Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1330 Shelburne RoadCity of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 27, 1997 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Re: Addition, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the February 11, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 7.Weith,' er y, J// City Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls cc: Ken Pinkham PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 11 February 1997, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: Mac Teeson, Acting Chair; John Dinklage, Gayle Barone, Dan O'Rourke, Marcel Beaudin Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Chris Dunn, Bob Kischko, Mark Hamelin, Jesse Beck,John Coei.nwohl, Bob McEwing, J.J. Hamilton, Lorrie Doering, Cheryl & Ralph Guillette, Mildred Estey, Barbara Pell Don Lefebvre, Lenore Budd, Ernie Lemay, Betty Dalton, Gaila & Marc Foisy, Avis & Allen Porter, Joseph Oppenlander, John Little, John Little, Tom Foisy, Jim Lamphere, John Giebink, Charles Deslauriers, Greg Rabideau, John Larkin 1. Other Business: a. Mr. Dinklage asked if there could be a discussion about alternate standards for city streets. Mr. Weith said the Commission has always been instructed by the Council not to change the standard. Mr. Dinklage said he felt there should be a bona fide alternative. Mr. O'Rourke agreed. Mr. Weith said the first step would be a joint meeting with the City Countil. 2. Review Minutes of 21 January: Mr. Dinklage moved to approve the Minutes of 21 January as written. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Consent Agenda: Mr. Teeson explained that if any member of the Commission or a member of the public wanted a full hearing, there would be one. If not, the application will be passed without a hearing. Ap- plications have been reviewed by staff and have been determined to meet standards. a) Site plan application of the City of Burlington to construct a 5600 sq. ft. addition to a 9800 sq. ft. A/C component service facility, 860 Army Guard Road. b) Site plan application of Uno Restaurant to construct a 99 sq. ft. addition to a 5530 sq. ft. standard restaurant with 155 seats, 1330 Shelburne Road. No increase in seating or other changes to the site are proposed. Mr. Dinklage moved to approve the consent agenda subject to the conditions proposed in the City Planner's memorandum of 7 Feb- PLANNING COMMISSION 11 February 1997 page 2 ruary 1997 re: February 11, 1997 Aqenda Items. Mr. Beaudin sec- onded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of the City of Burlington to 1) construct a 13,240 sq. ft. addition to an existing 72,625 sq. ft. airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1108 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Hamilton said they have met with property owners along Airport Drive. The Airport is sensitive to the fact that they are located in a residential neighborhood and have a deep feeling for the neighbors. He said he felt the plan being proposed meets everyone's requirements. Mr. Beck, the architect for the plan, said they will rearrange traffic patterns. No gates or emplanements will be added to the Airport. The Airport has acquired the Park & Travel property which they will use for a long-term parking lot. The Airport entrance will be moved and traffic will be brought in to a 4-lane access road and a 2-lane by-pass road (for taxicabs, etc.). There is a service drive for truck traffic, and this is the area where dumpsters will be located. The plan is to have a pedestrian skywalk to link the second floor of the parking garage to the second floor of the terminal building. There will be a new area for rental cars. The FAA parking will be moved to the airport side of the building for direct access. Their current parking lot will be used for employees. It will be served by a one-way entrance from Airport Drive. This access will be signed and gated. Employees will exit the Airport with the rest of the Airport traffic. The long term lot will be entered from White Street Extension. Shuttle service will be provided to the terminal building. The landscaping plan has changed since the plans were made. Mr Beck showed the building setbacks which range from 90 ft. at one end to 115 ft. at the other. There will be significant plantings to soften the massiveness of the parking building. They will exceed the landscape formula. All lighting fixtures will be cut off fixtures and will be below the 3 candle maximum. This applies both in the lot and in the Akt7 WMAS N 14 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 7, 1997 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Re: Addition, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7956 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 11, 1997, at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls cc: Ken Pinkham please give me a call. cere y, JoWeith, Cily Planner Memorandum - February 11, February 7, Page 3 Planning 1997 agenda items 1997 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new addition. 8. Any change to the plans shall require approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. b) UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION - RESTAURANT ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 99 square foot addition to a 5530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats approved on 3/19/96 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1330 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl and R4 Districts. It is bounded on the east by a single family dwelling, on the south by a retail/office building, on the north by Imperial Drive and on the west by Shelburne Road. The only issues involved are as follows: Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 6.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). Overall coverage is 51.8% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverages are not affected. Setback requirements will be met. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $371 which is being met. No additional landscaping needed since the original landscaping plan exceeded the minimum requirement by more than this additional $371. Recommended Conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For purposes of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the addition will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3 Memorandum - Planning February 11, 1997 agenda items February 7, 1997 Page 4 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the new addition. 5. Any change to the plans shall require approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4) CITY OF BURLINGTON - PARKING GARAGE & TERMINAL EXPANSION - STTF PLAN This project consists of: 1) constructing a 13,240 square foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport terminal building, 2) constructing a multi -level parking structure for 1108 vehicles, and 3) constructing new employee and long term surface parking areas. This property located at 1200 Airport Drive lies within the Airport and Airport Industrial Districts. Access/circulation: Access will be provided by the three (3) curb cuts on Airport Drive and via White Street Extension. The three (3) curb cuts on Airport Drive from south to north include a 28 foot ingress only curb cut, a 28 foot egress only curb cut and 16 foot ingress only curb cut. White Street Extension will provide ingress and egress access to the long term parking area. The long term lot access road should be for two (2) way traffic and the plan so modified. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Due to the vast size of the airport property, building and overall coverages were not calculated. Front yard coverage along Airport Drive is 28.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). The parking structure does not meet the front yard setback requirement (see discussion below regarding building height). The terminal addition will meet the setback requirements. 5! TO ,Jr. 1-1 SHE BURNS -SS- — — -SEWER LINE RIM-ST- — — -STORM LINE v '61fgto n , N) rwV N. ............ . ...... LINE MH RIM 176.2 .8 {_oHMFC/M,/CATV—OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CATV INV 169,0 E — n5 ---UG=C/M,/CATV--UNDERGROUND ELEC/TEL/CATV % WOOD FENCE Rl"- CHAIN LINK FENCE T OF IVX WILDING a MANHOLE. IH CATCH BASIN — SIGN 0 LIGHT POLE 0 IRON PIPE FOUND 0 IRON ROD FOUND Ej MONUMENT FOUND P=L.,�11,574 4124.5 _.G. ,,1 84.7 TOTAU Ball 30 2.02 100% LOT COVERAGE: PROPOSED S.F. AC. x BUILDINGS; 5,607 .13 6.3 IL PAVEMENT: 40,030 .92 45.5 MMSPACL 4140 .... .... . .... TOTAL: 88,130 2.02 100% FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES: SHELBURNE ROAD - 21.7% IMPERIAL DRIVE - 14.3% PLANNING COMMISSION 9 January 1996 page 7 Mr. Teeson felt this plan was an improvement but he still had concerns with stacked traffic blocking the intersection. He agreed this was the best alternative suggested by the applicant but did not feel this was the best use for this location. Mr. Burgess noted receipt of a letter. from Mark Edridge, Burlington Planner, opposing the 4th lane because it will add more traffic to the jug handle. Mr. Weith raised the question of lighting and noted the applicant is showing 98 foot candles whereas the brightest gas stations in the city now show only 25-68 foot candles. Mr. Boyle said this is because those other stations have more reflection from their lights and the ones proposed here will be recessed. Mr. Weith asked if this project is approved, will it appear to be as bright, less bright, or more bright than the Shell Station. Mr. Boyle said he thought less bright because at the Shell station light bounces off all the yellows. A poll of members showed that 3 would vote in favor, 3 against the plan as presented. Mr. Burgess gave the applicant the opportunity to table until a full Commission is present. Mr. Weith noted a vote must be held by 27 January. The applicant asked to table. Mr. Austin moved to continue the a lication until 23 January. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion asked unanimous) . 7. Site Plan application of Gail Wyand and Mary Grunwald to 1) raze a 26-unit motel building, and 2) construct a 5090 sq. ft. standard restaurant with 160 seats, 1330 Shelburne Rd: Mr. White said they expect this to be a Uno Restaurant. It would be located at the corner of Imperial Drive/Shelburne Rd. which is currently Handy's Motel. Mr. White said they will leave the majority of the woods untouched. The building would be placed at the northwest corner so as to have parking behind the building. They have widened the green belt on Imperial Dr. and added evergreens. The parking lot would be below the grade of Imperial Drive to minimize the impact of lights. They will also add a row of street trees on Imperial Drive. Mr. White noted they had met with the Agency of Transportation and the Agency won't allow a full access curb cut on Shelburne PLANNING COMMISSION 9 January 1996 page 8 Rd. So that access will be an entrance only. This means there has to be an access on Imperial Drive. Mr.. White said they propose to widen this part of Imperial Drive which will result in a net improvement for traffic on Imperial Drive even with the additional traffic from the proposed use. There would be 2 west bound lanes, so there will be dedicated right and left turn lanes at the intersection. The proposed use is a quality restaurant, not high turnover., and the peak hour would be after the peak hour of Shelburne Rd. Mr. Austin asked what other restaurants would be of a similar size to the one proposed. Mr. White said it would be smaller than Red Lobster. There would be only a very small bar. The restaurant would be open for lunch and dinner.. Mr. Austin noted they would have double the required parking. Mr.. White said they have about 40 employees. Mr. Austin raised the question of problems with the "suicide" lane and potential conflicts. Mr. White said there are 3 things in Mr. Weith's memo the applicant does not want to do: the first is the 35 ft. radius which, Mr. White said, the A of T is going to do. The second is street trees, and Mr. White said they already have more than adequate landscaping. The third is the sidewalk, and he said that as there is no sidewalk on the rest of Imperial Dr., it would go nowhere. Mr. Kebabian asked the square footage of the restaurant and how much parking will be provided. Mr. White said the restaurant would be 5090 sq. ft. with 106 parking spaces. Mr. White was asked what the A of T's objection was to access on Shelburne Rd. Mr. White said the Agency is trying to minimize conflict points and move traffic better. Even if you have a curb cut today and you change the use, the Agency requires traffic pattern improvements. Mr. Kebabian said he felt it would be a disservice to the people of the city to add more traffic to Shelburne Rd. Mr. Lefebvre said there have been some improvements since neighbors first saw the plan, but there is still no alternate to access from Imperial Dr. He said he would like to see access to the rear to use the light at Holmes Rd. Mr. White said they talked about connecting parking lots, but the other owner said no to this. The applicant does not control any other land to get to Holmes Rd., and Imperial Dr. traffic does not meet traffic PLANNING COMMISSION 9 January 1996 page 9 warrants for a signal there. Mr. Hoechner_ felt the restaurant would be an improvement over what is there now, but the problem was safety of the road. He presented the Commission with a letter of opposition signed by 170 residents of the area. Mr. Behn said the problem is the cars on Imperial Drive. Mr.. Naramore said fixing the end of Imperial Drive is nice but the applicant would be adding a lot of traffic. He felt people would go up Imperial Dr. through the residential neighborhood instead of using the Imperial/Shelburne Rd. intersection. Mr. Dunn noted that restaurants get food deliveries in the morning and trucks would create a problem getting out of the street in the morning traffic. Mr. Knight said the problem isn't the restaurant but the cuts in the road. At Talbots, people could use the light with an advance green to make turns and not have to worry about cutting across 2 lanes of traffic. Ms. Dunn said she would like to see a sidewalk. She felt that with the increase in traffic, people should be walking off the road. Mr. Mansfield felt safety is an issue. The restaurant would attract bus groups, and the left turn out is very dangerous even now. Even a right turn out is dangerous in the morning. Mr. Mansfield also noted problems with traffic from Jakes. He said there is also a lot of pedestrian traffic at noon with workers from IDX walking in the area in good weather. Mr. Mansfield said there is a problem now with cars parking all over the place when Great Northern Stereo has a sale, and he felt restaurant users would do the same. Due to the late hour, Mr. Austin moved to continue the application until 13 February 1996. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Sketch Plan application of Bernard and Nancy Barone and Gail Wyand and Mary Grunvald for a boundary line adjustment between two adjoining properties of 28,010 sq. ft. and 91,860 sq. ft. resulting in two reconfigured parcels of 31,740 sq. ft. and 88,130 sq. ft., 25 Imperial Drive and 1330 Shelburne Rd: Mr. White said they discovered that the driveway for. the Barone's encroaches on land proposed for Uno's and they are trying to correct this. They propose to change the lot line so the PLANNER 658-7955 Ernie Hoechner 22 Imperial Drive South Burlington, Re: Pizzeria Uno Dear Mr. Hoechner: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Vermont 05403 January 7, 1997 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I just wanted to inform you that Uno's is returning to the Planning Commission on Tuesday, February 11, 1997 to request permission to construct a 99 square foot addition to the Uno's Pizzeria building (see enclosed agenda). The addition is proposed along the west side of the building fronting Shelburne Road. I have highlighted the addition in yellow on the enclosed site plan. The addition is being proposed only for architectural reasons. There will be no increase in seating and no other changes to the approved plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. S�'n erel J Weith, C#y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl A-?7 i 7�T X d- PAZIO C,(4t Z, - a Ye w f �7(7i = Memorandum - City Engineer February 11, 1997 agenda items January 23, 1997 Page 2 5. Airport Drive should be widened to 4 lanes from Williston Road to White Street. 6. The short dead end of Airport Drive should be extended and tied into Airport Parkway at approximately the sewer plant area. 7. The garage entrance should be opposite Ledoux Terrace especially if traffic signals are planned. PIZZERIA UNO - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan received 1/16/97 with revision dated 1/8/97 prepared by Pinkham Engineering is acceptable. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 22, 1997 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Re: Addition, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with revised plans and/or additional information, if appropriate, no later than Friday, January 31, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Ken Pinkham PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1996 page 3 4. Site plan application of Uno Restaurant Corporation to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 5530 sq. ft. standard restaurant with 155 seats. The amendment is to reduce the southerly Imperial Drive radius from 35 ft. to 25 ft., 1330 Shelburne Road: Mr. Spencer, Chair of Uno Restaurant Corp., said he had heard that this project was the subject of community controversy and wanted only the best relations with the community. He said that they now believe everything has been complied with, including the 35 ft. radius. He then put up a new plan. Mr. Spencersaid it appears the construction people build a 35 ft. radius with the exception of 6". To comply exactly, the radius would end dead center on a telephone pole. Mr. Dinklage noted the engineering company had said they put in a 25 ft. radius. Mr. Pinkham said they had checked in the field to see what was actually built and found that for all intents and purposes the 35 ft. radius has been met. A resident noted the state had come out and measured and said it was 28.6 ft. Mr. Pinkham said they are asking only for the required radius to be reduced to 34 ft. He noted that when the road is widened the pole will be moved and the road can be widened to the 35 ft. radius. A bond has been posted to insure that if the state doesn't do the widening the applicant will. Ms. Barone said it had been her thought that all left turns had to be at the signalized intersection. Mr Weith said that was staff's recommendation, but the Commission did not approve it that way. Mr. Hoechner, a resident of the area, said the turning arc starts at 35 ft. and then becomes straight. This changes the whole action of the turn. He noted the plan approved by the Planning Commission took the road inside the pole. He said that now any time a vehicle other than a passenger car makes that turn, they have to go over the double yellow line. The pole is so close to the curb that vehicles trying to correct as they make the turn will hit the pole. He wanted to see it built as it was author- ized by the Planning Commission and didn't want to have to wait 2 years to get it. Mr. Beldock noted the pole is in the state right-of-way and Green Mountain Power doesn't want to have tax payers pay twice to move it. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1996 page 4 Mr. Dinklage suggested having the applicant work with the City Engineer and Green Mountain Power on a protection scheme for that corner. Mr. Spencer said they are willing to cooperate in any way. Mr. Crow asked when the Shelburne Rd. project will happen. He wanted to set a time limit for work to be done at that corner. Members agreed. Mr. Spencer said the pole is not on their property. Mr. Burgess said if there is a problem, the applicant could come back to the Commission and present their case. Mr. Hanley said he was bothered by the fact that residents never got any written information on the requirement for Uno's to bring traffic in from Imperial Drive instead of Shelburne Rd. Mr. Spencer said the estimated cost to move the pole is $25,000. He also gave members traffic projections based on other Uno's locations. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the revised site plan application of Uno Restaurant Cor oration to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 5530 s ft. standard restaurant with 155 seats. The amendment is to reduce the southerly Imperial- Drive radius from 35 ft. to 34 ft., 1330 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a two page set of plans,age one entitled "Revised Site Plan - C Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering As- sociates, Inc, dated 12/11/95, last revised 10/2/96, with the 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are_ not su er- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the As -Built conditions of the Imperial Drive radius. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for widening the radius to 35 ft. after completion of the Shelburne Road widenin roject if the radius is not so widened as part of the widening project. 4. The applicant shall install a physical barrier to protect the pole as approved by the City Engineer. Mr. Dinklaae seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 5. Continued PUbliC Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of Greg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 19 March 1996, at. 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chair; Mac Teeson, Gayle Barone, Marcel Beaudin Terry Sheahan, Mark Crow, David Austin (part of meeting) Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; David White, Gregg Beldock, Maurice Mobd, Herbert Martin, Joan Martin, Jack Barry, Carla White, John Raoth, Al Mansfield, Vincent Narr_amor.e, Rosemary Narramore, Paul Kebabian, Wayne Racine, Don Lefebvre, Sharon Racine, Karen Lefebvre, J. Edgerton, F. Caruccio, Bernie Barone, Doug & Gail Wyand, Mary & Jeff Grunvald, R. P. Fisher, Bill Hanley, Michael Cimoneau, Jim Cameron, John Buechler, John Akey, J. Enstode, Doug Fitzpatrick, Steve Kirschner., Monica Farrington, John Kennedy, Ann Mer_ceau, Ken Hilder., Mark Oudette, Shelley Snyder., Rolf Kielman, Bill Cimonetti 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Review Minutes of 13 February 1996. Mr. Sheahan moved the Minutes of 13 February be approved as written. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Sketch plan application of Herbert & Joan Martin to subdivide a 10.1 acre lot into two lots of 2.74 acres and 7.36 acres, 1201 Spear Street: Mr. Fitzpatrick showed the property located at the corner of Spear and Swift Streets. The applicant will sell off the 7.36 acre piece, but there are as yet no plans for its development. They are not requesting an access to Lot B. There is presently a gate for farm vehicles for haying. Mr. Martin asked if it would make a difference if the boundary were moved a couple of feet. Mr. Weith said he would have to check with staff as this is a unique situation because there is no primary residence on the lot. 4. Site plan application of Gail Wyand and Mary Grunvald to 1) raze a 26 unit motel building and 2) construct a 5530 sq. ft. standard restaurant with 155 seats, 1330 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Teeson stepped down due to a conflict of interest. PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 2 Mr.. Burgess noted this application had been denied on 13 February, and the first issue for the Commission is whether or not to rehear it. There must be a significant change to warrant rehearing, and staff has recommended that it be reheard. Mr.. Sheahan said he felt the circulation changes and reduced seating warranted rehearing. Mr. Sheahan moved that the Plannin Commission deter.min that changes to the 2roposed 21an are significant enou h to warrant rehAar.ina. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed unanimouslv. Mr. white said they are presenting 3 alternatives that address issues raised at the prior hearing. He said the applicant is willing to work with any one of the alternatives. Plan B is most similar to the first plan with an entrance only access on Shelburne Rd. and a full access on Imperial Drive. Plan A shows a full access on Shelburne Rd. and no access on Imperial Drive. Plan C shows full access on both Shelburne Rd. and Imperial Dr. In all plans, seating has been reduced from 164 to 155. The square footage would remain the same. This reduces trip generation so that it falls within guidelines of the traffic overlay zone. The Commission had questioned whether. the 5th lane on Shelburne Rd. was wide enough at the point opposite the proposed restaurant. The applicant will now lengthen and widen that lane so it is of adequate width at the restaurant entrance. This has been reviewed with Don Allen of the Agency of Transportation and he is comfortable with it. There was also a question of queuing capacity in the left turn lane on Imperial Drive in order to allow access to the right turn lane. Traffic consultant John Kennedy says there is adequate capacity, but theapnlicant will still lengthen this lane to now provide queuing for 4 or 5 vehicles. The applicant will provide a sidewalk on Imperial Drive and street trees on Shelburne Road. (Mr. Austin arrived at this point in the meeting, and a brief review of the above information was provided for his benefit.) A question had also been raised as to whether there would be sufficient gaps in traffic for vehicles to turn left onto Imperial Drive. Mr. Kennedy says there will because of the PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 3 retiming of the lights done as part of the Southland project. The signals at Holmes Rd. and McIntosh create gaps before vehicles get to Imperial Drive. Mr. White noted that it was the area neighbors who brought about the Agency of Transportation's acceptance of the full access on Shelburne Road. This access (in Plans A and C) would have 3 lanes, one entrance, one left turn out and one right turn out. In Plan A, Imperial Drive would not be widened as it would not be part of the project. Mr.. White felt the widening of Imperial Drive would provide benefits to the neighborhood. Mr. Austin asked if there would be conflicts because of left turning traffic from both Shelburne Rd. and Imperial Drive in Plan C. Mr. White said their model shows that both can use the gaps in traffic. Mr. Mansfield sugested an Option "D" which would include Plan A plus the widening of Imperial Drive. Mr.. White said that since they would have no impact on Imperial Drive, they would have no interest in widening it. Sen. Barry said he had talked with Mr. Ger.shanek of the AOT, and they want good relations with the neighbors. He read into the record Don Allen's letter. Mr. Burgess stressed that the Com- mission has always preferred access from side streets, and that the denial of the application by the Commission had not been because of the Imperial Drive access but for excessive traffic, the width of the 5th lane on Shelburne Rd., etc. Mr. Kirschner asked about the adequacy of the turning radius. Mr. White said the turn radius would be 35 ft. on both Imperial Drive plans. Mr. Beaudin raised the possibility of rezoning an area to commercial and routing traffic there. Mr. Weith said that would take at least two months and the property owner would still have to agree to it. Mr. Barone, one property owner, said he would not want that. He also noted there is a Class 2 wetland to be considered. Mr. Washburn asked what guarantee there is that the applicant will do what he says. Mr Burgess explained that the applicant must_ do what the Commission approves. Ms. Farrington said the neighbors prefer Plan A but asked what the time frame would be for tearing up Imperial Drive if one of the other plans were chosen. Mr. White said they would try to be as unintrusive on the neighborhood as possible. PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 4 Ms. Lefebvre noted the curb cut is close to her driveway and asked if the widening of Imperial Drive is OK with Northern Stereo. Mr.. White said the widening will all be in the public right of way. Mr. Hilder asked about a traffic light at Imperial Dr. Mr. White said they are not even close to meeting the warrants. Mr. Lefebvre asked if the curb cut had been moved in Plans B and C to get a longer queuing capacity on Imperial Dr. Mr. White said it had not. Mr. Burgess said Uno's must have some idea of its peak data and none of this information has been given to the Commission. All that has been provided is ITE data. The applicant is, however, requesting more parking than standards would require for the estimated traffic. He said this leads him to suspect that the applicant anticipates more volume than the ITE data indicates. He said he also does not believe that a typical patron spends more than an hour in the restaurant as the "quality restaurant" designation would suggest. He said if the applicant doesn't supply their volume data, he would have to make his own as- sumptions. Mr. White said he has never seen any anticipated business volume data. He added that he has been told patrons spend one to one and a half hours in the restaurant. He also noted that the restaurant peak hour is later than that of the road. Mr. Burgess cited the situation at the Red Lobster where the applicant used ITE traffic data but requested much more parking than their estimated volume data would have made necessary. What has appened is that there is significantly higher traffic than the ITE figures. He said he does not want to see that happen again. Mr. Kennedy then presented traffic data. He noted that counts were done in March and figures were 15-20o than the December counts, which is typical for March. He noted that the method- ology for assessing traffic gaps has changed. The new procedure does not take into account traffic signal induced gaps, and that is the case here. Mr. Kennedy said signal induced gaps will provide up to 44 seconds of turning time. In counts done recently, the consultant found 20 gaps of 6 seconds or more from 4:45-5:00 p.m. One gap was 20 seconds long with no traffic in either direction at Imperial Drive. He estimated that up to 80 left turns could be handled during the P.M. peak hour. The original model had said only 25 could be handled. PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 5 Mr. Kennedy acknowledged that as traffic grows in the corridor., the gaps will diminish, but he felt they will still be adequate. He said this means that as this site is developed, there will be gaps to handle additional traffic. He felt the two lanes out of Imperial Drive improves the overall approach capacity. In terms of adding traffic to the corridor, of the 44 peak hour. trips, Mr.. Kennedy estimated 75% would turn north and 25% south. He felt the additional lane exiting Imperial Drive would more than compensate for this. Mr. Kennedy felt that any of the three plans would work, but from a pure traffic standpoint, he felt Plan C would work best. Mr. Austin asked if the additional counterpoints negate some of the gains. Mr.. Kennedy said he did not feel this was true. Mr. Weith asked if Plan B would be safer because it has fewer conflict points. Mr. Kennedy felt it was a trade-off. Mr. Crow asked at what point the increased traffic on the side road would be so great as to influence traffic gaps. Mr. Kennedy felt if that happened, it would be because the whole corridor breaks down. He did not have any idea when that would happen. He added that when improvements are made at the south end of Shelburne Rd., the road will be able to take more traffic than the north can feed it. Mr. Burgess asked which plan works worst just from an overall traffic point of view, making the biggest mess on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Kennedy said Plan A or Plan C because it adds addition left turns onto Shelburne Rd. But he still felt Plan C was best overall because of improvements to Imperial Drive. Mr. Austin asked how many cars would make a right turn out of the Imperial Dr. driveway and go through the neighborhood. Mr. Kennedy did not think many would. Mr. Lefebvre was concerned with trying to get into th= neicTrr­rhood from the north with so many left turns out. from Imperial Drive. Mr Wyand (owner of Handy's Motel) said they have 26 units. He noted that 4-7 P.M. is their peak for renting room which coincides with the peak of the road. Morning is also a peak hour for the motel and for the road. He said this motel traffic would no longer exist. Mr. Beldock suggested the possibility of a "no right turn" into the neighborhood if Plan C is adopted. PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 6 Ms. Mer.ceau was concerned with the incompleteness of information about right turns out into the neighborhood and noted there are many children playing on Imperial Drive. Mr. Hilder asked how long a person might wait to turn left before giving up and turning right. Mr. Kennedy said that would be individual choice. Mr.. Hider felt some actual measure should be done. He feared people will go through the neighborhood and felt that was what he would do. Mr. Hanley asked if now changes were made to Imperial Drive, no curb cut on Imperial Drive, would there be a perceptible change on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Kennedy said there would not. Ms. Farrington asked if the city has to pay for road damage to Imperial Drive due to additional use. Mr. Burgess said they do, but the added business would also increase the tax base. Mr. Mansfield asked how the neighborhood could get the widening of Imperial Drive done if the applicant does Plan A. Mr Burgess said that is not the province of the Planning Commission, and the neighbors would have to approach the City Council. Mr. White noted the traffic analysis is based on the new signal timings. He felt problems in the neighborhood may be different today from past years. Analysis and observation show that gaps do exist. Sen. Barry felt a traffic count should be done in the summer. Mr. Austin said he would like to see actual traffic numbers from Uno's. Mr. Mobd of Uno's reiterated that the average customer stay is 1 to 1-1/2 hours. Mr. Burgess said real numbers are always better than ITE averaged. He was concerned that the ap- plicant wants to use ITE numbers for traffic but not for the parking lot. Followin discussion Mr. Sheahan moved to close the 2ublic hearin . Ms. Barone seconded. Motion assed unanimous) . Mr. Beaudin felt the new timing system was a big improvement. He prefered Option C and did not believe people would go into the neighborhood. Mr. Austin did not feel people would go into the neighborhood but did feel they would go right onto Shelburne Rd. if they could not make a left turn. He preferred Plan C. Mr. Crow said he had voted against the plan previously because they were over the traffic limit. He felt Plan C was a compro- PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 7 mise with some benefit all around. He asked if the Commission can stipulate that if an agreement can be reached with the Mery Brown property for an access to this property, that the applicant pursue this. Mr. Austin agreed and felt that when such an access is negotiated the Imperial Drive access be closed. Mr. Sheahan was sympathetic with the neighbors but felt Plan C was the best plan. Mr. Burgess and Ms. Barone agreed. All felt the above -recommended stipulation should be made. Mr. Sheahan moved the Planninq Commission approve the site plan a22lication of Gail W and and Mary Grunvald for a roject con- sistin of: 1) razin a 26 unit motel building, and 2) construct- in2 a 5,530 s . ft. standard restaurant with 155 seats 1330 Shelburne Road as depicted on a planentitled "Revised Site Plan -C.-Pizzeria Uno 1330 Shelburne Road, South Burlin ton, Vermont" pre ared by_ Pinkham En ineerin Associates,_Inc,_dated 12 11 05 with a last revision date of 3 8 96 with the followin sti ula- tions• 1. All revious a22rovals and sti ulations which are not super- seded by this..a royal shall remain in effect. 2. For the ur ose of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlin ton Im act Fee Ordinance the Plannin Commis- sion estimates that the proposed use will qenerate 27.85 additional vehicle trip ends_durinq_the P.M. peak hour._ 3. Anv new exterior_ lightinq_shall consist of downcastin ----------------- --- - - - shielded fixtures so as not to_c_ast_ light beyond the proper . line. An chan e in li htin -shall be a2j2roved by the City - Planner prior to installation. Details of the lights under the cano shall be a22rov7f7b the City Planner prior to ermit issuance. 4. The a22licant shall ost a $13 100 landsca e bond prior to issuance of a zonin ermit. The bond shall remain in effect fo: three ears to assure that the landscaLinq takes root and has a goon chance of surviving. 5. Pursuant to Section 26.103(a) of the zoninq re ulations, the Planning_C_ommission_a2,2roves two driveways for this lot as shown on the approved plan. 6. The plan,shall be revised 2rior. to issuance of a zonLacL permit to show the chan es listed below and shall require 222 roval of the City Planner. Three copies of the a2proved revised Lan shall be submitted to_th_e_City_ Planner prior to permit issuance. a. The site lan shall be revised to indicate the t e of PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 8 screening to be used around the dum ster stor.a e area. b. The site plan shall be revised to show the sidewalk con- tinuous across the driveway. 7. Prior to issuance of a zonin ermit the a licant shall post a bond to cover the cost of constructinq a sidewalk on Im erial Drive. The sidewalk shall be constructed rior. to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancv/Compliance. 8. Prior to issuance of a zoning ermit the a licant shall post a bond to cover the cost of widening Imperial Drive to provide Separate left -turn and ri ht-turn lanes. These improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Oc- cupancv/Compliance 9. Applicant shall obtain approval from VAOT to extend the left - turn lane on Shelburne Road further to the south as shown on the site plan and shall submit evidence of this a roval prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This improvement shall be com lete prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancv/Compliance. 10. The existing four inch sewer servin the ool backwash shall be abandoned and.ca22ed at the connection with the existjacL six inch service. 11. The a licant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 12. The_-a2plicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occu anc Com fi- ance from the Administrative Officer rior to occu anc of the building. 13. Any change to the siteplan shall require approval by the South Burlin ton Planning Commission. 14. In the event the ropertv owner to the south a reed to allow this ro ert to access Holmes Rd. over the ro ert to the south the applicant shall construct such connection and close the Imperial Drive curb cut. A revised site plan shall re wire approval of the Plannina Commission prior to construction. 15. The exit to Im erial Drive will be designed in such a;av as to discoura e ri ht turns from the site goinaeast on Imperial Drive. Final desi n of this intersection shall be a roved b the City Planner prior topermit. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion assed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION 19 March 1996 page 9 Mr.. Teeson rejoined the Commission at this time. Mr. Austin left the meeting at this time. 5. Sketch plan application of Greg Beldock to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 sq. ft. movie theatre (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq. ft. restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3500 sq. ft. restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive -through service, located on Shelburne Rd. The amendment consists of site modifications to parking layout and landscaping: Mr. Sheahan stepped down due to a conflict of interest Mr. Beldock noted that they are in violation of the CO zone. He presented two plans, one "as built" and one showing three fewer parking spaces with parking removed from the CO Zone. Mr. Burgess noted that parking had been moved into the CO Zone in violation of what had been approved by the Commission. Mr. Beldock said they would need a curb even if they moved the parking spaces. Ms. Snyder said the Natural Resources Committee had visited the site. There is a bank that is actively eroding and there is already evidence of cracks parallel to the stream. Mr. Beldock said he had been told to move boulders to the other side of the stream. Mr. Burgess asked if it would do more damage to take out the parking spaces and move the curb than to leave it alone. Ms. Snyder noted that at some time, the parking lot could begin moving downhill. She felt it would be better to move it back, decrease the angle and stabilize the bank with vegetation. Members agreed they want the plan with the revisions, including the moving of the dumpster. Mr. Sheahan rejoined the Commission. 6. Site plan applicationof Shelburne Plastics to construct an 18,000 sq. ft. addition to an existing 15,840 sq. ft. light manu- facturing facility, 8 Harbor View Rd: The applicant said they will expand toward the lot next door. Mr. Weith said the second access is important for circulation. He also noted that there is a new landscaping plan adding land- scaping along the east property line. The plan is still $5,300 Preliminary February 11, January 22, Page 2 Comments - Planning 1997 agenda 1997 --- show the CD3 boundary line on lot #2 as recently approved by the ZBA. --- a portion of building "4d" extends beyond the allowable building envelope. A recently adopted zoning amendment which takes effect on 2/3/97 allows the Planning Commission to approve this extension provided the building contains a minimum of two (2) stories and the overall site design of the property is found to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Central District. --- the subdivision plat should be revised to note that the portion of the public street labeled "Sherry Road Extension" is "Aspen Drive". --- the applicant should consider shifting the location of Building A so that the long side of the building fronts Dorset Street rather than Aspen Drive. UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION - RESTAURANT ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- plan submitted is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Review for February 11, 1997 Date: January 22, 1997 1. Allenwood Phase II Dated 12/2/96 16 Harbor View Road Acceptable 2. Pizzeria Uno Dated 1/16/97 1330 Shelburne Road Project #7226 Acceptable 3. P.S.H., Inc. Dated 1/9/97 Pines Housing Phase 4 Acceptable 4. Farrell Distributing, Inc. Dated 1/15/97 5 Holmes Road Acceptable 5. Aviatron Dated 1/14/97 Army Guard Road The Fire Department's concern is that access be maintained to the existing building and to the addition. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 20, 1997 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Imperial Drive Radius Modification, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. D,igenberry: Enclosed is a corrected copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on October 8, 1996. The Findings of Fact and Decision sent to you on November 18, 1996 was missing two (2) conditions imposed by the Commission. The conditions are now included on the enclosed version. If you have any questions, JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Ken Pinkham please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe'Weith i / City Planner JAN 07 '97 12:04 CITY OF S BURLINGTON P.12 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Uno Restaurant Corp. 100 Charles Park Road, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (617)323-9200 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Uno Restaurant Corp. 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone ;) Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road, blest Roxbury, MA 02132 (617)323-9200 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:1330 Shelburne Road 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USES) Restaurant 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, g units, maximum height and t floors, square feet per floor) 99 sf additionfor 5,607 new total 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES no change 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 6.3 X; landscaped areas 48.2 % building, parking, outside storage51.3.k 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $12,375 , Landscaping $ included in Other Site Improvements (please list with cost•) S building cost 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 2, 1997 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) No Change Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday No.Cha4 ge 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 P.M. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 6:30 AM to 8: PM 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Friday a d sat r DATE OF SUBMISSION G ATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers :• Planners -e Landscape Architects •3 Surve-i ors October 11, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry Pizzeria Uno 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, MA 02132-4985 Re: Pizzeria Uno, South Burlington, Storm Drainage Issues Dear Charlie: Tim called Friday morning to indicate question has arisen as to how best to connect storm drainage from the restaurant site to the storm system in Shelburne Road. Apparently the other existing utilities within the Shelburne Road right of way do not allow the installation exactly as shown on the approved plans. Reportedly contact has been made with someone representing the State which has jurisdiction over activities within the right of way. This individual, whom we tracked down to be Dick Hosking, VAOT District Transportation Administrator, will allow construction of a new storm manhole on the existing shallow storm drain closest to the project. It is my understanding this alternative requires raising the grade of the new storm line upstream from there on your property to within one foot of the ground surface. This is too shallow and, even with pipe insulation, will create maintenance problems which we cannot support unless there is no other reasonable alternative. Doug Marek, from Colton Construction, also indicated that if the proposed 18" pipe could be reduced to 12" and raised one foot, the connection can be made. Both Dick Hosking and Don Allen, the latter from the VAOT Utilities Section, who reviewed and suggested revisions to permit plans, agree the option of changing the pipe to 12" with a slightly higher elevation is the better of the two alternatives for this temporary situation. Please note the utilities in this area of influence are proposed to be completely replaced when Shelburne Road is rebuilt by VAOT in the future. Therefore, I suggest the proposed 18" pipe from the existing Shelburne Road catch basin to the first storm manhole be substituted with 12" and raised as necessary to fit between the other utilities encountered. The new 12" should be installed as steep as reasonable to the first storm manhole which invert can be raised one foot. The grade of the proposed 18" upstream from there can be flattened to retain the design invert at the proposed storm catch basin in front of the restaurant of 176.00. Physical structural separation of 6' between pipes, conduits and utilities would be ideal but, for the temporary The Maltex Building - 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 Bus. (802) 658-5588 ee Fax (802) 658-3629 Mr. Charles Dusenberry October 11, 1996 Page two nature of these improvements less may be acceptable. It is my understanding Dick Hosking has the last word on any work within the Route 7 right of way. Any further questions please call. Sincerely, ��� Kenneth W. Pinkham, P. E. President cc: Colton Construction Dick Hosking Bill Szymanski K ..7226\cdusenb6.kwp PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers + Planners + Landscape Architects + Surveyors January 16, 1997 Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant City Planner Municipal Building Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Pizzeria Uno Restaurant Shelburne Road, South Burlington Dear Ray: Enclosed please find five (5) copies and an 11" x 17" print of the latest revised plan for the referenced which shows a small expansion on the Shelburne Road side of the building. Please also find a site plan application and a $25.00 check for the related application fee. If this minor addition needs to be heard by the Planning Commission please schedule the same as soon as possible and let Charlie Dusenberry and I know the date when decided. Thanks for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, Kenneth el�Pinkham, P. E. President enclosures cc: Charlie Dusenberry K:..7226\sobur11.kwp The Maltex Building ❖ 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 * Bus. (802) 658-5588 * Fax (802) 658-3629 PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers 4- Planners w Landscape Architects •A Surveyors January 8, 1996 Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant City Planner Municipal Building Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Pizzeria Uno Restaurant Shelburne Road, South Burlington Dear Ray: Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the latest revised plan which shows the actual as -built curb radius at the project side of the Imperial Drive and Shelburne Road intersection. Also added to the plan is a narrative description of the proposed power pole treatment as requested by the planning commission, which is noted as revision dated 1/7/97. From our conversation I understand this concludes the requirements necessary for submission on the referenced project at this time. Sincerely, Kenneth W. Pinkham, P. E. President enclosures cc: Charlie Dusenberry K:..7226Gsobur1.kwp The Maltex Building 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 + Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Imperial Drive Radius Modification, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on October 8, 1996. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give -me a call. SYnPeren, J/�e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Ken Pinkham City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Imperial Drive Radius Modificaiton, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: Enclosed is a copy of the October 8, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Ken Pinkham please give me a call. Si cerel It I Jo Weith, City Planner S E R— 1 3— 9 6 v R I 1 5: 0 0 R. -Y . COL -TON CO. P.01 1. n _ 32s _ L2 GA R. J. Colton Company, 20 siounpike nowi, P.O. Box 818, Wililston, Vermont 05495 (802) 865-4900 Fax Ntimber (002) 860-1060 Sending To: Sent From: --.- Date: Number of Paper JnobvIlIng This Cover: 4. 35' {t Jtiu . vew c u{� aid asla a to wct nw 5,Aou mi4 . It 20906, 66 GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN Dikiw • P.Q. BOX 850 • SOUTIi BvkL1NGT0N, VT 05402-0850 • (8o2)864-5731 September 6.1996 Joe Weith City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Re: Intersection of Route #7 & Imperial Dr. Dear Joe: Green Mountain Power has been asked to relocate pole numbered #1 on Imperial Dr. A job of this nature is a costly venture. in the range of five to six thousand dollars for electrical alone. In view of the Route #7 road widening project due to begin in 1997, the above mentioned pole is slated to be relocated in the first phase of construction. Without an approved plan from the state the permanent location of the pole has not been approved. Opening up the possibility that the pole may have to be moved twice; causing an undue burden and cost to GMP and its customers. In Conclusion, it may be advantageous for all parties concerned to hold off on the pole relocation until construction of Route #7 begins and/or the state approves an exact location. Sincerely, Michael Benjamin Field Services Associate 1510 Cc: Gregg Beldock 7 Acorn 4mc P.O. }1,'x 658 17,.4d ,. tcr, VT05446 (Sit-tkr.Y� Z2 Muiu Srnet 126 AiLm .n, Nrcvt P.O. K�x 077 MI. N* Z67 W06 River, VT 05081 Ilcllow. Fills. VT 05101 757-2250 461-1120 Grcen Mountain chivy Mechanic Street 110, Box 466 co. MW s monil'•hcr, VT 05601 Vcrrrnntr. VT 05491 221_4235 $77-2631 liayy�t:wk [lord 64 Qluxt lhivc, Wrklct P.C). li rx 396 PO Box 687 Wihninutm, VT05303 Notwlch, VT05055 464-5208 295-3270 Non—Tariffed NME X Reimbursabe Construction Contract .fob No. District <a 1.1-4E--�U.aT- Estimated Completion Date Municipality Licensee Phase Print or Type ,ta 3VAAp3gb4 r'Yes ❑ No iName Customer i �'1���F—�+► ��� �v P�..1_]�}}AJ`.A �^�i.� 1'�C�►_{ECG ��.. Street No /Name Room/Floor r Billing Address City(Town state Zip Code r , i Description Of MJ64DIUS Work Required ` 1 Name/Title Telephone No. NYNEX Contact Address FAX No Costs No. of Hours Engineering Labor-- — -- - _ --. Line f Splice r i Material r r Contract Costs/ Vouchers , (Police detail eta) F Sub Total 10% Administration Rate Amount 00 Terms And Conditions Total Estimated Costs i P �` 50. �5 Customer hereby requests the work described above to be performed by NYNEX, pursuant to the Special Conditions provisions of NYNEY's applicable state tariff on the following terms and eondltlons: 1. NYNEX shall hereby provide Customer with an estimate of the cost incurred in performing the requested work and Customer shall pay such estimated cost in full prior to NYNEX'j commencement of work. 2, WNEX si,au perform all requested work in conformance with Telephone Company standards. 3. Upon completion of the requested work. NYNEX snail prepare an invoice of its actual cost Incuned in performing the work. Customer hereby agrees to pay promptly any additional cost in excess of the estimate previously deposited with NYNEX upon receipt of an invoice for such charges from NYNEX. NYNEX hereby agrees to refund excess payment collected where the actual charges are less than the estimated costs. For bills rendered by NYNEX, the following shall be applicable: interest shall accrue and be payable to NYNEX at the rate set by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, Section 6621; Treasury Regulations Section 301.6621-1, from and after the payment date of any payment required by this Contract. The payment of any interest shall not cure or excuse any default by Customer under this Contract." Please make check payable to: NYNEX and forward to NYNEX Contact as listed above. Signature date By signing this agreement, Customer hereby authorizes the work described above and agrees to pay for same upon receipt of invoice from NYNEX. wkn.e _ r,�o�,..,o. Pink- Accountinn Yellow F Engineering TOO�j ,LA TjnfioS,9N2[ dSu CTLO CgB ZOI TFd 62:60 21,1,E 96,,LTA0 EJOERP26 Run Date: 0911711996 10:31 AM ' Page: 1 WORK OPERA TION LOG Job Number 6GSS11 Print Number 1 Print Wire Center 4741 WKOP Mqr STI WKOP Material Est Time Est Actual WKOP Date Rev Ty; No Ini FRC DESC 4tv LAP Description Hours Charged Price Price STS Camp No C ' MAD 22C PL STRAND 150 10M STRAND 6.61 0.00 712 712 Adder NYNEX HOURS 4 C 2 MAD 22C PL CA 240 20 BKMA-100 9,31 0,00 1528 1528 1 Adder: NYNEX DOLLARS 300 Adder NYNEX HOURS B C 3 MAD 4C WORK 6 7.64 0.00 1496 1496 1 INSPECTION Adder CONTRACT DOLLARS 750 C 4 MAD 22x RMV CA 238 CA 600-24 2.66 0,00 260 260 1 C 6 MAD 45C PL CA IN 60 ANMW-100 3.11 0.00 381 381 1 CONDUIT C 7 MAD 2M TRFIMV CA 1 1.72 0.00 166 166 1 CS MAD 22C PL CA 300 APF71W-6CO 3.56 0.00 1970 1970 1 C 9 ',.P, AD 45X ABANDON CA 236 CA '. OC-24 C C.00 0 0 1 (ALL TYPES & SIZES) CIO MAD 45X ABANDON CA 80 CA 25-24 4 0,00 0 0 1 (ALL TYPES & SIZES) Pi MAD 1 C PL 1 1 25 0.00 857 857 1 PAGIPPGITRG Adder: NYNEX DOLLARS 732 P 2 MAD 1 C PL ANCHOR 1 1" TTA 1.41 0.00 157 157 1 P 3 MAD 1 C P L 1 1.25 0.0C 125 125 1 PAG/PPGtTRG P 4 MAD 1 C PI_ 1 1,25 0.00 278 278 1 PAG/PPGJTRG Adder NYNEX DOLLARS 153 Notice: Not for useidisclosure outside NYNEX without written agreement EJ O BR P26 Run Date: 09117/1996 10:31 AM Page: 3 ti a n m ap CIA 0 00 >.' a; a 0 0 W E-� F' ti 7' ca 0 WORK OPERATION LOG Jab Number 6GSS 1 1 Print Number 1 Print Wire Center 4741 WKOP Mgr STI WKOP Material Est Time Est Ty1No Ini FRC DESC City LAP Description Hours Charged Price Multi: OPEN/CLOSE Total 92.66 0.00 13773 Actual WKOP Date Rev Price STS Comp No 0 Notice: Not for use/disclosure outside NYNEX without written agreement EJOBRP26 Run Date: 09/17/1996 10:31 AM Page: 2 I1 WORK OPERA TION L 0O Job Number 6G SS 11 Paint Number 1 Print Wire Center 4741 WKOP Mgr STI WKOP Material Est Time Est Actual WKOP Date Rev TyINo Ina FRC DESC Qty LAP description Hours Charged Price Price STS Comp No P 5 MAD 1 C PL 1 1.25 G.00 649 649 1 PAGIPPGITRG Adder: NYNEX DOLLARS F24 P 6 MAD 1 C PL 1 ' .25 0.00 278 278 1 PAG/PPG/TRG ' Adder: NYNEX DOLLARS 153 P 7 MAD 1 X RMV POLE 1 45-3 SPC 4.54 0.00 443 443 1 P 8 MAD 1 X RMV ANCHOR 1 .85 0.00 83 83 1 v? P 9 MAD 1 X RMV GUY 1 1.16 0.00 113 113 1 w P 10 MAD 1 X RMV GUY 1 1.16 0.00 113 113 1 a. P 11 MAD I X RMV GUY 1 1.16 0.00 113 113 1 P 12 MAD 1 X RMV ANCHOR 1 .85 0.00 83 83 1 R 1 JRB 42M RECON - 3 2.15 0.00 208 208 1 REGULAR S 1 JRB 2M JOIN PAIRS 200 4.33 0.00 419 419 1 Multi: OPENICLOSE 1 r- Multi: TRIM OUT PAIRS 100 S 2 JRB 2M PL & SPL 25 PR 1 PMT-25 10.45 0.00 10`I 0 1010 1 TERM c QD Muni: O PENICLOS E Multi: JOIN PAIRS 300 w Multi: TRIM OUT PAIRS 300 o S 3 JRB 2M JOIN PAIRS 850 2043.0.00 1975 1975 1 (MH) r Multi: TRIM OUT PAIRS(MH) 425 F- Multi: OP1 NYCLOSEWN) 1 S 4 JRB 12C JOIN PAIRS 200 3.31 0.010 356 356 1 r— ci 0 Notice: Not tot use/disclosure outside NYNEX without written agreement EJOBRA09 I PLANT RETIREMENT/SAL VA GE Job Type .lob No Job WC Wire Center Name MunilTax Dist R 6GSS11 4741 BURLINGTON 4741901 Print No WKOP TylNo FRC 1 C10 45X v4 22X 1 C9 45X 1 P7 1 X T-� ti Q m P7 Q 00 Quantity Material Description 80 CA 25-24 238 CA 600-24 236 CA 100-24 1 45-3 SPC Run Date: 09/1711996 10:32 AM Page: 1 - MunilTD Name BURLINGTON VT (BURLINGTON Yr Pled Plant Ret Salvage 1968 118.85 1987 3630.36 882.98 1987 1799.71 1988 1405.81 Totals 6954.73 382.98 Notice. Not for use/disclosure outside NYNEX without written agreement _j�El,.,�� cK F, ILOIVV 74'�1'7 Waltham Hourly Sales Amounts Week Ended September 29, 1996 $ sales per hour 11-12 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 Monday 348 1,026 306 192 75 124 223 716 473 246 94 11 104 Tuesday 839 977 332 78 101 124 327 572 565 393 205 89 0 Wednesday 248 1,333 381 102 77 76 439 784 806 394 190 73 129 Thursday 683 1,130 298 90 62 112 647 614 607 381 213 191 88 Friday 882 1,553 1,077 222 171 220 918 1,350 1,120 523 337 194 54 Saturday 134 476 483 398 176 200 572 1,072 1,115 785 263 242 147 Sunday 21 160 434 200 234 452 620 932 696 161 73 76 50 Traffic Projections Methodolgy: one car = 2.2 customers = $25 in sales Number of cars per hour 11-12 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 Monday 14 41 12 8 3 5 9 29 19 10 4 0 4 Tuesday 34 39 13 3 4 5 13 23 23 16 8 4 0 Wednesday 10 53 15 4 3 3 18 31 32 16 8 3 5 Thursday 27 45 12 4 2 4 26 25 24 15 9 8 4 Friday 35 62 43 9 7 9 37 54 45 21 13 8 2 Saturday 5 19 19 16 7 8 23 43 45 31 11 10 6 Sunday 1 6 17 8 9 18 25 37 28 6 3 3 2 5 t ":a � '�'4y yrt ,fie • '� MOTION OF APPROVAL 10/8/96 UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION 3 Y Site plan application of Uno Restaurant Corporatio to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 553 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats. The amendment is to reduce the southerly Imperial Drive radius from 35 feet to 25feet, 1330 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Revised Site Plan - C Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 12/11/95, last revised 10/2/96, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. he southerly Imperial Drive radius shall be widened to 35 fee , as shown on the site plan approved on 3/19/96, within three ( 3 years' of the to of,,,,this amendment approval (i.e., by-M/8/99 ) u lei the Shelb me load reconstruction has started prior to the end' of this three (3) year period. 3I 10/8/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION Site plan application of Uno Restaurant Corporation to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 5530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats. The amendmeryj� is to reduce the southerly Imper al Drive radius from 35 feet to 25 feet, 1330 Shelburne Road, s depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitle to Site Plan - C Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road So h Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associa s, Inc., dated 12/11/95, last revised 10/2/96, with the following s pulations: 1. All previous ap rovals and stipulations which are not superseded by this appro al shall remain in effect. 2. The southerly Imperi6l Drive radius shall be widened to 35 feet, as shown on the site la approved on 3/19/96, within three (3) years of the date of thi /e,ndment approval (i.e., by 10/8/99) unless the Shelburne Road re onstruction has started prior to the end of this three ( 3 ) year eriod. tf -" ra..cl iui 115 vkci )-% a +0 3 S' p J �0 3 tt.� -V14- 10/8/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION Site plan application of Uno Restaurant Corporation to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 5530 square foot standard res aurant with 155 seats. The amendment is to reduce the southerly Im erial Drive radius from 35 feet to 25 feet, 1330 Shelburne Roa as depicted on a two (2) pager -set of plans, page one (1) entit ed, "Revised Site Plan �'� Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 12/11/95, last revised 10/2/96, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this 'pproval shall remain in effect. 2. he southerly Imperkal Drive radius shall be widened to 35 fee , as shown ?3) site" p an approvd on 3/19/96, within three (3 years of t dthi amendment approval (i. y 10/8/99) unle �s the Shelbuad e nstructon has sta ed prior to the en of this throy a period. ,2 S AGES STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 August 2, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Subject: South Burlington US 7 L S 48+00 - L S 49+79 Dear Mr. Dusenberry: AUG oti 19 In response to the recent call from Ken Pinkham, I am writing to explain our reasoning in allowing the southerly Imperial Drive radius to be reduced from 35 feet to 25 feet. A few weeks ago, the contractor doing the work contacted our district office to request a change to the curbing which would allow them to complete the Imperial Drive widening without having to relocate the utility pole on the corner. I felt this was a reasonable request and authorized the change. The following factors were involved in the decision. 1. The vast majority of vehicles using Imperial Drive will be passenger cars. A 25 foot radius is perfectly adequate for passenger cars and even small delivery trucks. 2. The 25 foot radius is considerably better than what is currently at the location. 3. The 35 foot radius would have necessitated relocation of utility pole #1/1, a costly item and one that will have to be redone as part of our upcoming Shelburne -South Burlington project. 4. When the Shelburne -South Burlington project is constructed (currently scheduled for 1998), the radius will be improved to 35 feet as originally designed. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-8W253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. Charles Dusenberry Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 August 2, 1996 Page Two In conclusion, I do not feel the benefits of going to the larger 35 foot radius, at this time, warrant the time and expense of relocating the pole when it will be done anyway in the near future for our project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, 11 : M'4 M.. WM/�N � Don L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section VIRAL :7 cc: Ken Pinkham, Pinkham Engineering Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Planning Steve Lynch, AOT Special Projects Bob Fitzgerald, District #5 David White, David G. White & Associates Gregg Beldock AGF�c�- - O SPORIP STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 August 2, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Subject: South Burlington US 7 L S 48+00 - L S 49+79 Dear Mr. Dusenberry. - In response to the recent call from Ken Pinkham, I am writing to explain our reasoning in allowing the southerly Imperial Drive radius to be reduced from 35 feet to 25 feet. A few weeks ago, the contractor doing the work contacted our district office to request a change to the curbing which would allow them to complete the Imperial Drive widening without having to relocate the utility pole on the corner. I felt this was a reasonable request and authorized the change. The following factors were involved in the decision. 1. The vast majority of vehicles using Imperial Drive will be passenger cars. A 25 foot radius is perfectly adequate for passenger cars and even small delivery trucks. 2. The 25 foot radius is considerably better than what is currently at the location. 3. The 35 foot radius would have necessitated relocation of utility pole #1/1, a costly item and one that will have to be redone as part of our upcoming Shelburne -South Burlington project. 4. When the Shelburne -South Burlington project is constructed (currently scheduled for 1998), the radius will be improved to 35 feet as originally designed. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. Charles Dusenberry Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 August 2, 1996 Page Two In conclusion, I do not feel the benefits of going to the larger 35 foot radius, at this time, warrant the time and expense of relocating the pole when it will be done anyway in the near future for our project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Don L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:tb CC' Ken Pinkham, Pinkham Engineering Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Planning Steve Lynch, Au T Special Projects Bob Fitzgerald, District #5 David White, David G. White & Associates Gregg Beldock City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 4, 1996 Charles Dusenberry Uno Restaurant Corporation 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Imperial Drive Radius Modification, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 8, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, loe Weith,5L' City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Ken Pinkham BENCHMARK CHISELED SDUARE P 5NT 7iR TRIMS •ur lisr IN SOUTHEAST CORNER CCAA4�5 .9,. dnt. 5 aed Su mm.r....t 24- 30' AG 13 Amdon�Mr oonca.nd. Dv.ny SrNubsry OF TRANSFORMER PAD ELEVATION 186.657 C5 t5 c_ . wkw Rw .t. d DWq W 18-24' AP 5 A.E.r 1,1.-oida. Em"d 0.— Nonroy MWI. ID 28 "- I$oba k"—Y 15-24' rtrdOusn' Iq.^ to 4- 0.be --to D. 1 to 75-tC FP 15 irodnu. pnn.ylr.nge 'Po6ne.: Potmor. b.ei Ad, W POLE LIGHT, 18' POLE, 250W, METAL -HALIDE, WITH � E PHOTO -CONTROL SPAULDING #'E1-250-M-208V-111-PC- PC 2 Pica g P_ . 'oonicd D..1 A&wta Spun 15-24' CT 5 aw!t.!o vleconttlo. Hon.yIo t B' UNGT RC a Rh­..t. Tm '-5 p r If RP n '.c..a.-mM 21 Rho.6narm'PY oL PWRhWdnd— 15-1 Y TO 24 TAup—Id-tclM Ypa' Dwk 4n.HoArbaMtc. I TBM REBAR & ELEV. 1 0.19' g / r � i ................PLAZA INVESTMENTS......... .... . (MERV BROWN) I g / —PROPERTY LINE `1 TAI // —SETBACK LINE I I /----w----WATER LINE TO 51 SHELBURNE / / - — — -SS- — — - SEWER LINE —sT— — — — STORM LINE 111 I INV S87.D (N) / R V +e72 S —II t7e.e c GAS LINE I V leas s IN teD.S (Wj—DH/E.tEc/1EL/cATV—OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CAN RIM t7a2 IN 169.0 E, INV 7aa4 ((H)) e• PAC ,NY 1eD.o (L) e. —5s m I—UG/ELXc/M/cATv—UNDERGROUND ELEC/Ta/CATV — —— — — ♦ + ♦— WOOD FENCE 8 TO WIDI�1 D CHAIN LINK FENCE IN �i OF IDk OU DING THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK. THE GATES VALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 1'z6' WOOD SLATS. GRAPHIC SCALE T 0 3 1996 jr of So. Burlington BLODGETT & MILOT PROPOSED PARKING: JDA SPACES Jim ALL CLINES ON SIZE PROPOSED SEATING: = SEATS ARE �H (8: 16fREMOVED ) d HYDRANT LOT SIZE: 2,g2 AC. l toon K s GATE VALVE LOT COVERAGE: O A! 1@D AA�D .S UA+C OWW 70 O�et2WXZ A-SWkW AY.I,I�'7P EXISTING S.F. AC. 1 ArItffn M MA1W COWIA 'POV &AAS 0— UTILITY POLE W/GUY BUILDINGS 9,550 .22 10.8 ♦ OWWW A7,7RA4Cr AA0 Sa'W"A 01 A0191W P9/7A'.' AL12'9 AN-SRR DvaaNAa At4fi7N&s PAVEMENT. 21,574 .49 ""FACE: 24.5 ,s Armim Arms aWk, 444FS A4O RWW4 AXW f N X AWL%= SCk NUX Ai AM11F 1l.NLD O MANHOLE 0 ,'71,(�6 1.31 TOTAL,88,130 2.02 64.7 100R a Af'WW XCAWIV 1W7MW'7 AA0s for a2toD4a' AW IWAWAM.'S IB CATCH BASIN 7 At'L• AA" 84WW C0VW7A W3W LOr W$OFAAW AWA2? .AJF MA4' NL1004 LOT COVERAGE: SIGN PROPOSED S.F. PEA REMSED SIZE PLAN — C BUILDINGS: 5,506 .13 .13 6.3 19 Q LIGHT POLE PAVEMENT: 40,030 .92 GREENSPACE: 42.592 .27 45.5 48.2 LC9O76D NK cW* O IRON PIPE FOUND TOTAL 88,130 2.02 100R LWAM. ' NPN PMGIAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P:YZERtA LWO * IRON ROD FOUND FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES: SHELBURNE ROAD m 21.7% awpu D • • Ar.... • t..+.s. Av*a..+, • Alnpn. HP[ CI MONUMENT FOUND IMPERIAL DRIVE Q 14.35 LDY T'h. Maltz 8ufldine n.... e...r.n. au+.vr. ..�.a.re. Amended CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #)Uno Restaurant Corp. 1-00 Charles Park Road, West Roxbury, 11A 02132 (617)323-9000 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Uno Restaurant Corp. 100 Charles Park Road, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (617)323-9000 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (617)323-9,000 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1330 Shelburne Road 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Restaurant 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 5,508 sf 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 40 per shift maximum 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 63 %; landscaped areas 4L_07 building, parking, outside storage 51.8% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings SSh� non , Landscaping S 13,100 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost*) S include in building cost 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: January 31, 1997 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) See previously submitted Traffic Report - Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday See previous Traffic Report 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m.- 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m._ 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 6:30 A14 to 8: 0 Pit 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Friday �a� y DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING IGNATURE OF APPLICANT BENCHMARK P. T •T CHISELED SQUARE S+Rms TREES IN SOUTTiEAST CORNER CA 5 aetn,a da1a1. s.mmrewet 2- 3e AC 13 A­1-Ih twnotlmeb coeny swvk b. y OF TRANSFORMER PAD ELVATION 186.657 cs t3 CRmue _kea Rh -et-" Da9.0 16-24' AP 5 Avv atma:Me 'EmwdE EmaaiE Cues Nonoy Mop4 IC 3p in pd- Nibrry 16-3t' a,� 1 R• FP 15 indn�e pr,neymlm 'Pwnori Potm>e Ow Aeh ~ POLE LIGHT, It' POUF, 25OW. METAL -HALIDE, 'MTH IGC 16 {I.. pat- eo to D-ff Inks—y 15-18, E TO LINGT MW INC FOCI-250-M-208V-111-PC- Ri�o PC 2 Pic. pdaa 'oonko' p Rhamnu. hmpula mdmr.arh Dart .Nbena spud Tdihd" puckh— 1p-24' 5-p' GT 6 cl Eltk tlbmnlfq. Nm.y—t p'D1'RC Ei I ' � v r. L RP 27 Rhwade &m'PAT' ­ . PM Rh.EMe — 15-1 a, TG 34 Thug occibmtdb 'Nigro' )..644j Daft AmMoan ArborMtae 1 s i I TBM REBAR 8/ d„ / e / ••••••••••••••••••••• -. PLAZA INVESTMENTS (MERV BROWN) —PROPERTY LINE 1 PROYIDE M / / —SETBACK UNE — - WATER UNE 1 TO SHELBURNE - — — -SS- — — - SEWER UNE $1 I wv r75.o -STORM UNE �i MN NV 167.9 ((N` tau »e.e I nvv 167s (ss / c GAS UNE 1 MH Nv 169.5 (Vn AIM 176.2 INv Ip9.6 E INv it".. eds ((s 1—cN/ELEC/TEL/CATV--OVERHEAD ELC/TEL/CAN 1 {NV 7E&4 j(N3 — — 6' PVC 1 INV 169.c (E) p. Pvc — — —s5 41 —uc/eEc/T¢/urv—UNDERGROUND ELC/TEL/C'ATV — -- — �� I ♦ '♦- T WOOD FENCE $1 TO W_�rrtavl CHAIN LINK FENCE ICX MoL.DNC PROPOSED PARKING: 19A SPACES PROPOSED SEATING: M SEATS .6 HYDRANT LOT SIZE 2&2 AC. 0 GATE VALVE LOT COVERAGE: EXISTING S.F. AC. % o— UTILITY POLE W/GUY BUILDINGS: 9,550 .22 10.8 PAVEMENT: 21,574 .49 24.5 0 MANHOLE 7 TOTAL 88,130 2.02 100% ® CATCH BASIN LOT COVERAGE: SIGN PROPOSED S.F. AC. % BUILDINGS 5,508 .13 6.3 0 LIGHT POLE PAVEMENT: 40,030 .92 45.5 CRF NCPA 4iN2 .97 ? O IRON PIPE FOUND TOTAL 8B,130 2.02 1DC% ® IRON ROD FOUND FRONT `.'ARD LOT COVERAGES: SHELBURNE ROAD - 21.79 O MONUMENT FOUND IMPERIAL DRIVE - 14.3% THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK. THE GATES WALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 1'N6' WOOD SLATS. GRAPHIC SCALE ( DI FM) 1 In.6 - m R N/F BLODGETT k MILOT ALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMOVED Memorandum - Planning October 8, 1996 agenda items October 4, 1996 Page 2 Sewer: No additional allocation required. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area will be provided. Lighting: Existing exterior lighting consists of: --- six (6) 500 watt building mounted fixtures with quartz bulbs. These lights will be tilted down to prevent peripheral glare. No additional lighting proposed. Other: --- note on plan should be revised to indicate that the square footage of the NYNEX mobile phone space is 3500 square feet not 3580 square feet. 4) UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION - MODIFY IMPERIAL DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a site plan approved on 3/19/96 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 5530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats. The amendment is to reduce the southerly Imperial Drive radius from 35 feet to 25 feet. This property located at 1330 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl and R4 Districts. It is bounded on the east by a single family residence, on the south by a retail/office building, on the north by Imperial Drive, and on the west by Shelburne Road. The applicant has constructed the widening of Imperial Drive that was part of the 3/19/96 approval. During construction it was discovered that a utility pole on the south side of Imperial Drive next to Shelburne Road would have to be relocated. Since the cost to relocate the pole was high and it was determined that it may need to be moved again when Shelburne Road is reconstructed, the pole was not relocated. This resulted in the southerly Imperial Drive radius being reduced from 35 feet to 25 feet. VAOT has approved the change in radius (see enclosed letter). The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission also approve this change. The radius will be improved to 35 feet when Shelburne Road is reconstructed. E / /,o I #)f l�,fiv(- 14 �0-/OAA L . ........ ... I^Z- -,, gl� /,/;e> � -2 FORM UR-1 4_1-yam COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES % �6 PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR v h VEHICLE TRIP ENDS p (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax assessment) units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION 530 s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE � /T�!%�t�A%7— (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) A4ay,S,clnct)T= 0 s�y.�8 FORM NR-2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) _ CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-3) $ CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (5) (7) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) (8) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-4) (9) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (7) X (8) (10) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (9) $ 221.72 / vte units / unit ;J , C156 units •�`J vte $_ / unit $ FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-5) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 s.f. 5P. 1_�& units PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers Planners * Landscape Architects * Surveyors MEMORANDUM TO: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner FROM: Robert M. Alexander, P.E., Traffic Engineer.. RE: Pizzeria Uno - Trip Generation (Revised) DATE: February 13, 1996 Supplementing our January 2 memo, a minor revision in the building configuration will result in a slight increase in trip generation. The proposed resturant now has 164 seats (previously 160); calculations using the fitted curve equation yield 45.7 trip ends vs. 44.9 earlier, an increase of 0.8 trip end. As noted in the January 2 memo, this change in the proposed restaurant still readily fits within the parameters of the Traffic Overlay Zone as calculated using the appendix. 7226/memolrma The Maltex Building •s 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 * Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers 4� Planners :• Landscape Architects 4 Surveyors u 001:M, u To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: Robert M. Alexander, P. E., Traffic Engineer Re: Pizzeria Uno - Trip Generation (Revised) Date: January 2, 1996 Trip generation Traffic which can be expected from the proposed restaurant is estimated by utilizing trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). In the 1995 5th Edition Update, many studies of existing "Quality Restaurants" (Land Use Code 831) are summarized for a weekday p.m. peak hour, with a data plot on pages 50 and 59 (see Figs. 1 & 2). The gross floor area is 5090 sq. ft.; utilizing the average rate, this yields 37 trip ends in the p.m. peak hour. For comparison, reference was also made to the trip rate having the number of seats as the independent variable. The proposed restaurant has 160 seats; the average rate shows 38 trip ends in the p.m. peak hour. Calculations using the fitted curve equation yield 44.9 trip ends. Traffic Overlay Zone: According to Sec. 21.303 of the zoning regulations, Traffic Overlay Zone 2 allows 44.0 trip ends for a site this size (88130 s.f.) We are proposing an additional 0.9 trip ends, but we feed the proposed traffic improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow at this site. Using Appendix C of the zoning regulations, Traffic Overlay Zone 2 allows 87 seats per 40,000 sq. ft. of land for a quality restaurant. This site is 88,138 sq. ft., or 2.2 times greater than 40,000 sq. ft. By this measure, the site therefore could support a restaurant with 191 seats, a significantly greater number than the 160 seats proposed for Pizzeria Uno. The allowed 191 seats would generate 45.9 trip ends. Consequently, the proposed restaurant fits within the parameters of the Traffic Overlay Zone as calculated using the appendix. Previous use traffic Volume Traffic estimated from the existing motel is summarized in the 1991 ITE 5th Edition under Land Use Code 320 - Motel, with a data plot on page 552 (see Fig. 3). The number of motel rooms (assume all occupied) is 26; utilizing the average rate, this yields 16 trips. Net Increase The increase in trips generated by the site in the p.m. peak hour would be 29, using 44.9 trips for the restaurant. The Maltex Building w 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 ++ Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 1, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Re: Uno's Pizzeria, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 It has come to our attention that the recent construction at the corner of Shelburne Road and Imperial Drive which is associated with the above referenced project was not done in accordance with the approved site plan. Specifically, the southeast corner of Imperial Drive/Shelburne Road was constructed at a radius of 25 feet while the approved plan shows a proposed radius of 35 feet. Condition #13 of the 3 / 19 / 96 site plan approval requires that any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. The Commission discussed this issue at their 7/30/96 meeting and ruled that the change to a 25 foot radius constitutes a significant enough change to require review and approval by the Planning Commission. The proposed revision requires an amendment to the 3/19/96 site plan approval. Enclosed is a site plan application form. Please complete the form and return it to me with a $50 application fee, five (5) full size copies of the revised plan, and a reduced copy of the plan to 11 "x 17" . Once I receive the application package, I will place this item on the next available Plan 'ng Commission meeting. Joy Weith, Ci v Planner JW / mcp cc: Richard Ward Ray Belair Ken Pinkham Don Allen 3�7 5,5-- V �y�5-6 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 August 14, 1996 658-7958 Gregg Beldock Jiffy Lube 1525 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Uno's Pizzaria, Imperial Drive Dear Mr. Beldock: I reviewed the revised site plan for the above referenced project dated 12/11/95, last revised 7 / 23 / 96 , prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. The revised plan shows several minor changes in the site layout from the plan which was approved by the Planning Commission on 3/19/96. With the exception of the proposed change to the radius at the southeast corner of Imperial Drive and Shelburne Road, it is my determination that all other changes are immaterial and therefore will not require a review and approval by the Planning Commission. These changes are consistent with the spirit of the plan approved on 3/19/96. Specifically, the minor changes include the following: 1. Building reduced in size by 22 square feet. 2. Building location shifted approximately three (3) feet to the east. 3. Bike rack relocated. 4. Slight change to the configuration of the dumpster and secure areas located east of the building. 5. Addition of several pole lights. As stated in my letter to Charles Dusenberry dated 8/1/96, the Planning Commission has ruled that the change to the corner radius on Imperial Drive/Shelburne Road constitutes a material change which requires review and approval by the Planning Commission. JinerIWeith, y Planner JW/mcp cc: Richard Ward GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • P.O. BOX 850 • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05402-o850 • (802)864-5731 September 6, 1996 Joe Weith City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Re: Intersection of Route #7 & Imperial Dr. Dear Joe: Green Mountain Power has been asked to relocate pole numbered #1 on Imperial Dr. A job of this nature is a costly venture, in the range of five to six thousand dollars for electrical alone. In view of the Route #7 road widening project due to begin in 1997, the above mentioned pole is slated to be relocated in the first phase of construction. Without an approved plan from the state the permanent location of the pole has not been approved. Opening up the possibility that the pole may have to be moved twice; causing an undue burden and cost to GMP and its customers. In Conclusion, it may be advantageous for all parties concerned to hold off on the pole relocation until construction of Route #7 begins and/or the state approves an exact location. Sincerely, Michael Benjamin Field Services Associate Cc: Gregg Beldock 7 Acorn Lane P.O. Box 658 Colchester, VT 05446 658-8000 22 Main Street P.O. Box 677 Wells River, VT 05081 757-2250 128 Atkinson Street P.O. Box 267 Bellows Falls, VT 05101 463-3120 Green Mountain Drive P.O. Box 486 Montpelier, VT 05601 223-5235 Mechanic Street P.O. Box 5 Vergennes, VT 05491 877-2631 Haystack Road P.O. Box 398 Wilmington, VT 05363 464-5208 64 Olcott Drive, Wilder P.O. Box 687 Norwich, VT 05055 295-3270 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 44 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed use (i.e., "quality restaurant") to generate 43.85 vte's which complies with the Traffic Overlay District. 13. Applicant submitted a traffic impact study dated 3/13/96 prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 14. The applicant was made aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $5700. 15. Sewer: No additional allocation required due to the credit given for the existing motel. 16. Dumpster: The dumpster storage area is shown on the plan. The plan should be revised to indicate the type of screening proposed. 17. Sidewalk: The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along the property's frontage with Imperial Drive. This is shown on all three (3) plans. The plans should be revised to show the sidewalk continuous across the driveway. 18. Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting will consist of the following: --- 13 250 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting and shielded luminaries mounted on 16 foot poles. --- one (1) building mounted 100 watt metal halide lamp with a downcasting and shielded fixture. Details of the lights under the canopy are not available at this time. These details should be submitted for approval by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the site plan application of Gail Wyand & Mary Grunvald for a project consisting of: 1) razing a 26 unit motel building, and 2) constructing a 5,530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats, 1330 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Revised Site Plan - C, Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 12/11/95, with a last revision date of 3/8/96, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) For the purpose of calculating required road impact fees under 3 the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed use will generate 27.85 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 6("1 r; 3) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of the lights under the canopy shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 4) The applicant shall post a $13,100 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5) Pursuant to Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves two (2) driveways for this lot as shown on the approved plan. 6) The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to indicate the type of screening to be used around the dumpster. b) The site plan shall be revised to show the sidewalk continuous across the driveway. 7) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the cost of constructing a sidewalk on Imperial Drive. The sidewalk shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 1 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the cost of widening Imperial Drive to provide separate left -turn and right -turn lanes. These improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 9) Applicant shall obtain approval from VAOT to extend the left - turn lane on Shelburne Road further to the south as shown on the site plan and shall submit evidence of this approval prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 10) The existing four (4) inch sewer serving the pool backwash shall be abandoned and capped at the connection with the existing six (6) inch service. 11) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) 4 months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 12) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 13) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 14) In the event the property owner to the south agreed to allow this property to access Holmes Road over the property to the south, the applicant shall construct such connection and close the Imperial Drive curb cut. A revised site plan shall require approval of the Planning Commission prior to construction. 15. The exist to Imperial Drive will be designed in such a way as to discourage right turns from the site going east on Imperial Drive. Final design of this intersection shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit. Chairman or er South Burlington Planning Commission 3141�� Da e 5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 9 1996 Donald Lefebvre 14 Imperial Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Uno's Pizzeria, 130 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lefebvre ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of a letter dated August 1, 1996 which I sent to Mr. Charles Dusenberry of Uno's Pizzeria. As stated in my letter, the radius as constructed on the southeast corner of Imperial Drive/Shelburne Road will require approval of the Planning Commission if Uno's intends to keep it as constructed. I have not yet heard from Mr. Dusenberry whether they intend to try to obtain approval from the Planning Commission or whether they intend to construct the corner as approved. ere4y, Jo Weith, Ci v Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 1, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Re: Uno's Pizzeria, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dusenberry: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 It has come to our attention that the recent construction at the corner of Shelburne Road and Imperial Drive which is associated with the above referenced project was not done in accordance with the approved site plan. Specifically, the southeast corner of Imperial Drive/Shelburne Road was constructed at a radius of 25 feet while the approved plan shows a proposed radius of 35 feet. Condition #13 of the 3 / 19 / 96 site plan approval requires that any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. The Commission discussed this issue at their 7/30/96 meeting and ruled that the change to a 25 foot radius constitutes a significant enough change to require review and approval by the Planning Commission. The proposed revision requires an amendment to the 3/19/96 site plan approval. Enclosed is a site plan application form. Please complete the form and return it to me with a $50 application fee, five (5) full size copies of the revised plan, and a reduced copy of the plan to 11"x 17" . Once I receive the application package, I will place this item on the next available P an 'ng Commission meeting. Si ere `I Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW / mcp cc: Richard Ward Ray Belair Ken Pinkham Don Allen 14 Imperial Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 July 15, 1996 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Weith, Re: Uno Pizzeria Project at 1330 Shelburne Road With the completion of the widening of Imperial Drive, the question arises as to why the radius of the left turn onto Shelburne Road does not conform to the plan approved by the Planning Commission at its 19 March 1996 meeting. As it is done, it is conceivable that there will be problems with large vehicles maneuvering such a narrow turn with all the traffic expected to be at this inter- section at certain times when the new restaurant opens. Of primary concern is ready access to emergency vehicles. Sincerely, Donald M. Lefebvre c: Donald Allen, Vermont Agency of Transportation �p1 AG fAe STATE OF VERMONT Q, AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building .A�q �\02 Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 NSpGRCP July 24, 1996 Mr. Charles Dusenberry 100 Charles Park Road West Roxbury, Massachusetts 02132 Subject: South Burlington, US 7. L.S. 48+00 - L S 49+79 Dear Mr. Dusenberry: We have recently received revised plans which comply with the conditions in your permit dated May 3, 1996. The plans were further revised by Pinkham Engineering as agreed to by Ken Pinkham and myself. The changes included the deletion of arrows and ONLY's on US 7 and the modification of the southerly radius for Imperial Drive. Both of these items are interim measures and will be addressed by either a paving project to be completed this summer or our upcoming Shelburne -South Burlington reconstruction project. We will attach the new plan to our copy of the permit and you should do the same. You are now authorized to proceed with all work shown in the permit. If you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2653. The layout of the new US 7 pavement markings should be verified by Bob Fitzgerald before actual application. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section cc: Gregg Beldock David White, David G. White & Associates Ken Pinkham, Pinkham Engineering Associates Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Steve Lynch, AOT Special Projects Unit Bob Fitzgerald, AOT District #5 Office Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. AGf�v �O SPORO P� STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 May 3, 1996 Gail Wyand & Mary Grunvald Handy's Motel 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Subject: South Burlington, US 7 L S O48+00 - L S 49+79 Dear Ms. Howard & Ms. Grunvald: Your application for a permit to construct a new access to serve a restaurant, widen Imperial Drive, and modify pavement markings on US 7, at the above -referenced location, has been processed by this office and is enclosed. Please contact the District Transportation Administrator, John Wood, to discuss the permit conditions and to arrange for his timely inspection of the work. His telephone number in Essex Junction is (802)655-1580. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Enclosures c: John Wood, District Transportation Administrator #5 Maurie Molod, Senior Director of Real Estate, UNO Restaurant Corp. Gregg Beldock David G. White, David G. White Associates, Inc. Bob Alexander, Pinkham Engineering Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Steve Lynch, Special Project's Unit Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mile Marker Log Station 4f7G STATE OF VERMONT �'� ..: t3,, r 1. �'\ 1 S -7 AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PERMIT APPLICATION Owner's Name, Address & Phone No. G a i l Way a n d and Marx G r r n ya J,�j, H nS);,S,,,(`J�j�,].�...1�3 ............... .... ....... South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 862-9608................................... _................. Co -Applicant's Name & Address & Phone No. (if different from above) .0 n o _ Restaurant C2rp,.,.i,_,100 „.Q.Ur l as ...P..ark Rd..., West Ro x b u r.Y..:.. MA...»0 213 2 (,�,� 7 �».3.2 3.:.�?..QIL...l antar t.:...R� u i.d..fa....klh i.to............................... .... .... ........... P.O. Box 1007, Burlington, VT 04502 (8D2) 862-19 The location of work (town, highway route, distance to nearest mile marker or ihta&;ection & which side) 1) Curb cut revision for 1330 She 1 b u r n, _section of Imperial Dr. and Shelburne Rd. _ _ _ _ _ _ cto performed (attach sketch) �.l ) « Close two e x i s t i nq curb, cuts �r ep l a c e .with Description of the work ... ° one 2) widen Imperail Dr. approach to 3 lanes and han e curb rad.�i 3 ext h ..»..........................»» ««............ ..PP................................. e.....�........q...»..«».......... d i i-....).....«. Q.� d...;"h r P left turn lane further south on Shelburne Rd. Act 250 Not Applicable, Local Permit Attached. Have zoning or Act 250 permits been applied for? .......................«. If yes, give application # or other identification, if different from above. Date work expected to begin ... May 1:..................................................«»»».......................... 19 Owner «_ Gail «_Wyand and ..Mary Grunval d By...........w...�r..««.... ................ ............»».. Date......1..�/�'........................... Co -A Uno Rostaura►f Corporation By » �«.«« PERMIT APPROVAL - then _ This permit is issued "the following du�ections, restrictions and conditions, and covets only the work desenbul , and Drily when the work described is performed as directed, and subject to the following special conditions:, .._ - -- ... Permission is granted to construct a new access to serve a restaurant, widen fmpenaT 0 r i v e, aril modify pavement markings on US 7, at the above -referenced »» «:..:..:..lo�atioua »ia.accardance.uvithahe at ec�+a�- aad+#ieos-a #Ige attached .plans. gi ' December 1 6 Work m be completed by D ....... ...:........ ti.... 199 ..... Secretary of Transportation By »..... ! i...»..............'Dab :a2��..»........ Acting Engineering Services Engineer NOTICE: -This permit covers only the Vermont Agency of Transportation's jurisdiction over this highway under Title -19 A. Section I I I I V It does not release the petitioner from the requirements of any other statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. This permit is effective upon compliance with such of these other requiranents as are applicable. , OTEi ksm FOR ADDITIQNAL CONDTTIO S, N .� a . - .�.:�, ' �w hoc,-ii�.rt $u:; No work shall, be done . under, this .permit until the party or parties to whom it is granted shall have communicated with and received instructions from the District Transportation Administrator at p.5..�s»...8..».. ..••••.•• ac�hli.1/1(aati,. phone.�802�65..=1-584-........ «.».»....... «.....«...:........»....«......«.................«....«..«»..«...».:.:.......:.«....... ......... TA 210 6M 8/89 RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS: The word "Engineer" as used herein is to mean the authorized agent of the Chief Engineer. The word "Agency" as used herein is to mean the Vermont Agency of Transportation. The word "Applicant" as used below is to man the party(%) to whom the permit is to be issued Permit is granted subject to compliance with all federal and state statutes or regulations controlling occupancy of public highways, and adherence to all governing local or national codes. unless specific conditions quoted herein are more restrictive. Compliance with all local ordiances and regulations relating to highways is required. All work, including rock blastin8, shall amply with all the laws and regulations of the State of Vermont. The peanut holder must, in every case where there is a possibility of injury to life or property in blasting, use blasting mats and bags of sand. if necessary. to prevent the stone from scattering. During the progress of the work, all existing utility facilities shall be propedy protected from damage or nnjury. Such barriers, as may be necessary for the protections of the traveling public, shall be erected and maintained and shall be properly lighted at ni&L The Applicant shall be responsible for all damages to person or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. Except as herein authorized, no excavation scull be made or obstacle placed within the limits of the auto highway in such a manner as to interfere, unnecessarily. with travel over said road. If any work done under this permit interferes with the drainage of the state highway, such catch basins and outlets shall be constructed as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Engineer, to take proper cue of said drainage. The Applicant shall pay the entire coat of the proposed work and the salary, subsistence and traveling expenses of any inspector appointed by the Engineer to supervise such work. The permit may be modified or revoked at any time by the Engineer without nmicring the Agency or the State of Vermont liable in any way. In addition to any other enforcement powers that may be provided for by law, the Engineer may susperd this permit until compliance is obtained. If there is condnmW use or activity after suspension, the Engineer may physically dose the driveway or access point if, can the opinion of the Engmeer. the safety of highway users is or may be affected. All of the above conditions shall be applicable to the work herevm authhonzed, unless the same are irnconti tent with the conditions an the face of the permit, m which ease the conditions written or printed on the face of the permit shall apply. Thhe acceptance of this permit, or the doing of any worn thereunder. shall constitute an agreement by the party or parties to whom this permit is granted, to comply with all of the conditicm and restrictions printed or written herein. RELATING TO UTILITY WORK AND THE CMING AND T'RD1I1 UNG OF TREES: '_'his permit is grunted on condition that the Applicant shall obtain the written consent of the adjoining oroerg or occupants or, to the alterative, an order from the Sate Transpmutiou Board so acoorduroe with Task 30, Section 2506, Vermont Statutes Annotated, regarding nmN*Y to trees. In general, all utilities shall be located along and closely adjacent to the highway right-of-way botmdary line and shall be installed in such a manner that ono damage will result to highway property. No pole, pushbraee, guy wine or other above -grand facilities shall be placed closer than thirty (30) feet from the edge of pavement unless the existing right-of-way is insufficient width. Should the lontioo of the utlity faalitia covered by this Permit be in conflict with the above, each location must be reviewed by the Engineer, and approved only if, in has opinion. the mimm = ckamcc root be obtained. In the event that observation of the minnmum standard will result am the plating of such facilities within 4.0' of the center of a maintained or natural ditch or within I0.0' of the inlet or outlet of a culvert or any type of waterway which crosses the highway, no anchor guys, pushbmoes or other appurtenances shall moss a ditch and thereby be installed between the ditch and roadway. Unless otherwise herein provided. ono trees within the limits of the state highway shall be cut or trimmed No guy wires shall be attached to tam without a specal permit from the engineerand to no event shall they be attached as to gitdle4ie trees or m any wry naerfem with their growth. Wires shall be to protected at all times and places that they shall not interfere with or injure the trees inside our euuide the location of the highway. Where the coming or trimming of trees is authorized by permit, only arch coming and trimming shall be done as may be designated by the Engwotx. All debris resulting from such aauimmg are: manning shall be removed from the highway }omits. Open an excavation for highway crossings is NOT the option of the Appian, and may be utilized only where attempted jacking. dtiling or tunneling methods fail or prove to be impractical. The Applicant d aIl obtain an appropriate modi5utiOn of the highway permu fttirp.thhe F nor to the uulination of open cut methods. The parry or parties to whom the permit is granted shall maintain the the amface of the roadway over said strucmtres as 1omg at the Engineer may' necessary, until all ups of the trench shall have been eliminated. err JOINT PERIv M - A joint permit applicant n n%po ed when mere than We parry wall be reapmnble for the cams�4n. �! a. aodMi operation of the facility being constructed under this permit Examples are joint ownership or occupancy of a utility pole line and of% in the secand cue. the tmuniapaiity and the contractor trust be joint appiica4tas _ line by a contractor. Both wMty companies, and Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald and UNO Restaurant South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 May 3, 1996 SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the conditions on the back of the permit, with particular attention given to the Special Conditions listed below. All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached plan, dated 12/11/95, with the following additional revisions: �- All pavement markings will be in accordance with Page 14 of the Vermont Agency of Transportation "Pavement Marking Guideline". There will be a 40' break in markings opposite Imperial Drive. Arrows shall be spaced 32' apart. Taper distance from the new drive to the south shall be 220'. + The arrows at Imperial Drive and the new drive shall be accompanied by "ONLYs". There will be a "STOP" sign on Imperial Drive. �- Old pavement markings on US 7 are to be removed by burning or grinding. The project plans are to be finalized before any work under this project is started. New curbing along frontage shall meet current Agency of Transportation standards and match what is currently existing. It is intended that existing drainage at the intersection of US 7 and Imperial Drive will remain until the State reconstructs US 7. However, if a problem becomes apparent along with the relocated northerly curb line, the applicant may be required to reconstruct the drop inlet and extend the pipe so that drainage works properly. Act No. 86 of 1987 (30 VSA Chapter 86) ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone (800)225-4977 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, begin- ning any excavation at any location. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the District Transportation Administrator or his staff. Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald and UNO Restaurant South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Special Conditions Page Two In areas to be grass covered, the turf shall be restored by preparing the area and applying the necessary topsoil, limestone, fertilizer, seed, and mulch to the satisfaction of the District Transportation Administrator. All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on all holidays (which shall include the day before and the day following), during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15, without specific, written permission from the District Transportation Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper pro- tections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of eighteen (18) months after final inspection by the District. In the event that area lighting proves to be a hazard to the traveling public, the Permit Holder will be ordered to remove or modify it at their expense. Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as-builts" with copies provided to both the Utilities Engineer and the District Transportation Administrator. Upon completion of the work by the Permit Holder, a final inspection will be held. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. The Permit Holder shall indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not constructed satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's expense. Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald and UNO Restaurant South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Special Conditions Page Three Curbing or other suitable physical barriers must be installed to control ingress and egress of vehicles to the approved access only. In the event traffic from this project increases to the point where additional lanes for turning or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The Permit Holder may be required by the Agency to update or provide a traffic study to determine if additional modifications are necessary. The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of paved shoulder). In conformance with Title 19 VSA § 1111(0, this access may be eliminated in the future where development has burdened the highway system to such an extent that a frontage road must be constructed to alleviate this burden. The expense of the frontage road shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors or assigns of the properties abutting said frontage road. The Agency of Transportation shall determine the need of a frontage road based upon and justified by standard Agency procedures. It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appropriate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Transportation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transportation Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. Construction will be performed in such a way as to minimize conflicts with normal highway traffic. Uniformed traffic officers or trained flagpersons, shall be provided when two- way traffic cannot be maintained, and at the request of the District Transportation Administrator whenever he deems it necessary for the protection of the traveling public. When traffic control becomes so complex that the traffic control cannot be accomplished using Agency standards, the Permit Holder must submit a traffic control plan to the Agency's Utilities Section for Agency approval prior to beginning work. 1 J • � Y •//L'%ri7���/ice -------- ' 00 Pogo oig -1, rl •1 bmAERILWi GREASE..rat- TRAP /� `R•/ 1 %��••./J/_ /�X/7.-I / - • i - I/I��� /%///���//�/�����1/�,.��/I •v / -.. - / . ///I/I///////, .//�//�I,//j J / /%/�///I, �/� .. / �:.n / i�/'" •� f ��ri �. _i. �`�� i .�i ��r>=ter �. ��r»� i _�.r. J. �:.-���w`-��i`�-r'��Jd����+i�:s���i����•• • • - - LiLiSFl�1'� i • 1 a 1 1 I • 1 • 11 ° 1 I APR-18-199G 17:22 D + C DEPT. DATE: TO: FROM: P.01 /4/////A/ Uno Restaurant Corporation, 100 Charles Park Road, Nest Roxbury, MA 02132 617-323-9200 FAX TRANSMISSION Design E Construction Dept. FAX 1: (617) 325-6267 18) 14�?1Q, " �p No. of Pages: A t-4 0 Y "< N DX COMPANY: FAX Call (617) 323-9200 ext. 240 or 243 if problems with transmittal. XESSAGE: RPR-16-1996 17:22 D + C DEFT. P.02 WOL)~ERS LIGHT7N CUSTOM WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE JRWD-200 WITH WALL BRACKET PER ATTACHED DRAWING, WIRED AND PAINTED BENJAMIN MOORE #714 HIGH GLOSS ALL FIXTURES TO BE WIRED PER FACTORY/UL STANDARDS NOTE: SEE ACCOMPANYING SPECS. NO FLANGES, MOUNTING LAG SCREWS, SEALANT, OR SPACERS PROVIDED, TUBING TO BE 3/4" ALUMINUM CONDUIT. FIXTURE AND ALL PARTS TO BE PAINTED BENJAMIN MOORE #714 GLASS. FIXTURE TO BE WIRED WITH PROPER LENGTH WIRE TO "Jo BOX. MOUNTING BRACKET TO BE SHIPPED DISASSEMBLED. LAMP SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. PACE Cr- VfZIVIT FNLt,w -- �ootukr EON �(P? D(�GAS.1' ALu• 8Eavc TO BLXL !<) LAG %M6 1' SPA�dR A Y-ALMi / ♦ EA $CFsEWMP; ---JJJ Es=c -E CN f T7Ptf..Ai1 STriucdi� :+� .a .A1•LSiGCl � eox - - i L2' FLYWO y EA7vwD WLGCi A+a o c t DETAIL— CUSTOM EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SCALE: I DATE: APR-16-1996 17:23 D + C DEPT. P . Fj3 A.SOLITE LIGHTING ANGLE REFLECTOR # AD-150 9 SCALE DATE: APR-16-1996 17:23 D + C DEPT. P . C14 0S SERIE ? SIGD 3 Y. 6" PLAMC COVER 5314 - voreloggi, CONDUIT CEN= -a NQkWAL L LENGTH PLUS 2 11.2" L arod &S rs l,&Abw &+mbo*a a/ *m mdpMldhp a a and C4tvl0q Na. L4dp$ She ad,LWPPft 840 MA • il1Gg OUVUT• i r1TE a Cdad xaft ,*.d s , OS WHO 1/60W SOQM�1;: -- 41 aft +rah a� east ... dwodrd b � 3Ri' aondat .. OS 17=0 1/65W aomm L ckw am* � , ,.sir ba r os 194HO - 1/11GW,bt�DMA` a • OS'172THO - 2/&W *fix s r law Wm6,... J�ww omt= abd air CS 198TSO 2410W SW � .16' L' or car:ror�,o.► : ti t. are slrged+ lod s� � � a�odi so syap� ' JAI udoArt N.Li yppR,rwd..- dants 4i'li+t Y.iZZER(,� � r- �- ram•. Wt. 24 29 32 36 42 PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers + Planners + Landscape Architects + Surveyors April 23, 1996 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Pizzeria Uno - Follow up on approval conditions Dear Joe, Enclosed please find three prints of the Pizzeria Uno site plan C, revised to address the conditions outlined in the approval granted on March 19, 1996. The plans have been revised as follows: 1. The dumpster storage area shown on the plan has been supplemented with a note describing the materials for the fence and gates around the area. 2. The sidewalk along Imperial Drive is now shown continuing across the Imperial Drive access. 3. Additional details on the building have been forwarded to us by Pizzeria Uno, and I have enclosed a copy with this letter. The awnings will be backlit by three rows of fluourescent fixtures, with an "egg crate" bottom panel. 4. The exit to Imperial Drive has been redesigned to discourage right turns from the site going east onto Imperial Drive. Ken Pinkham has discussed this with Sonny Audette and they have concluded this design is the most that can be done to discourage right turners. Please call me if you have any questions about this package. Otherwise I assume we have met all of the approval conditions. Sincerely, Nancy ox Lan cape Architect cc: Gregg Beldock, D. White, Don Weatherbee 7226Iunofinal.nk The Maltex Building 0 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 -0- Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 i ��oNT acFtic� NSpDR�P Mr. David White David G. White & Associates P.O. Box 1007 69 College St. Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Mr. White: STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 April 18, 1996 Re: South Burlington UNO Restaurant l I have reviewed the latest plan for the Pizzeria UNO project and there needs to be a few changes to the US 7 pavement marking design. Necessary revisions are listed below: 1. There should be a forty foot break in the markings at the Imperial Drive intersection. 2. The arrows are shown wrong. Our Pavement Marking Placement Design Guideline, page 14, shows the correct detail. Arrows should be spaced 32' apart. 3. The taper distance is not long enough. The beginning point opposite the UNO drive is O.K. but the length should be 220'. This still allows for adequate lane widths from what I can see. 4. You should check to see if there are lane assignment signs which will need to be relocated. 5. There should be a stop sign on Imperial Drive. 6. Both Imperial Drive and the access to the restaurant need "ONLY"s accompanying the arrows. 7. There needs to be a provision on the plans for removal of existing markings where necessary. Please make the above changes and resubmit for final approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (802) 828-2653. incerely; Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mb cc: Joe Weeth, City of South Burlington Pinkham Engineering Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. bcc: Utilities File Central Files DTA #5 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 15, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the March 19, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that you obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S n erel , l 0-1 Joe eith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 28, 1996 David G. White David G. WY)ite & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant., 1330 Shelburne Road Dear.. Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 E ciosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on March 19, 1996. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null a-d void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. icerel&',i Jo-K enh, Cit Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. if 101 Walnut Street Post Office Box 9151 Watertown Massachusetts 02272 617 9241770 FAX 617 924 2286 Memorandum To: Mr. David G. White Date: March 13,1996 David G. White & Associates, Inc. 69 College Street P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, VT 05402-1007 From: John J. Kennedy, P.E. INTRODUCTION Project No.: 04867.12 Re: Traffic Impact Review, Restaurant, Shelburne Rd. at Imperial Dr., South Burlington, Vermont Transportation Land Development Environmental Services This Memorandum has been prepared to evaluate the traffic impact associated with the development of a 155 seat restaurant at 1330 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Shelburne (U.S. Route 7), Imperial Drive intersection on land which is currently occupied by a motel. The review conducted by VHB is a follow-up study for the site. Initial work has been completed by others and transmitted to the City as part of the on -going review process. Data and findings associated with that review, prepared by Mr. Robert Alexander for Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., have been used and supplemented as part of this Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. review. The VHB study has included data collection and analysis together with the evaluation of three access alternatives for the site. EXISTING CONDITIONS • ROADWAY GEOMETRICS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL The study intersection is at the transition point between a five lane, center lane for left turn condition north of Imperial Drive and a four lane section to the south approaching the signal controlled Holmes Road intersection. South of Holmes Road, Route 7 eventually becomes a two lane facility with paved shoulders. The intersection is a Tee type with Imperial Drive a two lane, two way, 30 foot wide local roadway approaching from the east. PC146 Q\MS0FFICE\W1NW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 The proposed site is located on the southeast corner of Shelburne Road and Imperial Drive. It is currently occupied by a 26 room motel with approximately 70 beds. Access is via a single 100 foot wide curb cut on Route 7. The cut actually provides two driving areas separated by a 25 foot area which includes the Motel sign. The northerly limit of the driveway is approximately 55 feet from the center of Imperial Drive.. With heavy flow in the Route 7 corridor, a major commercial arterial, the opportunity to exit from STOP sign controlled Imperial Drive is limited. Gaps in the traffic flow are created by traffic signals located at Holmes Road to the south and at the McIntosh Road, Fayette Drive intersection to the north. \lot) U" IN TRAFFIC FLOW A manual turning movement count was conducted at the intersection on Tues ay, March 5, 1996. count covered the mid -day peak period between 12N and 2PM and the evenin ak eriod_ een 4PM and 6PM. A summary of the peak period with associated back-up is provided as an attachment to this Memo. During the noon peak period, which occurred between 12:15 and 1:15, approach volume in the Shelburne Road corridor totaled 1991 vehicles. The movement from Imperial Drive totaled 40 vehicles, 90% of which turned right to Shelburne Road northbound., The movement to Imperial Drive also totaled 40 vehicles with over 75% entering from the north. During the evening peak hour, Shelburne Road approach volume totaled approximately 2400 vehicles. Approximately 55% was moving to the north and 45% to the south. Movement from Imperial Drive totaled 39 vehicles, 70% of which turned right to Shelburne Road northbound. Movement to Imperial Drive totaled 72 vehicles, 87% of which were left turns from Shelburne Road southbound. The counted evening peak hour volumes are considerably less than those identified in the January 2, 1996 Memorandum prepared under cover of Pinkham Engineering Company. In that Memo, the capacity analysis worksheets for the PM peak indicated a total Shelburne Road volume of 2990 vehicles with a 53%/47% southbound/northbound split. Demand on the Imperial Road approach totaled 62 vehicles, approximately 75% of which turned right to Shelburne Road. Entering d_emand to Imperial Drive totaled 111, 70% of which were left turns from Shelburne Road southbound. The comparative counts vary by approximately 20% in the Route 7 corridor. We have reviewed data from a VAOT permanent count station on Route 7 in Shelburne. That review has indicated that the variation between an average day in December and a day during the first week in March was 10% with the December traffic the higher of the two. The annual data also suggests that average weekday traffic in March is 95% of the average traffic for any day in the year while the December weekday traffic was equal to the average daily traffic. A, A • CORRIDOR SPEEDS Average speeds in the corridor were measured during the mid -afternoon, off-peak period. In a series of runs, the 85th percentile speed, i.e. the speed at which the 85th fastest car was traveling out of 100, was between 38 and 40 miles per hour northbound and 40 to 42 miles per hour southbound. PCI46 CAMS0FFICE\W1NW0RD\04867IM.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 • GAP STUDY 3 Over the course of the turning movement counts, three fifteen minute periods included the determination of the number of gaps in the Shelburne Road traffic flow which were in excess of six (6) seconds, the amount of time which would be required to exit from Imperial Drive and safely enter the Route 7 traffic stream. The studies were conducted at 12:30, 3:00 and 4:45PM. • As previously noted, gaps in the Route 7 traffic flow are created by traffic signals. Northbound, the closest signal is at Holmes Road. Southbound the closest signal is at McIntosh and Fayette. The signals will cause the general north and southbound flows to be concentrated with lesser flows occurring when Route 7 signals approaching Imperial Drive are red due to green signals on the side street or side street vehicles turning on red. n ' Ag ' iod of concern is the evening peak hour. During the 15 minute period between 4:45 and . 5:0 20 gaps excess of six (6) seconds were identified. Nine ranged between 6 and 8 seconds, one betwe nd 10 seconds, 3 ranged from 10 to 12 seconds, 2 were between 12 and 14 seconds and one was between 18 and 20 seconds. When gaps exceed 10 to 12 seconds, more than one vehicle can enter 3 the traffic stream. During this 15 minute interval there appears to be capacity for approximately 30 vehicles to enter the Route 7 traffic stream as left turns from Imperial Drive. This equates to 120 vehicles per holiJC Fx, sn _v. Prz K-191,L Z � ��- ` / ..,,.�,,,,,.....*�°"'" „;�.�.�„,• Frto has u (� ��ir ��,_„__ These gap measurements correlate well with those which would be expected with the recent signal .� modifications in the Route 7 corridor. As part of the mitigation program for the Southland development located opposite Laurel Hill Road, signal operation in the corridor was modified and expanded to include all locations from Home Avenue in Burlington to Pine Haven Shores in South Burlington.. The time/space diagrams prepared for the Monday through Thursday evening peak hour, (the diagrams which represent a graphical interpretation of the relationship of the signals and S green time allocated to movement in the Route 7 corridor) suggest that a gap in the general Route 7 flow of approximately 18 seconds eleven times each fifteen. These gaps would be reduced by turning movements from Holmes Road or t e"'1Giclntosh/Fayette corridors. Those same time space diagrams for the Friday evening peak and Saturday mid -day peak suggest that 10 gaps of approximately 15 �x seconds each could be expected. The correlation between the mid -day gap studies and the anticipated gaps based on the time/space diagrams for the corridor is also good. The diagrams suggest a total of thirteen (13) gaps of up to 20 seconds in length during each of the periods could be expected. These would aga-in be red-u-c—ed due to �y turning movements from Holmes Road, the Fayette, McIntosh intersection and various land uses in between. The actual measurement between 3:00 and 3:15 indicated 24 gaps of greater than six seconds (three of which were greater than 16 seconds). During the noon peak, between 12:30 and 12:45 there were also 24�a s in excess of six seconds„ three of which were greater than 16 seconds. The same 70 second signal cycle is in effect during both of these periods. In addition to actual measurements of side street capacity by the conduct of a gap study, a capacity analysis was also completed using procedures identified in the Highway Capacity Manual and it's associated software programs. Correlation was poor in both the mid -day and evening situations given the HCM/HCS process of examining vehicle arrival rates in a free flow condition rather than the existing condition with vehicle flow interrupted by traffic signal operation in close proximity to the study intersection. Data and results presented in the January Memo are correct in assessment of conditions based on this software, and in fact is supported by VHB analysis in the March condition PC146 C:\MSOFFICE\WINWORD\048671M.DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 using the same software. To compare results, the HCM method identified only 25 available left turn exit gaps during the evening peak period based on the March counts. The gap study for a fifteen minute period during this peak hour identified over 20 left turn exit gaps which could be equated to in excess of 80 gaps in an hour. Given this difference and with the knowledge of the computational procedure and methodology in the software, the results of the HCM/HCS calculation are questionable in that the software does not recognize the effect of signal induced gaps. DEVELOPMENT CONDITION • SITE PLAN The existing motel structure will be demolished and replaced with a 5,530 square foot free standing restaurant on the 2 acre parcel. The site plan indicates total restaurant seating for 155. Parking for 106 vehicles is proposed. The parking field is generally east of the building given the shape of the lot which provides approximately 180 feet of frontage on the Route 7 corridor and 500 feet on Imperial Drive. Three potential access plans have been identified. Alternate A, provides a full access curb cut on Shelburne Road with no access provided to Imperial Drive. The 36 foot driveway (at the property line) provides one entering and two exiting lanes. Alternate B, which was previously considered by the Planning Board in a somewhat different version, provides for access from both Route 7 and Imperial Drive. In this instance, the 24 foot wide drive from Route 7 provides access only to the site. All exits would be required to use Imperial Drive, which could also be used by entering vehicles. Alternate C would provide full access curb cuts from both Route 7 and Imperial Drive. • SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Construction on the site will lead to an increase in traffic volumes entering the intersection and passing through the corridor. The January 2nd Memo which described impacts accurately described the site's trip generation characteristics, except that the current plan now provides for 155 seats, down from the original 164 seats. Applying Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation data from the 5th Edition Update dated February, 1995, for Land Use Code 831, High Quality Restaurant, suggests that the site will generate 2.86 vehicle trips per seat on an average weekday. This is equivalent to a total of 444 vehicles trips, one-half of which would be entering and one-half exiting. The rate on a Saturday is slightly lower with each seat generating an average of 2.81 trips. This is equivalent to 436 vehicle trips. On a Sunday, the rate 2.15 trips per seat per day, resulting in a total generation of 334 trips. The critical concern is not the total daily generation of traffic but that which occurs during the evening peak hour. Applying the ITE fitted curve equation for this land use to the number of seats proposed yields a total evening peak hour generation of 44 trips. These would be split with 22 entering and 22 exiting. Not all of these trips would necessarily be new to the Shelburne Road traffic stream. Some would be redirected or passby trips given the high level of traffic demand currently in the corridor and some would be a replacement of trips associated with the existing motel. PC146 C\MS0FFICE\WINW0RD\04867IM.D0C C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 The evening peak hour traffic count suggested that 30 percent of the vehicles exiting from Imperial Drive had a destination to the south but only 10% approached Imperial Drive from the south. Movement in the Shelburne Road corridor is generally balanced although the northbound movement is higher, and therefore passby trips associated with the site would tend to be more of the right turn in, right turn out variety. With these factors, we concur with the findings of the earlier study which identified a site traffic distribution of approximately 75% north and 25% south. When these factors are applied to the generated evening peak hour trips, the site will see six (6) left turn and 16 right turn exits to Route 7, with 16 left turn and six (6) right turn entrances from Route 7 Because these generation rates are relatively low when compared to overall traffic in the corridor, expansion of the impact review area to adjacent intersections has not been completed. The actual additional traffic at these other sites would actually be less than the identified site related trips given the fact that some portion of the trips are already in the traffic stream (from 10 to 25%) and that trips �- associated with the current motel use would be removed from the traffic stream. (With full occupancy of the sites 26 rooms, ITE estimates the site would generate 16 trips, or one-third of the total generated by the new use.) The distribution of trips to the Route 7 corridor would vary dependent on the selected access alternative. In Alternate A access to and from Route 7 only, all movements would take place from the single access point centered 160 feet from the Imperial Drive intersection. Should the Route 7 access point allow entering vehicles only in conjunction with exits and entrances on Imperial Drive, (Alternate B), all exiting trips would be added to the Imperial Drive traffic stream together with a portion of the entering movement from southbound Route 7. With full�access drives from both corridors provided (Alternate C), it is anticipated that all vehicles entering from or exiting to the south would use the Route 7 access. In this instance, the majority of vehicles entering from the north would use the Route 7 access. However, the majority of vehicles exiting from the site to the north would be expected to use Imperial Drive given the layout of the parking field. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - BUILD CONDITION The movement from the site will use available gaps in the general Shelburne Road traffic flow as does the existing movement from Imperial Drive. As previously described, these gaps are created by traffic signals north and south of the site and therefore the standard analysis program as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual is not applicable. Actual measurem ed as part of the gap study suggested a potential evening peak hour approach capa ' of over 80 lef turns per hour given signal induced gaps versus an HCS calculated left turn capac of 25 vehic per hour. The Shelburne Road corridor is subject to significant ranges of variations in peak hour demand as identified in the differences in traffic counts conducted in Decer ber and in March. -These variations become even more pronounced when the highest hours of corridor, use over the course of a year are identified. Past work in the corridor has suggested that the 30th highest hour of corridor use in the a vicinity of the site totals approximately 3300 vehicles, an increase of 900 vehicles or 35% over the J March count. As development in the corridor increases, the five year projection on this 30th highest hour increase by approximately 10% to approximately 3600 vehicles per hour. The previous findings using December count data identified Level o ervice F operadon with a calculated average delay in excess of 1000 seconds for vehicles exiting Aerial Drive. These calculations are based on derived vehicle arrival rates on the Route 7 rridor, which when evaluated using a Route 7 conflicting flow of almost 3000 vehicles generalw<n average gap in the traffic stream PC146 CAMS0FFICE\WWW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.1; of slightly over one (1) second. As previously described, applying this same methodology to the existing cor 1dition March counts, results in an average Imperial Drive delay of 108 seconds (The average leff turn delay and right turn delays are not calculated separately as there is only a single lane approach.) potential capacity for Imperial Drive left turns of 25 vehicles was identified with a capacity to handle over 640 right turn vehicles also noted. With left and right turn sharing the same lane, the Imperial Drive approach capacity has been identified as 73. The Imperial Drive Level of Service was also classified as "F". As seasonal traffic fluctuations occur in conjunction with increased vehicle demand in the Route 7 corridor, the HCS model suggests that adequate gaps for entering the Route 7 traffic stream will be few and far between as evidenced by results in the January study. These results do not take into account the continued presence of traffic signal control at adjacent intersections however. In fact, as traffic continues to grow in the corridor, and on the side street approaches to the signalized intersections, we believe that the traffic flow in the Route 7--corridor will become more concentrate platoons than it is to av and hat thPra will b ontinued acceptable yaps for traffic to enter from uncontrolled side streets and driveways. The existing signal system operates on a fixed backgr� o d vanes y time -of -day and day -of -week. The background cycle ensures that signals are green on Route 7 during preset periods as a means to handle high traffic flows with few stops. As part of this program, the side streets are actuated with signals turning green for side street vehicles to exit at preset times, but only if there is demand on that side street approach. Once the signals turn green for a side street approach or a left turn phase from Route 7, that phase is allowed to extend to a preset maximum if vehicle demand on the approach continues. If the demand is not enough to use all of the time allotted for the movement, signals will then automatically return to the Route 7 green phase. At the current time, demand at the Fayette, McIntosh intersection, including the left turn from Route 7 to Fayette is below the demand capacity and therefore signals are normally returning to the Route 7 corridor north and south through movement early. This has the impact of increasing the amount of time signals are green for the Route 7 flow which tends to lower the number of gaps which would otherwise be available to exit from uncontrolled intersections and driveways. Therefore, as traffic increases from the controlled side streets and left turn movements, more concentrated flow can be expected in the Route 7 corridor. This concentration will not necessarily lead to more or longer gaps. There will be an increase in movement from the controlled side streets into the Route 7 corridor which will balance the possible gains due to the concentrated flows. This side street demand will however generally be much less concentrated and will generally occupy only one of the two lanes available within the corridor. Given these findings with respect to existing gaps and system operation versus the HCS software applications, we would suggest that any introduction of traffic to Imperial Drive from the site be accompanied with a capacity improvement which will allow the best use of existing and future gaps in the traffic stream. This statement is not intended to circumvent the capacity analysis process but to recognize the true operation of the corridor and fully mitigate any traffic impact of the project with respect to the optimum use of available gaps. Should Alternate A be approved, allowing for full access to Route 7 with no curb cut provided on Imperial Drive, no work will be required on Imperial Drive as a result of this project. Gaps in the Route 7 traffic stream would be simultaneously utilized by both the driveway and Imperial Drive with little or no loss in the number or length of the gaps when compared with existing conditions. Note that this will not provide relief for right turn vehicles from Imperial Drive which will continue to queue behind vehicles waiting to complete a left turn maneuver. PC146 CAMS0FFICE\WINW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 7 Project No.: 99901.12 In Alternate B, with full access via Imperial Drive and entrances via Route 7, the mitigation should address the added traffic on Imperial Drive. The introduction of any left turn movement will further obstruct exits to the right in addition to requiring more time for left turn movement. In this instance, M Imperial Drive should be widened to create a two lane approach allowing multiple vehicle use of the �! same 7 second gap. The allowance of multiple use of the gap will more than mitigate the addition of vehicles to the corridor and generally result in a lower average delay to all existing vehicles in the t Imperial Drive corridor. In Alternate C, allowing full access to both corridors, the mitigation as developed for Alternate B should be considered. Again, the introduction of any vehicles to the Imperial Drive corridor will tend to use existing gaps, increasing delay to existing Imperial Drive users. Note that in terms of capacity improvements, the third alternative provides the greatest level of improvement as the existin one --y OW lane entrance to the corridor, now serving approximately 40 peak hour vehicles, would be expanded I to four lanes serving 62 vehicles. WAA01- 2 Additional HCS analysis of the three alternatives has been completed for comparative purposes only. The analysis sheets are attached. Under existing conditions, HCS identified a single lane approach capacity of either 25 left turns or 643 right turns on Imperial Drive. Given the existing turning percentages of left and right movement from the approach, a single lane approach volume of 73 vehicles per hour was calculated with an average delay per vehicle of 108 seconds. Because the approach is a single lane, no calculation of left turn or right turn vehicle delay is provided. The defined operation for all vehicles on the approach was Level of Service F. With the widening of Imperial Drive, HCS estimates an overall approach capacity increase to,allow up to 25 left turns and a right turn capacity of 640 vehicles. According to the program, the right turn operation will experience operation at Level of Service B with an average delay of approximately 6 seconds even with the added development traffic. Delays associated with left turn movement increase however. As noted, the existing left turn delay is not individually calculated as the approach is a single lane. In alternatives B and C the average vehicle delay remains at 108 seconds with the widening, a delay level comparable with the existing condition. In order for any mitigation which improves right turn access be successful, the number of vehicles queued waiting to make a left turn must be recognized and the length of the turn lane thereby developed. The HCS program data has been applied to queuing projections in the Highway Capac � 0 Manual. The worst case queue occurs in Alternate B with a defined 95th percentile queue of 1.5 vehicles. Any action regarding the construction of the turn lane in any Alternate should develop a V:, lane which has the capacity to handle two (2) vehicles. ,N RECOMMENDATIONS Given the above evaluation, our recommendation would be based on an access alternative rather than on defining that alternative. We understand that the City would prefer no movement to or from the site via Imperial Drive and that the Vermont Agency of Transportation would like to see a use of the Route 7 corridor limited. Based on these varying goals we would propose a project mitigation to involve the widening of Imperial Drive should a curb cut be added to that corridor. Without access to Imperial Drive, the construction of a two lane approach from the site directly to Route 7 would provide adequate mitigation. PCI46 C:\MSOFFICE\WINWORD\048671M.DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 With access Imperial Drive, the widening at Route 7 should allow for a 23 foot wide approach consisting of an 11 foot left turn lane and a 12 foot right turn lane. The departure lane should be maintained at it's current 15 foot width, resulting in a widening of eight (8) feet. To allow for proper access into the lane and avoid a taper beginning in a driveway, it is suggested that the turn lane Q commence in it's full width at a driveway approximately 125 feet east of the Route 7 corridor. Without access to Imperial Drive, the exiting site drive should be two lanes in width for a distance of approximately 40 feet. PC146 CAMSOFF10E\MNWORD\048671M.DOC VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. Site Code : VERMONT PA!;_: 1 N-S Street: SHELBURNE RM U.S.RT.7) FILE: BURL-VT2 E-W :street: IMPERIAL DR.,BURLING..VT. Weather : OVERCAST,COOL Movements by: Primary DATE: 3105196 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Time From !forth From East From South From Nest Vehicle Begin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12:00 PM 0 184 8 9 0 1 7 1 i) 0 0 i; 428 12:15 0 223 16 11 0 0 4 241 i, i 0 0 495 12:30 0 Z19 5 14 0 1 0 245 0 0 0 0 484 12:45 0 222 7 5 0 0 0 238 0 0 0 0 472 HR TOTAL 0 848 36 39 13 2 11 943 0 0 0 0 1879 1:00 PM 0 230 3 5 0 3 5 23% 0 0 0 0 484 1:15 0 1.06 9 5 0 1 0 227 0 0 0 0 448 1:30 0 194 4 1 0 2 Ei 218 0 0 0 0 425 1:45 0 22S 7 6 0 0 4 221 6 0 0 0 459 HR TOTAL .� 851 23 24 0 b 9 903 i) 0 0 0 1816 DAY TDTAL 0 1699 59 6*?0 8 20 1846 0 0 0 0 3b95 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FA TOR Right Thru Left Total Right Tiru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .North 12.i5 PM "..9' ) 994 31 925 0 97 3 East 12:00 PM 0.68 J9 0 2 41 95 0 5 Soouth 12.15 PM 011.a9 3 961 0 970 Nest 12: 15 PM 1). r{) 0 V 0 v 0 tl 0 Entire Intersection No i.1.. 0. , 274 31 _5 East 0.61 36 0 4 40 90 0 if, 'JANMASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. Site 'node . "CRAGNT N-5 Street: SHELBURNE RG. U.S.RT.7) E-W Street: IMPERIAL GR.,BURLING.,VT. Weather . GVER`AST,LuGL ------------------------------------- T4 iRp =rD.- 'dorti Lv.ir PT THRU LT ------------------------------------------ A 7 iisl.t i, u 0 13 t! ,1p T T is ;7P ; G I tiL t,J J� 0 1: t': PM i' 13 11 1:!5 111I ? HR T A 1 :1{ JI '• �1 C1 Tlii:L . PA>1E: I 7 -. BURL -VT' fovement_ by: Secondary DATE: 3/05195 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'roA East P-os1 South Croy West Vehicle 1' R T?,(��ti :RU T L: T T 1 RI IHRL LT T RI ,si U I T _I T—' Iota! --------------------------------q---------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 1) i i 0 ��iqq t !.! 10 24 26 C 44 0 U 0 0 7 L ------------------------------•__-------------_---__---_-------_-------_----__—_---_----__--_------------------------------- TOTAL 1 u L CH `'t !!L ANALYSIS C JR R PER10 j. 1::t! ..:I)!I P1# DTRECT.:MIN STIRT PEAK 4R ........ VO! MCv r....,.. ...!t ,..PERCENTS ... PEAK NGCh: P?C GR Riont Thru Left Total nighTI:rI� Le7t --------------------------------- 15U"trl 1.' j -------------------------------------------------------------- East pt 12.-`, '?M Ur l;) C '? tj 'I t _.rE :nter.e,- sn, VHNASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. Site Code : VERMONT N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.(U.S.RT.7) E-4 Street: IMPERIAL-uR..BURLING.,VT. Weather . uVERCAST,COOL ---------------------------------------- Tioe From Mori`? Begin RT THRU LT ---------------------------------------- 12:00 PM ? 19i 3 12:15 0 229 16 12:30 0 232 5 12:45 '.? 235 7 HR TOTAL 0 887 36 1:00 PM it 243 1:15 it 216 9 1:30 t? 205 4 1:45 0 27,5 7 HR T 0 T ?�L 0 899, 23 Sup of th_p r'. ?.ri �a ? are..d ---------------------------------------------- From East From South, Ri THRU IT RT THRU LT ---------------------------------------------- 9 0 i 7 229 0 it 0 0 4 255 14 0 i rl 257 0 5 0 0 0 249 U 39 0 2 11 990 t'? 5 0 1 0 232 v 7 0 2 it 231 0 6 0 0 4 233 24 0 6 9 947 A PAGE: i FILE: BURL-VT2 DATE: 3i05i96 -------------------------------- From West Vehicle RT THRU LT Total -------------------------------- 0 0 +: 445 0 0 0 515 0 0 t? 509 0 0 0 496 0 0 0 1965 0 0 0 511 0 0 46.3 t? t? 0 449 0 0 0 485 0 0 0 Me ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 OTn r 7 Dn: T�IML 0 1726 59 6� 0 8 20 1937 ;v 0 0 0 3873 PE?;r PERIOD ANALYM FOR THE PERIOD: 12:00 PM - 2:0' PM 71 J11, ; TON .lr+r,. FEAK Hr ........ YULu�ha ........ . , _h _!t:o .,. >�11M 4, .H t rE*HU"r FACTOR Rlg` Thru _act Total R:aht Thru L_: t ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Morth 12:15 PM 0.99 0 939 3i 970 0 97 3 Ea_t 12:00 PM 0.68 39 0 2 41 75 0 5 Scut` 1_.1 1 . M 0.99 9 1012 0 i021 99 0 West 12:15 PM 0.00 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 i tire l terseclion Nort11 15 FM 0.99 I? 39 - ?S 7n-1 l y? Ga=.r 0.67 766 V 4i_i 90 0 io .�_.'? tt.'f9 9 1t':2 :l iti 7`9 0 ^, ~ Site N-S Strpet: SHELBURNE RU./U.S.RT.7) �# Street� [9PE���� D8.,BbRLlNG.'�7. YANASSE HAMGEN 8RUSTLIN, INC. #e�' er � OVER' -' -T.COUL Sum of t�e F�iery an�cma r-y __________________________________________________________________________ PEAk PBlCD ANALYSlS ��R ,H[ ,�9lDD� 12��O PM - ���� rM �RO� �EAK HQ8 F�CT5R R��n� ��ru Ls�L Total ___________________________________________________________ �.9Y "I Esz �2�O0 Ph 0.�8 39 0 � 41 95 � 5 �O12 V Ent�r� �x�yr�accizp ^ PAGE; 1 FILE: BURL-VT2 DATE; 3/0 5V96 VANASSE HANSEN BRUSTLIN, INE S1te Cope . VERMONT PAGE: 1 N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD. (RT.71 FILE: BURL-UT1 E-W Street: IMPERIAL DR. ,BURLING.,VT. Weather ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WET,COLD Movements 5V. Primary DATE. 3/05196 Time From North From East From South `rom West Vehicle aegin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU IT RT THRU LT Total ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4:00 PM f! i9i i i 2 !} 3 3 264 f! ! 0 0 474 227 $ 2 3 271,: f: f: fi 0 519 4:30 0 222 13 9 0 1 3 253 .} 0 0 0 501 4:45 266 9 7 0 i 4 293 f1 0 -} 580 fR TOTAL 0 906 41 27 0 ? i'a 10$0 0 0 0 0 2074 5:00 P1 0 244 18 7 0 4 2 387 C 0 0 662 ::15 0 267 13 b 0 1 1 3i9 0) 0 0bill 5:.30 218 23 6 0 6 2 279 0 0 0 0 534 5:45 0 247 3 0 0 3 248 6 0 0 0 512 r--^� HR jai?4L s -• 0 9,6 5+; 27 0 1 '?7 �., 0 - 0 0 0 n� sa15 D4*' Tv?AL U is!$2 1Ui 54 0 1$ Y1 2313 U i] 0 U 4389 PEAK: PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 Pit - 6:06 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... FRO PE;K HO+JR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Righo Tiiru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- North 4:45 PM 0.94 0 995 63 1059 0 94 6 East 4.15 PM 0.91 32 0 $ 40 SO 0 20 S.ut! 4:45 PM 0.$3 9 127$ 0 12$7 i 99 u West 4:45 'OM 0. 0 C t! 0 0 0 -! 0 Entire intersection Nord 4:45 PM .,94 0 995 63 i"`6 0 94 East 0.79 26 0 12 3$ 60 0 tit 2 78 99 VaQEHANENma%m.INC. a@ 'ode :"AEI v§Street; gERmEg2r2) ew Street: !MPERTAL ee kKlgn Q. #2§r :£\COLD ------------------ GE R2 North Bqb R THRU J ------------------- k # ? a § a Ag a 7 q k & 0 & 0 Ag a 5 a GI£ 0 3 0 500 PM J. 2 0 7 a 2k 9 « a 5 « a & a m ISk 0 2 0 ka,E@ by: Secondary ° From Est RR South C qR C 9 ImD J ------------------------ ) a § a Z n a A 0 ; ) 0 0 9 ! 7 9 ! § 0 ! 29 0 0 a @ 0 5 @ ! 0 a 0 9 0 a 0 0 : 0 a a 0 9 5 i 0 9 § 9 a § ----------------------------------------------- RY Q9L 9 # 0 I & 9 I 2 e PaK Rg3 MH L Ra 9E PERIOD: § W 9 - a 9 q w3: ! FILE:Rkg2 DATE; 2ai% ---------------- Re A# Ghee E I«B g Total ----------------- a 0 0 2 a a s 2 0 § 9 » a (In 1-,7 , 9 ) 2 9 0 § 5 9 a 0 9 0 # 0 E 0 a 0 4# --------------- C. a 0 102 efts., 2:&QG ©, yA rMN . + , ... gLae ..� .. .� PERCENTS .. E2M R« HOUR I % #! 5@ Left Total R§k 22 Left --------------------------------------------------- N2b §6 R «2 a 2 9 4 § Soy (mot §g PM E3 1 0 0 ! av 9 0 2a§ § 2 R 0.75 ! 2 a 2 ; 9 n ;e! 4.30 9 0.00 a e G n . § 0 BG -e Intereerie %R§ Ag PM G3 a 20 2 § 29 e East 0.3 ! 00 1 QR 0 9 Soar 0.66 , a J , 9 a @a « 9 § § 9 ) ) a ) «g 6#G m6&a.EX. Site Code: Rgal »Berea aEkmEQ2gJ) yW Street: IMPERIAL ReaaeKe S. Weather ;E\COLD ------------------ 2e From North Begin R IRu LT ------------------- § 00 q a 19 R A 2 J 2& 2 4.30 0 22 2 § Q a 2! 9 R TOTAL 0 q4 41 J. y R ) a2 e 5 15 a 2 2 Q 30 a 22 2 e R . 9 !S 6 R «IL a 96 60 NE: ! Ra:kk42 &, f be Rik9 £§SE269 —.---------------------------------------------- DATE:;&2% - c From South From #a Vkea E 9Q J Q 9K J g IRu LT Ia6 ----------------------------------------------- 2 0 ; ; 21 0 a 9 a 489 9 n 2 ; 27) a 0 0 9 S! 9 0 ! 4 260 a 9 c a S! E 0 ! 4 ;G 0 0 a 0 2 S a,7 ne a n 9 9 22 7 t 4 2 92 c 0 0 0 670 6 0 ! COS a a a 0 623 6 i 6 } 284 0 0 0 a »! 2 a 0 ; 3; 0 a a 0 g; S E H B 127 a 0 o 0 SS -------------------------------------------------------------------- M e9L 0 Rod D! S 0 e 2 25§ 0 a 0 Ag PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE REg: 4010 m- a 3 R DIRECTION gQT PEAK# ...VGae .... ... rR2gg .. qm PEAK @@ GeS; R #t 9G Lw[ Total Right Rod Left --------------------------------------------------- N2« Aa R Eg 0 DA 2 22 0 9 6 East a Gg 0 J 2 t g 9 2 Qa§ w@ R 284 9 Og 9 COP ! T § West ACT @ ty ) 9 G e 0: a Entire RterSRiE t Rt f U. u wa & we e 9! met E S 3 9 12 #a G y a 9 a a ) ) ) VANASSE HANiEN BRUSTLIN, INC. Site Code . 'VERMOAT N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.!RT.74 E-W Street; IMPERIAL ".R.,BURLINS.,VT. Weather : WET,COLD ------------------------------------- Sum of the Primary and Secondary PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PAGE: I FILE: BURL-VT1 DATE: 3/05/96 ------------------------------ DIRECTIL!;o START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES ........ .... PERCENTS .,. FRO1I PEAK HOUR *ACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nortr: 4:45 P`i 0.94 0 1014 63 1077 Li 94 6 East 4:15 PM 0.93 ''+ 0 8 41 80 k, i. 3ouLh 4:45 PM 0.84 1308 0 13147 1 99 0 West 4:45 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.94 0 1014 63 1077 0 94 6 East 0.61 27 0 12 39 69 0 31 South 0.84 1 I308 0 1311 1 99 0 West 0.00 L! L! U U 0 it 0 I 1 .iHl:i_.E'LiF1`1I"_T. r;li. 1 cr:; rn i i 1 i i 1 I 1 1 v•. v u v• n v n ' v u i �' 1 i I 1 I 1 1 I 1 ' • v 1 •- �•� n I n• 1 i I.t i _i.014 1 6-1, .. n .. n r, • ,r • n rc n n i n ..• ; "I I'' `:. t { I; Ft -i '1 *_-1u ,r; 1 .......... __...... ... .... .... ..... .... ............... ......... ..... ......._. 1 _... 1 _._ _... .i 4:•i1•-`L'_f'V .L ('91__ .l rl" __.._..................-........ ... ..... .._. ..... ..... _._ _.._. L;F". 5....I t:7 n q '•. r .. _ .._.._.._.._•___...__._.....___•___......._.............. ... i 1 v n u. ny v. u u..,.. n x.• f r u n• n n - I• u v f V n rc n v e n, r i 7 1 I I i 1 1 fANAESE HANGEN BRUSTLIN. INC Site Code . LEFT TURN GAP PAGE: N-S Street: SHELBURIE R7.W.S.R1.71"> FILE: BURL-'r?5 :-4 Street: IMPERIAL BR.,BURLIfvG.,VT. :leather . ?IR.1=3B,2=NB Sum of the directions Bir 1 and Bir ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I S +�,a � DATE: 3/05/96 'IME TGTAL T.3'vL GAPS !in seconds; Avg r*i -AP c, par-r, _3 r BEc::i -APS 'J�:,, _ 4-6 6-3 e,i �n �_ r �; �r _nn �5_n 8-10 iv- . 1 14 34-0 16-18 1B- :t .,) 22 2_ _4 nn �r .4-76 .6-cc .- 0 r ,.�5 Gao ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- in,+0 c c n i n ra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LIA V T1O1HL 7J4 424 9 6 2 1 2 U 1 G 0 U 0 1 B VANASSE HANGEN BRUSM—i LzIN iNE Site Cede . 'LEFT TURN GAP PAGE: I N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.(U.S.RT.;:, FILE: BURL-VT4 c- Street: IMPERIAL DR.,BURLING.,VT. Weather DIR.I=SD.2=vB Sue 21" the directions Dir I and Dir 2 --------------------.--__-___--__-_-_____-____--_-----_------_____-____-____-___---________-_--___-_------------------------------- M1w`. DATE: nn IC�5�70 T14 i.E TOTAL TOTAL 3'nPS iili sEcendsi Avo Bc_IGA- CC :1 c .-4-6 6- 8-ID i .-I -I is tl ,c _. __ _ a'4- b6-:8 B-vG 30 Gav ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;:; , --------- — -------------------------------'------------------------------------------------------------------- DAY TOTAL 31 47i J 6 6 5 I � ? � ------ ------------- :� :J 0 9 VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, IN Bi*a "ode , LEFT TURN 'ark PilGE i 'd-S Street: 'HELrURNE RD,iU...RT,' =iLE: BURL-VT3 E-0=treet: MPERIAL DR.,BURL?NC.,VT. :feather DIR.1=SB.7=NB Sinn of be directions Dir ? and iDir ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �S n�,,.►v-rz s DATE: 3/05i96 'Ii!c TIT -)I,- T,. Gnh'S tir: secund5: Avg sqt i „-_ _ _ 3-:. .t� :; _ . iY :b h-. i8- ::� _ _ . b c2 ', 3D San ---------------------------------♦------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4:Y !� jT. i i ) 1� I 4 Q, C A 0 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nni� 7�;rr, n• c-+c . unt ,. iL z jI. 9 J } v i + i :i : 1 itit y1 !i 7 ►ACT - l Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 f ,rxx,r :rf,t �+try.x fr frfr*�r*♦�tf,�,r,rx,ewwx,rf.w,t•rr*,r frww:x,r +frk frw,t ,r ,r�r�,r*w,r ,t*wax• File Name ................ IMP96BSE.HCO Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 318196 other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT - 1MP96BSE Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I OI ---- 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 0> ---- l< 0 Stop/yield I NI NI I Volumes 1 1308 91 63 1014 I I 12 0 27 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 0 SU/RV's (`s) I 0 01 0 0 I I 0 0 0 CV's M I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 0 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.1 1.01 Adjustment Factors vehicle Maneuver -------------------------- Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Critical Gap (tg) ----------------- 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 Follow-up Time (tf) ------------------ 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 H CS Z- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 643 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 643 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1317 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 337 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2390 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 44 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 35 Prob. of Queue -free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2390 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation MCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay q 5,/, Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) -------- ------ ------ ------ Delay ------------ LOS By App --------------- - - - WB L 13 25 > > > ` 73 108.1 F 108.1 Q WB R 28 643 > > > SB L 67 337 13.3 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 2.3 H c.s - ,3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 I-1 L S - `} File Name ................ IMP96AL2.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 318196 Other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT W/ALT.2 - 1MP96AL2 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R No. Lanes 1 ---- ---- ---- I 0 2< OI ---- 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI I Volumes I 1308 91 65 1028 I I 18 43 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 SU/RV's (o) I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 CV's (%) I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.0211.02 1.02 I 11.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) .. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 1-� LS WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 643 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 643 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- con£licting Flows: (vph) 1317 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 337 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2406 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww f4 CS - Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By ADD -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ --------- WB L 19 25 421.6 F 108.1 WB R 45 643 6.0 B O SB L 69 337 13.4 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 3.2 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 xx*xwk**w**,��er#w�*+r*►*++ww*kw,r+ew**,�,r*,rxx«,rx*rrx,r�*x**w+. �,r ,r ,r*w*� File Name ................ IMP96AL3.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 Other Information......... 1996 SASE COUNT W/ALT.3 - 1MP96AL3 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection i Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound I L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R i---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I OI ---- 1 ---- ---- 2 i ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI I Volumes I 1310 91 63 1030 I I 12 41 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 SU/RV's (%)I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 CV's M 1 2 21 2 2 I 1 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 HC_r- I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 **************************************************************** 1'�La—S WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 660 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 641 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 641 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1319 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 336 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 336 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2408 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 wr**,r+r*�ww�w*w**ww*ww�xw+rw+w,rrt+,r,et,r�w*w*rw�w*:rrwi�*,e +rww#,rwxrr..r Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App WB L 13 25 278.9 F 108.1 WB R 43 641 6.0 B SB L 67 336 13.4 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 2.8 C MC-s - 9 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 x+++x++++x+++xx++xxxx+++x+x++x++++x++xx++++x+x+xx+xx+++x++++++xx " C_ S - 1 Q File Name ................ IMP96AL1.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 Other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT AT UNO DR. W/ALT.1 - IMP96ALl Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection I Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I OI ---- 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI I Volumes I 1317 61 16 1024 I I 6 16 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 SU/RV's (o) I 0 01 0 0 I I 0 0 CV's M I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 xxrr,r+wxxrtxx::xx,r+xrx:e,txxxxxxxx>xxwxxx,rw+:x,r ,r w,r*wx.xxxxxwxxxxrxx• H C S - )I WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 662 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 640 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 640 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1323 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 334 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 334 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2360 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 33 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 31 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation BCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 HLS - 12 Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay C�S Movement v(pcph) -------- ------ Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) ------ ------ Delay LOS ------------ ------ By App --------- — — — — WB L 6 31 143.5 F 108.1 WB R 17 640 5.8 B SB L 17 334 11.4 C 0.2 Intersection Delay = 1.3 3/19/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Gail Wyand & Mary Grunvald for a project consisting of: 1) razing a 26 unit motel building, and 2) constructing a 5,530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats, 1330 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Revised Site Plan - C, , Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 12/11/95, with a last revision date of 3/8/96, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) For the purpose of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed use will generate 27.85 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of the lights under the canopy shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 4) The applicant shall post a $13,100 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5) Pursuant to Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves two (2) driveways for this lot as shown on the approved plan. 6 ) The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to indicate the type of screening to be used around the dumpster storage area. b) The site plan shall be revised to show the sidewalk continuous across the driveway. 7) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the cost of constructing a sidewalk on Imperial Drive. The sidewalk shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the cost of widening Imperial Drive to provide separate left -turn and right -turn lanes. These improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 9) Applicant shall obtain approval from VAOT to extend the left - turn lane on Shelburne Road further to the south as shown on the site plan and shall submit evidence of this approval prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance. 10) The existing four (4) inch sewer serving the pool backwash shall be abandoned and capped at the connection with the existing six (6) inch service. 11) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 12) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 13) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. '5 e - -6 /L_jg� M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner Re: March 19, 1996 Agenda Items Date: March 15, 1996 3) HERBERT & JOAN MARTIN - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the subdivision of a 10.1 acre lot into two (2) lots of 2.74 acres (lot "A") and 7.36 acres (lot "B"). Lot "A" is developed with a single family dwelling and accessory structures and lot "B" is developed with a barn, chicken coop and shed. This property located at 1201 Spear Street lies within the Rl District. It is bounded on the north by undeveloped land, on the west by two (2) single family dwellings, on the south by Swift Street and on the east by Spear Street. Access: Access to lot "A" is provided by two ( 2 ) 10 foot curb cuts on Spear Street. No access proposed for lot "B". Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement of one (1) acre will be met by both lots. The minimum frontage requirement of 170 feet will be met by both lots. Coverage/setbacks: Building and overall coverage information should be provided for final plat. All existing structures will meet the setback requirements from the proposed property lines. 4) GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD - RESTAURANT - SITE PLAN This project consists of: 1) razing a 26 unit motel building, and 2) constructing a 5530 square foot standard restaurant with 155 seats. This project which originally proposed 164 seats was denied on 2/13/96 (minutes enclosed). 1 Memorandum - Planning March 19, 1996 agenda items March 15, 1996 Page 2 The first issue the Commission will have to address is whether to reconsider this application. The applicant should be prepared to setforth reasons why the Commission should reconsider this application. It is staff's opinion that enough new information has been submitted and enough changes have been proposed to justify reconsideration. The applicant has submitted three (3) plans for the Commission's consideration, plan "A", plan "B" and plan "C". All three plans propose a 155 seat standard restaurant in a 5,530 square foot building. The differences between the plans relate to access. Plan "A" eliminates the curb cut on Imperial Drive and proposes all access through the Shelburne Road curb cut. Plan "B" is similar to the plan which was denied except that the number of seats is reduced to 155 and the area available for stacking at the Imperial Drive/Shelburne Road intersection has been lengthened. Plan "C" is a combination of plans "A" and "B". It includes the Imperial Drive access with a full ingress and egress curb cut on Shelburne Road. This property located at 1330 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl and R4 Districts. It is bounded on the east by a single family residence, on the south by a retail/office building, on the north by Imperial Drive and on the west by Shelburne Road.' J Access/circulation: Plan "A": Access will be via a 36 foot wide curb cut on Shelburne Road with two (2) egress lanes and one (1) ems' ingress lane. t Plan "B: Access will be via a 24 foot wide ingress only curb cuts on Shelburne Road and a 30 foot wide ingress and egress curb cut on Imperial Drive. The proposed access to Imperial Drive is a new access which does not currently exist. Unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission under Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations, there shall be a maximum of one (1) driveway per lot accessing a public street. Staff supports a driveway on Imperial Drive. The applicant is proposing to widen Imperial Drive v to accommodate a new right turn lane and lengthen the stacking � lanes for traffic wanting to make right and left turns onto Shelburne Road beyond that which was provided on the plan which was, denied. It appears that up to six (6) cars could be stacked waiting to turn left and still allow right turning vehicles toe ��n access the right -turn lane. Plan "C": Access will be via a 36 foot wide curb cut on Shelburne ` Road with two (2) egress lanes and one (1) ingress lane. A 30 foot K Memorandum - Planning March 19, 1996 agenda items March 15, 1996 Page 3 wide ingress and egress curb cut on Imperial Drive is also proposed. Since this plan also proposes two (2) curb cuts, the Commission will have to specifically approve two (2) curb cuts pursuant to Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations. All three (3) plans show that the left -turn lane on Shelburne Road will be moved further to the south to better accommodate traffic entering the project from the north. This will need approval from the VAOT. Circulation is adequate for both plans. Coverage/setbacks: Plan A: Building coverage is 6.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 51% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 21.7% and along Imperial Drive is 8.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). Plan B: Building coverage is 6.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 52.1% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 17.9% and along Imperial Drive is 14.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Plan "C": Building coverage is 6.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 52.3% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 21.7% and along Imperial Drive is 14.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements will be met on both plans. Parking: A total of 56 parking spaces are required for all three (3) plans and 106 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces are being provided for plans "A" and "B" and 104 spaces for plan "C". A bike rack is being provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on S° building costs, is $13,100 which is being met. Plantings will Ir include Dogwood, Inkberry, Spruce, Rhododendron, Yew, Cranberry, Serviceberry, Norway Maple, Ash, Honeylocust and Arborvitae. The plans show new street trees along Imperial Drive, an evergreen buffer around the back parking area and two (2) street trees along the Shelburne Road frontage in keeping with City policy. 3 Memorandum - Planning March 19, 1996 agenda items March 15, 1996 Page 4 Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 2 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 44 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed use (i.e., "quality restaurant") to generate 43.85 vte's which complies with the Traffic Overlay District. Enclosed is a copy of a traffic study which staff received last' week which we have not had time to review. The study will be reviewed prior to Tuesday's meeting. I �V ✓o The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $5700. Sewer: No additional allocation required due to the credit given for the existing motel. Dumpster: The dumpster storage area is shown on the plan. The plan should be revised to indicate the type of screening proposed. AV Sidewalk: The applicant is proposing a sidewalk property's frontage with Imperial Drive. This is three (3) plans. The plans should be revised to show continuous across the driveway. along the _ -- shown on all; 2� the sidewalk Ayft�o Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting will consist of the following: --- 13 250 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting and shielded luminaries mounted on 16 foot poles. --- one (1) building mounted 100 watt metal halide lamp with a downcasting and shielded fixture. Details of the lights under the canopy are not available at this time. These details should be submitted for approval by the City 1� Planner prior to permit issuance. 4 . 1 JNo's Piz-z.4. . _ . � /+-C.G �M�-Ci/ rt,'^i, � ✓ �.. Gi !, v F �- +��� � V n r '1 •' %h;V'L7rk+.i5 U H � �� (rw �/ /i'YZ-J 1 � 7 4v `�e.61A.r....:�.P-Lv`�..a(..�-c,�.c �..,.�i �✓�il�l,,\. �r i�c.. � 1 iti.�y�t. vet s.-t-c..r� .�n�,_...�=�.M-.<�i.I'. -h� Ito �. r e.- �-L +~ � , �rty. y��W' G t.�'� M I ✓lt �j�evt.,fi( Wi/ Wt. �;yLY'Y-c,�j CY'N"tri-c+...� > ='+�! C:dG`"".+ '�'"'i BENCHMARK CHISELED SQUARE IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRANSFORMER PAD ELEVATION 186.657 1 E TO BURLINGTON I II I I 1 I MV 1601 � I i II I i SWA B5 LA 5 Pu+T IMT 2.-]fY CS fJ Ca/rar4 Ewa R•4'•f�aa.atl Daq.Patl 1{-24• 9 SHARP CUT OFF SHOET30X FIXTURES C - 9— w y MOUNTED ON 16' POLES ct 16 w da1.a a D.an `Vm..7 15-,e• IIN ACK TYPE WALL -MOUNTED ^' S {e ..r,sJY•,a Tw.are..r 24-W FIXTURE m 2 plea gwu.ev 'omka' Da Ab.0 5p 1e-24• = RC { Mw.wrw tsyla mk•mar14 TaAnatlVA 9.cNMn S-6 RP T 1p.e0�rbv� VJI' P,Y RAa6nanbva I5_,e n m 11 T— augilala I—' D.vl J000rra.. Yaa 15-11 TX 26 1— . nrSa Nei Nidu Yaa 15- Ir 1 !—RETAIN EXiSTWG er0 21 va....a oo.Aw mnoacWn Earaoaol Ovr.�.lbud, 15-1e• CB UNTIL AOT PROJECT ON U.S. 7 PROPOSED TW 47 U01 orse 00'fAo d-dr Ga arEvNt<. 3-e - WIDENING - - - - - - - - - - - IMPERIAL D R"I—V—E r,- -s-r "—'`--------------------t `` --- — XX 1Xu /M.4 MAINTAIN EXIS-TMO- PROPOSED 5' SN"ALK __--__�� ���� \• •�$/ 15' LANE mp — — — . 1'"^'-�OBD�1bT��4�reV'n✓i8173rii.�r[I.rT.:�'..��6cvd.`vytiae� wfMIA • V EXITING Dy` _ �gyy TRIPE DUMPSTER AREAc LOADING AREA E705TING STING PAVED PARKING -ram/j� �'rR � •. '-.""'�./ ■`' atlLw ' TREES PSANT LIST AC 13 AradwW.ir Daanr sa.cearry { - {' 1iAB AP 5 Ari dataroer 7�dtlwia�' E� Q. 2-2 1/2- 64e- -. 4P 15 lrmV.w pwv..,lrmica Pabav Oar Adr 1 3/. - 2- CT 5 O.N.y biocmmu Xm.yoonf 2_2. 1/2• gY3 m 24 T.J. �,dY W". Dark Mtiica. ArEeMlp 3 - 4• We _ / m j /— — RN lYG]/ / r 1 \ \ I LP. TU JIE SET MVV612 I 1 151:09 — 1 I 1 ♦ ` 1 1 ♦ ` 7 1 1 �+-XEw' W �j �`♦ BU ♦ I Ap( FROM `. ♦ � i � 1 I RY 1ezJ\ o ♦` 1 yy w 4w_Ii. s2y.&7o.,e6n. yi ry..sd-Jai=�.crN Pti +Y•:�v�.,�,�i�.�i_-i MCI r.,r.-•..� J IVANO\ �i► .s �/ �i'�..�'<v/I?r•�/ir�iYi�i��v�i.7%�ii' i..��i/laVfi G.�/. ����`�/I%syyGii%�ls;'f/ x/�/�//i•��/ y�%i ry��� �rP lows � iaw: %i vy •• ._� I MV /7R0 ` co XAN,RAIJZfD Iu7lu rtANluc Tr NM 177.3 (1� DmAR Do0wom. voum wK 1611,Rf TRANSFORMER WV 174.5 (C I I I' /I• '/ .„ NV 1712 3 1 Uw � I I I I i s ; ' I • ; i' � ''' / �� lam_ s ^ ♦/ / I i TBM . ' PLAZA INVESTMENTS \ REBAR t t, / (MERV BROWN) ELEV. 1 .19' j / . / PROPOSED PARKING: la SPACES S I I I `. • •' / i4FiStPROPOSED SEATING: = SEATS C I ♦ / ♦` / /4 —PROPERTY LINE .l HYDRANT LOT 9ZE 2➢2 AC I END TAPER AT CURRENT END OF SETBACK LINE • GATE VALVE - LOT COVERAGE- EMSTING S.F. AC. z TAPER I TAPER I // _ - - - - WATER LINE 0— UTILITY POLE W/G!Y BUILDINCS 2.550 .22 10.6 SNEITO I , - PAVEMENT: - 21.574 .49 24.5 -e5- - - - SEWER LINE O MANHOLE j�$EENSPACE- 57.006 1 31 64 7 $I l TOTAL_ BB,130 2.02 1DO% Row 1710 / -ST- - - -STORY LINE IN CATCH BASIN -I LOT COVERAGE w : {tlV ,67.e 5 PROPOSED S.F. AC. >< wsl ,7{.e GAS LINE -d SIGN ( I T{{wXe77rVVV 17a] X ePII-- ,_.e I f ►VC c II BUILDINGS: CF' 452,5O3B0I 13 6.3p,6e99 .5 (Eq —O/O/UL/CATv—OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CATV 0 LICIT POLE PAVEMENT: 40.519 .93 46..0 TmD 97 477A4 TOTALB130 2.02 t00STI WOOD FENCE • IRON ROO FOUND FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES: SHELBURNE ROAD - 21.7% IN 7.1 1047 OF IUD "" CHAIN LINK FENCE O MONUMENT FOUND IMPERIAL DRIVE 14.35 IN F'a oz e,Anatl6 - I ; TBM t / t 1 RFBAR 1 ! CAP ! � \ ELEv..90' 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 a ` 1 GRAPHIC SCALE larar) 1 b—b • 1m & ZONING DZO%;�G HOUSE N BARONE i 111 1 b w- , �r N/F BLODGETT ! MLDT ALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LIES ON SITE ARE TO BE REMOVED BENCHMARK p �1 CHISELED SQUARE stRtles 5 a•ttra dneda wa.a...•et 2h3o' IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRANSFORMER PAD Es 13 cwau• w.1wa RW—N4 D"— t6-24' ELEVATION 186.657 9 SHARP CUT OFF SHOEBOX FIXTURES 1G 26 ra+ pdNa Vwer.r 16-24' < 1 MOUNTED ON 16' POLES tcc 16 w. 61m.a wro«to D. I tN y 15-1e' E V TTO WALLPACK TYPE WALL -MOUNTED ry 5 •.. wrtiawm WV1t.N..7 x.-3o' BURLINGTON FlXTURE vG 2 Pio4a 9-1 'oon.ca' D.uf A-ft S_- 18-24. RC 6 N+e+11nw ftng," eaMnrnarh TdM•dg4 &N iiw 5-6' 1 ? RP 21 MaEOMn 'PX' P. N•o0o _ 15-16' II I I Tc 13 Taw, cugl••ta T4ana• 0p1 ,bPe•w•A Yw /}16' I I I TM ZS raw. , n1•eb 741 k.f NkA• Yw +5-16' I w 21 wi.n.a aN+v rnae 1c EuraPAv1 a nbw,* .n t5--1e' i Tw 41 11wp aed Wb '%II—d1f aa•• a.•>MI•, 3-4' / i W IMPERIAL DR_I-V'E 1iK0 PoM i _-------------------ss-t:r-zv ----------i_------------t T MN - PROPOSED W SIDEWAIX ` RIM 164.4_ n 163.E NV 179.3 --____ 1 _ - ---- - - - - - - - - - - --� IW C H ANT .�: ° D► _ •' >> f TRIPE INES TO 1 EX CETEND NTER UEFT- TURN LANE L'ad r•6 0W-- •A I!IIiiIIl50% --RES is TM 3 AREA•• -1 F► _ EXISTING .CURE _ EXISTING PAVED AEA _'R0QFI.LNE PARKING LOADING AREA T gq arm •� - - i i a � Hca N im�MmbN —PROPERTY LINE -6 HYDRANT END TAPERATOF CURTAPER �/ —SETBACK LINE • GATE VALVE I I — - -�' — - - WATER UNE 0- UTILITY POLE W/GUY TC / SHELBURNE I - - - -a- - - -SEWER UNE O MANHOLE e I �I I RN tTs o I NV67(N) - - - -ST- - - -STORM UNE 1B CATCH BASIN 11N RIM 1]66 NV 'a67.5 GAS UNE SIGN I NV +6•.S Nv t1w.• (E —otMEc/rti/cATv— OVERHEAD ELEC/IEL/CAN Q LIGHT POLE I Nv 5 NV 1+66Q46.5 ((N Nv ts•.o )) I —uGhLEc/'It>_/uTv—UNDERGROUND ELEC/TEL/CAN O IRON PIPE FOUND - - �- WOOD FENCE • IRON ROD FOUND 8I I RE"TIC" Pao -N •- CHAIN LINK FENCE O MONUMENT FOUND I + N FRONT OF -y, DI oullU NG TREES AC 13 AP 5 Aa•d Pc cu.•aw•d4 Ace pbtmoW44 i�+C E Sr.�c4.4k EmrdE O..•n NonoY MaP1e 6 - '2 B M 2-2 1/2' BiB -� t E V t: 'Em4rd0 Ouwn' m Is frminuA p.1m1/.vlico P_ G_ A4M1 1 3/4 - 2' WB vaemorl GT 5 "wo bbcantM4 ~mb Men•yaev4t 2-2 1/x' OW , t R 1 1 1"6 m 24 Thep o Id, wwd Ou. A� A-4t- 3 - C B•B a $Ington G1r 7i 7•I �. s_ '7. � �1_1201111 F FEE i 121 IWO �IJ,,,% ��%i" 44% �% b...G�. X PROPOSED PARKING: JN SPACES PROPOSED SEATING: = SEATS LOT SIZE: 2•Q2 AC. LOT COVERAGE: EXISTING S.F. AC. 'A BUILDINGS: 9.550 .22 10.8 PAVEMENT: GREENSPAC_ 21,574 57.006 .49 1.31 24.5 64.7 TOTAL: 88.130 2.02 100% LOT COVERAGE: PROPOSED S.F. AC. 1: BUILDINGS: 5.530 .13 6.3 PAVEMENT: GREENSPAC_ 39,M7 43.153 .90 .99 44.7 49.0 TOTAL: 88,130 2.02 1D0% FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES SHELBURNE ROAD - 21.7% IMPERIAL DRIVE i B.B.S �y•i„ • OKE Omen /' '' ,�; BARONE /. — -- TBU REBAR CAP GRAPHIC SCALE N/F ARE TO a4 i •w/R�`�o�i.)—�r�2 iS...,.:..,•• i.�:�:�..cvfi. vii•��iii'6i .. i•ra�"�.�i�ti:��•�" ♦ 6�— '•�""" • _ - - Jam- l �/l _-����I i�J/•. -. ��� -_-_--•..i7 /r v//I'�i////I % I i.�::��-< A�!//I"•n� ../////I%/I I♦` `►��w %%ice %/• %i " %� %:iii�1�%"/� , t�/�j• >. / -ni W,�/J /� // !/ % i•WI /i//r'/i %i ♦i�/, ,/v//•/i / �• v�i � y� J� J %, i -/,�♦ 5.: :�i.�Ii. i_�._ii..:i..ii.1.t.,..ii.ii<a.•.J/ic%i.:.,_i/•%�%s/!>�ii•�n.2--i♦i_-/tal�:C: 1���� �9�' �I' � j/ r�7/��//////�i�%•wv '/////.'�!/'Y/1.��/�d fir. •/.Ji, ♦� ... _ -� -,�• llll III ���/,�. : / � �i► •4T A. o"00-01,1110",/ �2o!t%//. _/./.4i � ,a�ur�>+rr�����•-•�• � uA � {��^A,.ii ,:,,•.,: % � �%i e% /% i-/�%`••� j//! ,..I � // ��,�,% LANES TO g EXTEND CENTER I+ �L 4` • ' NO MIN � 64 V LL71�Lf J L _ M 0, I /�/. ��lty �� !r ��,.. � -�.� - - _J - - - - "'�A�---•-�a��.•.. � ��q.�„/fir y a ommo •=1330 SHELBURNE City of South Burtington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 15, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 19, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith,14 City Planner JW/mcp Encls City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 13, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision on the above referenced matter denied by the Planning Commission on February 13, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erel , J Weith, C ty Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 101 Walnut Street ffm Post Office Box 9151 Watertown Massachusetts 02272 617 9241770 FAX 617 924 2286 Memorandum To: Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. 69 College Street P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, VT 05402-1007 Date: March 13,1996 Project No.: 04867.12 Transportation Land Development Environmental Services From: John J. Kennedy, P.E. Re: Traffic Impact Review, j Restaurant, Shelburne Rd. at Imperial Dr., South Burlington, Vermont INTRODUCTION This Memorandum has been prepared to evaluate the traffic impact associated with the development of a 155 seat restaurant at 1330 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Shelburne (U.S. Route 7), Imperial Drive intersection on land which is currently occupied by a motel. The review conducted by VHB is a follow-up study for the site. Initial work has been completed by others and transmitted to the City as part of the on -going review process. Data and findings associated with that review, prepared by Mr. Robert Alexander for Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., have been used and supplemented as part of this Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. review. The VHB study has included data collection and analysis together with the evaluation of three access alternatives for the site. EXISTING CONDITIONS • ROADWAY GEOMETRICS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL The study intersection is at the transition point between a five lane, center lane for left turn condition north of Imperial Drive and a four lane section to the south approaching the signal controlled Holmes Road intersection. South of Holmes Road, Route 7 eventually becomes a two lane facility with paved shoulders. The intersection is a Tee type with Imperial Drive a two lane, two way, 30 foot wide local roadway approaching from the east. PC146 CAMSOFFICE\WINWORD\048671M.DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 The proposed site is located on the southeast corner of Shelburne Road and Imperial Drive. It is currently occupied by a 26 room motel with approximately 70 beds. Access is via a single 100 foot wide curb cut on Route 7. The cut actually provides two driving areas separated by a 25 foot area which includes the Motel sign. The northerly limit of the driveway is approximately 55 feet from the center of Imperial Drive.. With heavy flow in the Route 7 corridor, a major commercial arterial, the opportunity to exit from STOP sign controlled Imperial Drive is limited. Gaps in the traffic flow are created by traffic signals located at Holmes Road to the south and at the McIntosh Road, Fayette Drive intersection to the north. • TRAFFIC FLOW A manual turning movement count was conducted at the intersection on Tuesday, March 5,1996. The count covered the mid -day peak period between 12N and 2PM and the evening peak period between 4PM and 6PM. A summary of the peak period with associated back-up is provided as an attachment to this Memo. During the noon peak period, which occurred between 12:15 and 1:15, approach volume in the Shelburne Road corridor totaled 1991 vehicles. The movement from Imperial Drive totaled 40 vehicles, 90% of which turned right to Shelburne Road northbound. The movement to Imperial Drive also totaled 40 vehicles with over 75% entering from the north. During the evening peak hour, Shelburne Road approach volume totaled approximately 2400 vehicles. Approximately 55% was moving to the north and 45% to the south. Movement from Imperial Drive totaled 39 vehicles, 70% of which turned right to Shelburne Road northbound. Movement to Imperial Drive totaled 72 vehicles, 87% of which were left turns from Shelburne Road southbound. The counted evening peak hour volumes are considerably less than those identified in the January 2, 1996 Memorandum prepared under cover of Pinkham Engineering Company. In that Memo, the capacity analysis worksheets for the PM peak indicated a total Shelburne Road volume of 2990 vehicles with a 53%/47% southbound/northbound split. Demand on the Imperial Road approach totaled 62 vehicles, approximately 75% of which turned right to Shelburne Road. Entering demand to Imperial Drive totaled 111, 70% of which were left turns from Shelburne Road southbound. The comparative counts vary by approximately 20% in the Route 7 corridor. We have reviewed data from a VAOT permanent count station on Route 7 in Shelburne. That review has indicated that the variation between an average day in December and a day during the first week in March was 10% with the December traffic the higher of the two. The annual data also suggests that average weekday traffic in March is 95% of the average traffic for any day in the year while the December weekday traffic was equal to the average daily traffic. • CORRIDOR SPEEDS Average speeds in the corridor were measured during the mid -afternoon, off-peak period. In a series of runs, the 85th percentile speed, i.e. the speed at which the 85th fastest car was traveling out of 100, was between 38 and 40 miles per hour northbound and 40 to 42 miles per hour southbound. PC146C:\MS0FFICE\W NW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 • GAP STUDY Over the course of the turning movement counts, three fifteen minute periods included the determination of the number of gaps in the Shelburne Road traffic flow which were in excess of six (6) seconds, the amount of time which would be required to exit from Imperial Drive and safely enter the Route 7 traffic stream. The studies were conducted at 12:30, 3:00 and 4:45PM. As previously noted, gaps in the Route 7 traffic flow are created by traffic signals. Northbound, the closest signal is at Holmes Road. Southbound the closest signal is at McIntosh and Fayette. The signals will cause the general north and southbound flows to be concentrated with lesser flows occurring when Route 7 signals approaching Imperial Drive are red due to green signals on the side street or side street vehicles turning on red. Again, the period of concern is the evening peak hour. During the 15 minute period between 4:45 and 5:00, 20 gaps in excess of six (6) seconds were identified. Nine ranged between 6 and 8 seconds, one between 8 and 10 seconds, 3 ranged from 10 to 12 seconds, 2 were between 12 and 14 seconds and one was between 18 and 20 seconds. When gaps exceed 10 to 12 seconds, more than one vehicle can enter the traffic stream. During this 15 minute interval there appears to be capacity for approximately 30 vehicles to enter the Route 7 traffic stream as left turns from Imperial Drive. This equates to 120 vehicles per hour. These gap measurements correlate well with those which would be expected with the recent signal modifications in the Route 7 corridor. As part of the mitigation program for the Southland development located opposite Laurel Hill Road, signal operation in the corridor was modified and expanded to include all locations from Home Avenue in Burlington to Pine Haven Shores in South Burlington.. The time/space diagrams prepared for the Monday through Thursday evening peak hour, (the diagrams which represent a graphical interpretation of the relationship of the signals and green time allocated to movement in the Route 7 corridor) suggest that a gap in the general Route 7 flow of approximately 18 seconds eleven times each fifteen. These gaps would be reduced by turning movements from Holmes Road or the McIntosh/Fayette corridors. Those same time space diagrams for the Friday evening peak and Saturday mid -day peak suggest that 10 gaps of approximately 15 seconds each could be expected. The correlation between the mid -day gap studies and the anticipated gaps based on the time/space diagrams for the corridor is also good. The diagrams suggest a total of thirteen (13) gaps of up to 20 seconds in length during each of the periods could be expected. These would again be reduced due to turning movements from Holmes Road, the Fayette, McIntosh intersection and various land uses in between. The actual measurement between 3:00 and 3:15 indicated 24 gaps of greater than six seconds (three of which were greater than 16 seconds). During the noon peak, between 12:30 and 12:45 there were also 24 gaps in excess of six seconds„ three of which were greater than 16 seconds. The same 70 second signal cycle is in effect during both of these periods. In addition to actual measurements of side street capacity by the conduct of a gap study, a capacity analysis was also completed using procedures identified in the Highway Capacity Manual and it's associated software programs. Correlation was poor in both the mid -day and evening situations given the HCM/HCS process of examining vehicle arrival rates in a free flow condition rather than the existing condition with vehicle flow interrupted by traffic signal operation in close proximity to the study intersection. Data and results presented in the January Memo are correct in assessment of conditions based on this software, and in fact is supported by VHB analysis in the March condition PC146 C:\MSOFFICE\WIMNORD\04867IM.DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 using the same software. To compare results, the HCM method identified only 25 available left turn exit gaps during the evening peak period based on the March counts. The gap study for a fifteen minute period during this peak hour identified over 20 left turn exit gaps which could be equated to in excess of 80 gaps in an hour. Given this difference and with the knowledge of the computational procedure and methodology in the software, the results of the HCM/HCS calculation are questionable in that the software does not recognize the effect of signal induced gaps. DEVELOPMENT CONDITION • SITE PLAN The existing motel structure will be demolished and replaced with a 5,530 square foot free standing restaurant on the 2 acre parcel. The site plan indicates total restaurant seating for 155. Parking for 106 vehicles is proposed. The parking field is generally east of the building given the shape of the lot which provides approximately 180 feet of frontage on the Route 7 corridor and 500 feet on Imperial Drive. Three potential access plans have been identified. Alternate A, provides a full access curb cut on Shelburne Road with no access provided to Imperial Drive. The 36 foot driveway (at the property line) provides one entering and two exiting lanes. Alternate B, which was previously considered by the Planning Board in a somewhat different version, provides for access from both Route 7 and Imperial Drive. In this instance, the 24 foot wide drive from Route 7 provides access only to the site. All exits would be required to use Imperial Drive, which could also be used by entering vehicles. Alternate C would provide full access curb cuts from both Route 7 and Imperial Drive. • SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Construction on the site will lead to an increase in traffic volumes entering the intersection and passing through the corridor. The January 2nd Memo which described impacts accurately described the site's trip generation characteristics, except that the current plan now provides for 155 seats, down from the original 164 seats. Applying Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation data from the 5th Edition Update dated February,1995, for Land Use Code 831, High Quality Restaurant, suggests that the site will generate 2.86 vehicle trips per seat on an average weekday. This is equivalent to a total of 444 vehicles trips, one-half of which would be entering and one-half exiting. The rate on a Saturday is slightly lower with each seat generating an average of 2.81 trips. This is equivalent to 436 vehicle trips. On a Sunday, the rate 2.15 trips per seat per day, resulting in a total generation of 334 trips. The critical concern is not the total daily generation of traffic but that which occurs during the evening peak hour. Applying the ITE fitted curve equation for this land use to the number of seats proposed yields a total evening peak hour generation of 44 trips. These would be split with 22 entering and 22 exiting. Not all of these trips would necessarily be new to the Shelburne Road traffic stream. Some would be redirected or passby trips given the high level of traffic demand currently in the corridor and some would be a replacement of trips associated with the existing motel. PC146 CAMS0FFICE\WINW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 The evening peak hour traffic count suggested that 30 percent of the vehicles exiting from Imperial Drive had a destination to the south but only 10% approached Imperial Drive from the south. Movement in the Shelburne Road corridor is generally balanced although the northbound movement is higher, and therefore passby trips associated with the site would tend to be more of the right turn in, right turn out variety. With these factors, we concur with the findings of the earlier study which identified a site traffic distribution of approximately 75% north and 25% south. When these factors are applied to the generated evening peak hour trips, the site will see six (6) left turn and 16 right turn exits to Route 7, with 16 left turn and six (6) right turn entrances from Route 7. Because these generation rates are relatively low when compared to overall traffic in the corridor, expansion of the impact review area to adjacent intersections has not been completed. The actual additional traffic at these other sites would actually be less than the identified site related trips given the fact that some portion of the trips are already in the traffic stream (from 10 to 25%) and that trips associated with the current motel use would be removed from the traffic stream. (With full occupancy of the sites 26 rooms, ITE estimates the site would generate 16 trips, or one-third of the total generated by the new use.) The distribution of trips to the Route 7 corridor would vary dependent on the selected access alternative. In Alternate A access to and from Route 7 only, all movements would take place from the single access point centered 160 feet from the Imperial Drive intersection. Should the Route 7 access point allow entering vehicles only in conjunction with exits and entrances on Imperial Drive, (Alternate B), all exiting trips would be added to the Imperial Drive traffic stream together with a portion of the entering movement from southbound Route 7. With fullaccess drives from both corridors provided (Alternate C), it is anticipated that all vehicles entering from or exiting to the south would use the Route 7 access. In this instance, the majority of vehicles entering from the north would use the Route 7 access. However, the majority of vehicles exiting from the site to the north would be expected to use Imperial Drive given the layout of the parking field. • TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - BUILD CONDITION The movement from the site will use available gaps in the general Shelburne Road traffic flow as does the existing movement from Imperial Drive. As previously described, these gaps are created by traffic signals north and south of the site and therefore the standard analysis program as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual is not applicable. Actual measurements completed as part of the gap study suggested a potential evening peak hour approach capacity of over 80 left turns per hour given signal induced gaps versus an HCS calculated left turn capacity of 25 vehicles per hour. The Shelburne Road corridor is subject to significant ranges of variations in peak hour demand as identified in the differences in traffic counts conducted in December and in March. These variations become even more pronounced when the highest hours of corridor use over the course of a year are identified. Past work in the corridor has suggested that the 30th highest hour of corridor use in the vicinity of the site totals approximately 3300 vehicles, an increase of 900 vehicles or 35% over the March count. As development in the corridor increases, the five year projection on this 30th highest hour increase by approximately 10% to approximately 3600 vehicles per hour. The previous findings using December count data identified Level of Service F operation with a calculated average delay in excess of 1000 seconds for vehicles exiting from Imperial Drive. These calculations are based on derived vehicle arrival rates on the Route 7 corridor, which when evaluated using a Route 7 conflicting flow of almost 3000 vehicles generates an average gap in the traffic stream PC146 C:\MSOFFICE\ W1 NWORD \ 048671 M. DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 of slightly over one (1) second. As previously described, applying this same methodology to the existing condition March counts, results in an average Imperial Drive delay of 108 seconds (The average left turn delay and right turn delays are not calculated separately as there is only a single lane approach.) A potential capacity for Imperial Drive left turns of 25 vehicles was identified with a capacity to handle over 640 right turn vehicles also noted. With left and right turn sharing the same lane, the Imperial Drive approach capacity has been identified as 73. The Imperial Drive Level of Service was also classified as "F". As seasonal traffic fluctuations occur in conjunction with increased vehicle demand in the Route 7 corridor, the HCS model suggests that adequate gaps for entering the Route 7 traffic stream will be few and far between as evidenced by results in the January study. These results do not take into account the continued presence of traffic signal control at adjacent intersections however. In fact, as traffic continues to grow in the corridor, and on the side street approaches to the signalized intersections, we believe that the traffic flow in the Route 7 corridor will become more concentrated in platoons than it is today and that there will be continued acceptable gaps for traffic to enter from uncontrolled side streets and driveways. The existing signal system operates on a fixed background cycle which varies by time -of -day and day -of -week. The background cycle ensures that signals are green on Route 7 during preset periods as a means to handle high traffic flows with few stops. As part of this program, the side streets are actuated with signals turning green for side street vehicles to exit at preset times, but only if there is demand on that side street approach. Once the signals turn green for a side street approach or a left turn phase from Route 7, that phase is allowed to extend to a preset maximum if vehicle demand on the approach continues. If the demand is not enough to use all of the time allotted for the movement, signals will then automatically return to the Route 7 green phase. At the current time, demand at the Fayette, McIntosh intersection, including the left turn from Route 7 to Fayette is below the demand capacity and therefore signals are normally returning to the Route 7 corridor north and south through movement early. This has the impact of increasing the amount of time signals are green for the Route 7 flow which tends to lower the number of gaps which would otherwise be available to exit from uncontrolled intersections and driveways. Therefore, as traffic increases from the controlled side streets and left turn movements, more concentrated flow can be expected in the Route 7 corridor. This concentration will not necessarily lead to more or longer gaps. There will be an increase in movement from the controlled side streets into the Route 7 corridor which will balance the possible gains due to the concentrated flows. This side street demand will however generally be much less concentrated and will generally occupy only one of the two lanes available within the corridor. Given these findings with respect to existing gaps and system operation versus the HCS software applications, we would suggest that any introduction of traffic to Imperial Drive from the site be accompanied with a capacity improvement which will allow the best use of existing and future gaps in the traffic stream. This statement is not intended to circumvent the capacity analysis process but to recognize the true operation of the corridor and fully mitigate any traffic impact of the project with respect to the optimum use of available gaps. Should Alternate A be approved, allowing for full access to Route 7 with no curb cut provided on Imperial Drive, no work will be required on Imperial Drive as a result of this project. Gaps in the Route 7 traffic stream would be simultaneously utilized by both the driveway and Imperial Drive with little or no loss in the number or length of the gaps when compared with existing conditions. Note that this will not provide relief for right turn vehicles from Imperial Drive which will continue to queue behind vehicles waiting to complete a left turn maneuver. PC146 CAM50FFICE\WINW0RD\048671M.D0C Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 In Alternate B, with full access via Imperial Drive and entrances via Route 7, the mitigation should address the added traffic on Imperial Drive. The introduction of any left turn movement will further obstruct exits to the right in addition to requiring more time for left turn movement. In this instance, Imperial Drive should be widened to create a two lane approach allowing multiple vehicle use of the same 7 second gap. The allowance of multiple use of the gap will more than mitigate the addition of vehicles to the corridor and generally result in a lower average delay to all existing vehicles in the Imperial Drive corridor. In Alternate C, allowing full access to both corridors, the mitigation as developed for Alternate B should be considered. Again, the introduction of any vehicles to the Imperial Drive corridor will tend to use existing gaps, increasing delay to existing Imperial Drive users. Note that in terms of capacity improvements, the third alternative provides the greatest level of improvement as the existing one lane entrance to the corridor, now serving approximately 40 peak hour vehicles, would be expanded to four lanes serving 62 vehicles. Additional HCS analysis of the three alternatives has been completed for comparative purposes only. The analysis sheets are attached. Under existing conditions, HCS identified a single lane approach capacity of either 25 left turns or 643 right turns on Imperial Drive. Given the existing turning percentages of left and right movement from the approach, a single lane approach volume of 73 vehicles per hour was calculated with an average delay per vehicle of 108 seconds. Because the approach is a single lane, no calculation of left turn or right turn vehicle delay is provided. The defined operation for all vehicles on the approach was Level of Service F. With the widening of Imperial Drive, HCS estimates an overall approach capacity increase to,allow up to 25 left turns and a right turn capacity of 640 vehicles. According to the program, the right turn operation will experience operation at Level of Service B with an average delay of approximately 6 seconds even with the added development traffic. Delays associated with left turn movement increase however. As noted, the existing left turn delay is not individually calculated as the approach is a single lane. In alternatives B and C the average vehicle delay remains at 108 seconds with the widening, a delay level comparable with the existing condition. In order for any mitigation which improves right turn access be successful, the number of vehicles queued waiting to make a left turn must be recognized and the length of the turn lane thereby developed. The HCS program data has been applied to queuing projections in the Highway Capacity Manual. The worst case queue occurs in Alternate B with a defined 95th percentile queue of 1.5 vehicles. Any action regarding the construction of the turn lane in any Alternate should develop a lane which has the capacity to handle two (2) vehicles. RECOMMENDATIONS Given the above evaluation, our recommendation would be based on an access alternative rather than on defining that alternative. We understand that the City would prefer no movement to or from the site via Imperial Drive and that the Vermont Agency of Transportation would like to see a use of the Route 7 corridor limited. Based on these varying goals we would propose a project mitigation to involve the widening of Imperial Drive should a curb cut be added to that corridor. Without access to Imperial Drive, the construction of a two lane approach from the site directly to Route 7 would provide adequate mitigation. PCI46 C:\MSOFFICE\WWWORD\048671M.DOC Date: March 7,1996 Project No.: 99901.12 With access Imperial Drive, the widening at Route 7 should allow for a 23 foot wide approach consisting of an 11 foot left turn lane and a 12 foot right turn lane. The departure lane should be maintained at it's current 15 foot width, resulting in a widening of eight (8) feet. To allow for proper access into the lane and avoid a taper beginning in a driveway, it is suggested that the turn lane commence in it's full width at a driveway approximately 125 feet east of the Route 7 corridor. Without access to Imperial Drive, the exiting site drive should be two lanes in width for a distance of approximately 40 feet. PC146 CAMSOFHCE\WINWORD\04867IM.DOC VANASSE HAN01 BRUSTLIM. INC, Site Code : VERMONT N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.(U.S.RT.7) E-W Street: IMPERIAL DR.,BURLING.,UT. Weather : OVERCAST,COOL Ti me From North Begin RT THRO LT ------------------------------------- 12:00 Pa :} 184 ? 16 12:=U 0 219 n :+ HE ?OTAL 0 848 36 1:00 P" 0 230 3 1:15 0 206 9 1:1!0 0 194 4 :4w !1 a11 . l 7 HR T,[FAL 0 851 IT 23 Movements by: Primary -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Frcm East From South From 4est RT TuP.0 L? R? THRL! LT RT THRU LT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 0 1 7 219 ! 0 0 i) 11 0 0 4 241 f: 0 0 0 14 0 1 0 245 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 39 0 2 11 943 0 0 0 0 6 tl 3 5 231 u 0 tl 0 5 0 1 0 227 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 221 0 0 0 0 24 0 6 9 903 i) 0 0 0 'v 1699 �5' 61% 0 8 i 846 0 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM PAGE: 1 FILE: BURL-9T2 DATE: 3105/96 ---------------- Vehicle Total ---------------- 428 y45. 484 472 1619 484 448 425 459 1916 0 0 0 369 DIRECTiJif START PEAK HR ........ V0LUMES ........ .... PERCENTS ... FROM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PEAS:: HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total RigM Thru Left Nilrth 94 iJ� n 97J East 12:uc) PM 0.68 J9 0 i 41 95 0 5 Sout4 12:1� PM 0.99 9 961 n 9/0 1 99 0 west 12:15 Pl, 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eritire Intersection I 8q4 11 7-1 East 0.67 36 0 4 40 90 0 1t} S a U 1 h 0.3= 9 961 0 97: 1 99 0 ##§E dHm mGem.IR. Si -'le Code: RR»I PAGE; ! v§alee 9EmgEQ.(U,3.r2) FILE;ekg2 e■ area I9@!£ ode RRige 2. . w2ir ; QeSg J3L Movements by: @E2#ry N«; &gZ% -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ra RR tRB From Gs From South From West Vehicle &/n 9 Iag J Q !m) 2 R 2& J 2 ImB L 2Iz --- -----------------------------------------------------.---------- .�, w . , 9 ) a 2 R5 a & 0 a 9 o n @ 0 9 a a & 2P& a g a a a 0 9 2 01 0 ) 9 25 2@! a 2 0 a a : n R a c : e a 4 IS± 3 0 § a ) g ( 0 a § a B m q o . n . 9 o 0 @ 0 0 n § 2 2 y ) a ) a § 0 § a 0 0 0 2 u 2 ) 2 a 9 0 a § O 0 i a 0 a b e 9 A J ) 9 § a E § 0 a § S g aIk v # e a 0 a 9 q a 0 a a £ -------------------------------------------------------------------- »y TOTAL a g & a § c § g § & ! aI3 PEAK PERIOD aR22 FOR THE PERIOD: SRaa- ay R eRe! �Iq ©` 3#! P HR .. .. VEag .... .. K2 S .. EROM PEAK «E Ek2§ Q #! 5G L§t Total t§r 2q @R -------------------------------------------------- »a§ 3:2 R G# ) # ) p a 29 a ;et 2 G5 R G 00 0 ) & § & 2 ( edebtieaE: .� a a as K 9 & e 5 « § J § a . JAfASSE HANGEN BRUSTLI?�, l fL. Site Code : 9EM- NT H-S Str3et: SHEL NE RD.iU.'S.RT.71 E-W Street: IMPERIAL sR..BURLING..VT. Weather ta'dV�LmST.CiIOi Sum of the %*unary and Secondary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time From Morth Crom East From South From best cegin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12:00 PM 0 19i d 9 0 1 7 229 0 0 Ij {} 12:15 0 229 16 11 0 0 4 255 0 0 0 0 12:3,0 0 2�2 5 14 0 1 U 257 ,s (1 ;1 0 12:45 0 235 7 5 0 0 0 249 0 it 0 0 FIR TOTAL 0 887 36 39 0 2 11 990 0 0 0 0 1:00 PM 0 243 3 6 it 3 5 251 0 0 Ol 0 1: i5 0 216 9 5 0 1 0 232 0 0 0 0 t tl 205 4 7 0 2 :i 231 U 0 U 0 1:45 0 235 6 it 0 4 233 0 is 0 it SR TOTAL 0 899 2' 24 4 b 9 947 ; 0 0 0 Dyt Y:' Tf TA' L 0 1786 59 ! 6, 0 8 20 7 A 197 J \ :• c� r? PEAK PE-:IGD AAALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 12:00 PM - 2:OA PM JIr:ECTI? START PEAK HR ........ VOLUMES I....... ... PERCENTS .,. =sO" PEAK H OU'R. FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru L_._ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N:rth 12:15 P?, 0.99 0 939 31 970 0 97 1200 PM 0.62 a9 0 2 41 '�5 U 5 nth 12:15 PM 0.99 9 1012 0 1021 1 99 0 4St. 12:15 PM 11).00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire I-tU SEC tiOn v 1 :i5 PM 0.99 0 939 71 970 0 97 _act 0.67 36 0 4 41 90 0 10 0.99 9 1i?12 it 1021 1 99 0 PACE: 1 FILE: BURL-VT2 DATE: 3/05l96 ---------------- Vehicle Total ---------------- 445 515 509 496 1965 5i1 463 449 485 1908 3873 VANASSE HANSEN BRUSTLIN, INC. � to code : VEFMuNT F`ASE, ? 4-5 Street: SHELBURME U. ;J.'3.RT.7) Ff' E. BURL-rT� tin. ,lJ(1' ':Y:7.,YT. +feather UYE^F!.i, Ju m (1� t�L� ?�'1 Aiary d�iL =conear'� ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y.TE CPf r.:?tftlL f.,:: TDIR !Ht _RICE .t, u n' T ft E,;'7 nN '. T:. R. T --' :II'iL:;fMIEz' Fi;U" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '�;.�k. :.:u!'P 'hl� i;l �.y�l ;t�r� !_e.:F ;.'i: ^• � � :ram _c. _ sppa 75 Ul- $eo. ....... ..:ne, rr `i .JLt ?y A HB_: .JF'l....V.i`•,�_ :i , 1 __...... .... .... ._...... , 1 , , - 3,te��V ON I~S Steet: SHELBURN[ RD.(8T.7> E-W Street� lNPERlAL OR.,9UHL0G..VT, Wea�her / WET.COLD �2 From North 9eqin KT THRU LT ------------------------------------- 4�O0 YM V B1 1\ 222 �3 0 266 9 TAT O 906 41 5��O PH V 244 \8 5,15 V 267 13 5:30 2418 23 5:45 V 247 6 H8 TOTAL O 976 60 VANASSE HAN8EN 8RUST IN~ lNC. PAGE: l FTLE: BURL-VT1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movements by: Primary DATE. 3/05K96 FromEast From South -romNe5t Vehicle RT TPIR U LT 8T THRU IT RT TH0U IT otal _________________________________________________ 2 V J 3 264 V 0 V V 74 9 � 2 9 V 1 3 253 V 0 V V 5V1 7 V l 4 293 V V V V 580 27 O 7 13 1080 A V V O 207� 7 V 4 2 387 V V V O 662 6 V i 1 319 0 V V V 607 6 0 6 2 279 V V V 0 53174 8 V V 3 248 V V V V 5�2 27 0 11 8 i233 O 0 V 0 2315 ___--________-_—____________________-_______________________-_-______ 8AY TOTAL 0 i8841 101 54 V Is 21 2313 O A O O 4389 DlRECTlON START PEAK HR ....... VOLUMES ......., .... PERC[N7S ... FRDU _____________________________________________________________________________ PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru 'Left Total 0ght Thnu Left North 4:45 PM 0.94 V 995 63 1058 V 94 6 East 4.15 PM 0.91 32 0 8 40 80 0 20 South 4�45 PM 0.93 9 1278 V 1287 Y9 V NesT 4:45 PM O.OV 0 0 V 0 0 � V Entire lntersectioo North 4:45 Ph O.94 V 935 63 1O58 V 94 6 East V.79 26 38 68 V 32 South 0.87 9 l278 V 1287 1 Y9 V West O.O V V V V V 0. 0 ^ VANASSE HPNGEN BRUS:LIN.. INC. Site Code : VERMONT PATE: I N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.(RT.7) FILE: BURL-VTI E-N Street: IMPERIAL DR.,BURLIN6.,VT. Weather : NET,COLD `!ovements-. by: Secondary DATE: 3/05196 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Time From North From East from South From WESt `JeMcIe r' 'H U LTTHRUTTHBe.n RT RU Tota! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4:00 PM : 3 0 0 is is 7 0 i, 0 0 15 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t, 0 12 . n i} 6 is is 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 14 a,; (1 5 0 1 i} i) ,7 11 0 i> , 0 1, HR TOTAL 0 28 0 1 0 1 28 0 0 0 58 J:417 PM U 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 J. i 5 0 7 0 0 {► 0 0 9 0 0 0 ii 16 5:30 is 4 fI it is it 0 5 0 0 0 i} 9 5:45 0 6 0 0 v 0 is 5 00 0 0 11 HR TOTAL 0 20 0 U 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 t 44 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DAY TOTAL 0 43 0 1 0 0 1 52 0 0 0 0 102 fEr{F. PERIOD ir',!A l,n I3 FOR THEC PERIOD: 4:V Fy - b:JL'� DI E%TIOti START PEAk HR ........ VOLUMES. ........ .... PERCENTS ... -RO! PEAV HOUR FACTOR Rioht Thai Left Total RigR Thru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nortb.. 4:00 Ph 0.73 0 28 :j 28 0 y10o 0 -ast 4:00 PM 0.25 1 0 0 1 x10U 0 0 Snil ., 4:: } PM 0.75 I J!2 0 ?J ) 9 0 Entire Intersection! Nort`, 4 u'6 FM 0.16 li 28 t} Zc 0 ;:100 U cast 0 i) i x 00 0 0 So-u.t 0.66 1 i:3 0 29 97 i, West U. Ui} 1. fi is ;S 0 0 3 ##§& HANG& ae%m,INC. 5@Code :Kegl v;ar#e SHLRmER2Q2? eW arae IMPERIAL muBag&e 3. Weather :«\COLD ------------------- 2a Be§in �Q A §& 4.45 e ISR 5a m 5:ls 57 ::45 a Iek From North RT I IRu 2 -------- ) !9 R a 26 2 0 2§ 2 a 2! 9 9 934 4! 0 !R g 0 !a E a 22 23 9 257) & a 9& k &■ of be Primary and §£e ra«y From East From South r m& 2 9 m& 2 --------------------- 2 2! a 9 0 2 3 22 a 9 0 ! 4 26 9 § a ! ■ 39 e @ 0 7 14 j!g a 7 0 4 ! 92 a & 0 ! ! ;8 0 ! a & 2 2@ o § a ; 3; S g a R B 137 u NR; ! ES:kK92 lee: &eZ# ----------------- RR 4a vehicle Q IRu J Total ---------------- a # & 49 0 0 a S! t ) 0 27 0 0 0 2132 § 0 0 67 0 ) 0 &2 0 u 0 g! 0 0 0 52 o C. 0 227 ------------------------------------------------------------------ p* SERE 9 !Qo D! S a 2 2 2k5 0 . a v qa R# PEES akSS FOR THE PERIOD: §y m- eg R gg21 PEAR F&<m .....VOLUMES .... ..rERCES FQM PEAK FACTOR Right Right Thru Left T'I R -------------------------------------------------- ER§ A@ 9 0.9 u PEA E 22 0 946 G. .§ q G 9")2 a 2 t g e 2 Slew ,45 9 Eg 9 g2 § #a A« 9 ty ) MP G e 0 a 0 Entire btreRon, kR§ A@ R a9 i eJ £ W9 a 94 & East 0,21 g ' E 5 g e 2 22§ GR 7 2J 9 22 . i , w§ G y a § § a ) J » VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, INC. Site Code : 'VERMONT N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD. iRT./ E-W Street: IMPERIAL R.,BURLINB.,VT. Weather WET,GOLD bum of the Primary and Secondary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PAGE: 1 PILE: BURL-VT1 DATE: 3/05196 DIRECTION START PEAK HR .,...... VOLUME'S ........ .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Lett ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yorth 4:45 PM 0.94 G 10i4 63 1071 094 6 East 4:15 PM 0193 30 0 8 41 80 0 20 South 4:45 PM 0.84 9 1308 0 13111 1 99 0 .West 4:45 PM 0.00 0 0 U 1 U 0 D Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.94 0 1014 63 1077 0 94 6 East 0.81 21 iti 12 4 69 0 31 South 0.84 9 1308 0 1317 1 99 0 West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; Iz-iN1:::i_.Ei LiF:i•,IET. I'tC: n t 1 fR-I» . 7 I 1 1 i 1• n I i I n n n u n n n n n n F ::7 i 1 ! 1 I v a, 1 1 v v u• n u n, u i �' I 0 _i.014 ; 67!; ;.,n, nn n.nnnn T. ................................... _.. _........... .... _•_ __• 1 ....... 4:� r :I I)l__ _.................... :f• Ff 4 10{ Jf"•:!.-. . ..._...._ ... ....... a. I It:3 1 i i 1 1 i I i I i 1 VANASSE HANSEN RRUSTLIN. INC Site Code . LEFT TURN GAP RAGE: 1 N-S Street: SHELBURNE RD.;U.S.RT.7} RILE: BURL-'VT5 E-N Street: iNPERIAL DR..3uRLING..VT. Weather DIR.I=SM*7=NB Sum of the directions Dir 1 and Dir 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE: 3i0`196 TIME TOTAL T-TA! Gr'4PS (in seconds) Avg BEGi'1 APS COUNTED 4-6 6-8 3-10 1v-12 12-14 i4-i6 16-18 18-20 20-22 .72-24 24-26 26-28 28-::0 i 30 Gap ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1,::30 34 48'? J 9 6 l 2 �� I 8 0 U 0 0 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DA Tu+TAL 34 489 J 9 3 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 B S to Code: LEF" ' i�P+ AF PAR: 1 -5 Street: 5liElBdB?E RC. L.S.iiT.i? FILE: BURL-VT4 E-W Street: IMPERIAL CB..c1BLINv.+VT. i8iL1Br Sum o** the directions Li.' I and LIT 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 M, �. ----------------------------------------------- DATE: 7U0506 Ti"?E TOTAL TOTAL riP: ;;r. szconds Ava BEGIN GAPS ;.0 .,TC .' Y-b b-d a -iv .:!-li l,'Ia :7'I5 16-I8 1E-2:+ --- LL- v 26-22 GO -.tip> 30 Ga! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ,:00 PM 1 i �lr 1 Z. 5 6 6 i 3 2 !j ! y ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- fitly uTAL 11 47! 5 6 i 3 2 01 0l! f 0 �/ MANA5EE HANSEN BRUSTLIN. TNC. Site Code : LEFT TURN GAP PAGE: 1 A-S Street: SHELBURNE RD. (U.S.RT.?; FILE: BURL-UTJ E-W S1.- IMPERIAL DR.,9URLINn.,VT. Weather . DIR. =SB.2=NB Sum of the directions Di, 1 and Dir _ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 rn,av-r3 S DATE: 3/05/96 'IME TOTAL TIOTAL S"IFF iii 5eLGna5; Avg *__zzd tr S COUNTE t-4 a-' ;-:� g-1? 10-1�n ' 1-t.� 14-.h b-i`l 2-2-21 28- 25-2? 2-.:0 30 Gay y CC ?: 45 26 Jt 1 2 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------- . J 0 0 U C it 0 S� 7 T`-41 `EE� C7/C i;mIAY !:9L D J/J Z 9 j J 2 {: 11 • v �, ., 0 0 0 7 HGT - I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ..r,ex.<wr....,ew,t.w.w.,r.�.x:.++:.w.f.►.:.w:....■a*x.xw:r..,e. r,�:.. File Name ................ IMP96BSE.HCO Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 Other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT - 1MP96BSE Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I OI ---- 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- OI 0> ---- ---- 1< 0 Stop/Yield I NI NI I Volumes I 1308 91 63 1014 I I 12 0 27 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 0 SU/RV's (%) I 0 01 0 0 I I 0 0 0 CV's (moo) I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 0 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.1 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) .. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 H G S _ Z- f}f*}4fff#f YfffffYY*Y##**#*#f**f#*#ff##***ffffffY##ff*###fffff*f WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 643 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 643 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.96 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1317 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 337 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2390 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 44 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 35 Prob. of Queue -free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2390 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 ww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap Sharedcap Avg.Total Delay Cic�.�. Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App Q -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ --------------- " — — - — WB L 13 25 > > > 73 108.1 F 108.1 0 WB R 28 643 > > > SB L 67 337 13.3 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 2.3 N cs - ,3 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 x:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx File Name ................ IMP96AL2.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT W/ALT.2 - 1MP96AL2 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- ---- I ---- 0 2< OI 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI I Volumes I 1308 91 65 1028 I I 18 43 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 SU/RV's (%)I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 CV's ( o) 1 2 21 2 2 I I 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 I -a L S - `} Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB conflicting Flows: (vph) 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 643 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 643 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1317 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 337 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2406 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation BCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 xf wf xxfff xffxfffffffffxxxffxxxxffffffffxxf xffffffffff fxxffffxfxf H GS Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay �)S Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By ADD C� v Q ii4/ -------- ------ ------ ------ ------------ --------------- - — WB L 19 25 421.6 F �' S 108.1 WB R 45 643 6.0 B SS L 69 337 13.4 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 3.2 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 «xxxxxx«xxxxxxxxxx«x«««««xxx««x««««x««««x««««x«xx««««««««x«««««« File Name ................ IMP96AL3.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 Other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT W/ALT.3 - 1MP96AL3 Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection I Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I ---- OI 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI Volumes I 1310 91 63 1030 I I 12 41 PHF 1 .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 1 I 0 0 SU/RV's (moo) I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 CV's M I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.0211.02 1.02 I 11.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 1-1Lr-'4 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 x xxx,rxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hr L S - V WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 660 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 641 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 641 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.93 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1319 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 336 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 336 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.80 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2408 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 31 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.80 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.80 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.80 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 25 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 xx#xx##x#xxx####xxxx##x##a####x##xxxxxx##xx###xxxxxx#x###xx#x### Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By ADD -------- ------ ------ ------------------ --------------- - - - - WB L 13 25 278.9 F 108.1 Q WB R 43 641 6.0 B SB L 67 336 13.4 C 0.8 Intersection Delay = 2.8 HLS-- 9 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:xxxx:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx !-t C. S — l %a File Name ................ IMP96AL1.HC0 Streets: (N-S) US Route 7 (E-W) Imperial Drive Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst ................... Ravi Date of Analysis.......... 3/8/96 Other Information......... 1996 BASE COUNT AT UNO DR. W/ALT.1 - IMP96ALl Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I westbound I L T RI L T RI L T RI L T R I---- No. Lanes I ---- 0 2< ---- I ---- OI 1 ---- ---- 2 I ---- OI ---- ---- 0 0 I ---- ---- OI 1 ---- 0 1 Stop/Yield I NI NI volumes I 1317 61 16 1024 I I 6 16 PHF I .95 .95I .95 .95 I I .95 .95 Grade I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 MC's M I 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 SU/RV's MI 0 OI 0 0 I I 0 0 Cv's M I 2 21 2 2 I I 1 1 PCE's I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.02 1.02I1.02 1.02 I I1.01 1.01 Adjustment Factors vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HCS -- 11 WorkSheet for Twsc Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 662 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 640 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 640 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1323 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 334 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 334 Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 2360 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 33 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 31 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation BCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 #xxx###xxxxxx#x##xxxxxxxxx:xxx###xx#xxxxxx###xxxxxxxxx##xxxxx##x Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay cis %• Movement v(pcph) -------- ------ Cm(pcph) ------ Csh(pcph) Delay LOS ------ ------------ ------ By ADD --------- — — — — WB L 6 31 143.5 F 108.1 O WB R 17 640 5.8 B SB L 17 334 11.4 C 0.2 Intersection Delay = 1.3 Preliminary Memo - Planning March 19, 1996 agenda items February 26, 1996 Page 2 --- square footage to be used for storage. --- provide the number of handicapped spaces required by Table 26- 1 of the zoning regulations. --- provide north arrow. --- indicate property's street address. --- show locations of existing and proposed exterior lights (submit details (cut -sheets) for all new exterior light fixtures). --- show screened dumpster locations, if any. --- provide a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Other: --- site plan application incorrectly states that Mickey Wiles is the owner of record of this property. The correct owner of record is Technology Park Associates. The application should be corrected. --- indicate whether there will be any research done at this location. GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD - RESTAURANT - SITE PLAN --- the plan should show a minimum of four (4) street trees along the Shelburne Road frontage. --- the plan should indicate the type of screening to be used around the dumpster storage area. --- staff still recommends that a curb -cut be provided on Imperial Drive and that the Shelburne Road curb -cut only be ingress. Imperial Drive should be widened to include northbound right - turn and left -turn lanes. However, it is not clear to staff whether the Commission will support this recommendation. --- the Shelburne Road driveway is proposed to be 38 feet in width. Section 26.103(b) of the zoning regulations limits the width of a commercial driveway to 36 feet. Staff recommends that the driveway be reduced to 36 feet in width. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner Re: March 12, 1996 Agenda Items Date: March 8, 1996 1) OTHER BUSINESS a) Public Hearings warning error: There are 3 items on Tuesday's agenda which were supposed to be warned public hearings (i.e., National Gardening, Meadowbrook Condos, and Centennial Place). Unfortunately, staff did not get the warnings in the paper. I have gone ahead and warned the public hearings for March 26. I have listed these items as "discussions" on Tuesday's agenda so that the applications can be discussed in detail, and therefore, hopefully be relatively short on the 26th. The Comprehensive Plan public hearing is also scheduled for the 26th. Sorry for the screw up, especially since I can't blame it on Ray, Marie or Dick. b) Uno's Pizzeria Findings of Fact and Decision: Enclosed for your review is a proposed Findings Of Fact and Decision (FOF) for the Uno's Pizzeria denial. If the FOF is satisfactory, the Commission should authorize Bill Burgess to sign it at Tuesday's meeting. 3) WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. - EXPAND OFFICE BUILDING - DISCUSSION This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) construction of a 36,000 square foot general office/medical office building, 2) construction of a 12,432 square foot general office building, and 3) amending a previously approved site plan to increase coverage by reducing the lot size and adding an access to Joy Drive. The amendment consists of: 1) increasing the size of the 36,000 square foot building to 41,000 square feet, 2) eliminating the medical office use so the entire building will be general office, and 3) reducing the size of the 12,432 square foot general office building to 11,400 square feet. The final plat was approved on 5/9/95 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 60 Farrell Street lies within the C2 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the north by the Olympiad fitness City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 4, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since.eely, R Zymot J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 19, 1996 Agenda Items Date: February 29, 1996 L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD There exists a street light within the conservation zone which will also have to be moved. Plans should show where it will be relocated. MARTIN SUBDIVISION - SWIFT/SPEAR STREET 1. The subdivision should include a 30'x 30' triangle at the intersection of Swift and Spear Street to allow for future street improvements especially a sidewalk. The corner as it now exists is almost at the edge of the pavement. 2. A 24 inch water main exists along the south side of Swift Street. It should be shown. BEN & JERRY'S - DIGITAL PLANT - KIMBALL AVENUE Plans should show water and sewer services and include a north arrow. PIZZERIA UNO Revised plan dated 12/11/95 prepared by Pinkham Engineering is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for March 19, 1996 Agenda Date: February 27, 1996 I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Subdivision Plan/Martin Dated 2/15/96 Spear Street Project No. 96018 Acceptable 2. L&M Park (Plan A) Dated 2/9/96 Fayette Road Project No. 7221 Acceptable 3. L&M Park (Plan B) Dated 2/9/96 Fayette Road Project No. 7221 Acceptable 4. Ben & Jerry's Dated 2/16/96 Kimball Avenue Acceptable, except adequate water and hydrant plans are required. 5. Pizzeria Uno Dated 2/23/96 1330 Shelburne Road Project No. 7226 Acceptable MOTION OF APPROVAL GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD (2) I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Gail Wyand & Mary Grunvald for a project consisting of: 1) razing a 26 unit motel building, and 2) constructing a 5,530 square foot standard restaurant with6�/� seats, 1330 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Pizzeria Uno, 1330 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 12/11/95, with a last revision date of 2/13/96, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) For the purpose of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed use will generate 29.7 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3) Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of the lights under the canopy shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 4) The applicant shall post a $13,100 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5) Pursuant to Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Co n pproves two (2) driveways for this lot as shown on a roved plan. 6 This :op:e �i locatedin Traffic Overla Zone 2 which allows PY Ythis prop enerate a maximum of 44 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during a. peak hour. ITE estimates the proposed use to generate--4*vte' s which is 1.7 vte' s or 3 . 9% more vte' s than permitted. The Planning Commission pursuant to Section 21.50 of the zoning regulations may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if the Commission determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. It is the Planning Commission's opinion that the following proposed improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. --- elimination of one (1) curb cut on Shelburne Road. --- restricting the remaining access on Shelburne Road to ingress only. --- providing an ingress/egress curb -cut on Imperial Drive. --- widening Imperial Drive to accommodate separate left -turn and right -turn lanes. 7) The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to show a minimum of four (4) street trees along the Shelburne Road frontage. b) The site plan shall be revised to indicate the type of screening to be used around the dumpster storage area. c) The site plan shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the property's frontage on Imperial Drive in a location approved by the City Engineer. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond to cover the cost of constructing a sidewalk on Imperial Drive. The sidewalk shall be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy/compliance. 9) As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant is proposing to widen Imperial Drive to provide separate left -turn and right -turn lanes. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy/compliance. 10) The existing four (4) inch sewer serving the pool backwash shall be abandoned and capped at the connection with the existing six (6) inch service. 11) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 12) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 13) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3 s City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 26, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are my preliminary comments on the above referenced project. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich will be forwarded when they are available. Please respond to these comments with revised plans no later than Friday, March 8, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, I Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: January 9, 1996 Agenda Items Date: January 4, 1996 GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Existing four inch sewer serving pool backwash shall be abandoned and capped at the connection with the existing six (6) inch service. 2. With the main entrance off Imperial Drive, a sidewalk is warranted on Imperial Drive due to the increase in traffic. 3. The radius of the curbing of the widening on Imperial Drive should be at least 35 feet to accommodate school busses. BARONE, WYAND/GRUNVALD - IMPERIAL DRIVE The subdivided parcel should have exact dimensions as shown on the site plan and not ±. PRECOURT INVESTMENT COMPANY - WILLISTON ROAD Site plan prepared by Brian Precourt dated November 10, 1995 and revised November 30, 1995 is acceptable. COMMERCE SQUARE - WILLISTON ROAD The updated site plan received December 1, 1995 is acceptable. TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATES - WILLISTON ROAD 1. Abandoned sewer services shall be capped at the main. 2. Granite curb for work on Williston Road may be available at City Street Department. That and the entrance construction shall be coordinated with City Street Department. Memorandum - Planning January 9, 1996 agenda items January 5, 1996 Page 6 One of the reasons why the previous application was denied was because the design did not provide a safe and adequate means for customers to exit the site and head west toward Burlington, south on Spear Street or north on East Avenue. It was felt that such a situation would create a potential safety hazard or burden adjacent property owners by encouraging customers to use these adjacent properties in order to turn around. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $12,000. Sewer: The sewer allocation needed for this project is 885 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is shown on the plan. The plan should indicate the type of screening to be used. Lighting: Exterior lighting will consist of the following: --- eight (8) 175 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting and shielded fixtures mounted on 15 foot poles. --- eight (8) 400 watt metal halide lamps mounted under the canopy. --- 100 watt wall washer soffit lights on south, east and west sides of building. 7) GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD - RESTAURANT - SITE PLAN This project consists of: 1) razing a 26 unit motel building, and 2) constructing a 5090 square foot standard restaurant with 160 seats. This property located at 1330 Shelburne Road lies within the C1 and R4 Districts. It is bounded on the east by a single family residence, on the south by a retail/office building, on the north by Imperial Drive and on the west by Shelburne Road. Access/circulation: Access will be via a 24 foot wide ingress only curb cut on Shelburne Road and a 30 foot wide ingress and egress curb cut on Imperial Drive. The applicant will be closing a curb cut on Shelburne Road and relocating the southerly curb cut five (5) feet to the south. The proposed access to Imperial Drive is a new access which does not currently exist. Unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission under Section 26.103(a) of the 6 1 Memorandum - Planning f January 9, 1996 agenda items January 5, 1996 Page 7 zoning regulations, there shall be a maximum of one (1) driveway per lot accessing a public street. Staff supports a driveway on Imperial Drive. The applicant is proposing to widen Imperial Drive to accommodate a new right turn lane. A number of residents have expressed concern regarding the proposed access on Imperial Drive. They feel that the additional traffic on Imperial Drive will make it more difficult for the neighborhood to access Shelburne Road. Staff agrees that additional traffic on Imperial Drive may increase somewhat the delay experienced by those waiting to enter Shelburne Road. However, it is staffs opinion that the closing of a curb -cut on Shelburne Road, providing an "in - only" access to the restaurant, and adding a turning lane on Imperial Drive will improve traffic efficiency and safety on Shelburne Road and result in a "net benefit" for traffic flow in the vicinity. The Vermont Agency of Transportation also supports the provision of an access on Imperial Drive (see enclosed letter). Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 5.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 51.1% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 17.9% and along Imperial Drive is 13.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements will be met. Parking: A total of 57 parking spaces are required and 106 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces are being provided. A bike rack is being provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $13,100 which is being met. Plantings will include Dogwood, Inkberry, Spruce, Rhododendron, Yew, Cranberry, Serviceberry Norway Maple, Ash, Honeylocust and Arborvitae. Uv' The plan shows new street trees along Imperial Drive and an evergreen buffer around the back parking area. Staff recommends that several street trees be planted along the Shelburne Road js frontage in keeping with City policy. ` u` i, Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 2 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 44 vehicle trip ends�r (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed 5+�" Memorandum - Planning 7 January 9, 1996 agenda items January 5, 1996 Page 8 use will generate 44.9 vte's which is 0.9 vte's or 2% more vte's than allowed. The Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if the Commission determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. The applicant is proposing several improvements which would benefit traffic flow: �t6 Y9" o elimination of one (1) curb cut on Shelburne Road. o restricting the remaining access on Shelburne Road to ingress only. o widening Imperial Drive to accommodate a new right turn lane. aN The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $6,000. Sewer: No additional allocation required due to the credit given for the existing motel. Dumpster: The dumpster storage area is shown on the plan. The plan should be revised to indicate the type of screening proposed. Sidewalk: Staff, including the Public Works Superintendent, recommends that the applicant construct a sidewalk along the ^° �9 property's frontage with Imperial Drive. Plan should be revised to � show a sidewalk along the property's frontage with Imperial Drive �'y in a location approved by the City Engineer. r" lP t0 Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting will consist of the (P$ following: --- 13 250 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting and shielded luminaries mounted on 16 foot poles. --- one (1) building mounted 100 watt metal halide lamp with a downcasting and shielded fixture. Details of the lights under the canopy are not available at this time. These details should be submitted for approval by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. N. DRUID G H1HIIE AedIty R d U i S 0 T S February 16, 1996 Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section VT Agency of Transportation 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00-L.S. 49+79 Gail Wyand and Mary Grunwald Dear Don, Many thanks for your letter of February 2, 1996 providing conceptual approval for a highway access permit for the above -referenced project. Unfortunately, at the meeting of the South Burlington Planning Commission held February 13, 1996 the Planning Commission denied site plan approval for this project. As the Planning Commission's denial was directly related to the highway access design which grew out of our discussions with the Agency of Transportation, I am writing to request the Agency allow us to alter the access design. The proposed project contemplates demolishing the existing Handy's Townhouse Motel and replacing it with a 5,530 sf Uno Restaurant with 164 seats. The Uno Restaurant is considered a "quality restaurant" under the ITE guidelines with patrons staying an average of more than one hour. The motel is presently served by two curb cuts directly on US Rte. 7 with no access to the side street (Imperial Drive). Since the subject property is a corner lot (at the corner of Shelburne Road/US Rte. 7 and Imperial Drive) consistent with AOT policy you took the position that we needed to put our primary access point on the side street. After some discussion, you agreed that we could maintain a single curb cut on US Rte. 7 subject to that curb cut being used for entrance only. Imperial Drive serves a neighborhood of several hundred homes to the east of Shelburne Road. Early in our process it became clear that these residents would object strongly to the curb cut on Imperial Drive. Consequently, we made every reasonable effort to mitigate our impact on Imperial Drive. The most significant step we took was to propose widening Imperial Drive from its present two-lane configuration (one lane eastbound, one westbound) to a three -lane configuration providing two westbound lanes, one dedicated for left turns and one dedicated for right turns. Our analysis showed that while the additional traffic from the Uno Restaurant would have an incremental negative effect on the westbound left turns, the proposed widening would dramatically improve levels of service for the westbound right 69 C o l l e g e S i r e e t turn movement even with Uno's additional traffic. Since this westbound right turn movement is by far the greater of the two, we believed we had more than P . 0 0 0 � 10 01 mitigated our impact. 0urlingt0n. Vermont 05402-1007 t Nonetheless, at the two public hearings held by the Planning Commission dozens of neighbors appeared (the Burlington Free Press reported 100 neighbors at the second hearing) to oppose Uno's curb cut on Imperial Drive. In the end, the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to deny our permit and there were no issues other than the curb cut. Even the neighbors were clear that they did not oppose the Uno Restaurant and liked the rest of our site plan. I understand that it is AOT's policy to minimize curb cuts along major state highways, particularly in congested areas. It is also my understanding that AOT allows curb cuts for mid - block properties which do not have reasonable prospects for access on secondary or side roads. Effectively, the subject property has now become equivalent to a mid -block property without access to a side street. The Planning Commission has made it clear that the Imperial Drive curb cut will not be available to us. Thus, I respectfully request that AOT view this property as if it had no access to Imperial Drive since it doesn't and thus, allow us a full curb cut with full ingress and egress directly onto Shelburne Road/US Rte. 7. I would be happy to meet with you or anyone else at AOT to discuss this further and to provide any additional information you may require. For your information, I am enclosing a copy of the latest version of the site plan as denied by the Planning Commission. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely D€tGid G. Wl te, CS! j CRE President / l Vbs enclosure cc: Gail Wyand and Mary Grunwald Bob Alexander, Pinkham Engineering Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Maurice Moulod, Uno Restaurant Corp. Jeff Squires, Agency of Transportation 6dU.T1IIi u�l•I a o.11.. ...Iw s........w 24-w• BENCHMARK a 13 0.•— ,.-2.• CHISEED SOUARE +It-74• FIXTURES SOUTHEAST CORNER SHARP CUT OFF SHOEBOX XTURES w 2• •m^ "++'7 z OF TRANSFORMER PAD MOUNTED ON 16' POLES EL£VATK]N 1E6.657 E WAL PACK TYPE WALL -MOUNTED '+�k•.1. PY,1�M.Y 2 -•30• FIXTURE AA>•V s— Ill-24 RC • Rlati 1re.y.Aa wrwn.Y 1a•ray. •rA11..w 5-•' C \� — M 21 t•,a4oeMan lY 1'y Rl.s•••wOq ,}li --f---------t I `�" tt a r... o..r .+— Y.. t}1r / I TO I Al M To.....•. MKi wm. Yw ta-1r RETAM EXISTING w T v4r....w .o..'� •..vaea.,1 Iu.11Pw1 Ow..Y.rw 1}tf I I BIxa.MGTON I i 0 47 CB UN AOT PROJECT ON U.S. 7 PROPOSED TW nMF G. aoo01n1Y ••m4wd m..n.,ww ]-t I /♦�'--------- I NI � WIDENING ' Mv1m1 i I I 11 I M P E R I A. L D R_I-•V-E I' I ri'�'' I ♦ MAINTNN-EXI319•Q--$$-----_---.---------- -- 1N.4 15' LANE _-- --- --7►__ I,u. zs�%---------- ---- �---- RADK,S I �'-- - _ _ — — '- — -- - ----5 - ---------- - /�irL%/_•'e��..... �W /..!ice ������;..-. -y y i /iUFAND tt —PROPERTY LINE p -*- _ — SETBACK LINE / — -WATER LINE -------WATER -SS- — — - SEWER LINE RM 1719( ) / / - — — -sT- — — - STORM LINE ' 1.7A (S) GAS LINE 4.1 MV 1 1712 RMMwVy 9N-3 —o,/C2EC/ra/u—OVERHEAD E�C/TEL /CAN ' I 1a( N ((CMy =-a r P`c —II —ix/=C/TaXATV— UNDERGROUND ELEC /TEL/CANSS WOOD FENCE gI To I IKTEW v POND CHAIN LINK FENCE ti` j r1roR] v -R oa sJan.w C— G..., 1r.n 1A.or 2-2 1/2• !•• n 14 f.v�w. 9wrytiwa P.e...r. 4M AI, 1 3/4 - 7 US 9eVn.i CT 2 2-2 1/Y N• 1D 24 n ). TA.•• ] - 4' •m `, `\ ♦` `% V. TOt� SET . `♦♦ j i t ♦ 111y tI1Q9 ``, - 50• 1 — •12 I 1 1 ♦ 1 65, low aME PAVEDF. maw gims / 1 1 1,01011XNOva\\, N/F • PLAZA INVESTMENTS (MERV BROWN) 10 ♦ j/ YANCE 1 I `♦`% 2011E 3,730 S.F.\ . .♦ \` , 1 \ Iq 1 .. , REAR t CA.- - BLODCETTTT ! MI,OT GRAPHIC SCALE- PROPOSED PARKING 101 SPACES . PROPOSED SEATING jyj SEATS O HYDRANT - LOT SIZE: 2.OY AG ( IN Y93T) ALL OvERHEAO ELECTRIC LVIES ON SITE • GATE MINE LOT COVERAGE: LOT 1lo•G - m ti - ARE TO BE REMOVED S.F. AG i 0--• UTILITY POLE W/GUY BUILDINGS: 9.550 .2.2 10.6 PAVEMENT: ,.1,57� .49 2.4.5 S AYNAD R.[4AC /2t]!FW1'r.,An S!_ [ar A]NT./?.u0 R.44•pt445 �•>�! O MANHOLE. CFFFNCPACE• 57_DD6 1.," 64.7 g4,q]1(Q]YK/M1:1•:` ACMYD /0I A]1R/lE' A/1vr 9Jl /XM' 4l`,B12,ff I l/JyW TOTAL 66,130 2.02 1007C BI CATCH BASIN — SIGN LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED SF. AC. BUILDINGS: 5,530 .13 2 6.4 R/..(7' PEA '�.* ;,w»• SITE PLAN pAIF tZrj�s ' 0 UGHT POLE PAVEMENT:' 40.356 .92 (:REFN�ACF• 42242 97 45.6 46.0 A�sa[D NK u p,• f.• O rA. a•o fa �j�p� * P. �A H2 0 IRON PIPE FOUND TOTALBB,130 2.02 100% pr.•v NPN IMMM ENGDiMUNG NSSOCIATM. DIE PIZZERIA LINO SHEET 1 OF 1 • IRON R00 FOUND FRONT YARN LOT COVERAGES ROAD 17.91< SMELRIAL O'4-vID ram• . 1... /�'+.'.. r.'+..+ • a.T• 1330 SHE1Bl)REE ROAD a MDNUMENT FouNp IMPERIAL DRIVE - 13.2[ D LDT _ TL• M•ll•: F:uLidio{� ._. ...-.- ._._ _ ,,..,,. SOUTH BURUNGTOt< VERNONT )7r- No Text BENCHMARK CHISELED SQUARE IN SOUTHEAST CORNER - Z OF TRANSFORMER PAD Y ELEVATION 186.657 E I I I I I I TO BURLXIGTON ----------- I v!'C • 1 CIS RM 1643 NV IBM, I I I t NN lna RETAIN EASTIN0 CS UNTIL AOT PROJECT ON U.S. 7 PROPOSED WIDENING m RADIUSMAINTAIN 15' LANE TO CONSTRUCTED / - 9_A! G ! GI.MIr. Mn9.9. P1-AMT 115T Sur..w..wl 24-30" - C3 13 Cw w.1o.. Rwl-.twr.n.. D.s..r 16-24• 9 SHARP CUT OFF SHOEBOX FIXTURES IG 26 qmr. IrA , 16-2e MOUNTED ON 16' POLES IOC Is Ia 91..r. .4.rl...w D—f Iwmw.a 15-11r WALLPACK TYPE WALL -MOUNTED Iv ! I nrti n.t. 9 twewry 24-3W FIXTURE PC 2 Pk.e 'omf..• D. Arwt g1wa. a Spun RC 6 Nr..I..w Rm9114 awwr.ww T.Ilweq. Bvalna. 16-24 5-6' w 21 Mro6.6w.6.. 'PJM• P3M RHe6eew.tr.e t5-Ir TC 13 Tow.. ww7ld.t. W.w' D..{ Aww.... Y.. 1l-16' TM 26 Taw . —ft T4lotwf H{d. Yw 15-141' ' vo 21 VII .wv.I..a.rw...r. Evwy.w CrwwwTl0.wA I!-Iir TW 47 Th-J. -dd6 ft -W-d ldr G....r0.rvitw. 3-1' IMPERIAL DR-I-V-Lr-- RMH- -- �� e-- - -- ---- - - - - ---- _-----ST ------- _ 0"Tw— FOE HAWANT oj CLOSE��,,,. Ig CURB CUT -�: SIDEWALK TO BE ' I OEM .. EXISTING LI 2. LOC ` E ' l>r A I TRANSFORMER i TO SHELBURNE jTBM REBAR k W ELEV. 1 .19' 4 / i At / I \-Ce \A� MM 177.3 �$ • I wv 1745 (((N) / NV 177.E (S 4 �N NV T714 (( NV 1712 SI GAS METER tREM AC 13 M.ks hI., W. Dowry SwNnywf 6 - 6' B✓r AP ! A �PMt-a.k%. EmwdO Owwr Nwwy Mql. 2-2 t/2. 66! N 14 Frwi.w. .a...11roro P.Imw. Q— Arr 1 3/4 - 2- SM GT 2 Glgt.l. bieow.6.v Hw.ow t 2-2 I/T 9M TO 24 TH.I. o ItimM . V,.' Dw Amwlvr Ar6vNls 3 - c sM T r � No 1 MW VA XMI I 'All I ' LEGEND PROPERTY LINE / — SETBACK LINE I / ----'.'----WATER LINE -SS- — — - SEWER LINE -ST- — — - STORM LINE niv azs s RIM ,76.6 G GAS LINE j,'RIMH 16.D2 669 Nv taw.5 (� II e. PVC w EEc♦R/GTv—►- OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CAN Nv tea (EN wvte9.gpw —uG/EIfC/TEI/CAlV—UNDERGROUND ELEC/TEL/CAN — WOOD FENCE TO 1 1✓ETENllON PDND CHAIN LINK FENCE F T N OF 0 X 9U DNG --------- I / 1 \ r I 1 \ Il 1 1 \ I i \ I \\ 1 a\ RC ,FA •..9 FEB Irc t Td\BAROk r �• 3.73p SFA \ ZONING Z DISTRICT I DISCT 1 1 a N/F BARONE I 1 IA ♦ 1 1 I ---- k CAP 1 .90, 1 I I 1 1 1 N BLODGETTTT k MILOT PROPOSED PARKING: = SPACES GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED SEATING: 1B! SEATS h HYDRANT LOT SIZE-- 2D2 AC. ( IN PE6T) ALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES ON SITE w GATE VALVE LOT COVERAGE: 1 im6 - 20 rL ARE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING S.F. AC. 11 0— UTILITY POLE W/GUY BUILDINGS: 9.550 .22 10.8 PAVEMENT: 21,574 .4. O. MANHOLE zt C.RFFNSPACE: 57.006 1.31 64.7 1 ,g-a D a[pnc tm77 t,T,etp ,uo ,q,w7iN SF LOrg WP.rr TOTAL 88,130 2.02 100R ,w O aueHr rnvlerut.'L 4eAaa<o 20r mH:xAZ AtNt^/P sr� sE,w fiEv-v v5 ® CATCH BASIN LOT COVERAGE: , REwsaPar SIGNPROPOSED S.F. seawr - 0 BUILDINGS,-.13 5.530 .13 PAVEMENT: 40,358 6. 4 PEA SITE PLAN LIGHT POLE .92 GREENSPACE 42 242 97 45.6 48.0 AStTFo INK 61t mm i B ~� O IRON PIPE FOUND TOTAL 88,130 2.02 100% zwA w, _ .._ a ® IRON ROD FOUND FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES: NPN PRIG M ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. PIZZERIA UNO SHELBURO x orzp TIDY ---- - e2.A�.,..w..sr.w.. MONUMENT FOUND MPERIALNDRIVEAD 13.21E ,4.....w - ,..�_ .._..__ ,�.,. ,._ 1330 SHELBURNE ROAD F7 38 Imperial Drive S. Burlington,Vt.05402 February 10,1996 Chairperson South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset St. S.Bur! ington. Vt. 05403 Dear Sir: The proposed curb -cut on Imperial Drive to accomodate the location of a restaurant on the site now occupied by Handy's Motel has seriously alarmed the many homeowners of the immediate area who fear that the security and well being of their quiet family neighborhood may be jeopardized by noise,smells and traffic pollution. Some weeks ago many of us who attended the meeting with regard to this matter came away far from reassured by the presenter of the proposal. For your consideration here is a summary of the cogent objections raised by some of those present. 1. A 140-car parking lot is proposed.This means that during times when the restaurant is packed we can expect traffic at the rate of 140 cars per hour, pouring into Imperial Drive. 2. The restauAnant will have a staff of 40.This translates undoubtedly into at least 40 cars in the lot on a daily basis. Peak nights for the restaurant would certainly involve an overflow of 40 cars which would probably spill out out onto our street thus giving it the appearance of a permanent garage sale. 3. Before the meeting concerning our neighborhood we listened with interest to a representative of Fitzpatrick-LLewellyn INC. try to reassure your commission concerning a queuing problem where traffic lights are involved. But what about the humungus queuing problem that would arise with 140 cars per hour pouring out onto Shelburne Road with no traffic light to mitigate it? At present during peak traffic periods it requires the dare -devil skills of a Lucky Teeter to negotiate a left turn onto Shelburne.We maintain that restaurant customers frustrated by the inevitable log jams will react by turning right thus bestowing a traffic problem on the road network serving Imperial Drive et al. 4. Restaurants are served by big trucks. One truck trying to egress from Imperial Drive to Shelburne would be a queuing problem all by itself. 5. On peak Restaurant periods when cars coming to the Restaurant only to find no spaces would cause a milling -around confusion which would accerbate an already impossible situation. Computer simulations as mentioned by Fitzpatrick LLewellyn Inc do not hold out much to reassure us. They merely prove that that the problem is insoluble. In short, after considering the objections stated above we are not pleased by the prospect of having to live with a neighbor that will gluttonize with cars from Shelburne Road only to vomit them onto Imperial Drive. Res tf lly yours, "ij W0�0 Vincent H. Naramore -- 1- E E4 - - 13 F^ .J -- I J �. c; , i' ''-3 i11 L M L _ 4 U `.e� .� L VT qOT DEP T OF Erj(jKt, 1 LI".*a'vZ-62d PACE 7 V'.J V •.: J V 1 r STATE OF VERMONT A(;E,NCY OF TRANSI't)RiA110:ti 133 Stott Street, Admintvmc)n BL:ildijg Montpelier, Vermont 016,13-5m.] February 27, 1996 Mr, David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc, 69 College Street, P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Subject-: south Burlington, Us 7, L.S. 048+00 egjagoatd- ---- Dear David: in response to your request for oxi- reconsidcrrati_orr of the access rtquiroments for the above-:pX-Oject, I offer the following. ' WQ since -rely appreciate your attempt tc, ccjmp'y with our recommendat-lcn for .a full service dr',ve on Drive and an entrance only on US 1, This arrangement would have cony rlidated most Of the traffic at an exiet:ing access to US 7, wl-;i.c:z io in kv�eping with both Agency and City policy. Title t9, V,S,A. 1111, requires t_^.a*, "A,; a ronril t..ion of any such permit, ecr'pl l arce with all local r -d Manyee and regul a t J ons re2ar_jn to ways shall be required. The a 6ncy cx- 1egie2atly& body, within thoir respective juriadiUt.iojia, may make such rules tv o�tx.xy out t"e ,�iZ'Ov.iBiOrs Of this sacticn as will adecpjatY,ly protect and p.rcooti~ the safety of the traveling public at.rd -maintain reason- able levels of service on the exis�.ing hjyYway system, but shall i►z rzo ca>Qe delly reasonable entrance a)d exit~ to or tron property Abut- ting the Ifig'-waYu, except or. 11:t l tad ac,�'esa hig.s-Alays, using safaLy as the test for xeaaonab2wneaa, 0 Tslecommunkrtlom Relay Serrko ;•'800•W.0191 vtrmant 4 an Equal Opportunity Employer. =ES-27-9E 02 10 PROP! PONETPL.EAU REAL. ESTATE VT [II i)Lf i LPu bNUKI- rL-bUL-040 L4Ji D iE+Fi286�?2 :9 PACE Mr. David G. White David G. white & Asaociates, Inc. ,qubject: South Burlington, US 7, Propoeed UNO Restaurant February 27, 1996 Page Two L.S. 04Rt 00 Although we continue to kielieve trial atc;;uaa f4huuld be primarily from the existing aide road, the actinn taken by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission has made t.hia impossible. Becauee: of the circumn"anrea involved in this project, the only reasonable access left: is on US 7, and we will re •uctant'_•y ioaue a permit at this location if plans are modified appxopaiato:y, We would recommend that the grading and layout of the parking lot be such that future access onto ?tnpe_lal I)x•ivo Yu poosibie, should the City reverse ,its position in the fuL,zrt�. Another option that might be poaSible would 2)� to connect to Hcal.mee Road Extension so than the existing Signal could be utilized. At the present "irle, the owner of the adjacent prni)er.ty is not Willing t-0 allow this; however, the City may be able to mandate ouch a connection if an expansion or modification to the ohopping center ever is proposed. Also, the access for the rest.a,leant may work more efficiently if the drive is Widened ao chat there az-a two exiting lanes. One other detai 1 which should be addressed is the new raturm drain that will be connected to auV Sys»ea; near tit& isouLherly radius of the drive. Since our pipe will be removad tsi.11l ttie project, you should install i1 D., . or ;unction box some, near tc+e northerlyradiumwhich will facilitate reconntc;t.i01 t o G: S new system. The details cf that can be worked out With Steve Lynch atr our Spec iai ;project' e unit. J 1 J :'R hl ;9't LHA:, PE 1 PACE VT HOT UEF OF rVt-iKv tL;dUL-b<0 r c:c _ �, . _ • . f David O. White & Aasociates, Inc, Subject! South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 048,00 Proposed UNp Restaurant February 2-1, 1996 Page Throe In conclusion, I think it is urfortunat•.k, that the original deaign cannot be implemented; however, we believa we urc obligated to provide as acc000 as long as you are willing to keep your options open for the future. This decision still requires noncurrence from the City. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, "4504A4!;ZL� Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA;mw C: Glenn Gerahaneck, Secretary of Tranaportation John K. Dunleavy, Assistant Attorney General. Steve Lynch, special Projects Unit Joe Weith, City of south Burlington Bob Alexander, Pinkham Engineering Aseociatea, Inc, STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpclier, Vermont 05633-5001 February 27, 1996 Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. _ 69 College Street, P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 048+00 Proposed UNO Restaurant Dear David: In response to your request for our reconsideration of the access requirements for the above -referenced project, I offer the following. We sincerely appreciate your attempt to comply with our recommendation for a full service drive on Imperial Drive and an entrance only on US 7. This arrangement would have consolidated most of the traffic at an existing access to US 7, which is in keeping with both Agency and City policy. Title 19, V.S.A. 1111, requires that, "As a condition of any such permit, compliance with all local ordinances and regulations relating to highways shall be required. The agency or legislative body, within their respective jurisdictions, may make such rules to carry out the provisions of this section as will adequately protect and promote the safety of the traveling public and maintain reason- able levels of service on the existing highway system, but shall in no case deny reasonable entrance and exit to or from property abut- ting the highways, except on limited access highways, using safety as the test for reasonableness." Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 048+00 Proposed UNO Restaurant February 27, 1996 Page Two Although we continue to believe that access should be primarily from the existing side road, the action taken by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission has made this impossible. Because of the circumstances involved in this project, the only reasonable access left is on US 7, and we will reluctantly issue a permit at this location if plans are modified appropriately. We would recommend that the grading and layout of the parking lot be such that future access onto Imperial Drive is possible, should the City reverse its position in the future. Another option that might be possible would be to connect to Holmes Road Extension so that the existing signal could be utilized. At the present time, the owner of the adjacent property is not willing to allow this; however, the City may be able to mandate such a connection if an expansion or modification to the shopping center ever is proposed. Also, the access for the restaurant may work more efficiently if the drive is widened so that there are two exiting lanes. One other detail which should be addressed is the new storm drain that will be connected to our system near the southerly radius of the drive. Since our pipe will be removed with the project, you should install a D.I. or junction box somewhere near the northerly radius which will facilitate reconnection to the new system. The details of that can be worked out with Steve Lynch at our Special Project's Unit. David G. White & Associates, Inc. Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 048+00 Proposed UNO Restaurant February 27, 1996 Page Three In conclusion, I think it is unfortunate that the original design cannot be implemented; however, t•;e believe we are obligated to provide an access as long as you are willing to keep your options open for the future. This decision still requires concurrence from the City. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, n Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw c: Glenn Gershaneck, Secretary of Transportation John K. Dunleavy, Assistant Attorney General Steve Lynch, Special Projects Unit Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Bob Alexander, Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. AG VSpOR�P STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 January 2, 1996 Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. 69 College Street, P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Subject: South Burlington, US 7 - UNO Restaurant Dear Mr. White: This letter is to confirm our position relative to your proposal to construct a sit-down restaurant on the southerly corner of US 7 and Imperial Drive. This project was discussed at a meeting on December 27, 1995, at the Agency of Transportation's Special Project's office in South Burlington. Our goal with this project is to minimize conflicts with US 7 traffic, and at the same time provide an efficient traffic pattern for restaurant patrons and other existing traffic using Imperial Drive. We believe the best solution to this will be to provide an entrance only access on US 7, near the southerly property line, with a second full service drive on Imperial Drive. In addition, we recommend that the Imperial Drive approach to US 7 be widened with a left and right turn lane. We anticipate most traffic would come from the north and could utilize either Imperial Drive or the US 7 access for ingress. Traffic leaving the site would be consolidated at Imperial Drive. With the addition of the two exit lanes, traffic waiting to turn left would not hold up the larger volumes wanting to go north. In addition, anyone from the large residential area to the east of US 7 could enter the restaurant without having to cross traffic twice on Shelburne Road. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. Subject: South Burlington, US 7 - UNO Restaurant January 2, 1996 Page Two It has been an ongoing goal of the Agency to consolidate and minimize access points and conflicts along Shelburne Road. Just south of this project we will be constructing a raised median which will prevent all left turns except at intersecting streets. We feel the above configuration is a reasonable design, which will minimize conflicts on US 7. As soon as you have finished your construction plans, you should submit them along with a traffic analysis for our review. If you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2653. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw c:"'Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Steve Lynch, Special Project's Unit AG§Vc� tiSpGR�P STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 February 2, 1996 Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. 69 College Street, P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald Dear Mr. White: We have completed a review of your preliminary plan and the traffic study recently submitted by Bob Alexander of Pinkham Engineering. The traffic generation and distribution looks reasonable. The analysis shows of Level of Service ( "LOS") F for the exiting -left turn movements from Imperial Drive. This is a common scenario on Shelburne Road and is a function of the US 7 traffic volumes, not the side street. The two-way left turn lane on Shelburne Road should provide some measure of safety for vehicles attempting to enter Shelburne Road form Imperial Drive and also provides Shelburne Road (southbound) left turning vehicles a safe place to wait. We also agree with the concept of providing two exiting lanes for Imperial Drive. I understand that there has been some discussion of a signal at the US 7/Imperial Drive intersection. State law requires that we comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices when considering traffic signal installations. Our analysis shows that none of the warrants for a signal are met or are even close to being met. Because of this, we will not consider a signal at this location. We believe there will be sufficient gaps produced by other nearby signals so that traffic can exit Imperial Drive. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. Subject: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald February 2, 1996 Page Two In conclusion, we will approve a permit for your project as proposed after you obtain your local approval. We would like to see the conditions for the local permits prior to finalizing ours. I am including a copy of our proposed conditions for your information. As the project develops, it may be necessary to include additional conditions. If you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2653. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Attachment c: Gregg Beldock Gail Wyand and Mary Grunwald Bob Alexander, Pinkham Engineering Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Steve Lynch, Special Project's Unit Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 February 2, 1996 SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the conditions on the back of the permit, with particular attention given to the Special Condi- tions listed below. All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached plan, dated 12/11/95, and last revised New curbing along frontage shall meet current Agency of Transportation standards and match what is currently existing. It is intended that existing drainage at the intersection of US 7 and Imperial Drive will remain until the State reconstructs US 7. However, if a problem becomes apparent along with the relocated northerly curb line, the applicant may be required to reconstruct the drop inlet and extend the pipe so that drainage works properly. Act No. 86 of 1987 (30 VSA Chapter 86) ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone (800)225-4977 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, begin- ning any excavation at any location. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the District Transportation Administrator or his staff. In areas to be grass covered, the turf shall be restored by preparing the area and applying the necessary topsoil, limestone, fertilizer, seed, and mulch to the satisfaction of the District Transportation Administrator. Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Special Conditions Page Two All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on all holidays (which shall include the day before and the day following), during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15, without specific, written permission from the District Transporta- tion Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper protections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of eighteen (18) months after final inspection by the District. In the event that area lighting proves to be a hazard to the traveling public, the Permit Holder will be ordered to remove or modify it at their expense. Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as- builts" with copies provided to both the Utilities Engineer and the District Transportation Administrator. Upon completion of the work by the Permit Holder, a final inspection will be held. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. The Permit Holder shall indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Special Conditions Page Three The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not construc- ted satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's expense. Curbing or other suitable physical barriers must be installed to control ingress and egress of vehicles to the approved access only. In the event traffic from this project increases to the point where additional lanes for turning or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The Permit Holder may be required by the Agency to update or provide a traffic study to determine if additional modifications are neces- sary. The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of paved shoulder). In conformance with Title 19 VSA § 1111(f), this access may be eliminated in the future where development has burdened the highway system to such an extent that a frontage road must be constructed to alleviate this burden. The expense of the frontage road shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors or assigns of the properties abutting said frontage road. The Agency of Trans- portation shall determine the need of a frontage road based upon and justified by standard Agency procedures. It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appropri- ate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control .devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Trans- portation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transportation Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. Gail Wyand & Mary Grunwald South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 48+00 - L.S. 49+79 Special Conditions Page Four Construction will be performed in such a way as to minimize conflicts with normal highway traffic. Uniformed traffic officers or trained flagpersons, shall be provided when two-way traffic cannot be maintained, and at the request of the District Transporta- tion Administrator whenever he deems it necessary for the protection of the traveling public. When traffic control becomes so complex that the traffic control cannot be accomplished using Agency standards, the Permit Holder must submit a traffic control plan to the Agency's Utilities Section for Agency approval prior to beginning work. , J Me - -- - =ion - i//�,i//% �/ /:'• r/N//��r���i� /fir i�'i�r1/�ir.ii��'�':vii/iii'� i',/�/� i / /i' r // �/I/ /i��:./�i•., r.� • j��i � mv, • i %i r.i. n. ..� i.i i��r i. .� Pr ii. •..�/ri /, l /. G�. .�i. ��. + %�,/�ii9. /i. �./�i ��/%. �� .,'I,i✓ :1 �.. 's..i..•.�•1'- - -'t..• /. r,f...;i/�il ��� /:�//.//"7 J� � ��//.r:;��r%r/.% r ./�/ j + �. r . F,_ � / • � . r,7j �: v� � iy/� � //;� r•/ /// •I/� /�•G, p-� ri;•. +� �� �'i %�a MEN��,,� ��j /'tire.' .'. �Yi.: i.�\ ��,Yai'7.��1�••"iI`� I III I' .- -rIW r r + I �%' : r �• t ;; % r CIA• ( 't�� •/: •� .�% %% /% `"'-� � �� �� .,•% r /r'//r -' • - • • • ,� f min "' �,,,,�j� � / +�I �� irk •• 7UIf' ��•. !�l i //i - • -. •. • . � •.. •..- r. / %///li%.. /ii./%%%%//%/i///,%/ /�i/%i✓✓%/i 'i/////% ;/yi, "....�,.:rr�. �.i/i//%%�%////�%//,/�/��r///�//,///����_ �► � � � � � �f s City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 12, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. BOX 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the January 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erely, oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl. smmm CA 5 cl d- � P,mT L_ 24-31r BENCHMARK cs 13 c_ rt... ,6_24' CHISELED SOUARE IN SOUTHEAST CORNER SHARP CUT OFF SHOESOX FDRURES w 26 M yr.• -46-ry z OF TRANSFORMER PAD MOUNTED ON 16• PDXES IDc 15 w. yre ..t1P.•1. D- d W6M 15-,r ELEVATION 186.657 ry 5 •a 'AA11.e..r 24-SD' E WALLPACK TYPE WALL -MOUNTED rMa.m Fl)(1L1RE PG 2 Pi.9 yN,as 'm D-d Ap.W spun 18-24' V o Rc 6 RI•.t... Mvt9,b rA•...tpi Tdl. w BuQlltvn 5-6' I --�--------- I I s W 24 RN•brMv, 'PJY P,Y t6t.see..trvi I}Ir TC 13 1-..w9vte 'N-. D-1 Jt..rtt. Yw 15_Ir TM 25 1-. n.ft Matt mNN Ttt. 15-tr TO BURLINGTON I I Q I RETAIN EJOSTNIG vo 2D vr.t�.t •9t+v. e.tos6.tt E..'a, K 1d� trtr 1 i CS UNTIL AOT PROJECT ON U.S. 7 PROPOSED ,w 47 INNI. -de.,tri Yooe.ver a•6. es.ate. 3-V 1WDENINC - - - - - - - - - - - - I� ----- - 5 20:1 TAPER RM I8..3 wV 16[l1 12 ' i ' I I I I M P E R I A L D R_i-�-E / / 169.0 - -ram- /''' wV161-0 --+--------=- _is- \� IO11616 9aV 179.7 - 91V 179.3 --- - ---'�--------sT- �p ----- �- - 11111 W RADIUS TO BE ______ _ r�c�� yr.-� x �_.�•� • a• BY • EXISTW­ F% HYDRANT CURB CUT SIDEWALK BE- CONSTRUCTEDa- , 6 ' i�4. � • L16_161111113- -A�t\`C•. IN T M, wl ry DO T TRAP \7 1 -\ IEN W EXISTING GUR�� I I / I / LOCATION INN 179.6 x wV 1710 / A R611-3 TRANSFORMER ��¢ yl 6W i71e Fc9) 6w 1714 s 4 wV 1712 S 1� TO SHELBURNE /} / / TBM ^� REBAR / / 11EGEX� I I / PROPERTY LINE I I / SETBACK LINE / - - - -r- - - - WATER LINE -ss- - - - SEWER LINE RIM trio -sT- - - -STORM UNE rI I my 167.a (N) / W RIM 176.E mV 167.6 NV 169.5 aT S O GAS LINE RIM 176.2 mV 1665 s ((N)) WV 169.6 (E) I -011/mEc/IEL/CATv-OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CAN WV 1664 I wv 169.O (E} = -A o -uc/UEc/RL/urv-UNDERGROUND E1FC/TEL/CAN r pVC - - - - - I -� - SI TO WTENTNXN POND WOOD FENCE CHAR/ LINK FENCE 1 w FWMT OF Oa BUILDING POOL AREA 2 p ED / __j_4_J CMAR. OOG 9RQ PL WW OT Gr<nAN, Daaoao. Mettw•I6L 9tNtIEN N/1' PLAZA INVESTMENTS (MERV BRONN) A HYDRANT • GATE VALVE 0-- unuTY POLE w/GUY O MANHOLE IS CATCH BASIN - SIGN 0 LIGHT POLE O IRON PIPE FOUND O IRON ROO FOUND ❑ MONUMENT FOUND I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 a TREES Ac 17 A1nN.tdtlp RANT IIST 0a.ty S.MOMry 6-cm ... -. AP 5 Am OotwKddm E-M 0- N..97 M•I. 2-2 1/2- WA`.... ` T1t1p.I9 Q_' 1 '-. m /4 Ami.r P.-.>ti.vP. Pb- 91- AM 1 3/4 - 2- W . . P.-.,. GT 2 l i trbcm6w i Nawy.a.l 2-21/i W J� O 1/96 10 24 0tu1• a.w t." Ugr a Oa Am.i1. AMVIL 3 - 4' W V'W / CI / N 190 7/ / i L wv Iasi - r 1669 INW 0.12 M WE Ib01 AQq PROPOSED PARKING: = SPACES LOT SIZE, 2&Z AC. LOT COVERAGE EXISTING S.F. AC. Z BUILDINGS 9,550 .22 10.8 PAVEMENT: 21.574 .49 24.5 64.7 GREEN SP ACE: TOTAL 57.006 88.130 1.31 2.02 100% LOT COVERAGE: PROPOSED S.F. AC. x BUILDINGS 5.090 .12 5.8 PAVEMENT: 39.924 .91 45.3 TOTAL 88,130 2.02 100% FRONT YARD LOT COVERAGES SHELBURNE ROAD - 17.9% IMPERIAL DRIVE - ,12x I 1 I 1 / 1 / 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I C I 'tY-a S gu ttgton WTI ,�tra b=i�r • _ LL Y I 1 1 11 \ 1 IN I _ ------------ _--- \ TBM 1 \ REBAR k CAP \ ELEV. t 90' I 1 1 1 1 N BLODGETT k MILOT GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN ►QT ) 1 l..a - 20 IL ALL OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES ON STE ARE TO BE REMOVED M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: February 13, 1996 agenda items Date: February 9, 1996 3) GAIL WYAND & MARY GRUNVALD - RESTAURANT - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the January 9, 1996 meeting (minutes enclosed). Staff's January 9, 1996 memo is enclosed for your review. Enclosed is a letter from VAOT dated 2/2/96 in which they indicate that a signal is not warranted at Shelburne Road/Imperial Drive intersection. 4) BARONE, WYAND & GRUNVALD - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - FINAL PLAT This project consists of a boundary line adjustment between two (2) adjoining properties of 28,010 square feet and 91,860 square feet resulting in two (2) reconfigured parcels of 31,740 square feet and 88,130 square feet. Subdivision approval is necessary for this boundary line adjustment because adding land to the smaller lot will make it capable of subdivision into more lots than before the adjustment. The sketch plan was reviewed on January 9, 1996 (minutes enclosed). These properties located at 1330 Shelburne Road and 25 Imperial Drive lie within the Cl and R4 Districts. They are bounded on the east by a single family residence, on the north by Imperial Drive, on the south by a commercial building and undeveloped land, and on the west by Shelburne Road. Access: Access to the residence at 25 Imperial Drive is currently across the northeasterly portion of the property at 1330 Shelburne Road. This adjustment is to convey 3730 square feet from the 1330 Shelburne Road property to the 25 Imperial Drive property. This will result in the access to 25 Imperial Drive being on its own property. No access changes proposed. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirements of 9500 square feet in the R4 District and 40,000 square feet in the Cl District will be met. The parcel at 25 Imperial Drive will increase in size from 28,010 square feet to 31,740 square feet. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 February 9, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Pox 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 13, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please JW/mcp Encls gi e me a call. i cer , Jo Weith, Cit Planner 1 State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-6563 January 25, 1996 Gail Wyand and Mary Grunvald 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Ms. Wyand & Ms Grunvald: Subject: Application #WW-4-0924, PIN #EJ96-0043; Conversion of the Handy Motel to 170 Seat Restaurant, Route 7, South Burlington, Vermont. Our office has completed an initial review of the above referenced project and has determined that the additional information listed below will be needed before approval can be granted. 1. The plans note that 3,730 square feet of your lot will be conveyed to one Barone. This is a subdivison and will need our approval under the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 3. Subdivisions. One way would be to obtain a Subdivision Permit for the land you will be retaining and obtain a Deferral of Permit for the land being conveyed to Barone. Enclosed please find the appropriate application forms. Please note that no construction is granted until written approval is issued by the Division and all other authorities. Upon receipt of the above items, we shall continue our review. Should there be any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c City of South Burlington Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) (,, _.L: lc�alo��r PROJECT REVIEW SHEET (� THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOT ,L # DEC PERMITS RESPONSE DATE o AY 9lv PENDING APPLICATION # DISTRICT TOWN S*04V A(4kU1cI417-0,1 PIN #_ OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT GR nr-nF= i-AIT E: V C � C'CTZnT � NAME:(2,4/1 LUMAIVA 4 MAWY (;-2WIA416 NAME:,i�fZ Z fA/A U NO % UAIQ k CSTi9tt�Aal>' �j oeA ADDRESS: _ f 33D SAtASIl,2�Vr AV ADDRESS:_ /00 56. 6(dUAJM,d M m syd'a E1T QoX Ue y_, 11v4 Oai3 A. TELEPHON Based on information provided by PiA 4.4tu EW, on / birlS'L a project was reviewed on a tractttracts of land of-Q-3 acres, located on -rn,� /�„4i ��Q . The project is generally described as: ,[/ y"'wSd /ZC&Adc 41►Td AJ E6u 4mwoeae voAJ or / 7o se.4 T DES?a4u,QrS,uT PA211100� cd,( /os' Q.Ael , ), kAirCl,44c_ W/3't"I2/C CAJEle Prior Permits From This Office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION I. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? ILength of newfimproved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/w ereN# of lots COMMENTS: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: YES NO; Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO ENVIRONWNTAL CAMMSSM • DISTRICTS 04, 6, & 9 SIGNATURE: DATE- i ADDR�,S (IF DIFFERENT): VVM STgEEr ieherrh District Coordinator Telephone 66 ESSEX JUNCn0 N—Vr-npWZ 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL RECU!RED v YES NO —Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision &/or Exemption Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES SIGNATURE: DATE �4EK. Of ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION : ii� ADDRESS: c iEnvironmental Assis ance Division 111 WEST STREET ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802) 879-6563 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ? NASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Indirect discharge permit Contact:_ Stormwater permits Residuals management sludge disposal W (OVER) OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED: (Continued) 4... R POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: Construction/modification of source Waste oil burning Open Burning Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (? 200 bHP) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Underground injection control (Floor Drains) Construction Permit, water system improvements 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Stream Alteration (748-87871786-5906) Contact: Well head protection areas Permit to operate Contact: Bottled Water New Source Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate: (241-3770) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) ✓, WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) 4---Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3737) Contact:_ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) Municipal water/sewer 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval n 1DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# 1)# � cConstruction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access Boilers and pressure vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ' LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers �2DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: .4 (, ?_ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Prograifi for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (241-2158) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) Q4.AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: `—Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2049) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/kennels/livestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Oleo/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste 22. -OCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) OTHER: REVISION DATE: 8/23195 State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voioe 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD January 22, 1996 Gail Wvand Mary Grunvald 1330 Shelburne Road So. Burlington VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction Regional Office I I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05352 (802) 879-6563 Re: WW-4-0924, Pizzeria Uno -- Convert existing 26 unit motel to 1713 seat restaurant, municipal water and sewer, 111c. 110 gpd 2.11 acres located on Route #7/Imperial Drive in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on 3anuary8, 1996, including a fee of $100,00 paid by check number 1894. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 30 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the permitted time of 30 days in-house, please contact this office at (802) 879-6563. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you also should check with toum officials regarding any local requirements you may need to meet. or the Division of Wastewater Management Iren 1. Rob erg a Administrative Secretary cc: South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Pinkham Engineering Pimeria. Uno Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury ----------- C', TVA,,,, December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the 11andy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g, undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South E " r %� 6 56CnOV6 ROAD 3 51 to e, 1 '�'3 Sr'b.:�a 2 ✓� CA December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g, undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South 47 `Clad I CIG�cIf i2-130) 7 fO 7 n 7 4 ` 16 December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g, undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally l emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or moze feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South Z'a . 1 6 ce � ,, -�> �'ut /07 0 S 91 w w 9 �1� r wvx Cree^ � d l� / / -1 Pr/ r. (JJs �� � ©off �� C� �zi�1 -Je) 20 xkalticoal�' elr_/ December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally �YY I'N 5"-, emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South o S �c) -,!-, December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the 11andy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g, undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally I- Y emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or move feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South o December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or snore feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South 1 p S,..nc�c. �ooc� i o ScLxda /wood It cSa-"Ca-e GC- I — 5'<4ctl/w 0a 4 �L/ b,o,. CQ Soo - b 1ci-1 December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. "`y �' Sincerely d '-�� aj"� Incerned Residents of Laurel Hill South Mum lb}agg-e�' q4�6 ybt Q � December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South w � � r December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally 7Y n i � )lo � r\Y\ rV ►� 1 UA loL 6)r, emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 foot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we t s project ul ask each of in fairness Con our board members to all. �— t � cr Sincerely, to carefully weigh ed Residents of Laurel Hill South �-7 PrI Ve - Z I -:]�- 6--� '9 'D VA No Text December 26, 1995 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Planning Commission Mr. Joe Weith Subject: PROPOSED UNO PIZZERIA RESTAURANT - SHELBURNE ROAD Dear Mr. Weith and Board Members: Several months ago it was brought to the attention of some residents in our neighborhood that the owners of the Handy's Townhouse Motel were negotiating the sale of their property. The interested buyer was a "major restaurant concern- details to follow". The surveying team arrived early in December and from them we learned that the interested buyer was the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. After some research we contacted David White, Uno's Development Consultant. Some of the neighbors met with him on December 15, 1995. He presented his plan including pictures for the proposed 170 seat restaurant with 105 parking spaces. He emphasized how it met all guidelines for our town's commercial zoning requirements. The neighbors present at the meeting expressed their reservations such as parking lot lighting, "odors" vented from the restaurant, e.g. undesirable exhaust from Lilydale Bakery, neighborhood security, pedestrians, bicylists and children at play- all valid concerns applicable to any change bordering a residential area. However, our primary concern is the proposed curb cut on Imperial Drive. Presently Imperial Drive services approximately 120 two -car families in Laurel Hill South plus the Great Northern Stereo commercial traffic. With IDX's expanding workforce, it has become increasingly hazardous for those of us who live here to enter or exit our development. For most of the day a left-hand turn on to Shelburne Road requires an agressive driver with nerves of steel. And it's our understanding that we don't qualify for a traffic light. Now with this plan being presented, the potential for yet another 100 plus cars can be expected. Based on the facts amd figures that David White presented at our meeting, this figure of 100 cars (possibly double) is conservatively realistic. With the probability of perhaps 600 cars using this access daily (not including school buses, commercial deliveries or occasionally 9 emergency vehicles, it comes sufficiently apparent that the proposed Imperial Drive access site for the Uno Pizzeria Restaurant is not in our best interest. There are alternatives to be explored. One is to enlarge the proposed 24 toot entrance on Shelburne Road to 30 or more feet. Another possibility is exiting traffic via the rear of the property taking you to the traffic light on Shelburne Road. Each of these suggestions were discussed with David White. We think each is reasonable and should be considered. Not to be misunderstood, we are very comfortable with change on that corner as presented by David White for Uno Pizzeria Restaurant. Our hope is that the neighborhood relationship with Uno Pizzeria can be a positive one. In closing we ask each of our board members to carefully weigh this project in fairness to all. Sincerely, Concerned Residents of Laurel Hill South '2. 2.- 14 W)re- s /` J' V e,. , �. /n /l tt � "^ V 5 (�4At�� ��J'Mduav a(w- Inc �vn City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7956 January 5, 1996 David G. White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting, revised comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 9, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, JW/mcp Encls please give me a call. in ere V7, Q Jo Weith, City Planner CAMBRIDGE APPLICATIONS Planned Communities, Parks, Walk- ways, Parking Areas, Stairs, Entrances, Residential Streets, Marinas, School Campuses, and Other No -glare Applications. CONSTRUCTION FEATURES Housing —One-piece die-cast alumi- num housing with soft radius corners. Lens door is also cast aluminum with soft radius corners. Lens is a clear tem- pered, impact resistant, glass held in place with sealant and retaining clips. A continuous gasket seals the door as- sembly to the housing. Mounting —An extruded aluminum arm, using four bolts, is provided for rigid attachment of luminaire to pole. Optical Assemblies— Specular an- odized aluminum reflectors provide square or round symmetrical (Type V), forward throw, or narrow asymmetrical (Types I and Ill) lighting patterns. Reflec- tor is mounted with hinges and captive locking screws into housing for easy access to ballast. Ballast Assembly —Starting rated to -20 degrees F. Ballasts for Metal Halide lamps are constant wattage autotransformer type. Ballasts for High Pressure Sodium are constant wattage autotransformer type using an electron- ic starter. Ballasts are mounted directly to die-cast housing for reduced tem- perature and increased life. All ballasts are high power factor. Lamps —Luminaires accommodate Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium mogul base lamps. Lampholder— Mogul base glazed por- celain socket with spring loaded, nickel - plated center contact and reinforced lamp grip screw shell. HPS sockets are pulse rated. Finish —Standard baked -on enamel paint finish is Dark Bronze. Other fin- ishes available. SPAULDING INDALUX CAMBRIDGE ORDERING INFORMATION LAMP WATTAGE ORDERING NUMBER DESCRIPTION'S LBS. METAL HALIDE 175W CEI-175-M-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 29 250W CEI-250-M-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 31 40OW CEI-400-M-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 34 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 100W CEI-100-HPS-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 29 150W CEI-150-HPS-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 29 25OW CEI-250-HPS-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 31 40OW CEI-400-HPS-* Cast Aluminum Area Light 37 " Specify ballast voltage 120, 208, 240, 277 or 480 volt. Specify optical system type I, 111, R5, S5, or FT. Standard color Dark Bronze (DBA). Other finishes available. UL All units are U.L. listed. I-GUMSIM I DESCRIPTION ORDERING NUMBER Photoelectric Cell (120V to 277V) Suffix "PC" Photo Receptacle (Less Cell) Suffix "PR" Polycarbonate Vandal Guard Suffix "VG" Wall Mount Arm Suffix "WB" Single Fuse Suffix "SF" Double Fuse Suffix "DF" Cutoff Shield Suffix "CS" CAMBRIDGE ORDERING INFORMATION LAMP WTJ WATTAGEI NUMBER G DESCRIPTION S. METAL HALIDE 40OW CEII-400-M-* Large Cast Aluminum Area Light 63 1000W CEII.1000-M-* Large Cast Aluminum Area Light 75 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 40OW CEII-400-HPS-* Large Cast Aluminum Area Light 76 1000W CEII-1000-HPS-* Large Cast Aluminum Area Light 82 • Specify ballast voltage 120, 208, 240, 277 or 480 volt. UL Specify optical system type II, III, R5, S5, or FT. All units are U.L. listed. Standard color Dark Bronze (DBA). Other finishes available. WALL MOUNTING ARM OPTIONS DESCRIPTION ORDERING NUMBER Photoelectric Control... Built-in, 120V-227V (Up to 40OW) Suffix "PE" Photo Receptacle ... (1000W & 48OW) Suffix "PR" Wall Mounting Bracket Suffix "WM" Polycarbonate Vandal Guard Suffix "VG" Double Fuse Suffix "DF" Cutoff Shield Suffix "CS" POLYCARBONATE GUARD ORDERING INFORMATION FOR POLES & BRACKETS... SEE SECTION E SPAULDING sR aUoac9 oa�o INDALUX 993 1736 Dreman Avenue. Cincinnati, Ohio 45223 (513) 541-3486 13615 Excelsior Drive, Santa Fe Springs. California 90670 (310) 868-0478 OUTDOOR SECURITY LIGHTS — HPS Attractive, compact design is combined with exceptional light output in these versatile lights. Wall Perimeter Cutoff The economical operation and Optics long life of their High -Pressure Wall -mounted fixture Sodium and Metal Halide Lamps designed for wide light makes them outstanding values distribution, to permit as well. A broad choice of lenses economical maximum and reflectors lets them meet a spacing between fixtures. wide variety of requirements. Lens is clear, strong, These lights are designed for polycarbonate. internal shroud may be removed both interior and exterior uses. and finished to blend with Complete gasketing equips surroundings or left them for wet and damp specular to reflect locations. The virtually surroundings. unbreakable polycarbonate lens, and phillips-head captive stainless steel fasteners, suit them for use in high -vandalism areas. Internal polished aluminum shrouds are designed to reflect Wall Projection Cutoff their environment. They are also Optics This wall -mounted fixture easily removable for painting if provides sharp -cutoff desired. forward projection of The attractive housing, of light away from wall. durable die-cast aluminum, is Internal shroud may be finished in acrylic bronze removed and finished to thermo-set powder paint. blend with surroundings Rounded corners on lens and or left specular to reflect housing let it blend well with any its surroundings. surroundings. Inside the housing, a thermal air isolation chamber between the ballast and electronic components keeps temperatures down to extend component life. Wall Up/Down Cutoff Optics 8.5" 4.1 " �\� Both uplight and �s 4" downlight are provided. Top and bottom surfaces of lens are clear; internal specular shroud on front s:o" and sides affords beam control and sharp cutoff. May be finished to blend with surroundings. —_ io.o" — NOTE: For 100w, MH: r *dimension Deep Shielded Downlight is TV Typical Applications -dimension is 3.0'. The Deep Shielded Building perimeter security lighting Downlight providesdeep brightness Floodlighting from building shielding without Parking ramp or lot lighting sacrificing a wide Floodlighting of building distribution. Ideal for Sign lighting over entrances where. Wallwasher lighting brightness is important Accent lighting yet a wide band of light Landscape lighting is needed along the building. The internal Loading dock lighting aluminum shroud may Walkway lighting be finished to match the Stair lighting surroundings. Corridor lighting Countless other applications RUUD LicfiriNc 0) Quality for Less BUY DIRECT Pricing $56 - $71 See Price SheA M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project les From: Raymond J. Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, January 9, 1996 agenda items Date: December 15, 1995 UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION - RESTAURANT - SITE PLAN ./ --- This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 2 (Bob Alexander's Trip Generation report indicates that this property is in Zone 3, this is incorrect) which allows this property to generate a maximum of 45.9 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed use will generate 46.93 vte's (using the fitted curve equation) which is 1.03 vte's more than permitted. The Planning Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if the Commission determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the vicinity. The applicant is eliminating the northerly curb cut and relocating the southerly curb cut further away from the Shelburne Road/Imperial Drive intersection. These access modifications would appear to produce a net benefit for traffic flow. --- indicate location of nearest fire hydrant. -✓ two (2) driveways are proposed, unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission there shall be a maximum of one driveway per lot accessing a public street. Staff supports a �. driveway on Imperial Drive. --- plan should correctly show the zoning boundary between the R4 and Cl zoning district (boundary is located 500 feet from the center of Shelburne Road). The boundary shown on the plan is incorrect. --- provide square footage of space available for patron use but not containing seats (for parking calculation). five (5) handicapped spaces are required (see Table 26-1 of the zoning regulations). Plan should show three (3) additional handicapped spaces. --- provide front yard coverage information for each of the two (2) front yards. --- provide exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) for the pole lights and all building mounted lighting. Show locations of all building mounted lights. -� indicate type of screening to be used around dumpster area. --- a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be approximately $6400. --- applicant should indicate the snow storage area. Preliminary Comments - Planning January 9, 1996 agenda items December 15, 1995 Page 2 applicant should construct a sidewalk along the property's frontage with Imperial Drive. Plan should be revised accordingly. --- is the paved parking area located at the northeast corner of the site included in the overall coverage calculation? PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers d• Planners eo Landscape Architects 6* Surveyors MEMORANDUM TO: David White FROM: Nancy Knox RE: Pizzeria Uno - response to South Burlington staff comments memo DATE: 1/2/96 The following comments are listed in the same order as the staff memo: 1. Traffic - The number of seats proposed for the restaurant has been revised to 160, which will generate 44.9 vehicle trip ends in the p.m. peak hour, calculated by the fitted curve equation. This is slightly higher than the allowable amount of 44.0 for a site of 88,130 s.f. in traffic overlay zone 2, per section 21.303 of the zoning regulations. The applicant requests that the Planning Commission grant a waiver for the difference of 0.9 trip ends. The applicant feels that this is justified based on the proposed improvements to the site, to include the following: -reduction of curb cuts on Shelburne Road from two to one - restriction of the Shelburne Road access to use as an entrance only -the widening of Imperial Drive to accommodate a new right turn lane, making it easier for cars leaving Imperial Drive to turn right These improvements will improve the traffic flow through the Imperial Drive/ Shelburne Road intersection, even with the additional trips from the restaurant. 2. The nearest fire hydrant is in the right of way along Shelburne Road near the northwest corner of the subject property, and is indicated on the site plan. 3. The site plan continues to show two access points. The Shelburne Road access will be an entrance only, with the Imperial Drive access to be used as an entrance and exit. 4. The zoning boundary and associated building setback line have been revised on the site plan. 5. The square footage of space for patron use and not containing seats will be provided as soon as it is available. The Maltex Building + 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 + Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 Memo re Pizzeria Uno January 2, 1996 Page 2 6. Three additional handicap spaces have been added to the plan. 7. Front yard coverage for both front yards has been added to the site plan. 8. Exterior lighting cut sheets have been provided (see attached). Additional information about the building lighting will be provided as soon as it is available. 9. Information about the dumpster screening material will be provided as soon as it is available. 10. A bike rack has been added to the left of the main entrance. 11. The applicant is aware of this fee. 12. The plan has been revised to show snow storage areas east and northeast of the parking lot. Temporary snow storage will also be available at the east end of the parking lot if needed. 13. The applicant is not proposing this sidewalk as there is none on the remainder of Imperial Drive, which is fully built out. It seems unlikely that sidewalks will be constructed here in the future. 14. This paved area has since been deleted as part of the area which will be conveyed to the Barone's. Response to Mr. Szymanski's comments: 1. The applicant will retain the two entrances as shown. Two entrances are a reasonable and desirable design feature. The plan for two entrances is being required by the Agency of Transportation (refer to letter from the AOT sent directly to the City) and is supported by the City planning staff. Furthermore, the AOT requires that the Shelburne Road access be used as an entrance only, so the applicant has no choice but to have a full access on Imperial Drive. The improvements proposed by the applicant will mitigate the increase in traffic in this area. These improvements include closing one of the Shelburne Road curb cuts and adding a right turn lane exiting Imperial Drive. This will mean that residents will no longer need to wait behind left turners in order to turn right onto Shelburne Road. 2. The drainage along the south side has been designed to match existing drainage patterns. The existing flow to the south has been determined and the current design utilizes this flow pattern but does not exceed the current stormwater runoff in the southerly direction. We understand from an informal conversation with Wagner, Heindel & Noyes (the City's stormwater consultant) that they suggest the runoff from this site be channelled through the existing catchbasin on Mery Brown's property to the south, which outlets into the pond at IDX and provides attenuation for Bartlett Memo re Pizzeria Uno January 2, 1996 Page 3 Bay watershed. The applicant is not able to do this via a new structure connected to this catchbasin, as they don't have an easement allowing them to do so. Another option would be to channel the runoff to Shelburne Road, but this would not allow for any attenuation of the runoff. Consequently, the best solution seems to be to continue to direct this runoff to the existing catchbasin via overland flow, with proposed trees and shrubs south of the parking lot providing some treatment and additional attenuation. The runoff from the north and west sides of the site will be treated by grassed swales and channelled into the stormwater systems along the adjacent streets, where it goes today. 3. A manhole structure has been added to the site plan in lieu of a cleanout. 4. Construction easements for the VAOT will be provided when the AOT notifies the applicant specifically what will be required. 5. All proposed utilities will be underground, and all existing overhead utilities on the site will be removed. 72261memostafnk City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 15, 1995 David White David G. White & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. White: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to the comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, December 29, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin rely, Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls ti S11R1194 FIL L-mi Mf FS PEANT u5T CA 5 CI.t . Oflb s.mma -t 2{-3C• Ar 13 ArM-&W cmo0 M. D-y S rw..etr-r e - e' am CS le C­.. _ Rd-.t--m D q..q4 /*_24• AP 5 A- W.Lm . E-ald 0~ Np y MR 19 2-2 1/2• SW IG 31 .a. y.H.a r+r,4•.r 16-N' [msda a FP 15 FrR .. P.nn.11vonica Patmlr. GV­ Alt, 1 3/4 - 2• BIB 'GC IS p.v ydn. ca•wR0[tR Dwnr1146— 15-,r v.lmpa' IV 1� IM a•ticablo 1Mntpq.nr 24-30' CT a P.,tnpR t•iocmtnv. Ny.RMa..I 2-2 1 n• IMB N Pc z PN.. a1..�R '�to 13.a1.w.+. sP..c. 18-21• na mb W TO 24 Th.lo xciEantdlR 'Nigro' Dwk Am H,l Arbo ftR 3 - e eee I I � RC a RAomn.. lrengd. nd.mnp/. 7RMl..lg. &,cAtM1pn 3-e' / I RP 24 Rn,rtl.Ae•�trlr 'PM' PM RNR4•�n� ts-lir I■ ( I SA 1 sr^ hr* PVR dn.. %. _ , le-24" TO I rc 13 r.w. nnowRlR TRpro D.trr .Is.,AR. • ,3-le• F I --_`_. � ,\ BLIRONGTON I i I I - n w zS Tow.. m.dR '•w�rl' 20 vlpp.A,m �p.Ml. co•pp:twr Fu•.P.s• Gmtr-14.+n 13-lor II as ca- 'I. RIM 104.I 110,5 INV 999 IM ���� W j MV VEER I I I RIM 104.2 MM1 ---- I M P E R I A L D R I V E -- 10•-e MV too's \'G/ // / - - J' �• - - `\\ \\\\ `\ pt�/ELEC/�TE L/CATV - ` e-- ------- - - - - \ 3 FP ` `• \ MY 99.5 - - - - - - - - - - - ' 3rpRM03.1 - - - - - - - MV10 0 _,, _ ... ' _ - � _ 1 1 RADIUS TOE CONSTRUq`fED BY _ ___ ___ _____ ____ _.___ _ S 0'_1 01• _ ___ fOth-__ ._ / ------- _ -- �. ---- •_54 E I \ f I VERMONY AOT I I i W �. / // EXte��1 102 TOJ 9AS METER 1 1 Oe ."_ HYDRANT u� I A /// 3 AC �- --1-1!•6' -t __ _ /' �• "�" S 7M - __ 7 SA I I \ ' \ SIG 1 AREA AO - 21 TO i- r,i.• 1 0 { kg ` S S e + �. �\ \\ 11 11 ; PARKING \ 11 \\ \\ I HOUSE .. LDING \ 11 G>~ ctosE EXISTINGI CURB CUT ` ENTRANCE rYP. '7 I \ 1 1 \ Q SIDEWALK TO BE FIL w C - g COOLERS -- XISTINC SIDEWALK l 3 CS \ \ I I - 3 -�-- CONSTRUCTED BY VERMONT AOT I � ___ -- I r► 1 \ \ \ ``. 1 - O 1 I I I .- 'ol ly � PIZZERIA UNO I `J,O9O DUMPSTE! AREA - --_ EXISTING 1 \ �\%ISTINO\ `\ `\ ` ``\\ `\ \\ \` • o \`` • I I S.F. SECURE EX-'I$TIRC--SAVED ROOFLINE PARKIAC--- __ I 1 1tAIR5 \\ I \ \ �` \ \ \ ` N/F (� AREA �� 1 11 1\ `\ \\ BARONE ` 0 L I I` - - -- � ` (`\ S XI$ I - 2 AC 1 CT j 1 Gi' R AC \ \ \ \ \ \ I / 50•II IBA 3 ry `\ �\ -jt \ a "'„U 5 RP IT `\`\\ t\I ` \\\ `\` y I I II ,'P R; i s IG_ _ 3 cs .- - - « \ ` _ _ _ g, \♦ 1 o I -- 6• AN. EWE --_ - POOL ♦` \\ - `\ 11 \� X !!qq11 I I'' I L/' I I TRAPSE \ \ AREA ,/ 2 / ` ♦ \ \ \\ ?N `\ \ \\ AP` ♦ \ \ \ \\ OIIL //' -- 1p / N O \ EXISTING I I T\ �I I\_ II I, oe+ `` `\ ` ' 7 V _ _ 'J' ` `\ `\`` `♦\\ ` \`` ♦` `\\ t m ` `\ 65' W CURBSTOP �I I I -I E%ISTINNG _-```-__�- SH (SCALED I I / - i __ ��, _� \ ♦ ♦ `` ♦ `♦ R-{ ZQFIING OIS7gt`7 tIT iIn `\ LOCATION) \ focwc 1 lx �- __ _ __ -_ _ _- `� ` n I 99.4 I 07 . Y - - - `. \` 1 1, IN v 9z.e CS - --- ' `2 `♦ \ \\ 36 L— Im • j i 1 1 I O \ BARNE _— T T ^-- �__-______-a-_ - -a`--�------_ate- ---' - rr __ -� \ �"\ 1 ---------- / IO �/ .TUIIAU2ED IU:FER PL49 MG OF CEDAR, DOGWOOD. VIK 1TRN1. MUHEIIRY I 11 \`\ G1 �`fG TRANSFORMER Ce 4g1 RIM 97.1 1 1 I I108.711' \ REBAR k C�1P I ` 10 1 I�' I i / MV 93.0 / I I 1 I j I I I ♦ \ DATUM / in ' 1 `ASSUMED lot _I TO I / N/F SHELBURNE I / , TBM PLAZA INVESTMENTS N/F • GGGL ) / i REBAR t CAP ELEV. 100.00' (MERV SRO") �yp i� BLQ¢f ' f I A, MLOt 1`1 / ASSUMED DATUM GRAPHIC SCALE-• �r� Tow LEGEND 11011 H OF HOURS RD. _ _ —PROPERTY LINE d HYDRANT DEC l T 1995 PROPOSED PARKING: M SPACES I Inch 20 rL — — SETBACK LINE • GATE VALVE ' LOT SIZE: 2-U AC. - - - -•- - - -WATER LINE 0-- UTILITY POLE W/GUY - - - -SS- - - -SEWER LINE O MANHOLE LOT COVERAGE: EXISTINGOVER $.F. AC. 11 � OI SO. Burlington C�J BUILDINGS: 9.550 .22 10.4 SHARP CUT OFF SMOEBOX FIXTUIIE4 - - - -ST- - - -STORM LINE IB CATCH BASIN PAVEMENT 22.949 .53 25.0 MOUNTED ON te' POLES C GAS LINE -- SIGN Lr`REEMSPACE, TOTAL 59.371 91,870 I36 2.it 64.6 IOOR PEA 9A7£ SITE PLAN �� 9O Fl%TURECK TYPE MALL-MOUNTED —OM,YLEc/t[L/CATv OVERHEAD ELEC/TEL/CA7V Q LIGHT POLE LOT COVERAGE: � •a lt•d R►'s (i �,. ru 1.eQ1 .tIFXn. PROPOSED S.F. AC. 1G � W,4WAV DRAWING NO —Irc/nfC/Tn/CAw— UNDERGROUND ELEC/TEL/CATV O IRON PIPE FOUND BUILDINGS: 5.090 .12 5.5 Am" '-° �- SHEET PIZZERIA UNO - WOOD FENCE a rRpi Roo FOUND PAVEMENT: DOTAL. A 41.220 41.870 .95 44.9 NPN PINKIRAY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. I OF I rorAL: 91.e7o 2.1f 2.11 100 loon 12wrmv �Y rAw..nM... •...mow. oP.W.►.s.�.n•. 1330 SHEL13URNE ROAD PRacc" � -• •--- CHAIN LINK FENCE ❑ MONUMENT FOUNfn 7T1a Yallea Building J SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT scut 431 Pine St., Burlington. VT 05401 / 226 SFr x4AY -;x 1'-20' M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: January 9, 1996 Agenda Items Date: December 14, 1995 PIZZERIA UNO - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. This type of business can get by with a single entrance. I would recommend the Imperial entrance be eliminated and the Shelburne Road entrance be a double one. 2. The drainage along the south sdie should be intercepted and piped to the Shelburne Road storm sewer system. 3. There should be a manhole where the proposed sewer connects to the existing service. 4. The planned Shelburne Road improvements will require construction easements. Those should be acquired before a construction permit is issued. 5. All utilities should be underground. PRECOURT INVESTMENT COMPANY - WILLISTON ROAD Site plan prepared by Brian Precourt dated November 10, 1995 and revised November 30, 1995 is acceptable. COMMERCE SQUARE - WILLISTON ROAD The updated site plan received December 1, 1995 is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for January 9, 1996 Agenda Date: December 14, 1995 I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Commerce Square Hinesburg Road Acceptable 2. Pizzeria Uno 1330 Shelburne Road Acceptable 3. Precourt Investment Company 1160-1174 Williston Road Acceptable Dated 6/12/95 Project #86141 Dated 12/11/95 Project No. 7226 Dated 12/13/95 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7956 November 30, 1995 David White David G. White & Associates P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Proposed Pizzeria Uno Restaurant, Shelburne Road Dear David: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter is intended to confirm that the City has sufficient capacity at the Bartlett Bay Treatment facility to handle an additional 700 gpd sewer allocation for the above referenced project. While official approval of the sewer allocation will not be granted until the Planning Commission grants site plan approval, I do not see any reason, based on the information you have submitted to me, why the Commission would not approve this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any additional questions. in erel J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 10 1802963921E PAGE 1 NOV-28-9S O4:03 FROM POMERLEAU REAL ESTATE 167-11 FROf1 PINWAM ENGINEERING Post -It* FaxNotei b/1 011911 7 gh,S Nye► f To \, `; ` l� \ from •, , 4) t-, 1 Co.rDepi Co Phone A C� �"`C% "•� S GG Phurw N C'r' 1— 1 ,• Fax N . 5- ^. LI l I," u FINKHAM ENGINEERING Elt${/teers �► �'lannc��:� a JAP14 opc Architerts S'r�rveyors �' PM. URiA tIN0 Sanitary Se*ef Flow Calculations L Nov6! U"r tih�` ;095 Fxist g Niot -ifH�> x �Vlcttr ��ili; ii A*mate based on'c�iiri, per C L'nviroilmant pirv4400n Rubs) . 19 units 'with 2 d6ubW4uee.bMng size 2 pens s/be i au 1191x Z x Z ai��b�bed spaces X 50 $Xtd f i A. 5 Units With 1uecn'size bed each @2.. i s'> X 50.' $00 cps 2 units with °l qu of size bid and one pi&dW* o&x'b (queen size) 2 x,(2 •;t, =2) — 8 x 50J Wd = 400,; Wd Total tadst#I `'flb+oh, 161 38W 4 500 + ' 1 ' � ir'�000atri--� RQ.��►it :��'�a U o ' ' f" . , 200 deals .30 ' d, ': scat N0, 41000 ot, 10% i tb anion lbr witte.>j consa 'rvitlg: initut+es '� -600 gpd Total flows ii'. 6W ll� $1400 EPd,r�, f 1'. E2 C f Qom- L.� `: • 5,400 « 4,'7t1 pd. +100 0& ', '1N %Z 2{/1�M ; R 1 The MWtelt 8,UWbg o 431 Pine St.. aurltnlgcoj ; V't 03401 Bus. (8(12) 858 3S83 O F c (902j S 2g - - - PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers * Planners * Landscape Architects 0 Surveyors PIZZERIA UNO Sanitary Sewer Flow Calculations December 7, 1995 Existing, Motel (Handy's Motel) - 26 units (estimate based on current usage per Environmental Protection Rules) 19 units with 2 double/queen/king size beds @ 2 persons/bed = 19 x 2 x 2 = 76 bed spaces x 50 gpd 76 x 50 = 3,800 gpd 5 units with 1 queen size bed each @ 2 persons/bed 5 x 2 x 50 = 500 gpd 2 units with 1 queen size bed and one pull-out couch (queen size) 2 x (2 + 2) = 8 x 50 gpd = 400 gpd Total existing flows = 3800 + 500 + 400 = 4,700 gpd. Proposed Restaurant (Pizzeria Uno) - 170 seats 170 seats @ 30 gpd per seat = 5,100 gpd 10% reduction for water conserving fixtures = -510 gpd Total flows = 5,100 - 510 = 4,590 gpd Net decrease in fl 4,700 gpd - 4,590 gpd = -110 gpd. wp172261sscaks The Maltex Building A 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 + Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 4_4 Ir SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale -1� Survey data (distances and lot size) - � Contours (existing and finished). - — Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. --- Zoning boundaries -✓ Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). - V Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. 1�IL4_ Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. -l�Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. - Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. UX --,-/ Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded) . - v pumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). - C.O. Zone --- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standards -=- Airport Approach cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement --- Setback from planned r.o.w. --- If boundary line adjustment, need subdivision? --- Nonresidential use setback from Residential District City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 December 13, 1995 David White David G. White & Associates ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 P.O. Box 1007 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1007 Re: Proposed Pizzeria Uno Restaurant, 1330 Shelburne Road Dear David: This letter is to confirm the fact that although site plan approval has not yet been granted for the proposed restaurant, this property has in place the full sewer allocation needed for the development. The existing Handy Motel, which will be replaced by the 170 seat restaurant, has estimated flows of 4700 gpd. The proposed restaurant has estimated flows of 4590 gpd. Since the proposed flows are less than the existing flows', no addition allocation is needed from the City. If you have any questions, please JW/mcp give me a call. i cere , J Weith, C ty Planner PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ar Planners ++ Landscape Architects .• Surveyors MEMORANDUM To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: Robert M. Alexander, P. E., Traffic Engineer Re: Pizzeria Uno - Trip Generation Date: December 8, 1995 Trip generation Traffic which can be expected from the proposed restaurant is estimated by utilizing trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). In the 1995 5th Edition Update, many studies of existing "Quality Restaurants" (Land Use Code 831) are summarized for a weekday p.m. peak hour, with a data plot on pages 50 and 59 (see Figs. 1 & 2). The gross floor area is 5090 sq. ft.; utilizing the average rate, this yields 37 trip ends in the afternoon peak hour. For comparison, reference was also made to the trip rate having the number of seats as the independent variable. The proposed restaurant has 170 seats; the average rate shows 41 trip ends in the afternoon peak hour, a more conservative number of trips. Previous use traffic Volume Traffic estimated from the existing motel is summarized in the 1991 ITE 5th Edition under Land Use Code 320 - Motel, with a data plot on page 552 (see Fig. 3). The number of motel rooms (assume all occupied) is 26; utilizing the average rate, this yields 16 trips. Net Increase The increase in trips generated by the site in the p.m. peak hour would be 25, using the higher number for the restaurant. Impact on Traffic Overlav Zone Traffic Overlay Zone 3 allows 109 seats per 40,000 sq. ft. of land for a quality restaurant. This site is 91,800 sq. ft., or 2.3 times greater than 40,000 sq. ft. The site therefore would support a restaurant with 250 seats, a significantly greater number than the 170 seats proposed for Pizzeria Uno. Consequently, the proposed restaurant fits within the parameters of the Traffic Overlay Zone. The Maltex Building + 431 Pine St., Burlington, VT 05401 + Bus. (802) 658-5588 + Fax (802) 658-3629 Quality Restaurant Fi2- (831) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 19 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 9 Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.39 2.42 - 18.64 4.57 Data Plot and Equation 150 140 130 120 N D 110 C W p 100 m 90 _U L 80 N m 70 OD co m 60 Q �I 50 F- 40 30 20 10 ..... .... . .... .... .... X .... ..... ... X. X............. ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... X... .... ..... .... . .... .. .... ..... ... X X X .. .. :.X ... ;..... . : . . . . . . ...- ........................... . �X.. X .... , .... .... ... X: ...X------ :..............:..................... :X ... .... ..... .... X.... .... ..... ...- 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ------ Average Rate R2 _ **** Trip Generation, 5th Ed. Update, Feb.1995 50 Institute of Transportation Engineers Quality Restaurant (831) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 14 Average Number of Seats: 327 Directional Distribution: 68% entering, 32% exiting Trip Generation per Seat Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.24 0.07 - 0.50 0.50 Data Plot and Equation in 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 .................. ........._.....----'-..................:...._...._....--_.. ................ .................. ................... .........X----.--- .......... X X ......... X----. .. ................. X X X . ......................................... • X X ............................ _., ............................ ...._....._.....- ' X .......... ..........X.................... •---.......••... X ............ .................................................................. ........................................ .................... ............ ....... 100 200 300 400 500 X = Number of Seats X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.205(X) + 12.075 R2 = 0.40 Trip Generation, 5th Ed. Update, Feb.1995 59 Institute of Transportation Engineers Motel (320) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 16 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 141 Directional Distribution: 56% entering, 44% exiting Trip Generation per Occupied Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.60 0.31 - 0.90 0.79 Data Plot and Equation z 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ......................... :----....---......---- .----....----........ X.... •........................:...........................................• ........ •------•------------------..................................... X.............. .........................:..........................•................ ....... .......................... .......................... ........ ..----- .................................................. X........... --.......... ..................................................... ................., X .................. ...................... ;.. ..................... ....................•-.................---.....I.. -.----...................... ...................... .........X.... ...- -----......----........., X------- "..................................... .... ...... X.................................. , .......................... .<'...--. X ...----.... ........................... ............ X.... ,.X.......... X ........... ......................... x ...X----- ...............................•-------------------------. 0 100 200 X = Number of Occupied Rooms X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve --- - -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.963 Ln(X) - 0.382 R2 = 0.76 K0• Trip Generation, January 1991 552 Institute of Transportation Engineers 3 Land Use: 831 Quality Restaurant Description This land use consists of eating establishments of high quality and with turnover rates usually of at least one hour or longer. Generally, quality restaurants do not serve breakfast; some do not serve lunch; all serve dinner. Typically, the restaurants included in this land use are not a chain, and reservations are required. Related land uses include high -turnover (sit-down) restaurant (832), fast food restaurant without drive -through window (833) and with drive -through window (834), and drinking place (835). Additional Data Information on transit trip ends is not available. Information on person trip ends is not available. Average weekday truck trips: Average 1.63% of vehicle trips (range 0.71 to 3.87). Vehicle occupancy: Average 1.78 persons per automobile (range 1.59 to 1.98). Peak hours of the generator: Weekdays 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon and 6:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. Saturdays 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M.; Sundays 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. A significant number of the studies in this land use were conducted prior to 1980. For this update, a study was conducted to test the sensitivity of the older versus newer data. It was determined that there is no statistically significant difference between the pre and post-1980 data, therefore, all of the data points were retained to maximize the size of the database. The studies were conducted throughout the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's throughout the United States, many in the San Francisco Bay Area. The sites average 69 employees (range of 31 to 140), 9,100 square feet gross floor area (range of 4,400 to 16,000), 303 seats (range of 161 to 488), and 112 parking spaces (range of 50 to 174). Average densities are summarized below: Quality Restaurant Average Densities Independent Variables Average Range Employees Per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area 7.71 4.06 - 13.07 Employees Per Parking Space 0.57 0.28 - 1.03 Employees Per Seat 0.22 0.14 - 0.39 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Parkin S ace 0.08 0.06 - 0.11 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Seat 0.03 0.02 - 0.05 Parking Spaces Per Seat 0.38 0.17 - 0.52 Source Numbers 13, 73, 88, 90, 98, 100, 126, 172, 260, 291, 301, 338, 339 Trip Generation, 5th Ed. Update, Feb. 1995 47 Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 832 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant Description This land use consists of sit-down eating establishments with turnover rates generally of less than one hour. This type of restaurant is usually moderately priced and frequently belongs to a restaurant chain. Generally, these restaurants serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and are sometimes open 24 hours per day. Typically, reservations are not required for the restaurants in this land use. Related land uses include quality restaurant (831), fast food restaurant without drive -through window (833) and with drive -through window (834), and drinking place (835). Additional Data Information on transit trip ends is not available. Information on person trip ends is not available. Information on truck trips is not available. Vehicle occupancy: Average 1.52 persons per automobile (range 1.39 to 1.69). Peak hours of the generator: Weekdays 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and 12:00 Noon to 1:00 P.M. Weekends (limited sample) 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon. A significant number of the studies in this land use were conducted prior to 1980. For this update, a study was conducted to test the sensitivity of the older versus newer data. It was determined that there is no statistically significant difference between the pre and post-1980 data, therefore, all of the data points were retained to maximize the size of the database. The studies were conducted during the 1960's through 1990's at sites throughout the United States. The sites average 53 employees (range of 9 to 165), 5,400 square feet gross floor area (range of 1,000 to 26,000), 149 seats (range of 13 to 250), and 60 parking spaces (range of 17 to 165). Average densities are summarized below: High Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant vera a Densities Independent Variables Average Range Employees Per 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area 9.12 1.91 - 18.13 Employees Per Parking Space 0.81 0.43 - 1.76 Em to ees Per Seat 0.30 0.08 - 0.66 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Parking Space 0.07 0.04 - 0.14 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor Area Per Seat 0.03 0.01 - 0.05 Parking Spaces Per Seat 0.45 0.34 - 0.62 Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72, 90, 100, 126, 173, 269, 275, 280, 300, 301, 305, 338, 340, 341 Trip Generation, 5th Ed. Update, Feb. 1995 66 Institute of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 320 Motel Description A motel is a place of lodging providing sleeping accommodations and often, a restaurant. Additional Data Information on transit trip ends is not available. Information on person trip ends is not available. Information on truck trips is not available. Information on vehicle occupancy is not available. Peak hours of the generator: Motel traffic generally peaks at times other than when the adjacent street traffic peaks. The peak hours of the generator for the sites surveyed are too varied to draw any conclusions. Employment density: The average employment at motels is much lower than at hotels. The average employment density of the motels surveyed is 0.44 employees per room; the range is 0.14 to 0.58. The studies were conducted in the late 1960's to late 1980's at sites throughout the United States, and ranged in size from 15 to 545 rooms. For all lodging uses, it is best to collect data on both rooms and occupied rooms, to eliminate any misunderstanding in trip generation analysis. Source Numbers 2, 4, 11, 12, 13, 72, 88, 92, 172, 187, 191, 193, 277, 295, 300 Trip Generation, January 1991 549 Institute of Transportation Engineers CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Gail Wyand and Mary Grunvald c/o Handy's Motel - 1330 Shelburne Road. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 862-9608 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Same as owner 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) David G. White 69 College Street, P.O. Box 1007 Burlington VT 05402-1007 (802) 862-1225 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1330 Shelburne Road 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) quality restaurant 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 5.530 SqFt. 155 seats, one story bldg. 106 narking spaces 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES Maximum Quantity on shift at one time = 40 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 6.4%; landscaped areas 48.5% building, parking, outside storage 45.1 % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 560,000 , Landscaping $ 13,100 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ included in building cost 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 7/30/96 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1 p.m. ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. ; 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Friday and Saturda � 3 -%lo DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF -�—ie7"'& DATE OF HEARING AHEO.ff D CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPIA CAT ION 1) OWNER OI RF:CORI) ( name add ress , phone #) Gal-! t� 6M �� . woir &VUhva(d eld 4Aytd-V'S WOW - 133o Sl�elbw-;1+ Road 5 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone ><)yke�_gS BWVj^ 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) College �� , P o• �yx looq- FjI�V�iV101 V1 VT n —� --, 4) . PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 13 3 c Sh e l b urm,' ROM - - 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) R e.5-i ca u VaV)t 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and * floors, square feet per floor) t7 d 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES_ M G,X . C�N . Oki SIB (�� a l On 1 4 6 40 0 9). LOT COVERAGE: building 5 g X; landscaped areas 8 A % building, parking, outside storage 571.1 X 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 510,, 000 Landscaping S 13 /00. Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) S IVI� jam_ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: .51 31 (p 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out)b}a ffiiae, � wbP.►NtD. Estimated trip ends (in and out ding the following hours: Monday through Friday Set Al at�uM �0 i/ Mtw 11-12 noon 12-lp.m. ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 3-4-4 p p.m. 4-5 p.m. ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: : 3 YYl g : 3� 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: _ V' I . �lV1G� Sat. DATE OF Sl!BMISSION SIGNATURE 0 APPLICANT DATE OF 11FAR I NG CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) C 133d 51�e� wpte ayo nianA Layvaid's Itil o13UV1iM,61Vy1 VT,05'�to3 2 F&2,- 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) (AN O RP,51-a.m V pit Ci-OOrati m I0o Ckar(es Park Rd. - Wcc,f k0x�uv!j MA 01132. C&(n) 313- 12420 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Id ayi'd CJ . lAitr- C q Cotlro,t St, Co 60k (ooq - 8uvU,Mfioo VT Os-z�-o� - (007 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1330 SG, e(bu Vn e Rogd 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) R es f-aa4 yao 1 I 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # uni s, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) S 170 S eats 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES May . 0+m . oh 56,4 Af ni1P -- W1 P. ' q0 9) LOT COVERAGE: building,%; landscaped areas% building, parking, outside storage % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ S 0 Landscaping $ h00 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $ /{il &.da°ff ' 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Sz3( s c 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out,) during the following hours: Monday through Friday SeG A a %G {Me4rO 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION : __ �: 30 p►iV1 , fo g 30 pm 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATIO DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING PLEASE SUBMIT.FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 181) with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires sepa- rate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet. by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2