The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0981 Shelburne Road (4)November 10, 2016 Re: #SP-16-75 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sin rel iRa f mond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com south � arl I g o PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- I - (ofT use onZP APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): US60 Ny IM0 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 107-7 - Z$3 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): (t. J . S *V4 INL % MR:Melll-1 SHAW p.0• Pox 235 1V44 , 1.1V 1315q 35.727.020 r-er_L n,shayi573°Ita gwull•tom 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #):fl4A. We-k4 gHkt4 P.O• goc 236 fuLyi, NY 13151 315.1Z'f•o2c.5 CCU 1mshaN1 6-7518 q/mJl(. Lows 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: MShr)oj575g a JPUI I • CvM 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: qal SHa13QZK1C- /ZD. S. raurzotjeroa J, Jr 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 15/40 - OM51 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each sepirate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): fF0HTZ .t2 WF&M IGINdr ' Fh�7 V.Fj�;TAtJK4xr41✓' d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 4, 11 & gF_ e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 6114 S1w4tZ £ Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): . Ac- g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 15 �X1sCii * 15 h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 65, 70. Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 8. 317 % / 5517. sq. ft. Proposed 4 - 30 % / 111 V sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing (A. L_% / 4S -!q5& A sq. ft. Proposed (,a. 3a % / 44, 91A.1*Z sq. ft. J4*MJkr*WM- Zg.OD Jost. SZ c. Front yard (along each street) Existing seesRuw_Z,*,,Z % / z&w.91 sq. ft. Proposed **j^Fsb Z�.d %/ Zasz•si. sq. ft. SW,,,.w Z&-00 240-7. ZI d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1 J ,b00i/— * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 621ft o0 cot-ipwrc i► a. L wo5c^fs-, b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (ln and out): 5Wr- A5 F,,ctsn t- , 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 69hm - 12. t m 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 5. M , T, 1, F , s 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: (p,14 . l & 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time o submitting the site plan application in accorda e with the city'sss fige schedule. /V� ,`A L, �'1 /v 4g �' ,e /"/v J t� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. a - SIGNA APPLICANT ft,c' Rv M f- SIG ATU F PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: FIDevelopment Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomp dministrative Officer bate The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 EXISTING GRASS AND LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. IN.I.C.) 1F-7 -7 I 1 I h�I I I I I 1 ENCLOSURE BY G.C. SEE DETAIL UDRIVE THRU SIGN TO REMAIU ems." REMOVE OLD CLEARANCE BAR & FOUNDATION. ADD.®., NEW CLEARANCE BAR & FOUNDATION. !O & SPEAKER FAIN. (N.I.C.) - `�EXISTING CONC. TTOOPPRIIEEECCMEEAII AK . M L_JL -� 2 � I AS-1.2 I t EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLANDS TO REMAIN. tiN 10 E. 11 EX. 11 EX. SPACE SPACES G.C. TO PAINT ALL (6) LIGHT POLES & REPLACE (12) LIGHT ALL ASPHALT REPAIRS, HEAD FIXTURES (PROVIDED SEAL & STRIPE BY OWNER. BY OWNER) EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLANDS TO REMAIN.-7 I NEW I" CONC. FILLED HANNAF( q u ,FILLED BO- LLAR ��TEEL I --_ -I EXISTING LIGHTED DRIVE THRU SIGN TO REMAIN. I EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER &RAISED CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 01 c.) ENCLOSURE. EXISTING CONC _ EMAIN. O EXISTING GRASS AND LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. (N.I.C.) ! T ,L OUTLINE OF gXISTING " ROOF OVER!{ANGABOVE ( y J )UTLI F/' N Y �S OVE 4•-T EXISTI G a BURG E KING '% RESTA RANT /j — — — — — — — — A311.2 I I 6 r1i ACE.0 EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLANDS TO REMAIN. (RIVE FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE II S CES S SNOW STORAZi€AFAC f �- CONC. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. H_ANNA_FORD DRIVE 1 EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHADED AREAS = OF EXISTING BUIL BE REMOVED. G.C. TO PAINT EXIST. PYLON SIGN POLE & EXISTING $TO WALL TO REM LEGAL NOTE: 1. INFORMATION FOR ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, LEASE LINES, ETC. WAS REFERENCED FROM A PLAT OF SURVEY WHICH WAS TAKEN FROM A PORTION OF A LARGER PLAT OF SURVEY DATED JANUARY 25, 1999 W411CH WAS PREPARED AND CERTIFIED BYA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, IN THE STATE OF VERMONT, RONALD E. GAUTHIER, VERMONT REGISTRATION 6574. 2. ALL BOUNDARIES, BUILDINGS AND SITE FEATURES SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK D_� 70I� _ 4tl GENERAL NOTES A. ALL WORK IS TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE w.ev OF VERMONT BUILDING CODE AND ANY/ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES. S. ALL FLATWORK: DRIVEWAYS, CONCRETE WALKWAYS AND CONCRETE PADS ARE TO COlMPUTER DRAf(IN61[CHNDI061ES IIK. COMPLY NTH ALL REQUIREMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. C. FINISH GRADE THE AFFECTED AREAS AFTER ALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, SUCH THAT ALL SURFACE WATERS ARE DIRECTED AWAY FROM BUILDING AND NEW STRUCTURES TOWARDS EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE bRMlll ` AlllPO4R SY STEMS. . i¢AIIN 4 D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD SURVEY AND VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL s111 w" 1 EXISTING UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, PRIOR TO '� m COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. E. THEiCONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE COKrNNCING OF ANY WORK THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OBT NING OF ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK SITE / ZONING INFORMATION ZONING INFORMATION: ZONING bISTRICT: COMMERCIAL i -RESIDENTIAL 15 (C1-R15) EXISTING LOT SIZE: 85,767.5082 S.F. (1.5098 acres) EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACK(SHELBURNE RD.): 50 FT. EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACK (HANNAFORD DR.) : 30 FT, FRONT YARD AREA LOT COVERAGES: RANNAFORD DRIVE TOTAL FRONT YARD AREA: 7,331.88 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUSAREA: 2,052.028,F. (28.00%) TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA: 5.279.06 S.F. (72.00%) ITHERE IS NO CHANGE IN THIS AREA) SHELBURNE DRIVE TOTAL FRONT YARD AREA: 11,102.47 S.F. TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2,685.91 S.F. (24.02%) TO,�Atr�iWSjI�ryG'PyEyR'd16J 995,�8.5�%) ypp TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2,907 21 S.F. (26.00%) p� TOTAL NEW PERVIOUS AREA: 8,2]5 28 S.F. (74.00%) BUILDAR`f'A�3'�^@iS'F'C'�YbE�i'ri"� 3 TOTAL BUILDING AREA EXISTING 5,512005E TOTAL BUILDING AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED = 1.36600 S.F TOTAL BUILDING AREA TO REMAIN = 4,146.00 S.F. TOTAL EXISTING BLDG LOT COVERAGE: 5,512.00 / 65,767.5082 = 8.38% TOTAL NEW BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 4,146.00165,767.5082 = 6.30% TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: BUILDING = 5,512001E ASPHALT PARKING, SIDEWALKS, ETC. 39 94819 S.F TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA:=45,45818SF =6912% TOTAL EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: GRASS PLANTING BEDS ETC. = 2030932 S.F. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA=2030932 S.F.=30.88% TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: �tiN•"y.^q BUILDING 4,188.00 S.F. ASPHALT PARKING. SIDEWALKS, ETC. = 40.903.62 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: -44,969.62 S.F.=68.38% TOTAL NEW PERVIOUS AREA: GRASS. PLANTING BED8, ETC. = 20,7g7.89 S.F. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA = 20,797.89 S.F. =31.52Y. (AN INCREASE OF 0..7,4%t�FOR THE PERVIOUS AREA) PARK1I MN'f�i71�ii1TA,&4 `."' � � 3 RESTAURANT, SHORT ORDER. 12 SP11,000 S.F. G.F.A. 4,166.00 S.F. / 1,0DO S.F. = 4.166 x 12 = 50 SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL ORIGINAL EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 70 SPACES tr "NUMBER OF SPACES TO REMAIN (NOT IN SCOPE) 57 SPACES " 'lr+ NUMBER REWORKED/NEW SPACES: 10SPACES' TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 67 SPACES 'INCLUDES NUMBER OF REQUIRED H.C. SPACES - 3 SPACES 3 (INCLUDES ONE H.C. VAN SPACE) ^ f NORTH ARROW N N Z I ISSUED FOR PERMIT - 02-29-2016 RINARD P. ALI RRIf III PROFESBONAL ENCRR9M, P.E. 11ri - Y:' 1 - �w `'flcgpsF°: bow` YT. LICENSE Na: 9593g gwaehrY 1 O Zo �o °LO YQ N O ;= o W O u a) 4) �O C VJ m 0, I� I C LU C m m a 0 a � Y 0 o O LL COae omi a6Mo 0 ar=M `oE$ VmA -� REVISIONS 1 6-1-16 OWNER REVISIONS 2 7AS-16 SITE PLAN REV'S 3 10-21-16 SITE IN -FIELD PEWS DRAWING TILE BK Remodel - Existing Site Plan DRAWING INFORMATION Scale AS NOTED Drawn LEK/CDT Ch.ketl RAV Date 02.25-11 Job No, 15-154 DRAWING NUMM]R AS-1] r i I ENLARGED PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: V = 10'-0" ROUND OFF CONCRETE AS SHOWN (ALTERNATE: - ----__-- ROUND OFF CONCRETE AS SHOWN.(ALTERNATE. !h PREFORMED CAP.) PREFORMED CAP.) P6 STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL P3.5 STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL POST (6W O.D.), GALVANIZED, FILL POST (4" O.D.), GALLYANIZED, FILL WITH CONCRETE. (30DO P.S I) WITH CONCRETE. ODO P.S.I.) PAINT SAFETY YELLOW. PAINT SAFETY YELLOW SLOPE 7 X 3" CONCRETE ® SLOPE 3" X 3' CONCRFTE (, BASE TO SHED WATER. BASE TO SHED WAT L R CONCRETE SLAB AS ^- CONCRETE SLAB AS \ �'i vy1 � 7 - li,— COMPACTED -I 1 - I i COMPACTED ' FILL. ' < I_ FILL. - c M 4 (;6 O x W DP CONCRETE FTG. 8. (9000 P.S.I. ®28 DAYS) SOIL BELOWWELL COMPACTED. 3 TYPICAL FILLED STEEL BOLLARD DETAILS SCALE: t• 11'- t I / 21'- OUT TO OUT OF CONIC. PAD 4�4 5'-0 4" V-3" 5.-0" 5,0 4 4a�-0 I i . _ ] -"- VERT. 1x8 NICHI HA PT: 2X6 HORIZ.@ r I ` CEMENT BOARDS, TOP,BOTTOM&." MINX " GAP BE EN MID POINT of 11• BOARDS. (TYP.) POSTS (TYP) a. — � f� CONC. FILLED EL BOLLARDS. OODETAIL SEE Ki 5'3" 108' 6'$' THIS SHEET. (TYP.) O 5 NEW DUMPSTER I NEW DUMPSTER O LOCATION \ LOCATION P.T. 6x8 AID POSTS. \`--r S" THK CONC. SLAB w/ I T.O. POST+6'-B• ABV. FIN. GRADE. O.D. P3.5 STEEL SX6-W2.4xW2.4 WWM (TYP.) a I GATE POST. (TYP.) I OVER 8" COMP. FILL. WDP 8" WIDE THICKENED L- — __ J _ J ^ LLAS EDGES ^ 9�1111_`_�_IIIII® Nil n q�•O O Xt YL P4 PI LGSTF' ."phi(: GAL y eTf�- j� S THK GONG. APRON w/ SLEEVE TO POST LE ST NEAR BOTTOM. ANGFRAME wl VERT. ix8 6x6-W2.4xWL.4 MAW WELD (2) 4Yj•O.Dsl2*L P4 PIPE HARDIE BOARDS. FURNISH Q OVER 6• COMP. FILL. SLEEVES TO EA CUTE LEAF. TO NVO DROP RODS EA, LEAF, j SLOPE T ADJ. AS RE09 ACT AS HINGE. (TYP.) (TYP.) TO MEET ADJ. PAVING. r,_�_ENLARGED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN � SCALE. v4" = ra• 1'-WO X 41" OP CONCRETE FTG. (WOO P.S.I. ® 28 DAYS) SOIL BELOW WELL COMPACTED . NORTH ARROW N N W Z ISSUED FOR PERMIT - 02-29-2016 polky.lhdge.Pelneq CQWIR DRARIN6 TECHN01061CS INC. a. snow da Etr�� • >it Yvrn_ sin RICHARD P. AUPPCR11 III PROFEBBMM ENGINEER, PE pttpdnN,,, `.ct oP Ye •9. 1 - - tl'� Rx9E� G2t" �'��70NAL EAR n. uGExtx�x sa89R 1Mwct r t �u� s.+rnr rrr_=xar"'�'n texas s�,yx.tetiyw'r• .-0nnja n.b�iv.o.r,wwr.r�e sM.sxis�seb rr �e"rxre ZD w � L0 _ LI Y 0 Q a C c: o nD �� o > ¢ 0 m � 0) M� WV R I C ' w � a Lf) m 4 1 a o \ Y t 2 m $$ Omn oS�,a ads$ 07o a1 Nan O$� i 4- REVISIONS 1 6-1-16 OWNER REVISIONS 2 3 7-18-16 SITE PLAN REVS 10-21-16 SITE IN -FIELD REVS DRAMW Tau BK Remodel - Partial Site Plan, Enlarged Dumpster Plan & Details DRAMNG INFORMATION Scale AS NOTED Drawn LEK/CDT Chocked RAV Date 02-2548 Job No. 15-154 DRAMNG NUMBER III -1.2 S®Uthl ,3 PLANNING & ZONING August 17, 2016 Re: #SP-16-20 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer y ymond J. Bela Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south: PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number Sp- -1`_'_ rolYicc use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW pAdministrative ODevelopmcnt Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF 4ECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Yv 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): kvv 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all address, phone & fax #): 'S�4 *1,� 1q-C Q�p from Staff. Include name, 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: ` spa->�1 `S75®1� ` )n I�' • -- 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: g S �tQ (�uYLt Q O 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): ( Q - Con 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburL.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project des ption (explain what you want a proval for): 1 � �Xi�lZiu�� , '�►LTIc� bPr> 6}A:b1tXi M PA94 y4amr,mal-- i- b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on uses to remain): _ (include 4iescription and size of each new use and existing d. Total building square footage on p��r//operty (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): � / l 'C �_ m e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings an4 existing buildings to main, specify if basement and mezzanine): ro oSe 2 f. Numberof;es* ntial units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existingandproposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application of specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): os2P M 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Qc,-es 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: S Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing �"`� % / sq. ft. Proposed _% / sq• ft b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing SQw-p % / sq. ft. Proposed TZ% / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) " Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC Z2S 000 $ (7 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 6kfS-� jnter n 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 5 /Lt i W I—F-S 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: q Lek S &O, S �- 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by thi City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in actor lance with the cittyy's fee schedule. nM 0 !�(/�►'"'�"" J V' ��/(J U Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and orn digital (PDF-format) copy. 4 1, 3 14� Sfta Plan Application Form. Rev_ 12-201 W NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and.is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ATURE, OFrAPI'l.lCANT OF PX-QeE-RiDi- OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: R Development Review Board Adninistrative Officer I have reviewed i site plan application and find it to be: Comp The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identff y, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 am THE CENTER OF THEI9LAND� ' SHALL BE EXCAVAT ED TO A DEPI H — 'a .OF2,6 FT. AND REPLACED WITH - LOAM OR SANDY LOAM SOIL TO _ PROVIDE ADEOUATE SOIL VOLUME -...._....TO SUPPORT TREE GROWTH. ....-..... ....:r " nc a M i E 1 LbL41;Rx �.—. I T Tr.Fw. C. 9 1oa: tkTYWtas' Mrfnmrcr sl i fie: N':N:fJ1811% HR s(` xtTl Ti..,;:T.._. . ..sH'tLe. AR. rvw+r✓',21rt a•s :isU 2s, .. A! 43tLn s. I T T C I d : : ,r .... _. t/ ......... ...... .. .. ............ .. ......... �. ._._ MARTIN's DI LVE (P-ri va t e Roa d) AUG 1 1 2016 City of So. Burlington NOTE'. THE' CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAVIIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGN DRAWINGS, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES. AS SUCH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND UNCOVERING EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITY CONNECTION POINTS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO ASCERTAIN EXACT MATERIALS, LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, ETC. AND THEIR POTENTIAL CONFLICT VNTH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. GC SHALL CONSULT WITH CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ENGINEER AS APPROPRIATE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK, I Scale 1" = 201 PLANT SCHEDULE FOR NEW PLANTINGS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME CONT CAL OTY BN Betula ,gre / River Birch B & B Z"Cal 3 Multi -flunk 3 trunks min. SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME/COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING OTY V BG Buxus x'Green Gem' /Green Gem Boxwood 3 gel 3P' o.c. 3E OTR Thu) occidentalis'Rheingold/ Rheinguld Arborvitae 5 gal 4B" o.c. 26 GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL. NAME./COMMON NAME CONT SPACING ON FA Festuce arundmil.e. /Tall Fescue sod 3,537 d HO Himl—call—'—I. de Or. /Stella de Ora Daylily I gal 35 Rf GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1 TI+EGFNFRN CTXJTRACTOR SRESPONSIaLF. FOR FEMOVIALLF%ISTING V=GE'p'KKvLF%CFPr VAIERE IJOTEp TO RENNNI WOREbTNtTNGWORx. TFELAFDSUAPECONTRACTORSHALLVERFY'HA-THEGRA'JEOF'A.L LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE WITHN HU 1' OF FINISH GRACE. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NQ: FY THE OA•EF IMEDIATELY SHWLO ANYDISCREHlCCSEXLST FCE 5PEC�F�1".A AFS UR MUFEtt '.f0 NSTR 'CT JI ry '.RF AREA A'JD RANI NG SEC PRFPAR T. CONSTRUE' NAIN FINIaH GRADES N LARDSOARE ARfAS AR SHC ON GRAD.NG ATAN8, ANDOONSTRUCTANO MANINNSL 'ES SR.•O MENUEDB"1NEGEUYE( ' EWJ I A N 'G FEARS S,HALLINAVEROSITVE IRA NAUF ANAI FROM STRI: T RF SPFOIFIDDINTHEREFORTrANDAREASOFPCTENTLA, RONUING SHALL SE REGRADED TO ELENUN IVITHI HE SURROUNDING GRADE5 AND ELIMINATE FONDIMS POTENTIAL a .UL D ANY GONFLICTSAtJr,AIRDI ,RFPANC FS AR F R'TW E OR D ND PLAR:6 OEOTECHN CAI. RF.RT TI CSNOTESNCptT =4NTIUJSTIE'O 'TORSHALL IMMEDIATELY ESUCH ITEMS TO THE ATTENTION OF' LANDSCAPE ARCH. ECT GE ER CCM' ACOR AND-1— EN. F THATTRE GRACE IN SHRUB AREA. —SE >BC QV NIE GRADE AFTER NSTAL NGSOILAMENDMEN'S A BELOWFNSHORAGE Ne R Ab ER>DTA S L M NL. EfrS. JIC. COVEPWTTW OF 0. 'RFTEWPIJLSANPDDRISS TRUDEABOVFHFFNRNSLIRFACEOF THEWALXSNDCUR98M U EO ER WTIHi TOF SNALLaE T LEASr S OAER HAN HE TC: OF WALL A. INSTALLSIXA.`CE WOVEN NEEfAFFLMCFEC— PROPYIENEFABRICDKAnfl— OREUUALIUNDE PLL MDLCHEDARCASAMDrtDVDC L TREER 5 6 NSTALL MULCH TOPCRESSMIG TIRE AND DEPTH PER MULCH NOTE IN ALL PLANT.— BEDS AND TREE RINGS DO NOT Ne ALL MU CH WTHN S OF TREE PoOTT.AFF 6 INS [ALL 1AG GREEN STEEL EUGING SET WEEN ALL PLAN' NG BEUS ANO TLRF AREAS AND EETWEEN GRCIUNGODVERS AND OTHER PLANTS N.HERE INDICATED OHF FT. T. HYDROMULI:I LLDISTURDEU AHkA3 OUlb LXC iWEKY IMf1R (UNLESb 3MKTVJMl AR S(JL;. 8 ALI. PLANT I.UCATICNS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC —JAL LOOATIOUS SH U. R VERIFIED WITH THE LANDaGAPE PRCHTFCT ORDESIGNE FRIWTOFYAMHu. THE LANLISGAR kCTOR HALL ENSURE THAT ALL REUUIREMENrb OF THE FERMRTING AUTHORITY ARE MET (E MN MUM 7 OU NTITIES. PLANT NG METI-0.15, TREE FROTECT ON METHODS. HE M IANCSCAPE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE BLEF LN.GRANi SPLM88NCN LEGENDSAONAREFORGRALINFORMATOLYLATHEN01FAgSCRERANDY NhTHE I— ND THE CLAN FATTER THE RANI' WAR 'TY AS 9MDN'MI W THE RAN (FOR INCRIPJPL SYMBOLS; OR CALLIX1i IFDR CRC .'hMVFR TTERMjbI'll". KALLM YEM1CF 4 MU sue T.:F UFRL11E 1ANT11ARE NOT SS LLCM VAND—IITE WRRTBJ RIMIISSIOM Till TELANUSGAPE ARCH SOME'TF TFIER NT ARENOER pN.I THE IAND C. ttCOM1TRAC SHKLMT THE [ [£ NWR VOV ED OR PE NtE ': RANTS A EE NVECTED AND APPROVED OR RE.,ECTEC ON THE 1OB6 TE BY THE WYNER q`.UWJEkS REFFFIENTATIVE THE LANDSCAPE UYT PC'I':xJ SHALLBE HESPNIS BS FOR I'HE MNM(IE ANCE Of A WYJkK l3PE MAI CT HLSE 5-1 FOR 5f1 DA VS BF:YONO NPI. pC.E ANGF OF AM t ANpSEAPF. WORK BY TNF LXANFFL i MC%SCAPE MR N TAKzN5 SHAM �N(:CUL%VF_EILT SITE VRIY&FW?HEF(XLOWING AC[KYVS (AS AFYHOPRIPTEI. iROfER FRUNING, RESTATING R TREES. RESETF!GGFPLANTS THATHAVESETTLED MOWIM1G PND AERATKx: @'LAWNS. NEE0i M R KFEU;AREAS AAeO,IT'rIER HAVEIRSTGH:MNARIG WELLYSTEM FOR INSECTS AND ANDI ES,REFUCEMEM CK'MULCH REMOVALOF TER REPAIRS L PTHE h�RxSATHE SYSTEM N CTO RAD TY PARTS A AINT I THE I.NJ.SHIR, AND THEMAPPROPRIATEINPPER WATERSGR NJ.RANT MATS THE. UNuBCAPE CONn'h:IX+SHNLAMeJTNN RE FRIGA,TpN SYSTEM IN PROPER WURI(IM� M.IER, WITH 5(:HEDJ" Tx: AUiUSTMEMS BY (EASCIN lU MPNM:ZE VMTER COMJSERTELIT T 1... SHIXJLDREEDEUNJfiJGSOCDFl .EF.At N!JTRIOTEEOaYEASAND TICNlR AFU SYRT£N GL SATFE - AD ITI ACTOR SHN. TRE3RJNSIERS: FUR WATERING THEY PR[AS AND OBTNNING AFULL STMOOr'GRASS AT ID AO ACH EYE COST TO THE OIMVER 1A. TO pCNIEVE FINAL ACCEPTANCC 0.T THE END OF TH[MA:NTENPNCE PERIOD ALL CF THE FULL.(YJANG CCMCITI(xJS MUST OOCL'R. A THELANfiS NOT MHALL G THei CTiVE,ONDI HEALTHY GROWTH LIEDWffH AND REPLAS MADE HEALTHOR Y PLAN.IMATERI L PRI RANTS NOT MEE'I':NG THIS CONDITION SHAH RE REJECTED AND REFUCEU a'Y HEALTHv PVVJ'T MATERIAL PRIOR TOFINAL 0.C(.AL BECE U ALL HAkUSCAf£$FALL eE GLENJEU FYJIOR IO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. C 90T1DFD PRFiS MUS?3E 4CARELYGFOWTNL:AAD MIATREACHAMINIMUM HF.IC:ii CFltll IM1CAIE5 BEELIKE. FIRST INE $—Rli H:rURUML:LCHECAREAS3HALLSHOW ACP'VE,HEALTHYG EIRIP BAREAREAb ERIAACE NTVFLl'E SOIJPRE TDR'S— EERESODDEC OR RESEEDED LAS PPFROFRiATE; PRIOR TO F3:AL ACCEPTANCE. ALL SPEGFO TURF SFIND BE [DAILY MCW£C. 15. SEE SPEGFK,'ATIOMIS ANO DETA0.5 FCW FURTHER REQUIREMENTS. MULCHES AREF AL:. Fi pNTlta::3 COMRLTE, CCXYTRPCTCR SHALL NSTALL 3'THICK IAYER P.' 1 t.T SRE(lUf:U 11C%1T MUiLN OV!ERLANUSGAPEFA&tICINALLF—mixi AREAE U]Mf!RACTOR.— SLF 11T FpMRE3 CF A L MLAD ESTOLANDE CAPE ARCS IF.CT AND O— R FOR APPROVAL FRIOR TOCCIJ—DETION ABBOU:TELYNOE%PUSECGR-NDSiAL--FT3HWNNGANYNMERECW THE PRO.IE(^ AFTER MULCH HAS BEEN INSTAI.IF-1 EVERGREEN DE 51QN GROUT (MIm 6111460L) ITMI Him CKt Dr.. Suits IAV W.ke 1'PrGt NY'. 1?56"l wxTY.ImM1cxp:<.mnullAnM.neL ray From: Luna, Charles <Charles.Luna@lend lease.com> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:24 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Ray, Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403. Per the landscape contractor the revised total landscape and installation cost is $7,226. Let me know if there is anything else. Thank you. Regards, Charlie Luna Program /Project Mgt -Advisor V, Multi -Site Group, Construction, 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Dallas, TX 75039 T 469 628 0144 1 M 469 628 0144 1 F 312 423 1301 Charles. Luna(cDlend lease. com I www.lendlease.com From: Luna, Charles Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 7:55 AM To: 'ray' Subject: RE: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Ray, I don't have that information at the moment, however, I'll get it to you this morning. Regards, Charlie Luna Program /Project Mgt -Advisor V, Multi -Site Group, Construction, 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Dallas, TX 75039 T 469 628 0144 1 M 469 628 0144 1 F 312 423 1301 Charles. Luna(a)lendlease.com I www.lendlease.com �bK ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 3:16 PM To: ray Subject: RE: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 That's satisfactory Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(o-)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 2:51 PM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: FW: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Craig, The attached plan has been revised to address your comments. Please review and let me know if things look OK. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitv.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City of or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Luna, Charles[mailto:Charles.Luna @lendlease.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 2:16 PM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: RE: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Ray, ray From: Luna, Charles <Charles.Luna@lendlease.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 9:45 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Attachments: xlcm-datasheet.pdf Ray, Good morning. Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403. I spoke with the lighting consultant this morning and have included his response below along with a manufacture's data sheet showing the actual type `C' site light fixture. The clarification is as you anticipated and fixture is not mounted at 180 degrees. The "180" note is for the direction of the internal optics. See attached manufacture's cut sheet and the consultants response below. Please let me know if this is sufficient information to clarify and address the plan review question regarding this item. From: Patrick G. Reinke <patrickCc�tr2corp.com To. Luna, Charles; Thomas S. Reinke Cc Wilson, Greg, OLItlaw, Ken, V.1illiams, Brock, Franceschelli, Vincent Subject, RE: Burger King Message 7-1 xlcm-datasheet,pdf f1 MB,I Charlie, Please see the attachedcut sheet on the XLCM. This fixture is designed to be mounted parallel tc that would allow it to be angled upward. The arrows on the drawing indicate the direction on the type C fixtures to further ensure no light spillage. Thank you, Patrick Patrick. G_ Reinke l TR2 Corporation l Tel 800,457,0031 Ext. 12 l Fax 973.696-8376 l Mobile 201.317.3184 l patrick tr2cr This electronic message contains information from TR2 Corporation. which maybe privileged- The information is intended to be ft of the contents of this message is prohibited. Thank you. Regards, 1 Charlie Luna Program /Project Mgt -Advisor V, Multi -Site Group, Construction, 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Dallas, TX 75039 T 469 628 0144 1 M 469 628 0144 1 F 312 423 1301 Charles. Luna(c),lendlease.com I www.lendlease.com From: Luna, Charles Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 6:56 AM To: Ray Belair Subject: Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Belair, Good morning. Burger King #1567, 981 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403. For the Burger King store I am working toward obtaining the requested revision for the birch trees and clarification (or revision) for the type 'C' site lighting discussed on our phone call yesterday afternoon. I have not received responses yet from the landscape designer and the lighting consultant and will follow up today. I appreciate your time and assistance. If there are any other questions, comments or discussion needed, which arise during the review period please contact me directly. Thank you. Regards, Charlie Luna Program /Project Mgt -Advisor V, Multi -Site Group, Construction, 909 Lake Carolyn Parkway, Dallas, TX 75039 T 469 628 0144 1 M 469 628 0144 1 F 312 423 1301 Charles. Luna(o)lendlease.com I www.lendlease.com This email and any attachments are confidential and may also contain copyright material of the Lendlease Group. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. You must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it. Copying or use of this communication or information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Contracts cannot be concluded with the Lendlease Group nor service effected by email. None of the staff of the Lendlease Group are authorised to enter into contracts on behalf of any member of the Lendlease Group in this manner. The fact that this communication is in electronic form does not constitute our consent to conduct transactions by electronic means or to use or accept electronic records or electronic signatures. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lendlease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interception, corruption or LED AREA LIGHTS - LSI b fiver` SLICE MEDIUM (XLCM) LED idGit7dNG T>'CiYOtL7GY — I US & Int'l. patents pending DOE LIGHTING FACTS Department of Energy has verified representative product test data and results in accordance with its Lighting Facts Program. Visit www.lightingFacts.com for specific catalog strings. LIGHT OUTPUT - XLCM Lumens (Nominal Type 3 Type FT Type 5 TypI TypeFTE Watts (Nominal) o Ss 19900 22800 22900 15500 15800 193 HO 27500 30900 31100 21200 21100 278 SS 19300 1800 18500 15000 15000 193 =s 26700 4100O 23900 20i00 204000 278 LED chips are frequently updated Inerelore values may increase. SMARTTECTm - LSI drivers feature integral sensor which reduces drive current, when ambient temperatures exceed rated temperature. ENERGY SAVING CONTROL OPTION - DIM - 0-10 volt dimming enabled with controls by others. Available with High Output (HO) drive current only. EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100.000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high -brightness LEDs in Cool White (5000K), or Neutral White (4000K) color temperature, 70 CRI. DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 3, FT, FT-L, FT-R and 5. FT-L and FT R allow for D180 mounting configurations with factory set optics for applications such as automotive front row. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Internal Louver (IL) option available for improved backlight control without sacrificing street side performance for FT distribution. Consult factory for internal louver for FT-L. and FT-R applications. HOUSING - One-piece, die -formed aluminum housing contains factory prewlred driver. Wiring access door (with safety lanyard) located underneath. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered flat glass lens permanently sealed to weather -tight aluminum optic frame creates an IP65 rated optical unit (includes pressure -stabilizing breather). MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in 90° and 120' configurations without the need for extension arms. Use with 3" reduced drilling pattern A round pole plate is required for mounting to round poles. Wall mount available by ordering wall mounting bracket (BKS-XBO-WM-'-CLR). Proprietary pole quick mount accessories available with horizontal mounting or fixed 15' angled mounting (POMH-KIT-CLR and POM15-KIT-CLR) for mounting to square poles. See Accessory Ordering Information chart for all brackets. ELECTRICAL - Two -stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2-2002, Location Category C. Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277 VAC (50l60Hz input), and 347-480 VAC. Optional button - type photocells (PCI) are available in 120, 208. 240, 277 or 347 volt (supply voltage must be specified). DRIVER - Available in SS (Super Saver) and HO (High Output) drive currents. Components are fully encased in potting material for moisture resistance. Driver complies with FCC standards. Driver and key electronic components can easily be accessed. OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50°C (-40°F to +122'F) FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI's DuraGrie polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. Available in black, bronze and white. Other standard LSI finishes available. Consult factory. WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.Isi-industries.com for detailed photometric data. SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) - One fixture: 25.25 lbs. (11.5 kg) Packed two per carton: 43.5 lbs. (19.7 kg). LISTING - UL listed to U.S. and international safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. For a list of the specific products in this series that are DLC listed, please consult the LED Lighting section of our website or the Design Lights website at www.designtights.org. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. ARRA `&ar HS E ® 1 ' IP65 R.*Vcb Ast `` Q2V w0t awn s: 3Lr r RxturesawVty with ANSI 03631-201C Amefran Nail srareuni lox Rr aNW L 9NX19 EQuPM( - Lllsnmm ftrr�an 1,5E raquiremwti �� Project Name _ Fixture Type 08y19d15 Industries' Catalog >, __ _. LSI INDUSTRIES INC LED AREA LIGHTS - LSI SLICE MEDIUM (XLCM) O55 LEDwTECH �o LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE XLCM 5 LED SS CW UE BLK PC112® Prefix Distribution CnrrIve Te oelor Input Voltage Finish Options XLCM 3 - Type'-11 LED SS • Super Saver CW - Cool While OE - Universal &K - Black DIM - 0.10V Dimming 5 - Type V Y (5000K) Voltage BRZ - Bronze (from external signal) HO -f0gh Output NW - Neutra' While (120.277V) WHIT White available with High Output FT • Forward Throw (4000K) (H0) drive current only FT-L - Forward Optic Rolataf lor 0180 347-480 Button Type Photocells Mount (left Sideii Universal PC 120 -120V FT•R • Forward Optic Rotated for Of SO Voltage (347-48OV) PC<208-277V- 208-277V PC1347 - 347V Mount (Right Side, IL - internal Lower (available with FT distribution only) LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - XLCM ' m Single 0.5 ! 43 0180' 10 �i D90' 0.8 Tor _ 17 fir* TN120` 1 7 090' 1.9 Nude: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult Factory. ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION (Accessories are field installed) Description Order Number Description Order umber BKS-XBO-WM-'-CLR Wall Mount Bracket 382132CLR FK1M Ss01KF0ing(12@P), FK1202 XLCM 3IFT HSS RM External House Side Shield FK277 Stile Fiisirq a) FK2772 .._ . (Mcka*-rear wooed) 6031598Lr(` D_FK M 240..OaubieFus�slr208w240Y XLCM•FF-1/FT-R-HSS SM External House Side Shield ................... .... 0FK480 Double fair {4 .�DFK208,240 OFK4802 {Bladcony sidempurled)_____ 603161BLK'_ FK347 Single Fusing (347V) FK347f X5RPP Round Pore Plate for 5' Poles 379968CLR POµ15-KIT-CLR Square Pole Ordch Mount Bracket weed 15' Angle 582329CLR FOOTNOTES: 1 - House Side Shields add to fixture EPA Consul[ factory. 2 - fusing must be located in the hand hole of pole. DIMENSIONS .,, 34-5/16 (871mm) 11-3n6" _i. rim)4-7/3" 15e - (123mm 74" — 1-15116" (23mm) (49mm) HOUSE SIDE SHEILD (rear mount) LEFT AND RIGHT VERSIONS OF TYPE FT REFLECTORS (TOP VIEW) Area to he Lit Use Type Use T�rpe FT-L FT-R pole peft) (right) T 7-1R" t (191mm) 4-7/8" (124mm) (396m ) (S96mm) Note: Optics are not field -rotatable. For D180 Forward Throw installations specify left (FT-L) and/or right (FT-R) side mounting. Orientation is based on standing at the pole and looking out at the area to be lit. "r OM115 Project Name I Fixture Type fndusixies_ INC. 2 Cdlalog tt 1 LSI INOOSTRSES NC ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:28 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Burger King Ray, European White Birch is a poor species choice for a parking lot island. They don't tolerate drought and reflected heat, are susceptible to attack from birch leaf miner and bronze birch borer. Of all the available birches, River Birch would be the best choice. In addition, the island they're proposing planting birches in should be excavated to a depth of 2.5 ft. and replaced with loam or sandy loam soil to provide adequate soil volume to support tree growth. There is currently only 5 to 6 inches of soil on top of compacted subbase. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(a)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 11:11 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: Burger King Craig, I am send you a hard copy of a plan to make landscaping changes at Burger King. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks. 3/23/2016 South Burlington Planning and Zoning Attn: Raymond Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 RE: Burger King: Carrols Corporation # Burger King #676 #1567 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403 Interior Dining Room Remodel and Exterior Fagade Upgrade Dear: Raymond Belair In reference to the proposed Burger King remodeling project, Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. is submitting a building permit application for the project located at 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403. The proposed Scope of Work includes remodeling improvements to the building's exterior fagade (construct two (2) Archon elements, partial removal of existing parapet wall, remove and replace light band, demolition of 2 story playground, partial removal of existing overhang/mansard roofing, selective glazing system removal, infill, and glazing system replacement, existing wall signage removal, paint exterior finishes, install Stucco/EIFS Hardie paneling, install canopies/awnings, remove & replace existing awning soffit lighting, interior Dining Room improvements (paint/install wall finishes, furniture & decor replacement), Restroom improvements (remove existing urinal, remove and relocate existing lavatory, replace entry doors, partial wall reconstruction), and NO work required in the Kitchen or on HVAC. The Scope of Work also includes new Burger King S-Logo and Letter wall signage and Drive-Thru preview & menu board signage, as permitted by the local sign regulations. Sign Permit will be submitted separately, by our Sign Vendor, for local review and approval. We have also provided construction information for this project. Please see details below for your review. Construction Questions 1. Will Burger King be remodeling the service counter or beverage station? No. 2. Will the Dining Room be closed during the renovation and keep the drive -through open? Yes. 3. if the drive -through remains open, how will Burger King provide restroom facilities for the employees during renovation? We will keep one restroom open for employees and patrons. 4. How will Burger King provide dust control during construction? We plan to provide floor to ceiling visqueen dust wall to separate the working area from public, beverage, or Kitchen areas. 4wo / V , 4, A f emm /V � //(,Oz/ a 0 i6� h ht q" 4Tgl-/ 44V 14; 10 Od f ~Z� Transmittal To: South Burlington Planning and Zoning Attn: Raymond Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 From: Joshua Bazis Lend Lease (US) Construction Inc. Date: March 4, 2016 Subject: Burger King: Carrols Corporation # Burger King #676 #1567 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403 Interior Dining Room Remodel and Exterior Fagade Upgrade Dear, In reference to the Burger King Restaurant, located at 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403 within South Burlington, please find the enclosed documents for review and approval: • Two (2) Sets of Construction Drawings (24" x 36") • Application Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. is the Agent for Carrols, LLC (current site operator for Burger King). We will be the Project Manager for this proposed remodeling project. If you have any questions, comments, or need additional information please contact me at (717) 860-2171 or via email at Joshua.bazis@lendlease.com We look forward to working with your office on this project. Thank you, JgiKua Bazis, ZOpitlg Manager Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. 120 B Brookstone Drive Morganton, NC 28655 SA4� Date Telephone 828 475 0015 Mobile 717 860 2171 Facsimile 815 301 8256 www.lendlease.com 3/6/2016 South Burlington Planning and Zoning Attn: Raymond Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 RE: Burger King: Carrols Corporation # Burger King #676 #1567 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403 Interior Dining Room Remodel and Exterior Fagade Upgrade Dear: Raymond Belair In reference to the proposed Burger King remodeling project, Lend Lease (US) Construction, Inc. is submitting a building permit application for the project located at 981 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington VT 05403. The proposed Scope of Work includes remodeling improvements to the building's exterior fagade (construct two (2) Archon elements, partial removal of existing parapet wall, remove and replace light band, partial removal of existing overhang/mansard roofing, selective glazing system removal, infill, and glazing system replacement, existing wall signage removal, paint exterior finishes, install Stucco/EIFS Hardie paneling, install canopies/awnings, remove & replace existing awning soffit lighting, interior Dining Room improvements (paint/install wall finishes, furniture & decor replacement), Restroom improvements (remove existing urinal, remove and relocate existing lavatory, replace entry doors, partial wall reconstruction), and NO work required in the Kitchen or on HVAC. The Scope of Work also includes new Burger King S-Logo and Letter wall signage and Drive-Thru preview & menu board signage, as permitted by the local sign regulations. Sign Permit will be submitted separately, by our Sign Vendor, for local review and approval. We have also provided construction information for this project. Please see details below for your review. Construction Questions 1. Will Burger King be remodeling the service counter or beverage station? No. 2. Will the Dining Room be closed during the renovation and keep the drive -through open? Yes. 3. If the drive -through remains open, how will Burger King provide restroom facilities for the employees during renovation? We will keep one restroom open for employees and patrons. 4. How will Burger King provide dust control during construction? We plan to provide floor to ceiling visqueen dust wall to separate the working area from public, beverage, or Kitchen areas. BUR43ER 1'(1 N143 Proposed Exterior Renovations ar1;';It<vrations F'�r: BK #1567 - 981 Shelburne Fload South Burlington, Vermort (")540..' GENERAL NOTES CODE INFORMATION 1. ALL WORK IS TO COMPLY WITH AND BE PERFORMED AS PER ALL APPLICABLE CODES: LOCAL CODES, LAWS AND THE 2012 VERMONT FIRE AND BUILDING ZONING INFORMATION. CODE. AND ANYIALL APPLICABLE AMENDMENTS. 2012 VERMONT FIRE AND BUILDING SAFETY CODE 2. ALL CONTRACTORS ARE TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND 2014 VERMONT ELECTRICAL SAFETY RULES ZONING DISTRICT: EXISTING: CI -RIB CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE 2012 VERMONT PLUMBING RULES 2012 VERMONT ACCESS RULES (ADA) PARKING REQUIREMENT: ARCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEERS) OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE 2012 THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, IBC COMMENCING WORK. OTHERWISE THE CONTRACTOWBUILDER SHALL ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. (DO 2012 NFPA 1 FIRE CODE BEE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL, NOT SCALE DRAWINGS) 2012 NFPA 101 LIFE SAFETY CODE 2014 NFPA 70 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 1 3. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING PORTION OF BUILDING 2012 ICC INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE INDICATED ON DEMOLITION PLAN, INCLUDING ALL WINDOWS, FLOOR BUILDING DESCRIPTION: FINISHES, ETC. li 4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW ALUMINUM WINDOWS VA 1- INSULATED CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-S GLAZING UNITS AS INDICATED. USE GROUP: ASSEMBLY, A-2 5, CONTRACTOR TO INFILL EXISTING OPENINGS AROUND NEW WINDOWS BUILDING AREA: YMTH LIKE MATERIALS SIMILAR TO THE ADJACENT EXISTING MATERIALS. TOTAL GROSS AREA - EXISTING BUILDING 5,312.00 S.F. TOTAL GROSS AREA -REMOVALS •-1,%�.008.F. NEW TOTAL GROSS AREA • 4,140.80 B.F. DESIGN LOADS: (FACE TO FACE OF MASONRY) FROST DEPTH-48INCHES CALCULATED OCCUPANCY: DESIGN WIND SPEED - 90 MPH, 3-SECOND GUST SNOW LOAD- 40 LBIFT. EXIST. KITCHEN I STOR. AREAS: 1,699.70 S.F. 12M S.F. - 9 PEOPLE SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY - B EXIST. PARTY ROOM 412.3 S.F./15 S.F. = 28 PEOPLE CUSTOMER AREAS (DINING I WAITINGI: 1.4H80 S.F.113 S.F. = 98 PEOPLE TOTAL CALCULATED OCCUPANCY: 135 PEOPLE TOTAL SEATING PROVIDED: 74 FIXED SEATS AERIAL MAP ) BURGER KING SK 41567 L 981 3M1.1b R.. South Burongtu . VT 23230 VICINITY MAP BK 015-, 881 BMIE 'g4tl. .< •� South 8 N Lib � :3230 ' SHEr- - ! ML)f 1 L_',.2AWING INW)( 1FE7TIT�E COVER SHEET AND CODE IN N _ DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN RENOVATION FLOOR PLAN _ _ - . - RENOVATION REFLECTED CI II. IN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - WILL SECTIONS AND DETAILS WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS _ DOOR a FRAME TYPES, ADA AC;, - 1z DRY MOUNTING HEIGHTS EXTERIOR MATERIAL AND FINIS .,; :1 IEDULE _ ^ a D.:::,� RE\'. _: 13 all X,-, O. en tl an 7111X i DATE ISSUED G-1 V =512016 D-1 ' 205G016 A l 2rAMIG A 1.1 1RSQ016 A 2 (I 2125MIG A-2 225r"6 A 3 G 2r2sQ0/a A-3 22S201S A-6 0 2Q5R016 AA. _ 2r"MIS :!SUED FOR PERMIT - 02-29-2016 C MPU1ER DURING IKHN WGIIS INC RICHARD P. AUPPERLE III PROFESSIONAL OKIIINE , P.E V,. FN9L Na: 999J9 .airr :s M ZOO 1��o r�' N f0 It si In x20 L �a hs) �� o� O r � 12 CO 1 C LLn oo 1 i4 m () o I Qmr� U J,rn o A k O I:- SIONS 1 6-1-le OWNER REVISIONS 2 7-18-1le REVIEW REVISIONS i1HANNc nrl( K Remodel - Cover Sheet IIRAWING INFORMATION - 's.ls AS NOTED �.O.4wn LEK/COT <:—k.tl RAV D,e. 02-2o-1e ,n No 15-15d G-1.0 i' 1 EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER & RAISED _ CONC. PAD TO REMAIN. EXISTING GRASS AND EXISTING DRIVE-THRU (N.LC.) LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. '.LC-) ; - MENU BOARD 8 SPEAKER PYLON TO REMAIN. (N.I.C,) ENCLOSURE. EXISTING CONC 1 EMAIN, O EXISTING GRASS AND LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. (N.I,C.) �-EXISTING CONIC. PAVEME ,t TO REMAIN. MAKE REPAIR r-OUTLINE OF [%ISTING ECESSARY. I ROOF OVERHAND ABOVE — — — - - ---- - I T EMAIN II NEW TRASH -- _ -- 5G4)' ENCLOSURE BY I \\\ Li �? O.0. SEE DETAIL L - -- --y O 1 _ 2 AS SHOWN. - 1 RO 11 neove Y 4'-V EXISTI G I ,.. --.#. ° 0 1 _ — BURGE KING _ RESTA RANT I -��..- r ,• - SHADED AREAS PORTS `# I EXISTING LANDSCAPED I I )-� OF EXISTING BUILDING I ISLANDS TO REMAIN. BE REMOVED. w. Al EXISTING LIOXTED r,-�'��" �•- I � — DRIVE THRU SIGN TO REMAIN I REMOVE OLD CLEARANCE I --' — — .,.r — I a BAR 6 FOUNDATION. ADO_.: "+c .''V I 2 NEW CLEARANCE BAR 6 ; WORKE �y 1 FOUNDATION. »ai-�---•�_^� � IY (OZ SPACES AS-1.2 I �Ii 11EX ACE SPACES 1 O.C. TO PAINT ALL (6) LIGHT ftlG 6 POLES S REPLACE 1111 LIGHT ALL ASPHALT REPAIRS, p :;A CES I HEAD FIXTURES (PROVIDED 6EAL 6 STRIPE BY OWNER, BY OWNER) EXISTING LANDSCAPED EXISTING LANDSCAPED I IO ISLANDS TO REMAIN ISLANDS TO REMAIN. A,Im I� NEW WO CONC, FILLED - HANNAFORD DRIVE FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE 1 j STEEL BOLLARD. r� 1 �_ I _.. SPACE A61.2 T E IBNIT ICATC — I� - - �ff J X 5 EX.I i -S SI LEWJ _ _ j Ij 7 S CES O.C. TO PAINT 8 ACES EXIST. PYLON SIGN POLE & CM I 1 ��-SNOW ❑ n � ` ¢ -SN � � � EXSTING ORA36 AND LANDSCAPING TO REEXISTING STONE MAIN. (N. C.) .EXISTING GRASS AND LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN. (N.I.C.) WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING PROPERTY I�. ❑ , 17 p -.. ❑ BO EXISTINGCONIC, SIDEWALK TO REMAINUNDARY LINE .I . L;;/ �\ _ EXISTING CONIC. SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. -EXISTING LIGHTED ..._ DRIVE THRU SIGN TO REMAIN.- - HANNAFORD DRIVE EX ISTING ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE 1' = 20'-0' A LEI'1N. NOTE 1 N OE RMAT . DR ALL F'IT -:'ERTY BOUNDARI- : I .INES. ET, : REFERfr"'I D FROM A PLAT C A')IICH VVA .-..EN FRO + `,RTION OF A LAF-X ;. SURVEY D JANUAR'• 1999 VMICH WAS %S CERT: BYARE:' - RED PROFESSIO we', 3URVEYOL :HE STAT: , VERMONT, RONAL.,; F' 'DAUTHIER !AONT Rf RATION 0574. 2 ALLSOUM, : S BUILD .AND SITE FEATURI.::: •' VERIFIE A LICEN 3 '.AND SURVEYOR :DMMENC \T OF AN ':RK. 0 10, 20' 4O 6%sw' '06wimMf ICJ SCALE:. V' - 20'-0" --_ GENERAL NOTES A. ALL WORK IS TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF VERMONT BUILDING CODE AND ANY/ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES. r� S. ALL FLATWORK: DRIVEWAYS, CONCRETE WALKWAYS AND CONCRETE PADS ARE TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. (�IR OR HIK IIIFNKILOEIES OIL C. FINISH GRADE THE AFFECTED AREAS AFTER ALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, SUCH THAT ALL SURFACE WATERS ARE DIRECTED AWAY FROM BUILDING AND NEW STRUCTURES TOWARDS EXISTING SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD SURVEY AND VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, BOTH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD, PRIOR TO �� RaiMw 1aa•tma La•,uua inniK w a•.uaz% w COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCING OF ANY WORK THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WORK. OBTAINING OF ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY RIfINPD P. AUPPERLE III PEOgYIOEY 9107116t PE - � '= � °�,,,�'•- �Ma J`�VNnal, SITE / ZONING INFORMATION ZONING INFORMATION: ,f ZONING DISTRICT: COMMERCIAL 1 -RESIDENTIAL 15 (CI-R15) VT. LIa1Nu.. 9iii6 EXISTING LOT SIZE: 85,707.60112 S.f. (1.8098.cna) N-.uci- 1 EXISTINO FRONT YARD SETBACK (SHELBURNE RD.) : 50 FT. EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACK (HANNAFORD DR.): 30 FT. FRONT YARD AREA LOT COVERAGES: ;•a �,�mr �� •.. HANNAFORD DRIVE TOTAL FRONT YARD AREA 7.331.88&F. .r �tiw TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2.052.82 S.F. (28.00%) TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA: 5.279,00 S.F. (72.00%) '.wa>rrr•.aw+r� wig• ".e �: '.'•�w°"a'4 ••%.:• (THERE 18 NO CHANGE IN THIS AREA) SHELBURNE DRIVE TOTAL FRONT YARD AREA: 11,182.47 S.F.' TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2.685.91 B.F. (24.02%) TOTAL EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: 8,490.56 S.F. (75.98%) TOT NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2.933.86 S.F. (26.24%) TOTAL NEW P6RVU8 AREA: 6,241.62 S.F. (73.76%) PERVIOUS • y \ BUILDING AREAS & LOT COVERAGE: TOTAL BUILDING ARIA -EXISTING • 5,512.00 B.F. TOTAL BUILDINGARE tO REMAIN LIBHED = ,'3�OOBF TOTAL EXISTING BLDG LOT COVERAGE. 5,512.00105 7875OB2 = 638% 1+_ TOTAL NEW BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 41,116.00166,767.5082.6 30% ! TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: .f BUILDING a 5,512.006F ySPHALT PARKING, SIDEWALKS ETC. =38.848.18 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA'. a 45.458.19.S.F • 6912/6 �' TOTAL EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: GRASS PLANTING BEDS ETC. •20308.326.F. TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA =20,300.32 S.F.•30.BB% '( TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: ) BUILDING 4,166.008.F. Tor!A TIF R KI SIDEWALKS, ETC. bA00.21 ILS.F. •NAY% TOTAL NEW PERVIOUS AREA: GRA,§.S PLANTING BEDS ETC. • 20,767.23 B.F. b 0 i('I QTOTAL �� Of O < i {_ O m 5 Oc C -Q ` O i \ c / N C � 00 0 m M C E M Q. W Lo 11 i r, TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA • 20,767.33 B.F. • 31.611% (AN INCREASE Of 0.70% FOR THE PERVIOUS AREA) o O w 2. PARKING INFORMATION: S ! 0 RESTAURANT. SHORT ORDER: 125P/I,000 S.F. G.FA. 4.166OD 3.F.11,0008. F.- 4,106 a 12 a 50 SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL ORIGINAL-16TIlIG PARKING SPACES: 10 SPACES L n axg NUMBER OF SPACES TO REMAIN (NOT IN SCOPE) 57 SPACES A �n v NUMBER REWORKED/NEWSPA&ES: 11 SPACES' t \ TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 66 SPACES fj y 'INCLUDES NUMBER OF REQUIRED N,C. SPACES • J SPACES tl (INCLUDES ONE N.C. VAN SPACE) .y Es 2. REVISIONS I 6-1-10 OWNERREVISIONS 2 7.18.16 BITE PLAN REVS DRAMNC PTLE BK Remodel - Existing Site Plan ABE RVEY DRAWING INFORMATION PLAT OF ABED AND - - - - NORTH ARROW Bala AS NOTED Drawn LKACDT EKOCDT ---- -- _ Checked RAV Date 02.2540 SHOULD IV N Job No. 15-154 2 TO THE ,., Y 4 DRAWNG NUMBER AS-1.1 ISSUED FOR PERMIT - 02-20-2016 =—r 1--_ OUNDOFFCC11 •ETEAS 25`P XISTING LA ,IR:E,A TO RE EXIST ING I CURB TQF ,_3 —NEW 4"TH 1 2% CROSE FOR POSIT "ST - C. CURB, I N' CUR THAT _Y ;D. JDURING . MAGE CC . EXII NE..:.AHOPY AS:_ (fYP !�UNEOF EXISTING SIDEWALKS KS TO BE REMOVED. —EXISTING SAN. SEWER V.I.F. EXACT LOCATION AND ss — - 4uEAN OUTL CONNEC, '-*CINAF rNEENISTINI? IJI.SEV FROM GA' qE TNT 0 N, _CLEMOILHNE (w4t W 1) "A GREASE TRAP � EXISTING GRASS AR%'IRL' AND RESEED AFTER COMPLETE. (Tyff—) LINE OF EXISTING SIDEWALKS TO BE 1YLE REMOVE ��LENT i47"-r I rIEW4'THK CONC. SIDEWALKS (M a% CROSS SLOPE ON ALL WALKS IOR POSITIVE WATER DRAINAGE) 7+�'FQOM MAIN WALK ADJACENT�O — ROUND OFF CONCRET: SHOWN (ALTERNATE PREFORMED CAP.) PS STANDARD WEIGH; 1-MIL POST (OW O.D), GAL%' Q.12D, FILL WITH CONCRETE. (3CO 0;.I.) PAINT SAFETY YELLC9 SLOPE3'X3'CCNCI BASE TO SHED WATt CONCRETE SLAB AS SCHEDULED COMPACTED FILL. GRADE b, A SHOWN. (ALTER - PREFORMED C# P3.5 STANDARD CfGHT STEEL I POST (4- 0 D.) I VANIZED, FILL WITH CON RE f '3000 P s I PAINT SAFETY 1 13W SLOPE 3'X31 . EYE BASE TO SHED �:R _ CONCRETE SL�- AS SCHEDULED-' COMPACTED FILL. 4 IN1-60 .— DPCONCRETE FTG. (X=f- � 028DAYS) SOR. L_1�1 BELO%, qLCOMPACTED. �TYPIC�FILLED STEEL BOLLNR1_ TAILS SCALE 1'I V- 2 4" 1' .1 fO OUT OF CONC. PAD ORIZ 0 T-0 -VERT, 116NICHIH1 CEMENT BOARDS, TPP, BOTTOM fP,T UISHORIZ 0 MIN X"GAP BETWE EN 11;TOINT OF BOARDS. (TYP) — P 8 (TYP) A. 60 CONC. FILLED I STEEL BOLLARDS, F SEE DETAIL 03 la-v I THIS SHEET (TYP.) c ts NEW D c LOCATIONSTER LOCATION . UP LOCATION P T, WD POSTS. c T 0, POST -60 S" THK CONC. SLAB wl ABV FIN. GRADE. P3 5 STEEL 6,0841n.4WA YAW (TYP) GAT. POST (TYP OVER 8- COMP. FILL. WIDE ti x B'WIDE THICKENED SLAB EDGES THK CONC APRON i WEI 0 4WD n -1 L P4 -v u.. e.6VQ.4.W2A NW SLEEVE TO POST NEAP ITOM. ANGLEFRAME w1VERT. 1 OVER (r COMP. FILL. WELD (2) 4)VO 13.021 PIPE HAR EBOARDS. FURNW-d SLEEVES TO EA. GATE �r TO WO DROP RODS EA LEAF. SLOPE ARPON AS REO'D r•TO MEET ADJ. PAVING. ACT AS HINGE. I (TYP (T� P., . jI'DP CONCRETE FTGL 30tj q.1.028DAYS) SOIL BE- v WELL COMPACTED, EXISTING tCONC P TING LIGHT ENLAP- D DUMPSTER ENCLOSUF;P PLAN CURB TOR MAIN.' OLE TO REMAIN NORTH AV.ROW ENLARqg�, 1 PARTIAL SITE PLAN Admw6mom sul V �10 SCALE: V= I V-0" ISSUED FOF! ,FRMIT - 02-29-2016 (MMIR DKING TKHNOLOGIIS WE A, WARD P. AUPPIRLE III O 0 CD cz 0 WHO > co r -0 (.YD) t, L0 M 0 CaS u 4 +CVISIONS 6-1-16 OWNER REVISIONS 7-18-16 SITEPLANREVS DROM Tw 111K Remodel - Partial S;Ite Plan, Enlarged Oumpster Plan & 6etails DRAWING INFORMATION i-I. AS NOTED — LEKICOT ChWk.d RAV Data 02-25-le I. Job Nov 15-154 ,AWING NtIMBER AS-1-.2 T/ NEW PARAPET 0 DRIVE THRU NEW LIGHTe NEW NICHIID' STUCCO FTrA NEWLIGHTBAND j NEWLIGHTBAND ----------- -- NEW NICHIHA PANEL./ NEW NICHIHAPANELW/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINT. STUCCO FINISH PAINT. ___ EP,2 ___ Eaq EP•2 MP ER2 MP P-3 P,1 E0.2 q" EP•2 4° 4 EP•2 EP4 ER2 4" 4" ER2 EP•2 ® I EP-0 EP4 EPA I (;Pd� EP-I It It CT• S"X12"CERAMIC NEW EB-1 RICK O NEW E&1 BRICK NEW 3070 ALUM. NEW EB•/ SRICK EXISTING BRICK VENEER, TILE ON �" VENEER TO VENEER TO DOOR AND FRAME VENEER TO PAINT AS INDICATED. — CEMENT 00. MATCH NG, MATCH E TINO, MATCH E NG, PAINTED EPJ PAINTED EP.4 PAINTED 2 RENOVATED EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE 114"= 1'-0" PAINTED EP4 NOTE: ALL FIFASHES PER 20,')0 FINISH SCHEDULE. PAINTED EPi .._...._. �emervr nu. PAINITEO Ep./ RENOVATED SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION I SCALE: iM"=1'-0" a*NAGE NOTES: 1. THE SIGNAGE DEPICTED AND INDICATED ON THESE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS IS FOR CONSTRUCTION COORDINATION ONLY. 2. FINAL SIGNAGE TYPES, COLORS AND LOCATIONS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY A LOCAL SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR AND THE OVMlER IN COORDINATION WITH THE LOCAL SIGNAGE ORDINANCES AND IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR FOR SEPARATE APPROVALS AND PERMIT. — — — — _ — T/NEW LIOHTSAND -EXISTING ROOF OVERHANG W/ NEW STANDING SEAM METAL -- ROOFING SYSTEM PAINTED EPA D.&q.Deign AmJ q C6NPUIPR DRARNE TE(mm Iloills INL A��IARI� M�IIPuMt RIC00 P. AUPPERLE III PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, FIL OF r a'�euu.I.•. VT. LIOERRt No.: OO.tso 81�1ure1 1 1 ZO W � o� Y� ado 0 WO > = oc D CIO o m � � co a �-- ol� n� �a Nh s r`S t�^ o V tF REVISIONS 1 7-1SA6 REVIEW REVISIONS DRAWING RTLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWING INFORMATION S.I. AS NOTED D,a LEK/CDT CMcked RAV Date 02-25-16 Job No. 15-154 DRAWING NUMBERA-2.0 ISSUED FOR PERMIT - 02-29-2016 T/NEW _ LIGHTBAND EXIST ROOF ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN, ENCLOSE END wl METAL PANELS.—�. EPd TIEXISTSLAB W —I--- - I EXISTING WALK-IN COOLER)FREEM' 4: TO REMAIN. REPAINT AS SHOWN. �- 2 A-3.O 1 C-2 NEW LIGHTBAND NEW NICHIHA PANEL`' STUCCO FINJSHL PAIR EP-2 EP-1 :- i1i� C ENCLOSE EXISTING 2, T / �-- ENCLOSE EXISTING R. COL, EXISTING H.M. DOOR COL. WRAPSNG & EXT. `�'\'111[/-/—// WRAPS ICHI EXT. GR. SIDING g, TO REMAIN, REPAINT GR.SHEATHINOS NEW KNEW NICHIHA PANEL SIDING w7 AS INDICATED. NICHIHA PANEL SIDING STUCCO FINISH, PAINT. (TVP.) STUCCO FINISH, PAINT. NG BRICK VENEER, EXISTING BRICK VENE£i,^r, EFI j! I PAINT AS INDICATED. m'P.) PF"� i AS INDICATED. o- G3 '1 S•1 EF-7 EF 7 5' DIA ....;.._ 19.83 SO FT. TI NEW PARAPET C-1 I � 0 RIVE THRU � IGHTBAND-- i NEW NICHIHA PANELd - -- '- NEW NICHIWI PANEL w/r--- 1 STUCCO FINISH, PAINTL STUCCO FINISH, PAINT. ------------- 2 RENOVATE )WEST EXTERIOR ELEVA','I,N SCALE:}— �_� EXISTING ROOF C',,, 1>INNG w/ NEW LIGHTBAND NEW STANDING Sy',1 METAL ROOFING BYSTEM. TIN[ I I "I WINDOW W1NDI'. l I EP 4 T/EXISI AB: M'-0" — EXISTING BRICK VENEER PAINTASINDICATED.--- r{r: L Y a L PAINT AS INDICATEI:( ---J PAINT AS INDICATED EF-7 I -�-- EXISTING RF,.IIF OVERHANG w/ j NEW "TAN Ly, sG 6EAM METAL ROOFING ._,r 7... -r r EXISTING BRICK VENEER, PAINT AS INDICATED. --- RENOVATO NORTH EXTERIOR ELEV,lw; I ION NOTE: ALL FINISHES PER 20/20.`i-INISH SCHEDU ET. ' SCALE:1/4 = '-G g C; _... ..------- ' EP y C 3 Tx i EXISTING WALK-IN �` INFILL AT REMOVED H.M. DOLER/FREEZER TO r DOOR WITH BRICK VENEER IN. REPAINT AS SHONM. 1 AND PAINT AS INDICATED. . _EXISTING BRICK VENEER, PAINT AS INDIC, TED. .. s;I9!NAGE NOTES: 1 THE SIGNAGE DEPICTED AND INDICATI,1�,1N THESE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS IS FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 8 DINATION ONLY. FINAL SIGNAGE TYPES, COLORS AND U.-A'f10NS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY A LOCAL SIGNAGE CCF;`.:(ACTOR AND THE OWNER IN COORDINATION WITH THE LOCAL SIGN?+• "- ORDINANCES AND IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE SIGNAGE CONT'--TOR FOR SEPARATE APPROVALS AND PERMIT. TI NEW PARAPET (AMR DRAFT11I6 T[LIRIOLNES INC. �r' WF. kOYpW k YRRIi , RIEIARD P. ALWITLE III PROFE8811M aIaNEER, PE. 11tQF1� PXwI _ LICENBE`NN.:-,9`�.lii e4ucNrtl t Z(o O -0 Co Tr"T o p U) C O m O Cm 0 0501 U [[ L` T tl Jl: REVSIONS -i 7-18-16 REVIEW REVISIONS pRAMNG TIME p',XTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWING INFORMATION 5wN AS NO jNawn LEK/CDT :heaketl RAV Dale 02-25-16 Job No. 15-154 :jK WNG NULMER A-2.1 ISSUED NOW y vL ter s '. IMtii+Nb NiMnsP '�I IIIJw j f i �TV 9 P Ix Y��A SHty \ a- y a � W izi ' msP 3 20' P .Tram EL ; �a.«I,a Scale f" = I /r I it CL —... I VE (Pri va t e Roa d u .I a61br♦ � 1 I�� NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR IS BPEG'I :OALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION,AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON ffLc ; Z! I PLANS IS BASED ON DESIGN DRAWit {7, RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND IV 1IF POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN jN THE FIELD. CORE STATES, INC. DOES NOT GUARANTEE tHF I LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE EXACT THE CSj glRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COI "HIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE. ANY k;XPAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILI I I' 1. AS SUCH THE GENERAL CONTRACTC�; SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND UNCOVER INt'.; ` XISTING UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OP'( l{F PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITY CONNECTION POIN I'W ."RIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION TO ASCERTAIN EXACT MATERIALS, LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, VT I AND THEIR POTENTIAL CONFLICT WIT 4 ROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. GC SHALL CONSULT WITH CON d IRUCTION MANAGER AND ENGINEER A3;:+�PROPRIATE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. PLANT -SCHEDULE FOR NEWf'LANTINGS T/REEEES•�� CODE BOTANICAL NAME I CC7{_Q/'.d NAME CONT CA QTY BP Betula pentlula / Eur6P900 Vvilile Birch B 8 B 70e1 3 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME / Cg04OM NAME SIZE $L'AQNG QTY 0 BG Buxus x'Gmen Genf / GIN%H,,t Gem Boxwood 3 gal w o c. 36 O TR Thuja omldentalis'RhYln�W ➢'Rheingold Arborvitae 5 gal 4&1 0,I. 26 GROI V qffl$ CODE BOTANICAL NAME f CIO( ?CA� NAME CONT OT'ACING QTY r--- 7--1. FA Fast,, arundinecee / Tell reotue sod 3,637 id HO Herrero-116 x'S.. de OWL Stella de Om Daylily 1 gal 35 sf EI 3 a a 9 :SAL PLANTING NOTES _ r IIkNERAF RESTACTd2W RK,TH SI AN FOR1L CON ALL Exi6TING RIFTTHAT HE GRADE WHEREL LANI 10 ISA BEFORE —1-OF FINISH THE WV09CAY4?CON tIAQTpft 8Hr1LL VEFAL THAT THE GRADEOF ALL IAA yie;AVE IS ARE WITHIN«/.m. t'OF FINISH GRADE. THE LAf4DS(-Im'U 4ONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMa01Av H ANY DI6CREPANCIES EXIST. SEE SPECIFICAIION'I I; MORE DETAILED INSTRUL?IOJ ON TURF-1 ANb I NNG BED PREPARATIOJ. irMUCTANDMAINTAINFINISHGRADESINLANDSCAPI; AI.% ASSHOWPJOa GRADINGPLANS,ANDCONMTRIA:IAND i SHALL EE REGRADED TO BLEND IN WITH TINE Ell n n+UNCING GRADES AND ELIMINATE PONDING ROTINTiAL. ANY CONFLICTS A— OtSCREFANCIEs ARSE t C IW EN THE GRADING PLANS,GEI—CHNICAL ER)tMr` OTES, AND_ ND ACTUPL CONDITIONS, THE CONTRAOI Ot C SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING SUCH ITEMS To A 11T HOT AND9CAFE ARCHITECT, GENERAL CQVTRAOYCR, RNG b1NNER. THAT THE GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS SHALLIBE 7 �1 Ow FINISH GRADE AFTER INSTALLING 901E AAiRNPMti*tIC, BLOW FINI6 A GRADE IN SOD AREAS AFTER INSTAN ING SOL AMENDMENTS, MULCH COVER WTI'H d•OF TE WALKS AND CURES SHALL NOT PROTRFIDS AVYSNL THE FINISH SURFACE OF THE WALKS AND CUpN. MI II (WI JITHIN 17'OFWgLLSSHALLEEATIEABTJ LGV.�'/IIYANTHETOPOFWALL ONCE. WDVEN, NEEDLE -PUNCHED POLVPMOWI (NC FABRIC (—TT "FR08 OR ECUAL) UNDER ALL J AREAS AND INDIVIDUAL TREE RMGe. MULCH TOPORESSNG, TYPE AND DEPTH PEP MW NH NOTE IN ALL FLANTING BEDS AND TREE RIN(ip. DO NUY MULCH WITHIN a" OF TREE RODT FLARE. 14G, GREEN STEEL EDGING BETWEEN ALL 0LAN11-n&DS AND TURF AREAS, AND EETA£EN GROLN=)?j 116 ER PLANTS (WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLAN) ULCH ALL —REED AREAS OUTSIDE OF }+RDP'St,, LIMITS (UNLESS SHOWN AS SCDL IT LOCATIONS Me 01AGRAMMAT C. ACTUAL LCOA,t ONS SHALL SE VERIFIED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARM F I, C NEORTOPLANTING THE LANDecpPb CDNI HpCTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL REOIIREMENFa Cp,i}M, LNG AUTHORITY ARE MET (E, M ry MUM PLANT gl1ANTITIEB, PIANTINO METHODS, TREE PROTECTION MhN>',%E JSCPPE CONTRACTOR IS RE9FON91BIE FdR DEIr-11MSdING PLANT GANTRIES: PLANT WANitTIE¢ SHDWy DN i ANOCALLOUTSAREFORGENERALINFORMATIONONY INTHEEVENTOFA DI9CREPPNCV BETyxZaN INCH?EDT IN WRITING (VIA FRO BEIN6PECTECANDAPEROVEDt TW a CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REI BEYOND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF :KLY SRE VISITS FOR THE FO -C TTING OF PLANTS THAT HAVE SE NOTGERMINATED WELL, TREATI IRS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM BY THE OWNER OR OWNER'S NCE GE ALL V/ORK SHCNMN O 13, STt II V SEEDED ANWOR SODDED AREAS NOT BECOVE 'INv AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THELAND&f/ei;-6 CCM rNACTCR SHAL BE RE3FONSIBLE FOR WATERING TttiHi AREAS pM1D OBTAINING AFULL STAND OF GRA68 Atp1O A""' III ANAL COST TO THE OWNER. IO 14. TCIACHl� FINAL ACCEPTANCE AT THE END OF THE MAIM IGNANCE PER Go. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIDNM MLIgT AA T:T HI. AUTIANDSCAFESHALLSHUNACNVEHEALTHYGRcll'GYH(4WTH EXCEPTKM'SMADEFOR SEASONALFATERyDY1. AL4 PLANTS NOT MELTING TH13 CONOiTION 9HRLL Bf:9ri .t?CTED AND REPLACED BY HEPLTHY PLANTMATERI9L. {AIORTOFINALACCEPTANCE B. AEI- HARDRCA S SHAH EE CLEANED PRIOR 6 FINAL Mf RE W A C. MOPING AR YDROM ICI AOTIVELYGROVANG AND AQ-84EACHAMINIMUM HEI AREA R INCHESNBRO,T.I IPSi MO`TMNO INCHES RE AAEARMH R.EEMD'N'E;HEALTHYATE)I. TOFI EASLAKAE tAAL, tYF ST,TuARE INCHES MUST RE RE60DOEDOR RESEEDED (AS APPgppRIATE) PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEFTANC€. qLl.' eDPOED TURF SHALL BE NEATLY MOWED. tb. $/,) IwFCIFICpTIOJ9 AND DETAILS FOR FURTHER REWIiii.0E,3NT6, MULr4HES �n - AFRW' IF PyA D M IS COMPLETE, CONTRA FABRIC Sl4ALL INSTAL r S" THK]( LAYER T ACTO SHRINli S-f+ytNOD MULCH MULCHES ES TO-APEFABRICINALANOSCAEE T CT NIDbAREAS WNTRACTOR RICIR TOMMGt1NtliH TIOV.FAE80LUTELY NO EXPO6ED RODlO BHT+ Ti-5FTSHIMEROWINGANYWHEREON Twa PR« u4i AFTER MULCH FU3 BEEN IN9TAt1E0. EVERGREEN DESIGN GkoUF (almj 650dfi3R ITBa He,iregvCwMr a., RYae 104 WeLe Fwra4 NC 2TSST www.lamdaapo-ewaellmd.nel e bd bi ba be b.2 b.e b3 ba b.5 b5 b.4 b.3 b.3 b3 b3 b.3 b.a b.2 b.2 $2 b.e bt b.1 ba b.i bi b.o 1 Il to I bo bo b,a bo b.o b.o b.o bo b.1 ba b.z b.3 b.a b.4 6.5 be be b.7 11.6 b.s b.4 b.4 b.4 bA b4 b.4 b.3 ba b.z b.e b.2 b.1 b.1 ba b.o to b.o b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.o b.o bo b.1 he b4 b.s b,5 b6 b9 1.3 1.3 1.0 b,9 h6 b6 b.6 b6 b.6 4 b.6 b5 b.4 b.4 b.a b.2 to b.t b,p bo to to b.o ba b.o to to to b.o b.1 b.2 be 1.1 1d It 1.5 b.l 111.0 1,5 1.1 H4 "bl- t.s to - to b.9 - bi be 5.6.. b.5 _ _.b9.. -ba L.z_ b.o b.o bo bo I b.o Do" b.o b.o b:0 '., b.0 b.o to b.z b.3 14 ''._..k.l_-.21---ts----35--- .9--- R.o---_ya.__...la 1.3 1.4 15 Ss 14 la b./ 4 b.a_.._D,Y_ 15.6___bIl- _U _--b bo ha_ _bap_. bo b,a I a ba b.o Do b.a _..-. H,e b,e b A.o d.3 H8f. „3 D1 as }6 19 17 f.a as i?,I e:3 bx is k.a-. D.z. ho_ __.. 5n- bo _.__bo ba _. bo'. A.o f _ _ b,2__- 6.o U,p,' b,o to b,o H.4 b.7 h.3 S09 be 17 ' yL __ _ Sa . k.3 __ S`,2 t.+ 5 r. :ea S• 9.z 2.e b.9 to b.o b.o b.o b.o 0.p bo , to b.o IT 1 a 0.0 So b.o b.0 H.4t li I71 i7r 9.+.] 14", to D,4 b,0 b.6 }I to b.3 1.4 SA 12 b.3 1,5 D.9 b.0 a b.l Dio bo by 1 a bq b.o b,0 to te, 1.2 13.2 1;1 be 1.3 b4 bt bA 14.6 t7 t/.7 11.6 10.A b.3 1*6 hi ; b.i b3 bo 0 b.d b.0 to b.a b5 b.9 h i h4 1 79 53 y9 1t 71 3.4 H.9 b9 10.2 t79 b3.5 191 iM 13 b4 bj to 0 bo b.0 b.0 b.0 b:3 b9 9; „� <9 b.4 165 ',3 b.9 b.5 7,3 >,1 13.1 475 1 f6 bl2 14a�', b6 bo be b:1 0 b,� b.o b,o b,o � 1 b3 b.4 1r, ... .. '25 !"4 1.7 �.3 b.6 b.3 't.0 1.} 11"9 Dad '36.71., b52 Ub4 bl 1 bb b.0 b.0 b.0 b2 D4 1;2 1.9 b4 D.6 b.6 be b.1 'd.6 4u.5 bA 124 17.4 J, l42 '90 i 371` 1.e b,5 bl b.p t.0 b.0 ba b.e b.4 ti9 ,., }:� 1.4 �2 b.]'.4.3 b.9 29 b,I to �A 4.s b4 Vl 16 So h9' � ! 4.e b,5 to 1 bi j D.o b.o b.0 H:2 bd bA Ij3 b.3 to t2:4 D,5 b,a b,6 i.8 I 1.6 is � Dh 191, � it ba b 3 2 4 H:II to b.0 b.a i b.3 D4 1 +. ''06 Ile 4.a b.7 1±.8 b.3 4a.2 b.3 !.6 �.9 b.l by b' to1. b.0 b0i l9. b.3 11.9 $5 bo 106 leol 1.5 11 b 3 b D., b.o b.o b.3 b 5 '1 a / i.3 9.9 b.7 4.6 b.l D.3 D.0 b.0 b.l 1.2 i!.3 b.l i.9 19 1.7 1�9- b.d HA 4,7 1i.4 5.9 133 l 199 1a.9 1a tc'.1 �, b Hj3 l H.1 H.0 _ ..1 155 b9 b3 i1.1 7 e yb b7 b6 t,5 bi b0 4k1 H0 d0 to 1.6 15 1,5 17 �A t35 'S.9 1.7 1.4 103 1381 V4I, ti,e 16 2 bl6 b2 b.1 b0 b.1 1.3 7,,.a. 1>.: .... '16 bw VI 1.7 14.5 b.5 b.1 b.9 b.9 '!.6 bz 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.4 1,7 ba 5! b.7 +a S7 i4 Aa U b.9 1:4 e b.5 I' b.z b.1 ba b.6 t.a 113l 193 136 100 bl De 'YB 11 S.5 b3 '4,9 '.0 b0 1I.3 le 1� I '.Ij 1.4 1,6 b.8 ''aa b9 Ib3 D.8 1,6 t b.51'. i 43 1 a I 5.2 b.I bj b.5 b.9 b3 ! 1�n Vii 5,9 D.l 9.e ba S,t \b.6 "J'7a b3 b:l id SA b.7 bZ 1.7 113 1.2 1.4 19 b.6 b.9 I b.9j '.o 5.4 s 1.1! D4 1e s 14 1jA i b.e b.1 ba ha b.5 S.9 b.9 Sa i.8 ba '7.o %.6 1.7 S.e b.4 bl 7.t '4.9 b.o 19 la l.o b.9 l.a to b.0 b.4 b.< 1,3 1s _., 10:-'. 9.9 2.0 .3 b.6 I". b.3 b.1 ba , b.3 1� S.9 D�6 D.7 b,4 :7 S, b7 b7 b, b,l to .6 b, .0 1:5 E.a a6 /,4 I I. � 1 ti 2b2 �.6 b3 b.2 b.l b.i b.e 10 1.4 1.4 14 b.3 b4 az b.5 §.2 131 12o b.5 i.t hA le b:7 b5 b.5 b,5 D.7 1.z S.4 `.1.9 la e.4 5, S.7 b,A 1.r .9 pb b.3 b.z b.1 bt bx j bs b 7 to b',9 15 1! 5 as ,! 1.e 11.7 1'n:4 17 e 11.1 D.3 b.6 t.3 b7 b4 b 4 b.s 16 10 to t o l b:, `. �1 i 1._14,x '•o b.7 5 �a i:� b.a b.p b.1 1 {'� 51 : b.1 b.1 De ba b.4 b,6 7 a 19 ea 4.e S.4 A9 13.3 15.a b 9 ' `�.1 4 2 ! b.s t. .a t - 0.3 b.5 b N lA t.l 11.9 t,0 54 3 �.2 t.l b.1 b.1 b.t b.l ba b.2 ba b-a to b7 is b.8 to 113 1,3 b.e bs b3 b) b.3 b;: b.e b.e b.3 b,x 'Io 1} 1z be 'I b.9 b» b:t bz i i bl b.i b.i b7 to b.t H.I 0.1 b,e b3 b.3 1,4 b:b b5 6,6 bo bb 133 ba to bI b.l to t.z t.a b.4 T,7 b 6 a7 bA b.4 be b1 b1 b.l to b.o b.o to b.i tfi b.i bi- b: bz b2 b.3 b.3 be b.a ba 6.1 D1 b.l ba__ b.i ba-__ tA1_.-__ 5e b-3_-. b.5 b.5 - b.4 br n=. --be be bl b.1 bo ho to bo ba to b.o b,o b1 bi b1 bi bj ba b2 bl b.1 b.1 bi b.1 b,l b,1 to bT ba b.1 be b3 b.3 b2 b,a hi b.1 bl b,l b,a to t.o to b.o b.6 b.o ho bo b.o b.o b1 bi b.1 b.l D.; b.l b.1 b.i hi to b.o ba bo D.1 b.1 b.1 U b,e b.2 bo b3 b, I b.i bl bo bo b.o b.0 b.0 b.o b.o I,a b.o b.9 bo ho ba b.o to b.o bo, b.o bm to D.o b.o bo bo bo b.A ea bt ba b.i b.1 ba b.l b.a I bo bo to bo to to ba to Lumlrioire- �. SymoBt .._..-_ !Jty ---_...--..�_ L¢W.el Arrpngement Descriptign LLF lumen! iz 1 A SINGLE XLCM-rT -LED-HG-CW-HSS-SINGLE-?4'PQLE+2'BASE L000 NA 3 0 120 DEGREES XLCM-5-LED-HQ-CW - TN120 ON 24'-PGLE + 71ASE 1.000 N.A.' _ T 3 C � 0180' 2RTD XLCM-(t)FT-L 1 (llrt-R-LED-Hp-CW-HSS-p180-24'POLE±2'BASE J J~ 1A00 N.A. e v D 2 2 90 DEGREES XLCM-FT-LED-HG-CW-HSS-D9o-24'PGLE+2'BASE 1.000 N.A. Cokulotion Summary �- Lofoet C¢IcType Units - AV8 Mox M Avg/Min Max/Mln ALL CALC POINTS Itluminnnce Fc 2.54 46.7 00 N.A. N.A PARKING/DRIVE SUMMARY _ HWHnonce FC 5.43 46.7 Oa 13.58 116.75 Bored On the Inform tion provldutl, oil or_.loh. and lunina N'P locotlons sham represent reconne+tletl pltlons.. The engineer Ond/or archltect oust determine the applicability of llie 1pyout to evisting or future field conditions. This oghtng plop represe"- Illumino lion levels cal -lot" Cron laboratory data token under controlled cSndlSiunti in a -rda-, elth The Illunina<Ing Engineering Satiety (:ES) approved nethotl�. 6ctuplcperformonce of any n nuf pcture+"s 1-hiilres nay vary dHKNb9iLRhlages In ell". 1,lcal voltope. tolerance In loges/LEO's and other rioble field conditions. GOleula06- do not include obstructions such os bWdings, curbs, londscoping, or any atN.r arch'tectural elements unless noted. Arr. Lun, I u ens Arr. Watts P348 274,7 - '33426 829.2 15096 549.4 45096 549.4 AREA TO HF ILLUMINATED 4 � 4 F,ole Use Type op� ne4 ataad�rar o10a i,eOeUse Ty0e FT-LL FT-R (Left) " '"� "" e` "< (Right? FIXtL4rc- Type C XJ,_CM LED Cro4,:)ver Area Light PEPSPecme view Total Project Watts Total Watts = 3301.5 LIGHTING PROPOSALL❑ 1,�2597-1 BURGER RING X1567 981 S R¢4B " TON.NE BURLINGTON.vi SCALE: 1'=20' - 0 r 2. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 197� Mr. Kitchell said some run-off problems would be incurred if the exposed cut should stand for any long period of time. Asked by Mr. Wessel if it was his intention to reseed immediately after stripping, Mr. Willis said it would be done before it is too late; it should not be done in the summer time because there is not enough rainfall. Mir. Wessel then asked what provision would there be to prevent the sand from blowing, and if he would anticipate the sand blowing once the stripping took place between that time and August lsth. Mr. Willis said the land has been plowed, harrowed, and planted; that he can't answer that question; he doesn't think there has ever been a problem. Mr. Ward said he agreed. Mr. Willis stripped about five acres this past summer; he was very cautious to prevent it from blowing; he has worked the farm for quite a few years. The piece in question has been reviwed by Russ Reay. The access is through an open driveway. No traffic problems would be created other than trucks coming and going on Shunpike Road. Mr. Mitchell asked Mr. Willis what length of time it would take to strip the soil once he starts. Mr. Willis replied it might be a month; would depend on the weather. Mr. Levesque moved that the Planning Commission approve Mr. Willis' application to strip 1h topsoil inasmuch as he has a permit from the District Environ- mental Agency. _---- Seconded by Mr. Lidral and voted unanimously for approval. Site plan review-- Burger King Restaurant at Mr. William Means of Burger King Restaurant presented drawings of his proposed building to the Planning Commission. He said he had gone over the plan in detail section by section and problem by problem with the City Manager in an endeavor to answer all the questions the Planning Commission had asked. He said he did away with two parking spaces on each side of the entrance. He was willing to go with the dividing strip if necessary or practical, but at this point it was felt that it probably was not practical so it is not shown on the plan. He said he had added landscaping on the south side which had been a concern. The parking spaces along the south side were broken up, taking away one space and adding landscaping so it doesn't give a straight-line effect. Mr. Means said he had talked with the adjacent land owner who has agreed to allow a ditch along the back side of the property and drain all the property to the rear, so drainage is not a problem. He stated he had made application to the State Highway Department for a curb cut. There are three curb cuts there now; he would propose to close two and open one. The topographic is not completely drawn yet, but two things are to be incor- porated in it. There is an apple tree on the front which will be preserved, and they will probably lose two or three parking spaces in order to preserve the birch tree. Will probably put some curbs around the birch. perhaps with a table under it, that if he is going to preserve it he will do it right. Ms. Means repeated he had tried to answer the questions the Planning Commission had regarding the site including the landscaping on the south side, the drain- age. the preservations of the trees woth preserving. He will be able to tie into the sewerage now being used by the house and will put in a pressure booster to avoid going under the highway, so interference with the highway will be minimal. r 3. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1975 Mrs. Maher asked about a sidewalk. err. Means said if he had people walking on his grass or across his landscaping, then he would want a sidewalk; that if there is a problem he is the first one who would want a sidewalk. There will be a rack for twenty bicycles as he is hoping to get this kind of traffic. There are no sidewalks now on that side of the street. Mrs. Maher said she thought the Commission's motion would have to include a sidewalk. Mr. Means said the Commission could ask for a sidewalk and he could give them a sidewalk which would meet approval, but it would not really enhance what he is trying to do there. Putting in a sidewalk, $100 worth of asphalt, is not going to make any difference to him, but it is foolish to put in a sidewalk and dead-end it. If the City wants to put sidewalks down the street and wants to include him in the plan, he would have no objections to it. Chairman Wessel said he was not sure that asphalt would meet the specifications. The Chairman then asked if there were any more questions from the members of the Commission, or from the audience, and received no response. Mrs. Maher moved that the Planning Commission approve the proposed plan for Burger King Restaurant on Shelburne Road, the revised plan dated March 4, 197� contingent upon the followings that a sidewalk be constructed to meet the specifications set down by the City Manager; that the birch in the rear and the apple tree in the front are to be preserved; and if in the future should the City of South Burlington give approval for the development of the adjacent prgRerty to the south. with a road, that the over of the property in question can be required �j the City of South Burlington"blose his access on Shelburne Road and to provide an alternate access from the new road to be construct that a landscaping bond in the sum of $5,000, a sidewalk bond, a bond for drain_gee and any other bonds deemed necessary by the City Manager,are to be made contingent upon approval. Mr. Means objected to the $5,000 bond for landscaping when all that is required is 3%. Mr. Ward said 3% is what is in the ordinance. Mrs. Maher then revised her motion, changing the provision for a landscaping bond as follows: in accordance with the zoning ordinance the developer will cost a bond at the rate of of the estimated buildig_cost;. Motion with revision seconded by Mr. Lidral. Voted unanimously for approval. Request to rezone Lamplough property - Paul Graves Chairman Wessel stated the basic issue before the Planning Commission is to either reject or accept this application. Mr. Graves read his nine -page presentation in support of his request for the rezoning of the Lamplough property. Each member of the Commission received a copy of this presentation, and a copy is to be included with the Minutes of this meeting. At the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Graves offered to answer any questions. P'xs. !;aher questioned the statement on page 3. that the Flanning Commission rezoned the Lamplough property in 1972, saying that was really not the case. It had previously been zoned Planned District. His statement was correct to LAW OFFICES OF I EWING & SPOKES 86 ST. PAUL STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 February 28, 1975 William J. Szymanski City Manager 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vt. 05401 RE: Opinion 14o.80 Site Plan Review Conditions of Approval Dear Bill: The Planning Commission has asked whether it can approve a site plan but impose certain conditions based upon future contingencies. As I understand the situation, they wish to approve a plan indicating a curb -cut onto Shelburne Road. There is a possibility in the future that a new city street will be constructed adjacent to the subject property. In that event, the Planning Commission wishes to require the developer to have traffic flow off the new street and close the curb -cut on Shelburne Road. I see no problem with imposing conditions since 24 V.S.A. 54407 (5) and Section 12.25 of our Zoning ordinance provide that the Planning Commission in reviewing site plans may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards with respect to the adequacy of traffic access, circulation and parking, and land- scaping and screening. This opinion is intended to supplement opinion no. 40, dated November 16, 1973. NS:nm Very truly yours, Richard A. Spokes 4. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1975 Asked by Mr. Ewing about the exterior of the building, Mr. Thomas said it would be the same traditional clapboards as used in traditional New England homes -- 4 inches to the weather -- sprayed once, then shrinkage allowed, then sprayed again. Asked about the cooling system, he said they are to use General Electric package units which are very quiet. Maintenance is easier as a separate unit can be replaced without shutting down the whole system as would be the case with a central plant system. Also is a lower investment cost. The package units will not be seen at all, and also act as a sun screen over the windows in hot weather, thus reducing the demand for cooling. Mrs. Krapcho asked about a slope in the rear of the building, and was told that would be the slope of the parking lot, to drain the parking area. Asked b y Mr. Ellis about the level of the first floor. Mr. Thomas said it would be about the same as the street. Mr. Lidral asked about putting any other identification on the site. Mr. Thomas said there is no name for the building at present, it will not be the Anchorage sign. Will have just an identification sign on the wall that would be seen from the interstate and Dorset Street; just an appliqued sign. Peter Judge, who owns 100 Dorset Street immediately north of the property being considered, said he had attended the Zoning Board hearing last week and was told that th e motel would have 82 rooms and 82 parking spaces. He was still concerned that there would be insufficient parking for employees or visitors. Jim Mitchell explained that 95% occupancy would probably require four girls to take care of the rooms, but they would be coming in as guests would be leaving; there would be only one other car after 10:00 p.m., that of the resident manager. Mr. Thomas said that under the zoning ordinance they are only required to have 82 spaces for 82 rooms, but he realizes people will park anywhere and that spill- over could be a double question with theater -goers perhaps parking on motel property. Mr. Ward explained the requirement of one space per room is because there will be no restaurant facilities. He felt there would be no problem. There is the additional land to provide more parking is it becomes necessary. The parking area was designed on the old requirements of 200 square feet per space. Based on the new requirement of 10 by 16. or 160 square feet, they would come up with additional spaces. Chairman Wessel asked about screening on the line that abuts Carroll's Plaza, saying it could act as a pedestrian barrier to Mr. Judge's property. Mr. Thomas replied the only really effective barrier is a six foot fence. Mr. Ewing asked about the bar and was told it would be only a lemonade bar for the swimming pool patrons, and a coffee bar for mornings. No liquor whatsoever. Mrs. Yaher moved that the Planning Commission_a rove the site plan of World Wide Builders and Developers dated February 25, 1975, for an 82 unit motel on Dorset Street. with the understanding that the street sidewalk shall be continued to the wrap -around sidewalk on the property; and furthermore that all bonds as required by the City Manager shall be posted. Seconded by Mr. Erring and voted unanimously for approval. Site plan review - Burger King Restaurant, 981 Shelburne Road Chairman Wessel asked William Means to give the details of his plan to the members of the Commission. Mr. Means said this is actually to be an extension of the Big Burger operation. He worked out the details with Burger King and will use their name. He had been .,parching for two years for a site on Shelburne Road that would meet the zoning PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1975 requirement of South Burlington and his own requirements. It was difficult to find a piece of land big enough to provide the necessary amount of parking space. They are proposing to build on the site adjacent to the Petco gas station, taking down the barn and house and leave the land contours basically the same. Will face the unit south instead of toward the street, making the entrance more accessible to the parking area in the rear with most of the landscaping in the front. Also will have a stonewall facing the street, providing protection for an outside patio. The intention is to preserve the apple tree which is there. The site plan and also a sketch of the proposed building and landscaping were displayed on the board and Mr. Means said a topographic had been ordered for the site. Building will be basically the same as Big Burger. Mrs. Maher said she felt the site plan could be improved considerably and the Commission should pursue what it wished Mr. Means to work on before he comes back. Mr. Means said the suggested island would be no problem, that the State has a standard plan for this and it does help the traffic flow. His only objection to it would be the problem of snow removal. Mrs. Maher suggested widening the entire ingress and egress, then there would be no problem with an island. Mr. Ward said the curb cut will be crucial as it must meet State requirements, and they will scrutinize it more than the Planning Commission would. Mr. Erring suggested leaving it up to the City Manager and the Highway Board whether or not an island would be needed, with Mrs. Maher saying they should ask the City Manager for a recommendation. Mrs. Krapcho asked about the new entry opposite Laurel Hill Drive mentioned in the memorandum from Mr. Ward. Mr. Means said he wouldn't want to lose his entrance from Shelburne Road, with Mrs. Krapcho replying that the City does have a very serious problem with curb cuts. Mr. Means said he felt that if there was a new street built to the Fomerleau property and it was a major street and his customers could properly get to his business from that street, then the matter could be discussed at that time. Mr. Ward said he had discussed this with the City Manager. At one time the Pomerleau plan proposed an entrance from Shelburne Road to go down to the Pine Street extension; this new road is almost inevitable and it makes good engineer- ing sense to put it in line with Laurel Hill. Mr. Means objected that he did not own the extra 27 feet, and that Mr. Pomerleau is nowhere near reaching any agreements with tenants because there are no national firms that are moving. Mr. Ellis said it is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to make sure of long term future development, and as the area develops Mr. Means is going to be able to re -orient his infgress and egress. Mr. Means said he could look at it in the future, but that he was not putting this investment into a business that would be on a side street. He did feel commuter traffic will sometime be by-passed off from Shelburne Road, leaving it as a shopping district. Mr. Ward said he didn't see any problem as long as the Planning Commission has this as a matter of record. Even though the first plan doesn't show the line-up, there is no reason why it can't line up in the future. Mrs. Maher said the Commission would need an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether such a stipulation can be included in approval of the plan. Mrs. Maher then moved that approval by the Planning Commission be withheld until the opinion of the City Attorney on the matter is received. Seconded by Mr. Ellis and voted unanimously. e4x k ti PLANNING C014MISSION FEBRUA RY 25. 1975 6. Asked about the necessity for so many parking spaces, Mr. Means said they have learned that insufficient parking means turning away customers who drive in, can't park, and drive out. Also having more facilities inside the building encourages customers to eat inside, thereby staying longer and tying up the parking spaces longer, in contrast to a strictly take-out food service operation. They are now designing for 70 cars as a minimum and hoping for 100 spaces wherever possible. Mrs. Maher suggested that he bring in some of his figures next time. Mrs. Krapcho asked about landscaping. Mr. Means said they are trying to put most of the landscaping in front where it would benefit most; also most of the trees would be put in to screen the Petco station. Mrs. Krapcho questioned the visual impact from the south, and Mr. Ewing questioned using the front for parking, and also questioned the drainage on the back of the lot, saying that provision should be made to channel drainage to the proper place, not just let it go. He suggested asking the City Manager to take a look at it, and also recommended planting more trees in front. Mr. Levesque complimented Mr. Means on the appearance of the building in his drawing, saying he thought it very pleasant. Mr. Means said the landscaping design was done by Four Seasons, with one other firm quoting on it. Asked about angle parking, Mr. Means said the parking has been designed for drive -through spaces with no curb for separation. He said many people, women especially, prefer to drive through if there is no car in front, rather than having to back out, and angle parking would prevent this. Mr. Mitchell said this point was well taken, that he had been looking at angle parking from the point of view of giving a sense of direction. The Chairman asked about a deceleration lane, suggesting that Mr. Mitchell look into this. Mrs. Maher said the Commission would like Mr. Means to do some very extensive work with the City Manager, the Zoning Administrator, and the City Planner before the next meeting in two weeks. Mrs. Maher then moved that the Planning Commission defer action on the Burger King building pending s�ecific recommendations from the Zoning Administrator, City Manager, and City Planner, and the receipt of a letter from the City Attorneys that the Commission direct the above named City emplovees_�ve specific attention to the ingress and egress, to whether or not an island is needed, to the location and extent of landscaping, to the_question of how parking be situated and what the specific number of _L)arkinLareas should be, and whether_ or not the parking areas proposed on the plan for the southerly corner of the lot should be replaced by landscaping; and furtherLthat the Commission would appreciate_ their opinions on the need for a deceleration lane. Seconded by Mr. Lidral. Motion voted unanimously for approval. Chairman Wessel asked Mr. Means to return in two weeks. Planned Unit Development study Mr. Mitchell presented to the members of the Commission a map showing the location of commercially zoned land in proximity to the area zoned R4 PUD, also a list giving land use breakdown within these areas. After inspecting the site, he said he felt the site was more inadequate for the zoning than the zoning was inadequate for the site. If a PUD is to be established, the terms of uses should be specific, perhaps a 50-50 mix in terms of office and com- mercial with residential in the back. He felt the Lamplough property should be planned commercial development because of the proximity to the interstate, the surrounding commercial activities, and the intent in the Master Plan to cluster SOUTH BURL INGT Oil PLAT v ING C Oi'L11 I SS I ON SITE PL'N REVIid DATA SITE LV IE"-J FOR /� 4� c ,c' ��:' F, DATE /� T �,r Owner of record of Lana or facility: %oY �ti:hat is being proposed: �s �l�c'<< Total area of Lot in sq. ft. F (, c c c' Total area for proposed: Structure(s) sq. ft. -:�/ r Parking, spaces needed Open space Cost of all Improvements Performance bond Existing Zoning Zoning Board Adjustment variance ana stipulations if any n-c. Character of surrounding land use(s) S-1,0494�•�� 7`�� , le, .i a r� � ,14�� s .- , / �A Impact on: Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses Maximum sarety of vehicular circulation between the site and adjacent street network: Avz1,6eIr Gc�� f- hdequacy or circulation, parking and loading facilities with particular attention ^^t//o safe- ty: ��..•��/; L�v� s✓ G�ric� Gc/rrb_ C'i�so �'.� S i QV- -�r� Adequacy of landscaping, screening and setbacks in regard to achieving maximum comp 9,tibiltiy and pro- tection of adjacent property: '14 Environmental Factors, if any: / cioi c' Any utility easements, right-of-way, land use or deed restrictions? X %r '- cl'Z T) r 7 't' m -C "17Tr 1 -1 C4 2. BONDING OR ESCRO,'-," ,GREET -TENTS I ' � o CT111% DRIZIINAGE _17 F]V_ rn I D D ., -'TED. "ITH D'T7!:! -ROVALS " �L� 7 �"i�TS C (-)'.'7-17 "PED. ETC rl ---rr.7 �7C ',T' r)� rr- •- - .1 -,-. T_ x IkTI TP A - �,_ ,Q # :I . 1. - r,,,-T,. T- rr, r)7) 7T). C-T ^7T 7 C! D_'D "77 —D V - (-11T T)' T) T -'I S �4gOQ EX�> -T- '.'T rn D"IT il March 13, 1975 M Big Burger 1200 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05401 C., "ttention: Mr. William Means Dear 14r. Means: Be advised that the South Furl ington Planning Commission has granted approval of your proposed plan for the construction of a Durger -Xing 7-,estaurant at 9F1 Shell'urne -road as rev-'sed March 4, 1975. A rroval is contingent upon the following: 1. that a sidewalk be constructed to meet the specifications set down by the City Manager,, 2. that the bircli in the rear of the lot and the apple tree in the front be preserved, 3. t1nat if in the "uture shoulc the City give approval to development of the adjacent property to the south, with construction of a new road, the owner of the, --property in question can be required by the Oit� �o close access on Shelturne 'foad and to provide an alternate access from the new road, 4. that a. landscaping bond in the amount of Y' of the estimated building cost, a bond for side- walk'#construction and drainage, in addition to any other bonds deemed necessary by the City Manager are to be made contingent upon approval. The all'.'ove conditions must be in compliance Drior to the issuance of a permit. Very truly, Richard 1,ard Zoninrg Administrative )fficer RItI/J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT M E M O R A N D U M To: Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Addendum to Burger King Memo of March 7, 1975 Date: March 11, 1975 Sidewalk: I have reviewed the need for a sidewalk along the west side of Shelburne Road and find that with the increase in commercial development in the area there is a need for a sidewalk along the frontage of this property. There will be pedestrian traffic to and from the Justgold Shopping Center where there is a sidewalk along the south side. Pedestrians crossing at the Brewer Parkway signals would would have to walk in Shelburne Road to get to the Burger King. I will work with the developer on the location and design of the sidewalk. Respectfully submitted, William J z nski,C-City Manager MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: WILLIAM SZYMANSKI RE: BURGER KING DATE: MARCH 7, 1975 Drainage: 1. The parkint7 lot surface drainage can be intercepted by a shallow ditch constructed along the westerly property line and extended westerly to the natural drainage ditch. The future development can pick this up into their storm sewer system. Entrance: 1. I have no strong feelings regarding an island at the entrance since this entrance will be relocated in the future. 2. A deceleration lane built whQn the new road is constructed is an excellent recommendation. MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BUR LINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW OF BURGER KING, 981 SHELBURNE ROAD DATE: MARCH 7, 1975 Comments based on February 25th Planning Commission meeting. Additional land.sc _2MLjin&: White pines, junipers and yews added to the north and south property lines. Drak e: Mr. A. Pomerleau to provide necessary drainage easement to allow for an open ditch which will parallel the rear of the lot and enter into an existing drainage ditch. Development of a new road into prop-rt yo Mr. A. Pomerleau informed me_that _he has no immediate plans for this land. Is interested in working with the Planning Commission regarding locating a proposed road in the future. As for conditions of approval (see Attorney Spokes opinion #80). Entrance & Exit: Buffer zone increased to twenty-five feet _whi_�FaTj:6ws for better traffic movement. Exceeds minimum required by ordinance. In and Out signs to be installed also assist for better traffic movement. Mr. Szymanski does not recommend a traffic island or a deacceleration lane. MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER RE: PROPOSED BURGER KING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1975 Location 981 Shelburne Road, bounded on the north by Petco Service Station, on the south by a portion of Merrihew property. Proposal is to construct a Restaruant containing 2,938 square feet. Area is zoned B.P.D. District, use is allowed. Lot involved contains 80,000 square feet. Parcel is part of the Merrihew property. (48 acres total) Five buildings to be razed, large house and four farms and or sheds. Estimated building cost $110,000. Estimated landscaping cost $5,000. All dimensional requirements are in conformance. Vehicular circulation as proposed is a 1+0 foot (in and out) curb opening. Presently this area is served by three curb cuts. These are to be closed, granite curb work replaced. Curb cut requires City and State approval. In the future, access to the remaining property should be from a new city street which should be required to inter- sect with Laurel Hill Drive. This is possible by rearranging the proposed lot by adding an additional 27 feet of frontage, at that time access to Burger King should be from the new street and the Shelburne Road entrance be closed. Site is mostly flat, slight natural slope westerly. Very little natural tree growth. Within front yard is a large fruit (apple) tree and along north property line a large white birch, both trees can and should be saved. Parking required by regulations is 31 spaces, proposed is 96,spaces, with additional area to the rear of the lot for future parking. Recommend posting performance bond for landscaning at $5,000, curb work at $1,500 and drainage as per City Engineer request. M, MORAN DUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: FRED MITCHELL RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW INF ORYATION DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1975 19C AX 1) Should have a determination if the size shown for "future" expansion is going to be the final size and how would this relate to their parking demands? 2) Is the parking location in the C-0 District necessary? Has been some consideration for pedestrian - bicycle trail through there. BURGER KING 1) Diagonal parking would affirm the direction of internal circulation. 2) Additional landscaping on the north and south sides would be beneficial. Perhaps utilize some of the parking to landscape in. Also diagonal parking will create some dead areas that could contain landscaping. 3) What about runoff from the parking lot, any proposal to channel this? 2+) An island in the entrance - ex,--, t would also fac_litate access & circulation. MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI, CITY MANAGER RE: WCAX AND BURGER KING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1975 WC AX 1. Existing curb cuts if not to be used shall be blocked by removing existing depressed and constructing new. 2. A curb should be constructed along the west and south side of the parking area to control runoff and erosion. Two inlets should be installed as shown on plan to intercept the runoff and carry it to the natural drainage ditch along the west side. 3. Existing water and sewer service lines to the property shall be used. 4. Parking area and drive should be paved with bituminous concrete. BURGER KING 1. Future entrance to the property should be from a future road opposite Laurel Hill Drive. 2. Temporary entrance to include a depressed curb to prevent Shelburne Road runoff from entering Drive. 3. It appears that angle parking would delineate traffic movement to facilitate ingress and egress. 4. Owner of property to west should anticipate having to pick up the runoff from this parking lot and carry it westerly to the natural drainage ditch. 5. The existing water and sewer services should be utilized so that openings in Shelburne Road would not be necessary.