Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB-96-0000 - Decision - 1301 1325 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in ,cordance With Sectio: 4468 of the Plaguing Development Ace (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the i provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or digricttin which the properrA'�' ty is located;14tIZ4 ��, /1,1 a"? .`4 &,. , tTZ_ (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is - therefore nece $ary to enable the easonable use f the property; (L,k�� A fid dv��" (3) That such appellant; in h created by the (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential -character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent prope y, n r be detr,imenta to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the . least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date 4 Appellant Vote: Yes do = Si Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; I (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare.; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. I Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No � Sign \ Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 5"--)(o.C)0a (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; w ., o+t.L- r�L"'&. 4., .,"I tl'-% ►�. t .l:,,1 r Sag- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; w u.L N o a-- U (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. "ui,- wF as sec_ Zc.•�� Appeal # Date 0,[a- j(e Appellant Uewi-s Wln-i-c�ns Vote: YesG, No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or Aistrict in which the property is located; (2) (3) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property: That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; - (5) That the variance, if authorized, will representL-the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of he plan. Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes Use Reverse side for additional findings