Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SP-09-62 DR-09-05 DR-09-04 - Supplemental - 0325 Dorset Street
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 7, 2009 \d rb\sit\schwa rtz\schwa rtz_sp. doc Plans received: June 17, 2009 325DORSET STREET SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-09-62 Agendas #9 Meeting date: August 21, 2009 Owner _Applicant Diane Weisburg Mitchell Schwartz MD PO Box 911 329 Dorset Street Burlington, VT 05402 South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0570-00325 Central District 3 Zoning District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mitchell Schwartz, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan review to convert a single family dwelling to 1,572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft. of retail use, 325 Dorset Street. As the subject property lies within the Design Review Overlay District, the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed application. This review can be found in a separate report prepared for the same hearing date. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on June 17, 2009 and have the following comments. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant is proposing to convert an existing single family dwelling to medical use in order to expand the space for his existing business at the adjacent 329 Dorset Street. The applicant has stated that they do not anticipate adding any additional patients but merely providing more space to see those existing patients. The proposed 1572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft of retail use (to sell products to patients and non -patients) will require a minimum of 9 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing six (6) parking spaces on site and one (1) parking space on the street. This would result in a shortfall of 2 spaces or 22.2%. Therefore the applicant is requesting a parking waiver of 2 spaces or 22.2%. 1. The Board grants a parking waiver of two (2) spaces or 22.2 % for a total of seven (7) spaces provided, six (6) on -site and one (1) on -street. The transition on site and from structure to structure is sufficient. The two properties are directly across from each other on a local street. A striped crosswalk connects the sidewalks which are in front of each property. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. This criterion is being met. Parking is existing and is located entirely to side or rear of the building as viewed from Dorset Street. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the existing building is below the maximum height of 40 feet for a peaked roof. No height waivers are requested or needed. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and stated that no changes or additional allocation will be necessary. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. No new structures are proposed. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, there are no good opportunities for connecting access to surrounding properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plan shows a small screened area for trash and recycling. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING As there is no new construction, no additional landscaping shall be required. However, the applicant is proposing substantial new landscaping for the property. The front of the property which faces Dorset Street shall be trimmed back and manicured with new plants. The applicant is also proposing a new hedge row between the subject lot and the residential zoning boundary to the rear. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall depict snow storage areas that will minimize the potential for run-off. Snow storage areas and a bicycle rack are shown on the plans. Lighting Pursuant to Section 13.07(A) of the Land Development Regulations, all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties and rights -of -way. The proposed lighting meets this requirement. Traffic The proposed 1572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft of retail use (to sell products to patients and non -patients) is estimated to generate 5.86 vehicle trip ends. This will result in 4.85 additional pm peak vehicle trip ends over the existing single family residential use. Central District Requirements Staff has addressed this criterion in a separate report for Design Review Application #DR-09-05. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Development Review Board Site Plan application #SP-09-62 subject to the conditions included herein. Respectfully submitted, xx 9y64_S_'_1 b, Cathy n LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Mitchell Schwartz, applicant SITE PLAN ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the keOv 2"n k , hereinafter referred to as WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Development Review Board for the development of property located at 3 Z'` Dorxc+ A. f.:? as depicted on a site plan entitled " 32r ►�o--r<t Sf ►���Ft J_'.`ka 21,6.1 ", dated a' 06 vg_ and prepared by d ec,, elf n 1 c�t,✓!ey UKc , WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: S� T . 1, ,Z,o ®9 2. T e Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than uey- 31) 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all this improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements herinabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit fo, 1j 25- 90►-fe+ feet , Developer and Bank agree that the sum of 10, o(x) . 00 shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and ah II be available for payment to the Municipality in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in t'-iis Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Be nk shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality , nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to Le performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such a manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 10. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this agreement. 11. This agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 12.The sum of o 000, oo shall be maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 13. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executers, administrators, successors, and assigns. Dated at aue this day of �,-z,�� .��?o 206. i C` C1 t�0vrQJ--- Witness Wi s Dated at Sculh F3Uk6(Y) Qtnh i this day of C t oher ;, 1 J2 0_La. By: 064 Authorized Agent (DEVELOPER'S NAME) Wi ess ; By: Witness my Authorized Agent CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Dated at . ���,✓ 1�,,� I �/" V this day of Wi ess sue}--- Na Witness Duly Authorized Agent (NAME OF BANK — 3`d PARTY) e t•. �;� �'�s �t �'r Jh'r .. ��. � - � 'i T �, � ice+ �� ,�.�N �tA 1Rh- � �;+� t {�, ���'� Y•y �,r Ay p`tyrt .� �. ,��� �t r. �� x �,` 5'A `.tr ..# S� i� trp * t.,t,'1� 1� ,, i `�� t .. �. •..:-� � - 4�• ma'. Vic. ,�, �• � �,=w j ✓A' - y p < s71.. F - �Y f ' •`.:' i.. •.,-_ r, _.. i . •fir q - _ - - ;. - �_ mar. --•-II••--- ,ram ` �• '� f�•.. ?� I �_ :.. _.' - �- � :n ,tiny - i `' R t, a , • t r , �i South May 23, 2013 Dr. Mitchell Schwartz 329 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 V t H M U N f Re: Authorization for Release of Escrow Account — 325 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby authorizes the release of the above referenced Escrow Account at Key Bank required for landscaping improvements pursuant to the terms therein. The Escrow was for a total amount of $10,000. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Bob Rusten City Treasurer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com r ,o Op VA, X1 southburliutoxi PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Rusten, City Treasurer FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Office DATE: May 16, 2013 SUBJECT: Release of Escrow — 325 Dorset Street The applicant's request for the release of the above -listed has been reviewed for the following project: Landscaping Modifications, #SP-09-62 The original amount of the surety was: $ 10,000 The surety is presently: $ 10,000 The purpose of this release is that the three (3) year requirement for maintaining this surety has expired. Please complete and sign the enclosed form authorizing the financial institution to release the funds in Escrow. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com I CY ce, I .. .................. 3 2- South Burlington Planning Zoning New Non -Residential. Construction Impact Pees Grand List April 1, 2oo8 Project Name & Address Property Owner Effective Date TOTAL IMPACT FEE Value of New Construction: Tvne of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or Reinforced Concrete Masonry or Concrete SF Bearing SF Wall Structure Wood Frame Structure Pre -Fab Steel SF Structure SF Industrial/Manufacturing S66 S69 S65 S64 Engineering & Research S88 S96 S93 S88 General Office S123 S113 silo 0 S104 Medical Office S133 S71 S69 S67 General Retail S84 S54 S51 S41 Auto Service Facility 84 S81 S78 Elder Care Facility 102 S74 S72 Motel Sprinkler credit? (Enter 1 if yes) Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Past payments credit: Post construction value of structure & land Future payments credit: Base fee: NET FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE: PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: ROAD IMPACT FEE: 4.85 $144.98 _1 7.41 $4,5o6.93 1 $0 $0. $207,800 $70.65 $207,800.o0 $62.34 $0.00 -$132.99 EMAT` DI o�lOLOGYv.,�a MircHEltSc w=M.D. PHOEBE PElKE7 PA 660.8608 6' 'ice ��s�• .¢. .r, ,�c. YYr, �'t �y .��2 I�wn � oewnvai[ts Un ', u No Text No Text DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 SEPTEMBER 2009 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; M. Behr, E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, R. Farley, B. Stuono Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; Dr. M. Schwartz, M. Hall, M. Young, E. Farrell, P. & C. O'Brien, M. Kristiansen, S. Homested, M. Carter, D. Crane, W. & E. Wolfe, T. Barritt, A. Wright, N. Osborn, C. Stone, C. Trey, D. Weisburgh, J. Skynara, S. Dattilio, P. Joppe-Mercure, D. Hewitt, C. Lewis, D. Fisette, M. Buscaer, M. Holgate, J. & D. Neroni, K. McEachern, F. Haddleton 1. Other Business & Announcements: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 21 July and 18 August 2009: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 21 July as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 18 August as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site Plan Review Application #SP-09-62 of Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. to convert a single family dwelling to 1,572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft. of retail use, 325 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair advised members that the City Manager is no longer recommending to the City Council that the north side of Sherry Road be designated as "no parking." Mr. Dinklage noted that the applicant is asking for a two (2) space parking waiver. There will be six (6) parking spaces on site and one off -site space provided. Dr. Schwartz said there will be no additional staff or patients with the exception of a possible future part time person. Ms. Quimby said that on four occasions in the past two weeks she had driven to the site during her lunch hour and seen lots of cars parked on the side of the road. She asked what will happen when there are snow banks on both sides of the road. She said she didn't feel good about this. Dr. Schwartz said this project will actually be a solution to these problems as his staff will no longer be parking in the street. Mr. Shepard said that despite the fact that there is a "no parking" at the corner, the DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 SEPTEMBER 2009 PAGE 2 Doctor's staff still parks there and police ignore them. Mr. Dinklage said that is an enforcement issue. He felt that six new off-street parking spaces could help address that issue. He added that if the situation got worse, the city can always go back to the "no parking" option on the street. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-09-62 of Mitchell Schwartz, M.D., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-1 with Ms. Quimby voting against. 4. Continued Conditional Use Application #CU-09-05 of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, to install six panel antennas not to exceed 46 feet in height, 1285 Williston Road (LaQuinta): and 5. Continued Site Plan Application #SP-09-55 of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 76,630 sq. ft. shopping center. The amendment consists of installing six panel antennas on the rooftop, 1285 Williston Road (LaQuinta): Mr. Belair distributed a testimony from the person who took the photos explaining how he did it. Mr. Stuono asked whether the applicant had considered using the Vermont Federal building. Mr. Hall said they had, but it is already too crowded. Mr. Stuono said that at some time in the future the question of visual clutter should be considered, since utilities will probably be underground. Mr. Dinklage said that state indicated that "never again" would they underground utilities after the Dorset St. project. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-09-05 and Site Plan Application #SP-09-55 of T-Mobile Northeast subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-31 and Final Plat Application #SD-09-32 of Buckthorn Group for a planned unit development to subdivide a 6.93 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into nine lots ranging in size from 0.39 acres to 1.96 acres,1404 Hinesburg Road (Furlong property): Mr. Dinklage said the Board has to deal with the aspect ratios of lots and come up with a decision that is consistent with zoning regulations. Mr. O'Brien reviewed changes made since the last hearing. These include: 1. Reducing the width of the road to 24 feet (from 26 feet). This still allows for parking on one side of the road 3z s�OZXT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: �r 1 • 1 (�t/�� NAME I MAILINCq ADDR SS PROJECT OF INTEREST 11 " `lam T ✓� l� . � �- p l ln,t/ t 5? .. �G 4' d d y0 , L . �r�te��Iz1�,o�Fe ZCje- Y7 V Jura 3 � - T ,ram `lip. i o-# CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 VV..jS.A. § 4471(c). HEAR G DATE: NA //�� MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST ?6w( 'Poo'I) 9-zed Cti So S DTLt�i : 5a. 13,)o 4. tocC,-'-V*C . ✓r H -t iti � ,Y�aZt l% e L Its f� n vu' bu Jlf-+kon-� i?y7 /T012i}j2.s 5�b/,J1 COLcFf- Tr-�Z VT-. -BJ6cTHo2,) 2aL/ aJ�� e Cntge>- I �elp►`� to D(belk POD M sdielle- *190-le- ek/ q Interested Persons Record and Service List southburl n too VERMONT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A./§�4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST A Oil �4t TuGAt r /17 r/ t r sal LL t— I 1 south PLANNING & ZONING September 3, 2009 Paul Jopp-Mercure 10 Brookwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan — 325 Dorset Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com September 3, 2009 Mitchell Schwartz 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 325 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Schwartz: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on September 1, 2009 (effective 9/1/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, I � 41e� Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 7410 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 te1 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 AUGUST 2009 PAGE 4 visual clutter. Mr. Birmingham said he would prefer to see them on this building than on a big metal tower sticking out of the ground. Members agreed to continue the item until there were more Board members present and to give the applicant the chance to address Mr. Stuono's concerns. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Conditional Use Application #CU-09-05 and Site Plan Application #SP-09-55 of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, until 1 September 2009. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Design Review Application #DR-09-04 of Mitchell Schwartz for approval for site modification to a property that falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. The modifications include: 1) removal of back deck, roof overhang and chimneys; 2) replacement of vinyl siding, doors and windows, 3) changes to the parking area and landscaping; 4) change of use to medical and retail use, 325 Dorset Street: Ms. LaRose said staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application 4DR-09-04 of Mitchell Schwartz subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Design Review Application #DR-09-05 of Mitchell Schwartz for a Master Sign Permit for a property that falls within the sign design overlay district, 325 Dorset Street: Ms. LaRose noted that the Design Review Committee had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-09-05 of Mitchell Schwartz subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site Plan Review Application #SP-09-62 of Mitchell Schwartz, M. D. to convert a single family dwelling to 1,572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft. of retail use, 325 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair noted the applicant is asking for a parking waiver. They are one parking space short on the property, even with a waiver. He indicated that he had recently learned that there will be a "no parking" area on Brookwood. Mr. Shepard indicated that he lives 4 houses down and the employees of this business park in front of his house. Dr. Schwartz said his goal had been to have this be the same as his other building. He could go back to the original plan which staff changed to get more green space. He said he was comfortable that they have enough parking. He added that they will not be hiring DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 AUGUST 2009 PAGE 5 more staff, and existing staff can park in the new lot. Ms. Dattilio said she favors expansion of the business. Her only concern is parking as she now has trouble getting out of her driveway. Ms. Troyan said there were a lot of cars associated with the house that Dr. Schwartz is buying. Staff felt they need to find at least one more parking space. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application 4SP-09-62 until 1 September 2009. Mr. Stuono seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Conditional Use Application #CU-09-06 of Steve & Jennifer Heroux to install a 10-foot high fence in conjunction with a proposed tennis court, 670 Nowland Farm Road: Mr. Snyder said Mr. & Mrs. Heroux are building a tennis court and need a fence. An 8- foot fence is allowed, but most tennis courts have a 10-foot fence. Neighbors are OK with the plans. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-09-06 of Steve & Jennifer Heroux subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Final Plat Application #SD-09-33 of Steve & Jennifer Heroux to amend a previously approved four lot subdivision. The amendment consists of merging lots #3 and #4 into lone lot of 1.72 acres, 670 Nowland Farm Road: Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-09-33 of Steve & Jennifer Heroux subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 12. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-06 of Winding Brook Homeowners Association to alter the existing grade by removing 1450 cubic yards of fill to reconstruct a storm water pond, Winding Brook Drive (Winding Brook Condominiums): Mr. St. Germain noted this had been approved in 2007, but the approval has lapsed. Mr. Berkett said it is the same exact plan as was approved. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous application #MS-09-06 of Winding Brook Homeowners Association subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 7, 2009 \d rb\sit\schwartz\schwa rtz_sp. doc Plans received: June 17, 2009 325DORSET STREET SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-09-62 Agendas #3 Meeting date: September 1, 2009 Owner Applicant Diane Weisburg Mitchell Schwartz MD PO Box 911 329 Dorset Street Burlinaton, VT 05402 South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0570-00325 Central District 3 Zoning District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Mitchell Schwartz, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan review to convert a single family dwelling to 1,572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft. of retail use, 325 Dorset Street. As the subject property lies within the Design Review Overlay District, the Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposed application. This review can be found in a separate report prepared for the same hearing date. The application was reviewed on August 18, 2009 (minutes not yet available) but was continued so that the applicant could address some concerns with adequate parking. The applicant will discuss this plan at the hearing. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on June 17, 2009 and have the following comments. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant is proposing to convert an existing single family dwelling to medical use in order to expand the space for his existing business at the adjacent 329 Dorset Street. The applicant has stated that they do not anticipate adding any additional patients but merely providing more space to see those existing patients. The proposed 1572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft of retail use (to sell products to patients and non -patients) will require a minimum of 9 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing six (6) parking spaces on site and one (1) parking space on the street. This would result in a shortfall of 2 spaces or 22.2%. Therefore the applicant is requesting a parking waiver of 2 spaces or 22.2%. 1. The Board grants a parking waiver of two (2) spaces or 22.2% for a total of seven (7) spaces provided, six (6) on -site and one (1) on -street. The transition on site and from structure to structure is sufficient. The two properties are directly across from each other on a local street. A striped crosswalk connects the sidewalks which are in front of each property. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Df=PARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING This criterion is being met. Parking is existing and is located entirely to side or rear of the building as viewed from Dorset Street. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the existing building is below the maximum height of 40 feet for a peaked roof. No height waivers are requested or needed. (d) !Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and stated that no changes or additional allocation will be necessary. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. No new structures are proposed. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, there are no good opportunities for connecting access to surrounding properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plan shows a small screened area for trash and recycling. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING As there is no new construction, no additional landscaping shall be required. However, the applicant is proposing substantial new landscaping for the property. The front of the property which faces Dorset Street shall be trimmed back and manicured with new plants. The applicant is also proposing a new hedge row between the subject lot and the residential zoning boundary to the rear. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall depict snow storage areas that will minimize the potential for run-off. Snow storage areas and a bicycle rack are shown on the plans. Lighting Pursuant to Section 13.07(A) of the Land Development Regulations, all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties and rights -of -way. The proposed lighting meets this requirement. Traffic The proposed 1572 sq. ft. of medical office use and 156 sq. ft of retail use (to sell products to patients and non -patients) is estimated to generate 5.86 vehicle trip ends. This will result in 4.85 additional pm peak vehicle trip ends over the existing single family residential use. Central District Requirements Staff has addressed this criterion in a separate report for Design Review Application #DR-09-05. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Development Review Board Site Plan application #SP-09-62 subject to the conditions included herein. Respectfully submitted, Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Mitchell Schwartz, applicant To: South Burlington Development Review Board: It has come to my attention that the application by Mitchell Schwartz l Dorset Street Dermatology was continued until the next Development Review Board meeting scheduled for September 1. I had been led to believe, as was Dr. Schwartz, that the application would be approved. It came as a complete surprise that the Board was asked to reconsider or perhaps deny the application because a new ordinance might be proposed that would restrict or prohibit parking on the north side of Brookwood Drive. Right now this prohibition does not exist. The new ordinance hasn't even been proposed yet, and it doesn't seem at all reasonable that at the last minute the outcome of this application is put at risk in this way. I am aware that on street parking related to Dr. Schwartz's practice has been a problem for some of the Brookwood residents. This is probably the motivation for the ordinance. However, it's my understanding that the neighbors support this application because the additional parking provided on my property will considerably reduce the on street parking impacts. Regulations or the desire of the Design Review Committee will only allow for 6 on site parking spaces. Zoning would require 9, maybe 10, but a waiver would be granted to reduce the requirement number to 7. The seventh space was to be on the street, which is currently legal. Next door, Dr. Schwartz has a well maintained and appealing property that has 10 or 1 i on site spaces. Now we're told he can only have 6 on my property, and that no on street parking is available? This seems unreasonable. Dr. Schwartz has been encouraged, as an alternative solution, to secure the rights to a parking space somewhere nearby his current business. A space would only be secured at some additional cost. It will also require a whole other site plan application process, which could take months and cost thousands of dollars. Dr. Schwartz has indicated he is not prepared to consider this alternative. I don't blame him. It would be a great burden to me and a disappointing outcome for Dr. Schwartz and the neighbors if this sale and process fails. An approval with the entitlement of a space on Brookwood seems a very reasonable solution, and I ask the Development Review Board to approve Dr. Schwartz's application. Regards, xjkll-�4a- L1,1t)Lt4 �44-1 Diane Weisburgh owner of 325 Dorset St„ So. Burlington,Vt. In I f� south PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2009 Sue Dattilio 2 Brookwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review — 325 Dorset Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 5? Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2009 Anne Joppe-Mercure 10 Brookwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review — 325 Dorset Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.41 06 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com August 27, 2009 Paul Joppe-Mercure 10 Brookwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review — 325 Dorset Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Wi PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2009 Ken Dattilio 2 Brookwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review — 325 Dorset Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com W CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate -compliance -with the -applicable criteria. 24-V.S.-A. § 4461(b).-The DRB must keep a— written record lof the.- name-,- address --and- participation of each person who has sought -interested -person -status.- 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be.mailed to. every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. §.4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court; Ahe DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the - appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEA ING DATE: NA1VI PTC%-Nd-(A tcd C� MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST G+ VrC-09)i y�r'ir1k V V •� 1 10 Knoll �.h�W .I.•h ��i �/.Y'.'S YiS #.'6..-._ (5o , i JAA • LC> 0 l I7'V7 Poprty2� Poi&t-r 1-4 ►ic I - ow RJZ\A-501— TL &V V J0�40 � �1 Sr «IVVVIII FA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 446-1(b). The DRB must keep a -written record of:the name- address -and participationn-of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V:S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every -person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24. V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEA G DATE:_�_DOO� t NT CCU NA E MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST C 1--v S ,j b�ti�ntt,r yr e 7 --"5G + TV I% - e A kVG'ta ^ ITT" p"jAdt, k_' i cz - y e ! /J Y� j aicYl j /J�csb 0 WA to GU_,'_0 —6Q+I-t (LID pZ P0y--7E)VUbC d 3_2 �s �yj� �D�jo���% JGY?1cYe /U Jv✓?��G�c��1 JZ� �vrs�i� S�-, jo -� [wf* 3)r �� �� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: _ 4� 246e/ N MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST JC��✓1 �� r Y'0 t D r /\ �� A T T ► c D 7i �jr- 0040W Lc ��,�' : �Z � -�� �.)' eT .S . 1 Yt l Lu © �1� � �� 6 ► �� Pc.�. s-r gSY UU'4.L1 nIC�T� - r^P--L I 5��kwoi,y f Z 3 )-1 'Qoe z+ Si-ee— i 2 57 gv. I c6YID lG��oc�J �fb3 i'�1fi. Vi<<a Bvt � Co�cancs�r , �` fl54o3 (3�,� Prof E— southburlington PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2009 Mitchell Schwartz 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Reviews for 325 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Schwartz: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions of the above referenced projects approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on August 18, 2009 If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT #7008 0150 0003 6150 7380 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com i south 117s, PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner,'-,``1 DATE: August 6, 2009 � Cc: Mitchell Schwartz, applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application DR-09-04 325 Dorset Street Agenda #7 Mitchell Schwartz, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval to for site modifications to a property that falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. The modifications include: 1) removal of back deck, roof overhang, and chimneys; 2) replacement of vinyl siding, doors, and windows; 3) changes to the parking area and landscaping and; 4) change of use to medical and retail use, 325 Dorset Street. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. Although on a separate lot, the applicant is proposing to remodel the run-down dwelling to match an abutting property. New vinyl siding (color to match or complement), windows and doors will be consistent with the improvements made to the adjacent property. Although the property is proposed to be used as a commercial space (medical office), the building will largely retain the look of a single family dwelling. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Design Review Application DR-09-04 325 Dorset Street Page 2 of 5 (b) Materials used. High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings. Natural, indigenous materials of stone, masonry, and wood shall predominate. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. Again, the proposed changes to the site are harmonious with the neighboring building which is aesthetically pleasing and well -kept. Although the regulations stipulate preferences for natural building materials, the proposed changes are for a remodel of a small and existing building. The proposed improvements are in scale with the proposed change of use on the property. To rebuild the structures based on this application would be excessive and disproportionate. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The proposed project appears to be in compliance with this criterion. The applicant is proposing to reside the building in classic cream color with white trim. They have submitted samples of the colors and materials. The siding shall have a 3" reveal. 1. The siding shall have a 3" reveal. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity, however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. The applicant is proposing to maintain as much as possible the appearance and feel of the building as a single family residence. The windows and doors will be replaced with more energy efficient and modern styles but will remain reflective of the style of the residential home. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. The roof is that of a single family residence, the theme throughout the building and much of this section of the street. The roof Design Review Application DR-09-04 325 Dorset Street Page 3 of 5 is in good condition and the applicant is not seeking to replace it. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. The building fronts on Dorset Street. There is access from the parking lot which is to the rear of the building. There is a door on the front access along Dorset Street. The applicant has stated that they will ensure that this remains accessible during business hours. 2. The business shall be accessible via the front door during all business hours. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. The applicant is proposing to replace windows and doors with more modern and energy - efficient ones. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R. O. W. shall meet the specifications identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the Design Review Application DR-09-04 325 Dorset Street Page 4 of 5 general appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site and, where needed, for screening purposes. In particular, parking areas shall be well screened by berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas. The applicant is proposing a new landscape plan. This includes substantial changes to overgrown areas as well as some new areas of shrubbery. The parking lot is too small to warrant internal landscaped islands. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co- exist to the greatest extent possible. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. The applicant is proposing a dense hedgerow at the western edge of the lot, where the property borders a residential zoning district. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian, between adjacent properties. Design Review Application DR-09-04 325 Dorset Street Page 5 of 5 This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (f) Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed. The applicant is proposing a curved pole -mounted lighting on the site. Staff recommends that the applicant discuss other lighting options which would be mounted lower and are more aesthetically pleasing and design -oriented. The applicant is also proposing a curved lighting sconce to be building -mounted. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. Staff feels that this is being met. (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. Staff feels that this is being met (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review application #DR-09-04 subject to the conditional item included herein. MA Style General Information ) SiteLighting.com - Architectural Outdrr Lighting Soluti... Page 1 of 4 SiteLighting.com: Architectural Outdoor Lighting Solutions featuring Gardco and Emco Luminaires and Poles Outdoor Lighting Products and Information for the Professional Lighting Designer • Go to Search Box (Access Key: "s" ). • Go to Full Site Navigation. • Go to Accessibility Page Access Key: "aa. MA Style The Form Ten semi -sphere is a dome shaped, cylindrical cutoff luminaire. Its softer silhouette lends itself to integration with curving architectural structures, or may be tastefully used to provide an interesting counterpoint to sharply defined structural lines. Semi -Sphere luminaires accommodate all six Gardco optical systems and accept HID lamps from 70 to 400 watts. Like all Gardco luminaires, housings are sealed against penetration by insects and the elements with high compliance memory retentive, extruded silicone gaskets. Housings are spun aluminum with a circumferential reveal. • About Us • Privacy • Search • Contact Us • Home • Products • Literature • Photometry • TechTalk http://www.sitelighting.com/Products.cfm?Brand=gar&ProLine=fl Or&Style=MA 7/27/2009 MW Style General Information.' SiteLighting.com - Architectural Outd(- Lighting Solut... Page 1 of 4 SiteLighting.com: Architectural Outdoor Lighting Solutions featuring Gardco and Emco Luminaires and Poles Outdoor Lighting Products and Information for the Professional Lighting Designer • Go to Search Box (Access Key: "s" • Go to Full Site Navigation. . • Go to Accessibility Page (Access Key: "a". MW Style Gardco offers its round form products with wall mounting configurations that carry the theme introduced in the parking area directly to the architecture. Available up to 400W, the housings are one -piece, spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Wall mounted luminaires accept four different precision optical assemblies, allowing for excellent design flexibility. • About Us • Privacy Policy • Search • Contact i N • Home • Products • Literature • Photometry • TechTalk • Sales http://www.sitelighting.com/products.cfm?Style=MW&Brand=gar&ProLine=fl Or 7/27/2009 I , - Hedge Row ri Woovon Wire Fonceline 102' _— _-----------r. T I o J09v25:.. 1 a'xy" ac ss ranP with 36" 11 °i Z (i'iC) hi<1b ADA ccompliant handrails J r ------ (design:tlY othara) `. - i R Bike Rack ' \ 1 I - \ Shed for recycling and trash ,1 ) p Light on: 10•-0, Building Setback - 1 Zoning Setback m ; C" `to match � f I sxielg glade •,r"�C s a --- ; 3j o_... ----------------- u Curb to match Former curb cut existing grade 1 Existing 'Neighborhood Watch' sign 'o g i ____________________ _ .. _zzzczzz.z_____________ _____________ r S Match existing Match _ - existing Relocate No Parking From Brookwood Drive curb _ curb Here To Comer sign Notes earett S,nwt• i a _ Site [ South awlbgw, , V-mmt Locus WnWy Or. — 1. Owner. Bernard &.Diane Weisburgh P.O. Box 911 Burlington. Vr. 05402 (7) 802-658-0457 2. Applicant. Mitchell Schwartz. MD 329 Dorset Street I�l 11j' I� i I1 ' ; • I v_ v. g is 1� � • W i R E.,C-8 1 V E p JUL 17 2009 City of So. Burlington South Burlington, Vr. 05403 (7) 802-660-8808 3. Parcel.. 0.17 owes South Burlington. Vr 4. Zaned City Center Design District J 5. Existing Conditions: The parcel is at the North West comer of Dorset Street and Brookwood Drive. The existing house is accessed from Brookwood Dries. 6. Project Description: Convert existing house to medical offices. Add parking and landscaping. Maintain existing city sewer and water services. 7. Parking Required: - Building area (first floor and basement): 2 x 864 sf - 1,728 sf Medkd Oiflce Parking: S spaces per 1.000 sf Required Spaces: 8.64 say 9 25X wetwer request Parking Spaces Requested 6.75 say 7 _ Proposed Parking:. 6 spaces an site 1 space on Brookwood Drive 8. Lot coverage: Total Parcel Size 7,405 sf coverage Existing Buildings 1.453 sf 19.6X Existing Told. 1,986 sf 26.8R Proposed Buildings 935 sf 126X Proposed pavement 3.528 sf 47.65 Allowable coverage - Building 40.T, Overall 90,5 Dorset Street. Front Ywd coverage Existing 1.253 sf 35.85 Proposed 1,261 sf 36.OX Brookwood Drive front Ywd coverage Existing 826 sf 3705 - Proposed 1,064 sf 34.8x 9. Perimeter property line information obtained from South Burlington tax map. 10. Existing topography and site features obtained from. Button Professional Land Surveyors, 2009. 11. Newest lire hydrant /mated at the SW caner of Brookwood Drive and Dorset Street. 12. See Landscape Plan by Susan McBride Els Gordon & Landscape Design, South Burington, VT. Legend g Property Line —»---- Building Edge of Pavement - Building Setback — — — — — Cantour _------ ,y________ Fence '— Vegetation r�rrrv-r.v�, Luminaire �[ Sign T T _.._ GRAPHIC SCALE 0 T 1e' :O W + E -' "- '�r r r I `�,` S LLEWELLYN - HOWLEY INCORPORATED ConeulW9 Servbas Engineering Permitting 20 I0m6e11 Are Ste. 202H F (802) 658.2882 South Burlington T (802) 658.2100 Vermont OS403 httpdhsww.thine.net — 325 Dorset Street aura esesw v«.aae Site Plan 1 Inch 5 fL :*t,xEFE zkOlm I I 12128MIngm a W s g 1= W •: N .1 •i vt W n ei at .A Dorset Street « - - -- ------ ----- --- -- - -- ---- -- �' - ----- - - -- -- �s------------ ----- --=------- ------------ ---- -s==__--- - --- 1(� I 1 r , � ' i i r l,� I I i r Z� q W � ca hh� I� s � 1 � I a v ° 3 ♦�_ I r _„,- ------------ ---- - - exrstmy sie�+olr �_�/�/------------------------ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a o I N W �op 3 h g � a 6 � 2 ® =s yd y CM 0 IF W 01 •C �IIIi,I;V i uaP4� 5 �i ' 4 x.6 x h PRCdED Rc>7F WOOD 5kED ?WSN y(peAc`e . 1 LAw N LAW N ,'91KC RACK LAWN 1 LAwN j I ..i PGPtNN1A1.5 I I i � I. ; PFR4:NNIA LS I o 1 np ' VA R K I nl Z- I I �o-r DoR � t 5-y"e-j I I ! I pi 5 11 uip f I L i Oil (MULCH LAWN ex. .. I OAK 1 I �lsw r�jKooYwpOD D'Rly ); Susan Mc6rWe GIs Garden & Landscape Perim 5aA (iu'lingtal, Vf 802-60-3989 anar 5@cl wwL et 325 12a-set Street 5altk Gudim tm, Vt 05403 July 2009 .Scale; I"s5' N NOTES 1. Ownel: Dlane wetshurgh P.O. Box 911 Burihxlton, Vr 05402 658-0437 2. Appll—t: Mkd1di SdrA wM 323 Dorset St South Burlington, Vr 05403 660-8808 last Ke4 to Landscape Plm ata res a Tres ree agea Ire N14ik wilim 5adix I I MW)M[Pcr Jvli s Vi6itta aFerer--spirea 5pirea aterer y trq Inecre h4&awa a TinkLI �. angea - arcwwa lea Usue Xig�Yargea y Vwart we a VlB w Ja ITa jtj I V ED ` ci ty ofSO' e�ni nvton CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance=with the -applicable criteria. 2-4-V.S:A. § 4461(b).-The DRB must keep a -written record of the -name-,- address --and partici--pation of each person who has sought -irate rested_ person= status.- 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A -copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be -mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. §. 4461 (b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24=V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEA ING DATE:Aw,1146T NAM PT((ZqAtV MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST `It `� v�►r��s�on, o S . %3va/ /7 Trnt)� tJ 0rrsQ k�r �Ln n `aro-d b .u. r I I n- n S -o F rj I-m CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.-S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a-writ#en record of:the name, address -and participation -of each person who has sought -interested person status 24 V:S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every -person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEtf G DATE: >� V� D �T NA MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST CCU bry �"'r yr C)S�y Y po✓ i s1®r WAfc� aw uGl� 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation- of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NANI Cl MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 0Luc `1 �>v ze—c-v�) 81 MA PL(= s-T- View I>- g Cotc- tcs�r , VA-05go5 E- Permit Number DR-pf- 6 APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington ALL information requested in this application must be completed in full. If you do not provide all of the requested information with this application form, as well as the required plans and design information, the City will not schedule a review of the application before the Design Review Committee. Application for: d Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 Amendment of Master Signage Permit Individual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR - Property & Street Address: 325" )oy-V-e,1- . 54re-f Tax parcel ID # (from Tax Assessor or Planning & Zonin os ?v — 00 325- erty OwnerofRecord (name as shown on deed, mailing address, pih/one, fax#): 11 & VI i- U/Q,&-fbV �q e 1 .v. 13oai 1 I' 1J u,11ha IV.. Y 6�—q.0'z k0 2— G S"dY - 0 ti 3 7 D-0 Z- 8G 3 1 q o -7 147-. ) ant, if not Owner (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): wavi z A Q iio,,Pe-t 5-1: f , 3w�l «n v itc�-� V i ' a s It 03 �dL_ Cc v �Patr ' .A,s2 - kk a - Lt -3 /0 / �) Contact person. (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): Is the applicant an existing or future tenant of the building? _Yes No Application is seeking approval to: ��} C'ej & h t,W S'%�r+ in 44.c- Cr, o `W% Pam. c4- C: e,- vu.✓ J V-L Inr Aj- Mn — l.L n i. — r.. I hLreby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitte and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r Ap li ant Property/Building Owne Please do not unite below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have viewed sap ication arld find it to be complete incomplete Co cer or esignee Date Permit Number DR - APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington REQUIRED DESIGN INFORMATION for INITIAL & AMENDED MASTER SIGNAGE PERMITS ONLY The following information MUST be included with the application and/or shown on an accurate plot plan of the lot. Failure to include this information will delay the review of your application! Please submit five full size and one 11"x17" plot plan drawing. Accurate plot plan of the lot, showing the location of: Buildings Parking lots Driveways Landscaped areas 2. Computation of the maximum area, number and height of signs allowed on the property, by type of sign: Free-standing and/or landscape feature signs (See Section 9 and Section 14) Wall signs (See Section 10) Directory Signs (See Section 11) Incidental and Directional Signs (See Section 12) 3. Area and height of each sign proposed for your property (Initial Master Signage Permits and Master Signage Permit Amendments only) 4. Location, size, date of installation, and status of all non -complying signs on your property. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT (See Section 8(d) of the Sign Ordinance for details) 5. Color illustrations showing proposed: Shapes Materials Foreground and background color schemes Typeface(s) Sizes (include a range of sizes if desired) Installations/sign types Description of how one or more of the features above will relate all of the signs to each other visually. 6. Location and specifications of all proposed light fixtures and lighting elements, including cut sheets. 7. Proposed general design for any incidental and directional signs on the property, other than those with designs prescribed by law. Permit Number DR . d � CITY OF SOUTH BURLNGTON APELICATI N FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being -.rejected and a delay in 'the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board, 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): I resign Plan Approval Sign Design Approval ?) O'VVNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fw-. #j . Lief sbyv-q . P.O. as K I/ 7 8U Z o �►'7 4v 2. - f(C 3 - i 9 0"7 (K 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)—�,4 C-A e I I YCC,A w ti✓ �z � 4) CON -TACT PERSON (l-,Tame, mailing address, phone and fw3- #) _ 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Ci.5-70 00 325- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being s,,)ught. If sign design appr9val is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and hi'.3glit. ,11G /+9,e ✓a►. � O'i' � ��� �alC e.ru� Yd dT oVt ✓ �n.e %��..,e....� o� o Vessit Ci&lnstw tA1' 00-1, ,A4& (. .� C0.YVc. LA%acQ J'".&LI & Cn/a✓' ; G�u►Jvc- C_Yt,.n�.Zki k 1"i'n Aar v � W r► dfk1 S Tayt�G kA. 4e_ L' �tlX i:?�'�l ✓` i �'� �4 L,'1 n c.n At,, [Fh.K.. ✓gym & �I(..cJZr ie 'A>o" & " ['�..-�s�r n. l"� i' r �,Y^ L�� l w1s A. ,Mi .w s j 14A.Jvc4 J nA c� y P e./' S'.-4e nr!c , . S: a w. as ,o.--r- .iLlsc w i n fcu�, The information listen on EYJ-dbit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. t r OF�k�UCANr Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMMSSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: //1 Complete ❑ Incomplete ®f PlanniAg & Zoning or Designee 9 Notes: Job: Type: FORM 10 ROUND CW / MW WALL MOUNT U Master�oolorg Elite GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco wall mounted Round Form 10 products are cylindrical (CW) or j \ semi -spherical (MW) cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostatically applied polurethane. Luminaires can accept one of four (4 ) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Flat glass lens luminaires provide full cutoff performance. Sag Lens luminaires provide cutoff performance. ORDERING PREFIX MOUNTING DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. CW17 17" Spun Cylindrical Luminaire 1 Single Assembly CW22 22" Spun Cylindrical Luminaire MW17 17" Spun Semi -Spherical Luminaire MW22 22" Spun Semi -Spherical Luminaire DISTRIBUTION Horizontal Lamo 1 Type 1 3 Type III 4X' 2 Type IV (22 only) FM Type IV F 4I_lC7 120 240 347 208 277 480 200-277 CMPE7MCE/PSE types only. BLA Black Anodized BRA Bronze Anodized NA Natural Anodized BRP Bronze Paint BLIP Black Paint QUAD 120120812401277, Factory tied to 277V. NIP Natural Aluminum Paint WP White Paint OC Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation. ex: OC-RAL7024. SC Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip. HS6 Internal House Side Shield Fe Fusing PC10 Photocontrol and Receptacle PCR Photocontrol Receptacle only POLY" Polycarbonate Sag Lens QS12 Quartz Standby QST12 Quartz Standby - Timed Delay XF13 Extended Flat Glass Lens SG14 Sag Glass Lens 1 T' 22" 25OPSMH 750PSMH4 Pulse StartMH 50MH' 15OMH' 320PSMH11 875PSMW Magnetic Ballast 70MH' 175PSMH 350PSMH1l 1000PSMHe °' 100MH' 20OMH4 40OPSMH2 CosmoPolisrM Electronic S stem 60CMPE18 140CMPE16 140CMPE'6 MasterColorO Elite ❑G Electronic System 210MCE16 315MCE16 Pulse Start MH Electronic Ballast 250PSE16 320PSE1516 StandardMH 175MH* 250MH 4 250MH` 1000MH45,e.7 Magnetic Ballast' I 400MH•2 High Pressure Sodium 70HPS 150HPS 250HPS 4 750HPS Magnetic Ballast 100HPS 400HPS ' 175MH, 25OMH and 40OMH not available for sale in the United States. Notes• 1. 22" luminaires, 40OW and below are supplied with flat glass lens standard. For wattages above 40OW, 'XF" extended flat glass lens is supplied standard. 2. MH/PSMH 40OW Type 4X luminaires require the E281BT28 reducedjacket lamp. 3. Medium base lamp. Note 7: 1000W Lam Tables 4. Available in CW Style only. Not available in MW Style. 5. Uses E37 / ST37 lamps only. For CW22 with 4X Optics, 1000W Metal Halide, use: 6. Available with 4X optics only. Brand Product Code Cataloc Number 7. For 1000W CW22 with 4X optics, see 1000W lamp tables. Venture 53702 MS10o0WIHORIBT3713K 8. Supplied standard with FM optics. G.E. M205 MVRIOWUBT37 9. In Head. Not available above 40OW. venture 15332 MH1000WAhEiT37 10. Not available in 480V. Provide Specific input voltage. For CW22 with 4X Ophcs, 1000W Pulse Start, use: 11. In lieu of flat glass. Not available with 4X optics, or 75OW through 1000W. Polycarbonate lenses carry a 1 year Brand Product Code Catalog Number warranty only. G.E. 10389 MVR10001U/BT371PA 12.. See QS/QST Table. Venture 49111 MS1000W7HOR(T251PS 13. Flat Glass lens with extended drop. WARNING: Use of other lamps volds warranty Available with 22" luminaires only Allows for the use of a larger lamp (Note 12) QS / QST Table while providing full cutoff performance. 14. In lieu of flat glass. Available on HID Lamp Watts Maximum Quartz 22' luminaires only. 175 watts or less 100 Watts 15. Requires E281BT28 lamp. 16. 200 - 277V only. Not available with Above 175 watts up to 400 watts 150 Watts CS or CST options. 17" luminaires limited to 100 watt quartz lamp maximum regadless of HID, wattage. QS and QST options are not avdable in luminaires above 400 watt HID, Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos,TX 78666 (800) 227-0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com © Copyright 2009 Philips Group. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 0 optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. 7911500209 Gardco Lighting is a Philips group brand PH 1 LI PS Ox GARDCO FORM 10 ROUND CW / MW WALL MOUNT G MasterColoi ' MasterColor@ Elite GENERAL: Each Gardco Form 10 wall mounted Hardtop is a cylindrical (CW) or semi -spherical (MW) cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain -tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Housing is one piece, .100" (.25 cm) seamless aluminum with integral rolled circumferential reveal and lower section aperture incorporating a returned flange stiffener to protect against housing edge deformation. Units are offered in profiles of 17" (43.18 cm) or 22" (55.88 cm) diameter. WALL BRACKET: Hooking diecast aluminum wall bracket conceals 10 ga. mounting plate. Extruded arm extends unit from wall and includes integral channel which captures tie rods for proper luminaire alignment. LENS: One piece, diecast aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass, extended flat glass, sag glass or sag polycarbonate lens in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Concealed stainless steel hinge and two (2) fasteners secure lens assembly to luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form Ten optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve IES Types 1 (1), III (3), and IV (FM, and 4X ) distributions. The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell - all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 50MH, 70MH and 100MH units have medium base lampholders. All Metal Halide units in the 22" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. 11A W — C i- A — B ELECTRICAL: All electrical components are UL recognized and factory tested. Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are high power factor and mounted on a unitized plate. Magnetic HID ballasts are the separate component type. Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20°F / -29°C. Luminaires provided with the CosmoPoliSTM or MasterColor@ Elite high performance ceramic metal halide electronic systems include high power factor electronic ballasts, designed specifically for the system selected. FINISH: Anodized housings are created with an Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodizing process to achieve a bronze, black or natural aluminum finish. Painted units are finished with hardcoat, fade resistant, electrostatically applied polyurethane. LABELS: All luminaires bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels. WARRANTY: Gardco luminaires feature a 5 year limited warranty. See Warranty Information on www.sitelighting.com for complete details and exclusions. Polycarbonate lenses carry a 1 year warranty only. FULL CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Full cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where zero candela intensity occurs at an angle of 90' above nadir. Additionally, the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80' above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 25 (2.5 percent) at an angle at or above 90' above nadir, and 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80' above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire. s° CW Style weight 1270cm Size A B C Single O O 17" 17" 8" 7.5 28lbs 1 43.18 cm 20.32 cm 19.05 cm 12.70 cm 22" 22 11 7.5 44lbs 7" O 4" 55 .88 cm 27.94 cm 19.05 cm 19.96 cm 17.78 cm 10.16 cm MW Style Weight Size A B C Single O 0- 17" 17" 11" 7.5" 291bs 21/4" 5.72 cm 43.18 cm 27 94 cm 19.05 am 13.15 cm 22„ 22" 14" 7.5" 45lbs 55 88 cm 35.56 cm 19.05 cm 20.41 cm Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos,TX 78666 (800) 227-0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com © Copyright 2009 Philips Group. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. 791154IM209 Gardco Lighting is a Philips group brand PH I LI PS Color: White Dove (Ben. Moore) mll corset Street Derrnatology Ira Medical Sna Copper strip or copper metallic color Copper clad Recess carved or dimensional lettering copper metallic color Recess carved or dimensional lettering Color: White Dove (Ben. Moore) Copper strip or copper metallic color Mahagony or Sign Foam panel 1.5"deep 6"x 6" P.T. posts Color: Pantone 5545 U 84"to Color: White Dove (Ben. Moore) ground level Dorset Street Dermatology 7/16/09 180 Flynn Ave. Ste. 5, Burlington,Vt. 05401-5482 802-862-1060 hglaeserco@aol.com Notes: Job: Type: FORM 10 ROUND �- • LIGHTING CA / MA ARM MOUNT r ,V stercclorcrL Elite GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Round arm mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CA) or semi -spherical (MA) cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts (400w in the MA). Housings are one-piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Flat glass lens luminaires provide full cutoff performance. Sag Lens luminaires provide cutoff performance. PREFIX MOUNTING DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS Enter the order code into the appropriate box above. Note: Gardco reserves the right to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are valid. Refer to notes below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or concerns, please consult the factory. CA17 17" Diameter Cylindrical Luminaire MA17 17" Diameter Semi -Spherical Luminaire CA22 22" Diameter Cylindrical Luminaire MA22 22" Diameter Semi -Spherical Luminaire ISTRIBUTION Horizontal Lama Vertical Lamp 1 Type I VS Type V 3 Type III In 40OW and below, luminaires with VS optics are supplied with an acrylic sag lens. 4X' 2 Type IV (22' only) Aglass sag lens is supplied with luminaires above 40OW. Medium base lamp FM Type IV only on 17" luminaires only. Q Type V 120 347 QUAD 120120812401277, Factory tied to 277V. 208 480 277 200-277 CMPE/MCE/PSE types only. BRP Bronze Paint BLA Black Anodized BLP Black Paint BRA Bronze Anodized WP White Paint NA Natural Anodized NP Natural Aluminum Paint OC Optional Color Paint Specify RAL designation ex: OC-RAL7024. Sc Special Color Paint Specify. Must supply color chip. HS" Internal House Side Shield F12 Fusing LF In-Line/In-Pole Fusing MF1° Mast Arm Fitter PC6" Photocontrol and Receptacle PCR6 Photocontrol Receptacle only POLY16 Polycarbonate Sag Lens QS16 Quartz Standby QST16 Quartz Standby - Timed Delay PTF2 Pole Top Fitter - 2 3/8 - 3" Dia. Tenon PTF3 Pole Top Fitter - 3 - 3.5" Dia. Tenon PTF4 Pole Top Fitter - 3.5 - 4" Dia. Tenon XF11 Extended Flat Glass Lens SG18 Sag Glass Lens GDR' Provision for Gardco Demand Response 1 Single Assembly 3 Triple at 90' 2 Twin Assembly 3@120 Triple at 120o 2@90 Twin Assembly at 90' 4 Quad Assembly 17" 22" 250PSMH 75OPSMH6 Pulse StartMH 50MH' 15OMH' 320PSMH's 775PSMH6 Magnetic Ballast 70MH3 175PSMH 350PSMH11 875PSMHI 10OMH' 20OMH6 40OPSMH2 1000PSMHe.e.r° 45OPSMH4 CosmoPlist r°] System CUB/ 60CMPE20 140CMPE20 140CMPE20 Mastencolor® Elite Electronic System 210MCE20 315MCEI Pulse StartMH Electronic Ballast 250PSE20 320PSE1920 Standard MH 175MH" 250MH' Magnetic Ballast* 250MH+,1 250MH*6 40OMH'2 1000MH... High Pressure Sodium 70HPS 150HPS 250HPS 6 750HPS Magnetic Ballast 100HPS 400HPS ' 175MH, 250MH and 40OMH not available for sale in the United States. Notes 1. 22' luminaires, 40OW and below are supplied with flat glass lens standard. For wattages above 400W, XF" extended flat glass lens is supplied standard. 2. MWPSMH 40OW Type 4X luminaires require the E281BT28 reducedlacket lamp. 3. Medium base lamp. 4. Available with vertical lamp optics only. 5. Available with horizontal lamp optics only. 6 Available in CA Style only Not available in MA Style 7. Uses E37/OT37 lamps only. 8. Available with 4X and VS optics only. 9. Available with 17" 175PSMH or 150HPS and 22" 250PSMH through 40OPSMH or 250HPS through 400HPS wattages. Includes dual -level capacitor and Wring to connect to Gardco Demand Response System. 10. For 1000W CA22 with 4X optics, see 1000W lamp tables. 11. Supplied standard with FM optics. 12. In Head, Not available above 40OW. 13. Requires 2 318" OD mast arm. 14. Not available in 480V Provide Specific input voltage. 15. In lieu of flat glass. Not available with 4X optics, or 75OW through 1000W Poilycarbonate lenses carry a 1 year warranty only. 16. See OS/OST Table. 17. Flat Glass lens with extended drop. Available with 22" luminaires only. Allows for the use of a larger lamp while providing lull cutoff pedormance. 18. In lieu of flat glass. Available on 22" luminaires only. 19. Requires E28/BT28 lamp. 20.200 - 277V only. Not available with OS or OST anti. - IVore 7U: I UUUW Lamp /ayies For CA22 with 4X Optics, 1000W Metal Halide, use: Brand Product Code Catalog Number Venture 53702 MS1000WIHORIBT3713K G.E. 18205 MVR1000/UIBT37 Venture 15332 MH1000WIUIBT37 For CA22 with 4X Optics, 1000W Pulse Start, use: Brand Product Cotle G.E. 10389 Catalog Number MVR7000/UIBT371PA Venture 49111 MS1000WIHORIT251PS WARNING: Use of other lamps voids warranty (Not" 16) OS / OST Table HID r Watts Maximum Quartz 175 watts or less 100 Watts Above 175 watts up to 400 watts 150 Watts 17" luminaires limited to too watt quartz lamp maximum regardless of HID wattage. OS and OST options are not avilable in luminaires above 400 watt HID. Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos,TX 78666 (800) 227-0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com ®Copyright 2009 Philips Group. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. 79115-4010209 Gardco is a Philips group brand PH 1 LI PS - C SMFORM 10 ROUND CA / MA ARM MOUNT M terColior® Efite GENERAL: Each Gardco Form 10 arm mounted Hardtop is a cylindrical (CA) or semi -spherical (MA) cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain -tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Housing is one piece, .100(.25cm) seamless aluminum with integral rolled circumferential reveal and lower section aperture incorporating a returned flange stiffener to protect against housing edge deformation. Units are offered in profiles of 17 (43.18cm) or 22 (55.88cm) diameter, ARM: Extruded aluminum arm is secured to prewired fixture by contractor. Assembly is suitable for mounting to pole without requiring access to luminaire. Internal extruded channels capture tie rods for proper luminaire to pole alignment. LENS: One piece, diecast aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass, extended flat glass, sag glass or sag polycarbonate lens in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Concealed stainless steel hinge and two (2) fasteners secure lens assembly to luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Farm Ten optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve IES Types I, III, IV and V distributions. With the 4X optics, the reflector facets form a conical fan around the arc tube with each facet positioned to be precisely tangent to the top of the arc tube. The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell and is securely attached to the reflector assembly. 50MH, 70MH and 10OMH units have medium MA Avg. MA Style EPA Weight Size A B C D Single Twin Quad Single 17 11 5 5 .8 it, 1.6 ft- 2.3 fe 27 Ibs MA17 43.18 cm 27.94 cm 12.70 cm 12.70 cm .07 m° .15 m° .21 m° 12.25 kg 22 14 7 5 1.3 it, 2.7 ft' 3.7 tt, 40 Ibs MA22 55.88 cm 35.56 cm 17.78 cm 12.70 cm .12 m' .25 m' .34 W 18.14 kg base lampholders. All horizontal Metal Halide units in the 22 housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. ELECTRICAL: All electrical components are UL recognized and factory tested. Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are high power factor and mounted on a unitized plate. Magnetic HID ballasts are the separate component type. Electronic and magnetic HID ballasts are capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20°F / -29°C. Luminaires provided with the CosmoPolisTm or MasterColor® Elite high performance ceramic metal halide electronic systems include high power factor electronic ballasts, designed specifically for the system selected. FINISH: Anodized housings are created with an Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodizing process to achieve a bronze, black or natural aluminum finish. Painted units are finished with hardcoat, fade resistant, electrostatically applied polyurethane. LABELS: All luminaires bear UL or CUL (where applicable) Wet Location labels. WARRANTY: Gardco luminaires feature a 5 year limited warranty. See Warranty Information on www.sitelighting.com for complete details and exclusions. Polycarbonate lenses carry a 1 year warranty only. FULL CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Full cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where zero candela intensity occurs at an angle of 901 above nadir. Additionally, the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80' above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminaire. CUTOFF PERFORMANCE: Cutoff performance means a luminaire distribution where the candela per 1000 lamp lumens does not numerically exceed 25 (2.5 percent) at an angle at or above 90° above nadir, and 100 (10 percent) at a vertical angle of 80' above nadir. This applies to all lateral angles around the luminalre. CA i� n Avg. CA Style EPA Weight Size A B C D Single Twin Quad Single 17" 8 5 5 .7 it, 1.5 2.1 27 Ibs CA17 4318 cm 20.32 cm 12.70 cm 12.70 cm .07 m' .14 m° .20 m• 12.25 kg 22" 11 7 5 1.2 2.3 3.3 42lbs CA22 55.88 cm 27,94 cm 17.78cm 12.70 cm .11 V .21 m' .31 m2 19.05 kg Gardco Lighting 1611 Clovis Barker Road San Marcos,TX 78666 (800) 227-0758 (512) 753-1000 FAX: (512) 753-7855 www.sitelighting.com ® Copyright 2009 Philips Group. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. Gardco Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. The 4X optical system is protected by U.S. patent number 5690422. 79115-40/0209 Gardco is a Philips group brand PH I LI PS Frame with molding Dimensional lettering --Drset Street Dermor recess carved 30" M Dorset Street Dermatology, Wall Mounted by Building Entrance 7/16/09 180 Flynn Ave. Ste. 5,Burlington, Vt. 05401-5482 802-862-1060 hglaeserco@aol.com 84"to ground level Color: White Dove (Ben, Moore) 96" 48" Dorset Street Dermatology 180 Flynn Ave. Ste. 5,Burlington,Vt,05401-5482 802-862-1060 hglaeserco@aol.com Copper clad Recess carved or dimensional lettering copper metallic color Recess carved or dimensional lettering — Color: White Dove (Ben. Moore) Copper strip or copper metallic color 6" x 6" RT, posts Color: White Dove (Ben. Moore 7/16/09 south PLANNING & ZONING August 6, 2009 Diane Weisburg PO Box 911 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: 325 Dorset Street Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the August 18, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Cc: Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed,,, mailing address, phone and fax #): (% V . A - I- LJP_ ( 1 .4 ✓I-Q P. V _ n Q" q I II I "S Cl /' �r ln.n�i[T7L i/ o )- L -D 2 MD .L - 4 > X - ON_"' 2 '7 S=n 2 - eiC I - / 9 @ 7 / 44L k-t 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): K1. 7140, p, 3-1 2 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #):,['tAt�-I �c:�iwarf'- tit D P&2- - 660- $Seg 2 - GGc - `f, 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): - �►.w r,, T o s-4 a 3 f k- 21 - 2 x R z r 2 r- - 2 t a c a. Contact e-mail address: M . e< Sc%w��-1`z 0 a.t f , n et 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: .3j S— oLc.-fif- S�f. 10 , /�c.�/;v,a` -i1 , VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 05-70 -- U 3ZS`- 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): % .. -4. r r^_ _�,, „ , A Y _ . - /r - ) -XP. - "- - a - / - - o. _ 2 .. _j. .. -- — i-, 1 Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): j-7d « ,' /�'lr v. .o ,- Z) i,.. CA ➢/ A. T-+''-e i v Y 1.2 /'o G.s. / c-4, c-- 4-2"-4- d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): F[ovs- _ C'L4 S d--A.-- 4r.�+ e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): G ,�� . �j��.•s �S4rga.�n~f If f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): Me ^ e- g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): e,m�/a�e2s .� �4AAC'Us' h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 14 o5- Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing_ / 7, C % / 1 q t�"3 sq. ft. Proposed_ A _% / _ j �' sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (buildinq, parking, outside storaae. etc) Existing_ I G. $ % / _/ q $ sq. ft. Proposed_4 7, .� _% l _ s'Z$ sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing .I f. ? % / 2 L 3 sq. ft. Proposed 3 „ u % 12- 4 1 sq. ft. P^Pdfcs 23�=�% l V(4 `).wz t r J i �'C' c j I-C, 9 'fT X iF r Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 4 " * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 70 boo • 00 b. Landscaping: $_ /n 0 000 0 o c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): �2 8 b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 4 c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): If 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: y N "I L Prl 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 41o,, fops,, We . � ups Fez , 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: D� 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) Ke>hv,p--W & . ' .J�s�� 1�4f-.'��•`o 2 )3►���k�u�. �,,,•„�� fa�yl� ,,�1:. ,`r�uz. Vl �fi�r l.�� S'tie+^�'� �u-''•�°� � Z �ler✓y j��c...11/ f � i3��1.'„� � V� �'f'Yc 3 r _ )e { r y� r 3 `Z �v �f� f �7 rem+� f�,, 3u� 1 r V f 6 5'Y0 3 4C Z, io �or�iet Sr`t'� j Sa". �I°yam'`- V 7 Cdwf�� f ti � MT 3 Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r S NATURE OF APPLI NT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line ,r►� P l 5 b k r- h PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: /Will REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete _ ) „ ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee 5 Site Plan Application EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations c Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) o 3icycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE V Site Plan $ 186* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 186* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 86* * Includes $11.00 recording fee SUSAN ELS GARDEN & LANDSCAPE DESIGN 15 July 2009 Proposed New Landscape 325 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT Owner: Mitchell Schwartz Dorset Street Dermatology BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR: New plantings $10,000 (see landscape plan submitted to South Burlington Planning Commission 7/16/2009) Includes: 1. All new plant material in the Planting Key (See attached list for more information) 2. Installation of all new plant material according to Planting Key 3. Premium hemlock bark mulch installed in all planting beds 4. Fertilizers and weed preventers 5. Premium grass seed and Penn mulch for new/damaged lawn areas Among the items not included in this estimate: 1. Demolition and removal of current plant material and trees 2. Fill 3. Topsoil for planting beds and grassed areas 4. New front walkway and renovation of front porch 5. Construction of accessibility ramp 6. Storage shed for trash bins 7. Perennials and grasses on the 7/15/2009 plan; possible relocation of existing perennials 8. Susan Els, professional services prior to final plan and estimate 32 Pheasant Way South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-863-3989 susanels e,comcast.net l 325 Dorset Street Landscape Plan New Plants 3 Malus 'Pink Spires' 2- 2 1/2" 1 Tree Hydrangea 'Quick Fire' 5-6' B&B 1 Salix'Hakuru Nishiki' 3-4' 9 J uniperus 'Wichita Blue' 5-6' 4 Spirea 'Anthony Waterer' 18-24" 1 Hydrangea'Pinky Winky' 2-2 1/2' 8 Hydrangea 'Endless Summer' 5 gal 7 Hydrangea 'Annabelle' 3 gal. 5 Weigela'Fine Wine' 15-18" 25 Thuja 'Nigra' 6-T