family living expenses, mortgage reduction, interest or the necessary purchase of 15 replacement animals. If one can assume family living expenses of $12,000.00, then $13,818 would be left to pay for the 15 replacement animals at a cost of $24,000.00. The taxes $4200.00 per year and the mortgage payment of $53,306.00 leaving a, negative cash flow of $67,688.00. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 February 5, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: G.B.I.C. - Mountain View Industrial Park Dear Dave: Transmitted herewith are an application and four copies of a preliminary plat for the Mountain View Industrial Park. At the sketch plan hearing on January 27, 1981, certain questions were raised. In response to those questions, the following information is submitted. 1. Would the company consider staggered work hours? Yes, the hours would be staggered between plant and office personnel. 2. Are there any toxic wastes going in the sewers? No, only domestic wastes from toilets and cafeteria. 3. Are there any chemicals vented to atmosphere? Yes, a minimal amount of both chemicals described on the attached chemical list. Both are vented from hoods above the work areas. 4. What types and quantities of chemicals are stored? Refer to the attached chemical list. All chemicals are stored in a rated chemical storage room. 5. Would the company consider a R.O.W. for the future Swift Street Extension? Yes, a R.O.W. can be left that gives access to the Green Acres property. However, serious thought needs to be given to the need for a public road through this property. 6. Could a R.O.W. be left to the bottom corner of the 10 acre Wright parcel? No, this would not be considered by the company. There is existing and proper access on Hinesburg Road now. Mr. David Spitz February 5, 1981 Page 2 7. What type of lighting is proposed? The site plan addresses the location of fixtures and the attached sheets indicate the type of fixture proposed. Additional information will be submitted as it is generated. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING EN INEERS, INC. Wichard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 ) Name '-of Applicant Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation 2 ) Name of Subdivision Mountain View Industrial Park 3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, inclu::e gross floor area if con - Fr cia 1.) Use of 111 Acre site for industrial use located easterly of Hinesburg Road and southerly of I-89. Proposal is for 55,700 ft.2 building, 219 parking spaces for light manufacturing operation. 4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: None-- -------------- -- -- 5. Name, address, and phone number of: a, Engineer _hard P, Trudell�PyEyTrudell_Consulting_Eineers, Inc. Route 2A.i Box 308, Williston, Vermont 05495 802Z 879-6331 b. Surveyor Scott D. Taylor, L.S., Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Route 2A, Box 308, Williston, Vermont 05495 .(802) 879-6331 c . Attorney __.None retained atpresent �. P1=-t D e s i^ n e r Richard P. Trudell, P.E., Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. ______ _ Route.__2Ai_Boic_108, _W 111stonL Vermont__05495 802 879-6331 2_ 6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the Z. property, etc., since this proposal was last before the Commission: I Changes in Vuilding configuration, parking lots, road entrance and Rfnrm drninnap- 7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont- igous properties: _ See attached list. 8) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer (s) of the preliminary map W ' acCorVanying this appli- Ca t ion: Greater Burlington Industril Coruorationn Mountain View _ _ TnduStrial Park Prepared by Trudel.l Consulting F. gineers Inc. 2-4-81 9) Attach a preliminary map showing the following information: 1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the city. 2) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. 3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 4) The names of all subdivisions im.nediately adjacent and the names of o,,,rners of record of adjacent acreage. 5) The location and size of any existing sewers and rater mains, culverts and rains on the property or serving the property to be subdivided. 6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks -3- and other public or privately maintained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. 7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finishee grades where change of existing ground elevation will be five feet or more. N/A 8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. 9) Numerical and graphic scale, date and true north arrow. 10) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative mans of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. 11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site disposal of septic wastes. N/A 12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed�.,, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface toil, rock f and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. 13) Provisions for collecting and discharging stoY-m drainage in the foria of drainage plan. 14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culvert: which may be required. 15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay- out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection small be shown. 16) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) Begin construction spring, 1981., completion by summer, 1982. 11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: Non -4- 12) Attach a vicinity map showing the following: 1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the record owners of all adjacent parcels of .land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street ad- joining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or proposed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street. system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat sulxnitted covers only part of the sub - divider's entire holding. (si_ ature applicant or contact person cla to ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Richard and Ann Painter 1060 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Linus and Sue Wiles, Jr. 42 Longmeadow Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Keith Wright 850 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Green Acres c/o Ralph Goodrich Marble Island Colchester, Vermont 05446 Rollin Tilley 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Lawrence and Roberta Coffin 1100 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USAGE 1. Chemical Mixture By Volume: 92.5% Chloroethane and 7.5% Secondar Butyl Alcohol. Storage approximately 5-8 (55 gallon drums per month. Weight per drum - 450 lbs. Total Storage = 2,250 lbs. - 3,600 lbs. Flash point of chlorethane = NONE. Flash point of Secondary Butyl Alcohol = 95OF closed cup. Disposal = One of Two Methods: a. Reclaim in house using a recovery still. b. Manifest out to our distributor' for reclaiming through a recovery house. This mixture will be used in a vapor degreaser for cleaning small parts. 2. Chemical Mixture by Volume. 40% denatured Ethanol, 40% Isopropanol, and 20% Naptha (VM + p) Storage approximately 1 (55 gallon) drum p8r month Flash point of 95% denatured Ethanol = 50 F closed cup. Flash point of 99% Isopropanol = 53oF closed cup. Flash point of Naptha (VM + P) = 530F closed cup. (This is an aliphatic Hydrocarbon) This mixture will be used for cleaning of precious metal and solder print silk screens. Therefore quantity used will be absorbed by Kim Wipes used to clean these screens. The disposal of these Kim Wipes will be to a reclaimer of precious metals. Therefore there will not be a fluid reclaiming process or fluid disposal process. LSL r 1• 1 1- sW Crouse -Hinds LSL/LRL series have both a quiet day form, and night form. Ideal for parking areas, cou walkways, rt ards, entrances and more.The Y Y y possess a unique, concealed light source which reduces glare and Increases comfort and lighting efficiency. Optical system is designed for use with the latest high efficacy HID lamps. The duo are available in two sizes: 250 and 400YI. • The smaller luminaires are ideally used with lower wattage lamps at mounting heights o(b' to 14'. Larger �+•., luminaires function best at 20'to 00' with higher .� wattage lamps. 'X- Smaller luminaires are available for all HID `f lamps through �250V'' metal halide, Large unit is available in 40OW mercury and metal halide, 250, 310 c•,,� and 40OW high pressure sodium. `. The upper housing of the LSL is fabricated with extruded aluminum sides and sheet aluminum top. The upper housing of the LAL is single piece 0.125" spun aluminum. The lower housing of all units is acrylic and the base is cast aluminum. Standard finish on all units is a dark bronze thermoset acrylic enamel, Both are designer♦ for polo or wall mounting. A complete line of poles for single or multi -head mounting In aluminum, steel or wood, is available in heights ranging from 8' through 30'. • 41 a Gold anodized distributor reflector; four stage air filter, Photoelectric control; optional clear, black, or 313S bronze anodized finish (Architectural Class 1, AA-A42 with integral anodic color) are available. • .. For more data, please refer to LSL/LAL brochure in C Qus, e, Hinds Catalog 600 or call the Crouse -Hinds office nearest you which is listed on the back cover. irs ,� Cyr � l i•�r�+�, ("�i ' �. —i II � - r+ l ► �'''�. ��... .►...��. r1c► ..�. i 1 ; �.1 A ; ��.����rriiii "'_ 1s.7�. . • �^{,�~;C�LS�tiJ� �� 6iJ�� LSL OVERALL DIMENSIONS (IN.) f A SiZE A S C LSL-1 116M, Sq. 21 % 9S LSL-4 Sq. 21;i ' t 1l �'i�•= i �L 25 tt. Mounting Height io 4 r-W 3 4 XNGR. 105-S00 Drown By: 111 Approved By: Desipncd By: Scala: .75"=1 Mtg.Ht Date: 8/15/77 Drwg. No: 4691 -A; 1 C 1 2 3 4 LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE IN UNITS OF MOM —,LING HEIGHT VALUES SHOWN ARE I.IITIAL FOOTCANDLES w �a X wl 0 Iy H H z ]0 H 11 3 4 1 1 ENGR. 105-500 Drown By: Approved By: Dena i n, ed By: Slate: .75,,wi �K g Date: 8/18/77 DrPt' NO: 4697 -� LONGITUDINAL, DISTANCE IN UI,TITS OF MO 3 4 VALUES SHOWN ARE INITIAL FOOTCANDLUSING HEIGHT Ct LR a, !0 J�Mtfl16 a•�ll y •• IS � 2 ■ 4• 1 1/2. 1/2 i �1.0 . Mv0 1 30, I'. 16 177 2 •• .. . 4 ML9S11 1 • 36 12 190 2"'. 4'" 12 it 1" 9.4 J3' ALMS 1 • 36 12 212 2" . 4'• � 12 . 7/1 !.1 40• AL9339 1': a 40 141y 273 2' . 4"' 14 r 1 1.0 CALM 4. 10 20• ML13aq 1 a 36 its 1•' . 4" -..�� 1 I a 7,'/ 13.0 Mv0 25• AL9341 1 a 36 1" . 4" 12 . p�A 12.4 2 30, ML9S42 1'. a 40 T 3" . 4" 14 • ► 1a.6 is, ML9343 V' 4 40 3" ■ 4" 14 r 1 � 12.0 40' ML9Sa♦ 1`. r 40 3" r a"' � I4 ■ 1 13.3 CALR A. 10 20 W.fS41 i ■ 16 12 I I;$ I N. Tenon (1" .4••) 12 a 1 1 14.6 3 77 ML9346 1 . 16 12 110 ) 1" a 1•' 12 ■ 1 11 s M+tO or 30, ML9347 1'4 ■ 40 144 I13 I ]" . 1" 14 ■ 1 r6.4 1 ]sowL9741 1'. r l0 i4fi 31S 3" ■ v. 11 ■ 1 16.6 40' ML9l49 I'l • 41 11 190 i 3" r 4°' t1 ■ ► 1/4 ! 20.5 10, ML9479 • • 24 13 No T.n.n (]" r4") A 3 4 ■ 1/21 OJ 12' MLf490 '. • 24 /i 30 No Toron (3" ■4") 1 3/4 a t,'2 S.2 PTL•A is, ML9441 24 84 34 N. Tonon (3" ■4^) 1 3,14 o 11'2 4, 1 PTL•C 1 19. wL94tl2 . • 24 9K 63 No T.n.A (3" 04") 9 1/2 ■ 112 4.0 91ML 20' ML9433 l: ■ I4 11 70 No T.n4n (Y• a4") 9 3/4 ■ 1,'2 3.6 24' ML9464 v ■ 24 1)1 99 N. Ton4n (3" a4") 9 1/2 r S/'1 4.0 TL-A L-C 2 13. Ia. ML9416 ML9417 .. 24 1 . 36 9`y l i 59 N. T.n.n 97 2 1; 2" a S 1/2" 9 T/2 ■ s,(1 11 10.2 TL-A lop or 20' ML94SI I ■ 36 1► too 2 1, 10. ■ S 1/2•' . !' / 11 . 7. 1 13.0 13.0 4 24. ML940 1 a 16 12 140 2 1/7-■ S 1/2•' 12 r '�1 37.4 20• ML9493 ! r 31 11 100 11. I" a 3 L 2" 1 11 3.1 PTL•C a 24• ML9491 t a ]6 12 140 ■ 2 1/2" .Slid" 12 ■ 8 11.0 12.4 SQUARE STRAIGHT ALUM. POLES PTL•A. -C 1 ►p. Ir MLf473 ML9176 `. • 24 1"l 40 2 1"2" a 2 iir' 1 ■ 5,'1 4.3 .1 trMt is, ML9477 .. 24 1►S 83 2 1,7" ■ 2 1/2" 9 . 3/1 a.1 •r 2 11' ML9471 `■ 24 IIM1 103 2 1i 2'" a 2 112" 4 a 3!1 4.3 SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLES i( _._ ._.... 9'tt•A, .0 10. 12' ML9a4) ML9442 �i ■ {1 ■ II 1 1 k 10 2 1/2" ■ 2 L,'2" 110 i 2 1/2" • 2 1.'2" 1 . 5/1 i r S.1 10 1 VAL 15' ML9443 `r o 11 6 130 2 1/2" 21/V 1.5,6 1 1 14' wL9<ea :. II 1 170 2 LT' , 2 1,'2 1 ■ J%4 i -s - L- L-Z- -3 f X�� ROUND NON -TAPERED STEEL POLES 10' ►TL-! ML9469 `• r 1/ '• 1 70 2 1/2" ■ ! 1/2" 1 . S• 1 DO 1 11' wL9470 • II 1 I Ia 2 1/210 ■ S 1/2" 1 . 3 1 1 I s' ML/471 .. II 1 140 2 1/2" . S 1/7 " d . S, 1 6 t1' MLV472 '. • 11 1 ISO 2 1/2" a s 1/2" 1. 1 � 4 PYLCI 1 It 134 ML1912 r. a 12 / I O 3" 00 r 2 1/2" S . S// is, ML9912 1, is 1 140 ]" 00 r 7 1/2"1 5/1 6 MC1918 � . • 16 / ISO 1" 00 ■ 2 1/2'• 1 r 1 1 page 3 A Lf.�.� 1 ROUND TAPERED ALUM. 1 1 DOA K 3,zv•4zr . :r ' I T1 rr•r�. r lI A ROUMD NON-TAPEQED STCEL ,� �" .1�' Y� Pt.a+u..s,d9„1d�N1 b.As/Md..+r C. > a • �.�e CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PUAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a . a- ner of record George _.D Robert E. Boardman, David M. Boardmann Bernard A. Roy 346 Shelburne Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 b. Applicant Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation 135 Church Street ----Burlington, Vermont_ 05401 — C. Contact person Walter Bruska, Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. Richard P. Trudell, Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels involved as well as proposed use(s). Use of 111 Acres site for industrial use located easterly of -t Hinesburg Road and southerly of I-89. Proposal calls for approgimately 50,000 sq. ft. of building and 251 parking spaces for light manufacturing operation. _ 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc ) Op on to ourchasP if i �. a - - for industrial use. ------- 4) Namesof owners of record of all contiguous properties — Keith Wright, Rollin Tilley, State of Vermont, Ralph Goodrich, Malcolm Vosburgh, Richard Painter, Linus Wiles 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easeme^ts, co%tenants, lE ases, ri:htS Of way, etc. Subject to sewer easements for City of gput B i_� _rl ineton 2- 6) PrOPOSCv e:;tension, relocation, or• lnodif municipal facilities �.icsuch a� _ 't-ion of streets, storm drainage, etc. ^e'erage, J';ater supP11" Extension of water main down Hinesburg Road and unto site, construction y easements for force main location. Of pumping station and use of Cit 7) Describe any actions A -� or previous actions bya4 he so- the Zoning th_ So --ocrc of ydjll5t.'`lc'nt, :rhich a ffect the p.,ronosed u` ar? ington-'l�nna_na c.l;,i ssion, L.bo'1� 1s1011 11U1nclu(fe' Gc,1:.es: NSA ._.-- — -------------- 8) it�Ts,2uj s7:�tcil nla:� sho.:i.,c sll _r.• _ •-- ---- �hroue�h n. ;^°r: `'L : on rzauirac' under °ri 5 of === Su.)r._vis,on Reculatio-,. Attached i OZ.Col- date FG G?r rv� U 1 L - CU ficZ?r Ori G� c.A�l i Cc; -'on cnO 61*-*tch Plon tJ c O i1J_n1SL r0 41VC� `e this '7L-070Sc1 is 7'' C�c .]r SSl_1CG — s oor m .:lor su?:oivi - an_•licatioa c ec::�=•c co:.;� _,� - J ------------ �. o:: -2- (4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves, tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street. (5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space for which offers of cession are made by the subdivider and those spaces title to :which is reserved by him. (6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical orcer within blocks, and blocFis lettered in alphabetical order. (7) The location of all of the i7:,prove7Lents ref -erred to in Section 301.1*and in adcit_on thereto the location of all utility poles, se:.age disposal s-, stemis, `pater supply systems and rough grading and other cevices and miethods of draining the area affecting the su'rrivision.� (8) Permanent reference --monirients sho:•,-n thus: and lot corner -markers shown thus: "O". (9) Construction drawings of all :.-equired improvements. VI inclose supporting cocuments listed below or request that they be requires as a condition of final plat approval: (1) Copies of proposed seeds, agreements or other documents showing the :manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. (2) A certificate of the City 7_neineer as to the satisfactory completion of all improvements required by the Co=ission, or, in lieu of any required improvements not so completed, a performance bond to secure completion of such improvements and their l:iaintenance for a period of two years, and written evidence that the City Council is satisfied either with the bonding or surety company or with security furnished by the subdivider. 1 (3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in- tended to cover all or part of the tract. (4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one is required. (5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street:. (a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other documments which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right--of-way, and a certi- fic-te of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. -3- (b) a completed contract between the lanoo;mer and the city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private _ .street and the responsibility for the roadway maint- enance, along with a certificate of the Ci::.-y Attorney that the contract is satisfactory. (sicnaC-ur applicant or contact person rate TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. ROUTE 2A BOX308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 March 13, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel - Planning Commission Hearing April 17, 1981 Dear Dave: Our presentation to the Planning Commission on April 17th will be structured as follows: 1. Introduction of Chuck Thweatt, Director of Operations for Mitel in South Burlington. Chuck will present a resume of the Company's history and their plans for South Burlington. 2. Discussion of the use of chemicals from delivery to return, and discussion of the nature of the chemicals that will be used in the plant. A chemical representative of the company will be present for this aspect of the presentation. 3. Introduction of Mike Hogg, Project Architect, who will describe the layout of the building and the architectural features of it, and present drawings which indicate how the building will look on the site. Mike will discuss the materials used in the building and how the building will relate to the surroundings. 4. Slide presentation of the site and of other buildings that Mitel has constructed. 5. Discussion of the building siting (See attached outline) and Mitel's reasons for locating the building where proposed. 6. Update on the Traffic Report which includes the impact on Old Farm Road. 7. Discussion of landscaping and lighting for the project. Mr. David Spitz March 13, 1981 Page 2 Since we are somewhat limited in the time allocated for review in these evening meetings, and Mitel has gone to the expense of flying a chemical representative and the project architect down to South Burlington, we would request that the Planning Commission allow us to make our presentation, at least through item 5 above, without interruption or discussion of legal matters with the audience. It is our intention to address questions of the Commission or audience after items 2, 3, 5, and 7. If there is not sufficient time to address items 6 and 7, these can be put off to a later date. It is our contention that the submission of evidence under Preliminary Plat Review would be completed after item 7 and that discussion of the project should be limited to those items properly addressed in a preliminary review. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTIUQ ENGI ERS, INC. R chard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures The following outline portrays the reasons Mitel has selected the present site for the location of its new facility. 1. Zoning Regulations (Assuming rezoning to Industrial) A. Permitted use - manufacturing of electrical components B. Conditional use - not applicable C. Minimum area - 80,000 ft. 2; well exceeded (111 Acres) D. Minimum frontage - 120 ft; exceeded (633 ft.) E. Minimum depths Front yard - 75 ft.; exceeded (170 ft.) Side yard - 65 ft.; exceeded (820 ft.) Rear yard - 65 ft.; exceeded (1240 ft.) F. Maximum lot coverage - 30%; Proposed 5% G. Setback from I-89 - 150 ft; exceeded (215 ft. - building) complied (150 ft. - drive) H. Frontage on public road - Hinesburg Road (The proposal does not contravene any zoning regulations) 2. Site Constraints A. Zoning Setbacks B. Drainage conservation zones and low lying areas C. North - South sewer easement and Hinesburg Road easements D. Location of building closer to Hinesburg Road would infringe on views of residents to the east and be too close to adjacent residential land E. Proposed Swift Street Extension 3. Engineering Considerations A. Excellent bearing capacities on ledge B. Excellent drainage around building location C. Short distance to pumping station D. Use of excavated rock for construction of parking lots 4. Planning Considerations A. Ground contours adjacent to building permit screening of parking areas from most visible directions (I-89 Northbound and Hinesburg Road) B. Use of natural rock formation and vegetation to enhance immediate environment of building C. Allows continued short term use of agricultural land until expansion occurs D. Permits the logical use of the balance of the site for future development 5. Mitel Considerations A. Need a presence to a major highway B. Views from locations are spectacular and do not interfere with views from Hinesburg Road C. Preference is to be located away from existing or possible development 6. Other Considerations A. Of the major entrance points to South Burlington (Route 2, 7 and I-89) the presence of a well .landscaped and attractive building in conjunction with the Digital plan will be the most attractive entrance B. Due to openness of site any location will be highly visible C. Focus of attention from I-89 will be drawn from less attractive structure to this attractive building. March 3, 1981 South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: GBIC Application Gentlemen: At the last hearing before the Planning Commission on February 24, 1981, a question arose regarding the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission to hear this matter prior to a zoning change by the City Council. We feel that the Planning Commission does have the legal right to proceed as planned, as long as any final decision is delayed until the matter of the zoning change has been resolved. We are; however, sensitive to our position in the community and we do not want the public to feel that we are opposed in any way to a full and open discussion of this application. Hence, although we are ready to proceed before this Commission, if the Planning Commission, upon advice of its legal counsel, chooses to suspend these hearings until after the zoning matter has been decided, we will have no objection, and will abide by the wishes of the Planning Commission. Either way, we are convinced that after the general public hears the entire plan for this project, they will agree it will be a welcome and positive addition to the South Burlington Community. Furthermore, we have been authorized to notify this Commission and the general public that the company which will be purchasing this property from GBIC, will hold a formal press conference tomorrow to introduce itself to the community and discuss its plans. GREATER BURLINGTON INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION By: Duly Authorized Agent Xgrc� Luncheon, Wednesday, AW 4, 1981 The Ramada Inn, South Burlington. Mitel Representatives RALPH A. BENNETT Vice President &General Manager Mitel Semi -Conductor Division CHRIS BAILEY Vice President -Marketing Mitel Semi -Conductor Division WIL RINER Vice President-U.S. Marketing Mitel, Inc. ROBERT WRIGHT Manager, Public Relations Mitel, Inc. CHARLES A. THWEATT Director of Operations Mitel Semi -Conductor Division, Burlington MICHAEL HOGG Consulting Architect Ogilvie & Hogg State of Vermont C. HARRY BEHNEY Secretary, Agency of Development & Community Affairs City of South Burlington VID H. SPITZ City Planner ATTENDEES GBIC/Cynosure & Community Representatives PETER JUDGE President of GBIC; President, Investors Corporation of Vermont DUDLEY H. DAVIS President of Cynosure, Inc.; President, The Merchants Bank EDWARD E. HORTON President of The Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce; Administration Manager, IB11 FRANK A. BALCH President, Vermont Broadcasting Company WILLIAM J. CIMONETTI General Manager, General Electric LATTIE F. COOR President, University of Vermont JAMES F. DALEY Executive Director, The Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce PHILIP H. HOFF Attorney; Hoff, Wilson & Powell NANCY E. LANG President, Lang Associates, Inc. RAYMOND C. PECOR, JR. President, Lake Champlain Transportation Company JAN W. ROZENDAAL President, Nordic Ford, Inc. JOHN T. BASCOM Assistant Director, Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation WALTER G. BRUSKA Executive Director, GBIC and Cynosure, Inc. PECCIVED U� 2 10,21 Mitel Semiconductor N Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. T'r `' '• r i.Jol-tM1G Air Guard Road, Building 880, So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 Telephone: (802) 658-5039 March 4, 1981 Richard A. Spokes, Esquire City Attorney City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Spokes: As you are aware, the City Council will soon hold a public hearing and then make a decision on whether certain land in the southeast quadrant should be changed from Agricultural to Industrial. Our company has expressed an interest in possibily building a plant in the area in question should the zoning be changed to Industrial. This is one of several possible sites we have been considering. One or members of the City Council have expressed a concern as to whether they had a potential conflict of interest since they are employees of IBM. The purpose of this letter is to state that as far as Mitel is concerned, we are not a competitor of IBM and we see no conflict of interest problem with any member of the South Burlington City Council taking part in the zoning change decision. Very truly.your ; l MITEL J;a�r O UCTOR Ralph A. nnett Vice Pr ident and General Manager Duly Authorized Agent HAB/daa l TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. February 5, 1981 Mr. William Szymanski, City Manager City Hall City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mountain View Industrial Park Dear Bill: ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 As we discussed by phone the anticipated sewage flows from the G.B.I.C. project, I am forwarding my estimates for your review. I have included some cost figures for three difference approaches. As you can see, there is a significant additional cost to install a 6" force main instead of a4" force main. The 6" force main would require a larger pump and plumbing within the pump station to maintain cleansing velocities. Another consideration is potential for septicity in the 6" force main with minimum flows before full development. Please consider this information and let me know what the City's position will be so we can start working drawings. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TA #� Tyler Hart, P.E. TH/slp TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. February 5, 1981 Mr. David Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: GBIC - Mountain View Industrial Park Dear Dave: ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 Transmitted herewith is additional information relative to the chemicals used and stored in the proposed building. This information is supplemental to the preliminary plat submission of February 5, 1981. Very truly yours, TRU ELL ONSULTING ENG EERS, INC. Richard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Form Apploved OMB No. 44-R1367 Occupational Safety and Health Aministlation MATERIAL SAFETY DA'A SH'FET Required under USOL Safety and Health itegulations for Ship Rapairing, I Shipbuilding, and Shipbreaking (29 CFR 1915, 1916, 1917) 1 SECTION I_ MANUFACTURER'S NAME - EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NO. Vulcan Materials Company Chemicals Divisio-n ' _ _ .__316-524-5751 ADDRESS (Number, Street, City, Stare, and 2/.F' Cvdr) P . 0. Box 7689, Birmingharn, Ala1) ma 223 G E IC NAMSYNONYMS TRADE NAME AND $YhdONVM5� ,�,�L TricEi_NAMEoroethane - Methyl Chlorofo. m Solvent 1.11 ' H ICAL FAFORMULA — CATFORMULA Ciiorinated Hydrocarbon CH3 - CCL� SECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES, i4 SOLVENTS % TLV Units ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS 94 TLV (Units) PIGMENTS BASE METAL CATALYST ALLOYS VEHICLE METALLIC COATINGS - SOLVENTS - FILLER METAL ^—�- COATING OR CORE FLUX ADDITIVES _PLUS OTHERS r OTHERS HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES q � % TLV U n I JU, :1 SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA BOILING POINT ('F.) 2 -19 0 SPECIFICGRAVIiY(H 0-1 ) 1.3 VAPOR PRESSURE (mm H9.) 20C) C. lOO _' PER@ VOLATILE BY VOLUCENT, VAPOR DENSITY (AIR-1) -- 4.6 —----- - (VAPU &j)N RATE e�LLIIllCC Ii .._iSt11— 0.4 SOLUBILITY IN WATER oderat r- APPEARANCE AND ODOR Colorles$ clear 1'gua,d d1 mi V Get �— SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA — !� FLASH POINT (Method uad None ltag closed cum � F—LAMMABLE LIMITS Lai Ue1 — � EXTIN UISHING M QIA Rot applicable _ SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTINCk PRO EDURES _ v Self- Conta 1 ned breathing equipment b(L—.g i•r _should ,building where_ 1,1,1 trichloroethane i_s_stored, _y�Pf;g � r JNL,5 L FIRE AND EXP OSION AZARD va ors can JoHe ignited by high energy ignition with fire or hot surfaces to acidic gases & other highly toxic sub- s a n no'"�.�....�...�.�..�—.•®-•,.�_.._..�....� PAGE (1) (Continued on reverse side) Form OSHA-20 Rev. May 72 SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD DATA 7HRESHOLD LIMIT VA UQ _ 350 ppm as listed in Part 1910.1000 of CFR, Title 23)-~_ EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE--------_ .Overexposure can cause vomiting, nausea, drowsiness, unconsciousness and even death, in extreme cases. �^ `— EMERGENC11 AND FIRST A11? PROCEDURES Move to fresh air. Remove contaminated clothing. If breathing has _ stopped, administer_artificial respiration. _ Keep warm and quiet. Call physician. Eye contact ---wash with copious amounts of water. Never _ SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY UNSTABLE ^w--ONC>ITIONS TO J>V ID -R UNSTABLE Contact with ' bpen flame hot _ _ -- _—�—r surfaces or STABLE __ X emissions from welding arc. INCOMPATABILITY (tlotrrrn s ro avo(/ "- HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS -- Hydrogen chloride ,_phosgene and oth_e_r higher toxic substance. �— HAZARDOUS MAY OCCUR CONDITIONS TO AVOID "--"'--" — POLYMERIZATION WILL NOT OCCUR X SLCT1ON VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLEp acuat_e the aka, ventilate, avoid breatii_ng vapor oz coming in contact with liquid Clean up area (wear protective r-I n-�,;.,, i tain spill, transfer by mopping or with absorbent _material �to storage WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD Gansult manufacturer or„ local pollution ccntrnt SECTION VIII - SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION ON RESPIRATORY PROTECTION �$P_C fy None requir d when used with adecjuat.e ventilation VENTILATION L CA�xHAUS7 — Ss' Furticient to maintain below TLVI ECIAL MECHANICAL (t;CRlr�ll =:I!� ER PROTECTIVE GLOVE; EV ed PROTECTI N Neoprene, viton, P.V.C•. coatChemical safety (jogglesOTHER PROTF�CTIV QUIPMENT -- — Protectiveheadgear& apron when splashing is a problem PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN Store in cool )THER PRECAUTIONS vapors. PAGE (2) SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS - ANDLING AND STORING skin and avoid vapors. Pipe vents outdoors. ventilated area rom entering storage. Na smoki_nq in r�:sence of Glbo 934.1M Form OSHA•20 Rev. May 72 IA I'VIA 6-70 DATA I I.-' 'B 0 4 (Appruvr,d by LJ.!-',. Uh-patimont of 1 rlbc)f "I 'flli;IIIY S11111kil" 10 I"Orin t 01' 0 4) 1-0 Section I c, r s- nm�vr Ati-sco Division, Union Oil C0111P,111Y of California 1345 North 1-feacliam Road fiix-: —AiSzip 66—or, - Schatimbura-L' -I"Inpis 60196 -107 TF I�isportatlon, Fire, Safety ONLY 424-9-300. Ileal'th and Poison ONLY (213) 664-21.21 :AL NKME AND SYNONYMS TRADE NAME Butanol Butyl Alcohol FORMULA Alcohols C411901i PAINTS, PRESERVATIVES, & SOLVENTS--- -2 . . ........... .... 00 100 SOLVb4i'8 TLV-- ;T AF,D17 IV[ S -UTHERS, HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIOUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES AII ay.i-4t7z'v J.." u.! % TLV (Units) POINT ('F.) 71� ,244 SPECIFIC GRAVITY (1-130=11, 0.81 IFSSURF- (,wn Hp.) 200 C )4 VCW:ENT V01 ATILE BY VOLUME (%) 100 ENSITY (AIR./)2.5 MUXT 0.5 TY IN WATER 200C 8% NCE AND ODOR Clear. colorless jiwiid: cliaracteristic nonres dual odor. -57 �-7 2 416t,: , -, . .. " , , " _ . , ,i . '. , :; t ANT (METHOD USED), 97 aF. TIbC FLAMMABLE LIMITS Lai �Il��G ME01A AlcWidl" foam.' I 4AZARDS None 106--pp-I Tuettation of nose. and tl).rt�at- WLY Ap.0 FIST AID PROCEDURES Remove to fresh air. "L f ­,wa I lowed, :induce v6mitin nd call a pbysiclai IjUgh skin and (_-yc contaeL with water. cc-t mc-dic.al c.r.:rc for ems. • IT y UNSTABLE. CONDITIONS TO AVOID x 1PATABILITY (McIctists 10 avoid) y S t ron , 1!1L3 .,d0_USDECC F"1;USITIOi; PRODUCTS None ADOUS ,iERIZATION Nolle CONDITIONS TO AVOID x MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED 10 BE 7AKEN IN CASE MA Eliminate. all -SoUrMc; of ijgnition. null) with tar ht.%Y OCCUR WILL NOT OCCUR -,,mints of. water. F-c; 1 7%�0_5�-7 L I I -TH 0 1) _-----Atomize into an incinerat6r.. L7 RATORY PROTECTION (54'eci(Y 1), f) All- LATIONLOCAL EXHAUST I -- v . . I I-.-- - ECTIVE GLOVES i ivi x, C1,01 teal cartridge respirator. Preferable Prefera jLCIIANICAL (Getierts OMER Acceptable JCY:,�IPII�TICIION Face shield P111-11,%we cAnxit cz 9 PROTECTIVE ECUIPMENT ri one 'J AVTION510 UE 7A�LN IN 1(ANOI.ING ANC) STORING Avoid COntaCt: LJlt�l C:)�CS. Avoid breathing f vapor. Kee - tier closed. .r ....... ..... t LR PRECAUTIONS else of contact_ with ewescdiately__L1tTsh with plenty of water for at leas,l minutes; get medical atteittion, *1 1 f E B 0 4 RCC O 8 C 5 ETHANUL PROPPIf 1ARY 191 P 3224 MATERIAL. S.AF E 1 Y DATA SHF ET PAGE: I ACCEPTED BY U.S.H.A. AS ESSENTIALLY SIMILIAk TU O.5.H.A. FORM 20 LAND CHEMICAL CO,ENVIRCNMENTAL60CCUPATIf)NAL SAFETY OEPT,BOX 2219rCOLUMBUS9OH4321 24-4.UUP EMERGENCY TELEPHONE: 6n6-324-1133 (LOCATED AT ASHLAND► KENTUCKY) *****t-aa** a*t a*a�aaa**�*****#**mtaa *aaat c•o**�: �� aa****t-*ao*�*** *****r•s*�**s*�**�* LAND PRODUCT NAME: ETHANOL PROPRIETARY 199 P 3224 15 50 074 3335151-001 FULING INDUSTRIESDATA SHEET 40: 0104289-001 PO BOX 218 LATEST REVISION DATE: n7/79-79206 WINCOSKl VT 054n4 PRODUCT: 7430000 INVOICE: 550672 INVOICE DATE: 09/14/80 TG: FGLINO INDUSTRIES 11 MORRIS DRIVE .ATTN: PURCHASING/SAFETY UEPT.. ESSEX JUNCTION VT 05452 ****a*aa**********a*** SECTION I=PROOIJCT IDENTIFICATION ************* ***s*s**s* ERAL OR GENER IC ID: SOLVENT BLEND. ARQ CLASSIFICATION: 173) f-LAMMABLE LIQUID (173.115) SECTION 11-HAZAR DOUS COMPCNENTS INGREDIENT PERCENT TLV ONE 1.00% 100 PPM HYL ALCCHOL 1-5 4 2no PPM YL ACETATE < 1 % 40f) PPM YL ALCCHOL 85-91 1000 PPM rr +a**c aaaaa**#*******#**** SEC 1IQN I IJ-PHYSICAL CATA ****##******�►******* ****t** PROPFRTY KEFINFMFNT MEASUREMENT TIAL BULLING PCINT FOR PRODUCT 176.00 DEG F I 80.00 DEG C) ----------------------------------------------------------- ai 760.00 MMHG OR PRESSURF FCR PRODUCT 46.00 MMHG a) 68.00 DEG F ---------------------------------------- C 20.00 ------------------- DEG Cl OR DENSITY AIR = 1 1.6 ----------------------- ------------------- -------.--------- CIFIC GRAVITY .812 68.00 DEG F ----------------------------------------------------------- I 20.70 DEG C) CFNT VOLATILES -------------- --------------------------------------------- 100.00 % PORAIIGN RATF SLOWER THAN ETHER CCNTINUED ON PAGE: 2 � t15 EtHANOL PROPRIE TARP 19el P 3224 PAGE: SECTION IV -FIRE AND EXPLOSION DATA 14SH POIhTIrt.CSED (;LIP ) 4ER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT 97. nf) nF G F ( 13.till Ul:U C) (LOWEST VALUE OF COMPONEINT) 3.3 % INGUISHING MEDIA: ALCOHOL FOAM OR WAT�.R fOG OR CARBON DIOXIDE OR DRY CHEMICAL. "ARCOLS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: MAY FOkM TOXIC MATERIALS:, CARBON DIOXIDE AND CAR3CK MONOXIDE.. ETC. -CIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES: SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS WITH A FULL FACEPIECE OPERATED IN PRESSURE DEMAND OR OTHER POSITIVE PRESSURE MODE. ISUAL FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: VAPORS ARE HEAVIER THAN AIR AND MAY TRAVEL ALCNG THE GPOUND OR MAY BE MOVED BY VENTILATION AND IGNITED BY PILOT LIGHTS, OTHER FLAMES, SPARKS, HEATERS, SMOKING, ELECTRIC MOTORS, STATIC DISCHARGE, OR OTHER IGNITION SOURCES AT LOCATIONS DISTANT FROM MATERIAL HANDLING PCINT. NEVER USE WEI.nING OR CUTTING TORCH UN OR NEAR DRUM (EVEN EMPTY) BECAUSE PRODUCT ( EVEN JUST RESIDUE) CAN IGNITE EXPLOSIVELY. SECTION V—HEALTH HAZARD CAT.A ESFOLD LIMIT VALUE: NOT ESTABLISHED FOR PRODUCT. SEE SECTION II. ECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: FOR PRODUCT S - CAN CAUSE SEVERE IRRITAT IO'N, REDNESS, TEARING, BLURRED VISION. N - PROLONGED OR REPEATED CONTACT CAN CAUSE MODERATE IRRITATION, DEFATTING, DERMATITIS. ATHIK(; - EXCESSIVE INHALATION OF VAPORS CAN CAUSE NASAI IaRITATIO4 DIZZINESS, WEAKNESS, FATIGUE, NAILS EA, HEA GACHE, POSS i BLE UNCONSC IOUSNESS, ANC EVEN ASPHYXIATION. LLOWING - CAN CAUSE GASTRL31NTESTINAL .IRRITATION, NAUSEA, VOMITING, DIARRHEA. ST A I0: ON SKIN: THORCU,HLY WASH EXPOSED AREA WITH SOAP AND WATER. REMOVE CCNTAMINATED CLOTHING. LAUNDER C(jNTAMINATEO CLOTHING 3EFORE RE -USE. IN EYES: FLLSH WITH LARGE AMOUNTS OF WATER, LIFTING, UPPER AND LOWER LIDS OCCASIONALLY. GET MEDICAL ATTENTION. SWALLOWEn: GIVE TWO GLASSES OF WATER; INDUCE VCMITING IMMEDIATELY BY STICKING FINGER DOWN THROAT. CALL A PHYSICIAN. NEVER GIVE ANYTHING BY MOLTH TG AN UNCUNSCIOUS PERSGN. BREATHED: If AFFECTED, REMOVE INDIVIDUAL TO FRESH AIR. IF BREATHING IS DIFFICULT, Ar)MINISTER OXYGEN. IF BREATHING HAS STGPPEU, GIVE ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION. KFFP , PERSCN WARM, UU I ET, AND GET MEDICAL ATTENf ION. CONTINUED ON PAGE:, 3 �3845 ETHANOL PROPRIETARY191 P 3224 PAGES SECTION VI -REACTIVITY DATA `IZARCQUS POLYMERIZATICN: CANNOT OCCUR 'ASTLITY: STABLE CCMPATABILITY: AVOID CONTACT WITH:, STRONG OXIDIZING, AGENTS. SECTION VII—SPILL CR LEAK .PROCEDURES EPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: -------------------------------------------------------- ALL SPILL: ABSCR8 LIOUIC ON PAPER, VERMICULITE, FLOUR ABSJgBE�T, OR OTHER ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND TRANSFER TO HOOD. RGE SPILL:"ELIMINATE ALL IGNITION SOURCES (FLARES, FLAMES INCLUDING PILOT LIGHTS, ELECTRICAL SPARKS). PERSONS NOT WEARING PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM AREA OF SPILL UNTIL CLEAN—UP HAS BEEN COMPLETED. STCP SPILL AT SOURCE, DIKE AREA OF SPILL TO PREVENT SPREADING, PUMP LIQUID TO SALVAGE TANK, REMAINING LIQUID MAY BE TAKEN UP ON SAND, CLAY, EARTH, FLOOR ABSORBENT OR OTHER ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND SHOVELLED INTO CONTAINERS. PREVENT RUN—OFF TO SEWERS, STREAMS, OR OTHER BODIES OF WATER. IT E DISPOSAL METHOD: -------------------- ,LL SPILL: ALLOW VOLATILE PCRTICN FOR VAPORS TO COMPLETELY CLEAR BY BURNING IN AN IPON PAN. TO FVAPORATF IN HOOD. ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME HJOD DUCT WORK. DESTROY REMAINING MATERIAL :GE SPILL: DESTROY BY LIQUID INCINERATIU^d. CGNTAMINATEO ABSORBENT NAY BE DEPOSITED IN A LANDFILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH .LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATICNS. SECTtCN VI I I—PROTFCTIVE EQUIPMENT TO BE USES) P IRATORY PROTECTION: IF TLV Of THE PP(J!)UC T (-,Ft ANY CC'MPONEN T IS EXCEEDED, A NIOSH/MSHA JOINTLY APPROVED AIP SJPPL IED RESPIRATOR IS ADVISE') IN ABSENCE CF PRCDER ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL. OSHA REGULATICNS ALSO PERMIT OTHER NIOSH/MSHA RESPIRATORS UNDER SPECIFIED CONDITIGNS. ISEE YOUR SAFETY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER). ENGINEERING OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED TO REDUCE EXPOSURE. TILATICN: PROVIDE SUFFICIENT :MECHANICAL (GENERAL AND/UR LOCAL EXHAUST) VENTILATION TO MAINTAIN EXPOSURE BELOW TLV(S). TECTIVE GLOVES: WEAR RESISTANT GLOVES SUCH AS:, - NATURAL RUBBER, POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PROTECTION: CHEMICAL SPLASH GOGGLES IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA REGULATIONS ARE ADVISED; HOWFVER, OSHA REGULATICNS ALSO PERMIT OTHER TYPE SAFFTY GLASSES. (CONSULT YOUR SAFETY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER) ER PROTFCTIVE EQUIPMENT: TO PREVENT RE;"C_ATFU OR OPOLONGEj SKIN LONT,ALT, WEAR IMPERVIOUS CLOTHING . AND BOOTS. CONTINUED UN PAGC: 4 I tIIANUL PRO PR I F TA Y 190 V J?24 PAGE: 4 # # # # SECTION IX —SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS OR OTHER CCMMENTS `AIKS METHANOL. OT BE MADF NCN—P►lI SONGUS. A INERS OF THIS MATERIAL MAY BE HAS' ARDJOS WHEN EMPTIED. SINCE EMPTIED CONTAINERS RETAIN PRODUCT RESIDUES (VAPOR, LIQUID, AND/DR SOLID)r ALL HAZARC PRECAUTIONS GIVEN IN THIS DATA SHEET Mt:ST HE OBSERVED. INFORMATION ACCUMULATED HEREIN IS BFLIFVEO TO BE ACCURATE BUT IS NOT' WARRANTEC TO %3E WFETHER ORI�;INATING WITH ASHLAND UR NOT. RECIPIENTS ARE ADVISED TU CCNFIRM IN ADVANCE OF NEED THAT THE INFORMATION IS CURRENT, ApPLICAALE• A:N9 SUITABLE TO THEIR CIRCUMSTAtl&CES. �rs LAST PAGE --SEE ATTACHMENT PAGE E.NCLUSED--LAST PAGE W.; IKI,All I i.11.1,1 . 1 01 1 A(',0 0°7.,, APPIn.,a � ,,....»....... .. ;i 0 0.4 0 rJn. A 111311 �E 0 9 RECO OCCtivatl()Ilal Sa(cty wid Ilealth Administration IN T1111111 SAFETY' DATA Farrell Chomical Corp. �, aA W fOlt`4,t Ct<I-A DI&[. 110 t., r Sl,r:ng ,7. Mnooski VT 05404 hcquircd under USDL S:Ilety and llr.,Ilth Rc(µllations for Ship (80:) 6s5 0300 ' >-�- Shi1)huil(1+1111, an(I Slei1)f)rcakin�7 (?:) CF(i 1915, IJtG, 1017) SECTION I Allied Chemical Corporation EMERGENCY TLLE.PI+ONE: NO. _srccialty CLIcmt_��Lyj�ipn 41 (201) k55-2000 AD4).U'." Box 1087R, Morristown, NJ 07960 C►1[ LIIC.tL NPA,i. ANf) Sr NUNYKIS TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS Isnitroryl �1,� JtQ�..,1SAl1YIIptnrT1 1so rr6pyl Alcohol C1Itr.•i( A! I W-11Lr FORMULA Ali )h.itic Alcohols (C11 ) C110H _ SECTION 11 HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS N.A. PAINTS. 1'nESL1tVATIVES, 11. SdLVrNTS .— % Tt.V nitt�` AN ALLOYS D METALLIC COATINGS c TLV I 'TLV PIG►.1CNTS BASE PAETAL i CATALYST VEHICLE SOLVENTS RC)OITIVCS ALLOYS METALLIC COATINGS 1-1LL.Ell ME TAL— PLUS COATING on SCORE FLUX � `�-•—��- OTHERS OT1t _ RS HAZARDOUS MIXTURES Oi' OTHER LIOUIDS, SOLIDS, OR GASES _ % ' L10 IUneul SECTION III • PHYSICAL. DATA E)OILING POINT 1•01.1 -` 180OF (82.50C) SPECIFIC GrIAVITY (0410-1) (Liquid) 0.785 VAPOR PRESSURE (mm►r9.lAt 20°�. (68°F 33 TIL£ BY VOLUMEVOLATILE lU(] - <1 VAPOn DENSITY (AIR, 1) 2.1 EVA ONA,1(JN RATE�~�^ 111 iiut.Ac .11 Crime to evaporate) SOLVDILITY IN WATER complete ^� APPf AFIANCE AND 00011 Colorless liquid; slight odor, resembling a mixture of acetone SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FL 2Cl6-0110 os(,-d cup) Alit530E (11.70C) tlme I 1 LAVo 1LE LIMITS L r 41s1 Alcohol foam, or CO Water may be ineffective. ShE.CIAL II1iC sIG1(IIN(. 111C)Ctt/Uttt.S k1;1r_r:t lf=rrc,nt:llncd hrt,rtthini;_,lp.ir.ituS .i r11 ovedby NIOS11. Use water to cool _ nc_11;11_bo_ri_n`_ container-,. _ IJI.,I'.UnL rlrtl �Nl) 1 ►IVLOSION 1+ATA11U5 '� •����'W �i We know o none. PAGE (1) Farm CISHA-2�9 y 7 IM.v, Nov.. A .uprersedes Mar., 1975 Isopropyl Alf-, pale 2 of I <,, SECTION V - HEALTH IIAZARD DATA THnr •-1+0LO I IMI I VALUE 400 pprn* or. .�I�proximately 980 Ing per cubic meter 9 1r, lfflCt,UI Uvl.u(.xi•,+•,tJttt: lnhilition: flushi , headache, dizziness. nausea_.yomi_Cii _ lrve: Irritant. Skid: absorbed through skin ad4_i__nfiLinn - I u•.1 r1CV AI1I) I IIIST Alp 1 ItoC.I.OUNI S InhaIatIon: remove, to fresltr<a11, ��kl� �d�om£oZL,Zhtr•- Cull aT�l1,in for coma). If breathing is labored, give artificial respiration. If conscious_, give black coffee.. Eyes: wash with water. Skin: remove soaked clothing. SECTION VI • REACTIVITY DATA STAI)ILITV UNSTABLE CONDITIONS TO AVOID STAULE X INCOt•If+ATAUILITY (.11ah-rIQ 1 IU 01 Pt,j thdrol;en_ra)_lndium_cornt>in1Cj�; ntrrefarrn� fnL H ,AH )0LrS Ut COI.'I'OS ION IN 1•uOl, r1;T5 �c lave no studies on this product. CO and CO and possibly aldehydes would be /4A7ARnOVS MAY OCCUR CONOIT VOID NS i; Aexpected. POLYME RIIATION —' X < WILL NOT OCCUR SECTIONI VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEI•S TO OL TAKEN IN CASE MATLIIJAL IS ItELEASED ON SPILLED Use Personal protection equipment. 5� WASj` `` )) OJ..t'O'.At- Mt 111(4) „ Vikporate with authority_ approval. (2) Sewer with authority approval. (3) Reclaim internally or by outside chemical disposal contractor licensed for thi SECTION VIII - SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION nlor"i,►n1ui1 nuni1.C1i1,N' i�Jl — - r_k'or ]oaks and ;:pills, ty�)C see Ref. (a) VENTILATION erI y required. 11 1�t ,it 1 x + Ir,l - -• 3f'LCIAL fil'n 1IE.C►IANICAL (Goicrol)� OTNEA PROT[CTIVL GLOVI S EYE PROTECTION Not generally required. Safety glasses. OT1It It PI?OTLC IIV CGUIrr.+l NT Not generally required. SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS Pitt CAUT ICUs,', T O UL T nK N IN IIANI)t 1N N <; I11) '.I UItING _See Reference (a�. Corrodes rubber - use neoprene. Avoid ignition sources and hot spots. Use Underwriter -approved explosion proof electrical systems, formal D1►ILIt P111 • nUIIUNS NUIC entry p�rOCe UCL. Sec kecrence (a), including personnel trainine. PAGE 121 -91IL8 L5 uesasnacea a '"skin" value by ACGIH • form 0 ;IIA•20 ""• Nov., 1977 F.C.H. �b. M '•wr . . i{ . . . i .. '.A iJ • '.A . a w� .. iY .. i REd Fr.T31MAR Y 1977 I • A14SCO Division, Union Oil Company of California— ,. 1345 North 11{,aclwm Road as. /:',o zip cove •__ _ __.-_ _._.___ ._ � ._ Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 •ansportat-ion, Fire, Safely ONLY (800) 424-9300, Health and Poison 0IN, I Y 213 661t ,2121 i �Yn;L.tr_s — _ _ ' _Yi+::oa W;9 ree FA t/-$ Not Applicable . A113CO Solv 1101,Special Naphtbolito 6613 Me;uuLA Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fraction Not Applicable 5�on 11; - E�a/t;_tDOUS I��IG l:U 1N75 �� PAINTI, PAEsFEsiVAYIVES, a r.0LV-:4T8 1. 0 Solvent 1.00 1100 PIIm NF1'A 7(Y#M, r ADDITIVPS { i OTHERS i i i HAZAROM 4 PIXTU?1:3 Cf OTHEn LICUMS, SOLIDS, OR GASES S?ctlon I I I _.' PHYS 9CA DATA A i���lii�l�i 011ijhkiii�ii _w,tcIFIC I.OIriT (•/.) _ __.__ _ 250-3000F 0.21-1119oC) ommrY p+,o=I') 0.75 dSSUr:� (+.n• NI•) p 1.2 @ 63 F (20 C) P�ACFNT VCLATILE aYycl UME (a) ]CO i411FY (AIA-I) EVAPC+IATIC4 RATE 1.0 Negl igibl.e Clear, colorless charu.cteristic _ Il.,li,Section IV, FIRE AIND C_,_;_P_i..o_S ION flAZAIr-W DATA rT Ltit N*00 VLAWLIASL« LIHITS- i O. _ FotL_n, COn, dr�c lic^���i cnl., 'i rntwrr nPray - -- ----- — Wi Wear sc-1 f-contni nee t�rc�;t;aii r�, :.-� ,�x•stus lh,kter nay be u.nsuitubl.e exc(:pt 6.3 a cooling medium Yl�ii�il{II{1{II{iliiiii��f(�~Sr.cticjn V IA7 A► f T Iu twlT ►ovi«�.,•u=:'��► T)ry3n�`c,l__kin._ _I'eY.'=. ilriLnt.i fy irriLuLiorl {__._. i _ ,users, Uh er re:ari c.rttc r crestlle:Ign, 1►car];:r:he, El i zlirl�_ _---Tlc-_ _ ...__.... 1 V AND FIriST 1.10 YSic)CCC'iUAiS - _ _f��.._-----��i"_--- r ^o'.c: to Crc:�h air, r►Y�pl.v t>rtif.ic:i.�l r030irrtLion if neces.attr calla lr :ic..lrl. ation: P _.._- - -`- in severe cases contract - milcl skin crerlmJ ._._--------- ItFuct• t'rs11 frith mild l3orcp r:nd Nr<<l.er,�'.1�h1Y z.con— - esl:ion: Cal.ln. -- 1�re contact: Flush Vi-th zi3ter� r.r1J 1_rL 1�1:I;�s i ri an, Int�- .. .�ici �n. _. __---- -- _._-_____ - � 1 �; Il11141111(I11111(Illlll!>II�I ' 1 JT_ RI ---------- -ACT I V I TY D AT A�lilllilEll�lll�lillll►-llli. �_____. . ((1((►((((IiI�1(1I1��liIIill��(�(ILiI((Il� sort on V I ...__:..� CO';U1TI(,1;s To .VOID IV X lie t_. �arlcs, Grill n fl�uneL i'ire STAKE AT.L0ILI7Y 04n►16a115 4i Oily O idi.zing Tn 'nth -•-_- __----'--. - ---- -� OUSOfCoM,O51T1UN ►AOOUCTS ie].d crlxbon Tronoxide_vnd_er►rbon dioxide - '1'h�•r, ►r_] cic:coln osit:ion 1nFIy�,Y _ _ _ - _ C. ,OUS ONOIIIONS TO AV01I MAY OCCU'1 � - RIIAON •----..._ iI WILL NOT OCCUR 1• X ______._.�.-..-------- iI(i�1((11��1(�il��I��iIIIiI,►>>!(II F-DURE�sSeCt1()j,VjI 5�li.on Lrnc ��oc O -- b6 TAKEN 1-4 CASE PAMERIAL IS IULEASEO 0+1 S"ILLEO ^�' _--_ --•( � � Flush with writer into retaining area c rconl.rci.ncr, Avoid ;;pa. _— fire or llot'Tnetal sTufr=Wits.—r1nEil1 quantit:ic� may be ebsorbed onto an bsorbant . ---- _� _____ r'. --- ,.,r_cord�.rce with c)IsrosAL UE ll/oO Tnc•i i?::rrCtF' under ;;I:fe conditions car di ST)o�e of in ^ _ u �pli.cable locFil., state and fecicr3.]: 2•c,syu] cations ._..�— --------•- �'F�OTi�CT i ON I N OR ION i!!!Illllllilil�lilllllllllllll! s�'c+ion V 111 SPEC,IA 9Af0�'F I �vT;crlo►+-fs�,,Vrrii, e_.r:1-i cr� ti.h _12:11 c Cifr\�onconcitrtiion_cbav ��ptcAL :OrnL EXHAUST .,_uf PT cic:nt to kcehoror2� ;- ILAiiON j'�`1:3_triyf:_r is _. _ --• ---" - OTI,ER viCHANICAL c�ncentra~tion 1 low the_,V` __-- .--- - _ _ — E,YE 1'110TEG110N ._ i1VE GLOVES �_�helniCSL�__�f�?::W �•:`a�.__- -- �_.'_'. is jI,- met bl_e _-__----------- 9YyOIECT1VF COUIrr.+E1'11:n.--cmeable,ar prop X -- S P► c ► AL ;'R :( AU ; oN s l�llll(1111':(11`{1'!I 111 Ill __lll?Illl section I 1 l� Illl 111111 Illl N111�f�,iill���l�lli�ll;lil►�,�.�,��flll� ----_--_---___._ TJs'� whiz rdwjuatc vent:ilaid ;AUTIUHS TO w- T,�EN IA �'ANOL1NG ,ND :rUAl11G Cro,1 Ul1rCC8 Of ii,ni-tAon. Yc L-o cool and - Q11pnECAUrIn>i3 �.tf_d Ylc'r nc,nAl--- pC0* PIZZAGAIII CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 50 JOY DRIVE/SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 802/658-4100 TELEX 954611 Mr. Richard Trudell Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 Dear Dick: May 20, 1981 Re Mitel Semiconductor South Burlington, Vermont Project No. 8421 The construction schedule for the Mitel Project sitework will begin June 8 and will be coapleted by September 11 including all grading and seeding (temporary). Final seeding will be done in the spring of 1982 after completion of the building. Erosion control will be required during this phase based on the following schedule. Strip roadway and parking lot, cut and fill 6-08-81 thru 7-03-81 Drilling, blasting and rock removal 6-19-81 thru 7-17-81 Site grading including: a) culvert installation 7-13-81 thru 9-11-81 b) retention pond c) regrading to existing conservation zones. The necessary erosion control, will be accomplished in accordance with spec- ification section 3.01 and 3.02 and the appropriate detail drawings. As Project Manager,we understand that the temporary erosion control devices for the parti- cular portions of the work will be installed prior to any stripping of earth or topsoil in the construction area. Sincerely, -ram Robert Accorsi Project Engineer TRU®ELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. June 11, 1981 Mr. Daivd Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel Dear Dave: ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 Transmitted herewith are a set of plans for the Mitel project which have been updated to June 9, 1981. Please not thatI have deleted Sheet SP 24 (Kennedy Drive Intersection) from this package until we have had the time to revise it in accordance with the presentation to the Planninq_ Commission. We have estimated the following costs for improvements to the site: a) Water - includes the tap and main along Hinesburg Road $33,000 b) Sewer - includes the force main to Kimball Drive and the pump station $98,000 c) Route 116 - includes the wideninq of Route 116 for the intersection of the access road $10,000 The two remaining items that are required are: a) Delivery of bonds or other suitable surety. b) Recording of final plat(SP 3 and SP 19). Mr. David Spitz June 11, 1981 Page 2 To the best of my knowledge, this completes the other items that were conditions of the permit to Mitel. Very truly yours, TR ELL CONSU UG EN INEERS, INC. f Richard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures 6, 1-qffio- TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Inc. April 14, 1981 Mr. David H. Spitz City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel Dear Mr. Spitz: ROUTE 2A BOX 308 WILLISTON, VT. 05495 879.6331 Transmitted herewith are four sets of plans and supporting documents for final plat review of the Mitel project. As we have discussed previously, we are submitting these plans concurrently with our Act 250 submission. As such, I am considering that two of the four sets submitted meet our obligation under Title 10 VSA, Section 6084 to provide a full copy of the Act 250 submission to the Council and Planning Commission of South Burlington. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. c; llG1[X `. Y4 el , Richard P. Trudell, P.E. RPT/slp Enclosures DHS 6/9/81 STIPULATIONS That the following stipulations be added to comply with and to supplement stipulation 6 of the May 5, 1981 South Burlington Planning Commission final plat approval of MITEL Semiconductor for a 59,800 square foot industrial building on Hinesburg Road: Stipulations: 1) The following road improvements for the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive shall be completed prior to e1, 1982: Septorn er a. Widening of both the southbound and northbound Hinesburg Road approaches to accomodate two 12-foot traffic lanes. b. Improvement of all approaches to and from the southerly Hinesburg Road leg as necessary to accomodate turning movements for design WB-50 vehicles. 2) The applicant.shA 1 coorate with the Vermont Agency of Transportation and with the City 6 esign long term improvements for the Kennedy Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection All improvements required in stip- ulation 1 shall be designed to be consis n with any longer -term improvements. Final plans shall be submitted 4w inclul with -the record copy. �to and Gpp�ov -tie C,ly1Kahgye�aM�l 3) A bond for the estimated cost of improvements required in stipulation 1 shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. DHS 5/5/81 STI PiLATIONS For the final plat application of MITEL Semiconductor for a 59,800 square foot industrial building on Hinesburg Road as depicted on a 28 page set of plans entitled "MITEL, Mountain View Industrial Park," dated April 1, 1981, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers: Stipulations 1. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City Manager's memo, dated 5/1/81, regarding road gravel, sewer and water main, and sewage pumping station improvements. 2. The following legal documents shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit: a) Easement deed and offer of dedication for a pedestrian trail along the southern boundary of the property. b) Right-of-way deed and offer of dedication for a possible extension of Swift Street. c) Easement deeds and offers of dedication for access to and maintenance of the sewage pumping station. d) Easement deeds and offers of dedication for potential sewer connections to abutting properties. 3. The 15 foot pedestrian trail easement along the southern boundary of the property and 20 foot sewer easements to adjacent properties to the east, south, and west shall be indicated on the final plat. 4. Road improvements at the intersection of the new park road and Hinesburg Road shall be as indicated on page SP23, entitled "Entrance Road Intersection", revised 4/29/81. Arovo'fi"vs sti<llde eruXeol 5. 111 _- __t No 44Q+" s Aat both entrances of Old Farm Road. -� sec Gu�e/s a.1�lrno� 6. Road improvements for the intersection of Hinesburg Road and Kennedy Drive shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Information on building elevations, roof screening, and a color chart indicating the exterior color of the building - all as presented to the Planning Commission during public hearings - shall be submitted as part of the record prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A landscaping bond to cover the following items shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. a) $56,000 for new plantings. b) An amount to cover replacement of existing trees in front of the Brisson property if damaged during road widening. DHS Stipulations 5/5/81 Page 2 9. A bond to cover all proposed public sewer, water, and road improvements shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. In the event that Swift Street is extended across this property, the area of land southwest of the proposed road shall remain as part of the overall property and shall not constitute a separate building lotws}hoof Plan; y Cow,Mlssim q#rOVQ1 11. Sewer allocation for this project is 9,000 gallons per day. 12. The location of the fire hydrant or hydrants on Hinesburg Road near the intersection with the existing CWD water main shall be as approved by the fire chief. 13. If volumes of chemicals to be disposed in the City landfill exceed those listed in the March 20, 1981 letter from David Martell, MITEL Production Manager, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Manager before disposing of the additional chemicals. 14. A revised final plat padkagi,containing required changes from stipulations 1,3,4,6,7 and 12, shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. This approval expires in 18 months. 16. Tne final plat - to include pages Sp3 and Sp19 - shall be recorded within 90 days. 0. A,)y clwjes to fie /©cafio7 ei"�' Xe wa r `ihe A 45 /"Gfu!/eY I t�e GXylrigyer.SSo// 6e re"rWd om 4e �,e/ Memorandum Next week's agenda items 6/5/81 Page 2 Dealership is for a relatively expensive variety of vehicles - Jaguars, Ferraris, etc. Applicant expects a maximum of 25 cars on display at any 1 time. However, site will still be fairly crowded. Currently, site is almost all gravel. Applicant proposes to close off Dorset Street with a 10 foot wide landscaped strip and to add landscaping areas at the two corners of the property along San Remo Drive. Cost of trees meets the ordinance requirement, but front yard is substandard (10 foot width instead of 15 feet, and 28% landscaped instead of 50%). The difficulty is that the applicant wishes to display cars along Dorset Street, and the fixed building location prevents any wider front yard green strip. The other issue is that by constructing a fence along the southern property boundary, existing shared use with the adjoining property will be cut off. This will cause sane difficulties for the adjoining property, but it has no legal rights to use the applicant's property. The applicant feels he needs the fence for security reasons. 4� Mi tel Several potential traffic problems have been identified at the Kennedy Drive/ Hinesburg Road intersection. a) Traffic volumes for design year 10,86 plus Mitel traffic will exceed service standards on both Hinesburg Road approach legs. Initial capacity calculations indicated that this problem would be resolved by addition of a second lane on each Hinesburg Road approach. Alternate calculations indicate that at certain peak hour conditions (e.g. northbound trips on Hinesburg Road turning left onto Kennedy Drive in the morning), an additional requirement would be a multi -phase traffic signal that would allow exclusive left -turn phases. b) Turning radii for large semi -trailers are insufficient for both right - turn movements from Hinesburg Road onto Kennedy Drive. This will become more critical on the northbound approach due to increased truck traffic frcm the industrial park. c) Traffic volumes on Kennedy Drive will exceed service standards after design year 1986 but in the not -too -distant future. At some point, additional approach lanes should be provided at the intersection and the entire length of Kennedy Drive may have to be widened to four lanes. The proposal that will be presented at Tuesday's meeting is that both Hinesburg Road approaches will be widened to accomodate two 12-foot lanes and that turning radii on the northbound Hinesburg Road approach will be increased to aceomodate large semi -trailers but that the southbound Hinesburg Road approach will be maintained at a design serving all but the largest trucks. The improved traffic signal, a fairly expensive item, would not be provided at this time. Finally, the entire intersection would be designed for a future time period, perhaps 20 years hence, and the above improvements would be constructed to be consistent with the overall design. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: MITFI, Final. Plan Application R-1 t->/1_/8 ) There are relatively few changes since the preliminary plat sukmission other than provision of complete engineering, landscaping, and other details. Intersectic of new park road with Hinesburg Road has been modified to comply with State re- etuir(nu-nt. The State has nent a letter regarding projxer landfill procedures for ,,ny MITEI, chomicr_11!-. Several item:-; r(inain to I)e resolved. Legal documents must still be reviewed. A revised traffic report for improvements at the Hinesburg/Kennedy intersection has been submitted and is also being reviewed. I will report further on the status of these items at Tuesday's meeting. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items [)ate: 4/3/8 1 2) San Remo Realtv Questions on site plan details have been resolved since last meeting. Drainage is also satisfactory. All parking areas will drain to a storm drain inlet. Drain- age is not expected to have an adverse input on the Church of God property. 7tre curb cut that has not yet been closed is on the Reilly Tire profx�rty. 3) MMI--I, C13IC The following if-; the proposed motion with stipulations for the preliminary plat approval for the M111-:1, in(ILMtrial develoriwnt. Note that :;everal item, :;ca►>irl<3) which have kx,en di:;cussod at Planning Ccxrnlis;ion meetings are 1x•irlg stipulated for r('Suljillssion because final details have not yet been provided to the Mministration. 5V00 ► Or the Preliminary Plat application of Greater Burlington Industrial Corp- �u�rti��n or a , square foot industrial building on Hinesburg Road south of I-89 as depicted on a plan entitled, "MITEL, Mountain View Industrial Park", last revised 2/27/81, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers: Stipulations: 1) All traffic information shall be reviewed during the course of final plat review. Iterro for di.x-u:,sion shall include: a) 1N)tc•ntial impr(rv(•monts for the intersection of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Poll(]. b) Potential signing or other modifications for Old Farm Road. c) Lengths of bypass lane and deceleration lane at the intersection of Hinesburg Road and the industrial park entrance. 2) The "possible location, Swift Street extension" shall be deleted. 3) The sewage pumping station shall be served by an unobstructed access road with at least a gravel surface. A parking and turnaround area shall be provided at the pumping station. 4) Water service shall be provided to the pumping station. 5) Sewer easements shall be provided across the applicant's property to the south- west corner of the Wright property and the northwest corner of the Wiles property to allow possible future sewer connections to abutting properties on the east side of I I i no.,;burg Road. 6) A 15 foot pedestrian trail easement leading towards the quarry on the Green Acres property shall be provided along the rear southerly boundary of the applicant's property. The exact location shall be reviewed by the Trails Committee. Menx) randum Next week's agenda items 4/3/81 Page 2 7) Lc9al doc:uiient ; for required easements and public utilities shall be sub- mitted"for final plat ram. ,, 8) Detailed landscaping information shall be submitted for final plat review including the potential for screening to the south of the main entrance. 9) Sutxnissions of ch(�mical data, as they relate to use of the landfill and other municipal servic(,s, shall he reviewed during the course of final plat review. 10) All aspects of this proposed development shall be open to public c(lawnt and Planning Ccmmission consideration during the course of final plat review. Sel)arate Motion: The Planning Commission recomuends to the City Council that the City pay for the additional cost of installing a 6 inch force main instead of a 4 inch force main to provide for future sewer service to the area south of I-89, east of iiine.,;hurg Road, and north of Van Sicklen Road. Ibis cost may be recovered from future users of the sewer main according to an appropriate formula to be determined. iT DHS 2/24/81 STIPULATIONS For the Preliminary Plat application otzGrea "e , u�.�ington e _ Industrial Corporation for a 55,000 square foot in`d-ustrial building on Hinesburg Road south of I-89 as depicted on a plan entitled, "Moun- tain View Industrial Park", last revised 2/17/81', prep�ted by Trudell Consulting Engineers. / Stipulations: h) Sewer easements shall be provided acro, Ztheapplicant's property /to the southeast corner of the Wright property and the northeast corner of the Wiles property to allow possible future sewer connections to abutting properties on the east side of Hinesburg Road. 2) Location of a proposed pedestrian trail connection to the quarry on the Green Acres property shall be reviewed and, if located on the applicant's property a 15 foot easement shall be provided. 3) An eighty foot easement for a future Green Acres property shall be provided. constructed, the applicant's main drive ect the new street at a right angle. 4) The sewage pumping station shall be road with at least a gravel surface. A t�//be provided at the pumping station. street extension to the When and if that street is shall be relocated to inter - served by an unobstructed access parking and turnaround area shall 5) Water service shall be provided to the pumping station. i�ydrarrt - and - o-€---fi-re protection shall b e t o f i a s -1-a-t a-ppr c­v-a 1. s s 8) Detailed landscaping information shall be t-6 for final plat review including the potential for screening to the south of the main entrance. 9) Traffic information and potential improvements for the intersection ,,/of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road shall be reviewed during final plat review. Separate Motion: The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the City pay for the additional cost of installing a 6 inch force main in- stead of a 4 inch force main to provide for future sewer service to the area south of I-89, east of Hinesburg Road, and north of Van Sicklen Road. This cost may be recovered from future users of the sewer main according to an appropriate formula to be determined. DHS 3/3/81 Additional Stipulation (GBIC): 10) All aspects of this proposed development shall be open to public comment and Planning Commission consideration during the course of final plat review: 4. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission Fran: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: GBIC Application',, Date: 3/20/81 Because of the widely -ranging discussion on the GBIC/MITEL application over the last several meetings, I feel it is important to summarize the current status of the application and the administration's position on the major issues. Please note that it is still a preliminary plat application. Decisions on building and road location and other aspects of site layout should be made before preliminary approval is granted; but review of engineering aspects, traffic data and impacts of chemical usage can be completed, where necessary,during the final plat review process. If the City Council approves the zoning change on April 6, preliminary plat approval can be granted on April 7 or whenever all preliminary issues are resolved. 1) BUILDING LOCATION AND APPEARANCE. Although there is no design control in South Burlington, the City's subdivision ordinance (section 416.5) does provide for evaluation of impact on "the scenic or natural beauty of the area." However, the ordinance specifies that an "undue adverse effect" must be found before modifications may be required. It is important to balance the applicants' preferences with the degree of impact on the area; and the relocation of the building is one item that the applicants have indicated will be very difficult to accept. They have submitted considerable visual evidence to show that the building would not rise above Hinesburg Road and would not block the view of the mountains around or even directly above the building. Further- more they have indicated three buildable areas (15,24 and 14 acres) on this 110 acre parcel, and a maximum building area of 100,000 square feet on the first 15 acre site. Similar coverages on the other two sites would produce a total building coverage of 7.4% over the entire site. Removal of the 15 acre knoll area from development could reduce the potential building coverage to 5.3%, a very restrictive amount. I would suggest that possible modification of the building's color would be a much easier way to produce canpatibility with the scenic and natural beauty of the area. 2) ACCESS. There are three areas of concern related to access - location of the entrance to the project, road design of the entrance, and off -site road improve- ments. Please refer to my 2/20/81 memo and sketch regarding the two alternate locations of the Swift Street extension and the entrance to this project. Linus Wiles, an abutting property owner, has also submitted a letter to you on this issue. Either of the two locations should be suitable to allow for the Swift Street extension, and I have no adverse comments on the applicant's preferred southerly location. Concerning design of the main park entrance, the applicant has agreed to construct both a bypass lane heading south and a deceleration lane heading north. An acceleration lane heading north is not proposed since both the State and the applicant feel that such a lane can be a safety hazard. Memorandum GBIC Application 3/20/81 Page 2 Off -site road improvements, i.e. the Hinesburg Road/Kennedy Drive intersection, remain as one of the major issues in this develoixnent. At the request of the neigh - hors, Bruce Houghton has suYxnitted a report (enclosed) indicating that the applicant's traffic study has several fl1j,w;. I concur with that report. One point that all parties agree on is that the Ilinesbury/Kennedy intersection will be operating below level of service C in the not -too -distant future. It is also clear that the applicant's develop- ment will be a contributor, though only a partial one, towards growing congestion of the intersection. The difficulty is in determining who should pay what portion of the re- quired intersection improvements. That determination may or may not require a detailed traffic study, and the Connission should discuss that point shortly. Traffic concerns raised by this development should encourage new efforts towards implerr-eiiting an I-L9 interchange at Hinesburg Road. This is a relatively low priority in the recently adopted comprehensive plan but becomes more important with prospective development in the designated industrial area. 3) PARKING. Spaces should be brought up to a 9 foot width. 4) WATI.R _SUPPLY AND FIRE FLOW. The City Manager has requested that water service be provided to the pumping station. There are no other problems at this time. 5) SIWE:R. Sewer facilities should be sufficient to serve an area roughly east of Hinesburg and north of Van Sicklen Road. Based on Current vs. future cost consider- ations, the force main under I-89 should be oversized now, but the pump station equip- ment can be upgraded later. A recommendation to this effect should be made to the City Council. 6) STORM DRAINAGE. There are no problems at this time. 7) EASEMENTS. Three separate easements across this property must be reviewed - a right-of-way for Swift Street extension, sewer easements to abuttors on Hinesburg Road, and a pedestrian trail leading towards the quarry behind this property. The need for the Swift Street extension to the east of Hinesburg Road is marginal. There is no problem with requiring an easement for the future, but the commission may wish to review the need for it. The applicant has agreed to provide sewer easements to abettors on Hinesburg Road as long as the location of these easements can be flexible so as not to interfere with potential future development on the applicant's property. Exact location of the pedestrian trail easement will be considered during final plat review. 8) LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. I have no comments on these items except that screening between the entrance location and abutting properties should be carefully reviewed. 9) CFEE14ICALS. The applicants have submitted detailed verbal and written test- imony on proposed plant operations, chemical usage, water and air emissions, and solid waste disposal and reclaiming. This information is part of the local public record and Memorandum GBIC Application 3/20/81 Page 3 is accessible to all citizens. I would suggest that now that this information has been provided, that the City make proper use of the available expertise, i.e. that of the State, and allow the State to conduct its normal review of fire -prevention and environmental safety. There is no need to undertake a complete independent review; the State is an easily accessible (in Vermont) and adequate representative of the public interest. However, we have requested additional input on several items that may have specifically local impacts - particularly the use of municipal services such as the landfill. That additional input will be reviewed by local officials; and, if necessary, additional expertise will be sought during the course of final plat review. 11 r NaeQA, At � O \ � ¢ ® � (s��►i-conducl��S qre (hc�wd�� 1 �,,„ Die �l , ® ter, ► T #Jt ak Bn Y7 "IyJ - - - pt-4 k� 7. la Ay' &,4 - War c� - �► wkd a ,�tff * 11" - a TL 46- , A otit Vt, ,ire n/ ?tm-o txj4 44k" pukx,4� 1wd wak w� c' Yo d- 0 -livot` z Iwo F4 �� . uy► ��h* u'a �� a� C�- [�8� �'�7�3-� arc �-q�wt'� � �e,►��r�, ���,,1� �D,�AVII S �sd �OVWtee 20 D �4`lOwr S. 3�- awe PAT, 3) At j6 Lod- 30 Gam' j� ���� r e 1 .✓i1 MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DAVID H. SPITZ, CITY PLANNER RE: NEXT WEEK'S AGENDA DATE: ,MARCH 13, 1981 2) GEIC The applicant will be presenting testimony from company respresentatives on two specific areas of information. First, a chemio.al representative from MITEL will discuss the types of manufacturing operations and chemical usafre that will take place in the proposed plant. Second, the principal architect for the project will be providing additional information on building appearance and materials. Since these MITEL representatives may not be able to regularly attend commission hearings, I would suggest that they both be allowed to make their complete presentations. This can then be followed by questions from the planning commission and public. A representative of the Vermont Environmental Engineering Office will also be available at the meeting and can answer specific questions pertaining to the State's review of chemical usage and potential environ- mental impact. Following these items (if time permits) the applicant will present additional information on traffic, lighting and landscaping. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 2/27/81 2) GBIC The City Attorney will provide an opinion prior to Tuesday's meeting, on the legality and advisability of continuing the preliminar, plat proceedings. If and when the proceedings do continue, the applicant has supplied the following order of presentation. Due to the scope of the presentation, itmay be helpful to follow the same order in the review of the application. 1) Area considerations, including reexplanation of airport approach cone and additional information on views. 2) Additional traffic data (access should also be considered under this heading). 3) Water supply and fire flows. 4) Waste water pump station and force main. 5) Detailed site plan of building area, including parking areas and a grading plan. 6) Drainage plan and erosion control. 7) Landscaping 8) Building appearance 9) Chemicals 10) Signage To: From: M E M O R A N D U M South Burlington Planning Commission Administrative Staff Report Re: GBIC Preliminary Plat Date: 2/20/81 City Manager, William Szymanski's comments 1. Hinesburg Road intersection with new intersecting drive should include a turning lane and deceleration lane. A state permit will be required. 2. Land should be reserved for future relocation of driveway to intercept Swift Street extension at right angle. 3. Sewage pumping station access road must be unobstructed. It must have at least a gravel surface. A parking and turnaround area must be provided at pumping station. 4. Water (Service should be provided at pumping station. City Planner, David Spitz's comments Applicant has made minor revisions to building and parking lay- out. Location of sewer and water lines h6s been shown. Since the application is only at the preliminary plat stage, a large amount � of engineering data has not been presented or reviewed yet. Thin can be done at the final plat stage. However, I feel that several , items must be resolved before preliminary approval can be grantedt (a) Location of entrance drive, (b) submission -of traffic data and ' determination of public street and intersection improvements, and I ' (c) recommendation to -City Council on installation of oversized improvements. d , (a) Location of entrance drive. The attached map shows 2 possible routes for the Swift Street extension. The routes can be compared as follows: Sight distance for Route A at the intersection with Hinesburg Road is approximately 600 feet. This distance is adequate according to highway standards, for design speeds up to 70 mph; however, it is below the South Burlington standard of 800 feet for horizontal sight distance. Sight distance for Route B is more than adequate. Access to neighboring properties for Route A would allow direct. access to Wright an perhaps indirect access to Tilley. Continuation of Route A to Green Acres might not be feasible. Conversely, Route B could more easily be extended to Green acres but separate access would be- needed for Tilley and Wright. A difficulty with Route. 8 is the possible isolation of part of Rye. Memorandum GBIC Preliminary Plat 2/20/81 Page 2 Green Acres has sufficient frontage and sight distance to be allowed its own entrance. However, if Route B is chosen, the right- of-way extension should probably be retained as a possible alternative. Each route would come fairly close to one existing small re- sidential lot. Applicant's reference is Strongly for Route B. Route A,would enter immediately :.south o£ -a small house close to the road. The applicant feels this would not be an aesthetically suitable entrance. (b) Traffic data and street and intersection improvements. Traffic studies have not yet been submitted. These are needed to evaluate possible improvements along Hinesburg Road and at the inter- section of Kennedy Drive and Hinesburg Road. The Planning Commission also asked at the last meeting that the possibility for a sidewalk and/or bikepath be addressed. , (c) My understanding is that the applicant will be suggesting installation of an oversized sewer force main now and a pumping station that can be upgraded later. The Planning'Commission should recommend to the City Council whether the City should undertake the cost of these oversized utilities now. Several other less critical points should also be addredseds The parking lot turn -around should be removed from the Interstate-69 setback. Sewer easements,should be provided to all abutting properties along Hinesburg Road. If Route B is chosen, the adjacent property owner to the south has requested that sufficient landscaping and screening be provided. Fire and water department reviews are needed for final plat ' review. Legal documents for any easements or public improvements must be provided for final plat review. A proposed pedestrian trail crosses the south east portion of the, property. Entire appearance of the building, including the roof, should be described. Size of parking spaces should be rechecked) they may be sub-standar! t MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's Agenda items Date: 1/23/81 2) Juster/Welby Drug Applicant now proposes an additional 3 foot widening of the sidewalk from the North end of Martin's past the proposed Welby's and then tapering to the existing K-Mart sidewalk. This will provide adequate sidewalk width through- out and will not interfere with traffic flow. 3) Nowland/Peoor See other memo 4) GBIC Proposal is for a 50,000 square foot building and 250 parking spaces for light manufacturing operation. Application is for the entire 161 acre parcel, though only a relatively small portion is being proposed for development at this time. Public water and sewer will be extended. Traffic -related issues must be discussed. (1) The City's master plan shows a major future through road crossing the side. Since this parcel is not being subdivided, a through road may cause sane difficulties for the applicant. The purposes to be served by the through road should be revaluated. (2) A traffic study should be done to examine the impact of traffic from this develop- ment on existing city streets. In relation to this question, other proposed City street improvements (the I-89 interchange and the Swift Street extension) and the possibilites for their implementation should be addressed. 5) Annual and Capital Budgets 1980-1981 July - Dec. 1980 Budget Expenditures Salaries $2650 $2650 Travel 780 390 Publications, etc. 650 444 Special Printing 1500 161 Professional Assistance 7000 739 Advertising 700 334 1981-1982 Proposed Budget $2650 780 650 500 700 /� E � ('I -., � q c, E � L-) C Y svr9s��z � A/ 7 PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1980 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, July 15, 1980 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 1175 Williston Road Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Kirk Woolery, James Ewing, George Mona, Peter Jacob, Robert Walsh Member Absent Ernest Levesque Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Dennis Delaney, Walter Adams, Jr., Carl Cobb, Richard Trudell, John McGrath, I:ary I:cGrath, Steve LaRose, Free Press Minutes of June 24, 1980 This item was deferred until the next meeting. Sketch plan review and zone change application from agricultural -rural to industrial of BDR, Carl Cobb, 346 Shelburne Road, 16 lot Industrial Dark - Wright farm, Hinesburg Road 2r. Poger noted that �Ir. Cobb had submitted a letter to the Commission requesting the zone change. Mr. Trudell said the area in question was a 114 acre parcel of land formerly known as the Wright farm. This proposal is for a 16 lot Industrial subdivision and Mr. Trudell also showed the Commission how they intended tolay out the land if the zone change were approved. Mr. Spitz noted that the new industrially zoned land in the Quadrant encompassed this entire property. The proposal to zone this area in that manner has been sent to the Council as part of the new Master Plan wording. The southern boundary of this acreage is the new line shown on the maps of the proposed Industrial zone before the Council. Mr. Trudell said there was a sleeve under the Interstate which was intended for sewering this area and that they could pump sewage to Kimball Avenue. They can also tap the 24" CWD water line. The developers were told they might have to increase the size of the smallest lots in order to conform to the regulations. Sight -distance on Hinesburg Road was also discussed. The Commission felt there should be very good sight -distance. It was also suggested that a road larger than the two lanes present now might be necessary. I4r. Ewing also suggested extending the streets shown on the plan to other properties so the city could have only one curb cut in this area. Yr. Spitz noted that the Swift Street Extension should come in in the area of the entrance to this property. Mx. Ewing suggested connecting these roads to the town of Williston, across Muddy Brook. N.r. Poger felt that Hinesburg Road was going to need upgrading and this might make that need arrive faster. Yr. Cobb said they had a party interested in one of the lots and they had checked and not found much available Industrial land in the city. The Commission felt it would be some time before the new zoning document was in place, but Mr. Spitz said that since the Commission had passed the Plan, it could legally propose any part of the zoning changes now. Xr. Poger said that once the Plan HICKOK& BOARDMAN REALTYINC. 346 Shelburne Street, Burlington, Vermont 05402 Phone 658-3500 July 9, 1980 South Burlington Planning Commission Attn: Sidney Poger, Chairman South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Please consider this letter a formal request for a zoning change from Agricultural to Industrial for the property located on Hinesburg Road owned by B.D.R. Associates and formerly known as the M.K. Wright Farm. Due to its location under the approach cone and the lack of available commercial or industrial land in South Burlington, we feel that the Industrial Classification would be the highest and best use for this particular piece of property and would be of greatest benefit to the City of South Burlington. Thank you. M f, ( �g Y Carl F. Cobb CFC:bc MLS[13 REALTOR`- Y CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN i) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record B D R 346 Shelburne Street Burlington, Vermont b. Applicant Same as above c. Contact person Richard P. Trudell,•Y.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Route 2A, Box 308, Williston, Vermont 05495 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels involved as well as proposed use(s). Subdivision of 114 acre parcel into 16 lot industrial subdivision. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Fee simple 4) Namesof owners of record of all contiguous properties See attached list. 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of wiy, etc. None existing, 60' R.U.W. proposed for roads, 20' sewer easement proposed for force main. 2- 6) Proposed extension# relocation, or modification of municipal facilities 13uch as sewerage, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Roads to have water sewer_ s and storm drainage. Pump station and force main under I-89 to Kimball Drive. 7) Describe any actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment, or previous acticns by the South Burlington Planning Cbm-ni sion, � which affect the proposed subdivision anoinclude Cates: _ Zoning chance will be needed. 8) Attcch a sketch plan shozoing all if ` items 2 through 7 on p. 5 of the S required under unbdiviormation �ion Reoulatior.s, signature) applicant or contact person Z �� date FOR OFFICE USE - submission of a date officer application and sketch plan to administrative - this proposal is classified as a major or minor subdivision application deemed complete -- —_� - proposal tentatively scheduled for rirst Planning co .:,mission rnAetins on Confirmed r'or Adjoining Property Owners Green Acres, Inc. R. Goodrich 625 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont M.K. Wright 900 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont R. Tilley 700 Hinesburg goad South Burlington, Vermont L. Willis Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont R. Painter 1060 Hinesburg r3Oad South Burlington, Vermont 3M ON 1 80k -1�4 w4t7& Ae kvltla�to4t b o r► �'2 - /1� ►'�+ a�► t �i1'`°uAg&�IALa &V Na' : '7/14 /$ 0 Adjoining Pro erty Owners Green Acres, Inc. R. Goodrich 625 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont M.K. Wright 900 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vermont R. Tilley 700 Hinesburg road South Burlington, Vermont L. Willis Hinesburg load South Burlington, Vermont R. Fainter 1060 Hinesburg Aoad South Burlington, Vermont M MITS=L Mitel Semiconductor Division of Mitel of Delaware Inc. Telephone: (802) 95IK 658-5500 1000 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 July 30, 1982 Mr. David Spitz South Burlington Planning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Mitel overall site plan with easements. Dear Mr. Spitz, Enclosed please find the above for filing with your office. If there is anything else please let us know. WSD/jg Enclosure Very truly yours, William S. Duncan Facilities Manager �. _ � ��r—fir' ` \� \ '� i ♦ s -- \ N •r / � ( • h / N \\ w a ! I AlifIt ��I • •• (/ • 'w"a r Municipal Burllrlgloii South �• • Burlin - New Eldriii ' ��' •� � � � ��� / � � !�� �� ram' if o nl OCATION OF.'/ .. — r w,,, „n • MITEL NELIR4 . o Bigo A / I N`; .A ... . 4. > LIN AMR I"LOCATION OF I A I I MI TEL NMI* AN . If ---it let, sn a qwkw t*NW 6k MITEL 6 MMA(UM VjjrW @WUSTFAAL PAM m lop Sanm BLMLNWM. vvwmr M2WW L SCAMMM. we 0 GMUIMMW A- Off