Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 1200 Airport Drive (3)
Case No. 4C0331-4-EB City of Burlington and Burlington International Airport APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO PROPOSED DECISION The Appellant, South Burlington Realty Company, disagrees with the proposed decision of the Administrative Hearing Panel dated March 27, 1991. 1. CRITERION 1(B). The Panel concluded that SBRC failed to rebut the presumption created by the stormwater discharge permit issued to the Airport. To rebut the presumption, SBRC is required to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that (a) The proposed stormwater disposal system does not comply with applicable Department of Environmental Conservation regulations; and (b) The non-compliance will result in or will substantially increase the risk of undue water pollution. Environmental Board Rule 19(F) (May 4, 1990). (a) Compliance with Regulations. The applicable regulations are the Vermont Water Quality Standards (effective January 8, 1987; amended April 27, 1990) and the April 1987 Draft Stormwater Procedures, which implement the Standards. The regulations require that the post -development J -2- peak discharge rate shall not exceed the pre -development peak discharge rate. SBRC provided the Panel with a modeling study done by professional hydrogeologists showing that the Airport project would increase the peak discharge rate from the Airport property onto the Munson property from 44.1 cubic feet per second to 59.5 cubic feet per second. The Airport submitted a study based on the same modelling technique showing a decrease from 44.1 cfs to 34.6 cfs; however, the Airport's consultant agreed during the Panel hearing that a number of the key assumptions underlying the Airport's study were incorrect or impossible. The Panel's decision recites the results of both studies, but the Panel failed to choose between them. The Panel should have resolved this factual discrepancy in favor of the Wagner, Heindel & Noyes study, based on the evidence adduced at the Panel hearing. The Board's prior decisions require the Panel to adopt the most conservative expert predictions where the analysis is subject to "wide variations in assumptions used or interpretations made." Swain Development Corp., Case No. 3W0445-2-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order at 27 (August 10, 1990). Even based on a balanced review of the evidence, the Board must conclude that the Airport's project does not comply with the stormwater discharge regulations. -3- (b) Undue Water Pollution. SBRC submitted two types of evidence proving that the non- compliance would substantially increase the risk of undue water pollution. That evidence can be summarized as follows: (i) The receiving watershed, a tributary of Potash Brook, is relatively small, resulting in a likelihood of increased erosion and sedimentation from an increased peak stormwater discharge. (ii) The increase in peak stormwater discharge predicted by Wagner, Heindel & Noyes will inundate the Munson property. This evidence was not contested by the Airport. The Panel made no findings with respect to this evidence. The State Water Quality Standards characterize increased erosion and sedimentation as water pollution. See Section 2- 05(c). Moreover, the Board's review is not limited to water pollution identified by State regulations; for example, effects on groundwater level (e.g., flooding of basements) have routinely been addressed under the undue water pollution test. E.g., Winooski Housing Authority, Application No. 4C0857, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order at 6 (November 7, 1990). As another example, the Board has considered noise pollution under the undue air pollution test of Criterion 1 without any applicable State noise regulations. R.E. Tucker, Inc., Application No. 5W0829-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order at (June 2, 1986). -4- Based on the evidence, the Board must find a likelihood of undue water pollution. SBRC has rebutted the Rule 19(F) presumption and has demonstrated non-compliance with Criterion l (B) . 2. CRITERION 9(K). The Applicant has the burden of proof under Criterion 9(K). The Airport's evidence under this Criterion consisted solely of a statement that, since the peak flow onto the Munson property would decrease, the peak flow off of the Munson property would also decrease. As discussed above, the Airport's conclusion with respect to peak flow onto the Munson property was thoroughly discredited at the Panel hearing. The Panel relied solely on SBRC's evidence with respect to the Williston Road culvert. The Panel concluded that peak discharge into the culvert would be 7.46 cfs with the Airport project, versus a culvert capacity of 8.8 cfs. SBRC's evidence does not support this conclusion -- our evidence showed that (i) the Airport project would increase the peak flow into the culvert from the Munson property and the Airport to 7.46 cfs; and (ii) the culvert also carries stormwater from the Williston Road drainage system, which was not included in the 7.46 cfs. The Board cannot determine, based on the evidence admitted, whether the total peak flow will exceed the capacity of the culvert. It must find that the culvert is currently close to or over capacity, and that the Airport project will significantly � � 1 -5- increase the peak flow. Based upon the evidence, the Board cannot conclude that Criterion 9(K) is satisfied. 3. CONCLUSION The Airport has installed a new stormwater system. The system drains an additional 9.2 acres of the Airport property onto the Munson property. The system's outfalls onto the Munson property have a much greater flow capacity than the pipes used in the prior system. SBRC's hydrogeologist demonstrated persuasively at the Panel hearing that the new system will increase peak stormwater discharge onto the Munson property. The Panel's proposed decision is inconsistent with the evidence presented. We request that the Board adopt SBRC's proposed findings and conclusions. Dated: Ai�,,;,,� 12 qq Downs Rachlin & Martin Attorneys for Appellant By tV JA_ V3 . fvtl�_ William W. Schroeder B4/17.0411 13 _. 0 m Burlington International Airport =3 d Terminal Road and Parking Project *+ (D C K- �E 4) �a November 8, 2002 Q 30 as as C oc L 3 = m � 3 0 Prepared for: Burlington International Airport y South Burlington, VT Prepared by: W y+ Dufresneo. Henry 0 Oonsad ing Engineers Permit Number SP j�l-"� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax) City of Burlington, 1200 Airport Drive #1, South Burlington VT 05403 phone 863-2874, fax 863-1526 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book and page #) Book 13, page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Burlington International Airport, (same address, phone and fax) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax) J.J. Hamilton, Director of Aviation (same address, phone and fax) 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, #1 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Airport facilities: (entire site is 942 +/- acres) terminal & parking areas 20 acres +/-) parkinggaraize_ (3 levels, 353,100 g.s.f. total), vacant land (former residences) on Airport Parkway Extension (1 ac +/-) b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) New narking garage addition (approximately 415 ft x 244 ft3 levels 297,000 € s f 2075 spaces), reconfigured site parking (1,008 spaces total), realigned access road (new/reconstructed 1,265 1 and new elevated pedestrian bridge (14,461g s_f) New toll booth canopy (4267 s f ) c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Total parking garage area will be 650,100 g.s.f. Existing terminal is approximately 110,000 g s f Total _pedestrian bridge area will be 17,300 g.s.f. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Garage addition will have 3 levels, max. height is 35 ft (See attached elevations) The existing parking garage is 36 ft. 8 in. max. Existing terminal 35 ft 0 in max s) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) n/a f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): One, possibly two additional employees will be required to operate and maintain the expanded Rarage. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are involved): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Buildings: Existing UNK % Proposed <0.3 % added b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing UNK % Proposed <0.3 % added c) Front yard (along each street): Existing 24.9 % Proposed 29.3 % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ 9,406,467 (Garage addition + walkway) b) Landscaping: $ 126,550 (see estimate) c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Roads, parking $1,610,286, Site utilities $70,000: traffic control equipment $425,000 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): est. 9,600 ypd** b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 2008 DHV: 271 vph (enter), 83 (exit) c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out): 2008 DHV: 405 vph (enter), 633 (exit) 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 4:30-5:30 pm 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Summer `04 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). **Ref. 2001 VTrans Grouping Study & Regression Analysis I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. S NATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) Burlington International Airport South Burlington Site Plan Review Application Terminal Road and Parking Project November 8, 2002 EXHIBIT LIST Attached: 1) List of Abutters 2) Overall Site Plan by Dufresne Henry, Inc. (%2 size) 3) Landscaping Information by Michael Lawrence and Associates Cost Estimate Plan (% size) Detail at Transformer and Generator 4) Architectural Elevations (%2 size) & Photo Renderings by Freeman -French -Freeman, Inc. 5) Lighting Information: Design Description Fixture Manufacturer's Cut Sheets Photometric Lighting Level Plan 6) Traffic Impact Study by Trans/Op, Inc. Bound Separately: 7) Plans, Elevations and Details by Freeman -French -Freeman, Inc. Titled: Terminal Road and Expansion Project Burlington International Airport Design Development Drawings Dated: October 25, 2002 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LANDOWNERS ADJOINING AIRPORT November 1, 2002 To the best of our ability here are the names and addresses of the adjoining landowners except for those located on Airport Drive that are listed on a separate list. All addresses are located in So. Burlington, Vermont 05403, unless otherwise stated: -Leo & Robert Dumont, 12 Woodlawn Place -Philip Bowler, 395 North Street, Burlington, VT 05401 -Gary & Sandra Hall, 222 Airport Parkway -Thomas & Laurie Piche, 218 Airport Parkway -William & Anne Yawney, 210 Airport Parkway -Roger Olson & Kit Zukowski, 206 Airport Parkway -Douglas & Lillian White, 234 Kirby Road -John & Arlene Duffy, 236 Kirby Road -Robert A. Ennis, 238 Kirby Road -Chambers Leasing, PO Box 859, Augusta, ME, 04332 -George Brady, 9 Shamrock Road -Griswold Corporation, Industrial Ave., Williston, VT 05495 -Alan Palmer, 2169 Dorset Street, Shelburne, Vt 05482 -Pete's RV Center, 4016 Williston Road -David Desarno, National Car Rental, 1200 Airport Drive #10 -Lacey's, 2000 Williston Road -Joseph Senesac, SSL Corporation, 444 So. Union Street, Burlington, VT 05401 -Leland & Patricia Calkins, 1835 Spear Street -Randall Munson, 366 Dorset Street -Robert & Anne Audette, 41 Peterson Terrace -Northern Rent-A-Car, Inc., Box 2145 Burlington, VT 05401 Summary of property owners on Airport Drive attached. Northendrampprojectl permitslabutters Michael Burnor Mr. Thomas Corrow Mr. & Mrs. Paul Landerl 1401 Airport Drive 1400 Airport Drive 1399 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Cota 1396 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 I Mr. & Mrs. William Dalton 1383 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. John Russell 1161 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Foisy 1261 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. John Cameron 1247 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 4 Mr. & Mrs. Ken Daley 1227 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ms. Camille Chastenay Box 9400 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Bernard Laplante 1181 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Howard Loso 1391 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 11 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Lemay 1389 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Occupant 1371 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Allen Porter 1257 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Roomey 1237 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Antonio Todisco 1223 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ms. Deborah Roberts 9400 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Marc Derobertis 1185 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Barry 1387 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Alade Tessier, Jr 1375 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Adams 1265 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Martin Bessette 1253 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Kruger 1233 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 r Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Lagrow 1213 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Occupant 1205 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Harold Ashton 1195 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ms. Joan Brown Mr. Louie Toulis Occupant 1171 Airport Drive 1 Upland Road 11,65 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Essex Jct., VT 05452 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Harold Ashton 1159 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. George Myers 1151 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Charles LeTourneau 1111 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Occupant 1103 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Adams 1083 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Occupant 1081 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Proulz 1155 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Frances Tilley 1141 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Hamel 1107-1107B Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1Mr. & Mrs. Robert Doering 1089 Airport Drive -So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Burton Jaques 285 Lakeshore Drive Colchester, VT 05446 Mr. & Mrs. Charles P1oof 1153 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Scot Renzori 1131 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Deforge 13106 Council Bluff Austin, TX 78727 Mr. & Mrs. Roger Emmons 1085 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Occupant 1079 Airport Drive So..Burlington, VT 05403 , a BTV TRAP 10/30/2002 Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont Parking Garage Expansion Project - 2002 Source: Mike Lawrence & Associates New Installations: Item Size Quantity Cost / Value Unit Total Evergreen Trees 5-6' 50 300 each 15,000 Evergreen Trees 6-7' 30 350 ea 10,500 Evergreen Shrubs 24-30" 38 125 ea 4,750 Deciduous Trees 3-3.5" 9 500 ea 4,500 Deciduous Trees 2-2.5" 13 350 ea 4,550 Cedars 6-7' 50 100 ea 5,000 Granite Edging Is 6,000 Irrigation Is 21,000 Transplanted Trees 46 200 ea 9,200 Transplanted Shrubs 21 50 ea 1,050 Protected Material to be retained in project area: Item Value 36" Silver Maple 7,500 30" Red Oak 7,500 36" Red Oak 7,500 30" box Elder 7,500 12" Red Maple 5,000 15" Pin Oak 5,000 15' Blue Spruce 5,000 TOTAL VALUE OF LANDSCAPING 126,550 /r;;y,,,, �►R i�►� IR.RIGATED A NEW I'r NEW GARAGE I EXISTING GARAGE DETAIL AT TRANSFORMER AND GENERATOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION 2003 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29 Williston, Vermont 05495 -October 2002 TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29 Williston, Vermont 05495 October 21, 2002 Mr. Jon B. Leinwohl, P.E. Dufresne -Henry, Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Leinwohl: 802-985-2765 Phone and fax transop@together.net In this study, various analyses were performed for the traffic conditions that occur at selected intersections on Airport Drive in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport in South Burlington, Vermont. Proposed expansions for this commercial site result in an annual growth rate of 2.5 percent for all traffic volumes associated with the airport. Traffic demands were generated for the two intersections that provide ingress to and egress from the airport and for the adjacent intersections of Airport Drive with Kennedy Drive and Williston Road, with Airport Road, and with White Street for the design year of 2008. For three of the four unsignalized intersections, warrants for traffic signals were assessed for average weekday volumes, while 30' highest hour volumes were selected for performance evaluations at all locations. Safety evaluations were performed for that section of Airport Drive that includes Airport Entrance and Exit. In summary, acceptable conditions of traffic performance and safety are anticipated in the study area through the planning year of 2008. Please advise of any additional assistance that may be required in regard to the traffic aspects of this proj ect. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. President 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................ 1 VEHICULAR VOLUMES ......................................... 4 WARRANT EVALUATIONS ....................................... 7 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCES ....................................... 9 SAFETY EVALUATIONS ......................................... 15 SUMMARY..................................................... 17 APPENDIX A, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - Intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road ............................. 18 APPENDIX B, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - Intersection of Airport Drive and Airport Road ............................................ 25 APPENDIX C, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - Intersection of Airport Drive and Airport Entrance :......................................... 35 APPENDIX D, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - Intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street ................................ 40 APPENDIX E, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - Intersection of Airport Drive and White Street ............................................. 50 APPENDIX F, LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS .................. 56 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ 58 iii TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION 2003 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT INTRODUCTION Commercial activities, such as an airport, generate vehicular and pedestrian movements throughout their times of operation. Trip generations are influenced by the levels of commercial development, and, as a result, traffic conditions are often affected in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, transportation planning is essential to insure continuing commercial activity with roadway and intersection facilities that provide efficient and safe travel. The purpose of this traffic study was to assess the adequacies of one signalized and four unsignalized intersections, that are in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport, to serve efficiently and safely the travel demands through the planning year of 2008. This airport is located on the east side of Airport Drive at a distance of approximately 2400 ft north of Williston Road in South Burlington, Vermont, and is shown as site (P) on the street map in Figure 1. The five selected study intersections are identified by the indicated letter designations on this same figure: 1. Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road - `A'; 2. Airport Drive and Airport Road - `B'; 3. Airport Drive and Airport Entrance - `C'; 4. Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street - `D'; and 5. Airport Drive and White Street - `E'. 1 Figure I Locations of Burlington International Airport and Study Intersections in South Burlington, Vermont 2 Airport Road is a collector street with a speed limit of 25 mph and with stop control on the intersecting streets. Vehicular flows at the intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road are regulated by a fully -actuated traffic signal. At the last location of Airport Drive and White Street, traffic movements are regulated on the north and east approaches by stop signs and on the west approach by a yield sign. The scope of these traffic studies includes the following appraisals: 1. Signal warrants 2. Special turn -lane warrants, and 3. Intersection performances. In addition, safety evaluations were determined for the portion of Airport Drive that is directly influenced by vehicular movements associated with airport activities. Traffic volumes for the base year of 2003 and the planning year of 2008 were developed from recent turning movement counts provided by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT), the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO), and Dufresne -Henry, Inc. (D-H). A five-year period provides a reasonable interval over which to appraise the traffic requirements for the contemplated expansions at Burlington International Airport. Traffic growth for Burlington International Airport was estimated to be 2.5 percent annually from recent local enplanement trends. The normal increase in travel patterns is approximately 1.06 percent per year along Airport Drive. 3 VEHICULAR VOLUMES Five intersectional situations were studied in these traffic assessments, and Traffic Summaries for each set of evaluations are presented in the following appendices: 1. Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road - Appendix A; 2. Airport Drive and Airport Road - Appendix B; 3. Airport Drive and Airport Entrance - Appendix C; 4. Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street - Appendix D; 5. Airport Drive and White Street - Appendix E. Traffic growth for the anticipated airport expansion begins in 2003 with a planning year of 2008. Vehicular volumes for the analysis periods were adjusted for daily and monthly variations and forecasted to represent the following situations. 1. 2003 and 2008 build average weekday volumes for signal warrants; and 2. 2003 and 2008 build 30" highest hour volumes for special turn -lane warrants and performance evaluations. The build volumes for 2003 are almost identical to the no -build situation for that year, although the no -build case was not evaluated in this study. Temporal adjustments were derived from continuous count data collected at the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) Sta. D099 on I89 in the City of South Burlington and from the short count data taken at the VAOT Sta. D218 on Airport Drive in the vicinity of Burlington International Airport. The short-term growth factors were derived from the latter source to account for recent on- 0 going development activities in the general area of the project and the selected study locations. The adjustment factors to provide average weekday volumes (AWV) and the highest hour volumes (30HV) as the design hour volumes (DHV) were generated from summary statistics for VAOT Sta. D099. On the two airport driveways, the ratio of DHV to AWV was selected as 1.10. The development volumes on these driveways reflect both normal growth and airport expansion, while these values only represent airport development at the other three intersections. The normal growth factor is included in the forecasting from the base to the design years. In Table 1, a listing by location and appendix is provided for the following sets of traffic summaries. 1. Signal warrant evaluations. 2. 2003-2008 airport expansion traffic. 3. Design hour volumes for 2003 and 2008 build conditions during morning and afternoon peak hours. 4. Special turn -lane evaluations. 5. Traffic performance summaries; a. Intersection statistics. b. Queue lengths. C. Through -lane performance. Trip distributions for this project were developed by the analogy method from the turning movement counts at each study intersection. For both 2003 and 2008, the vehicular volumes are indicative of the build condition for the anticipated growth at the Burlington International Airport. 5 TABLE 1 INTERSECTION APPENDIX TABLE NUMBERS BIA Airport Expansion 2003 South Burlington, Vermont Appendix Signal Traffic Volumes Turn Lane Traffic and Warrants Warrants Performance Location 2003, 2008 Expan. 2003 2008 A Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., - 4 5 6 - 7, 8, 9 & Williston B Airport Dr. & Airport 10 11 12 13 14,15 16,17 Rd. C Airport Dr. & Airport - 18 19 20 - 21 Entrance D Airport Dr., 22 23 24 25 - 26, 27, 28, 29 Airport Exit & Maryland E Airport Dr. 30 31 32 33 34 & White St. N. WARRANT EVALUATIONS Signal Warrants To ascertain the acceptable levels of traffic control for the three relevant unsignalized intersections, the average weekday volumes were obtained for the analysis years of 2003 and 2008. These volumes were compared with the warrants for traffic signals as stipulated in the current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. These three comparisons are presented in the respective Tables 10, 22, and 30. Based on the guideline assessments, the minor street volumes for the two analysis years are below the warranting values for signal control at the two intersections of Airport Drive with Airport Road and with White Street. The intersection of Airport Drive and Airport Entrance was not included in these.warrant evaluations, because no side street traffic enters at this location. The present arrangements of intersection control for these three sites are satisfactory for the anticipated travel demands through 11: In the case of the Airport Exit onto Airport Drive, Warrant 3, Peak Hour is realized for the 2003 and 2008 levels of average weekday volumes. Although this warrant is generally applicable where a large number of vehicles are involved over a short time, such as an office complex or a manufacturing plant, this situation is evident on this roadway during the period of 1600-1700. This fact coupled with the calculated large control delays and queue lengths during the afternoon peak hour supports the installation of signal control with operation at least during the afternoon peak 7 period. However, the operation of the toll booths tends to meter the exiting traffic with greater queuing in the parking structure than on Airport Exit at peak times. Additional assessments should be made on these situations after the project has been completed, although the infrastructure (conduits and pull boxes) for signal control at Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street should be considered for installation during the construction phase of the parking garage expansion. Special Turn Lane The guidelines for a left -turn lane at an unsignalized intersection, as adopted by the Vermont Agency of Transportation, are realized on the south approach of Airport Drive at Airport Road for both analysis years. These findings are summarized in Table 14. This geometric need exists for both the base and planning years. A designated left -turn lane is currently in place on the north approach of Airport Drive at Airport Entrance. In addition, the design right -turn volumes on the north approach of Airport Drive at the intersection with Airport Road are below the VAOT guidelines for the provision of a separate right -turn lane. A summary of these evaluations are contained in Table 15. No other location qualified for the determination of any special turn lanes. TRAFFIC PERFORMANCES In Tables 7 to 9, 16,17, 21, 26 to 29, and 34 in the respective appendices of Traffic Summaries, 2003 and 2008 travel patterns are described in terms of design hour volumes and represent `extreme -case' situations for road -user demands. These volumes were developed from the peak 15-minute values with a peak hour factor of 1.00 to represent peaking characteristics associated with design hour volumes. The capacity procedures, for signalized and unsignalized intersections, as outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000, were used with Synchro software to assess traffic performances at the study locations. The time periods analyzed were morning and afternoon peals hours. For a signalized intersection, traffic performance characteristics are described by the following parameters. 1. Level of service and control delay in seconds per vehicle by lane group and total intersection. 2. Volume -to -capacity ratio by lane group and total intersection. 3. Queue length for the 50`h percentile by lane group. The following items represent the performance descriptions for an unsignalized location. 1. Level of service and control delay in seconds per vehicle by critical movement, approach, and total intersection. 2. Volume -to -capacity ratio by critical movement. 3. Queue length for the 95`h percentile by critical movement., we These performance measures collectively describe the operating characteristics for each class of intersection. Signal phasing and timing in the performance calculations were developed for demand volumes that represent the 30" highest hour in the analysis years. However, actual phasing and timing values are generally predicated on average weekday volumes in the time period selected for the design of the traffic signal operation. Service levels are qualitative descriptors of traffic conditions and range from `A' for excellent or free flow to `E' for intolerable or unstable flow. Level of service `F' describes that situation when demand volume exceeds calculated capacity. Qualitative and quantitative definitions ofperformance levels are given in Table 35 of Appendix F, Level of Service Descriptions. Levels of service `B' to `D' or better are often selected as the desired criteria in the design of roadway facilities. In certain cases, traffic operational improvements may be arranged on a cost-effective basis to provide service level `E' or better during those few hours when traffic demands peak in the design year. Conflicting performance assessments may occur at unsignalized intersections, where high control delays are associated with conditions of low volumes, low volume -to -capacity ratios, and/or short queues. Therefore, all measures of effectiveness must be considered in the performance evaluation of an intersection with stop or yield control. At the present time, unacceptable performance at an unsignalized intersection does not constitute a warrant for the installation of traffic signal control. A generic summary of the intersection performance evaluations is given in Table 2. For all scenarios, overall acceptable levels of service are available at the five study intersections with the recommended control improvements throughout the analysis period. Greater details for the 10 TABLE 2 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY BIA Airport Expansion 2003 Appendix and Location A. Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., & Williston Rd. B'. Airport Dr., & Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont Control Overall Level of Service 2003 2008 Build Build a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. Signalized B C C C Unsignalized A C A E Unsig. w/SA-LT A C A E C. Airport Dr. Unsignalized & Airport Entrance , D. Airport Dr., Unsignalized Airport Exit, & Maryland St. Signalized E. Airport Dr. Unsignalized & White St. 11 A A A A A F A F A B A B A ' B B B signalized intersections of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road and of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street are documented in Tables 7 and 27 for average control delays, I' volume -to -capacity ratios and levels of service by lane group and intersection total. In Tables 8 and 28, 50`h-percentile queue lengths by lane group are compared with available storages. For the intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road, all lane groups in Table 7 operate at `D' levels of service of better for the two peak hours in both analysis years. The through/right- turn lanes on the east and west approaches have the longest average queues of 10 to 11 vehicles during the afternoon peak hour. However, only the east approach lanes involve airport traffic. With signal control at Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street, all lane groups experience `D' service levels or better for all analysis scenarios. Maximum average queuing amounts to 5 or 6 vehicles on the through/left-turn lane in the afternoon peak hour. The queuing requirements on Airport Exit are greatly reduced by signal operation as compared to stop control on the side streets. In all cases, reasonable balances are reported among the various measures of effectiveness for describing intersection performance. The various performance values for unsignalized locations are given, respectively, in Tables 16, 17, 21, 26, and 34 for the intersections of Airport Drive with Airport Road, with Airport Entrance, with Airport Exit and Maryland Street, and with White Street. Acceptable balances exist among the various effectiveness measures for all morning and afternoon levels of traffic volumes in both analysis years. Excellent operational characteristics on Airport Drive are available for travel through the unsignalized intersections. 12 Poor characteristics exist for all performance measures on the west approach of Airport Road at I P PP rP Airport Drive for existing geometric conditions. Insignificant benefits result with the addition of the left -turn lane on the south approach of Airport Drive. However, no signal warrants are satisfied for I this intersection. Good overall performance measures are evident for the intersection of Airport Drive with Airport Entrance and with White Street. For the latter location, the east approach which serves as a driveway is assessed with poor delay times but with good volume -to -capacity ratios and with short queue lengths during the two afternoon analyses. The situation of Airport Exit is markedly improved in terms of delay, level of service, volume -to - capacity ratio, and queue length with the adaptation of an unsignalized intersection to signal operation. The benefits of this control modification is most pronounced for the afternoon peak hour, when the airport exit traffic is at a maximum level. During the afternoon peak hour, high control delays and long queue lengths are noted on Airport Exit for unsignalized operation. Therefore, at the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street, traffic signal control is contemplated for the anticipated volume demands. This condition was analyzed for signal operation during morning and afternoon peak hours in both study years. These results are summarized in Tables 27 and 28 with acceptable performance characteristics. 13 Although the unsignalized capacity procedure was applied to the traffic operations at the intersection of Airport Drive and White Street, the method is not strictly applicable to two through streets that intersect with major turning movements. Because no methodology is available to analyze this configuration, the results presented in Table 34 are only to be construed as an approximate evaluation. This intersection does appear to be operating in a reasonably effective manner. Little significance is often attached to the performance measures of unsignalized intersections that do not satisfy a warrant for traffic signal control. At the present time, plans are being studied for the extension of Airport Drive to the north for connection with Airport Parkway. The revised intersection of Airport Drive and White Street will need to be designed to provide acceptable performance measures for future traffic demands. Design queue lengths for the 95" percentile are given in Tables 16, 17, 21, 26, and 34 for the unsignalized intersections. The tabulated values are reasonably small, and no evidence exists for the potential blocking of any major driveways along Airport Drive. As noted in Table 26 for 2008, the storage requirement for the left -turn lane on Airport Exit should be approximately 36 vehicle lengths or 900 ft to prevent any potential blocking of exit movements from the parking stricture. This requirement is reduced to no queue formation with signal operation. To account for the South Burlington scope of study, levels of service and control delays for through movements at signalized intersections are reported in Tables 9 and 29, respectively, for the locations of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road and of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street. 14 SAFETY EVALUATIONS I Accident characteristics on Airport Drive were analyzed for a distance of 1800 ft from south of Airport Entrance to north of Airport Exit. Traffic accidents, as presently listed in the State Highway Sorted Accident File for the five-year period from 1996 through 2000, are summarized in Table 3 according to numbers, rates, causes, types, and severities. This section of collector street in an urban area is not currently classified as a high -accident location by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. A general guideline for the indication of a safety problem at an intersection or over a short roadway 1 1 section is the average occurrence of five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period. The three mishaps that were reported over the five years result in a frequency of 0.60 accidents per year, which is less than the criterion for an accident-prone situation. Another measure of relative safety is provided by a comparison of actual and critical accident experiences per one -million vehicle miles for the selected roadway section on Airport Drive. In Table 3, the actual rate of 0.69 accidents per one -million vehicle miles is less than the critical rate of 4.10 accidents per one -million vehicle miles. Again, the actual accident experience is below the critical value that is indicative of a safety problem. In general, causes of the reported traffic mishaps are attributable to driver errors. The accidents are I , not related to any elements of street design and/or traffic control. Two collisions are classified in the severity category of personal injury, while the remaining accident is listed as property -damage - only. Therefore, the study roadway is summarized as a non -accident-prone location. 15 TABLE 3 ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS Airport Drive between Airport Entrance 1996-2000 and Airport Exit Total accidents k Average accidents per year 0.60 Accident rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 0.69 Critical rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 4.10 Accident causes Inattention 2 Fatigue 1 Accident types Rear end 2 Left road 1 Accident severities Fatal 0 Personal injury 2 Property damage only 1 Conclusion: non -accident-prone location. 16 SUMMARY Traffic analyses were conducted at five intersections on Airport Drive in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport for travel demands in the analysis year of 2003 and 2008. In addition, safety conditions on this collector street were appraised in terms of accident characteristics over the period from 1996 through 2000. All traffic movements that relate to airport activities were increased at the rate of 2.5 percent annually to account for both normal growth and for airport expansion. The rate of 1.06 percent annually represents the normal growth pattern along Airport Drive. The intersection of Airport Drive, Kennedy Drive, and Williston Road is controlled with fully actuated signal operation, and a warrant for traffic signal installation is met at the location of Airport Drive with Airport Exit and Maryland Street. Operation of signal control during the afternoon peak period should reduce control delays and queue lengths on Airport Exit. The remaining three study sites along Airport Drive provide acceptable levels of service with stop control on the side streets throughout the analysis period. In addition, acceptable balances among the various measures of effectiveness are realized at both signalized and unsignalized intersections that were analyzed in this traffic impact study. As a result of the safety appraisal, the section of Airport Drive in the vicinity of the airport was judged to be a non -accident-prone street. No significant alteration of accident characteristics is anticipated with an increase in airport activities. No adverse conditions on the study section of Airport Drive are contemplated with enhanced levels I of operation at Burlington International Airport. Detailed designs of the recommended traffic -control improvements are beyond the scope of this impact study. This aspect of the project development is completed in the design phase and in coordination with the City of South Burlington. 17 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE, KENNEDY DRIVE, AND WILLISTON ROAD 18 TABLE 4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. 0 7 L 0 1 0 1 T 0 0 -1► R 0 0 Williston Rd. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 DHV Expansion Traffic 2003-2008 1_ 6 ® � 10 48 15 Airport Dr. R T L 0 3 3 7 20 21 N Williston Rd. 4 6 R -4— 0 0 T 4 E 0 0 L 3 21 0 6 0 0 8 0 L T R Kennedy Dr. 1 3 ® 6 © 20 T 8 19 TABLE 5 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. 2003 DHV Build 1 371 232 ® 572 620 Airport Dr. R T L 4 212 155 78 257 237 N A �A 609 1140 L 4 38 983 935 T 711 733 ---0► —� R 268 164 Williston Rd. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 *' 4 I 142 108 264 346 285 249 L T R Kennedy Dr. 740 678 514 880 20 Williston Rd. 120 297 R .�} - -4— 463 716 T 843 1270 260 257 L 1130 1219 TABLE 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. 642 1205 L 4 41 1035 986 T 749 772 -D► -4> R 282 173 Williston Rd. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 394 630 ® 250 r 663 Airport Dr. R T L 4 225 165 87 282 261 150 118 278 364 305 262 L T R Kennedy Dr. I 781 ® 726 546 931 21 2008 DHV Build Williston Rd. 128 317 R «+B - 488 754 T 274 271 L t .w-- 890 1342 1192 1295 TABLE 7 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. Approach Lane Group Control Delay (spv) a.m. p.m. North App. RT 14.2 TH 24.7 LT 17.0 South App. RT 4.1 TH 23.5 LT 17.0 East App. TH-RT 10.8 LT 22.7 West App. TH-RT 26.3 LT 9.8 Intersection 19.2 North App. RT 15.5 TH 27.3 LT 19.6 South App. RT 5.1 TH 26.0 LT 19.7 East App. TH-RT 10.6 LT 23.8 West App. TH-RT 27.7 LT 9.8 Intersection 20.4 7.4 32.6 21.0 4.8 26.4 27.8 22.4 27.4 35.1 13.5 25.7 7.2 36.7 21.2 6.5 29.5 37.6 25.2 32.6 42.7 13.7 9wj LOS a.m. p.m 2003 DHV B A C C B C A A C C B C B C C C C D A B o �►.TI 1: � a+I B A C D B C A A C C B D B C C C C D A B C C 22 South Burlington, Vermont v/c Ratio a.m. p.m. 0.01 0.21 0.54 0.69 0.37 0.66 0.49 0.40 0.29 0.56 0.44 0.83 0.36 0.73 0.36 0.79 0.85 0.89 0.01 0.20 0.23 0.01 0.76 0.58 0.70 0.42 0.45 0.52 0.66 0.33 0.91 0.51 0.77 0.36 0.84 0.76 0.94 0.87 0.22 0.01 0.94 0.87 TABLE 8 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. Approach Lane No. of 50-P Queue Group Lanes (ft) South Burlington, Vermont a.m. p.m. 2003 DHV Storage (ft) North App. RT 1 0 0 157 TH 1 83 133 - LT 1 47 86 157 South App. RT 1 2 7 243 TH 1 40 133 - LT 1 43 137 243 East App. TH-RT 2 64 250 - LT 1 62 91 215 West App. TH-RT 2 195 247 - LT 1 1 _ 11 _ 134 2008 DHV North App. RT 1 0 0 157 TH 1 98 150 - LT 1 57 96 157 South App. RT 1 5 15 243 TH 1 49 152 - LT 1 52 147 243 East App. TH-RT 2 73 274 - LT 1 79 101 215 West App. TH-RT 2 229 268 - LT 1 1 12 134 23 TABLE 9 THROUGH -LANE LEVEL OF SERVICE Airport Dr., Kennedy Dr., and Williston Rd. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Control Delay Level of Service (spv) a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. 2003 DHV Airport Dr. - North App. 24.7 32.6 C C Kennedy Dr. - South App. 23.5 26.4 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 10.8 22.4 B C Williston Rd. - West App. 26.3 35.1 C D Cycle Length (sec) 75 90 2008 DHV Airport Dr. - North App. 27.3 36.7 C D Kennedy Dr. - South App. 26.0 29.5 C C Williston Rd. - East App. 10.6 25.2 B C Williston Rd. - West App. 27.7 42.7 C D Cycle Length (sec) 80 90- 24 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD 25 TABLE 10 SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road Time Sum of the 2003 AWV 6- 7 7- 8 8- 9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 Major (vph) 358 557 572 537 677 697 692 656 692 897 1021 944 Warrants Satisfied: 1BR, 2R, 3R Time Sum of the Major (vph) 2008 AWV 6- 7 391 7- 8 596 8- 9 613 9-10 583 10-11 743 11-12 772 12-13 754 13-14 711 14-15 752 15-16, 983 16-17 1136 17-18 1023 Warrants Satisfied: 1BR, 2R, 3 Minor Volume (vph) 31 53 70 79 80 73 104 95 63 94 166 98 Minor Volume (vph) 33 56 75 84 85 78 III 101 67 100 177 104 26 South Burlington, Vermont Warrants Met 1BR 1BR 1BR 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1B, 1BR, 2R IA, IAR, 1B, 1BR, 1C, 2, 2R, 3R 1B, 1BR, 2R, 3R Warrants Met IBR 1BR 1BR 1BR, 2R 1B, 1BR, 2R 1AR, 1B, 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1BR, 2R 1B, 1BR, 2, 2R,3,3R 1A, IAR, 1B, 1BR, 1C, 2, 2R,3,3R 1B, 1BR, 2, 2R,3,3R Airport Drive and Airport Road TABLE 11 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY 1 7 10 ® 53 14 Airport Dr. DHV Expansion Traffic 2003-2008 R T L 0 7 0 6 47 0 0 6 _q*— Drive L 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 T 0 0 —® -99-- 0 0 T —� R 0 0 1 2 L Airport Rd. 0 10 0 0 14 0 L T R Airport Dr. 8 10 49 14 a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 27 1 2 0 0 TABLE 12 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road 103 109 L 30 103 84 233 T 1 4 ---$3► ' R 53 126 Airport Rd. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 2003 DHV Build 501 568 ® 288 r 798 Airport Dr. R T L 45 455 1 63 504 1 Drive 1 12 R T 1 4 L 57 257 1 45 683 8 L T R Airport Dr. 509 315 634 736 28 TABLE 13 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road 108 118 L 32 109 89 246 T 1 4 —� R 56 133 Airport Road a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 2008 DHV Build 1 532 ® 629 ® 309 I 849 Airport Dr. R T L 47 484 1 70 558 1 iLI' Drive 1 13 R d 1 1 T ?( 1 4 L � r 60 276 1 47 727 8 L T R Airport Dr. 541 ® 337 695 1782 29 4 3 18 3 13 TABLE 14 LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT Airport Drive and Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont South Approach Period Opposing Left Advancing Warrant Volume Turn Volume Satisfied (vph) (%) (vph) Actual Critical 2003 a.m. DHV 500 18.1 315 189 Y p.m. DHV 567 6.1 736 276 Y 2008 a.m. DHV 531 17.8 337 182 Y p.m. DHV 628 6.0 782 256 Y Speed Limit - 25 mph VAOT Minimum Left Turn - 5.0% 30 TABLE 15 RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT Airport Drive and Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont North Approach Period 2003 a.m. DHV p.m. DHV 2008 a.m. DHV p.m. DHV Warrant Product - 255 Speed Limit - 25 mph Advancing Volume (vph) 501 568 Right Turn 8.98 8.27 Product 143 156 Warrant Satisfied N N 552 11.84 172 N 629 11.13 198 N 31 TABLE 16 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2003 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1295 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1054 0.05 2.0 - 4 East App. L- 316 0.01 16.5 C 1 West App. L- 404 0.21 16.2 C 19 Intersection 2.3 A 2003 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. L- 895 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L- 995 0.05 1.2 - 4 East App. L- 201 0.08 24.6 C 7 West App. L- 212 1.10 139.5 F 270 Intersection 21.8 C 2008 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1274 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1026 0.06 2.1 - 5 East App. L- 291 0.01 17.5 C 1 West App. L- 377 0.24 17.5 C 23 Intersection 2.4 A 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. L- 861 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L- 944 0.05 1.3 - 4 East App. L- 175 0.10 28.0 D 8 West App. L- 181 1.36 243.6 F 363 Intersection 36.7 E 32 TABLE 17 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection - Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2003 Morning Peak Hour DHV with South Approach Left turn Lane North App. L-1295 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1054 0.05 1.6 - 4 TR-1700 0.15 - - 0 East App. L- 316 0.01 16.5 C 1 West App. L- 404 0.21 16.2 C 19 Intersection 2.1 A 2003 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV with South Approach Left turn Lane North App. L- 895 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L- 995 0.05 0.5 - 4 TR-1700 0.41 - - 0 East App. L- 201 0.08 24.6 C 7 West App. L- 213 1.10 137.5 F 268 Intersection 21.2 C 2008 Morning Peak Hour DHV with South Approach Left turn Lane North App. L-1274 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1026 0.06 1.6 - 5 TR-1700 0.16 - - 0 East App. L- 291 0.01 17.5 C 1 West App. L- 377 0.24 17.5 C 23 Intersection 2.2 A 33 TABLE 17 (cont.) IUNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Road South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection I Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay ! (ft) (spv) 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV with South Approach Left turn Lane North App. L- 861 0.00 0.0 - 0 South App. L- 944 0.05 0.5 - 4 TR-1700 0.43 - - 0 East App. L- 175 0.10 28.0 D 8 West App. L- 182 1.36 240.7 F 361 Intersection I ! I 354 E 1 i 34 APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE AND AIRPORT ENTRANCE 35 TABLE 18 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Entrance DHV Expansion Traffic 2003-2008 7 0 15 0 Airport Dr. R T L 0 0 7 0 0 15 N 0 0 -t— Airport Entrance L 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 T 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 L 27 41 0 0 20 0 0 26 L T R Airport Dr. L © 0 ® 20 0 T 26 a.m. peak hour - 0715-0815 p.m. peak hour - 1630-1730 Z TABLE19 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Entrance 2003 DHV Build 277 646 ® 80 T 392 Airport Dr. R T L 0 215 62 0 511 135 0 0 0- Airport Entrance L 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 T 0 0 -ice -4- 0 0 T —D" R 0 0 0 0 L x 0 80 180 0 392 224 L T R Airport Dr. 215 511 260 616 a.m. peak hour - 0715-0815 p.m. peak hour - 1630-1730 Data Source - CCMPO/99 37 -4- 0 1 0 —D- 242 359 TABLE 20 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Entrance 0 0 .9] L 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 —� —® R 0 0 a.m. peak hour - 0715-0815 p.m. peak hour - 1630-1730 Data Source - CCMPO/99 2008 DHV Build 295 690 ® 84 f 413 Airport Dr. R T L 0 226 69 0 538 152 Airport Entrance 0 0 R -A-- 0 0 T ,&- 0 0 L -,w, � I 0 84 202 0 413 253 L T R Airport Dr. 1 226 ® 538 p 286 r 666 38 0 0 --0- 271 405 TABLE 21 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive and Airport Entrance South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2003 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. T-1700 0.13 - - 0 L-1293 0.05 1.8 A 4 South App. R-1700 0.11 - - 0 T-1700 0.05 0.0 - 0 Intersection 0.9 A 2003 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. T-1700 0.30 - - 0 L- 954 0.14 2.0 A 12 South App. R-1700 0.13 - - 0 T-1700 0.23 0.0 - 0 Intersection 1.0 A 2008 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. T-1700 0.13 - - 0 L-1265 0.05 1.9 A 4 South App. R-1700 0.12 - - 0 T-1700 0.05 0.0 - 0 Intersection 1.0 A 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. T-1700 0.32 - - 0 L- 914 0.17 2.1 A 15 South App. R-1700 0.15 - - 0 T-1700 0.24 0.0 - 0 Intersection 1.1 A 39 APPENDIX D TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE, AIRPORT EXIT, AND MARYLAND STREET 40 TABLE 22 SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street South Burlington, Vermont Time Sum of the Minor Warrants Met Major Volume (vph) (vph) ' 2003 AWV 6- 7 223 89 - 7- 8 448 60 - 8- 9 420 75 - 9-10 420 114 - 10-11 422 204 1 AR, 2R 11-12 472 253 IAR, 2R 12-13 554 172 1AR, 1BR, 2R 13-14 540 135 1BR, 14-15 519 155 IAR 15-16 568 250 1A, 1AR, 1BR, 2R, 3R 16-17 732 406 1A, IAR, 1BR, 1C, 2, 2R,3, 3R 17-18 603 195 IAR, 1BR, 1C, 2R Warrants Satisfied: 2R, 3 Time Sum of the Minor Warrants Met Major Volume (vph) (vph) 2008 AWV 6- 7 236 114 - 7- 8 473 77 - 8- 9 443 95 - 9-10 444 145 1AR 10-11 448 261 1AR, 2R 11-12 502 323 IA, IAR, 2R, 3R 12-13 587 220 1A, IAR, 1BR, 2R 13-14 571 172 IAR, 1BR, 2R 14-15 549 198 IAR 1BR, 2R 15-16 603 319 IA, IAR, 1BR, 1C, 2, 2R, 3R 16-17 779 519 IA, 1AR, 1B, 1BR, 1C, 2, 2R,3, 3R 17-18 639 249 1A, 1AR, 1BR, 1C, 2R 3R Warrants Satisfied: IAR, 2R, 3 41 TABLE 23 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street 0 1 L 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 —® t� R 0 0 Maryland St. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1600-1700 1 2 ® 9 Airport Dr. R T L 0 2 0 0 9 0 V, t I 0 0 0 0 0 0 L T R Airport Dr. 8 0 62 0 42 DHV Expansion Traffic 2003-2008 3 15 Airport Exit 0. 3 15 R - 0 1 T 6 53 L t 9 69 0 0 TABLE 24 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street 509 305 220 670 Airport Dr. R T L 1 508 0 1 304 0 3 15 L 1 1 5 18 T 0 0 —� R 4 17 Maryland Street a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1600-1700 Data Source - D-H/02 V, T 1 197 0 8 545 0 L T R Airport Dr. 563 ® 198 755 T 553 43 2003 DHV Build f Airport Exit 22 124 R .�- - 1 6 T 74 564 ® 51 434 L TABLE 25 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street 3 16 L 1 1 5 19 T 0 0 —0- ' R 4 18 Maryland Street a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1600-1700 Data Source - D-H102 538 328 ® 233 T 714 Airport Dr. R T L 1 537 0 1 327 0 A V�' T I 1 207 0 8 574 0 L T R Airport Dr. 598 ® 208 832 T 582 U 2008 DHV Build Airport Exit ®� 25 139 R -� — 1 7 T 57 487 L 83 633 --W- 0 0 VA; a,L, UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2003 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. R-1700 0.30 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1046 0.00 0.1 - 0 East App. TR- 793 0.03 - - 2 L- 342 0.15 15.0 B 13 West App. R- 561 0.01 - - 1 L- 326 0.00 12.4 B 0 Intersection 1.5 A 2003 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. R-1700 0.18 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1244 0.01 0.2 - 0 East App. TR- 514 0.25 - - 25 L- 257 1.69 280.3 F 699 West App. R- .731 0.02 - - 2 L- 167 0.01 11.0 B 0 Intersection 110.0 F 2008 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. R-1700 0.32 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1020 0.00 0.1 - 0 East App. TR- 785 0.03 - - 3 L- 322 0.18 15.8 C 16 West App. R- 540 0.01 - - -1 L- 304 0.00 12.8 B 0 Intersection 1.7 A 45 TABLE 26 (cont.) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. R-1700 0.19 0.0 - 0 South App. L-1220 0.01 0.2 - 0 East App. TR- 493 0.30 - - 31 L- 236 2.06 408.7 F 910 West App. R- 709 0.03 - - 2 L- 142 0.01 11.3 B 1 Intersection 165.8 F 46 TABLE 27 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street South Burlington, Vermont Approach Lane Control Delay LOS v/c Group (spv) Ratio a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. 2003 DHV North App. RT-TH 3.8 10.2 A B 0.32 0.35 South App. TH-LT 3.3 11.9 A B 0.13 0.63 East App. TH-RT 5.9 2.9 A A 0.09 0.19 LT 10.7 12.2 B B 0.19 0.63 West App. RT 8.2 5.2 A A 0.02 0.03 LT 11.0 10.0 B A 0.00 0.00 Intersection 4.2 10.7 A B 0.32 0.63 2008 DHV North App. RT-TH 4.0 10.9 A B 0.34 0.38 South App. TH-LT 3.4 12.7 A B 0.13 0.68 East App. TH-RT 5.9 2.8 A A 0.10 0.20 LT 11.1 12.9 B B 0.20 0.68 West App. RT 8.5 5.1 A A 0.02 0.03 LT 11.0 10.0 B A 0.00 0.00 Intersection 4.4 11.4 A B 0.34 0.68 47 TABLE 28 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION STORAGE Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street Approach Lane Group North App. RT-TH South App. TH-LT East App. TH-RT LT West App. RT LT No. of Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 am 2003 DHV 51 17 0 13 0 0 2008 DHV South Burlington, Vermont 50-P Queue (ft) p.m. 50 105 1 83 0 0 Storage (ft) 157 243 215 134 North App. RT-TH 1 55 64 157 South App. TH-LT 1 18 134 243 East App. TH-RT 1 0 1 - LT 1 14 109 215 West App. RT 1 0 0 - LT 1 0 01 134 48 TABLE 29 THROUGH -LANE LEVEL OF SERVICE Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street South Burlington, Vermont Approach Control Delay Level of Service (spv) a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. 2003 DHV Airport Dr. - North App. 3.8 10.2 A B Airport Dr. - South App. 3.3 11.9 A B Airport Exit - East App. 5.9 2.9 A A Cycle Length (sec) 60 60 Airport Dr. - North App. 4.0 10.9 A B Airport Dr. - South App. 3.4 12.7 A B Airport Exit - East App. 5.9 2.8 A A Cycle Length (sec) 60 60 APPENDIX E TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE AND WHITE STREET 50 TABLE 30 SIGNAL WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Drive and White Street South Burlington, Vermont Time Sum of the Minor Warrants Met Major Volume (vph) (vph) 2003 AWV 6- 7 261 6 - 7- 8 465 6 - 8- 9 476 7 - 9-10 415 5 - 10-11 438 7 - 11-12 514 11 - 12-13 508 19 - 13-14 483 15 - 14-15 462 10 - 15-16 624 9 - 16-17 724 10 - 17-18 706 13 - Warrants Satisfied: None Time Sum of the Minor Warrants Met Major Volume (vph) (vph) 2008 AWV 6- 7 280 6 - 7- 8 493 6 - 8- 9 505 7 - 9-10 443 5 - 10-11 471 7 - 11-12 555 12 - 12-13 543 20 - 13-14 516 16 - 14-15 494 11 - 15-16 670 9 - 16-17 784 11 - 17-18 754 14 - Warrants Satisfied: None 51 Airport Drive and White Street TABLE 31 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY 0 ® 0 0 I 0 Airport Dr. R T L 0 0 0 0 0 0 DHV Expansion Traffic 2003-2008 3 14 - -- Drive L 0 0 0 0 R 2 9 T 0 0 — Dt- - —. 0 0 T R 2 9 \ 0 0 L White St. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 W, T I 3 0 0 14 0 0 L T R Airport Dr. ® 2 '® 3 9 r 14 52 -0- 0 0 —C� 0 0 TABLE 32 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and White Street 184 696 a L 4 1 � 457 285 T 4 4 --E� R 449 280 White St. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour- 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 13 � 6 17 10 Airport Dr. R T L 4 8 1 8 8 1 V, r 179 1 4 672 8 4 L T R Airport Dr. 458 ® 184 296 T 684 53 Drive � 1 � 1 2003 DHV Build 1 R 16 T 8 L - — 3 25 9 9 TABLE 33 TRAFFIC VOLUMES SUMMARY Airport Drive and White Street 197 744 L 4 1 457 285 T 4 4 —®- R 449 280 White St. a.m. peak hour - 0730-0830 p.m. peak hour - 1615-1715 Data Source - VAOT/01 13 6 17 10 Airport Dr. R T L 4 8 1 8 8 1 V�, x 192 1 4 719 8 4 L T R Airport Dr. 1 458 © 197 ® 296 f 731 54 Drive � 1 2008 DHV Build 1 R 17 T 8 L S 3 26 9 9 TABLE 34 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Drive and White Street South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement v/c Approach 95-P Intersection Capacity Delay LOS Queue Average LOS (vph) (spv) Length Delay (ft) (spv) 2003 Morning Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1603 0.00 0.6 - 0 South App. L-1594 0.11 7.4 - 9 East App. L- 315 0.01 16.6 C 1 West App. L-1045 0.44 11.1 B 57 Intersection 9.9 A 2003 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1594 0.00 0.4 - 0 South App. L-1589 0.42 8.8 - 54 East App. L- 61 0.41 99.6 F 39 West App. L- 875 0.33 11.1 B 36 Intersection 11.6 B 2008 Moming Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1603 0.00 0.6 - 0 South App. L-1594 0.12 7.4 - 10 East App. L- 284 0.01 17.8 C 1 West App. L-1045 0.46 11.4 B 62 Intersection 10.1 B 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour DHV North App. L-1594 0.00 0.4 - 0 South App. L-1589 0.45 9.0 - 61 East App. L- 50 0.52 139.8 F 50 West App. L- 853 0.36 11.6 B 41 Intersection 12.8 B 55 APPENDIX F LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS TABLE 35 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS Signalized Intersections Level of Control Ratio of Service Delay Service Volume (spv) to Capacity A <_10 - B >10 and <_20 - C >20 and <_35 _<0.85 D >35 and <_55 >0.85 and <_1.00 E >55 and s 80 >1.00 and _< 1.20 F >80 >1.20 Unsignalized Intersections (Two-way and All -way Stop) Level of Control Service Delay (spv) A s 10. B > 10 and s 15 C >15 and <_25 D >25 and s35 E >35 and s50 F >50 57 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION 2003 AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Traffic studies and analyses were performed for five intersections on Airport Drive in the vicinity ofBurlington International Airport to assess the efficiency and safety of continuing travel operations through the planning period from 2003 to 2008. Growth rates for all vehicular movements were selected to account for increased levels of activities that are associated with the operation of the airport as well as for existing traffic on the various roadways. A warrant for traffic signal control is realized at the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Maryland Street. However, acceptable levels of traffic performance among the various measures of effectiveness are anticipated at the five intersections. Airport Drive is presently classified as a non -accident-prone location. In general, the intersectional facilities adjacent to Burlington International Airport can continue to serve the airport travel demands in an efficient and safe manner throughout the planning period. TRANS/OP INC. 10/21 /02 W Lighting: Design Description, Manufacturer's Cut Sheets and Photometric Data Dufresne -Henry Creating Better Places To Live, Work And Play Exterior lighting for the Terminal Roadway and Expansion Project at Burlington International Airport has been designed according to the standards set forth by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA), the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission (CCRPC), and the Burlington Electric Department. IESNA standards recommend average lighting levels of 1 to 2 footcandles in airport parking areas, and approximately twice that at focal points such as entrances, exits, and heavy pedestrian crossings. Uniformity ratios (Average:Minimum) of 3:1 and 4:1 are recommended for the roadways and parking areas, respectively. Pole mounted fixtures are to be metal -halide fixtures of full cutoff design. Existing pole mounted lighting fixtures are to be reused for site lighting, and new fixtures equal to those existing are to be used to illuminate the deck of the parking garage structure. Switching of exterior fixtures will be controlled by existing timeclocks/photocells, with provisions for additional circuits as necessary. The prominent location of the Burlington International Airport in a predominantly residential neighborhood necessitates the careful design of exterior lighting to minimize glare and spill into residential areas, while maintaining adequate and uniform lighting as required throughout the proposed site. This is accomplished by utilizing high cutoff fixtures, and mounting heights of +20' above grade for site fixtures and +11' above the garage deck for garage fixtures. An iso- footcandle line of 0.1 footcandles has been shown on plans PH-1 and PH-2 to indicate the approximate location of the site lighting cutoff. Engineers Planners Landscape Architects Environmental Scientists Post Office Box 2246 South Burlington, Vermont 05407 Voice: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 E-mail: sburl@dufresne-henry.com B T C i 0 a m SIDE VIEW G A ARM: Extruded aluminum, with zinc plated steel tie rods. BALLAST: Factory prewired and tested. HOUSING: Aluminum. REFLECTOR ASSEMBLY: Specify optics. LENS FRAME: Die-cast aluminum, with integral hinges. SOCKET - Porcelain 4kv, (Lamp by others). WALL/ARM MOUNT E8 8" 6'A" 3" 8" 8" 20.3 cm 16.8 cm 7.6 cm 20.3 cm 20.3 cm E19 19" 7 %1" 6" 6 A" 14 3/4" 48.6 cm 19.1 cm 15.2 cm 16.5 cm 37.5 cm SPECIFiCATIONS HOUSING: Shall be constructed from a one-piece die-cast aluminum housing to eliminate the possibility of water entry and weld seams. LENS FRAME: Shall be a one-piece die-cast aluminum lens frame with integral hinges secured to the hous- ing with stainless steel screws. Lens frame gasketing shall be one-piece silicone gasket to provide a weather - tight seal. Clear tempered glass lens is silicone sealed to the lens frame. ARM MOUNTING: Arm shall be extruded aluminum with reversible arm mounting plate which permits installation to 4" or larger square poles and 4" O.D. straight round poles. OPTICS: Shall be formed from highly reflective specular aluminum. Segmented reflectors shall be multi- faceted components mounted in an aluminum frame. Reflector assembly shall be rotatable in 90' increments and equipped with electrical quick disconnects. ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS: Ballast components shall be installed on removable ballast tray (E19 only) for ease of installation and maintenance. All ballasts are factory prewired and tested. BALLAST: All ballasts are regulating with power factors better than 90% (HPF). Ballasts shall provide +/- 5% lamp power regulation with +/-10% ORDERING GUIDE DIE CAST FORM E8 ORDERING GUIDE DIE CAST FORM E19 input voltage variation. Ballasts shall be factory prewired and tested. FINISH: Thermoset polyester pow- dercoat is applied after a five stage conversion cleaning process. EPA: E8: 0.54 E19: 1.5 WARRANTY: Three year limited warranty. UL. Listed cUL. Listed * One Piece Reflector. ** Square Pole Only. 0 a m * One Piece Reflector. ** Type V medium base only, I LUMARKS DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION FEATURES The Lumark Quadra-Lume is perfect for applications which call for reliable, affordable illumination with minimal maintenance. Quadra-Lume is designed for easy installation on main T-bars or can be hung by wires in lay -in ceilings with 2'x2' tiles. U.L. 1572 listed and CSA certified. APPLICATION The Quadra-Lume provides minimum surface brightness, excellent uniformity and gentle diffusion. It is ideal for use in department stores, banks, auto showrooms, schools, libraries, office buildings and auditoriums. A ..Housing Die -formed heavy-duty housing is made of cold -rolled steel and finished in highly reflective white polyester powder coat. Stamped steel ballast mounting bracket is integral part of housing. B.--Reflector Die -formed steel reflector has removable panels for easy ballast access from below. A B C D l23 7/6- [606MMI C•••Door Frame Die -formed heavy -gauge steel frame can be hinged and latched from either side. Stamped steel retaining clips assure flush fit of lens with frame. D ••Lens Gasketed flat prismatic acrylic or C73 glass lens. 9MMI 1 QFQUADRA-LUME 7 0- 4 0 0 W High Pressure Sodium Metal Halide RECESSED COMMERCIAL WITH FLAT LENS ENERGY DATA High Reactance Ballast Input Watts 70W MH HPF (94 Watts) 100W MH HPF (129 Watts) 15OW HPS HPF (190 Watts) 15OW MH HPF (210 Watts) CWI Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (223 Watts) 25OW HPS HPF (300 Watts) 25OW MH HPF (300 Watts) 40OW HPS HPF (465 Watts) 40OW MH HPF (475 Watts) CWA Ballast Input Watts 175W MH HPF (210 Watts) 20OW HPS HPF (250 Watts) 20OW MP HPF (232 Watts) 25OW MH HPF (295 Watts) 320W MP HPF (365 Watts) 35OW MP HPF (295 Watts) 40OW MH HPF (455 Watts) 400W HPS HPF (465 Watts) 40OW MP HPF (440 Watts) COOPER LIGHTING ADH991206 f'y QFQUADRA-LUME PHOTOMETRICS CP/100 MHQF-GL/C73-400 400-Watt Metal Halide 40,000-Lumen Coated Lamp FLUSH MOUNTING TRIM (FTB, FTW, FTA Heavy -gauge extruded aluminum combination fixture trim and plaster frame. Neatly finishes out any 2x2 recessed installation. ORDERING INFORMATION Coefficients Of Utilization Effective floor cavity reflectance 20% rc 80% 70% 50% 30% rw 70 50 30 70 50 30 50 30 50 30 RCR 0 89 89 89 87 87 87 83 83 79 79 1 82 79 76 80 77 75 74 72 71 70 2 76 70 66 74 69 65 66 63 64 61 3 70 63 57 68 62 56 59 55 57 54 4 64 56 50 63 55 50 54 49 52 48 5 60 51 45 58 50 44 49 43 47 43 6 55 46 40 54 46 40 44 39 43 38 7 52 42 36 50 42 36 40 35 39 35 8 48 39 33 47 38 33 37 32 36 32 9 45 36 30 !4 35 30 34 29 34 29 10 42 33 27 41 33 27 32 27 31 27 m secured to m with screws. )1�24' [sq. ✓25�1/8' I638mm1 sq.q. min. min. opening requlred- 26•[660mm]sq. SAMPLE NUMNER: 1111HQF-GL/C73-400.MT-0 QFL::�= Lamp Type Door Frame p Wattage' Voltage' HP.High GS-Flat Steel 120V Pressure GO/GAS-Flat Aluminum F70-.70W 100W 20iV Sodium 150W 240V MH-Metal Lens Type 175-775W 277V Halide A -Acrylic 200-200W 347V MP -Pulse A/GL-Acrylic with Glass 250-250W MT-Multl- Start MH Overlay 320-320W Tap' (CWA) • ACTF.140-Acrituf, .140' thick 350-35oW' TT.Triple. ACTF.197-Acritut .187• thick 400-400W Tap. Series 8246-Holophane 8246 QF-QUedra-Lume PL-Polycorbonate w/ Flat Lens C73-Prismatic Tempered Glass Lens Options (add as suffix) F7-Single Fuse (120, 277 or 347V) F2-Double Fused (208, 240 or 480V) Q-Quartz Restrike DC Bayonet Base (Hot strike only) EM-Quartz Restrike with 'Delay Relay' (Strikes at cold start)' EM/SC-Emergency Separate Circuit OL-U.L. Labeled for Damp Locations GMXF-Flat Non -floating Aluminum Door Frame GMXR-3/8' Regressed Non -floating Aluminum Door Frame BDF-Black Door Frame VL-Vertical Lamp (Adds 3 1/4' to overall fixture height) OR -Quiet Ballast (MH 120277 only) SCF-T Aircraft Safety Cable -Housing to ceiling G2-Double Gasketing HL-LumaWatt Fixture Control Module (Allows low voltage control wire to be daisy -chained between fixtures outside AC conduit run similar to low voltage Intercom's, fire alarms and phone systems)•• HC-LumaWatt Fixture Control Module (Low voltage leads pulled out of top connection box for areas requiring all wiring to be installed in conduit)•• Candlepower Degree CP 0 12888 5 12878 15 12798 25 12165 35 10322 45 7253 55 3975 65 2097 75 1121 85 437 Accessories (order separately) Ffl-Flush Trim, Black FTW.Flush Trim, White FM -Flush Trim, Natural Anodized Aluminum WGQF-Wire Guard Mot compatible with FTA, FTB, or FTW) LL-Lamp Included Catalog Lamp Lamp Ballast Type/ Lens Net Wt. Shipping Number • Type/Base Wattage Power Factor Type S/MH (Ibs.) Volume (cu. ft.) HPQF-GS/A-70 HPS/Mogul 70 HI.--X/HPF Acrylic 1.2 28 4.51 HPQF-GS/A-150 HPS/Mogul 150 Hi.--X/HPF Acrylic 1.2 29 4.51 HPQF-GS/A-260 HPS/Mogul 250 CWI/HPF Acrylic 1.2 37 4.51 MHQF-GS/C73-175 MH/Mogul 175 CWA/HPF Glass 1.2 33 4.51 MHQF-GS/C73-250 MH/Mogul 250 CWA/HPF Glass 1.2 35 4.51 MHQF-GS/C73-400 MH/Mogul 400 CWA/HPF Glass 1.2 39 4.51 NOTES:' Fixtures with Metal Halide lamps MUST have protective glass tans IC73) or glass overlay (GL). • All lamps are mogul.beae. 150W-MH and lower are available medium -bees • Pules Stan Metal Holds only. • Products also available in non -US voltages and SOH: for intarnatlonai markets. Consult factory for availability and ordering information. • Multi -Tap Wlest is 120/208/240/277V wired 277V. Triple -Tap ballast Is 120/277/347V wired 347V. Add desired voltage before 'MT' or 'TT'. • 200, 250, 320, 350, a 400W only. ' Not compatible woh EM/SC. HC, or HL. • Not compatible with EM or EM/SC. • Requires VL tvartical lamp option). 000 COOPER Lighting NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 ADH991206 DUFRESN,E- ENRYMD. PREPARED BY - �i9��LTaj�+ DATE 2 PROJECT N0. 1 •4CV CALCULATIONS CHECKED BY DATE SHEET NO. OF ASSUMPTIONS / METHODS CHECKED BY DATE SUBJ5CT o6y A 9::rr G� zleHr 51 kaft G'omMFM-s : /�ixjc��e6 Svc-Irj']'a!r Post -It* Fax Note 7671 Date 19 1 pa9'-► ' To From CoJDept rG F Co. Phone M Phone N Fax N 2 • NO EXCEPTION TAKEN FURNISH AS CORRECTED REVISE AND RESIJdYR REJECTED Chaldnp +a .n1„ >b. peon,, at�t.tat>o. ,Mth etn r Ioa ooae.ve and pantaf ooldor wnm vft The Atkematka ON" to IM c nkwa ooaawwa: Coaectlan or aonmenrs made *J ft v" tvvfw do not noe" Ift Conft~ fowl ac Fil - c tetra IM Mq mr of D=Kme` D FR SM-HENRY, lfgQ Da, 9 2 9 7 91 wie& 001 li ADD 4 C7 �A , cv' Goa, K�xA�AA� N� /. A/XIVRE 7-y/=5 E SA4444 ,8,E S1AV_*4E ,C,4440 6r17-j ,t3.a cx Moux'7' 4,Eb 1W XXWDA c ReS157-A4 r A✓vuSi L�GkrA�.,aRrns c.Qr 40 T�xS -cP/=ockMr••lvP.% �y1�iJ/oyvA�. 2. �iX j'cJiplF �f +EA S*4LG eZ Daw. .44xc6 4XI77 L z ID T /09 i v Y.4&t MZ. ��S�,44r ,eS5l5,r44g- hyoV S,AA& y 1.jf46p-#7- 4 4R1nS C.47# 7-P2 uX5. GP/ - C4G /°,F/Uzti AT- `I% rNe ,q�1 jieA1Al• e&YVe(VRc3 lh n.Or Rt54vlRED. T• L�?'y o� PONDAAlf SHALL $E AS 990vdUrP Sucy 7-P Yv/' Ole S16N IN PELOW 6 07TOn-t of PA CAS-r -rllgl. r Fixrra►2E . O I t I l 1 $, NORwAy & SONS, INC. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 133 SOUTH MAIN ST. • P.O. BOX 472 • BARRE. Yr 05641 TELEPHONE 802-479-2030 • FAX 802-479-3183 Il All InternationalBurlin ton gAirport J, a Parking Garage Light Fixture Submittal Engelbertb Construct - Job # _ n, tnc. BY Steve Knight Proj En StJBMrTTAL # 6�b2- 0- ITEM #JQ22-�— REVr AUG 2 6 1997 Reviewed - Subject to approval Of Owner arArchitect ., .......� ..� wow NORWAY & SONS, INC. APPROVED DISAPPROVED ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ ,�;r1°,I�y� 'V in\'s4;'u3TN t�' � 4= •1�� I 1i,, Ll,. i1"•• �f�':4�'{ tsi`�K tM 4ti `.,.,:'.•��.rl 7• + '-O 4 JLv,�.�T�•r,.��J_.,i/V �`� hb� � J�y� ,��jY.� 4�✓r1i ,ly�� •C:,.,;att•. I��4'iy n iayf��Y'±t'ri:�J[i ;11:�:�.; Yr, ;�';��j.! �� rt;; ' h,-r�,;,ti r,,i. ��r,r �`�� �,,�.�•.,�i ��.. •� i Y uw�:1,»,tk� ,>JAI:S•5'si'�14;';,,`�.;j;'��;:�, I'•.'T,.i�',y�iv 1 '�I�-C:yri�! ,N .� -=a• i •111Ly� l�i:�.'511 :1'y' ,. Tbf��J':�rk�y,.•.:."; �.C}='}�eI - •'tL�., reJ 1:4 1�,+1��t`'�?:�'�•+I,t: -P,�•i•}'f;',y}�d^'`f ''.. k%1.'i r.'v.r. y1%}, '�1.�j� '�}}'r F.ar., 4 ;� ii- n,1;..�r. :rY'• i,V...t•i.. � � r` sir;;:' � tip• f�".:+;1.1•r.i�' �•,, . ; .. r,'i� Yid ;} 1 �';L: � 4��j1 +,';l. t, :�'� � 1�:'!�1��[;•�J�. t'�1' :4 i.;!- i"',' • r "r. .:',� �f �. i• o �, Y� �''� :..i:r' ,'T'•Jt' u5 �I ��'•�,�.,..�il, •.t dZ ii� FYI},�:.a,•5���':i.; 3'rij`»}�c'�')� r�.:�O,M.i„It nylf��r�j�+J' .•4Y:. i'rj"Ilry5„f y-`,{,t .J �i' Yir4 �tI '�Y.�.- t', ��.�i!a8 ''fi �1 "�: - �.,(�`9�9� �t,jl'1'17r r� a f, �:rt�L a^Su . Specifications UL Listed for wet locations. Housing shall be constructed from a one-piece pressure die-cast aluminum housing to eliminate the possibility of water entry and weld seams. Lens Frame shall be a one-piece die-cast aluminum lens frame with integral hinges secured to lhel housing witfi'stainless steel screws and mechanically retains the clear temp4red glass lens. Two captive stainless steel fasteners secure the lens frame assembly to [Ile housing. Gasketing shall be a one-piece extruded neoprene rubber gasket providing a weather -tight seal. Reflector shall be a one-piece hydroforined highly reflective specular aluminum or segmented reflectors shall be multi -faceted components mounted in an aluminumn framewith quick disconnects. Arm Mounting Assembly shall be an extruded aluminum arras with two 318-16NC running thread zinc plated steel tie rods. Reversible arm mounting plate permits installation to 4' and larger straight square poles and 3' or 4' diameter straight round poles. Optics Segmented Post Top Mounting Assembly shall be fabricated from 1 114' round aluminum tubing welded to a cast fitter which slips over a 2' tenon and locks via two set screws. Electrical Components shall be mounted to a key -slotted removable 16-gauge galvanized steel traywith quick disconnects for easy installation and replacement. Ballasts (HID) shall be I sigh reactance with power factors better than 90% (HPF). Ballasts shall be factory wired and tested. Sockets shall be UL recognized for appropriate lamps with high pressure sodium sockets rated for 4 KV. Finish shall be a thermoset polyester powdercoal application, laboratory tested for superior weatherability and fade resistance in accordance with AS IN B-117-64 and ANSI/ASTM G53-77 specifications. EPA: E18 = .54 E18 = 1.3 E22 = 1.4 Three-year limited warranty. One -Piece (Hydroformed) Type II Type III Type IV Forward Throw Type V • Type II Type III Type V PROJBCT: AIRPORT IMPROV6MRITS TIPB MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION A NADCO E18� FT 175M MULTI BLACK B IIADCO 2/818A III 175H MULTI BLACK AA NADCO E18A FT 175H MULTI BLACK WALL MOUNT Type 100W 150W 175W 25OW 40OW HPS E8 E8/E'I8IE22 — E18/E22 E18/E22 MH E8 — E 18/E22 E 18/E22 E 18/E22 MV E8 — — - - — t �r :9, ti„d; K�cC �:I a,l..•'.L�3_ '�tiU�6 3r. JZ I II --D A DIMENSIONS I A B C D E Ordering Guide I , I I I I I I ARM MOUNT POST TOP WALL MOUNT Fixture Size Mounting Finish Optics Lamp Voltage Options EBA E8W E 8 A H 30' 70S E W A 'Ow Pi-- 1005 mlkckw �+ B 1505' . '100H E18A E18W E 18 A H 20 150S E W A 30 250S' F a® '� B FT 400S' G 2 175H H 3 250H' 5' 4001-1' 'MINI. b w 'W w,W. L'YIMl ally Ml lypu l/ E22P E 22 P H 20' 150S E A 30' 250S F B 50' 175H G 2 250H H 3 400H 'Ow pioeu AI w1kHN -1BCT: AIRPORT IMPROVKHMS OR NANDFACTURRR DESCRIPTION MADCO 818A FT 175M MULTI BLACK WCO 2/818A III 175M MULTI BLACK 1 NADCO 818A FT 175M MULTI BLACK WALL MOUNT I Legend -1BCT: AIRPORT IMPROVKHMS OR NANDFACTURRR DESCRIPTION MADCO 818A FT 175M MULTI BLACK WCO 2/818A III 175M MULTI BLACK 1 NADCO 818A FT 175M MULTI BLACK WALL MOUNT I Legend A•Arm IA. „•Blonto 2+Ty,w 11 S.Iu•s E. 120 ru•F 1•. I•IYIIIICOIYra P . Wrl Top A . OI.IG 7 . Typo III FI . MI I F . 206 IWF I, . I.,Ylyl W . W:1x MI. 0 . WlYlo I; f � Fwtl 11. 6 - NO I qY F . bCYp s.Ty,wv 11-znnlr J . 277 I M'F E Is- A H 3 175H E P-L-F 83 0800AS0430 Va MAU .�i Valmont seamless tapered aluminum poles are designed to meet the current "American Association of. Stale Highway and Transportation Officials (1985 AASHTO)", titled "Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals" for static and wind load requirements, as well as for safety breakaway supports when required. To provide the widest selections, Valmont offers poles with mounting heights up to 50 feet for base wind speeds of 70, 80, 90 and 100 mph or to customer's specifications. All the materials used in the fabrication of Valmont lighting standards meet the requirements of current specifications. Certified test reports on mechanical properties and chemical composition on the aluminum alloys are available if required. POLE SHAFT. Shaft shall be one piece and tapered by a cold working process from seamless extruded tubing of 6063 wrought alloy, as specified by the Aluminum Association The shaft shall be. free of longitudinal welds and of sufficient diameter and wall thickness to withstand specified designed loads. After tapering, [lie entire shaft assembly shall be heat treated to T6 temper. The shaft shall be provided with a satin finish accomplished by.mechanical rotary grinding. BASE FLANGE. The base flange or shoe base -for the attachment of the shaft to the foundation shall be a one piece cast socket of aluminum alloy 356-T6. The flange shall be joined to the shaft by means of complete circurnferential welds, externally at the top of the flange and internally at the bottom of the shaft tube. HANDHOLE. A reinforced flush handhole is standard for 8", 10" and 12" diameter poles without transformer bases. The opening is oval in shape and measures 4 " x 6 1/2" with the major dimension along the vertical axis. The opening is closed with a snug -fitting handhole cover which has the same surface finish as the shaft standard. It is centered 18" above the base of the pole. Unless otherwise specified, the handhole will be located at 90° clockwise from the bracket arm as viewed from the top of Ilse pole. A 3" x 7" handhole is also available for 7", 8", 10" and 12" diameter standards. TRANSFORMER BASE: The transformer base, if reclt iit ec I, shall be cast aluminum alloy 356 with a cast ali it i tit it it i t removable access door held in place with a slaintnss stool screw. The access door opening shall be 13" high, 8 3/4" wide at the top, and 9 1/4" wide at the bottom. The base shall be designed to be attached to 1" or 1 1/4" anchor bolts. TRANSFORMER BASE: The transformer base, if required, shall be cast aluminum alloy 356 with a cast aluminum removable access door held in place with a stainless steel screw. The access door opening shall be 13" high, 8 3/4" wide at the top, and 91/4" wide at the bottom. The base shall be designed to be attached to 1" or 1 1/4" anchor bolts. Four 1" diameter x 4" long galvanized steel hex -head machine bolts with nuts and washers shall be supplied to attach the transforn ter base to the base flange of the pole shaft. Eight round heavy galvanized steel washers shall be provided to properly distribute the bolts' forces in the top and bottom flanges. The base can be ordered with hinged door option. Optional AASHTO approved breakaway transformer bases are also available. ANCHORAGE: Shall be four (4) hot rolled steel anchor bolts with a 55,000 psi minimurn yield strength. Threaded ends shall be hot dipped galvanized and be provided with, two hex nuts and two flat washers per bolt. GROUNDING. Each pole shaft shall contain an internal lug with a 1/4" or 318" diameter hole for the purpose of attaching a grounding, connector. MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE: All hardware shall be, 300 series stainless steel. POLE CAP: An ornarnental cap of aluminum alloy shall be provided with each shaft. The cap shall be fastened to the shaft by mean:; of stainless steel screws. WELDING: The MIG welding process with aluminum consumable electrodes in aluminum alloy 4043 is used for joining the castings to wrought alloy components, and 5356 alloy consumable electrodes for joining the components made of wrought alloys only. DRAWINGS. A detailed drawing of the lighting standard ordered is supplied at the customer's request. WRAPPING FOR SHIPMENT: Each pole sl iaft shall be spirally wrapped with protective paper secured in place with tape and shall be equipped with a ripcord for quick, easy unwrapping. All small parts shall be boxed. MODIFICATIONS AND ACCESSORIES. - Convenience outlet box with weatherproof cover. - Pole vibration damper for internal or external application. I , VALMONT 0 A 11) i"' - ` ..-�;, _. IuUJ LI.I. 1111►1 VLLl lut'.vu.m��o -. - -• TYPH KAMOFACTDBHH DHSCHIPTION A VALMONT 83 0800ASO430 AB HC BH BLACK Pedostal Poles B VALMONT 83 0800ASO430 AB NC HH BLACK Series 83 EMBEDDED BASE CATALOG MOUNTING POLE SHAFT SIZES �• LUMINAIRE E.P.A.' NUMBER HEIGHT (Om [Va. X Top Dia X Lergih X Thkkness) • ' to MPH 9O MPH 100 MPH 83-06000AD0430 6' 4' X 3' X 8' 0' X .125' t 10.9 8.5 6.8 . 83-08000AD0430 11' 4' X TX 10' 0' X .125' (., 8.0 6.1 4.4 83-10000AD0430 10' 4' X TX 12' 0' X .125' 5.9 4.5 3.5 83-12000AD0430 12' 4' X TX 14' (7 X .125' 4.5 3.4 2.6 83-12000AD0530 12' 5' X 3' X 14' 0' X .125' :;i 8.9 6.9 5.6 83-14000AD0430 14' 4' X TX 16' 0' X .125' 3.4 2.4 1.8 83-14000AD0530 14' 5' X 3' X 16' 0' X .125' 7.3 5.7 4.6 83-16000AD0530 16' 5' X 3' X 18' 0' X .125' �' ( 6.0 4.6 3.7 83-18000AD0530 18' 5' X 3'•X 20' 0' X .125' 5.1 3.9 3.1 83-20000AD0530 29 5' X 3' X 22' 0' X .125' °'i 4.1 3.1 2.5 83-20000CDO530 29 5' X 3' X 22' 0' X .188' 6.9 5.3 4.2 SHOE BASE (: CATALOG MOUNTING POLE SHAFT SIZES LUMINAIRE E.P.A NUMBER HEIGHT (Brio Du. X Tip Dia. X Le"X ThOmm) i to MPH 9O MPH 100 MPH 83-06000ASO430 6' 4' X 3' X 6' 0' X .125' + 8.1 6.3 5.0 83-08000ASO430 8' 4' X 3' X 8' 0' X .125' ;, a 5.8 4.4 3.5 83-10000ASO430 10, 4' X 3' X 10' 0' X .125' Y f 4.2 3.1 2.4 - 83-12000ASO430 12' 4- X 3' X 12' 0' X .125' { 3.0 2.2 1.7 -, 83-14000ASO430 14' 4' X 3' X 14' 0' X .125- j F 2.0 1.4 1.0 83-16000AS0530 16' 5' X 3' X 16' 0' X .125' • :�; 4.0 3.1 2.4 83-18000AS0530 18' S' X 3' X 18' 0' X .125- !a - ;�� 3.4 2.6 2.0 83-20000AS0530 20' 5' X TX 20' 0' X ,125' a 2.9 1.9 1.5 TRANSFORMER BASE CATALOG MOUNTING POLE SHAFT SIZES ; � ' .� LUMINAIRE E.P.A' NUMBER HEIGHT (Oasa Dim X Top Dia. X La" X T kkwss) 90 MPH 90 MPH 100 MPH 83-06000AT0430 6' 4' X 3' X 6' 0' X .125' ii 8.2 6.4 5.1 . 83-08000AT0430 8' 4' X 3' X 8' 0' X .125 ' •, i) `? 5.5 4.1 3.2 83-10000AT0430 10, 4' X 3' X 10' 0' X •125' . ,r 4.1 3.2 2.4 83-12000AT0430 12' 4' X 3' X 12' 0' X .125' ' , • ;;;; 3.0 • 2.2 1.6 83-14000AT0430 14' 4' X 3' X 14' 0' X .125' .;:s` 2.0 1.4 0.9 I• i . 'EPA: Elleclive projected area 6i stpiare feel :TYPE NANUFACT UEER-U65CHIPTlun f� C SIK .. PGLIHP-100M11271 6.PH1 CC KIM PGLIHP 100KH277 L QS Pill Warning: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. C. Fixture Recommended for interior Specifications •Ceiling -mounted installation only. Testing and Certification: Underwriters Laboratories listed (120, 208, 240 and 277 volt) and Canadian Standards Association certified (120 and 347 volt) for wet loc. itions. Pholomelrics based on Independent Testing Laboratory (ITL) reports. Hinge Speed Mount: Formed steel, electro-zinc plated for mounting to stan- dard 4' J-box or mud box. Hooks are designed to hang fixture, free - Speed Mount ' - ing both hands for field wire c:onnectiolis. Allows tool -free fixture mounting to J-box, with integi at anti -then. locking device. Electrical Housing: Die cast aluminum for direct mounting to the Kim Speed Mount. Wire entry is :,ealed with a silicone grommet. Toward p Toward Optical Housing: One-piece injection molded UV stabilized polycar- Parking D Parking bonate (minimum wall lhicknoss .125') with clear up -light window and Stalls 0 Stalls mask -painted down -light section with hydroformed Alzak aluminum reflector insert. Reflector has vertical facets to prevent reflected light from passing through the Ian ip envelope. Up -light window contains Mounting two prismed sections to spread additional light downward in the direc- holes for lion of parking stalls. Optical Housing is secured to Electrical Housing standard with full silicone gasketing around the perimeter. mud box or Up -Light Reflector and Socket: One-piece h droformed aluminum • 4' junction box.p y with Alzak surface facing prisms and diffuse white surface facing clear up -light window areas. Socket is 4KV pulse rated medium base. Reflector is removed by loosening three screws allowing access to the electrical components. Electrical Down -Light Window: One-piece clear injection molded UV stabilized Housing-11" Dia.— high temperature Acrylic (p(dycarbonale optional). Attached to Optical Housing with a "no-lool" quick release spring hinge and three captive phillips-head "shoulder" type screws to prevent overtighlening Optical I i , (tamper -resistant hex socket screws optional). Perimeter is fully gas - Housing I I 3/e keted with silicone. Convex shape yields maximum light transmission. _ Electrical Components: High power factor ballasts for -20°F. starting, 65,V 11-1/; rigidly mounted inside Electrical Housing and pre -wired with leads extended out top of housing. Optical Configuration: In the direction of the driving lanes, luminaire 2• down -light is of the "cutoff" classification with up -light provided for illu- Down-Light minating ceiling and beam ;. , In the direction of parking stalls, lumi- Window naire is a 'semi -direct" type, with partial up -light refracted downward 16' Dia. for additional fill -light in the parking stalls. In all directions, lamp is shielded from normal viewing angles by the opaque reflector section of the luminaire. Finish: Light gray color. Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint applied over a chromate conversion coating on Electrical Housing. Oven cured coaling, specifically designed for plastic on Optical Housing. Optional Balanced Pendant J-Box Required only for Installations where pendant is free -swinging. See note at right for rigid pendant. Balanced Pendant J-Box (PB1): Cast aluminum with offset 3/; N.P.T. pendant entry to balance P'GL1HP fixture when a non -rigid free -swing- ing pendant is used. For fixture mounting, Kim Speed Mount adapts 3/; Conduit directly to PB1. Natural aluminum as -cast finish. (See below for rigid (by others) type pendant installation). ->� 4�/; 1�PB1 1 Mount The PF31 is not required too installs- q , , lions where a rigid pendai it is used. For any rigid pendant instal- - _ lation (typical example at right) a �_- standard 4' J-box may be used - with a centered pendant entry. Surface mounted conduit system. .4— Rigid pendant Standard 4 J-box 6 K I M FROJECT:'AIRPORT IMPRO MENTS YPE MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION C KIM PGLIIIP 100MH277 L PU1 CC RIM PGLIUP 100MN177 L QS Pill r L Ordering Example 1 3 4 5 6 7 ode \��`fdov+ �a� 1 Fixture PGL1 HP / 175MH277 / L / PB1 / QS / TS / SF 2 Electrical Mode Caution: All manufacturers of metal halide lamps recommend turning them off for 15 minutes once per week when under continuous operation. This will reduce the risk of arc tube rup- ture at end of life. Also, color temperature may differ between manufacturers of metal halide lamps. See lamp manufacturers' specification sheets. All fixtures are available pre-lamped by Kim. Consult representative for pricing. Note: For lamp/ballast infor- mation outside of the U.S.A. and Canada, please consult your local Kim representative. Electrical Lamb Mode Mode Line Input Max. Input (Lamps by others) . Cal. No. Volts Watts Amps 100 Wall Clear 100HPS120 120 130 2.20 High Pressure Sodium 1 OOHPS208 208 130 1.27 E17 Med. Base 100HPS240 240 130 1.10 100HPS277 277 130 0.85 ANSI Code S-54 IOOHPS347 347 130 0.70 150 Watt Clear 150HPS120 120 188 2.80 e High Pressure Sodium 150HPS208 208 188 1.60 E17 Med. Base 150liPS240 240 188 1.40 150HPS277 277 188 1.25 ANSI Code S-55 150HPS347 347 188 0.92 100 Watt Clear 10OMH120 120 129 2.60 Metal Halide 1OOMH208 208 129 1.50 ED17 Med. Base 10OMH240 240 129 1.30 10OMH277 277 129 1.15 ANSI Code M-90 10OMH347 347 129 0.90 150 Walt Clear 15OMH120 120 185 3.65 Metal Halide 15OMH2O8 208 185 2.10 ED17 Med. Base 150MH240 240 185 1.80 15OMH277 277 185 1.58 ANSI Code M-102 15OMH347 347 185 1.25 175 Watt Clear 175MH120 120 215 1.80 Metal Halide 175MH2O8 208 215 1.04 ED17 Med. Base 175MH240 240 215 0.90 175MH277 277 215 0.78 ANSI Code M-57 175MH347 347 215 0.65 3 Optional Polycarbonate Down -Light Window Cat. No. L One-piece clear injection molded UV stabilized polycar- bonale Down -Light Window in place of standard acrylic. Caution: Use only when fix- lwe vandalism is anticipated wilhin the parking garage. Service life is reduced by UV discoloration from metal halide lamps. High Pressure Sodium lamps are recommended to p►omote full service life. 6 Optional Tamper -Resistant Lens Screws Cat. No. TS Captive hex socket (allen) shoulder screws provided for down - light window instead of standard pl illips-head screws. 4 Optional Balanced Pendant J-Box Cal. No. PB1 Cast aluminum J-box with of set 3/4' N.P.T, pendant entry to balance PGL1HP fixture when a non -rigid free -swinging pen- dant is used. For fixture mounting, Kim Speed Mount adapts directly to J-box. Natural aluminum as -cast finish. 7 Optional Fusing Cal. No. SF Single Fusing for 120V, 277V and 347V only 5 Optional Quartz L Standby Cat. No. OS Integral electronic device ener- r gizes a T-4 mini -can socket dur- ing lamp warm-up and after power interruption. Socket de - energizes prior to the H.I.D. lama reaching full brightness. 100W. T l' mini -can quartz lamp by others. NOTE: Input amps will increase by .80 with this option. r Cat. No. DF L Double Fusing for 208V and 240V only. 7 6 AHC, UNJ and UNJC Flexible Fixture Hangers For Pendant Fixtures Features: • For connection to conduit hub or hub cover of supporting conduit fitting • For incandescent, H.I.D., and fluorescent fixtures • Cushion support for conduit stem is a universal joint permitting fixture to swing through an angle of 8 degrees in any direction from the perpendicular • Gasketed by means of a durable neoprene diaphragm which excludes moisture and dirt from both lighting fixture and conduit system Standard Materials: • Housing: top cap - malleable iron: bottom cap - Feraloy, iron alloy • Fixture stem support - Feraloy iron alloy Standard Finishes: • Feraloy iron alloy and malleable iron - electrogalvanized and aluminum acrylic paint Size Ranges: • Male nipple -'/" • Fixture stem - %" • Fixture weight - 4 to 100 lbs. Features: • For connection to conduit hub or hub cover of supporting conduit fitting • For incandescent, H.I.D.. and fluorescent fixtures • Su000rting nipple. ball or cushion type, is a universal joint permitting fixture to swing through an angle of 20 degrees in any direction from the perpendicular Standard Materials: • Body and nipple - malleable iron • Clamp - copper -free aluminum Standard Finishes: • Malleable iron - electrogalvanized and aluminum acrylic paint • Copper -free aluminum - natural finish Size Ranges: • Male nipple - W and 1W • Fixture stem - W and • Fixture weight: cushion type - 6 to 48 lbs.; ball type -125 lbs. Certifications and Compliances: • NEC: Class I, Div. 2. AHG Cushion Vaportight for Class I, Div. 2; Class II, Div. 2; Class III Fixture Male Fixture Stem Nipple Weight Size* Size* Lbs. Cat. " '/. '/1 4 to 8 AHG22103 1 '/ 8 to 16 AHG22104 '/. 16 to 100 AHG22111 UNJ Ball Fixture Stem Size Male Nipple UNJC Size Cat. '/2 UNJi Cushion '/. UNJ2 Fixture Male Fixture Stem Nipple Weight Size* Size* Lbs. Cat. # % % 6 to 12 UNJC28 3% 1% 12 to 24 UNJC216 % /P UNJC132 % % 24 to 48 UNJC232 * %' connection can be made by using reducers. January1995 Copyright, 1995 Cooper Industries. Inc. ra j CjOtc A Division of L. E. MASON CO. Standard Boxes •Raintight Deep Boxes 5 Hole Boxes Catalog alog Hub Size Description Cat. No. Hub Size Description I Box only S-47 1/2 " 5 outlets, 4 closure S-48 3/4" plugs, mounting lugs •JBU 1 '/: " 5 outlets, �F • JBU-2 �/. " 2 closure plugs dit,�'' with mounting lugs Iva Box with Cover 1 S-49 '/: " 5 outlets, 4 closure 11 S-50 3/. " plugs, mounting lugs �- and cover with one J1' 1/2"hole J BX-1 1/2 " 4 outlets, A JBX-2 3/4 " 2 closure plugs Box with Cover + J _ ="r �- with mounting lugs S-51 1/2 " 5 outlets, 4 closure v plugs, mounting lugs and cover with three '/z"holes I�•4 iil I l Hole Boxes Vaportight Boxes for use with V Series Fixtures 1 i Box only S-71 1/2 " 7 outlets, LVX-1 1/2 5 outlets, 4 close-up 4 closure plugs" LVX-2 3/4" plugs with mounting with mounting lugs i �'t++ lugs W Box with Cover S-73 '/: " 7 outlets, 4 closure plugs, mounting lugs and cover with one 1/2"hole 'Covers For Catalog Standard Boxes No. Description fi >rt,; Standard Cover 4" Diameter SS-B Blank (Replaces cat. no. S-B) S-1 S-1 One 1h" NPT tapped hole ' S-3 S-12 S-3 One 3/4" NPT tapped hole Three 1/2" NPT tapped holes - Jumbo Covers 4%' Diameter SJ-B Blank Si-11 Si-11 One 1/2" NPT tapped hole .. SJ-21 Two Y4" NPT tapped holes SJ-31 Three 1/2" NPT tapped holes u SJ-31 "Covers for Vaportight & Deep Boxes Type Vaportight Deep LVX Boxes J. Boxes Hub Size V-B JBK-B None Blank V-1 JBK-1 1/2" i V-2 JBK-2 3/4" Female 1 Hub A Covers packed with gasket and screws Raintight when used with corresponding Red Dot covers. • Denotes items made to order. Consult factory for minimum quantities and lead time. FEATURES: • Available in 4' and 8' lengths. • Solid reflectors with optional uptight. • Rotary lock tombstone lampholders. • 21/,' lamp spacing. • For individual o� continuous row mounting. • Channel ends double as joiners. • Reflector aligners supplied on 8' fixtures. Cross Section 96' CSR4-2 CSR8-2 CSR INDUSTRIAL TWO LAMP RAPID START PROJECT: AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TIPS MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION D COLUMBIA C24-232-E118120 SPECIFICATIONS: Housing Die formed steel with knockouts for stems or chain hangers. Reflector Die embossed with transverse ribs for maximum rigidity. Available with apertures for uptight. Ballasts Energy efficient, thermally protected, automatic resetting, Class P, high power factor, CBM, sound rated A, unless otherwise specified. Finish All parts pre -painted with high gloss baked white enamel, minimum reflectance 86%, applied over Iron phosphate pre- treatment for maximum adhesion and rust resistance. Labels All fixtures carry the U.L label. (CSA approval available. Use Suffix "CSA"). 24' 24'—s 4%. k 48' 1 48' A - 7/8' Diameter Knockout ' 3' 5' 5' 's/,�" 3' B -.570' x .656" Strain Relief Knockout --- — b F - 2' Diameter Knockout 4r— 24' —sl R-11/16" Diameter Knockout 3 sus• Note: All Non -Shielded (strip) fixtures - Deduct 1/16" from overall dimension for continuous row mounting. Dimensions shown Include end panel. All dimensions are in Inches; dimensions are subject to change without notice. Please consult factory or check sample for verification. Mounting Accessories , v � CSZTF Zip Tee Hanger' q Nv CSZT Zip Tee Hanger .o v ® q 4 CS2 S18 Stem CSTH Slide Ceiling Spacer and Canopy Set GlampTong Hanger 3808 North Sullivan Rd. • Spokane. WA 99216 - (509) 924,7000 ,Q; CSHC Chain Set 128 Columbia M C9 0 7 0 Z L 0 a a 0 r d E 0 0 L a Gfumbia TwSS.R41U. ro Sr 11t7O•a•I l•.• N.S 0•b-Rw cr.t.., WA MIS Environmental Laboratories ACrOIT E 10331 DATEf 1♦ 5 R3 LUMAMIRE, CS114- 272-E••-PM 1 1 . 2-LA-WITH RAKED W41TE ENANI;L nerLECTON DAL., 02321120, LAMS, F0321 ■.F., .001 WATTS, a0 LAMS RATED AT 2100 LUE ,NS INCH L1S1IN00S AREA 461 10.3 REFLECTANCEI RA IKKARTIM. 011r WAIPENOnNf PLOT OF mon"m ►LIME: SI M, PAIR L.20 MOM 1.47 411I1.9INOf rARL • NOM1 • C A N 0 L E P O N E IS.-- --------- 10 OEe • 22.3 4 3 a7.3 10 1 0 1447. 1.11.. 1..0. 11.3. 1413. 1 ! 1.33. 11a1.70. 1..7. 1137. 1 It 1417. 1.137. 1442. l..l. 1436. 1 13 1307: 1.07: 1.27: 1177. 1.31: 1 20 1317. 1373. 1.07. 1.31. I4 37. 23 32,7. 1321. 1302: 1113. 11:3. 1 70 1737. 1270. 13.7. 1.10. 1.•!. 1 7! llal. 1217. 1301. 1731. 1371. t .• l003. 1173. 12.1. 1770. 13.3. 1 43 916. 10701101. 1772. 111911. 1 30 .... ...: 1177. 1201. 1233. 1 33 713. 104. 1042. 112a. IIl7. 1 60 a71. 00T• 142. 10... 107a. 1 ai 331. 700. 037. 932. 133. 1 t 7• .32. l70. 72:. 7aa. 7a7. _ 73 302. .31. 347: SLO. 310. I so 173. u7. 703. Sa3. 23l. I 03 .3. 1.1. 0.. 30. .7. l - „ a. 21. f1. 3. 2. • 10"AL .UrO.MY Tn I. PMt-.alrl. bSI ,o• PrrrwwS loM Lume" LAM FIIT u•lflS • aP-CI lie MII••t 1•-P eS.YI- 0- 30 1173. ••-- e.2 2.0 n•ctlr,. 4lr.P•1. I S ..4 a• 31S•. a3.•72.-w--It-tMtnSTwMtltbrMb,at•11u1-.r--.•rnt •- 1• S2•. N!100f.t.r wla \-al••N,O-1N •. •.• •• rt.. Pl-. tt r INS 1•-PI.1 -r 4-100 3210. 01.0 190.41 t. the c.M1.P-.nr vIw• ■M.n•. Lw ln•lrr •tflc..► r-U.2 ILIR1 P-r NIfrA LE•3-17,7. LER - FI- n TESTED Of, �,. MrRPrIO Sr, TEST RUI IN ACCORDANCE TO CN1nENT I.C.S. NOLISMO PROCIONELS Ordering Information Example: CS R4-240-U-LE1 20-EL CSR 2 - Series CSR Size 4-4' 8-8' No. of Lamps In Cross Section 2-Two Lamp Type 40 - 4' T12, 40 Watt 32 - 4' T8, 32 Watt Reflector Type Coefficients of Utilization C Zonal Cavity Method Floor Rellegance ..20 0 m N Y•- O N c N �U m O U RC RW 70 50 80 30 10 70 70 50 30 10 50 50 30 10 0 0 1 97 93 89 86 95 91 87 84 87 84 82 76 2 88 81 74 69 86 79 73 68 76 71 67 62 3 80 71 63 57 78 69 62 57 66 61 56 52 4 73 62 54 48 71 61 53 47 59 52 47 44 5 66 54 46 40 64 53 45 39 51 44 39 36 6 61 48 40 34 59 47 39 34 46 39 33 31 7 56 43 35 29 54 42 35 29 41 34 29 26 8 51 39 30 25 50 38 30 25 37 30 25 22 9 47 34 27 21 46 34 26 21 33 26 21 19 10 44 31 24 19 1 43 31 23 19 1 30 23 18 17 LER: FI-77 Energy Cost: $3.12" Input Watts: 60 BF:.88 l4 The above energy calculations were conducted using a specific lamp/ballast combination. Actual results may al vary depending upon the lamp and ballast used. Lamp c and ballast specifications are subject to change without W notice. 'Comparative annual fighting energy cost per 1000 lumens based on 3000 hours and $0.08 per KWH. PROJECT: AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TIPS MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION D COLUMBIA CS114-232-08120 Voltage 120 - 120V Ballast 1 270 - 270V LE •Energy Saving 347 - 347V Magnetic T12 I Z - Zero Degree MagneticTl2' Industrial Options EB12 - Electronic T12 GLR - Fast Blow Fuse EB12LH - Electronic T12 <10%THD GMF - Slow Blow Fuse OCT - Magnetic Oclron T8 EL - Emergency Battery Pack EBB - Electronic T8 BC - Branch Circuit Plug -on Wiring System EBBLH - Electronic T8 210%THD (See options section for details.) 4EB8 - 4 Lamp Electronic T8 CSA - Approved, Canadian Standards Association 4EBBLH - 4 Lamp Electronic T8 PAFB - Paint After Fabrication <10% THD For a specific ballast vendor, show Industrial Accessories as option. Order Separately Blank - Solid Reflector, No Uptight U - Apertured Reflector for 5% Uplighl Not for use with energy saving lamps. For complete list of options and accessories, see options and accessories section. CSZTF - Zip Tee Hanger - flush mounting on tee bar ceiling CSZT - Zip Tee Hanger-1-1/2N spacer on tee bar ceiling CSTH - Slide Clamp Tong Hanger S18 - 18' Stem, canopy and 80 aligner SS18 - 18', 450 Swivel Stem & Canopy ITB4 - Close mounting onTBarCeiling CSHC - 14' Chain Hangers L L 128 • eeo� �s SERIES X YH1JJhC1: AlltPUicl' ltll'itOVEWES TYPE MANUFACTORBR DESCRIPTION E LIGHTALARMS TPXSB WRW VR4X EA LIGHTALARMS TPXSC WRSf V4111 6" Exit Signs NO"' i_A131 (Polycarbonate) AN Incandescent, Fluorescent or LED ul !!: LISTED features selection chart e Slimiine silhouette exit sign for normal Illumination has Injection molded, scratch resistant polycarbonate housing. • Knockouts are provided for universal mounting to wall or ceiling box. ® Universal chevrons. e Bottom aperture provides downlight. 0 Universal exit signs are supplied with canopy kit and extra stencil and dif- fuser set to permit any mounting either as single or double face sign. U. AC only, Incandescent signs are U.L. Listed for Damp Locations. lamps ■ Supplied with two 15T6 145V extended life incandescent lamps which consume less than 12 watts each. ■ OPTION 1: Available with two 7 watt PL type energy saving fluorescent lamps. • OPTION 2: Available with LED long life, even illumination light panel. Consumes only 2 watts of energy for either single or double face signs. ordering format X B RB -'L Option (Fluorescent Lamps) Face Type ri< Color (Red LettedBlack Stencil) Housing Color (Black) Series (Single Face, Series X Exit) ^. t :�;,SAras �: a r :.>d��+3 xi�'�sHousln Colore',•s :: ,ram: :. Lett9r/.Stdncl Colorer D4sgrlpllon z,%'*:.; z..;: •: i}Symbol;Dacripllon,> ,'Symbol );rdesctlptlal;, k'� M ,:,Symbol.'. f� .. {''.:i�':: • : > SI FACE 3:': 53.^" r sMr'f ! r� n. 7 'F r' K.rF "` •,xo' K{; �� s.'ft✓'i�•+'#••', 'ti' pe `Ilirs/AlunlirHr 51druN 3 ��lil�. ryn Ei: .: x�. �Ildr N(r.tt :3?4 1AOtiiN anopy` t.... "�• Y .�� ;Black"':'': r; ,,� v8,❑ ..z.., a,3�,Gre tiller umliiWm'sUnbN� } �f^ :`s�bk,Ci�<'. s"'+"' gz : a »�: :?.k' 'Ffrid LiUer laek•Sli+ncN?� X.,t� +Cx'.�'j i" n^ J>•`,'3'. •,�'7.`•' pS.l ': "'.�`..i,•��:rtff: UWIVEg L :.� �n :> 11R CI: '`' '.s „� s Gr6a� Ifa vlalaskStand, x :$,ktRli o{ Doir6leici•! :,:„ +r s N s '<rµ,• W d. w; T'Sexy s` z+.. iJ iV+i al C9Ntri is N-Back Mount. Tel9 r lt` #,. Canopy annex d - E e„ ,?' « ,+e�Vfike"' :;Kry'".tk,,,. - '.+- ' ?<<% };;q ,` '•'+ ofx'i:Y.i •s ?4 Red fill iftfti SenaM. a� ••:.-'::..�.... �fjlN D't'Bd eilstenckrdi,p ^3t' 3,�a`,• c.;;... � sar. fi'n• 8g :`. =z,r., ean'CeUers/Whflf,5lenbN. x? frbJx.... `G�V.�. 'I+i ,� .••'•:' r' .+.fF iT:�.i7%x �.. -x. .: ^' ::: •.. •,t .�. -' a(3 .� t'.'l ,�'�: -: T3j.'.: ,':. :::•• a/•t. �:A .M 4.. options .1'r. :f+%✓ti'e�5?t.....,M.... r ti3`�.1�� Y:. i f i�' 7'fa•t..��;f•.ku:T!.�f:'n?f +9•d: R1+... W . < Tf�.F.v•• .f .;,i,. :.; ,� x. •"�"k'K'^'M�E !x _(Iriate:d of La11er/St�rii il)+ " �•��' YY.` 4 .3 . Wert11Ari on.White ,V3%ja LallerS On ried.y�k'yif'�Yj3" tlNhll��eiierapii`Giietf }��'� S`doiil Li(lariny N, (kiairid:e6anl'd Fii;iir Mt &; ) •�. eri ''}',F.:: •f?`x. "r'•z:. :.. kkv�':e:.fxtx:.:vi" ' '�' °- ePl?S!, IIer/S1anCi�Sym ':•?^,.'z:`� �� � r �rllt):Ilu'kiGoYrliiq:'�`' . •�"' :�'� . a �,..• q. �r�. s � () i w :{7] Z•: ;. ��`.:�'`: }� : '•>'"' :' o ' Add S INk FdNowed, :f::�s ' ii t itl:dn b ,Two'ZW*R-Fiuorescont lam i^� ?A r�§A :' �,il r ?tg ' vM ,1�'!` <gz.•• $ Uphl Panel(ged,Q N) i %' x s 12oV a L: ' x.` SuHik•Lpfi. 9 RMtotY Lad Ix 00*10lon(Ri'd.arllyt; F6gn�gctklil jo f6mo1' Site'"ry Uril) 4 i'2ovi�c tErlaY<d` z d..' T7V uke : E' Add'SvNN1 L,P.Si s' R :• x. k:: 'FireMgn. ActiVatdd gafhdr.(Incantl fAdSSU.Ki><-F,F? ; t„ a14pj.4�.. ; 3k accessories (order as separate item) '•Modal No,:. .Ciriopy kli'''���``' '<�.:•#:�x `� x�11fYlle:s:;,k Bleck3� • ��� ; �� t,�.�, n . (Fbr: villlnp/EAd MPU ) '� 4�r ,�endaq Kile: !s; i�.,f'� h.%•`^' f •�"?''!' �^r. 0100 7'> •° •yam_ :j: K' W:.� PB f.°. <(F6Fir1i#an(Iouiilj rs =€l:> .r H.wldles"&��iri.<�r�s:, PYy"`. 3 . p. Erlefpen Sogkit 8') amP K$•For•r•t W.�' For a V611 Unl(':: # �;. 3" a 0�njAc((o111�'RemOli 961ibry:lJnitlS� llnil xTc>iry'.g�r K12 .i.' O (Ineludes (as 3.8 Ihau'.00 lamps) ' - ?�brJ2,Nol1 For iT' It Unit ' ::' , :..i ' • K24' ' O 27.7VoN Converson KIt: : (a :Black tvl,il: Block (:1111.277 crxw•277 0 IxB•277.2 ' T%lr CI(cuit 277 .; ? ..5:,; i`: } ' Conversion kit: While For Wall Moun(ad Signs l I Yw-277.2 0 " v U Guards: For End Mounted Signs U For Coilnq Mounlod S pns `(: U Eli specifications for series X - I 12 1/4" I I _ 2" --+ PENDANT: 12" STEM GENERAL: The contractor shall furnish and install Lightalarms Series X, 120 volt normal illumination exit signs, as indicated on all plans. Input power shall be 120 volt AC, 60 Hz. (Other voltages must be specified). CONSTRUCTION: The exit sign housing shall be injection molded from high impact, mar -resistant polycarbonate. Concealed knockouts for universal mounting and an aperture at the bottom for downlighting shall be provided. Sign shall be available with either stencil/diffuser face having stenciled let- ters, field selectable universal chevron knockouts and a break resistant fiberglass diffuser (lexan diffuser with LED option); or open face having silk screened letters on a fiber- glass panel and a frame with field selectable, universal chevron knockouts. Letters shall be 6" high with a 314" stroke. LAMPS: Two 15T6 145V extended life incandescent lamps shall be provided for normal illumination. These lamps shall consume less than 12 watts each. 713116" T 1 1/4" _1 OPTIONAL: •Two 7 watt PL type energy efficient fluorescent lamps may be provided, instead of incandescent. "One 2 watt even illumination LED light panel may be provided, Instead of incandescent. WARRANTY': Exit signs (less lamps) shall carry a 3 year full warranty. Optional: LED light panel -LP shall carry a 5 year full warranty. 'Subject to proper installation and maintenance U.L. listed Standard 924. Complies with NEC, Life Safety Code and OSHA requirements. MANUFACTURER: Unit shall be Lightalarms Model it E24 .i�:�.. � •:j: .il,�li•i.l�i'!i:\fw�n:�f'i�: Jai%i.;•:!J,: Lightalarms Electronics Corporation Member of the Kaulel Group of Companies I? 1170 Atlantic Avenue, PO Box 512, Baldwin, New York 11510-0512 15161 379.1000 Fax: (5161 379.1698 MODELNRC Vandal Resistant Cover features 11 Mounts over single or double remote heads (exept ELF640, 640D & 646), Series DM, DS (lop mounted heads only) and RC units and all wall mounted exit signs (exept X66 & 8" signs). a Provides protection against tamper- ing, vandalism and accidental damage. M Constructed of UV stabilized, unbreakable, non -corrosive, clear polycarbonate material. • VRC-4X model complies with NEMA 4X standard and is supplied with a self-adhesive, closed -cell neoprene gasket which forms a bond around the perimeter of the cover to make the unit dust & water light. N Installs easily to wall or flat surface. Mounting holes are predrilled. ordering format Model No. ' Description =Y ;'VRC .; y, Vandal. Resistant- f VRC-4X Vandal Resistant,Coverwitti I 1Y/4 1xv: sv: 1x�r: FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW PROJECT: AIRPORT IMPROYEMEMTE TIPA MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION E ' LIGBTALARMS TPXSB WRW:VR4X EA LIGRTALARMS TPXSC WRW,V4RX. - F11 12/95 1 PN 960.0611 BEGA Classics Wall or ceiling luminaires with die cast aluminum guard. Crystal glass with internal textured surface. Polycarbonate diffuser available - suffix: PD. Captive socket head stainless steel screw$. Color: Black, while or EuroCoat"A- Lamp Lumen A B C 2812P Wall+7,eiling 2 13W PLC 1720 101/4 101/4 61/4 2812M i Wall+Ceiling I 5OW ED-17 MH 3500 lol/4 101/4 61/4 2812S Wall+Ceiling 1 50W E- 17 HPS 4000 .101/4 101/4 61/4 2813MH Wall only 1 70W ED-17 MH 5500 101/4 lol/4 61/4 2878 Wall+:;eiling 1 10OW A-19 1750 101/4 1 OVI 61/4 SBX Surface wiring box with cover for lo,/4* 4) luminaries rw-? Wall or ceiling luminaires with die cast aluminum guard, - Crystal glass or PolYcarbonate plastic diffuser with internal textured surface. Captive socket head stainless steel screws. Color: Black or while. PROJECT: AIRPORT IRPROVIRIATS TIPH RAXIFACTURKR DISCRIPTIOR G BEGA 2951KH Q PC PROVIDED WITH PHOTOCELL Glass potycarbonate Lamp Lurnen A B C 267e 2679 1 60W A-19 890 7 'A 77A 4Y4 2680P 2681 P 1 7W PL 400 7 ?A 7 'A 43A 2984MH 2987MH 1 100W ED-17 Mli 8500 13% 13% 7 'A 2990P 2994P 2 26W PLC 3600 131A 13 Y-4 7 Va SBX-7 Surface wiring box with cover for 77/; (� luminaries — SBX-13 Surface wiring box with cover (or 13YV� luminaries 41 Classics Wall mounted luminaires with rugged die cast aluminum half lid (7. d guard. Three-ply opal glass B an [FF with screw neck. Polycarbonate diffuser available - suffix: PD. Captive socket head stainless A C steel screws. Color: Black, white or EuroCoat1m. Lamp Lumen A B C 2885 Wall 1 IOOWA-19 1750 10'/4 101/4 8/4 2955P Wall 2 13W PLC 1720 10 A 101/4 8 Y4 2955MH Wall 1 50WED-17MH 3500 101/4 101/4 81/4 2955S Wall 1 SOWE-17HPS 4000 10'/4 10 A 8'/4 2956MH Wall 1 70WED-17MIl 5500 101/4 10'/4 81/4 SBX Surface wirthg box with cover for 101/4' (� luminaries Wall mounted luminaires with - rugged die cast aluminum half lid and guard. Three-ply opal glass with screw neck. Polycarbonate diffuser available for 2887. 2897 suffix :PD. Captive socket head A C stainless steel screws. Color: Black or white. Lamp Lumen A B C 2829, Wall 1 60W A- 19 890 7 'A 7 'A '61/2 2830P Wall 1 9W PLC 575 71A 77/s 6 V2 2887S Wall 1 50W E- 17 HPS 4000 13V4 133/4 9% 2887MH Wall 1 70W ED-17 MH 5500 133/4 13Y4 9% 2897P Wall 2 26W PLC 3600 133/4 133/4 9:Ya SBX-7 Surface wiring box with cover for 71A"(� luminaries SBX-13 Surlace wiring box with cover for 13:Y4* (� luminaries BEGA PROJHCT: AIRPORT IMPROVININTS TIPR KANIFACTURER DKSCRIPTION GA BEGA 2887KH Q j x. A .:T1 I 45 Ordering Example: FIXTURE ELECTRICAL MODE FINISH OPTIONS WD1 4D3 / 175MH277 / BL-P I A-33/ HS / 5DS 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... etc. PROJECT: AIRPORT IMOMENTS TIPE HANDFACT1111111 DISCRIPTIOX I Kim WD14 D3 100KH 120 CHOR QS A30 3Finish 4Photocel 5Houseside Shield TGIC powder coal finish Factory installed Combination louver shield and black end - applied to reflector housing. inside housing panel for reflector. Factory installed to 1� ballast housing and lens frame. with fully gasketed sensor on reflector module. Reduces light toward wall Cat No. Color side wall. by the following amounts: BL-P Black. Cat No. Line Volts APPROXIMATE LIGHT DB-P Dark Bronze. A-30 120V REDUCTION TOWARD WALL LG-P Light Gray. A-31 208V Type 11 Type III Type IV WH-P While. A-32 240V A-33 277V WD14 43% -74% -77% Custom colors subject to additional A-34 480V WD18 -72% -73% -84% charges. rninimurn quantities and longer lead times. Consult factory. A-35 347V Cat No. HS 65* Shield 7 Pollycarbonate Shield 8 Fusing Aluminum shield For DOWN fixture models only. All fusing is factory installed field -attached to Vacuum formqd clear polycarbonate inside the fixture housing. lens frame. Maintains a shield replaces standard tempered Cat No. SIF horizontal cutoff fixture edge glass lens. 25OW maximum in WD18 Single fusing for 12OV, 277V when the luminaire is tilted 50. (see specs for higher wattage). CAUTION: Use only when and 347V primary. Finished to match the fixture. vandalism Is ' anticipated to be high. Useful life is limited by Cat No. UV discolor ' ation from sunlight and metal halide lamps. Cat No. DF 5DS1 4 For all 14" fixtures. Cat No. PS Double fusing for 208V, 240V 5DS1 8 For all 18" fixtures. and 480V primary. 9 Quartz Standby 10 Wall Embedment 11 Surface Conduit Mount Integral electronic device Plate Cast aluminum J-box and fixture mount for energizes a T-4 mini -can For WDI 8 only. .0 attachment (by others) to existing walls, socket during lamp warm-up Zinc plated steel beams or columns. SCM18 has one 3/4'NPT and after a power interruption. mounting plate conduit tap in each side, top and bottom. De -energizes prior to HID lamp for casting into 0 SCM14 has one 3/4' conduit tap in each side reaching full brightness. T-4 poured concrete walls, beams and bottom only. Finished to match the fixture. halogen lamp by others; 10OW and columns. Replaces Cat No. max. for WD 14. 250W max. for standard mounting plate. SCM14U For WD14 fixtures. UP only. WD18. See back page for dimensions. SCM14D For WD14 fixtures, DOWN only. Cat No. QS Cat No. WEP SCM18 For all WD18 fixtures, UP or DOWN. , r� — ' "LlrA ISTnY CA nl? In Pi rMr- r 1IInnr'nv%nr irr i I tpiv m9ar, i, t, tr,� r , r! wrl 11 tr' "' lln'e IM -------- ------- TIP8 HANDFACTURER DESCRIPTION 11 KIR WD14 D3 100H11 120 COLOR QS A30 Ordering Information 1 Fixture Fixture catalog number specifies fixture size (14' or 181, Up (U) or Down (D) r,onfiguration. and light LL distribution (2, 3, or 4). Type 11 distribution Type III distribution Type IV distribution Small UP 14' 70-175W WD14U2 WD14U3 WD14U4 DOWN 14' WD14D3 WD14D2 WD14D4 70-175W Large UP 18, 25OA00W WDISU2 WD1181.13 WD18U4 DOWN IS' WDI8D2 WDI8D3 WD1 8D4 250-40OW I 20ectricalMode Catalog number specifies lamp watts. lamp type and line voltage. 14' �� 4:::�n UP or DOWN Electrical Mode Une Line Max. Lamp (by others) Catalog No. Volts Watts Amps. 70 Watt 70HPS120 120 86 0.89 High Pressure Soditxn 70HPS208 208 91 0.47 Clear ED17 Medium Base 70HPS240 240 91 0.40 70HPS2T7 277 91 0.35 70HPS347 347 93 0.30 100 Watt 100HPS120 120 115 1.50 High Pressure Sodium IOOHPS208 208 130 0.76 Clear ED 17 Medium Base 100HPS240 240 130 0.66 1DOHPS277 277 130 0.60 100HPS347 347 130 0.44 150 Watt ISOHPS120 120 170 2.25 High Pressure Sodium 150HPS208 208 188 1.15 Clear ED 17 Medium Base 150HPS240 240 188 1.00 1 SOHPS277 277 188 0.85 ISOHPS347 347 188 0.56 70 Watt 70MH120 120 89 0.85 Metal Halide 70MH277 277 89 0.40 Clear ED 17 Medium Base 70MH347 347 94 0.30 100 Watt 10OMH120 120 129 1.15 Metal Halide 10OMH277 277 129 0.50 Clear ED 17 Medium Base 10OMH347 347 129 0.40 175 Watt 175MH120 120 215 1.80 Metal Halide 175MH208 208 215 1.05 Clear ED17 Medium Base 175MH240 240 215 0.90 175MH277 .277 215 0.80 175MH347 347 215 0.65 UP or DOWN Electrical Mode Line Line Max. Lamp (by others)- Catalog No. Volts Watts Amps. 250 Watt 250HPS120 120 295 2.70 High Pressure Sodium 250HPS208 208 295 1.50 Clear E18 Mogul Base 250HPS240 240 295 1.30 250HPS277 277 295 1.15 250HPS347 347 295 0.93 250HPS480 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400HPS120 120 457 3.80 High Pressure Sodium 400HPS208 208 457 2.20 Clear E18 Mogul Base 400HPS240 240 457 1.90 400HPS2T7 277 457' 1.70 400HPS347 347 457 1.32 400HPS480 480 457 1.00 250 Watt 250MH120 120 295 2.60 Metal Halide 2SOMH208 208 295 1.50 Clear BT28 or ED28 2SOMH240 240 295 1.30 Mogul Base 250MH277 277 295 1.10 Pin -Oriented 250MH347 347 290 0.90 2SOMH480 480 295 0.65 400 Watt 400SMH120 120 458 4.00 Metal Halide 400SMH208 208 458 2.30 Clear ED28* 400SMH240 240 458 2.00 Small Outer Jacket 400SMH277 277 458 1.75 Mogul Base 400SMH347 347 458 1.40 Pin -Oriented 400SMH480 480 458 1.00 *Lamp available from Kim: MS400/HOR/ED28 Venture High -Output - horizontal burning metal hailide; 40OW; 40.000 lumens; 40001K; 20,000 hr. L r'. L Aaft IT E L", I 0 PROJECT: AIRPORT IMPROVKHRATS TYPE MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION I PRESCOLITE CFR026EB 492 RALI 120 824 F 6V4' (172 mm) _ It CFR826EB' 8" Round Open Recessed Downlight Two 26W Quad Tube 4 Pin Electronic Compact Fluorescent 16Y/52" (411 mmi 1 710 2 (386 mm) Ceiling Cutout: 81/4' (209 mm) Maximum Ceiling Thickness: 1114" (31 mm) Scale: NTS Features 1. One (1) 26W compact fluorescent Class 'P" Intelect'" electronic ballast. (Ballast data on reverse side.) 2- Two (2) injection molded sockets (vented). 3. Two (2) 26W 4 pin quad tube lamps with G24q-3 base. I Order lamps separately. 4. White polypropylene trim ring for dry ceiling. May be discarded for trimless applications. Optional self trim (ST) reflectors available. 5. Specular AJzak* iridescence suppressed reflector. 6. Universal adjustable mounting brackets. (Hangers by others.) 7. Prewired J-box with snap -on cover for easy access. 8. One piece painted 18 ga. C.R.S. platform. 9. Vented at lamp tip and socket for maximum light output. 10. Ballast and socket connections made with Mate-N-Lock connectors. Labels U.L, CSA listed Damp location Through wiring 7%. - (197 mm) 91/16, - (230 mm) 6 3 9 —5 —4 INTELECT Standard Fixtures • CFR826EB-492wIth Clear Alzak Reflector • CFR826EB493 with Champagne Gold Alzak Reflector • CFR826EB-B492 with Clear Alzak Reflector and Black Milligroove Baffle Options • ST - Sell trim renector (not available on baffled trims). Prefix trim catalog number with "ST". • SLR8 - Prismatic spread tens. Suffix trim catalog number with *SLR8'. • RIF1 - Radio Interference filter. Suffix complete catalog number with '1711171". • FSD-FI- — - Fuse kit for field Installation. • FSD-FA- Fuse kit assembled at factory. Suffix complete catalog number and add 1 or 2 for single or double fusing. IJ EM - Emergency pack. (See TD Sheet HR-CF-52.) • SS - Semi-specular reflector. Suffix trim catalog number with 'SS". • MTR - Diecast aluminum trim ring. Suffix trim catalog number with *MTR*. El PW - Pewter Alzak reflector. Suffix trim catalog number with "PW'. U DM - Intelect electronic dimming ballast. Refer to TD Shoot Nn-CF-C. Suffix catalog number with 'DM". Example: CF!"INGE00M. Lamps (two per fixture) U CFQ26WIG24q-3 26W d pin quad tuba compnct fluorriscent Lamp and ballast data on reverse side. PRESCOLITE n-cr-5i Two 26W Quad Tube Electronic Compact Fluorescent 8" Round Open Recessed Downlight Lamp Data (two per fixture) Rated Watts 26W Rated Lumem 11100 each Efficacy (LPW) 69 Rated Ufa 10,000 hours CRI 86 Minimum Starting Temp. O*F Ballast Data (one per fixture) INTELECT Electronic Ballast: Flider free efficient operation of compact 26W (two lamp ballast) 120V 277V fluarescent lamps. Inialecil" features Total Input Watts 45W 44W Include: UL Listed (Class P), class A sound rating, low total harmonic Operating Current .380A 160A distortion, high power factor. and FCC Input Frequency 60Hz 60Hz approved. Lamp life Is significarilly extended due to this soft start/rapid start Power Factor Contact Factory function and Ih* Incredibly low currant crest factor. Universal voltage provides Ballast Factor 88%±3% 88%±3% Inlelect operation an 12OV, 206V. 240V. Total Harmonic Distortion <10% <10% and 277V systems. (Refer to M Sheet IIR-CF-B lot more Information.) Current Crest Factor 1.4 1.4 CFR826EB-492 with Clear Alzak* Reflector Two 26W Quad Spacing Criteria - 1.5 COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION Zonal Cavity Method % Efleclive Calling Cavity RaftdarwA 80% 1 711% 1 50% 1 30% 1 10% 20% Ellodilve Fbar Cavity Reftedanes % Wall PAdectanrui 70 50 30 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 I A in ii ss AS A? AS .64 .64 A St AM Al A .10 A 36 3 A A At is .85 A A is .0 is A? J111 V -4 37 A 34 3 a3 A M .63 At A 35 M A 34 A 35 M .51 M A J4 4 SO J4 At .41 M 44 It A .9 -50 AY .51 .41 .41 A AS A I JS A .47 .44 M 31 A .44 .0 .45 .43 .4 AS .43 At A 42 4 33 A? .43 .48 31 .4 .42 A$ .4 .42 "JI .44 At Is .43 .41 IS 1 .4 .43 X .311 .46 .42 2 .36 .41 A X At 28 25 .4 21 Is 6 AS 21 Ad J2 .45 21 As J2 IS Is J2 .21 34 X 17 34 22 -1 M Is 11 .3.1 -1 21 34 21 .22 .1 1 �41 .n �2 .M .2 Is . Is 1,14 .n " Is Is M T.d NILAI52111 PROJIM AIRPORT IMPROVERITS TIPI KANDFACTIRER DESCRIPTION I PRBSCOLITH CFR826EB 492 RAL1 120 B24 CFR826EB-B492 with Clear Alzak Reflector and Black Baffle Two 26W Quad Spacing Criteria . 1.2 CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION 9(r 2W 7V 400 Or sm ow 4V low 12001 01 IV Beam 45* ------ COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION Zonal Cavity Method Elleckv Ca" Cavity Raflactanc* 80% 1 70% 1 50% 1 30% 1 10% 21)-. Ellective Fbw Cavity Reflectance % Wal RenectsmA 70 50 30 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 1 .47 A AS .44 .46 .4 .44 .0 A .42 .4 .42 .11 A 40 .16 21 I As .0 .41 .0 .44 .42 A$ 2 .41 A 31 211 21 X A X X .X A. .41 a 37 A .34 36 is I? 1$ 23 j6 is ad .33 A IT X Z 311 34 32 X Z 32 .34 .33 22 5 -4 -4 32 J4 X X 2 A Z It 21 Z .31 21 21 .31 20 6 .34 .32 A 29 JS X 21 21 31 25 27 A 29 27 Z 24 J7 1 34 J* 21 25 Z 21 It Z 21 It 23 Is 28 2S 21 20 0 6 A 21 25 23 41 21 25 Z 21 .24 22 26 24 M A 24 23 9 J& 25 Z 21 A Z Z It 25 21 21 24 22 21 24 21 21 Of - 29 .23 21 .19 IT M 21 .19 - .23 20 311 22 28 .12 _ 22 20 .11 PRESCOLITE General Office: Prescoilte e 1251 Doolittle Dr. - San Leandro, California 94577 U.S.A. Phone (510) 562-3500 PROJECT: IIRPORT IMPROVKKKXTS TYPE KANUFACTURER DISCRIPTIOR KA PRES 1146 462 1 2 3 4 5 SCALE: 1/4" - V* Surface companions to recessed A -Line series. Utilizes economical 'A' lamps with full alzak reflectors in clear or gold. Unit features positive two position socket for precise lamp focus. Brushed aluminum (standard), bronzotic, matte white or black available. Damp location label avail- able (suffix catalog number with D.L.). I.B.E.W. labels. U.L. label "Type I.C." indicates tested and acceptable for use on insulated ceil- ings. 2" Im 8 dia. 203mm 1146 8 INCH A -LINE SERIES CEILING CYLINDER A-21,150 WATT ft- ORA-23,200WATT 1— .072" thick extruded aluminum cylin- der 2— 16 ga. C.R.S. socket/ref lector mount- ing bracket 3— Two position porcelain socket with nickel plated shell 4— A-21, 15OW or A-23, 20OW lamp may be used (Not furnished) 5— Specular clear or gold alzak reflector .050" spun aluminum (removable) COMPLETE FIXTURES c3 1146-462 w/SPECULAR CLEAR ALZAK REFLECTOR 01146-463 w1GOLD ALZAK REFLECTOR PRESOCILIT 1"146-462 8 INCH A -LINE SERIES CEILING CYLINDER mW TT A.91 COEFFICIENTS OF UTIUZATION Zonal Cavity Mathod 2880 Lumens SINGLE UNIT MULTIPLE INSTALLATION . on- FIXTURE AVERAGE INITIAL FOOTCANDLESt a. ANGLE OPENING DIAMETER' INITIAL TO LIGHTED FT-C WORKPLANE 10'-11" 33 5..6.. 14' - 10" 18 7'.6" 1 91 - 6" I 22' - 10" 8 11..6.. 26-.9" L___ 6 6 13'.6" — MAXIMUM SPACING IFENT) ROOM CAVITY RATIO 1 6 0 8'-6" 33 25 17 1 V - 7 19 13 9 1 14'-8" 11 8 6 17'-9" a 6 4 20'- 11 6 4 3 **EAM ANGLE I. DIAMETER TO 10% MAX. C.P. IFOOTCANDLES BASED ON 601SO120 REFLECTANCE PRORCT: 111pol? INPROVIKEITS TIPH KA111FACTUR11 DISCRIPTION 1A PRHS 1146 462 200 WATT, A-23 4010 Lumens SINGLE UNIT MULTIPLE INSTALLATION a.. FIXTUAll AVERAGE INITIAL POOTCANOLE$t GLE . OPENING DIAMETER' INITIAL TO LIGHTED PT-C WORKPLANII 111 - 9" 62 5' - 6" is, - 1" 33 7-.6" 20'- 4" 21 9..6.. 1 1 24' - 8" 1 14 1 28'- 11" 1 10 1 MAXIMUM SPACING 11FEETI ROOM CAVITY RA710 I I T-16" 61 45 33 10'- 2" 33 24 18 12'- 11" 20 is 11 14 10 8 10 8 5 'NEAM ANGLE & DIAMETER TO 10% UAX, C.P. IFOOTCANDLIS BASED ON WSW" REFLECTANCE E X_ 00 % Effective Coiling Cavity Reflectance 80% 1 70% 1 50% 1 30% 1 10% 10% 0 20% Effective Flocw Cavitv Reflectance % Wall Reflectance C 70 so 30 go 70 so *0 so so 30 10 so 30 10 so 30 10 0 1 07 @4 82 91 IIS l3 a! ?9 80 78 ?7 77 74 M 74 73 721 31 1 2 82 78 76 77 60 17 74 71 74 72 70 72 70 68 70 68 67154 3 77 72 46 65 76 71 47 64 49 694 1 47 65 62 46 93 at — I Go 4 Y3 67 47 119 71 64 62 58 #4 60 14 43 51 97 91 56 Be SS 5 64 67 S? S3 67 61 sia S3 S2 as S? III as 12 117 54 S 1 4 GS 57 1? 49 43 57 32 A-4 55 11 4B 54 $1 46 113110 47 _!O !4 7 Go 53 49 44 152 92 41 44 61 47 44 50 44 43 49 44 43 43 59 " 43 39ISS 49 43 32 47 41 39 49 42 34 52 44 " 3SI51 43 34 35 43 39 36 42 34 jo 49 40 3S 33144 do 35 21 39 34 311 6 34 mp Poww 85 0 75 1 65 2 55 20 47% 194 42% 539 37% 1046 32% 1 460 27% Ism 22% 1381 17% 12% 1177 7% 1016 2 987 0 996 1110% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% 20'. Effective Floor CavItV Reflectance % WON Reflectance 00 so 30 10 ro so 30 *0 so 20 to so 30 so so 30 10 6 I a? as 63 at 044 83 2 to so 79 2. 77 74 751 is 74 73 12 2 63 79 74 73 al in 7S 72 75 ?3 ?1 73 71 49 71 69 as 47 3 70 73 60 69 17 12 it 6"6 70 87 411 64 64 64 a? 111, 93 61 1 4 P4 66 44 90 13 47 63 90 GS 02 5!9 " 6! Be 47 so so 57 5 70 43 50 IS an 4:1 so as 61 57 SA 40 64 S4 so as 53 52 6 66 59 54 SI SS 54 SAS 60 57 S3 50 64 97 60 51 52 41 48 7 12 IS,30 41 6 1 S4 11 41 113 49 41,111 41 46 51 48 4S 44_ It a so 45 43 $7 so AS 42 149 4S 42146 42 47 44 41 40 9 54 " 41 38 S3 46 41 34 143 41 3!IA4 37 44 40 37 34 .10 [�7� So I., 0—��Qa--an a Anal. C.1m.. Pa.., IS 0 75 1 65 9 51 23 4 7,A 205 4 21A 513 37% 12 45 32% 19 ' 2 27% 2140 22% 2154 17% 2 145 12% 206 1 71A 1 902 2Y. 1856 0 1870 PRESCOLITE ADD PRESCOUTE 93OU LU-me-A-Line Series F Ceiling Mount With lay -in opal diffuser. Suitable for damp locations. Ceiling mount only. 5 CaL No. Description Ship Lbs. 9446 (1) 60W with black finish, opal glass Replacement glass only 2.5 1.5.. 71/4" dia.. extends 4' from coiling 9447 (1) 10OW with black finish, opal glass 5.5 Replacement glass only 117A' dia.. extends 4W from coiling Wall Brackets and Ceiling Lights sw� CaL No. Description Lbs. 150-20OW 2.3 Brushed aluminum, wall bracket. WB-28 51A" dia. x 9' high, extends TA" from wall. Suitable for wet locations. Replacement glass only 1.5 60W 2.5 Matte white. Wall bracket, Interior WB-151A use only. 7%" high x 6W wide, extends 3%". Satin Thermopal glass. Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass only 1.5 (2) 10OW 7.5 Matte white. Wall bracket, Interior use only. 61/2' high x 1 r/V wide, WB-19 -extends 5". Satin Thermopal glass. Suitable for damp locations. Replacement' glass only 5.0 110OW 3.0 Matte white. Wall bracket, interior use only. 91/4" high x 8%" wide, WB-16 extends 51/4* with glass diffuser. Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass diffuser only 2.0 (2) 10OW 4.5 Matte white. Wall bracket, Interior WBA 8 use only. 18" long x 5%" wide, extends 5% Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass only . 2.5 1.5 Ship Cat. No. Description Lb3. 10OW 2.3 9300 Painted aluminum or black. 6' dia. x 4%' back, extends 5%". Suitable for wet locations. 9301 9300.with GRD, C.O.-Aluminum 2.3 Suitable for damp locations. 150W 3.0 9304 Painted aluminum. 6" dia. x 43/4' back, 6* dia. globe, extends 7' from wall. Suitable for damp locations. (2) 10OW 3.0 9312 Painted aluminum. 131/4* x 4%" back, extends 5%* from wall. Horizontal mount only. Suitable for wet locations. 110OW 2.0 9316 Painted aluminum or black. 41A,' dia. x 7%* high. Suitable for damp locations. 110OW 2.5 9317 Painted aluminum. 6' dia. x 7V4" high, 6' dia. glass. Suitable for damp locations. PE-50-4 fill M9 W L 10OW 1.5 Painted chrome or matte white. ez� 94437 Decorative canopy. G-40, G-25, tl� or A-1 9 lamps recommended (not furnished). 43/4* dia. x 21/4". Suitable for interior or damp locations. 0 PRESCOUTE 105 1146-462 8 INCH A -LINE SERIES CEILING CYLINDER 150 W TT A-91 COEFFICIENTS OF IJTIUZATION Zonal Cavity Mathod SINGLE UNIT MULTIPLE INSTALLATION BE ANGLE'- 90' FIXTURE AVERAGE INITIAL FOOTCANDLESt OPINING DIAMETEW INITIAL TO LIGHTED FT-C WORKPLANE 10'- 11" 33 5'.6" 14', 10" 111 7', 6" 18* - 101, 11 W.W. 22' - 10" 8 : 6 MAXIMUM SPACING IFEETJ ROOM CAVITY RATIO I 1 6 2 8'-6" 33 25 — 17 ll'-7" 19 13 9 8 6 17'- 9" 8 6 4 6 4 3 I 'OEAM ANGLE & DIAMETER 10 10% MAX. C.P. IFOOTCANDLES BASED ON 1141501M REFLECTANCE CANDL POVVIR DISTRIBUTION PRORCT: 111PORT II(PROVI[KNITS TYPE 11110FACTIRRR DRSCRIPTION Goo [A PRRS 1146 462 '1000 44- 1500 11- IS- 211- w 0 % Effective Calling Cavity Reflectance 80% 1 70% 1 50% 1 30% 1 10% 10% 20% Effective Floor Cavity Renoctance % Wall Reflectance X 10 50 30 to 70 SO 30 10 50 30 10 60 30 10 50 30 10 0 1 87 64 0-2 91 IIS 8:1 91 79 40 74 77177 7.5 7S 74 73 721 21 2 02 76 73 72 10 17 74 71 74 72 10 72 70 64 70 64 97 66 3 77 77 62 AS 76 71 67 44 AS 64 63 Of 43 62 65 43 At 60 4 73 67 42 SO 71 44 62 SO 64 60 39 63 69 67 $1 $a SO SS 5 64 42 S? S3 67 at Sal S3 69 55 52 so 55 62 67 54 so so 6 AS S7 92 49 63 17 52 49 55 51 46 64 $1 as S3 so 47 7 60 53 44 44 5 S2 47 44 51 47 44 50 44 43 49 AS 43_ 42 6 E44'3 I—S 42 43 22141 42 39 '46 42 39 AS 43 39136 9 ST 44 39 3S SI 43 34 36143 34 3 !1 42 34 35 to 2342 49 40 3S 22 44 40 35 3, 139 34 3 1 38 34 31 ^.go. C-0. 85 0 75 1 65 2 55 20 47% 1 94 42% 539 37% 1046 32% 1460 27Y. 1 509 22% 1381 1 7% 1292 12% 1177 7% 1 016 2 987 a 1 996 200 WATT, A-23 4010 Lumens 'SINGLE UNIT _w MULTIPLE INSTALLATION 00% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0% BEAM ANGLE*.941 FIXTURE AVERAGE INITIAL FOOTCANDLIS? DIAMICTIER1 INITIAL OPENING TO ILIGHTED FT-C "ORKPLANI W.9" 62 61.6. 16--l" 33 7'.6" 20' - 4" 21 9'.6" 24'- 8 14 28'- 11 " 1 101 13'.6" MAXIMUM SPACING IFEETI ROOM CAVITY RATIO I 1 0 7' - 6" 61 45 33 10'- 2" 33 24 18 12' - I 1" 20 15 11 1 ..S.. 14 10 a is, . 4" 10 8 5 *BEA,M ANGLE & DIAMETER TO HIS, MAX. C.P. IFOOTCANOLES BASED ON SWSW20 REFLECTANCE CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION 79- 500 20% Effective Floor Cavity Reflectance -. Wall Reflectance 70 50 30 10 FO 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 So 30 10 0 1 81 OS 03 it Its 23 82 90 1 0 79 78 77 76 PS 75 74 73172 2 83 is is 73 1111 78 75 73 79 73 71_ 73 11 SO 71 as of !? 3 is 73 69 66 77 17 GO 64 70 47 Its 46 as 64 62 as 43 61 4 74 on a& so 13 47 53 so As 4259 64 SL SO 67 so 58 67 5 204358 SS 68 47 SO SS 61 17 54 60 SO 54 so 55 53 52 46 SO SA 51 4-5-SO 94 60 _57 S3 90 66 92 SO SS 52 AS 44 G2 is Sir 44 .6 1 54 4. 49163 49 411 ff 52 48 4G 51 44 45 44 42 IS7 6460 44SO 50 AS 47 49 45 A 21 42 '4AO 4372 47 44 41 44 ISS44 38 IS3 44 41 34 JAS 41 3814"4 101151 43 32 34 150 47 37 24141 27 34141 37 34 Iwo 1500 11- IS- 26. Angle Candle Pa.., IS 0 7' 65 9 65 23 47% 206 42A "3 37% 1245 32% 1912 27% 21 40 22% 2154 17% 2 1 45 12114 2061 7% 1902 2% 1 856 0 1870 PRESCOLITE ADD PRESCO61TE 9300- LU-me-A-Line Series F Ceiling Mount W-ith lay -in opal diffuser. Suitable for damp locations. Ceiling mount only. Cat. No. Description Ship Lbs. 9446 (1) 6OW with black finish, opal glass 2.5 Replacement glass only 1.5.. 71/4' dia., extends 4" from coiling 9447 (1) 10OW with black finish, opal glass 5.5 Replacement glass only 1.5 I I 'A* dia., extends 4%" from ceiling Wall Brackets and Ceiling Lights Ship Ship CaL No. Description Lbs. CaL No. Description Lb3. 150-20OW 2.3 10OW 2.3 Brushed aluminum, wall bracket. 9300 Painted aluminum or black. WB-28 5'A'dia. x 9" high, extends 71A" 6" dia. x 4%" back, extends 51/4". from wall. Suitable for wet locations. Suitable for wet locations. Replacement glass only 1.5 9301 930a with GRD, C.O�—Alumlnum 2.3 U Suitable for damp locations. 60W 2.5 Matte white. Wall bracket, Interior 15OW 3.0 W13-151A use only. 71/4* high x 61/2" wide, 9304 Painted aluminum. 6' dia. x 4%" back, extends 3%*. Satin Thermopal 6' dia. globe, extends 7' from wall. glass. Suitable for damp locations. Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass only 1.5 (2)10 OW 3.0 (2) 10OW 7.5 9312 Painted aluminum. 131/4* x 43/4* back, extends 5%" from wall. Horizontal Matte white. Wall bracket. Interior mount only. Suitable for wet locations. ,use only. 61/2' high x 17%" wide, WB-19 extends 5'. Satin Thermopal glass. 10OW 2.0 Suitable for damp locations. L�l Painted aluminum or black. Replacement glass only 5.0 9316 4%" dia. x 7%" high. 10OW 3.0 Suitable for damp locations. Matte white. Wall bracket. Interior 10OW 2.5 use only. 99/ta" high x 81/4" wide, W13-1 6 extends 51/4' with glass diffuser. 9317 Painted aluminum. 6" dia. x 7V4* high, 6' dia. glass. Suitable for damp locations. Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass diffuser only 2.0 D (2) 1OOW 4.5 Matte white. Wall bracket, Interior .10 WB_1 a use only. 18' long x 5%* wide, extends 5". Suitable for damp locations. Replacement glass only . 2.5 110OW 1.5 Painted chrome or matte white. 94437 Decorative canopy. G-40, G-25. or A-1 9 lamps recommended (not furnished). 4-1/4' dia. x 21/4'. Suitable for interior or damp locations. PRESCOLITE BEFORE AIRPORT DRIVE LOOKING SOUTH EAST AFTER AIRPORT DRIVE LOOKING SOUTH EAST -ovBURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL & RAMP ACCESS PROJECT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OCTOBER 16, 2002 PROJECT # A0229 FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. BURLINGTON, VERMONT MICHAEL LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 41, 4 p E M F BEFORE AIRPORT DRIVE LOOKING NORTH EAST AFTER AIRPORT DRIVE LOOKING NORTH EAST BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL & RAMP ACCESS PROJECT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OCTOBER 16, 2002 PROJECT * A0229 FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. BURLINGTON, VERMONT MICHAEL LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING PROJECT AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29 Williston, Vermont 05495 January 1997 ii TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 January 17, 1997 Mr. Jon B. Leinwohl, P.E. Webster -Martin, Inc. 1025 Airport Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Leinwohl: In this study, various analyses were performed for the traffic conditions that occur at selected intersections on Airport Drive in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport in South Burlington, Vermont. Although no expansions are planned for this commercial site, the present parking facilities are to be complemented with a three -level parking structure in the area of the attended parking lot. Traffic demands were generated for the two intersections that provide ingress to and egress from the airport and for the adjacent intersections of Airport Drive with Innotech Drive and Airport Road and with White Street for the design year of 2008. For these four intersections, warrants for traffic signals were assessed for average weekday volumes, while 30th highest hour volumes were selected for performance evaluations and for application of turn - lane guidelines. In addition, the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terrace was appraised in terms of traffic assessments for air quality requirements. Safety evaluations were performed for that section of Airport Drive that includes Airport Entrance and Exit. In summary, acceptable conditions of traffic performance and safety are anticipated with several geometric improvements in the study area through the planning year of 2008. Please advise of any additional assistance that may be required in regard to the traffic aspects of this project. Very truly yours, OF Vt 0 P fir(�� h rat Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. No. 2672 Vice President '� c /STT.?, s���NAL 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 VEHICULAR VOLUMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 SIGNAL WARRANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 TURN -LANE GUIDELINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 AIR QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 SAFETY EVALUATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 SUN24ARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 APPENDIX A, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - AIRPORT DRIVE, INNOTECH DRIVE, AND AIRPORT ROAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 APPENDIX B, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - AIRPORT DRIVE, AIRPORT ENTRANCE, AND PATRICK STREET . . . . . . . . . . . 28 APPENDIX C, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - AIRPORT DRIVE, AIRPORT EXIT, AND LEDOUX TERRACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 APPENDIX D, TRAFFIC SUMMARIES - AIRPORT DRIVE AND WHITE STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 APPENDIX E, LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS . . . . . . . . . 50 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 1 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING PROJECT AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT INTRODUCTION Commercial activities, such as an airport, generate vehicular and pedestrian movements throughout their times of operation. As a result, traffic conditions are often influenced in the immediate vicinity of these locations. The trip generations are influenced by the levels of commercial development and not by any changes in the parking facilities, such as lot versus structure. However, transportation planning is essential to insure continuing commercial activity with roadway and intersection facilities that provide efficient and safe travel. The purpose of this traffic study was to assess the adequacies of four unsignalized intersections, that are in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport, to serve efficiently and safely the travel demands through the planning year of 2008. This airport is located on the east side of Airport Drive at a distance of approximately 2400 ft north of Williston Road in South Burlington, Vermont, and is shown as site (P) on the city map in Figure 1. The four selected study intersections are identified by the indicated letter designations on this same figure: 1. Airport Drive, Innotech Drive, and Airport Road - 'A'; 2. Airport Drive, Airport Entrance, and Patrick Street - 'B'; OTT OF IOOIN BOLMrON 1 2 L[KM� m a ..a .Y.r.rrw:••rw ...•. .r.ta...Mwa I GOaCNI Ir[N ;/ 1 ^{JJ 1 WrN003 L1 1 alaWl YYaNI, ' .w r.....�� :;�•.•�w=� WYa..r. Im MW __ w~_ 4EIILNK MIfIMa, NV CITY OF SOUTH MALIWTON ' r ' Wli[NaN WIM11 �� Figure 1 Locations of Burlington International Airport and Study Intersections in South Burlington. Vermont 3 3. Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terrace - ICI; and 4. Airport Drive and White Street - 'D'. IAirport Road is a through collector street with a speed limit of 25 mph and with stop control on the intersecting streets. At the last location of Airport Drive and White Street, traffic movements on the north and east approaches are regulated by stop signs. The scope of these traffic evaluations includes the following appraisals: 1. Signal warrants, 2. Special turn lanes, 3. Intersection performances, and 4. Traffic assessments for air quality. In addition, safety evaluations were determined for the portion of Airport Drive that is directly influenced by vehicular movements associated with airport activities. Traffic volumes were ascertained for morning and afternoon peak hours and for noontime travel demands at each study location for the planning year of 2008. A ten-year period provides a reasonable interval over which to appraise the traffic requirements for the parking design contemplated at Burlington International Airport. Trip generations are correlated with the types and physical sizes of business activities on commercial sites and are not related to Ithe parking facilities. Therefore, no project volumes were added to the existing traffic patterns, because no increased land -use I 4 activities are contemplated for this airport facility and because the only change is to enhance parking opportunities by changing from a lot to a three -level structure to accommodate the airport parking needs. In fact, improved parking may actually reduce travel demands for those persons on short -time air travel. These travelers will be more willing to make one trip to the airport where an enhanced opportunity will exist for more protected vehicle storage than is currently available. This situation will reduce the pattern of two round trips for 'drop off' and 'pick up' as a result of less than desirable parking opportunities. (`fir y�rt�4 1i l�s: ci "'�- i.�'iiL-C�t a, '•�J.� f' � ����c-sr �:.�--/ 5 VEHICULAR VOLUMES Four intersectional situations were studied in these traffic assessments, and Traffic Summaries for each evaluation are presented in the following appendices: 1. Airport Drive, Innotech Drive, and Airport Road - Appendix A; 2. Airport Drive, Airport Entrance, and Patrick Street - Appendix B; 3. Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terrace - Appendix C; and 4. Airport Drive and White Street - Appendix D. Because no expansion of airport trip -generating facilities is involved in this project, only the existing vehicular volumes were analyzed in this traffic study. Vehicular volumes for the analysis periods were developed from turning movement counts taken by Webster -Martin, Inc. on December 1 12, 1996. In every case, adjustments were applied for daily and Imonthly variations, and volumes were forecasted to the following Isituations for the stated purposes. 1. 2008 average weekday volumes for signal warrants; I2. 2008 30th highest hour volumes for turn -lane guidelines and for performance evaluations; and I3. 1998 and 1999 first highest hour volumes and average eight highest hour volumes for air quality assessments. Temporal adjustments were derived from continuous count data Icollected at the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) Sta. D099 C01 Ion I89 in the City of South Burlington and from the short count data taken at the VAOT Sta. D218 on Airport Drive in the vicinity of Burlington International Airport. The short-term growth factors were derived from the latter source to account for recent on -going development activities in the general area of the project and the selected study locations. The adjustment factors to provide 30th highest hour volumes (30HV), first highest hour volumes (1HH), and average eight highest hour volumes (8HH) were generated from summary statistics for VAOT Sta. D099. In Table 1, a listing by appendix is provided for the following sets of traffic summaries. 1. Signal warrant evaluations. 2. Turn -lane guidelines. a. Left. b. Right. 3. 2008 design hour volumes. 4. Air quality considerations. a. First highest hour. b. Average eight highest hour. This last category was applicable only to the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terrace. In the proposed site plan for the revised internal traffic circulation, the driveway has been eliminated for the exiting vehicles from the regulated parking lot. Based on the volume count studies, these movements were assigned to the Airport Exit. G TABLE 1 INTERSECTION APPENDIX TABLE NUMBERS Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont Appendix Signal Turn 2008 Traffic Air Quality and Warrant Lane Volumes Perform Volumes Perform. Location Left Right DHV 1998 1999 A Airport Dr., 3 4 5 6,7 8 - - - Innotech Dr., and Airport Rd. B Airport Dr., 9 Airport Ent., and Patrick St. C Airport Dr., 15 Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. D Airport Dr. 24 and White St. 10 11 12,13 14 - - - 16 17 18,19 20 21 22 23 - 25,26 27 - - - M IAlthough no additional project traffic is anticipated from the levels of airport activity, these movements were forecasted in keeping with the rate of normal traffic growth. E SIGNAL WARRANTS ITo ascertain the acceptable level of traffic control for each study I intersection, the average weekday volumes were obtained for the planning year of 2008. These volumes were compared with the warrants for traffic signals as stipulated in the current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. For the four intersections, these comparisons are presented in the respective Tables 3, 9, 15, and 24. In all situations, these guidelines were not realized through the planning period. The present arrangement of intersection control is satisfactory for the anticipated travel demands in 2008. 10 TURN -LANE GUIDELINES With stop control on the side streets at the intersections of Airport Drive with Innotech Drive and Airport Road, with Airport Entrance and Patrick Street, and with Airport Exit and Ledoux Terrace, guidelines were applied to the design hour volumes in 2008 to ascertain the need for any left- and/or right -turn lanes on Airport Drive. This appraisal was not required at the fourth location of Airport Road and White Street because of the major - movement turning patterns. These guidelines for a left -turn lane at an unsignalized L intersection, as adopted by the Vermont Agency of Transportation, are realized on the south approach and the north approach of Airport Drive, respectively, at the intersections with Innotech Drive and Airport Road and with Airport Entrance and Patrick`s Street. The results of these assessments are summarized in Tables u v �f k 0' I 4, 10, and 16 for the three relevant locations. Because the 1� criterion is barely satisfied for only the afternoon peak hour on the south approach of Airport Drive at the intersection with,`�,� Airport Entrance and Patrick Street, this left -turn lane is not recommended to serve a demand volume of only 15 vph in 2008. In the evaluations of the need for right -turn lanes at the three intersections, the appropriate volumes in 2008 are below the VAOT guidelines for the provision of a separate right -turn lane at an unsignalized intersection except for one intersection. Summaries of these evaluations are contained in the respective Tables 5, 11, 11 and 17. The requirement is reasonably satisfied on the south r approach of Airport Drive at the intersection with Airport Entrance n and Patrick Street. This geometric improvement is recommended and will assist the right -turning vehicles that are entering the airport. 12 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCES In Tables 6-7, 12-13, 18-19, and 25-26 in the respective appendices of Traffic Summaries, 2008 travel patterns are described in terms of design hour volumes and represent 'extreme -case' situations for road -user demands. Because these volume levels are exceeded for only 29 hours in the respective years, a peak hour factor of 1.00 was selected for an unsignalized intersection to represent peaking characteristics associated with design hour volumes. The capacity procedure for unsignalized intersection, as outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 1994, was used to assess traffic performance at the study locations. The time periods analyzed were morning and afternoon peak hours and noontime. Average delay in seconds per vehicle describes the operating characteristics of critical movements at unsignalized intersections. Service levels are qualitative descriptors of traffic conditions and range from 'A' for excellent or free flow to 'E' for intolerable or unstable flow. Level of service 'F' describes that situation when demand volume exceeds calculated capacity. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of performance levels are given in Table 28 of Appendix E, Level of Service Descriptions. Levels of service 'B' to 'D' or better are often selected as the desired criteria in the design of roadway facilities. In certain cases, traffic operational improvements may be arranged on a cost-effective basis to provide service level 'E' 13 or better during those few hours when traffic demands peak in the design year. The results of the performance calculations are summarized in Tables 8, 14, 20, and 27 for the respective intersections. In all cases, levels of service 'A' are available for the critical movements on Airport Drive in the planning year of 2008. The effectiveness measures as noted in parentheses are approximate values when no separate left -turn lane is provided on the designated approach of the major or through street (Airport Drive). In that situation, the approach performance is described by the probability of a queue -free state. These values are also tabulated in the performance summaries for the four unsignalized intersections. The high probabilities in all cases are indicative of only minor delays produced by left -turning vehicles to the through and/or right movements on the single -lane approaches of the major roadway. If the two recommended left -turn lanes are added to Airport Drive, then the values in parentheses are the actual measures of performance. In addition, the probability of queue - free state is not relevant in the appraisal of those major -street approaches with designated left -turn lanes. The side street approaches with stop control at Airport Drive have service levels that range from 'A' to 'D' for all intersections. However, only one measure of 'D' is noted in Table 20 for the east approach (Airport Exit) during the afternoon peak hour in 2008 at the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux I 14 Terrace. Airport Exit is planned to operate with a left -turn lane and a through/right-turn lane. The overall intersectional levels of service are rated as 'A' or 'B' for the various scenarios evaluated in this traffic study. Although the unsignalized capacity procedure was applied to the traffic operations at the intersection of Airport Drive and White Street, the method is not strictly applicable to two through streets that intersect with major turning movements. Because no methodology is available to analyze this configuration, the results presented in Table 27 are only to be construed as an approximate Ievaluation. This intersection does appear to be operating in a reasonably effective manner. Little significance is often attached to the performance measures of unsignalized intersections that do not satisfy any warrant for traffic signal control. Design queue lengths for the 95th percentile are given in the last column of Tables 8, 14, 20, and 27 for the four intersections. The tabulated values are reasonably small, and no evidence exists for the potential blocking of any major driveways. As noted in Table 20, the storage requirement for the two lanes on Airport Exit should be approximately five vehicle lengths or 125 ft. 15 AIR QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS Travel demands at the intersection of Airport Drive, Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terrace were appraised for performance levels in terms of the requirements for an air quality assessment. Traffic volumes were calculated for the base year of 1998 and for the analysis year of 1999. Because the level of airport activity is not to be expanded, the first highest hour volumes and the average eight highest. hour volumes for 1999 represent both the no -build and build conditions. The vehicular volumes are presented in Tables 21 and 22 for 1998 and 1999, respectively. IResults of the capacity analyses for all scenarios are summarized in Table 23. Overall levels of service 'A' are reported for the Itwo volume levels during both analysis years. The individual approaches have measures of effectiveness that range from 'A' to 'C'. Therefore, this intersection does not meet the guidelines for a detailed air quality study. 16 SAFETY EVALUATIONS Accident characteristics on Airport Drive were analyzed for a distance of 1800 ft from south of Airport Entrance to north of Airport Exit. Traffic accidents, as presently listed in the State IHighway Sorted Accident File for the five-year period from 1991 through 1995, are summarized in Table 2 according to numbers, Irates, causes, types, and severities. This section of collector street in an urban area is not currently classified as a high- Iaccident location by the Vermont Agency of Transportation. A general guideline for the indication of a safety problem at an intersection or over a short roadway section is the average occurrence of five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period. The 13 mishaps that were reported over the five years result in a frequency of 2.60 accidents per year, which is less than the criterion for an accident-prone situation. Another measure of relative safety is provided by a comparison of actual and critical accident experiences per one -million vehicle miles for Ithe selected roadway section on Airport Drive. In Table 2, the Iactual rate of 2.99 accidents per one -million vehicle miles is less than the critical rate of 4.44 accidents per one million vehicle Imiles. Again, the actual accident experience is below the critical value that is indicative of a safety problem. I In general, causes of the reported traffic mishaps are attributable to driver errors. The accidents are not related to any elements of Istreet design and/or traffic control. Only two collisions are 17 TABLE 2 ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS Airport Drive between Airport 1991-1995 Entrance and Exit Total accidents 13 Average accidents per year 2.60 Accident rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 2.99 Critical rate per 1,000,000 vehicle miles 4.44 Accident causes Follow too close 5 Miscellaneous driver errors 5 Inattention 3 Accident types Rear end 4 Other collisions 3 Right angle 2 Backing 2 Miscellaneous 2 Accident severities Fatal 0 Personal injury 2 Property damage only 11 Conclusion: non -accident-prone location. 18 classified in the severity category of personal injury, while the remaining accidents are listed as property -damage -only. Therefore, the study roadway is summarized as a non -accident-prone location. 19 SUMMARY Traffic analyses were conducted at the four intersections evaluated I on Airport Drive in the immediate vicinity of Burlington International Airport for travel demands in the planning year of I2008. In addition, safety conditions on this collector street were appraised in terms of accident characteristics over the period from I1991 through 1995. No additional development other than improved parking facilities is anticipated at the airport during the Ianalysis period. For all locations, no warrants were met for intersectional control by traffic signal operation, and acceptable levels of performance are anticipated for these unsignalized intersections with stop sign regulations on the side streets that intersect Airport Drive. The following geometric improvements are recommended in keeping with the VAOT guidelines for left- and right -turn lanes at unsignalized intersections: 1. Airport Drive, Innotech Drive, and Airport Road - left - turn lane on the south approach and I2. Airport Drive, Airport Entrance, and Patrick Street - left -turn lane on the north approach and right -turn lane on the south approach. In addition, the geometric configuration for the Airport Exit is Ione left -turn lane and one through/right-turn lane. As a result of the safety appraisal, the section of Airport Drive in the vicinity of the airport was judged to be a non-accident- 20 Iprone street. No significant alteration of accident Icharacteristics is anticipated with continuing operation of the airport at its current level of activities. No adverse conditions on the study section of Airport Drive are Icontemplated with the provision of a parking structure on the site Iof Burlington International Airport. Detailed designs of the recommended geometric improvements are beyond the scope of this traffic study. This aspect of the project development is completed in the design phase and in coordination with the City of South IBurlington. 21 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE, INNOTECH DRIVE, AND AIRPORT ROAD 22 TABLE 3 SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATIONS Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and Airport Rd. South Burlington, Vermont Time North App. South App. Sum Vol. Vol. Major 6-7 157 207 364 7-8 348 192 540 8-9 341 232 573 9-10 247 225 472 10-11 254 266 520 11-12 358 300 658 12-13 354 372 726 13-14 317 344 661 14-15 396 341 737 15-16 335 344 679 16-17 346 513 859 17-18 420 514 934 18-19 187 216 403 Year 2008 AWV East App. West App. App. Warrant Vol. Vol. Total Satisfied 1 64 429 3 66 609 2R 5 75 653 2R 10 68 550 7 84 611 10 78 746 2R 16 113 855 1R,2R,9R 13 90 764 2R 9 77 823 2R,9R 3 72 754 2R 8 93 960 2,2R,9R 7 75 1016 2,2R,9R 3 33 439 Warrants Met: 2R, 9R 23 TABLE 4 LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont Airport Rd. Period Opposing Advancing Left Warrant Volume Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (vph) M 2008 a.m. N App 228 413 0.5 N S App 411 260 12.3 Y 2008 noon N App 360 417 1.2 N S App 412 399 9.8 Y 2008 p.m. N App 625 466 0.9 N .S App 462 360 9.7 Y Speed limit - 25 mph 24 TABLE 5 RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and South Burlington, Vermont Airport Rd. Period Advancing Right Product Warrant Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (_%) 2008 a.m. N App 413 11.9 134 N S App 260 2.3 39 N 2008 noon N App 417 13.9 144 N S App 399 2.3 60 N 2008 p.m. N App 466 15.9 170 N S App 660 0.9 62 N Warrant product - 262 Speed limit - 25 mph I 25 Table 6 IINTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and Airport Rd. 2008 Design Hour Volumes North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 413 266 466 698 49 362 2 74 388 4 Right Thru Left Right 1 6 Thru 2 7 Westbound 4 11 Westbound 83 113 Left 4 --------------------- 1 43 Left ------------------- 12 Eastbound 73 10 88 4 Thru East Approach Eastbound 119 0 Innotech Dr. 41 Right 46 West Approach Airport Rd. I Left Thru Right 32 222 6 35 619 6 407 260 435 660 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. 0730-0830 p.m. 1630-1730 eel Table 7 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and Airport Rd. 2008 Design Hour Volumes Westbound 104 0 --------------------- 70 Left 0 124 5 Thru Eastbound 0 0 49 Right 0 West Approach Airport Rd. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 417 430 0 0 58 354 5 0 0 0 Right Thru Left 410 0 Southbound Right 9 0 Thru 7 23 0 0 Left 7 0 ------------------- 19 0 Left Thru Right 39 351 9 0 0 0 399 0 Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach Innotech Dr. Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement noon - 1215-1315 27 TABLE 8 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr., Innotech Dr., and Airport Rd. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Queue- Average Level Approach 95% Capacity free Movement of Delay Queue (pcph) State Delay Service (spv) Length (prob) (spv) (veh) 2008 Morning Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1335 1.00 (2.7) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1092 0.96 (3.4) (A) 0.4 0.0 East App. 452 8.1 B 8.1 0.0 West App. 570 7.6 B 7.6 0.7 Intersection A 1.1 2008 Noon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1155 0.99 (3.1) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1091 0.95 (3.4) (A) 0.3 0.0 East App. 464 8.2 B 8.2 0.0 West App. 458 10.9 C 10.9 1.3 Intersection A 1.7 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L- 863 0.99 (4.2) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1033 0.95 (3.6) (A) 0.2 0.0 East App. 383 9.7 B 9.7 0.0 West App. 321 18.0 C 18.0 2.0 Intersection A 1.9 28 APPENDIX B TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE, AIRPORT ENTRANCE, AND PATRICK STREET 29 TABLE 9 SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATIONS Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and Patrick St. Year 2008 AWV South Burlington, Vermont Time North App. South App. Sum East App. West App. App. Warrant Vol. Vol. Major Vol. Vol. Total Satisfied 6-7 223 238 461 0 6 467 7-8 376 205 581 0 20 601 8-9 347 243 590 0 10 600 9-10 276 234 510 0 7 517 10-11 281 298 579 0 2 581 11-12 _ 417 332 749 0 8 757 12-13 407 384 791 0 4 795 13-14 359 372 731 0 7 738 14-15 453 347 800 0 4 804 15-16 341 352 693 0 13 706 16-17 434 573 1007 0 4 1011 17-18 439 470 909 0 11 920 18-19 203 204 407 0 3 410 Warrants Met: None 30 TABLE 10 LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and South Burlington, Vermont Patrick St. Period Opposing Advancing Left Warrant Volume Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (vph) (_%) 2008 a.m. N App 273 423 8.5 Y S App 387 275 0.7 N 2008 noon N App 395 487 14.0 Y S App 419 399 1.0 N 2008 p.m. N App 651 546 15.8 Y S App 460 666 2.2 Y Speed limit - 25 mph 31 TABLE 11 RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and South Burlington, Vermont Patrick St. Period Advancing Right Product Warrant Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (_%) 41111:jwav "it N App 423 0.5 30 N S App 275 34.2 130 N 2008 noon N App 487 1.0 48 N S App 399 25.1 173 N 2008 p.m. N App 546 0.7 46 N S App 666 26.3 293 Y Warrant product - 262 Speed limit - 25 mph I 32 ITable 12 IINTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and Patrick St. 2008 Design Hour Volumes Westbound 4 19 --------------------- 0 Left 0 16 1 Thru Eastbound 11 0 15 Right 11 West Approach Patrick St. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 423 179 546 476 2 385 36 4 456 86 Right Thru Left 400 467 Southbound Right 0 0 Thru 0 0 Westbound 0 0 Left 0 0 ------------------- 131 Eastbound 261 Left Thru Right 2 179 94 15 476 175 275 666 Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach Airport Entrance Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. 0745-0845 p.m. 1630-1730 33 Table 13 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and Patrick St. 2008 Design Hour Volumes Westbound 9 0 --------------------- 1 Left 0 6 0 Thru Eastbound 0 0 5 Right 0 West Approach Patrick St. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 487 296 0 0 5 414 68 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Right 0 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 Left 0 0 ------------------- 168 0 Left Thru Right 4 295 100 0 0 0 419 399 0 0 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. Westbound Eastbound East Approach Airport Entrance Vehicles per hour by movement noon - 1130-1230 34 TABLE 14 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Entrance, and South Burlington, Vermont Patrick St. Approach Movement Queue- Average Level Approach 95% Capacity free Movement of Delay Queue (pcph) State Delay Service (spv) Length (prob) (spv) (veh) 2008 Morning Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1271 0.96 (2.9) (A) 0.2 0.0 South App. L-1121 1.00 (3.2) (A) 0.0 0.0 East App. - - - - - - West App. 836 4.4 A 4.4 0.0 Intersection A 0.3 2008 Noon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1111 0.92 (3.5) (A) 0.5 0.1 South App. L-1082 1.00 (3.3) (A) 0.0 0.0 East App. - - - - - West App. 665 5.5 B 5.5 0.0 Intersection A 0.3 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L- 839 0.86 (4.8) (A) 0.8 0.3 South App. L-1035 0.98 (3.5) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. - - - - - West App. 811 4.5 A 4.5 0.0 Intersection A 0.4 35 APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE, AIRPORT EXIT, AND LEDOUX TERRACE 36 TABLE 15 SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATIONS Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. Year 2008 AWV South Burlington, Vermont Time North App. South App. Sum East App. West App. App. Warrant Vol. Vol. Major Vol. Vol. Total Satisfied 6-7 146 80 226 95 4 325 7-8 304 124 428 77 13 518 8-9 266 153 419 110 2 531 111 9-10 181 142 323 105 3 431 10-11 197 165 362 127 1 490 1R 11-12 239 205 444 204 7 655 1R 12-13 264 258 522 143 9 674 111,911 13-14 250 212 462 152 5 619 111 14-15 250 203 453 210 11 674 111,911 15-16 242 247 489 152 3 644 111 16-17 282 346 628 146 5 779 1R,2R,8,9R 17-18 219 373 592 271 8 871 1,1R,2R,9,9R 18-19 126 125 251 104 7 362 Warrants Met: 1R, 9R 37 TABLE 16 LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and South Burlington, Vermont Ledoux Terr. Period Opposing Advancing Left Warrant Volume Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (vph) M 2008 a.m. N App 163 362 0.0 N S App 362 164 0.6 N 2008 noon N App 266 301 0.0 N S App 301 270 1.5 N 2008 p.m. N App 451 278 0.0 N S App 278 451 2.4 N Speed limit - 25 mph 38 TABLE 17 RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and South Burlington, Vermont Ledoux Terr. Period Advancing Right Product Warrant Volume Turn Satisfied (vph) (_%) 2008 a.m. N App 362 0.3 20 N S App 164 0.0 - N 2008 noon N App 236 0.0 - N S App 270 0.0 - N 2008 p.m. N App 278 1.4 33 N S App 462 0.0 - N Warrant product - 262 Speed limit - 25 mph 39 Table 18 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. Westbound 2 15 --------------------- 1 Left 2 10 0 Thru Eastbound 9 0 9 Right 7 West Approach Ledoux Terr. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 362 199 278 515 1 361 0 4 274 0 Right Thru Left 2008 Design Hour Volumes Right 35 62 Thru 0 84 0 290 Left 49 228 Left Thru Right 1 163 0 11 451 0 419 164 509 462 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. 0 0 East Approach Airport Exit Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. - 0730-0830 p.m. - 1630-1730 40 Table 19 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. 2008 Design Hour Volumes Westbound 4 0 --------------------- 2 Left 0 9 0 Thru Eastbound 0 0 7 Right 0 West Approach Ledoux Terr. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound ( Northbound 301 317 0 0 0 301 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left 460 0 Southbound Right 49 0 Thru 0 201 0 0 Left 152 0 ------------------- 0 0 Left Thru Right 4 266 0 0 0 0 270 0 Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach Airport Exit Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement noon - 1130-1230 41 TABLE 20 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and South Burlington, Vermont Ledoux Terr. Approach Movement Queue- Average Level Approach 95% Capacity free Movement of Delay Queue (pcph) State Delay Service (spv) Length (prob) (spv) (veh) 2008 Morning Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1434 1.00 2.5 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1152 1.00 (3.1) (A) 0.0 0.0 East App. L- 516 7.8 B 5.9 0.3 TR-1145 3.2 A - 0.0 West App. 838 4.3 A 4.3 0.0 Intersection A 0.9 2008 Noon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1280 1.00 2.8 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1232 1.00 (2.9) (A) 0.0 0.0 East App. L- 488 11.0 C 9.2 1.7 TR-1015 3.7 A - 0.0 West App. 776 4.7 A 4.7 0.0 Intersection A 2.4 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1045 1.00 3.4 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1264 0.99 (2.9) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. L- 387 24.5 D 20.3 4.9 TR- 818 4.8 A - 0.2 West App. 727 5.0 B 5.0 0.0 Intersection B 5.7 42 Table 21 IINTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. 1998 Air Volumes INorth Approach - Airport Dr. ISouthbound Northbound 234 460 I282 339 7 227 0 3 279 0 I Right Thru Left Right 73 54 IThru 0 290 0 203 Westbound 20 9 I Left 217 149 --------------------- I 2 Left --'---------------- 0 1 0 8 0 Thru East Approach ' Eastbound 7 0 Airport Exit 6 Right 6 West Approach Ledoux Terr. Left Thru Right 13 385 0 6 284 0 450 398 434 290 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement 1HH 8HH i ITable 22 IINTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and Ledoux Terr. 1999 Air Volumes Westbound 20 9 --------------------- 2 Left 1 8 0 Thru Eastbound 7 0 6 Right 6 West Approach Ledoux Terr. North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 236 464 285 342 7 229 0 3 282 0 Right Thru Left 454 438 Southbound Right 74 54 Thru 0 293 0 204 Left 219 150 ------------------- 0 0 Left Thru Right 13 388 0 6 287 0 401 293 Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach Airport Exit 43 Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement 1HH 8HH 44 TABLE 23 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr., Airport Exit, and South Burlington, Vermont Ledoux Terr. Approach Movement Queue- Average Level Approach 95% Capacity free Movement of Delay Queue (pcph) State Delay Service (spv) Length (prob) (spv) (veh) 1998 1HH North App. L-1124 1.00 3.2 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1326 0.99 (2.7) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. L- 449 16.4 C 13.4 3.3 TR- 884 4.5 A - 0.2 West App. 770 4.7 A 4.7 0.0 Intersection A 4.2 1999 1HH North App. L-1120 1.00 3.2 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1323 0.99 (2.7) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. L- 446 16.7 C 13.6 3.4 TR- 881 4.5 A - 0.2 West App. 766 4.8 A 4.8 0.0 Intersection A 4.3 1998 8HH North App. L-1255 1.00 2.9 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1258 0.99 (2.9) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. L- 487 10.9 C 9.0 1.6 TR- 994 3.8 A - 0.0 West App. 866 4.2 A 4.2 0.0 Intersection A 2.4 1999 8HH North App. L-1251 1.00 2.9 A 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1254 0.99 (2.9) (A) 0.1 0.0 East App. L- 483 11.1 C 9.2 1.6 TR- 991 3.9 A - 0.0 West App. 861 4.2 A 4.2 0.0 Intersection A 2.4 45 APPENDIX D TRAFFIC SUMMARIES AIRPORT DRIVE AND WHITE STREET M TABLE 24 SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATIONS Airport Dr. and White St. South Burlington, Vermont Time South App. West App. Vol. Vol. Sum North App. East App. Major Vol. Vol. Year 2008 AWV App. Warrant Total Satisfied 6-7 100 129 229 11 11 251 7-8 151 291 442 12 3 457 8-9 169 257 426 11 9 446 9-10 160 177 337 7 5 349 10-11 200 199 399 6 7 412 11-12 226 216 442 6 18 466 12-13 288 245 533 11 6 550 13-14 277 249 526 16 10 552 14-15 236 228 464 13 13 490 15-16 278 243 521 6 4 531 16-17 378 280 658 19 9 686 17-18 416 218 634 30 27 691 18-19 174 130 304 11 6 321 Warrants Met: None 47 Table 25 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr. and White St. Westbound 178 498 --------------------- 5 Left 11 356 0 Thru Eastbound 291 1 351 Right 279 West Approach White Street North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 17 15 39 42 7 10 0 28 11 0 Right Thru Left 365 310 Southbound 2008 Design Hour Volumes Right 0 0 Thru 0 4 Westbound 5 25 Left 4 20 ------------------- 5 Eastbound 12 Left Thru Right 171 10 5 465 31 11 186 507 Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach White Street Vehicles per hour by movement a.m. peak hour over p.m. peak hour a.m. 0730-0830 p.m. 1630-1730 m Table 26 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Airport Dr. and White St. Westbound Eastbound 304 0 --------------------- 4 Left 0 271 1 Thru 0 0 266 Right 0 West Approach White Street North Approach - Airport Dr. Southbound Northbound 13 14 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left 2008 Design Hour Volumes Right 0 0 Thru 2 7 0 0 Left 5 0 ------------------- 11 0 Left Thru Right 298 10 10 0 0 0 280 318 0 0 Southbound Northbound South Approach - Airport Dr. East Approach White Street Westbound Eastbound Vehicles per hour by movement noon - 1200-1300 49 TABLE 27 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Airport Dr. and White St. South Burlington, Vermont Approach Movement Queue- Average Level Approach 95% Capacity free Movement of Delay Queue (pcph) State Delay Service (spv) Length (prob) (spv) (veh) 2008 Morning Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1686 1.00 (2.1) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1683 0.89 (2.4) (A) 2.2 0.4 East App. 435 8.4 B 8.4 0.0 West App. 1347 3.7 A 3.7 1.3 Intersection A 3.1 2008 Noon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1677 1.00 (2.1) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1690 0.81 (2.6) (A) 2.5 0.8 East App. 432 8.5 B 8.5 0.0 West App. 1335 3.4 A 3.4 0.9 Intersection A 2.9 2008 Afternoon Peak Hour Design Hour Volume North App. L-1637 1.00 (2.2) (A) 0.0 0.0 South App. L-1642 0.70 (3.1) (A) 2.8 1.4 East App. 285 13.8 C 13.8 0.2 West App. 1226 3.8 A 3.8 1.1 Intersection A 3.4 WHITE STREET LEDOUX LANE PATRICK STREET AIRPORT ROAD 4 hr FIGURE 2 WHITE ST. EXTENTION r AIRPORT EXIT AIRPORT ENTRANCE INNOTECH DRIVEWAY PROPOSED GEOMETRIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR AIRPORT DRIVE 50 APPENDIX E LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS 51 TABLE 28 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS Unsignalized Intersections Level of Delay to Minor Reserve Stopped Delay Service Street Traffic (spv) A Little or no :55.0 B Short 5.1-10.0 C Average 10.1-20.0 D Long 20.1-30.0 E Very long 30.1-45.0 F Extreme >45.0 52 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING PROJECT AIRPORT DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Traffic studies and analyses were performed for four intersections on Airport Drive in the vicinity of Burlington International Airport to assess the efficiency and safety of continuing travel operations through the planning year of 2008. Although this Iproject involves the development of a parking structure to replace I an existing parking lot, no increases in activity levels, and as a result in vehicular volumes, are anticipated for the airport site. Warrants for traffic signals are not realized at all locations throughout the design period, and acceptable levels of traffic performance are anticipated at the four unsignalized intersections. However, established guidelines are satisfied for special turning lanes at several locations on Airport Drive. In addition, the geometric arrangement for Airport Exit is specified as one left - turn lane and one through/right-turn lane. Airport Drive is presently classified as a non -accident-prone location. In general, the intersectional facilities adjacent to Burlington International Airport can continue to serve the airport travel demands in an efficient and safe manner through the planning period. TRANS/OP INC. I1/17/97 V1�\ &A� IJ& Technical Report No, 1 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING, ALTERNATIVE STUDY Prepared for Chittenclen County Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES January 1999 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 I.1 Summary of Existing Parking Inventory and Forecast Demand 1 H. SUMMARY OF AIR TRAVELER AND EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS 4 II.1 Air Traveler Survey Results 4 II.2 Air Employee Travel Survey Results 14 II.3 Conclusions From Air Traveler and Employee Surveys 17 III. COMPARISON WITH PEER GROUP AIRPORTS 19 ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE 1 BIA Passenger Origins 4 2 BIA Passenger Destinations 6 3 BIA Passenger Mode Of Arrival 9 4 Air Traveler Parking Duration 11 5 Air Traveler Stated Preference Questions 13 6 Airport Employers 14 7 Locations Of Employee Residence 14 8 Employee Work Hours 15 9 Employee Stated Preference Questions 16 TABULATIONS PAGE 1 Annual Increase In Enplanements 2 2 Destinations By Region Departing Passengers 7 3 Traveler Parking Survey (Questions 3 and 4) 8 4 Mode Of Access For Air Travelers 10 5 Traveler Parking Survey (Questions 5a and 5b) 12 6 Ground Access Vehicles Trips Per Air Passenger Trip 17 7 Parking and Service Characteristics Of Airports 20 8 Parking Per Annual Enplanements Of Airports 22 I. INTRODUCTION Burlington International Airport's (BIA) continuing passenger travel growth and the high utilization rate for its existing parking are both good indicators of customer satisfaction with the airport's current operation and facilities. What BIA customers are seeking, in selecting a local airport rather than driving to Albany, Montreal, LaGuardia, Logan or other larger airports, is the convenience of a full -service airport without the added driving time, traffic congestion or higher parking costs. In order to maintain its competitive position, BIA must continue to offer an adequate parking supply. At the same time, the airport must respond to environmental concerns and offer economic development opportunities where possible. The Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) was requested by the Airport and its owner, the City of Burlington, to perform a study of airport parking issues and to develop a range of alternative concepts for future accessibility to the airport. Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) was contracted as the consultant to perform this study. As a first step in the study process, meetings were held with a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting of representatives from CCMPO, BIA, the City of Burlington and the City of South Burlington. Other study tasks will include: ■ Identification of goals and objectives for future airport expansion strategies in coordination with TAC members; ■ Public outreach to community residents and other interested parties; ■ Review of potential parking and shuttle services locations; and ■ Development of a suggested airport landside transportation and parking strategy. This technical report contributes to this final task and reports on two data gathering efforts -- surveys of airport passengers and employees, and a review of operating conditions at airports with similar characteristics. I.1 Summary of Existing Parking Inventory and Forecast Demand BIA's new garage contains approximately 1,100 spaces, including some rental car space. The long term parking lot and employee parking facilities account for the remainder of the 1,700 on -airport parking spaces. BIA Parking Alternatives 1 Wilbur Smith Associates Two recent studies - SH&E's Parking Garage Feasibility Study (1996) and Hoyle, Tanner & Associates' (HTA) Airport Layout Plan Update (1997) - have projected future passenger traffic growth trends at BIA. While slightly different growth rates were developed for the 1997-2001 period, both of these forecasts project continued growth at an annual rate above 3 percent, as shown in Table 1: Table 1 ANNUAL INCREASE IN ENPLANEMENTS Year SH&E 1996 Forecast HTA 1997 Forecast 1997-2001 4.0% 4.5% 2002-2006 3.2% 3.2% 2007-2011 3.1 % 3.1 % 2012-2016 3.0% 3.0% Sources: Parking Garage Feasibility Study, SH&E, 1996 Airport Layout Plat? Update, Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, 1997 The travel growth projected in these forecasts would result in a rise in passenger enplanements from approximately 450,000 in 1998 to more than 850,000 by the year 2016. Demand for parking at airports depends on several factors, including: ■ Passenger trip purpose; ■ Mode of ground access; ■ Percentage of ground access made by drop-off; ■ Duration of travel; ■ Parking cost; and ■ Number of non -passenger visitor trips. The SH&E report also forecast parking demand to rise from about 1,350 spaces daily in 1996 to approximately 2,675 by 2016, or an increase of about 3.5 percent per year. At this rate, daily parking demand at the airport would exceed capacity on a consistent basis by 2003/4 based on current parking usage and trends in enplanements. Prior to this point, it is logical that the TAC and the Airport Authority should review options to provide additional parking and to implement strategies to reduce parking demand. The strategies which will be reviewed in this study include: BIA Parking Alternatives 2 Wilbur Smith Associates ■ Satellite parking serving airport patrons exclusively; ■ Shared overflow parking, with joint use by multiple activity centers; ■ Use of existing State-owned park -and -ride lots for overflow/satellite parking; ■ Shuttle services from activity centers (i.e. Downtown Burlington, UVM, and the Medical Center); ■ Valet parking at remote facilities; ■ Greater subsidy for existing CCTA transit links (i.e. fare -free service); and ■ Public or privately developed off -site parking. IBIA Parking Alternatives 3 Wilbur Smith Associates 1 IH. SUMMARY OF AIR TRAVELER AND EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS In August of 1998, WSA conducted origin/destination surveys for air travelers and other airport users, such as employees and people accompanying friends or relatives to the terminal. A random sample or 500 or more parking users was determined to provide a strong degree of statistical validity. Following approval by the TAC of survey questions and format, the survey was distributed at the airport during the first week in August, 1998. The air passenger survey was conducted in an interview format, with 595 valid responses obtained. Although survey staff were stationed in the baggage claim area initially, it was found that a much more limited number of arriving passengers were willing to participate in the survey, due to their desire to depart speedily from the terminal. The final response total of 31 arriving passengers was considered too small to provide statistically valid conclusions regarding this sub -group. Based on the data, it would seem that arriving passenger information is comparable to the departing passenger profile. The employee survey was conducted through distribution of survey forms to all airport -based employers, with 105 valid response. The results of these two surveys are presented in Sections II.1 and II.2, respectively. Conclusions drawn from the surveys are discussed in Section II.3 II.1 Air Traveler Survey Results Passenger Origins As shown in Figure 1, forty percent of passengers departing from BIA reported beginning their trip to the airport in the City of Burlington. Burlington's concen- trated development and large volume of business and institution -related travel make it a natural market for alternative travel, which can include scheduled transit, courtesy van or shuttles. BIA Passenger Origins -0% Burlington ® Other CCTA tt% CCMPO, Outside CCTA Resort Areas s% 4% ® Other Vermont S% ® Plattsburgh & Other NY ® Other 29% Figure t IBIA Parking Alternatives 4 Wilbur Smith Associates An additional eleven percent of departing passengers indicated a town of origin within the current service area of the Chittenden County Transit Authority (CCTA). The Town of Essex was the second most common origin point, reported by six percent of surveyed passengers. Therefore, at least half of departing BIA customers have some level of access to existing transit services within some portion of the town from which they travel to the airport. By comparison, six percent of BIA's departing customers reported origins in towns within Chittenden County but outside the CCTA service area. Clearly this represents the far greater density of population and employment within the region's urban and suburban communities, as opposed to the more rural towns located in the outlying portions of Chittenden County. Passengers from Colchester (3 percent of surveyed passengers) are the largest proportion of this group, so with the extension of CCTA service to this town, 54 percent of BIA passengers will fall within the CCTA market area. The major vacation resorts are another important source of travel through BIA, especially in the ski season. The towns of Stowe and Warren each contributed over fifteen daily travelers. Together these resort areas account for six percent of the surveyed passengers, even though the survey was conducted during non -skiing season. Summer season activity appears to be a growing market for many of the state's resorts. Twenty-nine percent (174 responses) of surveyed passengers indicated origin points in Vermont either outside the previously specified areas, for example in Montpelier, Middlebury, Barre, or Waterbury, or without indicating the specific city or town. It is likely that a significant number of these respondents also originated in the Burlington area. In total, 89 percent of surveyed passengers had origins within Vermont. The largest share of the airport's non -Vermont travelers connect from Plattsburgh and the surrounding area of upstate New York. These passengers account for seven percent (42 responses) of all surveyed air travelers. Passengers from Quebec, New Hampshire, Maine, and other origin points account for the remaining four percent of survey responses. Location of Travel Ori&in Air travelers were asked whether their trip began at home, work, hotel/motel, school/university, resort or another location. In response, 54 percent of departing passengers said they began their airport trip at home, 11 percent began their trip at work, 16 percent began their trip at a hotel or motel, and less than 5 percent began their trip at school or university. Eleven percent began their travel at another location, typically the home of a friend or relative. These percentages are not surprising given the time of year for the survey. Of the 235 people who indicated that their trip to the airport started in the Burlington, people leaving from home, work or school accounted for about two-thirds of the total. This suggests that the majority of this group are Burlington residents. BIA Parking Alternatives 5 Wilbur Smith Associates Passenger Destinations Figure 2 illustrates the destinations of surveyed departing passengers. As can be seen, the New York Metropolitan Area, including La Guardia, Newark, Westchester County and Stewart airports, is the single most common destination for travelers from BIA. Destinations by state and region for departing passengers are shown in Table 2. Both Figure 2 and Table 2 give a sense of the wide range of destinations offered for those who connect from BIA to larger hub airports, such as Logan, the New York airports, O'Hare and Philadelphia. Trip Purpose BIA Passenger Destinations Oix NY Area tox ax DC - National/Dulles Boston - Logan tax Other Northeast 22% South FL) ex ® Midwest ® West tax tex . Other (incl. International) Figure 2 Forty three percent of BIA departing passengers indicated they were traveling for business, while 51 percent indicated travel for vacation or personal reasons. Other trip purposes, such as trips to and from school, accounted for six percent of travel during the August survey time period. Trip purpose can have a substantial correlation to mode of travel to the airport, based on a cross -tabulation of the response to this question and the following question regarding mode used. Table 3 on page 8 summarizes this relationship. As can be seen, vacation/recreational travelers are substantially more likely to be dropped off at the airport than business travelers (41 percent versus 26 percent), while school related travelers (potentially under -represented in an August survey) are in fact the most likely to be dropped off (47 percent). BIA Parking Alternatives 6 Wilbur Smith Associates Northeast Maine 4 0.7% Maryland 7 1.2% Massachusetts 44 7.4% New Jersey 29 4.9% New York 77 12.9% Pennsylvania 18 3.0% Rhode Island 2 0.3% Vermont 5 0.8% Washington DC 44 7.4% Subtotal 230 38.7% Total USA 563 94.6% Canada 4 0.7% Europe 8 1.3% Asia 5 0.8% Carribean 3 0.5% None 8 1.3% Other 4 0.7% Total 595 100.0% Table 2 Destinations by Region Departing Passengers Burlington International Airport South Alabama 4 0.7% Florida 60 10.1% Georgia 10 1.7% Kentucky 1 0.2% Louisiana 4 0.7% North Carolina 19 3.2% South Carolina 5 0.8% Tennessee 7 1.2% Texas 20 3.4% Virginia 6 1.0% Subtotal 136 22.9% Source: Wilbur Smith Associates Surveys, August 1998 Midwest Illinois 13 2.2% Indiana 6 1.0% Iowa 5 0.8% Michigan 23 3.9% Minnesota 10 1.7% Missouri 7 1.2% Nebraska 1 0.2% North Dakota 1 0.2% Ohio 18 3.0% Oklahoma 2 0.3% Wisconsin 7 1.2% Subtotal 93 15.6% West Arizona 11 1.8% California 33 5.5% Colorado 13 2.2% Hawaii 3 0.5% Idaho 4 0.7% Montana 1 0.2% Nevada 6 1.0% New Mexico 8 1.3% Oregon 5 0.8% Utah 9 1.5% Washington 10 1.7% Wyoming 1 0.2% Subtotal 104 17.5% Table 3 Traveler Parking Sun-ey Burlington International Airport Cross tabs for departures (question 3 and question 4) Trip Purpose Mode of Arrival at Airport Own car Rental car Taxi Limo Dropped off Bus No response TOTAL Work/Business 79 31% 71 28% 17 7% 15 6% 66 26% 2 1% 7 3% 257 100% Vacation/Rec./Personal 72 24% 50 17% 30 10% 13 4% 123 41% 2 1% 12 4% 302 100% School/University 0 0% 6 40% 2 13% 0 0% 7 47% U 0% 0 0% 15 100% No Response 3 14% 5 24% 1 5% 0 0% 11 52% 1 5% 0 0% 21 100% TOTAL 154 26% 132 22% 50 8% 28 5% 207 35% 5 1% 19 3% 595 100% October, 1998 Wilbur Smith Associates Means of Travel to the Airport The survey indicates that the largest proportion of BIA departing passengers (35 percent) were dropped off at the airport, while 26 percent drove their own car, 22 percent drove a rental car, and 13 percent utilized a taxi, limousine service or courtesy van. Further examination of the survey data reveals that, of the 210 people who indicated that they were dropped off, 29 (14 percent) reported that the vehicle that dropped them off parked at the airport for some duration. BIA Passenger Mode of Arrival Dropped Off ® Drove Own Car Drove Rental Car Taxi/Limo/Courtesy Van Bus ® Other Figure 3 Table 4 on the following page has been adapted from a 1996 U.S. Department of Transportation report, lntermodal Access to Airports, A Planning Guide. It compares BIA's passenger modal split with other airport's of comparable size. BIA Parking Alternatives 9 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 4 MODE OF ACCESS FOR AIR TRAVELERS Airport* ACY SPI SAV BIA ICT ALB Yearly Orig. Passgrs. (in 1,000's) 100 200 400 458 500 800 Mode Split (%) Private vehicle 58 38 49 61 77 58 Rental car 2 46 35 22 15 15 Taxi 10 3 5 8 4 9 Other on -demand 24 4 6 -- 3 5 Scheduled bus/van 24 -- -- 1 -- 4 Courtesy van -- 2 -- 5 -- 6 Other 2 7 5 3 2 3 * SPI - Springfield, IL Regional Airport (1993 survey and enplanement data), ACY - Atlantic City, NJ International Airport (1995 survey), SAV - Savannah, GA Airport (1998 interview), ALB - Albanv Airport (1993 survey), ICT - Wichita, KS Airport (1989 survey), BIA - Burlington International Airport (1998 survey). Source: Adapted by Wilbur Smith Associates from Intermodal Access to Airports, A Planning Guide, 1996. The preceding table illustrates that the mix of passenger access modes covers a fairly broad range even among airports of comparable size and setting. In Atlantic City, jitney -type buses provide a unique mode of on -demand airport access accounting for 24 percent of all airport trips. This type of service is not found in any other city of comparable size. None of the other peer airports has a modal share for scheduled transit or courtesy van of more than ten percent. BIA Parking Alternatives 10 Wilbur Smith Associates Air Passenger Parking Location The 154 surveyed passengers who drove their own car were asked where they had parked. Of these, 90 percent responded that they parked at the airport garage, while ten percent parked in the long term lot or other airport parking. Not surprisingly, given the convenience of the garage and the relatively small differential for all day parking in the garage versus the long term lot ($8 per day versus $6 per day), the cross tabulation of parking location with parking duration in Table 5 shows that all passengers parking for less than 12 hours selected the garage, while only 13 percent of those parking for more than 12 hours selected the long term lot. Parking Duration As shown in Figure 4, the largest single segment of BIA customers park for between 12 hours and one day (21 percent), with 29 percent parking for 12 hours or less, nine percent parking for between one and two days, 13 percent parking for two to three days, 22 percent parking for between four and seven days, and six percent parking for more than one week. Parking Cost Reimbursement Figure 4 Many business travelers are reimbursed for their parking costs. This can create a disincentive for these travelers to park in lower cost, but less convenient facilities. The survey results indicate that 39 percent of surveyed BIA passengers had their parking cost reimbursed. However, the share of customers utilizing the long term lot (approximately 10 percent) appears to be the same for customers who are reimbursed as for those who are not. BIA Parking Alternatives 11 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 5 Traveler Parking Survey Burlington International Airport Cross tabs for departures (question 5a and question 5b) arkin Location [Airport Duration of Parkin < 1 hour 1 to 3 hours 3 to 12 hours > 12 hours No response TOTAL Garage 27 19% 9 6% 5 4% 90 65% 8 6% 139 100% Long term Lot 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 15 100% 0 0% 15 100% TOTAL 27 18% 9 6% 5 3% 105 68% 8 5% 154 100% October, 1998 Wilbur Smith Associates tated Preference Questions BIA customers were asked several questions to measure their opinion (stated preference) regarding the existing parking conditions at the airport, whether they would utilize off -airport parking in combination with a shuttle bus, whether they would utilize a transit bus service to the airport, and what factors would cause them to change their current travel behavior Their responses to first three of these questions are presented in Figure 5. Air Traveler Stated Preference Questions Does the airport have a parking problem? Would you use off -airport parking and shuttle bus service? - Would you use a transit bus service'? 0 Yes E No 0 20 40 60 80 100 Figure 5 As can be seen, only sixteen percent of surveyed air travelers reported a parking problem. Of the two alternative access strategies offered in the survey, off -airport parking in combination with a shuttle bus received the strongest support, with 50 percent of passengers indicating a willingness to use this type of service, while transit bus service received a positive response from only 30 percent of passengers. However, it should be kept in mind that the wording of the stated preference questions posed a situation in which the new services were "convenient, safe and cheaper," in other words ideal conditions. If these conditions were not fully satisfied by a potential new access mode, it is safe to I assume that passenger response would be considerably below the level indicated above. As a final question, air travelers were asked what factor would cause them to consider a change in their current access pattern to the airport. The largest number of respondents (37 percent) indicated that they would not consider a change, while 24 percent would be motivated by higher parking fees, and 18 percent indicated that they would be motivated by improved transit service. The remainder of survey participants (21 percent) did not answer this question, also potentially indicating a reluctance to change travel pattern. BIA Parking Alternatives 13 Wilbur Smith Associates II.2 Airport Employee Travel Survey Results Airport Employers In total of 105 survey responses were obtained from BIA. workers. The surveyed employees included both BIA staff and other employees of businesses in the passenger terminal area, such as the airlines, rental car companies and other airport concessions, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Weather Service. The number of employees from each of these employers who responded to the survey is shown in Figure 6. Business Express Continental Nat. Weather Svc. FAA BIA Staff US Air Hertz Budget Rent A Car World News COX AFSS Airport Employers 0 5 10 15 20 ❑ Number of Employees Responding to Survey Location of Employee Residence Figure 7 illustrates the wide distribution of employee residences. In contrast to the pattern at most airports, employee residences are more widely dispersed throughout the Burlington area than passenger origin points. Forty-one percent of surveyed employees reside within the CCTA survey area, versus 51 percent of air travelers. Figure 6 Location of Employee Residence ❑ Burlington , 2% S. Burlington o% Essex Colchester r% ® Milton ®5% Williston ® All other 3e% Figure 7 BIA Parking Alternatives 14 Wilbur Smith Associates IEmployee Schedules Due to the 24-hour a day character of airport operation, airport and airline employees tend to work more irregular and variable hours than employees in other industries. BIA's daily flight schedule begins at 6 a.m., with flights continuing until 11 p.m. This type of work environment can make it difficult to form carpools or to use conventional scheduled transit service. As shown in Figure 8, the most common start time reported by airport employees was 5 a.m. with the second most common answer being 6:30 a.m. There is a slight concentration of work shifts ending between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m., but both shift start and end times are widely dispersed around the clock. Employee Work Hours 35 30 IL 25 20 15 - - - - 15 - --- 6 am 7 am Yam 9 am 10 am 11 am 12 pm I pm 2 pm 3 pm 4 pm 5 pm 6 pm 7 pm Rpm 9 pm 10 pm I 1 pm 12 am Hour Ending Start Time End Time Figure 8 Employee Parking Location Since all airport employees (with the exception of a few airline personnel) have free employee parking available, it is not surprising that all but two of the survey responses indicated use of employee parking facilities associated with individual airport employers. Only one employee indicated current participation in a carpool (the other participant would have responded as a vehicle driver). Parkin Ten employees reported paying for parking, with seven indicating a reimbursement of parking costs by their employer. However, based on the employer names given, these responses may represent an error in filling out the survey form (which was self-administered by employees), rather than a valid survey response. BIA Parking Alternatives 15 Wilbur Smith Associates Parking Satisfaction Seventy-nine percent of employees indicated satisfaction with the current convenience and safety of employee parking, while 25 percent indicated that there was a need for more employee parking. Seven respondents noted that the employee parking lots are sometimes full, four observed a problem of unauthorized (non -employee) parking in these lots, and two suggested that there was a need for safer parking. Stated Preference Questions BIA employees were asked two questions to measure their opinion (stated preference) regarding alternatives to the existing parking conditions at the airport, and which factors would cause them to change their current travel behavior. Their responses are presented in Figure 9 Employee Stated Preference Questions Does the airport have a parking problem'? Would you use a transit bus service? 0 20 40 60 80 100 ® Yes M No Figure 9 While 12 percent of employees gave a positive response to the question regarding transit bus service, in response to the final question, 20 percent indicated that they would consider a change to their present travel pattern if more convenient transit service was available and an additional ten percent would be motivated by a monetary incentive for transit use. By comparison, 61 percent indicated that they would consider a change and six percent would be motivated by higher parking fees BIA Parking Alternatives 16 Wilbur Smith Associates f II.3 Conclusions from Air Traveler and Employee Surveys As noted in Section II.1, the concentration of air traveler origins within the City of Burlington and the CCTA service area offers a promising environment for alternative airport access modes. However, care must be taken to avoid creating alternatives for which there is insufficient market demand, or which fail to meet the objectives of reducing total airport -related vehicle trips. In order to accurately assess the range of airport access alternatives, it is important to realize that, while passenger modal split has been found to have a significant impact on the total number of vehicle trips generated by air passengers, it can also be affected by factors beyond the provision of conventional scheduled transit service, as shown in the following table: Table 6 GROUND ACCESS VEHICLE TRIPS PER AIR PASSENGER TRIP Mode Vehicle Trips/ Passenger Trip Pickup/Drop-off 1.29 Taxi 1.09 Parking (Own Car) 0.74 Rental Car 0.69 Door -to -Door Shuttle 0.33 Scheduled Bus 0.10 Rapid Transit (on airport) 0 Source: USDOT, Intermodal Ground Access to Airports, A Planning Guide, 1996 Although these numerical relationships were developed to analyze transportation options at a much larger airport, namely Logan International, the basic connection between airport access travel mode and vehicle trips would seem to be valid for a regional airport such as BIA as well. According to the USDOT report, "The data show that influencing modal choices in the auto mode must be part of a comprehensive access strategy, in addition to the traditional study of shifting passengers from automobiles to transit."' Bellomo-McGee Inc., Intermodal Access to Airports, A Planning Guide, 1996. Vienna, VA, 1996. pp. 41-42. BIA Parking Alternatives 17 Wilbur Smith Associates The report notes, "This analysis led Massport policy planners to focus their attention on the role of parking supply and parking pricing in an effort to deal with the serious problem of the pickup/dropoff trip. The analysis suggested that it would be cost effective to invest in a major advertising campaign to discourage the pickup/dropoff trip. ,2 Logan Airport currently offers a wide range of access alternatives, including ferry service from Downtown, shuttle service from a rapid transit station, express bus and local bus access, as well as numerous taxi and limousine services. In this context, travelers can choose the mode that best fits their budget and time schedule. Parking pricing strategies and a constrained parking supply are necessitated by the airport's setting within a densely developed urban neighborhood. In a lower density environment such as the Chittenden County/Burlington area, it may well be that simply restricting the growth in parking supply has the unintended consequence of encouraging additional pickup/dropofftrips. Without an accompanying strategy of increased transit or shuttle bus services, this approach can be viewed as contributing to the increase in airport -related vehicle trips. This conclusion would seem to lead the City of Burlington and BIA Authority in the direction of developing both satellite parking and shuttle bus programs to meet future parking demand. The key issues appear to be: ■ To determine what types of shuttle services can be supported in the Burlington market, and ■ To identify parking facility types (e.g. structured vs. surface, on -airport vs. off -airport) which best achieve its environmental, economic development and land use goals. WSA will combine information developed by the surveys with other data and professional judgement to evaluate the strategies listed in Section I.1. a Ibid, pg. 42. BIA Parking Alternatives 18 Wilbur Smith Associates M. COMPARISON WITH PEER GROUP AIRPORTS In order to provide CCMPO with background on a range of parking alternatives which have been utilized at comparably sized or situated airports, an inventory of parking characteristics has been conducted for 14 other airports located in the Northeast. These cover a range of enplanements - both substantially greater (2 million) and smaller (11,000) than the current 430,000 annual passengers at BIA. This inventory has been summarized in Table 7. With its new garage, BIA now has more parking spaces than all but one of the other airports with annual enplanements between 400,000 and 600,000. The relationship between annual enplanements and number of parking spaces is shown in Table 8. For most of the airports surveyed, the ratio ranges from approximately 1.5 to 4 parking spaces per 1,000 annual enplanements. At 4.01 parking spaces per 1,000 enplanements, BIA offers passengers a relatively good supply of parking. As can be seen in Table 7, BIA's parking rate structure is typical for airports of its size and setting. Due to the construction of the new garage, BIA does not face the immediate parking shortage or high level of indebtedness that has caused Portland Jetport, T.F. Green and Westchester County Airport toward the higher end of the parking fee structures. BIA does not have off -airport remote parking, and therefore has no parking shuttle service. These services are in place at two airports within the peer group, Manchester Airport and Stewart Airport in Newburgh, NY. This is clearly one future alternative for Burlington Airport as well. Unlike Syracuse's Hancock Airport and T.F. Green in the Providence, RI area, BIA does not currently offer valet parking as an option. It does, however, have a reasonably good level of service provided by the regional transit agency, CCTA, which is not always the case for airports in smaller metropolitan areas. In terms of access, all of the airports surveyed are served by taxis and rental car services. Even the smaller airports in the peer group are often served by some type of limousine service. These services are typically provided between one or more hotels located in the downtown or airport area. Only two of the peer airports have privately operated shuttle services. Bonanza Bus, an independent private bus carrier, provides hourly service between Downtown Providence and T.F. Green Airport. The charge for the 12-mile trip is $9. Bonanza also offers bus connections between the airport and a remote parking facility located at its terminal in an outlying area of Providence, as well as connections between the Boston area and T.F. Green. BIA Parking Alternatives 19 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 7 PARKING AND SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRPORTS Enplane. Parking Charges Valet Park Public Other # General # Employee # Airport 1997 Short Term Long Term Economy Park Shuttle Trans. Transportation Park S ac. Park S ac. Em to ees T.F Green Airport 2,017,782 1/2 hr $2 $15/day $10/day Yes No Bus Vans and bus Garage 750 450 1000 Providence, RI add 1/2 hr $1 $50/wk $35/wk $18/day to downtown Hour 250 $30/day max (in garage) (outside) $90/wk Taxi / Limo Valet 450 Car Rental LT 3550 Rochester Airport 1,255,255 1/2 hr. Free $7.50/day $4.50/day No Yes Bus Taxi Garage 1686 400 1200, but Rochester, NY 1st hr. $1.35 $37.50/wk free Car Rental Surface 800 not all use add hr. $0.80 Zoom No shuttle Sht Trm 400 employee $1 I/day max Lane* Shuttle 680 parking Hancock Airport 1,046,387 garage open lot Yes Yes Bus Taxi / Limo Garage 1887 830 1300 Syracuse, NY 0-1 hr $1.35 $1.10 Murbro: free Car Rental Open 841 1-1.5 hr $1.90 $1.65 $4.75 No shuttle Rental 402 1.5-2 hr $2.45 $2.15 per day VIP 46 2-3 hr $3.25 $2.70 $25.00 3-4 hr $4.05 $3.50 per wk 4-5 hr $4.85 $4.05 Budget: 5-6 hr $5.35 $4.55 $5.50 6-24 hr $5.90 $5.10 per day Albany Airport 1,035,249 1/2 hr Free 0-2 hr $2 No Yes Bus Shuttles to 1500 450 880 Albany, NY 2nd 1/2 hr $2 2-4 hr $4 free upper Albany +1500 add 1/2 hr $1 4-8 hr $5 10 min. not downtown Garage 8-24 hr $6 Taxi / Limo being built 1 wk $33 Car Rental Portland Airport 602,886 1/2 hr $1 1/2 hr $1 $5.50/day No No Bus Taxi / Limo ST 156 206 800 Portland, Maine $15/day max $7/day max $27.50/wk Car Rental LT 454+258 No shuttle EC 492 Manchester Airport 542,247 0-6 hr $1/hr $1/hr $1/hr No Yes Bus Shuttle 1/2 hr. L 1505+1025 200 N/A Manchester, NH 6+ hr $2/hr $5/day max $4/day max free toward south Econ 650 Daily: $1/hr 10 min. not downtown Hour 230 $10/day max Taxi/Limo Daily 888 Car Rental +4600 under construction Westchester Airport 526,737 $3.80/hr No No Bus Taxi / Limo 1100 N/A N/A White Plains, NY $14.60/day Rail Car Rental I (Metro N) No shuttle Table 7 PARKING AND SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRPORTS Enplane. Parking Charges Valet Park Public Other # General # Employee # Airport 1997 Short Term Long Term Economy Park Shuttle Trans. Transportation Park S ac. Park S ac. Employees Long Is. MacArthur 510,225 $0.75 / 1/2 hr No No Rail Taxi / Limo LT 1400 100 100 Airport $6.50/day max (LIRR) Car Rental ST 250 Islip, NY No shuttle Bangor Airport 493,215 $1 / 1/2 hr. 1 hr. $2 No No Bus Taxi / Limo LT 623 use LT 150 Bangor, Maine $10/day max add hr $1 Car Rental ST 180 spaces $6/day max No shuttle $30/wk Burlington Airport 424,266** 1st hr. $1 / 1/2 hr No No Bus Taxi / Lima 1700 200 350 Burlington, VT $1/hr Car Rental $6.50 / day $6.50 / day No shuttle >5 days $8.50/day >5 days $5.50/da Atlantic City Airport 422,949 No No No Prearranged 1100 use general 300 Atlantic City, NJ Free shuttles only spaces Taxi / Car Rent Stewart Airport 418,673 1/2 hr $1 $6/day No Yes No Taxi / Limo 1100 100 N/A Newburgh, NY 2 hr $2 $30/wk free Car Rental max $8/day 10 min. No shuttle Tweed Airport 65,141 $1.50/hr No No Bus No regular 600 use general N/A New Haven, CT $7/day shuttles spaces $27/wk Plattsburgh Airport 13,253 No No Bus No regular 120 75 350 Plattsburgh, NY Free shuttles 35 Rental Sikorsky Airport 10,256 1 hr $1.50 No No No No regular 400 100 300 Bridgeport, CT add hr. $1 shuttles $5/da max *ZOOM LANE - for frequent users - same cost, but quicker - like the express lanes at toll booths **Estimated 1998 enplanements = 440,000 Source: Wilbur Smith Associates, interviews with individual airport information, Fall 1998 1997 Enplanement data is from the FAA web page Table 8 PARKING PER ANNUAL ENPLANEMENTS OF AIRPORTS Airport 1997 Enplane. # Parking Spaces Park / 1000 Enplane. TY Green Airport 2,017,782 4,550 2.25 Providence, RI Rochester Airport 1,255,255 3,566 2.84 Rochester, NY Hancock Airport 1,046,387 2,774 2.65 Syracuse, NY Albany Airport 1,035,249 3,000 2.90 Albany, NY Portland Airport 602,886 1,360 2.26 Portland, Maine Manchester Airport 542,247 8,898 16.41 Manchester, NH Westchester Airport 526,737 1,100 2.09 White Plains, NY Long Is. MacArthur 510,225 1,650 3.23 Islip, NY Bangor Airport 493,215 803 1.63 Bangor, Maine Burlington Airport 424,266 1,700 4,01 Burlington, VT Atlantic City Airport 422,949 1,100 2.60 Atlantic City, NJ Stewart Airport 418,673 1,100 2.63 Newburgh, NY Tweed Airport 65,141 600 9.21 New Haven, CT Plattsburgh Airport 13,253 120 9.05 Plattsburgh, NY Sikorsky Airport 10.256-T- 400 39.00 Bridgeport, CT Source : Wilbur Smith Associates, interviews with individual airport information, Fall 1998 1997 Enplanement data is from the FAA web page BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO.2 PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES Introduction This report summarizes the situation concerning parking demand at Burlington International Airport, and discusses potential approaches to responding to the anticipated growth of demand. The purpose of this report is a preliminary review of a range of alternatives, and to recommend evaluation of the two most promising strategies in greater detail. Airport Parking Capacity The current parking supply at the airport consists of spaces in the parking structure and two surface lots. The parking structure has a total capacity of 1,150 spaces, of which 124 are allocated for rental cars, leaving a net capacity of 1,026 spaces for the public. There is a long term/overflow lot with capacity for approximately 260 vehicles. In addition, a Park and Shuttle service is operated by a private concessionaire from a 280-space lot, which can accommodate an additional 150 to 200 vehicles if valet parking stacking techniques are used. Thus, a conservative figure for the total parking capacity at the airport is about 1,700 vehicles. Airport Passenger Growth and Parking Demand Passenger traffic and growth trends at BIA have been reviewed and forecast in two recent studies. One was prepared to assess the feasibility of the recently -completed parking garage', while the other was prepared in connection with plans for the current airport renovation and expansion.' These two reports will be referred to as the SH&E and HTA Reports respectively for simplicity. Both reports forecast growth in passenger enplanements, as follows: ' Parking Garage Feasibility Study, SH&E, July 1996 ' Airport Layout Plan Update Documentation, Burlington International Airport, Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. February 1997 BIA Parking Alternatives 1 Wilbur Smith Associates v XIC[Naddv Burlington International Airport Alternative Parking Study Project Steering Committee Bob McEwing BIA Engineer Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Box 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 J.J. Hamilton Airport Manager Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Box 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jason Owen VAOT RAPT 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dan Bradley Burlington DPW P.O. Box 849 Burlington, VT 05402 Peter Keating CCMPO 100 Dorset Street Suite 22 South Burlington, VT 05403 Technical Report 2 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES STUDY Prepared for Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization �V Prepared by WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES April 1999 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION I AIRPORT PARKING CAPACITY 1 AIRPORT GROWTH AND PARKING DEMAND 1 STRATEGIES CONSIDERED 3 INSTITUTIONAL BACKGROUND 4 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 4 CHITTENDEN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 4 CAMPUS AREA TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 5 ISSUES IN SELECTING STRATEGIES 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 TABULATIONS TABLE FOLLOWS NUMBER PAGE 1 Growth in Annual Enplanements 1 2 Enplanements at BIA 2 3 Annual Variation in Enplanements BIA> 1998 2 4 Forecast of Parking Demand at BIA 2 5 Features of Airport Parking Alternatives 3 6 Recommend Action for Potential Parking Alternative Strategies 7 Table 1 Growth in Annual Enplanements Percent per Year Time Period SH&E HTA 1997-2001 4.0 4.5 2001-2006 3.2 3.2 2006-2011 3.1 3.1 2011-2016 3.0 3.0 Source: SH& E Study, July 1996; HTA Study, February 1997 These forecasts are generally consistent with each other and suggest that enplanements will rise from 1 approximately 400,000 in 1996 to more than 850,000 by the year 2016. It is noted that BIA staff expressed the view at a project steering committee meeting that they expect demand to increase more slowly, at approximately two percent per year. WSA has reviewed recent trends in enplanements at BIA, summarized in Table 2. There were approximately 440,000 enplanements in calendar year 1998, a 4 percent increase over the 1997 level. The level of enplanements in 1997 was about the same as in 1995, while there was a drop in enplanements in 1996. The average annual increase in enplanements was about 3 percent from 1996 to 1998, while the average annual increase from 1995 to 1998 was only 1.6 percent. In addition, demand is not uniform throughout the year. 1998 enplanements are summarized by month in Table 3. Demand was at a low point in January, at only 85 percent of the average, while the month of August was a peak with 20 percent above average levels. The four month period from July to October is the busiest, collectively representing 37 percent of yearly volume. Demand for parking at airports depends on several factors: • Passenger trip purpose; • Modes of ground travel; • Percentage of dropoffs; • Duration of stay; • Parking charges at alternative facilities; and, • Number of non -passenger visitor trips. The SH&E report also forecast parking demand to rise from about 1,350 spaces daily in 1996 to approximately 2,675 by 2016, or an increase of about 3.5 percent per year. At this rate, daily parking demand at the airport would exceed capacity on a consistent basis by 2003/4. This trend is summarized in Table 4. It should be noted that these are general averages, and do not account for peaking by season or time of day. Thus, it is likely that parking capacity could be exceeded during BIA Parking Alternatives 2 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 2 Enplanements at BIA Annual Increase from Cumulative Annual Year Enplanements Previous Year Annual Increase Increase 1996-1998 1995 421,235 -- -- -- 1996 414,688 -1.55% -1.55% -- 1997 424,266 2.31 % 0.36% -- 1998 441,574 4.08% 1.58% 3.19% Sources: 1995, 1996 From SH&E Study, April 1997; 1997, FAA Website; 1998 BIA, February 1999 Table 3 Annual Variation in Enplanements BIA, 1998 Month Enplanements Percent of Average January 30,992 84.2% February 35,191 95.6% March 36,523 99.3% April 36,162 98.3 % May 33,751 91.2% June 36,202 98.4% July 39,950 108.6% August 44,423 120.7% September 37,011 100.6% October 42,411 115.3 % November 33,369 90.7% December 35,769 97.2% Total 441,574 Average 36,798 Source: BIA, February 1999 Table 4 Forecast of Parking Demand at BIA Year Parking Demand Parking Surplus (Deficit) 1996 1,350 350 1997 1,397 303 1998 1,446 254 1999 1496 204 2000 1,548 152 2001 1,602 98 2002 1,657 43 2003 1,715 (15) 2004 1,775 (75) 2005 1,836 (136) 2006 1,900 (200) 2007 1,966 (266) 2008 2,035 (335) 2009 2,106 (406) 2010 2,179 (479) 2011 2,255 (555) 2012 2,333 (633) 2013 2,414 (714) 2014 2,498 (798) 2015 2,585 (885) 2016 2,675 (975) Source: Parking Garage Feasibility Study SH & E, 1996 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OFFICES WEDNESDAY, APRIL 14, 1999 AGENDA Welcome and Introduction - Peter Keating, CCMPO PRESENTATION BY CONSULTANTS 2. Parking Capacity and Forecast Demand 3. Parking Surveys - Passengers and Employees 4. Comparison of Peer Group Airports 5. Alternative Parking Strategies 6. Advantages and Disadvantages 7. Recommendations for Further Study 8. Next Steps - Peter Keating, CCMPO times of peak demand prior to 2003. In any event, the problem can be considered short-term, and efforts to address it will be timely. If demand rises as forecast, decisions must be made to provide more parking or to implement strategies to reduce the demand for parking. These strategies may delay the time when additional parking is required, but are unlikely to eliminate the need for it altogether. Strategies Considered Strategies to influence demand for parking at the airport fall into three general categories: 1. Strategies to reduce demand for parking by increasing the cost -"demand management"; 2. Strategies to reduce demand by changing the mode of arrival at the airport, from driving alone to public transportation, shuttle services, car pooling, etc. 3. Provision of parking in other locations. This approach requires a reliable way to get people from the remote locations to the airport. Strategies can be implemented alone or in combinations. For example, demand management is unlikely to be effective as a solitary measure, without additional complementary strategies. Each type of strategy could involve a variety of institutions, from the Airport acting alone to cooperation with any of several public or private entities. Provision of transport services to the airport can occur in a variety of ways, and remote parking can be developed in any of numerous locations. Strategies considered as potential responses to this situation include: • No Action (as a point of reference); • Parking Demand Management; • Improved CCTA Service to the Airport; • Shuttle Service without Satellite Parking; • Shared Parking; • Use of Park -and -Ride Lots for Airport Parking; • Development of Additional Parking at the Airport; • Construction of Off -Airport Satellite Parking Lot by BIA; and, • Public -Private Partnerships to Develop Off -site Parking. These strategies are summarized in matrix form in Table 5. The table includes the major elements of each strategy, likely advantages and disadvantages, and implementation steps for each approach. There are a range of capital and operating cost implications, as well as institutional factors to consider. IBIA Parking Alternatives 3 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 5 FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps No Action No additional No additional capital cost to Parking supply may be None. construction of on- airport. inadequate for peak use periods airport or off -airport within three to five years, based parking. Parking revenue increases on current trends. with airport use until Parking rates remain the capacity is reached. May reduce attractiveness of BIA same. as a travel choice for air May encourage private passengers. No new transit or sector investment in off - shuttle services. airport parking and courtesy May weaken regional job shuttles, as parking capacity creation/economic development is reached. efforts. No opportunity for joint use parking or airport -related development. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Parking Demand Variable parking rate Maximized parking May decrease attractiveness of Adoption of Management structure implemented revenues increase airport BIA for discretionary travel. revenue -oriented to encourage short term income. parking policy by • No Additional parking on -airport and May weaken regional job BIA Authority. Parking to maximize revenue. Surplus airport revenues creation/economic development Construction may support related efforts. Incremental economic development review and • Parking Rate initiatives, through May increase airport -related auto adjustments to Structure Used subsidized infrastructure travel and vehicle miles traveled parking rate to Moderate and/or site acquisition. (VMT) due to greater share of structure to Parking Demand drop-off trips. maximize Greater encouragement to revenue. private sector investment in May increase violation off -airport parking or rates/unauthorized parking at Effective shuttles vs. No Action. other airport parking locations enforcement of (i.e. FAA/NWS Employee parking Parking) regulations at airport employee parking locations. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Improved CCTA BIA funds CCTA to Moderate incentive for Prior CCTA airport service Adoption of fare Service to the Airport provide fare -free transit access to the airport. initiatives did not attract subsidy policy by service for airport significant increase in transit BIA Authority. travelers. No additional capital cost to utilization. airport. CCTA establishes - or - Existing service characteristics auditing Parking revenue increases (speed, frequency, vehicle type, mechanism to BIA funds CCTA to with airport use. and location of routes) do not identify and provide additional offer a great incentive to attract account for BIA service to the airport. May encourage private new transit customers. travelers. sector investment in off - No additional airport parking and courtesy CCTA bills BIA construction of on- shuttles, as parking capacity for airport trips. airport or off -airport is reached. parking. Parking rates remain the same. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Shuttle Service Airport -funded shuttle Addresses some future Narrow target market for service. Adoption of without Satellite service to downtown parking capacity issues. Shuttle Service Parking Burlington or other Cost to BIA Authority for shuttle Policy by BIA concentrated Offers a new access mode operation will likely be greater Authority. or development locations. for BIA travelers. than revenue from passenger fares. Planning and Shared Ride Taxi Opportunity for private design of shuttle Program. sector contract operation/ Limited reduction in parking service. participation in shuttle demand. service. Contract for Discourages/competes with taxi operation of May encourage private travel to the airport. shuttle service. sector investment in off - airport parking and courtesy Competes with existing transit Signage/infor- shuttles, as parking capacity services to the airport. mation campaign is reached. announcing shuttle service. May reduce airport travel cost versus existing taxi services. May reduce drop-off trips and taxi trips. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Shared Parking Joint funding and Reduced capital cost to BIA Requires agreement on location, Adoption of Joint construction of an off- for development of cost allocation, ownership, and Parking Strategy airport parking facility, additional parking. maintenance responsibility by BIA shared by multiple among multiple institutions. Authority. users, such as BIA, Reduced environmental UVM and the Medical impact overall vs. multiple Selected site may not be optimal Negotiation with Center, or use of a parking facilities for for BIA or other individual other institutions facility that already separate use. institutions. to create joint exists. parking Increases utilization and More significant traffic and organizational Provision of Shuttle revenue potential of parking environmental impacts at selected structure. Services to airport. due to multiple users. site due to facility size. Site selection May allow sharing of shuttle Capacity may not be sufficient to process. operational costs. handle combined peak demand. Environmental Validation and/or permitting Parking policies may vary among review and design may be used to modify fee participating organizations. of selected site. structure depending on individual participants Discourages private sector Construction of needs. investment in off -site parking. joint use parking facility. May reduce drop-off trips. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Use of Park -and -Ride Scheduled shuttle Addresses peak period Limited parking available at existing Adoption of Lots for Airport service established to parking capacity. park -and -ride lots. Potential park -and -Ride Parking selected State park -and- competition with existing park -and- Policy by BIA ride lots during peak Provides authorized free ride lot users. Authority. airport use periods. parking alternative for No security or other on -site amenities airport access. available at park -and -ride lots. Negotiation with Public information to AOT to permit advertise shuttle Low capital cost to BIA. No revenue to BIA Authority from airport parking service. parking. and shuttle Limited environmental service to park- Signage at park -and- impact. Cost to BIA Authority for shuttle and -ride lots. ride lots offering airport operation will likely be greater than access. May encourage private revenue from shuttle passenger fares. Planning and sector investment in off- May result in additional design of shuttle airport parking and courtesy unauthorized parking on -airport. service. shuttles, as parking capacity is reached. Contract for operation of shuttle service. Signage/infor- mation campaign announcing shuttle service. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Development of Short term addition of Maximum convenience Capital cost to airport. Financial feasibility Additional Parking at surface space. for air travelers. study. the Airport Growth of road traffic to Long term construction Allows BIA to maintain the airport. Arrange financing. of new parking structure. adequate parking levels. May discourage transit Planning and Parking revenue increases use to airport. environmental approvals with airport use. and permits. May encourage more Allows integrated single occupant Design and construction. management of parking automobile traffic and services and charges. congestion. Institutional simplicity. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Construction of Development of long Allows BIA to maintain Strongly discourages private Adoption of Off - Off -Airport Satellite term parking facility adequate parking and sector investment in off -site Airport parking Parking Lot by with shuttle service to moderate pricing levels. parking. policy by BIA BIA Authority airport within the next Authority. five years. Does not require May discourage transit use to construction of a parking airport. Site selection structure. process. May result in environmental Avoids greater impacts at parking site. Environmental concentration of airport review and design traffic. Investment in secure facilities for selected site. will be required. Offers greater range of Construction of parking choices. Revenue from shuttle service is parking facility. unlikely to cover operating costs. May reduce drop-off travel. Creates opportunity for transit center or joint development at off -airport site. Allows complete public control of BIA parking. location and size. Table 5 (continued) FEATURES OF AIRPORT PARKING ALTERNATIVES Strategy Elements Advantages Disadvantages Implementation Steps Public -Private BIA Authority creates a Offers greater opportunity to May bring additional liability and Adoption of Partnership to Develop development respond to parking capacity financial risk to the BIA Development Off -Site Parking management group constraints. Authority. Partnership (either in-house or Policy by BIA through a separate BIA retains control over May discourage transit use to Authority. subsidiary entity) airport parking. airport. charged with creating Creation of for -profit parking and May increase airport May result in environmental development development revenue sources. impacts at parking and entity. partnerships. development sites. Encourages off -site airport- Funding of Provision of Shuttle related economic May require legislative enabling development Service to Airport. development and joint use procedure. start-up costs. of parking. Site selection Reduced capital cost and process. risk to BIA Authority due to private sector participation. Environmental review and design for selected site. Construction of parking facility or other development. Institutional Background This section reviews and summarizes the background in which this evaluation is taking place. Several institutions are exercising responsibilities for transport services in the area, and planning studies are underway which may affect the implement ability or practicability of potential strategies. The major agencies and activities include: Vermont Agency of Transportation As the statewide transportation agency, VAOT exercises major responsibilities for infrastructure projects and is responsible for the statewide road network. VAOT maintains numerous park and ride lots for travelers around the state. CCMPO has prepared a study' prioritizing sites for development of new park and ride lots. This study initially recommended development of three new sites, none of which are near the airport. A location in Taft's Corner near Exit 12 of Interstate Route I-89 has also been recommended for implementation after questions about the site were resolved. This location is approximately 3.5 miles from the airport. Chittenden County Transportation Authority CCTA provides public transportation services within its service area - the communities of Burlington, South Burlington, Essex, Winooski and Shelburne. The services include fixed -route transit service and ridesharing services. The current timetable contains nine routes, of which one (University Mall/Airport) provides service from downtown Burlington to the airport with 30 minute headways from 6:30 am to 6:30 pm Mondays through Saturdays, with additional hourly service until 10:00 pm. on weekdays. The route is somewhat circuitous, as the bus makes stops at University Mall, Dorset Square Mall, South Burlington Middle School and High School before proceeding to the airport. The airport passenger surveys revealed that only about one percent of airport passengers arrive at the airport by bus. Service on the University Mall airport route was subsidized by the Burlington Airport Commission during the period from July 1990 to June 1991, and was free to riders during this time. Ridership on the route accordingly increased by approximately 75 percent while the subsidy was in force, but declined to previous levels within two years when the subsidy was discontinued. CCTA and CCMPO have been studying concepts for improving public transportation over the past year, assisted by consultants. A recent draft report' has summarized the potential redesign of the transit system and potential alternative funding mechanisms for transit. The study proposed a service concept for CCTA that would consist of the following types of services: s Chittenden Country Park and Ride Lots Prioritization, Interim Report, CCMPO, February 1999 ' Operational Analysis, Systems Plan, and Studying Alternatives for the Chittenden Country Transportation Authority, Draft Summary Report, prepared by KFH Group for CCMPO, February 1999 BIA Parking Alternatives 4 Wilbur Smith Associates • Regional Commuter Services; • Regional Trunk Lines or Line Haul Services; I Community Connectors; and, • Demand -Responsive Services. A trunk route is recommended for the corridor along Williston Road (Route 2), which passes the airport, and it is noted that service to the airport could be provided with a community connector type of service, or by possible modification of the trunk route itself. It is possible that a more direct route would attract additional passengers to the airport. Even so, most passengers would not have a door- to-door trip and special vehicles would be required to accommodate luggage. Campus Area Transportation Management Association CATMA is a Transportation Management Association (TMA) as defined in Federal legislation established by several academic and medical facilities,' and serves to jointly plan, manage, and share transportation and parking resources. It has developed Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs. It currently coordinates services provided by 15 shuttle vehicles which interface with CCTA services at key locations. CATMA also oversees several parking lots on the grounds of these institutions, and is looking for opportunities to develop more parking. A substantial need for parking spaces is anticipated to compensate for spaces lost due to pending construction of new facilities on the grounds of the Fletcher Allen Health Center. Issues In Selecting Strategies In selecting preferred strategies to evaluate in further detail, several factors should be taken into consideration: The pattern of demand. Although parking capacity at the airport may be exceeded by 2003 or sooner, the additional demand is expected to be relatively small at first and grow over time. A strategy must be flexible to accommodate demand as it increases. Costs. The alternatives have different levels of capital and operating costs. It may be an acceptable strategy to sustain an interim service with high operating costs in order to delay a capital investment. Institutional factors. Strategies require human resources as well as capital to implement. The airport has a limited staff, and organizations such as CATMA and VAOT have established institutional capabilities which may be helpful to deal with this problem. ' Champlin College, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Trinity College, the University of Vermont, and the American Red Cross. BIA Parking Alternatives 5 Wilbur Smith Associates Effectiveness. It is noted that subsidies of public transport service to the airport by CCTA was implemented previously and passenger levels declined when the subsidy was discontinued. Recommendations The alternatives in Table 5 have been sorted into three categories: Those for which no further study is recommended; Those for which further evaluation is recommended; and, Those for which further evaluation might be considered under some circumstances. Strategies in the first category are, in our view, unlikely to be effective in addressing parking demand. Strategies in the second category appear to have clear potential in that they deal with the problem comprehensively and can occur without major changes to existing institutions. Strategies in the third category also have some potential, but may be affected by ongoing developments. The extent to which these strategies will be considered will be determined in part by the progress of current activities and studies, public opinion and the concerns of the Stakeholders. Strategies for which further evaluation is recommended include development of additional parking by the airport authority acting independently, whether on site at the airport or off -site, and shared parking. BIA as an institution has the technical and administrative capability to develop such a lot and the financial ability to support it. This approach has the advantages of simplicity, without requiring extensive institutional coordination, and the ability to size and time development to meet demand. The tradeoff between on -site and off -site locations would be considered in terms of capital and operating costs and traffic volumes near the airport. The concept of shared parking would allow BIA to work with other institutions to develop parking or share in facilities which may be in process of development. A significant advantage to this approach is likely to be cost savings due to sharing of expenses. Strategies for potential consideration are use of park and ride lots, improved CCTA service to the airport, and development of a private -public partnership to develop parking capacity. It is possible that these strategies could be effective, although prospects are more indirect or conditional than for the previous group. For example, use of park and ride lots would require a commitment for such a lot in reasonable proximity to the airport. The lot at Taft's Corner is approximately 3.5 miles from the airport. Development of a public -private partnership would require a change in the BIA organization and possibly additional staff, and may also require legislative approvals of the new institutional arrangements. Improved CCTA service to the airport would require a more direct route and luggage -friendly vehicles. Alternatives for which no further consideration is recommended include no action, parking demand management, and shuttle service without satellite parking. Parking demand management is unlikely to be successful as an isolated strategy because the cost of parking is a relatively small portion of the BIA Parking Alternatives 6 Wilbur Smith Associates total cost of an air trip from BIA. Increased charges may encourage more drop-off traffic. Shuttle services without a specific designated parking location are not recommended for several reasons. I The airport passenger surveys did not identify strong concentrations of demand which shuttle services could serve. Such services are unlikely to be financially self-sustaining and would compete with existing taxi and transit services to the airport. These recommendations are shown in Table 6, and can be summarized as indicating a clear need to investigate development of both on -site and remote parking for the airport. The issues to focus on in the next stage are: • Location and size; • Shuttle service to the airport; and, • Institutional arrangements. If this perspective is shared by the Steering Committee and consistent with the views of the public, the next stage of the study would include a general evaluation of capital and operating costs, traffic considerations, institutional factors, environmental considerations and more specific implementation steps for the designated alternatives. BIA Parking Alternatives 7 Wilbur Smith Associates Table 6 Burlington International Airport Recommended Action for Potential Parking Alternative Strategies No Further Consideration Potential Consideration Strong Consideration • No Action Public - Private Partnership for 0 Shared Parking Off -Site Parking • Parking Demand Management 0 Construction of Off -Airport Satellite • Use of Park and Ride Lots for Parking Lot By BIA • Shuttle Service without Satellite Airport Parking Parking 0 Additional Parking at the Airport • Improved CCTA Service to the Airport WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS • ECONOMISTS . PLANNERS 135 COLLEGE STREET • P.O. BOX 9412 • NEW HAVEN, CT 06534-0412 • (203) 865-2191 . FAX (203) 624-0484 April 13, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed please find a copy of Technical Report No. 2 for the Burlington International Airport Parking Alternatives Study. This report has been revised and additional information included in response to comments from the Steering Committee. The Report is now final and transmitted for your retention and use. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES John M. Wilson Project Manager JMW/adj Enclosure cc: Mr. Peter Keating ACCRA, GHANA • ALBANY, NY • ANAHEIM, CA • ATLANTA, GA • BALTIMORE, MD •BANGKOK, THAILAND • CARACAS, VENEZUELA•CHARLESTON, SC COLUMBIA, SC • COLUMBUS, OH • DES MOINES, IA • FALLS CHURCH, VA • HONG KONG • HOUSTON, TX • KUWAIT • KNOXVILLE, TN LEXINGTON, KY • LONDON, ENGLAND • MILWAUKEE, WI • NEW HAVEN, CT • ORLANDO, FL • PITTSBURGH, PA • RALEIGH, NC RICHMOND, VA • ROSELLE, IL • SAN FRANCISCO, CA • SAN JOSE, CA • TALLAHASSEE, FL • TAMPA, FL • TORONTO, CANADA • WASHINGTON, DC EMPLOYEE -OWNED COMPANY Burlington International Airport Alternative Parking Study Project Steering Committee Bob McEwing BIA Engineer Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Box 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 J.J. Hamilton Airport Manager Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Box 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jason Owen VAOT RAPT 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 Joe Weith City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dan Bradley Burlington DPW P.O. Box 849 Burlington, VT 05402 Peter Keating CCMPO 100 Dorset Street Suite 22 South Burlington, VT 05403 V •f PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council 4)— FROM: William Burgess, Chairman, Planning Commission RE: Traffic Safety and Bus Service DATE: February 25, 1997 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 A couple of issues were raised at recent Planning Commission meetings which the Commission feels warrant attention from the City Council. One issue refers to traffic safety along Airport Drive. The other involves bus service along Dorset Street. Airport Drive: During the hearings for the proposed BIA terminal expansion and parking garage, a number of neighborhood residents expressed concern regarding traffic safety conditions along Airport Drive. One request made by the residents was for the installation of stop signs at the intersection of Airport Drive/White Street. Apparently, traffic speeds through the intersection, often cutting corners thereby creating a dangerous traffic situation. While the Commission felt the installation of such signs was beyond the responsibility of the applicant, we do feel the situation warrants some attention by the City. Another issue raised by the residents was a concern over the problem of on -street parking blocking the clear view of cars exiting the airport property. They feel it is necessary for the City to establish "no -parking" zones in the vicinity of all proposed access roads for the airport. The Commission was in general agreement with this concern and therefore we are recommending that the Council look into this issue. Bus Service - Dorset Street: During the hearings for the Pines Housing expansion and proposal for an extended stay hotel, there was considerable discussion regarding the installation of a covered bus shelter in the vicinity of the development. The Commission feels it would be a good idea to provide a shelter considering the development consists of uses that could potentially generate bus use (i . e . , elderly housing, hotel, and office building) . The Commission, developer, and CCTA are in agreement that the best location for the shelter would be on the south side of Aspen Drive close to the Pines. This, however, would require a southbound bus to turn right onto Sherry Road, turn left onto Aspen Drive, turn left toward Dorset Street and then turn right onto Dorset Street to continue its route to the airport. That would add an additional 800 feet and four turns to the airport route. While the above service may add to the City's cost for CCTA service, the Commission feels it is justified. The 800 foot loop would enhance service to the elderly housing project, provide convenient service to a hotel, and support the Comprehensive Plan's goal to "encourage greater use of mass transit". (cc2-25) C PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 7, 1997 J.J. Hamilton Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont,- 05403 Re: Terminal Building Addition & Parking Structure Dear Mr. Hamilton: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting, my comments to the Planning Commission and revised comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 11, 1997, at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please JW/mcp Encls cc: John Leinwohl Jesse Beck give me a call. i ce9,1"r , /X Jo Weith, Cit Planner I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 18, 1997 Irene Roberge Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Sewer Allocation, Airport Expansion Dear Ms. Roberge: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on February 11, 1997 approved a sewer allocation of 1500 gpd for a proposed terminal expansion and parking structure on property owned by the City of Burlington. This property is served by the Airport Parkway Wastewater Treatment Facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' cerel , s r e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp cc: John Leinwohl n/LC 4 , - , 7 Owl;jz'u-'/� �u 1 C/" vNo ♦ — .J44. / i 8+ INV 322.63 o r� 3oftlu Mp ry 31.53' 1 "I � �3.9' 0"INV.=,6�Xoo STING HYDRA �\ E 0 BE REMOVED 0, (ITEM 629.30) YD' 1 00 H (XASS 35p PIPE 704+00 4 629.28) NEW 8»x8 Wx , DIMJ 6+00 TEE TYPICAL THREE O 3 LOCTONS J (2) LOCATIONS S rCiE GR ; ; ; V 5 FOR TYPICAL PVC TARY SEWER TRENCH \IL AND t FOR SANITARY 'p PRnrn UTILITY MHO ANT iVED .30) 0NC • A� TG�;INV 'S3 6 12 629.28i E 1i,�pRAN�GA�V/►�� NEW NEW 6" Do J t, A 62g.2�i ZN %4 Eo pEZA��S• SEE W F`RE H�Rp,N� � l.�AI OF FRB N YO• 60 NEW CHAIN -LINK FENCE 8�� 0 SER CEROAD_33 0 12,'IN v 14v3 `325.6 o p1PE I 0 I 0 I 0 CIE 0 l 0 I 0 0 I 0 i } ,r 2/11/97 MOTION OF APPROVAL CITY OF BURLINGTON I move the So th Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan applicat on of the City of Burlington to: 1) construct a 13,240 squar foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport term nal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1.M vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas, 1200 Airport Drive, as depicted on a 25 page set of plans, page two (2) entitled, "Burlington International Airport South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Webster -Martin, Inc., dated 1/29/97, last revised 2/3/97, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed terminal expansion and parking structure will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 1500 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. or �.,� s., �r or o, 4. The applicant shall post a $129,0 0 landscape bond -prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to indicate that �theb'long term lot access road Is for 2 _w traffic. b) The site plan shall be revised to relocate the parking structure so it meets the additional front setback required under Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations. c) The site plan shall be revised to provide details of the street improvements required in condition #9. d) The site plan shall be revised to show the exact footprint of the new parking structure including the stairway towers. 1 e) The plans shall be r vised to correctly show the elevations of the proposed �f,*t high parking structure. f) The site plan shall be revised to incorporate the hydrant locations requested by the Fire Department in their memo dated 2/7/97. g) The site plan shall be revised to note the clearance height under the skyway bridge (minimum required is 12 feet). h) The site plan shall be revised to show the r.o.w. for White Street Extension. i) The site plan shall be revised to indicate the slope of the ramp within the garage which shall not exceed 15%. 6. Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission allows the proposed parking structure to exceed the thirty five (35) foot height limitation by (�G�11 The Commission has determined that the taller structure. a) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; b) will not detract from the important scenic views from the adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way; and c) will meet the additional setbacks required by Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations. The design of the parking structure shall be in accordance with the elevations depicted on Sheets A1.4 and A1.5. Any significant change to these elevation drawings shall require Planning Commission approval. 7. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. B. The berming and landscaping along the long term parking area shall be installed prior to use of this area as an interior parking lot during construction of the garage. If this is not possible, some sort of screening (i.e., fence) shall be installed on an interim basis. The type and location of screening shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for the following street improvements: a) A northbound right -turn lane at the Airport entrance. b) A southbound left -turn lane at the Airport entrance. 2 c) A`6toe thbo d�eft- la tla t A ve/ 'r o_"pad se ion. These improvements shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the parking structure. 10. Pr' to is nce of a zoning permit, the applicant shall submit or approv, the C' Attorn and rec 'ng in the land ecor , e egal do ment ( .e., irr oca le er/�f_ edi tion, anty d etc), a se n ) foo ip %land a g Airport Drive for future widening. `C A f. The applicant shall submit a third floor plan for the parking structure prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The drainage pipe under the proposed parking structure shall l( be relocated outside of the structure if possible. If not, the corrugated metal pipe should be replaced with plastic or ductile iron pipe. A'3. The existing 12 inch C.M.P. under White Street Extension shall (� be checked for adequacy to carry the increased storm water runoff. The results of this investigation shall be provided to the City Engineer. If a larger pipe is needed, it shall be installed prior to occupancy of the parking structure. ( /1-4-. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. -r5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the terminal addition and parking structure. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the r� South Burlington Planning Commission. 3 Preliminary Comments - Planning February 11, 1997 agenda January 28, 1997 Page 2 --- show the CD3 boundary line on lot #2 as recently approved by the ZBA. --- a portion of building "4d" extends beyond the allowable building envelope. A recently adopted zoning amendment which takes effect on 2/3/97 allows the Planning Commission to approve this extension provided the building contains a minimum of two (2) stories and the overall site design of the property is found to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Central District. --- the subdivision plat should be revised to note that the portion of the public street labeled "Sherry Road Extension" is "Aspen Drive". --- the applicant should consider shifting the location of Building A so that the long side of the building fronts Dorset Street rather than Aspen Drive. UNO RESTAURANT CORPORATION - RESTAURANT ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- plan submitted is acceptable. CITY OF BURLINGTON - PARKING GARAGE & TERMINAL EXPANSION - SITE PLAN --- the site plan should show the r.o.w. for White Street Extension and Airport Drive. --- a total of 17 handicapped spaces are required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations, these spaces should be shown on the site plan, --- the elevator/stairway towers for the parking structure scales to be 37'- 38' feet in height. The maximum height allowed under Section 25.113(a) is 35 feet. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non-residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations "provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way." Preliminary Comments - Planning February 11, 1997 agenda January 28, 1997 Page 3 In addition to the above criteria, Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires that for each foot of additional height above the normal 35 foot maximum, all front and rear setbacks shall be increased by one (1) foot. The site plan should be revised to show the additional setback (i.e., 93 feet from centerline of Airport Drive). --- does the City of Burlington currently own the Park & Travel property? If not, the owner should become a co -applicant to this application. --- provide list of new lighting fixtures including quantity, type and wattage. --- provide bike racks as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- the point by point lighting plan should indicate the average illumination at ground level. The maximum allowed is an average of three (3) foot candles. --- show screened dumpster locations and note type of screening proposed. --- provide gross floor area of terminal building, existing and proposed. --- planting plan uses symbol "AR" for trees along main access road, yet there is no "AR" symbol in plant list. --- the proposed crosswalks on Airport Drive should be connected to the existing sidewalks. --- provide front yard coverage information along Airport Drive. --- how are vehicles expected to access overflow parking area from Airport Drive? 3 gLP'ya�i FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC �J���Q� MEMORANDUM BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PROJECT NO. A9642 DATE: February 3, 1997 TO: Jon Leinwohl FROM: Jesse Beck RE: South Burlington Planning Department - Preliminary Comments Handicapped Parking Spaces City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations 26.253 (a) calls for HCP spaces to be 8'-0" wide with an adjacent 5'-0" wide access aisle. Table 26-1 requires 10 HCP spaces for 1,001 total spaces plus one space for each 100 over 1,000. 1,550 total spaces are planned which calculates to 10 + 6 added spaces for an A R C H I T E C T U R E overall total of 16 HCP spaces. One in every eight HCP parking space must be " van -accessible, which requires an 8'-0" wide access aisle. With 16 total HCP spaces 2 van -accessible spaces are required. P L A N N I N G ■ The plans will show 10 HCP parking spaces placed in the open parking structure INTERIORS with the remaining 6 HCP spaces located in the surface lots. Of those 6, 2 can be located in the FAA lot, 2 in the employee lot, and 2 in the Park and Travel lot. " The 2 van -accessible spaces will be located on the first level of the open parking structure. Maximum Height of Structure FFF is working with the maximum height allowed under Section 25.113 (a) at 35'. We comply in all areas except the elevator tower. Stair towers have been reduced in height to comply with the regulation. The heights for the open parking structure system are as follows: 1. Overall massing height and top edge of precast guardrail - 26'-8". 2. Top of stair towers - 33'-6". 3. Top of elevator tower required by elev. overrun and codes - 38'-0". We request that the planning commission consider the parking facility setback as being greater than the 90 feet required. Currently we have positioned the facility to have a 90 foot setback at the southwest corner and we have increased it to a 115 foot setback at the northwest corner. This yields an average setback of 102.5 feet, 12.5 feet over the 90 foot requirement. 81 MAPLE STREET, PO BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0306 TEL 802/864-6844 FAX 802/860-1815 In addition we will be berming the 90 to 115 foot setback to 4 to 5 feet in height from Airport Drive. Bike Racks Bike racks required under Zoning Regulations Section 26.253 (b) are located near the southwest corner of the terminal as indicated on the attached site plan. Terminal Gross Floor Area The existing gross floor area for the Terminal facility is 72,625 GSF. The proposed Terminal gross floor area is 85,865 GSF. cc: Bob McEwing Steve Mosman Chris Dunn i ■ s FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. C City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 31, 1997 J.J. Hamilton Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Terminal Building Addition & Parking Structure Dear Mr. Hamilton: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are comments on the above referenced project from the Fire Department. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Ray\m6nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Jesse Beck John Leinwohl M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Review for February 11, 1997 Date: January 31, 1997 1. Allenwood Phase II Dated 12/2/96 16 Harbor View Road Acceptable 2. Pizzeria Uno Dated 1/16/97 1330 Shelburne Road Project #7226 Acceptable 3. P.S.H., Inc. Dated 1/9/97 Pines Housing Phase 4 Acceptable 4. Farrell Distributing, Inc. Dated 1/15/97 5 Holmes Road Acceptable 5. Aviatron Dated 1/14/97 Army Guard Road The Fire Department's concern is that access be maintained to the existing building and to the addition. 6. Burlington International Airport Dated 1/20/97 Airport Drive Maintain existing hydrants at FAA plus add two on east side of building. Add two hydrants in grass area per plan. Add two hydrants in front of terminal building, relocate one hydrant east of delivery access road. J Memorandum - Fire Department February 11, 1997 agenda items January 31, 1997 Page 2 Sprinkler and stand pipe system for parking garage, add hydrant at entrance road for pumper connection to sprinkler system. Provide 4 inch starts connection for garage sprinkler system. Provide stand pipe fire department connections on three levels no more than 300 feet apart. Valves to be 212 inch standard F.D. connection with a 11" iron pipe reducer and cap provided. Provide looped water system throughout. Wherever possible maintain existing hydrants. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 28, 1997 J.J. Hamilton Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Terminal Building Addition & Parking Structure Dear Mr. Hamilton: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Comments from the Fire Department will be forwarded once they are available. Please respond to these comments with revised plans and/or additional information, if appropriate, no later than Monday, February 3, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer�gly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: John Leinwohl Jesse Beck uTr - `1 State of Vermont SUBDIVISION PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: EC-4-2037-1 Environmental Protection Rules PIN: EJ96-0386 Effective August 8, 1996 Applicant: City of Burlington Address: Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of revising the lot lines for the leased lot previously approved in Subdivision Permit EC-4-2037 so that the lot becomes 0.77 acres in size located off Army Guard Road in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This Permit does not constitute Act 250 approval under Case Number 4C0331. 1. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Job 96442AV "Land to be Leased to Aviatron, Inc." dated 12-20-96 revised 12-31-96 prepared by Little River Survey Company and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 2. All conditions set forth in Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2037 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 3. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Subdivision Permit EC-4-2037-1 Page 2 4. Each prospective purchaser of the'lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 24th day of January, 1997. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Act 250 Coordinator -Louis Borie Little River Survey Company Webster -Martin, Inc. State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Coasuwatioa" Department of Fish and Wildlife Wastewater MainaxementDM666 Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation EIssexJnect Fesielad ORioe+ Department of Environmental Conservation I11� W!li.Stll� , State Geologist Essex Junclion,VTQSM, W2) 879-650 : January 24,1997 '>._ City of Burlington :.r'.r,;r .<' " • .. - sa Burlington International Airp. ° E 1200 Airport Dr, # 1 -South Burlington VT 05403 Subject: EC-4-2037-1, Aviatron --Revise lot lines prev. approved com leased lot .77A located on Army Guard Roadm South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: We have received your application and fee paid by check #EXEMPT on January 17, 1997, which begins the 30 day- in-house performance standards for our review. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have .not received a' decision on your application within the 30 in-house days, please contact this office at (802) 879-6563. We have forwarded your application to the Information Specialist, who will send you a Project Review- Sheet indicating other state departments you should contact about additional permits you may need. If you have not already done so, you should also check «zth town officials about any necessary to«M permits. Sincerely, Irene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary c City of South Burlington Planning Commission Webster -Martin, Inc. l State of Vermont SUBDIVISION PERMIT LAWSIREGULATIONS INT'VOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 8, 1996 Case Number: EC-4-203 7 PIN: EJ96-0386 Landowner: City of Burlington Address: Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, 91 South Burlington, VT 05407 This project, consisting of creating lease lines for a 0.78 acre lot for the Aviatron building previouslN- approved in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0992, served by municpal water and sewer services, located off Army Guard Road in the town of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This permit does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C0331. GENERAL This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry -phone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 658-2199 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Job 96442 Sheets Sheet 1 of 1 "Land to be Leased to Aviatron, Inc." dated 12-20-96 prepared by Little River Survey Company The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval froili the Wastewater Management Division Each prospective purchaser of the lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The perillittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" ill the toxvil of Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of an\ - lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Subdivision Permit EC-4-2037 City of Burlington Page 2 5. All conditions set forth in Permit 4NA W-4-0999 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. WATER SUPPLY 6. The project is approved for water supple by connection to the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed x ithout prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division SEWAGE DISPOSAL 7. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal sewer system No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed v lihout prior review and approva' by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable la%vs and regulations Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on January 13, 1997 Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By , Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Selectboard Little River Survey Company Act 250 coordinator -Louis Borie I ( *11)16;' 6' SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). -`/ Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. -� Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. -=� Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. - Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). --- Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --= Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. �r --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). --- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone -� Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standards --- Airport Approach cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement --- Setback from planned r.o.w. --- If boundary line adjustment, need subdivision? --- Nonresidential use setback from Residential District 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #): City of Burlington,1200 Airport Drive #1. South Burlington, VT 05403; 802-863-2874 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #): Same 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #): J.J. Hamilton, Director of Aviation (same address and phone) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable): NA 6) PROPOSED USE(S): Terminal Building Addition and new Parking Structure. 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor): Terminal Building Addition: Parking Structure: Total Addition Area=12,900 sf Total Building Area=353,100 sf Maximum Height = 35'-0" Maximum Height = 36'-8" Number of floors = 2 Number of Floors = 3 Parking Spaces =1108 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: No additional Airport employees will be associated with the roiect. 9) LOT COVERAGE: Building: % Landscaped areas: % Building, parking, outside storage: % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: Terminal $1,500,000± Parking Structure $8,100,000f Landscaping: $ 200,000± Other Site Improvements: $1,900,000± 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Substantial completion 11/15/97t; Final completion 6/30/98f. 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out): Refer to Attached Traffic Study ESTIMATED TRIP ENDS ( in and out) during the following hours: 11-12 noon 12-1 pm 1-2 pm 2-3 pm 3-4 pm 4-5 pm 5-6 pm 6-7 pm 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Refer to Attached Traffic Study 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Refer to Attached Traffic Studv /- 90- U r r ) Vkni DATE OF SUBMISSION SMGNATURE OF APPLICANT a - it- c1 DATE OF HEARING Site Lighting and Parking Structure Lighting Design Concept The design objective is to maintain a uniform illumination "low" while still providing good visibility, uniform pavement luminance, and minimum glare. Preliminary layouts meeting required lighting levels are attached. The site and parking structure lighting design is based on IES (Illuminating Engineering Society) recommendations for driveway and parking lot lighting utilizing cut-off type metal halide luminaries. The site fixtures are mounted on 20'-0" poles utilizing 250 watt metal halide lamps. The parking garage fixtures on the top level are mounted on IT-0" poles utilizing 175 watt metal halide lamps. Forward throw optics with sharp house -side cut-off are used to prevent light trespass behind the fixture. The first and second level garage fixtures are 100 watt high pressure sodium lamps surface mounted. This fixture produces a Type V square pattern with peak output at high vertical angles along its sides and in the corners. The result is high horizontal and vertical foot candle levels efficiently achieved while maintaining superb uniformity. The controlled "up -lighting" eliminates eye strain and "cave effects" by enhancing uniformity between ceiling surfaces and the room cavity. Joe Weith -2- January 17, 1997 We sincerely appreciate your participation in the planning phase and look forward to working with you throughout the project. Please call if you have questions or require additional information. Copy to: FFF - Jesse Beck Signed: �-- BIA - Bob McEwing W-M - Greg Edwards, JBL, File Jon B. Leinwohl, P.E. DA - Chris Dunn fffte&ps\1 1797.trn Specifications UL Listed for wet locations. Housing shall be constructed from a one-piece extruded aluminum side and a formed aluminum top plate mounted to a rigid steel frame to support the electrical components and provide a rigid mounting surface for the extruded aluminum arm. Lens Frame shall bean extruded aluminum assembly with mitered corners which is hinged and mechanically retains the clear tempered glass lens. Stainless steel spring loaded latches shall provide access into the lamp compartment without tools. All fasteners shall be stainless steel. Gasketing shall be a one-piece extruded silicone gasket providing a weather -tight seal. Reflector shall be formed from highly reflective specular aluminum. Segmented reflectors shall be multi -faceted components mounted in an aluminum frame. Reflector assembly shall be rotatable and equipped with quick disconnects. Arm Mounting Assembly shall be a one-piece extruded aluminum arm with two 3/8-16NC running thread zinc plated steel tie rods. Arm radius for P20 and P24 shall be for mounting to 4" and larger straight square poles. Optics Segmented Post Top Mounting Assembly shall be fabricated from extruded rectangular tubing with welded mitered joints and welded to an internal cast fitter which shall fasten with a self-locking cast aluminum expansion fitter activated by a single bolt for a 4" or 5' square pole. Electrical Components shall be mounted to a key -slotted removable 16-gauge galvanized steel traywith quick disconnects for easy installation and replacement. Ballasts (HID) shall be high reactance with power factors better than 90% (HPF). Ballasts shall be factory wired and tested. Sockets shall be UL recognized for appropriate lamps with high pressure sodium sockets rated for 4 KV. Finish shall be a thermoset polyester powdercoat application, laboratory tested for superior weatherability and fade resistance in accordance with ASTM B-117-64 and ANSI/ASTM G53-77 specifications or duranotic anodized finish. EPA: P21 = 1.6 P27 = 1.8 P30 = 3.5 Three-year limited warranty. Type II Type III Type IV Forward Throw Type V Lamping Guide One -Piece (Hydroformed) Type II Type III Type 100W 150W 175W 250W 40OW 1000W HPS P21 P21 — P21 P27 P30 MH — — P21 P21 P27 P30 MV — — P21 P21 P27 P30 s • U 14 HADCO • • P21 P27 P30 DIMENSIONS A B C D E 21" 6 5/8" 3" 8" — 27" 7 3/4" 5" 11 " 37" 30" 11 1 /8" 5" 7" — Ordering Guide ARM MOUNT POST TOP WALL MOUNT Fixture Size Mounting Finish Optics Lamp Voltage Options P21A P21W P 21 A H 2 150S E W A 3 250S F B 4 175H G X FT 250H H U 20" 175H 30" 250M "One piece reflector 250M P27A P27P P27W P 27 A H 2 400S E P A 3 400H F W B 4 400M G X FT H U 5 20" 30" "One piece reflector P30A" P 30 A H 2 1000S E A 3 1000H F M_ B 4 1000M G X H U " P30A Does Not Have Reveal Legend A - Arm Mt H - Bronze 2 - Type II F . PL E = 120 HPF P = Photocontrol P - Post Top A - Black 3 . Type III S . HPS F = 208 HPF L = Lamp W - Wall Mt B - White 4 . Type IV H - MH G - 240 HPF F - Fusing X - Anod Bz 5 = Type V M . MV H = 277 HPF U - Anod Blk V - Venccal J = 480 HPF FT : Fwd Thr EXAMPLE: P 27 A H 3 400M E P-L-F HADCO 15 0 C, • Lighting Performance: Form and Function Cut -Off Luminaires are designed and engineered to maximize luminescence and minimize the number of pole/luminaire combinations you will need. To you, this means savings in installation and operation expenses. Optical Systems Type II concentrates the light distribution left and right for narrow roadways, walkways and bikeways with typical mounting height spacings of 1.75 by 6. Twin (back-to-back) configurations provide optimum spacing for large parking and area lighting applications allowing mounting spacings of 3.5 by 6. Type III produces more light on the "street side" for lighting roadways, entryways and intersections. Mounting height spacings of 2 by 6 are recommended. Segmented Reflectors Horizontal Lamp TYPE II These reflector systems offer precise optical control, excellent cut-off, uniformity of illumination, and the highest degree of lighting efficiency to minimize the number of pole/ luminaire combinations you will need. These structurally rigid faceted shell reflectors, fabricated from specular anodized high purity aluminum, have a quality of finish and grain orientation that cannot be duplicated by one- piece reflectors. One -Piece Reflectors Horizontal Lamp One piece hydroformed reflectors offer consistent performance and a good, cost-effective alternative to segmented reflectors where precise optical control and uniformity ratios are not critical. Reflector is anodized aluminum for maximum light output. One -Piece Reflectors Vertical Lamp For general illumination of parking areas, optical systems utilizing avertical lamp design offerthe highest degree of efficiency and the best pole/luminaire spacing ratios with excellent uniformity. Type IV has "forward -throw" optics with a wider distribution and good house -side cut-off ideal for lighting perimeter parking areas and for wall -mounted luminaires. Mounting height spacings of 3.75 by 2.75 are recommended. Forward Throw optics with sharp house -side cut-off are used for sports and security applications or perimeter lighting to prevent lighttrespass behind the fixture. Typical mounting height spacings of 4 by 2.5 are recommended. Type V symmetric distribution is well suited for general parking and area lighting applications. A 5 by 5 mounting height spacing is recommended. Type V Vertical Lamp optics produce the broadest light distribution offering the highest degree of efficiency and the best pole/luminaire spacing ratios with excellent uniformity. Ideal for large parking and area lighting applications. Up to 6 by 6 mounting height spacings are possible. FORWARD TYPE III TYPE IV THROW TYPE V TYPE II TYPE III TYPE V TYPE V TYPE V ROUND SQUARE HADCO 3 C • • Parking Garages The Complete Answer to Parking Garage Lighting Problems Neither cutoff nor refractor type luminaires are completely suited to the demands of parking garage lighting. Low ceilings, wide fixture spacing and shallow viewing angles create unique lighting demands. Spectra -Lyle, with peak ca power at high angles, sharp cutoff, and a useful uplig component responds to all of these demands. Precise Control For Optimum Photometric Distribution Spectra-Lyte produces a Type V Square pattern with peak output at high vertical angles along its sides and in the corners. The result is high horizontal and vertical footcandle levels efficient- ly achieved while maintaining superb uniformity; even at wide spacing ratios. Superior Shielding For Excellent Glare Con Spectra-Lyte's dropped lens/reflector assembly encom- passes the lamp with its primary reflector. This design allows lamp output to be efficiently utilized, yet shielded to give sharp cutoff at shallow viewing angles. Therefore, high levels of visual comfort can be achieved with dramatically reduced glare at low mounting heights. Uplight fills ceiling surfaces Cutoff zone a=777 try ii Cutoff above 70' Controlled Uplight For An Unmatched Visual Environment The Spectra-Lyte reflector system has an upper aperture that provides an evenly distributed uplight component. This elimi- nates eye strain and "cave effects" by enhancing uniformity between ceiling surfaces and the room cavity. The Spectra-Lyte Result A complete performance package in one luminaire that meets the lighting needs of parking garages without compromise. Specifications • 1� • HOUSING Shall be die-cast aluminum alloy construction with dark bronze UltraClad polyester powder coat finish. Easy Hanger Plate and internal component mounting brack- ets shall be fabricated from pre -galvanized steel. OPTICAL ASSEMBLY Shall have an internal reflector system with upper and lower aperatures for controlled down - light with uplight component. Reflector shall also shield the arc tube to sharply restrict discomfort and disability glare. Downlight component shall have Type V Square distribution with sharp definition and high peak angles to give wide spac- ing and high uniformity while avoiding glare in visual zones. Upper aperature shall provide a symmetrical, upward light component that provides fill light on ceiling surfaces. Primary reflector shall be fabricated from specular, high purity anodized aluminum that is fixed within the lens interior for rigidity and proper photometric alignment. The secondary, upper reflector shall be fabricated from specular, high purity anodized aluminum and shall re -direct high angle light back to the primary reflector and useful beam. LENS Lens shall enclose the optical system in injection - molded, UV stabilized, high impact acrylic. Injection molded, UV stabilized polycarbonate lens shall be optional on all wattages. However, it is not recommended with 175 watt metal halide. Lens shall have smooth, clear surfaces at all points where light is emitted in upper and lower components for accurate distribution. An internally ribbed area shall diffuse the reflector image for an attractive appearance. All external surfaces shall be smooth to deter dirt build-up and simplify cleaning. It shall have a retainer that allows the lens to be supported when opened to prevent possible damage due to dropping. Dimensions SOCKET Socket shall be porcelain with spring -pressure center contact. High pressure sodium shall be 4KV pulse rated. Socket shall mount directly to the upper reflector to assure proper photometric alignment with the optical system. BALLAST Ballast shall have copper windings, be prewired and high power factor. It shall be capable of starting and operating lamps at -20' F with HRAT ballasts and -40' F for high pressure sodium. MOUNTING The standard mount shall include a galva- nized steel Easy Hanger Plate with universal provisions for 4" round and octagonal junction boxes. An external set screw shall allow the fixture to be locked or removed without fixture disassembly. Optional tamperproof screws shall be available to prevent fixture removal by unauthorized persons. Threaded hubs are available as factory options for pen- dant mounting to 3/4" rigid conduit or direct surface mounting with feed -through wiring. U.L. Listed as suitable for use in wet locations and 40' C. ambients (175 watt metal halide 25' C. ambients). Fixture and ballast components shall be covered by Wide- Lites published five-year limited warranty. o O o 11" �% 13" 0 O 0 13' 10 Ordering Guide SL S - 150 - 120 - L - LQ I I I I Series Wattage Prelamped Options 50,70, Lamp Type 100,150, Voltage M = Metal Halide 175 120,208,240, S= HPS 277,QV Catalog No. Distribution Watts Lamp Ballast Metal Halide SPM-70-120/277-L Symmetrical 70 B/ED17 CWA SPM-100-120/277-L Symmetrical 100 B/ED17 CWA SPM-150-120/277-L Symmetrical 150 B/ED17 CWA SPM-175-120/277-L Symmetrical 175 B/ED17 CWA SPM-175-(V)-L " Symmetrical 175 B/ED17 CWA High Pressure Sodium SPS-50-12OR-L Symmetrical 50 B/E17 HPF SPS-50-120/277-HX-L Symmetrical 50 B/E17 HRAT SPS-70-12OR-L Symmetrical 70 B/E17 HPF SPS-70-120/277-HX-L Symmetrical 70 B/E17 HRAT SPS-70-(V)-HX-L " Symmetrical 70 B/E17 HRAT SPS-100-120R-L Symmetrical 100 B/E17 HPF SPS-100-120/277-HX-L Symmetrical 100 B/E17 HRAT SPS-100-(V)-HX-L " Symmetrical 100 B/E17 HRAT SPS-150-120R-L Symmetrical 150 B/E17 HPF SPS-150-120/277-HX-L Symmetrical 150 B/E17 HRAT SPS-150-(V)-HX-L " Symmetrical 150 B/E17 HRAT * Ballast Types: All ballasts are High Power Factor. All Metal Halide ballasts are CWA (Constant Wattage Transformer). Standard 120 volt High Pressure Sodium fixtures have Reactor ballasts. All other High Pressure Sodium fix- tures shown have HRAT (High Reactance AutoTransforrner) ballasts. Options Bi-Level Lighting Control. Hi/Low control of light output that adjusts to meet changing illumination needs and give significant energy savings. Solid State Quartz Restrike provides illumina- tion until HID lamp reaches 40% output. Quartz Restrike provides illumination until HID lamp restrikes. Quartz Socket that uses external emergency power. Up to 100 watts. (lamp by others) Through -Wire Option with 3/4" threaded conduit openings on opposing sides. BL LQ CSR *" Voltage: To specify a single voltage ballast, add the desired voltage (120, 208, 240, 277 or 480) to catalog number. Quad voltage ballasts (120, 208. 240, 277V) are available by adding "QV". 3/4" Threaded Conduit Opening in top for pen- dant mounting. Internal balance weight is included. PND W Stabilized Polycarbonats lens. (175W MH not recommended). VL Tamper Resistant Screws. TS Single Fuse for 120 and 277 volt service. F1 Double Fuse for 208, 240 and 480 volt service. LQ1 Industrial Gray Paint Finish. Easy Hanger Plate separately bulk packed for TW2 large rough -in applications. (50 fixture minimum order). • F2 GR 40 BP 0 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 20, 1997 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Parking Garage & Terminal Expansion Dear Mr. McEwing: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the December 17, 1996 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S'i� cerely JoWeith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Jesse Beck PLANNING COMMISSION 17 DECEMBER 1996 PAGE 10 records highlighting conditions under 16. 17, and 18 above. PIP - 1 • • 1 = • = - • 1 • _ - - - • records within 90 days or • • • null and void. The plans shall be signed by - Planning commission chair or 2rior to recording. 22. The applicant shall install a physical barrier along the west side of the property to prevent the parking of vehicles on landscaRed areas. The type of barrier shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed 5-1 with Mr. Teeson opposing. 7. Discussion with Burlington International Airport regarding the proposed parking garage and terminal expansion, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Hamilton noted that voters have approved the improvements. He felt the project would be good for the Airport and for South Burlington. Mr. Beck then showed the parking garage concept. It would serve 1100 cars, with a possible connection to the terminal. There will be a landscaped buffer to screen the neighborhood. The facade of the garage building will have a more vertical look. There will not be a glassed stair enclosure. A study is being done of lighting for the whole site. They are working to see that light doesn't get dispersed off the garage. They propose 81911 stall widths in the garage to allow the garage to be 17 ft. shorter in length. Mr. Beck then showed a drawing of the whole site. There will be long-term parking at what is now Park & Travel. Mr. Hamilton said the garage will result in a net increase of 400 parking spaces. The target is to start construction in the spring and end before Thanksgiving. Temporary parking is a problem. They will use the Park and Travel lot and the properties bought by the Airport during the 8 months of construction. The lot would be gravel and would be PLANNING COMMISSION 17 DECEMBER 1996 PAGE 11 operated by the City of Burlington. After construction, the lot will become a natural landscaped area. Mr. Weith questioned a row of mature trees that seems to be removed. Mr. Beck said this is not definite and they will try not to remove them. Mr. Weith asked why another connection to Airport Dr. is being added. Mr. Beck said this will be for employees. It will be signed one way/employees only. It will eliminate exit in the middle of the parking lot. Mr. Weith asked if a variance will still be required for the setback. Mr. Beck said they think it can be fit in without a variance. Mr. Beaudin was concerned about reducing the size of parking spaces to 8'911. Mr. Beck said that's what it is at Logan. Mr. Burgess said it doesn't work at Logan. If people can't get in and out easily, why do it? Mr. Weith said the requirement is for 91x18'. A slight waiver was granted for underground parking on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Beck asked if the Commission would listen to a light pole higher than standard. Mr. Beaudin said it can't be cut off so it isn't seen beyond the property line. Mr. Dinklage said there needs to be consideration of neighbors across the road. He felt that hot spot lighting needs to be considered. Mr. Beck said they had a meeting with about 60 neighbors. Their main concern was traffic. Mr. Burgess said that anything that can be done to make the building look attractive would be appreciated. Mr. Audette noted the city has plans for Airport Drive and suggested there be discussions to coordinate plans. Mr. Beaudin asked if airlines will raise fares. Mr. Hamilton said Burlington airport has the lowest fees to airlines but that doesn't get turned over to the customer. He said the more profitable the airport can make it for airlines, the better the service for Burlington. Mr. Hamilton ending by stressing the need to get through the project within the time frame. 8. Sketch plan application of L & M Partnership to amend an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 sq. ft. movie webster-martin, inc. MEMORANDUM 1025 Airport Drive, P.O. Box 2246 South Burlington, VT 05407 Telephone: 802-864-0223 Fax: 802-864-0165 To: Joe Weith From: Jon Leinwohl �gV Date: February 4, 1997 Project: BIA Terminal Improvements / Parking Structure W-M Project No. 04-9618 Subject: South Burlington Site Plan Application Sewer Allocation Request Distribution: Burlington Int'I. Airport: J.J. Hamilton, Bob McEwing Freeman, French, Freeman: Jesse Beck Dunn Associates: Chris Dunn Dufresne -Henry: Wayne Bonhag, Bob Luckury Webster- Martin: Greg Edwards, Jon Leinwohl, File The Terminal building is presently connected to the City of South Burlington's municipal sewer system with treatment occurring at the Airport Parkway facility. A new sewer service will be constructed from the Terminal addition to an existing manhole. It is proposed that floor drains from the first and second levels of the proposed parking structure discharge into the municipal sewer system after flows pass through grit removal basins and an oil/water separator. Alec Tuscany (Webster -Martin) has discussed this issue with Don Whitten and received Don's concurrence that the City will accept flows from the floor drains (see attached memo) . Although additional fixtures (2 drinking fountains, 10 water closets, 3 urinals and 8 lavatories) will be installed in the Terminal expansion, no additional employees or passengers are expected to result from the project and consequently the domestic water demand and sewer flows for the Terminal will remain at present levels. bia\fffte&ps\sbpcsew.mem r To: Joe Weith -2- February 3, 1997 On behalf of the Airport, we allocation of 1,500 gpd for floor drains be incorporated bia\fffte&ps\sbpcsew. mem are requesting a that a sewer flows from the parking structure in the Site Plan approval. MEMO TO: File BIAP Terminal Expansion and Parking Garage vy- 96IB FROM: AGT DATE: 28 January 1997 SUBJECT: Discussion with City of South Burlington, Don Whitten Called Don to discuss the discharge of parking garage drainage into the City sewage collection system. The drainage would be from snow melt off cars and occasional washdown of the first and second floors of the garage. The first and second floors are covered by the floor above and therefore not directly exposed to weather. The top floor or 3rd floor is exposed to the weather and the drainage from this top floor would be to the storm drainage system. I indicated the drainage from the first and second floors would pass through a grit trap and oil water separator before discharging to the City sewage collection system on Airport Drive. I asked Don if this discharge was permissible and did the City have specific design criteria for the oil water separator. Don indicated the discharge would be acceptable with the grit trap and oil water separator. The City does not have specific design criteria. FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. December 30, 1996 Mr. Joe Weith So. Burlington Planning Department 575 Dorsett Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Burlington International Airport Dear Joe: This letter is written to invite you to the scheduled team design Charettes regarding the development of the Burlington International Airport. The Charettes are scheduled for January 8th, and February 5th. You are also invited to attend the design team meetings scheduled for January 22nd, February 26th and March 12th. All meetings will be held in the Airport conference room and if you have specific A R C H I T E C T U R E topics you would like us to address please give me a call ahead of time so that I may place your items on the agenda. You are always welcome to participate in the meetings even if there aren't specific topics you would like to discuss. PLANNING ■ Thanks for your interest and consideration during this project and we look INTERIORS forward to your participation during these meetings. ■ Sincerely Yours, FREEMAN, FRENCH, FREEMAN, INC. 9esse Beck, AIA Vice President cc: Bob McEwing Charles Hafter 81 MAPLE STREET, P.O. BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0306 TEL 802/864-6844 • FAX 802/860-1815 5 { r=7 Ac ""z -e. Memorandum - Planning December 17, 1996 agenda items December 13, 1996 Page 9 7) BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - PARKING GARAGE & TERMINAL EXPANSION - DISCUSSION BIA has requested a meeting with the Commission to present their preliminary plans for the terminal expansion and parking garage. They would like to get comments before submitting for sketch plan review. I believe most of the discussion will focus on the location and design of the parking structure, location of temporary parking, landscaping/screening, and access. 8) L & M PARTNERSHIP - ADD RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending an approved planned commercial development consisting of 150 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 square foot movie theater (1000 seats), a 22,500 square foot restaurant/retail/indoor recreation building, a 3500 square foot restaurant with drive -through service, and a bank with drive - through service, located on Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of: 1) adding two (2) 30 unit multi -family dwellings, and 2) adding two (2) commercial buildings. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 10/8/96 (minutes enclosed). Access/circulation: Access to this development is via a proposed public street known as Fayette Road. This development currently has five (5) curb cuts on Fayette Road and one (1) additional curb cut is proposed to serve the two (2) commercial buildings. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Since the date that this development was first approved, the Commission has changed its interpretation of how to apply density/coverage requirements to mixed residential/commercial PUD's. In this district, the maximum residential density is 7 units/acre. The maximum building and total coverage is 20% and 40%, respectively, for residential use, but is 30% and 70%, respectively, for commercial uses. The question had been raised as to how these different coverage requirements should be applied when a mixed use development is proposed. Last year, the Commission developed a new policy on how to apply these requirements to mixed - use developments. Since such developments are encouraged, the Commission decided to apply the residential density based on the 9 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 December 13, 1996 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Parking Garage & Terminal Expansion Dear Mr. McEwing: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 17, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sr eI Jo Ci Planner Jw/mcp Encls cc: Jesse Beck City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 6, 1996 Jesse Beck Freeman French Freeman, Inc. 81 Maple Street P.O. Box 306 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0306 Re: BIA Parking Garage Dear Jesse: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the proposed amendment to Section 25.113 of the zoning regulations, Height of Structures, which will be considered by the Council on January 6, 1996. As you can see, subsection (c) is being added which would allow the Commission to approve a structure taller than 35 feet if certain criteria are met. Specifically, these criteria include compatibility with the character of the neighborhood and preservation of important scenic views. Subsection (e) requires the submittal of an elevation for the Commission's review and approval. You should also note subsection (d) which requires a larger setback for structures taller than 35 feet. For each additional foot above the normal 35 feet, there is an additional foot of required front yard setback. The Planning Commission may waive the additional setback requirements for projects undergoing PUD review. To date, all changes related to the airport property have been handled only as site plan reviews, not PUD reviews. Technically, the airport property constitutes a PUD and probably should be reviewed as a PUD. However, the Airport zoning district does not allow PUD's . This is basically an oversight in the regulations which should be corrected. This may be an appropriate time to start reviewing the airport property as a PUD. However, it will require a change to the zoning which is typically a three month process. Due to the timing of your project, this approach may not be of any benefit to you. Therefore, your best bet may be to comply with the 35 foot height requirement. Please let me know how you wish to proceed with the height issue. qity erel Weith, Planner cc: Ray Belair lb6 G",�tr, vv, kkP k4IJ _1/'. � d V f 0 rl N FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. CONSTRUCTION COST TARGETS BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 4DEC96 CHARRETTE NO 1 BIA REVENUE BOND COST BREAKDOWN Parking Structure $8,146,800 7,400/stallx1,100 Roadway Improvements $315,000 Toll Plaza 1 $135,000 Landscaping formula $135,000 emporaryFacilities $225,000 Sub -total $8,956,800 Terminal Expansion $1,557,900 Cano /Walk/Roadwa $1,140,300 Sub -total $2,698,200 TOTAL $11,655,000 ARCHITECTURE ■ PLANNING 0 INTERIORS 0 81 MAPLE STREET, P.O. BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0306 • TEL 802/864.6844 • FAX 802/860-1815 FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. CHARRETTE NO. 1 AGENDA BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 4&5 DECEMBER, 1996 WEDNESDAY 8:30 - 9:30 Arrivals and prep 9:30 - 10:00 Project definition Jesse B Budget,mtg schedule, boundary Jesse B Other remarks/Questions anybody 10:00 - 11:00 Team Presentations Site Analysis Chris D Parking Layouts Steve M Garage Plans Alan S Terminal Greg D Canopies Elise G Other Ideas guess who 11:00 - 12:45 Group Work SessionsScale 1"=100' Group 1 - Garage size and location Group 2 - Terminal planning and connections Group 3 - Site circulation, Service area, and Phasing 12:45 - 1:45 Lunch 1:45 - 4:45 Group Work SessionsLarger Scales Group 2 - Split into Terminal and Canopy/connections 4:45 - 7:00 Presentations and Discussion Hybrid System vs Precast Alan S w/ slides THURSDAY 8:30 -11:30 Group Work SessionsAll Scales/Color/Fun Group I - Garage plan and details Group lb - Garage Elevations Group 2a - Terminal Plan, Elevations,and details Group 2b - Canopies and connections Group 3 - Site Development and Landscaping 11:30 - 12:30 Group Presentations and discussion 12:30 - 1:30 Lunch 1:30 - 3:00 Prepare Drawing Package and Summary of findings 3:00 - 4:30 Final Presentation and closing remarks Alan S Greg D Ron S Alan S Jesse B Greg D Steve M Chris D ARCHITECTURE ■ PLANNING ■ INTERIORS ■ 81 MAPLE STREET, PO. BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0306 • TEL 802/864-6844 FAX 802/860-1815 T 1 Wuxi 404,00 tj F71, try, Ppc).JEC TGRASS Al' ,4- NCHMAPK TT Aj GRASS AREA FO Fri C) -13 f— AIRPORT DRIVE L�4 0 To-w- c)( Ct 40' ToTAL PRO?OSCO NOAI-GRASSED AREA 42&Y lf,21-nt-i PROPOSED PARKING /3 9 Poo 28 -170 PUBLIC NUMBER OF SPACES LONG TERM 274 PARKING STRUCTURE 1108 NrKl- C4USSM UCAS TOTAL 1382 OTHER 47 30 -T 7 00 -7 )o T -T ff + "v tt ti - ----------- - t 151 217+JO AIRPORT DRIVE -T0TAL PR0FC>!5VD -GRA'5597D AREA -= j4qgqp 5F ToTAL PRO?oSetU AJOAt-CiRAS-51EV AZEA-- 42" 5 V ZOO-4700, Pp4xNwm ffou DATE : Ol/.W/97 GRASS AREA FOR OVERFLOW PARKING GRASS AREA FOR OVERFLOW PARKING o .00 LEGEND EXISTING 11 SURVEY TRAVERSE POINT IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR GATE VALVE SOIL BORING LOCATION SEWER MANHOLE CHAINLINK FENCE GROUND CONTOUR WATER LINE OF(a 5 SEWER UNE STORE,! DRAIN A I AIRPORT DRIVE LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED SURVEY TRAVERSE POINT IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR IN GATE VALVE SOIL BORING LOCATION SEWER MANHOLE CHAINLINK FENCE GROUND CONTOUR 325 WATER UNE w SEWER UNE STORM DRAIN LINE —ST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD WIRES UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL nAq MAIN SPA I 'A ------------- Im gm PROGRESS co PROPOSED PAR STRUCTUR 1108 CARS 221.00 2 2 ♦i 0<� 225+00 PUBLIC LONG TERM PARKING STRUCTURE TOTAL OTHER F.A.A. EMPLOYEE RENTALS ADMINISTRATIVE NUMBER OF SPACES 274 1108 1382 97 150 51 5 E i n£ r T <Jb & F -.-.__._ i• 22,+00 W t� Ah2PORT DNVE PROGRESS PRNf DATE: 01/30/97 4, 6F � J y �{ m •5+OQ ?2'rOfi AIRPORT DRIVE PROOF PF*9 DATE: 01/30/97 e i 4 'y^.'�' 4 �):�. I � , a ... _ ...r,.,..,....._._... ........._.., .,..mow. __.. �.. _ __...- .. ,� � � _! . T .�i .g �� "" ".....,.,__._..__.._ �* � � � 4 � ._.__..__--...,.._� ems..•. ._,......_^-...,t-�._.,�..... � _, - AIRPORT DRIVE .2tl�(,t- ti9FOCF 230t00 3 •;, :31+OU T. .-.e.._,,a....._._._��...�_.....-_.� ._]�... ._fir-----"I`--�---•-- (�.- sae".. :','.a si -• _ ' 7 _._.._.'.... _.� ��. i ,....�....�.�,.. P . ,r, _ _ � � - �`._ .�. . _ 4 � _ ... F 4,h.0 ._._..-._........—._,ice. - LEGEND EXISTING a SURVEY TRAVERSE POINT iP IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE �— GUY ANCHOR ca GATE VALVE Q+ SOIL BORING LOCATION SEWER MANHOLE -- CHAINLINK FENCE GROUND CONTOUR WATER LINE SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD WIRES i itim-prpot imn Fi FrTRIrAf PROPOSED S --�--- S 325 S ST S OF (o 21 30 (A) LEGEND EXISTING SURVEY TRAVERSE POINT IRON PIPE UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR GATE VALVE 12% SOIL BORING LOCATION SEWER MANHOLE CHAINLINK FENCE GROUND CONTOUR WATER LINE SEWER LINE ST STORM DRAIN LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD WIRES UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL PROPOSED s 325 s ST 17 r. Lu V) e4 I -) SHEET ND EX SP.N PROGRESS m 04 < z 3t O 7- > z 0 r- 4c z cc z z 0 3 m OF (o I GRAM saAIs EXISTING PARTING SITE PLAN PUBLIC EXISTING TEMP P PERMANENT T RGETS LONG TERM 158 SHORT TERM PARK & TRAVEL 526 250 (pormM W) PARK & TRAVEL 46 TOTAL 980 OTHER FAA 116 EMPLOYEE 131 RENTALS 454 AIRPORT 6 TOTAL 707 0 BURI. NOTON NMRNATIONAL AIRPORT 01/24/97 A9642 FF F FRlIMAN FRENCH F119EYANI TE, INC. B UN ON, CHITECT R PLANNIN RIORS f� > A � a S e > H*1 ram; fill II► Ilf�lb..mo.. I.I I �"� rn m Z O I MATCH LPC d".b s1U11LNGTON YITEIlNAT1ONAl. MRL•ORT mn•n� _ .� v � waIA march, ha CONSULTMC ENOQTEE11.4 CONSU .r ~ DRNI S0. BURlIlICI'OH VT06tOS SOUTH SURU14GTON VERMONT �� s TEL (E02) E64-0223 *� r1 (�) ee4-0166 FREEMAN -FRENCH -FREEMAN SITE PLAN 04-9618 `Dvicow" ARCHITECTS DURLRJGTON, VERMONT IV yy55{{F ip a H LICE i ME 6URLN0T0N 94TERNATIOKAL AIRPORT wp�n. 1i Y0IN martin,Inc. CONSULTING EWGBE D� •� V w .� •, SO. ,BURIINGTON. VT 06403 •''AA SOUTH YURLINGTON VERMONT ""� '� TEL 602) E64-0223 v, 66 FAx 1602) 4-0166 FREEMAN•FRENCH •FREEMAN SITE PLAN 04-9618 A VVI COMPANY ARCHITECTS BURLINGTON, VER110NT CYcSTlk.G CMbino�►S 5CAt.A,: i" roo' 1�0�-G24sS�D r4�A-S I%If /47 1 0�3 J -.. � P � '�j�Tjjjj` �-- - . T I C=C> --- ---- -Af) FN VID 15� !k2<� TO-ALAZSA--� I -ro TAi- EMSTIAJ6 NON-CIZA.%rEb AZEA- WE bil WE l PUBLIC TEMP PLAN LONG TERM 218 SHORT TERM P1&P2 259 SHORT TERM P11 30 • PARK & TRAVEL 250 PARK & TRAVEL 46 OVERFLOW 40 TOTAL 843 OTHER FAA 96 EMPLOYEE 150 CARWASH/RENTAL 307 AIRPORT 6 TOTAL 559 • VALET TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED DURING PEAK DEMAND PERIODS. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD OCCURS DURING OFF PEAK SEASON BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 01/31/97 A9642 FFREEINAN FRENCH FREEMAK INC. �!sal.lwcsc�, yr A�ct+ia'�rtua� �1.�,Nt+1iaR:; 3=1gti�1���s i FAA EMPLOYEES t ? a e i� \ j CAR WASH 237 CARS OVERFLOW 40 CARS M 0 OCARS 15 ��qq PAS GI %VEL Lg L 11 li I OVERFLOW 218 CARS AIRPORT DRIVE RENTAL 36 CARS PUBLIC PERMANENT TARGETS SHORT TERM 1,058 • PARK & TRAVEL 274 OVERFLOW 40 OVERFLOW 218 TOTAL 1,590 OTHER FAA 96 EMPLOYEE 150 CARWASH/RENTAL 337 AIRPORT 6 TOTAL 589 • VALET TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED DURING PEAK PERIODS, EXCEPT IN OVERFLOW AREA FOR 218 TRADITIONALLY PARKED CARS. 14 �1 RENTAL 50 CARS - -- 16 PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY 1 ,058 CARS AIRPORT OMW W PAKKMB AIRPORT ORIVE BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 4 � 01 /311 /97A9642 GPAP SCu F ■31■97T, ft .A'w"Ti BURL.INOTON,-VT 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\temp parking_doc (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. As no new buildings are proposed, this criterion is not applicable. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. As no new buildings are proposed, this criterion is not applicable. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). No additional dumpsters will result from the proposed use. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As no new construction is proposed, his criterion is not applicable to this application. However, staff notes that in the past, the applicant has stated that there are no locations available for additional landscaping on the site. Staff recommends that this location be considered for receipt of landscaping required for future development. While the applicant currently owns most of the lots surrounding the area, it would still be prudent to more adequately screen the parking area. Lighting Staff has already noted that the applicant has not proposed any additional lighting. If at any point the applicant desires additional lighting, they shall need to apply to the Development CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\temp parking.doc Review Board for such. The Board should discuss this issue. Traffic The proposed project will not generate any additional P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-07-34. Respectfully submitted, Cathya n LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert McEwing, BIA Permit Number SP---�--� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874, Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Heather Kendrew, Mailing address, phone, and fax # same as 1) Greg Govette, Stantec, P.O. Box 2246, South Burlington, VT 05407, Phone: 802-864- 0223, x 150, Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive #1, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 OOOOC 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) This site plan review application is being resubmitted because Site Plan Approval #SP- 08-49 issued to the Burlington International Airport by the Development Review Board on 7/1/08 to construct a general aviation ramp and partial taxi -way has expired due to not obtaining a zoning -permit for the land development within six (6) months as required by condition #3 of said approval. All other information remains the same. The project will be constructed on vacant land within the "airfield" side of the Burlington International Airport. Surrounding uses consist of general aviation facilities including the Army National Guard Building (west), the Pratt & Whitney Building northwest), a taxiway (north), Heritage Flight (east), and a Class II wetland (south). b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) A general aviation ramp and partial taxiway will be constructed. Work includes excavation and embankment, aggregate base course and gravel base, installation of storm drainage systems, asphalt paving, pavement markings, ramp sealcoating, taxiway edge retroreflective markers, relocation of existing utilities, installation of chain link fencing, installing temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control measures, topsoiling and seeding. The location of the project is within the airfield side of the Burlington International Airport property at 1200 Airport Drive in South Burlington. The purpose of the project is to provide aviation facilities for the continued viability and projected future growth at the Burlington International Airport. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this rp oject. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Lighting: Site lighting will consist of retroreflective taxiway markers. Site li ting will comply with all applicable provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration as required by the Burlington International Airport and the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations 2004. Landscaping: The project consists of construction of a general aviation ramp and connecting taxiway for aircraft use only. No landscaping is proposed with this protect. Other Improvements: All improvements will be constructed on the "airfield" side. Therefore, a bike rack and dumpster are not included as part of this project. The proposed construction is designed to take place above an existing Champlain Water District (CWD) waterline. The waterline will not be moved or impacted. CWD has been contacted and informed of the proposed construction. They have approved the design to leave the waterline in place. An underground detention facility and infiltration gallery will be constructed to treat stormwater runoff from the proiect site. Applications for the following permits have been submitted for management of stormwater runoff during and after construction. • Construction General Permit #3-9020 • Stormwater Discharges from New Development and Redevelopment General Permit #3-9015 • Underground Injection Control Permit 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 41,033,520 +/- Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing Unknown % / Proposed 0 % added/ sq. ft. sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0.49 % added / 205,000 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 475,000 * { * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: $ 0 No buildings are proposed with this project, therefore there will be no landscaping. c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): General aviation ramp and partial taxiway connection, site drainage; stormwater treatment and erosion control; site electrical; security fence. Estimated cost: $2,200,000. Estimated cost for stormwater treatment is currently being evaluated, and is not included. Total project cost: $ 2,200,000 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No additional trips will be generated as a result of this project. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2009 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) See attached list. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE C A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY 0049R —f-f) 0—tx, -c;-a�- Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date PLANNING & ZONING August 7, 2008 Heather Kendrew Burlington Int'l Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — SP-08-49 Dear Ms. Kendrew: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved July 1, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 675 Lnrsct Strati) Sualh Surkrigi.-n, VT 054.33 lei fax g1#2.4411.4101 w.sbar1:.r.arn DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 JULY 2008 4. ite Plan Application #SP-08-49 of the City Of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to construct a general aviation ramp and partial taxiway to add 205,000 sq. ft. of additional impervious surface, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. McEwing noted that storm water will go into a tank and then be pumped into the system. Ms. LaRose said the Airport will probably be contacted by the Storm Water Department. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-49 of the City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-08-50 of Patricia Calkins to amend a previously approved plan for a 14,220 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of constructing a 2100 sq. ft. addition for retail use, 2500 Williston Rd: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Site Plan Application 4SP-08-50 until 15 July 2008. Mr Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Final Plat Application #SD-08-30 of Homestead Design, Inc., to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 89 residential units in 16 buildings. The amendment consists of: 1) adjusting traffic control islands at Dorset Street and Spear Street, 2) relocating street light a Spear Street, and 3) encroaching into the wetlands with a retaining wall behind Unit R, Songbird Rd: Mr. Nedde gave members an enlarged drawing of the proposed wetland incursion. He noted that it was incurred by a contractor's staking -out in the area and involves a Class 2 wetland. There is also a portion of a wetland they had proposed to disturb but now will not. The proposed incursion is 1120 ft. To remedy this, they have had Krebs & Lansing stake out all wetland areas in the future, not the contractor. The State has approved this and has required extra fencing, which has been provided. Regarding the traffic control island, Mr. Nedde said they had met with the Fire Chief who approved the plans. The island is designed to discourage "cut-throughs." It is anticipated that a fire truck would encroach into the oncoming lane. The Chief is not happy with this and has now requested changes. The size of the island has thus been reduced. This affects the location of the street light. Bruce Hoar has approved the new location. Mr. Belair said the island was intended for traffic calming. Mr. Hoar is concerned with someone hitting it because of its small size. It also could become hidden in snow. &a v Permit Number SP- 6C� - 6 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403, Phone: 802-863-2874, Fax: 802-863-7947 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 13, Page 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as 1 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Heather Kendrew, Mailing address, phone, and fax # same as 1) Greg Goyette, Stantec, P.O. Box 2246, South Burlington, VT 05407, Phone: 802-864- 0223, x 150, Fax: 802-864-0165 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive #1, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The project will be constructed on vacant land within the "airfield" side of the Burlington International Airport. Surrounding uses consist of general aviation facilities including the Army National Guard Building (west), the Pratt & Whitney Building (northwest) a taxiway (north), Heritage Flight (east), and a Class II wetland (south). J ri b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) A general aviation ramp and partial taxiway will be constructed. Work includes excavation and embankment, aggregate base course and gravel base, installation of storm drainage systems, asphalt paving, pavement markings, ramp sealcoating, taxiway edge retroreflective markers, relocation of existing utilities, installation of chain link fencing, installing temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control measures, topsoiling and seeding. The location of the project is within the airfield side of the Burlington International Airport property at 1200 Airport Drive in South Burlington. The purpose of the project is to provide aviation facilities for the continued viability and projected future growth at the Burlington International Airport. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A, no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this rp olect. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): N/A no buildings exist on the project site, and no new buildings are proposed with this project. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Lighting: Site lighting will consist of retroreflective taxiway markers. Site lighting will comply with all applicable provisions of the Federal Aviation Administration as required by the Burlington International Airport and the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations 2004. Landscaping: The project consists of construction of a general aviation ramp and connectingtaxiway for aircraft use only. No landscaping is proposed with this project. Other Improvements: All improvements will be constructed on the "airfield" side. Therefore, a bike rack and dumpster are not included as part of this project. The proposed construction is designed to take place above an existing Champlain Water District (CWD) waterline. The waterline will not be moved or impacted. CWD has been contacted and informed of the proposed construction. They have approved the design to leave the waterline in place. An underground detention facility and infiltration gallery will be constructed to treat stormwater runoff from the project site. Applications for the following permits have been submitted for management of stormwater runoff during and after construction. • Construction General Permit #3-9020 • Stormwater Discharges from New Development and Redevelopment General Permit #3-9015 • Underground Injection Control Permit 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 41,033,520 +/- Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing Unknown % / Proposed 0 % added/ sq. ft. sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown % / sq. ft. Proposed 0.49 % added / 205,000 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 29.3 % / sq. ft. Proposed 0 % added / sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 475,000 * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b) Landscaping: $ 0 No buildings are proposed with this project, therefore there will be no landscaping, c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): General aviation ramp and partial taxiway connection; site drainage; stormwater treatment and erosion control; site electrical; security fence. Estimated cost: $2,200,000. Estimated cost for stormwater treatment is currently being evaluated, and is not included. Total project cost: $ 2,200,000 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No additional trips will be generated as a result of this project. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): See 10 a). c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): See 10 a). 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2009 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) See attached list. 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLI ANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 51�DJ REVIEW AUTHORITY. De opment Review Bo Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: . Air southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 27, 2008 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Hearing Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, I Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 06/19/2008 10'47 FAX 802 864 0`165 STANTEC So Burlington 003/003 George Brady 9 Shamrock Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Alan Brusoe & Ann Soutiere 11 Mayfair St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 N'Robert & Anne Audette Trustee 1900 Williston Rd So. Burlington, VT 05403 Shelburne Shipyard P.C. Box 611 Shelburne, VT 05407 Pete's RV Center 4016 Williston Road So Burlington, VT 05403 Munson Earth Moving Corp C/o So Burlington Realty Co PO Box 2204 @So. Burlington, VT 05403 I Robert Shand 5 Ethan Allen Drive So. ,Burlington, VT 05403 Joyce and John Belter 2 Country Club Drive So, Burlington, VT 05403 Robert J. A.udette Truckee 41 Peterson Terrace So. Burlington, VT 05403 Randall Munson C/o So Burlington Realty Co PO Box 2204 South Burlington, VT 05403 Leland & Patricia Calkins 1835 Spear St_ So. Burlington, VT 05403 Laceys Inc. 2000 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Lowell and Shelley Spillane P.O. Box 9299 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Allan and Christine Palmer 2169 Dorset Street Shelburne, VT 05407 Fargnoli Associates LLC 21 Point Farm West Grande Isle, VT 05407 Aviatron Inc (US) 25 Customs Drive So Burlington, VT 05403 SEAFOX INC 8 Calkins Court So. Burlington, VT 05403 David & Janet Desamo 5 Ladd Point Road Grand Isle, VT 05458 06/18f2008 10 46 FAX 802 864 0165 STANTEC So Burlington 16 001/003 Fax — - _ 8tantec Consulting Services, Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: (602) 864-0223 Fax: (802) 864-0165 Scant C 4-9,j To: TSY Company, Crrt- aF Fax: 8 YG --Y1 J I Date: File: 17,ro rBo From: ,<6-4 6,,P Phone: Fax: 3 page(s) total includes Cover sheet Original will NOT follow by mail. The content of this fax is confidential. If the reader is not the intended recipient or its agent, be advised that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the content of this fax is prohibited. If you have received this fax in error, please notify us immediately and retum the original fax to us by mail at our expense. Thank Reference: A,., �,A A,,t T Stantec Consulting Services Inc. C. cp c.5d00umenta Bfld 5ettlngyAb"nktrenVny doewentsNex sheet for prtnung Wenk.dx 06/19/2008 10 46 FAX 802 864 0165 STANTEC So Burlington 1&002/003 i Jost Investments 69 College Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Roger Emmons 1.085 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Burton Jaques Rev Living Trust 519 Shore Acres Colchester, VT 05446 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Doering 1089 Airport Drive So_ Burlington, VT 05403 Airport Realty Frances Tilley FBO AVCenter 1130 Airport Dr. 1141 Airport Drive So, Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Gerard Proulx 1155 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Marc Derobertis 1185 Airport Drive So Burlington, VT 5403 Carole Daly 1227 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Moffatt 1253 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr_ & Mrs. John Russell 1161 Williston Road So Burlington, VT 05403 Agnes F. Barry Uo Agrees Thomas, PO Box 218 Bakersfield, VT 05441 Mr. & Mrs. C hrisustomoms Toulis 11 Meadow Lane Underhill, VT 05489 Michael & Theresa Ashton 1195 Airport Drive So_ Burlington, VT 5403 Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Kruger 1233 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Kann Maxwell 1261 Airport Drive So Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Lemay 1379 Airport Drive So Burlington, VT 05403 Howard Loso 1391 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Roy Bushey & Roger Bonneville Chambers Rent -a -Car C/o Lillian White PO Box 2883 P 0 BMX 859 SO. Burlington, VT 05407 Augusts., ME 04330 Ruth and Ronald Adams 1083 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Kim Deforge 1103 Airport Drive So_ Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. Charles P1oof 1153 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Bernard La Plante 1181 Airport Drive So Burlington, VT 05403 Antonio & Anna Todisco Trust 71 Lakewood Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 William & Patricia Cameron 1247 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Donald & Louise Adams 1265 Airport Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. & Mrs. William Dalton 1383 Airport Drive So Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Dumont 30 O'Brien Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ashley Jane Adams 1215 Airport Parkway So. Burlington, VT 05403 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 26, 2008 \drb\sit\burlington_airport\aviation_ramp.doc Application received: May 23, 2008 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-08-49 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Meeting date: July 1, 2008 Agenda #4 Owner/ Applicant Contact Burlington International Airport Heather Kendrew 1200 Airport Drive Burlington International Airport South Burlington, VT 05403 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Airport Industrial (AIR-1) Zoning District 2000-000OC 1020 Acres Location Map rFl n E .k J rt 1' 1! 6 C C CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\aviation ramp.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to construct a general aviation ramp and partial taxiway to add 205,000 sq. ft. of additional impervious surface, 1200 Airport Drive. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans and has the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The subject property is over 1000 acres. The area proposed for the new ramp and connecting taxiway is essentially negligible in relation to the whole. Staff believes that the entire site is still well within limitations for the district. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. As no new buildings are proposed, these criteria are not applicable. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. C � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airport\aviation ramp.doc Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). No additional dumpsters will result from the proposed use. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As no new construction is proposed, this criterion is not applicable to this application. Lighting The applicant has not proposed any additional lighting. If at any point the applicant desires additional lighting, they shall need to apply to the Development Review Board for such. Traffic The proposed changes will not generate any additional P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. Water Line The applicant is proposing that this new construction will take place above an existing Champlain Water District waterline. The waterline will not be moved. The applicant has stated that the CWD has approved the design to leave the waterline in place. However, staff has not been able to confirm this with the Water Department. 1. The Water Department shall review the plans and provide comments prior to final site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-08-49 subject to the conditional item included above. Res ectfully submitted, 1��athyaf LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Heather Kendrew, BIA NOTES ! 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MAY 11- jE SHOWN. THE Stantec Consulting Services Inc. �11 • \ CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING UTILITIES TAXIW�IT7 $ F TYREA \ I 55 Green Mountain Drive /4 \�•\ / / _ SFFIIFE ISAgTY \' \ I PRIOR TO EXCAVAl10N IN ANY AREA. THE I ,PHASING fFWN\\ \\\ CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND DIG AS NECESSARY TO South Burlington 1? U.S.A \ JJ AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES. 05403 �• `� ( I ' \ f, A T.1 802 B64.0223 JkCK h E' U OER T�CIWAY, A- \ I I EX ND 51 B;YOND XIWAE C�V I \ • F "Y '• 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL Far 802864,0165 ZOrM � \ \ \ COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRIOR TO \ Tstanfec A IWAY F r +33 iT0 +36 ------ / DETAIL, SHE 7 \www.alant.c.com 3. CONSTRUCTION PHASING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE / / °o\\ �••\ \ I I I I \ S"f„ ` •'`� \ `.\ \ WITH SAFETY AND PHASING PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A DETAIL Copyright Reserved CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND PHASING PLAN \ \• 4 \ 1 9 \ Th. Cormier *d -* and W rw Ibi* for all eim.nevora W FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECEIVING A NOTICE TO WT Kati u,. dm.N - .rry «r.r. or .mn.l.na .hdI W r.ponse to / •-> PROCEED. 'wm;te ell 'a..an, ona dmrnq. am mw wash o I �"\ 4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ..v ha�.dd O" m'ada.n'm m"P«" oe1er Dion roar \I� ORIGINAL CONDITIONS I / \ \•Taz� 4 v-�� #r I I i I ' I` \ I tF ^ \ .c, 5. ALL YARD PIPING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 5.5 Consultants + 1. \ FEET OF COVER. WHERE 5.5 FEET OF COVER CANNOT a d ��-- / -I I I I I y 1 \y\ JfOO\ \\ \ \ \ INSTALLED. IAPPROVEDRIBYDENGIN ER. SHALL BE 6. THE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ARE BASED ON ORIGINAL APPROXIMATIONS. ALL STRUCTUREDESIGN DRAWINGS AND ARE TO EANDNUTILITYD AS Legend - _ DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE JOB SITE. 7. SEE PROFILES FOR ADDITIONAL ELEVATION INFORMATION. LIMIT OF WORK FOR t �w/ / / ` APRON PROJECT. / ��•` / /,d I I I \ 8. ALL CASs IN PLACE TANK PIPING CONNECTIONS '\ EXISTING CONDITIONS / ;� / ` 4� / ' ; FUTURE TAXIWAY SHALL BE MADE WITH D.I. MECHANICAL JOINT WALL AND CONTOURS INSIDE AREA \ SLEEVES. ALL PIPING BETWEEN CONCRETE THIS LIMIT OF WORK ARE j e�N j i l {{ I I I� III STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A DRESSER STYLE 38 REPRESENTATIVE OF A -y ,., / !/ ,��' / I I \ COUPLING. SEPERATE PROJECT TO t �o_d k \ BE BUILT "BY OTHERS" - / r ''/j / / % h * oo-✓ \ fir\ I II / 1I I I l � y // PUMP STATION AND VALVE VAULT. SEE DETAIL SHEET 7 PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL j ,� 1 �< �4" SCH. 80 PVC FORCE MAIN Notes 5p - / qti I a� TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM PROPOSED 18" PVC PUMP I--- - - PROPOSED I VORTECHS Y! 1 S 6' DIA. CLEANOUT STATION INLET - -'I�s oo \v� (UNIT, SEE �Oo° \! 1 1 1 /,I \ MANHOLE WITH AIR I III * PROPOSED 4' DIA- o° ° DETAIL SHEET B \ 1 RELEASE (TIP. OF OVERFLOW MANHOLE \_ - - + "' _. \ 1 1 C05 ll ,� n l'�, SEE DETAIL 8 00_ -_ a a* EXISTING DRAIN MH �- , - FM`\ 24 PVC �CO2 - 'M -. �y Fz\ "r •� \.��� \ Ifs `+r, -',. -@Y,_ _ I/_ �_ - i"II I 41 \ , RIM EL , .5 - �,r •" y - -- _ i ' - -0O3 1q0 ' • 1 '��� \ i - - - - i l e� / INV OUT EL 2ag.84 .P;° -� - •i; _ \I _ �� j 'g' ♦ "' �� 0 oPROPOSED VORTECHS �' -. \•; 4� - `,� y- J ! J;°\ I IY I .° I i I ' \� v -BYPASS STRUCTURE, 32� .\ \;, .� __ _ SE DETAIL SHEET 8 00>�! � +, 7 EXISTING SMH 6 6- INV. IN EL 313.0' 1\� _'$ \ \ • :\ ,I I * I I III I \ _ _ \ \ \ Qn o. j.PROPOSED 36" PVC -„" 38" INV. IN EL. 310.5 _-__JC04 _-`-1_.-•\ ` "IN / / OVERFLOW TO EXISTING {-'STORM DRAIN MANHOLE -_ J \ I _ bA' PROPOSED 1 B" PVC - -- - -- - - - - _ \ N _ /1 24' PVC TO 24' D.I. - - - r'� ` I \ �. I " f \ OVERFLOW TO EXISTING ! TRANSITION COULPING l�•'- I 1 \ \ 1I�, r --� STORM DRAIN MANHOLE T� �• � I ; � I I ! I Ii 24" RESILIENT WEDGE \ 1 3, \' •\ \ \ 1 I I 1! • I X I � Y 1 In II � l 1 24" PVC TO 24' D.I. �! GATE VALVE WITH TRANSITION COUPLING VALVE BOX TO GRADE e (TYP. OF 3) ! \ �O 1 1 \ �_ - -- IJ-- ! I REMOVE EXISTING CAP AND Y-\-g'.� ^\`�❑ \ ' 1 Ti inil 1 INSTALL 24' D.I. PIPE AND 1, - 1\ I ` c,., �, j .?O \ •- --�, ,.� 1 _ �n i l D m VALVES PIPE INV. EL. 313 5 / 1, 1 / i \ o o - ,; '� IO \ I o �� / ? Redcan M rova rr Mu oo i �o _ I ti \ - - -- - -- - - - Iri� EXISTING 24 PIPE W/'0 - - Ye CAP (TYP. OF 2) '\ l I / IT ------------- --- - - ------ 1 ! INV. EL 313.5 } I 1 Gov oeo4.10 Issued I� ey Appa YY MM.DD \ 1 1 I - . ! ? I •�\\. / i II \ 15 `S, / \ 1 y i n?S.• H I I i1� ,` \/ I \ ,I \ I FiN fNmr MLCS - Vmtlal .It. Wan awG Pm Chw D gn W MY.m \ \ 1 I ►: - > / /� �2 \ yr s15 Penn l Seal -to Yra I'dlI PROP) \ \ \ I ! (BY THERS) -I I! A I IIIILI Z N..,IL ,7r,IllI, - \� ( •\ I� \ /" % I ry.,M,f ,- II o Y`I ClientlProject BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT � \.�I.9aJ � FAA AIPNO. 3-0&0005-69-2007 \ of � I � ( 1 CONSTRUCT STORMWATER TREATMEANT PUMPING AND INFILTRATION SYSTEM FOR N N \ \ l P \ I L \ I GENERAL AVIATION APRON - SED PHASE N I, \ �,.I ♦ \ South Burlington, Vermont ! III I / 1' \/ PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN L -1'LSITE PLAN I ! ! Ili I I I-. t rI �I,I• 29 / \; I \III\ Roo No Scab D 40' � 195310144 i" = 40' oa — l 2>T E, \ , B@ — — —32s oD— _ — — _ j /i ,< < _ DtaM g No. Sheet Revisio S r,LE: 1" 40' -32500-_ 1 - S;� nn- _, I � C4 5 of 11 i 4 VT AIR NATIONAL GUARD ♦ ' CONTROL POINT ♦ , NGS BTV 95 3 CONTROL POINT \ N719031.233 - - - - - _ - - -- - _ NOS BTV 95 2 E1470293.884--- - N717455.504 ELEV. 33t13' - -� E1472088.486 ♦ ♦ - ' ELEV. 332.77 ! RSA RSA RSA --•--� RSA �— — — — RSA �' ♦ - --------- RUNWAY t5-33i 4AY l VS21 VSB;'---�--,7, RSA RSA R RSA ,I FM' / SAFETY AREA RUNWAY/ TAXIWAY 'K' 250' FROM _~ {@ RUNWAY q 1 - RGY,4A SfOPROPOSED RMW TER PROPOSED 20'x3OO, FORCE MAIN 1 +11 INFILTRATION SYSTEM SYSTEM PROP. + O O 1 w O 4 l 21 .C, GENERAL O �11 AVIATION � 1, APRON t (BY OTHERS) w 14 �F \ N ♦ w -fib- O�, � .A.1c 300' 0 300' 600' SCALE: 1" = 300' N0. EXISTING BUILDINGS N0. EXISTING BUILDINGS O TERMINAL BUILDING O AVIATRON / CUSTOMS O COVERED PARKING GARAGE O BUILDING 890 O RENTAL CAR FACILITY 1i P&W HANGAR O FAA BUILDING & ATCT O HANGAR / MAINT. FACILITY © BUILDING 6 17 HEXAGON HANGARS O ATLANTIC AVIATION NORTH HANGAR ® MAINT. HANGAR O FUEL FARM ® FORMER ALERT HANGARS O GA TERMINAL BUILDING (BEACON LOCATION) ©0 NEW ASR-11 TOWER (2005) 0 ATLANTIC AVIATION SOUTH HANGAR 21 PREVIOUS ASR-9 TOWER SITE ® MAINTENANCE SHOP / SREB ® PARKING CONTROL OFFICE O FEDEX FACILITY © BUILDING 860 ® HERITAGE FLIGHT HANGAR ® AIRFIELD LIGHTING VAULT StanteC Consulting Services Inc 55 Green Mountom Drive South Burlington VT U.S A 05403 TM. 802 864.0223 Fax 802,564,0165 wwwatontec coin stamK Copyright Reserved Rw Coetroator ,hoU unify end M m*-ible fur of drm,nu"rM. DO NOT .cal, ft dm eq -arty ,rtan « -WY , .MII to npo to Sbnl.a without Nby TM Cagy *b ball d ,.gn. eM drawing. are tM PM_p , of S 't.0 R.pmduutwn or - fer arty p.9- otMr than Nat auth -! by Stm. a forb-wd.n Consultants Legend �--�� CONTRACTOR'S ACCESS ROUTE -- - --- - EXISTING SECURITY FENCE -- - - PROPERTY LINE Notes DATUMS ARE HORIZONTAL-NAD-83(1996) SPC (4400-VT) U.S. FEET, VERTICAL-NAVD88 FEET Issued Permit -Seat BY MPd, ri Mu DD GOM- ---- 0804,to By Appd W,MM OD MFR 070425 �d.�lan_aM_g,n�wb M MFR Own. Child D", W,MMOD Cllenwmlect BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FAA AIP NO 3.05000569.2007 CONSTRUCT STORMWATER TREATMEANT PUMPING AND INFILTRATION SYSTEM FOR GENERAL AVIATION APRON - SED PHASE II South Burlington, Vermont Tile SITE PLAN PmjW No Scale 195310144 1"= 300' DMINIng No Sheet Revision Cil 2of11 0 uthb l g " June 19, 2008 David & Janet Desarno 5 Ladd Point Road Grand Isle, VT 05458 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the „July 1, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, '6�64 down Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Durs,at Street Saulk ittrrlington, rtr nbc.)i Cai 902_841L,41,06 yak tlR .9i5. 2ti7 Marv.+%v.st+ur5.corn a ME southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 7, 2008 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-08-49 Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board on July 1, 2008 (effective July 1, 2008). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Donough Brown Planning bz Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5768 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com y southbur *119tork PLARN tic a ZONING July 7, 2008 Jon Lienwohl Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-08-49 Airport Dear Mr. Lienwohl: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant a75 Dorset 31ra t Sosith flurlkngton, YT t15VD3 tel t02A4t'0Dh raw, W-e.vw.s:hurl.emm SOUth FLA�IAC'NO i ZONING July 7, 2008 Robert McEwing Brian Worthen Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-08-49 Airport Dear Mr. McEwing & Mr. Worthen: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant 575 Dorset Stroot Sanih $tsrlrngion, VT A503 tal H02A4t't"96 fi'm M'R18'001 WVu',r.3'hU0.ram AGENCY OF NATUY',RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAr 'SOURCES BOARD http://www.ar s _.;.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / http:// �..,.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: PENDING APPLICATION #: DISTRICT: TOWN: South Burlington PIN: EJ96-0386 OWNER OF PROJECT SITE. APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) Commute -Air / Eastern Aviation Fuels (Name) L.H. LaPlante Company, LLC (Address) (Address) P.O. Box 496 (Town) (State) (Zip) (Town) (State) (Zip) Plattsburgh, NY, 12901 (Telephone) (Telephone) 518-561-8003 Project Name: Fuel Storage Tank Based on a written or oral request or information provided by L.H. LaPlante, received on 1-08, a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of N/A acres, located on Valley Rd. The project is generally described as - Installation of an above ground 12000 gallon aviation fuel tank for the "Commute -Air" hanger at the existing Burlington International Airport. Prior permits from this office: WW-4-1042(6), 4CO034 & 4CO331 and amendments PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION E I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coo rdinat" A i t tact Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ❑ Landew4UA1gent E Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION FROM THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (C)) OR MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) ** Project: E Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? ❑ Yes ❑ No When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: E Yes ❑ No Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes E No BASIS FOR DECISION: Material change to permitted project SIGNATURE: DATE: 2/5/2008 ADDRESS: District # 4 Environmental Commission Y ✓ is rict Coordinator Telephone: 802-879-5658 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED? E Yes ❑ No E Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)** ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (#2 ❑ Floor Drains (#1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: Wastewater Management would want to confirm that there is no interference w/ the existing wastewater systems. SIGNATURE: DATE: 1-30-08 ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation E Environmental Ass 5 ce Office, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: 802-879-5676 ❑ Wastewater Mana ement Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» **NOTE: NUMBERS /N PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS /N THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm TH IS A PRELIMINARY, NON-BINDI iTERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PER( WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7;2, & 8) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 91) ❑ Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source #14 ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation #14 ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (#14) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-8500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants (#22) ❑ >500' waterline construction (#22) ❑Community Water System (CWS) ❑Bottled Water (#20) ❑Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) #( 21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) (#21) WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (#6 — 6_5 ) ontact: Contact: Matt DeWolfe 802-879-5659 ❑ Flood Plains (241-3759) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) ❑ Construction General Permits>1AC of disturbance (#6.1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) 0 Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (#6.2 & 6_3) ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) 0 Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (476-2679 / 879-5631 / 786-5906) (#27 & 32) WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dennis Fekert 241-1493 Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) #36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) June Middleton (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37,39,40) ❑ Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) ® Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35)—❑ Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) Contact: ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5) 11 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50 2) ® Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial #51.1 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (j&:9) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: _ ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) #( 65) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) #68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 802-828-3429) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3429) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑ Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-3429) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3429) (#83, 83.1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-3429) ##889, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-2431) (#71) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)(#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) (#88) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-3429) (#75.1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47,1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90.1) ❑ Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 93. 94, 995, 96) 21 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ® Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) qP LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & J 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date:1-30-08 I may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 6/06 CD 1000 9 3 X Q H TEMPORARY AIRFIELD PARKING 117,124 SF I L TAXIWAY G E:l (] LJ ED C, / \ 228 222 218 214 210 l� 1pp�ZOZ QaQo =1 o O � tp r Oo 0 o � 00 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY AIRFIELD PARKING AREA MAY 2006 0 1 if = 1000' 0 Q t eG< o �0 Oo o O o ` 4 C> o 1000 o O o Q 4 p O 0 �? SOUTH BURLINGTON <� Q RECEIVED o a a MAY 21 City at'f� - irarrrr�llr C BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TEMPORARY ON -AIRFIELD OVERFLOW PARKING TAXIWAY G CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 12, 2007 \drb\sit\burlington_airport\temp_parking.doc Application received: May 21, 20007 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-07-34 BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Meeting date: June 19, 2007 Agenda #3 Owner/Applicant Contact a if Burlington International Airport Robert McEwing, Director of Planning & Dev. 1200 Airport Drive Burlington International Airport South Burlington, VT 05403 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Airport Industrial (AIR-1) Zoning District 2000-000OC 1020 Acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sitlburlington airport\temp parking.doc The City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to allow temporary parking along the runways, 1200 Airport Drive. This is an after -the -fact application. The applicant has already been engaged in utilizing this area as parking and has only since applied for the site plan after the City addressed the issue with them. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans and has the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The subject property is over 1000 acres. The area proposed for overflow parking is essentially negligible in relation to the whole. The entire site is still well within limitations for the district. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff understands that patrons utilizing the overflow parking will not be the ones driving to the area reserved for the overflow parking. There is a staging area proposed which would minimize access to the area and decrease accessibility issues. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. This criterion is not applicable to this application. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No new buildings are proposed. This criterion is not applicable to this application. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. It is staff's understanding that no new utility services will be necessary as part of this application. If this is not the case, the applicant should state so and shall adhere to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations which states that any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Permit Number SP- - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1 OWNER QF RECORD (Name a sh wn on deed, mailing address, phone and fax 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)F 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Z -r',6 oo G 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) r.r W ,cis "Wd /; �J/? �kS b) Proposed 8s is on property in ude description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Jf '*- r r% r; kl',1/ in K-7 c) Total b�ilding square �footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) N� 41 I (".D i7 J 7 l,V I. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) �nJ f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): A4 :l/J/ W!1t0 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 14]-k. a) Building: Existing % / Proposed sq. ft. sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverer (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing �= `� % / sq. ft. Proposed: , c, % / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. N/.�/ d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ Nm—e / V,a p-p c) Other site improvements (please list. with cost): ' , .- It 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): ,,, )--I Z 4 k- b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 0ar-�,0"Ck 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION:_ %" c/ sv-s �/ - 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: /� -/yli/' 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:'rr��`�LIS(' y�r 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 1-2 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN SIGNAvTURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: C� l REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: C Complete f ❑ Incomplete Di ctor of Planning & t--\ or Designee Date 4 a jocf+ f, L SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 JUNE 2007 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 19 June 2007, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: M. Behr, Acting Chair; P. Plumeau, E. Knudsen, R. Farley, G. Quimby, M. Birmingham Also Present: C. LaRose, Associate Planner; B. McDonough, Planning Department; H. Kendrew, G. Henderson -King, R. Cassidy, M. Beaudin, Y. Poon, C. Yandow, P. Ayer, A. Farrington, D. Wilson 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. The Chair reminded the Board that the next meeting will be on 10 July. 2. Minutes of 1 May and 5 June 2007: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 1 May 2007 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Messrs. Plumeau and Behr abstaining. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 5 June 2007 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Messrs. Plumeau and Birmingham abstaining. Site Plan Application #SP-07-34 of the City of Burlington/Burlington Inter- national Airport to allow temporary parking along the runways,1200 Airport Drive: Ms. Kendrew said that at certain times during the year, the garage and overflow lots are full, so they shuttle cars onto the Airport. She stressed that no customers drive onto the Airport. Mr. Behr said that apparently this use has been going on. He asked the applicant to come in before they do these things. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-34 of the City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -1- SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 July 11, 2007 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes - Temporary Parking Dear Ms. Kendrew: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved June 19, 2007 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 21, 2007 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Temporary Parking Dear Ms. Kendrew: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, 1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE:. NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST CW IS T �0 ��S av�SO- Pe&� S n/ aJ 100 o 0, n ?4-1 + OA-lkl �e C- UT Gr��fl 10P P RE'A xT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 8, 2007 Burlington International Airport c/o Bob McEwing 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the June 19, 2007 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, W�� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONi' 05403 (802) 846-4106 --` FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM To: Chuck Hafter, City Manager From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: Zoning Violations — Burlington International Airport Date: December 13, 2006 The following is a list of outstanding zoning violations at the Burlington International Airport: The addition to the parking garage has been completed and used and occupied without a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for 2-3 years. A C.O. application was received on 9/6/05 with an inspection of the premises conducted on 10/31/05. It was discovered that a substantial amount of required landscaping was missing. Bob McEwing was informed of this and was told that the airport would need to either plant the missing material or apply to the Development Review Board for a revised plan. Mr. McEwing responded that they would apply for a revised plan. No application for the revised plan has been received. 2. An addition was constructed last summer to the rear of the AVIATRON building without site plan approval and without a zoning permit. Site plan approval #SP- 06-38 has now been obtained but no zoning permit was issued because the conditions have not been met. The violation is that the addition was built without a zoning permit and is being used without a Certificate of Occupancy (the approval will e)W� n). 3. Temporary C.O. #01-04 expired on 7/10/01 for construction of a 25,165 sq. ft. terminal expansion (ZP-00-176). A permanent C.O. has been requested but cannot be issued because of other zoning violations. They are in violation for using and occupying this addition without a C.O. 4. Using Independent Wireless antennas on observation deck without a C.O. Antennas were permitted by #ZP-01-204. A C.O. application has been received but it can not be issued because of other violations. 5. Using and occupying 1165 sq. ft. addition to north end of terminal without a C.O. Issued under permit #ZP-01-317.-W C.O. application has been submitted. 6. Using a retaining wall without a C.O. Issued under permit #ZP-04-341. A C.O. application was submitted but it cannot be issued because of other zoning violations. 7. A new hangar and office building was constructed on Aviation Avenue. A C.O. was requested but cannot be issued because the approved plan was not followed. We have been waiting since July 2006 for a revised plan and application. 8. The new north terminal addition was opened in 12/12/06 without a C.O. ktr application has been submitted. ? CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The undersigned herewith requests an inspection of the premises indicated below and issuance of a "Certificate of Occupancy", pursuant to Section 17.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Property Owner:L�y�l�/,-����1�!�D"" Mailing Address:' �LGwe� r Property Address: ❑ The work for whichhp Certificate of Occupancy is being requested was completed on as authorized under Zoning Permit # dated ✓��,6 �� ❑ Home Occupation Request Property Owner Sire Fee: $60.00 Date Application received on: Application #CO - ❑ Temporary Certificate of Occupancy will expire on to provide the applicant time to complete the following improvements: ❑ Permanent Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Application denied for the following reasons: Administrative Officer's Signature Date In accordance with S / premises located at 11Lf-_ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY on 20.20 of th Zonin Regulations the having been completed / as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No.0 �`� / dated , b d P b d fon UT l l/) ,4 L may now a use r r� Temporary Certificate valid Sm CITY of �gvldod- Lj�14 549 PI � 6 1//10/0 occupancy. ems. Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMIT N04.1:7�?a .. APPLICATION FOR ZONING PERMIT 1st. Copy CODE OFFICER t ZOt1t....}`. 2nd. Copy CITY ENGINEER 3rd. Co ITY ASSESSOR / 4t opy APPLICANT Date .............................................. The undersigned hereby applies for permission to make certain building improvements as described below. (Plans to be submitted If required by Building Inspector.) All construction to be completed in accordance with the Zoning Laws and Building Regulations of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont, and con- form to the Regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and any and all Federal Regulations now in affect. CONSTRUCTION STREET ,,E' Y; �,(/ NUMBER t:2-0 6 OCCUPANCY FLOORS LOT SIZE: Frontage Depth Lot No. Single Family B 1 12 13 Two Family Cement OWNER ��. �' I LDER Apartment No. Fam. Earth Store Pine WATER SUPPLY: Public yg7 Private ❑ Offices ;<' Hardwood SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public ;{d• Private p Permit Wareho se Tile ' • carpet ROAD OPENING: (Show layout) Permit # Res. Geraills Attic FI. & Strs. ELEC. WIRING: Underground Overhead ❑ Permit # No. Cars Dot. 0 Atto Height Gas Station INTERIOR FINISH Additions -Alterations B L.Mark 1 2 3 Plot to scale Lot and Building Improvements, showing width of Front, Side and Rear yards. N at Compass point Indicating North. FOUNDATION Pine Concrete Hardwood Brick or Stone ®mr�mmm� ■■I■■■■■■■MI IMI ■■WJ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Wide SIdIng ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ = : - = ■■■■■■■■■■�1*Gr��r7■!/■11 I/I�Ar1i���s:G/'fi.//'lIFI■■■■■■■■■ ...SidingPbes. Shingles ■■■■■■la�l!L�!!■■L'CG/r■■■I■!/I■ii►9ri■I■■■■■■■■■ ,Wood Shingles ■■■■■■■■■■/►i■■■■■■■■■■■/�■■�/A■■■/�►_1■rI■■■ ■ ■■ ■ 1 ■■■■■■■■i��'■i��!�i■■■�sae-:►.r,.c■■■run,al+:■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■i111.1/.`/:'.'!i■■V�V■■J■iirllr■■lllli■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■Solid Brick =117-MIFTE ■■■■■■■■■I■■■■■■11■■■■■11■)•■■■l��r'i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ •■��LCI%%ii'v�i�:l�r���U��rr��Yi�i����������������� ROOFING 40117-1111W=110 Asph. Shingles Metal Composition ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■� a- ■ ■ r f � tr . . . .. • APPLICATION: ISSUED TO REJECTED ❑ APPROVED C✓ =LA—i SIGNATURE OF CODE OFFICER Date i g PERMIT VALID FOR SIX MONTHS PERMIT SUBJECT TO APPEAL WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED 'e..4'7�'uii-r:'�"��"�:_h4ri��Y:r�L,�4.�ji.: ,..� .....,.�...�z�+•.;.:y..,:s;��.:.:e+_...�._ti.� _ _ _ __ I�ID ' LECiQiI Z I cs.s AVE= NaaIAST SEe1ART uarnm TAMWAT "A' CEKTUVJW i1 _ s em m PU A1D CEMW C1ICIEM .AMENT TO E 141 L eGSn+o nCONCRETE PA413OT 10 BE IiACIED ® Iie��raJ�sJ�aJ.era...e.�Je•+_.M aas�..�.J��K�n ME!I1nINNUmom�Ap; �f!!4�• i����pg�'��1��1��IgFf�Y�9q��y®ra��1..�..�'}1�a�Yif�y.1>yew..�(.l�l1�1�1�1riELlt�i�EI�Kt ���t��^OM/ �1�Ka• worlds Imo® WNWHE ■!��®�I��iI�1���1�i�Iil '��iitYdYSi�'� \ �oI Ila III A 1_ Ir 1� )� L 1. ZOtQIC 0I AXVVRT �.aIFED a MAY 2 6 20O' iington ,.". . GRAPMC SCALE K 4t 0r A R R BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SOUTH BURUNGTON. VERMONT SOUTH TERMINAL EXPANSION PROJECT SITE PLAN 1 S dd Aww.n. Sully 410 AND Yr) 11111r NH 02107 WAIN R Z 9 I MM RI DYC i au1s: 1r�.1' D' +♦.norm GT oAm 10r1J/00 ►fL PROJECT Sll NO. 1 CF 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The undersigned herewith requests an inspection of the premises indicated below and issuance of a "Certificate of Occupancy", pursuant to Section 17.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Property Owner: �i' �y } c'sd • &-'/ 0 Mailing Address: izdb Property Address: 18r The work for which a Certificate of Occupancy is being requested was completed on 1v as authorized under Zoning Permit # -ZP-oC -Z&C dated -6 ❑ Home Occupation Request Pro ��r qwM ��ture� / - r Date Fee: $60.00 .�( Application received on: Application #CO - ❑ Temporary Certificate of Occupancy will expire on to provide the applicant time to complete the following improvements: ❑ Permanent Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Application denied for the following reasons: Administrative Officer's Signature Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The undersigned herewith requests an inspection of the premises indicated below and issuance of a ""Certificate of Occupancy", pursuant to Section 17.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Property Owner: Mailing Address: Property Address: The work for which a. Certificate of Occupancy is being requested was completed on i '7 as authorized under Zoning Permit # P-- dated ❑ Home Occupation Request �op Ovyne/ i na� Fee: $60.00 Application received on: Date Application #CO - ❑ Temporary Certificate of Occupancy will expire on to provide the applicant time to complete the following improvements: ❑ Permanent Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Application denied for the following reasons: Administrative Officer's Signature Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Applicant: ,r.+�U� ..L-/1 46 No: Address: � d /1"r �n� Daytime Tel. No: '2-9�7f` . Property Location: 4-o-Rog �n Property Owner: TW �yT'�ii'ZT Address: �v�Q.tr�) Tax Parcel ID No. i Parcel Size: Present use of property -(�escri,5)L. n Proposed use of property (de sc b ): Proposed struc es/improvei ents(inchoing building djpaensions): H�a�►r.iwi d4�—S'�.�.Cun Attach sketch plan (see attached sketch Ian instructions) or site plan. �.••. e"�' " s� Estimated cost of improvements: Adjoining property owned by applicant/property owner: �ts (public road fronta e, public waterontage, approved right -of --way): J - r Y it r_ �%" • A Applicant/Owner Certification S The undersigned property owner hereby consents to submission of this application and understands that if the application is approved, the zoning permit attached conditions-wW be binding on the property. S Property Owner Signature Date The undersigned applicant hereby affi t the information presented in this application is true, accurate and complete. Ann$cant &ma'tuae Date ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ACTION ,O Date Received: Y v 4 Fee Received: $ t *\ q Identification of zoning district: A 'I Identification of proposed use: Proposed use type: —Permitted Conditional /IX Date of site plan approval/denial `� Approval ate Denial Date Date of subdivision approval/denial Approval Date Denial Date Date of conditional use approval/denial Approval Date Denial Date Date of appeal variance approval/denial: Approval Date Denial Date FINAL ADMINIST TIVE OFFICER ACTION APPROVED 6a � ? ZO G T � DatJ of Approval istrativ`ee Officer-1s Signature This permit shall expire on ! Fee: DENIED Date of Denial Reason for denial: Notice of Appeal Rights Administrative Officer's Signature 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PERMIT NOZ/..��~3/ APPLICATION FOR ZONING PERMIT 1st. Copy CODE OFFICER ry� 2nd. Copy CITY ENGINEER Zone.,JJ„ Y 3rd. Copy CITY ASSESSOR 4th Copy APPLICANT Date .......... no undersigned hereby applies for permission to make certain building Improvements as described below. (Plans to be submitted If required by Building Inspector.) All construction to be completed In accordance with the Zoning Laws and Building Regulations of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont, and con- form to the Regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and any and all Federal Regulations now In effect. CONSTRUCTION STREETS NUMBER OCCUPANCY FLOORS LOT SIZE: Frontage Depth Lot No. Single Family B 1 2 3 Two Family Cement OWNER UILDER Apartment No. Fam. Earth Store Pine WATER SUPPLY: Public ❑ Private ❑ Offices Hardwood SEWAGE DISPSAL: Public ❑ Pr�ivatewarehouseTil• O❑ Permit F M MJ ii�"Yi VX� I ROAD OPENING: (Show layout) Permit ■ , Overhead ■-00©© Plot to scale Lot and Building Improvements, showing width of Front, Side and Rear yards. Mark N at Compass point Indicating North. eZ�■■■- ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I SEES■■■N■■■■■ ■SEEN■■■ ■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Sip'■I ■��■-.-� ..............■..■...C.............■..... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■W�■I al Brick orsto� ■PWffRT�-■0i= 14114 ■�■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■SEE■■■■■I Finished Attic ■ ■■■■■■■��■■■■■■�17�■ ■��r�SEES/M11��■����■l�r:ilWide Sid Pipole-2-0- Fur—nace= �■■■■■■ ng ■■■■■■■�lh�_:�J■r■i:r6/,''s1■�I��I7►i?,1:1►./I■*'/r�4%�'!�J■■■■■■ Drop Siding OMb-1 Hot Air Furnace No Sheathing Forced Air F.rn. M ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l!7tSEES■I■■■■A■■■■rI■■1�I�i■■■■I■■ Wood ShI441; )as. Shingles =■■■■■■■■■111/I■r�Il�r_,+7■■C!i/:%!!/■[�■I11►.%1/.�I/.71�/��I■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■�■:.■■■E.�su�nu��,��■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■�l■SEES■■■■A■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■�ii■/I■■■■■■��■/I�'■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEMO = �'=�■■■■■■■■.■■■■�■■■■■■■■i■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■moon■ Brick Veneer Brick on Tile PLUMBING ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Bathroom Vitrollto Plate ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ �� � i■iiiiiiiiiiii■iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ROOFING Asph. Shingles ■= ■ ; ■ ■ f ■�� +ii -AFF40—S ME I PE ADDRE9S of e �99' •/ i • • CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 14, 2007 Robert McEwing Director of Planning & Development Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Zoning Violation Dear Mr. McEwing: Thank you for your letter of March 9, 2007. Since you anticipate that parking on the airfield may occur during the last week in April, the City requests that you submit your application for approval of this before the last week in April. Failure to do so will result in legal action to obtain compliance under the City's Land Development Regulations. Sincer , k�oncl J. Be air Administrative Officer cc: Chuck Hafter, City Manager Bi.,=RLINGTON INTER' ATIOMAL AIRPORT arC Raymond Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dear Ray: Reference your March 5, 2006 letter expressing concern over parking of vehicles inside the airport perimeter fence in the Airport operational area without a zoning permit. Please be advised that we consider this as emergency temporary parking, during a high traffic period, that cannot be accommodated in the parking structure or normal overflow parking lots that are provided on Airport Drive extension. You may be aware that the Airport is developing a new site plan for parking north of the terminal area to include areas along Kirby Road and Dumont Avenue. We anticipate that these lots would have limited access, would be screened from neighboring areas and would only be used during extreme travel periods (such as school/winter vacations). We do not like parking on the airfield as it requires unusual security measures and is labor intensive. The Airport is also looking at other alternatives that would provide parking at remote locations (including the So. Burlington landfill site) that would involve shuttle service. And, we are also reviewing options to relocate the existing car rental services to another location adjacent to the airport to free up customer parking. All of these require careful thought to insure that we do not create a problem while solving another. We anticipate that the parking on the airfield will be basically complete by March 16 but may occur again during the last week in April when there is another school vacation period. We will be coming forward to the Development Review Board as soon as we have something concrete to present. Thank you for your patience and consideration. Sincerely, RQl4ert McEwing t+,.,f€.Diredarof Pianning & Development CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 5, 2007 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Zoning Violation Dear Mr. McEwing: It has come to my attention that the City of Burlington (Burlington International Airport) is again in violation of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The violation consists of establishing at least two (2) parking lots north of Airport Drive (in between taxiway and south- westerly boundary) without a zoning permit. You have ten (10) days from the date of this letter to correct this violation or submit an application for approval of these parking areas. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sinc Ray Ad rY BTV B URLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT January 10, 2007 Charles Hafter, City Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Chuck: We have reviewed your letter of December 21, 2006 that pointed out eight zoning violations that you allege at the airport. Rest assured that we are concerned about these items and are making progress toward satisfying the required conditions. We do have some general issues concerning the timing of certain requirements and the delaying of subsequent permit applications due to problems with unrelated prior applications. However, those are separate discussions that we can have outside of these specific permit requests. In the meantime, we are working toward closing out the existing issues and, to that end; here is a status report by item number: Item 1. A new landscaping plan is required before the C.O. application for the parking garage addition pending in your office can be approved. This plan is being prepared by Michael Lawrence, Landscape Architect and could not be completed until after three, homes on Dumont Avenue were removed. The removal work was completed in early December. We anticipate that the plan will be coordinated with both the City of South Burlington's arborist and the planning office and be presented to the Development Review Board by the end of January. Items 2-4 & 6. C.O. applications are on file in the Zoning Department awaiting action. Items 5 and 8. Both phases of the North Terminal expansion were officially completed in December and C.O. applications will be filed by January 16, 2007. Item 7. A C.O. application is on file in the Zoning Department and is awaiting a new site plan for the Aviation Support Hangar area. That site plan is being prepared by Stantec Engineering and will include a new consolidated trash and recycling facility to serve this area of the airport. It is anticipated that the application and site plan will be submitted to the Development Review Board by the end of January. 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone: 802.863.2874 (TTY) FAX: (802) 863.1526 Hafter, Page 2 If more specific information is desired concerning these projects, please call Bob McEwing, Heather Kendrew or myself and thanks for your patience. Sincerel , ran R. Searles Director of Aviation Cc: Michael Flaherty Robert McEwing Heather Kendrew City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 846-4107 FAX (802)846-4101 CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER December 21, 2006 Mr. Brian Searles General Manager Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Suite No. I South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Brian: Attached is a list of eight current outstanding zoning violations at the Burlington International Airport. The City Enforcement staff has been working with the Airport to try to resolve existing issues for several years, but the list keeps getting longer, and we feel that the Airport staff does not take seriously the duty to comply with local development regulations. These land development regulations are a requirement for all developers in the City, including the City itself, and many other governmental and NGO agencies. We would have taken action against a private developer long ago, but have attempted to work with the Airport due to its importance to our region and the fact that you are a fellow municipality. It has come to a point where we can no longer wait for your decision that it is time to remedy these violations. Before turning this matter over to formal enforcement mechanisms, I wanted to get your attention to this list and to request that you take a personal interest in seeing that these violations are cured. If we do not see appropriate applications and other remedies by the end of January, we will need to treat the Airport as we would any other developer in default of our regulations. Please feel free to call Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, to discuss these further. I hope that we can come to a resolution without involving further outside parties. Sincerely, Charles Hafter City Manager Cc: Michael Flaherty, Chairperson, Airport Board Ray Belair, Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM To: Chuck Hafter, City Manager From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: Zoning Violations — Burlington International Airport Date: December 13, 2006 The following is a list of outstanding zoning violations at the Burlington International Airport: The addition to the parking garage has been completed and used and occupied without a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for 2-3 years. A C.O. application was received on 9/6/05 with an inspection of the premises conducted on 10/31/05. It was discovered that a substantial amount of required landscaping was missing. Bob McEwing was informed of this and was told that the airport would need to either plant the missing material or apply to the Development Review Board for a revised plan. Mr. McEwing responded that they would apply for a revised plan. No application for the revised plan has been received. 2. An addition was constructed last summer to the rear of the AVIATRON building without site plan approval and without a zoning permit. Site plan approval #SP- 06-38 has now been obtained but no zoning permit was issued because the conditions have not been met. The violation is that the addition was built without a zoning permit and is being used without a Certificate of Occupancy (the approval will expire soon). 3. Temporary C.O. #01-04 expired on 7/10/01 for construction of a 25,165 sq. ft. terminal expansion (ZP-00-176). A permanent C.O. has been requested but cannot be issued because of other zoning violations. They are in violation for using and occupying this addition without a C.O. 4. Using Independent Wireless antennas on observation deck without a C.O. Antennas were permitted by #ZP-01-204. A C.O. application has been received but it can not be issued because of other violations. 5. Using and occupying 1165 sq. ft. addition to north end of terminal without a C.O. Issued under permit #ZP-01-317. No C.O. application has been submitted. 6. Using a retaining wall without a C.O. Issued under permit #ZP-04-341. A C.O. application was submitted but it cannot be issued because of other zoning violations. 7. A new hangar and office building was constructed on Aviation Avenue. A C.O. was requested but cannot be issued because the approved plan was not followed. We have been waiting since July 2006 for a revised plan and application. 8. The new north terminal addition was opened in 12/12/06 without a C.O. No application has been submitted. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING COMMENTS CCRPC contractor Dan Albrecht and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and have the following comments: KEY ISSUES: Key issues for Board discussion at this time include: • The Board should discuss the building design as well as screening of the building from Airport Drive would be beneficial due to it highly visible location. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlinaton Land Development Reaulations. subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at an acceptable pressure. The project will tap into existing water lines near existing building #7 in order to provide water to the proposed sewage receiving facility. The Water Department has not yet reviewed the plans and has stated that they will do so at the preliminary plat level when more details are available. 1. The City of South Burlington Water Department shall review the plans for the subject project, prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The project will tap into existing sewer lines near the location of proposed sewage receiving facility. The City Engineer has not yet reviewed the plans. 2. The City Engineer shall review the plans prior to preliminary plat approval. 3. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to preliminary plat approval and final wastewater allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 4. The applicant shall include sufficient site grading and erosion control plans as part of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 21, 2012 \drb\staffcomments\2012\ Application received: August 31, 2012 S D_12 18 1150Ai rportDrive_B IA_sewage_sketch SKETCH PLAN #SD-12-18 CITY OF BURLINGTON/ BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1150 Airport Drive Meeting date: October 2, 2012 Owner/Applicant Property Information City of Burlington Airport Industrial (AIR-1) Zoning District 1200 Airport Drive, #1 927 acres S. Burlington, VT 05403 Agenda # 7 i 5 .g 1, City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport hereafter referred to as the applicant, to amend a planned unit development consisting of an airport facility. The amendment consists of constructing a 20' X 32' 1-story sewage receiving facility, 1200 Airport Drive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Utility lines for this project are buried. No lighting is indicated in the plans. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 8. The plans shall be revised to show existing and planned lighting to serve the building as part of the preliminary plat plan application. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G) (2) of the SBLDR. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. See above under project design. 9. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan and budget in compliance with Section 13.06 of the SBLDR as part of the preliminary plat plan application. 10. The applicant should submit estimated construction costs with the preliminary plat application, so that the exact minimum landscaping requirement can be determined. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Staff has already noted that the City Engineer shall review the preliminary plat plans and provide comments prior to approval of the preliminary plat application. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed project is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the applicant proceed to the preliminary plat and final plat level of review if desired, which shall include site -plan level data for Staff and Board review. Respectfully submitted, Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD the preliminary plat application. 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The proposed project will have no impact on traffic. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There are no wetlands, streams, or wildlife habitat on the site. The subject property is an operating airport and is not identified in the Open Space Strategy. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff recommends the building be designed to complement the architecture of the parking garage and/or terminal building, as this structure will be among the first seen from Airport users approaching from Kennedy Drive. The building will be visible through the cemetery to the south. Staff recommends that additional landscape screening be installed to the west of the proposed building sufficient to shield the area from Airport Drive. 6. The Board should discuss the building design as well as screening of the building from Airport Drive would be beneficial due to it highly visible location. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are no open space areas on the site. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has not yet reviewed the plans. 7. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review the plans for the proposed building, prior to preliminary plat approval. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. j� _ 'M ' ; , . � ��.' Sit f X � ,� �, ,� � � .ram #''�' � •1' , �� �� �'` � �; � ' �� , � sh � � "� ��w� ���,�+' - saw��','i may, . s � � w � s ; ';'r, -x � t� {' .. ,,. .� .t .�,, w. � . A — � , �".« ���` �"`�• ... -.. _.'. _ _. �, w, s .� fit:. +ly��'��'*-,"��'!'n Sao • i �. i CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drblsit\burlington airport\\paving.doc The City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to: 1) resurface runway 15-33, 2) reconstruct taxiway "H", and 3) improve the intersection of runways 15-33 and 1-19, 1200 Airport Drive. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans and has the following comments: ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The subject property is over 1000 acres. The resurfacing and slight movement will have a very negligible effect on any dimensional requirements or limitations. Staff notes that the entire site is still well within limitations for the district. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. As no new buildings are proposed, these criteria are not applicable. { CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\burlington airporMpaving.doc Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to create any additional access points to the properties that abut the subject property. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). No additional dumpsters will result from the proposed changes. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As no new construction is proposed, this criterion is not applicable to this application. Lighting The applicant has not proposed any additional lighting. If at any point the applicant desires additional lighting, they shall need to apply to the Development Review Board for such. Traffic The proposed changes will not generate any additional P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan application #SP-10-19. Res ctfully submitted, Cathyan aRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert McEwing, BIA John Leinwohl, Stantec DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 APRIL 2010 PAGE 2 Properties, LLC, until 4 May 2010. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Final Plat Application #SD-10-03 of Robert L. Provost for a planned unit development on a 0.57 acre parcel developed with a single-family dwelling. The proposal consists of: 1) adding an accessory residential unit to the existing single family dwelling, and 2) adding second single family dwelling, 27 Birch Street: Mr. Provost noted there was an issue regarding occupancy of the unit. He noted it is currently approved as a duplex. He showed the existing permit. He said the front structure will become a single family home with an accessory apartment. Mr. Dinklage said the apartment is limited to one bedroom, and it is shown with 2 bedrooms. He cited the Board's dilemma: the city used to have tight controls over accessory apartment but state law took away that control. However, even state laws were not intended to circumvent the laws to allow for a duplex. He said he would be hard- pressed to approve an "accessory unit" of this sort. He felt it would also set a bad example. Mr. Provost said his alternative is to convert the back to a single family home or to eliminate a bedroom. He indicated he has asked the Planning Commission to consider changes to the regulations. Mr. Stuono asked if this application was a misapplication of PUD standards. Mr. Belair said there is no longer a minimum acreage required for a PUD. Mr. Stuono asked if anyone can put multi structures on a lot if they can meet setback and density requirements and the Board cannot exercise discretion. Mr. Belair said the Board has no way to deny it. Mr. Stuono said he would like a legal interpretation of this. Mr. Belair noted that stipulation #10 requires that the main part of the house be owner occupied. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-10-03 of Robert L. Provost subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-1 with Mr. Stuono opposing. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-10-19 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to implement the following improvements: 1) resurface runway 15-33, 2) reconstruct taxiway "H," and 3) improve the intersection of runways 15-33 and 1-19, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl said they will resurface the main runway. He added that no work will be done outside of the runway complex. No issues were raised. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 APRIL 2010 PAGE 3 Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-10-19 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-10-06 of Peter, David & Jesusa Krag to subdivide a 10,357 sq. ft. lot developed with a single family dwelling and detached accessory residential unit into two lots of 12,100 sq. ft. (lot #1) and 10, 357 sq. ft. (lot #2), 250 Spear Street: Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from George Passage of 220 Spear Street expressing concern that this will create a non -conforming structure. Mr. Belair said the accessory apartment will become a principal structure that will not meet the setback requirements. He added that the only way to approve it would be to construct the single family home after the accessory apartment. There would still be a time when there is a violation, but it would be corrected. Mr. Dinklage asked if the owner could treat this as a PUD. Mr Belair said he could, and that would result in no violations. As part of the application, the accessory apartment could remain as it is or as an accessory apartment to the unit to be built. The applicant could come back later and subdivide so there could be 2 separate owners. This would result in two totally conforming situations. A neighbor asked whether there is a restriction on how many people can live there. Mr. Dinklage said 4 unrelated adults can occupy a single family dwelling. He asked the applicant what would be in the new house. Dr. Krag said they will build another single family unit. The plan is to ultimately sell one of the sides. He had no plan to rent to a lot of college kids. Mr. Conner noted that if the DRB were to approve a single family home with an accessory unit, the single family home would have to be owner -occupied. Both units could not be rented out. Mr. Dinklage said that however the plan comes to the Board, it will have to be squeaky clean. Dr. Krag said his goal is to comply. He indicated he would come back with a new application. 7. Preliminary & Final Plat Application #SD-10-09 of Burlington Properties Limited Partnership to subdivide a 77.6 acre parcel developed with a light manufacturing facility into four lots ranging in size from 4.93 acres to 38.55 acres, 85 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Wamsganz said all lots are now in conformance. He said the applicant would like to remove the condition that lot #1 can't come off Meadowland Drive. Mr. Dinklage noted that Meadowland Drive will be a major connector, and the Board would prefer not to have an access from it. Mr. Pollack said there are 2 large industrial buildings there with a lot of truck traffic and employees. It would be an access from a private, paved drive. He southbuxl1 V110f xjv r. PLANNING & ZONING March 25, 2010 Robert McEwing 1200 Airport Drive, Suite 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the April 6, 2010 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburi.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, ?Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Cc: Jon Leinwohl P.E. Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com e t southki!r ington H FH Mo 147 Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five wor in days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). AU / ..i ce O HEARING DATE: - PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST aln PF qQ) c��- S Ploy corc�i:Sil� � �� pwu,I2oG.� t_of�'. ,is -f fz WIN VInterested Persons Record and Service List south "ur tngton PCH`A O NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAIVE 6 zoo MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 5- . k4 l 00"k al VInterested Persons Record and Service List souxthug Ington VEPOYT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieive interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �[o E e,t, ot" xu � l 5 peaxrt FIHNQ--c,� f 7-c� G /'�i ►��u.T J60 6&1A1c,J aL4 L ss i5"e . WmC'P_aO T- So. ��- �K"I'll " �n W RO G LPQ O L C-,0 r-/S U LA Y) l rJd 12 ` & L C, 1 �� Vr OSI Lt 5 a l Interested Persons Record and Service List southburfivatou Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achidve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: A L 6 OelD PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST SQ iz- RDSAQiJE Cpee,) so U2z/a6T-W JT �0 osy a"`7 lc-, Y e s i �// Avc-aUc- ,S N I-"E Z Aa /iV ( N511�2� V6a(' 12t..1 N�TON�F � � 1 t/' PA -Tr- "VrCNHS(,Po-rC1 ) YT 49ear Utz ell s/�s, Ofi 0 Interested Persons Record and Service List southbuehing ton V EN M 0 N 7 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST cc. 2 s �� cEUu vN—�F li ak- -- —t �t l 0 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING April 8, 2010 Jon Leinwohl Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport runway resurfacing Dear Mr. Leinwohl: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on April 6, 2010 (effective 4/6/10).--Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT: 7009 0820 0002 2430 2757 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south . ; : PLANNING & ZONING April 8, 2010 Brad Worthen 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Repaving Project Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, 1 Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 0 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south, PLANNING & ZONING April 8, 2010 Robert McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Airport Repaving Project Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, ?Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburf.com AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: August 11, 2010 - September 9, 2010 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: PROJECT ID NUMBER: DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1, South Burlington, VT 05403 3028-INDS.A EJ96-0386 RECEIVING WATER: Muddy Brook and a Class 2 wetland contiguous to Potash Brook. EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft amended discharge permit proposed for issuance to City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport for the discharge of stormwater runoff from reconstructed Taxiways 'B' and 'C', relocated Taxiway T, and newly constructed Taxiway'G'; AIP No. 3-50-0005-YX- 2009 located at the Burlington International Airport in South Burlington, Vermont to Muddy Brook and a Class 2 wetland contiguous to Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes grass channels and overland disconnected sheet flow. Stormwater Discharge Permit #3028-INDS.A amends and replaces the previously issued Stormwater Discharge permit (3028-INDS) issued for this project. This amended permit incorporates a project change that resulted in an increase of 0.91 acres of impervious surface in the Muddy Brook watershed (Drainage Area S/N 001). TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources -2- (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) September 9, 2010, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation i J g xx AY4rr)Lnw ;Grp ,; dv s 1 k 4•f It JUT Ile i1 C WCr£I£ 'Cann%. J}5%5 W rr. ry.lr JVErya};,� C e auer. N J,Y a EOAn + SNOW REMOVAL , if E eu4fRY BIM UILDING E • icEwa`L ry n.r,LaTln � L _. (ZI-.r.---•r ``�= ji TNnV�37 ti V) �Y H I►AR (rxl M1�>4Y�my—Y " Inn 5]i'FVC IM'J2.4] �.• ��V IN Jt. Yi' 3)r31T_"l +N �Npr.'!5 i\\ CUTS)l t? Y4fPPVC YCJ 3]3II Al � Ft rRAY IYv S2aY• %' .0, rtz1r 1 rrH CN'K:KN�C•' Tf EL 3N Yt OPGSED RMSWNRTFF MAINTENANCE SCREENED VV IYNOffF3 HANG i rr i I AP"G" LANDSCAPING LENGEND FOR THE AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR: WILLISTON ROAD FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QUANTITY NOTE UNIT COST TOTAL COS DARK AMERICAN ARBORVITAE ThO O.W.M.14 Hvm WHIGH S RFPLANTFO $100 SA00 VALLEY FORGE ELM UYnu nrrrrrlLnr. V.6.y F.w 3-CAL { I a S gels $2.176 COMMON LILAC SY-O. vwgM rW 2 I i B $75 $150 SANUtNI JUNIFEKJ J.,*— tlWIK1.4 Y,W w 14, JS 1 UALLvN LUN IANtH SYe $u75 rAWr wNCrrn RIITLNWn Rim L:u yffla.WNY C.r own 7a" { 7 nN I ON CONTAINER SS0 SreO SIBERIAN YELLOWTVNG DOGWOOD Cana Mm TMYI r ' Xr 2 2 GALLON CONTAINER SIO $120 DWARF NNEBARK R"Ow" OW400MA'NarW 3T I 2 GALLON CONTAINER $50 S300 I LANDSCAPING IN THE VICINITY OF THE BUILDING. v Rcf w.a' LnrcL1OL=' '"°" •^ Iris "t1h`Lixe =R nl,•'NLr. rry 3.tF.of s,n rleLr IHv .+ u COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QUANTITY NOTE UNITCOST TOTAL COST HEDGE MAPLE Aar allpMb. T CAL I D i B f500 f3000 BLACK SPRUCE PIOr nA.rI.IA. 3- CAL 2 S a B $475 SI60 .,YYGr f SARGENT JUNIPERS AI0— dMr.n.4 NWft 21• Y 2 GALLON CONTAINER MOO SOBS \'GE rFrv=•+•Iv,, PLANT MATERIAL COST v • FP NEW DRY LAID FIELD STONE VVALL 50 LINEAL FEET X 3 FEET HIGH X $II/ FACE SQUARE FOOT $13,200 Fval rr "sr r TOTAL LANDSCAPING $24.305 'vAulT r `--- °y'°' rR,_ ` PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING: ,VEr < v WGj]?Si* �S+fC.AYII..V]]lL- [0 I Y01 3u.v- st rrvc; rHs n-t' / y �ROJi , •, AVIATRON I / OSPMW,G i COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QUANTITY NOTE UNIT COST TOTAL COST I AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR -� 1 SARGENT JUNIPERS .Ylrlpwa dYlrwrl. a.rp.Ia1 24 2 2 GALLON CONTAINER 06 $130 / 1IW X 1IW .( G C' F TOTAL LANDSCAPING $130 YCEEAR r ANGAR 2o"IB ,.R rA Fn _� ? SNOW REMOVING EQUIPMENT BUILDING: FF A270 OFFICE SPACE PROPOSED BIKE RACK .�1�jt I FFKil220 COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QUANTITY NOTE lM1T COST TOTAL COST S.W0 SF GROUND LEVEL m— I,I00 OF SECOND LEVEL I G 3s' HEDGE MAPLE A - .-Oft 2 CAL 1 B A B Ill M ]N 'W 7300 I500 SARGENT JUNIPERS A.p—d*.n.. J� lac ..7.IIM 21' 2 2 GALLON CONTAINER SIS 5130 / 1 y {�. � r G TOTAL LANDSCAPING 6630 (F, SMR11 S- 1(�CF'MA GASM 1 CtLL V[� a ��.YIa B a. J�FM'ADF R.f.1T 'r ■LDG aI0 G ,u��«<"-a<_. «<..a<._.f� <^•,L�.-u• .«. ul._,.<a..a % iu�. �.}kry47f0 •'_- �,rAG MIrM HWGAR VERMONTARMY j ll i7 4AC NITS II AK,iNL1M1.YW Lu (S'X KC WrFs vIGa.E YaPA."OfEe I NV171TL la,Ii'i rNM,F t in -1Mq'I yA.G P CSIBLE 1ST NATIONAL OlU1RD n' 3'%J TI Ri0 TA 0 r Jk4W UL ILY L r1RIL INV 1 HANDICAP AC ES (I7I1n StVr.4C= I =v>=, . L' � ,. - u 19 SPACES I I rTEp TY IT G40kLV O 1 � 7TIAb p G f iCpI1CK_! � �L'¢VCRF,E�, RM 31'W HANdr'4lRLU B]i1M I C 511CTfC HV 3TI4Y GJJI W RARIThG IOU N•:_S [4 r D LS57S4 YIYVL+:MVkV 37JirA]NI5 ' IJV JI.IL WGUT]iS ee •E0 F<YL ^< MAA7!m HANGAR �S'X D PARKING 3gMNDM 6PACE15n --_�7 'YCE0.W , ^iYeGAtiL a r CJN..SLTL« G < IL �t•CLWA W'lW^.' YMM-E JNAMf - \ Ll I H , r ` HMEV 1 11 Aalf• Avuna. 1A GAR 5 PROPOSED STRIPED '' LUFfCr, TAG I`I ►ARgNG SPACES (WX1I) l C< rLNGlI IeILL a` r3 n < �. f 54VLU „4VLJ 'If �Pam- I _CIC NNL RIIMf',M F !I. Q'V • SgGr CIYSrLF.'IE ,/e IN D'NF \ AVIATRON mom NHoi+wi` / - \ 1I PARgIN BPACES (W%7� = ANDIVAN ACCESSIBLEHANDICAP SPACE (WX1I) T__1 °,"�"'�" i -- - -• - ""' J JU \\ I - � I "" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 51R �urK4ci (NP) ED AVAILABLE AU%I ILUARY►ARgNG LI130I9PAC6(W%tW)I I I I l I I I 1 I I I I I f j F61TINE -I -I I I -I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 AI:"rl lr E. 1ACl ' I r l T-I. 1 T� rT I r7 I T� I T�-ir-�T-I-r�-1-T�-I T i PROPOSED 'r MIKE RACK F!M•. i{ue v:,vc[ (2 PROPOSED _ S�RGENTJUNIPERs i_..; AVIATRON I_I_ 1 _I_I I_I_I I_I_L I_I_ 1 _I_L 1_I_I i-S]-=� � ' VAi.'�C RIfLY f-lJrokMl r = COMPRESSOR ADDITION «_..« . 0 30 60 ( a PARKING INVENTORY I SCALE ExnnKO reoro.EO TOrAL rj r ' I HANWII ,,- Stanlec Consulting Services Inc 66 Grn MOY+W O DM r w.e INPIN►M, V I U I, A INYI/-l/Nf TJ K2,IM.0221 Flu 802,"4.0185 A.fllfhn4cmn Tlr firfm.rJ,�h w r r�rv.'MI bNl f.n..lvr W llrrfarYrIVIY► V III. nN MirP � Yw M�.rb M yAc ArNrluNwr.l rw 4rNawwr rfr NnlN1 .m.r.b.wrt 1. a,e.rr Lag{Ild NOII{ -LEGEND- EXISTING CONTOUR m STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ❑ STORM DRAIN INLET ® SEWER MANHOLE m ELECTRIC MANHOLE ® TELEPHONE MANHOLE YT HYDRANT WATER GATE VALVE A MONITORING WELL a CONC/STEEL BOLLARD CHAIN -LINK FENCE LUMIN T1'+4 TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT ❑° EXISTING DUMPSTER LOCATIO a SNOW STORAGE AREA Datums - Horizontal - NAD83(1996) SPC VT (US Feet) Vertical - NAVD88 (Feet) RwiWan M ASrA Yr LMI00 I,wee N A-L ri N� Ya — D�rf piAl. OfPI wNYW PITITII -W x x BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORI SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPROV/ AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR, AVIATRON BUILDING, AND SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT/ MAINTENANCE BUILDING TBN 195310135 1"=30' (at full size) Pmpd No. Scale 1 Dmvhlg No Sheet Revision updated site plan.dgn 3/9/200'/ 10:08:17 AM ` 1 ` f61 m <m mym �0 Z 9 m0 z0 n� r � O� C/)m c U) X(f) m0 X PROJECT NO. m n AVIATRON BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT s 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE, #1 z BUILDING SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FILE NAME O E9GNED Br DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ANAIRON 97E Puw ELEVATION VIEW SCALE: t' - t0' DATE: 06/t6/O6 wr oc—ao HAK RAM REV DESCRiPnON — R M Er)OF XIs E TING k - C: 1 .:. I HYDRANT t L V Z�LF-10 BUFFALO J1 GT- HOSTA / ---------- / -------- EDG3C OF te30 ()HW -l- .113 FLOWERING CRAB 20' 10 8' 8 20' 2 11 2' :I i I i .``� 41 CI_ j?,kn CK z 0 w qLD(7, AVIATR ON LEASE AREA (with Addition) ,O,C,g jq., loa FA COS #,Cdzy November 19, 1996 hl 1/1 0 to u S;C/> L —IV l\UZI kMAN 1�-INL CONSTRUCTION s & S 2 4- 06 0 0. 00 cll�l C\4 C11 1 /2 5' 2 C I uo : 125 FRAGRANT Su AC '2 O.C. C. 0 L W/100 TULIP BULB � O.C. FRONT EDGE OF PLAN I BED NEW 'TS & S-.! -I ,VjATR70N -4- BQ I L D I N G AVIATRON BUILDING t \% ADDITION 9,8 0 O'�,S Q..' FT. , 5,600 SF V. F. E.'. IN 34' 329 0 NX LANDSCAPING LENGEND FOR THE AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR: WILLISTON ROAD FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAM! SIZ! QUANTITY NOT! UNIT COST TOTAL COS DARK AWRlrA N ARRORVITAF Th* omJEn11ww Nips e' HIGH A REPIANTFD 11oo feW VALLEY FORG! ELM U6 w k.,. "Vkf66T F.w T CAL e B a B u7e $2 175 COMMON ULAC Spnp\ ,Ig— 4e" 2 B SB 176 f150 -_ SAKULN I JUNIPERS Ju4dlllw"wM-M 14" Jb 2UALLUN UUN IMNtH So $"Is nymRr VMNrarn RIIRNING MIMI hlbnYf111n \INfr C"P\MM 74. A 7 GM ION r:nNTAINFR no SWI SIBERIAN YELLOVV1WG DOGNOOO C— M. Tk in—' 30' 2 2 GALLON CONTAINER 3e0 $120 DVNRF NNEBARK Pl"oc"w oP khW'Nr ,' 3T a 2 GALLON CONTAINER $50 $300 _ I •rra :n.ol I.NItE'°+"� N t 01-^ _ LANDSCAPING IN THE VICINITY OF THE BUILDING NV.MIIGNED �(Wi.`a JYD �Ft N(: 'N^+e _•,A� SLtG-T��1Ml+vM ? ", 11cImr'. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 512E QUANTITY NOTE UNIT COST TOTAL COST _ _ _ IMY c+r JY.rt Db=J4` 'siH M'FF Ii-a HEDGE MAPLE MrDrllprNbe 7CAL a B&B SSW S3000 MA R x �f _+<'+;.; _ , + ct•Y( , \,Fry •`+ BUCK SPRUCE Plow IIIUNn\ 3' CAL 2 B a B $ITS f060 i `,za. tau�N •a'Yn SARGENT JUNIPERS Jun.CN_ wrpMtll 2P a 2 GALLON CONTAINER fey f5e6 an. c I W: cUl m a< _„r_ J^"' •'•, PLANT MATERIAL COST $11.975 t YMk_i£ ^-;AM nT reS'S >.->.,-.>.,--rr rrr >r ....+-r>. .r> ->r -.r- rr• ,r>- r>, , .• 0— \ NEW DRY LAID FIELD STONE 6VALL 50 LINEAL FEET % 7 FEET HIGH % $4V FACE SQUARE FOOT � f13,2W Ta}Fl4aTOTAL LANDSCAPING f2�, ' % ='FDA (:l.£CPLM1E4 'V 5614- 1- uIr ~.•�^� «_.... , i nT W q 5 UIY::F`ElI�r1 ,.j' C LI41iL�' F:1Vt - r>{->r-•rry--,-r . '°'NiO n, t'J`xiw+✓ r 6NIIxk Y 5 T —LT ,. "" PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING: >'! 'vio C . ' 0.1 i]tTa �RIV 30Y 3• S+ CCNY WY ]l! L —� V aTVC INY ])*ti —' ro� AVIATRON. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SUE QWNRTY NOTE UMT COST TOTAL COST un tlllnw�l\ 24' 2 2GKLON CONTAINERBIG 3130 ( AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR /-- =-I t , SARGENTS RGENT JUMPERS Wren -WO e•^EILV. �/ 1wxIw TOTAL LANDSCAPING $13D N11PCED4lte SNCYWME OVAL 1 e Ak F MAINTENANCE / HANGAR F T Fn+.4D BUILDING 20,BW SF J-srRLCE c�c FFMS2FO SNOW REMOVING EQUIPMENT BUILDING. I , t l' r _- OFFICE SPACE PROPOSED BIKIE RACK rFYSJ:E; COMMON NAME UNIT COST TOTAL COST -. e,eW SF OR-3322DD LEVEL BOTANICALNAME SIZE QWVrT17Y NOTE I I 9,1100 SF SECOND LEVEL f f; -CAL 1 B a e 'S+W ro v'rr - L HEDGE MAPLE Aar(wr9wY\ Q G NY' o.TN~ dfNwRn 2e' 2 2 GAILON CONTAINER Se5 SAROEM JUNIPERS J,Irflp�u\ wraa,I3 f130 ] r k B t F TOTAL LANDSCAPINO eaTo b ,a1cEDw BLDG ep a I Si TTni<tr GY< .u<._..,<_..-s<_...., f,[, < •',u�.'tkfiYYG•`,, ..b 9 e AJ �iFw GA(IFkr*�u.+i r HA—VERMONTARMY " 2.^,_ L7J.L,l• .< AC Jkrrs I r.Vrt,e u_rn. j(mEe 'E'k r NATIONAL GUARD 17 PARKING SPACES 151 Nonl�st•ItIn.E 17vawt.^oFrn ! I : »vyNTL .,,y, <9 T� (/% �c bW-1 W. rA. rN-NUViL U.V..L .TVL NIV ]'WJ'IF 1iMnt AND2 VAN SPACES(17 HANr3ARU AT CFwx L,%s HAND" SPACES RTIr1r) 5 l p B/ARKINO SPACER'III '�III1 1L1L(I,`,tlE:7jIE;_� Ts t t f� Y �'>•-�•� �: +an-r rn• I (Yxif) iI I7T{i UJJI Oi FNlIOxO !W WJ_k (qh: 1,fY b'NY]M'a�r CT it J%L H'311 i Mw \ YrnlHANGAR (e�(� I 1 PARKING BPACES (f7(1hAND7 HANOIC PSP SPAR- _ �<,... « <, ..<>,_« . ,• , �, rctuw , V <••y .�l(.IK / �oN]NANTii.%I YII )W'X` \ 4'11kRE }1.IIiNF YY.WI ...�<a<..•«n,A6 ]Tll-• •• ///'''��� / / Y'IL'NN�f+'- \_ _- -_ __—,__-___'-__� YAYf) O) � f EL JM 2r rl y n HANGAR 15 OD STRIPED IPErx1D \ FBI 1 n < u ^ < FArtu !� rLHuliw4 1 PARKING ( a € �> « ^ .,Y£D ! I` - Y\:.CNC rUIf. PUNfM sq.F ;`T,` PQ '�bn4F tUn:Afl! I—_-----—� - - =-- 6 INATIF AVIATRON 444 - j 1e►AlIgNO SPACES (f'IL1r) ��(}y;W,�y� \,IF YaN a)s` \R <„�� i J ACRInEE i-AERW E- -T— AMND 1 VAN ACCESSO \ +N I'' I T �A HANDICAP (/X1e� _ _ sr F. r��I^TT_i /T 1 �T-I->-7-I-T-f_I 7-1 FTC rT i -I'r 'T HI T l J I$ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I WR T Rs'►) D : E `i`iv i 73VAILABLE O SPACESAfu%11LLMU1r PARKING i'isv'.'c _ I} T 12, T(II I— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I— I I_ I I _I_I— I I —1— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 \ '33:1If ! rI FL`+iI'Y k MllribA -!- � I I T -1 � T I 1- 7 I I -( T -1 I 'T I— � 7 _— I 7 —I— I -i —I T I _ �_f._t• _e1r SD2 ffJC \Y ttlW ry c r II I I I I�,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F-�anc m N.E ENIP�IT�� PARKING INVENTORY ExnTnw ANAv1nAuN(AaTLRwNDNRY 1,>].t s PR-sws�T PROPOSED PRE RACK °M°-----L�S aGEJUNIPERS ry v,vcc I I AVIATRON ( IL I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I J_L I�!_L �_I_I I_I_ —I_I I i_I_L �_I_1 I 7CONIPRESSORADDITION 1�A wOi,- /*Oik, 1 0 30 60 ' SCALE stantec Consulting Services Inc 66 GIwn Mw. tw. DIM 14xI1 IYXNNPNA. V I ,1 L n IMMII JJNI Td W2 NA M23 rr 102 eeA 01ea w\rd t .oall 11. Drn]\dx aJ nrNt wtl r Iwralwr b M a1+.IMw,\ ro xoT r M N\rIn\-AIM w+w..af+l..lw. rn]r r Iwrr\r TIV�iFA1Ml+r rr1w4N NA v1>rN+P r. \. PNrVM Nrfrc A.P.awl.If M f.. rrre P]rr• w+r.,+n.l \,\I.raw \r+rc r ■,ravel CONulants Legend -LEGEND- EXISTING CONTOUR m STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ❑ STORM DRAIN INLET ® SEWER MANHOLE 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE O TELEPHONE MANHOLE Yf HYDRANT WATER GATE VALVE 6 MONITORING WELL a CONC/STEEL BOLLARD CHAIN -LINK FENCE O LUMIN Tv'AZ TAXIWAY EDGE LIGHT ❑° EXISTING DUMPSTER LOCATIO m SNOW STORAGE AREA Ndef Datums: Horizontal - NAD83(1996) SPC VT (US Feet) Vertical - NAVD88 (Feet) RwMm M Asr\ Yf w1 W Issued a ar YYw Mu WW x D,]Ir qY I]]\n YY MILOD x BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORI SITE PLAN FOR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPROW AVIATION SUPPORT HANGAR, AVIATRON BUILDING, AND SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT/ MAINTENANCE BUILDING 195310135 1"=30' (at full size) Proled No. scale 1 ❑rowing No Sheet RevisO 1 of 1 updated site plan.dgn 3/9/2001 10:08:17 AM 8�� ^ -- ' X"�---- � ---- ./ ;\/-`��.L}\/-� � y \ ` \ \ / --^"o� \ � \ � ^7 -- -- ' / . ci / / -----' / \ n7 n p ENCLOSURE 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE, #1 PROJECT NO. FILE NAME SCALE: 1" 30' DATE: 06/16/06 HAK RAM REV DESCRIPTION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 22, 2004 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-04-28 — retaining wall Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision regarding the above referenced project dated 7/22/04. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void, If you have any questions, please let me know J Sincerely, F!aym n J. Belair Administrative Officer Permit Number SP'Jjoq - �6 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) tr- 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)Rt 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) , 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ; . t r u, ( , (',,1 �' �; - 6) TAX PARCEL M # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2:-0y 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 7 C n . , l ' -, ' . I " �+ � I _ ,: I _A , ` ` - - c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 1 t d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) ">> ; (___t e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): ( , : - g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE 4 \,' l a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing -% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing -% Proposed % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ t ,u '�'t-k ' ( �- 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC 1 '�J //4 a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:_ 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). t4 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. '/cz SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT IGNATURE OF P OPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: uli Mo� REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan and find it to be: C 6mej;�'/)/? Incomplete k inis)rative Officer or Designee dministrative Officer EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible). o Survey data (distance and acreage). o Contours (existing and finished). o Proposed landscaping schedule (nuinber, variety, and size) as required in Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. o Zoning boundaries. o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations). o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Location of septic tanks (if applicable). o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o North arrow. o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. ` o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened)..- • Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Zoning Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number of seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats. ... APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185.00* ❑ Amended Site Plan (DRB review) $ 185.00* L Administrative Site Plan $ 85.00* *includes $10.00 recording fee State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 16, 2002 Case Number: W W-4-0414-1 PIN: EJ96-0386.09 Landowner: City of Burlington Address: Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive # 1 South Burlington VT 05403 This project, consisting of connecting existing maintenance garage floor drain vehicle washing system to the municipal wastewater system located off Airport Drive on the property of the Burlington International Airport in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C0331-5. GENERAL This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor & Industry — telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans prepared by Dufresne — Henry which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project No. 6533001, Sheet C1 "Maintenance Garage Stormdrain System Oil/Water Separator Tie -In" dated Jan. 2003; Sheet D1 "General Details" dated January 2003 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner, which would change, or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal, building location or the approved use of the building without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. All conditions set forth in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0414 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. l Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-0414-1 Burlington International Airport Page 2 6. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. 7. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 8. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 9. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 290 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. 10. This permit issued by the Wastewater Management Division shall be valid for a substantially completed wastewater system upon receipt by the Division of a certification from a designer or installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the wastewater system has been installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests." This shall include the sanitary sewer approved by this permit and the sanitary sewer extension approved by Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit 4WW-4-0414. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on April 18, 2003. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of /Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Dufresne — Henry Act 250 District Environmental Commission #4 Department of Labor & Industry State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Department of Fish and Wildlife Essex Regional Office Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation 111 West Street Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction, VT 05452 State Geologist Telephone: (802) 879-5656 April 18, 2003 City of Burlington Burlington Int' l Airport 1200 Airport Drive # 1 South Burlington VT 05403 Subject WW-4-0414-1, PIN EJ96-0386.09; Connect Existing Maintenance Garage Floor Drain for Vehicle Washing to Municipal Sewer located at the Burlington International Airport in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Ladies & Gentlemen: I issued the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit for the above referenced project. Please note Condition 95 of the permit which states that all conditions of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit 9WW-4-0414 remains valid and Condition and 910 that states the certification of construction required to connect the floor drain system to the municipal sewer extends to the construction of the sanitary sewer approved by Permit #WW-4-0414. The reason for this is I cannot find the certification of construction for the sanitary sewer required by Condition 48 and 99 of Permit 9WW-4-0414. I chose to approve the connection of the floor drain system prior to receiving compliance with the previous permit so that construction may commence as soon as possible to eliminate the potential health hazard created by the subsurface discharging of the floor drain wastes. Please contact me if you have any questions as to what is needed. Sincerely, Ernest 7 Christianson Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Dufresne — Henry AGENCY OF NATI(' L RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONq' TAL BOARD (ACT 250) PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # DEC PERMITS PRE APPLICATION REVIEW RESPONSE DATE ENDING APPLICATION # I.J DISTRICT 4 6, or 9 TOWN _ =kf" PIN # IQJ NO ^ (TT�t3Gti D^ OWNER OF PROJECTS : NAME: P,L 1 ADDRESS: 1I`r' or I 5. &'A2!4 TELEPHONE: $D a- $63 -+4 Project Name: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Based on a written or oral request and/or information provided by PG received on "5•,?I. &S , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of 9qa acres, located on KVn 5;The project is generally described as: �bv�reC� u�5� iv' o��►t� V44v".�-. h � doex�t u�� �u r,rznQl�) I-1Qr�Qp� Prior Permits From This Office: !{C-D33 1 '—V PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION [ ] I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordinator or Assistant District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. Jeff McMahon Permit Specialist 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNER/AGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE�NVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). �(`/ Commercial, residential or municipal project? as the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: YES NO; Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES,'�' NO BASIS FOR DECISI N: SIGNATURE: DATE: 3 ADDRESS: Environmental Commissions Districts #4, 6 & 9 istrict Coordinator Telepho e: 02 879-5614 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 2. LWASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED � YES NO Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit Notice of Permit Requirements EPR 1-403 _Floor Drains to a UIC well REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: Ernest Christianson (879-5675), Jessanne Wyman (879-5673), William Zabiloski (879-5672) Dolores LaRiviere (879-2341) SIGNATURE: DATE: t4' 9?,C7-L-' ADDRESS: Agency of Natural Resources Environment I sistance Division, Permit Specialist, 802 879-5676 Dept. of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division, Telephone: 802 879-5656 111 West Street, Essex Junction, VT 05452 OVER»»»»» THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact _ Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Indirect Discharge Permits Residuals Management 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888 520.4879) Contact: _ Construction/modification of source _ Open Burning —Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) _ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions _ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800 823-6500 in VT) Contact: New Hydrants >500' of waterline construction Community Water System (CWS) - - Bottled Water Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: River Management (241-3770) Stormwater Permits (state and federal ) Hotline (241-4320) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate (241-3770) Stream Alteration (751-0129/879-5631R86-5906) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Waste oil burning (241-3888) Used septic system components/stone 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9659) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS AND MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE Contact: Judy Mirro or John Daly 802 241-3745 RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers Boilers and pressure vessels 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification (Phil Comock) Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (1-800 649-2642) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2053) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2710) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800 675-9873) Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/pet merchantAivestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 VT Building Energy Standards 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste 22 LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 3. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St.,Suite 205, Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 24. OTHER: �1 P� `�7 Sections S3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date: '1 - 73 -vim I maybe reached at 879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: REVISED 3/13103 State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of EnvironmentalConservation Wastewater Management Division Department of Fish and Wildlife Essex Regional Office Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation 111 West Street Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction, VT 05452 State Geologist Telephone: (802) 879-5656 April 4, 2003 City of Burlington Burlington Int'1 Airport 1200 Airport Drive # 1 South Burlington VT 05403 Subject WW-4-0809-1 Maintenance Garage Connect existing maintenance garage floor drain vehicle washing to municipal sewer 290 gpd municipal water 6 employees. located on Burlington Int'l Airport in South Burlington, Vermont. Ladies & Gentlemen: We have received your application and fee paid by check #EXEMPT on March 21, 2003, which begins the 30 day in-house performance standards for our review. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in- house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded your application to the Information Specialist, who will send you a Project Review Sheet indicating other state departments you should contact about additional permits you may need. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. PLEASE SUBMIT A LETTER FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPROVING THE WATER & SEWER ALLOCATION. PLEASE SUBMIT A SIGNED APPLICATION WITH YOUR CONSULTANTS SIGNATURE. THIS APPLICATION IS ADMINISTRATIVELY INCOMPLETE UNTIL THESE ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. For the Division of Wastewater Management Iren4Lob—e—rge DEC Regional Office Coord cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Alec G. Tuscany AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: 1- 1580 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: March 19, 2003 — April 18, 2003 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, #1, South Burlington, VT 05403 PERMIT NUMBER: 1-1580.0302 FILE NUMBER: 04-14 PROJECT ID NUMBER: EJ96-0386 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Groundwater, and an unnamed tributary to the Winooski River EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from date of issuance of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to the City of Burlington for stormwater runoff from parking lots, roads, and roofs associated with expanded parking facilities at the Burlington International Airport to an unnamed tributary to the Winooski River, and groundwater. The means of treatment includes grassed swales, and a sand filter. -I - TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative determinations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vermont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) April 18, 2003 to the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Any person may, within thirty (30) days after permit issuance or denial, appeal the VANR determination to the Vermont Water Resources Board pursuant to Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, subchapter 1269. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Dufresne -Henry DH Consulting Engineers February 10, 2000 James Boyd District Coordinator PO. Box 2246 1025 Airport Drive . South Burlmgton,VT 05407 . Tel: 802.864.0223 . Fax: 802.864.0165 E-mail wmi@together net District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Burlington International Airport South Development Master Plan Act 250 Application #4C00331-15 DH Project #6380009 Dear Jim: In response to the Prehearing Conference Report and Order, Section III, Issues, dated December 8, 1999, and on behalf of the applicant, we submit the following: 1) A matrix showing the criteria for which the applicant is seeking affirmative findings. Additional evidence (attached) supporting this matrix includes: a) a letter of review clarification from the ANR Air Pollution Control Division (Criterion 1) b) a letter of review from the Vermont Agency of Transportation (Criterion 5) c) a letter from the South Burlington School District (Criterion 6) d) a letter of review from the Division for Historic Preservation (Criterion 8) e) a report from Wm. D. Countryman addressing rare plant species (Criterion 8A) 2) A list of all existing land use permits for the Airport and an explanation of how of the proposed Master Plan complies with any relevant conditions set forth in those permits. 3) A discussion of the secondary growth impacts expected from the proposed development. 4) A detailed Explanation of Project Phases, construction activity and anticipated time frame for build -out. Corporate Headquarters: North Springfield, Vermont www d-hinc.com 0 P,,m,d - R,cyrdw P.P., Area Offices: Portland, Maine Newburgh, New York Port Charlotte, Florida Boston, Massachusetts Manchester, New Hampshire Pawling, New York Naples, Florida Greenfield, Massachusetts Montpelier, Vermont Rochester, New York Sarasota, Florida Westford, Massachusetts South Burlington, Vermont Saratoga Springs, New York Jim Boyd -2- February 10, 2000 We hope this additional information addresses the commission's concerns. Please let us know if you require anything further. Sincerely, Mark C. Smith, P.E. Project Engineer encl. cc: Bob McEwing, BIA CJ P-ted 11 Recycled Paper Burlington International Airport South Development - Master Plan Master Permit Act 250 Application February 3, 2000 Project # 4C-0331-15 The 10 criteria: 1-Air Pollution IA -Headwaters IB-Waste Disposal 1C-Water Conservation I D-Floodways 1 E-Streams Applicant's anticipated "affirmative finding" for Act 250 criteria: IF -Shorelines 1G-Wetlands 2-3-Water Supply 4-Soil erosion 5-highways 6-Educational Services 7-Municipal Services 8-Aesthetics 8A-Wildlife and Endangered Species 9A-Impact on Growth 913-Ag. Soils 9C-Forest Soils 9D&E-Earth Resources 9F-Energy Conservation 9G-Private Utilities 91-1-Scattered Development 9J-Public Utilities 9K-Public Investment 9L-Rural Growth Areas 10-Conformance to Local/Regional Plans Criterion 1=.`. IA aIB 1C 1D 1F a2G 2-3 4 5 6 7 8 $A; 9A 9B 9C 9D 9F 9G 9H 9J 9K 9L 10 Phase y MA Master Plan Permit �w: X X X X '�.' • X X •v;y° " X X X X X X • X X X Phase I XKV Phase II .% .✓ :r✓:: "`✓" 0 `✓. 0 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Phase III ✓. ✓✓_ ;✓ , 0 ✓.. 0 ✓;. .✓ ✓ ✓ Legend: 0 Denotes criteria noted in the ANR motion, dated 11/18/99, expressing concerns related to water quality and wetlands. X Denotes when criteria will be found satisfied for entire project. ✓ Denotes criteria which will be found satisfied for the construction of the phase specified only. It • Denotes criteria for which partial finding is anticipated: Criterion 1: Air pollution: An indirect source permit will not be required until the total number of parking spaces reaches 1,000 in the project area. See letter from the Air Pollution Control Division. Criterion 1B: Waste Disposal: The City of South Burlington has verified that sufficient capacity exists at the wastewater -� treatment plant for the entire project. (see letter from South Burlington Planning and Zoning). Criterion 2-3: Water Supply: The City of South Burlington has verified that sufficient water supply exists for the entire project. (see letter from South Burlington Water Department). Criterion 7: Municipal Services: See letters confirming no undue burden from: the City of South Burlington Planning (sewer service), City of South Burlington Water Department (water service), City of South Burlington Fire Department (fire and rescue services), and the City of Burlington Police Department (police services). Criterion 9J: Adequate ability to serve has been verified by all potential public utilities. 0 Denotes criteria which will be satisfied through permits from other agencies: Criterion 2-3: Department of Health and/or Wastewater Management permit required for municipal water line extensions. Criterion 7: Department of Labor and Industries permit required for public buildings. l' �A\ I �Z 19�51'ORlP�` STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 August 9, 1999 Mr. Mark Smith, P.E. Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Post Office Box 2246 South Burlington, VT 05407 Subject: South Burlington, Land Air Express Dear Mark: We have completed a review of your traffic study for the above -referenced project and offer the following comments. We agree with the conclusion reached by Trans/Op, Inc. that a traffic signal will be warranted at the US 2/Shunpike RoadNalley Road intersection for the build scenarios. With the installation of a traffic signal and the construction of turn lanes on US 2, a reasonable level of service can be obtained at this intersection for the build scenarios without going to four lanes. This section of US 2 presently operates at a poor level of service, but the trips generated by Land Air Express and the ledge removal operation will not make it worse. We see the relocation of truck traffic and control of traffic by a signal as a big improvement over the present situation where the trucks are exiting at a location with borderline sight distance. As I explained at our meeting, the next step is to develop construction plans for the US 2 widening and signal installation. Once you have obtained City and Act 250 permits, and completed your construction plans, we will issue a permit for the work. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. r Mr. Mark Smith, P.E. Dufresne -Henry, Inc. Subject: South Burlington, Land Air Express August 9, 1999 Page Two The update of your traffic study for the Burlington International Airport master plan has been sent to our Traffic Research Section for review and comment. If you have any questions, please call me at (802)828-2486. Sincerely, 0�&_ OM17_1� Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit DLA:mm cc: Joe Oppenlander, Trans/Op, Inc. Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Bob McEwing, Burlington International Airport Amy Gamble, AOT Traffic Research Engineer Richard Hosking, AOT District Transportation Administrator #5 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES (ANR) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT250) PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOTA PERMIT TOTAL # DEC PERMITS PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW RESPONSE DATE //G�J PENDING APPLICATION # DISTRICT TOWN - QUV CJ�%2yesVCrTZ7?V PIN OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: NAME: 01:=7 ADDRESS: �G i1'T}f �� /.2 ♦/LtlrY7f IV O,S�fa TELEPHONE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: - ADDRESS: /GAS`/.e.Rr2TY' TELEPHONE: X� 6 2.2-2 Based on information provided by -!5N9 c T,Y received on ��lv �gr a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of _!racres, located on The project is generally described as: '?4S AA1-iA✓1/� v5 = �� �Sr7�G- _V�v�� 2>12,4-ir Al (V 7-iz � NDlLThF ftylW�r�.� i� ✓1-t �A/( C? [ v9F1-LL Prior Permits From This Office: �7 l' lrQ /S , , r PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION I. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (ACT250) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). Commercial, residential or municipal project? Length of new/improved road(s) Has the landowner subdivided before? When/where/# of lots AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: _YES NO; Copies sent to Statutory Parties: YES NO COMMENTS: -rya q At �vppPMa•� u)a�et�►x�. � �or�� i f � �, �� ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION %alqw�a 6" WkcLw *A, Op&4-41 am Aro*�+a 4c0015. DISTRICTS #4,6 &9 No �ce or 111 WEST STREET �� SIGNATURE: ���" DATE:_` Z3 ADDRESS: ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 Xw I�b(^ — 4 District Co rdinator Teiephone: (802)879-5614 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED > YES NO Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision &/or Exemption Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Home Park Floor Drains (UIC) Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNATURE: TE: ��-AO�ADDRESS: CONSERVATION Aotff Environmental Assistance Division Telephone: (802)879-5676 111 WEST STREET Wastewater Management Division Telephone: (802)879-5656 ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 THIS IS A PRELIMINARY,, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION BY THE PERMIT SPECIALIST REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW AND ON THE REVERSE SIDE. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits; industrial, municipal Indirect discharge permit Contact: _ Stormwater pen -nits (state and federal, UIC) _ Residuals management sludge disposal MIMM OTHEr—7RMITS AND REVIEWS YOU MAY NEED: `inued) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3840) Contact: - Construction/modification of source Open Burning Wood Fred Units (z90HP) Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (> 200 bHP) 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Well head protection areas Construction Permit, water system improvements 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Stream Alteration (751-0129) Contact. _Bottled Water New Hydrants Permit to operate New Source Contact: Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) _ Waste oil burning (241-3888) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) State funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Contact: Judy Mirm 802-241-3745 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval ee� - P l� 1 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) Sprinkler Systems Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Piumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers Boilers and pressure vessels 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lah 800-660-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Comriercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (241-2158) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2853) Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) Construction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) Junkyards (828-2067) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Contact: Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) __— Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) Golf courses (828-2431) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) Green Houses/Nursedes (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) 16. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (800-642-3281) VT Residential Building Energy Standards (See Enclosure) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals &rooms, amusement machines) DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste- ' LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON,, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) 25. OTHER: REVISION'DATE: Form Date 11197 Rev.'. 6199 i interoffice MEMORANDUM To: Don Whitten and Bruce Hoar From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: BIA South Development Master Plan Date: August 9, 1999 Enclosed is a request from Mark Smith of Dufresne -Henry asking that I write a letter indicating that the above referenced development will not create an "undue burden" on the City's sewer system. Please review the proposed plan and let me know if you think that the City's collection and treatment facilities can adequately serve the above referenced development. I would appreciate it if you could send me a memo so that I can attach it to my letter to Mark Smith. Thank you for your help. Dufresne -Henry DH Consulting Engineers August 2, 1999 I P.O Box 2246 1025 Airport Drive . South Burlington,VT 05407 . Tel: 802.864.0223 . Fax: 802.864.0165 . E-mail: wmi@together.net Joseph Weith City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Burlington International Airport South Development Master Plan WM/DH Project No. 6380009 Dear Mr. Weith: As you know, we are preparing an Act250 Land Use Permit Application under the Master Permit Policy for the referenced project on behalf of the airport and are required to request that you provide a letter of review regarding Criterion 9J) Public Utilities indicating that the South Burlington Public Works Department has the ability to receive sewage from the project "without undue burden". We are not requesting allocation at this time, but rather an indication that current conditions at the City's collection and treatment facilities would not alone prevent this project from proceeding. The project involves planning for future needs at the airport and the specific details are still to be determined (see enclosed site plan). At this time we estimate that eight (8) new buildings will be constructed for various uses. Most are industrial type facilities with a small portion of each dedicated to office space. The hangars will probably have less water demand. We estimate a total sewage flow generated by the project of 10,500 gpd, based on an estimate of the number of future employees. We expect that all of this flow will be conveyed to the gravity sewer main along Williston Road. We appreciate your cooperation on this project. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Mark Smith, P.E. Project Engineer encl. cc: Bob McEwing, BIA Corporate Headquarters: Area Offices: Portland, Maine Newburgh, New York Port Charlotte, Florida North Springfield, Vermont Boston, Massachusetts Manchester, New Hampshire Pawling, New York Naples, Florida www d-hinc.com Greenfield, Massachusetts Montpelier, Vermont Rochester, New York Sarasota, Florida Westford, Massachusetts South Burlington, Vermont Saratoga Springs, New York CP P-1.d - Recycled P.p.r l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 30, 1999 Mark Smith Dufresne - Henry P.O. Box 2246 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Burlington International Airport South Development Master Plan Dear Mark: I have reviewed the Airport South Development Master Plan and have the following comments: 1) The intersection of Williston Road & Aviation Drive should be improved especially for left turns into and exiting from Aviation Drive. 2) The four lanes on Williston Road should be extended easterly at least beyond Shunpike Road intersection. 3) Filling the wetlands in Phase II will impact the drainage system on Williston Road near our sewage pumping station also the culvert crossing Kennedy Drive, both of which run full at times. 4) Calkins Court should be connected to Valley Road in Phase I or II. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, to William S A. City Engineer a / of South Bur/ingt( -i )WO 575 Dorset Street • South Burlington, VT 05403 • (801) 658-7964 • Fax. (801) 658-7975 August 20, 1999 Re: Burlington International Airport South Developement Master Plan WM/DH Project No. 6380009 Dear Mr. Weith: I have reviewed the above referenced plan for the estimated volume of sewage from this project. And based on the estimated sewage flow of 10,500 gals. per day will not cause undue burden on the sanitary collection system or the Airport Parkway W.W.T.F. Sincerely your Don Whitten, Superintendent of Water Pollution Control interoffice MEMORANDUM To: Don Whitten and Bruce Hoar From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: BIA South Development Master Plan Date: August 9, 1999 Enclosed is a request from Mark Smith of Dufresne -Henry asking that I write a letter indicating that the above referenced development will not create an "undue burden" on the City's sewer system Please review the proposed plan and let me know if you think that the City's collection and treatment facilities can adequately serve the above referenced development. I would appreciate it if you could send me a memo so that I can attach it to my letter to Mark Smith. Thank you for your help. N _ ESM CITY OF BURLINGTON Pu RG N •::' :b� BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL VERMONT :'..p•.:.:• BURUNGTOh AIRPORT _ _ (I BURLINGTON T \\ 5. BURUNGTON \ S 0 U T N ■ U N L I N 0 T 0 N INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VICINITY MAP MILE 1 0 1 2 MILES GRAPHIC SCALE RUNWAY 33 EXTEND SAFETY AREA AIP NO. 3-50-0005-54 APRIL 2004 MAJOR ITEM QUANTITIES: M-006 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH RETAINING WALL NO PORTION OF THESE DOCUMENTS MAY BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF HOYLE, TANNER do ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCATION MAP MILE 5 0 5 10 MILES GRAPHIC SCALE RFc F�V ofsa ?49 ev��9fo 4 2,900 SF ADDENDUM N0.2 DESIGNERS STATEMENT REGARDING CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RUNWAY ;;-sArETv AREA IUPRdVdtENTS NEW ENGLAND REGION These plans and specifications have been prepared to the beet of my knowledge and APPROVED DIRECTOR OF AVIATION DATE APPROVED DATE APPROVED belief In accordance with the list of current FAA Advisory Circulars for AIP projects provided byy the FAA in a list dated July 14, 2001 Known deviations from FAA standards were approved by FAA letters dated NONE and are discussed In the Project Engineering Report and/or other official project documents. BY DATE TITLE SHEET PROJECT MANAGER DATE APPROVAL SUBJECT TO COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN LETTERS DATE REV DESCRIPTION DR B. CKD. sY APPD B DATE RrK Hoyle, Tanner & Associates,lnc. fl Consulting Engineers SCALE. NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. 037738 SHEET OF 1 16 DRAWING NO G 1.1 DATE APRIL, 2004 DES RY DR BY CHKD BY KJF TDB KJF 150 DOW ST. MANCHESTER. NH MAINTENANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. 1) THE CONTRACTOR'S ATTENTION IS CALLED TO SECTION M-001 OF THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - "SUMMARY OF WORK AND SPECIAL WORK REQUIREMENTS." 2) AREAS FOR PARKING AND STAGING ARE SEVERELY LIMITED AT BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. NO EMPLOYEE PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED ON THE AIRPORT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE AND SAFE PARKING AREA FOR HIS EMPLOYEES AND PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE WORK AREA. 3) THE CONTRACTOR WILL FURNISH (25 BARRIERS MIN.) AND PLACE BARRICADES (SEE DETAIL) AT LOCATIONS AS DESIGNATED BY THE AIRPORT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MOVING AND MAINTAINING THESE BARRICADES THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. THE BARRICADES WILL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE AIRPORT AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. BARRICADES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH 6" WIDE DIAGONAL REFLECTIVE STRIPING. BARRICADES SHALL BE HIGH IMPACT, UV RESISTANT. POLYETHYLENE SAFETY BARRICADES AS MANUFACTURED BY MULTI -BARRIER, MODEL AR-10 X 96 OR EQUIVALENT. PAYMENT FOR BARRICADES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO ITEM M-001. 4) THE CONTRACTOR WILL TAKE SPECIAL CARE TO PROTECT THE LOCAUZER ANTENNA LOCATED STA. 189+15t. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVELY WILL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 25' OF THIS AREA, INCLUDING HAUL ROADS AND GRADING OPERATIONS. 5) THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO TRANSPORT HIS EQUIPMENT BACK TO THE DESIGNATED STAGING AREA AFTER EACH NIGHT'S WORK. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE CONSTRUCTION SITE FREE OF PAPER, BOXES, AND OTHER DEBRIS WHICH COULD BE BLOWN ONTO THE RUNWAYS AND TAXIWAYS. 7) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN, AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, THE EQUIPMENT FOR THE APPLICATION OF WATER TO CONTROL DUST WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ON HAUL ROADS. THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A SHUT-OFF CONTROL VALVE WHICH CAN BE OPERATED FROM THE CAB BY THE OPERATOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FOR DUST CONTROL AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND/OR HAUL ROADS FROM BEING A HAZARD TO AIRCRAFT AND FROM BEING A NUISANCE TO THE PUBLIC AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 8) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES WHILE THE CONSTRUCTION UNDER THIS CONTRACT IS IN PROGRESS, A SELF- PROPELLED, SELF-CONTAINED VACUUM SWEEPER WITH NOT LESS THAN A 10-FOOT BROOM WITH A 4 CUBIC YARD CAPACITY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SWEEPER SHALL OPERATE AS NECESSARY TO KEEP ACTIVE AIRCRAFT PAVEMENTS, ACCESS ROADS AND THE WORK AREAS CLEAN. AT THE CLOSE OF EACH DAYS WORK, ALL ACTIVE AIRCRAFT PAVEMENTS AND AIRPORT PAVED ROADS USED OR DIRTIED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SWEPT. 9) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING ANY OTHER EQUIPMENT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO CLEAN ALL AREAS THAT ARE CONTAMINATED AS A RESULT OF HIS/HER OPERATIONS TO THE COMPLETE SATISFACTION THE ENGINEER AND THE AIRPORT OPERATIONS SPECIALIST. 10) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE PARTICULARLY CAREFUL NOT TO TRACK FOREIGN MATERIAL ONTO PAVEMENTS OUTSIDE OF AND WITHIN THE AIRPORT (E.G. TACKCOAT). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING FOREIGN MATERIALS FROM VEHICLE TIRES PRIOR TO THE VEHICLE LEAVING ITS WORK AREA. 11) THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL LOCAL AND STATE PERMITS NEEDED TO HAUL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TO AND FROM THE PROJECT. 96"t 10"t 6" RETRO-REFLECTIVE Sl (TYP) WITH 12" SPACING. n L�- 10't HIGH IMPACT, UV RESISTANT POLYETHYLENE BARRICADE WITH (2) RED FLASHING SOLAR POWERED LIGHTS. NOTES: 1. BARRICADES MUST MEET FAA REQUIREMENTS FOR VISIBILITY. 2. BARRICADES TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL BARRICADES WITH WATER TO A MIN. WEIGHT OF 75 Ibs. CONSTRUCTION BARRICADE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE OF AND FOLLOW PROPER CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH (NIOSH). CONFINED SPACES ARE GENERALLY DEFINED AS SPACES WHICH: 1. ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR CONTINUOUS WORKER PRESENCE. 2. HAVE LIMITED OPENINGS FOR ENTRY OR EXIT. 3. HAVE LESS THAN IDEAL NATURAL VENTILATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AS A MINIMUM, SUPPLY THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT FOR USE BY HIS EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS, INSPECTORS, AIRPORT PERSONNEL ETC.: 3 HARNESSES 3 40' LENGTHS OF 5/8" NYLON ROPE 3 SETS OF LEATHER GLOVES 3 SETS OF SAFETY GLASSES 1 VENTILATION BLOWER 1 TRIPOD W/WINCH 1 TRI GAS DETECTORS OF THE LATEST APPROVED MODELS. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AT LEAST ONE PERSON AVAILABLE AS AN ASSIS- TANT FOR ALL INSPECTIONS IN CONFINED AREAS. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES. THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF KNOWN UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND CABLES ARE SHOWN ON THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EXCAVATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK ON AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES WITH THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES AS APPROPRIATE. • THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION - AIRWAYS FACILITIES BRANCH. • THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION - NATIONAL WEATHER BUREAU. • GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER COMPANY • BURLINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY • TELEPHONE COMPANY • CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT • BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - AIRPORT OPERATIONS k MAINTENANCE • VERMONT AIR NATIONAL GUARD • VERMONT NATIONAL GUARD • VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS INC. • CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MATERIALS NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES IN THE AREA TO REMAIN AND TO MAKE ANY TEMPORARY CONNECTIONS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN OPERATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES WHICH ARE TO BE RELOCATED UNTIL THE PERMANENT RELOCATION CAN BE MADE. LEGEND FLOW ARROW ® GRANITE CONTROL MONUMENT ■ NEW CATCH BASIN EXIST. DRAINAGE PIPE NEW DRAIN PIPE EXIST. GROUND CONTOUR — 320 — PROP. GROUND CONTOUR EXIST. TAXIWAY LIGHT TO REMAIN 1 EXIST. TAXIWAY LIGHT TO BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE EXIST. RUNWAY LIGHT TO REMAIN EXIST. FLUSH RUNWAY LIGHT TO BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE EXIST. ELEVATED RUNWAY LIGHT TO BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE EXIST. TAXIWAY SIGN GCB EXIST. CATCH BASIN EXIST. FENCE INDEX TO DRAWINGS RFc �l U�<79 '7' FO 1- p f`SO �% e���h9toA 'I SHEET NO, DWG NO, DESCRIPTION 1 G1.1 TITLE SHEET 2 G1.2 GENERAL NOTES, INDEX TO DRAWINGS, LEGEND 3 G1.3 GENERAL PLAN, HAUL ROUTE 4 G1.4 WORK AREA #3 5 S1.1 SAFETY PLAN, CONSTRUCTION PHASING, AND DETAILS 6 C1.1 GRADING do EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7 C1.2 DRAINAGE PLAN 8 ER1.1 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 9 C2.1 DRAINAGE DETAILS 10 C2.2 MSE WALL DETAILS AND WALL PROFILE 11 C2.3 MSE WALL DETAILS AND FENCING DETAILS 12 X1.1 CROSS SECTIONS AT R/W SAFETY AREA STA. 184+50 TO STA. 186+00 13 X1.2 CROSS SECTIONS AT R/W SAFETY AREA STA. 186+50 TO STA. 187+50 14 X1.3 CROSS SECTIONS AT R/W SAFETY AREA STA. 188+00 TO STA. 188+50 15 X2.1 CROSS SECTIONS AT PROP. RETAINING WALL STA. 0+00 TO STA. 1+25 16 X2.2 CROSS SECTIONS AT PROP. RETAINING WALL STA. 1+50 TO STA. 2+61.75 ADDENDUM N0.2 n w m N m I UY I o m m 0 1 I = to 0 m impp u 0 m L u E 0 Lo In N o Uzu m t - (n to a 3 0 o p OC omi Z O - V 3 N m w c F_ c w UL�� w � N OC o a. U F-a Qo d Q N Lk: F- (n Z w W m J L < o 0 < a� ZZ < zw JAW Ld Q 0 0 I Of W H J o� Z x W LLI za 0 � z Z mW m 0 c z o L o of �ROJ No: 037738 "ILE NAME B1vgln01 MP No 3-50-0005-`. DRAWING NO. G1.2 SHEET 2 OF 16 o D o2 q oO 00 0 O� p 0 D Q o� 0 a Oo Qcpo �8Q 0 NOTE: REFER TO WORK AREA "3" DRAWING G1.4 FOR THE FOR THE VIEWS LISTED ON THIS SHEET. 00 0 oQo�4 dO 0 �o O O o� WILLISTON LIMITS OF GRADING ONT CTOWS 1— HAUL ROUTE \ 11CY) Q V — ENTRANCE TO S.D. IRELAND GRAVEL PIT uu a o u D 00 m N to o m m to 0 1 M z0 m X� m .LL � E D N t m 1 IN j wU N o m m01; - VI (0 3 3 M 0 0 ID a Z O _ L U N 3 Lu m � W W�� 2 f-¢ < � 0 a o O QLj N a~ Z Lu -j Lf) Q 0-6 0- d H0 O z Ld J o x <z � J —j z 1 W � z N] Z Q O 7 Lu = Q-�.... Z 4 u ZZ 3 J 3 m (Ifz me a w J U N O (n a o Ln j 8 of RECEIVED A= a 738 JUN 2 9 2004 FILE No- Bt7ggp FILE NAME Btv99p01 �+ AIP No 3-50-0005-54 City of So. Burlington DRAWING NO. ADDENDUM N0.2 400 400 G1.3 GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET 3 OF 16 . '*, _j k7 REMOVE CONCRETE FOUNDATION. (APPROX. 6'X6'X6') BACKFlLL TO ADJOINING GRADE AND RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH LOAM AND SEED REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT � (APPROX. 3") AND RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH LOAM AND SEED SAWCUT ALONG ,j PAVEMENT JUNCTION r TAXIWAY 'G' VIEW A SCALE: 1"=50' //r--REMOVE CONCRETE (APPROX. 6'X6'X6') FOUNDATION. BACKFlLL I1/ TO ADJOINING GRADE AND RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS ❑ WITH LOAM AND SEED REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT (APPROX. 3") AND RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH LOAM AND SEED SAWCUT ALONG PAVEMENT JUNCTION TAXIWAY 'G' \/Ip*W 'R' ---- RUNWAY 15-33 _ - SAWCUT ALONG C PAVEMENT JUNCTION r y, >REGRADE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER - RESTORE• ALL DISTURBED AREAS IM ' LOAM AND SEED REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT (APPROX. 2") AND RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH LOAM AND SEED TAXIWAY 'C' ' VIEW 'C' SCALE. 1 "=100' VIEW 'E' NOTE: REFER TO GENERAL PLAN DRAWING G1.3 FOR THE SCALE- 1"=50' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE ABOVE VIEWS WITHIN "WORK AREA "3". REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT (APPROX. 3") AND RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH LOAM AND SEED REMOVE CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS. (APPROX. 6'X6'X6') { G BACKFlLI.TO ADJOINING GRADE AND SAWCUT ALONGyJ RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS PAVEMENT JUNCTION WITH LOAM AND SEED , VIEW 'D' SCA1 1"=100' RECED SUN 19 2004 r;h. _s SEAL I n m m N f0 N oto I V cYi x I O 01 u M � o I M i 0 m to In m X� 0 m � t c E mu u m � c In o S w I r ul m m a 3 V1 tD 3 I .. 3 M 0 0 � Ora W o _ Z~3 U ` LNLI c C � w Lu rn W � 0 Oe: o CL U F< o � LL. O a< 0 N J� V) a a << < to Lj Q o z o LLI k It ww 0 Q I 0 Y zn Of 0 1 Q < zJ ?� 0 �3 Z - N W N mO� < � \ F\ +\ * \ +\ o 'c 1 a PROJ No 037738 FILE NAME BNggp02 AIP No 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. GlA SHEET 4 OF 16 ADDENDUM N0.2 EXISTING RUNWAY EDGE LIGHT TO REMAIN (TYP) +00 174+00 175 10. (TYP) - APPROACH SURFACE �5- \ \ \ EXISTING \ \\ POWERLINE vM;"=' +\ REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND REGRADING OF N � o AREA WITHIN TAXIWAY 04 _ \ \ SAFETY AREA WILL BE NEW MECHANICALLY COORDINATED WITH STABILIZED VTANG RETAINING WALL \ \ 01 ` r1 RUNWAY EDGE LIGHTS. TO BE o <� COVERED WHILE TEMPORARY THRESHOLD �+ \\\\ °�N,�� \ EXISTING \ L IS IN USE. (TYP) WILDLIFE `\ o FENCE 1. Fm \ � TEMPORA 100' 4 .; �, \\\\\�_ --- • ��o -- -- OHe ---- ` - } E--'-'�'� `—"\\\ \ o 0 o THRESHO D AR I \-- ------ ° LIMITS OFF .� p \ \ w o _ a E 10' X 1 l REGRADING 0 �'� Z 0- 3 STA 175+40 W c 0 + 179+b0 180+ 7� 181+00 182+00 183+0 1 +00 1 +00 1 +00 1 +00 1 +00 18 190+00 ¢ 191+00 *,Q2+00 19�3+� 194�00 195+00 196+00 197+00 y 198+D0 1993. _200+00 201+00202+001�0,+ w PROJECT SITE WITH BARRICADES. CONTRACTOR'S MEN. do EQUIPMENT EXISTING \ \ � LOCALIZER APPROACH ` \ I SHALL NOT CROSS THE LINE. 1 ANTENNA LIGHTS\� I FAA. do AIRPORT CAN IMPOSE A1 TEMPORARY FINES FOR RUNWAY AND MAINTAIN BUFFER *\ \\ r a '� LIGHTS THRESHOLD r `- _ - — — — — 1AOMWAY]NcMsfoNS:., i DURING CONSTRUCTION \� \\ C o w� o STA 175+40 +r — — €----------—____----� - -- \ �a Z N LIGHTS TO BE NOTE: TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHALL BE <r ❑- IEE NSTALLED THRESHOLD HALMLEBENREMOVED AT TEMPORARY % \ a ¢ Z Q DISCONNECTED IL _ __ >y C�j, 1i J Q EXISTING TH SHO -- - +iy THE CLOSE OF EACH WORK DAY. THE + F\ 4 0 0 J = (f) IS IN US 9J LOCALIZER �f r �i• CRITICAL AREA AIRPORT SHALL HAVE THE USE OF THE FULL �►\\\�% a z 11 J XTENDED LENGTH OF R/W 15-33 FOR NIGHT TIME 100 0 z Q RUNWAY OPERATIONS. �L \ \ w X �- Z 0 AREASAFETM -1m. � \ \ z w L> l TAXIWAY 'K' GRAPHIC SCALE \\ Z rM V'" C) G 0 \ 0 N1 Q �P+\�'-1 i�� • \"` - n fir;.. / 0 } N � PAVE NEW ROADWAY SEE DWG NO G1.4 "\ ~? r ;,y,`• ALL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ' REGRADING THAT IS OUTSIDE THE PAVE NEW LIMITS OF SAFETY AREA REGRADING ROADWAY �. WILL BE INCLUDED IN WORK/AREA #3 \ SEE DWG NO G1.4 J .J 3 J J Z 0 3 Lr) to o � Z L oco ~ 00 AMP°ate °i 000 M - vi CE f °R/SvAG - cd Z a URF % cx o m z zo M o F" ROpCj F pGE F% a o cO F> z r 4:� pP� CH SV� o g y N MAX. EQUIPMENT W J w v1 w% pPR°� EL + wo + HIEGHT IN W.A. #2 m 1n w W)co o Mo / i 210' 25' 32' 335=----- - /�--------1�- _ _ A#2 335 330 ` -- 330 325 WORK AREA (W.A. - ELEV. 322.0' 325 320' -- - - ' - "" xx•. r �x• rt r y rrM a i ar< wFr" = assne wrw ucv.. wv .w mcn w n> 320 315 EXISTING GROUND 315 310 AT RUNWAY CENTERLINE RETAINING \\ • � �� 310 305, WALL \ \ 305 300 \ �• 300 295 \ 11 295 290 !1�'r 1 290 F � z 0Z) N U mE Z < O N k 0 PROJ No 037738 FILE NAME 13tvgIch0l AIP No 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. APPROACH AND WALL PROFILE S1.1 SCALE: 1"=200' HORIZ. 1"=20' VERT ADDENDUM _NO.21 SHEET 5 OF 16 ENG►EER'S SEAL REMOVE PAVEMENT F ate, •'<F`r:.'>• FROM TAXIWAY 'D' TO STA.186+66. i260 L ' \ , �r . EXISTING BUILDING xs ; \ n m TOP OF WALL''=328,0' \'\,� ` 00 to GRADING'LII.IITS.\\\ '�YF \� \ N `� .lee :' ��`a+' °. ;,:v'+.' '�; .. ,, wry•+\ ,w•,• \ r - - ,O SAFETY AREA7-1NEW FENCE �� , \ o Z > \ • .: qyf ' \ \�. I \r ° m M a, NEW FENCE\PbST. E \AOOs�i ` INSTALL SILT FENCE (TYP.) \ �� �\ , \" , Lo �� +62:'182't �• \ \ 'STA187 , V) a TOP. OF WALL=327.5' \ \ \- , REMOVE ;. ;!1A� i v' ., . \�. I, CG to 0 EXISTING x- `��.• • \' ;uj FENCE DEMOLISH EXISTING \ Z 0 3 \ I WOOD STRUCTUR Z (T-111 EXTERIOR) -AND 's- CONCRETE FOUIVDA7101� W STORAGE `BUILDING \\ \\ - w� J� I \ NEW 12' SWING'G�1TE \�----- -- - u ol ` ,"A,I e''I I.\,\ '?B NEW FENCE POST. \.a ' DME I ^ •s 13 ff LIMITSOF ►"d, GRADING" 315-� +` Q I— a x s +` of w J o Lo N I - O 0_ p_ �+ C r F o. HAY BALE O / CHECK DAM t p\ 5' 188+31, 910L a ~Z a ¢ TYp) Zo aZ32 RECEIEDO wxQ Q` RIP RAP D5wD=6" I �UN 2 J 7 n �11Z CO Z .0% z o 0 ,wc—w<.--a•+N—r s+--�9v--s.—4rrtia.: r,{y�;�rw—C.k.--w. r+nr. �wl,x�1,cLY-x?tE�11•iYe!—Il:m —nuts—Dllwr�wlR r-w/xt—nrs >[--4/s-yrro, s—.xx--r;rw.--»S:ta_ aw--Itl.—YAW--fin fc—rr '�'—,.r - O } '^ I City of So. Buriinogf z n m� w PROPOSED DRAINAGE SEE DRAINAGE PLAN I, SHT. C1.2 - • < I- iq m vNJi N N al 1 W . MAINTAIN A BUFFER 50' Z �I TO PROTECT LOCALIZER ANTENNA a 184+00 185+00 186+00 y{, 1117+00 188+00 t l 189+00 o —�—— —— --�—— �— —� — (-- -- I-- —— — } — — — — Enj `n z ix s w z O U 0 O W K 1000' FROM R/W 33 THRESHOLD REMOVE CONCRETE p� No, a Q a FOUNDATION. (APPROX. 45'X8'X6') BACKFILL TO ADJOINING "GRADE AND RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS a WITH LOAM AND SEED PROJ No 037738 FILE NAME BtvcgrOl AIP No 3-50-0005-5+ DRAWING NO. [ADDENDUM N0.2 z° ° 20 1=�0' cil SHEET 6 OF 16 \ ��• ` /, m to oltn t ��J,.;'r> C•ig"\ %PROPO GRADN # z oo CSEE GRG, PLAN.? SHT. C1.l w — 4BB+21 15O.OL w _— m am C — ELEV+= d� — — ',-� -0H t - - _ O „fi �,,"•,.' i Nh ;p.\ 'I V. OUT•�BR 9HE. ^J.--��OHE —y'— -- -- — — ---- _ W m \ Ewa J ! s 127—CLASS.IV,l RCP MH#2—STA. 187+50, 10O.0'L —f L _ ;\: \ ` \, *�#\ o (4' DIA"MANHOLE)' I \: ; ,, RIM, ELEV.=329.8' ~ a INV: IN (18'RCP)=315.25' ;' I \` „.? aof a R INV. OUT (18"RCP)=315.15'; Z 182+00 183+00 ' 184+00 185+00 ,' 186+00•' �,' 187+00 I ':' 188+00 I 189+ i • , 190+00 ' 191+00 *�-19�s .-- �� `---.-1 fl3+00-k ' `~ Z <CL a 200'—CLASS IV 18"RCP I aw w X w o P w Q .5=0.01 o� of Z M Er rn n Er U MH#3—STA. 187+50, 1O0.0'L--/' e ° (4' DIA MANHOLE) RIM ELEV.-328.5' INV. IN,(1B'RCP)=313.15' ° INV. OUT (18"RCP)=313.05' / {Q 127'—CLASS IV 18'RCP 5=0.02 fi� I W ------------- EXISTING'MH STA. 167+50, 227'R , RIM ELEV.=325.8' (NEW) INV. IN 18"RCP=310.51 INV. IN 15"CMP=284.7 INV. IN 36'RCPF285.15 INV. OUT 36" RCP=284.20 � Eivi� JUN 29 2004 City of $o. SuMngton w o w ADDENDUM NO.21 PRO' N' 03Bt7738 FILE NAME vdm0l AIP No 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO C1.2 SHEET 7 OF 16 4" TOE IN SIDES AND SECURE WITH STAPLES 18" ON CENTER —REINFORCING STAPLES 12' EROSION CONTROL BLANKET �_o / \ � -� L k SEED STAPLE (TYP NOTES 1. PRIOR TO PLACING EXCELSIOR MATTING PREPARE THE SOIL BY RAKING AREA FREE OF CLODS AND LARGE STONES. 2 SEED, MULCH AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED AS SPECIFIED OVER THE PREPARED SOIL PRIOR TO PLACING THE EXCELSIOR MATTING. 3 ALL SEAMS SHALL BE OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM OF 4" AND SECURED WITH STAPLES SPACED 18" ON CENTER. 4. TO SECURE MAT TO GROUND STAPLE RANDOMLY AT 24" (MAX.) THROUGHOUT. 5. MATTING SHALL BE BURIED AT, THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH RUN. TYPICAL DITCH SECTION NOT TO SCALE DIRECTION OF FLOW PLAN VIEW CATCH BASIN GRADING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE STAKE (TYP ) HAYBALE (TYP }-� �'-HAYBALE: ` COMPACTED SOIL / TO PREVENT PIPING (TYP.) � �a►::-.I'';;1 qg� ,:c FLOW i FILTERED ' ' ,:.•:1w+�w." �` �_ FLOW I_Irr .I ❑p00 �{{+ L Xy �L.S 4� ❑ O O ❑ Y. L'� . 2 STAKES MIN PER CATCH BALE (TYP.) BASIN BL& I I SEC'nON SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AT CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE 4" MIN. EXIST GROUND 250' MIN. TOR WQ SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS DWG. NO C5.1 k SEED 2-2"X2'X3' STAKES FOR EACH BALE (TYP.) FILL SLOPE r 1 ' ELEVATION ED OVERLAP EDGES SALE of 71 BALED HAY I 12' ON CENTER OR STRAW '-^'Y ., n PLAN FOR ON HAY BALE CHECK DAM DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MATTING -SEE NOTES 2H.1V (MAX ) PLACE STONE LINING TO 6" ABOVE NORMAL TOP OF WATER OR 18" WHICHEVER IS MORE 1 4' MIN. I /F V MIN MINIMUM 6" j COMPACTED LL EXIST. �! Z z FILTER FABRIC W/i;;;;i;i; GRADE BURIED FLAP - SEE SPECS. — 1O F //\—'•%1' _ - 6"X6" MIN. TREN 16" MIN. BURY FLAP OF FILTER FABRIC 1. SPACING OF WOOD FENCE POSTS NOT TO EXCEED 10'-0". 2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY EARTH REMOVAL OR EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE. 3. FILTER FABRIC TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOODEN FENCE POSTS. 4. OVERLAP BY 6", FOLD AND STAPLE ADJOINING SECTIONS OF FILTER FABRIC. 5 MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED, AND THE MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP. DO NOT DEPOSIT MATERIAL NEAR WETLANDS OR WATERCOURSES. I SECURE WITH STAPLES 18" ON CENTER (TYP.) D� =A" ` (225 X A) 1 MIRAFI 140NS OR APPROVED EQUAL 2 3 RIPRAP LINED DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL 4 NOT TO SCALE 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 ADDENDUM NO. 2 14 SILT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES GRADE 1. ALL EARTHWORK SHALL BE CONFINED TO THE LIMITS OF WORK AS SHOWN ON CONTRACT DRAWINGS. 2. HAY BALE DAMS AROUND CATCH BASINS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE INDICATED, k PER THE DETAIL SHOWN ON THIS PLAN BLOCK h CRUSHED STONE SEDIMENT FILTER SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NECESSARY 3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF STOCKPILES OF TOPSOIL AND OTHER SOIL MATERIALS AND IN OTHER LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED, TO PREVENT SILT AND SEDIMENTATION FROM ENTERING THE EXISTING DRAINAGE CHANNEL. 4 ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF FINAL GRADING OR TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INITIAL DISTURBANCE OF SOIL ALL PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FOLLOWING SEED FORMULA AND APPLICATION RATE: TYPE 1: KIND OF SEED LBS PER ACRE MINIMUM PURITY X MINIMUM GERMINATION X RED FESCUE (CREEPING) 40 85 80 KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS 25 85 80 REDTOP 5 85 80 PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 50 85 80 TOTAL 120 LBS ALL TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FOLLOWING SEED FORMULA AND APPLICATION RATE: TYPE 2: KIND OF SEED LBS PER ACRE MINIMUM PURITY X MINIMUM GERMINATION % RED FESCUE (CREEPING) 65 85 80 KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS 20 85 80 WHITE CLOVER 65 85 80 RED TOP 2.5 85 80 BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL 4 85 80 VAR. EMPIRE ANNUAL RYEGRASS 32 85 80 TO [TOTAL 130 LBS LIME, FERTILIZER AND HAY MULCH SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE MOBILIZATION INSTALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WHERE INDICATED ON PUNS, IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR AS INDICATED BY THE ENGINEER STRIP AND STOCKPILE EXISTING TOPSOIL FOR REUSE. STABILIZE BY PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SEE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES, THIS DRAWING EXCAVATE EXISTING SUBSOILS TO ACCOMMODATE THE PLACEMENf7FVO E I V E D MATERIALS PER RETAINING WALL CROSS SECTIONS. ,, `` L. INSTALL MSE WALL PANELS. INSTALL DRAINAGE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ��� 2 9 2004 INSTALL HAYBALE DAMS AROUND CATCH BASINS AS SHOWN ROUGH GRADE TURF AREAS, SIDE SLOPES AND SWALES. REPLACE SILT FENCE AS REQUIRED City of So. Burlington FINAL GRADING OF ALL TURF AREAS. ALL TURF AREAS SHALL RECEIVE PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH WITHIN 15 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. CONTINUE WITH TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL TURF AREAS HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY STABILIZED. UPON COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND WHEN ALL TURF AREAS SHOW A GOOD STAND OF GRASS, TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED. ALL EROSION k SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS SHALL BE PLACED h MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE STANDARDS. I- a L 0 c $ cf J Q O EE Ll �. a a < Z to (� O _J w 10 C) Q o W X LLI Z w ZI O Z rO O rl C~D } za :3 W = X Z mm a J a 0 0 to a O v� U1 0 of PR0J No 037738 FILE NAME 8tverodt02 AT N. 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO ER1.1 SHEET 8 OF 16 TURF PAVEMENT 4' TOPSOIL & INSTALL CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATE NOTE: SEED EXCELSIOR 1Y• 3" SHALL BE NEENAH WHERE SOLID COVERS ARE INDICATED ON PLANS SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TACK COAT E MATTING NO 3475 OR APPROVED EQUAL USE NEENAH R-3492 C OR APPROVED EQUAL AFTER NEW PAVEMENT IS PLACED AND COMPACTED MATH "DRAIN" CAST INTO COVER FOR IDENTIFICATION SAW CONTROL JOINT AND FILL WITH HOT POURED N L m `CONCRETE JOINT SEALER CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS COLLAR PCC APRON (MIN 4" THICK) OF ASTM D3405. ! UY SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN 0 � u PROVIDE SMOOTH FINISH 24" X 36" I o STEEL REINFORCED ADJUST FRAME TO GRADE WITH OFFSET OPENING STEPS 1/2 1/2 f1/8 3 4" f l 8' I -0IN Z 0 m TWO COURSES OF CLAY BRICK EXIST. BIT. CONC. NEW BIT. `m MINIMUM OR CONCRETE GRADE VARIES - - CONC. x < RINGS, MINIMUM B" WIDE „ ILL RISER SECTIONS ALL JOINTS SEALED BUT ( ) EXISTING I NEW — c JOINT SEALANT OR AS SPECIFIED AS REQUIRED AS � m FOR BASE SECTIONS GREATER THAN F-- 10'- 0" InL I I 5'-0", PROVIDE ECCENTRIC CONE VARIES 10'- Iin n u1 I tvi usi REDUCER SECTION OR FLAT VARIES MEET EXISTING PAVEMENTto SLAB REDUCER TO ACCEPT 5'-0' DIA. RISER SECTION EXIST. BIT. CONC. .. NEW BIT. 3 II n o 0 CONC. p[ o (D a EXIS7_BASE COURSE \ - 3'-0" — — — NEW BASE Z N H 3 CAST IN PLACE RUBBER COMPRESSION SUMP 18" TACK COAT N GASKET OR RUBBER BOOT WITH m GJJ STAINLESS STEEL BANDS c RECOMPACT EXISTING rn BASE COURSE AND APPLY PRIME COAT V LT / l NOTE 0 c N CRUSHED STONE ------ / SAWCUTTING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT, (I'/'7 MAX.) 1'-0' MIN AND SAWING AND SEALING THE d CONTROL JOINT ARE INCIDENTAL TO THE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE TYPICAL CATCH BASIN DETAIL COURSE ITEM. NOT TO SCALE PAVEMENT BUTT JOINT DETAIL �w NOTE: THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LOADING ON ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 0 of Q N N IS BASED ON A 200,000 LB DUAL WHEEL AIRCRAFT LOAD. THE NOT TO SCALE J CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY SHOP DRAWINGS AND MANUFACTURER'S Q < J CERTIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONS. Q Z N LLJ OQ Q <w o LY X L♦1rJ� FF_ LJ V I Q zZ 0 r1 Q z> ¢ J 3 N 4" TOPSOIL & SEED O_ Z D m 0Y 0 a GJ SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL LJ N (PLACED IN 12" LIFTS MAX.) PIPE COVER LAYER TO BE CLEAN FILL, FREE OF LARGE STONES OR ° PAVEMENT DEBRIS PLACE PIPE BEDDING TO HALF OF THE OUTER DIA WITH 3/4" CRUSHED STONE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE L PIPE DIA TRENCH WIDTH UP TO 12" 36" 12" TO 24' I.D PLUS 24" GREATER THAN 24" 2 X LD DIA. OVER LEDGE CONTRACTOR SHALL SHORE TRENCH SIDES WHEN REQUIRED OR AS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL IN SOIL CONDITIONS NOT TO SCALE 3"-VTRANS TYPE III PAVEMENT (2 LIFTS - 1 1/2" PER LIFT) PAVEMENT TO BE PLACED USING MACHINE METHOD FOR FULL WIDTH SAWCUT & APPLY TACK COAT 6" CRUSHED GRAVEL VTRANS SECTION 70405 (FINE) NOTE 1. ALL MATERIAL WILL BE 12" GRAVEL - VTRANS SECTION 704.04 COMPACTED TO MEET ASTM 1557 REQUIREMENTS. 2. NO TRENCH WILL REMAIN - - UTILITY TRENCH OPEN OVERNIGHT. TRENCH _ WILL MEET RUNWAY _ 'K: SAND BEDDING AROUND PIPE REQUIREMENTS BY END OF WORKDAY. - DRAINAGE PIPES (DIA. VARIES) TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL IN PAVEMENT RUNWAY 15 — 33 NOT TO SCALE 2' CRUSHED 2' CRUSHED GRAVFI SHouInFR GRAVEL SHOULDER 4" LOAM & SE 41 12 HOT BIT PAVEMENT (MACHINE METHOD) 3" WEARING COURSE (VTRANS TYPE III) 2 LIFTS - 1 1/2" PER LIFT � 4% 2% 2R 4% LOAM & SEED 1 CRUSHED GRAVEL ( RECEIVED (VTRANS SECTION 704 O5) EXISTING GROUND (CLEAN, GRUB & STRIP TOP SOIL) JUN 2 g 2004 PERIMETER ROAD TYPICAL CROSS SECTIVSo' Burlington NOT TO SCALE ADDENDUM N0.2 o Ln a LnLn o > $ <v a �ROJ No 037738 'RE NAME Btvddt0l UP No- 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. C2.1 SHEET 9 OF 16 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: G-1 ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS, THE MORE STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. G-2 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS AND COORDINATION OF OTHER TRADES. G-3 THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. CARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SITE SAFETY SHALL SOLELY BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. G-4 ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR RESPONSIBLE TRADES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE WORK, FABRICATION OR ORDERING MATERIALS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, USE DIMENSIONS SHOWN. G-5 ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. G-6 THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS CONCERNING THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATIONS AS TO THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE THERETO. G-7 ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY DEPARTMENTS AND COMPANIES SHALL BE NOTIFIED BEFORE EXCAVATION IS STARTED. UTILITIES WITHIN 50 FEET OF AN EXCAVATION SHALL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD. G-8 HOYLE. TANNER do ASSOCIATES, INC. WAIVES ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR PROBLEMS THAT ARISE DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE CONTRACTOR: - TO FOLLOW THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE DESIGN INTENT THEY CONVEY. - TO NOTIFY HTA OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR CONFLICTS AND OBTAIN THEIR GUIDANCE TO RESOLVE. WISE WALL CONCRETE LEVELING PAD: C-1. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ALL CONCRETE OPERATIONS. C-2. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST A.C.I. SPECIFICATIONS. C-3. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4.000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. C-4. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615 GRADE 60 AND SHALL BE DETAILED, FABRICATED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST A.C.I. SPECIFICATIONS. C-5. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLUMP OF CONCRETE SHALL NOT EXCEED 4'. C-6. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE AIR -ENTRAINED A MINIMUM OF 6% C-7. ALL HORIZONTAL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE CONTINUOUS. LAP ALL SPLICES 32 DIAMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROVIDE CORNER RODS. C-8. PROVIDE A CLEAR COVER FROM REINFORCING STEEL TO ADJACENT CONCRETE SURFACES AS FOLLOWS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO EARTH = 3'. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER = 1-1/2' (EXCEPT 2" AT #6 AND LARGER). THESE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED ACTUAL AND ARE NOT TO BE ADJUSTED IN EITHER DIRECTION. C-9. FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING COLD WEATHER, LEVELING PADS WILL REQUIRE PROTECTION FROM FREEZING TEMPERATURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 306. C-10. FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING HOT WEATHER, ALL CONCRETE WALL REQUIRE PROTECTION FROM HIGH TEMPERATURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 305. C-11. FIELD FABRICATION OR CUTTING OF REINFORCING STEEL WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 330 PROPOSED GROUND 325 EXISTING GROUND \ / 320 / / 315 -- - �\ BASE OF WALL \\�� FOOTING 310, 305 1 DATUM ELEV 300.00 CC L\ N^, Ln r� o c0 Lq o a rn 00 N N N 04 N N N N N N N 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROFILE 4 v E R T 0 1 c A L HORIZONTAL 4 40 0 40 RECEIVED JUN 2 9 2004 n m m N m N w o 0, m m o I 2 p z m m m m x� o a g u E � o I m a - Vl ; I .. 3 n & 0 p p m as Z p - a V 3 N m F- Q c rn c w Urn u Lu me o a ~a a OQ O¢ W N ¢ J LJJ M a `w` Q J < z v¢ H Ly pz oZ QQ0Q w Z of zo W X J Q w zl Q J Z M Q on �> z z ¢ li l o 3 W N crz c to H 0 (iV T J BUrlington FILE NAME -02 AIP No 3-50-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. C2.2 SHEET 10 OF 16 ADDENDUM NO.2 FRONT FACE OF WALL PANEL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 18" WIDE PLACED AS SHOWN STRIPS (CARTHAGE MILLS TYPE FX-45HS OR EQUAL) i>REINFORCING CORNER ELEMENT VARIES I u u �l 3/4"t3/8" I iv OPEN JOINT WORKING POINT v-2'. CORNER ELEMENT DETAIL SCALE: 3/4' - 1'- 0' FINISHEDIGRADE DRAINAGE SWALE o COMPACTED EMBANKMENT ALL PER PROJECT SPECIFICATI0NSQ.' SELECT GRANULAR II APPROXIMATE EXISTING GRADE (VARIES) TION = COPING FRONT FACE - PRECAST PANELS 'ASHLAR STONE' FINISH 1 z I o FINISHED GRADE (SUPPORT OF EXCAVATION BY OTHERS) 11 - 2 MAX. SLOPE 1.00 GALVANIZED STEEL REINFORCING STRIPS (TYP.) V-0" x 6" UNREINFORCED CONCRETE LEVELING PAD REINFORCING STRIP LENGTH: APPROXIMATELY 70% WALL HEIGHT TYPICAL SECTION - REINFORCED EARTH WALL SCALE: 1 : 10 FOUNDAT10N TRADE NOTES: F-1 MATERIAL BENEATH THE LEVELING PAD DEEMED UNSUITABLE BY THE ENGINEER SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH STRUCTURAL FILL CONFORMING TO REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 508 COMPACTED TO 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR F-2 THE BOTTOM OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR PRIOR TO FORMING FOOTINGS. F-3. ALL BACKFILL USED BEHIND THE WALL SHALL BE WELL GRADED GRAVEL CONFORMING TO REQUIREMENTS OF M-006. MATERIAL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN 6" LAYERS TO 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR. MSE WALL NOTES, M-1. THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WALL CONSTRUCTION M-2. THE EXACT SOIL REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT AND LENGTH IS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE MSE WALL MANUFACTURER M-3. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PLANS AND CALCULATIONS (FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL WALL STABILITY). SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER QUALIFIED TO PERFORM THE WORK IN THE STATE OF VT FOR THE PROPOSED WALL SYSTEM SEE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. UNREINF. CONC. LEVELING PAD TYP LEVELING PAD STEP DETAIL NOT TO SCALE �1'-4" LEVEL -UP CONCRETE 1 8 8 1 AS REQUIRED—. I �� CONTRACTOR TO FILL SPREAD ANCHOR RECESS WITH NON -SHRINK GROUT AFTER PLACEMENT FRONT FACE OF WALL PANEL AND HORIZ CONTROL LINE 5 1/2" PRECAST COPING SECTION NOTE: NOT TO SCALE STANDARD COPING UNIT IS 10'-0' LONG WITH SQUARE ENDS 12'-0" WIDE GATE POST BARBED WIRE 'FABRIC FRAME STRETCHER BAR ALL 4 SIDES '--LOCK TRUSS/ STRETCH BAR - RODS '�;� �'"• ` BANDS _ 10'-0" MAX. _ •10'-0" MAX. ' 'Ti ji,ti TZt LINE -v t+>Z:Y, 'NO. 9 GA CLIPS POST 2'-0" O.C. MAX (RAILS) rs 1'-0" O.C. MAX. (POST) BRACE RAIL ` 'TRUSS ROD 'II NO. 7 TENSION / WIRE 11 ` SEE POST SETTING '•U DETAIL THIS SHEET SINGLE SWING GATE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 TURFED AREAS PAVED AREAS N TLY TROWELED 0 C Z 1 FINISH N O 4" TOPSOIL (TYP.) 3' FOR LINE POSTS AND 5' FOR ALL OTHERS 03 7 � rr 3000 PSI CONCR 12" DIA. FOR ALL LINE POSTS, 18 DIA FOR ALL OTHERS POST SETTING DETAILS NOT TO SCALE BARBED WIRE 5-0" MAX. 5'-0" MAX. MOUNTING B ACK (45') TOP RAIL BARBED WIRE TOP R 1'-0 DIA. 3 STRANDS (TYP.) TOP OF PRECAST TOP OF LEVEL -UP _L COPING. CONCRETE F 10 -0" 1/2" OPEN JOINT r '•-'• 6-5 8" DIA. CORNER AND `N0. 9 GAUGE CLIPS FABRIC WITH- �:`ti"'^"• ERMINAL OST W n a PLASTIC INSERT (TYP );', CAP (ACORN) (TY ) -2 O.C. MAX (POSTS) ) P TS) MAX. RAILSt4" o ¢ a 7ji—�r�— wo LINED HOST BAR TENSION of 2, 9 _ _ L. _ _ � 0 BAN S I LMID RAILS MID RAILS m 1-5/8" DIA. ; , 1-5/8" DIA. LINE POST ?; TENSION BAR 4" DIA , ;> ,, OTTOM RAIL 1 Wz W/ N0. 91A 3/4 X 3%16 GAUGE CLIPS PROJ No. 037738 FILE NAME Bt—dt03 - PRECAST COPING PARTIAL ELEVATION TRUxS ROD DETAIILOSS THIS SETTINGTSHEET AIP No 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. 3/4 X 3/16" NOT TO SCALE SECURITY FENCE TO SCALE ^r�•3 l� L NOT ADDENDUM N0.2 SHEET 11 OF 16 No Text No Text No Text 0+ 00 336 336 r\ 332 1 \\ I 332 , 1 � 328 z 328 I< 1 � 324 j 1 324 I Z f i I 320 t 320 1 < I � 316 I I 316 312 I i I l EXISTING 312 308 1 GROUND 308 I (TYP.) I 304 1 i I 304 300 I . I 300 I 296 1 I 296 I I 292 1 1 1 292 I 288 1 I 288 I 284 N 284 W NDo N 280 M M- 280 -50 0 50 0+25 336 336 I, 332 1 ,\ 332 1 1 \\ 328 z 328 I� 1 < 324 j 1 324 1 z I 320 320 < I 1 316 I 316 312 j I 312 308 I I 1 1 1 308 304 I I 304 300 I I 300 1' I 296 j I I 296 I 292 1 I 1 292 I 288 I 288 M 284 284 00 N N M M -50 0 50 0+ 50 336 336 1\ \ 332 \\* 332 328 1 328 IZ 1- 1 324 < 1 324 � 1 I I uj 320 I - 320 I = I U I < 316 1 316 312 I j I 312 I I 308 1 I I 308 1 304 304 I 300 I `I 300 296 j I 296 I 292 I 292 I 288 I 288 1 284 I 284 M N 00 00 N N M 280 280 -50 0 50 0+75 336 336 332 1��\ I 332 \ I \\ 328 328 1 I z z 324 j ¢ 324 I � 1 � 320 t I 1 La 320 1 v I � 316 < 316 I f 312 1 I 312 I I 308 1 i I 308 1 304 I 304 I 300 300 I 1 I 296 f I 296 I 292 292 1 288 1 288 0 0 00 0 N N 284 M M 284 -50 0 50 rn ro N (0 I a uY p to to U M O o I 2 -0 zO to m n 4 m 0 t m [ E °u � N N c m I 1 N m wV U I m � 3 to 10 3 3 W m o O t0 a Lu p—a 1+00 v~3 336 336 1 + 2 5 m Lu T c w \ rn 332 j \ \ 332 332 332 L r \�o CL 328 328 328 328 z / l ca o J 324 1 0 �< 324 324 1 324 < Q Lr) 04 o j 1 I r I 0w !- + N 320 t 320 I 320 I W z 320 �< > J Q Ur N Z Q Q F I zo <n Z Z N O 316 I 1 < 316 I 316 < 316 Fo Z F Q f- �- 0 a I 1 x U W F- I �W W (Y I I I (n O 312 1 312 312 1 312 zo n N 00 j z a O (/) O o 1 O p 308 308 308 i 308 m U O Fa- a 1 I � 304 II 304 304 304 a U N I 1 300 30cfRD E I V E00 D m 300 11 1 jr JUN � &4 296 I 296 296 / 96 I 292 2921ty Of SO. Burlington 292 o0 n N o v F. h h n j W S 288 M M 288 288 M M 288 of -50 0 50 -50 0 50 ADDENDUM N0.2 5' 5 E R T 0 1 0 A L HORIZONTAL 5 0 50 P '= I <1 <1 <1 a 'ROJ No 037738 -ILE NAME Btws04 UP N., 3-50-0005-54 DRAWING NO. X2.1 SHEET 15 OF 16 No Text No Text No Text r southburlinoon PLANNING & ZONING December 29, 2009 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of Site Plan Approval #SP-09-51 Dear Ms. Kendrew: Please be advised that site plan approval #SP-09-51 issued to the Burlington International Airport on 6/18/2009 to construct a general aviation ramp and partial taxi -way has expired. This approval has expired due to not obtaining a zoning permit for this land development within six (6) months as required by condition #3 of said approval. Therefore, please reapply for site plan approval as soon as possible so that you may obtain a zoning permit for this work. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Since , Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com A� t WO bi ��.1 southburlin�ton PLANNING & ZONING January 8, 2009 Heather Kendrew Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of Site Plan Approval #SP-08-49 rew: PIPasP ha �riLl����+,hn+ +�N u uh.p - - - -in -on--------- — International Airport by the Development Review Board on 7/1/08 to construct a general aviation ramp and partial taxi -way has expired. This approval has expired due to not obtaining a zoning permit for this land development within six (6) months as required by condition #3 of said approval. Therefore, please reapply for site plan approval as soon as possible so that you may obtain a zoning permit for this work. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Wond J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 26, 2007 Heather Kendrew, Airport Engineer Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan #SP-07-14, #SP-07-15, & #SP-07-16 Dear Ms. Kendrew Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced projects approved by the Administrative Officer on March 26, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval including that you obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Bets cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP / CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport, 1200 Airport Drive #1, South Burlington, VT05403 802-863-2874 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)_Book 13, Pa e 271 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as #1 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Heather Kendrew, Airport rt Engineer, 1200 Airport Drive #1, So. Burlington, VT 05403, 863-2874 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Aviation Avenue, South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2000 0000 C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 14,400 SF building used as an air2ort service facility present tenant is AWATRON. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Same as above with the addition of a 12'x12' high compressor building(144 c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 14,400 SF Aviatron building+ 144 SF addition = 14,544 SF total area. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Height of building = 10', Number of Floors = 1 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Parking accommodations and requirements will not change with this site plan. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, V:\1953\active\195310135\aviation\Permits\Aviatron Site Plan\Aviattlon site plan application. doe { Penn Number SP- please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): This is a re -application for SP-06-38 previously approved June 28, 2006. The applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within six months from the Site Plan approval date and consequently is required to re -apply for Site Plan approval. The attached site plan shows proposed landscaping, a bicycle rack, snow storage areas, and a screened in dumpster location as require by the June 28, 2006 Decision by the DRB. 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing Unknown % Proposed 0 % added b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Unknown% Proposed 0 % added c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0% Proposed 0% 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 3,500 b) Landscaping: $105 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): None 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): Parking accommodations and requirements will not change with this site plan. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: July 2006 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). V:\1953\active\195310135\aviation\Permits\Aviatron Site Plan\Aviat$n site plan application.doc t <. Permit Number SP- I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. F SI N ffjRE OF APPLICANT r SI AT OF OPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 2Ll—;Lb 1ng REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 1�r Complete ❑ Incomplete ector of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date V:\1953\active\195310135\aviation\Permits\Aviatron Site Plan\Aviat$)n site plan application. doc C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S WEBSTEFR-MARTIN, INC_ ^ - 1025 AIRPORT DRIVE - P.O. BOX 2246 - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05407 - 802-864-0223 420 COMMERCIAL STREET • MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03101 • 603-626-4832 April 29, 1993 Frank C. Evans, P.E. State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 57 River Road, # 1009 Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Burlington Main Street MEGC 5000(14) W-M Project No. 04-8808 Dear Mr. Evans: As you requested, Webster -Martin has performed a' capacity analysis for the Main Street - Spear Street - East Avenue and Main Street - Sheraton Drive - Staples Drive Intersections. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential problem of Main Street's eastbound traffic in the right most lane, which ends at Staples Drive, not having an opportunity to merge left with the thru traffic. As shown on the attached sheets, we have determined the level of service and the resulting 90th percentile queue lengths on the west approaches of Main Street. This was done for the design year 2003. Our analysis, as summarized in Tables A and B, indicates the following: * The west approach for Main Street - East Ave - East Terrace was analyzed with two and three thru lanes. Two thru lanes produce queue lengths in excess of the available storage. Three thru lanes result in a queue length of 295 feet, which is 11 feet less than the available storage between Fast Terrace and Spear Street. For each scenario a level of service "B" is obtained. Frank C. Evans, P.E. -2- April 29, 1993 * The Main Street - Sheraton Dr - Staples Dr west approach was also analyzed with 2 and 3 thru lanes. In each instance the queue lengths did not exceed the available storage. The level of service for 2 thru lanes is "C" and the level of service for 3 thru lanes is "B". This analysis is based on traffic volumes as generated by Chittenden County Regional Planning Commisssion's T-Model and adjusted as indicated on the attached sheet. This analysis suggests 3 eastbound thru lanes are required at the East Ave intersection. Thru traffic using the right most lane would then need to weave left previous to the lane ending at Staples Drive. Once you have had an opportunity to review this information, please feel free to call me if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC. Grego . Edwards, P.E. Projec anager GAE/baf del\ 1191300 I I 4/26/93 Basis for Traffic Volumes at Sheraton Dr., Staples Dr., and Williston Rd. 1. Performed manual count on 10/15/92 at this intersection by T/O. 2. For East Ave., East Terr., and Main St. intersection, obtained east approach entering and leaving volumes from CCRPC TModel 2 data for 2000 and adjusted to 2003. 3. Applied movement percentages from T/O count to CCRPC volumes to obtain turning movements. TABLE A W-M, Burlington Main St. - 93102 Intersection of East Ave., East Terrace, and Main St. Lanes on Ave. Delay Queue Length Storage Length West App. (spv) on West App. on West App. (ft) (ft) 2T 10.9 (B) 436 306 3T 9.1 (B) 295 306 TABLE B i-M, Burlington Main St. - 93102 Intersection of Sheraton Dr., Staples Dr., and Williston Rd. Lanes on Ave. Delay Queue Length Storage Length West App. (spv) on West App. on West App. (ft) (ft) 2T 23.4 (C) 426 500 3T 8.6 (B) 328 500 Notes: 1. 2003 design traffic volumes (CCRPC). .2. 90th percentile queue lengths. ------------------- -------------------- Vift-&6Iff AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROJECTS UNIT ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Record FROM: F. C. Evans, Project Manager DATE: May 7, 1993 SUBJ: Burlington M EGC 5000(14) A meeting of the Coordinating Committee was held at Webster -Martin's office on May 5. Also present were Steve Goodkind (a cameo appearance) and Don Morley for Burlington; Bob Penniman for UVM; Jim Bush, Pat Arno and Mark Bolte for FHWA; Joe Oppenlander and Greg Edwards for Webster -Martin; John Hannah for Dubois & King; Michael Oman for CCRPC and Ken Robie, project engineer for AOT. 1. Status of preliminary design. Draft plan and profile has been prepared for comment by AOT. Further work is stymied until an understanding on pavement width is reached with SHPO. (See below). 2. Status report on preparation of the EA. Draft 4(f) statement and a proposed additional contract scope of services to prepare the 4(f) statement are being prepared for submittal to AOT via Webster -Martin. Extent and level of detail for archaeological review needs to be defined by the State Archaeologist, working with the consultants. 3. There was extensive discussion of ruling by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation directing the.SHPO to work with the consultant on design parameters (pavement width, median width, length of curve at University Place). Review by the Advisory Council preceded review by the SHPO staff. The staff review needs to be requested via a plan submission and a request for a meeting. 4. Status of subsurface explorations (borings). AOT Materials Division to perform the work. They have made some of the necessary coordinating contacts with UVM and the City. 5. ANR has found that a Stormwater Discharge Permit is not required. 6. Third eastbound lane at Staples. Webster -Martin has reported that intersection capacity is adequate with two through lanes and that queuing is not expected to block the East Terrace/East Avenue intersection. Therefor, AOT does not believe it necessary to add a third Eastbound departure lane (to eliminate lane discontinuity) as part of this project. The City of South Burlington will be asked to comment on the report. FHWA asked for a copy of the report. 7. Adjustments to traffic modeling output. WMI prepared a display showing the discrepancies in link volumes between the intersections. AOT believes some adjustment is needed to avoid the perception that the inconsistencies invalidate the turning traffic 'projections. The City opposes adjustment of the turning volumes because of the possibility that adjustment may lead to a perceived need to change the design to accommodate reduced (or increased) turning volumes. Joe Oppenlander will review the model output to check the relationship between intersection turning volumes and link volumes. Mike Oman will review the traffic model to see if there is a data or coding problem which might have produced the inconsistencies. Joe reports that AOT Traffic Research is in the process of counting the three major intersections in the project area. 8. The next meeting was scheduled for June 16; 2:00 PM at Webster -Martin. Copy to: Steve Goodkind, Burlington City Engineer Don Morley, Burlington Traffic Engineer Chuck Hafter, South Burlington City Manager Bob Penniman, UVM Leonard Locke, Webster -Martin, Inc. John Hannah, Dubois & King, Inc. Michael Oman, CCRPC James Bush, FHWA State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests. Parks and Recreation Oepartment of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Greg Edwards, Project Manager 1025 Airport Drive, P.O. Box 2246 South Burlington VT 05407 Department of Environmental Conservation Permits, Compliance and Protection The Annex, 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0405 Telephone: (802) 244-5674 May 3, 1993 Re: Stormwater Permit Requirements Burlington - Main Street Project MEGC 5000(14) Dear Mr. Edwards: Based on a review of the plans and information submitted to the Permits Section and discussions during the April 29, 1993 meeting, it has been determined that no stormwater permitting action is required for this project at this time. This determination is consistent with a previous determination on this project documented in an April 4, 1990 letter from the Department to your office. For AOT related projects stormwater permitting action is not required when the proposed project does not significantly alter the permitted roadway area, drainage system, discharge location, or nature of contaminants. A finding can clearly be made on the eastern portion of the project that no significant change is proposed. Even though the western portion of the project will include widening the existing roadway, considering the extent of the existing roadway and the inclusion of a proposed detention structure, it is likely that the discharge rate and contaminant level will be reduced from the current system. A finding can also be made that the western drainage design does not trigger a significant change and therefore does not trigger permitting action at this time. Via copy of this correspondence the Environmental District Commission will be appraised of this determination. It is further recommended that issuance of the Land Use permit not be delayed on the basis of stormwater permitting criteria. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, `1 iY�i�'12 , Nancy R. a Permits and Complian e cc: Essex Environmental District Office Steve G�000dkind,,r�Ciittyy Engineer, City of Burlington, DPW, P.O. Box 849 TDD: 1-800-253-0191 CONSULTING I ENGINEERS ,�.,.FC� WEBSTEFR • MAFMI N I N C O R P O R A T E D 1025 AIRPORT DRIVE • P.O. BOX 2246 • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05407 • AREA CODE 802-864-0223 January 13, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Burlington - Main Street MEGC 50000 4) W-M Project No. 04-8808 Dear Mr. Weith: Webster -Martin is currently developing the Act 250 application for the City of Burlington's Main Street project. In order to address Criterion 10 of this application, it is requested that your office furnish a letter commenting on how this project conforms to your plans. For your use, enclosed are preliminary plans and a project description. This information will be included with the Act 250 application. Since our application is to be submitted by the end of January, we would appreciate the receipt of your letter by January 26th. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Prgoor Edwards, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures del\0130830.pf Names and Addresses Jpeople getting form letter (del\0130830`.vt) RE: Burlington - Main Street, MEGC 5000(14) - WM Project No. 04-8808 January 13, 1993 Mr. Art Hogan Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 66 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Mr. Hogan Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Mr. Weith Mr. Mark Eldridge City of Burlington Planning Commission City Hall Burlington, VT 05401 Mr. Eldridge del\0130830.1st BURLINGTON - MAIN ST. M EGC 5000 (14) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Burlington Main Street Project consists of the rehabilitation and reconstruction of U.S. Route 2 (11ain Street) in the City of Burlington. The project begins at South Prospect Street and continues easterly for approximately 0.64 miles to the Burlington - South Burlington City Line. Proposed alignment remains on the existing location. The primary goals of this project are to (1) improve traffic flow and capacity on Main Street, (2) to provide safe crossings and accommodations for pedestrians and bicyclists, and (3) to accomplish these goals while minimizing impacts.' Features of this improvement include the following: 1. Widening of Main Street to four lanes with additional turning lane at South Prospect Street. Includes planted median for aesthetics and safety. 2. Providing UVM inter -campus vehicular and pedestrian facilities across Main Street. Includes at -grade crossing at University Heights. 3. Widening of East Avenue to four lanes and the widening of the slip ramp from westbound Main Street onto East Avenue to two lanes . 4. Reconfigure lanes at Carrigan Drive to allow two (2) right turn lanes onto East Avenue. 5. Minor lane reconfiguration at the intersection of East Avenue - Spear Street - East Terrace and Main Street. 6. Providing a bike path from College and South Prospect Streets through the UVM Campus allowing connection to Spear Street in South Burlington. 7. Widening of South Prospect from Main Street to College Street. S. Addition of an Access Road from Main Street, just west of the East Avenue intersection, to Carrigan Drive. This will accommodate westbound traffic only. 9. Coordinated traffic signals added at University Place, Carrigan Dairy Science Building, and University Terrace. 11. Public transit transfer sites with pull -offs and shelters on both the east and west sides of Main Street. These are located near the University Heights pedestrian and shuttle crossing. 12. Both sides of Main Street to be lined with plantings and trees. Extensive input, analysis and planning has been considered by a Citizens Task Force comprised of representatives from numerous interested parties including neighborhoods, planners, historians, bicycle and handicap groups, local businesses, and city, state, federal and regional transportation officials. Task Force members have come to a general consensus on the recommended improvement as outlined on the enclosed plans and the attached "Resolution Relating to the Main Street Improvement Project", dated February 2, 1992. o ,�'VERMONT State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): Burlington International Airport Permit Number: WW-4-1042-8 c/o Heather Kendrew PIN: EJ96-0386 12oo Airport Drive #1 South Burlington VT 05403 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 2000 0000C referenced in a deed recorded in Book 13 Page(s) 271 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of the proposed renovation of.three existing food service kiosks, the reduction in seating in the existing restaurant, and the addition of seating associated with the food service kiosks within the Airport Terminal, with no new external water or wastewater services construction, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 12oo Airport Drive in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. i. GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. of Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., with the stamped reference plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date 1 Exhibit A- Property Map 5/17/1990 1/03/2005 Al South Conc. Plans 12/10/2012 2/22/2013 A3 North Conc. Plans 3/12/2012 2/22/2013 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Sa eq; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 This project is approved for a restaurant with 130 seats (3 meals/day), a food service kiosk with 15 seats (2 meals/day) in the Main terminal, a North food service kiosk with 29 seats (2 meals/day) and a South food service Kiosk with 26 seats (2 meals/day). 1.5 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-1042-7 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. 1.6 Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1;2 Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water supply Permit WW-4-1042-8 Page 2of2 1.7 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.8 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property subject to this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes, regulations, and permit conditions, including performing an inspection of the wastewater disposal and water supply systems serving the/each structure. 1.9 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 This project is approved with the existing connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington for an increase of 729 gallons per day and a maximum of 11429 gallons of water per day. 2.2 This project is approved with an existing building water line. The Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division assumes no liability for the adequacy of this water line. Should the line fail and not qualify for the minor repair or replacement exemption, the landowner shall engage a Licensed Designer to evaluate the cause of the failure and to submit an amendment application to this office prior to correcting the failure. 2.3 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for the connection of any sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water system. 2.4 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. .WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 This project is approved with the existing connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility for an increase of 648 gallons per day and a maximum of 11348 gallons of wastewater per day. 3.2 This project is approved with an existing building sewer line. The Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division assumes no liability for the adequacy of this sewer line. Should the line fail and not qualify for the minor repair or replacement exemption, the landowner shall engage a Licensed Designer to evaluate the cause of the failure and to submit an amendment application to this office prior to correcting the failure. 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Vgbsanne Wyman, Re o al Engineer Dated March 6, 2013 cc South Burlington Planning Commission Jeffrey Olesky/Civil Engineering Associates Benjamin Adler Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Act 25o District Environmental Commission-4Co034 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety Department of Health — Food & Lodging Licenses STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF PLANNING AND LEGAL AFFAIRS RE: BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL AIRPORT ) COMMISSION # 4 APPLICATION # 4CO331-15D January 22, 2013 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Jennifer Mojo, in the above -captioned matter. COMMENTS Criteria 1B Waste Disposal Cynthia Parks of the Agency's Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection has reviewed the application and indicates an Underground Injection Control (UIC) permit may be required for this project. Please contact Cynthia directly at 802- 585-4913 or Cynthia. 12arks(&state.vt.us. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By: Jennifer Mojo Regulatory Planning Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs (802) 318-8713 E-Notification CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILE 44CO331-15D I hereby certify that 1, Jennifer Mojo, Regulatory Planning Analyst, for the Agency of Natural Resources Office of Planning and Legal Affairs, sent a copy of the foregoing Agency Comments and Entry of Appearance dated January 22, 2013, regarding File # 4CO331-15D by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the individuals without email addresses and by electronic mail to those with email addresses as indicated: City of Burlington Burlington International Airport c/o Heather Kendrew 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 hkendrew@btv.aero Jon Leinwohl, PE Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 jon.leinwohl@stantec.com Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Jennifer Mojo, Regulatory Planning Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs Chair, Selectboard/Chair, Planning Commission Town of Williston 7900 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 110 West Canal Street, Suite 202 Winooski, VT 05404 rmahony@ccrpcvt.org Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 Elizabeth.lord@state.vt.us anr.act250@state.vt.us Peter E. Keibel, District Coordinator District #4 Commission Naturail Resources Board 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 nrb-act250essex@state.vt.us AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: October 21, 2011 —November 21, 2011 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: PROJECT ID NUMBER: IR0 F-11 1.0104 flau�M NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary City of Burlington - Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 3028-INDS.2 EJ96-0386 RECEIVING WATER: Wetlands contiguous to Muddy Brook EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to City of Burlington - Burlington International Airport for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the Burlington Aviation Technical Center & Vermont Flight Academy located on Eagle Drive in South Burlington, Vermont to wetlands contiguous to Muddy Brook. The means of treatment includes bioretention and detention, and disconnection. The Site Balancing Procedure for the Discharge of Stormwater Runofffrom the Expansion or Redevelopment of Impervious Surfaces was utilized to meet applicable treatment standards for this project. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS The Secretary has determined that the permitted discharges satisfy Vermont's Anti -Degradation Policy described in the Department of Environmental Conservation's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation Procedure, because the procedure allows a presumption of compliance for discharges that are in compliance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual and any I additional best management practices that will be used to control the stormwater discharge as described in Section IX.D.l .d. of the Department's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation Procedure. The Secretary has also determined that for such discharges that qualify for the presumption under IX.D. Ld, all existing uses of surface waters, and the level of water quality necessary to protect those existing uses will be maintained and protected. The Secretary has determined that if the permittee is in full compliance with all permit conditions, including approved plans, monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping conditions, and is fully implementing stormwater BMPs required by this permit, the permitted discharges will meet the requirements of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual and qualify for the presumption described in Section IX.D.l .d. of the Department's Interim Anti -Degradation Implementation Procedure and will be presumed to comply with the Vermont Water Quality Standards, including but not limited to § 1-03 (Anti -degradation Policy). FURTHER INFORMATION For information on the application, access to related documents, including the draft permit, the Vermont Water Quality Standards (including §1-03 Anti -degradation Policy) or the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Telephone: 802-33 8-4839 Copies, obtained by calling (802) 338-4839, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) November 21, 2011, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or tc deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontiudiciM.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation AGENCY OF NATUT' RESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURA� RESOURCES BOARD http://www., _a.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htm / http:// .v.nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: PENDING APPLICATION #: DISTRICT: TOWN: �ew�ln Q�.S�a�-c,•�. PIN `C--.,\Y& - 038(o OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) (Name) y (Address) (Address) c* t (Town) (State) (Zip) (Town) (State) (Zip) ",,,"C(_c It (Telephone) (Telephone) o 5 G>oi6 i 8ri Proiect Name: Based on a written or oral request or inforWation provided by j;vr[,, kaok received on 1 , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of acres, located on 0,-Y- eor a- ter, . The project is generally described as: ,_& Lx_ ��,�,`. > d.r , ;14 , wf w� A 5-1'>V%� �,G_,4 < t P,. �.�1 �,s � : sc Iti-,�c 1 a S�-r•u > 6(C,,G V, 4 i' .fit S ".^ 4Y-• 1 < L—e S cY\ r wr, W 1 �4_1 Prior permits from this office: 14(_cr}3t4br) PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coor ' to t District Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. a ner/Agent Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LANDOWNERIAGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION FROM THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR (10 V.S.A. § 6007 (c) AND ACT 250 RULE 3 (C)) OR MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 220). (#47) "" Project: ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential Municipal Has the landowner subdivided before? �Ye ❑ No When/where: # of I ts: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: J eS ❑ No Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes�"No BASIS FORCI,SIO . SIGNATURE: --46 DATE: ! 3/ d DDRESS: District # Environmental Commission istrict Coordinator Telephone: 0 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)" ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (#2) ;KFi0orBraM11:s #L2 ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ❑ Extension of sewer lines (#5) (.4k n l/+6 %— j t C 4-. sv REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: - DATE: I ' f ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation 9 Environmental As a Yce Division, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: 802-879-5676 ❑ Wastewater Management Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» "NOTE. NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://Www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BIND DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PE( TS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CON_i RUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPAR..dENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment, industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7 2, &_?) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 91) ❑ Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source #14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#j 4) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (tt 4 5. WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-8500 in VT) Contact: ❑ New Hydrants (#?j2 ❑ >500' waterline construction (#L2) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#2J ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) (#21 0 WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (Hotline 802-241-4320) (16 — 6_5 ) Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear 802-241-4320 ❑ Flood Plains (241-3759) ❑ Ponds (#32 1) 'KConstruction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6 1) ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) IgStormwater from new development or redevelopment sites (#6.2 & 6_3) ❑ Wetlands (241-3770) (#L9) ❑ Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) ❑ Stream Alteration / Section 401 Water Quality Certification / Stream Crossing Structures (476-2679 / 879-5631 / 786-5906) (#27 & 32) WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: 6 ti�tS ❑ Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) (#L6) ❑ Underground Storage Ta ks (241-3888) June Reilly (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37Q9,40) ❑ Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) ) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35) ❑ Demolition waste 241-3477 ❑ Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: _ ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly 10. FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) Contact: ❑ Nongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) #47 4 ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval (#47.5 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (802-479-7561) or District Office 879-2300 Contact: i.Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 502) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels (#50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, 51 1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55 1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection —Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#U3 ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) #( 61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: ❑ Junkyards (828-2053) (#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64 ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#65) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873 OR 802-828-3429) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3429) #72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-3429) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3429) (#83, 83 1, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-3429) (#89, 89 1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-2431) #71 Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431)(#79) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) L#88) ❑ Medium and Large Farm Operations (828-2431) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-3429) (#75 1, 80, 16. VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ❑ VT Building Energy Standards (#47 2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47 1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (490) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90 1) p Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 22, 93, 24, 25, 6 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99 14. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Date: ilk o--.I may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 6/06 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 28, 2006 Bob McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Aviatron Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on June 28, 2006 (effective June 28, 2006). Please note the conditions of approval including that you obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, �-11* PC Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECO (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)~ J91./V401 r Ys /t/+/l 4/l /4/ 1 ,Pvle J 2,tM A /7`fPI?+! 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax �'- 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, n r n\ VC 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use b) Proposed Uses on property (i clude description and size of each new use and existii g uses to remain) �q-M e aced ; Z �s� Z tic j��N c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) _ 2��rs--- d / % J� __ _ e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 1 f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): _/- /d of a z ,e _ g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay District��" applicable): 1c/ if c -- ---- 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: a) Building: Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. Sq. Ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing__ —% / sq. ft. Proposed —% / _ sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % / _ sq. ft. Proposed % ___sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES c� a) Building (including interior renovations): b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): /CIa G`t4 c b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): l 1) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APP SIGNATURE OF PROPERTIC OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: CO �p (? U REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board i�'Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete rect r of Planning & Zoning or Designee Efate 4 15 EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) o Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways o Zoning boundaries o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) o Location of any easements o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard o North arrow o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) a Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations o If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Amended Site Plan $ 185* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 85* * Includes $10.00 recording fee 5 Permit Number SP- a �_ - CITE' OF SOUTH BURL,INGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OR OF RE CO Name as shov4ri og deed, mailing address phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) K Q(. 7" ?yl 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) CA., - V/ 41 CONTACT PERSON (Name. mailing address. nhane and fax dbv AllrLY6- ell " 7(-V q (/ l J �'�,,(�.✓_�r.'_S,�.t�' � i��� .ICJ I!'/.�!'�� j�% �� �"''F - .ter � /i ���%�"7 �; -�s�.c'� ?/ ✓ B 1 J 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: y�%r�'r ,�4��,,�,cr� , r U�J D 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) fClV CfQ� 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a Existing Uses on Pro erty (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on pro erty (include description and size of eachjiew use and e fisting uses to remain) �' c) Totalbuildingscuare footage on property (proposed buildings and d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings if basement and mezzanine) iin %lc 1� %—' Si 1 ? ,� ) existin buildi s to remain) ispng buildings to remain, specify e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of eTployees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): —�� tr _ r 1 1 � ---_ -„A 1 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) / A r � Existing -% Proposed /o c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 9) COST ESTIMATES V"I a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 1-9,fl j 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):__ ly c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Jy�� 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. cowl�L /x SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Wei" - #, SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed is site plan and find it to be: mplet Incomplete Officer or Designee Administrative Officer J�JS l EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible). o Survey data (distance and acreage). o Contours (existing and finished). o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety, and size) as required in Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. o Zoning boundaries. o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations). o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Location of septic tanks (if applicable). o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o North arrow. o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). o Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Zoning Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number of seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing Fixed seats. APPLICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan $ 185.00* ❑ Amended Site Plan (DRB review) $ 185.00* ❑ Administrative Site Plan $ 85.00* *includes $10.00 recording fee State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conervation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>VOICE 1-800-253-0195 VOICE>TDD Donna Kinville, City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Runoff Dear Ms. Kinville, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 FAX 802-241-3287 TEL 802-241-3770 February 23, 2005 Enclosed are two copies of the Public Notice for the comment period for an Authorization to Discharge under General Permit #3-9015 proposed for issuance to the Vermont Air National Guard. The Authorization to Discharge will authorize the discharge of stormwater runoff from the replacement of two aircraft arresting systems for the Vermont Air National Guard site at the Burlington International Airport in South Burlington, Vermont to the Winooski River and Muddy Brook. We respectfully request that a copy of the Public Notice be posted in the Town Offices starting February 24, 2005 through March 7, 2005. The other copy is for your local officials. We are also sending copies of these notices to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, L-- tz", l,-/ Stephanie Lanphear Environmental Technician Stormwater Management Section enclosures (3) cc. Board of Selectman (w/enclosure) Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury I AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: February 24, 2005 -March 7, 2005 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: Vermont Air National Guard PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 30 Falcon Street South Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9015 PERMIT NUMBER: 3844-9015 PROJECT ID NUMBER: EJ96-0386.04 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Winooski River and Muddy Brook EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance date of final authorization DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to the Vermont Air National Guard for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the replacement of two aircraft arresting systems for the Vermont Air National Guard site at the Burlington International Airport in South Burlington, Vermont to the Winooski River and Muddy Brook. The means of treatment include infiltration trench and overland flow. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. (! -2- PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) March 7, 2005 by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed authorization to discharge. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontiudiciM.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 225 North Main Street, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-479-4487) Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner l AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: March 1, 2005 — March 10, 2005 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9015 PERMIT NUMBER: 3845-9015 PROJECT ID NUMBER: EJ96-0386 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed Tributary to Muddy Brook EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance date of final authorization DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to the City of Burlington, Burlington International Airport for the discharge of stormwater runoff from the BTV Building 880 replacement project located on Airport Drive in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary to Muddy Brook. The means of treatment include grass channels. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. -2- PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) March 10, 2005 by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted continents. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general perniit. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed authorization to discharge. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontjudiciM.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 225 North Main Street, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-479-4487) Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 28, 2005 JJ Hamilton, Director of Aviation Burlington International Airport 12oo Airport Drive #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan Amendment — Aviation Avenue Building Dear Mr. Hamilton: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on February 28, 2005. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc e �. lRa nd J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. ransWo king to Get You There Vermont Agency of Transportation AVIATION PROGRAM OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Pagel, Water Quality Division, Agency of Natural Resources District Environmental Commissions FROM: Scott G. Fortney, Aviation Program Project Manager _ DATE: November 3, 2004 SUBJECT: Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports MOU With the MOU executed and the mapping complete, I have prepared the attached package of materials for distribution to the Environmental Districts. These materials will be distributed to our Agency's environmental staff as well. As you are aware, the MOU affects the State's eighteen public use airports. The buffer zones were established by the type of aviation fuels that airports sell. For airports that primarily serve piston driven aircraft (and sell only 10OLL Aviation Fuel) the buffer will be 5,000 feet. For airports that regularly serve turbine driven aircraft (and sell Jet A fuel) the buffer will be 10,000 feet. These distances are from the nearest aircraft movement areas. A copy of the FAA Advisoiry Circular on buffers is attached. The eighteen public use airports are: Basin Harbor, Ferrisburg - Piston Burlington, So. Burlington — Turbine Caledonia Co, Lyndonville — Piston Knapp, Berlin — Turbine Fair Haven Municipal, Fair Haven — Piston Franklin Co., Highgate — Turbine Hartness, Springfield — Turbine John H. Boylan, Island Pond — Piston Middlebury, Middlebury — Piston Morrisville- Stowe, Morrisville — Turbine Mt. Snow, West Dover — Piston Newport, Newport — Turbine Post Mills, Post Mills — Piston Robin's Nest, N. Windham — Piston Rutland State, Clarendon — Turbine Shelburne, Shelburne - Piston Warren Sugarbush, Warren — Piston William H. Morse, Bennington — Turbine It is our expectation that the DEC staff will consult with VTrans when considering impacts within the airport buffer zones as identified on the mapping. It is our hope that over time a project's location within an airport buffer will be incorporated in permitting checklists. Attachments: FAA Advisory Circular No. 150/5200-33A Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports MOU Buffer Mapping for above listed airports r MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING � APR 8 e 2004 s BETWEEN VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES REGARDING HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE ATTRACTANTS ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made this I-- day of 6z---L�/ , 2004, by and between the Vennont Agency of Transportation ("VTrans") and the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources ("ANR"). WHEREAS, VTrans is responsible under the State Aeronautics Act, 5 V.S.A. Chapter 9 for the protection and promotion of safety in aeronautics-, and WHEREAS, ANR is responsible for the protection of Vermont's natural resources, including but not limited to wetlands and wildlife, and administers permit programs which, in some instances, may require the construction of wetland or other environmental mitigation areas; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), most recently in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33A ("Hazardous Wildlift Attractants on or near Airports") (Jan. 30, 2004 draft), has provided guidance on locating certain land uses having the potential to attract hazardous wildlife to or in the vicinity of public -use airports; and WHEREAS, VTrans and ANR recognize that many Vermont airports are surrounded by extensive wetlands which naturally attract wildlife, especially during migration periods; and WHEREAS, VTrans and ANR recognize that waterfowl and other wildlife may present potential hazards to aircraft and therefore should not be specifically attracted to or in the vicinity of airports; NOW, THEREFORE, VTrans and ANR agree as follows: 1. General Policy. In recognition of the potential hazards that certain wildlife may present to aircraft, it is ANR's policy not to contract or issue permits or approvals for the constriction of mitigation or other open -water areas which could attract wildlife near airports. 2. Scope. In addition to wetland mitigation sites or other open -water areas, this memorandum of understanding also shall apply to other projects with the potential to attract Page 1 of 2 hazardous wildlife, including but not limited to putrescible waste disposal operations, wastewater treatment facilities, and stormwater treatment ponds. 3. Siting Criteria. Unless otherwise approved by VTrans as not being of concern, projects that may attract wildlife hazardous to aircraft should be sited at a distance of at least 5,000 feet from airports serving piston -powered aircraft, and 10,000 feet from airports serving turbine -powered aircraft. Where a mitigation site attractive to wildlife may cause hazardous wildlife movements into or across the approach or departure airspace, a wetland or other open - water project shall be located at least five miles from the airport. 4. Interagency Consultation. Before proposing or approving projects that (a) will be sited within five miles of an airport, and (b) have wildlife hazard potential, ANR shall consult with VTrans. VTrans and ANR, including all relevant departments, recognize the need to form an interagency team to examine projects and proposals of concern and to take corrective steps when necessary. 5. Airport Maps. VTrans will supply ANR with maps illustrating the distances described above from all state, municipal, and public -use airports in Vermont. The number of maps supplied will be sufficient for ANR's central and regional offices. 6. Limitations. This policy is not intended as a prohibition against all mitigation sites or other open -water sites near airports. Some mitigation may replace functions that do not pose any hazard or threat to aircraft. Rather, this policy is intended to alert ANR staff to consider the potential wildlife hazards of projects near airports. 1. Duration. This policy shall remain in effect until terminated or superseded by joint action of the signatories. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Dated: By: By: Patricia A. McDonald Secretary of Transportation AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Dated: co � l/ ti By: ���� r t �'1 El abeth A. McLain Secretary of Natural Resources G:Wviahon\Airports\WETLANDS_MITIGATION\N[OU - Airport Wildhfe.doc Page 2 of 2 a U S Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE ATTRACTANTS ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS Advisory Circular Date: 1/30/04 AC No: 150/5200-33A Initiated by: Change: DRAFT 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance and requirements on locating certain land uses having the potential to attract hazardous wildlife to or in the vicituty of public -use airports. It also provides guidance concerning the placement of new airport development protects (including airport construction, expansion. and renovation) pertaining to aircraft movement in the vicinity of hazardous wildlife attractants. Appendix I provides defrutions of terms used in this AC 2. APPLICABILITY. The standards and practices contained in this AC are recommended by the Federal Aviation Admuustration (FAA) for use by the holders of Airport Operating Certificates (certificate holder) issued under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, part 139 (Part 139) Certification and Operations, Land Airports servmg Certain Air Carrier, Subpart D. For airports which have received Federal grant-in-aid assistance, the use of these standards is mandatory At certificated airports, the standards, practices, and recommendations may be used to satisfy specific requirements of Part 139 The standards and practices contained in this AC are recommended by the FAA as guidance for land use planners, operators, and developers of projects, facilities, and activities on or near airports Part 139 requires the certificate holder to conduct an ecological study, acceptable to the FAA, when specific events involving wildlife occur on or near the airport. This study is used by the FAA to determine if a wildlife hazard management plan (WHNIP) is needed for the airport 3. CANCELLATION. Advisory Circular 150/5200-33, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports, dated 5/1/97, is cancelled. 4. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. a. Reorganized outline of the AC. b. Expanded Table 1 to include updated information from the Special Report for the FAA "Ranking the Hazard Level of Wildlife Species to Civil Aviation in the USA: Update # 1, July 3, 2003 ". c Removed Table 2 outlining distances between certain airport features and any on -airport agricultural crops, and removed any discussion of on -airport crop production. d. Added discussion on the basis for separation distances between wildlife hazard and airport movement areas, and Figure 1 depictmg the separation distances. e Added options for wetland mitigation for impacts from airport projects, including mitigation banking 3. BACKGROUND. Information about the risks posed to aircraft by certain wildlife species has increased a great deal m recent years Improved reporting, studies, documentation and the resultmg statistics clearly show that aircraft collisions with birds and other wildlife are a serious economic and safety problem. While all species of wildlife can pose a threat to aircraft safety, not all species are equally hazardous to aviation. Table I ranks the wildlife groups commonly reported as being involved m damaging strikes in the U.S. according to their relative hazard to aircraft The rank -mg is based on the 47,212 records that are in the FAA's Wildlife Strike Database for 1990-2003 This information is meant to rank species as to their relative hazard to assist certificate holders m focusing hazardous wildlife management efforts on the species most likely to cause problems These hazard I USDA Wildlife Services uses the term "Wildlife Hazard assessment " Part 139 uses the term "ecological study " In this contest the two terms should be considered synonymous. Wildlife Hazard Assessment is the preferred term as it is more descriptive of what is actually bemg done. (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01 /30/04 rankings should be used in conjunction with site -specific wildlife hazard assessments to determine relative abundance and use patterns of wildlife species for the airports in question Table 1' Ranking of 25 species groups (1=most hazardous) as to relative hazard to aircraft based on 3 criteria (damage, major damage, effect -on -flight), a composite ranking based on all 3 rankings, and a relative hazard score. Data were derived from National Wildlife Strike Database, January 1990—April 2003 Species group Ranking by criteria Major Effect on Composite Relative Damage3 damage flights ranking hazard score' Deer I 1 1 1 100 Vultures 2 2 2 2 64 Geese 3 3 6 3 55 Cormorants/pelicans 4 5 3 4 54 Cranes 7 6 4 5 47 Eagles 6 9 7 6 41 Ducks 5 8 10 7 39 Osprey 8 4 8 8 39 Turkey/pheasants 9 7 11 9 33 Herons 11 14 9 10 27 Hawks (buteos) 10 12 12 11 25 Gulls 12 11 13 12 24 Rock dove 13 10 14 13 23 Owls 14 13 20 14 23 H. lark/s. bunting 18 15 15 15 17 Crows/ravens 15 16 16 16 16 Coyote 16 19 5 17 14 Mourning dove 17 17 17 18 14 Shorebirds 19 21 18 19 10 Blackbirds/starling 20 22 19 20 10 American kestrel 21 18 21 21 9 Meadowlarks 22 20 22 22 7 Swallows 24 23 24 23 4 Sparrows 25 24 23 24 4 Nighthawks 23 25 25 25 1 Excerpted from the Special Report for the FAA `Ranking the Hazard Level of Wildlife Species to Civil Aviation in the USA: Update # 1, July 2, 2003 ". Refer to this report for additional explanations of criteria. 3 Aircraft incurred at least some damage (destroyed, substantial, minor or unknown) from strike. ° Aircraft incurred damage or structural failure which adversely affected the structure strength, performance, or flight characteristics and which would normally require major repair or replacement of the affected component; or the damage sustained makes it inadvisable to restore aircraft to airworthy condition. 5 Aborted take -off, engine shutdown, precautionary landing, or other. 6 Relative rank of each species group was compared with every other group for the 3 variables, placing the species group with the greatest hazard rank for > 2 of the 3 variables above the next -greatest ranked group, then proceeding down the list. Percentage values, from Tables 3 and 4 in the Special Report in Footnote 2, for the 3 criteria were summed and scaled down from 100, with 100 as the score for the species group with the maximum summed values. 2 01/30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A Most public -use airports have large tracts of open, undeveloped land that are desirable for added margins of safety and noise mitigation These areas can present potential hazards to aviation because they often attract hazardous wildlife Human -made or natural areas_ such as poorh -drained areas, retention ponds, roosting habitats on buildings; landscaping, odor -causing rottmg orgaruc matter (putrescible waste) disposal operations, wastewater treatment plants. agricultural or aquaculture activities. surface mining, or wetlands, may be used by wildlife for es- cape, feeding, loafing, or reproduction Even small facilities, such as fast-food restaurants, can produce substantial attractions for hazardous wildlife Wildlife use of areas within an airport's approach or departure airspace, aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas may cause conditions hazardous to aircraft safety During the past century, wildlife -aircraft strikes have resulted in the loss of hundreds of lives world-wide, as well as billions of dollars worth of aircraft damage Hazardous wildlife attractants near airports could jeopardize future airport expansion because of safety considerations Tlus AC provides certificate holders, and those parties with whom they cooperate, with the direction and tools to assess potential hazardous wildlife attractants and take actions to abate these hazards In implementing programs to reduce wildlife hazards, certificate holders and aviation regulators need to determine the relative risk posed by various species so that management actions can be prioritized by the most hazardous species. Locating new facilities and land use practices on or near public -use airports, whether by the certificate holder or another party, must be done with management of wildlife hazards in mind. DAVID L. BENNETT Director, Office of Airport Safety and Standards (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01 /30/04 SECTION 1. GENERAL SEPARATION CRITERIA FOR HAZARDOUS WILDLIFE ATTRACTANTS ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS. 1-1. INTRODUCTION. Land use practices that attract or sustain hazardous wildlife populations on or near air- ports can significantly increase the potential for wildlife -aircraft collisions. For all airports receiving Federal grant- in-aid assistance, the FAA recommends minimum separation distances for land use practices that attract or sustain populations of hazardous wildlife within the vicinity of airports or cause movement of hazardous wildlife onto, into, or across the approach or departure airspace, aircraft movement area, loading ramps, or aircraft parking area of airports. Certificate holders, local planners, and land use developers must consider whether proposed land uses, including new airport development projects, would increase the wildlife hazard. Caution must be exercised to ensure that land use practices on or near airports do not enhance the attractiveness of the area to hazardous wildlife. The basis for the separation criteria contained in this section can be found in existing FAA Regulations. In 14 CFR 77.25, airspace surfaces for civil airports are defined, including the length and width of the horizontal, conical, primary, approach and transitional surfaces. The separation distances are based on (1) flight patterns of piston - powered aircraft and turbine -powered aircraft (turbine -powered aircraft take much longer to gain altitude than do piston -powered aircraft), (2) the altitude at which most strikes happen, and (3) NTSB recommendations. Given the geometry of the airspace surfaces for the various types of runways contained in the existing FAA Regulations, and the statistic that 78% of all strikes occur under 1,000 feet and 90% occur under 3,000 feet above ground level, the separations contained in this section are consistent with current FAA Regulations 1-2. AIRPORTS SERVING PISTON -POWERED AIRCRAFT. If an airport does not sell Jet A fuel, then it serves piston -powered aircraft and falls in this category. These airports typically have runways designated as visual runways Notwithstanding more stringent requirements for specific land uses, the FAA recommends separations of a distance of 5,000 feet when siting any of the hazardous wildlife attractants mentioned in Section 2 or when planning new airport development projects to accommodate aircraft movement for airports of this type. This distance is to be maintained between the farthest extending edge of the airport's aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas and the hazardous wildlife attractant. Figure 2 depicts this separation distance extended from the farthest extending edge of the aircraft movement areas. 1-3. AIRPORTS SERVING TURBINE -POWERED AIRCRAFT. Airports selling Jet A fuel serve turbine - powered aircraft, and typically have runways designated as non -precision or precision runways. Notwithstanding more stringent requirements for specific land uses, the FAA recommends separations of a distance of 10,000 feet when siting any of the hazardous wildlife attractants mentioned in Section 2 or when planning new airport development projects to accommodate aircraft movement for airports of this type. This distance is to be maintained between the farthest extending edge of the airport's aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas and the hazardous wildlife attractant. Figure 2 depicts this separation distance extended from the farthest extending edge of the aircraft movement areas. 1-4. PROTECTION OF APPROACH, DEPARTURE AND CIRCLING AIRSPACE. For all airports, a distance of 5 statute miles is recommended between the farthest edge of the airport surface movement area and the hazardous wildlife attractant, if the hazardous wildlife attractant may cause hazardous wildlife movement into or across the approach or departure airspace. NOTE: AC 15015000-3, Address List for Regional Airports Division and Airports District/Field Offices, provides information on the location of these offices. 01 /30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 5,000 ft from Furthest extending movehen* an eoa Taxlways Runways 0 Aprar-cm, par^Wnp aroa�, atc. AI rper� s Serving PIsion-Powered Adrera #'-� 10.000 ft fram furthest extending movement area Taxlwaya Runways 0 Aprort-, por- Wn!;l araa:5, etc. Air por•-l;s Serving Turbine -Powered Aircra.�t Figure 1 5 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01 /30/04 SECTION 2. POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS LAND USE PRACTICES ON OR NEAR AIRPORTS. 2-1. GENERAL. The wildlife species and the size of the populations attracted to the airport environment are highly variable and may depend on several factors, including land -use practices on or near the airport. It is important to identify those land use practices in the airport area which attract hazardous wildlife. This section discusses land use practices known potentially to threaten aviation safety In addition to the specific considerations outlined as follows, certificate holders should refer to the manual for airport personnel Wildlife Hazard Management at Airports prepared by the FAA and USDA staff and Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage compiled by the University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Division. 2-2. WASTE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS. a. Siting for new Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Section 503 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21 st Century (Public Law 106-181) limits the construction or establishment of new municipal solid waste landfills (MSWL) within 6 statute miles of certain public use airports Before these restrictions can be applied, both the airport and the landfill must meet very specific conditions. These restrictions do not apply to landfills or airports located within the state of Alaska. The new MSWL must. 1) be within 6 miles of the airport, as measured from airport property line to MSWL property line; and 2) have started construction or establishment on or after April 5, 2001. Public Law 106-181 only limits the construction or establishment of some new MSWL. It does not limit the expansion, either vertical or horizontal, of existing landfills The airport must: 1) have received Federal grant(s) under 49 U.S C. § 47101, et seq.; 2) be under control of a public agency; 3) serve some scheduled air carrier operations conducted in aircraft with less than 60 seats; and 4) have total annual enplanements consisting of at least 5 1 % of scheduled air carver enplanements conducted in aircraft with less than 60 passenger seats NOTE: The reader is referred to E,14 .4dvisory Circular 15015200-34 "Construction or Establishment of Landfills [Near Public Airports ", dated August 26, 2000, for a more detailed discussion of these restrictions. For those airports and MSWL that do not meet the restrictions of Public Law 106-181, the FAA recommends against locating MSWL within the separation distance identified in Section 1-2 through 1- 4 The separation distances should be measured from the farthest point of the airport's aircraft movement area, to the closest MSWL cell. MSWL are known to attract large numbers of hazardous wildlife. Because of this, these operations, when located within the separations identified in the siting criteria in Section 1-2 through 1-4, are considered incompatible with safe airport operations. b. Enclosed trash transfer stations. Enclosed waste -handling facilities which receive garbage indoors behind closed doors, process it via compaction, incineration, or similar manner, and remove all residue by enclosed vehicles, generally are compatible, from a wildlife perspective, with safe airport operations, provided they are not located on airport property or withm the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). At these facilities, no putrescible waste should be handled or stored outside at any time, for any reason, or in a partially enclosed structure accessible to hazardous wildlife. Trash transfer facilities that are open on one or more sides, or that leave the building's doors or windows open during normal operating hours; or that store uncovered quantities of municipal solid waste outside, even if only for a short time; or that use semi -trailers that leak or have trash clinging to the outside; or that do not control odors by ventilation and filtration systems (odor masking is not acceptable), would not meet the FAA's definition of fully enclosed trash transfer stations and would be considered incompatible with safe airport operations if located closer that the separation distances recommended in Section 1-2 through 1-4. c. Considerations for existing waste -disposal facilities within limits of separation criteria. The FAA recommends against airport development projects that would increase the number of aircraft operations 01 / 30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A or that would accommodate larger or faster aircraft near MSWL operations located within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 In addition_ in accordance with 40 CFR 259 10. owners or operators of existing MSWL units that are located within the separations listed in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 must demonstrate that the unit is designed and operated so that the MSWL unit does not pose a bud hazard to aircraft The owner or operator must place the demonstration in the operating record and notify the State Director of USDA Wildlife Services (Wildlife Services) that it has been placed in the operating record d. Composting operations on or near airport property. Composting operations that accept only vard waste (e.g leaves, lawn clippings, branches) generally do not attract hazardous wildlife. Sewage sludge; wood -chips, and similar material are not mumcipal solid wastes and may be used as compost bulking agents. Components of the compost must never include food or other municipal solid waste Composting operations should not be located on airport property, or if off airport property no closer than the greater of the following distances- 1,200 feet from anv aircraft movement area, loading ramp or aircraft parking space, or the distance called for by airport design requirements (see FAA AC 150/5300- 13, Airport Design). This spacing is intended to prevent material, personnel, or equipment from penetrating any Obstacle Free Area (OFA), Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ), Threshold Siting Surface (TSS), or Clearway (see AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design). On -airport disposal of compost by-products is not recommended for the reasons stated in 2-3.f e. Underwater waste discharges. The underwater discharge of any food waste, e.g., fish processing offal, which could attract scavenging hazardous wildlife is not recommended within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 f. Recycling centers. Recycling centers that accept previously sorted, non-food items such as glass, newspaper, cardboard, or aluminum are, in most cases, not attractive to hazardous wildlife g. Construction and demolition (C&D) debris facilities. C&D landfills are not considered to be hazardous wildlife attractants if those landfills are maintained in an orderly manner, admit no putrescible waste, and are not co -located with other waste disposal operations. However, C&D landfills have similar visual and operational charactenstics to putrescible-waste disposal sites When co -located with putrescible-waste disposal operations, the probability of hazardous wildlife attraction to C&D landfills increases because of the similarities between these disposal facilities. Therefore, a C&D landfill co - located with another waste disposal operation should be located outside of the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. h. Fly ash disposal. The incinerated residue from resource recovery power/heat-generating facilities, which are fired by municipal solid waste, coal or wood, is generally considered not to be a wildlife attractant because it no longer contains putrescible matter. Landfills accepting only fly ash are generally not considered to be wildlife attractants. These landfills should be maintained in an orderly manner, admit no putrescible waste of any kind, and not be co -located with other disposal operations that attract hazardous wildlife. Since varying degrees of waste consumption are associated with general incineration (not resource recovery power/heat-generating facilities), the ash from general incinerators is considered to be a regular waste disposal by-product and, therefore, a hazardous wildlife attractant if disposed of within the separation criteria outlined in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. In general, if the fly ash is pure, i.e. contains no food, then it is acceptable. If there is still some form of food for hazardous wildlife, then it is incompatible and should be considered as any other form of putrescible waste. 2-3. WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. Storm water and wastewater treatment facilities and associated retention and settling ponds often attract large numbers of wildlife that can pose a threat to aircraft safety when they are located on or near an airport. a. Existing storm water management facilities. Storm water management on airport property involves water conveyance structures which quickly remove surface water from impervious surfaces such as pavement and termmal/hangar building roofs Existing detention ponds located on the airport which collect storm water, protect water quality and control runoff and release it slowly following storm events may attract wildlife which pose a threat to aircraft safety. Where a WHMP has been developed in (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01 /30/04 accordance with Part 139, the FAA requires correction of any wildlife hazards arising from existing storm water facilities located on or near airports without delay, using appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques outlined in the WIDAP. Where possible, storm water detention ponds should be modified to contain a maximum 48 hour detention period for the design storm. Furthermore, detention ponds featuring dead storage should be avoided or removed to eliminate standing water. There are cases where there is no possibility of fully draining down all water. In these cases, certificate holders should apply such mitigating measures as bird balls, wires across the water, and other methods developed to deter hazardous wildlife. Accordingly, measures to minimize hazardous wildlife attraction should be developed in consultation with a wildlife damage management biologist. The FAA recommends and certificate holders encourage that off -airport storm water treatment managers incorporate appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques into their operating practices, when located within the separation criteria in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. b. New storm water management facilities. The FAA recommends that systems on airports and within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 be designed and operated so as not to create above- ground standing water, which could attract hazardous wildlife. To facilitate hazardous wildlife control, steep -sided, narrow, linearly -shaped, rip -rap lined, water detention basins should be designed. When possible, these ponds should be placed away from aircraft movement areas to minimize aircraft -wildlife interactions. All vegetation in or around detention basins that provide food or cover for hazardous wildlife should be eliminated. If soil conditions and other requirements allow, the FAA encourages the use of underground storm water infiltration systems, such as French drains or buried rock fields, because they are less attractive to wildlife. c. Existing wastewater treatment facilities. The FAA recommends correcting any wildlife hazards arising from existing wastewater treatment facilities located on or near airports without delay. Where required, a VvHN P, developed in accordance with Part 139, will outline appropriate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques. Accordingly, certificate holders should encourage wastewater treatment facility operators to incorporate measures to minimize hazardous wildlife attractants, developed in consultation with a wildlife damage management biologist. Certificate holders should also encourage those operators to incorporate these mitigation techniques in their operating practices. In addition, they should consider the existence of wastewater treatment facilities when evaluating proposed sites for new airport development projects and avoid such sites when practicable. d. New wastewater treatment facilities. The FAA recommends strongly against the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or associated settling ponds within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. During the siting analysis for wastewater treatment facilities, the potential to attract hazardous wildlife should be considered if an airport is in the vicinity of a proposed site. Certificate holders should voice their opposition to such sitings. e. Artificial marshes. In warmer climates, wastewater treatment facilities may employ artificial marshes and use submergent and emergent aquatic vegetation as natural filters. These artificial marshes may be used by some species of flocking birds, such as blackbirds and waterfowl, for breeding or roosting activities. The FAA recommends strongly against establishing artificial marshes within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. Wastewater discharge and sludge disposal. The FAA recommends against the discharge of wastewater or sludge on airport property. Regular spraying of wastewater or sludge disposal on unpaved areas may improve soil moisture and quality. The resultant turf growth requires more frequent mowing, which in turn may mutilate or flush insects or small animals and produce straw. The maimed or flushed organisms and the straw can attract hazardous wildlife and jeopardize aviation safety. In addition, the improved turf may attract grazing wildlife such as deer and geese. Problems may also occur when discharges saturate unpaved airport areas. The resultant soft, muddy conditions can severely restrict or prevent emergency vehicles from reaching accident sites in a timely manner 01/30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 2-4. WETLANDS. Wetlands provide a variety of functions_ and can be regulated by local, state and federal lases Normally_ wetlands are attractive to main wildlife species, including many which are ranked high on the list of hazardous wildlife species (Table 1) NOTE: Ij questions exist as to whether or not an area would qualifi, as a wetland, contact the local division of the U.S .4rrym Corps o/Engineers, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, or a wetland consultant certified to delineate wetlands. a. Existing wetlands on or near airport property. Certificate holders with wetlands located on or near airport property, should be alert to any wildlife use or habitat changes in these areas that could affect safe aircraft operations At certificated airports, the FAA recommends correction of any wildlife hazards arising from existing wetlands located on or near airports without delay. Where required, a WHIvIP, developed in accordance with Part 139, outlines appropnate wildlife hazard mitigation techniques. Accordingly, measures to mirumize hazardous wildlife attraction should be developed in consultation with a wildlife damage management biologist. b. New airport development. When practicable, the FAA recommends siting new airports using the separations from wetlands identified in the siting criteria in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. Where alternative sites are not practicable or when expanding existing airports in or near wetlands, the wildlife hazards should be evaluated and minimized through a Wi-Ev1P prepared by a wildlife damage management biologist, in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers c. Mitigation for wetland impacts from airport projects. Mitigation may be necessary when unavoidable wetland disturbances result from new airport development projects or projects required to correct wildlife hazards from wetlands. Wetland mitigation must be designed so it does not create a wildlife hazard The FAA recommends that wetland mitigation projects that may attract hazardous wildlife be sited outside of the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 (1) On -site mitigation of wetland functions. Exceptions to locating mitigation activities outside the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 may be considered if the affected wetlands provide unique ecological functions, such as critical habitat for threatened or endangered species or ground water recharge, which cannot be replicated when moved to a different location Such mitigation must be compatible with safe airport operations. Enhancing such mitigation areas to attract hazardous wildlife must be avoided. On -site mitigation plans should be reviewed by the FAA to determine compatibility with safe airport operations. Wetland mitigation projects that are needed to protect unique wetland functions, and that must be located in the siting criteria in Sections 1-2 through 1-4, should be identified and evaluated by a wildlife damage management biologist before implementing the mitigation. A wildlife damage management plan should be developed to reduce the wildlife hazards (2) Off -site mitigation of wetland functions. Unless identified as a unique function which must be replaced on -site (see 2-4.c.(1)), the FAA recommends that wetland mitigation projects that may attract hazardous wildlife be sited outside of the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. Agencies which regulate impacts to or around wetlands recognize that the `splitting' of wetland functions in mitigation schemes may be necessary, and therefore may allow portions of mitigation to take place in different locations. (3) Mitigation banking. Wetland mitigation banking is the creation or restoration of wetlands in order to provide mitigation credits which can be used to offset permitted wetland losses Mitigation banking benefits wetland resources by providing advance replacement for permitted wetland losses, consolidating small projects into larger, better designed and managed units, and by encouraging integration of wetland mitigation projects with watershed planning. This last benefit is most helpful for airport projects, as wetland impacts mitigated outside of the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 can still be located within the same watershed Wetland mitigation banks meeting the siting entena offer an ecologically sound approach to mitigation in these situations. Certificate holders should work with local watershed management agencies or organizations to develop mitigation banking for wetland impacts on airport property. (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A O1 /30/04 2-5. DREDGE SPOIL CONTAINMENT AREAS. The FAA recommends against locating dredge spoil contain- ment areas within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4, if the spoil contains material that would attract hazardous wildlife, such as any form of food substance. 2-6. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES. While certificate holders sometimes promote revenue -generating activities to supplement an airports income, agricultural use may create hazards to aircraft by attracting hazardous wildlife. Any proposed on -airport agricultural operations must be reviewed by a wildlife damage management biologist. Further, some agricultural activities within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 should be discouraged, and all should have programs developed to reduce the attractiveness of the practice to species that are hazardous to aviation safety. a. Livestock production. Confined livestock operations (i.e. feedlots, diary operations, hog or chicken production facilities, egg laying operations) often attract flocking birds such as starlings that pose a hazard to aviation. Therefore, these facilities should be discouraged within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. Any livestock operation within these separations should have a program developed to reduce the attractiveness of the site to species that are hazardous to aviation safety. Finally, free -ranging livestock must not be grazed on airport property because of the danger of their wandering onto aircraft movement areas. Additionally, birds may be attracted to livestock feed, water and manure. b. Aquaculture. Aquaculture activities conducted outside of fully enclosed buildings are inherently attractive to a wide variety of birds that may pose a hazard to aviation safety. Existing aquaculture facilities/activities within the separations listed in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 must have a program developed to reduce the attractiveness of the site to species that are hazardous to aviation safety. New aquaculture facilities/activities should be prohibited within the separations listed in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. 2-7. GOLF COURSES, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS. a. Golf courses. Golf courses may be beneficial to airports because they provide open space that can be used for noise mitigation or by aircraft during an emergency. On -airport golf courses may also be a concurrent use that provides income to the airport. Because of operational and monetary benefits, golf courses may be deemed potentially compatible land uses on or near airports. However, waterfowl (especially Canada geese) and some species of gulls are attracted to the large, grassy areas and open water found on most golf courses. Because waterfowl and gulls occur throughout the U.S., the FAA recommends that certificate holders exercise caution and consult with a wildlife damage management biologist when considering proposals for golf course construction or expansion on or near airports. Furthermore, landscaping of any golf course on an airport must not include roost trees, water, or ornamental plants which produce seeds, fruits or berries. Any golf courses located within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 should have a program developed to reduce the attractiveness of the site to species that are hazardous to aviation safety. Golf courses should be monitored on a continuing basis for the presence of hazardous wildlife. If hazardous wildlife is detected, corrective actions should be implemented immediately. b. Landscaping and landscape maintenance. Hazardous wildlife attraction to landscaping may vary by geographic location. The FAA recommends that certificate holders approach landscaping with caution and confine it to airport areas not associated with aircraft movements. All landscaping plans should be reviewed by a wildlife damage management biologist. Landscaped areas should be monitored on a continuing basis for the presence of hazardous wildlife. If hazardous wildlife is detected, corrective actions should be implemented immediately. Turf grass areas can be highly attractive to a variety of species of hazardous wildlife. Research conducted by the USDA Wildlife Services' National Wildlife Research Center has shown that no one grass management regime will deter all species of hazardous wildlife in all situations. Airport turf grass management plans should be developed on a prescription basis, depending on the airport's geographic locations and the type of hazardous wildlife likely to frequent the airport. M 01/30/04 (Draft)AC 150/5200-33A Certificate holders should ensure that plant varieties attractive to hazardous wildlife are not used on the airport. Disturbed areas or areas in need of re -vegetating should not be planted with seed mixtures containng millet or am other large -seed producing grass For airport property already planted with seed mixtures containing millet or other large -seed producing grasses, it is recommended that disking, plowing, or other suitable agricultural practice be employed to prevent plant maturation and seed head production Furthermore, landscaping on an airport must not include roost trees. water, or ornamental plants which produce seeds, fruits or berries The area should be planted based upon the specific recommendations for grass management and seed selection from the State 1JruVerS1ty Cooperative Extension Service, or the local office of Wildlife Services c. Airports surrounded by wildlife habitat. Certificate holders at certificated airports surrounded by water or wetlands should refer to Section 2.4 of this AC Certificate holders at certificated airports surrounded by woodlands and other wildlife habitat should provide for a Wildlife Hazard Assessment, in accordance with Part 139, conducted by a wildlife damage management biologist This Wildlife Hazard Assessment is the first step in preparing a WHMP, where required d. Other hazardous wildlife attractants. Other specific land uses or activities (fishing, shellfish harvesting), perhaps unique to certain regions of the country, may also have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife. Regardless of the source of the attraction, when hazardous wildlife use is noted on a certificated airport, prompt remedial action(s) to protect aviation safety is required. In accordance with Part 139, certificate holders must be prepared to take immediate action to deal with unexpected incursions of hazardous wildlife into aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or parking areas 2-8. SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF SURROUNDING LAND USES. There may be circumstances where two (or more) different land uses which would not, in and of themselves, be considered hazardous wildlife attractants, or where such attractants are located outside of the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4, are in such an alignment with the airport as to create a wildlife corridor directly through the airport and/or surrounding airspace An example of this situation might involve a lake located outside of the separation enteria on the east side of an airport, and a large hayfield on the west side of an airport, creating a flyway for Canada geese directly across the airspace of the airport. There are likely countless examples of such a situation, therefore certificate holders and the wildlife damage management biologist must consider the entire surrounding landscape and community when developing the WHMP under Part 139 11 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01 /30/04 SECTION 3. PROCEDURES FOR WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT BY OPERATORS OF CERTIFICATED AIRPORTS. 3-1. INTRODUCTION. In recognition of the increased risk of serious aircraft damage or the loss of human life that can result from a wildlife strike, the FAA may require the development of a WHMP when specific triggering events occur on or near the airport. The specific events that trigger a Wildlife Hazard Assessment, and the specific issues that a WHMP must address for FAA approval and inclusion in the Airport's Certification Manual are presented in Part 139. 3-2. COORDINATION WITH QUALIFIED WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT BIOLOGISTS OR USDA WILDLIFE SERVICES. The FAA will use the wildlife hazard assessment, conducted in accordance with Part 139, to determine if a WHIvIP is needed for an airport. Therefore, the assessment must be conducted by persons having the education, training, and experience necessary to assess adequately any wildlife hazards. The certificate holder may look to private consultants or to Wildlife Services to conduct the required Wildlife Hazard Assessment. When the services of a wildlife damage management biologist are required, the FAA recommends that land use developers or the certificate holder contact a consultant specializing in wildlife damage management. If no such consultant is available, the appropriate state director of the Wildlife Services should be contacted. NOTE: Telephone numbers for the respective USDA Wildlife Services state offices may be obtained by contacting USDA Wildlife Services Operational Support Staff, 4700 River Road, Unit 87, Riverdale, J111D, 20737-1234, Telephone (301) 734-79 1, Fax (301) 734-5157. 3-3. WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT AT AIRPORTS: A MANUAL FOR AIRPORT PERSONNEL. This manual, prepared by the FAA and USDA Wildlife Services staffs, contains a compilation of information to assist airport personnel in the development, implementation, and evaluation of WHMPs at airports. The manual includes specific information on the nature of wildlife strikes, legal authority, regulations, wildlife management techniques, wildlife hazard assessments, WHMPs and sources of help and infonmation The manual is available in three languages, English, Spanish and French. It can be viewed and downloaded free of charge from the FAA wildlife hazard mitigation web site: httl2://%vildlife-miti2ation.tc.faa.gov It is emphasized that this manual provides only a starting point for addressing wildlife hazard issues at airports. Hazardous wildlife management is a complex discipline and conditions vary widely across the United States. Therefore, the development of a WHMP and the implementation of management actions by airport personnel must be under consultation by qualified wildlife damage management biologists trained in wildlife damage control. Complementary to this manual are many other resources for certificate holders in developing and implementing WHMPs. These are listed in the bibliography. 3-4. ECOLOGICAL STUDIES8 UNDER Part 139. Part 139 requires the certificate holder to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment ("Ecological Study") acceptable to the FAA Administrator when an aircraft experiences a multiple bird strike, a damaging collision with wildlife other than birds, or when wildlife of a size or in numbers sufficient to cause these events is observed. This Assessment must be conducted by a qualified professional wildlife damage management biologist. Part 139 outlines the requirements of the study, and the Wildlife Hazard iVanagement at Airports manual provides clarification and guidance for completing the study. In addition to identifying the wildlife observed and the locations of the features on or near the airport that attract the wildlife, the Assessment must include specific prioritized recommendations for mitigating the identified hazardous wildlife attractants. 8 USDA Wildlife Services uses the term "Wildlife Hazard Assessment " Part 139 uses the term "Ecological Study " In this context the two terms should be considered synonymous. Wildlife Hazard Assessment is the preferred term because it is more descriptive of what is actually being done 12 01 /30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A As a point of clanfication. the Assessment is not the same as a one day site visit Wildlife Services officialh refers to the site visit as the "initial consultation The Assessment_ however_ could take up to one year if the nature of hazards and the time period in which they operate are not clear 3-5. WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLANS (WHMP). The FAA will consider the results of the Wildlife Hazard Assessment, along with the aeronautical activity at the airport and the views of the certificate holder and airport users; in determming whether or not a formal WHMP is needed, in accordance with Part 139 if the FAA determines that a WHNIP is needed, the certificate holder must then formulate and implement a WHMP, using the Wildlife Hazard Assessment as the basis for the plan. The goal of an airport WHMP is to minimize wildlife populations on and around the airport that pose a threat to aviation safety or to structures, equipment and human health The WHNIP must identify hazardous wildlife attractants on or near the airport and the appropriate wildlife damage management techniques to minimize the wildlife hazard, along with priontization of the management measures 3-6. LOCAL COORDINATION. The establishment of a Wildlife Hazards Working Group (WHWG) will facilitate the communication, cooperation and coordination of the airport and its surrounding community necessary for the review of the effectiveness of the WHNIP The cooperation of the airport community is also necessary when new projects are considered, whether on or off the airport, so that the input from all involved parties is considered when a potentially hazardous wildlife attractant is being proposed. Certificate holders must be aware of proposed land use changes, or modification of existing land uses, that could create hazardous wildlife attractants within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 Particular attention should be given to proposed land uses involving creation or expansion of waste water treatment facilities, development of wetland mitigation sites, or development or expansion of dredge spoil containment areas. Certificate holders, at the very least, must be on the notification list of the local planning board or equivalent review entity for all communities located within 5 miles of the airport, in order to receive notification of any proposed project to review for attractiveness to hazardous wildlife. 3-7. COORDINATION WITH FAA PURSUANT TO NEPA. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (Public Law 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, as amended.), certificate holders must carefully consider environmental impacts of implementation of steps in the WHIAP. Except under extraordinary circumstances outlined in FAA Order 5050.4A, paragraph 24, federal actions Gamed out in fulfillment of the requirements of Part 139 in the WHNlP may be categorically excluded under NEPA. A proposed WHMP must be reviewed by a FAA Environmental Specialist to make this determination Certificate holders must work closely with the FAA early in the WHMP development process to identify these environmental considerations. 3-8. COORDINATION/NOTIFICATION OF AIRMEN OF WILDLIFE HAZARDS (NOTAM). If an existing land use practice creates a wildlife hazard, and the land use practice or wildlife hazard cannot be immedi- ately eliminated, the certificate holder must issue a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) and encourage the land owner or manager to take steps to control the wildlife hazard and minimize further attraction. 13 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A 01/30/04 SECTION 4. FAA REVIEW OF PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES. 4-1. FAA REVIEW DURING NEPA PROCESS. In brief, under the Airports Program the FAA is responsible for analyzing the environmental impacts and consequences of a proposed Federal action involving airports, for the environmental assessment and related documents, and ultimately for approving or disapproving the environmental documents and the Federal action. Although the environmental assessment submitted by a certificate holder may be used in whole or in part, the FAA is responsible for the facts, opinions, and judgments upon which the environmental determination is based It is, therefore, incumbent upon the FAA to assure that all documentation presents a full, accurate, and fair assessment of the environmental consequences of the proposed action. Attractiveness to hazardous wildlife shall be reviewed under the "Environmental Consequences Specific Impact Categories" portion of any Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment under NEPA. 4-2. FAA REVIEW OF PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES. a. The FAA discourages the development of facilities discussed in Section 2 that will be located within the 5,000/10,000-foot criteria in Sections 1-2 through 1-4. b. For projects which are located outside the 5,000/10,000-foot criteria, but within 5 statute miles of the airport's aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas, the FAA may review development plans, proposed land use changes, operational changes, or wetland mitigation plans to determine if such changes present potential wildlife hazards to aircraft operations. Sensitive airport areas will be identified as those that lie under or next to approach or departure airspace This brief examination should be sufficient to determine if further investigation is warranted. c. Where further study has been conducted by a wildlife damage management biologist to evaluate a site's compatibility with airport operations, the FAA will use the study results to make its determination. 4-3 WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. a. Notification of new/expanded project proposal. Section 503 of the Wendell H Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 2151 Century (Public Law 106-181) limits the construction or establishment of new MSWL within 6 statute miles of certain public use airports, when both the airport and the landfill meet very specific conditions. See Section 2-2 of this AC and AC 150/5200-34 Construction or Establishment of Landfills Near Public Airports, for a more detailed discussion of these restrictions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires any operator proposing a new or expanded waste disposal operation within 5 statute miles of a runway end to notify the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office and the certificate holder of the proposal (40 CFR 258, Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, Section 258.10, Airport Safety). The EPA also requires owners or operators of new MSWL units, or lateral expansions of existing MSWL units that are located within 10,000 feet of any aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas used by turbojet aircraft or within 5,000 feet of any aircraft movement areas, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas of any airport used by piston -type aircraft, to demonstrate successfully that such units are not hazards to aircraft. When new or expanded MSWLs are being proposed near airports, MSWL operators must notify the certificate holder and the FAA of the proposal as early as possible pursuant to 40 CFR 258. b. Waste handling facilities within separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 14. To claim successfully that a waste handling facility sited within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 does not attract hazardous wildlife and does not threaten aviation, the developer must establish convincingly that the facility will not handle putrescible material other than that as outlined in 2-2.b. The FAA will use this information to determine if the facility will be a hazard to aviation if the facility is other than as outlined in 2-2.b (enclosed transfer stations). c. Putrescible-Waste Facilities. In their effort to satisfy the EPA requirement, some putrescible-waste facility proponents may offer to undertake experimental measures to demonstrate that their proposed facility will not be a hazard to aircraft. To date, the ability to sustain a reduction in the numbers of hazardous wildlife to levels that existed before a putrescible-waste landfill began operating has not been 14 O1/30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A successfulF, demonstrated For d11s reason_ demonstrations of expenmemal wildlife control measures maN not be conducted in active aircraft operations areas 4-4 OTHER LAND USE PRACTICE CHANGES. While U S EPA regulations require landfill owners to provide notification, no similar regulations require notifying the FAA about changes in other land use practices that can create hazardous wildlife attractants Although it is not required bv regulation the FAA requests those proposing land use changes within 5 statute miles of an airport to provide similar notice to the FAA as early in the development process as possible Certificate holders who become aware of such proposed development in the vicinity of their airports should also notify the FAA The notification process gives the FAA an opportunity to evaluate the effect of a particular land use change on aviation safety The land use operator or project proponent may use FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. or other suitable documents to notiN the appropriate FAA Regional Airports Division Office It is helpful if the notification includes a 15-minute quadrangle map of the area identifiling the location of the proposed activity The land use operator or project proponent should also forward specific details of the proposed land use change or operational change or expansion In the case of solid waste landfills, the information should include the type of waste to be handled, how the waste will be processed, and final disposal methods a. Airports which have received Federal grant-in-aid assistance. For airports which have received Federal grant-in-aid assistance, the FAA requires that certificate holder, to the extent practicable, oppose off -airport land use changes or practices within the separations identified in Sections 1-2 through 1-4 that may attract hazardous wildlife Failure to do so may lead to a finding of noncompliance with applicable grant assurances The FAA will not approve the placement of airport development projects pertaining to aircraft movement in the vicinity of hazardous wildlife attractants without appropriate mitigating measures to alleviate the attractiveness. Certificate holders should identifv hazardous wildlife attractants and any associated wildlife hazards during any planning process for new airport development projects b. Additional coordination. If, after the initial review by the FAA. questions remain about the existence of a wildlife hazard near an airport, the certificate holder should consult a wildlife damage management biologist. Such questions may be triggered by a history of wildlife strikes at the airport or the proximity of the airport to a wildlife refuge, body of water, or similar feature known to attract wildlife 15 AC 130/5200-33 Appendix 1 APPENDIX 1. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THIS ADVISORY CIRCULAR. 1. GENERAL. This appendix provides definitions of terms used throughout this AC 1. Aircraft movement area. The runways. taxiways, and other areas of an airport which are used for taxiing or hover taxiing, au taxiing, takeoff_ and landing of aircraft exclusive of loading ramps and aircraft parking areas 2. Aquaculture. The managed production of aquatic plants and animals 3. Certificate holder. The holder of an airport operating certificate or a limited airport operating certificate, except that as used in subpart D of Part 139 "certificate holder" does not mean the holder of a limited airport operating certificate if its airport certification specifications do not require compliance with the section in which it is used 4. Certificated airport. A public airport for which an Airport Operatmg Certificate has been issued 5. Approach or departure airspace. The airspace, within 5 statute miles of an airport, through which aircraft move during landing or takeoff. 6. Concurrent use. Aeronautical property used for compatible non -aviation purposes while at the same tune serving the primary purpose for which it was acquired, and the use is clearly beneficial to the airport The concurrent use should generate revenue to be used for airport purposes (see Order 5190 6A, Airport Compliance Requirements, sect 5h ) 7. Federal action. The Federal action, as far as the Airports Program is concerned, may be any of the following. a. Approval of an airport location; b. Approval of an airport layout plan or revisions to an airport layout plan, c. Approval of funding for airport development (including separate funding of plans and specifications for development), d. Requests for conveyance of government land under Section 516 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 for development or improvement of a public airport, and/or e. Approval of release of airport land. 1. Fly ash. The fine, sand -like residue resulting from the complete incineration of an organic fuel source. Fly ash typically results from the combustion of coal or waste used to operate a power generating plant. 2. Hazardous wildlife. Wildlife species that are commonly associated with wildlife -aircraft strike problems, are capable of causing structural damage to airport facilities. or act as attractants to other wildlife that pose a wildlife -aircraft strike hazard. 3. Piston -use airport. Any airport that would primarily serve fixed -wing, piston -powered aircraft Incidental use of the airport by turbine -powered, fixed-wmg aircraft would not affect this designation However, such aircraft should not be based at the airport. 4. Public -use airport. Any publicly owned airport or a privately -owned airport used or intended to be used for public purposes. 5. Putrescible material. Rotting organic material. 6. Putrescible-waste disposal operation. Landfills, garbage dumps, underwater waste discharges, or similar facilities where activities mclude processmg, burying, storing, or otherwise disposing of putrescible material, trash, and refuse. O1/30/04 (Draft) AC 150/5200-33A Appendix 1 7. Runway protection zone (RPZ). An area off the runway end to enhance the protection of people and property on the ground (see AC 150/5300-13). The dimensions of this zone vary with the airport design, aircraft, type of operation, and visibility minimum. 8. Sewage sludge. The de -watered effluent resulting from secondary or tertiary treatment of municipal sewage and/or industrial wastes, including sewage sludge as referenced in U.S. EPA's Effluent Guidelines and Standards. 40 C.F.R. Part 401. 9. Shoulder. An area adjacent to the edge of paved runways, taxiways, or aprons providing a transition between the pavement and the adjacent surface, support for aircraft running off the pavement, enhanced drainage, and blast protection (see AC 150/5300-13). 10. Turbine -powered aircraft. Aircraft powered by turbine engines including turbojets and turboprops but excluding turbo -shaft rotary -wing aircraft. 11. Turbine -use airport. Any airport that routinely serves fixed -wing turbine -powered aircraft. 12. Wastewater treatment facility. Any -devices and/or systems used to store, treat, recycle, or reclaim municipal sewage or liquid industrial wastes, including Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW), as defined by Section 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500) as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-576) and the Water Quality Act of 1987 (P.L. 100-4). This definition includes any pretreatment involving the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to or in lieu of discharging or otherwise introducing such pollutants into a POTW. (See 40 CFR Section 403.3 (o), (p), & (q)>. 13. Wildlife. Any wild animal, including without limitation any wild mammal, bird, reptile, fish, amphibian, mollusk, crustacean, arthropod, coelenterate, or other invertebrate, including any part, product, egg, or offspring there of (50 CFR 10.12, Taking, Possession, Transportation, Sale, Purchase, Barter, Exportation, and Importation of Wildlife and Plants). As used in this AC, wildlife includes feral animals and domestic animals while out of the control of their owners (Part 139, Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving CAB -Certificated Scheduled Air Carriers Operating Large Aircraft (Other Than Helicopters)). 14. Wildlife attractants. Any human -made structure, land use practice, or human -made or natural geographic feature, that can attract or sustain hazardous wildlife within the landing or departure airspace, aircraft movement area, loading ramps, or aircraft parking areas of an airport. These attractants can include but are not limited to architectural features, landscaping, waste disposal sites, wastewater treatment facilities, agricultural or aquaculture activities, surface mining, or wetlands. 15. Wildlife hazard. A potential for a damaging aircraft collision with wildlife on or near an airport (Part 139). 2. RESERVED Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Notice of Issuance of Conditional Use Determination #1998-235 Please be notified, as per Section 8.4 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, that the request for a Conditional Use Determination received from Burlington International Airport for the expansion of the Burlington International) irport, involving the filling of 8.3 acres of Class Two wetland has been approved on thisf„� day of JQ uc� , 2005. It was found by the Agency of Natural Resources that this conditional use will not result in any undue, adverse effects to the protected functions of the significant wetland located at the south east corner of the airport property in South Burlington, Vermont. Complete copies of the decision can be obtained by calling the Water Quality Division at 802-241- 3770 or writing to the address'below. Any person with an interest in this matter can appeal this decision pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269. Any notice of appeal must be filed (ie: received) at the Water Resources Board, National Life Records Center Building, Drawer 20, Montpelier, VT 05620-3201 (telephone (802) 828-3309) within 30 days of the date of the decision. Alan Quackenbush 1-041 District Wetlands Ecologist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 10 North Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 AQ:pd cc: Distribution List AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: November 3, 2009 -November 12, 2009 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: City of Burlington - Burlington International Airport PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 1200 Airport Drive, 41 South Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010 Amended (May 2007) PERMIT NUMBER: 3028-9010.A PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBERS: 3028-9010, 3972-9015, 1-1270, 3845-9015, 4026-9015 and 3028-9015 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributary of the Winooski River, groundwater in the Winooski River watershed, a wetland tributary to Muddy Brook and groundwater in the Muddy Brook watershed. EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: Ten years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft amended authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to the City of Burlington - Burlington International Airport (BTV) for the discharge of stormwater runoff from BTV facilities in South Burlington, Vermont as follows: the.Burlington International Airport (BTV) north runway; the north end terminal expansion and concrete apron; parking lots, roofs and roads associated with expanded BTV parking facilities; the Pratt & Whitney Building; the Building 880 replacement; the South End Development Phase 2 Project; and the Quarry Overflow Parking Area located in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary of the Winooski River, groundwater in the Winooski River watershed, a wetland I Public Notice 3096-9010.A Page 2 of 3 tributary to Muddy Brook and groundwater in the Muddy Brook watershed. This permit amends the previously issued Authorization to Discharge by combining 6 separate authorizations that are part of common ownership and plan of development into one authorization for the purpose of more efficient maintenance and inspection management. The means of treatment include overland flow, grassed swales/channels, infiltration basin, exfiltrating sand filter, Vortechs/StormTech treatment system, and use of the Disconnection of Non -Rooftop Runoff Credit. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) November 12, 2009, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Attention Vicki Hill, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671 or send via email to Stormwater@state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the general permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In t Public Notice 3096-9010.A Page 3 of 3 addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vennontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1,.Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660) Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 18, 2009 Greg Goyette, Stantec PO Box 2246 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 1200 Airport Drive Dear Mr. Goyette: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on June 16, 2009 (effective 6/2/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, a" k4?- Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com r MAIN, 911.. southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 18, 2009 Heather Kendrew City of Burlington, BIA 1200 Airport Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 1200 Airport Drive Dear Ms. Kendrew: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on June 16, 2009 (effective 6/2/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tal 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 12, 2007 Bob McEwing Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, # 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Parking Dear Mr. McEwing: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on June 19, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. i I Site Plan Application Permit Number SP-� APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. O NER OF REC RD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax All: a 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 1 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): uc-1►�¢S�-�; ,,ncz� ht •�`iFtx� �,,-)p 'N.c�c—A� , g'l K'7 -A I _ — . I- .YL 1 'Y-z ) 1 -2 I ^ Y 12 ." 7 S C I-i 4. CONTACT PERSON (per on ho T ll rec ive all corres addre s, hone & fax #):�j <�) c v ' Qj-nLA cz:F I _-2, - --) Q LA-1 a. Contact e-mail address: n � 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: I` \ CA� 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain mfhat you want :e\fCromm Staff. Include nnamre.,,/J)(` for): 1 l CI Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Pro er�f (including dTptio and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses Muses to\rgmain): d. Total build remain): I Dry (include description and size of each new use and .�. on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existin buildings to remain, �gecify it basement an rre z�nine): rC -IAN �7 T^v� f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): Q� h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this applicatio�J t specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): _%��--I 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 1!���VSq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq.ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $j ,[�' . 0v b. Landscaping: $ �� � A c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):�i-(l c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): ,LNZ)A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) C] Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 { J Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF ARPLICANT SIGNATURE O PROPERTY O R Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION. 1 4)1a P REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Corr Incomplete r j PRINT NAME Ve Administrative Officer of Planning & Zoning or Designee lollVlld Date I PLANNING & ZONING October 27, 2010 Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive # 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the revised Aviation Avenue Findings of Fact and Decision of the enclosed project approved by the City of South Burlington, Administrative Officer on September 27, 2010 (effective 9/27/2010). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT O5403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 1 ENGP ER'S SEAL O i ice.• � N � � O _ U 2KIR � � O / d ',• �'i✓1 m f. ��� •� �C �1 � / - _�:.`�f'•� � � �. � - ✓-^.�^�` w..n...+nn.wn.�,..n.n.-..w.v..u.tir✓..�+�.-n✓� / � t - - s,� " ".._'.."`__�.�-. i-•.`y',�- �"1'_f J o ��. '1 1r - /1 r'- _�-= ---- ... _ _ _s l r \ - _'' y"C.^ti. ` 'v.-,._ ,-_. � _ . �_ _ - _ _.._ 1 1 / / f J /.� 1 /� /' / ' / r / � r ".y' ._ - r J -• '" f `,` , � Y -'- , S �___'-- ___y..-.,.' / l f f.J�/_--,_-_ ,..d %� /'� J 1 J!�✓ j i� i - r-__.- .---__J �.�.._...� __-.._.-...___ �,� ILr-• �\\ \l It ! t �. ti �/""--_---�',-.:':-_..- � r• �-�•�,.✓.�; .._.r11/, /./�f � (r/ J� JJ / IJ / ) � � 11 ! r`� J � r' .. --- -�/ \\i i yt y t T. ^ti\ -_ _ l -` J! J/ ✓ J J 1 1 1 !� -rn...� t�lil� •o \"*ti• -___ - _ . JJ/��`// J J! 1 /J lJ j ! f J1 �= \ �y-o1 / _�i _. \, \ -� J�i _ � �� `"--�' -" %'"•'iii%J j1/"!r JJ �1�/ // / ,( ,i 1 / rJ � ! � \ �/ / AARRES-FOIbI`t_'�'�^"_-"RCFA ^^ .0?`-�"`��!-�<CF -1..- F�� �-�-.• ,. tkOFA-T• -_RCJ� - ! 1 `•. l A.-- RCr h' i'i�R'�' _ � 1 _- .� J t r t A_ %'C"S� A __ itiq -•�- ---� _ '".'r_J!� ":.,��._-..c✓:=�7" • - -s� -�_ 15A ��%1 I j•"'' �.� r f.�/ `� V� 3� r- '`�� �i��% •.f'"�.��,___ 3�i?:.=-- _ ,/ �5l 0 1 5+! 0+ rj{5 r. /- 125 0 _ .' 135 5 0 r r rr 14 - PSA - R p RSA . -L� ••\!SA } Rix' __-� \ ' _y- _-4--_ rA 7 J .\ �.„ _._ _ _ .w / �.- ,`_ �..:. �-'. sA --'�-- �-1 ah G •- _ 4RSA 1'L - 97i'.`-� _•, RSh ,'W�'� - - k .y_ \ l Q� t �� D — _1i :=--E{.',.. _. "'��— \ =�' r �l .7 n` \ D -�-_-._._r �__ y I ✓-: 1 I!� �1�\ t r r- A ROE'._-_--_. ROr--_RQFA A___.._._-RQFx-_—_ROfA--._."-RCFA-.__.__."-_'ROf'A--_--RQF Yr..-____ROFh--_--_.RdFA_-'�"-.- - ♦ ! �.-_•�RtA'F,�_.-.qP�-/r__"_-__ROFA-. ..._-__ROPA_----_ROFA___-_.-___RtNA -_'- NCF D o- 0 ❑ V=--[-�-f1- 1Y e II" a V -- II- --$— Q- 0 ACCESS ROAD ��-��oUf 71' i ! - Q 0b, ED C� AIRPORT PR E� LINE Z` VN / o r`�Q�I� d �' '� .\ L 4 oC7 ij 4 01 N U W W r N W dI- �_Z ao Z > z H z O m Z F- Z (n Z 0-RF- Z c� x Z ul W is 8 RE � - - — AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE Q ROLLED EROSION CONTROL e -- -jD�-- EXISTING DRAINAGE EXISTIGRADE O VFp PRELIMINARY ® STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I'� ry/ E — EXISTING ELECTRICAL ZQ FEB 2 6 2010 EXCAVATED DROP INLET PROTECTION 'O EDGE OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT -304— FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR ® TOP SOIL do SEED City Of So n,n PROPOSED LIMIT OF REGRADING El EXISTING CATCH BASIN Won 0 200 500 1000 ■ NEW CATCH BASIN FEET 1' = 200' PRC& No: 037743 FILE NAME' BiV—EC3Ol AIPNo: 3-50-0005-XX DRAWING N0. EC3.1 PERMIT SHEET 25 of 34 1.z ° RSA RSA 88+0 2+00 96+00 11 o O (} 13 7 0 U 1 ra � o q p ! c1 u� l 61 ❑ r 000 r —WORK TEMPORARY +� NORTH ARRESTOR BARRIER THRESHOLD 1 STA. 123+00 RSA---P--'A• .FRS/. - '\ ti, -',' `- •`R/. .1 �•1iS�(`,.'.'� •, ✓ RSA R ��RSJ < _ _ c 2 VERMONT A.N.G. LIMIT OF TEMPORARY THRESHOLD REGRADING (TYP.) STA. 180+00 - RSA \ SOUTH ARRESTOR _ BARRIER EXISTING LANDING TEURM'AL Q CAL AR O � •{ ,, �O ; } HAUL !ROUTE o d " % �'� v0°G \\\° > .✓dpG ��� o\� v ° : \� 1 s O p� �oCS ��h �•� � 7pp\�ci Q O ���Ci� ���p �` �a �:l G ° () 0 u r t L1 4? o a o � u �cy 11 0� �t��' q -\o el SEQUENCE WORK AREA 1. (DAY/NIGHT WORK) BEGIN IN WORK AREAS 1 do 2 — REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DEPTH VARIES) COMPLETE WORK AREA 1 — REPLACE WITH CONCRETE PAVEMENT (15' WORK IN AREAS 2 do 3 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION TIME 150 CALENDAR DAYS 80 CALENDAR DAYS :•�, WORK AREA 2. (CENTER PORTION) NIGHTWORK — REMOVE 3' EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT — REPLACE WITH 3' NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT - OVERLAY 2' ASPHALT PAVEMENT - EXTEND TAXIWAY 'A' & RUNWAY 19, 500' NORTH - FULL DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION OF TAXIWAY 'H' (477 - 150 CALENDAR DAYS ® WORK AREA 3; (SOUTHEND) — (DAY/NIGHT WORK) — REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT (DEPTH VARIES) — REPLACE WITH CONCRETE PAVEMENT (15") a 45 CALENDAR DAYS r ENGNEER'S SEAL t PRIX. AIRPORT U- P PERTY E V G m a s U v c� u � � A TC GLIDE .. PE vt'i ii SLOPE 4NTENNA Q TAK FF 0 "1a 7— R R i \..� - ti f Lu +00 188 00 192+00/ +'O4b 0+ U RSA RSA LOCALNARANTEN— - f - ---- W AREA 0 R/W 33 l� _�� THRESH rt,T7 0 0 a 9 K~ Q0 Q a J {Lalr1 � C ,i . F z k C'/ C zm a Z O 7 U 400 0 400 y m 1"=400' RFc C. ? ¢ FO '0 fso ?010 ev��n9t0y� - RsA - RUNWAY SAFETY AREA -ROFA RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA +� HAUL ROUTE PRELIMINARY FEB 2 6 2010 �ROJ. No. 037743 'ILE NAME: Pam--103 UP No.: 3-50-0005-XX DRAWING NO. G1.3 PERMIT SHEET 2 of34 ..,rr316Fy f =�I =-�.-•-.""`.- � � v .. � 1 j ' \ 1 � ./ it /I L• I 1 1 f rn t�• 1 i (_)'I • 1 1 I fj A� I PROJECT NO. m O AVIATRON BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE, #1 FILE NAME z COMPRESSOR SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 Z AVIATNON SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 0 ENCLOSURE SCALE: 1' - 30' DATE: 06/16/06 REV DESCRIPTION oio.n -� HAK RAM No Text