Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0981 Shelburne Road (5)C i ty of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOl1TH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 October 5, 1988 Mr. David White Pomerleau Real Estate P.O. Box 6 . Burlington, Vermont, 05402 Re: 40 Acre Shelburne Road parcel Dear David: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed are the Sgptember 6, 1988 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if ,you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 6 SEPTEMBER 1988 PAGE 6 c) the entrance drive to the south having a depressed concrete curb 3. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Discussion with Pomerleau Real Estate concerning various city policies in particular traffic regulations and future plans for Shelburne Rd. and a Southern Connector, and how these relate to potential development of the 40-acre parcel on Shelburne Rd. Ernie Pomerleau explained they have owned the property in question for 20 years. He located the property on a map of the area. He noted they proposed a concept a few years ago and were asked to table it and to come in with a master plan for the area. He stressed they are not looking at an enclosed mall but would be proposing multi -use, primarily retail. They are seeking the Commission's input on traffic and understand a Southern Connector Extension would be 10 years away at best. The JHK study said that intersection improvements would make their project OK. He asked under what guidelines the Commission would review a project on their land. The Commission asked about the possibility of access from the north. Mr. Pomerleau said there will be no access from Pine St. which will be dead -ended and that they don't own the land to the north. Mrs. Maher asked, in jest she noted, whether there was anything that could go in there that would make the intersection no worse than it is now. She said she would prefer something not at the upper reaches of density and would prefer a combination of retail, office use and residential apartments, even some affordable housing. She felt there could be a mini -community there. She specif- ically did not want to see a large department store or a super market. Mr. Pomerleau asked how far a traffic study should go. Mr. Burgess said they usually get figures for 1, 3, and 15 years. Mr. Weith said he would like a figure for full build -out of the parcel, It was noted that the erosion issue would be important. Mr. Pomerleau asked if level "C" is a requirement or whether they could just improve the intersection. The Commission said it could be a combination of what the developer doesn't make worse and what it can improve. PLANNING COMMISSION 6 SEPTEMBER 1988 PAGE 7 Mr. Craig said he personally felt Rt. 7 to Shelburne Village will improve in 5 or so years and within another 3 or 4 years the City of Burlington will get the Southern Connector going. In 10 years roads on either end will outstrip the capacity of this area. He felt it won't get any better unless this section of Shelburne Rd. is improved. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 11:20 pm. Clerk r r Memorandum _ Planning ah r"4 September 6,_ 1988 agenda stems September �, 1988 ,...:., Page 3 the p parking.s aces and loading zones for the building. No circulation i$ -available along the back of the. building due to the narrowness of the lot. Parking; The plan shows 21 spaces plus 6 future spaces to accommodate -the future addition. Without the future addition, the building requires 16 spaces (4 spaces p per unit) by ordinance. With, the "addition`, the building would require 20 spaces. Therefore, even with the addition, the proposed 21 parking spaces should be.sufficient. The 6 future 'us spaces could-. further" be ed if determined to -,be, necessary. " Landscaping:, The.. proposed building-(5 units) requires $9,300 . worth of landscaping. The -landscaping plan shows Norway Maple, :.Cap Yew, Barberry, "Dwarf Juniper, and nativ"e White Ceda"r: The proposed., landscaping is valued at $3,500. The plan 'hould"'be revised"to show an additional $5,800 Worth.of landscaping". - . The 'plan shows a Dwarf Juniper in the area. proposed"aa tfuture parking spaces. The Juniper should - be -,moved outside o.f`"this area: _SetbackslCoverag"e'' All setback`_req.uirements "are met. Font yaFd " •. ' . coverage. -requirements are, met. • ;Building cc?verage i'or- the .'5 un'i.t building is 27%, (maximIjm of - 3 %, -Total; .allowed) . ' "lot; Coverage,'.- incl.ud"ing t.hs future...p;ark'ifig ".spaces", "is - 64.X (maxim o'f al -lowed) . 90•X ! Other i ' ,See`, Bi l l Szymanaki',a and Chief "bodd6t:te's 'c.omm�ents .I 5} ;: DISCUSSION: WITH.-POMERLEAU REAL -.ESTATE" - An informal' discussion i=s , being held with Po.merleau : Real testate to, di'scu'ss- various ` . City policies and to 'the plans a.nd hv.w thesR relate . potential ,devel;opment of .their 40+ acre She.lbiirne Road:,, No plans are 'being parcel ..on g, "prssen.te'd :" The primary' purpose of" the discussion is to' -get feed back from the Planning 'on # Commission what they. would like to see in that :srea_ and*:a,ny major, concerns they see- at: this -point. - Other issues "which will most. Iikel.y surface are the City's traffic regulations and future; plans for Shelburne Road and a Southern Connector. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 September 2, 1988 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Mr. David White Pomerleau Real Estate P.O. Box 6 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: 9/6/88 Planning Commission meeting Dear Me Enclosed.are the.agenda item and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 6, 1988 at 7:30 P..M. to represent your request. Sincerely, tj Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp POMERLEAU December 16, 1987 Jane Lafleur South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Jane: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Fitzpatrick/Llewellyn indicating that our original traffic study assumptions for our Shelburne Road properties are still valid and compatible with the analysis that JHK Associates recently completed for the City. Since the City now has more background data with which to address our proposal submitted some- time ago to the Planning Commission, we will proceed to finalize our plans for re -analysis by the Commission. It has always been a fine balance between traffic, sewage and economic timing but it is now clear that it would be prudent on our part to continue now on our proposal on Rte. 7 to come up with an acceptable approach to this development. Even now it seems like we will have to get onto an allocation list for sewage, but obviously need to proceed with our process before other options are closed to us due to infra- structure constraints. Thank you for your continued assistance. We will keep you advised. My best wishes to you and your family for a wonderful holiday season. Kindest personal regards, r Ernest A. Pomerleau EAP/nlb cc• Peter Jacobs Pomerleau Real Estate Co. P. O. Box 6, 69 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05402 802/ 863-2841 FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services One Wentworth Drive • Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000 8 December 1987 Mr. Ernest Pomerleau Pomerleau Real Estate 69 College Street P.O. Box 6 Burlington, Vermont 05402 RE: Shelburne Road Retail Shopping Center South Burlington FILE: 85082 Dear Mr. Pomerleau: As per our meeting of September 10, 1985 with local planning officials, we have awaited completion of the Shelburne Road corridor study so as to allow a better understanding of future traffic conditions on Shelburne Road. That corridor study, prepared as part of "Traffic Systems Management Study, JHK Associates, July 1987, is now comp -Tee ana-F)as�een pu�Ticly distributed. As requested, we have reviewed the findings of that report. Its traffic projections and recommendations largely substantiate those of the traffic impact evaluation prepared for this Project, dated October 1985. Specifically, traffic generated by this Project, a 160,000 square feet shopping center, was included in the projected 1990 design year volumes. Analyses of those volumes at all major intersections in the vicinity of this Project resulted in Levels of Service C or better. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, FITZPATRICK-LLE ELLYN INCORPORATED Rogerd Dickinson, P.E. .T RJD:amov Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying r 0 PLANNING COMMISSION 78 acres APRII. 10, 1y84 of F. ft _ Mr. Ward said the State had told the city that it had no more capacity at the Bartlett Bay Treatment Plant. The present Burger King will close its access to Shelburne Road when this land is developed, and will have access from an interior road instead. That has been agreed.to already. Mr. Ward said the applicant had shown a corridor for the Southern Connector which parallels the railroad tracks. At the entrance point to the land, the road will line up with Laurel Hill Drive and will be signallized. The complex would require 37,000 gpd of sewer space. With the Bartlett Bay plant at capacity, a waiting list will have to be started, as has been done for the Airport Parkway plant. Position on the list is determined by the date of preliminary approval. Mr. Ernie Pomerleau said that the city had turned down the plans for the Southern Connector, but he had left a 150' wide corridor near the tracks to allow for the eventual construction of a Connector. He noted that the plan showed not only the Pomerleau land, but also adjoining Fayette land. The development has been discussed by both landowners. Mr. Pomerleau felt it would be helpful for the city to see what might be done on both pieces at once. Mr. Mona felt a heavy line should be drawn around both pieces of land so that they would be distinctly separated, and that they should be presented as one piece or as two separate applications. Mr. Pomerleau said his portion of the total land was 48 acres to the north and the Fayette land consisted of 33 acres to the south.He said they could present the application in any form the Commission wished. He was present as an owner of one property and joint developer of his land plus that of the adjoining landowner. Mrs. Maher was not sure the city could handle the traffic that the development would bring without the Southern Connector in place. Mr. Lindberg, representing the developer, said the interior access road would have a 60' right of way. It was hoped that connections could be made to the Burger King, Big Boy and K-Mart lots. They hoped to have the interior road intersect with the Connector with an on -grade intersection. The restaurant, shown on Fayette land, would have access from a secondary road intersecting with Shelburne Road. This would eventually lead to 2 signallized intersections giving access to the total 78 acre parcel. Mr. Spitz, representing the applicant, said they would like to line this road up with McIntosh, if possible. Mr. Pomerleau said he would like some direction from the Commission on the plan. Pars. Maher wondered if it was all academic because of the lack of sewer capacity and the absence of the Connector. She was not sure Shelburne Road could handle the traffic from this much commercial space. Mr. Mona pointed to Corporate Circle, where the overall concept was approved, but the Commission reserved the right to review each lot as it came in. He felt it was likely there would be too much traffic for Shelburne Road to handle the entire development without the Connector. ,ir. Burgess felt that it would hinge on specific traffic studies for specific uses and he was not sure that approving or disapproving the concept would have anything to do with the hard facts shown in a traffic study. ?1r. Spitz noted that 5-6 years ago calculations on the Airport Parkway plant had shown that it was at capacity and that a waiting; list was started. After some projects had been built, they were monitored, and it was found that 3. PLANNING CUNIEISSIuly APRIL 10, 1984 they had used les:> capacity than the estimates, so people on the waiting list were allowed to build. That is why Mr. Pomerleau would like to get on the list here. Fletcher Crowe said he lived on Laurel Hill Drive and he wondered if there were a way to get the Connector and the sewer upgrade without costing the taxpayers money. He felt property owners could not stand any more tax increases. Mr. Krassner noted that it seemed to cost the community to add to the Grand List. He felt it would defeat the purpose of the Connector if it were to have many connections such as one to this area. Mr. Pomerleau noted that the scale of the project was not immense. 75,000 sq. ft. is about 1/3 the size of Sears. This will not be a major enclosed mall. A 30,000 sq. ft. office building is not unusual in South Burlington, and that is not proposed at this time. The hotel/motel is planned to be on a suburban scale. Fie said that he felt the Southern Connector size could be scaled down for lower costs and said they would be willing to participate in some way. They are prepared to do their part. Mr. Fitzpatrick, representing the applicant, said they had talked to the State and had not been told that this would be impossible. Mr. Belter said he was ready to look at a plan, and Mr.Burgess said he would not oppose this in principle, but he felt it might be hard to get a favorable traffic study. Mr. Pomerleau said he was considering the retail first and the motel second. The office space was down the list. It was noted that what was built first would affect the traffic, which would in turn affect what more he could build. Sketch plan review of application of LTH Associates, Inc., for construction of a 100 unit residential development on approximately 15 acres, located off Harbor View Road Mr. Ward said the area was zoned C2 and that there had been some discussion of mixed residential and commercial uses, but no provision for that existed now in the regulations. Those amendments have been put on the back burner since the Planner left. The proposal is for 100 units on the 15 acres. The land in the area contains the Harbor View Road commercial area plus a residential area farther up the hill. The density in the first residential area is 4 units per acre. This proposal is at 7 units per acre. Mr. Mona noted that there were two issues - whether to allow residential in this area, and whether this is the proper density. Mr. Ward said that if the Commission proceeded with the proposed amendments, this use would be allowed. Mr. Spitz said he represented the applicant. He said that when the ordinance was approved the idea had been to allow mixed uses in Cl and C2. The dimensional tables for those zones show a listing for multi -family units at 7 per acre. The list of uses for Cl shows multi -family as a conditional use in a PCD, but that line was left out of C2 when the ordinance was written up. It was just an oversight. He felt the developer could lock for a zoning change or a variance. Fair. Mona said the Commission could review the application as if the zoning were eventually to be in place, or the developer could seek a variance. He personally did not favor the variance, since there is no i.ardship here. The Commission agreed to review the application. Mr. Spitz showed slides of the area. It is isolated. Access would be from Harbor View Road. Mr. Erik Davis, representing the developer, said the land was very pretty and that it was too bad to use it for commercial uses. Mrs. Maher did not feel the plan was well laid out. firs. Hurd pointed out that M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer < Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 4/6/84 2) Fassett's, Shelburne Road Proposed lots are conforming, lot #2 is at minimum square footage required, others exceeds required. Access to lots 2 and 3 will be directly across from Harbor Ridge Road, an easement will be provided over lot #3 allowing access to lot #2. Access to lot #1 must be resolved, at sketch plan review access was suggested off the existing private roadway located southerly of the lot. If access is permitted of Shelburne Road it should be located as near to the northerly property line as possible. Access permits will be required from the State Highway Agency. Lot #1 provides utilities to Fassett's Bakery, easements will be necessary. Suggest tabling any action until issue of access is resolved with the Highway Department. 3) Pomerleau, Shelburne Road A Planned Commercial Development is proposed on approximately 30 acres, the uses are as follows: 75,000 square feet of retail area; 30,000 square feet of office area; 200 room motel and a 3,000 square foot restaurant. Major issues, entrance road, proposed directly across from Laurel Hill Drive, signals at this intersection should be considered. Estimated sewer usage for this project being approximately 37,000 g.p.d. Presently no uncommitted capacity is available at the Bartlett Bay plant. Right-of-way for the proposed Southern Connector must be considered. Entrance to proposed restaurant adjacent to a residential development (1185 Shelburne Road) . Connector to the K-Mart Shopping Center is possible and should be considered. Removal of existing curb cut at Burger King Restaurant. 4) L.T.H. Associates, Harbor Ridge Road The area is zoned Commercial II District. Understand that Planning Commission intended to provide for Planned Commercial Development with mixed uses within both commercial districts. However, the proper language is not provided with- in the zoning regulations, amendments as proposed will correct that. Proposed are 100 residential units on approximately 15 acres, which averages a density of seven units per acre. NORTH COUNTRY PLANNING P.O. Box 333 Winooski, Vermont 05404 (802) 655-3661 December 7, 1983 South Burlington City Council 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Councilmen, I am writing on behalf of the Pomerleau Real Estate Company concerning a proposed Planned Commercial Development on Shelburne Road. The property in question lies just south of the Justgold (K-Mart) shopping center, has considerable frontage on Shelburne Road, and backs up along its entire western boundary to the railroad tracks. As you are well aware, the proposed South Burlington Connector has been designed to parallel the railroad tracks, and a long section would cross our planned development. Initial sketch plans for a 30 acre development on the Pomerleau property and a potential connection to the abutting 35 acre Fayette property to the South have just been submitted to the Planning Commission. I wish to emphasize that provisions for connection to the proposed South Burlington Connector have been part of our planning from the outset. The following items have already been included in the sketch plan: 1) Reservation of a 150 foot wide corridor for the South Burlington Connector along the entire western boundary of the property. 2) Designation of one point of intersection with the South Burlington Connector that potentially can serve 2500 feet of frontage for both the Pomerleau and Fayette properties. 3) Construction of a commercial boulevard from the intersection with the South Burlington Connector extending to and directly lining up with Laurel Hill Drive. 4) Erection of traffic signals and turning lanes at the new commercial boulevard and Shelburne Road intersection (also serving Laurel Hill Drive). 5) Relocation of the existing Burger King curb cut away from Shelburne Road and onto the new commercial boulevard. We are able to provide the connecting roads through our development and to reserve the necessary corridor for the South Burlington Connector, but we must seek your help in getting the Connector itself built as soon as page 2 12/7/83 South Burlington Connector/Pomerleau PCD possible. Planning funds for the Connector currently are listed at the bottom of the State's 5-year plan, but recent discussions of Route 7 corridor traffic problems by yourselves, the Town of Shelburne, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, and the Vermont Agency of Transportation all indicate that now is the appropriate time to seek advancement of the timetable for construction. We also suggest that South Burlington voters might be more likely to approve the Connector with some design modifications. Separated crossings are desirable for a "cadillac" design, but at -grade crossings are consistent with the Burlington portion of the Connector and should provide acceptable traffic flow. The number of crossings, of course, must.be limited. We will be happy to participate in any discussions on the future of the Route 7 corridor, and we hope that you will make this one of your top priorities. Sincerely, David H. Spitz cc: William Szymanski Richard Ward Ernest Pomerleau Colin Lindberg Douglas Fitzpatrick CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1)- Name, address, and phone number of: a. owner of record Antonio B . Pomerleau b. Applicant Pomerleau Real Estate c. Contact person Ernest A. Pomerleau 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Planned commercial development including such things as a motel, retail area, and other uses. See Attached Plot Plan: 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Lessee 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Please see attached list S) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Per Plot Plan 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. To be engineered 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the.South Burlington Planning Commission ;which affect the proposed: �sub- division, and include `,the dates of such actions: None 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record. and (b)'proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size- of existing Id proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. da to Abutters - Pomerleau Property Property Address 303 & 503 Queen City Park Road 403 Queen City Park Road 533 Queen City Park Road 929 Shelburne Road 977 Shelburne Road 1041 Shelburne Road 1075 Shelburne Road (Cemetery) 1095 Shelburne Road 1175 Shelburne Road Mail inq Address Green Mtn. Power Corp. 25 Green Mnt. Drive So. Burlington, VT 05401 Champlain Water District PO Box 2085 So. Burlington, VT 05401 Baird Children's Center 1110 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 Justgold Properties 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, NY 10704 Lowell T. & Susan G. Spillane Tamarack Shores Shelburne VT 05482 Wesco, Inc. 25 No. Prospect St. Burlington, VT 05401 City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05401 San Remo Realty Co. PO Box 2009 50 Joy Drive Soitth Rurlington; VT 05401 Fayette Co., Inc. PO Box 7 Burlington, VT 05401 COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401 802-864-4950 802-863-5790 November 28, 1983 Mr. Dick Ward Planning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Ref: South Burlington Development Park (Pomerleau Property) Dear Dick: Enclosed please find an application for preliminary sketch plan together with four copies of the site plan. In the application I have included a location map, a completed form for application of sub -division, a list of all the abutters, a brief outline sheet that reviews key issues contained in the site plan as well as a site plan at 1" = 100'. It is my understanding that the planning commission will be meeting in the evening of December 13, 1983 and at that time we will be present with additional aerial photographs and copies of the site plan to review the preliminary issues that are under consideration. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, b"�. P. Colin P. Lindberg, CPL/jcs cc: Mr. Ernest Pomerleau Mr. David Spitz Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick No Text COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401 802-864-4950 802-863.5790 November 22, 1983 South Burlington Development Park - #329 KEY ISSUES 1. Entrance road alignment with Laurel Hill at a signal. 2. Right-of-way for new access road 60' Right-of-way planned. 150' (connector) 3. Connection to existing parking at K-Mart, Big Boy's and Burger King. 4. Burger King curb cut on Shelburne Road removed. 5. Road planned for future link to connector with on grade intersection. Access road to southern property connecting to Shelburne Road at a signal. 6. Initial Functions: a. 130 room motel b. 60,000 square feet of retail C. 30,000 square feet of offices d. Restaurant 7. Time table, winter review, spring approvals, summer construction. CPL/jcs No Text i Q . a COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401 802-864-4950 802-8b3-5790 December 8, 1983 Memo - South Burlington Development Park - #329 To: Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick Mr. Ernest Pomerleau Mr. David Spitz Mr. Dick Ward The meeting that was scheduled for sketch plan review, Tuesday evening, December 13, with the South Burlington Planning Commission needs to be rescheduled due to a conflict in overlapping meetings. Dick Ward indicated that the earliest we could reschedule would be in the first week of January, 1984. We will meet again Tuesday, December 13, 2:00 p.m. at 120 Lake Street, to cover the loose ends. Sincerely, Colin P. Lindberg, A.I.A. CPL/jcs COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401 8U2-864-4950 802-863-5790 March 7, 1984 Mr. Dick Ward Planning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Ref: South Burlington Development Park (Pomerleau Property) Dear Dick: Enclosed please find an application for preliminary sketch plan together with four copies of the site plan. In the application I have included a location map, a completed form for application of sub -division, a list of all the abutters, a brief outline sheet that reviews key issues contained in the site plan as well as a site plan at 1" = 100'. It is my understanding that the planning conxnissiQn will be meeting in the evening of March 27th, 1984 and at that time we will be present with additional aerial photographs and copies of the site plan to review the preliminary issues. that are under consideration. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, b".-V �. Colin P. Lindberg, CPL/jcs cc: Mr. Ernest Pomerleau Mr. David Spitz Mr. Doug Fitzpatrick No Text COLIN P. LINDBERG ARCHITECT 120 Lake Street • Burlington, Vermont 05401 802-864-4950 802-863-5790 March 7, 1984 South Burlington Development Park - #329 vry Treiii-C 1. Entrance road alignment with Laurel Hill at a signal. 2. Right-of-way for new access road 60' Right-of-way planned. 150' (connector) 3. Connection to existing parking at K-Mart, Big Boy's and Burger King. 4. Ourger King curb cut on Shelburne Road removed. 5. Road planned for future link to connector with on grade intersection. Access road to southern property connecting to Shelburne Road at a signal. 6. Initial Functions: a. 200 room motel b. 75,000 square feet of retail C. 30,000 square feet of offices d. Restaurant 7. Time table, winter review, spring approvals, summer construction. CPL/jcs CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Antonio B . Pomerl eau b. Applicant Pomerl eau Real Estate c. Contact person Ernest A. Pomerleau 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Planned commercial development including such things as a motel, retail area, and other uses. See Attached Plot Plan. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Lessee 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties Please see attached list 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Per Plot Plan 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. _ To be engineered 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the .South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- ., division, and include `.the dates of such actions: None 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record. and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) lype of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. da to Abutters - Pomerleau Property Property Address 303 & 503 Queen City Park Road 403 Queen City Park Road 533 Queen City Park Road 929 Shelburne Road 977 Shelburne Road 1041 Shelburne Road 1075 Shelburne Road (Cemetery) 1095 Shelburne Road 1175 Shelburne Road Mailinq Address Green Mtn. Power Corp. 25 Green Mnt. Drive So. Burlington, VT 05401 Champlain Water District PO Box 2085 So. Burlington, VT 05401 Baird Children's Center 1110 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 Justgold Properties 1304 Midland Avenue Yonkers, NY 10704 Lowell T. & Susan G. Spillane Tamarack Shores Shelburne VT 05482 Wesco, Inc. 25 No. Prospect St. Burlington, VT 05401 City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset St. So. Burlington, VT 05401 San Remo Realty Co. PO Box 2009 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05401 Fayette Co., Inc. PO Box 7 Burlington, VT 05401 •' •,:i -.-.- c "'""f _...p.c•�.�._"-,�><1aJ nor [ •,r:, �-. L .,. �.ai �'�Li4" �� ��M. t.y�..,� ,,/ `. rJ Fos)(/� �.�r i��' �: I.•.....-.-,._... t . _ • All 1; `4 II 1 %1 ' � -- ...- .... i•..�{, _rs-=rv-�'' _ � •> \_ ,.ems' '�� '- ,•, .. ,- _`!'; .• h \ 1�� � i•r \ \\ `` 1 - /`•' .. 1� 1 ` _ M _ z y, 3 U '.! �•r, d - /� '' I I d' �r fir/ ' ,� I l I l 4 \•. , a - s_j F,WMNW r - `. - ,'�• j — ` y , � � � z F'� , a � _ : 3, »s ; �� :._ -� � � a •� 11 ' i ..." ,;,-•- ����� , �' � i I \ I � . 1, 11-�'�.•.�""'��-• � �- : �1, '�i� . • // * !/ o p if v � ,1 1, l 1 ' / .. ,.. ., � ... "�� , v Cr--- - _ - � \ 1 II rr• r •` l ..1. r�''. �'` .� �� ' - � , � �n �y t ' p l ''�.. _�� I � C _.__._. _ I � �-�.r-..� ter„^- � .. � W �' _ r A �. ' � \�,.� •�J,.-...� , H �e ff l ` s •� , r1 ' A rlAP 4'<' da a _9 j _ say TAM Am ; 0 RETAIL i TS,000 lost / 6' M....T6 L �� �o 1I MOTEL + 200 .00.io �, i OFFICE, 30,000 so It � mom I'' RESTAURANT 3,000 to n , -- .... : i� :.�...�, ......sell•••. _.t. v ... ..ease • ,I � -+. -�.: ....>,.. � '«_ � •• •� ueMeuuuuu • su•e sus � - _ ...� i v. I Y , � � _ _ ;� { puea•see•aeaoseseaoatu.seveoVa.aes ' �t � fir•'-�•�+«.,•+..�. ••.. TT I � ee1�l �"�'J' �"�-'J•... •ice �'�C� T-. rr Y -�r � ��.coo '7 U �, � ��. .