Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-23-10 - Supplemental - 0255 Kennedy Drive (2) VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL May 17, 2023 South Burlington Development Review Board C/O Ms. Marla Keene, Development Review Planner City of South Burlington 180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Review: Hillside at O’Brien Farm Lot 13 and Lot 15 Dear Board Members: This Final Plat application is for the next phase of a previously approved master plan for up to 458 dwelling units and up to 45,000 square feet of office space. This phase consists of two (2) five story multi-family residential buildings on Lot 13 and Lot 15 with a total of 251 dwelling units, 1,219 square feet of commercial space, and associated site improvements at 255 Kennedy Drive. This application is submitted in accordance with Preliminary Plat SD-20-16, as amended by SD-21-13 (the Preliminary Plat). The Preliminary Plat allows for the submission of this application in phases over a period of six years. The first phase of this final plat was previously submitted in October 2021, for the construction of 94 dwelling units including up to 79 units affordable to those earning under 80% of area median income. That application also included full details regarding roadway, bike and pedestrian improvements (the “Inclusionary Phase” herein), as required for the first submission of the Preliminary Plat by the Preliminary Plat permit. That project and the roadway is now under construction, and the inclusionary units will be the first rental units to be occupied on the O’Brien Farm site. After that filing, the Board may remember that the Applicant submitted a filing for the same project discussed herein, which was granted approval by the Development Review Board less than one year ago, in July of 2022, after several hearings. The issued final plat permit (the Decision) is attached to this Application as Exhibit 036. That Decision granted a three-year period prior to needing to file for a zoning permit to construct the project, where the Project permit would remain valid. The extended timeline was granted by the Board after some discussion. That timeline still holds, and the Applicant did in fact need the time the Board granted. While the Decision granted the time needed for the applicant to pursue a zoning permit and construct the project, it included a condition that both the plat plans AND the project Site Plan, would be recorded within 180 days of the Decision, or the Decision would be null and void. While the Applicant is accustomed to the requirement to record a Plat Plan, which is required by State Statute, the requirement to record a site plan (in need of numerous changes as outlined in the Decision, typically completed and filed with a zoning permit application), caught the applicant off-guard. . Regardless, the required recording of the site plan did not occur, and therefore the Decision has been deemed to be no longer valid. 2 The Project is unchanged from what was previously approved. The Applicant has reviewed the entire previous filing and attached hereto each most-current exhibit that was relied upon in the Decision as well as all items submitted during the entire process. The enclosed packet contains each piece of information previously reviewed. Because of the phasing of final plat enabled in the Preliminary Plat permit, the regulations in effect are identical to the previous Decision. Given this, the Board may issue an identical decision, and re-permit the project, unchanged per the enclosed submission. The Applicant believes that the Decision previously issued holds true. All material facts and conditions are unchanged. The previous application narrative and Decision issued outline in detail compliance with the applicable zoning regulations. A months-long hearing process ensured such. The Applicant seeks only the same decision previously issued, without amendment. We appreciate the Board’s consideration and granting of this request to renew its previous decision. Our team has worked over the past year to advance this project, investing heavily in the approved plans to get full project details, and attempting to build the Project on the timeline previously approved by the Board. We are currently in the process of building this project’s required inclusionary housing (now without the project approval) and we expect it will be occupied by year’s end. We have been caught off guard by this condition and the extreme penalty levied for an administrative mistake. We hope that the Board can reconfirm their previous findings in short order, such that we may again be secure in this Project’s outcomes as it is currently underway. Thank you for your time and effort in reviewing this application. We look forward to meeting with you soon. Please see the following Exhibit Table of Contents, outlining what is re-submitted herein. Sincerely, Andrew Gill, Director of Development