The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH 4 - Supplemental - 1600 Spear StreetTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED NOWLAND TWO RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT January 15, 1993 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 January 15, 1993 Mr. Gerald Milot c Milot Real Estate P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4193 RE: Traffic Impact Evaluation - Nowland Two Spear Street, South Burlington FILE: 92075 Dear Mr. Milot: As requested, we have analyzed potential traffic impacts of the above -referenced project, which will be the construction of 73 single-family houses to be located along the easterly side of Spear Street just south of the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection in South Burlington. It is anticipated that this project will be constructed in two phases. Phase I will commence in 1993 and includes the construction of 37 single-family houses. Phase II will be the full build -out of this project, 73 single-family houses, and will commence in 1994. Two accesses are proposed to connect from this project to Spear Street; a southerly access is proposed to be located at the existing Spear Street/Deerfield Drive intersection and a northerly access is proposed to be located adjacent to the northerly property line, approximately 1,640 feet north of the above -referenced southerly access. The study area of this traffic evaluation includes the two proposed accesses along Spear Street and the Spear Street/Swift Street 19 intersection. The posted speed limit within the vicinity of this project equals 35 mph. Three areas of concern to local and State officials are addressed herein: Traffic Congestion, Traffic Safety and Geometric Conditions. The objective of this evaluation is to identify and assess potential impacts created by this project in each of the above areas of concern for both existing and future traffic conditions. Design 9 Inspection • Studies 0 Permitting 0 Surveying 'If Mr. Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Two TRAFFIC DATA Traffic volume information was ascertained from the following data: 1. Route Log and Progress Chart - Spear Street,'Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT). 2. Turning Movement Count, Spear Street/Swift Street, Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, June 25, 1992.' 3. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Spear Street — Station D85, VAOT, May 2-9, 1989. 4. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Swift Street — Station D227, VAOT, May 2-9, 1989. 5. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Swift Street - Station D337, VAOT, May 9-16, 1989. - - 6. Turning Movement Count, Spear Street/Deerfield Drive, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc., January 6, 1993 (A.M.) & January 7, 1993 (P.M.). 7. Automatic Traffic Recorder Count, Spear Street, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc., January 5-11, 1993. TRAFFIC CONGESTION The preceding traffic volume data were used to develop 1993 and 1998 design hourly volumes (DHV) at the Spear Street/Project Access intersections and the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. The DHV is the 30th highest hourly traffic volume of the year, and is used to design highways and traffic control systems. Future design hour volumes are calculated by projecting annual average daily traffic volumes (AADT) at an annual background growth rate. Within the aforementioned study area, that growth rate is best estimated by examining recent historical traffic growth at VAOT Automatic Traffic Recorder Count Station D85, located north of the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. Based on data from that count station and recently observed growth trends, an annual growth rate of 4% was used to calculate future AADT's. DHV's were then determined for future AADT's using DHV/AADT ratios recommended by the VAOT. The resulting DHV's constitute future background traffic volumes. An estimate of the traffic generation for this project was calculated by applying vehicular trip generation rates from "Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 5th Edition, 1991". That report contains the results of trip generation studies for numerous land -uses. Table 1 outlines the projected vehicular trip generation for this project. Detailed calculations are attached as Appendix A. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Mr. Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Three TABLE 1 PROJECTED VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION Phase II Phase I (Full Build -Out) Average Weekday (vte*/da Y) 413 772 A.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) Enter Exit TOTAL P.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) Enter Exit TOTAL 9 16 25 45 34 61 28 _ - - 52 16 29 44 81 *A vehicle trip end (vte) is a single vehicle either exiting or entering the project. The directional distribution of project -generated traffic was estimated from the existing directional traffic patterns on Spear Street. The projected A.M. and P.M. peak -hour distribution of project -generated traffic is enclosed as Appendix B. Levels of traffic congestion are defined differently for certain types of intersections. For example, signalized intersections use vehicular delay (seconds) and most unsignalized intersections use reserve capacity (vehicles per hour). In all cases, those parameters are subdivided into ranges which are referred to as levels -of -service (L.O.S.). L.O.S. "A" represents very low loading with ample reserve capacity and no vehicular delays; L.O.S. C represents average conditions; and the threshold of L.O.S. E/F represents a street or intersection at or near capacity. L.O.S. F is a condition of "forced flow" resulting in long queues when traffic volumes exceed the available capacity of an intersection. Since traffic flow on a street network is typically limited by the available capacity at intersections, potential traffic congestion impacts of this project were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the two proposed Spear Street/Project Access intersections and at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. The methodology used to determine intersection capacity was obtained from the "Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985". FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Mr. Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Four Tables 2 through 4 present the results of the capacity analyses at both of the project access intersections and at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection, ,for Phases I and II. Detailed intersection capacity analyses are enclosed as Appendix C, D, E and F. TABLE 2 PHASE I & II - LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEAR STREET/DEERFIELD DRIVE/SOUTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS Phase I - 1993 Phase II - 1998 Approach-& Turning Movement A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Deerfield Drive Eastbound Left -turn D D E E Thru C D C D Right -turn A A A A OVERALL APPROACH D D E E Deerfield Drive Westbound Left -turn Thru Right -turn OVERALL APPROACH Spear Street Southbound Left -turn Spear Street Northbound Left -turn i C D D D C D C D A A A A B B C C A A A A A A A A TABLE 3 PHASE I & II LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEAR STREET/NORTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS Phase I - 1993 Phase II - 1998 Approach & Turning Movement A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Project Access Westbound Left -turn C D D D Right -turn A A B A OVERALL APPROACH- B B C C Spear Street Southbound Left -turn A A A A FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Mr: Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Five Approach & Turnina Movement Swift Street Eastbound Westbound Spear Street Northbound Southbound OVERALL INTERSECTION TABLE 4 LEVELS OF SERVICE SPEAR STREET/SWIFT STREET w/o Project 1993 1998 A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. w/ Project 1993 1998 A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. B B B B B B B B B B B C B B C C B B B C B B B C A B A B A B A B B B B B B B B C Accepted design standards for roadways recommend that a minimum of L.O.S. C be maintained during DHV conditions on collector highways, which in this case includes Spear Street. On a case by case basis in urban areas, that can be lowered to L.O.S. D. At unsignalized intersections, it is not uncommon for traffic exiting the minor street to experience long delays. This is caused by their having to yield right-of-way to all other movements. The threshold of L.O.S. E/F is therefore used at unsignalized intersections as being the point at which unacceptable traffic congestion conditions typically occur on such approaches. An examination of the levels of service at the Spear Street/Project Access intersections and the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection indicate acceptable levels of service, with good levels of service at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. TRAFFIC SAFETY The safety of vehicular traffic traveling to and from this project is largely dependent on the geometric and physical conditions of the existing roadways and intersections within the study area, projected traffic volumes, and on the presence of adequate traffic control devices. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services Mr, , Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Six The most recent available 5-year (1987-1991) accident history was examined for Spear Street from the intersection of Spear Street/Swift Street to 1,000 feet south of the Deerfield Drive/Project Access intersection and at the intersection of Spear Street/Swift Street. (During that period, 14 accidents were reported along the aforementioned section of Spear Street, and 6 accidents were reported at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. The resultant accident rate along that section of Spear Street equaled 1.08 accidents/million vehicle -miles (acc/mvm). The resultant accident rate at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection equaled 0.30 accidents/million vehicles (acc/mv). By comparison, the statewide average accident rate for that 5-year period on similar highways in Vermont equaled 3.63 acc/mvm, and for similar intersections equaled 0.56 acc/mv. For both the roadway section and the intersection the actual accident rates do not exceed the average accident rate, therefore these are not considered to be high -accident locations. Sight distances were measured at the locations of the proposed Project Accesses. Based on an average vehicular running speed of 45 mph and a minimum seven second perception/reaction time, the minimum recommended sight distance equals 462 feet. For a motorist entering Spear Street from the proposed southerly Project Access, sight distance will exceed 700 feet in the southbound direction and equals 620 feet in the northbound direction. For a motorist entering Spear Street from the proposed northerly Project Access, sight distance will exceed 700 feet in both the northbound and southbound direction. GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS Upon the completion of Phase I, several geometric improvements will be required. A left -turn lane warrant analysis for southbound left -turning traffic entering the project indicates that a left -turn lane will be required at both of the proposed accesses. The recommended storage length for those lanes equals 125 feet. To accomplish the roadway widening for the left -turn lane, Spear Street must be modified to provide a centerline shift and taper. The left -turn lane warrant analysis and the calculation of the left -turn lane storage length is included as Appendix G. A right -turn lane analysis for northbound right -turning traffic entering the project indicates that a right -turn lane will not be warranted for 1998 Phase II conditions. Detailed calculations for the right -turn lane warrant are enclosed as Appendix H. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services R Mi.' Gerald Milot FILE: 92075 January 15, 1992 Page Seven A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed and it is anticipated that a traffic signal will not be warranted for 1998 Phase II conditions. CONCLUSION This report has evaluated the potential traffic impacts resulting from the two-phase construction of 73 single-family houses to be. located on the easterly side of Spear Street south of the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection in South Burlington. The study area of this evaluation includes that section of roadway just south of the Spear Street/Deerfield Drive intersection to the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. As part of the construction of this project, geometric improvements are recommended in the vicinity of the proposed Project Accesses. Those improvements include exclusive left -turning lanes for Spear Street entering traffic. Upon the construction of those improvements, it is anticipated that this project will not create any unreasonable or adverse traffic congestion conditions to the adjacent roadway network. Traffic safety conditions were analyzed along Spear Street in the vicinity of the Project Accesses and at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection and it has been determined that the construction of this project will not result in any adverse safety impacts. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, or if we may be of additional assistance, please contact us. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Brendan Kelly, P.E. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services INDEX OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A DETAILED TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX B PROJECTED A.M. & P.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECT —GENERATED TRAFFIC a c APPENDIX C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/DEERFIELD DRIVE/SOUTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS APPENDIX D UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/NORTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS APPENDIX E EXISTING CONDITIONS — SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES, SPEAR STREET/SWIFT STREET APPENDIX F PHASE I & II — SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY--- - ANALYSES, SPEAR STREET/SWIFT STREET APPENDIX G LEFT —TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS & STORAGE LENGTH APPENDIX H RIGHT —TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS 3-1 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION ------------------------- JOB NAME: NOWLAND II DATE: DECEMBER 22, 1992 ANALYST: D. CONGER � JOB NO.: 92045 r DATA SOURCE: ITE TRIP GENERATION - 5th EDITION ITE AVERAGE -- AM PEAK HOUR -- -- PM PEAK HOUR -- DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L.U.C. SIZE UNITS WEEKDAY ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 210 37 UNITS 413 9 25 34 28 16 44 ITE AVERAGE -- AM PEAK HOUR -- -- PM PEAK HOUR -- DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L.U.C. SIZE UNITS WEEKDAY ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 210 73 UNITS 772 16 45 61 52 29 81 APPENDIX B PROJECTED A.M. & P.M. PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECT -GENERATED TRAFFIC A-2 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 xT 204.1 (Single Sheets) M-1(Padded) ®, Mrc., 6rabn, Lou OIOt. To Ordlf NX TOIL FREE t-WZ!5-M JOB ��✓ / Y!y �GG [ ! c:�. lJ SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE / --& 2 i CHECKED BY DATE APPENDIX C UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/DEERFIELD DRIVE/SOUTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS A-3 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services --- '�--�-_� Y$ , � >� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ***************************************************************Page_1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------- 0------------------------ _________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ^~^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^^^^ .95 � AREA POPULATION .........''''.',.'.... 40000 ~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.''.-','. DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST ^.^..^^^.......... D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1993 AM OHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _... ..... ... ... ... .... ..... ..... .... .... ______________-_______-_-___________ -' -__-- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _______________________________-_____- � � EB WB NB SB ..... .... ..... .... _..... ..... .... ..... __..... LEFT 67 4 3 3 THRU 0 0 544 179 RIGHT 3 9 2 6 ` NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ___________________________ ----- ------------------------------------ � EB WB NB SB r ....__ --- '---- ------- ------- LANES / �^~ LANE USAGE LTR LTR �~� � ^ '+ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS . � ` Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE _GRADE_ __ANGLE___ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ---------------- -------- 20 « N--------- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 1.00 90 20 N . SOUTHBOU�D -2.00 90 20 N �VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ _ -' ----'-% Sl�TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S ----------- VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ------------- 0 ----------------- 0 0 ' WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ------- ---- ------------ __--------- - ------- ---- ------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. __________ FIHAL _(Table 10-2) VALU[ ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ------------ EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6 10 WB 6,10 6.10 0.00 6'10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80 5.60 0.00 NB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5 80 5^80 MINOR THROUGHS EB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7 40 WB 6.90 6.90 0'00 6^90 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 WB 7'40 7.40 0.00 7^40 IDENTIFYING ______________________________________________________ INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEERFIELD DRIVE --------------- NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...' SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OTHER OF THE ANALYSIS...., 01-13-1993 ; 1993 AM DHV INFORMATION.... PHASE 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC ^ T , CAPACITY AND _____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERV- � v RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ..... .... ..... .... .... �..... p .... .... ..... ----- M --------- --------- SH m -- R SH ------------ MINOR STREET EB LEFT 71 219 215 > 215 > 145 > D THRH 0 254 253 > 223 253 > 149 253 >D C RIGHT 3 883 883 > 883 > 880 > A -- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 4 252 250 > 250 > 246 > C THROUGH 0 288 286 > 377 286 > 363 286 >B C RIGHT 9 487 487 > 487 > 478 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 3 528 528 528 525 A NB LEFT - 4 838 838 838 835 A /ING INFORM('--,, NA�E OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEERFIELD DRIyE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ________________________________________ « ----------r------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .95 AREA POPULATICN...................... 40000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET''''... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST...........''''''. D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED...''...`........ 1993 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------- __----------- ------ ------------- ------- --------------- ----- ___ - IUTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG ' MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SE, LEwT 28 2 3 10 THRU 0 0 321 579 RI[HT 3 6 4 54 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------ -... ..... ... ---------... .... —'---------..... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... ... .... ... .... ..... ..... -.... ..... -.... --..... .... -..... ..... ------ EB WB N,B C8 _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... LANES 1 1 .... 1 -..... ..... 2 LANE USAGE 1TR LTR ` .` ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ______________________________________________________________ Page-2 _ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS o..... .... ........ ___ _________ EASTBOUND 1.00 90 _______ 20 ---------- N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 1.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND -2.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION _______ � �� AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ EASTBOUND 0 _____________ 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 . 0 CRITICAL GAPS ... ..... .... ..... .... ___.... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ... ..... ________________________________________________ ' TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . / FINAL _(Table _10-2)_ _VALUE__ ADJUST'1EN- CRITICAL GA� , MINOR RICHTS �-------- ---------- EB 6.10 6.10 0 ^00 6 10 ` WB 6.10 6.10 000 6^10 \ MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5 80 NB 5.80 5.80 5^80 MINOR THROUGHS EB 7.40 WB 7.40 0.00 7 40 6.90 6.90 0.00 6^90 MINOR LEFTS ' EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7 90 WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7^40 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NAME DEERFIELD DRIVE ---------------- OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC ^ . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE |. ' ------------------------________--------------------___________'ay]e-3 i POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE MOVEMENT RATE v(pcph) CAPACITY (pcph) CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY c c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ _p______ __M__---- ___5H_______ __R___SH MINOR STREET ___ � ------- EB LEFT 32 140 137 > 137 > ..OUGH RIGHT o 168 166 > 149 166 1 /5 > 113 1`o6 > D >D D 3 666 666 > 666' > ��--- — 663 ----' > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 2 161 158 > 158 > /mRu .`^""T UGH 0 6 193 190 > 368 190 156 > 360 190 > D >B D 660 660 > 660 > 654 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT np Lcr/ . 10 704 704 704 695 A 4 470 47) 470 466 A [DENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET DEERFIELC�------------------------ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STRE^`^^^^ u DRIVE---- �1YE ^ E|.... SPEAR STREET ' DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS ..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993`PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------ T-------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR......'..'''......... .95 AREA POPULATION.......'..'........... 40000 ' NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1998 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ..... ..... _..... __.... ..... ... .... __.... _..... ..... .... ..... ..... ... _..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... .... _____________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN ` CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN , ` TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------- _____________-__________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT 76 7 4 6 THRU 0 0 616 206 RIGHT 4 15 ' 2 7 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------- _________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 2 LAME USAGE LTR LTR 3IAM8l 1332OU6 II 3SVH6 ^^^^NOIlVW8OjNI 83HlO AHO W� 866T 1 S66T-CT-TO ^^'^^SISAIUNU 3Hl AO AWIl GNU 31VO 133UlS 8V36S ^^^^l338lS HlOOS/Hl8ON 3Hl 30 EWVN 3AI8O O13IJU33O ^^^^^^l33U1S lS3M/lSV3 3H1 AO 3i1V;,,l .... .... ..... ��.... �..... ..... .... .... �..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... �----------------------------------`----------------- NOIlVW8OJNI 8NI/.MlNMI OWL 00^0 OWL 8M 06~� 00^0 06^Z� 06^L 83 ' SlMI 8ONIW 06^9 00^0 06^9 06^9 or., 0t^L 00^0 0t^� OWL 8� SHSOO8Hl 8ONIW 08^S 00^0 08^S 08^9 81\1 08,9 00^0 08^s 08^2 8S SlAM 8O2M � 01^9 00^0 0T^9 0T^9 8M 0T^9 00^0 01^9 0T^9 M-1 ------------ ___________ ________ Sl` I8 8ONIW duo IV3I1I83 lNwlSOvOv mim ------------------ (B-0T eIqel) -TJNI� ^lSIO lHBIS O3lSO2Ov Mmm 8umml ' _.... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... --------------------------------------------------------- _ ... ..... ... ..... ..... S6uS 1v3IlI83 0 0 ONOO8HlOOS 0 ONOO8Hl8ON 0 0 0 ONDO8lSM 0 0 0 ONOO8lSw _____________ _____________ ___________ S313A38OlOW % S313IH3A S'A8 OM) -'-NUTTtHI8WO3 % m3O8l OS% — ___________________ NOIlISO6WO3 313IMA N 02, 06 00^2- ONOO8HlOOS N 0a 06 ONOO8Hl8ON N 02 06 00^0 ONOO8lSm N _________________ 02 06 00^0 ONOO81Sw SN8Ol lHSI8 8OJ ________________ SN8Ol lHSI8 8OJ __________ 318NV Mu8S 3NVI NOIlV831333W (m SDIOm 88D3 N8Dl lHSI8 lN33836 _____________________________________________________________________ S8Ol3VA lN3WlSOfOv ` ^ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE i ----------------------------------______ Page-3 / | POTEN- ACTUAL | FLOW- / TIAL MOVEMENT o SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS _______ p ________ M _________ ____________ SH R SH ____________ ------ MINOR STREET EB LEFT 80 176 171 > 171 > 91 > E ' THROUGH 0 210 208 > 178 208 > 94 208 >E C RIGHT 4 868 868 > 868 > 86+ > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 7 208 205 > 205 > 198 > D THROUGH 0 242 239 > 323 239 > 299 239 >C C RIGHT 16 441 441 > 441 > 425 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 479 479 479 474 A NB LEFT 5 811 811 - 811 806 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1998 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC r.= m 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ***************************************************************Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------ T_________________________________________��_______ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR................~.... .95 AREA POPULATION ............''..,.'.,. 40000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET,.'...... DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1998 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION,.., PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------- ----------- __---------------- ------------------------- - INTER3ECTION TYPE: 4-LEG - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 31 5 4 18 THRU 0 0 367 657 RIGHT 4 10 8 61 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE __--- ________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ..... ..... __..... .......... .... ..... .... .... _ LANES 1 1 1 2 LANE USAGE LTR LTR ADJUSTMENT ____________________________________________________________-________ FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE __________ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.00 90 ________________ _________________ 20 N ^ WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 1.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND -2.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ � % SU TRUCKS % CoMBINATION AND RV'S ___________ VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND _____________ 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ' ..... ..... .... TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. /FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT ________ CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ___________ ` EB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6'10 WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 ` MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.80 ND 5.00 5.80 0.00 5.80 MINOR THROUGHS ' EB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 WB 6.90 6.90 0.00 6.90 MINOR LEFTS EB 7.90 7.90 0.00 7.90 ' WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 IDENTIFYING _____________________________________________________________________ INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1998 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC -� CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ----- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 33 106 102 > 102 > 70 > I T1--!ROUGH 0 133 130 > 113 130 > 76 130 >E D RIGHT 4 627 627 > 627 > - 623 -'- > A — MINOR STREET WB LEFT 5 126 123 > 123 > 117 > D THROUGH 0 154 150 > 263 150 > 248 150 >C D RIGHT 11 616 616 > 616 > 606 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 657 657 657 640 A NB LEFT 5 ' 416 416 416 411 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET....,. DEERFIELD DRIVE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET'.'. SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...,. 01-13-1993 ; 1998 PM DHV ' OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC ` APPENDIX D UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/NORTHERLY PROJECT ACCESS A-4 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------- r----------------------- ----------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .95 AREA POPULATION....'................. ~ 40000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1993 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ LEFT -- 3 0 3 THRU -- 0 619 185 RIGHT -- 9 1 0 NUMBER OF LANES ----------- ------------------------------- ------ --- --- _______________ EB WB NB SB _______ _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... .... ..... ..... .... .... ______ LANES -- 1 1 2 ^ . ' ^ ADJUSTMENT ----------- FACTORS` __________________________________________________________ Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- --- ___ / ^ - � WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- _____ _____________ ___ --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS -------------------------------------------------------------- --- ____ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) -------------- VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS -------- ----------- ------------ WE 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.30 5-30 0.00 5.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 IDENTIFYING _____________________________________________________________________ INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE 1 PROJECT TRAFFIC CAPACITY AND _____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL o FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT t SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p _______ ________ M _________ ____________ SH R SH ____________ ------- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 3 222 221 > 221 > 218 > C > 352 > 340 >B RIGHT 9 439 439 > 439 > 430 > A MAJOR STREET - SB LEFT 3 551 551 551 548 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR 'STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC r' ~ `. . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* � � IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ; _________________ T___________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .95 AREA POPULATION...................... 40000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... ~ NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. - -- D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1993 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ ^ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH , CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN ` TRAFFIC VOLUMES ` ------------------------------------------------------ _______________ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ LEFT THRU -- 0 350 641 RIGHT -- 6 4 0 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES . ^ p' ^ ' � ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________________ Page-2 0 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE _______ ___ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS � EASTBOUND ----- --- ________________ _________________ --- WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N | | NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 . N VEHICLE COMPOSITION | ..... ... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... -..... ... ---..... ..... .... ..... ..... � ' ... ..... ..... --------------------- -.................. % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION -- - - ----'-- AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --- -__ WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICK GAPS ... ..... ... _______..... ... ..... _..... ..... .... _... ..... .... ... ......... .... ____________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2 ) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL SAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 , 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS � SB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...'.. NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-`1993 ; 1993 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC _ ^ ' . ` ^ ^ CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY ^ CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ------ MINOR STREET WB LEFT RIGHT - MAJOR STREET SB LEFT ~ 2 153 152 > 152 > 150 > D > 353 > 345 >B 6 634 --- 634 — > 634 > ` ----'--` `-- 627 > A 11 763 763 [DENTIFYING INFORMATION 763 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET''.. SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1993 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE I PROJECT TRAFFIC ' 753 A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ / u AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...'''.'''.'''''''.'. .95 AREA POPULATION.,...''..'..''''''.... 40000 ~ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1998 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION. . . . PHASE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ____ LEFT -- 7 0 6 THRU -- 0 705 212 RI2HT -- 16 2 0 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB LANES -- 1 1 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS` Pdge-2 _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE _______ ANGLE ___ FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- --- ________________ --- _________________ - / u WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N .NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ — -' -----' '%-SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- --- --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________________________________________ - TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table ______________ 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ________ ___________ WB 6.10 6.10 0.00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.'.... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS'.... 01-13-1993 ; 1998 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATIOH.... PHASE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC ` CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ^ RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M Sol R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ___________ ------- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 7 176 175 RIGHT 17 387 387 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 491 491 > 175 > 168 > D > 283 > 258 >C > 387 > 370 > B 491 485 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS _ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1998 AM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC ^ '. � 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---- T---------------------------------------------------------------- v AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..........''...''.... .95 AREA POPULATION....,......'''','''.'. 40000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... ' NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... SPEAR STREET NAME OF THE ' ANALYST.................. -- — ' ------ - D. CONGER DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 01-13-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED................. 1998 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION _..... .... .... _.... .... ..... .... ______ TYPE AND CONTROL ..... .... .... .... ..... _........ .... ..... .... _.... _..... ..... .... ..... ____________________________________ , INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTIONs NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES __________________________________-__________________________________ EB WB NB SB LEFT THRU -- 0 400 732 RIGHT -- 10 8 0 NUMBER OF LANES _______-________-__-_________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB _ ... .... .... ..... ..... ..... _ ..... _.... ..... __ _.... .... _..... ... _ LANES -- 1 1 2 � � ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _____________________________________________________________________ Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ----- --- _________ ___ WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 . 20 N ~ VEHICLE COMPOSITION ..... ..... .... ___.... ..... _... .... ____..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ' .... ..... _..... ____________________________________ %-SU-TRUCKS '%-G{M8INff'rTION -' ----'-- -'- AND RV`S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND --- ______ _____________ --- WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 2 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 2 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS _______________________________________________-_____________________ - TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) ______________ VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS ` ________ ___________ WB 6.10 ^ 6.10 0.00 6.10 ` MAJOR LEFTS SB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.30 MINOR LEFTS WB 7.40 7.40 0.00 7.40 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..,... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET,... SPEAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 01-13-1993 ; 1998 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE 11 PROJECT TRAFFIC . ' ' . � � CAPACITY AND _____________________________________________________________________ LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ` Page-3 � POTEN- ACTUAL ° FLOW7 TIAL MOVEMENT oSHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY �- MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ` _____ p ________ M _________ ____________ SH R SH ____________ ------- MINOR STREET � ' WB LEFT 4 117 116 > 116 > 111 > D > 272 > 257 >C RIGHT 11 590 590 > 590 > 580 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 19 715 715 715 696 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET,..... NORTH PROJECT ACCESS NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... S9EAR STREET DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...,. 01-13 1773 ; 1999 PM DHV OTHER INFORMATION.... PHASE II PROJECT TRAFFIC APPENDIX E EXISTING CONDITIONS - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/SWIFT STREET A-5 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services HCS:==8ignalized Intersection Version 2.1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 ============================ (802) 878-3000 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET ================================== ========= Analyst: D. CONGER (N-S) SPEAR STREET Area Typ6: Other File Name: 92075AO1 HCq ~ ' Comment: 1993 W/0 PROJECT TRAFFIC 1-12-93 AMDHV ____________________ Traffic and Roadway Conditions ---------------------------- ---------- | Eastbound / Westbound 7------------------ | n | Northbound ---- L T R / L T R � i Southbo u nu NoL /---- ---- -- �____ __ L T an / - | R / L T R PH ------------------------- ______________ Signal Operations Phase combination 1 --------------- L--------- 2 ------------------ E� Left * 3 4 / ---� 5 6 7 Thru * 1 N� Left � * Right * ` � Thru * Peds / Right ` * | Peds WB Left * Thru * |SB Left * Right * � Thru * Ped Right * . � Peds NB Right / SB Right !EB Right /WB Right Green 17 A � Yellow/A-R 6 !Green 41A Lost Time 3,0 !Yellow/A-R 6 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 70 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 � HCS: ==========================================,======================= Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET ===== Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO1 ^ HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1993 W/0 ======================================================================= PROJECT TRAFFIC --------------------------- Volume Adjustment + Worksheet Direc- _________________________________ Lane Lane Adj ----------- tion/ M«t Mvt Vol Adj Lane Grp N Util Growth Grp prop prop _____ ____ PHF ____ yol ____ Grp ____ Vol ... ..... .... io^ n Fact Fact Vol LT RT EB ..... __ _____ ..... .... __..... _ ____ ---- ---- Left 32 0.95 34 ^ Thru Right 37 0.95 39 LTR 122 1 1.000 ^ 1.000 122 0 28 ^ 0 40 47 0.95 49 ^ Left 54 0.95 57 Thru Right 87 39 0.95 0.95 92 LTR 190 1 1'000 1.000 ` 190 ^ 0 30 ^ 0 22 41 NB ' Left 216 0.95 227 Thru 293 0.95 308 LTR 666 1 1.000 ^ 1.000 666 ^ 0.34 0 20 Right 124 0.95 131 ' , ^ SB Left 10 0A5 11 Thru 57 0.95 60 LTR 83 1 1.000 1.000 ' 83 0 13 0 14 Right 11 0,95 12 ^ ^ - _______`_______ ' Saturation _ Flow Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Ideal ---------------------------------------- ` ------------ tion/ Sat N o. f f f f Adj LnGrp Flow L W ` HV_ G__ f p__ BB_ f A__ f f S t a ___ ____ _ns LT F1'w EB--- __RT ..... ..... ... -- ---- LTR WB 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1^ 00 0^ 85 0^ 96 1443 LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.99 1495 NB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1^ 00 0 87 0 95 1430 SB ^ ^ LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1388 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO1'HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1993 W/0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= / « Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor Input Variables ____________________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SD Cycle Length, C (sec) 70 70 70 70 Effective Green, G (sec) 20.0 20.0 44.0 44.6 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 122 190 666 83 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 88 133 439 72 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 34 57 227 11 Proportion. -of LT' Plt -' ----'-- - 0.279 0.300 0.341 0.133 Opposing Lanes, No 1 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 133 88 72 439 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto ____________________________________________________________________________ 0.300 0.279 0.133 0.341 Computations ____________________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))> 1619 1611 1613 1606 Yo=Vo/SoP 0.082 0.055 0.045 0.273 Gu=(G-C*Y0)/(1-Y0) 15.526 17.111 42.785 34.215 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.792 0.820 0.830 0.601 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5)>) 0.279 -0.300 0.341 0.133 Gq=G-Gu 4.474 2.889 1.215 9.785 Pt=1-Pl 0.721 0.700 0.659 0.867 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/Pl 2.684 1.879 0.865 6.561 El=1800/(1400-Vu) 1.42 1.37 1.36 1.87 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/6)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1iPl) 0.957 0.994 0.948 0.898 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N -------------------------------------------------------------- ` 0.957 0.994 0.948 0.898 ----------------------- HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1993 W/0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Cap&city Analysis Worksheet _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v) (s> (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio _________ _________ _____ ___________ __________ _____ EB LTR 122 1443 0.085 0.286 412 0.21j", WB LTR 190 1495 0.127 0.286 427 0.445 * �E}-- LTR 666 1430 0.466 0.629 899 0.741 * SD LTR 83 1388 0.060 0.629 872 0.095 Cycle Length, C = 70.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.593 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.648 _______________________________________________________________________ Level of Service Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By , LnGrp Ratio Ratio Len 1 Cap 2 Fact Delay LOS App Apr.) -...... ......... ..... -... -..... .... .... ..... ... .... ... ..... ..... ..... ..... -.... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... -..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... -.... ----- ---- ----- ---- EB LTR 0.30 0.286 70.0 14.8 412 0.1 0.85 12.7 B 12.7 B WB LTR 0.44 0.286 70.0 15.5 427 0.5 0.85 13.6 B 13.6 B NB LTR 0.74 0.629 70.0 6.9 899 2.3 0.85 7.8 B 7.8 B SB LTR 0.10 0.629 70.0 3.9 872 0.0 0.85 3.3 A 3.3 A Intersection Delay = 9.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B _______________________________________________________________________ \ HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Anal D. CONGER File NameR 92075PO1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Traffic and Roadway Conditions | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound | Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R |---- ---- | |---- ---- ----|---- No , Lanes | > 1 Volumes PHF | 134 166 103| -- ^~~ �' or PK15|0.93 O.95 0.90|0.9� |0'95 V� -� Lane Width 1 12.0 ^ � 11 0 ^ | 11 ^» ' 11.3 Grade 1 0 | 0 | 0 | ^0 X Heavy Veh| 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 2 Parking | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N Bus Stops | 0| 0| 0| 0 Con. Peds | 0| 0| 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N Arr Type | 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 3 RTOR Vols | 0| 0| 0| 7------------------------------------------------ 1------------------- 0 "_ Signal -------------------------------- Phase combination 1 2 3 EB Left * Thru * Right * Peds WB Left * Thru * Right * Peds NG Right SB Right Green 24A Yellow/A-R 6 Lost Time 3.0 Operations ______________________________________ 4| 5 6 7 8 |NB Left * | Thru * | Right * | Peds | |SB Left * | Thru * | Right * | Peds | . {EB Right |WB Right | !Green 24A !Yellow/A-R 6 Most Time 3.O Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PO1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC � Volume Adjustment Worksheet _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _____ ______ ____ ____ ____ EB Left 31 0.95 33 ^ Thru 135 0.95 142 LTR 413 1 1'000 1.000 413 0.08 0.58 Right 226 0.95 238 WB Left 161 0.95 169 Thru 79 0.95 83 LTR 278 1 1.000 1.000 278 0.61 0.09 Right 25 0.95 26 NB Left 134 0.95 141 Thru 166 0.95 175 LTR 424 1 1.000 1.000 424 0.33 0.25 Right 103 0.95 108 SB Left 32 0.95 34 Thru 185 0.95 195 LTR 260 1 1.000 1.000 260 0.13 0.12 Right 29 0 .9a 31 ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------- Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Ideal Adj tion/ Sat No. f f f f f f ` f f Sat LnGrp Flow Lns W HV G p _____ BB _____ A _____ RT _____ LT _____ Flow ____ ______ EB ____ ___ _____ _____ _____ � LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1464 WB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.62 946 NB ' LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.88 1320 Si..-.'( LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.95 1480 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PO1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment F /actor Input Variables ------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SD Cycle Length, C (sec) ___________________________ 60 60 60 60 Effective Green, G (sec) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Number of Lanes, N ~ 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 413 278 424 260 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 380 109 283 226 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 33 169 141 34 Proportion of LT, Plt -- ---_ _0.080 -0.6(H�-'-0��]S 0.131 Opposing Lanes, No 1 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate Vo (vph) , vp 109 380 226 283 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto _____---- ____________--- ___--- --- 0.608 0.080 0.131 0.333 ----- __--- Computations ------ ___ EB --- _____________________ WB NB SB Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))> 1229 1745 1667 1529 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.089 0.218 0.136 0.185 Gu=(8-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) 23.788 17.813 21.823 19.504 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.807 0.637 0.734 0.698 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5))) 0.080 0.608 0.333 0.131 - Gq=G-8u 3.212 9.187 5.177 7.496 Pt=1-Pl 0.920 0.392 0.667 0.869 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/Pl, 2.883 1.272 2.604 5.432 El=1800/(1400-Vo) 1.39 1.76 1.53 1.61 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/G)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1+Pl) 1.041 0.617 0.882 0.954 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N ` ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ... ..... ` 1.000 .... ... ... _______________________-______ 0.617 0.882 0.954 HCS: Signalised Intersection Version 2.1. 4 Streets: (E_ W) SWIFT STREET (N--S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D . CCJi• GEri File Name: 9 c? (:;7 5 i=' C)1 . L-I G 9 Area Type: Other 1.--1.2--9 3 PM I HV Comment: 1993 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC: Capacity Analysis Worksheet e Dir'ec--• Hd j ........_..........- Ad j Scat -----....._......_.........._ Flow ='w ....................._..._....._..._._....... _... _... - _._..._...............- _._ ......._....----._..... _._ Lane Group tionr Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c i_r'tGr"p (v) (S) __ __ (v% s) (g C) (c) Ra.t1(:� ED ----- 1464 0.282 0.450 659 L...TR 278 946 ( ) . ca94 0.450 r.::• 1a iV I3 L. l" F: t� ti• 2 Ci .a 0 1 sic- - 1 7 (-... �i_ 1. 0.450 594 0.714 -x L_.l R 260 1480 0.176 0.450 666 0.39f.) Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (v/s) c_r'i.t:ir..:.:a1 = 0.61.5 Lost Time m( Per Cyc l e•:� q L .: -• 6.0 sec, x critical =_: i) ., %a 8i L...evel of Service Wor'ksheat; i rec-- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay L 0 S) ti.oni v/c:_ gfC Cycle d Group d Pr-og Grp i:,r-p By By L-nur_p Ratio Ratio Len I Cap 2 Fact Delay L_.11S jpp Apl::) E I L... �T R 0.63 0.450 60.0 9.6 �!" a C.: 3 ��i 1.4 0,85 t�i .:3 t- .l_� 9.3 I-( 11 L...TR 0.65 0.450 60.0 9 L,2w. 2.5 8f.: raI_i L_. T R 0.71 0.450 t: 0.0 10.2 `.:19 4 2.8 0,85 11,0 B 11.0 ..a l:i S L...TR 0.39 0.450 60.0 8.4 ,:ar' 6 0.2 0.85 85 33 I Intersection Delay =-: 9.7 (Seclveh) 10he,r-cy(:?ct:ion L._ClS :::= B HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 ======================================================= 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated ================ 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ======================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET' ================= � Analyst: D. CONGER , File Name: 92075Au2 HC9 � Area Type: Other ^ 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= ____________________ Traffic ------------------------------------------ and Roadway Conditions | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound 1 Sout-------- | L T R 1 L T R | L T R 1 L //u»�^nq |____ ____ ____|____ ____ | R No. Lanes | > 1 < | > ---- |---- __ | ---- _-' Uolumes | 36 42 531 62 1 < 99 | > 1--<----|---->---- 441 244 332 1401 11 1�5< � 12 r'�ForpK15|0.95/0.94 Lane Width 0.9S10.95 0.95 0.95|0.95 0'95 0.95|0 ^ 95 0 0 95 Grade � 12.0 | | 11.0 � 11 0 ` | 1^'� z^� ^ % Heavy Veh| 0 2 2 � 21 2 0 2 | 21 2 0 ( 0 Parking | (Y/N) N 1 (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N� 2| 2 2 2 Bus Stops | 0| (Y/N> N Con. Peds | 0� 0| 0/ / 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N 0� |(Y/N) N 0| 0 Arr/ype | 3 3 31 3 3 |(Y/N) N n/uR 31 3 3 31 3 3 3 __vols__|_____________0�_____________0�_____________0|________'___0_ Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 | �------------------------ EB Left * 5 6 7 8 Thru 1NB Left * * Right * | Thru * Peds | Right * | Peds WB Left * | |SB Left * Thru * Right X. | Thru * Peds | Right * | Peds . NB Right | SB Right |EB Right |WB Right Green 17A Yellow/A-R 6 | !Green 41A Lost Time 3,0 !Yellow/A-R 6 !Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 70 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 HCS: ======================================================================= Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= � _______________________________________________________________________ Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc - Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT EB _ __ .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... __ ____ ' Left 36 0.95 38 Thru 42 0.95 44 LTR 138 1 1.000 1.000 138 0.28 0.41. Right 53 0.95 56 ^ WB Left 62 0.95 65 Thru 99 0.95 104 LTR 215 1 1.000 1.000 215 0.30 0 21 Right 44 0.95 46.) ^ NB Left 244 0.95 257 Thru 332 0.95 349 LTR 753 1 1.000 1.000 753 0.34 0.20 Right 140 0.95 147 ~ SB Left 11 0.95 12 ' Thru 65 0.95 68 LTR 193 1 1.000 1.000 93 0.13 0.14 Right _______________________________________________________________________ 12 0.95 13 ^ _______________________________________________________________________ Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet ' Direc- Ideal tion/ Sat No. f f f f f f f f Adj LnGrp ______ Flow ____ Lns ___ W _____ HV _____ G _____ p BB A RT LT ~~ Flow ' EB _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.94 1413 WB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.98 1478 NB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 0.87 0.94 1425 SB ^ LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.87 1349 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 ==========================================~==================== 3 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET ======== Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO2 HC9 Area Type: Other ^ 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= o Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor Input Variables _______________________________________________EB______WB NB SB Cycle Length, C (sec) ------------7-------- Effective Green, G (sec) 70 70 70 70 Number of Lanes, N 20^0 20~0 44.0 44,0 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 131 V 215 1 18 Mainline Flow Rate, ym (vph) 100 753 93 -eft-Turn Flow Rate, ylt (vph) 150 496 81 Proportion of LT, pit 3 u 65 257 12 ]pposing Lanes, No 0v275 0.302 0�341 —0,12q ]pposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 1 150 1 1 1 'roportion_of_LT_inOpp, Vol.,_ Plto0.302 ^|00 0.75 81 496 __ 0.129 0.341. __________ >mputations ----------------------------- _ ______________________________________ EB NB SB ______ !op=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) ______WB 1613 1�-------------------- 'o=Vo/Sop �»5 1596 1601 m=(G-C*Yo)/(1-yo) 0`093 0^062 0.051 0,310 s=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 14^872 16^679 42.610 32,327 l=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+ 4 5>)) 0^781 0^813 0.824 0,565 �q=G_Gu ^ 0^275 0.302 0.341 0,129 t=1_pl 5.128 3.321 1.390 11.673 f=2Pt(1-(Pt**0 5Gq))/pl 0^725 0^698 0.659 0,871 l=1800/(1400-y-^) 2^S59 2^077 0.972 7,472 m=Cf/G+(8u/G)(-r/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1+�l) 01^44 1^38 0^981 1^36 1.99 lt=(Fm+N_1)/N ^939 0.944 0,873 _ __---- --- __------------- --------- ________0.939 -------------r----------------- 0.981 0.944 0.873 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AO2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= / o Capacity Analysis Worksheet _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio _________ _________ _____ ___________ __________ _____ EB ~ LTR 138 1413 0.098 0.286 404 0.342 WB LTR 215 1478 0.145 0.286 422 0.509 * NB ---- ----'--' '-- LTR 753 1425 0.528 0.629 896 0.841 * SB LTR 93 1349 0.069 0.629 848 0.110 Cycle Length, C = 70.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.674 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.737 _______________________________________________________________________ Level of Service Worksheet Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By LnGrp Ratio Ratio Len 1 Cap 2 _____ Fact Delay _____ LOS ____ App _____ App ____ _____ , EB _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ LTR 0.34 0.286 70.0 15.0 404 0.2 0.85 13.0 B 13.0 B WB LTR 0.51 0.286 70.0 15.9 422 0.9 0.85 14.2 B 14.2 B NB LTR 0.84 0.629 70.0 7.8 896 5.1 0.85 10.9 B 10.9 B BB � LTR 0.11 0.629 70.0 3.9 848 0.0 0.85 3.4 A 3.4 A Intersection _______________________________________________________________________ Delay = 11.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B - HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. YONGER o File Name: 92075PO2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Traffic and Roadway Conditions | Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R |---- ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- ----|---- ---- No. Lanes | > 1 < | > 1 < | > 1 < | > 1 < 153 2561 182 90 28| 152 188 1171 36 209 33 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width | 12.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 Grade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % Heavy Veh| 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 2 Parking / (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N Bus Stops | 0{ 0: 0| 0 Con. Peds | 0| 0| 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N Arr Type } 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 3 RTOR Vols ( ------------------------------- 0| =--------------------------------------- 0| 0| 0 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * :NB Left M. Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds WB Left * | |SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds NB Right | |EG Right SB Right |WB Right Green 24A | !Green 24A Yellow/A-R 6 !Yellow/A-R 6 Lost Time 3.0 Most Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 . HCS:==Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET ============================= Analyst: D. CONGER (N-S> SPEAR STREET Area Type: Other File Name: 92075PO2,HC9 Comment: ================================================================= 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC 1-12-93 PM DHV ________________��Volume Adjustment Worksheet Direc- -------------------------______ -- tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Lane Lan e Grp No. Util Adj Mvt Vol pHF Vol G Vol_ Ln Fact Growth Grp prop prop _rp_ Fact Vol LT RT EB-- ----- ------ ---- --__ __-- Left 35 0.95 37 Thrut 153 0.95 161 LTR 467 1 1.000 1.000 467 0.08 0.58 WB Left 182 0.95 192 Thrut 90 0.95 95 LTR 316 1 1.000 1.000 316 0.61 0.09 NB Left 152 0.95 160 Thrut 188 0.95 198 LTR 481 1 1.000 1.000 481 0.33 0.26 SB Left 36 0.95 38 Thrut 209 0.95 220 LTR 293 1 1.000 1.000 293 0.13 0.12 _______________________________________________________________________ ________ _____ ____8aturation ��----------------- Flow Adjustment Worksheet ' Direc- Ideal ---------------------------------- tion/ Sat No. f f f Adj LnGrP Flow Lns W HV G f f f f f Sat ______ ____ ___ _____ p BB A RT LT Flow EB----- _____ _____ ----- ----- ----- WB LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 0.82 1.00 ---- 146` NB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.56 861 LTR SB 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1,00 ^^ 1,00 1 00 1^00 ^ 0.86 0.86 1280 LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.93 1443 /` � HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PO2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= ` Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor ' Input Variables ____________________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C (sec) 60 60 60 60 Effective Green, G (sec) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) / ^+67 316 481 293 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 430 i24 321 255 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 37 192 160 38 Proportion of LT, Plt 0.079 0.608 0.333 {}.130' _ Opposing Lanes, No 1 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 124 430 255 321 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto ____________________________________________________________________________ 0.608 0.079 0.130 0.333 Computations EB WB NB SB Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) 1184 1743 1656 1512 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.105 0.247 0.154 0.212 23.141 16.195 20.995 18.108 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.798 0.606 0.716 0.674 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5))) 0'079 0.608 0.333 0.130 Gq=G-Gu 3.859 10.805 6.005 8.892 Pt=1-Pl 0.921 0.392 0.667 0.870 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/P1. 3.422 1.283 2.821 6.184 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) / 1.41 1.86 1.57 1.67 Fn=Gf/8+(Gu/0)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/0)(1+Pl) 1.037 0.561 0.856 0.930 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N ... ... ..... ______.... ..... ---------------------- _________________________________________ 1.000 0.561 0.856 0.930 , HCS: Siqnalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PO2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/O PROJECT TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Capacity/ Analysis Worksheet o ____________________________________________________________________ Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio _.... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... EB ' ..... ..... .... _ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... _.... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... ..... _..... .... ... _..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ... ~TR 467 1464 0.319 0.450 659 0.709 WB LTR 316 861 0.367 0.450 387 0.816 * NB LTR 481 1280 0.376 0.450 576 0.835 * SB LTR 293 1443 0.203 0.450 649 0.451 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.743 Lost Time Per _______________________________________________________________________ Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.825 Level of Service Worksheet Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By LnGrp .... _... .... ..... Ratio ..... ..... ..... ..... Ratio Len 1 Cap 2 Fact Delay LOS App App EB ... _..... .... .... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... LTR WB 0.71 0.450 60.0 10.1 659 2.5 0.85 10.7 B 10.7 B LTR 0.82 0.450 60.0 10.9 387 8.7 0.85 16.7 C 16.7 C LTR 0.84 0.450 60.0 11.0 576 7.2 0.85 15.5 C 15.5 C qB LTR 0,45 0.450 60.0 8.7 649 0.4 0.85 7.7 B 7.7 B Intersection _______________________________________________________________________ Delay = 12.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B APPENDIX F PHASE I & II —.SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES SPEAR STREET/SWIFT STREET A-6 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services . . - ' � HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 1 ======================================================================= � FitzPatrick--- Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802> 878-3000 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S> SPEAR STREET 9 An�lyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12--- 93 AM DHV � Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC [raffic and Roadway Conditions | Eastbound | Westbound | Nort hbound | Snuthbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R ..... ..... .... _|.... ......... .... ____ ... ..... ..... ..... |..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... .... Volumes 1 32 37 49| 57 87 391 222 301 1281 10 59 11 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.95|0.95 0.95 0.95|O.95 0.95 0.95|0.93 0.95 O.cs5 Lane Width ( 12.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 Grade | 0 | 0 � 0 � 0 % Heavy Veh| 2 2 2| 2 2 2| 2 2 2| 2 2 2 r Paking | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N ' 1 (Y/N) N Bus Stops | 0| Con. Peds | 0 0| 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N �(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N> N Arr Type | 3 3 3| 3 3 3| 3 3 3| 3 3 3 RTOR Vols - _____-___________________________ | 0| 0� ..... ..... ..... ' ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0� ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... 0 ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... Signal Operations ' Phase combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds WB Left * | |SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds . NB Right | |EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 17A | |Green 41A YelIow/A-R 6 |Yellow/A-R 6 Lost Time 3.0 |Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 70 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 S8ST 68^0 88^0 00^T 00^T 00^T 00^T 66^0 66^0 T 008T 81-1 8S 629T 26^0 L8^0 00^T 00^T 00^T 00^T 66^0 L6^0 T 008T 81-1 8N 88NT 66^0 L8^0 00^T 00^T 00'T 00^T 66^0 L6^0 T 008T 81 1 8M 2551 96^0 Q8^0 00^T 00^T 00^T 00^1 66^0 00^1 T 0081 8l-1 ____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ 83 Mold 11 18 v 88 .d _____ S _____ AI-4 _____ M ___ sul ____ moId --------- diSul WS 1 j j j � � � ^oN 4eS /uoT4 �p� ` leepI -zeilO ..... ..... _..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... .... _____________________________________________________________ 4eeqslioM Juem1snopu molJ ' uolleinjeS _______________________________________________________________________ 2T 96^0 TT Wwj KT^0 ST^0 08 000^T 000^T T s8 oil 29 G6^0 6G nj4l TT S6^0 01 UK] 8S SST S6^0 82T 4 4 B V8 02^0 KC^0 989 000^T 000^T T 989 811 ME 26^0 TOE nj4l fC2 26^0 222 41e*1 8N is S6^0 6E Wu8 TWO TWO S6T 000^T 000^T A E6T oil 26 S6^0 L8 njq1 09 S6^0 L9 - '----- — ----- 8M 2G 96^0 69 4B 18 25^0 LW0 G21 000^T 000^T T G2T 811 6E 96^0 LE nAql KS 96^0 2E 4jel ' 83 ____ l8 ____ l-I ____ loA ______ _____ __ 4zeJ Izej ul ____ loA ____ dig ____ loA ____ AM ____ IoA _____ 4»W doi6 doi6 dib wmojS mD -ON dig euel fptj 4xW /uojj. _______________________________________________________________________ CPU euel eueI _zenyj 4eeqsjjoM ;uem4sn?pv emnloA / » ======================================================================= 3IJJt/8l I 3SVH6 /M S661 :Iuemmo3 AHO WV 66-2T-T jeq, :edAl eeAV 63H^TMUM026 :emeN eITJ 838NO3 ^O WsAleuV ======================================================================= 1338lS 8hB6S (S-N) 1338lS lJIMS (M-3) :sleeJ4S � 1^2 uolsneA uoTIzesieluI pezTIeubTS :S3H , ' . .. .~ ' HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 � Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET � Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW1.HC9 � Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC / Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor o Input Variables _..... _..... ________________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB Cycle Length, C (sec) 70 70 70 70 Effective Green, G (sec) 20.0 44.0 44.0 Number of Lanes, N ^ 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va.(vph) 125 193 686 85 Mainline Flow Rate, Val (vph) 91 133 452 74 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 34 60 234 11 Propprtiorlof LT, plt Opposing Lanes, No 1 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 133 91 74 452 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto _..... .... .... .... _..... ... ..... .... _______ 0.311 0.272 0.129 0.341 Computations ... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... EB ... ..... ..... _____________________ WB NB SB ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm>/(1400-Vm)>> ..... .... .... ..... ... ... ..... ..... 1612 _..... ..... ______ 1615 ..... ..... ..... _..... ..... ..... ..... 1612 ..... ..... .... ..... ... ..... .... _ 1604 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.083 0.056 0.046 0.282 Gu=(G-C*Yc;)/(1-yo) 15.504 17.015 42.749 33.802 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/10O0 0.792 0.818 0.829 0.592 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1>G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5>)) 0.272 0.311 0.341- 0,129 Gq=8-Gu 4.496 2,985 1.251 10.198 Pt=1-Pl 0.728 0.689 0.659 0.871 Gf=2Pt(1..... (Pt** .... .5Gq))/Pl 2.731 1.890 0.887 6.) 818 /.. El=1800/(1400-Vo> 1.42 1.38 1.36 1.90 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/G)(1/(1+Pl(El-1G)(1+Pl> 0.959 0.987 0.947 0.894 Flt=(Fm+N-1>/N ` -_____..... .... _.... ..... ..... ... .... ... ..... .... .... ..... ___..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... _..... ..... _..... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... 0.959 ..... ..... .... ..... .... .... ..... .... 0.987 .... ____.... .... ..... ... 0.947 .... ..... ..... ... ___..... 0.894 .... _..... ..... ____ HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC ======================================================================= _______________________________________________________________________ � Capaczty Analysis Worksheet o Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v> _________ (s) _________ (v/s) _____ (g/C) ___________ (c) __________ Ratio EB ' _____ LTR ` 125 1442 0.087 0.286 412 0.303 WB LTR 193 1488 0.130 0.286 425 0.454 * LTR 686 1429 0.480 0.629 898 0.764 * SB LTR 85 1383 0.061 0.629 869 0.098 Cycle Length, C = 70.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.610 Lost Time _______________________________________________________________________ Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.667 Level of Service Worksheet Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog_ Grp Grp By By LnGrp _____ Ratio _____ Ratio _____ Len _____ 1 Cap 2 Fact Delay LOS App App EB _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____ LTR 0.30 0.286 70^0 14.9 412 0.1 0.85 12.7 B 12.7 B WB LTR 0.45 0.286 70.0 15.6 425 0.5 0.85 13.7 B 13.7 B NB ` LTR 0.76 0.629 70.0 7.1 898 2.7 0.85 8.3 B 8.3 B SE' LTR 0.10 0.629 70.0 3.9 869 0.0 0.85 3.3 A 3.3 A Intersection _______________________________________________________________________ Delay = 9.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC � g ======================================================================= Traffic and Roadway Conditions 1 Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound 1 Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R |L T R |___' ____ ____|____ ____ ____|____ ____ ____|____ ____ No. Lanes | > 1 < | > 1 < | > 1 < | > 1 < Volumes 1 31 135 2341 167 79 251 138 171 1061 32 191 2� PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.900.95 0.95 0.9110.9S 0.15 0.9510.95 0.95 0.0: Lane Width 1 12.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 Grade | ` 0 0 | 0 | 0 % Heavy Veh| 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 2 Parking | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N Bus Stops ( 0| 0| 0| 0 Con. Peds | 0| 0| 0( 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N {(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N Arr Type | 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 3 RTOR Vols ---------- -�____________________________________________________________ | 0: 0| _______________________________________________________________________ Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru * ) Thru * Right * | Right * Peds { Peds WB Left * | |SB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds | Peds NB Right | |EB Right SB Right |WB Right Green 24A | !Green 24A Yellow/A-R 6 !Yellow/A-R 6 Lost Time 3.0 Most Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 60 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC o Volume Adjustment �Worksheet _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Hvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _____ ______ ____ ____ ____ EB Left 31 0.95 33 Thru 135 0.95 142 LTR 421 1 1.000 1.000 421 0.08 0.58 Right 234 0.95 246 WB Left 167 0.95 176 Thru 79 0.95 83 LTR 285 1 1.000 1.000 285 0.62 0'09 Right 25 0.95 26 NB Left 138 0.95 145 Thru 171 0.95 180 LTR 437 1 1.000 1.000 437 0.33 0.26 Right 106 0.95 112 SB Left 32 0.95 34 ' Thru 191 0.95 201 LTR 266 1 1.000 1.000 266 0.13 0.12 Right 29 0.95 31 ' -----------------------------------------------------------�� Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Direc- Ideal Adj tion/ Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat LnGrp ______ Flow Lns W HV G p BB A RT LT Flow EB ____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1464 WB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.60 928 NB . LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.88 1311 SB LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.95 1475 ` ' ^ HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC � Supplemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor Input Variables EB WB NB SB ___ ___ _______________________________________________ Cycle Length, C (sec) 60 60 60 60 Effective Green, G (sec) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 421 285 437 266 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 388 109 292 232 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 33 176 145 34 Proportion of LT, Plt 0.078 0.618 0.3320.128 Opposing Lanes, No 1 109 1 388 1 232 I 292 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Proportion ofLTinOpp. Vol.,_Plto__________0.618___0.078___0.128___0.332__ ---------- _____ Computations EB WB NB SB Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm)>) 1216 1746 1667 1526 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.090 . 0 222 . 0 139 . 0.191 Gu=(G-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) 23.749 17.572 21.665 19.191 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.807 0.632 0.730 0.692 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu14.5))) 0.078 0.618 0,332 0.128 Gq=G-Gu . 3 251 9 428 . 5 . 335 7.809 Pt=1-Pl . 0 922 . 0 382 0 . 668 0.872 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/Pl 2.922 1.225 2.654 5.646 E1=1800/(1400-Vo) 1.39 ' 1.78 1.54 1.62 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/6)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1+Pl) 1.041 0.605 0.877 0.951 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N ____________________________________________________________________________ 1.000 0.605 0.877 ` 0.951 m HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW1.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1993 W/ PHASE I TRAFFIC ======================================================================= k _______________________________________________________________________ Capacity Analysis Worksheet / [>irec- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v) (s) _________ (v/s) (g/C) (a) Ratio EB _____ ___________ __________ ' _____ LTR 421 1464 0.288 0.45~ 659 0.639 WB LTR 285 928 0.307 0.450 418 0.682 * NB LTR 437 1311 0.333 0.450 590 0.741 * SB LTR 266 1475 0.180 0.450 664 0.401 Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.640 Lost Time Per ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.712 Level of Service Worksheet Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ V/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By LnGrp Ratio _..... ..... ... _ Ratio _____ Len ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 1 _____ Cap 2 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... _..... ... ... ... Fact ... ..... ... Delay LOS App Apr.) EB ..... ... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... ..... ... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ... ..... LTR 0.64 0.450 60.0 9'7 659/ 1.5 0.85 9.5 B 9.5 B- WB LTR 0.68 0.450 60.0 10.0 418 3,1 0.85 11.1 B 11.1 B NB LTR 0.74 0.450 60.0 10.3 590 3.4 0.83 11.7 B 11.7 B SB LTR 0.40 0.450 60.0 8.4 664 0.2 0`.85 7.3 B 7.3 B Intersection _______________________________________________________________________ Delay = 10.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 ========================================================== 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated ============= 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ========================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET======�======= Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW2 HC9 r Area Type: Othe^ 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Traffic and Roadway Cbnditions 1 Eastbound | Westbound | Northbound 1�� n 5----------- | L T |---- R | L T R i L T R | Louthbound / R ____ No. Lanes | > 1 ____| ____ < ____ ____�____ ___ -<----|---->----<---- | | > 1 < | > 1 volumes 1 36 42 rn+orPK1510.95 0.95 57166 99- 444-255 346 �69 12 LaneWidth 0.9510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 ^ 0.9510 95 0.95 0,95 1 12.0 | 11.0 1 11.0 ^ | 1`�^ 5 ^ Grade | 0 | 0 | % Heavy Vehl 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 0 | 0 Parking 1 (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N� 2| 2 2 2 Bus Stops � 0| � (Y/N) N Con. Peds � 0| 0/ Ped Button ((Y/N) N 0| 1(Y/N) N !(Y/N) N 0 HrrType | 3 31 3 3 31 3 !(Y/N) N :TORvols|_____________0i_____________0| 3 31 3 3 3 ____ _____________0|____________0_ _____________________ Signal Operations --- Phase combination 1 ' _________ 2 3 --- ---- 4 _________ | ----�----------------- 5 EB Left * 6 7 8 Thru * |NB Left * Right * . � Thru * Peds 1 Right * | Peds WB Left * � | Thru |SB Left * * Right * | Thru * Peds 1 Right * | Peds NO Right | SB Right |EB Right |WB Right Green 17A Yellow/A-R | !Green 45A 6 Lost Time 3 0 !Yellow/A-R 6 . |Lost Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 74 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 ~ ' . , .. ' � . HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 ` Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW2.HC9 . Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC Volume Adjustment Worksheet ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop � Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp 'Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... ..... ..... .... ..... - ---- ... ..... ..... r ---- -- ----- .... -..... -..... - ..... ..... ..... ... ---- ..... .... .... .... EB ~ . Left 36 0.95 38 Thru 42 0.95 44 LTR 142 1 1.000 1.000 142 0.27 0.42 Right 57 0.95 60 WB Left 66 0.95 69 Thru 99 0.95 104 LTR 219 1 1.000 1.000 219 0.32 0.21 Right 44 0.95 46 NB Left 255 0.95 268 Thru 346 0.95 364 LTR 786 1 1.000 1.000 786 0.34 0.20 Right 146 0.95 154 SB Left i1 0.95 12 Thru 69 0.95 73 LTR 98 1 1.000 1'000 98 0.12 0.13 Right 12 0.95 13 - _________________________________________________________________ ---------------- Saturation Flow Adjustmdnt Worksheet Direc- Ideal Adj tion/ Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat LnGrp ______ Flow ____ Lns ________ W HV _____ G _____ p BB A RT LT Flow EB _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1'00 1'00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.93 1399 WB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.97 1456 NB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 1415 SB LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.87 1347 0 HCS: Siqnalized Intersection Version 2.1 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC Supplemental Worksheet For Left -turn Adjustment Factor « Input Variables EB WB NB SB ____________________________________________________________________________ Cycle Length, C (sec) 74 74 74 74 Effective Green, G (sec) 20.0 20.0 48.0 48.0 Number of Lanes, N. 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 142 219 786 98 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 104 150 518 86 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 38 69 268 12 Proportion of LT, Plt__ ��`268 0.315 0.341 0.122 Opposing Lanes, No 1 1 1 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 150 104 86 518 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto ____________________________________________________________________________ 0.315 0.268 0.122 0.341 Computations EB WB NB SB ____________________________________________________________________________ Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400_Vm))> 1604 1610 1597 1598 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.094 0.065 0.054 0.324 Gu=(G-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) 14.427 16.272 46.520 35.534 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.781 0.810 0.821 0.551 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)0)/(Fs*Gu+4.5))> 0.268 0.315 0.341 0.122 Gq=G-Gu 5.573 3.728 1.480 12.466 Pt=1-Pl 0.732 0.685 0.659 0.878 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.50q)>/Pl 3.175 2.200 1.027 7.983 E1=1800./(1400-Vo) 1.44 1.39 1.37 2.04 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/G)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1+Pl) 0.931 0.966 0.938 0,870 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N ` ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ` 0.931 0.966 0.938 0.870 ` - ^ � . HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET r � Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075AW2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 AM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC ======================================================================= ' o Capacity Analysis Worksheet _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio _____ _________ _________ _____ ___________ __________ _____ EB LTR 142 1399 0.102 0.270 378 0.376 WB LTR 219 1456 0.150 0.270 394 0.557 * _ NB LTR 786 1415 0.555 0.649 918 0.856 * SB LTR 98 1347 0.073 0.649 874 0.112 Cycle Length, C = 74.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.706 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.768 NN ______________________________________________________________________ NN Level of Service Worksheet D i r e c ---- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By LnGrp ----- Ratio ----- Ratio ----- Len ----- 1 ----- Cap ----- 2 ----- Fact ----- Delay ----- LOS ---- App ----- App �� EB LTR 0.38 0.270 74.0 16.7 378 0.3 0.85 14.4 B 14.4 B WB LTR 0.56 0.270 74.0 17.6 394 1.3 0.85 16.1 C 16.1 C NB LTR 0.86 0.649 74.0 7.8 918 5.7 0.85 11.5 B 11.5 B SD LTR 0.11 0.649 74.0 3.7 874 0.0 0.85 3.2 A 3.2 A Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------------- Delay = 12.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B � HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 1 FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 (802) 878-3000 ======================================================================= Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075RW2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC ======================================================================= _______________________________________________________________________ Traffic and Roadway Conditions 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound | Southbound |L T R |L T R |L T R (L T R |____ ____ ---- |---- ____ ____1____ ____ ____|____ ____ ----- No. Lanes | > 1 < 1 > 1 < | > 1 < | > 1 < Volumes 1 35 153 2701 192 90 281 159 196 1221 36 221 33 PHF or PK1510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.9510.95 0.95 0.95 Lane Width ( 12.0 ( 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 Grade | 0 i 0 0 % Heavy Veh| 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 21 2 2 E. Parking 1 (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N | (Y/N) N Bus Stops 0| 0| 0i 0 Con. Peds | 0| 0i 0| 0 Ped Button |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N |(Y/N) N Arr Type | 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 31 3 3 3 RTOR -------------------------------------------------------- Vols | 0| 0| 0| !______-_______ 0 Signal Operations Phase combination 1 2 3 4 | 5 6 7 8 EB Left * |NB Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds } Peds WB Left * WO Left * Thru * | Thru * Right * | Right * Peds 1 Peds NB Right | |EB Right SO Right MB Right Green 25A | !Green 24A Yellow/A-R 6 !Yellow/A-R 6 Lost Time 3.0 Most Time 3.0 Cycle Length: 61 secs Phase combination order: #1 #5 11 HCS: Siqnalized Intersection Version 2.1 2 Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW2.HC9 Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC ======================================================================= Volume AdjulLstment Worksheet Direc- Lane Lane Adj tion/ Mvt Adj Lane Grp No. Util Growth Grp Prop Prop Mvt Vol PHF Vol Grp Vol Ln Fact Fact Vol LT RT ..... ..... ..... _..... EB ____ ____ ____ ____ .... ..... ..... ..... __ ..... .... .... ..... ..... ... ... ..... ... ..... ... .... ..... ..... .... ____ Left 35 0.95 37 ~ Thru 153 0.95 161 LTR 482 1 1.000 1.000 482 0.08 0.59 Right 270 0.95 284 WB Left 192 0.95 202 - Thru 90 0.95 95 LTR 326 1 1.000 1.000 326 0.62 0.09 Right 28 0.95 29 NB Left 159 0.95 167 Thru 196 0.95 206 LTR 501 1 1.000 1.000 501 0.33 0.26 Right 122 0.95 128 SB Left 36 0.95 38 Thru 221 0.95 233 LTR 306 1 1.000 1.000 306 0.12 0.11 Right ------------------------------------------------------------ 33 0-95 35 ' ___________ Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet / _______________________________________________________________________ Direc- Ideal Adj tion/ Sat No. f f f f f f f f Sat LnGrp Flow Lns ___ W _..... .... .... ..... HV _____ G .... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... p BB ..... ..... .... .... ..... ..... .... .... ..... A ..... .... .... .... ..... RT .... .... ..... ..... .... LT _____ Flow , ..... _.... _ EB LTR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 � 1462 WB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.54 836 NB LTR 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.84 1257 SB LTR 1800 1 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.92 1431 ' . ~ HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 3 � Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S) SPEAR STREET ' Analyst: D. CONGER File Name: 92075PW2.HC9 � Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV � Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC G======================================================================= SuppDemental Worksheet For Left -Turn Adjustment Factor - Input Variables EB WB NB SD ____________________________________________________________________________ Cycle Length, C (sec) 61 61 61 61 Effective Green, G (sec) 28.0 28.0 2710 27.0 Number of Lanes, N 1 1 1 1 Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) 482 326 501 306 Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) 445 124 334 268 Left -Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) 37 202 167 38 Proportion of LT, Plt 0.077 0.620 0.333 0.124 Opposing Lanes, No '-� 1 1 '-- 1- 1 Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) 124 445 268 334 Proportion of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto 0.620 0.077 0.124 0.333 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computations ____________________________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SB Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) 1163 1745 1658 1504 Yo=Vo/Sop 0.107 0.255 0.162 0.222 Gu=(G-C*Yo)/(1-Yo) 24.060 16.704 20.446 17.295 Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 0.798 0.597 0.707 0.666 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/4Fs*Gu+4.5))) 0.077 0.620 0.333 0.124 Gq=G-3u 3.940 11.296 6.554 9.705 Pt=1-Pl 0.923 0.380 0.667 0.876 Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/Pl 3.502 1.222 2.941 6.693 El=1800/(1400-Vo) 1.41 1.88 1.59 1.69 Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/0)(1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G)(1+Pl) 1.035 0.545 0.840 0.921 Flt=(Fm+N-1)/N ____________________________________________________________________________ 1.000 0.545 0.840 0.921 ' ' / ' HCS: Signalized Intersection Version 2.1 4 ======================================================================= �h Streets: (E-W) SWIFT STREET (N-S> SPEAR STREET , File Name: 92075PW2 HC9 Analyst: D. CONGER e . Area Type: Other 1-12-93 PM DHV Comment: 1998 W/ PHASE II TRAFFIC Capacity Analysis Worksheet Direc- Adj Adj Sat Flow Lane Group tion/ Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Green Ratio Capacity v/c LnGrp (v) ..... ..... .... _.... .... ..... _..... _ (s) .... ..... ..... ..... _... (v/s) .... .... .... .... ..... (g/C) .... .... ... ..... ..... ------ (c) __________ Ratio _____ _.... ..... .... _ EB ..... .... LTR 482 1462 ~ 0.330 0.459 671 0.718 WB LTR 326 836 0.390 0.459 384 0.850 * LTR 501 1257 0.399 0.443 -�� '- 0.900 * SB LTR 306 1431 0.214 0.443 633 0.483 Cycle Length, C = 61.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.789 Lost Time ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.875 evel of Service Worksheet Direc- Delay Lane Delay Lane Lane Delay LOS tion/ v/c g/C Cycle d Group d Prog Grp Grp By By LnGrp Ratio Ratio _____ Len _____ 1 _____ Cap _____ 2 _____ Fact _____ Delay _____ LOS ____ App _____ App ____ _____ EB _____ LTR 0.72 0.459 / 61.0 10.1 671 2.6 0.85 10.8 B 10.8 B WB LTR O.85 0.459 61.0 11.1 384 11.3 0.85 19.1 C 19.1 C NB LTR 0.90 0.443 61.0 12.0 556 12.6 0.85 20.9 C 20.9 C SB LTR 0.48 0'443 61.0 . 9.2 633 0.5 0.85 8.2 B 8.2 B Intersection Delay _______________________________________________________________________ = 15.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C APPENDIX G LEFT —TURN WARRANT ANALYSIS & STORAGE LENGTH A-7 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 JOB 97 ,,e-, SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY //� l �/� �� // Z DATE Z 7 CHECKED BY erel F DATE _.... _.............:......__.:.............. [............. ............. .. ...... ....._ ..... ... ... ..... ..._. ._..... .. M1MW 204 1(SL* SAeeb) 205'I ICI ®w W , f+aloe. E m 01471. To aeee PNW TOLL FREE I-0W225�M No Text JOB / ZO7 —/ f C,-✓ /0 1 !401 ;7 c 0 SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE I ITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 .. i�............. .............................. ........... ,..................... ............. ............. ............. -.1- ......... ... ; .......... Td..af =Tara ,P_. = LZ5 �;Sd��___Q'S R.aQc•P� M0011CT 204 1 (SiMk Shms) M I (Padded) ®. tm.. GrOW, MM, 011)1 %Older MX iaL FREE I-8%2M 6W APPENDIX H RIGHT —TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS A—g FITZ PATRIC K- LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services JOB 9Z MTZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 SHEET NO. OF //�� CALCULATED BY11ad / P/ DATE /! 1//e13 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE h_ ................ :.............l............:................ rho' JP r.Q4PdP.__. ftUT204-t (S*r &mW) M I (NM) Im, Grolon. Mass, 01471. To Order MW TOLL FREE t-B00-225-M r � Zo t YERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 111 //9 3 TRAFFIC VOLUME WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN AUXILLARX LANES At Unsignalized Intersections Problem Statement: The Agency's current method of determining the need for right turn lanes is based strictly on the number of right turning vehicles, which calls for a right turn lane where the number of right turning vehicles exceeds 50 for design conditions at commercial drives. There is concern that this criteria may not be adequately responsive to specific traffic characteristics. Policy: Upon review of current literature, with improved traffic operation and reduced accident experience the principal concerns, the following policy is adopted based on traffic volume and speed warrants. Where the approach highway speed limit is 25 MPH, or the difference between the speed limit and the intersection design speed for right turning vehicles (reference 1984 AASHTO Publication A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Table III.16, etc.) does not exceed 15 MPH, these criteria are generally exempt. o The need for a right turn lane shall be met for two-lane highways where the advancing (total approach volume excluding lefts utilizing a Se arate left turn lane) traffic volume exceeds the relationship 33 80-S /(R(1-R ; where S is the highway speed (speed limit assumed), in MPH, and R is the ratio of right turns to the advancing traffic volume for design conditions, expressed as a decimal. 0 The need for a right -turn lane shall be met for four -Lane highways where the above two-lane warrant is met and a minimum of 50 right turning vehicles is exceeded. Two-lane versus four -Lane highway determination is based on the number of advancing volume lanes used to carry through traffic, e.g. Where one approach lane carries through traffic it is considered a two-lane highway.. Specific nmfety concerns may also be cause for inclusion, on a case by case basis, such as restricted sight distance or other severe geometric conditions. In any event it shall be the Agency's prerogative ,to determine the implementation of any improvements in considering any impacts or hardships that might result from such improvements. APPROVED: irector Planning D to PLANNING COMMISSION 26 May 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 26 May 1992 at 7:00 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, David Austin, William Craig, Terry Sheahan, Catherine Peacock, Ann Pugh Also Present: P� Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Charles Scott, Lisa Scagliotti, Greg Premo, Andrew Lee, John Larkin, Dave Andrus, Dave DuBrul, Gerry Milot, Lance Llewellyn, Rene Bourne, G. Bourne, Vince Bolduc, Holly Campbell, Edwin Faber III, Andy O'Brien, Jason George, St-ven Jaffe, Greg Barth, Alan Bartlett, B. Mark, John Steel Chuck Hafter, Albert Audette, Dick Underwood, Roger Dickinson, L. Hillman 1. Executive Session: Mrs. Maher moved the Commission meet in Executive Session to discuss advisement from the C=.:y Attorney. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: (7:45 pm): 1. Other Business: Mrs. Maher directed the Commission's attention to a letter from Ann Byrnes regarding problems with Pillsbury Manor construction. She noted that John Larkin had called Ms. Byrnes today to try to solve the problems. Mr. Bur.zess noted that items 3 & 4 on the agenda are sketch plans for PRD's in the Southeast Quadrant Zone. The question is whether they would be heard under the old or- proposed zoning. Mr. Burgess noted the City Council has warned a public hearing on proposed zoning in a few days. Rather than hear the two items tonight, Mr. Burgess said he would like to delay them until after the City Council has met and decided what to do with the proposed zoning ordinance. He asked for a 2-week delay in hearing the two sketch plans. Ms. Pugh moved to delay review of items 3 & 4 on theagenda enda until 16 June 1992. Mr.Crai seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Milot said he has designed plans to fit both possibilities. He noted it has been expensive to cooperate with the city on this. He asked what would happen if the Council amends the Ordinance and decreases the densities. Mr. Craig said they PLANNING COMMISSION 26 May 1992 page 2 should wait and see what happens. Mr. Burgess said he didn't know how to answer the question. The Council can either reject or adopt the proposed zoning as a temporary referendum and get a new density number and try again. He stressed it was not the Commission's intention to put these items off forever and ever. Mrs. Maher suggested the applicant look closely at wet areas as there are more severe standards now. Mr. Milot said they have done this. He asked if preliminary approval can be phased. Mr. Burgess said that would be no problem but noted the clock starts when the applicant begins. If the Commission got edgy that it wouldn't be completed in time, theycould turn it down. Mr. Milot asked if a sketch plan could be warned and have neighbors notified. Mr. Burgess said a sketch plan would still not have force of law. 2. Site Plan application of the City of South Burlington for con- struction of Phase I of Dorset Street Park: Mr. O'Neill said the park concept was thought of by a committee of city, school and community members. He noted there had been concerns by residents of Village of Dorset Park which have -now been addressed. Bob White presented the plan. The first phase of the plan will be mainly for site work. The city is planning to do the fol- lowing: two soccer fields, 2 Little League fields, a Babe Ruth baseball field, a softball field, a multi -purpose field, tennis and basketball courts, parking, roadway, site utilities, entrance sign, lighting for parking areas. There will be no buildings or stadiums at this time, and tennis court lighting will be done at a later time. Mr. Burgess asked about the length of the approval. Mr. Weith said the regulations allow the approval to be open-ended, or the Commission could choose an approval time period. Mr. Austin noted that "by default" the Commission would be approving the location of buildings. Mr. Burgess said the Commission would still consider traffic, access, circulation, etc. for the build- ing locations. Mr. Sheahan asked about the building time frame. Mr. White said that optimistically the Little League, baseball and soccer fields would be seeded by the end of fall. The rest of the site work would be done by early in the next construction season. He an- ticipated that active use of the park could begin at the end of this summer. Regarding access, the city would re -align Swift Street and create an access drive. From the parking area there is a connection to PLANNING COMMISSION 16 June 1992 page 4 that is actually wetland. Mr. Steele said they swapped this for a piece that is dry and doesn't seem to have any reason not to be developed. Mr. Weith noted the Regional Planning Commission did a study last year which identified that piece as wetland. He said if Mr. Milot can show it isn't, the Commission will look at the swap. Regarding the additional density, Mr. Burgess noted it is not the applicant's by right but has to meet certain criteria. Mr. Craig felt there had to be something exceptional in the plan to get the bonus. Mr. Milot noted he is leaving 45 acres open across the road. He said they will go through the exercise of trying to convince the Commission that they are a PRD and will also try to cut back to the allowable amount. Mr. Weith said it would help if the applicant shows how all the criteria are met. Mr. Milot asked if it would help if all units were affordable. Members liked that idea. Mr. Steele said they have indicated the pedestrian trail accord- ing to the map they received. He traced the route on the plan. Mr. Milot said he would grant the easements with the option to relocate as long as the path isn't put in a buildable area. Mr. Milot asked if this would cover the recreation fee. Mrs. Maher asked why the barn is being kept. Mr. Milot said he hoped it could be used. They are talking to three sources. He noted it is a state-of-the-art barn, the finest in the north- east. The University wants it but they are "cash poor." Mr. Milot said it would be a shame to tear it down as it could be an asset. He said they are proposing to gift it to the University for research facilities. This would involve a total of 90 acres, and Mr. Milot felt this would also benefit the neighborhood. A house might be built next to it for a tenant farmer. Mr. Steele said they would provide municipal water and sewer. The sewer would connect with Village at Dorset Park. Mr. Weith said they should put in appropriately sized facilities. Mr. Sheahan asked what burden this puts on current residents. Mr. Milot said the sewer would be impractical for anyone to tie into. He noted that the residents he had talked to do want municipal water. Mr. Milot said he is proposing a 3-5 year buildout. 5. Continue sketch plan application of G. Milot and John Larkin for a 93-lot planned residential development on 67 acres of land, east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive: Mr. Steele said they would extend Deerfield Drive to the east PLANNING COMMISSION 16 June 1992 page 5 property line of the project. It would have an 80 ft. right of way with 32 ft. paved. They would prefer to go with two access points on Deerfield Drive but could also access Spear St. or connect with the Farrell parcel. Mr. Craig noted they still have a second access problem. Mr. Milot said they talked about a Spear St. access but staff felt they didn't want another curb cut on Spear St. It would also infringe on a neighbor's home as lights from cars would shine directly into the windows. Mr. Milot said they wanted to put an access as far from single family homes as possible. He said there is also a wetland consideration. Mr. Weith said there is a situation here where there could be roads where the city doesn't want them. Mr. Craig said the Commission is being asked to evaluate an applica- tion based on existing law and you can't do "regulations on the fly." Mr. Milot said they can do the road, dedicate it to the city and the city can take it up whenever they feel they no longer need it. Mr. Steele said they are proposing 97 units (without three lots that may not be allowable it would be 94). This relies heavily on the 25% bonus. Mr. Weith noted this may involve the transferring of units from other properties. Mr. Milot said he is not interested in transferring any density onto this lot. Mr. Weith said he has a concern with open space along Spear Street and said they were trying to discourage forming lots on these streets. There is also an attempt to maintain an open feeling in the Quadrant. He said the city is trying to encourage develop- ments like Village at Dorset Park and trying to discourage such developments as Butler Farms and Oak Creek Village which have 300 ft. setbacks. Mr. Craig asked if the 3 units were allowed, would the applicant be willing to designate building envelopes. Mr. Milot said he would. Mr Steele noted some of the houses would be restricted in height because of the view protection requirements of the new ordinance. Mr. Burgess said the city has just passed a Zoning Ordinance. Now the Commission is talking about changing what was done. He said the Ordinance was constructed deliberately to create the impression of openness. Mr. Burgess said he can't find any reason to say those units can be built there. Ms. Peacock agreed. Mrs. Maher said she had no objection if they were as far back as possible. Mr. Sheahan said he was not thrilled about waiving anything. Mr. Austin said he wasn't sure this is the right place to waive anything. He said there don't have to be buildings everywhere. Mr. Milot said he would stake out the lots for the Commission to see. He felt they would be impressed at how far back they are. PLANNING COMMISSION 16 June 1992 page 6 Mr. Steele then showed the Recreation Path route. Mr. Milot said they would build the path instead of a sidewalk in some places. Commission members liked that idea. The question was raised as to whether the Commission wants a traffic impact analysis. Mr Austin noted the traffic situation is already a problem. Mr. Weith said a study could show what could be done to help the situation. Mr. Sheahan said he would like some level of service information. Mr. Burgess said he would like to know what improvements could be done. Mr. Milot said they would do an intersection analysis. Mrs. Maher asked the applicant to describe the wetland. Mr. Milot said it is partially treed and doesn't dry up. They would leave it in its natural state. It is not deep enough to be a hazard. A resident asked about timing. Mr. Milot said it would take them quite a long time to do preliminary plat drawings, then final plat, then Act 250. At this point, members agreed to postpone item #8 -on the Agenda as the hour was getting late. 6. Discussion of proposed amendments to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations - Industrial -Agricultural District: Mr. Weith said he did an industrial lot survey as recommended by the City Council. He showed slides of industrial sites in Milton, Williston and Colchester. Mr. Sheahan observed that none of the projects just seen came close to maxing out on a site. Mr. Weith warned that this was just a handful of samples, but he did feel they were typical. Mr. Sheahan said he felt there should be a standard coverage regardless of lot size. Mr. Weith noted there seems to be a lot of demand for 3-10 acre parcels. Members then reviewed Draft #4 of the proposed Regulations. Permitted and conditional uses would include agriculture, recreation, municipal facilities, single family homes on pre- existing lots of three acres or less. Industrial and office uses would be allowed in PUD's only. The lot size for newly created lots would require a 3-acre minimum with a 12-acre average. Maximum building coverage would be 300. There would be no changes for pre-existing lots of 3 acres or less except that single family homes would be allowed. After a discussion, members agreed to a 3 acre minimum with a 10-acre average. Mr. Sheahan felt that land use planning should leave some larger lots. After further disucssion, members agreed on a 3 acre minimum, 8 acre average with 30 percent building PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 page 5 2. Theslan shall be revised to showthelocation of the access between this,212perty and 348 Dorset St. The access shall be located so as not to conflict with the a roved arkin s aces on the 348 Dorset St. property_. The revised plan shall be sub- mitted to the City -Planner for approval within 90 days. 3. The applicant shall return to the Planninq Commission in two years- fo_r_Wa review ofhowthe access _connection between the two properties has functioned over the two yearPeriod. +WWAt that time,_ the Planning Commission shall decid_e_whe_ther_ or not the access shall remain open and whether or not.a-portion of the paved area shall be removed and replaced with lawn landsca in to improve the appearance_of the north side of the property. 4. Any chan_gesWto thesitewhich differ_ from this_ approved site plan shall not be made without first�obtaining_approval from the_ Plannin Commission . Ms. Peacock seconded the motion which then -passed unanimously. 6. Preliminary application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive: Mr. Austin raised the question of whether he should sit on the Commission for this hearing as he is with a legal firm that has done work for Fred Hackett who opposes the project. Mr. Milot stated he had no objection to Mr. Austin sitting on the Commission for this hearing as he did not feel it represented a conflict. Mr. Steele noted that two entrances have been provided. There will be 27 acres of open space. All lots will be single family. There is a Class 2 wetlands which dictates the layout of the pro- ject. This wetlands requires a 50 foot buffer around it. Mr. Steele then addressed staff comments. Mr. Weith had questioned the impact of the northerly access on house cross the road as there would be headlights shining in their windows. mr. Milot agreed to move the road over one lot. The question of homes indicated in non -buildable areas was then addressed. Mr. Steele -paid all or a portion of 45 lots are in restricted areas. They feel part of the unbuildable area was thought to be a wetland and it is now known that it isn't. Mr. Weith noted there is also a restricted area on Spear St. This can be met by setting the building envelopes back. Mr Milot said this will be done on final plat. None of the lots will access Spear St. He said he was willing to give an 80 ft. r.o.w. for a road along the full boundary with the Economou property. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 page 6 View Protection: Mr. Steele showed the heights of various pro- posed homes as they would be allowed with view protection re- strictions. The proposed landscaping plan was also presented as was the location of the proposed pedestrian trail. Mr. Milot said they are willing to build that path and asked for a credit toward the recreation fee for the part of the path that is not a replace- ment of sidewalk. Mr. Bresee of the Rec Path Committee said they have reviewed the plans. Gravel needs to be 10 feet wide with 8 feet paved. Traffic: Mr. Llewellyn noted a letter on traffic given to Com- mission members tonight. He felt it explained what the Commission wanted to know. Mr. Weith said he hadn't yet gotten comments from Regional Planning. Mr. Llewellyn said they would change the timing for the light at Swift/Spear Sts. Mr. Weith said he has asked that the current timing be checked. Mr. Llewellyn said the overall level of service is not provided for unsignalized intersections. They will present turning movement analysis, if required. They will design turning lanes if the report is accepted. Mr. Austin asked if these would be the only road improvements. Mr. Llewellyn said they would. Sewer: Mr. Milot said he tried to come up with a plan to give the City a time window. Their concern is that to do that infra- structure, they would have to finance it. Without the sewer cap- acity so lots can be built, they can't get financing. He sug- gested a plan that would allow four years holding of the sewer capacity until roads are built. Once the road is built, they would be subject to losing the sewer capacity if the homes weren't built. Mr. Weith said he was comfortable with the con- cept. The entire development would require 45,800 gpd. This would be at the Bartlett Bay facility. According to present calcula- tions, there is now an available capacity of 63,000 gpd. The State says this figure should be only 54,000 gpd. There is another development being reviewed which would use it all up and leave no capacity for smaller developments or even some additons to homes already existing. Mr. Weith suggested Mr. Milot consider some 3 bedroom units to get the required capacity down. Mr. Milot felt thAt was restrictive. He felt there could be some 3 bedroom homes and, if there were, he would return some capacity to the city. Mr. Weith noted another issue. He received a letter from the City Manager today. The City Council is concerned about force main sewer systems in the Southeast Quadrant. The City En- PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 page 7 gineer will make a presentation on this to the Council on 1 March. Mr. Weith felt the Commission should wait till the outcome of that study before making a final decision on sewer. Mr. Milot said he did not want to have to wait 2 years. Regarding phasing, Mr. Milot felt they would built 36 units in year one and 37 in year two. Re: School impact fee, Mr. Steele said the School Board has suggested $750 per unit but is still discussing it. Mr. Milot said he wouldn't oppose it. He hoped the schools would put the money to good use. Housing types: Mr. Milot said the houses would range in cost from $175,000 to $400,000. This is not "affordable" by state defin- ition. He said affordable housing is hard to do with such a low density. Mr. Weith said he felt lot 35 was a better place for the access to the Farrell property. Mr. Milot felt that didn't do them any good and would encourage development of the Farrell property which would make their streets collector streets. Mr. Weith felt both options should be left open. Mr. Milot said they would then lose another lot and add traffic to the neighborhood. He felt developments need to access collector roads instead of neighbor- hood streets. Members of the Commission preferred the easterly access as shown. Mrs. Maher noted receipt of information tonight from residents opposing the project. She noted the Commission has not had time to review this information. Mr. Gilbert said his position is that this hearing is a sketch plan and not a preliminary plat. He felt it was a new plan, totally different from what was presented at previous sketch plans. He said the Commission is being asked to assume that the applicant is entitled to maximum density. He then showed the developable area and noted the Commission MAP allow development in other areas. He felt that the base density should be 1.1 times the developable area. The Commission could then grant a 25% bonus, if it chose to. He said if undevelopable area is allowed to be used to compute base density, all someone would have to do is buy an adjacent wetland and come up with quarter acre zoning on a 5-alcre piece they happen to own. He also questioned whether a wetlands study was ever done or was put together by someone at a desk. Regarding traffic, Mr. Gilbert when schools and the University may be a philosophical question said he felt the study was done were not in session. He said it as to where cars come from and 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 page 8 why, but the cars are not philosophical. Mr. Milot replied that the intent of the "unbuildable" area concept was to protect the wetland. That wetland has been flagged by an expert. The State willwill at aquifer recharge. The density used to be 2/acre. Recalculation was to take the total area and multiply it by 1.1. The added stipulation was that at no place on the property could you exceed 4 units per acre. In p.r.d. requirements, the Planning Commission gave it- self the right to review buildable/unbuildable areas and to make changes. Mr. Milot added they are not requesting the 25% bonus. Arthur Boyd said his concern is that residents have an established neighborhood of 2 acre lots and now right behind them would be these 1/2 acre lots. He felt those lots should be the same as the currently existing lots and then getting progress- ively smaller. He felt their property values would be adversely affected by this plan. He asked that the plan be denied and that residents be given several months to study it and evaluate it. He also noted it would block their easterly view of mountains. Mr. Hackett, also a neighbor, felt the Commission should take into account the impact on the neighborhood and town. He was also concerned about the transition from 2 per acre to 1/2 acre zoning and with traffic impacts. He felt the 1.1 per acre zoning was being manipulated. Mr. Milot replied they are entitled to reasonable expectation for the use of their land. He stressed that the zoning changes made were not intending to take land away from owners. Members agreed to continue the hearing and to request traffic information from Regional Planning. Mr. Austin moved to continue the application until 9 March 1993. M=Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 pm. Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION 10 AUGUST 1993. PAGE 5 Three sets of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner. a) the engineering plan shall show the existing decks on the rear of the building. b) the plan shall show a five foot green strip between the main access drive and proposed sidewalk. c) the existing light pole in the green area shall be moved to the edge of the access drive. 4. All exterior lighting shall be downcasting and shielded and shall not cast light beyond the property line Any change in existing lighting or new lighting shall be approved by the Citv Planner prior to installation. 5. The revised final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new addition 7. Any changes to the plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission 8. The grass paver block area of the emergency access shall be given one year to get established The Planning Commission shall review the health and status of this green area in July, 1994 If the Commission determines that the grass/paver block design is not working as expected, the applicant shall submit an alternate plan for the access to the Planning Commission for approval Mr. Sheahan seconded the motion which then passed 5-1 with Mrs Maher opposing. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive: Mr. Steele said that since last time they have reduced the number of lots in the sensitive area from 6 to 4 and have extended the length of the cul de sac to add those 2 lots. The total is still 73 lots. Mr. Austin said he will vote against the plan as he felt certain features have to be met and aren't. He felt it doesn't match the l PLANNING COMMISSION 10 AUGUST 1993 page 6 features of the area and that 73 lots are too many. Mrs. Ratkus was concerned with moving the detention system. Mr. Milot said there can be a stipulation for an easement so the city can maintain it if the homeowners association doesn't. The Commission would have the right to enforce it at any time. Mr. Scollins felt there was too much density. He also questioned the rec path which is to be between two housing clusters and noted that people who use the path use the east portion of that area. Mr. Milot said he worked with the Rec Path Committee and they want as open an area as possible. Mr. Milot said they have agreed to do the Rec Path along with the completion of Pinnacle Drive. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive as depicted on a plat entitled, "Nowland Two, Subdivision Plat," dated 7/92 and last revised 7/28/93, and a 28 page set of plans, page one entitled "Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont," dated October, 1992 (stamped "received" 7/30/93) prepared by Fitz- patrick Llewellyn, Inc, with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subiect property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. In accordance with section 26.602 of the South Burlinaton Zonin Regulations, the Planning Commission approves the creation of lots for development upon land designated as "restricted area" on the Southeast Quadrant Official Zoning Map. It is the Commission's opinion that based on the information submitted by the applicant the proposed development will not adversely affect wetlands on the property. Also, it is the Commission's opinion that the goals for maintaining an open space corridor along the north -south arterial roadways in the Southeast Quadrant will be promoted through the establishment of building envelopes on lots 5 through 8. The al- lowance of buildings in this manner is compatible with adjacent development along Spear Street. Finally, the Planning Commission supports moving the r.o.w. for a future north -south collector road to the east as proposed so as not to impact the wetland area. 3. The Commission approves the 1100 foot long cul-de-sac street serving lots 52-73. It is the Commission's opinion that the 1100 foot length will not result in unsafe or inefficient traffic con- ditions particularly since r.o.w's are being reserved for roadway connections to future developments on adjoining parcels. 4. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed develop- PLANNING COMMISSION 10 AUGUST 1993 page 7 ment will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe con- ditions with respect to use of the highways the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) the applicant shall construct the southbound left turn lanes at each proiect access on Spear Street (sheets 5 and 7) pri_or__to issuance of a zoning/buiiding permit for the 38th lot b) The applicant shall construct the improvements to the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection as shown on the plan entitled "Spear Street/Swift Street Intersection Improvements" dated 5/93 prior to the issuance of a zoning/building permit for the construction of any residential structures c) Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits for this devel- opment the applicant shall post a bond to cover the costs of con- structing the improvements referenced in a) and b) above This bond or bonds shall remain in effect until such time as the improvements are constructed. d) Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits for this de- velopment, the applicant shall be responsible for retiming the signal phasing at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection as recommended in the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant 5. The Planning Commission grants a credit of $300 per lot for construction of the portion of the proposed recreation path located outside of the public street right-of-way. This credit may be applied toward required recreation fees At time of application for a zoning/building permit the applicant shall pay the differ- ence between the recreation impact fee and the $300 per lot credit 6. The developer shall be required to install two trees on each lot as required in Section 19.104(a) of the South Burlington Zoninq Regulations. A "Notice of Condition" addressing this requirement shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final plat plans. 7. Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits the applicant shall post a $103 366 landscape bond for proposed street and common area trees, and a $65 335 bond for proposed lot trees The bonds shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. Legal documents for all public streets (i.e, irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., utility easements and recreation path easements) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits PLANNING COMMISSION 10 AUGUST 1993 page 8 9. A "Notice of Condition" addressing the height limitations for structures and landscaping on each lot shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final Plat plans. 10. In accordance with section 301.5 of the subdivision regula- streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.), the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. A "Notice of Condition" addressing the building envelopes on lots #5-8 and purpose and restrictions thereof shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final plat plans. 12. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the plans shall be revised to show the following: a) the survey plat shall show survey data for the recreation path easement and the utility easement between lots 41-42 and 57-58. b) lot numbers shall be correctly shown on sheet 2. c) the plans shall show a 20 foot drainage easement for the pro- posed drainage pipe on the Ratkus property west of Spear Street. This easement shall be included in the required legal documents. 13. A bond for streets, sidewalks, recreation paths, sewer and water shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 14. No zoning/building permit will be issued for a lot until the street serving that lot has a gravel sub -base installed in conformance with City specifications. 15. The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer alloca- tion approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway con- struction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within four years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed within this four year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. In addition, if at the end of three years no more than 50% of the roads have been completed, 25% of the total sewer allocation shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 OCTOBER 1994 Page 7 Subdivision Approval" which describes the management of the private roads in the development. The specifics of the agreement shall be finalized prior to final plat approval. This document shall be approved by the City Attorney and the Planning Commission and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to the recording of the final plat plans. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion which passed 4-1 with Mr. Teeson opposing. Mr. Sheahan rejoined the Commission. 9. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive. The amendment consists of revising the landscape plan to include cedar trees and a four foot high wooden rail fence along the 50 foot wetland buffer line behind lots #33-45. Mr. Weith said they need to be sure the landscaping doesn't exceed height limits because of the view protection zone. These changes have been mandated by the District Environmental Commission. Mr. Larkin assured that the fence and landscaping would meet all requirements. Mr. Weith was comfortable with the species of trees. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership to amend an approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive. The amendment consists of revising the landscape plan to include cedar trees and a four foot high wooden rail fence along the 50 foot wetland buffer line behind lots #33- 45, as depicted on a plan entitled "Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont, Landscape & Lighting Plan" prepared by FitzPatrick- Llewellyn, Inc., dated November, 1992, with a last revision date of 3/22/94, subject to the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. PLANNING COMMISSION 25 OCTOBER 1994 Page 8 Mr. Sheahan seconded the motion which was then passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION 10 AUGUST 1993 page 9 16. No zoning/building permit will be issued for construction of any dwelling unit within this development until after the City adopts an education impact fee ordinance or September 1 1993 whichever first occurs. This condition is being imposed to provide the school district a reasonable period of time to complete devel- opment of an impact fee ordinance and present the Ordinance to the South Burlington City Council for adoption No zoning/building permits shall be issued after the adoption of such an impact fee_ until that impact fee has been paid. 17. A "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records prior to recording the final plat plans which addresses the re- quirement of the homeowner's association to maintain the community mailbox area and all drainage ditches. 18. The final plat plans, including survey plat shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this ap- proval is null and void The plans shall be signed by the Planninq Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 19. As provided in Section 605 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations, if no action is taken to construct substantially the proposed subdivision within three years said approval shall become null and void. 20. The retention ponds shall be maintained by the homeowners' association. The legal documents for the Association shall state this responsibility. The legal documents shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to permit issuance. 21. The recreation path shall be constructed by the cornlpletion of Pinnacle Drive or during the construction of the cul-de-sac, whichever first occurs. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed 5-1 with Mr. Austin opposing Mrs. Maher left the meeting at this time. 6. Site plan application of Leland & Patricia Calkins for parking and coverage changes on a lot currently used for wholesale distribution, 3 Calkins Court: Ms. Calkins said they will upgrade, paint, move the doorway and landscape. There will be new overhead doors. No issues were raised by the Commission. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan ap- plication of Leland and Patricia Calkins for parking and coverage changes on a lot currently used for wholesale distribution as de- PLANNING COMMISSION 8 AUGUST 1995 PAGE 6 of plans, page two entitled "Southeast Summit South Burlington. - Vermont, Landscape Plan," prepared by Michael Lawrence & Associates dated November, 1994 last revised 7/27/95 with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. Prior to issuance of any zoning_permits the applicant shall post the following landscape bonds to cover the installation cost and value of all proposed landscaping: (a) a $52 500 bond for multi -family site landscaping (b) a bond in an amount to be determined by the City Planner for the proposed street trees and site landscaping and (c) a $96 600 bond for the proposed two trees per single-family lot. The bond(s) shall remain in effect for three years from the date of planting to assure that the Planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving_ 3. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission or Clerk prior to recording Mr. Crow seconded. The motion then passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat Application of Larkin-Milot Partnership to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Spear Street. The amendment consists of 1) modifying the front yard setback requirement along a collector street from 50 ft. to 20 ft. and 2) reducing size of drainage easement on Ratkus property: Mr. Milot explained that the easement for the sewer right-of-way is on the Ratkus property. Mr. Ratkus is concerned with trees he planted being disturbed during maintenance. Since the disturbance would only be 8 ft., the question is why there has -to be a 20 ft. easement for maintenance. Mr. Szymanski agrees that 10 ft. would be OK. Mr. Audette is on vacation and can't be con- sulted. Commission members felt 10 ft. was OK if agreed to by the City Engineer. Mr. Milot then explained that 4 lots are impacted by the 50 ft. setback. All of these are view protected lots which will have one-story homes. They are requesting a larger building envelope in which to build a house. All access to these lots will be off the interior street so these are side yard setbacks. Lots 1 and 51 are the only ones for which a waiver is now being asked. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 AUGUST 1995 PAGE 7 Mr. Burgess said he understood the problem but didn't know what reason he had for approving what is asked for. Mr. Milot said the impact would be minor and no impact on the community. A poll of members showed the following opinions: Messrs Beaudin, Sheahan, and Teeson felt it was OK. Mr. Austin said it would be OK as long as there were no driveways and there was more land- scaping provided. Messrs Crow and Burgess were opposed. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Spear Street. The amendment consists of: 1) modifying the front yard setback requirement for lots 1 and 51 along a collector street from 50 feet to 20 feet and 2) reducing size of drainage easement on Ratkus property, as depicted on a plan entitled "Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont, Site and Utilities Plan," sheet 5 of 27, prepared by Fitzpatrick- Llewellyn. Inc., dated July, 1992, last revised 7 28195, with the followings stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 6.607 of the zoning regulations, modifies the front yard setback requirement along Nowland Farm Drive from 50 feet to 20 feet for lots 1 and 51 only. 3. The final plat plans shall be revised as follows prior to re- cording and shall require approval by the City Planner: a. The landscape plan shall be revised to add a low berm with dense landscaping along Nowland Farm Drive to buffer the homes on lots 1 and 51 from the street. Proposed landscaping shall consist of species which at maturity will comply with View Protection Zone height limitations. b. The site and utilities plan (sheet 5 of 27) shall be revised to show the easement dimensions. 4 The legal documents for the drainage easement shall be ap- proved by the City Attorney and recorded in the land records 5. Based on the expressed representation of the applicant, there shall be no driveway access provided from Nowland Farm Drive. All lots shall be accessed from the local roads only. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 AUGUST 1995 PAGE 8 6. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Sheahan seconded Motion passed 4-2 with Messrs Crow and Burgess opposing. 9. Site plan application of William and Lee Bissonette to construct an 826 sq. ft. addition and add 38 indoor seats to an existing 3174 sq. ft. standard restaurant with 94 seats and 28 outdoor seats, 1251 Williston Road: Mr. Bissonette said they are trying to add seating for customers. He noted the main concern was traffic and they are trying to make improvements. They will redesign the entrance to eliminate left turns into the property. They will add $6200 in landscaping and also increase the perennial garden. Mr. Vock said the driveway will go from 32 ft. to 15 ft. It would be a sharper turn than the one at Ramada. Mr. Weith felt this was a better plan than he'd seen before. Mr. Austin asked if it warrants this increase in traffic. Mr. Weith said the traffic numbers he gave the Commission are from ITE. The applicant doesn't feel there will be that much of an increase. Mr. Bissonette said that now people who come and don't find seats leave. With the changes, 90% of the seats will be in view. He felt that due to the conditions of the market, he has to provide additional seating. He didn't feel there would be more trip ends because he felt they can't produce food fast enough. Mr. Teeson noted that the business is dictated by parking and he didn't think the addition would add new business. Mr. Weith said they other side of the argument is that people who can find a seat with the addition will come back and will add business. He noted it is a high turnover restaurant and that the parking lot is never full now. Mr. Bissonette said their peak hour for business is 11:30-2 pm. Mr. Burgess felt there would be more traffic but it would be offset by the access not allowing left turns in. Other members agreed there would be a net benefit. They agreed on 20 additional peak hour trip ends. Memorandum -- Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 3 Bikepath: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the last sketch plan (see enclosed memo). The applicant is proposing a six (6) foot Wide bike path located within the 30 foot paved roadway along the'southerly side of the road. A painted line will be used to separate the bike path from the traveled way. Preliminary plat review: The following information should be submitted for preliminary plat review: --- proposed and existing landscaping details --- coverage information --- property survey of entire site --- show property lines for Ben Franklin lot. --- cost of new bank building --- existing and proposed exterior lighting details --- the loading dock change for Ben Franklin should be requested by them and treated as an amendment to their plat, or should be included as part of this application. If the latter, then Ben Franklin needs to be a coapplicant. 4) SOUTHEAST SUMMIT/NOWLAND II 369 UNIT PRD - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 369 dwelling units on two (2) parcels of land. The Southeast Summit parcel will consist of 237 units (80 multi -family units and 157 single family lots) and the Nowland II parcel will consist of 132 units (92 single family lots and 40 multi -family elderly units). The Planning Commission reviewed a sketch plan for both these parcels on 6/16/92 (minutes enclosed). At that meeting these two (2) parcels were treated as separate projects. These projects have now been combined into one (1) project due to the transfer of 40 units from the Southeast Summit parcel to the Nowland II parcel under Section 26.604 of the zoning regulations. 3 Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 4 SOUTHEAST SUMMIT This portion of the development is located at the south end of Dorset Street, 157 acres on the westerly side and 45 acres on the easterly side. This project abuts the Shelburne Town line and is located in the SEQ District. The entire development is proposed for the westerly side. Access: Access to the development will be via an 80 foot r.o.w. which will bisect the project and eventually continue westerly to connect with Allen Road. Off from the main east -west access road will be two (2) main loops, one to the north and one to the south, each with a smaller loop within the larger one. These loops will provide access to all the lots and multi -family units. This project should be conditioned on the requirement that access to all the lots be from the secondary access roads and not from the main access road. Since it is proposed that there be only one (1) access from Dorset Street until Allen Road Extension is continued to connect to Spear Street, staff recommends using the existing barn access road to provide emergency access in the event the main access is blocked. The applicant at the 6/16/92 meeting indicated that the existing farm access road would be used for emergency access and to serve as the required second access for a development of 50 units or more but this second access is not shown on the plan. The plan also shows a 60 foot wide strip of land between lots 41 and 74 to provide a future connection with the Lang property to the north. �+ Density: The PRD provision in the proposed SEQ zoning may allow this property to generate 222 units (base -density) plus 25$ or 278 units maximum. The maximum number of units allowed is based on the developable area as shown on the SEQ zoning map multiplied by 4. The developable area in this project at the last sketch plan was 64.1 acres which results in a maximum of 256 units. The applicant is proposing 237 units. Of the 41 remaining generated units,(40 \ are being transferred to the Nowland parcel. `__. The plan should show the development and restricted areas as shown on the SEQ zoning map. The applicant, should provide a detailed breakdown on the actual developable `drea for this parcel as was done in the 11/18/92 memo (see enclosed) for the Nowland II parcel. 4 Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 5 Nonbuildable area: A portion of the development is proposed outside of the designated developable areas as shown on the SEQ zoning map. A detailed site analysis will have to be submitted which should include evaluations on wetlands, views, soils, etc. before a determination can be made as to the appropriateness of building outside of the designated areas. Applicant should review Section 26.606 of the SEQ zoning. Wetlands: The site to be developed contains some wetlands and streams. These are shown differently on the sketch plan than they are shown on the SEQ zoning map. Applicant should provide detailed information on the location of wetlands on the site. Due to the differences between the sketch plan and the proposed SEQ zoning map, the applicant is proposing development within a restricted area. The applicant should be prepared to address this issue as a part of the discussion on developing in the nonbuildable area. A detailed wetland delineation study should be submitted. Recreation Path/Pedestrian Trail: The plans incorporate some paths/trails but not exactly as recommended by the Recreation Path Committee. Staff will be meeting with this committee on 12/7/92 to review the proposed plans. Sewer: Municipal sewer system will serve this development via a 4 t inch force main to Kennedy Drive. The sewer allocation being requested is 106,650 gpd plus 6,288 gpd for infiltration for a total of 112,938 gpd. The Planning Commission should consider putting a time limit on the allocation in order to prevent hoarding of sewer capacity by one development. i Water: Municipal water system will serve this development via a 12 inch main and will connect with the existing CWD main adjacent to the storage tank on Dorset Street. Applicant should submit a full set of plans to CWD for their review and comment. Other: --- sheet 1 and 2 should show the 45.48 acre parcel located on the easterly side of Dorset Street which is part -of this project. --- note #3 on sheet 2 should explain that the total acreage is for both lots. --- lot numbers on sheets 2 and 7 do not correspond, i.e. # 158 and 64 on sheet 7 and #42 and 43 on sheet 2. --- portions of lots 65, 64, 63, 62 and all of lot #37 are not shown at 1"=40' scale. --- Dick Ward's property line not properly shown. 5 Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 6 --- matchlines should indicate on which page the match is located. --- applicant should submit`a report indicating how the proposed PRD meets all the PUD criteria (19. 151(a) - (n) ) and all the SEQ criteria (26.606(a)-(c)). --- plans do not appear to take into account the protection of the archaeologically sensitive area as determined by the State. Section 19.151h of the zoning regulations requires the applicant to show that this development will not have an undue adverse effect on and will protect rare and irreplaceable historic sites. Applicant should address this issue. --- indicate proposed use of existing barn. --- all watercourses should be shown on the 1"=40' scale plans with the corresponding C.O. zones. --- type of line used to designate existing wetlands should be consistent throughout the plans, i.e. the legend for "existing wetlands" on sheet 3 is not the same as is shown on sheet 9 and the line for existing wetlands in the legend on sheet 9 is not the same as is used in the drawing on sheet 9. --- plan should show buffer plantings along street "C" similar to the plantings along street "A". --- landscaping schedule should be broken down into three (3) parts: 1) all multi -family plantings, 2) all street trees and 3) all other landscaping. --- applicant should provide approximate dimensions and acreage for each lot. --- plans should show all wooded areas on the property. Preliminary Plat: In addition to the information requested above, the following should be provided for preliminary plat: --- all proposed streets should be named. --- a complete survey of the subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor must be submitted. --- list waivers the applicant desires from the zoning and subdivision regulations i.e., reduction in lot frontage and area requirements. --- parking spaces for the multi -family buildings should be shown. --- applicant should provide approximate dimensions and acreage for each lot. --- exterior lighting details for the multi -family buildings should be provided. --- dumpsters for the multi -family buildings should be shown and screened. --- provide size of Ginkgo trees. N Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 7 _ NOWLAND PROPERTY II This portion of the development is located on the easterly side of Spear Street in the vicinity of Deerfield Drive. It is bounded on the west by Spear Street and several single family residences, on the north, south and east by undeveloped property. It is located within the SEQ District. Access: The development is proposed to be served by one (1) access road from Spear Street. This access will be an extension of Deerfield Drive and is part of the east -west arterial shown on the Interim Official Map. The applicant is reserving a 60 foot r.o.w. connecting "Street All with Spear Street for a second access. The applicant should address the impact of this road on the adjacent single family homes and redesign the retention basin so that no portion of this structure lies within the street r.o.w. One of the conditions of the 9/17/91 approval which created this lot stated that "a development of 50 units or more shall have two separate accesses". This application is similar to the Village at Dorset Park and L&M Park developments where there are actually two (2) access points to the development off a collector road which is planned to continue as development on adjoining parcels occur. Therefore, until such time as the collector is continued, there will technically be only one access to the entire development. The applicant has reserved a 60 foot strip�of land between lots #78 and 92 for a possible future connection with the Farrell property to the north. A similar strip should be reserved between lots #13 and 14. A strip has also been reserved between lots #72 and 73 to provide access to the multi -family development and to the Economou property to the east. This roadway could eventually connect to the north -south connector. Density: The PRD provision in the SEQ zoning may allow this property to generate 73 units (base density) plus 25% or 92 units maximum for development. The maximum number of units allowed is based on the developable area as shown on the SEQ zoning map multiplied by 4. The developable area in this project is 39.5 acres which results in a maximum of 158 units allowed on this property. The applicant is proposing 132 units. 40 units from the Southeast Summit parcel are being transferred to tfiis parcel since the lot size limits this development to a generation of only 92 units. The applicant has these 40 extra units which are not being used and is using them here for elderly housing. The 132 unit total is below the density maximum of 158 units (see enclosed memo from applicant). 7 k Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 8 Nonbuildable area: Lots #8, 9, 10 and 11 and portions of lots 12,13,17,18,19 and 20 are within the restricted area under the SEQ zoning. The applicant has proposed building envelopes for lots #8- 11 which are 150 feet from Spear Street. These building envelopes should be shown on the plans. Applicant has informed staff that the westerly boundary of the building envelopes for lots #9-11 have been staked out should the Planning Commission members wish to view them before the meeting. Applicant should review Section 26.606 of the proposed SEQ zoning and submit prior to preliminary plat review information to substantiate conformance with the criteria contained in this section as well as the criteria contained in Section 19.151. A written report should be submitted. The plans should be revised to show the development and restricted areas as shown on the SEQ zoning map. There are also a number of lots located within a restricted wetland area as shown on the SEQ zoning map. The plan submitted shows the delineated boundaries of the wetland area (discussed below) which is smaller than that shown on the zoning map. All lots have been located outside of the wetland except ';for small portions of lots #79 and 92. Wetlands: This site contains approximately five (5) acres of class 2 wetlands which is shown on the sketch plan along with a 50 foot buffer area. The location of the wetland -on the sketch plan and its location on the proposed SEQ zoning map are different. This results in the sketch plan showing units in the wetland area as shown on the proposed SEQ zoning map. Applicant should provide information to substantiate building in this restricted area. The Natural Resources Committee has reviewed this sketch plan (see enclosed memo) and will again review these plans at their 12/8/92 meeting. View protection: This property is located within the proposed Dorset Park View Protection Zone. Applicant should provide detailed information on the allowable height of each house within the development. All site and street landscaping should be evaluated and revised to be certain plantings proposed will not exceed the height limitations. C Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page 9 Recreation Path/Pedestrian Trail: The plans do incorporate some paths/trails but not exactly as recommended by the Recreation Path Committee. For example, the proposed path/trail is partially located within the wetland. Staff will be meeting with the committee on 12/7/92 to review the proposed plans. Sewer: Municipal sewer system will serve this development. Applicant proposes to connect a force main to Swift Estates. The sewer allocation requested is 53,400 gpd plus 2,455 gpd for infiltration for a total allocation of 55,855 gpd. Planning Commission should consider placing a time limit on sewer allocation. Water: Municipal water system will serve this development. Applicant proposes to construct an 8 inch main to connect with existing main at Deerfield Drive. Applicant should submit a complete set of plans to CWD for their review and comment. Other: --- note 7 on sheet 3 should be revised to indicate that this project also includes 40 multi -family units. --- all lots should be numbered including the retention basin lot, wetland lots and multi -family lot. --- it should be noted on the plans that the wetland lots and the retention basin lot are to be held in common. --- list of waivers, if any, the applicant desires from the zoning and subdivision rcguiations i.e., reduction In lot frontage and area requirements. --- all watercourses should be shown on the 1"=40' scale plans with the corresponding C.O. zones. Preliminary Plat: In addition to the information requested above, the following should be provided for preliminary plat: --- traffic study should be submitted as discussed at the 6/16/92 meeting. --- applicant should provide approximate dimensions and acreage for each lot. --- all proposed streets should be named. --- a complete survey of the subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor must be submitted. --- 90 parking spaces are required including 4 handicapped spaces for the multi -family buildings and only 81 spaces are provided with no handicapped spaces. 9 Memorandum - Planning December 8, 1992 agenda items December 4, 1992 Page_ _ 10 --- landscaping schedule should be broken down into three (3) parts: 1) all multi -family plantings, 2) all street trees and 3) all other landscaping. --- exterior lighting details for the multi -family buildings should be provided. --- dumpsters for the multi -family buildings should be shown and screened. It 10 Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items February 5, 1993 Page 5 Dumpster: A new 8'x32' dumpster enclosure is proposed along the northerly boundary. The enclosure is proposed for only three (3) sides leaving the south side exposed to the parking area. The applicant should consider enclosing the dumpster area on all sides to enhance the appearance of the property and to contain windblown debris. 6) NOWLAND II - 73 UNIT PRD - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots. This project was last reviewed by the Planning Commission on 12/8/92 (minutes enclosed) when this project was combined with the Southeast Summit project containing a total of 369 units. The two (2) projects have again been separated and this project reduced from 132 units (92 single family lots and 40 multi -family elderly units) to 73 single family lots. This property is located on the easterly side of Spear Street in the vicinity of. Deerfield Drive. It is bounded on the west by Spear Street and several single family residences, on the north, south and east by undeveloped property. It is located within the Southeast Quadrant District. Access: The development is proposed to be served by two (2) accesses, one at either end of the property along Spear Street . The southerly access will be an extension of Deerfield Drive and is part of the east -west arterial shown on the Interim Official Map. The applicant should address the impact of the northerly access on the adjacent single family homes. The traffic impact analysis (see enclosed) submitted for the project addresses the traffic impact of this intersection but does not address the impact on the adjacent homes. This access will intersect with Spear Street directly opposite the home at 1455 Spear Street which will result in headlights shining into the house. Staff recommends that the access be relocated 150 feet to the south so that the access will be opposite the trees between the boundary of 1455 and 1475 Spear Street. A cul-de-sac street is proposed on the easterly side of the property running in a north -south direction. This street would serve 20 lots and would provide future access to the Farrell 5 Memorandum February 9, February 5, Page 6 - Planning 1993 agenda items 1993 property to the north and the Economou property to the east via reserved r.o.w.'s. This cul-de-sac is 1,000 feet in length and would exceed the allowable limit of 850 feet (Section 401.1(7)) of the subdivision regulations). The Planning Commission in the past has allowed cul-de-sac streets to exceed the limit if the street is planned to continue as development on adjoining parcels occur. The applicant should reserve a r.o.w. in the vicinity of lot #35 for future connection to the Farrell property. Density: The PRD provision in the southeast Quadrant zoning may allow this property to generate 73 units (base density) plus 25% or 92 units maximum for development. The applicant is proposing the base density of 73 units. Nonbuildable area: Either all or a portion of 45 individual lots are within the restricted area under the Southeast Quadrant zoning. Included in this number are the lots along Spear Street (lots #7 - 10 ) for which the applicant is proposing building envelopes to keep the houses away from Spear Street. These building envelopes should be shown on the plan. The applicant has submitted a written report addressing the criteria in Section 19.151 and Section 26.606 (see enclosed). Wetlands: This site contains approximately five (5) acres of class 2 wetlands which are shown on the plans. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Johnson Company describing the wetland and addressing its values and functions (see enclosed). The delineated boundaries of the wetland and contour lines are difficult to see because the lines on the plans are so light. Applicant should provide better quality blueprints. Enclosed is a copy of a memo from the Natural Resources Committee to the Planning Commission. Their only concern was the location of the bikepath which crossed the wetland. The current design has the bikepath located entirely outside the wetland. View protection: This property is located within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. The applicant has submitted detailed information on the allowable height of each house within the development (see enclosed). The street trees and other trees proposed on the site will exceed the height limitations at maturity. Applicant must revise 2 Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items February 5, 1993 Page 7 landscaping plan to propose only those trees which will not exceed the height limitations at maturity. Recreation Path/Pedestrian Trail: The path/trail has been relocated outside of the wetland area as recommended by the Natural Resources Committee. A 20 foot easement should be provided for that portion of the path/trail which is not located within a future street r.o.w. The path/trail which is located within the Deerfield Drive r.o.w. narrows down to five (5) feet when it connects with the north -south segment. The path/trail should continue its original eight (8) foot width all the way to the easterly end of Deerfield Drive. Traffic: A traffic impact analysis is enclosed. The study projects that at full build -out the project will generate 81 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The following scenarios were evaluated: o North and south project accesses with Spear Street: -- 1993 AM and PM DHV with Phase I build (i.e., 37 units) -- 1998 AM and PM DHV with full -build (i.e., 73 units) o For Spear Street/Swift Street Intersection: -- Existing 1993 and 1998 AM and PM DHV (no -build) -- 1993 AM and PM DHV with Phase I -- 1998 AM and PM DHV with full -build The results of the analysis indicate the following: 1) both project access intersections and the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service during both the 1993 and 1998 build scenarios, 2) traffic safety (e.g., sight distances) will not be a problem, and 3) upon the completion of Phase I, southbound left turn lanes on Spear Street for traffic entering both project accesses will be needed. Staff offers the following comments and observations: o The analysis indicates that the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection currently and in the future will operate at an LOS of "B" (except during the 1998 PM DHV when it will 7 Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items February 5, 1993 Page 8 G operate at LOS "C". The northbound approach is estimated to operate currently at LOS "B" and in the future at LOS "B" or "C". I find this surprising. I constantly hear horror stories of northbound traffic backed up to Stonehedge Drive during the AM peak. The turning movements used in the analyses are slightly lower than actual counts done in June of last year. However, the 1998 no -build analysis assumed turning count numbers that are almost identical to the June, 1992 turning counts and still an LOS "B" is calculated by the model. o Tables 2 and 3 should provide an estimate of "overall intersection" LOS. o It would be helpful if the report included exhibits showing all turning movements for the analysis scenarios, not just project generated traffic turning movements. o The final plat should include a plan showing the improvements for southbound left turn lanes for each project access which will be needed prior to the construction of Phase II. Cost estimates should also be provided. An approval of this project should include a condition requiring the applicant to construct the improvements prior to permits for phase II and should include the posting of a bond to cover the costs of such improvements. Sewer: The sewer allocation required for this project is 43,800 gpd. The applicant should submit an estimate for infiltration which would be expected. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee in effect at the time of permit for each house. The Planning Commission should structure a condition which precludes this development from hoarding reserved capacity for an extended period of time. Water: Municipal water system will serve this development. The applicant has received a letter from CWD indicating that the demand of 43,800 g.p.d. can be met. Phasing: The applicant indicates in the PUD General Standards narrative that Phase I will be 35 units. The traffic report indicates that Phase I will be 37 units. Which number is correct? Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items February 5, 1993 Page 9 Historic sites: The applicant has received a letter from State Division for Historic Preservation indicating that the project will not have an adverse effect on any historic or archeological. properties. Recreation: The applicant will be required to pay the per unit recreation fee at the time of permit. School impact: The applicant has reviewed the impact of this project on the school system with the School Board. Enclosed is a copy of the School Board's findings and analysis for the Southeast Summit residential project. Staff has been informed that this same type of decision will be made for this project in the very near future. Staff expects to have a draft copy of the decision at the meeting. Approval of this project should include a per unit school impact fee as addressed in the School Board's motion. Landscaping: The landscaping plan should be revised to only propose street trees and any other landscaping which will not exceed the height limitations. It is suggested that the landscaping plan be broken down into phases with separate listings for the street trees, house lot trees and other landscaping. The plans should show two (2) trees of at least 2.5 inch in caliper for each lot as required under Section 19.104a. of the zoning regulations. These trees will have to be planted before the sale of any lot or referenced in the deeds for the individual lots. Lighting: The applicant is proposing street lighting similar to what is in Butler Farms and Oak creek. The lamps would be 70 watt d 20 foot- i t�, (-„t-off iilgii pressure Si�uiuiii fiiouii�.eu vii av ioo�. pv^.ie wi,.,a .... luminaries. No part of any street light can exceed a height of 21.9 feet above the roadway centerline. It appears the top of the fixture will meet this height limitation. Street names: The proposed street names have been reviewed by the Fire and Police Chiefs. These names are acceptable and would not pose a problem for emergency response. Report Addressing Criteria of Sections 19.15 and 26.606: It is staff's opinion that the enclosed report addressing the criteria of sections 19.15 (PUD criteria) and 26.606 is adequate except as identified below: 19.15(a) Water and Air Pollution - The applicant should provide an estimate of acres of wetland to be filled (i.e., road fill, sewer line, etc.). 0 Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items February 5, 1993 Page 10 (d) Traffic - Traffic should not be a problem as long as staff comments contained in the "traffic" discussion are adequately addressed. (e) Education - It is staff 's understanding that the project will have an adverse impact on schools unless mitigation fees are paid as recommended by Larry LeCours (i.e., $750/sf unit and $375/mf unit). (g) Natural Resources - The landscape plan will need to be revised to include species that meet the scenic view protection height limitations. (h) Compatibility/Aesthetics - The Commission has indicated that the intent of the Spear Street restricted zone setback will be met if building envelopes are shown for lots 7 - 10. The envelopes should be shown on the plans and referenced in the deeds. Report should address historic sites. (i) Housing Types - The report indicates that development will include a "broad range of values that will provide for the housing needs of various social and economic groups". What does this mean? What will be the range of values? Affordable? Moderate? What social and economic groups is the applicant talking about? (k) Streets - The plan does not provide for a north -south collector/arterial as shown on the official map. Staff agrees it is better to move this road so that it does not go through a wetland, as is shown on the official map. The Commission should be aware that the plan proposes moving this roadway almost entirely onto the Economou property. (1) Road and Utility Extensions - Report indicates that r.o.w.'s are being reserved for future connections to adjoining properties. As mentioned previously in this memo, a r.o.w. connection to the Farrell Property should be provided near lot 34. Other: Applicant should identify what roads and lots are in each phase. 10 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner r Re: March 9, 1993 agenda items Date: March 5, 1993 3) NOWLAND - 73 UNIT PRD - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing on this project was continued from the 2/9/93 meeting (minutes not available). Refer to the staff memo for this meeting for our comments (see enclosed). Street trees: The applicant has submitted a plan showing tree height limits and the types of trees proposed. According to a document published by the Vermont Urban and Community Forestry Program, some of the trees proposed will exceed the height limit. For example, Hedge Maple are proposed for the 20-25 height limit area and they can reach a height of 35 feet, Hop Hornbeam are proposed for the 25-35 foot limit area and they can reach a height of 40 feet and Green Ash are proposed for the 35-45 foot height limit area and they can reach heights of over 50 feet. Traffic: Enclosed is an addendum to the traffic impact anaylsis. Since the last meeting, the applicant took new traffic counts at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. The counts were adjusted to the design hour and turned out to be slightly higher than the counts used in the original analysis. The model was rerun with the new numbers and the results are presented in Table 3 of the report. Table 3 indicates that the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS with the project fully built. The consultant also reran the analysis for existing conditions using existing signal timings. The previous report had assumed optimal signal timings for existing conditions. Table 2 presents the results of the model assuming existing signal timings. The estimated LOS for the northbound approach during the AM peak hour is "E". This better reflects existing conditions. It is the consultant's opinion that the intersection LOS can be greatly improved by simply adjusting the signal timings so that less green time is given to Swift Street during the AM peak. Memorandum - Planning March 9, 1993 Agenda items March 5, 1993 Page 2 It is staff's opinion that traffic will not be adversely: affected if the following is done: o Signal timings at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection should be adjusted as recommended in the report. o Applicant construct southbound left turn lanes for each project access prior to issuance of permits for phase II. The final plat submittal should include plans for these improvements. Sewer: The applicant is requesting a sewer allocation of 46,957 g.p.d. for the subdivision. He has proposed that in order for the allocation to remain in effect, he would have to complete all the roadways serving the development within four years of receipt of the Act 250 permit. If all the roadways are completed within this time frame, then the allocation would be reserved until permits have been issued for each and every lot. If a certain roadway is not completed within the four year period, then the allocation for those lots served by the uncompleted portion of the roadway would be lost. These lots would be issued permits only if capacity is available at the time of permit application. I am agreeable to this approach as far as reserving sewer allocation. My only concern, however, is the amount of allocation being requested. There is currently 72,000 gpd of unreserved capacity at the Bartlett Bay treatment plant. If 46,957 gpd is allocated, then only 25,043 gpd is left. The Southland project will require 26,635 gpd which if approved will use up the remaining capacity. Both of these projects are long term projects which will tie up the capacity for many years. This will prevent the City from issuing permits for smaller projects that are "ready to go". School Impact: A question was raised at the last meeting on this application as to the Commission's authority to impose a school impact fee as mitigation to potential adverse impact. Enclosed is an opinion from City Attorney, Steve Stitzel. 4) FRANK NAEF - OFFICE TO RETAIL - SITE PLAN This project consists of converting 240 square feet of office space to retail. The Planning Commission on 7/10/90 approved a 6,400 2 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: March 30, 1993 Agenda Items DATE: March 25, 1993 2) CONTINUE NOWLAND II, SPEAR STREET Enclosed are the staff memos dated 2/5/93 and 3/5/93 regarding this application. Also enclosed is a memo dated 3/5/93 in which I respond to several issues raised by Mr. Gilbert in his letter dated 2/9/93. Finally, enclosed is a letter from Attorney, William Schroeder, who is representing Fred Hackett. Provided below is a summary of issues which staff feels are still unresolved and which require decisions by the Commission: Traffic: There has been a lot of discussion regarding the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. The City revised the signal timings at this intersection last week. Prior to the revision, the signal timings were set for 27 seconds of green for Spear and 25 seconds of green for Swift. The timings were revised to 35 seconds of green for Spear and 26 seconds of green for Swift. I observed traffic at this intersection after the signal timings were revised (Tuesday, 3/23/93 and Thursday, 3/25/93) during the A.M. peak (7:30 a.m. - 8:00 a.m.). In my opinion, the intersection operated quite well. The longest queue for the northbound approach was approximately 600 feet and all vehicles were able to get through the intersection during one cycle. The City is also in the process of improving the existing controller so that different signal timings can be operated during the a.m. peak, p.m. peak and off-peak periods. I believe the consultant will be making a recommendation on optimal timings at the meeting. I also reviewed with Bill Szymanski and Sonny Audette the suggestion of improving the radius of the southeast corner of the intersection for northbound right turns. Both Sonny and Bill agree that increasing the inside radius to 25 feet would improve traffic flow. They recommend that a right turn stacking lane 50 feet in length and 150 foot taper also be constructed. This would require extending the culvert. Bill estimates about $10,000 to $15,000. SEWER: The applicant is requesting 46,957 gpd of sewer allocation. This assumes four bedrooms in each home. As stated previously, Planning Commission Memorandum March 30, 1993 Agenda Items March 25, 1993 Page 2 staff is concerned that if this project and the Pomerleau project are approved, there will be very little unreserved sewer capacity available for other projects, particularly smaller projects which are "ready to go". I recommend that the Commission approve a sewer allocation of 41,557 gpd. This assumes 37 four -bedroom homes, 36 three -bedroom homes, and 3157 gpd for infiltration. This will allow approximately 10,000 gpd of capacity to remain available (assuming Pomerleau is approved). SCHOOL IMPACT: Enclosed is the letter from Steve Stitzel regarding the school impact issue (section 19.151(e) of the zoning regulations and section 417(e) of the subdivision regulations). Basically, the school board has determined that this development would have an adverse impact on school services and facilities since the K-5 schools are at capacity. They feel that based on current studies and plans to increase school capacity in the next 2-3 years, this impact could be mitigated through the payment of a per unit mitigation fee. An approval of this application could include a condition that no permits be issued until the City adopts a school impact fee or sometime this fall, whichever comes first. LOT SIZE/DENSITY: The neighbors have testified that the proposed density and lot sizes are incompatible with existing development in the area. The Commission has not yet made any statements as to whether it feels the proposed density, lot size, and layout meets sections 19.151(h) and (n). Section 19.151(h) addresses a proposal's impact on aesthetic compatiblity with existing buildings and site characteristics while section 19.151(n) deals with comformancy to the comprehensive plan. 3. CONTINUE SOUTHEAST SUMMIT Enclosed is application. (mem3-25) the staff memo dated 3/19/93 regarding this Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda items August 6, 1993 Page 3 measurements are taken from the closest point of the building to the property line as shown on the plan. The plan does not show some decks which project out from the side of the building. When the decks are included in the setback measurement, the setback will be even less than shown. These decks are shown on the landscaping plan and should also be shown on the engineering plan. Parking: This project requires 20 parking spaces and 33 spaces were approved as part of the October, 1990 approval. The applicant has constructed 10 additional parking spaces along the easterly side of the emergency access lane. These additional spaces eliminate a sidewalk which was proposed for that side of the access drive, encroach into and reduce the amount of green space, and are located where several large maple trees were to be planted. This proposal eliminates these parking spaces but does not replace the sidewalk that was lost. Landscaping: The landscaping plan has been revised since the original 1990 approval to reduce the number of plantings proposed. The minimum landscaping requirement for this project is $19,600 and the revised planting schedule has a value of only $9523, a $10,077 shortfall. The applicant is requesting a credit for existing trees to make up the shortfall (see enclosed letter from Greg Rabideau). Retention basin: The retention its original location. It had north at the 6/8/93 meeting. basin is now proposed to remain at been proposed to be relocated to Other: The dumpster shown on the landscaping plan should be shown as screened. 5) NOWLAND II - 73 UNIT PRD - FINAL PLAT This project consists of a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots. Preliminary plat approval was granted on 3/30/93 (see enclosed minutes). This property is located on the easterly side of Spear Street in the vicinity of Deerfield Drive. It is bounded on the west by Spear Street and several single family residences, on the north, south and east by undeveloped property. It is located within the Southeast Quadrant District. 3 Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda items August 6, 1993 Page 4 The applicant has reduced the number of lots located to the east of the Meridith, Gagnon, Chiu and IBIS properties in order to increase the size of the lots in this area. The number of lots has been reduced from six (6) to four (4). The two (2) lots were relocated to the end of the cul-de-sac and its length increased by 100 feet to 1100 feet. Access: The development is proposed to be served by two (2) accesses, one at either end of the property along Spear Street. The southerly access will be an extension of Deerfield Drive and is part of the east -west arterial shown on the Interim Official Map. The northerly access was relocated approximately 150 feet to the south to minimize the impact on the houses located on the west side of Spear Street with headlight glare. This was a requirement of the preliminary plat approval. A cul-de-sac street is proposed on the easterly side of the property running in a north -south direction. This street would serve 20 lots and would provide future access to the Farrell property to the north and the Economou property to the east via reserved r.o.w.'s. This cul-de-sac is 1,100 feet in length and would exceed the allowable limit of 850 feet (Section 401.1(7) of the subdivision regulations). The Planning Commission approved the length of the cul-de-sac as part of its preliminary plat approval. Density: The PRD provision in the Southeast Quadrant zoning may allow this property to generate 73 units (maximum base density) plus 25% or 92 units maximum for development. The applicant is proposing the maximum base density of 73 units. Nonbuildable area: Either all or a portion of 45 individual lots are within the restricted area under the Southeast Quadrant zoning. Included in this number are the lots along Spear Street (lots 5 - 8) for which the applicant is proposing building envelopes to keep the houses away from Spear Street. These building envelopes are shown on the plan. Wetlands: The site contains approximately five (5) acres of class 2 wetlands which are shown on the plans. The applicant should provide an estimate of acres of wetland to be filled (i.e., road fill, sewer line, etc.). View protection: This property is located within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. The applicant has submitted detailed In Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda itesm August 6, 1993 Page 5 information on the allowable height of each house within development (see enclosed plan). Allowable heights for structures and landscaping will range from 17.6 feet to 41 feet. Recreation Path/Pedestrian Trail: The path/trail has been relocated outside of the wetland area as recommended by the Natural Resources Committee. A 20 foot easement is being provided for that portion of the path/trail which is not located within a future street r.o.w. The path/trail has been widened to eight (8) feet for the entire length of Deerfield Drive as required under preliminary plat approval. The survey plat should be revised to provide survey data on the location of the path/trail easement. This should include the same type of information provided for a City street. Traffic: A traffic impact analysis was conducted. The study projects that at full build -out the project will generate 81 P.M. peak hour trip ends. The following scenarios were evaluated: o North and south project access with Spear Street: --- 1993 A.M. and P.M. DHV with Phase I build (i.e., 37 units) --- 1988 A.M. and PM DHV with full -build (i.e., 73 units) o For Spear Street/Swift Street Intersection: --- Existing 1993 and 1998 A.M. and P.M. DHV (no -build) --- 1993 A.M. and P.M. DHV with Phase I --- 1998 A.M. and P.M. DHV with full -build The results of the analysis indicate the following: 1) both project access intersections and the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service during both the 1993 and 1998 build scenarios, 2) traffic safety (e.g., sight distances) will not be a problem, and 3) upon the completion of Phase I, southbound left turn lanes on Spear Street for traffic entering both project accesses will be needed. An addendum to the traffic impact analysis was prepared in response to concerns expressed by staff. The applicant took new traffic counts at the Spear/Swift Street intersection. The counts were adjusted to the design hour and turned out to be slightly higher 5 Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda items August 6, 1993 Page 6 than the counts used in the original analysis. The model was rerun with the new numbers and the results were presented in Table 3 in the addendum indicates that the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS with the project fully built. The consultant also reran the analysis for existing conditions using existing signal timings. The previous report had assumed optimal signal timings for existing conditions. Table 2 in the addendum presents the results of the model assuming existing signal timings. The estimated LOS for the northbound approach during the A.M. peak hour is "E". This better reflects existing conditions. It is the consultant's opinion that the intersection LOS can be greatly improved by simply adjusting the signal timings so that less green time is given to Swift Street during the A.M. peak. Signal timings have been adjusted and the intersection is working much better than before. The applicant has submitted a plan for proposed improvements to the corner radius for northbound right -turns at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection. This was a requirement for preliminary plat approval. Sewer: The Planning Commission at preliminary plat approval granted a sewer allocation of 46,957 g.p.d. based on the following conditions: "The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within four years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not competed within this four year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. In addition, if at the end of three years no more than 50% of the roads have been completed, 25% of the total sewer allocation shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission". Historic sites: The applicant has received a letter from State Division for Historic Preservation indicating that the project will not have an adverse effect on any historic or archeological properties. Recreation: A credit of $22,000 should be given the applicant for construction of the portion of the proposed recreation path located outside of any public street r.o.w. This value is based on $11 per linear foot for a distance of 2,000 feet. This translates to $301 A Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda items August 6, 1993 Page 7 per lot. Based on the current recreation impact fee of $200, the applicant would not pay a recreation fee since the credit is more than the actual fee. If in the future the City adopts a recreation fee of more than $301 per lot, then the applicant would be required to pad, the difforanca_ The issue of when the recreation path r-1 should be constructed needs to be resolved. Landscaping/Street trees: The landscaping plan has been revised since preliminary plat to propose trees appropriate to the tree height limits. The landscaping plan has also been revised to add a note addressing the requirement for two (2) trees on each lot. The total value of street trees and common areas is $130,366 and the value for the two (2) trees per lot is $65,335. School impact: The Planning Commission as part of the preliminary plat approval imposed a condition (#16) which prevents a zoning/building permit from being issued until after the City adopts an education impact fee ordinance or September 1, 1993, whichever first occurs. This condition should also be made a part of the final plat approval. Lighting: The applicant is proposing street lighting similar to what is in Butler Farms and Oak Creek. The lamps would be 70 watt high pressure sodium amounted on 20 foot poles with cut-off luminaries. It appears the top of the fixtures will meet the height limitation. Water: Municipal water system will serve this development. The applicant has received a letter from CWD indicating that the demand of 43,800 g.p.d. can be met. Legal documents: o applicant should submit a "Notice of Condition" addressing the requirement of two (2) trees on each lot, addressing the height limitations for structures and landscaping on each lot, and addressing the requirement of the homeowner's association to maintain the community mailbox area and all drainage ditches for review by the City Attorney. o the applicant should submit the legal documents for all public streets and easements for review by the City Attorney. o applicant should submit a "Notice of Decision" addressing the building envelopes on lots #8-11 (now lots #5-8) and 7 Memorandum - Planning August 10, 1993 agenda items August 6, 1993 Page 8 purpose and restrictions thereof for review by the City Attorney. Subdivision plat: --- survey data for the recreation path/pedestrian trail easement and the utility easement between lots 41-42 and 57-58 should be provided. Other: --- lot numbers not correctly shown on sheet 2. --- the plans should show a 20 foot drainage easement across the Ratkus property for the drainage pipe. This easement should be included in the legal documents. 6) LELAND & PATRICIA CALKINS - PARKING CHANGES - SITE PLAN This project consist of expanding the parking area, adding a sidewalk and relocating the main entry to a building used for wholesale distribution. This property located at 3 Calkins Court lies within the IC District. It is bounded on the south by an office building, on the west by Calkins Court, on the east by a multiple use commercial building and on the north by a burial vault manufacturer. Access/circulation: The main access is via a shared curb cut on Calkins Court with a 22 foot access drive. A secondary access to the rear of the building is provided by a 28 foot curb cut also on Calkins Court. An unpaved drive connects the rear access drive to the adjoining lot to the north. No access changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 15.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 39.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 22% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parking: The current use requires a total of five (5) parking spaces and five (5) are shown on the plan. A handicapped space should be designated. Memorandum - Planning October 25, 1994 agenda items October 21, 1994 Page 9 one half of lot #10 lies within this buffer strip. This lot has multiple detached farm buildings, some of which lie either partially or entirely within the buffer strip. The applicant represented at the sketch plan meeting that he will be able to develop lot #10 in accordance with the buffer zone requirement and other standards of the zoning requlations. Access to lot #10 will not be allowed from Hinesburg Road and must be provided from Swift Street Extension. Since preliminary plat approval, lot #10 has increased in size from 3.97 acres to 5.52 acres. View protection zone: Portions of proposed lots #1 and #10 are located within the Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone. Other: --- all plans were revised to reflect that the current owner of this property is now Marble Bank. --- note #2 on sheet SP3A was revised to indicate the revised lot numbers. LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP - NOWLAND II REVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending the landscape plan for the 73 lot Nowland II PRD approved on 8/10/93 (minutes enclosed). This amendment is to comply with a condition of approval from the Vt Agency of Natural Resources to construct a roadway through a Class Two wetland and construct a bike path and stormwater pond in the 50 foot buffer zone. This decision required the applicant to plant a line of northern white cedar along the 50 foot wetland buffer zone on the western side of the wetland adjacent to lots #33 - 45. In addition, the applicant is required to install a four (4) foot high wooden fence along the buffer zone adjacent to these lots on the western side of the planted cedars. Landscaping: This is the only aspect of the project that is changing. The landscape bond should be increased to $133,779 for street trees and common area trees. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION 27 OCTOBER 1998 Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public hearing: Final Plat application of L&M Partnership to amend a condition of approval granted on 8/ 14/97 for a planned residential development consisting of 80 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend by two years the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed which, in turn, extend by 2 years the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development: Mr. Llewellyn said they are submitting an Act 250 permit for the additional lots. They would rather not build the road until they have Act 250 approval. Mr. Larkin wants to build next summer. Mr. Weith said they are at capacity for sewer allocation and if the applicant loses this, the capacity would go to Mr. Larkin's extended stay hotel. Members had no problem with this. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of L&M Partnership t amend a condition of approval granted on 10/13/98 for a planned residential development consisting of 80 single family lots Pinnacle n Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by two years, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed, which will in turn extend, by two years, the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development. This approval is based on the following stipulation: Condition H6 of the 10/13/98 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 50,576 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed by 12/21/00 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of Real Charlebois to convert a vacant lot into a contractor's yard not including retail, 90 Ethan Allen Drive: Mr. Burgess noted this work has already been done. Mr. Weith noted the fuel tank and enclosure don't meet the setbacks and will have to be moved. Mr. Burgess noted that staff recommends plantings to screen. 0 LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED November 5, 1998 Greg Bostock Department of Environmental Conservation Water Supply Division The Old Pantry Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671 RE: Pinnacle @ Spear File: 97024 Dear Greg: Please find enclosed a revised overall site plan and a revised plan and profile sheet (sheets 1 of 9 and 4 of 9 respectively) for the above referenced project. After talking to you recently, it is my understanding that you can complete your permit review upon approval of the revisions made to these two plans. Two of your comments pertained to water service locations. Specifically, you requested that we relocate the service to Lot 62 to avoid the roadway catch basins and relocate the service to Lot 67 to be before the hydrant rather than after it. As shown on the enclosed plans, these changes have been made. Also, a note has been modified on sheet 1 (see note 2) which reminds the reader that this plan set supercedes all previous plans with regards to the Vale Drive area (29 lots, utilities and infrastructure). Thank you very much for your help with this project. Please feel free to call me with any questions or if you need any additional information. Sincerely, LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED !Scott A. Rogers, P.E. cc: Ray Belair, City of South Burlington Brent Desranleau, South Burlington Water Department John Larkin enclosure 4049 Williston Road • South Burlington • Vermont • 05403 T 802.658.2100 • F 802.658.2882 • e-mail: Ilewellinc@aol.com Engineering • Permitting • Consulting Services PLANNING COMMISSION 8 J` LY 1997 PAGE 2 memo dated 3 July 1997. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Century Partners to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 sq. ft. of general office and shopping center use in 4 buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way. The amendment consists of minor site modifications to accommodate an outdoor plaza area: Ms. Lindsay explained that Dakin Farms will be a tenant and they want the plaza area. Landscaping will be relocated to the area around the Barnes & Noble sign and to other locations on the site. There will be no coverage changes. No issues were raised. Mr. Teeson moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Century Partners to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four buildings 100 Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way. The amendment consists of minor site modifications to accommodate an outdoor plaza area, as depicted in a plan entitled "100 Dorset Street Complex 100 Dorset Street South Burlington VT," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Inc dated 10/31/95 last revised 3/10/97 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to recording, the plan shall be revised to accurately show the limits of landscaped areas and paved areas in front of the 100 Dorset Street building 3. The final plat Dian shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed ed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording_ Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of John Larkin and Gerald Milot to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by one year, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed. This will in turn extend, by one year, the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development: Mr. Weith said that once the road is completed, the applicant will have their sewer allocation forever. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 JULY 1997 PAGE 3 Mr. Larkin said the work was set back by an appeal. The road will be built next summer. The Commission raised no issues. Ms. Barone moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of John Larkin and Gerald Milot to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by one year, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed. This will in turn extend, by one year, the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development. This approval is based on the following, stipulations: 1. Condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval shall be revised to read as follows. - "The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadway serving_this development shall be completed by December 21, 1998. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed by 12/21/98 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Dinklage seconded. The motion was passed unanimous. 6. Site plan application of Patrick & Terese Ayer to construct 62 auto storage spaces on a lot containing a 9761 sq. ft. Building consisting of 3200 sq. ft. Of printing use and 6561 sq. ft. Of auto repair and service use, 4 Berard Drive: Mr. Llewellyn said the space is for cars being worked on. There is a gate between this property and the Pizza Putt property and there has been a request to remove it. The applicant would rather leave it. Mr. Weith said he had no problem with the access but it will have to be shown on both site plans. Pizza Putt said this would be a landscaped area with no access. Mr. Kleh of Pizza Putt said that the Ayers had been using the access. He sat down with Mr. Ayer and worked out an agreement. When his lawyer drafted the paper work, Mr. Ayer refused to sign the agreement. Mr. Ayer also had the area paved without Mr. Kleh's approval. The gate is on the Kleh property but the Ayers are using the gate to move cars back and forth all the time. Mr. Kleh also said the Ayers have a "junkyard" in the back and he wants the area back the way the Planning Commission approved it. Mr. Llewellyn said he was not aware of this situation and will go back and talk with Mr. Ayer. JqN-11-1998 MON 02; 39 DN ST TZEI-J: CE & FLETCHER FAX NO. 80266K552 F, 03 JAN-06-99 FRI 15:49 ' lap & Lismai FAX N0. E02-F''J629 a.02/C9 KN NACLE AT SPEAR N TICE OF DEV ET-ODNMIST CONDITIONS THIS NOTICE is made ties _— day of Junuary, 1999, by trrald C. Milot ar4 Jobn P. Larkin, doing business as Larkin tiiilot Partnership, a Vermont general partnership (the "Declarrent' ). RECITALS I. The Declarant was the original gviL r of the subdivision located on tie easterly side of Spear Street in the City of South Burlington known as ",Pinnacle at Spear." The lands comprising the subdivision were conveyed to Card C. Milot and John P. Larkin pursuant to a warranty dead, dated July 871990, from Rhcnl C. Gagnon and Idclon N. Gagnon, recorded in Volume 296, Page 53 9 of the Land Reczrds of the City of South Burlington. and p=wnt to a warranty deed, dated March 17, 1992, from Marie Urv-'crowd, recorded in Volume 322, Page 188 of the Land Rccords of the City of South Burlington (the "Property",. 2, The 1eclarant initially received approval from, the South Burlington PLuuiing [,omrnission to subdivide the Property into 73 ample -family loss, common area and roads, as depicted on the Plan, T =pafter, the Declarant r=ivcd approval to craftte 7 additional single-faamily lots m. d xecmfigure a portion of'the common srea!i,. 3, The subdivision, as originally approved, is showm and depicted on a plan entitled Now°ltand Two South Burlington Yermont Plat of Subdivision of Lards of (Jerald C. Wot, at. al. dated ,l4!y 1992, prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated, recorded in Map Volume 286, Pagos I I I and 112 of the Land Pwcotds of the City of South Burlington, The subdivision, with Lots 74 through 94, is shown and. depicted on a plan entitled Final flat for SuMiviginn of ?roperty of Cicrrald Milot and John Lark Pinnacle @a Spear (Fotr.Yerly Nowland Two) dated Augwt 21,1998, last reyUed January 5,1999, prapared by Vaughn C. Mutton. L.S., recorded hi Map Volume_, Pages _._ and of the Land Records of the City of South Durlinngton. JAN-11-1999 MON 02:40 'N STITZEL,PACE � FLETCHER FAX 110, 30236021552 P. 04 JAN-08-03 FRI 15:50 rnan Lisman FAX NO, E02- r36201 ?,03I08 4, It is a condition to the subdivision approval, as amended, by the Plaimiag Coimuimior. thnt the Doclamt m ;ice certain undertaking and promises. 5. This document supplements prior Noticcs of Development Conditions, dated November 5,1993, recorded in' ahme 353, Page 595 and dated. _ ^, 1995, recorded in Volume Page of the sand Records of the City of South Burlingtorn. AGREEMENT In consideration of Tc.a Dollars and foe other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledges the Declarant hereby declares that the Property is and confirms that the Proptrty shalt be held, sold and coaveyed subjecl to the following covenants, apeemments, easements and restrictions, all of which are for the pruposo of proteufi g the va!uc and d;usirability of, and which shall run with, the PropeM and be binding on. all parties having any right, title or interest therein or any part thereof and their heirs, swccssors and assigns; 6, The maximum height of any building and any land_Scgping on eacli Lot shall be as set, forth ozI the Attachment hereto. No building shall be constuctcd or landscaping pcnztittcd whirl: shall oxcood such limits. IN'WITNESS WTIEREOF, tho Declarant has executed this LDacla-4on this ____ day of January, 1999. WITNESSES S'TATF rip VERMONT CHlT'MNDEN COUNTY, 53. LAWN MILOT PARTNERSHIP BY _ Gerald �. Milat, general partner and duly amhoriwd agent BY John P. Larldn, general parmer and duly authoziex�i agent At: Burlington in said County and State; can this day of January, 1999, personally appeared John P. Larkin, gaawral partner and duly authorlzed agant of Larkin Milot Partrae7z6ip, and he acknowledged this itYSt =ent by him signed and sealed to be his froe act and dcrd and the trot act and deed of Larkin Milot 3Pwtnership. Before rxmc 2 Notary Public JAN-11-1999 MON 02:41 PM ST?TZEL,PAGE & FLETGHER JAN-08-99 FRI 15*0 �aaa & l.issan FAX NO, 8026602552 P. 05 FAX NO. 802- P629 P. 04/09 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNW, SS, At in aid County and State oil this day of January, 1999, personaUy appeared Gerald C. Milot, general partner and duly authorize agent of Larkin Mlot Partnership, and he acknoWledged this instrwnent by him signed and sealed to be his free act and deed and the free act and doed of Larkin Milot Partnership, OZ12o�? �n i �+�csrpm nt, eos Before me Notary Public 3 J,AN-11-1999 MON 02: 41 PM STITZEL, PAGE & FLETGHER FAX NO, 8026602552 P. 06 JAN-C9-89 FRI 15�50 }ar, & U smaa FAX N0, 802- )3829 P,C5109 PTNNACL,E @ SPEAR Lets 1 throuugh 51 South Burlington, 'Vermont The following information was obtained from a document tntitled "Tabic of Height Limitations For Structures within the Dorset Pack View Protection Zones" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated in July 1993 Table of height limitations for Dorset Park View Protection Zones Zone A . Section 25.401 Zone D - Section 25.407 Nam Mfor to Table holo)� Column 1, Lot numbers according to Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated, Drawing D-4382 Colin 2. Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ), A or D Column 3. Distances scaled from Dorset park VPZ baseline to center of house lot - feet Column 4. Existing house lot grade Column 5. Ceiling Height relative to Dorset Park VPZ Baseline VPZ A., ceiling height - 435' - 3.1(diytance11000) VPZ D., ceiling height = 435' - .7 (distance/1000) Column 6. Road Centerline Grade aci<jacent to house lot Column 7, First Floor Elcvation (mad centerline grad plus 5 feet) Column 8. Maximum height of structures, first floor elevation to ridgeline (coiling height minus ]; FE). TARIS I 1 Lot # 2 View Protect Zone 3 Distance from VPZ Bast Line 4 Existing Grade 5 Ceiling Height 6 Road Centerline grade 7 I" Floor Elevation 8 Max Hei t 1 A 5900 391.0 416.7 390.5 395.5 21.2 2 A 5900 390.0 416.7 389.5 394.5 22,2 3 A 5850 387.0 416.9 387.9 392.9 24.0 4 A 5850 39610 416.9 397.0 392.0 24.9 5 D 5900 384.0 430.9 386,0 391.0 39.9 6 D 6000 38210 430.9 385.2 390.2 40.6 7 D 6000 390.0 430.9 334.2 399.2 41.6 8 D 61(M 380.0 430.7 384.1 1991 41.6 LLEWM.YN INaellroAArap JAN-11-1999 MON 02;42 PM STTTZEL,PAGE 9. FLETCHER jAN-08-99 FRI 15:60 ° )an & Lisman FAX NO. 8026602552 FAX NO, Dr-r �629 1 Let 4 2 Vi" Protect Zone 3 Distance from VPZ Ease Line 4 Existing Grade 5 Coiling Height i 6 Road Centerline grade 7 1' Floor EIavatiom $ 1 Max He q it 9 1c D D 5900 5850 3; 386.0 430.9 430.9 387.0 384.0 392.0 369.0 3KS 41.9 1 k I7 5850 386.0 430.9 383.8 389.9 42.1 12 D 5800 386.0 430,9 384.4 389.4 41.5 13 D 5800 386.0 430.9 384.8 389.9 41.1 14 D 5750 387.0 431.0 385.4 390.4 40.6 15 D 5720 388,0 431.0 385.9 390.9 40-1 16 A 5650 390,0 417.5 386,8 391.8 25,7 " 17 18 A A 5650 5650 390.0 390.0 417.5 417.5 396_9 397.4 191.8 392.4 25.7 25.1 19 A 5600 ;90.0 417.6 397.8 392.8 24.9 20 A 5620 189.5 417.6 383.3 M.3 243 21 A I 5500 392.0 417,9 390.5 395.5 22..4 22 A 5500 392,0 417.9 391.5 396.5 21.4 23 A 5500 392.0 417.9 392.2 397.2 20.7 24 D 5550 392.5 431.1 393.0 398.0 33,1 25 D 5550 392.5 431,1 393.0 398.0 33.1 26 D 5560 393.0 431.1 393,2 398.2 32.9 27 D Y 55600 093.0 431.1 393.5 398.5 32.6 28 D 5610 391.0 431.1 393.3 398.3 32,$ 29 D 5650 392.0 431,0 3930 398.0 - 33.0 30 D 5680 392.0 431,0 392.5 397.5 32.5 31 i7 5720 391.0 431.0 391.0 39<_0 35.0 32 1) 5780 391,5 431.0 389,5 394.5 36.5 Page 2 of 3 SUE - LLYH INCOwpaIRAT19b JAN-11-1999 MON 02:42 PM STITZEL,PAGE & FLETCHER JAN-03-99 FRI 15:51 �at & Lisman FAX NO, 8026602552 FAX NO, 802-` 0629 P, 08 P. 0 7 008 1 2 3 4 5 b ? 8 Lot # View Distant Existing Ceiling Road 1 `` Floor Max Protect Sbaa VPZ Grade Haight Coatorlinc Elavatiom Height Zone Hass grade Lino 33 D 500 391.0 431.0 390.5 T395.5 35.5 34 D 5560 390.0 431.1 391.5 396.5 34.6 35 3? 5520 391.0 431.2 392.2 397.2 34,0 36 D $500 390,5 431.2 393.8 398.8 32.4 37 D 5460 391.0 431.2 393.2 398.2 33.0 38 D 5420 39110 431.2 3934 398.4 32,8 39 D 5406 391 A 4431.2 393,3 398.3 32.9 40 D 5370 391.0 431.3 393.1 398.1 33.2 41 n 5350 391.0 431.3 392.8 397.9 33.5 42 A 5330 391.5 418.5 392.3 397.3 21.2 43 A 5300 390.5 412.6 392.0 397,0 21.6 44 A 5290 390.0 419.6 392.2 397.2 21.4 45 A 5300 390.0 419.6 390.6 395.6 23.0 46 A 5340 390.5 418.5 390.2 395.2 23.3 47 A 5420 391.5 419.2 389.9 394.9 23.3 48 A 5540 390.5 417.8 389.4 394.4 23.4 49 A 5650 399.0 4175 389.0 394.0 23.5 50 A 5660 389.5 417.5 399.8 394.$ 22.7 L51 A $660 399.5 417,5 390.5 395.5 22.0 Page 3 of 3 LLewgLLYN INCO PONArsa JAN-11-1993 MON 02:43 PM STITZEL,PACE &. FLETCHER FAX NO. 8026602552 AN-"08--99 FR1 15151 ran & Lismar FAX N0, 802-" )3628 LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED PINNACLE @ SPEAR Lots 52 through 80 "Wale drive South Burlington, Vermont July 28,1998(rev) Table of height limitations for Dorset Park View Protection Zones Zoa r A - Section 22.401 Zone D - Sectinn 22.407 Notes refer to Table below Cohunn 1. Lot nttnbcrs according to L1ewtllyn incorporated, Drawing 0067-D Column 2, Dorset Paris View protection Zone (VPZ), A or D Column 3. Distance scaled from Dorset Park VPZ baseline to center of house lot - fiwt Cnlumn 4. Ridge Line Elevation telative to Dorset Park VPZ Baseline VFZ A: Ridgc line d 441 - 4.3 (Distmcc / 1000) VPy D. Ridge line = 441 -2.0 (Distance / 1000) Column 5. Roadway =niorlina clevud,on at center of house lot Colman d. Assumed Fiat Floor Elevation (based on footing drains discharging to storm sewers) Column 7, Height of house (First Floor Elovation to Ridge Line Elevttion) Column 9, height of Housc (Roadway centerline elevation to ridge lint elevation) TABLE V P. 09 P. VOR 1 Lot # 2 Vicw Prow Zome 3 Distance from VFZ Basc Lane 4 `` Ridge f Line Elcvatior. 5 Roadway Elevation 6 Assumed FFE 7 Height of House above FFE 8 Height of House above Roadway 52 A 4650 421,0 394.9 398.1 22.9 26.1 53 A 4685 420.9 395.0 398.3 22.6 25.9 54 A 4710 420.8 394.9 399.5 22.3 25,9 55 A 4725 420.7 394.6 398.7 2210 26.1 56 A 4735 420.6 394.5 398.9 21.7 26.1 57 4740 4?A4 394.4 399.0 21.6 z6,2 58 A rt750 420.6 394.4 --[:::: 399.3 21.3 26.2 4049 Whiston NOW - soUrn UMIM ion , ver,nora • W403 T 802.658.2100 . F 802-658.2$82 ^ e-mail: 11ew0Tnc@ao1xom Fnglri"HriE • OarrOting + CtAw k % Serviras JAN-11-1999 MON 0243 PN ST?TZEI.JKE 8 FLETCHER. FAX NO, 8026602552 JAN-08-99 FRI 15:51 )an & Lipman FAX N0. 802-' 136229 P. 10 F. 03f 09 fA.BLE V (continued) Pinnacle �& Spear July 28, 1.998 I Lot # 2 VPZ 3 Distance from Base 4 Ridge Line Elevation S Roadway Elevation � 5 Proposed FFE 7 Height of House 7 Hei�ht of Ylausc 59 D 4755 431.5 393.6 399.4 32.1 37.9 60 D 4760 0 ? .5 394.3 394,8 31.7 37.2 61 D 4765 431.5 394.5 399.;7 3L6 37.0 G? A 4750 431.5 394.7 400.0 31.5 36.8 63 D 4735 431.5 394.9 400.3 31.2 36.6 64 D 4750 431.5 395.2 400.5 31.0 36.3 65 D 4745 431.5 395.5 1 400.7 30.3 36,0 66 D 4790 431A 396A 401.0 30.4 35.0 67 D 4850 431.3 396.5 401.9 29.4 34.8 68 D 4600 431.€ 396.4 402.0- 29.8 3 5. 4 69 D 4580 431.8 395.3 401.8 36 70 D 4575 431.9 394.9 - 400.6 --30.0 -_ - 31.3 - 37.1 71 ' -- D 4590 431.8 394.6 4X.11 37.2 72 D 4580 431.8 394A 4QQ.Q -31.7 31.8 37A 73 D 4595 431.8 393.6 349.7 32.I 38.2 74 D 4590 431.& 394.4 399.6 32-',>. 37.4 75 A 4$80 421,3 394.4 399.5 22.8 26.9 76 A 4615 421.2 394.5 399.2 22.0 26.7 77 A 4555 421.4 r 94,6 399.0 22.4 26,8 78 A 4550 421.4 394.9 398.6 22.9 26.5 79 A 4525 4215 394.9 398.5 23.0 26.6 80 A 4500 421.7 394.9 '98.4 73.3 26.9 Rev.12-04-98 ----- -- ---- Pie 2 of 2 11 6V W INOORPOKATip LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED January 6, 1999 Ray Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Pinnacle @ Spear (formerly Nowland Two) File: 97024 Dear Ray: Enclosed please find revised recordable mylars for the above referenced project. We have included an 18" x 24" recordable for both survey plats as well as sheets 1 and 2 of our plan set as you requested. Also enclosed are 3 bond copies of sheets 1, 2, 4 and 5 of 9, as well as 3 bond copies of the overall site plan (sheet 1 of 1) and 3 bond copies of the survey plats. The changes made include the revision of the property lines for lots 68, 69 and common land "C", as well as some contour revisions around the detention pond. Please feel free to call with any questions, or if you need any additional information. Thank you for your help with this project. Sincerely, LLEWE��LrrLYN INCORPORATED Scott A. Rogers, P.E. —A cc: L & M Partnership Button Associates 4049 Williston Road • South Burlington • Vermont • 05403 T 802.658.2100 • F 802.658.2882 • e-mail: Ilewellinc@aol.com Engineering • Permitting • Consulting Services PINNACLE @ SPEAR Lots 52 through 80 Vale Drive South Burlington, Vermont July 28, 1998 Table of height limitations for Dorset Park View Protection Zones Zone A - Section 22.401 Zone D - Section 22.407 Notes refer to Table below Column 1. Lot numbers according to Llewellyn Incorporated, Drawing 0067-D Column 2. Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ), A or D Column 3. Distances scaled from Dorset Park VPZ baseline to center of house lot - feet Column 4. Ridge Line Elevation relative to Dorset Park VPZ Baseline VPZ A: Ridge line = 441 - 4.3 (Distance / 1000) VPZ D: Ridge line = 441 - 2.0 (Distance / 1000) Column 5. Road centerline elevation adjacent to house lot Column 6. Proposed First Floor Elevation (based on footing drains discharging to storm sewers) Column 7. Height of house (First Floor Elevation to Ridge Line) TABLE V 1 Lot # 2 VPZ 3 Distance from Base 4 Ridge Line Elevation 5 Roadway Elevation 6 Proposed FFE 7 Height of House 52 A 4650 421.0 394.2 398.3 22.7 53 A 4685 420.9 393.9 398.5 22.4 54 A 4710 420.8 393.6 398.7 22.1 55 A 4725 420.7 393A 399.0 21.7 56 A 4735 420.6 393.1 399.2 21.4 57 A 4740 420.6 392.8 399.3 21.3 58 A 4750 420.6 392.5 399.5 21.1 LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED TABLE V (continued) Pinnacle @ Spear July 28, 1998 1 Lot # 2 VPZ 3 Distance from Base 4 Ridge Line Elevation 5 Roadway Elevation 6 Proposed FFE 7 Height of House 59 D 4755 431.5 392.3 399.6 31.9 60 D 4760 431.5 392.2 399.7 31.8 61 D 4765 431.5 392.6 400.0 31.5 62 D 4750 431.5 393.1 400.1 31.4 63 D 4735 431.5 393.4 400.5 31.0 64 D 4750 431.5 393.8 400.6 30.9 65 D 4745 431.5 394.4 400.7 30.8 66 D 4780 431.4 395.0 400.9 30.5 67 D 4850 431.3 395.3 401.2 30.1 68 D 4600 431.8 394.8 400.9 30.9 69 D 4580 431.8 394.2 400.7 31.1 70 D 4575 431.9 393.5 400.5 31.4 71 D 4590 431.8 393.1 400.2 31.6 72 D 4580 431.8 392.5 400.0 31.8 73 D 4585 431.8 392.1 399.7 32.1 74 D 4590 431.8 392.4 399.6 32.2 75 A 4580 421.3 392.7 399.2 22.1 76 A 4615 421.2 393.1 399.3 21.9 77 A 4555 421.4 393.4 399.0 22.4 78 A 4550 421.4 393.6 398.7 22.7 79 A 4525 421.5 393.9 398.5 23.0 80 A 4500 421.7 394.2 398.4 23.3 Page 2 of 2 LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED January 4, 1999 Ray Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Pinnacle @ Spear (formerly Nowland Two) File: 97024 Dear Ray: Enclosed please find recordable mylars for the above referenced project as per our discussion last Wednesday. We have included an 18" x 24" recordable for both survey plats as well as sheets 1 and 2 of our plan set as you requested. Also enclosed are 3 bond copies of each sheet, as there was one small change to the plans. The proposed 20' recreation easement was relocated as shown. Please feel free to call with any questions, or if you need any additional information. Thank you for your help with this project. Sincerely, LLEWE�LLYNN INCORPORATED Scott A. Rogers, P.E. cc: L & M Partnership Button Associates 4049 Williston Road • South Burlington • Vermont • 05403 T 802.658.2100 • F 802.6582882 • e-mail: Ilewellinc@aol.com Engineering • Permitting • Consulting Services In the interest of maintaining oustan-. dards of accuracy and good tastr e, we reserve the right to refuse, cancel or edit advertising at any time. J The 3plItIr[ingtoll ref jkta SALES 1OPTION. SONALS 6 CHESTER Loving SALE . Fri, Sat married couple, Cathy 5. 11 Canyon and Ken, hes to adopt, sharersendless �r-=--- love, house full of otter to cash with laughter & forever ess Classified ad, sunshine with a baby. 11658.3321. Legal/medical paid- STER Furniture. 927collect (516) 1a64- s, linens, j (12-16) clothes, :atterns, books, 10, 9-4, 23 Bon- rk. Rai_ n o�_ LCHESTER lt'y sale!!! ,ircle/Sunderland off Route 7. Sat- 3/10. 9_ to 3_- - --Pinewood-- mily-Rustic Dr.- ;ze 17 sneakers - at'] Geo's & VT ildren's clothing & ent-bikes-jewelry- �-frames-glass, lore. 9-4 Sat. JCT furniture, -- VT bear collec- usewares, cam- lothing, and much 52 Old Colchester -Sat 10-4. JCT Sat & Sun 8- Venonah Ave., off St. The last hurra, s coming, enjoy :e. Chairs & more SBURG/MONK- Today only!!19-3. 3 Alectlon. Furniture ,hold items. Pas s Orchard on left. HO CENTER Y Many kids cos Land's End 2nd )bes, beach jacket ure, Antiques, Mis skiis. Fri & Sa & 10. loam-3pm. N birds. 18 Leary Rd ashville Rd. 899-418 RISVILLE Sat. 10/17 & 10/18. 4. Antiques, collet tools & much mor `fee Road, off Hill Road, 4 mil Morristown C Follow signs. ab�J RTM 10/10. 7 - 5. Old Hollow Rd. HMOND Busine uidation & Est e. Sat 9-4. Spa the & access, plumbi )ffice supplies, ab and pool. Plus fu housewares, line !elry, cookbooks, to Indoors. 920 W M -n. east of Exit 11 fur RICHMOND ;huge three family ,!door tag sale an estate sale: beds, shelves, kitchenware, edding, cookboo electronics, Cbristtt-a decorations, garden equipm lamps, toyys, coBectabba, pictures frames kitchen cabinet spa and pool chemicals and AnUiDment SOUTH BURLINGTON PLAnn.rtNG COM ION The Sou urlingto Planning Qommissio will hold a public hearin at the South Burlingt City Hall, Conferend Room, 575 Dorse Street, South Burlingtor Vermont on Tuesda October 27. 19911, at 7:� P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final Plat applicatic of L & M Partnership 1 amend a condition of approval granted c 8/14/97 for a plannc residential developme ADOPTION A bright fu- consisting of 80 sing ture with lots of love family lots. Pinnac awaits your child in our (n� Spear, Spear Strec New England home. Lov- file amendment is to e ing, happily married, and tend, by two (2) year financially secure couple the date by which tl with one daughter wish to roadways serving the d share our lives with a velopment must be ca newborn/toddler. Call pleted, which will in tL Denise collect at (603)228- extend, by two (2) yea 1614, M-F 8:30am-5:OOpm the approved resery or Anne & Brad at (800) sewer allocation for t 753-1503 eve/wknd. development. adoption A MARRIED COUPLE 2. are eager & ready NOW o to open our hearts to a your infant forever. We p will provide love & secu- ti rity in our happy home. ti Expenses paid. Call Su- u san & Jacobus TOLL c FREE (888) 878-9158 ADOPTION Two young hearts full of love, happiness. Full time mom, self-employed dad promise warm, loving up- bringing for your baby. t Legal. Confidential. Ex- 0 penses ppaid. Traceyy/ Evan 1-800-651-6550. t adoption WE'RE a childless cou- d pile longing to share love/secure home w/ a s: baby. If consider s. adoption, pis. call (888� c. 260-8686 Sharon & Brad. I. AEROSMITH TICKET Montreal October 101h. pRound trip bus travel, pre boarding party, red & section seating, $95, firm. Call 865-4496. t- AIRLINE TICKETS el (2). Round trip to Hawaii. of $500. Cell 878-1929. es or- CARIB13EAN VACA- TIONS 2 vacation pack- ages to Caribbean desti- nations. 5 days, 4 nights, $800. All inclusive, 3 days, 2 nights, $750. Air- rm fare not included. No ex- piration dais.-- 7609, leave message. ss NEVILLE BROTHERS ate TICKETS mi- 2 tickets for Oct. 30 at ng the Flynn. $72 for pair. ove Call802-482-4223. TICKETS ns, 1 way ticket to Ireland ys for October 7th, $50. Call alit 802-654-6825. WANTED: GREEK LAW GUAGE TEACHER for private instruction. Please call 802-454-8610 ADULT 8 ENTERTAINMENT - ESCORT EXCELLENCE Outcail onlyy. ks, Call863-9510 Now hiring. Mt, ) s, www.fanUsyant�rPrlss.eaw HARD, BODIES Final Plat applicauc f JAM Golf LLC mend a previously al roved planned reside at development consl ng of 244 resident! nits and an 18 hole g( ourse, Dorset Stro The amendment consis of modifying the golf cl area by: 1) razing a s gle family dwelling, constructing a 14,0 square foot clubhou! 3) constructing two ennis courts, 4) cc strutting a swimmi pool, 5) converting t temporary clubhouse a pool changing an tennis pro shop, and expanding the park area. BENEFITS ASSISTANT experience in A,/R, A/P, and payroll required. Also assists in adminis- tering benefits and vari- ous other duties. Apply TV,TerwWVNY 10Market Square, Burlington, VT 05401. 802-658-8622. EOE. ACCOUNTING STAFFERS NEEDED NOW! Both full and part time. A/R, and A/P experience. Stop by today, 19 Commerce St, Williston Call (802) 864-8255 OR: check out our website www.triadtemp.com N r� `Temporary jervices 864-8255 ACCOUNTANT/BUSI- NESS MGR w/ progres- sive non-profit arts orga- nization in Lamoille Country. Req.approx. 2 hrs per/wk. Must Pos- sess excellent admin. and financial skills. Must have mgr. exper. Ir charge of ledger, report ing, budgeting, payroll cash m9t., etc. Must be detail orientated and pro active. Knowledge o Windows 95, window based accounting pack Iages and MSOffcce must. Blackbaud expert ence a plus. Please fa resume, salary req, an cover letter to Nichola at (802)635-2730. Aetivlst CAMPAIGN JOB! for the ENVIRONMENT Copies of the appuc tions are available f public inspection at th South Burlington Ci Hall. William Burgess Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission October 10, 1998 REQUEST FOR BIDS IMPROVEMENTS TO INTERSECTION OF MOUNTAIN VIEW RD.! & REDMOND RD WILLISTON, VT The Town of Williston, i conjunction with the Chi tenden Solid Waste Dif u ici i� -1tritino bid from qualified contras tors for the reconstrui tion and widening of tt' intersection of Mounta View Road and Reg mond Road in the Tov, of Williston. The work i eludes grading, drainag subbase; base coax: pavement, and signag q pre -bid meeting will I held at the site on October 14, 1998 at 2: p.m. Sealed bids will accepted at the Town Williston Office located 722 Williston Road, V1 iston, VT 05495 until 1 p.m. October 23. 19' Copies of the Contr Documents can be amined and obtained the Williston Put Works Dept. at above address. October 8, 9 & 10, 199 AUTO BODY TECHNICIAN Under New Man" ment Qualified and gted Auto Body Tea sled to join our repair team. We offer either a strong flat rate pay plan or a very competitive hourly wage, along with a com- prehensive benefit pack- age including 401(k) re- tirement, insurance and paid vacations. Qualified applicant should have auto body repair experi- ence and be able to com- plete all phases of colli- sion repair. Frame and Unibody experience highly desirable. Addi- tional training available. Must have own tools. Shop has clean, modern environment with Down - draft booth and Chief Frame machine. Under New Management Contact Peter Haskell, Shop Manager, For confidential interview: Lewis Motors- 4 Lewis Acura 1325 Shelburne Rd So Burlington, VT Days:802-658-1130 AUTO TECHNICIANS Heritage Ford... Needs full time Techni- cians to diagnose, repair & service domestic vehi- cles. We are offering a $2000 hiring bonus and the opportunity to work in a flat rate shop that is always busy. If you are an experienced Techni- cian with either ASE or manufacturer's certifica- tions or have extensive dealership experience, give us a call. Heritage offers top pay, paid holl- days & vacation, med- ical/dental/life nsur- ance, 401(k) plan & flexible spending ac- counts (cafeteria plan). Contact Paul for a confi- dential interview or ap- ply in person during reg- ular business hours. Auto FINANCE MANAGER Experienced Finance Managger for expanding new & used car dealer- ship. Must be a moti- vated team player with strong customer skills. Excellent wage & benefit package. Please reply to Free Press Box # 55. _ Automotive RECEPTIONIST/ CASHIER $250-$400/wk Enthusiastic person Work w/ the Sierra Club, needed for busy automo- FT/PT and career posi- five dealership. Duties in- tions. Burlington. Call elude answering and di- Sandy:862-1600 ratting calls, greeting walk-in visitors, typing, fil- ng and other administra- tive duties. Prior switch- board experience preferred along with com- puter experience. Must have a positive attitude, willingness to learn, and a high energy level. Com- pete benefits package in- cluding 401(k). Weekday hours Monday through Friday 1:30pm to 7:00pm & Sat 8:00am to 5:OOpm. Please forward a resume or stop by. ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR « senior organization seeks individual to in- crease advocacy and ed- ucation capacity of group. Good communi- cation skills, policy or so- cial service experience, database/financial com- puter skills required. Lo- cated in Montpelier. Cover letter & resume to COVE, PO Box 366, Lyn- don Center, VT 05850 by October 19. ADMINISTRATIvc ASSISTANTS Needed Immediately P/T and F/T Must be computer literate. Familiarity with MS Office helpful. Apply in person at 19 Commerce St, Williston or on our website it www.triadtemp.com Ij 864-8255 A DREAM COMES TRUE Join the #1 team in our geld and make your every dream a reality! We offer Established accounts Expense -paid training .terit promotions Fantastic first -year r FORD 865-8100 1580-1600 Shelburne Rd South Burlington ®� 6r,glaod Federal Credit Union Banking MORTGAGE LOAN OFFICER Shearer Oldsmobile uadiiiac w„ t,ac 1030 Shelburne Rd So Burlington, VT 05403 AUTOMOTIVE SALES Wanted: New & Used Automotive Sales. Self motivated individual with ambition & drive. Excellent income potential for the right candidate. Call for appointment Dan or for Monday -Friday 9am to 5pm at 802-524-9, AUTO SALES TRAINER Auto sales background preferred. Earnings up to 140K. Burlington based. 1-800-722-8482. Automotive SERVICE ADVISOR Busy, growing sports utility vehicle dealership needs an experienced Service Writer. We offer a 5 day work week, out- standing benefit pack- age & the opportunity tc Blodgett Supply and 3odgett Distributors are ooking for experienced >ales professionals with lrive, and the knowledge and skills to help the pest customers in the ,vorld. Plumbing and heating experience is re- quired for 2 current openings. We're alsc looking for people expe rienced in major apph antes or television sales We can offer you a chat lenge and the opportu nity to work with a grea team who value you contribution to our com pany's success. Send re sume to: President, O B75 gett Supp y, Williston, 05495. BREAD BAKER experienced Brea Baker wanted. Part-tirr & full-time positions. C, 253-4733. New England Federal Credit Union has an open- ing for a Mortgage Loan Officer in their subsidiary' company, Direct Financial Services, Inc. The Mort- gage Loan Officer is re- sponsible for the origina- tion of quality residential mortgages. Strong candi- dates will have a knowl- edge of resdiential regula- tory & secondary market compliance to insure that the customer is given ac- curate information. Must have demonstrated com- munication skills and 2 ye- ras experience in a lend- ing function. Willing tc work evenings and week, ends as needed. Nev, England Federal offer exceptional benefits in cluding: employer paic medical, dental and life in surance, two week paic cation, 12 paid holiday! pension plan, 401k, tut tion reimbursement an: on -site exercise facility. you are interested an qualified, please stop b our One Harvest Lane o fices to fill out an applict tion, or send your resum to: New England Feder! Credit Union, PO Box 52' Williston, VT 05495, A tention: HR. EOE ®Now Englari Fe" I Cre dQredit Unix Banking MORTGAGE LOAN PROCESSOF New England Fede Credit Union has an opt ing for a Mortgage Lc Processor to work in c Williston branch. T Mortgaoe Luar, Proces, US DRIVER CDL ar pus license required. Pi ,ate: $50.00 per day, wi extra bus runs and fie trips available. Please r spond by mailing letter interest, resume ai three current work i lated references: Me Greenia, Principal, W Cott Elementary Scho PO Box 179, Wolcott, 05680. 802-472-6551. CABINETMAKER 5 exper. for a shop Monkton. Own transp tation. 985-8208 for ap CABINET MAKER M vated & skilled for h end custom woodsh Minimum 2 yrs exi Fax resumes to: 8 6615. Or mail to: Joinery, 118 Sheperd Hollow Rd, Ce bridge,VT 05444. • CAD OPERATO Excellent full-time opportunity with HD dynamic design/built company located in Burlington, Vermont a Responsibilities will clude architectural d ing and design. Mus well versed m Auto' 14. Architectural an building background necessary. Salary n tiable based on qual tions. Benefits incluc Submit resumes v HDI 183 Talcott Roac Suite 301 WillistonkVT 054t f I CAFETERIA PLAN MINISTRATION Word Processing i1 keeping and be background des excellent benefits. _ Planning Assoc., If Box 905, Willisto 05495. n CAFETERIA UVN worker for night; P.M. 10:00 P M., ends required. Cook, . Mon -Fri A.M. 8:00 P.Iv Cathy at 656-0805 i CAREGIVER Es Woman with strok al abates needs 11 n- Barn care. Mon.-T an aspects of person yr Sound judggamen he ect Home, 863-56 ;or CARPENTER I BARTLETTS BAY SEWERAGE TREATMENT PLANT UNCOMMITTED RESERVE CAPACITY Design/Permitted Flow 12 Month Average Flow Committments Against Reserve (State List) Committments Against Reserve (Municipal List) UNCOMMITTED RESERVE CAPACITY Date: 12/21 /92 tg t 4 V/ ttq 1? - qz x 800000 G.P.D. 630000 G.P.D. 78578 G.P.D. 27417 G.P.D. 64005 G.P.D. COMMITTMENTS AGAINST RESERVE Action/ Applicant Approval Date STATE LIST: DATE: 8/20/92 Project 6/19/79 LOZON ESTATE 2 COMM LOTS NOT BUILT 9/23/82 LTH ASSOC & BARTLETT(**) 5 DUPLEX, 2 LOTS NOT BUILT 9/24/87 THOMAS & CAROL DROLETTE 2 LOT SUBD 9/24/87 DAVIS DEVEL. CORP. 10,000 SF OFFICE BLDG 6/90 BLODGETT(*) 18 UNIT PRD 5/1/91 JAMES FAYETTE/L&M PARK(* RES/RETAIL/THEATRE PCD (THEATRE HOOKED ON) 9/25/91 BDP REALTY ASSOC PHASE 2 OFFICE BLDG 7/28/92 JWJ REALTY - SATURN CAR DEALERSHIP MUNICIPAL LIST: DATE: 12/21/92 NOWLAND SUBD H. MARK BOLTON MEADOWBROOK CONDOS BLODGETT(*) 4/16/91 LOCHMORE ASSOC 5/12/92 O'BRIENS TRAINING CTR 6/9/92 HANDY TOTAL COMMITTMENT 5 LOTS NOT BUILT 1 LOT SUBD 11 MF UNITS NOT BUILT 18 UNIT PRD HOTEL & RET/OFFICE-LAKEWD C ADDITION -VOCATIONAL MOTEL/RESTAURANT TOTAL COMMITTMENT G.P.D. 1650 5400 900 1000 7625 58028 3825 150 78578 2250 300 4950 475 14300 342 4800 27417 (*) INDICATES ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION GRANTED BY CITY ABOVE THAT GRANTED BY STATE. (**) INDICATES EXCHANGE OF RESERVED SEWER ALLOCATION (#) INDICATES PLACE ON EARLIER WAITING LIST FOR SEWER ALLOCATION VERMONT AGEICI Of NATURAL RESOURCES 18/21192 Peraits Cospliaace & Protection Division PAGE 1 KURICIPAL CORNECTIOI DATA FOR BARTLETTS BAY -- UNCORRECTED PROJECTS Action Application flow Connect'a Date latber , Rate of Applicant Description G.P.D. Status Reclo 06/19/79 4C0392 LOi0l ESTATE 2 LOTS 10T ELY 4/92 1,116 lotconn 73 19/23/82 4CIS26 LTH ASSOC & BARTLETT If AL 5 DUPLEIES,2 LOTS 107 BLT 5/88 5,401 lotconn 74 ..88/111181 --P8-t-m6 -- ROBERT- STEYEIS SR- -__ --- - - 6000 ADD'N TO COMMERCIAL BLDG 186 1'dravn 1663 t= -o9t31t8ir-4E/339-4--DALE IRAII&II 4 ROIARD SHERMAN- PAR TIER -11RUf-SERVIFS-BLDG---18g` I'drawn__ 1742 09/24/87 EC-4-1212 THOMAS & CAROL DROLET11 2 LOT SUBDIVISION 906 Notcoon 2280 19/24/87 PB-4-1375 DAVIS DEVELOPMEIT CORP 10,108 S.l. OIIICB BUILDIIG 1,000 Notcona 2283 12/01/89 11-4-0184 DEIIIS BLODGETT BOLUS ROAD EITEISIOI 7,290 NotCono 3614 12/11/89 11-4-0184 DENNIS BLODGETT HOLMES ROAD EITENSION 335 lotCoun 3615 - SSOCIkTES-----ADB-7$-CHILD;--IS-,STA�I--DAICAR�-fiti0-1f'-drawn---3tQ1-- Ac —&f i"A$ELMI --SIR; iMfERi-kb-DR- -;So —lotEenn RI6RT-/C K0R&YSS6i-INC--- 3-SlORF�IIICE BLDG,-SRIIT ST-1rU}- lotCoun— 4%1_ C -48tf#bF 8---RR-4--fftZ----1&IGHT &- MORRISSEY, -IIC. -- INFILTRATION ----- - -11}- lotConff-3�6A-- r 0101/91 11-4-4384 JAMBS IATETTE / L&K PARK BLDG 5 7,501 lotConn C 4293 65//1/91 11-4-0384 JAMBS LAYETTE / L&M PARK BLDG 6 7,506 lotCona 4294 05/81/91 11-4-4384 JANES FA19TT6 / L&M PARK BLDG 7 5,710 IotConn 4295 05/01/91 11-4-1834 JAMBS FATETTS / L&K PARK COKMUIITT BLDG 506 lotconn 4296 /5/11/91 11-44384 JAMBS LAYETTE / L&K PARK INFILTRATION 1,401_ Notconn 1299 17/93/91 11-4-0384 JAMBS IATETTE / L&M PARE RETAIL COMMERCIAL BLDG 6,525 lotCona 4297 19/25/91 11-44442 EDP REALTY ASSOCS 60,600 SQ IT ADDITION 3,825 NotConu 4489 -IiAR€Bl, TARRAI1L i-HOEHL-- }7} - pottoae--4fr44- 95/21/92 EC-4-1658 I1Y1TT1/L1RIIN/L&M PARK 115 SEAT IAST FOOD RESTAURAIT 5,750 lotCoun 4704 05/20/92 EC-4-1658 IATETTE/LAREIkIL&K PARK RESIDENTIAL BLDG 1-4 209 BURN 23,153 lotCona 4715 �t �5t31f4?—if1=#�8f11— tAL-t n"O#-HOMES-FOR -T m- ie-- cmD-€1RE-I-A I- �if1'4=151i- --ARBNBROOI-HOM"#IODIH-IIC III3LT&AT101 --}}l---lotcone- --#748- C 07/28/92 11-4-/512 JIJ REALTY CAR DEALERSHIP IS1 lotconn 4792 Total Outstanding Couitaents , 86,088 G.I.D. STATUS CODES lotCoun • Project Not Yet Discharging to Municipal Sever Systes (cmitsent) Connect - Project Coipleted, Discharging to sunicipal sever Denied = Request for Connection Denied I'dravn • Approval for Connection Withdrawn by Municipality (Coiiitteat) Revoke - Petitioned for Revocation of Persit EPP82251. G loc�1_ �kPrg2oVaC_XrI 1LE0 = CbtJNe C(D r r State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Mr. John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc. 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 4 . AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street `p d I� ;4 T: Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 s 802-244-6951 August 18, 1992 R fj a�W�rA �!}�'iII:-'JR•V�.w.••. •; ;,wSyo,I9�,MoM w6t RE: Southeast Summit and Nowland II Subdivisions, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Steele: Upon receiving your July 7, 1992 request for a wetland review for the two above referenced projects, I recalled that Lisa Borre, former Wetlands Specialist with the Wetlands Office, had reviewed the Nowland II Subdivision project in 1990. While looking for that file, I found that she had also reviewed and commented on the Southeast Summit project. Enclosed are the letters she had written regarding these projects. One of the letters had even been written to yourself in 1991. I'm am not clear why you are again asking for comments from the Wetlands Office when it seems the questions she has raised have not yet been answered and you have not applied for a Conditional Use Determination. Lisa's comments and inquiries for both projects are still applicable today. Please call me to clarify what I find to be a confusing situation. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at 244-6951. Sincerely, Catherine L. O'Brien Assistant Wetlands Coordinator enclosures cc: Lou Borie, District Coordinator co\jsteele.let iZc1c fil�G t 134TF. DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 10 North Building 802-244-6951 January 15, 1991 John Steel Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05676 Subject: Nowland Property II, Spear St., South Burlington Pre -conditional Use Review Dear John: Thank you for sending me the sketch plan by Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn, Inc., dated August 1990, for the above referenced project. I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the project during the early planning stages. Last year I conducted a preliminary site visit with Lance Llewellyn to determine whether there would be any negative impacts to wetlands from proposed development on the property. Since that site visit, the wetlands on the property have been accurately delineated by Brad Wheeler of the Johnson Company. Based on my preliminary evaluation, this wetland is important for at least the following functions: improving water quality through chemical action and storing stormwater. The wetland has been identified as a palustrine scrub shrub wetland on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps. The Vermont Wetland Rules designate all palustrine wetlands identified on NWI maps and contiguous wetland areas as significant (Class Two) wetlands. Any activity in a Class Two wetland or associated 50' buffer zone, other than allowed uses specified in Section 6.2 of the Wetland Rules, requires a Conditional Use Determination (C.U.D.) from the Agency of Natural Resources (Vermont Wetland Rules, Section 6.3 and 8). Such a determination may only be granted if it is shown that the proposed activity will not have undue adverse impacts on protected wetland functions [Vermont Wetland Rules, Section 8.5(a)]. A C.U.D. will be necessary for any proposed activities in the wetland of 50' buffer zone as identified on the plans. A John Steel Page 2 copy of the application and a fact sheet explaining Conditional Uses is enclosed. I have several comments/concerns about the project as proposed in the sketch plans that will need to be addressed as the project plans progress. In general, it appears as though you have attempted to keep development from encroaching on the wetland or buffer zone. My specific comments are described below: 1. Why is it necessary to have two road crossings? How much fill/impact will be involved? My main concern is whether the second crossing can pass the alternatives test as outlined in the mitigation section of the Wetland Rules. I need more information about the extent of impact to make an determination whether the second crossing constitutes a "minimal" impact or an "undue adverse" impact. 2. What are the stormwater plans? Stormwater should be pre-treated before discharging into the wetland or buffer zone. 3. Can the encroachment on lot #73 and the tennis courts be avoided? I recommend eliminating any encroachments on the buffer zone except for the road crossing. 4. Will the wetlands in the Open Space/Common Land and on individual lots be protected by restrictive covenants? Because of the number of lots that contain wetland or buffer zone, I recommend that restrictions be placed on individual lots that contain either wetland or buffer zone. A Declaration of Restrictions should be filed with the town land records and should carry with the land for the common land and the affected lots. There should be no dredging, draining, filling, grading or alteration of the water level in the wetland. Grading and mowing is allowable in the buffer zone. If you have any questions about these comments or the application process, please do not hesitate to call me at 244- 6951. Please keep me informed as plans progress. Sincerely, Lisa Borre Assistant Wetlands Coordinator cc: Lou Borie, District Coordinator Kurt Janson, Land Use Attorney February 9, 1993 Mr. Bill Burgess, South Burlington South Burlington, Dear Bill: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 658-7953 FAX (802) 658-4748 Chairman Planning Commission VT 05403 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER I have noted that the Planning Commission agenda for February 9, 1993 includes the review of a preliminary plat of Larkin-Milot for a planned residential development on Spear Street. (Item #6) In December, the City Council expressed concern about the future development of infrastructure, particularly sanitary sewer, in the Southeast Quadrant. The Council requested a staff review of the use of dedicated force mains and gravity collection systems in order to create a comprehensive and coordinated guide for future infrastructure improvements and extensions in the Quadrant. Bill Szymanski has been working towards this aim. Staff will have a plan to present to Council at the March 1, 1993 meeting. I do not know how far along your Commission will get in your review of the proposed development, but I wanted to make you aware of this study in case it impacted on your review process. Please contact Joe Weith or myself if you have any questions. Sincerely, k� Chuck Hafte City Manager CH/peh SOUTh LURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE: South Burlington High School Lawrence E. LeCours Superintendent SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403-6296 550 DORSET STREET Tel. 802/658-9050 FAX 802/658-9029 February 11, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe, The South Burlington Board of School Directors, at its meeting on February 10, 1993, unanimously approved a motion based upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools regarding Nowland Two Residential Subdivision, File #92045. The action taken incorporates all of the provisions of number 45 in the attached document. I have forwarded copies of this action to the Act 250 Office as well as to John Steele of Fitzpatrick Llewellyn Incorporated. Please give me a call if you have questions regarding any aspect of the above. Sincerely, nLawrencE. LeCours dent of Schools LEL:sc Attachment SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT South Burlington, Vermont 45. Nowland Two Residential Subdivision on Spear Street (File #92045), Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated: 73 single family units to be constructed. I have reviewed the above project as presented to the School Board on January 27, 1993, and have determined the following: A. Based on historical data, the project will generate school students at the rate of 0.5 per single family dwelling, for a total of 36.5 students. (Note that this is considerably lower than estimated by the developer.) B. Based on historical data, these students will be distributed among the school levels as shown below: K-5 16 students (44%) 6-8 7.7 students (21 %) 9-12 12.8 students (35%) C. The district's middle school and high school facilities are presently operating sufficiently below the "action point capacity" that the anticipated new students in these levels can be accommodated without problems. D. The district's elementary school facilities are presently operating at or slightly above the "action point capacity" and cannot readily accept additional students without overcrowding and/or programmatic limitations. The district is presently planning on additions to these facilities to alleviate crowding and to accommodate additional students. E. The district has undertaken a preliminary analysis of the cost of the planned additions and determined that such costs, including state contributions, bond interest and principal payments will amount to $2,609.25 per K-5 student space (see attached analysis summary). With the K-5 student generation rates described above, this yields a typical cost per dwelling as shown below: $750 per single family dwelling $375 per multi -family dwelling Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on February 10, 1993. Based on the above, it is my opinion that the proposed Nowland Two Residential Subdivision will create a burden on this municipality's ability to provide elementary school services. Further, it is my recommendation that such burden be mitigated by payment of a fee by the developer to the school district in the amount of $750 for each single family dwelling, for a total fee of $54,750. The fee will be placed in an account dedicated to expansion of elementary school facilities. I recommend that payment of said fee be considered as a condition of the State Land Use Permit. If construction of the project is phased, the fee may be paid in installments corresponding to the phases, provided that payment of the installment for each phase is made prior to commencement of any construction related to that phase. The South Burlington School District is currently working to establish a school impact fee program under the provisions of 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, and expects to implement such a program before the end of this year. If such an impact fee program is implemented, it is understood that: a. For any fees paid on the above described project prior to the implementation of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, if the paid fees differ from those established under the impact fee program by more than 10 (ten) percent, the difference between the fees actually paid and the fees due under the impact fee program will be addressed as follows: 1. The school district, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request from the developer, will refund any excess payments, or 2. The developer will submit payment to the district of any balance due within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment by the district. b. For any dwellings or phases of the above described project for which fees have not been paid prior to the adoption of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, the fees established under the impact fee program shall apply. Lawrence E. LeCours Superintendent of Schools Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on February 10, 1993. EXPANSION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS ADDITIONAL STUDENT CAPACITY _SCHOOL 96 J SCHOOL S.F. PER CLASSROOM 1,000 TOTAL CLASSROOM S.F. 4,000 SUPPORT FLOOR AREA {%) 20.00% SUPPORT FLOOR AREA 600 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,800 COST PER SQUARE FOOT $70 TOTAL COSTRUCTION COST $336 000 STATE SHARE (30%) $100, 800 SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARE $235,200 ASSUME 20 YEAR BOND ISSUE AT 4 %, LEVEL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS: TOTAL INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS $332,984 TOTAL COST PER STUDENT $3 468.58 --- MITIGATION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS j SCHOOL COST PE R K— 5 STU DE NT $3,468.58 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.5 K-5 STUDENTS AS PERCENT OF ALL STUDENTS 44.02% K-5 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.220080748 STUDENTS PER M.F DWELLING 0.25 K-5 STUDENTS PER M.F. DWELLINC 0.110040374 (COST PER S.F. DWELLING 763.37 COST PER M. F. DWELLING $381.68 MITIGATION FEE PER S.F. DWELLING $750.00 MITIGATION FEE PER M.F. DWELLING $375.00 Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on February 10, 1993. MEMORANDUM TO: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: WILLIAM A. GILBERT DATE: February 10, 1993 RE: NOWLAND TWO PARCEL Thank you for taking the time to consider my comments and receive my memorandum with respect to the Nowland Two parcel on Tuesday evening, February 9th. I believe that my memo made clear what I also thought was clear in my oral presentation. I am not representing any other person than myself in connection with this proceeding. The attached clipping suggests otherwise and I just want to be sure that the Planning Commission understands that I am representing myself in this matter. Once again, thank you for your consideration of the difficult issues in this matter. • THE BUR LINGTON FREE PRESS S WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY_10, 1993 VERMONT , Developers' plans anger Spear St. residents By Sandy Greiner Free Press Correvnondent SOUTH BURLINGTON — Neighbors reacted angrily during Tuesday night's planning com- mission meeting to a proposal by two developers to build 73 houses on land off Spear Street. William Gilbert, representing Spear Street property owners, said the developers are proposing to build 73 houses on an area of land that should only support 18 houses as he interprets the south- east quadrant zoning laws. Gilbert said the southeast quadrant measure allows for 1.1 units or dwellings per acre of eligible land. Becase the quadrant rules govern wetlands and open space, only 16 acres are eligible for development, he said. Developers Gerald Milot and John Larkin attended Tuesday's meeting. The two want to build luxury houses on 66.7 acres east of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive. Milot said the prices would range from $ l 75,000 to $400,000. "Property values will be ad- versely affected by the devel- opment," resident Arthur Boyd said. "I request that the planning commission deny this application. until the property owners have at least. several months for rebut- tal." Commission members said the matter will be discussed fur- ther at next week's planning com- mission meeting, which is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Tuesday in the town hall. . Town planner Joe Weith said he was concerned about the ca- pacity of Bartlett Bay Sewage Treatment Facility. . . "The 73 four -bedroom dwell- 1I ing units might eat up the avail-" ability for sewage treatment at, the Bartlett Bay facility," he said. � Commission member David' Austin, responding to Milot's;�- contention that traffic congestion on Spear. Street was ,a; result of motorists from other towns said:. "We can't ignore traffic problems ' T just because they're caused by' drivers from other municipali- ties." •! El No Text 0 WMA ct G is �neuPQ A.. l9 00 17 �e�, Argo S��,M yoce PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary Plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single-family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive. 2) Appeal by J.W.J. Realty, Inc. of decision by the South Burlington Zoning Administrator denying applicant's request to install two (2) freestanding pylon signs at 1095 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, Z� South Burlington Planning Commission January ,,I�, 1993 �o �it, t6Ai q ) Jed 1, 43, 8ow 26� ... F-AU,. Ic�53 - 13�N� -}m c�t s��,�.. -� 'Exivs,4 r- if lLt? I ro,..► $k 1 -G1' �lcae T - �% `a1�1�► t �� X vo = 7-2� Zv o 5(tJ 8 o z) ftL 101�Uu W WS'r� 1u�IC-14�rL I F{ N Z VA) I T� TC� G L� N SCR .� t_ N) 1/(/1plll Q 0 G ► SS., j._i' uN 1. ) h Av A I L4 /v L E FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 February 9, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Nowland II Traffic Impact Analysis FILE: 92075 Dear Mr. Weith: The Planning Commission Agenda Items dated February 5, 1993 for the Preliminary Plat Application for the Nowland II subdivision have been reviewed. The following are responses to comments relating to traffic items listed in the Agenda. For clarity, each comment is addressed in the order as listed in the Agenda: 1. Spear Street/Swift Street Traffic count data for the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection for June 1992 is greater than the volumes listed in the study for 1993 existing conditions. This difference is due to the monthly variation in traffic at this intersection. Variations in the amount of traffic occur during different months of the year. Those variations are accounted for by applying monthly group factors from the VAOT. For the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection, weekday June traffic counts are considered to be 112% of the annual average daily traffic volume. As an example, if 1,120 vehicles were counted on a weekday in June at this intersection, the actual annual average daily traffic volume would equal 1,000 vehicles. We are confident that the design hour traffic volumes that were developed in the Traffic Impact Analysis (dated January 15, 1993 by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn) are a sufficient estimation of future design hour conditions. The level of service analysis of the Traffic Impact Analysis indicates good levels of service at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection during both AM and PM peak hours, both with and without this project. Concern has been expressed that good levels of service do not currently exist during the AM peak hour. Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying Mr. Joe Weith FILE: 92075 February 9, 1993 Page Two The capacity analyses that were performed at this location for existing conditions included the provision for optimum traffic signal operation. To accomplish this, the cycle length and signal timing was based on providing the best overall level of service. It is highly probable that existing traffic signal timings could be refined to allow for an overall increase in capacity at this intersection, thereby reducing or eliminating existing queues. 2. Overall Intersection Level of Service Tables 2 and 3 of the Traffic Impact Analysis list the levels of service for the two unsignalized intersections that are proposed to serve the project. The "Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 1985" does define the overall level of service for signalized intersections, but does not list overall level of service for unsignalized intersections. 3. Turning Movement Exhibits All traffic volumes are included in the traffic volume tables of the capacity analyses. It was agreed that future traffic impact analyses to be submitted for review by City of South Burlington officials will include sketches of all turning movements. 4. Final Plat, Cost Estimate and Bonding The final plat will show all roadway improvements. Cost estimates could be developed and conditions could be set regarding the sequence of construction and bonding. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact us. Sincerely, FI'TZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Brendan Kelly, P.E. cc: Gerald Milot FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services *` lZo(4S rnviroamifi'ta'l Sciences and, Engt'neering December 16, 1992 REC�Njr DEC 2 1 1992 Mr. John Steele FITZPATRICF-LI r , t'Ll.Y1J Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. INCOf1POl,"I"flta One Wentworth Drive oonsulftng Eng Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Wetlands at the Nowland Two Property, Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont JCO # 1-0616-3 (048) Dear John: The wetland delineation at the referenced property was completed on June 15, 1990. The methodology used to delineate the wetland boundary was from the 1989 Federal Manual for the Identification and Delineation of Jurisdictional Wetlands. My field notes indicate that I hung 123 flags along the boundary of three separate wetland areas on the property. Two of those areas appear to be south of the area shown on the plan for the proposed subdivision (Overall Site Plan) which you recently sent to me. The third area, which was the largest of the three areas, is shown on the Overall Site Plan. Based on my recollection of the site and the general configuration of this wetland area, it appears that the wetland boundary is accurately represented on this plan. This wetland area is associated with a drainage system that flows through the property to the north. My recollection of it is that it is a mixture of wet meadow and scrub/shrub vegetation. The Geld data sheets that were completed for documentation of this boundary list reed canarygrass and several sedge species as the dominant vegetation near the boundary of the wetland. The shrub type vegetation was typically located at lower landscape positions, closer to the stream, probably due to the fact that the wetland edge is occasionally mowed during farming operations. The soils in this area are clayey sediments that were laid down when this area was inundated by the glacial Lake Vermont. These soils have a very high water holding capacity. The area slopes gently from both edges towards the drainage flow in the center of the wetland. The moisture regime gets increasingly wetter towards the stream itself. The National Wetland Inventory Map for this site supports my recollection of this area with its classification of the wetland. It basically describes it as a wetland with scrub/shrub and emergent vegetation with a moisture regime that varies from seasonal to semipermanent to permanent saturation. The emergent vegetation refers to herbaceous plants such as grasses and sedges. , Functionally, the main values of this area are for the enhancement of surface water quality and wildlife habitat. The function of surface water quality enhancement is particularly important at this site due to the proposed subdivision, which could potentially increase surface water flow into this drainage system. The wetlands present along this stream will help to reduce any increased sediment and nutrient loading of this small stream that may occur. Wildlife habitat for songbirds and small mammals is provided especially by the scrub/shrub areas within this wetland. If you have questions about any of the information in this letter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, THE JOHNSON /OMMPANY, C. By / T' Bradley k Wheeler, CPSS Senior Scientist Reviewed by: SAS/G:\USERS\BAW\FITZLLEW.LTR December 16, 1992 14.26 BAW 07411Fni,b n mental EngineeruW llydrogeolo:y Water Sullrh/ U Wash•uvder Oianr,rd 11atanbus Waste Renediation llydroltNy Coulaminant lille Analysis Soil ,r Witter Science CeuloNy & Geoj,hip r:s Rimers and Rims Solid Wioe llomitfi)W 5 State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 ■ (802) 229-4600 fax: (802) 229-5876 SG., i H BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTK..'T South Burlington, Vermont 44. Southeast Summit Residential Subdivision (File #92039), Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn Incorporated: 157 single family units and 64 multi -family units to be constructed. I have reviewed the above project as presented to the School Board on December 21, 1992, and have determined the following: A. Based on historical data, the project will generate school students at the rate of 0.5 per single family dwelling and 0.25 per multi -family dwelling, for a total of 95 students. (Note that this is considerably lower than estimated by the developer.) B. Based on historical data, these students will be distributed among the school levels as shown below: K-5 42 students (44%) 6-8 20 students (21 %) 9-12 33 students (35%) C. The district's middle school and high school facilities are presently operating sufficiently below the "action point capacity" that the anticipated new students in these levels can be accommodated without problems. D. The district's elementary school facilities are presently operating at or slightly above the "action point capacity" and cannot readily accept additional students without overcrowding and/or programmatic limitations. The district is presently planning on additions to these facilities to alleviate crowding and to accommodate additional students. E. The district has undertaken a preliminary analysis of the cost of the planned additions and determined that such costs, including state contributions, bond interest and principal payments will amount to $2,609.25 per K-5 student space (see attached analysis summary). With the K-5 student generation rates described above, this yields a typical cost per dwelling as shown below: $750 per single family dwelling $375 per multi -family dwelling Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on January 27, 1993. Based on the above, it is my opinion that the proposed Southeast Summit Residential Subdivision will create a burden on this municipality's ability to provide elementary school services. Further, it is my recommendation that such burden be mitigated by payment of a fee by the developer to the school district in the amount of $750 for each single family dwelling and $375 for each multi -family dwelling, for a total fee of $141,750. The fee will be placed in an account dedicated to expansion of elementary school facilities. I recommend that payment of said fee be considered as a condition of the State Land Use Permit. If construction of the project is phased, the fee may be paid in installments corresponding to the phases, provided that payment of the installment for each phase is made prior to commencement of any construction related to that phase. The South Burlington School District is currently working to establish a school impact fee program under the provisions of 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, and expects to implement such a program before the end of this year. If such an impact fee program is implemented, it is understood that: a. For any fees paid on the above described project prior to the implementation of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, if the paid fees differ from those established under the impact fee program by more than 10 (ten) percent, the difference between the fees actually paid and the fees due under the impact fee program will be addressed as follows: 1. The school district, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request from the developer, will refund any excess payments, or 2. The developer will submit payment to the district of any balance due within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment by the district. b. For any dwellings or phases of the above described project for which fees have not been paid prior to the adoption of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, the fees established under the impact fee program shall apply. C awrence E. LeCours Superintendent of Schools Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on January 27, 1993. EXPANSION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS SCHOOL ADDITIONAL STUDENT CAPACITY 96 / SC OOL S.F. PER CLASSROOM 1,000 TOTAL CLASSROOM S.F. 4,000 SUPPORT FLOOR AREA (%) 20.00% SUPPORT FLOOR AREA 800 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,800 COST PER SQUARE FOOT $70 TOTAL COSTRUCTION COST $336 000 STATE SHARE (30%) $100, 800 SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARE $235,200 ASSUME 20 YEAR BOND ISSUE AT 4 %, LEVEL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS: TOTAL INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS $332,984 TOTAL COST PER STUDENT $3 468.58 MITIGATION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMSJ SCHOOL COST PE R K— 5 STU DE NT $3,468.58 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.5 K-5 STUDENTS AS PERCENT OF ALL STUDENTS 44.02% K-5 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.220080748 STUDENTS PER M.F DWELLING 0.25 K-5 STUDENTS PER M.F. DWELLINC 0.110040374 COST PER S.F. DWELLING 763.37 COST PER M.F. DWELLING $381.68 MITIGATION FEE PER S.F. DWELLING $750.00 MITIGATION FEE PER M.F. DWELLING $375.00 Approved unanimously at a regular School Board meeting of the South Burlington Board of School Directors on January 27, 1993. File: 92045 Nowland Two Subdivision, Spear Street, South Burlington 26.606 Criteria for Development within Restricted Areas of the Southeast Quadrant District A. More than 27 acres or 41% of the 66.7 acre site will remain as open space including 5 acres of designated Class II wetlands. The majority of the open space is in the center of the project and separates the two developed portions of the site. This space includes a north -south segment of bicycle path and, combined with the 6 acres east of street B, provides significant recreational opportunities to the adjacent homeowners and City residents. The open space provides substantial buffers along Deerfield Drive extension, the Economu parcel on the east, and the Farrell property to the north. B. The general orientation of the Project is north -south. The street and lot layout parallel the wetlands and follow the natural topography. This layout maximized open space and preserves the wetland resources. On site scenic views will be maintained wherever possible, and off sight views will be maintained by the height limitations imposed by the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection District. The undeveloped 10 acres east of the wetlands and bicycle path remains open for agriculture use. C. The placement of buildings, lots, streets and utilities conforms with planned public facilities. The Project preserves significant amounts of open space, provides recreational opportunities including bicycle paths, and conforms to the City's standards for dedicated streets, water, and sewer connections. Deerfield Drive will be extended eastward as recommended by the S.E. Quadrant Study, and portions of an 80' north -south arterial will be set aside along the east side. D. The Preliminary Plat drawings reflect the southeast Quadrant Study and subsequent zoning district regulations including: open space provisions, recreational needs, developable areas, arterial right-of-ways, wetland resources, and height limitations based on the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Overlay District. 2-3-93 JAS#5:92045-1 PLANNING COMMISSION 8 December 1992 page 5 Weith to get comments on the bike path from those concerned. Mr. Weith noted that parking for Ben Franklin is proposed to be on Farrell land., and he will ask the City Attorney if this will require Ben Franklin to be an applicant as well. Mr. Burgess summarized the concerns of the Commission: a. 60 foot right of way b. possibility of parking in the triangular area (instead of landscaping) c. continuation of right of way to Farrell Dr. d. concern with curb cuts and access to adjacent properties, es- pecially Heathcote e. drainage f. screening, fencing, lighting g. issues raised by Heathcote regarding the safety of the rec path Members agreed to make independent site visits. 4. Sketch plan application of MBL Associates, Gerald Milot, and John Larkin for a 237 unit planned residential development on 202.2 acres of land located on Dorset St. near the Shelburne town line and a 132 unit planned residential development on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear St. across from Deer- field Drive. This application involves a transfer of density of 40 residential units from the Dorset St. parcel to the Spear St. parcel: --- Mr. Steele said they are proposing 92 single family units on the Nowland piece and 40 units of elderly housing in 3 multi -unit buildings. Primary access to the Nowland land is off Deerfield Dr. They have reserved a 60 foot right of way at the north end of the project to tie into Spear St. On the eastern cul de sac, they show a right of way to connect to the Farrell property. They feel this is sufficient. They have chosen not to show a connection off the second cul de sac. Regarding buildable area, Mr. Steele showed what was taken out for wetlands, buffers, roads, etc. The developable acreage is 40 acres which would allow them 160 units. They propose 132. They will submit a formal wetlands report. They are also developing a table that will show each lot with the ceiling height in order to meet view protection standards. Meetings have been held regarding recreation and pedestrian trails, and more meetings will be held before a decision is made. The paths will extend along the wetlands but will not enter the wetlands. Mrs. Maher asked if there is proposed any play area PLANNING COMMISSION 8 December 1992 Page 6 for children in the development. Mr. Steele showed an area near the elderly housing and other possible areas. The Southeast Summit site will have an 80 foot right of way with a series of loop roads. For the time being, they will use the existing farm road for emergency purposes only (to satisfy the requirement for a second access). They are asking for a density increase to the fullest extent and propose 237 units here. This will be a mix between single family and multi -units. The applicant is also asking to switch some "developable" and "non -developable" lands. Mr. Milot said this is because a piece that was thought to be wetlands is not wetlands according to their experts. Mr. Weith said he has asked for a copy of this study. Question arose as to whether this plan meets the requirements for a p.u.d. Mr. Milot said they feel there are standards by which a p.u.d. is measured. He noted that Mr. Craig had said there had to be something "special" for the Commission to cprant a p.r.d., but it was their feeling that if they meet the criteria , this cannot be an arbitrary decision. Mr. Austin asked where in the regulations it says the Planning Commission has to grant a p.r.d. and bonus. Mr. Milot repeated that he didn't feel the Commission •can make an arbitrary decision. He felt if they meet the criteria, the Commission has to grant the bonus. He stressed that they had originally come in with a much larger development proposal but have been trying to comply with the city's efforts over the last 3 years and still make something that is economically viable. Mr. Austin emphasized that nowhere does it say that if you get a p.r.d. you automatically get a density bonus. Mr. Milot asked what the criteria are for the 25% bonus so they can apply for it. Mr. Weith asked for a report from the applicant as to how they feel they meet the p.r.d. requirements. He noted that he had asked for this in writing, but Mr. Milot had chosen to make a report orally tonight. Mr. Weith noted that 222 units are allowed as base density on the S. Summit property. Mr. Milot said they are proposing these be affordable housing units and feel this alone is worth of the bonus. He then went through the p.r.d. criteria and stated that for each one they felt they were meeting what was required. Mr. Milot noted that some of the S. Summit land may be gifted to UVM for agricultural research. There may also be several farmers farming some of the land. It was noted that CWD wants a 12" water line. The project needs PLANNING COM_MISSI.O_N_ 8 December 1992 page 7 only an 8" line but they are willing to put in the 12". Mr. Milot asked that they be allowed to recover costs from people who hook onto `his line and cited a precedent for this. Mr. Steele noted that there is a possibility of an architectur- ally sensitive area which Mr. Milot said they will address. ' Mr. Steele then addressed staff written comments. Regarding access at Southeast Summit, they will study the improvements nee e o make Xld Aearm Xd. usable. On the Nowland property, he showed the temporary access but noted there is a retention pond in the temporary access location. He said they will deal with this. He noted a problem with the possibility of headlights shining into a house across the road. He said they will do what the Commission wants regarding the location of this road. Regarding the non -buildable area and why they feel it should be buildable, Mr Steele said they will provide documentation for this. Mr. Gilbert said he didn't feel the applicant could transfer rights as they don't meet enabling legislation. Mr. Milot said they are not transfering development but only density. Mr. Weith said he didn't feel the transfer rules allowed transfer of bonus density, only base density calculation. Mr. Milot agreed with this but asked how he could get a 25% bonus on Southeast Summit and where that density could be put. He said they will go back and try to do a p.r.d. on each site then try to convince the Commission they deserve the density bonus. Mr. Cimonetti said that changes in "buildable" sites will in- volve substantial study and is not a "given." It will involve a lot of public airing. Mr. Boyd said there are some criteria you can't spell out in words such as input from abutting land owners. He noted that on Spear St. the applicant will be going from existing 2 acre lots to 1/2 acre lots which will change the character of the area. He felt this should not be done abruptly. Mr. Farrell, a neighbor, said he would like to comment at the ap- propriate time about traffic concerns. Mr. Bolduc noted a financial implication for neighbors who may be forced to hook on to the sewer and water which will be very costly. Mr. Milot said they propose a force main sewer to which neighbors wouldn't be required to hook up. Mr. Bolduc felt there was a question of efficiency with a force main system. There were no further comments regarding this developments, and as there was no further business to come before the Commission N/F UND£RWO NOTES N/F 18/S / j / p `� I. OWNER / APPLICANT. LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP �\ 410 SHELBURNE ROAD BURLINGTON, WRA40NT / N/F IBIS �� S \ •`••��,, 2. ZONED: SOUTHEAST OUADRANT J. TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 66.7 ACRES / N/F CHID >�` �` 4. PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM PLAN ENTITLED NOWLAND PROPERTY !I - SUBDINSION PLAN' BY FITZPA%RICK - LLEWELLYN INC. NUMBER D-3879 / 0-J880, DATED MARCH 1991. N/F GA GNON � � ��•• /' T ,�� 5. TOPOGRAPHIC AND EXIS77NG FEATURES /NFORMA77ON BY FITZPATRICK-LL£WELLYN N ATKINS i ! �. 6. PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION FOR SWIFT ESTATES TAKEN FROM TAX i N/F MEREDITN i\• MAPS PROVIDED BY THE C17-Y OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. 1 /•,�"•• ', �• y� ,` / �•�� .,, 7 PROJECT DESCRIPAAN: 2 %I 1\••�• 7J SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 66.7 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SPEAR 3 8 STREET /N SOUTH BURLINGTON, WRA40NT. OD HANSON 52 f - 10 ,, / -C [TAMOUNT LANE) STREET A. \• � "'��-- I � i ' M pNjNAI I 21 T / CCATpN r ` 21 I16; 15 14 / 1 50 20 19 18; I :17 I I I ' .43„ / 2� / 12 J 23 I 1 I - 49 24 { 1 25 26 27 -� 28 10' U77LI £AS£MENr Ira.) 29 30 31 32 33 34 I48 (FALL LINE DRIVE) STREET A' \ 1 �(4645 44 43 42 41 40 39 \ i I \ 38 37 36 N/F FARRELL ET. At. COMMON LAND I W !' B , � I r}1jDlCl1 - -�-- I --�- - I • -T DELINEATED M£TLAND UMITS 54 55 56- 57 5860y T 62 ( CASTLEROCK CIRCLE % ---C 63 \ 'STREET 9• -"- � � 10• U71UTY EASEMENT 73 72 71 70 69 68 \\ —� -- --L__ 67 / 65 COMMON LAND 0 i N/F ECONOMOU FARMS INC. U) / -\ 64 65 COMMON LAND �/ C N/F ISHAM (+/-) L A ROADWAY WITH CURBS BOTH SIDES AND SIDEWALK ONE SIDE WITHIN A PROPOSED CITY R.O.W. 6500 (+/-) LINEAR FEET OF 8- WATER MAIN FROM EXIS77NG WATER MAIN ON SPEAR STREET AT THE DEERFIELD DRIVE INTERSECTION. 5500 (+-) LINEAR FEET OF STORM COLLEC71ON SEWER DISCHARGING TO THREE PROPOSED DETENTION BASINS. 8. STREET NAMES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE PROPOSED ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO OWNER / CITY APPROVAL. RECENVED JAN 0 5 1993 City of So. Burlington n rr.0 I i I R£NS£D ROADWAY AND SOME LOTS VO. RE-NSlONS DATE IT IS THE USERS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS INCLUDE THE LATEST R£NSIONS. PR£UMINARY PLAT ACT 250 FINAL PLAT CONSTRUCTION [NO UPLAND TWO OVERALL SITE PLAN 92045 FH LLE w am INCORPORATED NILY 1992 BWD D - 4362 31N1t� J!;(i MLLISTON VERMONT J /9 ,rt,94-1 ......... 41le Y 7/ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 5, 1993 John Steele FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Nowland II PRD, Spear Street Dear Mr. Steele: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Jim Goddette were forwarded at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si c rely, oe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: Gerald Milot John Larkin January 1993 Nowland Two Subdivision, Spear Street, South Burlington 92045 Table of height limitations for structures within the Dorset Park View Protection Zones (VPZ) A and D L KeV Notes 1. Lot number according to drawing: D 4382S/-�- 2. Dorset Park View Protection Zone, A or D 3. Distance from Dorset Park VPZ baseline to house lot 4. Existing house lot grade 5. Ceiling height relative to Dorset Park VPZ Baseline 6. Road centerline grade adjacent to house lot 7. First floor elevation (road centerline grade plus 5 feet) 8. Maximum height of structures, first floor elevation to ridgeline (ceiling height minus FFE). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+.5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st Fl. Elev. Max. Height 1 p, 5600 391.0 417.6 390.5 395.5 22.1 2 `A 56 0� 390.0 417.6 389.5 394.5 23.1 3 IAl 5600 389.0 417. 388.8 393.4 23.8 4 A , 5 09 388.0 417.§ 388.4 393.4 24.2 5 A 5600 387.0 417.6 387.9 392.9 24.7 6 A 56,OQ, 386.0 417.q 387.0 392.0 25.6 7 5600 384.0 417. 3o. 386.0 391.0 26.6 8 5600 382.0 41 385.7 390.2 27.4 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services • i File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st Fl. Elev� Max. Height 9 5600 380.0 431.1 �+�0. 384.2 389.2 41.9 10 D �60a0o 380.0 4 310, 1 384.1 389.1 42.0 11 D3 5q)0 388.0 4 1. �. �R7.0 392.0 39.1 12 �A� 5.60 p 386.0 4311.1 384.0 389.0 42.1 13 D�� 5 OQa 386.0 4311 383.8 388.8 42.3 14 ADD` 5600p 386.0 4311.9 384.4 389.4 41.7 15 Dob 56 0- 386.0 431. 384.8 389.8 41.3 16 4_05S60A� 387.0 417.6 385.4 390.4 27.2 17 56QQ 388.0 4 7.6 385.9 390.9 26.7 18 560n 389.0 417.06 386.5 391.5 26.1 19 A 5 609 390.0 .6 386.8 391.8 25.8 20 A 560Q 390.0 417.� 387.4 392.4 25.2 21 5600 390.0 417.6 387.8 392.8 24.8 22 �IAV�a 56G00� 389.5 417.6 388.3 393.3 24.3 _ 23 �Ao 53_00 392.0 41 390.5 395.5 23.1 24 A _ c;, 5 QO mac^ 392.0 418.p U i 391.5 396.5 22.1 25 0�. 53Qc0 392.0 41 392.2 397.2 21.4 26 �A 53 -0 392.0 4,18.6 392.6 397.6 21.0 27 A, 530A., 392.5 a4106 393.0 398.0 20.6 28 3� � 53013 393.0 418.6 393.2 398.2 20.4 29 ;�7�� 5300� 393.0 418, Lf 393.5 398.5 20.1 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Exist Ceiling Rd. C.L. 1st F1. Max. Lot # VPZ Dist. Grade Height Grade Elew. Height 30 530 391.0 431. 393.3 398.3 33.0 31 D 53P0� 392.5 431.3 393.0 398.0 33.3 32 D 5300 392.0 431.3 392.5 397.5 33.8 33 D 5j3 0'�> 391.0 431.�3 391.0 396.0 35.3 34 D 5300 391.5 431.3 389.5 394.5 36.8 57 PO /-I,,.C> 35 D 530,0 391.0 431.; 390.5 395.5 35.8 36 -6D 5300_ 390.0 431.? 391.5 396.5 34.8 37 3gD 5`Qpp 391.0 431Lj .3 392.2 397.2 34.1 38 z D 53 0 390.5 431.3 393.8 398.8 32.5 39 �$D 530 391.0 4313 393.2 398.2 33.1 0 40 D 530.0 391.0 431.3 393.4 398.4 32.9 41 A J 5300, 391.0 418. 393.3 398.3 20.3 42 1OQ 391.0 418.6 393.1 398.1 20.5 43 A 5300 391.0 418.6 392.8 397.8 20.8 3 •q 3 JO q ,) 1, 3 44 A 5� 0 391.5 41 .6 392.3 397.3 21.3 m. n i 45 A 5300 390.5 418.6 392.0 397.0 21.6 46 A 5300 390.0 418.6 392.2 397.2 21.4 47 A 5300 390.0 418.6 390.6 395.6 23.0 48 �i�A 5 390.5 41Q 6 390.2 395.2 23.4 b i �. 49 /t A 5 00 391.5 41 .¢ 389.9 394.9 23.7 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Exist Ceiling Rd. C.L. 1st Fl. Max. Lot # VPZ Dist. Grade Height Grade Elev. Height 50 A 5.J Oo 390.5 418.6 389.4 394.4 24.2 51 A 5.6,00 389.0 417.6 389.0 394.0 23.6 52 A 56,00 389.5 417.E 389.8 394.8 22.8 53 569P 389.5 417.6 390.5 395.5 22.1 54 4�% 392. 0 42(�. � 394.5 399.5 20.6 aA 55 A 4800, 392.0 420.; 395.2 400.2 19.9 56 A 489,F� 392.0 429.�1 395.6 400.6 19.5 /T 57 A 4 ,,0 0 392.0 42Q.1 396.2 401.2 18.9_ / 58 A 4 393.5 420.1 396.8 401.8 18.3 59 48,00 392.0 �. 397.2 402.2 17.9 'S 60 �A,, 4$Og 391.5 0�} L44 397.6 402.6 17.5 J . 61 � 4800 391.0 420.j 398.1 403.1 17.0 3�A - . _-, 62 4,$OQ� 391.0 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 3- � (yc� N 3: _ , 63 D 4800, 391.0 43 398.1 403.1 28.5 64 D 3,4 4 g 393.0 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 65 D 4800 393.5 4331.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 66 4800 392.5 420.1 398.1 403.1 17.0 67 4800 392.5 420.1 397.5 402.5 17.6 68 4800 392.5 420.1 397.0 402.0 18.1 69 A 4800 392.5 4 0. 396.5 401.5 18.6 a�. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st Fl. Elev. Max. Height 70 14A 4800� 392.5 420;1 ao - 396.0 401.0 19.1 71 A 4809 ti 392.5 420.1 395.5 400.5 19.5 72 7 4800 392.5 420.1 395.0 400.0 20.1 73 �� A o 4800 393.0 42�0.1 '4o. 394.5 399.5 20.6 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services SOUTH �URLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE: South Burlington High School Lawrence E. LeCours Superintendent SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403-6296 550 DORSET STREET Tel. 802/658-9050 FAX 802/658-9029 January 29, 1993 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Joe, The South Burlington Board of School Directors, at its meeting on January 27, 1993, unanimously approved a motion based upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Schools regarding Southeast Summit Residential Subdivision, File #95039. The action taken incorporates all of the provisions of number 44 in the attached document. I have forwarded copies of this action to the Act 250 Office as well as to John Steele of Fitzpatrick Llewellyn Incorporated. Please give me a call if you have questions regarding any aspect of the above. Sincerely, Lawrenc E. LeCours �u iiu�i iL ui .�� i ita LEL:sc Attachment AGENDA 1 2. 3. 4 5 1 7 SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL BOARD MEETING February 10, 1993 7:30 P.M. FREDERICK H. TUTTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL LIBRARY REGULAR MEETING Comments and questions from the public Consider the proposed 1993-94 budget for presentation to the Steering Committee - Lawrence LeCours a. Discussion b. The Board is requested to take ACTION. Consider pilot program for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities -- Robert DiFerdinando a. Discussion Consider the impact of the proposed Nowland Two Residential Subdivision on Spear Street, (File #92045) project on the school district -- Lawrence LeCours a. Discussion b. The Board is requested to take ACTION. Receive preliminary outline of School Director's Objective #5, Plan for communicating with the public regarding budget ballot item in May -- Frank Murray a. Discussion Consider Accounts Payable Orders #31 and #32 -- Leo Brown a. Discussion b. The Board is requested to take ACTION. Consider the minutes of the Special Meetings of January 20, 26 and the Regular Meeting of January 27, 1993 -- Theodore Manazir a. Discussion b. The Board is requested to take ACTION. -Over- 8. Correspondence 9. Old Business 10. New Business 11. Executive Session -- Theodore Manazir a. To consider matters pertaining to negotiations b. To continue with superintendent's search deliberations (if necessary) 12. Adjournment Please contact the superintendent's office to place items on future agendas. I i SOS M BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT South Burlington, Vermont 45. Nowland Two Residential Subdivision on Spear Street (File #92045), Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated: 73 single family units to be constructed. I have reviewed the above project as presented to the School Board on January 27, 1993, and have determined the following: A. Based on historical data, the project will generate school students at the rate of 0.5 per single family dwelling, for a total of 36.5 students. (Note that this is considerably lower than estimated by the developer.) B. Based on historical data, these students will be distributed among the school levels as shown below: K-5 16 students (44%) 6-8 7.7 students (21 %) 9-12 12.8 students (35%) C. The district's middle school and high school facilities are presently operating sufficiently below the "action point capacity" that the anticipated new students in these levels can be accommodated without problems. D. The district's elementary school facilities are presently operating at or slightly above the "action point capacity" and cannot readily accept additional students without overcrowding and/or programmatic limitations. The district is presently planning on additions to these facilities to alleviate crowding and to accommodate additional students. E. The district has undertaken a preliminary analysis of the cost of the planned additions and determined that such costs, including state contributions, bond interest and principal payments will amount to $2,609.25 per K-5 student space (see attached analysis summary). With the K-5 student generation rates described above, this yields a typical cost per dwelling as shown below: $750 per single family dwelling $375 per multi -family dwelling Based on the above, it is my opinion that the proposed Nowland Two Residential Subdivision will create a burden on this municipality's ability to provide elementary school services. Further, it is my recommendation that such burden be mitigated by payment of a fee by the developer to the school district in the amount of $750 for each single family dwelling, for a total fee of $54,750. The fee will be placed in an account dedicated to expansion of elementary school facilities. I recommend that payment of said fee be considered as a condition of the State Land Use Permit. If construction of the project is phased, the fee may be paid in installments corresponding to the phases, provided that payment of the installment for each phase is made prior to commencement of any construction related to that phase. The South Burlington School District is currently working to establish a school impact fee program under the provisions of 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, and expects to implement such a program before the end of this year. If such an impact fee program is implemented, it is understood that: a. For any fees paid on the above described project prior to the implementation of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, if the paid fees differ from those established under the impact fee program by more than 10 (ten) percent, the difference between the fees actually paid and the fees due under the impact fee program will be addressed as follows: 1. The school district, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request from the developer, will refund any excess payments, or 2. The developer will submit payment to the district of any balance due within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment by the district. b. For any dwellings or phases of the above described project for which fees have not been paid prior to the adoption of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, the fees established under the impact fee program shall apply. - CAI►099::%a Lawrence E. LeCours Superintendent of Schools EXPANSION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS SCHOOL ADDITIONAL STUDENT CAPACITY 96 / SCHOO S.F. PER CLASSROOM 1,000 TOTAL CLASSROOM S.F. 4,000 SUPPORT FLOOR AREA (%) 20.00% SUPPORT FLOOR AREA 800 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,800 COST PER SQUARE FOOT $70 TOTAL COSTRUCTION COST $336 000 STATE SHARE (30%) $100, 800 SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARE $235,200 ASSUME 20 YEAR BOND ISSUE AT 4 %, LEVEL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS: TOTAL INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS $332,984 TOTAL COST PER STUDENT $3,468.56 MITIGATION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS SCHOOL COST PER K-5 STUDENT $3,468.58 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.5 K-5 STUDENTS AS PERCENT OF ALL STUDENTS 44.02% K-5 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.220080748 STUDENTS PER M.F DWELLING 0.25 K-5 STUDENTS PER M.F. DWELLINC 0.110040374 COST PER S.F. DWELLING -$763.37 COST PER M.F. DWELLING $381.68 MITIGATION FEE PER S.F. DWELLING $750.00 MITIGATION FEE PER M.F. DWELLING $375.00 ALL W14t 0 dA OSO 139: Ado Jr -x. - klT "(,OLJ r-l000e 6Ur,-V. s- 4-C-0- 42- FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORpI)RATED Engineering and Planning S, �es One Wentworth Drive WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 878-3000 TO 27 LCEUM L ) OF UQOZE DUUM �i. 0-i / > WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION � � �j ✓� ++!✓7 ! �plj �y THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR —BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US 0 M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning ]assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - February 9, 1993 agenda items Date: January 11, 1993 NOWLAND II - 73 UNIT PRD - PRELIMINARY PLAT --- a complete survey of the subdivision tract by a licensed land '\surveyor must be submitted. --- plans should show limits of developable area as shown on the A)a SEQ zoning map. --- building envelopes for lots 7-10 must be shown. --- applicant should address the impact of street "C" on the adjacent single family houses on Spear Street. --- this property is located within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. All site and street landscaping should be evaluated and evidence submitted to show that the proposed plantings will not exceed the height limitations. This also applies to all street lighting. --- landscaping schedule should be broken down into two (2) parts: 1) all street trees and 2) all other landscaping. --- plan should show a reserved r.o.w. in the vicinity of lot #35 �. for future connection to the Farrell property. --- provide Champlain Water District with copy of water line plans and details for their review and comment. --- a portion of the development is proposed outside of the designated development areas as shown on the SEQ zoning map. Section 26.606 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to review proposed developments in a restricted area according to certain criteria contained in this section. The applicant should submit a report which addresses these criteria. --- a copy of the wetland study should be submitted. This is needed to allow a variation from the SEQ zoning map. --- all watercourses should be shown on the 1"=40' scale plans with the corresponding C.O. zones. Preliminary Memo - Planning February 9, 1993 agenda items January 11, 1993 Page 2 --- the eight (8) foot recreation path on the north side of Deerfield Drive reduces to five (5) feet in width when it changes from sheet 4 to sheet 5, this recreation path should continue to be eight (8) feet in width all the way to the end of Deerfield Drive. --- a 20 foot easement should be provided for the proposed bike/pedestrian path which runs north -south through the development. 19.104 of the zoning regulations require that in addition to the street trees, two(2) trees per single family lot be provided. --- in the type of street light proposed provided and maintained by GMP? --- street trees can not be allowed which will exceed the height limit, applicant is proposing "Zelcova' trees along "Street B" which has a height limitation of 17-20 feet. The "Zelcova" can reach a height of 50 feet. Trees must be chosen which will not exceed height limit (i.e. Gray Dogwood, Amur Maple). --- need letter from CWD that water details are acceptable. --- provide number of bedrooms in development for sewer allocation purposes. �r y //v r r f'• 41 l'rlCORPOR A7n ors STATE OF VERMONT Consult�n41 3 AGENCY OF DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Preserving Vermont's historic, architectural and archeological resources July 15, 1992 John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. 1 Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05495 Re: Nowland II Property, So. Burlington. Pre -Act 250. Dear Mr. Steele: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced project. The Division has reviewed this undertaking for purposes of Criterion 8, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250). Project review consists of identifying the project's potential impacts to historic buildings, structures, historic districts, historic landscapes and settings, and known or potential archeological resources. The purpose of our review is to provide the Environmental District Commission with the necessary information for them to make a positive finding under the "historic sites" aspect of Criterion 8. David Skinas, on our staff, conducted a field inspection of the project area on July 8, 1992. Based on available environmental information, the project area was believed to be archeologically sensitive. The field inspection revealed that the drainage that flows through the project area was man-made. Therefore, we have no further concerns with archeological resources in relation to this project. Office location: 135 State Street. (802) 828-3226 Mailing address: 109 State Street, Pavilion Building Montpelier, Vermont 05609-1201 Mr. Steele Page 2 July 15, 1992 We conclude that the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on any historic or archeological properties that are listed on or eligible for inclusion in either the State or National Registers of Historic Places. SiC-, rely, Eric Gilbertson Director/ Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer EG/SCJ cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT Dedicated to Quality Water & Service Mr. John Steele Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn One Wentworth Drive Williston, VT 05405 RE: Act 250 Review: Dear Sir, January 18, 1993 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 (80022j)��88�'6'' 4((--'77454 !� / ,! ?HIV 2 5 1993 �' ii'�fy',�;1'Ti3CF:-l-�:.C'•`,!::I.LYhi c.;ans:y!,tltt� ��yr�irzu►r�rs Nowland Two Subdivision Spear Street, South Burlington, VT In response to your request for information regarding the Champlain Water District's capability to supply water to the referenced project we submit the following: 1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via a 24" transmission main. 2. Adequate water storage is located and maintained south of the Dorset Street and Swift Street intersection as provided by a 1,500,000 gallon storage tank. 3. Your estimated demand of 43,800 gallons per day for the above referenced proposed project can be furnished by the Champlain Water District without restricting or encumbering its present users on the CWD supply system. 4. Capability of the local water distribution system must be verified by the local water system official. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT James W. Fay Operations Manager cc: E. Blake R. Pratt R. Gardner C. Hafter P. Jacob S. Burlington school -`-cuts N considered By..Sandy Grelner Free Press Correspondent The South Burl ington,.School Board on Wednesday discussed reductions in the ] 993-94 district budget that would be necessary if voters reject a tax increase to offset a deficit in operating funds. If voters in -May reject the 3.7 percent taxincrcase,,which would. add $374,662 to next year's oper-, sting budget, cuts.,;aotaling that, amout�f ;would ?result' in rcduc- tions ,irleluding personnel, sup-- ` plies,"' ' ' todial services, athletics,:-; field trips and library funding. 'If the referendum fails, the proposed budget says: ' ■ Twelve staff members and teachers would receive reduction - in -force notifications. None j would be terminated, but all would face a . reduction in work loads and pay. Each of the three elementary schools would lose a part-time custodian, and the mid- dle school would lose a half-time custodian. ■ Special education funding would be reduced by $44,125, resulting in the loss of aides. 0 The largest cut { $124,374 — would come from the high school budget. The el- ementary schools would lose a total of $113,350, and the middle school $46,450. ■ Central office cutbacks would total $46,363. Reductions planned regard- less of the outcome of the May vote arc elimination of sabbati- cals, at a savings of $60,000; the loss of one high school custodian, $24,000; a reduction of $20,000 in the middle school guidance administration budget; and $45,000 in salary savings through the retirement of a staff member. The board will prescni a final version of the proposed reduc- tions to the City Council when the two boards meet at 7:30 p.m. Feb. 10 in City Hall. In other action In other business Wednes- day night, the board approved an interim Impact fee rate, which would be charged to developers who propose hous- ing projects that would signifi- cantly increase school' enrollments. The board approved a fee of $750 for each single-family dwelling and $375 for each multi -family dwelling. The impact fee is designed to offset the cost of school expansion. The board acted on the impact fees In response to proposed developments, in- cluding 73 single-family units off Spear Street In the Over- look Park area, and a Dorset street development that would include 157 single-family units and 64 multi -family units. SC ►H BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISM..,i :4'4 South Burlington, Vermont 44. Southeast Summit Residential Subdivision (File #92039), Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn Incorporated: 157 single family units and 64 multi -family units to be constructed. have reviewed the above project as presented to the School Board on December 21, 1992, and have determined the following: A. Based on historical data, the project will generate school students at the rate of 0.5 per single family dwelling and 0.25 per multi -family dwelling, for a total of 95 students. (Note that this is considerably lower than estimated by the developer.) B. Based on historical data, these students will be distributed among the school levels as shown below: K-5 42 students (44%) 6-8 20 students (21 %) 9-12 33 students (35%) C. The district's middle school and high school facilities are presently operating sufficiently below the "action point capacity" that the anticipated new students in these levels can be accommodated without problems. D. The district's elementary school facilities are presently operating at or slightly above the "action point capacity" and cannot readily accept additional students without overcrowding and/or programmatic limitations. The district is presently planning on additions to these facilities to alleviate crowding and to accommodate additional students. E. The district has undertaken a preliminary analysis of the cost of the planned additions and determined that such costs, including state contributions, bond interest and principal payments will amount to $2,609.25 per K-5 student space (see attached analysis summary). With the K-5 student generation rates described above, this yields a typical cost per dwelling as shown below: $750 per single family dwelling $375 per multi -family dwelling Based on the above, it is my opinion that the proposed Southeast Summit Residential Subdivision will create a burden on this municipality's ability to provide elementary school services. Further, it is my recommendation that such burden be mitigated by payment of a fee by the developer to the school district in the amount of $750 for each single family dwelling and $375 for each multi -family dwelling, for a total fee of $141,750. The fee will be placed in an account dedicated to expansion of elementary school facilities. I recommend that payment of said fee be considered as a condition of the State Land Use Permit. If construction of the project is phased, the fee may be paid in installments corresponding to the phases, provided that payment of the installment for each phase is made prior to commencement of any construction related to that phase. The South Burlington School District is currently working to establish a school impact fee program under the provisions of 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, and expects to implement such a program before the end of this year. If such an impact fee program is implemented, it is understood that: a. For any fees paid on the above described project prior to the implementation of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, if the paid fees differ from those established under the impact fee program by more than 10 (ten) percent, the difference between the fees actually paid and the fees due under the impact fee program will be addressed as follows: 1. The school district, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request from the developer, will refund any excess payments, or 2. The developer will submit payment to the district of any balance due within thirty (30) days of receipt of a request for payment by the district. b. For any dwellings or phases of the above described project for which fees have not been paid prior to the adoption of the impact fee program under 24 V.S.A., Chapter 131, the fees established under the impact fee program shall apply. 04�?4�A-x .. Lawrence E. LeCours Superintendent of Schools January 27, 1993 EXPANSION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS SCHOOL CAPACITh 9�PER rADDMGNAL-s-TIJfD-ENI CLASSROOM AL CLASSROOM S.F. 1,000 4,000 PORT FLOOR AREA (%) 20.00% SUPPORT FLOOR AREA 800 TOTAL FLOOR AREA COST PER SQUARE FOOT 4,800 $70 TOTAL COSTRUCTION COST $336 000 STATE SHARE (30%) $100, 800 SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARE $235,200 ASSUME 20 YEAR BOND ISSUff AT 4 %, LEVEL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS: TOTAL INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS $332,984 TOTAL COST PER STUDENT $3 468.58 MITIGATION COST ANALYSIS FOUR CLASSROOMS SCHOOL COST PER K-5 STUDENT 3,468.58 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.5 K-5 STUDENTS AS PERCENT OF ALL STUDENTS 44.02% K-5 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.220080748 STUDENTS PER M.F DWELLING 0.25 K-5 STUDENTS PER M.F. DWELLINJ 0.110040374 COST PER S.F. DWELLING $763.37 COST PER M.F. DWELLING � $381.68 MITIGATION FEE PER S.F. DWELLING $750.00 MITIGATION FEE PER M.F. DWELLING $375.00 EXPANSION COST ANALYSIS FIVE CLASSROOMS SCHOOL DDIT 0 "fDOC N AP C 100 SC 00 S.F. PER CLASSROOM 1,000 TOTAL CLASSROOM S.F. 5,000 SUPPORT FLOOR AREA (%) 20.00% PPORT FLOOR AREA 1000 AL FLOOR AREA 6,000 T PER SQUARE FOOT E $70 AL COSTRUCTION COST $420 000 STATE. SHARE (30%) $126,000 SCHOOL DISTRICT SHARE $294,000 ASSUME 20 YEAR BOND ISSUE AT 4%, LEVEL PRINCIPAL -PAYMENTS: TOTAL INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS $417,480 TOTAL COST PER STUDENT 1 $4 174.Q0 �- MITIGATION COST ANALYSIS FIVE CLASSROOMS SCHOOL COST PE R K- 5 STU DE NT 4,174.80 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.5 K-5 STUDENTS AS PERCENT OF ALL STUDENTS 44.02% K-5 STUDENTS PER S.F. DWELLING 0.220080748 ' STUDENTS PER M.F DWELLING 0.25 K-5 STUDENTS PER M.F. DWELLINC 0.110040374 COST ('ER S,F. - CLLING $918.79 COST PER M.F. DWELLING $459 40 MITIGAW FEE PLR S.F. DWELLING $900.00 MITIGATION FEE PER M.F. DWELLING $450.00 January 1993 Nowland Two Subdivision, Spear Street, South Burlington 92045 Table of height limitations for structures within the Dorset Park View Protection Zones (VPZ) A and D Key Notes 1. Lot number according to drawing: D 4382 2. Dorset Park View Protection Zone, A or D 3. Distance from Dorset Park VPZ baseline to house lot 4. Existing house lot grade 5. Ceiling height relative to Dorset Park VPZ Baseline 6. Road centerline grade adjacent to house lot 7. First floor elevation (road centerline grade plus 5 feet) 8. Maximum height of structures, first floor elevation to ridgeline (ceiling height minus FFE). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st Fl. Elev. Max. Height 1 A 5600 391.0 417.6 390.5 395.5 22.1 2 A 5600 390.0 417.6 389.5 394.5 23.1 3 A 5600 389.0 417.6 388.8 393.4 23.8 4 A 5600 388.0 417.6 388.4 393.4 24.2 5 A 5600 387.0 417.6 387.9 392.9 24.7 6 A 5600 386.0 417.6 387.0 392.0 25.6 7 A 5600 384.0 417.6 386.0 391.0 26.6 8 A 5600 382.0 417.6 385.2 390.2 27.4 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st F1. Elev. Max. Height 9 D 5600 380.0 431.1 384.2 389.2 41.9 10 D 5600 380.0 431.1 384.1 389.1 42.0 11 D 5600 388.0 431.1 387.0 392.0 39.1 12 D 5600 386.0 431.1 384.0 389.0 42.1 13 D 5600 386.0 431.1 383.8 388.8 42.3 14 D 5600 386.0 431.1 384.4 389.4 41.7 15 D 5600 386.0 431.1 384.8 389.8 41.3 16 A 5600 387.0 417.6 385.4 390.4 27.2 17 A 5600 388.0 417.6 385.9 390.9 26.7 18 A 5600 389.0 417.6 386.5 391.5 26.1 19 A 5600 390.0 417.6 386.8 391.8 25.8 20 A 5600 390.0 417.6 387.4 392.4 25.2 21 A 5600 390.0 417.6 387.8 392.8 24.8 22 A 5600 389.5 417.6 388.3 393.3 24.3 23 A 5300 392.0 418.6 390.5 395.5 23.1 24 A 5300 392.0 418.6 391.5 396.5 22.1 25 A 5300 392.0 418.6 392.2 397.2 21.4 26 A 5300 392.0 418.6 392.6 397.6 21.0 27 A 5300 392.5 418.6 393.0 398.0 20.6 28 A 5300 393.0 418.6 393.2 398.2 20.4 29 A 5300 393.0 418.6 393.5 398.5 20.1 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade lst F1. Elev. Max. Height 30 D 5300 391.0 431.3 393.3 398.3 33.0 31 D 5300 392.5 431.3 393.0 398.0 33.3 32 D 5300 392.0 431.3 392.5 397.5 33.8 33 D 5300 391.0 431.3 391.0 396.0 35.3 34 D 5300 391.5 431.3 389.5 394.5 36.8 35 D 5300 391.0 431.3 390.5 395.5 35.8 36 D 5300 390.0 431.3 391.5 396.5 34.8 37 D 5300 391.0 431.3 392.2 397.2 34.1 38 D 5300 390.5 431.3 393.8 398.8 32.5 39 D 5300 391.0 431.3 393.2 398.2 33.1 40 D 5300 391.0 431.3 393.4 398.4 32.9 41 A 5300 391.0 418.6 393.3 398.3 20.3 42 A 5300 391.0 418.6 393.1 398.1 20.5 43 A 5300 391.0 418.6 392.8 397.8 20.8 44 A 5300 391.5 418.6 392.3 397.3 21.3 45 A 5300 390.5 418.6 392.0 397.0 21.6 46 A 5300 390.0 418.6 392.2 397.2 21.4 47 A 5300 390.0 418.6 390.6 395.6 23.0 48 A 5300 390.5 418.6 390.2 395.2 23.4 49 A 5300 391.5 418.6 389.9 394.9 23.7 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st F1. Elev. Max. Height 50 A 5300 390.5 418.6 389.4 394.4 24.2 51 A 5600 389.0 417.6 389.0 394.0 23.6 52 A 5600 389.5 417.6 389.8 394.8 22.8 53 A 5600 389.5 417.6 390.5 395.5 22.1 54 A 4800 392.0 420.1 394.5 399.5 20.6 55 A 4800 392.0 420.1 395.2 400.2 19.9 56 A 4800 392.0 420.1 395.6 400.6 19.5 57 A 4800 392.0 420.1 396.2 401.2 18.9 58 A 4800 393.5 420.1 396.8 401.8 18.3 59 A 4800 392.0 420.1 397.2 402.2 17.9 60 A 4800 391.5 420.1 397.6 402.6 17.5 61 A 4800 391.0 420.1 398.1 403.1 17.0 62 D 4800 391.0 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 63 D 4800 391.0 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 64 D 4800 393.0 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 65 D 4800 393.5 431.6 398.1 403.1 28.5 66 A 4800 392.5 420.1 398.1 403.1 17.0 67 A 4800 392.5 420.1 397.5 402.5 17.6 68 A 4800 392.5 420.1 397.0 402.0 18.1 69 A 4800 392.5 420.1 396.5 401.5 18.6 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services File: 92045 cont. Table of height limitations for structures, within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone (VPZ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (6)+5.0' (5)-(7) Lot # VPZ Dist. Exist Grade Ceiling Height Rd. C.L. Grade 1st Fl. Elev. Max. Height 70 A 4800 392.5 420.1 396.0 401.0 19.1 71 A 4800 392.5 420.1 395.5 400.5 19.5 72 A 4800 392.5 420.1 395.0 400.0 20.1 73 A 4800 393.0 420.1 394.5 399.5 20.6 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services aeA-Id'�wra 'to VcoeseT 10Al2K- ulev ep-4�17e.G'ft0p -i5Our-, NOTES 1, N/FIS/5... N/F IBIS � N/F CNlU � /• T � i �� L.. / • N/F GAGNON ` \��- •l / .�• , ��. J 1 N/F MEREOITH %I N/E ATKINS-/,' % • I •\' ` N/F _ _ / i � UNDERWOOD El I l 52 _ - I S7Rff 'A' Fl CATAMOUNT LANE /51) J 22: COMM plvi : N/F HANSON 50 : 21 .20 19 18 171 i ' 16 ! }5 i Gl .13 . 1? • �� ! A ! L _ L A` 24 25 Q27 mI . Q 26 J ' ro' uEASEuENr rrn.) 28 y (, 70 I -c 32 77 34 I' 48 _ (FALL LINE DRIVE) STREET 'A'-- — - --= I �( A. 45 44 43; 42 4 / 40; 39 (S 37_ 1. OWNER / APPUCANT: LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP 410 STiELBURNE ROAD BURLINGTCK VER,l10NT 2 ZONED: SOUTHEAST QUADRANT S TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 56.7 ACRES 4. PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM PLAN ENTITLED ' NOWLAND PROPERTY 11 - SUBDIN90N PLAN' BY F777PAmCK - LL£WELLYN INC. NUMBER 0-3879 / D-JMO. DATED MARCH 1991. S TOPOGRAPHIC AND EXISTING FEATURES INFORMATION BY i7TZPATRICK-LLFWELLYN 6. PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION FOR SWIFT ESTATES TAKEN FROM TAX MAPS PROVIDED BY THE OTY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON. 7. • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 73 SINGLE FAMILY LOIS ON 65.7 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SPEAR SIREET IN SOUTH BURUNGTOM, VERMONT. 7068 (+/-) LINEAR FEET OF ROADWAY WITH CURBS 807H SIDES AND 9DEWALK ONE SIDE WITHIN A PROPOSED OTY R 0. If 5500 (+/-) LINEAR FEET OF 8- WATER MAIN FROM EA7577NG WATER MAIN ON SPEAR STREET AT THE DEERFIELD DRIVE INTERSECTION. 5500 (+-) LINEAR FEET OF STORM COLLEC770M SEWER DISCHARGINC TO 7HREE PROPOSED DETENTION BASINS 8. STREET NAMES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS ARE PROPOSED ONLY AND ARE SUBJECT TO OWNER / CITY APPROVAL. 0 > -T-<M* 3Z1 "o um(Taw RoucvC-� --- --�-----� I I - F RREL T i COMMON LAND ve B 54 55 56 57 58 59 T O 60 61 • S_-_ B. - (CAS7LfROCX -TOT 72 71 70 69 68 73 �O �O OHO 67 G66 COMMON LAND O 65 'N/F ECONOMOU FARMS INC. DEUNEA 70 WE7LAN0 UAIIM 10' uTwrY EAsa&Nr (rm) COMMON LAND C N/F A C E . AL. ❑ rL`� 3 I GD1.01-� I D 12 G' �•1�� 0 0 9, I.1ZAPhIC rt' 11 1 too r a too Zoo yoo 'T101.�1 TO le I l�Gr � t✓1 t-� � � � 11��-'� . Flpp��o ►� To 1 R".SED ROADWAY AND SOW£ LOTS TI/iy�07 Na REWSIONS DA 7E IT is THE USER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THESE DRAWINGS 1NCLUDf THE LATEST REW90NS: PRELIMINARY PLAT ACT 250 FINAL PLAT CONSTRUCTION NO W L A N D T WO D VERALL SITE PLAN FO��pQ�QOQG�� n �%% n n �% (�j� �_- _'-----------i �LS � W � AX Y �1992 INCORPORATED O - 4382 N/F ISHAM IN1L, J1.71 .. 1 YALLISTON VERIAONT 3 19 (802) 658-7955 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT, 05403 TO: South Burlington Planning Commission DATE: 9 December 1992 RE: Proposed Bike Path on Nowland Development After reviewing the sketch plans for the Nowland property the Natural Resources Committee recommends that the proposed bicyle path be moved. As currently proposed the bike path would cross a wetland area on the property's east side. The alternative route on the property's west side does not cross any wetland so would be a more appropriate site for the bike path. Since an acceptable alternative to the currently proposed path exists this committee sees no compelling reason why the wetland on the property's east side should be disturbed. For the Committee: Respectfully Submitted, Wm Laliberte cc Gerald Milot John Larkin John Steele a %, ` ;'� . 1 ,dsrj M LOMItitUM MA5—r A.q" �� G LA53 uG �-rr RDL�. %.v ZA' rJDM ! NA L N ; G M-n- - Ao.A4A KF--5 PaAFZ4-- c wL oyz, (.icy-} 6►r-4y TYPICAL STREET LIGHT N T 0 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 29, 1993 John Steele FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Nowland II PRD, Spear Street Dear Mr. Steele: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of some additional comments submitted by City Engineer Bill Szymanski regarding the above project. �f you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 29, 1993 John Steele FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Southeast Summit and Nowland II PRD Dear Mr. Steele: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the December 8, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please let me know. S' n erely,, j r z- JJ e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl RW/mcp cc: Gerald Milot John Larkin City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 25, 1993 John Steele FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. One Wentworth Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Nowland II PRD, Spear Street Dear Mr. Steele: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please respond to these comments by no later than Friday, January 29, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ly, R ym d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Gerald Milot John Larkin vatb N urlingtnn +Rine :43 cpartutrnt 575 +Bnrset ` treet �anth TSurlington, 'Vermont 054113 FAX: (802) 658-4748 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RE: DATE: 1. CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY FEBRUARY 9,1993 AGENDA ITEM MONDAY JANUARY 11,1993 NOG/LAND TWO DATED OCT. 1992 PROJECT # 92045 PLANS WERE REVIEWED ON THE CHANGES TO THIS PROJECT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT FEEL THEY WILL EFFECT US IN GIVEN EMERGENCY PROTECTION. (802)658-7960 PLANNER 658-7955 Michael Oman Chittenden County P.O. Box 108 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 January 20, 1993 Regional Planning Commission Essex Junction, Vermont 05453 Re: Southland PCD & Nowland II Residential Subdivision Dear Mr. Oman: Enclosed please find copies of the following documents: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 1) Traffic Evaluation for Southland Planned Commercial Development, and 2) Traffic Impact Analysis, Proposed Nowland Two Residential Subdivision The City requests your assistance in reviewing these reports from a technical standpoint. I would greatly appreciate it if you would provide me with any comments, concerns, and recommendations you may have in regards to these traffic impact analyses. If at all possible, I would appreciate a response on the Nowland project by February 9, 1993 and on the Southland project within three (3) weeks. If you unable to meet this schedule or if you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you for your assistance. n erely, J e Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Brian Searles, Police Chief James Goddette, Fire Chief From: Raymond J. Belair,� oning and Planning Assistant Re: Proposed Street Names Date: January 20, 1993 The following street names are being proposed as part of a 73 lot residential subdivision on Spear Street: 1. Catamount Lane 2. Fall Line Drive 3. Castlerock Circle Please let me know if these names would or would not create a problem for emergency response. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 15 January 1993 Mr. Joseph Weith, City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Nowland Two FILE: 92045 Dear Mr. Weith: In response to the Planning Commissions request for more information we are submitting the attached letters and reports for your consideration and to assist the commission in its review of the following issues: 1) PRD Criteria - See attached responses prepared by Gerry Milot. 2) Water Availability - We have requested reviews from both the City and CWD; no response to date. See attached letters. 3) Traffic Report - See attached report prepared by Brendan Kelly. 4) Education - We presented S.E. Summit to the School Board on 12/21/92 and have submitted Nowland. The School Board will make a decision on S.E. Summit at its 1/27/93 meeting and review Nowland Two. The Board is currently working with its consultants to develop a formula for determining impact fee. 5) Scenic View Protection - Based on existing and proposed grades shown on the Preliminary Plat Drawings, we prepared the attached table indicating the maximum height of structures for each lot. 6) Wetlands - See attached wetlands verification submitted by Brad Wheeler of the Johnson Company. Design 0 Inspection 0 Studies 0 Permitting 0 Surveying Mr. Joseph Weith FILE: 92045 15 January 1993 Page Two 7) Historical Sites - See attached letter from the State indicating no adverse impact. We look forward to meeting with the Commission on the 26th. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED 7hneele cc: Gerry Milot John Larkin Enclosure JAS#5/baf:92045 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services reek 'i 1 Spear MAO S t-Overlook,: 1, t,�: 1 Park • � VPZ �0J, P VPZ •'� Z Dorset ark Hines 1•� Spear St, ;. '. = � ' Him Ridge VPZ t• =�'__ Spear St. -Al en Rd. VPZ J �z',.4 SCENIC VIEW PROTECTION f• ' 1�1 + i •'�` * A more detailed map i angles, distances, E �\•/ inspection at the Sc MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Joe Weith, City Planner RE: Farrell, MBL and Milot/Larkin applications DATE: December 15, 1992 I met with City Attorney, Steve Stitzel, to discuss several questions raised by the Commission in regards to the Farrell (Chittenden Bank), MBL (Ramsey Farm), and Milot/Larkin (Nowland parcel) applications. Steve offers the following advice: Farrell: A question was raised regarding whether the Commission can require dedication of a 60 foot r.o.w. connecting Shelburne Street to Farrell Drive even though the r.o.w. would not be opened at this time with the construction of a City street. It is Steve's opinion that the Commission can require such dedication. The street is shown on the official map and subdivisions are required to comply with all bylaws of the City. In regards to interests which other parties (i.e., Heathcote, Davis, etc.) have in the so called Odell Parkway r.o.w., Steve does not anticipate any complications with a dedication since the City's plans for a public street would be consistent with the parties' current interests. As long as the rights of the parties to use Odell Parkway are not interfered with, there should not be a problem with dedication. However, the City should make sure that legal documents allow parties to continue use of this r.o.w. until such time as the r.o.w. is actually taken over by the City. Co -applicants - Steve has recommended that Ben Franklin be a co - applicant in this project since Farrell is proposing to amend a previously approved site plan for Ben Franklin. Similarly, Steve feels that Heathcote Associates should be a co -applicant since access and circulation changes are being proposed on the Heathcote property. This project should also include the submittal of a revised Heathcote site plan/subdivision plat showing these changes. This revised plan would have to be approved by the Commission and recorded in the land records. Southeast Summit and Nowland Property II• A couple of questions were raised in regards to interpreting the City's new SEQ zoning amendments. The first question related to what criteria the Commission should use in deciding whether or not to grant a 25% density bonus for a PRD. It is Steve's opinion that the additional 25% is not really a bonus but is in effect a higher maximum density which is allowed for a PRD, as opposed to a standard subdivision. Therefore, if an applicant is proposing a development at the max 1.375 units per acre density (1.1 u/a x 1.25 = 1.375 u/a) and can show that the development satisfactorily meets all the PRD criteria and criteria of the SEQ district, then the applicant is entitled to the max density. If the applicant can not demonstrate compliance with the criteria, then the application should be denied. It is important to keep in mind that an applicant is not entitled to the max 1.375 u/a density or even the base density of 1.1 u/a. The applicant is entitled to only whatever density satisfies the criteria, not to exceed 1.375 u/a. A similar question was raised as to the criteria which the Commission should use when deciding whether or not to approve a transfer of density. Steve's opinion is the same. The transfer of density can only be done as a PRD and under one application. Therefore, as long as the applicant can demonstrate that whatever he/she is proposing (not to exceed 1.375 u/a) successfully satisfies the PRD and SEQ criteria, then the applicant is entitled to an approval. Steve suggested that Section 26.604(b) be revised to make this more clear as follows, "...calculated for one parcel in the PRD pursuant to Sections 26.401 and 26.603 above to another parcel in the PRD. Any such .." Another question was raised in regards to water and sewer hook-up requirements. Steve -says existing homes along the proposed route for the water and sewer line extensions are not required to hook-up to the new lines. However, Steve says that if the City or applicant want to oversize the facilities to accommodate future development or hook-ons, the City needs to adopt an impact fee in order to collect fees to reimburse the developer or City for the extra cost of the oversized lines. DEC92.MEM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Recreation Path Committee RE: proposed developments DATE: December 8, 1992 The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee met Monday evening, December 7, 1992. The committee reviewed sketch plans and other materials presented for the Southeast Summit and the Nowland II Developments and the most recent plan for O'Dell Parkway. The committee recommends the following: Southeast Summit 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the major east -west road running through the development. This will provide a potential link to a future extension of Allen Street and to a future extension of the existing recreation path along Dorset Street. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path more or less paralleling Dorset Street on the portion of the property to the east of Dorset Street. This will provide a continuation of the existing recreation path along Dorset Street as it is extended south. This section of the path should be as far from Dorset St. as is practical; considering site limitations and the necessity of connecting to the path on the north side of the property. a 3. The developer should donate a 20' wide easement running north - south along the back of lots numbered 1 - 13. This will give the City the possibility of"linking other neighborhoods via a recreation path in the future. 4. The developer should donate a 20' wide easement running roughly north -south along the western edge of the property. This will give the City flexibility in "meeting" any Shelburne path in the future. 1 DEC92.MEM Nowland II 1. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path on the north side of the proposed extension of Deerfield Drive. This will provide access from the development to the existing recreation path via the sidewalk along the existing section of Deerfield Drive. 2. The developer should build an 8' wide paved recreation path running north -south along the backs of lots 58 - 92 or along the backs of lots 57 - 14. This will provide a link to future neighborhoods to the south and a`possible link to Meadowood Drive or Swift Street. 3. The developer should assume the cost of a pedestrian activated traffic light at the Spear St./Deerfield Drive intersection even though it may not be needed immediately. Traffic on Spear St. is often heavy and fast, making a pedestrian crossing at this intersection potentially dangerous. This situation will be made worse as the development becomes inhabited. O'Dell Parkway A 6' wide bike lane should be marked along the south side of the proposed route of O'Dell Parkway. The objective is to connect Shelburne Road and Home Avenue with Farrell Street and the soon -to -be -constructed recreation path paralleling I-189. 2 Preliminary December 8, November 17, Page 2 Comments 1992 agenda items 1992 applicant to show that this development will not have an undue, adverse effect on and will protect rare and irreplaceable historic sites. Applicant should address this issue. --- indicate proposed use of existing barn. --- all watercourses should be shown on the 1"=40' scale plans with the corresponding C.O. zones. --- type of line used to designate existing wetlands should be consistent throughout the plans, i.e. the legend for "existing wetlands" on sheet 3 is not the same as is shown on sheet 9 and the line for existing wetlands in the legend on sheet 9 is not the same as is used in the drawing on sheet 9. - - - exterior lighting details for the multi -family buildings should be provided. --- dumpsters for the multi -family buildings should be shown and screened. --- provide size of Ginkgo trees. --- plan should show buffer plantings along street "C" similar to the plantings along street "A". NOWLAND II - 132 PRD - SKETCH PLAN --- traffic study should be submitted as discussed at the 6/16/92 meeting. --- note 7 on sheet 3 should be revised to indicate that this project also includes 40 multi -family units. --- all proposed streets should be named. --- a complete survey of the subdivision tract by a licensed land _/ surveyor must be submitted. --- plans should show limits of developable area as shown on the SEQ map. --- building envelopes for lots 9-11 should be shown. --- it is staff's reading of the 6/16/92 minutes that the --- applicant would construct and dedicate to the City the access road to Spear Street north of lot #11. The applicant should address the impact of this road on the adjacent single family homes and redesign the retention basin so that no portion of this structure lies within the street r.o.w. --- all lots should be numbered including the retention basin lot, wetland lots and multi -family lot. --- it should be noted on the plans that the wetland lots and the retention basin lot are to be held in common. Preliminary December 8, November 17, Page 3 Memorandum 1992 agenda items 1992 --- this property is located within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. Applicant should provide detailed information on the allowable height of each house within the development. All site and street landscaping should be evaluated and revised to be certain plantings proposed will not exceed the height limitations. 90 parking spaces are required including 4 handicapped spaces for the multi -family buildings and only 81 spaces are provided with no handicapped spaces. --- dumpsters should be shown and screened. bike path should not be constructed in wetland. landscaping schedule should be broken down into three (3) parts: 1) all multi -family plantings, 2) all street trees and 3) all other landscaping. -- plan should show a reserved r.o.w. between lots #13 and 14 for future connection. provide Champlain Water Disrict with copy of water line plans and details for their review and comment. provide total number of bedrooms in multi -family buildings. list waivers the applicant desires from the zoning and subdivision regulations i.e., reduction in lot frontage and area requirements. - a portion of the development is proposed outside of the designated development area as shown on the SEQ zoning map. Section 26.606 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to review proposed developments in a restricted area according to certain criteria contained in this section. The applicant should submit a report which addresses these criteria. applicant should provide approximate dimensions and acreage for each lot. a copy of the wetland study should be submitted. This is -- needed to allow a variation from the SEQ zoning map. all watercourses should be shown on the 1"=40, scale plans with the corresponding C.O. zones. exterior lighting details for the multi -family buildings should be provided. dumpsters for the multi -family buildings should be shown and screened. eITY ftER 'S 6PPI6b ReceivP('J1L1C_$,f__._199'b at3� 26" Reco, h Vol. 3 53 on page-2 �,3 Of Attest UAington land Recor Vol. ��vaoat,c�. NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Margaret card, city clerk Pa 8S THIS NOTICE is made as of the 5th day of November, 1993, by Gerald C. Milot of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont and John P. Larkin, of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, (the "Owners"). \ WITNESSETH• i WHEREAS, the South Burlington City Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") has approved a planned residential development known as Nowland Two (the "Nowland Two PRD") as depicted on a final subdivision plat entitled "Nowland Two: Plat of Subdivision of Lands of Gerald C. Milot et al.", Sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, signed October 11, 1993, and prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated, and recorded in Map Volume &at Pages fL and fl2 respectively; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission dated August 10, 1993 requires some of the specific conditions which will be of particular interest to purchasers of lots in the Nowland Two PRD to be included in a Notice of Development Conditions to be recorded simultaneously with the recording of the aforementioned final plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Planning Commission's final approval, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Owners hereby give notice of the following obligations, restrictions, and requirements that will directly affect lots ' within the Nowland Two PRD. Reference should also be made to the complete text of the South Burlington City Planning Commission approval dated August 10, 1993, and on file in the planning office of the City of South Burlington. 1. Obligation for Tree Planting. Owners shall plant two (2) trees on each lot as required in Section 19.104(a) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The approximate location of said trees is depicted on a survey entitled "Nowland Two: Landscape & Lighting Plan", Drawing D-4501, dated November 1992, last revised October 5, 1993 and recorded in Map Volumeaat Page/ of the South Burlington City Land Map Records. Particular reference should be made to tree height limits and eligible species referred to in the notes of the survey. 2. Height Limitations. The Nowland Two planned residential development is in compliance with the Dorset Park View Protection Zone set forth in Article XXV, Section 25.40. Calculations of elevations and maximum height for each lot for Structures and landscaping are set forth on a schematic plan and tables attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Reference is also made to the Landscape & Lighting Plan referred to hereinabove and to surveys entitled "Nowland Two: Site and Utilities Plan" revised October 5, 1993, Drawings D-4383 through D-4388 and recorded in Map Volume a8&at Pages /f�, al d, and Q of the South Burlington City Land Map Records. 3. Building Envelopes on Lots 5-8. To satisfy the requirements imposed by the 200' view corridor adjacent to the Spear Street right-of-way, the area where Voi,. N7 Page residences can be constructed on Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 have been limited to building envelopes located therein. Reference should be made to the survey entitled "Nowland Two: Site and Utilities Plan", Drawing D-4384, last revised October 5, 1993 and recorded in Map Volume, at Page A of the South Burlington City Land Map Records, which depicts the boundaries of the building envelopes. 4. Community Mailbox Areas. The final approval of the Planning Commission includes a requirement to provide for two community mailbox areas. The first is adjacent to Pinnacle Drive and shall impose an easement imposed on Lot 49, the second is adjacent to Vail Drive and shall impose an easement on Lots 52 and 53. Reference is made to the aforementioned final subdivision plat and to a survey entitled "Nowland Two: Overall Site Plan" dat d July, 1992, last revised October 1, 1993 and recorded in Map Volumea�at Pag@lltof the South Burlington City Land Map Records for depiction of the aforementioned mailbox easements. The homeowners' association established to govern the Nowland Two PRD shall be obligated to maintain the community mailbox easement areas as well as all drainage ditches and ponds which serve the development. 5. Miscellaneous. Reference should be made to the plat of Subdivision of Lands, Overall Site Plan, Landscape & Lighting Plan, and Site and Utilities Plans for identification of any further easements, obligations, or restrictions which affect a . particular lot within the Nowland Two PRD. Executed as of the date first above -mentioned. OWNERS hGeral C. Milot ohn Larkin by Stephen R. Crampton, his attorney -in -fact STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Burlington, in said County and State, this 5th day of November, 1993, personally appeared Gerald C. Milot and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My commission expires 2/10/95 -2- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record S�t,� P- La2K �� / LA2Ki►J 'Re a l4 1110 5he (Zug-d .-aL"-.L1 V+ ps.gU3 b. Applicant Tok, (D . LAzw- N c. Contact Nce- LLF P AO.49 UJ%L --y,,j terc�-A Su.�„��l�.�S-�u�l , V% 0s-qy3 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). �.�-� s '� le - +s TL 4--1 VI_ L0 IAr-+•Y�J 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties t'AAriC � �s%�ar--, Lco.jurnuy, �iln+ch�wooGY .C, S (�VI�L 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. A�/i, �..� 1�k«t ., t1�A�; r.' ,o(�� (A N L�S LO L L"12_ 2�+[_'i-[_ N �h!L_Lrvv� T V+�- Lt P 7) 4„ Sc,z.ve U,4s S Z--�3 Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: / DC •,a t y kc.•c x, uN-+ \ . 1 u t S A- A \ •'L [n N IA % ,2e: c c tP � . '- , o-U^o( ,sr LA An Submit fAvelcopies and one reduced 6opy (81 x 11, 8J x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. i f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. 2-2-98 (Signature) appll ant or contact person Date N/F ECONLWOU FARMS INC. GRAPHIC SCALE O ( W 16T ) 1 _b - 2w IL ADO PRORERn OWNER NAW.% RENSE LOT NI.N/B£RS ADO NOWCANO I - CENTER DRAW NG ON SNEEJ, REASE PRWERT OWNERS RENSE LOT LAYOUT, ADO SOUTH wro REASED ROADWAYS AND SOME LOTS A[kanvs RECE,--, rD FEB 0 3 1998 City of So. Burlino-tcYn. - •,,• /ROOMW M WT U PnamkART OE90N E M& DC9W ACT 2W o,fola wocx wJkCAMS SrAM a' NS pv..wc IT IS satyr Ai 4.W" W904MVW Ta Oduff rW DRA04 ACIM rK LAUT ArwsOa NOWLAND TWOOlI _- i01IM pMRwGrfw .[ArO.I --_ Gz� II VICINITY PLAN _ ;_'t 04�PQ4G°30Q a LLC �C dd�(ayIm INCORPONAIED Y.R _W^ 0 -- 4MI -----VERMONT ? `o ?7 PRIM; NOV 12 1993 I I t A - 1171'JO , - 14DSa3• a . y7a'N• i / AREA CONTAINED MIIHIN 1 1 SX74'sl•a R - IR4.00' / 1 rs• r. 7aer / BIKE PA1H/PEDESTR/AN SEE SHEET ? OF $ 0-4745 r. 71.a7' NgpvptYD yp• EASEMENT 39.664 Sf. 10 L . a.u• PRg•a6(0 70• 0.91 ACRES L . nice• L . Ia14• PLnrsmAR Ngt3'w'oJY [A9aNrNr p - J3377s• A. s wn. Uh1rV USONCNr 04.8 --- qU e . woo• R . saw, F FOR CON 77NUA770N OF 7H/S PUT Na'w'OJY >e r 17. DS' r . ra 4T / 1 I^ IW.0 JS01' L - J).sT a1 •% �' I Na671's7Y r•06• ° 11 D5'aS' a - 1e76•B• V) a h {!�• 0 - on ra• I� J„S• R . IJo.", A . -- R . Ia00 .j(e •�:../ e R . In7. 44' a . ollt GI• Uyy GRID la t/. 7- 31i1' N' /. 1AOt' �, 1•�___ ? L Sx7a' /. p . 107rq• I .Ils7!'Oe'R L IO[iT L - 37. i1'sOA7.'7rR' l . xw' x17 so7W301W �_ -L - S2171' R. Sto W' 1 N Imo_ _ oabo d074 ITt j} tuia i - i11w7' M L .*a-ouo c IgeK r 1 fig . tASCcwi/ s O : a a 5v O Y `'�r•R. Nrr r,' oa _---_- R: 9aaal C(AREA D h 3 53 Q 54 5% 13". ,r. r i 4S. p . ,r.t.s 859,600 Sf. 5�, 8 8 O �18 1 x897 SF. !h8 1336J SF 58 '°a ie_�` L . saw, i : ld2523 79.7J AC. 1 N p •. aamao•Oli .'^i�i 'iR ?!_ 718 O '• ^ --a 1 R Isao 13,'N SF. - 1J,000 IF. 2' Q31 AG iR QJ1 AG 1aT Si v81^ 59 / ; 43t� \ •hIa I r ., Is00. 20, 386 S.F.i z p - OJsi•01• 71si' 0.30 AG QJO AG R . 70Jpar p - o7vr71• QJf AG 4p )x 1.x J7? IF. ! 60 15, 711 Sf. h \ L - :77 u• Q47 AG r . s7.ao a . 7oJaoo a . lu.i7l��I^ QJ/ AG8 / 1 61 f a - 17'a.s RECE L . rasar r - wol R . xium N p _ o7a7/• 0 14,12E Si. + Q36 AG i O r - 111.83* �. �L . IOaaO' r. xior is 74ra 00' ^I� Q32 AG g . m7i'se 01 13,308 IF. r . n1u PRa�os[o ,o' __-L.loaoo R:�nr. 73N0.31 AGL-sryFEB 0 3 1998 unrn [scurwr p--_-r" Iwoao• I an - Jar1r .B p - ae.e•as• _ [ • . 7i. 0o' •' I Ig YAaBOr rAY1KNI VALE DRTVl L " ?0.f0.°,o TO i R . Nnro• / \ �- r.Ina' TO BE DED/GATED ---- - r.74.Jr r- n11' L-slau T - / r.Ilsr i a-inrar 1 5067.'sTR J.7.l i' 7B, SITS g F TY (,CI ♦{ L - xi,s' _ i :.i °:• I a. aa.e•os• {{ ' e r j n fi.fJ'f - -/_ Ty B44L / T Icli s ;y a _ _ - `. ud. 16.58E SF.; `\ i s n s00• �1 ®� S0. BUM!"�t� W ■ i - aam'oo• p _ oiva.y. � _ 0/ qC AC QV _ 1 O.3B AG IOW' R ,ilg ro' a . 07s4'JO' A • Is'J7Ji• y - - ! 1'1•' • a l 13314' 1 C\ (' p • If I. IS00' I. JI.la' A. nro•`_-IRnm/1 RppR I,J1 JJL 7156' I . xi01' R . waoo' _ 7 • 7n>r' / . xw. ipn T\ _ A - 7ess'w• L . S7.a0' ' 72 71 L • IpOro' l IxiaO°m' R: o amr L 1,7.17• , r . 753. aa• p - 7373'7r I r O �I O }gl nl8 p �K'«• _ L . 3a17a• R . nsJ JJ' 8 73 88 ?18 .6 r-.are' jr. 1 noo I r-76a,r {� LLi 81 810 81 ' �r?i n' ' L - ei.N' I .LOOM /7 �- 7. T7,7T l L sn.77' 1J,000 S.F. `� 1J,000 SF. >: O s9 RI� 619 LRiA' L - °Vas• l p �y�a'o,• �L - sa.o• / \ `\ I 14046 IF. 0.30 AG O 4- 9. A . 7ats7'70• \� 1 3 I QJO AG 12,757 S.F. : 6% 8i^� i r _M0° 1 0.36 AG Q?9 AG 1$60B IF. 176L78 SF. ^ O I w R Q?9 AG o - rJsr« L \ L - 17t.r / p • LJey ` O e�_'iq.Y6' 'PaLg' ,00po• a3a9• QT�I9AG/ZO.IJ SF. 66 a. uoo. 1 5. u400i' p. oesr'Jr e 1 soi7.srR Yii.1 i7i 1 Q?B AG I-X 466 Sf. r - as L p . risrsi 1M . L - ir.si `\ a . loxiao' - - - - - -_ Lr. L . ruY r. Inn• 1 . air AG I Q �: J6Y % a. rr7r'm Q I J Ig 4 - 2ela'43' I ` R : 7ye.o�ati'• \\ a . 347r7T `, L • IO7I!' R . lsoo TEMPORARY R.O.W. FLIR 15,662 SF, i r - xao' nro ' • �\ ° uwr 1 i .: ni,• GRAVEL CUL.-DE-SAC a36 AG L . sa7r j 7 - 17.ra• p: a7Tsa. L ` o• unurr asr.IrNl 1 COMMON LAND �zq• L - n.xi' , . ww' iN I (AREA D") 64 11,59? IF. i L - rraJ7 U to-o�a� i / I p r7awlo )99,232 IF. ` Q50 AC. 63 S1 / R - nv'v r 4,57 AG lA iU, p . an7s I . Ja 11 r - ra.sf I 1 �� : iuio. r.777u' 1 � r •b�• I 25,745 SF. L i �. L. n7R1• u18 Q59 AG sp.`/ COMMON LAND - I�ty- (AREA "C f p - oe'!J'a - - 1 ii00i' Nsautyso,- UU / ?a5B AGF /p_ 0 1� -�- - - -� - - --- �1 8i -------------- - - ------,°a37af------------ ------ -------------------i i-/-----------'.4M7�-----------r-■-i-- _sa3+_----- 18 Isar o'- I SOi74'sre TO BE DEDICATED TO THE L7TY OF SOUTH BURLING TOM (FOR FUTURE USE) .° w, L 125 97C 5. F 2. 99 Ac. N a74'Sr [ N/F SCANLON �- 1421174 SnE4R 9 nI i r r ! . \I " i LV LKII IIo Gs, P/NNACLf - DR/L•£ _ _, _ _ J•r Ini Iti II i I WI I _ I..•W�,,, I PINNACLE D w III I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i I I q2 [L I i i 0I VADRI LE VE IO til I ~ v� l IL �__ __ __ L----- SHEET 1-OF 2 ----------j INDEX TO SHEETS N,s N/r £CONOMOU FARMS, INC. O TES 97/444 1) OWIR / APPLICANT. GERALD C 1ELOr el. aL C/0 LARxw ARLOr PAR7mxs711a 410 SIHE.BL.RNE ROAD BIAwmia . V•1tRwwr A MARAE GERALD M"WLLO1 AND W P LAOW DTmIS MADE 70 W WARRANTY DEED � 14AROVU1992 AS NDiNNOOD TO RECORDED W WU/ME JY7 BELiYNNING ON PAL! 166 OF THE CITY OF SW I N BARLANGTOV LAND RECORDS "AWY "TV RM( AND HILLAW N�R GAGN� If MA" 110 rW C OENALD MrLOI AND JONN A LANKAN. �0 f AXY 1"0 AS RECORDED W VOLUME 296 MGM" ON PAGE 5J6 OF THE arY OF SOUTN BWRLANGTON LAND RECORDS 4) REPD4ENKE /S MADE IO 1NE PLANS PREPARED BY RW-A IMM-UEMELLW UNCa%-QRAIEL7 Einnm 'AADWA AO PROPERTY R SWIM BNRLMGTOV, WRMONr 9.1[itY VI90V PLAN , PROECr NUMBER ROM DATED MARCH I99r, LA LEST REVISION AWE 7.X 1991, DRAWNG NUMBERS D-3679 AND D-JeeO AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 286 Alf4WW#G OV PALE £? OF INC CITY OF SOUTH BIRRLAINBTON LAND RECORDS 5) TIE PERIMCIER PROPERTY LUTES -HONN HEREON HAW BEEN CALCIALA TED FROM AYFOPW PON TAKEN FROM TINE LNSIAUMEN73 a7ED W NOTES 2 THROUGH A CURRENT RECORD OMNERS OF THE' PROPERTY AS DaAVEAIED BY THESE PERIMETER PROPERTY UNES ARE SE7FORTH AN THE /NS7RUMEN7S CITED W NOTES I AND J AND ARE sue.ECr To AV/E7dPRETA7KAN BY LEGAL COUNSEL. 6) THE PROPERTY 94ONW HEREON is 9A&ccr ro THE OFFER OF LRREWCABL£ DEDICA YIN AN AGREEMENT MADE 6 FEBWARY 1992 BY AND BETIAM GERALD G AMLOT, •OYW A LARK^ MARIE LAN"WOW AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BLRUNGION AS RECORDED W MXUME 322 BEGTRNNG ON PAGE 102 OF INC CITY OF SOUTH BURUNOWN LAND RECORDS 7) THE PROPERTY snow HE]REOM is S"cr TO A NOTICE OF DEWIO'MENT COV077OVS AN AwamENT DATED a nmRUARY I992 BY AND BErmmv GERALD G MOOT, "W P. LAR"4 MARIE UNDERWW AND TIE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGIOV AS RECORDED W VOLUME 312 BEONAWNG ON PAGE I97 Or THE Cry OF SOUTH BURUNG?DV LAND RECORDS 6) BCAAbNGS SI OW HEREON HAVE BEEN CALCULATED FROM WFORMAnOV TAKEN FROM A PLAN PREPARED BY R17PA IMCK-LIEMELLYH WCORPORA 7m EN7171ED •NOMLAND PROPERTY SOUIN BURUNGIDV, VERMONT FINAL PLAT REUSED' PRJ%CCT NUMBER 8101. DA7m NOYEMBER 1961. ORA MING NUMBER D-391 9) JNMR/OR 9WW90N LANES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED AS DiRECIED BY THE OMN£R(S)/AGLNT(Sl to) PRGPosED L sEwN15 SHOW HEREON ARE 9/B.Ecr To As-BW.r LocAr"S LEGEND PERMNE'TER PROPERTY LINE - - PROPOSM IOr LAVE - - PROPOSED Mar Of MN Y/EAS[MLNr LINE - - OTHER PROPERTY LINE UARIS OF TION TO BE TRANSFERRED _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 THE arY or SCLAIN WRUNG TON ■ PROPOSED CONORcir MLNUMENr PROPOSED A" PIN O CONCREV MMOOIIUM£NT FOUND ° POOR z1EY ., /E 4) A CALCLLAIED ANIERSECIION N/T NOW OR FORMERLY R.a W. MOLT DF WAY 125 /456 VOLUME / PAGE CITY or SOUTH BURLIN6TON LAND RECORDS THIS PLAT /S BASED ON A GROUND SURVEY AND ON FXAMWA7K.N OF IW LAND RECORDS RECORDED AS OF OCTCBER 11, 199.1 LOCH TED W IHE Cry OF SOU7H BURLWGTOV OERKY OFFICE: BASED UV 1W GROUND SIARIEY AND OUR INIERPRE7ADON OF NNE LAND RECORDS aIm W NOTES 2 170OUOY 4. 1 HEREBY CERWY THE PEIRME71F PROPERTY LINES SNOW HEREON ARE CORRECT 76 7HE BEST OF MY KNOIM.EDG'E INTERIOR LOT PAR177X WNG HAS BEEN REVIEMED twom NY sL/P6wg5V AND Is TRUE AND OYYBR£Cr 70 7HE BEST OF MY KNOW.EDGE I FURTHER a7R71FY INAr PRIOR 76 Ro-im CnO'O rHis PLAT SUBSrANI7ALLY CONFORMS MEIN IAE REOWREMEN7S Or I7LE 27.'VIA. SECILN /44= WRY )C CG& LI/ RWATRICK-LLEML.YN WCORPORAIm N/F /SHAM N/F FARRELL et.ol. 69/327 2741440 -- LOCUS - - - GRAPHIC SCALE L . • 60 n PRINI"- NOV 121993 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE' ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (`ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT 05402-0728 (802) 660-2555 (VOIC=D) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAMJMM2555 AOL.COM) August 22, 1997 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA I am writing to inquire about the status of the outstanding original documents for the above -referenced project. By letter dated February 13, 1997 I sent you a number of original documents that required revision and signatures by the respective parties before they were ready for recording. I enclose a copy of that letter for your reference. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/dah Enclosure cc: Ray Belair (w/ encl.)t, SON3376.COR S ,. .. _ kEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P. ATTOKNEYS AT L4W 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNIGTON, VERJ.90NT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2.555 (VOICFJfDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-25$2 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAM.IMML455 gAOL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO AD.Mn= IN N.Y.) February-13, 1997 Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT 05402-0728 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Enclosed please find original documents for the above - referenced project which need revision before they can be recorded. In reviewing these documents, I noticed a consistent error that can be remedied without redrafting. I realize that your clients are currently out of state and that making the necessary changes may take some time, but we want to record accurate documents. The March 17, 1992 Underwood deed is incorrectly listed as being recorded in Volume 332 of the South Burlington Land Records in every document which contains the reference. The correct Volume is 322. This reference can be found in the following enclosed documents: -Exhibit A to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of utility and recreation path easements from Larkin and Milot to the City of South Burlington. -Warranty Deeds from Larkin and Milot conveying utility easements (3) and the recreation path easement to the City of South Burlington. -The Second Notice of Development Conditions. -Exhibit A to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of roadways (and future roadways) from Larkin and Milot to the City of South Burlington. Carl H. Lisman, Esq Lisman & Lisman February 13, 1997 Page 2 -Warranty Deeds from Larkin and Milot conveying roadways (and future roadways) to the City of South Burlington. Schedule A's for each of the Partial Discharges I received three different versions of Schedule A for the Partial Discharges. I am enclosing a proposed draft of a revised Schedule A which uniformly refers to the necessary documents. Please review and give me your thoughts as to the changes made, and the likelihood of success of obtaining approval of the parties. Finally, we have issues with the Hausner Documents. The volume and page of the plan referred to ("Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont, Sanitary Sewer Extension") needs to be added to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Exhibit A (Vol. 365, Page 120). Moreover, Walter Grenier's signing of the document as a witness, notary and duly authorized agent of the Merchants Bank is troublesome. We request that this document be replaced with one which does not have Walter signing in multiple capacities. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly /r L� Timothy �M. Enclosures CC: Mr. Raymond Belair (w/out encl.) scNK99.coR yours; t Eustace City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1997 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Modify Condition #15, Pinnacle at Spear Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 8, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note that the roadways in this development must be completed by December 21, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S ncere y, J Weith, C' y Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls MOTION OF APPROVAL 7/8/97 JOHN LARKIN & GERALD MILOT I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the evised final plat application of John Larkin and Gerald Milot j7 amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by one year, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed. This will in turn extend, by one year, the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development. This approval is based on the following stipulations: 1. Condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval shall be revised to read as follows: " The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by December 21, 1998. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed by 12/21/98 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission". MOTION OF APPROVAL 7/8/97 PORINIOWAZWO• I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of John Larkin and Gerald Milot be amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by one year, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed. This will in turn extend, by one year, the approved reserved sewer allocation for the development. This approval is based on the following stipulations: 1. Condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval shall be revised to read as follows: " The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by December 21, 1998. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed by 12/21/98 shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission". Memorandum - Planning July 8, 1997 agenda items July 3, 1997 Page 2 4) CENTURY PARTNERS - OUTDOOR PLAZA - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way. The amendment consists of minor site modifications to accommodate an outdoor plaza area. This PUD was last amended on 12/10/96 (minutes enclosed). The only issues affected by this amendment are overall coverage, which is not changing, and landscaping. Coverage at Phase II buildout: Cl District: Building coverage is 24% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 84% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Dorset Street is 79.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). CD1 District: Building coverage is 49.8% (maximum allowed is 90%). Overall coverage is 82.1% (maximum allowed is 90%). Landscaping: The shrubs and perennials displaced by the plaza will be relocated on the site. The Crabapple tree will be relocated off -site. 5) JOHN LARKIN - SEWER ALLOCATION EXTENSION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to modify condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval to extend the time period by which the roadways in the development are to be completed by one (1) year. The sketch plan was reviewed on 6/10/97 (minutes enclosed). Condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval reads as follows: "The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within four (4) years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed within this four ( 4 ) year time limit shall be shall be lost unless K Memorandum - Planning July 8, 1997 agenda items July 3, 1997 Page 3 reapproved by the Planning Commission. In addition, if at the end of three years no more than 50% of the roads have been completed, 25% of the total sewer allocation shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission." The applicant is requesting one (1) additional year in which to complete construction of the roadways serving the development. The applicant claims to have been held up from starting the project due to an appeal taken to the Superior Court. The only road yet to be developed is Vale Drive which will provide access to 22 lots. This represents 14,151 gpd of sewer allocation. If this extension is not approved by the Commission, and the applicant does not construct the road by December, 1997, the 14,151 gpd of sewer allocation will go to all the projects on the waiting list and eliminate the waiting list. Staff recommends that the condition be revised to read as follows: "The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed by December 21, 1998. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed by 12/21/98 shall be shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 6) PATRICK & TERESE AYER - EXPAND PARKING AREA - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing 62 auto storage spaces on a lot containing a 9761 square foot building with 3200 square feet of printing use and 6561 square feet of auto repair and service use. This property was last reviewed on 9/15/92 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 4 Berard Drive lies within the IC District. It is bounded on the north by undeveloped land, on the east by a restaurant (Pizza Putt), on the west by a multiple use commercial building, and on the south by Berard Drive. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 20 foot curb cut on Berard Drive. Applicant has been using the adjacent Pizza Putt property for access to the northeast portion of the building. Approval for this access has never been approved by the Planning Commission and an easement across the Pizza Putt property does not exist. Since the access does not exist, the applicant should 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 10 JUNE 1997 PAGE 4 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the administrative Officer prior to the use of the new antenna tower. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 7. The site plan shall be revised to show the proposed concrete pad under the tower. Existing covered area shall be converted to green area so that there is no increase in covered area for the property. The revised plan shall require approval by the City Planner. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Weith said he will send a memo to the Zoning Board indicating that the Planning Commission did not consider the height issue in its deliberations and that the approval by the Commission does not represent an endorsement of the height of the proposed structure. Messrs. Dinklage and O'Rourke rejoined the Commission. 6. Sketch Plan application of John Larkin to amend a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear, Spear Street: Mr. Larkin said that when the plan was first approved, sewer capacity was not a problem. Because of delays at Act 250, they are now asking for a year delay on building the rest of the road (which is tied to the sewer allocation). The project is being built. Mr. Burgess explained that the time limit was placed so there would be no hoarding of sewer capacity. Members had no problems with the request. Mr. Weith said there would have to be a warned hearing. Other Business: Mr. O'Rourke asked for a further breakdown on the list of variances provided by the Zoning Administrator. Members wanted to know which of the variances on the list had been approved. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9 pm. yard coverage is 57.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall and front yard coverages are existing and will not be made worse by this application. The Zoning Administrator has determined that the tower meets setback requirements. Setback requirements are not met by the existing office building. The office building is a noncomplying structure subject to the limitations of Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations. Parking: A total of five (5) parking spaces are required and eight (8) spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are provided. Landscaping: There is no minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, for the project. No additional landscaping recommended. Traffic: No additional traffic expected. Dumpster: The existing dumpster is screened from the adjacent residences by shrubs and trees. Lighting: The existing building mounted flood light should be replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the City Planner. 6) JOHN LARKIN - SEWER ALLOCATION EXTENSION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to modify condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval (minutes enclosed) to extend the time period by which the roadways in the development are to be completed by one (1) year. Condition #15 of the 8/10/93 approval reads as follows: "The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within four (4) years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed within this four (4) year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. In addition, if at the end of three years no more than 50% of the roads have been completed, 25% of the total sewer allocation shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission." 4 Memorandum - Planning June 10, 1997 agenda items June 6, 1997 Page 5 The applicant is requesting one (1) additional year in which to complete construction of the roadways serving the development. The applicant claims to have been held up from starting the project due to an appeal taken to the Superior Court. The only road yet to be developed is Vale Drive which will provide access to 22 lots. This represents 14,151 gpd of sewer allocation. If this extension is not approved by the Commission, and the applicant does not construct the road by December, 1997, the 14,151 gpd of sewer allocation will go to all the projects on the waiting list and eliminate the waiting list. 5 Ybz m u.c So. Burlington. VT 05403 HEALTHCARE/ TECHNOLOGY WRITER Healthcare/Technology Writer needed for busy marketing department. 1-3 years experience in corporate communica- tions required. Reply to: IDX Systems Corporation, Human Resources Department, 1400 Shel- burne Road, Burlington, VT 05401: fax (802) 863- 9288: E-mail Shelley _moultonr7a idx.com KENNEL & MAINTENANCE Must love animals. 1 person (apt. avail for 1 or 2.) Crossover Ken- nels, 802-899-3877. PERSONALS 6 CANADIAN PORK PIE All the details to make it authentically. Light & de- licious. Send for info to: Fern's Recipies, PO Box 279, Wilton, NH 03086' CORPORATE BOX Molson Center hockey, to include playoffs. Call to discuss terms of lease. Eric at 802-527- 7792. - Merchandise Thrifty ads: quick, easy, and they work greatl Call 658-3321. WANTED yearly garage rental; near airport. 941- 778-0073 after 6pm. days 9-5 941-778-2253. NUDIST Family oriented cooperative nudist club seeking Increase in membership. Facilities incl. pool, clubhouse, recreation field, trailer & tenting sites situated on exquisite 300 acre Ver- mont site. Contact Maple Glen, Box 443B, Enos - burg Falls, VT 05450. ORGANIZING SINGLE MOTHERS who have lost custody of children to actual or alleged men- tal illness through Ver mont courts. 802-747 3086. TEXAS DESCENDANT Very much wants family info from descendents Henry Hull and Georgana Gratton Murphey, and Thomas O'Halloran and :TON Daniel O'Flaherty. Please es 16th an- Iv. msg. or call Radisson rood Sale, Hotel, Mon. & Tues. for rg for ev- Mary Jane Murphey Her - & 22 9-4 mon. s will be 'T'ISS ;hiss! Neighbor- 1, urniture, j �s i more. 3 Sun 9-4. Neighbor - id Stage Es - Stage Rd.) ,ekes, toys. Snowblower, household 340 Main ling lawn Buick, boat se Johnson, Fri- Sat, 9 Good g F, ,...,,..-_ TICKETS 2 for U2 concert on July 1. 7:30. in Foxboro, Mass. Good seats. $150. 802-253-2298. WANTED 2 VSO July 4th adult tickets. Will pay pre- mium. 658-2003, Bill. ENTERTAINMENT $ A PLANET ROCK EXPERIENCE Dancers 7 days/wk. 127 No Main, Barre 479-0234 HARDBODIES ...-..,.,,.. 14- CO. s familiar With coporate executive Insurance ben- efits. Individual —st have a strong ground using life ance proposal systen s, understand various types of insurance products and have excellent writ- ten and communication skills. Primary responsi- bility will be technical and marketing support. Can- didate should possess experience in word pro- cessing, spreadsheet, database software in a Windows environment. WordPerfect, QuattroPro and Paradox skills a plus. Send resume to BBC. 200 Twin Oaks Terrace, Suite 12, So. Burlington, VT 05403. MARINE MECHANIC Rate of pay dependent on experience. City Dock Marina, 1 King St. Cali 862-7200 LEGAL 11 NOTICES AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION, MONTPELIER, INVITATION FOR BIDS Sealed bids, on forms furnished by the State, will be received until 11:00 a.m. prevailing time on Friday, July 11, 1997, at 133 State Street, Room 319, Mont- pelier, VT for the con- struction of the project hereinafter described. The time of receiving and opening bids may be postponed due to emer- gencies or unforseen conditions. LOCATIONS: Middle- bury-Ripton STP 9743(1)S: In the town of Middlebury on VT Route 125 at station 197 + 50 and extendingg east for a distance of 2.507 miles to station 33 + 44 in Rip - ton. CONSTRUCTION BE- ING: Guard rail replace- ment and improvements and other related items. Plans and Bid Proposals may be seen and ob- tained at the Agency of Transportation, Montpel- ier, VT and may be seen at the office of R.D. Hoskings, District Trans- portation Administrator #5, Colchester, Ver- mont. Minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor for the project are set out in the advertised specifications and bid proposals, and such rates are a part of the Contract covering the project in accordance with Section 115 of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1956. This Contract is subject to the Work Hours Act of 1962, PL 87-581, and implement- ing regulations. Contrac- tors must perform this work under the Fair La- bor Standards Act (Fed- eral Wage -Hour Law) as well as all other applic- able labor laws. Min- imum labor and truck rates have been prede- termined by the State Transportation Board and are set out in the Bid Proposal. Contractors bidding on this project must be qualified in accordance with the Agency Regulations. The Vermont Agency of Transportation hersi notifies sill bidders that R will affirmativNY _ ii!e MS `Nordvrequirea. ]ireat benefits. Resume & cover to: Managing Member, Burak Ander- son & Melloni, PO Box 787, Burlington, VT 05402-0787. MAINTENANCE Hotel handy person needed. General mainte- nance and painting/wal- lpaper skills required. At- tention to details important. Appply to: Econo Lodge, 1076 Will- iston Rd., S. Burlington. MYSTERY SHOPPING' Must have fax/e-mail. ! Visit www.second-to- none.com or call 313- 668-1836. PLUMBER JOURNEY- MAN for residential work in Chittenden Co. Good benefits & pay. Must be neat & experienced. Please call 899-1966. LEGAL 11 NOTICES General Services until 1:30 P.M. Wednesday, July 16, 19A7. At that time all bids accompa- nied by Bid Security will be open d and publicly read aloud at Two Gov- ernor /Aiken Avenue, Montpelier, Vermont, State Buildings Confer- ence Room. Bonsfide Bidders may obtain documents at the Department of Buildings and General Services, Two Governor Aiken Avenue, Montpelier, Vermont 05602, upon request. There will be a site in- spection on Wednesday, July 2, 1997, at 9:00 am, in the maintenance office at the site. June 20, 21 & 23 1997 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL otter to: riuit a sources, 1i '50 Main Nuth Sy stems :urrentiy seekingCarter Manag- Street. Montpelier, VT ors for our South eur- 05602. lington office. `Ne offer a Convert clutter to cash high -base salary, weekly a Free Press Classified ___ commissions, monthly call6S8.3J21. bonus and oenefits. Call OFFICE ASSISTANT 863-5011. Ideal candidate to have TEACHING ASSISTANT ability to work indepen- School -year position to dently, good communica- work with emotionally/ tion skills, computer behaviorally disturbed skills, & customer serv- high school students. BA ice helpful. 26-34 hrs./ Degree required. 32.5 Neek. Weekends req.. hours per week at $9.18 More hrs. possible in fu- per hour with excellent cure. $6.50/hr Resumes benefits. to: PO Box 9279, So. Applicants should send Burlington, VT 05407. letter of application and RALPH GOODRICH INC. resume to: Seeking highly moti- Chittenden Central vated. team -oriented Supervisory Union people. Operators for: Human Resources Dept Excavator, Loaper, 7_Meadow Terrace Dozer. Also P ayers, ESs_6xxJct., VT 05452 Foremen, iiiii�borers. TOP Wages,, for those that Deadline:7/4/97 nualifdAU84 fAF EDE The South Burlington City Council will hod a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, July 7, 1997 to consider the following: 1) Proposed amendment to the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance to es- tablish two (2) new land use categories in the city - Bus Terminals and Transportation Services. The purpose of the amendment is to recog- nize these land uses and allow for them in appro- priate areas of the City. The amendments affect lands located within or near the following zoning districts: Commercial 1 (Cl), Commercial 2 (C2), Mixed Industrial and Commercial (I-C), Airport (AIR), Airport Industrial (AIR -I) and Muncipal (MUN). Specific sections to be amended include the following: 1. 28.10, Specific Definitions 2. 12.20, Conditional Uses, C1 Dist{ict 3. 13.20._ Conditional Uses, C2 District " 4. 15.20 ' y LEGAL 11 NOTICES PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 8, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat ap- plication of John Larkin and Gerald Milot to amend a condition of ap- proval for a planned resi- dential development con- sisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle (p Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to extend, by one year, the date by which the roadways serving the development must be completed. This will in turn extend, by one year, the approved reserved sewer alloca- tion for the development. 2) Revised final plat ap- plication of Century Part- ners to amend an ap- proved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shop - pin center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 2 Corporate Way. The amendment consists of minor site modifications to accom- modate an outdoor plaza area. 3) Final Plat application of Nile and Julie Dupps- tadt and John and Debo- rah Alden for a planned residential development consisting of 62 single family lots on 62.4 acres of land, 1550 Hinesburg Road and Van Sicklen Road. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman -Roquest for hampiain .alley LEGAL 11 NOTICES as sistant at the VEPP Inc. offices. 802-362-0748. June 21, 1997 STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT OF CHI'fTENDEN, SS. PROBATE COURT DOCKET NO. 27867 In Re the Estate of Evangeline S. DesLauriers Late of Bolton, Vermont NOTICE TO CREDITORS To the creditors of the estate of Evangeline S. DesLauriers late of Bol- ton, Vermont. I have been appointed a personal representative of the above named es, tate. All creditors having claims against the estate must present their claims in writing within 4 months of the date of the first publication of this notice. The claim must be pres- ented to me at the ad- dress listed below with a copy filed with the regis- ter of the Probate Court. The claim will be forever barred if it is not pres- ented as described above within the four month deadline. Dated: June 17, 1997 Alison J. Bell, Esq. Address: PO Box 271 Burlington, VT 05402 Telephone: (802) 864-0217 Name of Publication: Burlington Free Press First Publication Date: June 21, 1997 Second Publication Date: June 28, 1997 Address of Probate Court: Chittenden District Probate Court PO Box 511 Main Street Burlington, VT 05402 June 21, 28, 1997 marketing experience a plus. --sourly plus Bonus. Call 378-0614 and ask for Abdooi. "Sold the First Dar", We hear this every 1I from successful ad- vertisers. Free Press Classifieds work, Cab us at 658-3321. We can help you make your ad work. TELEPHONE SALES Publisher seeks experi- enced telephone sales persons, business to business. salary plus commission. Pleasant work atmosphere. Vergennes. 877-2510. TRUCK DRIVER For local petrolium car- rier. Tractor trailer class A CDL haz mat. Clean record & appearance. Benefits. Call De Vos & Sons,425-3020. EMPLOYMENT 12 ALL CYCLE WASTE, INC. A focal waste and recy- cling company seeks the following positions: DRIVERS CDL truck drivers w/ clean driving record, exp. pref. but not req. LABORERS for our transfer station, must be hard working. Excel. benefit package and competitive wages. Apply in person at: 28 Avenue B, Williston, VT. 864-3615. ARC NITECT/DRAFT- SMAN needed. 5 yrs . min. experience. Must be computer literate. Auto - CAD 12 pref. Fax resume to: 802-878-0080. ASSEMBLY LINE POSITIONS 30 immediate positions. 1 st, 2nd and weekend shifts available. Excellent opportunity for advance- ment. No experience necessary. Will train. Call Jess for immediate inter- view. TAD Employment Services 658-5007 EOE NO FEES ASSISTANT MANAGER TRAINEE Large national home care company seeks 3 individuals. We train. Car helpful. oppor- tunity to earn $300-$500 per week to start. Bonu- ses/salary/commission. Call 658-2082 . EDE .ASSISTANT MANAGER /TRAINEE If you are in- terested in an exciting fast paced business management position we have career opportu- nities at our rental cen- ters. You have to be hon- est, hardworking, anc able to lead, manage anc promote a profitable ca- reer oriented operation. Apply in person, nc phone calls please. U-Haul Center, 460 Riv- erside Ave, Burlington VT 05401. AUTO BODY TECH Est • e r° WWM here a e 5 years ai bofly e1111W prate and an, able to for 1 ae am plate al phases of c i.... ..n.r Frwrt CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record b. Applicant 4e h z-1pt11— c . Contact 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed usen(s). w 0 -,,-IQ ire U -�- % /0;?r 0 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 4) 5) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. -WA 'AllillilillgiillllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i w 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8J x 11, 8J x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT _ / 1) Name of Applicant �f/ f �`C� 4'�f, 2 ) Name'of Subdivision/ /U,q, zr-e —� ,e/ 0(x 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat applic"a-�t--ion: �"' o,/Y►'4Q�e�.-�-� C'�fr✓1.Yti D� c� .dL•Q ,cx.c� ��1Q.�1�� -� 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and aQntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision ulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for major subdivision. ( applicant or contact person 1-3 � 7 Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 6, 1997 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Modify Condition #15, Pinnacle at Spear Dear Mr. Larkin: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 10, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls please gi a me a call. Sin a el , Jo Weith, City Planner STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOIC=D) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE' E-MAII.(FIRM2555@AOL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) February 13, 1997 Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT 05402-0728 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Enclosed please find original documents for the above - referenced project which need revision before they can be recorded. In reviewing these documents, I noticed a consistent error that can be remedied without redrafting. I realize that your clients are currently out of state and that making the necessary changes may take some time, but we want to record accurate documents. The March 17, 1992 Underwood deed is incorrectly listed as being recorded in Volume 332 of the South Burlington Land Records in every document which contains the reference. The correct Volume is 322. This reference can be found in the following enclosed documents: -Exhibit A to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of utility and recreation path easements from Larkin and Milot to the City of South Burlington. -Warranty Deeds from Larkin and Milot conveying utility easements (3) and the recreation path easement to the City of South Burlington. -The Second Notice of Development Conditions. -Exhibit A to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of roadways (and future roadways) from Larkin and Milot to the City of South Burlington. i Carl H. Lisman, Esq. Lisman & Lisman February 13, 1997 Page 2 -Warranty Deeds from Larkin and Milot conveying roadways (and future roadways) to the City of South Burlington. -Schedule A's for each of the Partial Discharges I received three different versions of Schedule A for the Partial Discharges. I am enclosing a proposed draft of a revised Schedule A which uniformly refers to the necessary documents. Please review and give me your thoughts as to the changes made, and the likelihood of success of obtaining approval of the parties. Finally, we have issues with the Hausner Documents. The volume and page of the plan referred to ("Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont, Sanitary Sewer Extension") needs to be added to the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Exhibit A (Vol. 365, Page 120). Moreover, Walter Grenier's signing of the document as a witness, notary and duly authorized agent of the Merchants Bank is troublesome. We request that this document be replaced with one which does not have Walter signing in multiple capacities. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours; Timothy M. Eustace Enclosures cc: Mr. Raymond Belair (w/out encl.) SON3199.COR STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) Carl H. Lisman, Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Esq. 05402-0728 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAIL(FIRM2555@AOL. COM) January 27, 1997 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER Once again I am writing to request the legal documents that are still needed to finalize the above -referenced project. Please forward to this office a Partial Discharge of Mr. and Mrs. Gagnan's mortgage as well as the Property Transfer Tax Returns for all interests conveyed by your clients and Mr. and Mrs. Hausner to the City of South Burlington. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Timot y M. Eustace CC: Joseph Weith son3186.cor 1' F74? - /4)7 41-� J F1.._ANTING L15T TREE SELECTIONS FOR STREET TREES AND C MMON AREAS REC.OMME'NL FOR REC�UIR 1QY QTY m M�"� �'� �'� " bm 1�10 I �D (5ect lon 19.104 of a �T W Acer tatarloum Tatarlan Maple 25-3" StB 15-20, @ �- IOOZT C. � r- O�� i�� tr -. dy .�" �'S•�y 111 - i AR 41 Acer rubrum Northwood Northwood R- Maple 25-3" 54B 3b-4c,@/35°' =6, 0V-25' CLOT a 1, q do _ Acw g I" la AG 3 Asaculus glabra Ohlo Bvci a 2-25" 1548 30-40' �O ��1 - Acer tatarlcum Crataegus cruegalll In, E=0- 34 G61:10 oecldentalls "ackberry �.p3' B45 40-5i Malue floribunda cP 43 Grataegus phaenopTum Washlnoton "ak,thorn 2' 134B 18-20' l Y!--53325-35, CLOT 03, FP 38 Fraxwous p. Emerald Emerald Groom Ash 2!+-3" BtB 40-461: pcsr Gdropestre Gr a to sgw pha er�opyr� KP 3 Koelreuterla paniculata Golcisn Raln Tres 2-25` BAB 25-3fd',�/y�a;ya� 1�alsele earollna (oil s Koelreuterla paniculat MF 5 Malus rloribunda Flowering Grab 15-21 1545 Ia-15'Cd Sb7 Ov 56 Ostrya vlr!@miana A. 1.lophornbsam 25-3" Big 30-40'@ l79 o -4W 3b-45' CLOT • 5 P5 12 Pfnw d etrobiformis M. Borer Pins 5 6' BtB 30-40' ? qp: =robo Aesculue glabraGarpinus carolWana PT 42 Pinus thinbsrgil J. Black Pins 5-6' ede 25-30' $0= '33irb Cxr dsndrum arbor Qum 2 _ Phellodendron am,rsrw SG 14 Salix. caprQa Goat Willow 542' B.R 15-20, � g9s`�S�Pynis calleryana cv ci SN 20 Sallx nlobe Nlobe Willow 1.5-2" BtB 40-45'd! %a!t"p TC 6S NA VA me /ll;(,.. I- K. ,ifiYh h�1Mn� 3 ('4v a� aS @air = 13 i f Approxhnate mature hteightt of tress under Ideal cOndltlons. Heavy clay sobs on this site F 7 lff 5D will Ihnit growth and reduce the mature height. a sw.Sa X0,97. i i i _� Eff 7WAINWr X �*Aft ow(kcl -4v ------------- 7- qv-,e,f -- /rf ac>l 7 STEVENF. STITZEL PATTI R PAGE* JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (-ALSO ADM=D IN N.Y.) Carl H. Lisman, Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Esq. 05402-0728 (802) 660-2555 (VOICErIDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAIL(FBtNU 555QAOL. COM) December 16, 1996 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER On November 6, 1996 I wrote you a letter regarding documents that we needed to finalize the above -referenced project. I am writing to follow up that letter and remind you that we still need to obtain a Partial Discharge of Mr. and Mrs. Gagnan's mortgage as well as the Property Transfer Tax Returns for all interests conveyed by your clients and Mr. and Mrs. Hausner to the City of South Burlington. Please forward these documents to our office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance. Do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter. Very truly yours, Timothy M. Eustace cc: Joseph Wieth son3166.cor STEVENF. STITZEL PAM R- PAGE' JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) Carl H. Lisman, Lisman & Lisman P.O. Box 728 Burlington, VT STITZEL & PAGE, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Esq. 05402-0728 (802) 660-2555 (V OICE/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 E-MAIL(FIRM2555@AOL. COM) November 6, 1996 Re: South Burlington - Nowland II Dear Carl: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E.FLETCHER I have been working with Bob Fletcher on the above - referenced project. About a month ago, Bob spoke to you regarding some documents that we needed to finalize this matter. I am writing to follow up that discussion. In order to finish this project we need to obtain a Partial Discharge of Mr. and Mrs. Gagnan's mortgage as well as the Property Transfer Tax Returns for all interests conveyed by your clients and Mr. and Mrs. Hausner to the City of South Burlington. The City is anxious to receive these documents and finalize this project. Please forward them to our office at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter. Very truly Timothy M. cc: Joseph Wieth son3141.cor yours, Eustace WARRANTY EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in Burlington, Chittenden County, State of Vermont, ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, paid to its full satisfaction by THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, ("Grantee") by these presents, does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns forever, an easement in perpetuity for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring, and/or replacing a stormwater drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, under and through land in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, (hereinafter the "Easement") described as follow, viz: Being that Easement, subject to certain terms and conditions, conveyed to the within Grantor by Warranty Easement Deed of Victor L. and Ann 0. Ratkus of or about even date herewith and to be recorded in the South Burlington City Land Records. Reference is made to the plan described in said aforementioned Warranty Easement Deed for a more complete description of the Easement conveyed herein. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the granted Easement with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever, and Grantor for itself and its heirs, successors, and assigns, does covenant with Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the lands through which the Easement is granted and has good right and title to convey and encumber the same in the manner aforesaid, that the lands are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as aforementioned, and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforementioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor sets its hand this2� day of August, 1995. IN PRESENCE IDF: Witnes LARKIN LOT ARTNERS By: Gerald C. Milot STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At ', D , in said County and State, this L 5 day of August, 1995 personally appeared GVV.ALD C. JULOT, duly authorized agent of LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP. Before me U U Qom_ Notary Public My commission expires: 2/10/99 «Iarkinwd.b08>> WARRANTY EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That VICTOR L. RATKUS and ANNE O. RATKUS of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont ("Grantors"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars, paid to their full satisfaction by LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in Burlington, Chittenden County, State of Vermont, its successors and assigns ("Grantee") by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee, LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP, its successors and assigns forever, an easement in perpetuity for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring, and/or replacing a stormwater drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, under and through land in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, (hereinafter the "Easement") described as follow, viz: An Easement with an initial width of ten (10) feet centered on the existing drainage pipe located in the southeasterly corner of Grantors' property as it lies adjacent to the Spear Street right-of-way. Said Easement proceeds westerly from the westerly edge of the Spear Street right-of-way, diminishing in width until it terminates at the southwesterly boundary of Grantors' property, and is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the southwesterly sideline of the Spear Street right-of-way which marks the southeasterly corner of the 838 square foot easement area, said point being 4.74 feet northeasterly of the southeasterly corner of the property of the within Grantors; thence N 27047157" E in and along said Spear Street sideline 10.01 feet to a point; thence N 65008/300 W 70.14 feet to a point; thence N 67056100" W 25.32 feet to * point; thence N 85007105" W 11.66 feet to a point in the southwesterly sideline of Grantors' property; thence S 59058133" E 53.08 feet in and along the southerly sideline of Grantors, property; thence S 65008130" E 52.63 feet to the point of beginning. Included is the right to allow water exiting from the stormwater drainage pipe to drain within an existing ditch as said ditch proceeds from the southwesterly end of the drainage pipe to its intersection with the southwesterly boundary line of Grantors' property. Said "Easement Area" is depicted on a survey entitled "Drainage Easement Plan V & A Ratkus Parcel" dated May 9, 1995 with a latest revision date of July 17, 1995, and recorded simultaneously in Map Volume at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. In exercising any right granted hereunder the Grantee shall comply with the following conditions: f-ANGRUCKSYFREIN 1. Construction disturbance shall be kept to a ��>�,�. minimum by utilizing the smallest available equipment to complete the installation. Prior d L..1 \(:R(x: K SPERRY NVYxx. to initiating construction, the proposed alignment shall be reviewed in the field by the Grantors and Grantee so that the limits of construction disturbance can be kept to a minimum. 2. The new storm drainage line shall be aligned so that the maximum number of existing trees to be removed and replaced shall be two (2). The Grantee will replace each damaged tree with a new tree the size (DBH) of the tree(s) that was damaged in a location to be determined by Grantors. 3. Grantee shall warrant the continued health of the replanted or new planted trees for two (2) years following the completion of the construction improvements. Any diseased or dying plants identified during this period shall be also replaced by the Grantee and the two year warranty period shall be extended from the time of the replacement tree. 4. The existing stormwater drainage pipe, and any replacement thereto, is and shall be made of a long lasting material such as Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) or High Density Polyethylene (HDP) and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. 5. Once the stormwater drainage pipe improvements have been installed, the Easement Area shall be graded, seeded and mulched. 6. The Grantee shall comply with all laws, regulations, rules, permits, conditions or other governmental requirements applicable to the Grantee's exercise of any rights under this Warranty Easement Deed. Grantors and their successors and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of the Easement Area such as shall not be inconsistent with the rights granted under this Warranty Easement Deed by the within Grantee for the purposes set forth herein, and shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said Easement Area which would prevent or interfere with Grantee's ability to exercise its rights granted herein. Grantee shall protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantors, their agents and employees, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, damages, penalties, causes of action, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees and expenses) imposed upon or incurred by or asserted against "r;11o(K spFrim t %N cxn. Grantors or Grantors' property of which the Easement Area is a part by reason of the occurrence or existence of any of the following: (a) Grantee's use or possession of the Easement Area; (b) the exercise of Grantee's rights under this Warranty Easement Deed or anything else done or permitted by Grantee to be done in or about the Easement Area; (c) any failure by Grantee to perform or comply with Grantee's obligations under this Warranty Easement Deed, or arising from failure by Grantee, or Grantee's agents, contractors or employees; or (d) the performance of any labor or service or the furnishing of any materials or other property in respect of the Easement Area. Grantee shall defend Grantors against all costs, attorney's fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding. In case any action or proceeding is brought against Grantors by reason of a claim, Grantee, upon notice from Grantors, shall defend the same at Grantee's expense by counsel satisfactory to Grantors. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the granted Easement with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever, and Grantors for themselves and their heirs, successors, and assigns, do covenant with Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owners of the lands through which the Easement is granted and have good right and title to convey and encumber the same in the manner aforesaid, that the lands are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as of record, and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Grant s hereunto set their hands and seals this 23 day of W6 (i S`T , 1995. I RESENCE F Wit ess as to Witness as to Beth c;,Z�,� STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Victor L. atkusf G l Anne O. Ratkus At �) � c �� c: �1 , this '��c'' day of �7T /�TlIT] r rr T�73 [� ,.7 1995, ,E ANNE O. RATKUS persopa� appeared, and #tr-�kL acknowledged this instrument, by thci ` sealed and subscribed, to be-t- -free act Before me�rC� �c Notary Public STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At this 6?3 day of 4116&57- , 1995, VICTOR L. RATKUS personally appeare , and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and su s ibed, to a his free act and deed. Before me: N tary Public f-VNGROCK ` PERRY & % O()L s oFFicst l��t ►� 19� I age_ �;M orded in Vol. ngton Land Recor :.clest: r`p,, .�►ua. SUPPLEMENTAL µµ�rgaret A Picard, City Clerk NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS I THIS NOTICE is made this ay of AUGUST, 1996, by Gerald C. Milot and John P. Larkin, doing business as Larkin Milot Partnership, a Vermont general partnership (the "Declarant"). RECITALS A. This Supplemental Notice of Conditions applies to 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street in the City of South Burlington originally conveyed to Gerald C. Milot and John P. Larkin pursuant to a warranty deed, dated July 8, 1990, from Rheal C. Gagnon and Helen N. Gagnon, recorded in Volume 296, Page 538 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington, and a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Gerald C. Milot and John P. Larkin pursuant to a warranty deed, dated March 17, 1992, from Marie Underwood, recorded in Volume 332, Page 188 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (the "Property"). B. The Property is shown and depicted on a plan entitled Nowland Two South Burlington Vermont Plat of Subdivision of Lands of Gerald C. Milot, et. al. dated July 1992, prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated, recorded in Map Volume 286, Pages I I I and 112 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (the "Plan"). C. The Declarant applied for, and received (on August 10, 1993) final plat approval from, the South Burlington Planning Commission to subdivide the Property into 73 single-family lots, common areas and roads, as depicted on the Plan. D. The approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission for the subdivision required that the Declarant make certain undertaking and promises. One of those conditions was the requirement that a bond be posted to ensure the planting of two (2) trees per residential lot. E. On July 30, 1996, the South Burlington Planning Commission amended its approval to delete the requirement for the bond (Condition #7) and to amend the requirements for the planting of tree, as follows:. 6. In accordance with Section 412.4 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations, there shall be two (2) trees planted on each residential lot. Said trees shall be planted on a lot within one year of issuance of a zoning permit for that lot. Only tree species which comply with the height limits of the Scenic View Protection Overlay District shall be planted. A "Notice of Condition" addressing this requirement shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 30 days of this approval. F. This document supplements Notices of Development Conditions, dated February 6, 1992, November 5, 1993 and November_, 1995, recorded in Voluem 322, Page 197-, Volume 353, Page 585 and Volume ___, Page __, respectively, of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington andA. AGREEMENT In consideration of Ten Dollars and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Declarant hereby declares that the and confirms that the Property shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following coveants, agreements, easements and restrictions, all of which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of, and which shall run with, the Property and be binding on all parties having any right, title or interest therein or any part thereof, and their heirs, successors and assigns: 1. There shall be two (2) trees planted on each residential lot. Said trees shall be planted on a lot within one year of issuance of a zoning permit for that lot. Only tree species which comply with the height limits of the Scenic View Protection Overlay District shall be planted. 2. Except as amended and modifed by this Supplement, the Notice of Development Rights and the Second Notice of Development Rights shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has executed this Supplement. WITNESS: LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP n dQQ�- BY _ I'Le Gerald C. Milot, general partner and duly authorized agent BY John P. km, general partner and duly authorized STATE OF VERMONT agent CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington in said County and State on this�rdday of August, 1996, personally appeared Gerald C. Milot, general partner and duly authorize agent of Larkin Milot Partnership, and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Larkin Milot Partnership. Before meOL4,,( K1 V a r' ,-0 / Notary Public a STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. re At Burlington in said County and State on thisQ8 day of August, 1996, personally appeared John P. Larkin, general partner and duly authorize agent of Larkin Milot Partnership, and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed and sealed to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Larkin Milot Partnership. 03\20014\010\Iegsllsuppcon.chl Before me .0 n d a 9, W a n ,o n Notary Public — i I KAEKV City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 12, 1996 Gerald C. Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Nowland II, Landscape Waiver Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on July 30, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S'n er 1 d Joe eith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl t?nccrded in Vol. _ on page�� Of So. Burlington land Recor S9 I Attest. NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk THIS NOTICE is made as of the 5th day of November, 1993, by Gerald C. Milot of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont and John P. Larkin, of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, (the "Owners"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the South Burlington City Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission") has approved a planned residential development known as Nowland Two (the "Nowland Two PRD") as depicted on a final subdivision plat entitled "Nowland Two: Plat of Subdivision of Lands of Gerald C. Milot et al.", Sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, signed October 11, 1993, and prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated, and recorded in Map Volume at Pages I �IL and 1a respectively; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission dated August 10, 1993 requires some of the specific conditions which will be of particular interest to purchasers of lots in the Nowland Two PRD to be included in a Notice of Development Conditions to be recorded simultaneously with the recording of the aforementioned final plat. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the Planning Commission's final approval, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Owners hereby give notice of the following obligations, restrictions, and requirements that will directly affect lots within the Nowland Two PRD. Reference should also be made to the complete text of the South Burlington City Planning Commission approval dated August 10, 1993, and on file in the planning office of the City of South Burlington. 1. Obligation for Tree Planting. Owners shall plant two (2) trees on each lat as required in Section 19.104(a) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The approximate location of said trees is depicted on a survey entitled "Nowland Two: Landscape & Lighting Plan", Drawing D-4501, dated November 1992, last revised October 5, 1993 and recorded in Map Volume ,9 t & at Page /. O of the South Burlington City Land Map Records. Particular reference should be made to tree height limits and eligible species referred to in the notes of the survey. 2. Height Limitations. The Nowland Two planned residential development is in compliance with the Dorset Park View Protection Zone set forth in Article XXV, Section 25.40. Calculations of elevations and maximum height for each lot for structures and landscaping are set forth on a schematic plan and tables attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Reference is also made to the Landscape & Lighting Plan referred to hereinabove and to surveys entitled "Nowland Two: Site and Utilities Plan" revised October 5, 1993, Drawings D-4383 through D-4388 and recorded in Map Volume ,2&7at Pages /11 , 115, A, and L,'L[> of the South Burlington City Land Map Records. Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date C' _ 4 9�/ / pag°es� To `0 1 Z_e� From ' Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # itisfy the requirements imposed by ight-of-way, the area where r 1 7/30/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two (2) trees per residential lot, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Planning Commission amends condition #6 of the August 10, 1993 final plat approval to read as follows: "In accordance with Section 412.4 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations, there shall be two (2) trees planted on each residential lot. Said trees shall be planted on a lot within one year of issuance of a zoning permit for that lot. Only tree species which comply with the height limits of the Scenic View Protection Overlay District shall be planted. A "Notice of Condition" addressing this requirement shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 30 days of this approval." 3. The Planning Commission amends condition #7 of the August 10, 1993 final plat approval to no longer require the applicant to post a $65,335 bond for proposed "lot trees." 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 27, 1996 Gerald C. Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Nowland II, Landscape Waiver Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 30, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i4cere,*y, be Weith; ity Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl CARL H. LISMAN ALLEN D. WEBSTER C.PA. MARY G. KIRKPATRICK E. WILLIAM LECKERLING DOUGLAS K. RILEY RICHARD W. KOZLOWSKI JUDITH L. DILLON CHRISTINA A. JENSEN Mr. Joseph Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: LISMAN & LISMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW P 0. BOX 728 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402 602-864 5756 August 26, 1996 Pinnacle at Spear TELECOPIER 602 - 664-3629 OFFICES IN FINANCIAL PLAZA AT 64 PINE STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT LOUIS LISMAN BERNARD LISMAN MARK D. OETTINGER COUNSEL In connection with this matter, I am enclosing the original of the Supplemental Notice of Development Conditions, now ready to be recorded. , Carl H. Lisman CHL/ddp Enclosure 20014\010 PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE -s pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 3. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of--Occupancy/Compli- ance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new building. 4. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion vassed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two trees per lot: Mr. Burgess explained that the difficulty is that if the lots are sold, they may not be built on for a number of years, till after the bond has expired. Mr. Weith said his recommendation is to waive the requirement for a bond for 2 trees per lot but to add a condition that two trees be planted on a lot and require that a Notice of Condition be recorded in the land records so a buyer can see this requirement. He suggested that all residential subdivisions be treated this way from now on. Mr. Teeson asked if that can be tied into the building permit. Mr. Weith said Mr. Ward didn't want to accept a bond from each person buying a lot. Mr. Burgess felt that most people buying a lot will plant trees as it increases the value of the property. Mr. Teeson said the reason for the bond is to assure that the trees last 3 years. That assurance will now no longer exist. He also doubted whether the proposed condition would be found in the land records. Members questioned whether notices of violation get into the land records. Mr. Teeson suggested that a plan submitted for a building permit show two trees. Mr. Weith felt Mr. Ward should address this. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final PLANNING COMMISSION 30 JULY 1996 PAGE 4 plat application of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to in- sure the planting of two trees per residential lot, with the fol- lowing stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Planning Commission amends condition #6 of the August 10, 1993 final plat approval to read as follows: "In accordance with Section 412.4 of the South Burlington Subdivision regulations, there shall be two trees planted on each residential lot. Said trees shall be planted on a lot within one year of issuance of a zoning permit for that lot. Only tree species which comply with the height limits of the Scenic View Protection Overlay District shall be planted. A "Notice of Condition" addressing this re- quirement shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land records within 30 days of this approval." 3. The Planning Commission amends condition #7 of the August 10, 1993 final plat approval to no longer require the applicant to post a $65,335 bond for proposed "lot trees." Mr. Dinklage seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Christopher Bishop, Chittenden Bank, to amend an approved 10 building planned unit development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of 202,546 sq. ft. of shopping center use, a 55,000, sq. ft. supermarket, a 95 room hotel, and a 2500 sq. ft. bank with drive -through service, 981 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the drive -through bank to 3585 sq. ft., decreasing the size of the shopping center use to 201,461 sq. ft., and other minor modifications including landscaping, building footprints and circulation: Mr. White showed the location for the Chittenden Bank. The size of Building B will be decreased. The size of Building H will be increased slightly with a similar decrease in Building B. Mr. White said they were also called by a neighbor regarding additional screening for the retention pond. He said they will add landscaping there. Other minor changes include "cart corrals" in the Hannaford parking lot and other detail changes in landscaping and grading. Mr. White showed a layout of the bank and drive -up lanes and City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 5, 1996 Gerald C. Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05406 Re: Nowland II, Landscape Waiver Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the June 18, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erel , Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl 26. Subdivision plat: --- survey data for the recreation path/pedestrian trail easement and the utility easement between lots 41-42 and 57-58 should be provided. 27. Other: --- lot numbers not correctly shown on sheet 2. --- the plans should show a 20 foot drainage easement across the Ratkus property for the drainage pipe. This easement should be included in the legal documents. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the Final Plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single-family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive as depicted on a plat entitled, "Nowland Two, Subdivision Plat, and last revised 7/28/93, and a 28 page set of plans, page one entitled "Nowland Two, South Burlington, Vermont", dated October, 1992 (stamped "received" 7/30/93), prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. with the following stipulations: 1. Any previous approvals and stipulations affecting the subject property which are not superseded by this approval shall remain Ln effect. 2. In accordance with section 26.602 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, the Planning Commission approves the creation of lots for development upon land designated as "restricted area" on the Southeast Quadrant Official Zoning Map. It is the commission's opinion that based on the information submitted by the applicant the proposed development will not adversely affect wetlands on the property. Also, it is the Commission's opinion that the goals for maintaining an open space corridor along the north -south arterial roadways in the Southeast Quadrant will be promoted through the establishment of building envelopes on lots 5 through 8. The allowance of buildings in this manner is compatible with adjacent development along Spear Street. Finally, the Planning Commission supports moving the r.o.w. for a future north - south collector road to the east as proposed so as not to impact the wetland area. 3. The Commission approves the 1100 foot long cul-de-sac street serving lots 52 - 73. It is the Commission's opinion that the 1100 foot length will not result in unsafe or inefficient traffic conditions particularly since r.o.w.'s are being reserved for roadway connections to future developments on adjoining parcels. IN 4. In order for the Commission to find that the proposed development will not cause unreasonable highway congestion or unsafe conditions with respect of use of the highways, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) The applicant shall construct the southbound left turn lanes at each project access on Spear Street (sheets 5 and 7) prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit for the 38th lot. b) The applicant shall construct the improvements to the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection as shown on the plan entitled "Spear Street/Swift Street Intersection Improvements" dated 5/93, prior to the issuance of a zoning/building permit for the construction of any residential structures. c) Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits for this development, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the costs of constructing the improvements referenced in a) and c) above. This bond or bonds shall remain in effect until such time as the improvements are constructed. d) Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits for this development, the applicant shall be responsible for retiming the signal phasing at the Spear Street/Swift Street intersection as recommended in the traffic analysis submitted by the applicant. 5. The Planning Commission grants a credit of $300 per lot for construction of the portion of the proposed recreation path located outside of any public street right-of-way. This credit may be applied toward required recreation fees. At time of application for a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall pay the difference between the recreation impact fee and the $300 per lot credit. 6. The developer shall be required to install two (2) trees on each lot as required in Section 19.104(a) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. A "Notice of Condition" addressing this requirement shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final plat plans. 7. Prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits, the applicant shall post a $130,366 landscape bond for proposed street and common area trees, and a $65,335 bond for proposed lot trees. The bonds shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the planted landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. Legal documents for all public streets (i.e., irrevocable offer of dedication) and easements (e.g., utility easements and recreation path easements) shall be submitted to the City Attorney A for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to issuance of any zoning/building permits. 9. A "Notice of Condition" addressing the height limitations for structures and landscaping on each lot shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final plat plans. 10. In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., streets, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.), the developer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 11. A "Notice of Condition" addressing the building envelopes on lots #5 - 8 and purpose and restrictions thereof shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to recording the final plat plans. 12. Prior to final plat submittal, the plans shall be revised to show the following: a) The survey plat shall show survey data for the recreation path easement and the utility easement between lots 41-42 and 57-58. b) Lot numbers shall be correctly shown on sheet 2. c) The plans shall show a 20 foot drainage easement for the proposed drainage pipe on the Ratkus property west of Spear Street. This easement shall be included in the required legal documents. 13. A bond for streets, sidewalks, recreation paths, sewer and water shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The amount of the bond shall be approved by the City Engineer. 14. No zoning/building permit will be issued for a lot until the street serving that lot has a gravel sub -base installed in conformance with City specifications. 15. The Commission approves a total sewer allocation of 46,957 gpd for this development. The length of time that this sewer allocation approval shall remain in effect shall be tied to roadway construction. The roadways serving this development shall be completed within four (4) years of final plat approval. The sewer allocation for any lots served by roadways which are not completed within this four (4) year time limit shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. In addition, if at the end of three years no more than 50% of the roads have been completed, 25% of the total sewer allocation shall be lost unless reapproved by the Planning Commission. 7 16. No zoning/building permit will be issued for construction of any dwelling unit within this development until after the City adopts an education impact fee ordinance or September 1, 1993, whichever first occurs. This condition is being imposed to provide the school district a reasonable period of time to complete development of an impact fee ordinance and present the ordinance to the South Burlington City Council for adoption. No zoning/building permits shall be issued after the adoption of such an impact fee until that impact fee has been paid. 17. A "Notice of Condition" shall be recorded in the land records prior to recording the final plat plans which addresses the requirement of the homeowner's association to maintain the community mailbox area and all drainage ditches. 18. The final plat plans, including survey plat, shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. 19. As provided in Section 605 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations, if no action is taken to construct substantially the proposed subdivision within three years, said approval shall become null and void. 20. The retention ponds shall be maintained by the homeowners' association. The legal documents for the Association shall state this responsibility. The legal documents shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to permit issuance. 21. The recreation path shall be constructed by the completion of Pinnacle Drive or during the construction of the cul-de-sac, whichever first occurs. Chairman 6r Crerk, South Burlington Planning Commission Date 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 18 JUNE 1996 page 11 approved revised plat shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a. the parking information on the plat shall be revised to reflect correct parking requirements. 3. The applicant shall post a $750 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. The planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 1410 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 5. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the change in use will generate 20 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6. The proposed pedestrian walkway between the two parking areas shall be plowed in the winter. 7. The restaurant shall have a grease grit trap on the kitchen sanitary line. 8. Any change to the plat shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 9. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Jacob seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Revised final plat applicatiodof Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval fora planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two trees per lot: Mr. Milot said he felt the tree issue should be handled the same way it is for multi -family units. He felt posting of the bond should be by the person getting the building permit. He said he is only selling lots. His preference would be for a landscaping and cleanup bond. At present, they have 3-year bonds they can't control and there is nothing they can do if the person buys a lot and doesn't build for a number of years. PLANNING COMMISSION 18 June 1996 page 12 Mr. Weith said his concern is that the city wants to stay away from enforcing private covenants. After a brief discussion, members agreed to look into the matter and continue discussion at a later date. Mr. Flaherty moved to continue the application until 30 July 1996. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Sketch plan application of Wayne and Beverly Darling to subdivide a 1.66 acre parcel into three lots of 0.32 acres, 0.65 acres and 0.69 acres, 385 White Street: Mr. Darling said the lots will be 100' x 290', 104' x 290' and 100' x 140'. Ms. Darling asked that the sewer be put in so the street won't have to be dug up again. No issues were raised. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Clerk City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 26, 1996 Gerald C. Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05406 Re: Nowland II, Landscape Waiver Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 30, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give�me a call. 0 J C JW/mcp Encls Memorandum - Planning July 30, 1996 agenda items July 26, 1996 Page 2 4) LARKIN-MILOT PARTNERSHIP - LANDSCAPING BOND This application was continued from the 6/18/96 meeting (see enclosed minutes). This request is to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two (2) trees per lot. See enclosed letter from Gerald Milot. As was discussed at the last meeting, there is a logistical problem with requiring the developer to post a bond to cover the cost of planting 2 trees per residential lot. The problem is that the bond remains in effect for 3 years, however once the lot is sold it may not be developed for many years beyond the 3 year life of the bond. The 2 trees per lot typically are not planted until after the lot is developed. At the meeting, Gerry proposed requiring each individual lot owner to post a bond when they applied for a building permit. We met with the Zoning Administrator, Dick Ward, to get his input on this proposal. Dick does not support it because it would add a tremendous administrative burden which he feels in not necessary. Basically, he feels the requirement for two trees per lot is unnecessary because lot owners are willing to landscape their lots regardless of the requirement. I tend to agree with Dick. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission waive the requirement for a bond to cover the cost of planting 2 trees per lot. In addition, the Commission should include a condition which requires future lot owners to plant 2 trees per lot within one year of issuance of a building permit for the lot. Furthermore, this condition should appear in a "Notice of Condition" which the developer must record in the land records. This notice will alert future buyers of this particular condition. In the rare event a lot owner does not comply, the Zoning Administrator would then issue a notice of violation and pursue enforcement of the requirement. 5) CHITTENDEN BANK - PCD MODIFICATIONS - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending an approved ten (10) building planned unit development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of 202,546 square feet of shopping center use, a 55,000 square foot supermarket, a 95 room hotel, and a 2,500 square foot bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the drive -through bank to 3,585 square feet, decreasing the 2 PN W_ ■ ® 1� m ® U P P 4 P F R T t F. i t h e Joe Weith City of So. Burlington Dorset Street So Burlington, Vt Dear Joe, Please schedule me for an amendment to the conditions of our pen7nit at Pinnacle on Spear Street concerning the requirement for the developer to port a bond to insure the planting of two lot trees on each lot. My presentation will request that this requirement be waived on this project for the following reasons; 1..After we sell a lot we have no control over the landscaping on the lot other than the covenants of the development which require substantially more landscaping than two trees. 2 The zoning officer has a bond from us and the responsibility to plant trees lies with the homeowner or builder. The zoning officer has no way of enforcing this requirement. If he collects from our bond, he has no way to force the planting. I will also request that the Planning Commission consider a change to the regulations that would require; 1. The developer ,as a condition of final plat, be required to demonstrate through protective covenants that the minimum landscaping requirements will be met. Please schedule me sometime after May S. Sincerely, Gerald C. Milot PO. Box '1 (93 Buriin ton, Vermunc 0 5 4 U 6 Tcl (MU2) 658- OO iax (862) 86-i-81'2 - /� 171 ---- � � NO ,-j ( j r1 �,i dkncf.,, -� �y� -� � Gil �•-v .�k �! v r Memorandum - Planning June 18, 1996 agenda items June 14, 1996 Page 9 7) LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP - LANDSCAPING BOND - REVISED FINAL PLAT This request is to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle at Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two (2) trees per lot. The last amendment to this project was on 8/8/95 (minutes enclosed). Landscaping: The total landscaping requirement for this project is $199,114 ($65,335 for lot trees and $133,779 for street trees and common areas). The applicant is requesting that the requirement for a bond be posted for three (3) years for the two (2) trees per lot be waived. The applicant will be requesting the Planning Commission to consider a zoning amendment that the developer, as a condition of final plat, be required to demonstrate through protective covenants that the minimum landscaping requirements will be met (see enclosed letter from applicant). Staff is uncomfortable with the applicant's request for the following reasons: 1. To our knowledge the Planning Commission has never waived the bonding requirement for lot trees, thus a precedent would be set. 2. The bond is not only to assure that the trees are planted but that they survive for a three (3) year period. If the zoning regulations are amended as suggested by the applicant and the lot trees are not planted or die within three (3) years, the enforcement remedy would be to take legal action which would be costly and lengthy. The City might not consider it cost effective to take legal action for a few trees. Whereas obtaining the money from a bond is relatively easy and quick and doesn't cost the City anything. 3. If there is a problem with the trees, it would be better to deal with one (1) person than with 73 different property owners. 4. Protective covenants are typically not enforceable by the City. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 14, 1996 Gerald C. Milot P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, Vermont 05406 Re: Nowland II, Landscaping Waiver Dear Mr. Milot: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 18, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. n erely Joe Weith, Cit Planner JW/mcp Encls LEGALLEGALOTICESO ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Grand Isle Fire District #4 72 Moccasin Avenue Grand Isle, VT 05458 Separate sealed BIDS f) the construction of Zebi Mussel Control In provements, including 45 foot extension of existin intake, installation ( 1,000 feet of C HDP containment piping wit chemical feed lines an sample lines, chemict feeders and other appur tenances will be receive, by Grand Isle Fire District N4, Howart, Parizo, Chairman a the office of Lamou roux, Stone d O'Lea Consulting Engineers 14 Morse Drive, Esse Junction, VT 0543 until 4:00 P.M., (Dayligh Savings Time) June 27 1996, and then at sai office publicly opened an read aloud. Each BID must be accom- panied by a certified check payable to the OWNER for five per- cent (5%) of the total ]mount of the BID. A BID 3ond may be used In ieu of a certified :heck. adders are reminded that Minority Business Enter. )rise", "Women's Busi- ess Enterprise" and Federal Wage Rates -Da- is Bacon Act" do not pply to the WORK. he CONTRACT DOCU- tENTS may be examined t the following locations: lorksin Progress, )49 Williston Road, o. Burlington, VT 05403 odge Plan Room, ) Farrel Street, ). Burlington, VT 05403 imureux, Stone & Leary, 14 Morse Drive, ;sex Jct., VT 05452 )pies of the CONTRACT )CUMENTS may be tained at the office of moureux, Stone & _eary Consulting Engi- �rs, Inc. located at 14 )rse Drive, Essex Junc- 1, VT 05452 upon pay- nt of $35.00 for each . Any BIDDER, upon irning the CONTRACT CUMENTS within 30 is after the actual date BID opening and in A condition, will be )nded his payment. Performance BOND a Payment BOND ea- h in an amount equal one hundred percent )%) of the contract e, will be required. mum wage rates and is work employment are applicable. 28, 1996 'ard Parizo ict Chairman 30 & 31, 1996 1, 1996 I _ AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Mr"ITPELIER INVIT W FOR BIDS Sealed bids, on forms fur- nished by the State, will be received until 1100 a.m. prevailing time on Friday, June 14, 1996, at 133 State Street, Room 319, Montpelier, VT for the construction of the project hereinafter de- scribed. The time of re- ceiving and opening bids may be postponed due to emergencies or unfore- seen conditions. LOCATION: JERICHO AG MC 0005(1). In the Town of Jericho begin- ning a a point on TH 2, 0.25 mile east of its inter- section with TH 1 and extending easterly 0.0159 mile. CONSTRUCTION BEING: Replace existing bridge and other related items. d t Plans and Bid Proposals may be seen and ob- tained at the Agency of Transportation, Montpe- lier, VT and may be seen x at the office of J.E. 2 Wood, District Transpor- t tation Administrator N5, Colchester, Vermont. d Minimum wage rates pre- determined by the Secre- tary of Labor for the project are set out in the advertised specifications and bid proposals, and such rates are a part of the Contract covering the project in acordance with Section 115 of the Feder- al -Aid Highway Act of 1956. This Contract is subject to the Work Hours Act of 1962, PL 87-581, and implementing regula- tions. Contractors must perform this work under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Federal Wage -Hour Law) as well as all other applicable labor laws - Minimum labor and truck rates have been predeter- mined by the State Trans- portation Board and are set out in the Bid Propo- sal. Contractors bidding on this project must be qualified in accordance with the Agency Regula- tions, The Vermont Agen- cy of Transportation hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively in- sure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement;, mi- nority business enter- prises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invita- tion and will not be dis- criminated against on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award. The right is reserved to reject any or all bids, to waive any for- mality and any and all _ technicalities in bids and to accept such bid as may be deemed in the best interest of the awarding agency. May 29, 1996 June 1, 1996 BURLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT BID REQUEST FOR ROOF REPLACEMENT The Burlington Public School District invites in- terested roofers to submit Letter of Interest and Qualification Statement, Continued Next Column AIA Docurnent A305 for Pre -qualification for bid- ding on the contract for the roof replacement of the Barnes, Champlain, Smith Elementary Schools, Edmunds School Complex and Burlington High School. The Burling- ton Board of School Com- missioners has established pre -qualifica- tions which a contractor must meet. Sixty (60) days prior to opening bids, the Burlington Public School District requests contractors to complete the pre -qualification statement. At least thirty (30) days prior to the pro- posed bid opening, the Board will give written no- tice to each eligible bid- der. The pre- q u a I i f i c a t i o n statement must be completed and filed with the architectural office of Colin Lind- berg no later than June 21, 1996, Bid specifications may be obtained at the architectu- ral office of Colin Lind- berg, A.I.A, 444 South Union Street, Burlington, VT 05401 starting June 28, 1996. The contractor must comply with the City of Burlington Women In Trades Ordinance. The bid shall be submitted in a sealed envelope clearly marked SCHOOL DISTRICT ROOF PRO- JECT -SEALED BID and mailed to the Burling- ton School District, 150 Colchester Ave- nue, Burlington, Vt 05401, Attn: Scott Lisle. A11 proposals are due no later than 2:00 P.m. August 2, 1996 at the Burlington School Dis- trict Office, 150 Colches- ter Avenue, Burlington, Vt. The Burlington Board of School Commissioners reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to accept or reject any part of any bid and to re -ad- vertise, to waive any or all informalities in the bid and to accept the bid which in the sole judgment of the Burlington Board of School Commissioners is most advantageous to the Burlington School Depart- ment, even though it may not be the lowest priced bid. Any exceptions to the specifications in the bid should be clearly ex- plained in writing. No bid shall be withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) days after the opening of the bids. June 1, 2 & 3, 1996 ADVERTISING WITH STARS IS LIKE PUTTING YOUR NAME IN LIGHTS Lt"AL NV I IILJ LEGAL NOTICE The Es- Junction School )t invites bids for the tallation of approximately 600 ft. of dram pipe behind the Al- bert D. Lawton Jr. High School. Prot1ect may begin June 17, 1996. Specifica- tions can be obtained by contacting the Property Services Office at the Es- sex Community Educatio- nal Center, 2 Educational Drive, Essex Junction, Vermont 05452, 879-5554 (lam-3pm). Sealed bids clearly marked Drainage" will be opened publicly at the above address @ 2:15 pm, June 13, 1996. May 31, 1996 June 1, 2 & 3, 1996 LEGAL NOTICE The Essex Junction School District invites bids for a project at the Albert D. Lawton Jr. High School for the removal of the present gym floor, shot blasting and water- proofing the existing con- crete slab. Specifications can be ob- tained by contacting the Property Services Office at the Essex Community Educational Center, 2 Ed- ucational Drive, Essex Junction, Vermont 05452, 879-5554 (7am-3pm). Sealed bids clearly marked "Gym Floor" will be opened publicl at the above address 2:15 Pm, June 13, 1996. May 31, 1996 June 1, 2 & 3, 1996 NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Notice is hereby given that the undersign will sell to satisfy lien of owner, at public sale by closed bid- ding on June 22, 1996 at 10:00 A.M. at Extra Space Storage Facility located at 15 Williston Rd., Williston, VT. The personal goods stored therein by the following: George Blakley Jeff Folb Bonnie Westdyke Louis LaRose Gregory Enterprises Purchases must be made with cash only and paid for at the time of sale. All items to be removed from the unit at time of pur- chase. A $50.00 deposit will be made and re- funded after unit has been broom cleaned. We re- serve the right to accept or reject bids. June 1 & 8, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 18, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 EZP Golfco inc. for con- struction of Phase I of a planned residential devel- opment consisting of 191 single family lots and 40 multi -family units, and an 18 hole golf course on approximately 452 acres of land, Dorset Street, Phase 1 B consists of the creation of 75 single fami- ly lots for development and construction of re- lated roadways and utili- ties. 2) Final plat application of Dr. Herbert & Joan Martin for subdivision of 10.10 acres of land into two (2) lots of 2.75 acres and 7.35 acres, 1201 Spear Street. 3) Revised final plat appli- cation of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval for a Planned residential devel- opment consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle RSpear, Spear Street. e amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two (2) trees per lot. 4) Revised final plat appli- cation of Dik Kwan to amend a planned unit de- velopment consisting of two (2) multi -use commer- cial buildings and 16 mul- ti -family units. The amendment is to convert 1,836 square feet of office space to a 50 seat restau- rant, Patchen road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the south Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 1, 1996 STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT OF FRANKLIN, SS PROBATE COURT DOCKET NO. 96-95E IN RE THE ESTATE OF SUZAN NICHOLS LATE OF CHARLOTTE, VT NOTICE TO CREDITORS To the creditors of the estate of Suzan Nich- ols late of Charlotte, VT. I have been appoint- ed a personal representa- tive of the above named estate. All creditors hav- ing claims against the es- tate must present their claims in writing within 4 months of the date of the first publication of this no- tice. The claim must be presented to me at the address listed below with a copy filed with the regis- ter of the Probate Court. The claim will be forever barred if it is not pre- sented as described above within the four month deadline. Dated May 23, 1996 Renee C. Kleinman c/o David H. Greenberg, Esq. P.O. Box 201 Burlington, VT 05402 Telephone: (802) 655- 6621 Continued Next Column Name of Publicati� The Burlington Fr, First Publication C June 1, 1996 Second Publicatioi June 8, 1996 Address of Probat( County Courthousc P.O. Box 511, Mair Burlington, VT 054, June 1 & 8, 1996 ABSOLUTELY FRE auto, able 7 days Free Junk car re Cash for good c Dan K Sons 89, autc A FREE JUNK CAR REM, Some cars worth Greater Burlington Rathe's Salvage Fri 8-5. Sat 8-12 65, Bol The Burl 80 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 18, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of EZP Golfco Inc. for construction of Phase 1B of a planned residential development consisting of 191 single family lots and 40 multi -family units, and an 18 hole golf course on approximately 452 acres of land, Dorset Street. Phase 1B consists of the creation of 75 single family lots for development and construction of related roadways and utilities. 2) Final plat application of Dr. Herbert & Joan Martin for subdivision of 10.10 acres of land into two (2) lots of 2.75 acres and 7.35 acres, 1201 Spear Street. 3) Revised final plat application of Larkin Milot Partnership to amend a condition of approval for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single family lots, Pinnacle @ Spear, Spear Street. The amendment is to waive the requirement for posting a bond to insure the planting of two (2) trees per lot. - 4) Revised final plat application of Dick Kwan to amend a planned unit development consisting of two (2) multi -use commercial buildings and 16 multi -family units. The amendment is to convert 1,836 square feet of office space to a 50 seat restaurant, Patchen Road. Copies of the applications are available for publiC- inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 1, 1996 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant 2) Name of Subdivision ,QP 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plgt designer since preliminary application of plat 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for major subdivision. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date