Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0023 San Remo DriveY �south � . PLANNING & ZONING September 26, 2011 Re: #DR-11-07 & #SP-11-29 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained prior to alteration of your building. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sin- rely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3095 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Plannel�� RE: Agenda Item #2, DR#11-07 & SP#11-29, Four Boys LLC DATE: September 14, 2011 Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan review to expand a dumpster enclosure from 10' X 12' to 12' X 12' at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal was heard on September 6, 2011 and continued to ensure that the applicant would sufficiently post the public notice. In order to be more efficient, staff has attached a draft decision in place of the typical set of staff notes, as this is a simple application with no issues. A similar application was reviewed and approved earlier this year. This application seeks only to increase the proposed structure by an additional 2 feet in one direction. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-11-07 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-29 FOUR BOYS LLC — 23 SAN REMO DRIVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan review to expand a dumpster enclosure from 10' X 12' to 12' X 12' at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The Development Review Board held a public meeting on September 6 and September 20, 2011. Michael Dee represented the applicant. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure, 23 San Remo Drive. 2. The property is located in the Central District 2 (CD2) zoning district. 3. The owner of record of the subject property is Four Boys LLC. 4. The application was received on July 22, 2011. 5. The applicant has submitted a plan entitled "23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT" prepared by Ground Swell Architects, dated 9/8/04, as well as color photographs of the proposed structure. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements, and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 1 (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's fagade area shall consist of see - through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity; however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. These criteria are not applicable to the subject application. The proposed expansion of the previously approved dumpster enclosure is minimal. The PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRem o_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 2 existing fence is wood and easily falls into disrepair from weather, snow plow damage, and age. The proposed structure is fully enclosed and appears more of a structure than an attempt to surround a dumpster. It has a garage type roll -up door, louvered vents above the door and on the back side. The walls are wood panel, with black shingled roof. The proposed trash enclosure will compliment the existing building. DECISION Motion by , seconded by , to approve Site Plan Application #SP- 11-29 and Design Review Application #DR-11-07 of Four Boys LLC subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in full effect. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The new solid waste storage building shall rest on the ground such that there will be no openings underneath the structure. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use of the dumpster enclosure. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Tim Barritt— yea/nay/abstain/not present Mark Behr yea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley - yea/nay/abstain/not present Joe Randazzo— yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin — yea/nay/abstain/not present Bill Stuono — yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of Signed this day of Mark Behr, Chairman 2011, by PADevelopment Review Boa rd\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRem o_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 3 Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermont4udiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRem o_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 4 f off i� south') tirl p . PLANNING & ZONING ,/ 1/0, 9 1/� TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner ' RE: Agenda Item #2, DR#11-07 & SP#11-29, Four Boys LLC DATE: August 30, 2011 Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan review to expand a dumpster enclosure from 10' X 12' to 12' X 12' at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. In order to be more efficient, staff has attached a draft decision in place of the typical set of staff notes, as this is a simple application with no issues. A similar application was reviewed and approved earlier this year. This application seeks only to increase the proposed structure by an additional 2 feet in one direction. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR-11-07 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-11-29 FOUR BOYS LLC — 23 SAN REMO DRIVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The applicant is also seeking site plan review to expand a dumpster enclosure from 10' X 12' to 12' X 12' at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The Development Review Board held a public meeting on September 6, 2011. Bill Michaud represented the applicant. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is seeking design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure, 23 San Remo Drive. 2. The property is located in the Central District 2 (CD2) zoning district. 3. The owner of record of the subject property is Four Boys LLC. 4. The application was received on July 22, 2011. 5. The applicant has submitted a plan entitled "23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT" prepared by Ground Swell Architects, dated 9/8/04, as well as color photographs of the proposed structure. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 1 (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's fagade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity; however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. (0 Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. These criteria are not applicable to the subject application. The proposed expansion of the previously approved dumpster enclosure is minimal. The existing fence is wood and easily falls into disrepair from weather, snow plow damage, and PADevelopment Review Boa rd\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRem o_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 2 age. The proposed structure is fully enclosed and appears more of a structure than an attempt to surround a dumpster. It has a garage type roll -up door, louvered vents above the door and on the back side. The walls are wood panel, with black shingled roof. The proposed trash enclosure will compliment the existing building. DECISION Motion by , seconded by , to approve Site Plan Application #SP-11-29 and Design Review Application #DR-11-07 of Four Boys LLC subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in full effect. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The new solid waste storage building shall rest on the ground such that there will be no openings underneath the structure. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use of the dumpster enclosure. 5. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Tim Barritt— yea/nay/abstain/not present Mark Behr — yea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — yea/nay/abstain/not present Joe Randazzo— yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin — yea/nay/abstain/not present Bill Stuono — yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of Signed this day of Mark Behr, Chairman 2011, by Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior P:\Development Review Boa rd\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRemo_FourBoysLLC_ffd.doc 3 Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontaudiciaU.org/GTC/environmental/default.asox for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. PADevelopment Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2011\DR_11_07&SP_11_29_23SanRem o_Four13oysLLC_ffd.doc 4 f / Note to Roof Garden: This feature is designed to provide storrowater retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions an, present. Second floor Roof Gcirden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage • 471/ 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 501% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4099 sf Parking Information First floor size 5689 sf Second floor size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial Iatfloor 1 space/200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spaces/unit 12 1/4 units 1 Total spaces required 41 spaces Current off site spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of 8 spaces Planting Schedule Key Common Name Scientific name Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B mermis 'Shademastee Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea 104 15" h PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Ged 3 24" MP Mugo Pine Pious mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light I Lumec "New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 3:�A Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffttier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted i � E > Eo V U U E U y U � � N � c L • � S N � u U » U e � N v; E 0 Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 9.8.04 Scale: Revisions 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington Vr 864-1812 Job 0409 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans CEI IE IUL 12 2 11 wperwl0 Mrvawadwb, a'r�w�s,`trcnnn. cror.aaeeawr t�.mrinun«" as on rF PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- / - Al (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ''Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(§IOF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT phone and fax ft 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all address, phone & fax #): from Staff. Include name, 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: IZ? (L S & 'An t , 4O t-`t 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: *Z a !�� 7?er-la �� 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want c. Proposed Uses on uses to remain): _ for): and sizip of each separate use): (include description and size of each new use and existing A-t-A iE�z ' d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: S c. Other site improvements (please list with cost):2, 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. -., /0, V SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line 1 ` -1 k C"A-L t PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: II REVIEW AUTHORITY: 2 /Development Review Board ElAdministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Lam' Comp. The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 south PLANNING & ZONING 7 Permit Number DR- l - D (office use only) APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW (NON -SIGN) All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S)OF RECOBI .(Tame(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) /� i L t.. 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 77z�� L 3a) CONTACT EMAIL AD] 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want apprgval for): 1noL44L 1 ' 7) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre -addressed envelopes. The city will add the, return address). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburf.com r C 8) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ ve Officer Date The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Design Review Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 May 5, 2011 Re: #DR-11-03 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer y, aymond J$BelaXir Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3149 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ♦\ Pernlit Number DR - use only) APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW (NON -SIGN) All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax#) C`c_+cTiL CtlS L G d c`sFZi�.y ��.,},qRL�� 1p$l� �` /fait sir 7— 6 o i 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERSON (,Name,.mailing address, phone and fax #)' i 3a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2 3 � — r.� h P_ . 5) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 4qd — ©K) 09_ a 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General proiect description (explain what you want annroval for): 7) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre -addressed envelopes The city will add the return address). 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 8) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. y SIGNAT17 OF APPLICANT . l SIGNATURE OF >P PERTY OWN Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: VIZ�n�lete ElIncomplete j inistra`five Officer Y-25- Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Design Review Application Form, Rev. 12-2010 FOUR BOYS LLC MEMORANDUM _.. _._ ...._.. .. ... ....._ _._..... _ ......_ __..____. 1408 Ferry Rd./ Charlotte, Vt. 05445 / phone (802) 864-1812 / fax (802) 862-8391 TO: CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON FROM: BILL MICHAUD SUBJECT: 23 SAN REMO DRIVE — S. BURLINGTON DATE: 4/25/2011 CC: Re: Dumpster Enclosure Existing stockade enclosure is damaged from use, snow plow damage and age. Current structure is 10'-0 wide x 12'-0 deep, 6ft high with open top & swing gates. Proposed Structure: 10'-0 wide x 12'-0 deep with sloping roof (ridge is max 9'-6") and garage type roll -up door. Louvered vents above door and on back side. Walls will be wood panel, roof will be shingles (black) See attached photos for representation of appearance. south a PLANNING & ZONING TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Planne �,�V DATE: April 29, 2011 Cc: Bill Michaud, Four Boys LLC. Re: Agenda #4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Design Review Application DR-11-03 23 San Remo Drive Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for changes to a dumpster enclosure at a property located in Central District 2, 23 San Remo Drive. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements, and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity; however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. The proposed dumpster enclosure is an improvement over the existing fenced enclosure. The existing fence is wood and easily falls into disrepair from weather, snow plow damage, and age. The proposed structure is fully enclosed and appears more of a structure than an attempt to surround a dumpster. It has a garage type roll -up door, louvered vents above the door and on the back side. The walls are wood panel, with black shingled roof. The proposed trash enclosure will compliment the existing building. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Design Review Application #DR-11-03. { /�\\ 1 • • \/ 11 // A p I a�v \ IIr oplants) W Q plants) Mature htg-6 a.a Extended cabinet _` a 1 11 liiil lake Q� // !I • I 11 I�■�� t,Elm l�l, /iiil =_ / / ■ 9-0 Roof drains to Note on Utilities! w o 0 Relocated tree Existing plantings 121 c' F-,.i car, o"mpstz. �� w gate approximate property line 762' Site Plan & First floor t Gig Pc 0 Relocated l , tree a kln s aus ® m (13 plant ) 0 Existing t tree .4 i Light 1 N EO 0 Note to Roof Garden: This feature is designed to provide stormwater retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions are present. =£= Roof Garden ,�M,P(20 plants) 0e00 Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25 % 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 501/6 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information First floor size 5689 sf S-.w,ld hoof Size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial Iatfloor I space/200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spaces/unit 12 1/4 units I Total spaces required 41 spaces Current off site spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of 8 spaces Planting Schedule Key Common Name Scientific name Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B mcrmis Shademastee Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea 104 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Gi'd 3 24" MP Mugo Pine Pious mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light 1 Lumec "New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light ):jA Spaulding ST-MI00-HL- "Sotiitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted U a d � o ya l� U 0 c �l\ o � ua c Ot^ N h N Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 9.8.04 Scale. Revisions 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington t? 864.1812 Job 0409 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans me eox",�«Mi,"a n. .w bra nro�Pn.r.en.,"x ., srMwn.udx>.r.. poperty die„ "wnoM1"xh,.,w erot of De vzeOM wM1ob PN br Mon cromemuarox c�es"warxnach r� southburlingtoll PLANNING & ZONING November 13, 2008 Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-07-109 Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision Administrative Officer on November 12, 2008 (effective No note the conditions of a e rendered by the within slx g roval includin November 12 20pg) please months that a zonin permit If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 ww w.sburl.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- A - v APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): <,+A(-=, 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 13 i" � M N c." ALA(S a. Contact e-mail address: l-1 /-. Z, 06 L. ,4c,4_ e:-�e r,,t 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2 Z� 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1490 &ce:2. 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you w9nt approval for): 4�ui�,N ___� 1 I 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 8i www.sburl.com Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Pro rty (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): L_I",K, f { C . d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): r f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed % sq. ft. sq. ft. 2 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping: $ c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out):_ c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAT RE OF APPLICANT Z� V SIGNATURE OJ7 PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: (d l) v� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer have revie ed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete El Incomplete &Direc4PIninag&Zoning or Designee Dat 5 ?o 3+00 San Remo Drive ; W j Pe k 1 O light l 0 0L t l O N. ,rideuwlk N0,02pbw) --J 0° 1 Y c. P a e so yrre! ®®336 ) Erun a l F •` L .Nf(7p1.-) bg--6 Plnnti gr E•� d rabinet Nn p—L ©<J r - - rl I SAW a I as ° FIE IIIII� , liNcTgnnrcial Lkbt l � Rwfd m ro m: Existing building � tP.a��yels The Water R Je�yocer k connect o 5ations OWn l 3 are not eA 00 Gt ct ® 0 011' OVAL c to ORd.—d tree F,wi�g MAW I O �3rwpsrMtgtpw � Nf(13p4+61 I � I 1 Ey OPmrimaxp �.�' ba 162' — — _ — Site Plan 6- First floor 0 Structural engineering Mechanical engineering il 17 z 9-s Landscape architecture -- „ Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Conshuction Management Parking Lot coverage 47"/u 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 501% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Perking ieformation Date: 9.8.04 Please refer to Civil Engineering Associates letter of September 3, 2004 Scale: Planting Schedule Revisions Key Common Name Scientttilc name Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B inermis 'Shademaster Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea 104 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM t0 Wit. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Ged 3 24" Mp Mugo Pine Pinus mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light I Lumec "New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 ):�A Spaulding ST-MI00-HL- "Soffitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted 10.4.04 Snow removal 10.29.06 Parking revise 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 Srut Remo Drive South Burlington Vr W4-1812 Job 0409 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans nweeo°.rrn�r mia mae°sp�s as a.n e"orporermnerao. "s mvnvm",r or.rvrca. ra n" .opary orcmn esw.namarecre..oe copyaprroawr crooas.�i acmrecre r NINE ®� e LUX-111 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING November 13, 2008 William Michaud Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Dear Mr. Michaud: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby releases you from maintaining a $10,500 letter of credit from the Merchants Bank for the above referenced property. Enclosed is the original Letter of Credit to be returned to the bank. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincer y and J. Belair Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com merchants �--- BANK IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT Borrower: Four Boys, LLC Lender: Merchants Bank c/o William Michaud, 1408 Ferry Road 275 Kennedy Drive Charlotte, VT 05445 South Burlington, VT 05403 Beneficiary: City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 NO.: 1160038335 EXPIRATION DATE. This letter of credit shall expire upon the earlier of the close of business on 11-30-2008 and all drafts and accompanying statements or documents must be presented to Lender on or before that time, or the day that Lender honors a draw under which the full amount of this Letter of Credit has been drawn (the "Expiration Date"). AMOUNT OF CREDIT. Lender hereby establishes at the request and for the account of Borrower, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of Beneficiary for a sum of Ten Thousand Five Hundred & 00/100 Dollars ($10,500.00) (the "Letter of Credit"). These funds shall be made available to Beneficiary upon Lender's receipt from Beneficiary of sight drafts drawn on Lender at Lender's address indicated above (or other such address that Lender may provide Beneficiary in writing) during regular business hours and accompanied by the signed written statements or documents indicated below. WARNING TO BENEFICIARY: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AT ONCE. IF YOU FEEL UNABLE TO MEET ANY OF ITS REQUIREMENTS, EITHER SINGLY OR TOGETHER, YOU SHOULD CONTACT BORROWER IMMEDIATELY TO SEE IF THE LETTER OF CREDIT CAN BE AMENDED. OTHERWISE, YOU WILL RISK LOSING PAYMENT UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY STRICTLY WITH ITS TERMS AS WRITTEN. DRAFT TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Lender shall honor drafts submitted by Beneficiary under the following terms and conditions: Drafts under this credit must be marked, "Drawn under Merchants Bank, 275 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 1160038335, dated November 30, 2006" and the amount and date of negotiation of each draft must be endorsed on the Endorsements of Drafts Drawn section of the Irrevocable Letter of Credit hereof by the negotiating bank. Upon Lender's honor of such drafts, Lender shall be fully discharged of Lender's obligations under this Letter of Credit and shall not be obligated to make any further payments under this Letter of Credit once the full amount of credit available under this Letter of Credit has been drawn. If a non -conforming demand is made, Lender shall notify Beneficiary of Lender's dishonor on or before the time specified in the "Timing of Dishonor" paragraph below. Beneficiary shall have no recourse against Lender for any amount paid under this Letter of Credit once Lender has honored any draft or other document which complies strictly with this Letter of Credit, and which on its face appears otherwise in order but which is signed, issued, or presented by a party or under the name of a party purporting to act for Beneficiary, purporting to claim through Beneficiary, or posing as Beneficiary without Beneficiary's authorization. By paying an amount demanded in accordance with this Letter of.,Credit, Lender makes no representation as to the correctness of the amount demanded and Lender shall not be liable to Beneficiary, or any other person, for any amount paid or disbursed for any reason whatsoever, including, without limitation, any nonapplication or misapplication by Beneficiary of the proceeds of such payment. By presenting upon Lender or a confirming bank, Beneficiary certifies that Beneficiary has not and will not present upon the other, unless and until Beneficiary meets with dishonor. Beneficiary promises to return to Lender any funds received by Beneficiary in excess of the Letter of Credit's maximum drawing amount. USE RESTRICTIONS. All drafts must be marked "DRAWN UNDER Merchants Bank IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 1160038335 DATED 11-30-2006," and the amount of each draft shall be marked on the draft. Only Beneficiary may complete a draft and accompanying statements or documents required by this Letter of Credit and make a draw under this Letter of Credit. This original Letter of Credit must accompany any draft drawn hereunder. Partial draws are permitted under this Letter of Credit. Lender's honor of a partial draw shall correspondingly reduce the amount of credit available under this Letter of Credit. Following a partial draw, Lender shall return this original Letter of Credit to Beneficiary with the partial draw noted hereon; in the alternative, and in its sole discretion, Lender may issue a substitute Letter of Credit to Beneficiary in the amount shown above, less any partial draw(s). PERMITTED TRANSFEREES. The right to draw under this Letter of Credit shall be nontransferable, except for: A. A transfer (in its entirety, but not in part) by direct operation of law to the administrator, executor, bankruptcy trustee, receiver, liquidator, successor, or other representative at law of the original Beneficiary; and B. The first immediate transfer (in its entirety, but not in part) by such legal representative to a third party after express approval of a governmental body (judicial, administrative, or executive). TRANSFEREES REQUIRED DOCUMENTS. When the presenter is a permitted transferee (i) by operation of law or (ii) a third party receiving transfer from a legal representative, as described above, the documents required for a draw shall include a certified copy of the one or more documents which show the presenter's authority to claim through or to act with authority for the original Beneficiary. TIMING OF DISHONOR. Lender may rely upon any reason for dishonor which it communicates to Beneficiary or the presenter within three (3) Banking Days after Lender has received the last document forming Beneficiary's presentment (the "Three -Day Period"). Lender shall be entitled to rely upon such reason without regard to either (i) the timing of any presentment made before the Expiration Date, or (ii) the timing inside the Three -Day Period of any preliminary communications) from Lender concerning the dishonor decision or any reason for dishonor. For any reason for dishonor given during the Three -Day Period, Lender shall be conclusively deemed to have met the "reasonable time", "without delay", and other timing requirements as the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 1993 Revision, ICC Publication No. 500, as most recently published by the International Chamber of Commerce (the "UCP") may impose. The Expiration Date shall not be extended to accommodate a presentment made less than three (3) Banking Days before the Expiration Date, and Beneficiary shall not be entitled to submit a draw request or provide Lender with any documents in support of a draw after the Expiration Date. Lender shall not be required to communicate Loan No: 1160038335 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT (Continued) Page 2 a dishonor decision or its reasons within a time less than the Three -Day Period. "Banking Day" means any day, except Saturday, on which commercial banks located in Vermont are open. COMPLIANCE BURDEN. Lender is not responsible for any impossibility or other difficulty in achieving strict compliance with the requirements of this Letter of Credit precisely as written. Beneficiary understands and acknowledges: (i) that unless and until the present wording of this Letter of Credit is amended with Lender's prior written consent, the burden of complying strictly with such wording remains solely upon Beneficiary, and (ii) that Lender is relying upon the lack of such amendment as Constituting Beneficiary's initial and continued approval of such wording. NON-SEVERABILITY. If any aspect of this Letter of Credit is ever declared unenforceable for any reason by any court or governmental body having jurisdiction, Lender's entire engagement under this Letter of Credit shall be deemed null and void ab initio, and both Lender and Beneficiary shall be restored to the position each would have occupied with all rights available as though this Letter of Credit had never occurred. This non-severability provision shall override all other provisions in this Letter of Credit, no matter where such provision appears within this Letter of Credit. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed by federal law applicable to Lender and, to the extent not preempted by federal law, the laws of the State of Vermont without regard to its conflicts of law provisions, and except to the extent such laws are inconsistent with the UCP. This Agreement has been accepted by Lender in the State of Vermont. EXPIRATION. Lender hereby agrees with Beneficiary that drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit will be duly honored if presented to Lender on or before the Expiration Date unless otherwise provided for above. Dated: November 30, 2006 LENDER: MERCH BANK By: 7Gl Authorized Signer ENDORSEMENT OF DRAFTS DRAWN: Date Negotiated By Amount Amount In Words In Figures LASER Pq0 Landing, Ver. 5.33.W.004 Copr. Harland Financial Sol�tione, Inc. 199T, 3009. All Rlgn. Reserved. VT I:LLASERPROICFI\LPL\C43LOC. FC T M339 PF 94 S T TE Pr -.AN 1L.E'I"-rEFZ DF CFZEDTT AGI2EEMEWrr THIS AGREEMENT,' exe uted in triplicate between �,� i �� �,}_•� r���µ�.,�� of ? c-- 5 41-e , hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", y of hereinafter referred to as ""Bank", and e i 5,� , hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer has received site MUNICIPALITY'S Plannil�g Co ission for the located at 'Z. (,� ''J�` �c t"1. a site plan entitled" and prepared by _c plan approval from the development of property as depecited on a : ,.._� �A r4--U dated WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than �%c.�,' n-i (�i i ' 2icc "'_c-lt, t4 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the BANK to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment .limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The DEVELOPER and MUNICIPALITY hereby agree that the sum of r",� i,'�„ r5a._:��.i��> 1-�, ,.�-� ( $C,��tY• — ) shall be sufficient to secure DEVELOPER's obligations under this Agreement but shall not relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated cost. 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. 8. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file •with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICIPALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 13. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 14 This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 9 .s Dated at — , Vermont, this day of this day of C�� , 20 . IN THE PRESENCE OF: i-Go cv'4' , c(c Q4 By: thl", Duly Authori d Agent (DEVELOPER) (1,1 LLB„ ', Dated at Y !� n , Vermont, this day of this day of l/G7�D%��' , 20. IN THE PRESENCE OF: rMCkS Crw By: og& I - /�&a my Authorize 'Agent (BANK) S• �y�j� �`/ Dated at ��(, I Nl� 16� ,Vermont, this day of this day of 6 20. By: , Duly Autforized Agent (MUNICIPALITY) C! merchants ''_-t'�-- BANK October 25, 2004 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Irrevocable Letter of Credit #1160038335 Four Boys, LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We hereby establish our IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 41160038335 in your favor for the account of Four Boys, LLC, 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 up to the aggregate amount of Ten Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100th U.S. Dollars ($10,500.00) available by your draft(s) on us at sight. Drafts drawn under this credit must be marked, "Drawn under The Merchants Bank, 275 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, LETTER OF CREDIT #1160038335, dated October 25, 2004" and the amount and date of negotiation of each draft must be endorsed on the back hereof by the negotiating bank. This Letter of Credit expires at the close of business on November 30, 2006. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France, Publication No. 500) and is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code of Vermont, as from time to time amended. We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers, and bona fide holders of drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Credit, that such drafts will be duly honored on presentation to the drawee if negotiated or presented before the close of business on November 30, 2006. Sincerely, RC "TS` BAN P mela P. Steece ,ice President P.O. 6;u 1009, Burliu,,ton, Vcrnumt 0540-2 802-655 3400 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET soum BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner DATE: February 21, 2006 Cc: Bill Michaud, Four Boys LLC. Re: DRC Hearing February 27, 2006 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Design Review Application DR-06-01 23 San Remo Drive Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) change double glass door to single door with double sidelights on the north elevation; 2) change perch from triangular shape to rectangular shape on the north elevation; 3) eliminate small window from the east elevation The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee �DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, eic. The design of a baiiding should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed amendments are in compliance with this triter cn. The new design proposed for the door and porch is consistent with existing design. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e.. granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synft,etic stucco, wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. There are no new materials proposed as part of this application. The changes to the door, from double to single, will not affect this criteria. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The applicant is not proposing to change any of the colors used (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity; however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. Again, the applicant is proposing a change to the door, changing from a double glass door to a dingle door with double sidelights. Staff feels that the changes remain in compliance with this criterion and the goals of the design review regulations. The remain attractively present at the street -level. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. There are no changes to this criterion as part of this application. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. There are no changes to this criterion as part of this application. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This application does not change the proposal for a green roof, designed to be visually pleasing as well as functioning to retain stormwater. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. One of the unique features of the building is the roof -top garden. There are no changes to this criterion as part of this application. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. Access to the rooftop garden will not change as a result of this proposal. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (f) Outdoor Lighting. The applicant did not propose any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval to the Development Review Board regarding Design Review Application #DR-06-01 conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items above. 1 Southeast perspective 12 _.. 12 . 7.5 � ` 17.5 North/south section 5�� s�°°M North elevation 12 7.5 I j �zs 12 12 East elevation South elevation 7.5 West elevation East/west section c E ~ �t m t ZZ U Cc L m Cc � pp� c O,n Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 998*04 Scale: Revisions 5.17,05 Railing change 8. 8•05 WlndowlEIFS change 9.1.05 Railing change 1.30.06 ExUWnd/Drchange 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT' 964.1812 Job 0409 Sheet A2 Description Elevations & Sections 0 rha docurnenfard the dmlC�e end Id°ee Mcarpor.tw new nmru,ner�td e me pgosrry l�.a �dawava�.nn«.v,. h roffe pe uredln hwb or MpM Mtn w erry oMer D%Yct xJll�out Li° mlroerrPerrrJs.Ywr of SwR NdN(ach. CopyVNQ2W G—dSw,i � Southeast perspective 12 12 7.5 7.5 North/south section I771C 2910 A —II II11,11 •�� North 12 12 East elevation South elevation 7.5 [�-' �7.5 5 me g gev.— C di,g W m a'"erjain6, West elevation East/west section North 12 12 East elevation South elevation 7.5 [�-' �7.5 5 me g gev.— C di,g W m a'"erjain6, West elevation East/west section a y` O +Uy+ U y 11 C o h ti bb e U a 'C 0 c 0 c opt^. Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 9.8.04 Scale: Revisions 5.17.05 Railing change 8.8•05 Wmdow/E1FS change 9.1.05 Railing change 1.30.06 ExUWndDr change 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VF 864-1812 Job 0409 Sheet A2 Description Elevations & Sections 0 ,«+ �'"�M,� 3 ` t Pn,ide thcttra! break at ual! between interior and exterior slab. Pm, ide insulation bolos' exterior slab. Take care to keep �`-- thermal em elope continuous-* I u . ewr„m • 102 -Z5 I i k g O: Suspended ceiling where shoes n A -6 y �� rz t hlech I ewMoamA Chase r .....,...._.a _ A$ J$ 1 L. g g t' 1 Structural engineer to ' ,,nhgurc lateral • I u rcinrur.ement 4,• y.3'-5„r i 5`4' : 3-.v. y 3.-2^ a around sindoss t e.ameme O, Suspended ceiling where shown 'a .r r • � i ; = NOTES TO FRAMING: ' n' All interior walls are 2x4 r - - r - .0 studs. Dimensions refer to R'_ 3 finished walls, —� t t . I IN 4 - I I s \p e IT ti j¢ � 1 m - ry F � v 114 Sow S.W r.00e ,e ,w •F" � m - /_3:':v_j. _4'-1 A,.2�_Z.. .y4"z'._ T-7^ / 6 p'z• _.._y Provide thermal break at „all bcnccen interior and exterior slab. Pnwidc insulation belo,v exterior .lab. Take care to keep thermal em clope continuous Second floor plan A` 4 3 2 � 1 1 it m 1 e Roof p/an Sol I I IT I i 7-7 2' x 2' green root tra, s O AC condensor locations x 3 Shrubs in planters - t t 2' x 2' green roof trays U U B r Q G C I i t I e o � �O y E� m �h Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 11.19.04 Scale: 1 /4 "=1 '-0 " Revisions 4.13.Uq stairway narrows 4.21.0 dr to mach chase 8.8.05 12nd fl Apt A BR/Kit 23 San Remo Four Boys 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte Vr 05445 Job 0409 Sheet A1.2 Description Floor Plans I COP,-yMC]eW G.wNSwN NCM1rAa 6 Permit Number DR-� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1 Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): e mc+, I U r Lf4 D 5 2" Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, rnailinR address, -ohone and fwA 9) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax �) _ L. 4) C NTACT PERSON (-Name, mailing address, phone and fw- #) �.� t"I l,' i'�►'_S 9'�rJO L� l � 4 .mot � 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: N� ..1 6) TAX PARCEL, ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1426, & e-o23 G 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and Height. -1 fL l�0-L 41-455 c jZ I D 5. "J ew-15 Dmg %.f 1VLae, �I 1� G�E-F ' ��! r�l �-� 1.�9 55 ,�i? —4 E 'alZc-" 4�'-"A, . R-' .� i t 'Ly'� i .•l 2'``J �L r -�.�-mac.. i�i-4iz-lcoc--t Uita�c" 'I he information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along -ixith this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. �i STGI',TATURVF APPLICANT i W.4'. -, / �" - - SIGNATURE OF LAAD/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMSSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: 1�Complete A El Incomplete Director of Planning &lZoning -or X 9 E MBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected .and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design flan Approval o One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. o A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. o Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: architectural details exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground building height existing and proposed grading color, type and texture of building material doors © siding cornices entablatures roofing material moldings and trim window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings details (cut sheets) of all proposed exterior lights Sign Design. Approval o Mans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. o Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other.. o Statement as -to method of illurnination and intensity of the sign. c Master signage plan containing the follovning: an accurate site plan of the properly showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under -the sign ordinance. computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. ® standards for consistency among all signs or. the property (existing .and proposed). ei CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 8, 2006 Bill Michaud Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design Review #DR-06-01 Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced projects approved by the Development Review Board on March 7, 2006. Please note the conditions of approval including that you obtain a zoning permit within six months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, C � Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7005 1820 0004 9293 9045 Location Ma SWTH 8Ur1aNGTGN. PaGJEGT $nf BVRLWGTON m Il W W W a I:*a. W a O •o c rA ^I Cl) KEY Quan Scientific Name Common Name Size 88 2 Euonymus Matus Burning Bush 3'. 4' SY 6 Taxus densiiormis Spreading Yew 24 - 30' FILE 4 Berberis atropurpurea Red Leaf Barberry 18 - 24' DC 4 Hemerocallis Daylily (large) CL 1 Sydnga laciniata Cutleaf lilac 2.3' MP 3 Pinus mugo Mugo Pine 18' PGH 1 Hydrangea oompacta P.G. Hydrangea 2 .3' ( HY 1 Taxus hicksll Hichs Yew 3' 1 . SAN REMO DRWE 2✓ti! t.. _ AWN AAP.A . , _ _ • _ ;, IAWNJMU 2+5 My cxrsrwo 19 t .. . • ; •.. 5 yy 9 RuamsxG PW %IA40PAGk unrsrtQ ® .PAOPLIOP :f7A.It'IkI. 1AIN 013, C0. d Rt,r°'� tAl xv_w - s - _ vaL saI PG saa WORM i— s� `( 1 ( r !� r Cr �. a� 7 L � \ Our'dooe I ze I rAOccs I "' .- GENERAL INFORMATION ZONE: CENTRAL DISTRICT 2 LOT SIZE: 1.75 ACRES 76,620 SF ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE: 40% 30,648SF ACTUAL TOTAL COVERAGE: - 340 MAIN BUILDING 10,800SF - 338 DORSET 1,800SF - BARN ANNEX 3,300SF 21 % II4 6MF ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM COVERAGE, 90% 69,958SF ACTUAL TOTAL COVERAGE: 71+4% 54,707SF PARKING REQUIREMENTS: RETAIL FLOOR AREA: ' - SUITE 1 1ST FLOOR 1,680SF 1 - 2ND FLOOR 599SF hiC4yt • SUITE 2 1,000SF - SUITE 3 2,1145F - SUITE 4 & 5 2,594SF a 338 61 OSF • TOTAL RETAIL 8,697SF W • APARTMENT �..{ le&171 � . B Ac 4 \ e 338 p' Garage -HVAC Tsa4" awHMCST G NuA4 x , ---- - --^-----^----^-^--- - 340DorSet �I�cr+�,���E'���1T�/' 340 LiE iiWl�a' Gk corraraNaoa�Pc+cxav+naNm� �� °°•. � . w« xr,x¢rwcAl.r�srnrs-xHaasrw -'�-�� ` �'•^°• ,� ,• �i - i� PY9L'aPALTYANSYORSIaA yYG/ ' `< — � - _ �'Q Qewj � T " a ,q* P993BY7aL 71asLBix p - j - l -. - _ - r=- -- t _ `k' `• : b .r.. t'.� lJ' wraeT.u.miHraPwa�.s+r. xru6c8 cuT-on5era19xDLensw�ws p _ w W M"AL HYALRwALL FACY CV34)NF3UWJJ DLUMWALR9 .6 wMYTALHAS:tiel BO,a14SAGiQ CVY_Wo SHM1,011L T.TTMINAl" I Dorset Street rJ o '1 WMY7M.H.WFHawdLL Mo6Ptt CBS-OYP'srHYLUEH Luu.si I I (A� ® 4✓cG r _ii* tZ t i I V fr,UGy LAWDW.AMAUA ap -_ LnNpS WROARRA•. • ACE Key Qi an. Acef rubNm ame Common Name Size j�`'('"ti ^ .' SYR 4 Syringa reticulala MlaciJ Panese Red e Treace 21 2' {I TIL 2 Tilia Cordata Linden Lil4eleaf _ - _ T----8a•-. - -- - SOR 1 .,orbus aucu aria 2112. ARB 25 Arborvitae P Mountain Ash 3» 6010. IQ ;_ ^� 1-✓ DOG 8 Arborvitae 24' ij. ssosv sra J. D — CI t 4 _._ i -' --- - --- -- LANDSC.APSD nReA - I 1. l ��nxinusDogwood 321a d F� F i ETT SITE PLAN DORSET STREET j 1 / VV ZQI ^/11► rvo 2•/t 7 G II M 1 t4 es ?.r le&171 � . B Ac 4 \ e 338 p' Garage -HVAC Tsa4" awHMCST G NuA4 x , ---- - --^-----^----^-^--- - 340DorSet �I�cr+�,���E'���1T�/' 340 LiE iiWl�a' Gk corraraNaoa�Pc+cxav+naNm� �� °°•. � . w« xr,x¢rwcAl.r�srnrs-xHaasrw -'�-�� ` �'•^°• ,� ,• �i - i� PY9L'aPALTYANSYORSIaA yYG/ ' `< — � - _ �'Q Qewj � T " a ,q* P993BY7aL 71asLBix p - j - l -. - _ - r=- -- t _ `k' `• : b .r.. t'.� lJ' wraeT.u.miHraPwa�.s+r. xru6c8 cuT-on5era19xDLensw�ws p _ w W M"AL HYALRwALL FACY CV34)NF3UWJJ DLUMWALR9 .6 wMYTALHAS:tiel BO,a14SAGiQ CVY_Wo SHM1,011L T.TTMINAl" I Dorset Street rJ o '1 WMY7M.H.WFHawdLL Mo6Ptt CBS-OYP'srHYLUEH Luu.si I I (A� ® 4✓cG r _ii* tZ t i I V fr,UGy LAWDW.AMAUA ap -_ LnNpS WROARRA•. • ACE Key Qi an. Acef rubNm ame Common Name Size j�`'('"ti ^ .' SYR 4 Syringa reticulala MlaciJ Panese Red e Treace 21 2' {I TIL 2 Tilia Cordata Linden Lil4eleaf _ - _ T----8a•-. - -- - SOR 1 .,orbus aucu aria 2112. ARB 25 Arborvitae P Mountain Ash 3» 6010. IQ ;_ ^� 1-✓ DOG 8 Arborvitae 24' ij. ssosv sra J. D — CI t 4 _._ i -' --- - --- -- LANDSC.APSD nReA - I 1. l ��nxinusDogwood 321a d F� F i ETT SITE PLAN DORSET STREET j 1 / VV ZQI ^/11► rvo 2•/t 7 G II M 1 t4 es ?.r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 1, 2005 Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy c onough Planning & Zoning Assitant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 12, 2005 Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design Review Application #DR-05-05 Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 9/6/05 (effective 9/6/05) If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTII BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner DATE: August 17, 2005 Cc: Bill Michaud, Four Boys LLC. Re: DRC Hearing August 22, 2005 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Design Review Application DR-05-05 23 San Remo Drive Four Boys LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval for the following exterior modifications: 1) delete roof parapet rail, 2) replace the roof parapet rail by raising the parapet wall, and 3) option to delete porch railings and replace with solid wall. The subject property falls within Design District 2 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(d) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the addition or alteration of the roofline of a building or structure shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations - (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material; window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The proposed amendments are in compliance with this criterion. The extension of the parapet wall is consistent with the design of the building. (b) Materials used. A wide variety of both natural and high quality man-made materials are allowed. Examples of acceptable materials include red brick, indigenous stone (i.e., granite, limestone, and marble), architectural concrete, synthetic stucco; wood clapboard (synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles), and glass or glass block. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing metal railing by continuing the synthetic stucco parapet wall, a material previously approved by the DRC, and in compliance with this criterion. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The applicant is proposing to continue the color of the current wall. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity; however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. There are no proposed changes to windows or doors. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall he included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. This project is unique in its use of a green roof. A parapet surrounding the roof serves not only as a safety measure, but also an aesthetically pleasing architectural element. Staff does not feel that the transition from an open railing to an enclosed wall will substantially affect this criterion. (0 Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. New buildings shall be built to the street property line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows facing the public street. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. The proposed changes involved in this application will actually serve for greater concealment of the rooftop structures. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This application does not change the proposal for a green roof, designed to be visually pleasing as well as retain stormwater. (i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 2 shall comply with the following site design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) Landscape and plantings. One of the unique features of the building is the roof -top garden. With the open railings that had been previously proposed, some of the plantings were to be visible from the street. With the conversion to a closed wall, the plantings will not likely be visible until they grow to a height greater than the wall. The applicant should address this issue, and should consider the use of taller plantings. (b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned. Such features shall be incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a building and its surroundings. Staff feels that the proposed changes, from rail to parapet wall, will be in compliance with this criterion. (d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings, both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access. Access to the rooftop garden will not change as a result of this proposal. (e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. (f) Outdoor Lighting. The applicant did not propose any changes to the existing outdoor lighting. (g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks; and provisions for snow and ice removal from circulation areas. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment. Staff does not feel that the proposed changes will affect the existing plans for this criterion. (i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. This criterion is not applicable to the subject application. -a ' -DR-o J-- os-, I e= it Ntunber CITY OF SOUTH BURILNGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to previde the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board, 1) -Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): / Design Plan Approval Ej Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fw-. #) f7 Z, Z_ 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) ---- 4) CONTACT PERSON (1,Tarne, mailing address, phone and fw.- 4) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: C, 6) TAX PARCEL 1D 9 (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) L4 (Z' eA�nc,2� e-- 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement, or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. M T'he information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. .Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" Y, 17") of all recluired plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submit -Led. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge, h z xy -NGjT,TATUREbF APPLICANT SICTNIATURE OFLAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMSSION: /�' , I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: omplete r 1:1 Incomplete 01fic-t-W-of Planning & Zoning or Designee bate 9 TO'd -1ei01 FOUR BOYS LLC (FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM Kathy Kilt Michaud COMPANY: -- DATE City of South Burlington 8131/05 FAX NUMBER' TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 846-4101 one PHONE NUMBER` SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: 846.4106' RE YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER' 23 San Remo Drive 11 URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT Q PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTE84COliMi MM: Re: Design Review Application DR-05-05 Please amend our request from deleting the building railings to incorporating the railing at b01n the bak*nies and roof top parapet. The revised height of railing is V-0". The rail Will be mounted on top of a 2'-6' parapet wall. The overall height will be X-6' above tt>e finished walking surface. This wilt accommodate the life safety requirements. Thank you for your attention. Should you require any additional information, please Contact me_ 1.4108 FERRY ROAD CHARLOTTE, VT. 06445 PHONE`(402}864.1812 f FAX (802) 862-8391 101 TO' d 6€8 z98 208 'JPJ I 3 S D 6z : s sooz-zz-end A TL State of Vermont r WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-2383 PIN: EJ05-0136 Landowner: Four Boys, LLC attn: Bill Michaud 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 05403 This permit affects property referenced in deeds recorded in Book 471 Page 356 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of an existing building to be occupied by a physical therapy with five employees and 20 patients per day with a therapeutic pool; three one bedroom apartments; and three two bedroom apartments served by municipal water and wastewater services located at 23 San Remo Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Proj. No. 04228 Drawing Number C1 "Site Plan" dated Nov. 2004 last revised 3/8/05 and Drawing Number C2 "Detail and Specification Plan" dated Nov. 2004 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. that have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location or the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-2383 Four Boys, LLC Page 2 5. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 7. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 8. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 1,605 gallons of water per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 9. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The project is approved for a maximum of 1,605 gallons of wastewater per day. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex.) unction, Vermont on May 20, 2005. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By 9�2�� Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING c& ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 5, 2005 William Michaud 14o8 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: 23 San Remo Drive — Re -approval Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on April 5, 2005. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. g J. Be air Administrative Officer Encl. f. i Permit Number SP- v S-01 - 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURI_,INGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on d d, mailin address, phone and fax #) Li P-L-4 - 1912- 14 4zg 39-79- 2_ T, 3 —, i 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Mr , N A i\ /4,t>A P,2 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): , 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) /! 70 pb&Z 3 G 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of fach separate use) CMCI l- 626 31c s b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to rem�i� P, 1$`� 5rL L o 4crrs 2 2� S r c) Total building square footage on propert (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) %d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and xisting build' gs to rema�n, specify asement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new unjits and existing units to remain) �r4-n'� �� 1 f) Number of employees & company v>bicles (existin and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 59� VgoQ-eS E—) i - a 1 tF1 K€S u [. i75 AMr,74c 1" N _ g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed Z.5— % / sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing% / sq. ft. Proposed 72 % / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing d e % / sq. ft. Proposed G . % sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 2,xN= , b) Landscaping: $ "95" (50 c) Other site improvements (pleas list with cost): �,....�� Ca,C.,o,\. 7- f /2 ern ><--,11. 1 C . 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC — �' �iAZajg� a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 9-03-200d 3: 14PP1 FROG 1 P. 2 CIVIL ����Gl��l��stl��lS A'-f.AlAt" . INC, 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Mr. Ray Belair Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 23 Saga Remo Drive Dear Mr. Belair: September 3, 2004 Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 )E,-Mail: mailCocea-vt.com Our office has been asked by Four Boys, LLCC (Bill Michaud) to investigate the additional parking requirements at 23 San Remo Drive as a result of the proposed project. It is our understanding that the existing permit for the proposed project has recently expired and under the new zoning regulations a parking analysis is required. The proposed project will increase the total building size from 7200 sf to 11,289 sf which will result in a total of 5689 sf of medical office use and 6 residential units. Presently there are 2 one bedroom units and 2 two bedroom units on the second level. The City of South Burlington Parking Requirements require one space for every 200 sf of medical office space and two spaces for every residential unit plus an additional space for every four units. Based on these requirements the site would need 28.5 parking spaces for the medical office use and 13.5 spaces for the residential use for a total of 42 spaces. With the creation of the 3 new spaces as part of the proposed project there will be a total of 23 on site parking spaces and the 9 adjacent off site parking spaces shown on the site plan. Our office has completed a shared parking analysis on the proposed site: Bldg. Use Size sf./units Peak Parking Units Weekday 12- 7AM Weekday 7-9 Weekday 9-4 Weekday 4-6 Weeknight 6PM- 12 Weekend Medical 5689sf. 29.5 - 14 17 15 - - Resid. 6 units 13.5 13.5 6 6 6 13.5 13.5 TOTAL 42 20 23 21 13.5 13.5 9703-200A 3:15PH FRUI P.3 Mr. Ray Belair September 3, 2004 Page 2 The medical office parking requirements are based on the number of employees present during each time period. There are currently 2 employees working between 7AM and 9AK 5 employees between 9AM and 4 PM and 3 employees between 4PM and 6'PM. An additional 12 spaces are allotted during the office hours to account for patient parking. It is our understanding that there are currently 6 beds with the physical therapy which will not be increased due to the new addition, as the new addition consists of an indoor pool and exercise area. The proposed expansion will enable the medical office to better serve their existing clientele and will not generate any new positions or clientele as part of this proposed project. During the past three business days Dee Physical Therapy has been monitoring the parking lot and recording the number of vehicles present during the specified time periods. There findings are as follows: 7-9am 9am-1 4-6pm #CV #EV #RV #CV I #EV #RV #CV #EV #RV Monday 8/30/04 1 3 1 3 6 0 3 3 1 Tuesda • (8/31/04) 0 2 1 1 5 0 3 3 0 Wednesday 9/1/04 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 Notes: #CC =Number of customer vehicles using parking lot. #.EC = Number of employee vehicles using parking lot. #RC = Number of residential vehicles using parking lot. The numbers within this table represent the highest number of cars using the parking lot during each of the time periods specified above during normal business hours. These numbers are less than those within our parking analysis table. Our office has also made periodic site investigations, during which an average of only 6-9 cars were using the parking lot during any one time. 9-©3-20074 3:15PP1 FROH P.4 1 Mr. Ray Belair September 3, 2004 Page 3 It is our opinion that the present uses are very compatible with regards to shared parking and will not necessitate any additional parking spaces other than what is shown on the proposed site plan. If you should have any questions or should need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock, P.E. cc: Bill Michaud P'AutoCADD Projec2\2004\0422rBe1air.wpd SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 March 25, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Christopher Galipeau PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: 23 San Remo Drive Dear Christopher: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 2. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #l, and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." Please add this note to future plans in visible locations. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 3. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the `Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 4. When the connection is made at the existing 2" service for the new 1.5" line, a new curb stop shall be installed on the 2" service line, downstream of the new connection. This will enable the existing building to be shut off without interruption of water service to the new addition. This new connection and installation of the addition 2" curb stop will require an interruption in service to the existing building. 5. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 6. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 7. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 8. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 9. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Aiily, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Brian Robertson Plait Reviews: 23 San Remo Dr 2-25-05 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 6, 2004 Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Minutes — 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the September 21, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, c Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD�� 21 SEPTEMBER 2004� Mr. Burke explained that property owners want to put in decks. The sewer issue has been resolved. Mr. Belter will retain rights over the easement property for maintenance of the sewer. The strip being added across the backs of the two lots is 15 feet wide. There will be no grading changes. The finished grade will be the same as what was approved. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-60 of White Rock Development, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 21 September 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 06. Site Plan Application #SP-04-31 of Bill Michaud for re -approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 7200 sq. ft. building consisting of 3600 sq. ft. of medical office and four dwelling units. The amendment consists of constructing a 4089 sq. ft. addition which will consist of 2089 sq. ft. of medical office use and two dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive: Mr. Michaud said he did not get a building permit within the 6-month time frame. He then showed some parking modifications that have been made. Members asked about the "rubber roof." Mr. Michaud explained the nature of this as it is used for plantings. It is a "tray" system which will be maintained as such. Mr. Belair noted the applicant will have to maintain the plantings. If they want to do away with the "rubber roof," they will have to come back to the Board. Mr. Dinklage referred to the shared parking arrangement and noted that if there are any problems, the applicant must come back to the Board. He also reminded the applicant that the requirements of the Design Review Board are still in effect. Dr. Dean said he has a medical office in the building and asked if there would be a problem if he expanded his hours to 7 p.m. Mr. Belair said it would be a problem if it changes the shared parking analysis. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-04-31 of Bill Michaud subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 21 September 2004. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan Application #SP-04-30 Of Northern Builders, Inc., to amend a previously approved plan for an 11, 110 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of constructing a 520 sq. ft. addition, 1717 Williston Road: Mr. Rosenberg said he would like to get a waiver for the landscaping requirement. The addition is "rounding off a jag" in the building. He said he wouldn't know where to put any trees as it is very wooded in the back. -3- Distinctive Landscaping GREENBUSH RD. • CHARLOTTE, VERMONT 05445.425-2877 Thursday, January 16, 2003 Ted Montgomery Indiana Architecture 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte, VT 05445 Dear Ted: Enclosed is the estimate for the plantings at San Remo Drive for Bill Michaud and Mike Dee. I have priced all of the plantings, installed and guaranteed. I didn't include the supply and placement of topsoil as this is commonly done by the sitework contractor. I also included the materials for creating the rooftop garden. I do not have the labor and machinery to get to soil up onto the roof in the estimate... I was hoping Bill Michaud could provide some insight as to how this would be accomplished. I did put a number of hours to install the matting and soil and plugs, however. I'm sorry this didn't go out last month. Thanks for thinking of us. We look forward to moving forward. Sincerely, . � �:z e�� Charlie Proutt, ASLA "Landscaping by Design" Distinctive LandscapingGREENBUSH RD. • CHARLOTTE, VERMONT 05445.425-2877 January 16, 2003 Ted Montgomery Project Title: San Remo Drive Planting Estimate Indiana Architecture Project Number: 4767 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte, VT 05445 The following list itemizes the products needed to complete your landscaping project Lawns 17 SF Seeded Lawn per 100 SF 10-20K Planting 600 $ Allowance for removal and planting of existing trees (3 3 EA Gleditsia triacanthos 'Halka' 3.5" Cal Halka Thornless Honeylocust 20 EA Pinus mugo mugo 24" Spd Mugo Pine 5 EA Pyrus calleryana Chanticleer 3" Cal Chanticleer Pear 10 EA Rhododendron 'PJM' 18" Ht PJM Rhododendron 100 EA Spiraea japonica 'Neon Flash' 15" Ht Neon Flash Spirea Sitework 1,400 $ Allowance for drainage mat for rooftop 7,200 $ Allowance for perennial plugs for the rooftop garden 2,400 $ Allowance for rooftop soil mix 72 HR Labor for Sitework estimated to create rooftop garden Lawns Total Planting Total Sitework Total Project Total 206.38 10,524.08 13,520.00 24,250.47 "Landscaping by Design" — r San Remo Drive -tea • ,` \ Pa - - liaht 1 ugtrt t � ugnt 1 Y �1 .,._...4, _..—._ New si,t.walk - -- - Nf(e Wants) 1 stkp tree stkp vas t J • \ ``.t O ii r $f (40 Wants) ^, O a O Salptva 1 �� CC (3 Wants) Relocate _ Bench t ,X ' S ®3YK: Eslatkrp j• I �. % .r Nf (7 Wants )) Us -� Mature hto•6'_ _ _ w� Y_1 !1 WantlnW `txlst•rA EM,.t xteed "- Ebc panda V�.J Waxings ; Q J I Biker Pe � I l , , , © ; ± l tiNA I l ; I - -- NewCbmrnen:ial f � i . Roofdrak to Ezisting building stern Sewer Note w Otilitim j ' The Water & Sewer i comrectiohs and locations are not ca$d5mted. Q k Qoaa000 I� `PJM (10 plaids) ' ---- y W VAL AR --- • A� - — AC PC Relocated troe:_ _i _____.__ ___________ _____ _ __________ _________ _ _________ l oe Enstino Relocated Plantlrgs ___ ,_- vee t f�__ __ 3 new parldno spies f Nf (13 Wants) o O � � t -- ljgt t t �P Ang Durrp=tw new Exi gate tree 1 light 1 approximate property line 162• _-- — i1 Site Plan E : First floor I 1 � 1; o e OU VUj Note to Root Garden, y o } This feature is designed to provide slormwater _■ ._y3?4, V f retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains 4 ' when saturation conditions are present � ooE s (tJ o E^ - ®Lautlm /or AC �✓ eoalkalow•er C Orr m C uj Roof Garden ,• ® ; :•;= neenn 1 � � Strucfurgren9� g 103 o- MP (20 Plant=) Meohanicai eingineenng O \J \/ k Landscaiae architecture Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Construction Management Parking Lot coverage 49"/o 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bid$ 50010 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information Please refer to Civil Engineering Associates letter of September 3, 2004 Date: 908004 i Phtn1tingStJule Scale: Key Common Name Scfenn,/lcname Qty. Size Revisions Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" 10.4.04 I Snow removal CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer, 23 San Remo Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triscanthos B&B inerims Shademastee Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Orive Nf Neon Flash Spites Spiraca 104 15" h. South Burlington Vf japortien 864-1812 PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Job 04no Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Ged 3 24" Sheet Al MP Mugo Pine Pinus mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Description Lighting Schedule Floor plans Light I Lumec "New Westminster' on 16 pole to match style of street lights Light 2 ):�A Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted y.d� �.rra CcpyrCl"C3DSr durrd3�rAecM+Ca 1 ri �- r San Remo Drive KI r1 � rG/i' ///// ////i/ / �,. �/Gib%/r.,//,o✓�/%��%�///%/ %/ r�%%/_�/n - /o /' ■.�am�m��s oor�i0000000000000��:0 � - pop 1/ � I AI r. �•�11 �!I 4 o - - 1 Ut, a LT==-- MWER J_ Pc 10111 riN o I Re _ Eristirg plantugs --- g D�arpatar new gate app .A—te property line 162' Site Plan & First floor 1 0 Relocated ' Voe j 3 new parking spaces Nf 0 3 plane) $ _ 0 E)dstrg ugnt 1 9 1 N } �9 Nok to Roof GarJ-i This feature is designed to provide siormwater retention It will drain into two interttal roof drains when saturation conditions are present. I --- - -- Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 50% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information Please refer to Civil Engineering Associates letter of September 3, 2004 Planting Schedule Key Common Name Scientificname Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyres 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B Chanticlece Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanlhas B&B lnermis 'Shademastee Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spirses 104 15" It. Japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Grd 3 24" MP Mugo Pine Pins mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Construction Mana96r: Lighting Schedule 1-10or Mot to Light I Lumec 'New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 ):�A Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MB white mounted . - ". rnnemaaa^ra„a �erb.�ay w Cuq,�Yatrraa pp„dawaNa+da CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 16, 2004 \drb\sit\four boys\site_plan.doc Plans received: September 14, 2004 FOUR BOYS, LLC SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-04-31 Agenda #5 Meeting date: September 21, 2004 Owner/Applicant Property Information Four Boys, LLC Tax Parcel 1490-00023-C 1408 Derby Road Central District 2 (CD2) Charlotte, VT 05445 22,356 square feet Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\four boys\site plan.doc Bill Michaud, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan re -approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 7200 sq ft building consisting of 3600 sq ft of medical office and four (4) dwelling units. The amendment consists of constructing a 4089 sq ft addition which will consist of 2089 sq ft of medical office use and two (2) dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 14, 2004 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: The proposed density for the property is an F.A. R. of 0.5. This is the maximum allowed F.A.R. for the CD2 District. Therefore, the proposed density complies with the zoning regulations. 2. The proposed building coverage for the lot is 25%. The maximum allowed building coverage for the CD2 District is 40%. The proposed overall coverage for the lot is 72%. The maximum allowed overall coverage for the CD2 District is 90%. The proposal complies with the lot coverage requirements of the zoning regulations. The DRB notes that the proposed garden roof will mitigate the proposed lot coverage. 3. Pursuant to Section 14.402(b) of the zoning regulations, allowable building envelopes along San Remo Drive shall be between 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way and 80 ft. from the nearest edge of the right-of-way. The building envelope is greater than 80 ft. from the San Remo Drive right-of-way, but this is a condition of the existing structure and not the proposed new structure. The plans indicate that the new structure is at least 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way on the north and the east sides. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed project has been planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement. Pursuant to Table 13-2 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require 42 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 23 parking spaces. Since the medical office and residential units will have different peak -hour parking demands, the applicant has submitted a shared CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\four boys\site plan.doc parking analysis that indicates the proposed project will require a total of 23 parking spaces (attached). 1. The Development Review Board approves a total of 23 parking spaces on the subject property. Pursuant to Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans depict a bicycle rack. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking spaces are located to the side and rear of the building. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The maximum height for a pitched roof in the CD2 District is 45 ft. The maximum height for a flat roof is 35 ft. The proposed structure will be 34 ft. 3 112" to the top of the pitched stairwell roof. The flat roof will be 24 ft. high. Therefore, the proposed addition complies with the height requirements of the CD2 District. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The proposed project complies with the Design Review approval (#DR-02-19) from January 28, 2003 (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project complies with the Design Review approval (#DR-02-19) from January 28, 2003. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access easements as part of the proposed project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\four boys\site plan.doc (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show an adequately screened dumpster on the northwesterly comer of the subject property- (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Pursuant to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require a minimum of $10,500 of landscaping. The application states that $10,500 of landscaping will be planted on the site, plus 12,000 will be dedicated to the roof garden. Staff feels that this could be sufficient. However, pursuant to Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant must submit a landscape budget indicating the value of the proposed landscaping. This budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or landscape professional. The budget will give the Development Review Board sufficient information to determine if the minimum landscaping requirement is being met. 3. Prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall submit a landscape budget, prepared by a landscape architect or landscape professional, that indicates the minimum landscaping requirement is being met. 4. The applicant shall post a landscape bond for $10,500, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans do not depict proposed snow storage areas. 5. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict designated snow storage areas, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Lighting The applicant proposes using 100W recessed can lights, two wall mounted exterior light fixtures, and one 12 ft. Lumec "New Westminster" light within the project parking lot. The DRC requested that the soffit lights be reduced in wattage such that the illumination at the sidewalk not exceed 5 foot candles. The DRB agrees that illumination at the sidewalk should not exceed 5 foot candles. Access/Circulation Vehicular access to the site will remain unchanged. Pedestrian access will be enhanced with new sidewalks and inviting site design elements as discussed above. No changes to the existing traffic circulation patterns are proposed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\four boys\site plan.doc Traffic According to the ITE, 7th Edition (Land Use 814), the proposed 520 square foot addition will increase traffic on the subject property by 1.41 P.M. peak -hour vtes. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall pay applicable traffic impact fees. Other 7. If necessary, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Staff recommends that the South Application #SP-04-30, conditional "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Bill Michaud Burlington Development Review Board approve Site Plan upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the C1VI L ENNGlINst"kI NG A I'S ISOJCIArefS. 11 IN 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Mr. Ray Belair Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Belair: September 3, 2004 Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Our office has been asked by Four Boys, LLC (Bill Michaud) to investigate the additional parking requirements at 23 San Remo Drive as a result of the proposed project. It is our understanding that the existing permit for the proposed project has recently expired and under the new zoning regulations a parking analysis is required. The proposed project will increase the total building size from 7200 sf to 11,289 sf which will result in a total of 5689 sf of medical office use and 6 residential units. Presently there are 2 one bedroom units and 2 two bedroom units on the second level. The City of South Burlington Parking Requirements require one space for every 200 sf of medical office space and two spaces for every residential unit plus an additional space for every four units. Based on these requirements the site would need 28.5 parking spaces for the medical office use and 13.5 spaces for the residential use for a total of 42 spaces. With the creation of the 3 new spaces as part of the proposed project there will be a total of 23 on site parking spaces and the 9 adjacent off site parking spaces shown on the site plan. Our office has completed a shared parking analysis on the proposed site: Bldg. Use Size sf./units Peak Parking Units Weekday 12- 7AM Weekday 7-9 Weekday 94 Weekday 4-6 Weeknight 6PM- 12 Weekend Medical 5689sf. 28.5 - 14 17 15 - - Resid. 6 units 13.5 13.5 6 6 6 13.5 13.5 TOTAL 42 20 23 21 13.5 13.5 Mr. Ray Belair September 3, 2004 Page 2 The medical office parking requirements are based on the number of employees present during each time period. There are currently 2 employees working between 7AM and 9AM, 5 employees between 9AM and 4 PM and 3 employees between 4PM and 6PM. An additional 12 spaces are allotted during the office hours to account for patient parking. It is our understanding that there are currently 6 beds with the physical therapy which will not be increased due to the new addition, as the new addition consists of an indoor pool and exercise area. The proposed expansion will enable the medical office to better serve their existing clientele and will not generate any new positions or clientele as part of this proposed project. During the past three business days Dee Physical Therapy has been monitoring the parking lot and recording the number of vehicles present during the specified time periods. There findings are as follows: 7-9am 9am-4 m 4-6pm #CV #EV #RV #CV #EV #RV #CV #EV #RV Monday 8/30/04 1 3 1 3 6 0 3 3 1 Tuesday (8/31/04) 0 2 1 1 5 0 3 3 0 Wednesday 9/1/04 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 Notes: #CC = Number of customer vehicles using parking lot. #EC = Number of employee vehicles using parking lot. #RC = Number of residential vehicles using parking lot. The numbers within this table represent the highest number of cars using the parking lot during each of the time periods specified above during normal business hours. These numbers are less than those within our parking analysis table. Our office has also made periodic site investigations, during which an average of only 6-9 cars were using the parking lot during any one time. Mr. Ray Belair September 3, 2004 Page 3 It is our opinion that the present uses are very compatible with regards to shared parking and will not necessitate any additional parking spaces other than what is shown on the proposed site plan. If you should have any questions or should need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. --- r --- -- -- ' ----1 - - cc: Bill Michaud PAAutoCADD Projects\2004\04228\Be1air.wpd 461,- W C-1 Is Vj %1_, J�1_, j1� I v• V7 0 ® / \ / \ / _ \ Note to Rwf Garden: This feature is designed to prrnide stormwater retention. It will drain into two internal rwf drains i when saturation conditions are present ----------5 --- San Remo Drive • LJZZMM M.■/ H . / //H//////HHH/H///HHHH ,•:: / ///H/H//H//////H/HHH HH///H/////.%// •'�H//H////////////////H////////H///HLWb;W/H/b�y/H///. y:'%H///////H/H///.�I � r \ oistingo Nf (32 o of a 0 0 o u� ♦�oo • .1 Bench E kid plientinair Extended cabinat el — ■ o �w.��r �10�, El „ New Ci mmercial d Light 1 Roof drains to Existing building storm sewer -- Note on Utilities: - -- The Water & Sewer m J wnrrrxtions and locations i are not confirmed. tt� 0 �0�0 I ,n '-PJM (10 plants) e ererren � � yy PC $ I 1 Na,• 1 aa..3• i I 0® Relocated treezz / 6 Existing _ Relocated plantings --- 7 ' tree i 3 new parking spaces Nf (i 3 plants) !! LIg 1 Existing wri�Mtar gate tree , J ! Lil7ht 1 approximate property line 162' Site Plan & First floor v ❑• 0 \/ l.aetia"farAC \ ' / IL//_��I md'mi awn �r/ I 0 Roof Garden il-, Otl ,, w p a 6 H.H MP (20 Plal r 4 �O-C30 Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot dze 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.RAotal bldg 50% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking Information Please refer to Civil Engineering Associates letter of September 3, 2004 Planting Schedule Key Common Name Scientific name Qiy. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST niacanthos B&B inermis 'Shademastee Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea. 104 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbiense Ged 3 24" MP Mugo Pine Pious mugo 20 24" mugo B&B LlghHng Schedule Light t Lumec "New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 OA Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffttier" SYM-1 C Light B BEGA wall E I V E D 2492MH whi mounted SEP 14 2004 City of So. Burlington t R E O w a) N o w ti C j � rn U U N U m o h Cin � 0 � gv t} tV N O v F— oD Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 9.8.04 Scale: Revisions 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 0 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job 0409 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans rnra,mc„ma"ra"n w w"pn a"a weac NrcolFalaYtl MNn ae NabunwM of aeMc", h fMM.Ga'e'of draurWSWe1 AIC"IteLb, entl le notbMUsaEN wM1Na Mpwr /w Waw arry�r I"MI//Me wnfNn PanrYaNar ArwMpacb. eon ®��, (3'owMSlvdl ArchhacR CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 16, 2004 ldrb\sit\four boys\site_plan.doc Plans received: September 14, 2004 FOUR BOYS, LLC SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP 84-31 Agenda #5 Meeting date: September 21, 2004 Owner/Applicant Property Information Four Boys, LLC Tax Parcel 1490-00023-C 1408 Derby Road Central District 2 (CD2) Charlotte, VT 05445 22,356 square feet Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ? DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ,.drb\sit\four boys\site plan.doc Bill Michaud, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan re -approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 7200 sq ft building consisting of 3600 sq ft of medical office and four (4) dwelling units. The amendment consists of constructing a 4089 sq ft addition which will consist of 2089 sq ft of medical office use and two (2) dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 14, 2004 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: The proposed density for the property is an F.A.R. of 0.5. This is the maximum allowed F.A.R. for the CD2 District. Therefore, the proposed density complies with the zoning regulations. 2. The proposed building coverage for the lot is 25%. The maximum allowed building coverage for the CD2 District is 40%. The proposed overall coverage for the lot is 72%. The maximum allowed overall coverage for the CD2 District is 90%. The proposal complies with the lot coverage requirements of the zoning regulations. The DRB notes that the proposed garden roof will mitigate the proposed lot coverage. 3. Pursuant to Section 14.402(b) of the zoning regulations, allowable building envelopes along San Remo Drive shall be between 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way and 80 ft. from the nearest edge of the right-of-way. The building envelope is greater than 80 ft. from the San Remo Drive right-of-way, but this is a condition of the existing structure and not the proposed new structure. The plans indicate that the new structure is at least 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way on the north and the east sides. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas The proposed project has been planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement. Pursuant to Table 13-2 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require 42 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 23 parking spaces. Since the medical office and residential units will have different peak -hour parking demands, the applicant has submitted a shared CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sit\four bovs\site plan.doc parking analysis that indicates the proposed project will require a total of 23 parking spaces (attached). 1. The Development Review Board approves a total of 23 parking spaces on the subject property. Pursuant to Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans depict a bicycle rack. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking spaces are located to the side and rear of the building. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The maximum height for a pitched roof in the CD2 District is 45 ft. The maximum height for a flat roof is 35 ft. The proposed structure will be 34 ft. 3 Y2" to the top of the pitched stairwell roof. The flat roof will be 24 ft. high. Therefore, the proposed addition complies with the height requirements of the CD2 District. (d) !Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 4e) The Dl?B shall encourage the use of.a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The proposed project complies with the Design Review approval (#DR-02-19) from January 28, 2003. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed project complies with the Design Review approval (#DR-02-19) from January 28, 2003. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street; to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access easements as part of the proposed project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sitlfour boys\site olan.dcc (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show an adequately screened dumpster on the northwesterly comer of the subject property- (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements Pursuant to Table 13-9 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require a minimum of $10,500 of landscaping. The application states that $10,500 of landscaping will be planted on the site, plus 12,000 will be dedicated to the roof garden. Staff feels that this could be sufficient. However, pursuant to Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant must submit a landscape budget indicating the value of the proposed landscaping. This budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or landscape professional. The budget will give the Development Review Board sufficient information to determine if the minimum landscaping requirement is being met_ 3. Prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall submit a landscape budget, prepared by a landscape architect or landscape professional, that indicates the minimum landscaping requirement is being met. 4. The applicant shall post a landscape bond for $10,500, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving_ Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans do not depict proposed snow storage areas. 5. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict designated snow storage areas, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Lighting The applicant proposes using 10OW recessed can lights, two wall mounted exterior light fixtures, and one 12 ft. Lumec "New Westminster' light within the project parking lot. The DRC requested that the soffit lights be reduced in wattage such that the illumination at the sidewalk not exceed 5 foot candles. The DRB agrees that illumination at the sidewalk should not exceed 5 foot candles. Access/Circulation Vehicular access to the site will remain unchanged. Pedestrian access will be enhanced with new sidewalks and inviting site design elements as discussed above. No changes to the existing traffic circulation patterns are proposed CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 1drb1sitlfour boyslsite olan.doc Traffic According to the ITE, 7'h Edition (Land Use 814), the proposed 520 square foot addition will increase traffic on the subject property by 1.41 P.M. peak -hour vtes. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall pay applicable traffic impact fees. Other 7. If necessary, the applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to issuance of a zoning pen -nit. Staff recommends that the South Application #SP-04-30, conditional "Comments" section of this document_ Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Bill Michaud Burlington Development Review Board approve Site Plan upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the 328 Fails Road R(I Box 485 Sheibnme, VT 95�82 Mr. Ray Belair Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 23 San Ream Drive Dear Mr. Belair: September 3, 2004 phone. 3412-985-21-210 F am. a 02'985-227? ..,E-Mail: lllilaa3l @'Cu�.h- t.i'Safii Our office has been asked by Four Boys, LLC (Bill Michaud) to investigate the additional parking requirements at 23 San Remo Drive as a result of the proposed project. It is our understanding that the existing permit for the proposed project has recently expired and under the new zoning regulations a parking analysis is required. The proposed project will increase the total building size from 7200 sf to 11,289 sf which will result in a total of 5689 sf of medical office use and 6 residential units. Presently there are 2 one bedroom units and 2 two bedroom units on the second level. The City of South Burlington Parking Requirements require one space for every 200 sf of medical office space and two spaces for every residential unit plus an additional space for every four units. Based on these requirements the site would need 28.5 parking spaces for the medical office use and 13.5 spaces for the residential use for a total of 42 spaces. With the creation of the 3 new spaces as part of the proposed project there will be a total of 23 on site parking spaces and the 9 adjacent off site parking spaces shown on the site plan. Our office has completed a shared parking analysis on the proposed site: Bldg. Use Size sf./units Peak Parking Units Weekday 12- 7AM Weekday 7-9 Weekday 9-4 Weekday 4-6 Weeknight 6PM- 12 Weekend Medical 5689sf. 28.5 - 14 17 15 - - Resid. 6 units 13.5 13.5 6 6 6 13.5 13.5 TOTAL 42 20 23 21 13.5 13.5 Mr. Ray Belair September 3, 2004 Page 2 The medical office parking requirements are based on the number of employees present during each time period. There are currently 2 employees working between 7AM and 9AM, 5 employees between 9AM and 4 PM and 3 employees between 4PM and 6PM. An additional 12 spaces are allotted during the office hours to account for patient parking. It is our understanding that there are currently 6 beds with the physical therapy which will not be increased due to the new addition, as the new addition consists of an indoor pool and exercise area. The proposed expansion will enable the medical office to better serve their existing clientele and will not generate any new positions or clientele as part of this proposed project. During the past three business days Dee Physical Therapy has been monitoring the parking lot and recording the number of vehicles present during the specified time periods. There findings are as follows: 7-9am 9am-4 m 4-6pm #CV #EV #RV #CV #EV #RV #CV #EV #RV Monday (8/30/04) 1 3 1 3 6 0 3 3 1 Tuesday (8/31/04) 0 2 1 1 5 0 3 3 0 Wednesday (9/1/04) 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 2 0 Notes: #CC = Number of customer vehicles using parking lot. #EC = Number of employee vehicles using parking lot. #RC = Number of residential vehicles using parking lot. The numbers within this table represent the highest number of cars using the parking lot duri- each of the time periods specified above during normal business hours. These numbers are/ than those within our parking analysis table. Our office has also made periodic site investi/ during which an average of only 6-9 cars were using the parking lot during any one time / Mr. lay 13elair September 3, 2004 Rage 3 It is our opinion that the present uses are very compatible with regards to shared parking and will not necessitate any additional parking spaces other than what is shown on the proposed site plan. If you should have any questions or should need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. cc: Bill Michaud P:�AutoCADD Projects\2004104228113e1air.wpd 1 —fl (8 plants) ecateOd tre� rntlnps '� If C - n. w �Jie f U✓�1 — _- _ San Remo Drive r Ming tie) sculpture 1 Bench ,E. ding qplantings tiA a Relocated tree - V Existing emkrps 0 wmpatw \ new gate approximate property line 162, ite Plan 8c First floor as o.ei C A p k, a' a Cg (3 plants) Relocate Extended ca Bike rack New C,')mmercial yeti,.... � �_ *�nria�rce5 tt�;w;,af f�� '• Existing building f' � � Roof drains to _ _ storm sewer ' Now on Utilities: The Water & Sewer Ji--'- connections and locations / are not confirmed. (DHI O(Do00 E I. (J pJM (10 plants) Bench S N G4 Gt - Be= T pO \ Relocated tree I / 3 new perking spates Nt (13 plants) 0 Existing I \ t1 I Light 1 Light 1 AA- 1 J Now W Roof Garden: This feature is designed to provide stormwater \. retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions are present Ee O Roof Garden ptcin Second floor Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf _ Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 50e/9 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information Please refer to Civil Engineering Associates letter of September 3, 2004 Planting Schedule Key Cortimon Name Sciend; fic name QV. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B mennis 'Shademastef Nf Neon Flash Spires Spiraea 104 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" It. Rhododendron Cg Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Cmawbiense Grid 3 24" Mp Mugo Pine Plaits mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light I Lumec "New Westminster" on 16' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 ',(�A Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffttier" SYM-1 Pya� ��� `L"' Light B BEGA wall 2492MH whi "'"" ' " mounted yy ,, City of So, Burlington w N U i ai m � m A¢``, m j V tt- OM �o m C 011� Ira: z N R � � n I et co Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Dare: 9®8.04 Seale: Revisions 23 San Remo Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Orive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job 04 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans rMoram9rsfad n.mo.�� °B�ioa'w'"' . ra frewnpmfymomunwweaaronfxro, ma U "ofb0ppe�rorplwONw9de In W.r( OIIBw �GmurtlS� fhe virltWnpmmlaelm COpyrl�f ®TIXM Grp"94AwIl A2IrXec(a No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 17, 2004 Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, r Betsy Mc onough Administrative Assistant Encl. l CITY OF SOUTH BLTRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 22, 2004 Bill Michaud 14o8 Derby Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-04-31 Dear Mr. Michaud: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 9/21/04 (effective 9/21/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. cerely, U C� Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. w Pen -nit Number SP-�-� CITY OF SOUTH BUF LINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OW, NER OF RECORD Name as shown on deed, mailing.address, phone and fax #) Fot Boys LLC 1408 Perry Rd. Charlotte, VT 0445 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) N/A (missing from 1st applicata.>on) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Michaud 1408 Ferry Rd. Charlotte, VT 05445 (802)864-1812p (802) 862-8391 f 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as above 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1490 00023C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 1st floor Commercial DEE Physical Therapy (3600SF), 2nd floor 4 apartments (36005 b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) lst floor Commercial DEE Physical Therapy 2089SF, 2nd floor 2 apartments 2000SF new additioml SF c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Proposed building 4089 SF new construction,existing to remain — no demo d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Existing building 27' to roof ridge, New Building 34' —3" to roof ridge of stairwell, 2 floors in both buildings roof deck available to building tenants. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Existing building 4 apartments at 2nd floor, new building 2 apartments at 2nd floor f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and prosed, note office versus non -office employees): DEE PhVGi teal Therapy S Pmi 1 cLyePq/S vPhi rl PR - nPw c-_nmmPrei al 4 e= 4 vehicles g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 16 % Proposed 25 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 61 % Proposed 72 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existingno chane proposed no change .% 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) b) Landscaping: •• 26 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Roof Garden $12 , 000.00 Benches , 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 40 patient visits (existing) + 12 patient (new) 5 Staff existing + 4 stAff new b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 20 + 6 patient visit c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 20 + 6 patient visit 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7-10 AM 5-7PM 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 1 year from Building Permit 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 2 , ,w I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAT RE OF APPLICANT SIGNATLMR OF PROPERTY OWNER i_ p Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Administrative Officer or Designee Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 11 ' SITE PLAN #SP 02 $2 DESIGN REVIEW #DR 02-19 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Bill Michaud, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan and design review approval for 4089 sq. ft. of new construction to contain 2089 sq. ft, of medical use and two 1000 sq. ft. dwelling units. The South Burlington Development Review Board t,�/�,,u� ---� (DRB) held a public hearing on January-21, 2003. Michael Dee and Architect Ted — Montgomery represented the applicant Based on the testimony given at the above mentioned public hearing and on the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the DRB finds, concludes and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT The applicant is requesting site plan and design review approval for 4089 sq. ft. of new construction to contain 2089 sq. ft. of medical use and two 1000 sq. ft. dwelling units. The subject property contains an existing 7200 sq. ft. structure including 3600 sq. ft. of medical office use and 4 dwelling units. 2. Four Boys, LLC, received Site Plan approval from the DRB on October 17, 2000, for the addition of two 1200 sq. ft. dwelling units and two 600 sq. ft. dwelling units to the existing structure, subject to 10 conditions. However, two of these previously approved dwelling units were not built. The Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the current proposal on December 23, 2002. 4. Four Boys, LLC, is the record owner of the property (warranty deed in Volume 471, Page 356 of the city land records). The property is identified as Tax Parcel 1490 00023 C. 5. The subject lot contains 22,356 sq. ft. and is located in the Central District 2 (CD2) and Design Overlay District 2 at 23 San Remo Drive. CONCLUSIONS DIMENSONAL REQUIREMENTS The proposed density for the property is an F.A.R. of 0.5. This is the maximum allowed F.A.R. for the CD2 District. Therefore, the proposed density complies with the zoning regulations. 2. The proposed building coverage for the lot is 25%. The maximum allowed building coverage for the CD2 District is 40%. The proposed overall coverage for dk\ I/A k G'�1 � �/Pi/�� Il1Q l�f'�LiG1v� �Gf2Yo[� 17 ��.,..� f 6zyv-, �9f Aq �ekt cii Z,4� FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION #SP 02-62 & #DR 02-19 the lot is 72%. The maximum allowed overall coverage for the CD2 District is 90%. The proposal complies with the lot coverage requirements of the zoning regulations. The DRB notes that the proposed garden roof will mitigate the proposed lot coverage.. Ak, )* ` 3. Pursuant to Section 14.402(b) of the zoning regulations, allowable building envelopes along San Remo Drive shall be between 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way and 80 ft. from the nearest edge of the right-of-way. The building envelope is greater than 80 ft. from the San Remo Drive right-of-way, but this is a condition of the existing structure and not the proposed new structure. The plans indicate that the new structure is at least 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of- way on the north and the east sides. 4. The maximum height for a pitched roof in the CD2 District is 45 ft. The maximum height for a flat roof is 35 ft. The proposed structure will be 34 ft. 3 '/2" to the top of the pitched stairwell roof. The flat roof will be 24 ft. high. Therefore, the proposed addition complies with the height requirements of the CD2 District. 5. Access is provided via a 26 ft. ingress and egress curb cut, and a 13 ft. wide egress -only curb cut. Both access points are on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to an adjacent lot to the southwest. There are no proposed changes to access or circulation. The DRB concludes that existing access and circulation conditions are adequate. i, /1 ` L 6. No new signage is proposed, but there is an illegal wall sign on the western elevation. No design review approval or permit has been issued for this sign. This violation must be corrected prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the proposed addition. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA The DRB must find that the proposal conforms substantially to the building and site design criteria outlined in Section 24.40 of the zoning regulations. 7. Consistent Design. The proposed addition is inventive and departs from the form of the existing structure. However, the architect incorporated many of the design elements of the existing structure into the proposed addition. The architect also proposes a covered walkway along the western side of the existing structure, which matches the setback of the proposed addition and encloses a l;' L) small garden space. Likewise, on the southeast corner, a garden wall extends out and matches the setback of the existing structure. The DRB concludes that the color palette, proposed textures, scale, and design elements of the addition function to integrate the two structures and create a unified look for the entire property. 8. Materials. High quality materials shall be used on all buildings. The applicant proposes to use faux wood grain siding (same as existing) on the first floor of the proposed addition. The second floor siding is 8" wide vinyl without a texture. The roof top garden wall and peak over an enclosed stairwell is sheeted in a synthetic insulating compound that resembles stucco (DrivitTM). The proposed materials comply with the requirements of Section 24.4011(b) of the z regulations. \sit\michaud\SP#02-62.fcd.doc f l -ey "1 v �` h) 2 �-i� FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION #SP 02-62 & #DR 02-19 6 �_ 3( 9. Colors & Textures. Colors of the new structure include teal, which will be applied to the synthetic stucco and is the color of the existing structure's roof, and light gray, which is the siding color of the existing building. The applicant proposes another color, tan, for the 8" wide vinyl siding. The color swatches do not represent a specific manufactured brand of paint, but the intent is to match the existing colors. The DRB concludes that the proposed color and texture will be harmonious with the existina structure. ;1L 10. Windows and Doors. The fenestration of the addition mimics the paired metal frame windows of the existing building. A continuation of the paired window openings is repeated within a garden wall allowing visual access to a small garden space. The proposed locations of windows and doorways respond to the interior layout of the addition. The DRB concludes that the fenestration conforms to Section 24.401 ) If the g regulations. 11. Human scale Design Elements. The propbsed addition provides human scale design features. The applicant proposes using metal awnings over the windows on the northern and eastern first floor elevation to help relate the 2'/2 story building to the pedestrian. The location of an enclosed stairwell on the interior of the structure does not dominate a public side of the building. The synthetic stucco contains some windows to break up the massive wall found in the peak of the roof. These windows also allow natural light into the stairwell. The applicant proposes extensive plantings, which creates an environment inviting to the pedestrian. 12. Roofs as Design Elements: The proposed roof over the stairwell contains a pitch of 7 on 12. The minimum requirement for a two story structure in the CD2 District is a 5 on 12 pitch. The maximum pitch for the CD2 District is 12 on 12. Therefore, the pitch of the stairwell roof complies with the requirements. However, the proposed pitch needs to be noted on the plans. Where flat roofs are used in the CD2 District on structures of 2 or more stories, they must include architectural elements to improve appearance and provide interest. The proposed flat roof will be an innovative "green" roof containing a garden area and designed to provide stormwater retention. As noted already in this report, the garden wall will be sheeted with a teal colored stucco -like material, which mimics the roof color of the existing structure. The DRE oncludes that the roof design q conforms to Section 24.401(f) of the z -1 regulations. --�� 0 _r(r 13. Orient Buildings to ulic Street. In the CD2 District, new buildings shall be l built to the street property line. However, the configuration of the existing building ` does not conform to this requirement and the proposed addition does not extend to the property line. Pursuant to Section 24.401(g) of the zoning regulations, the DRB may approve buildings that are setback from the street property line provided that the overall site layout is in conformance with City Center goals. For existing buildings, improvements shall be designed to relate the building better to the public street. The proposal includes eight windows, in pairs of two, across the lower level fronting on San Remo Drive. The windows allow for visual access to the interior of the building from the public street. In addition, paired openings in a wall at the southern end of the proposed addition offer an inviting entryway from the public street into a garden area. An exterior door on the north side of the \s Mm is h a u d\S P#02-62. fcd . d oc 3 FINDINGS OF PACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION 1#SP 42,62-& #DR 02-19 61_(_1( building opens into a foyer, which provides access to both the medical office space and the residences upstairs. This entrance is directly off the proposed public sidewalk. The DRB concludes that these design elements serve to relate the building better to the public street. 14. Conceal Rooftop Devices. Air conditioning, vent stacks, and other mechanical elements necessary for the operation of the building should be hidden from view on the roof of the building. However, these elements are not shown on the elevation plans. The DRC has requested that the air conditioning unit be shown on the elevation drawings. The DRB notes that other mechanical elements should also be shown on the plans. 15. Promote Energy Efficiency. Casement windows are proposed for the addition instead of the double hung windows that exist on the present structure. The architect believes this style of window is more energy efficient. Most windows are south and east facing. Deciduous trees and awnings provide summer shade of first floor windows. The soil on the garden roof will provide insulative cooling in summer and heat retention in the winter. In addition, the garden roof will alleviate the heat island effect and provides cooling and evaporation. The DRB concludes that the proposal includes energy efficient design features. 16. Landscape & Plantings. Landscape plantings and amenities should provide integral enhancements to the site. The DRB concludes that the proposed rooftop garden and ground level gardens will enhance the site significantly. -17. Integrate Special Features. The proposal includes the relocation of utility lines underground. The applicant proposes to enlarge an electrical cabinet on the northern faqade to accommodate the addition. The enlarged cabinet may require the closure of one of the windows on this elevation. The DRC requested that the plans be revised to show that the expanded electrical cabinet be covered in the same siding as the building. In addition, the property has a single dumpster, which should be screened from view with the addition of a gate across the front of the enclosure. 18. Walls, Fences & Other Screening. An extension of the easterly building wall allows visual and physical access to a small garden space, repeats the fenestration on the proposed addition, and matches the depth of the existing building. In addition, a covered walkway on the westerly side of the existing structure is proposed to match the setback of the proposed addition. The DRB concludes that these features conform to the guidelines outlined in Section 24.402(c). 11'4(�� 19. Access /e"Open Space. As indicated already, outdoor garden spaces are designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Benches and shade trees are included in the garden area designs. Garden areas are located to take advantage of sunlight. In addition, the ground level garden area is accessible to people with disabilities. 20. Efficient & Effective Circulation. The proposed development is at -grade and provides adequate accessible routes. In addition, the DRB concludes that \sMmichaud\S P#02-62.fcd.doc 4 FINDINGS OF .FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION #sP 02-O2,.& � DR 02-19 vehicles and pedestrians are adequately separated, and the proposal provides for vehicular and pedestrian interconnections between adjacent properties. 21. Outdoor Lighting. The applicant proposes using 100W recessed can lights, two wall mounted exterior light fixtures, and one 12 ft. Lumec "New Westminster" light within the project parking lot. The DRC requested that the soffit lights be reduced in wattage such that the illumination at the sidewalk not exceed 5 foot candles. The DRB agrees that illumination at the sidewalk should not exceed 5 foot candles. 22. Provide for Nature's Events. The proposed rooftop garden is designed to provide stormwater retention. When saturation measures are achieved, two internal roof drains will provide flow. However, the plans do not indicate where these drains will discharge. City Engineer Bill Szymanski has reviewed the proposed plans and also commented that stormwater drainage plans should be detailed. 23. Streetscape Improvements. Proposed streetscape improvements along San Remo Drive include the installation of seven (7) street trees, construction of a seven (7) foot wide sidewalk on the east side and widening the north sidewalk to eight (8) feet, and installation of three 12 ft. metal halide Lumec "New Westminster" lighting fixtures. The applicant proposes curved sidewalk at the corner of San Remo Drive to align with the building's curved facade. The Streetscape Plan for San Remo Drive includes a Honey Locust tree on the northern leg of San Remo Drive approximately 40 ft. from the corner. Instead, the applicant proposes two Chanticleer Callery pear trees of equivalent size. In addition, the applicant proposes two pear trees along the eastern leg of San Remo Drive in excess of the pear trees shown on the Streetscape Plan. The tconcludes that the proposed trees are desirable. To meet conditions of a previous DRB approval, sidewalk was installed on the north side of the property along San Remo Drive. The sidewalk requirements for San Remo Drive have since changed. 'The applicant proposes widening the existing sidewalk on the north side of the property to comply with the current Streetscape Guidelines. On the north side of the property approximately 3 ft. of the sidewalk extends onto the Four Boys, LLC, property. On the east side, approximately 5 ft. of the proposed sidewalk extends onto the Four Boys, LLC, property. The Streetscape Plan for San Remo Drive includes 16 ft. Lumec New Westminster poles and luminaries. The applicant's plans show 12 ft. poles. The plans need to be revised to show the streetlights will be mounted on16 ft. poles pursuant to the San Remo Drive Streetscape Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 26.102 of the zoning regulations, the DRB may consider the following in its review of a site plan application: \s 6mich and\S P#02-62.fcd.doc 5 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION #SP 02& #DR 02-19 v 3((a) Pedestrian & Vehicular Access. 24. Vehicular access to the site will remain unchanged. Pedestrian access will be enhanced with new sidewalks and inviting site design elements as discussed above. (b) Circulation. 25. No changes to the existing traffic circulation patterns are proposed. (c) Parking. 26. The Site Plan shows 31 parking spaces, including 4 reserved handicapped parking spaces and 7 on -street parking spaces. All but 3 of the off-street spaces are existing. Pursuant to Section 26.252 of the Zoning Regulations, a total of 42 parking spaces must be provided. This amounts to a shortfall of 18 off-street spaces or 43%. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the DRB may reduce the requirement by up to 50% if overlapping uses or other characteristics of the site cause the requirements to be unnecessarily stringent. Because the building contains a mix of office use with residential use, it is likely that nighttime residential parking and daytime business parking will be compatible on the site. Therefore, the DRB concludes that a reduction in the parking requirements is warranted. Parking on the south side of the building is 60 degree angled parking. Pursuant to Section 26.251 of the Zoning Regulations, curb length for these spaces must be 9.8 ft. with a depth of 19.8 ft. The plans do not indicate the dimensions of these spaces, but they appear to meet the depth and aisle width requirements. Pursuant to section 26.253(b), bicycle parking shall be provided for employees of residents on the subject property. Bicycle parking is provided on the north side on the enclosed stairwell. (d) Landscaping & Screening. 27. The applicant has provided an estimated construction cost of $300,000. Pursuant to Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations, minimum planting costs must exceed $8500. According to cost estimates listed in Table 2, plantings will cost about $3833. With installation, landscaping will cost an estimated $9582.50. (e) Traffic Generation. 28. The calculation of impact fees will be based on increased trip generation for the site. According to data provided by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), medical offices generate an average of 5.18 trips per 1000 sq. ft. per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. Apartments generate 0.62 trips per dwelling unit. Existing approved uses (3600 sq. ft. of medical office and 4 dwelling units) generate approximately 21 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. The applicant proposes 2089 sq. ft. of medical office space and 2 additional dwelling units. Based on ITE data, with the proposed expansions 33 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street would be generated by the \sit\michaud\S P#02-62.fcd.doc 6 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION #SP 02-62 & #DR 02-19 uses on the site. This results in an increase of 12 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. 29. Water Superintendent Jay Nadeau has reviewed the plans and provided a number of comments regarding water service connection and sprinklering. DECISION MOTION by Mark Boucher, seconded by Gayle Quimby, to approve site plan application #SP 02-62 and design review application #DR 02-19, subject to the following conditions: All previous approvals shall remain in effect except as amended herein_ 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans dated December 10, 2002, as amended by this decision and on file in the Department of Planning & Zoning. 3. The proposal will likely generate approximately 33 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street, and increase of 12 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. 4. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the DRB hereby approves a total of 24 on -site parking spaces and grants an 18 space or 43% waiver. 5. Pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations, the applicant must obtain a zoning permit from the Administrative Officer within six (6) months of the date of this decision. 6. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit, the existing sign violation must be corrected. 7. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a landscape bond in the amount of $9582.50. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to guarantee survival of all plantings. 8. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit, Four Boys, LLC, shall record an easement to the City of South Burlington for the portions of sidewalk extending onto the property. The easement must be approved by the City Attorney. 9. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant must submit three (3) full sets of plans, which must be revised as follows: a. The elevation drawings must show rooftop mechanical elements of the proposed addition. b. The plans must show that the electrical cabinet will be covered with the same siding as the building. lsMmichaud1SP#02-62.fcd.doc 7 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION I#SP 02-62 & #Did 02-19 c. The plans must show that the dumpster will be screened with the addition of a gate across the front of the enclosure. The plans must show that the streetlights will be mounted on16 ft. poles pursuant to the San Remo Drive Streetscape Plan. e. The plans must indicate where the roof drains will discharge. The plans must show the dimensions of the angled parking on the south side of the building. The spaces must provide a minimum 9.8 ft. curb length. g. The plans must show that the soffit lights will not cause illumination at the sidewalk to exceed 5 foot candles. 10. The applicant must meet the requirements outlined by Water Superintendent Jay Nadeau in his letter dated December 16, 2002. 11. The applicant shall obtain a certificate of occupancy/compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the new building addition. 12. Any change to this approved site plan shall require review and approval by the DRB. Chuck Bolton —yea/nay/abstain Mark Boucher — e2aa/nay/abstain John Dinklage —Yea/nay/abstain Roger Farley —Yea/nay/abstain Larry Kupferman —Yea/nay/abstain Gayle Quimby —Yea/nay/abstain MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 6-0-0. Signed this day of 2003, by John Dinklage, Chair \s Mmicha ud\S P#02-62.fcd.doc 8 r j DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 10, 2003 Mike Dee Dee Physical Therapy 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Master Signage Permit Application #SD-03-07 Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 11/4/03 (effective 11/6/03). Please note the conditions, including that a Master Signage Permit must be issued to the owner of the property, prior to issuance of any individual sign permits for the property. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner DATE: October 30, 2003 RE: Agenda #3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BORAD MEETING — NOVEMBER 4, 2003 Master Signage Permit DR-03-07 23 San Remo Drive The subject application is for a Master Signage Permit. The applicant submitted a request for approval to amend a Master Signage Permit on October 7, 2003, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits. The applicant is seeking approval to replace the existing signs, which include two (2) wall signs and one (1) freestanding sign. Specifically, the applicant is seeking approval for a white background with blue and gold lettering. The subject property is located at 23 San Remo Drive in the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District (DS/CC Sign District). Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master Signage Permit prior to the issuance of any individual sign permits for the subject property. Section 8(e)(1) requires that the property owner of record be the primary permitee of a Master Signage Permit. The record owner of the property is Four Boys, LLC. 1, A Master Signage Permit shall be issued to Four Boys, LLC by the DRB, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the property. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Sign Ordinance, a Master Signage Permit shall establish consistent design parameters for the property to ensure that all signage is in accordance with goals of the DS/CC Sign District. The Master Signage Permit shall specify size ranges and the graphic elements to be used to relate multiple signs to one another. The current application consists of a request for two (2) wall -mounted signs and one (1) freestanding sign. 23 San Remo Drive Design Review Application DR-03-07 DRB November 4, 2003 Page 2 of 4 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the DRC and DRB shall consider the following: (a) Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. Staff feels the proposed signs are compatible with the existing building and the surrounding buildings. They will be constructed of aluminum composite with vinyl graphics. The freestanding sign will be externally illuminated at a later date. In addition, the freestanding sign will be mounted on two (2) cedar posts. All three (3) signs will be replacing existing signs, so the location of the proposed signs will not change. (b) Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. (c) Color & Texture The applicant has proposed a white background with blue and gold lettering. The proposed color scheme complies with the standard in Section 6(b)(3) that states, "The use of a maximum of three (3) predominant colors is encouraged to provide consistent foreground, text, and background color schemes." In addition, staff feels the texture of the proposed signs is compatible and harmonious with buildings on the property and nearby. 2. The colors of the signs shall include a white background with blue and gold letters. (d) Materials Used The proposed signs will be constructed of aluminum composite with vinyl graphics. In addition, the freestanding sign will be mounted on two (2) cedar posts. Staff feels the materials of the proposed signs are of high -quality and are complimentary to the building. (e) Wall Mounted Signs Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs. Pursuant to Section 10(b)(1) a wall -mounted sign shall not exceed 5% of the area of the principal public facade or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The proposed wall signs will have a total area of 32 square feet, which complies with this requirement. 23 San Remo Drive Design Review Application DR-03-07 DRB November 4, 2003 Page 3 of 4 Section 10(b)(2) states that a wall -mounted sign cannot exceed 15% of the area of the fagade to which it is attached. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the design review approval process. The proposed sign locations will not project above the roof or parapet of the subject building. In addition, the proposed sign locations will not extend below the top of any first floor doorways. Thus, the proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. The proposed signage is in compliance with this requirement. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". There is nothing included in the subject application to suggest compliance or noncompliance with this requirement. Staff notes that compliance with this requirement will be a condition of approval for this Master Signage Permit. 3. The proposed signs shall not project from the wall in excess of 9" 4. Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. (0 Freestanding Signs Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right -of -Way and runs sixteen (16) feet from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face. In those instances where dimensions do not provide for a two (2) foot setback from the Right -of -Way before a sign support post can be located, it is permitted to erect a centered single pole mounted sign of which the road side edge of the sign is directly outside the R.O.W. line. The Site Plan submitted by the applicant, dated October 25, 1999, last revised May 15, 2000, shows the proposed sign location within the appropriate sign corridor. Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs in the Dorset Street/City Center District may not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than twelve (12) feet, measured from the average finished grade at the base of the sign to the highest point of any part of the sign structure. 23 San Remo Drive Design Review Application DR-03-07 DRB November 4, 2003 Page 4 of 4 The proposed sign will be approximately 4' high, and no part of the sign structure will exceed 12' from the average finished grade at the base of the sign. The proposed freestanding sign will have a total area of 32 square feet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Master Signage Permit #DR-03-07 conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items above. Respectfully Submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner AGENDA City of South Burlington Design Review Committee Meeting City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street Monday, October 27, 2003 7: 30 PM 1. Call to order. Introductions, Attendance. Additions to/deletions from the Agenda. 2. Master Signage Permit #DR-03-07 - Robert Diaco, Applicant. This application is for approval to replace an existing Master Signage Permit with a new Master Signage Permit. at 23 San Remo Drive. Specifically, the applicant is seeking approval to replace the existing signs, which include two (2) wall signs and one (1) freestanding sign. 3. Other Business 4. Adjournment. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner ` Perm. ,lumber DR- 03 - 0 IN APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington REQUIRED DESIGN INFORMATION for INITIAL & AMENDED MASTER SIGNAGE PERMITS ONLY The following information MUST be included with the application and/or shown on an accurate plot plan of the lot. Failure to include this information will delay the review of your application! Please submit five full size and one 11"x17" plot plan drawing. 1. Acc,�urate plot plan of the lot, showing the location of: Buildings Parking lots % Driveways Landscaped areas 2. Computation of the maximum area, number and height of signs allowed on the property, by type of sign: _/� Free-standing and/or landscape feature signs (See Section 9 and Section 14) Wall signs (See Section 10) V4^A Directory Signs (See Section 11) N,,y,t Incidental and Directional Signs (See Section 12) 3. ,Area and height of each sign proposed for your property (Initial Master Signage / Permits and Master Signage Permit Amendments only) 4. Location, size, date of installation, and status of all non -complying signs on your property. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT (See Section 8(d) of the Sign Ordinance for details) 5. Color illustrations showing proposed: Shapes Materials /Foreground and background color schemes _l Typeface(s) ;;�"izes (include a range of sizes if desired) Installations/sign types Description of how one or more of the features above will relate all of the signs to each other visually. 6. Location and specifications of all proposed light fixtures and lighting elements, including cut sheets. 7. Proposed general design for any incidental and directional signs on the property, other than those with designs prescribed by law. Perm, . Lmber DR - APPLICATION for MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT City of South Burlington ALL information requested in this application must be completed in full. If you do not provide all of the requested information with this application form, as well as the required plans and design information, the City will not schedule a review of the application before the Design Review Committee. Application for: Initial Master Signage Permit after June 3, 2002 Amendment of Master Signage Permit Individual Sign, pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR - Property & Street Address: Z 3 b�c-c.,` ( .Q.--z, \\'11, Tax parcel ID # (from Tax Assessor or Planning & Zoning): Property Owner of Record (name as shown on deed, mailing a dress, hone, fax#): �4 ��� �� �,� C vs 425"- s I) i �4. 4-24(2-� Applicant, if not Owng' (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): 'O . ! IS A:4:! " 2 3 `J 4 v� Q -A,-- '�).� � � � 5 - R ,-, k ��-' UQ-• Cam=��43� ' 4 4-2_923 °S�03 Contact person (name, mailing address, phone, fax #): L Z�$sz 4 Is the applicant an existing or future tenant of the building? Yes No Application is seeking ap roval to: ( 4 e It C'�k Z. -. I here ertify that all the information requested as part o this application has been sub tt and is accurate to the best of my knowled e. f , ApF4icant Property/Building Owner Please do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be Code Officer or Designee complete Date incomplete CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERn1 ONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 30, 2003 Michael C. Dee Four Boys, LLC 23 San Remo Drive S. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Six (6) Month Extension Dear Mr. Dee: Please be advised that the South Burlington Development Review Board at their meeting held on 7/29/03 approved your request for a six (6) month extension to site plan #SP-02-62 and Design Review #DR-02-19 for an addition to 23 San Remo Drive. You now have until 1/21/04 to obtain a zoning permit for this construction. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 7 X i Rayr-n n�J: Belair Administrative Officer Encl. July 16 , 2003 104 City of South Burlington Dept. of Planning and Zoning Development Review Board Re: #SP 02-62, #DR 02-19 To Whom it may concern, I am requesting a six month extension to apply for a zoning permit regarding the above referenced property and approval. Our plans are moving at a slower than expected rate and need this extension at this time to continue our plans. Th o or your consideration. I can be reached at work at : 865-0045 Michol it. Dee, Member, Four Boys LLC Owner 23 San Remo Encl: Findings of fact 01/21/2003 July 16 , 2003 City of South Burlington Dept. of Planning and Zoning Development Review Board Re: #SP 02-62, #DR 02-19 To Whom it may concern, I am requesting a six month extension to apply for a zoning permit regarding the above referenced property and approval. Our plans are moving at a slower than expected rate and need this extension at this time to continue our plans. Th, o or your consideration. I can be reached at work at : 865-0045 Mich 1 C . Dee, Member, Four Boys LLC Owner 23 San Remo Encl: Findings of fact 01/21/2003 CITY OF SOUTH BURI INGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONENIG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 28, 2003 Bill Michaud 1405 Ferry Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: Irrevocable Letter of Credit #1160002190 Dear Mr. Michaud: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby releases you from your obligation to maintain $5,720 in the account of Four Boys, LLC for landscaping at 23 5an Remo Drive. If you have any questions, please let me know. Administrative Officer merchants BANK Date: March 7, 2000 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Irrevocable Letter of Credit #1160002190 Four Boys, LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We hereby establish our IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT #1160002190 in your favor for the account of Four Boys, LLC c/o William Michaud 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte, VT 05445 up to the aggregate amount of Three thousand seven hundred twenty dollars and 00/100th U.S. Dollars ($ 3,720.00) available by your draft(s) on us at sight. Drafts drawn under this credit must be marked, "Drawn under The Merchants Bank, 275 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, LETTER OF CREDIT # 1160002190, March 7, 2000," and the amount and date of negotiation of each draft must be endorsed on the back hereof by the negotiating bank. This Letter of Credit expires at the close of business on March 7, 2003. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this Letter of Credit is issued subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce, Paris, France, Publication No. 500) and is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code of Vermont, as from time to time amended. We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers, and bona fide holders of drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Credit, that such drafts will be duly honored on presentation to the drawee if negotiated or presented before the close of business on March 7, 2003. Sincerely, MERE ANTS BANK Mau Pamela P. Steece Vice President iy, Gars P.O. Box 1009, Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-658-3400 MEMBER Fore S I T E P LAN LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, exe uted in triplicate between , of 21V - , hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER".. "' r L.e of 1..1hereinafter referred to as ""Bank", and V -56r 1 I - �i T , hereinafter referred to as "MUNI'CIPALITY" W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer MUNICIPALITY'S Planning located at �, 7) a site plan. 9ntitled has received site Commission for the Zw, ) k),_ I plan approval from the development of property as depecited on 11, dated r.2 -//-�0 jL t- re,05c� and prepared by �A . ,LEA t ( D� C.4 WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: IN 2. The Developer shall c mplete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the BANK to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALITY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the payment limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6., The DEVELOPER and MUNICIPALITY hereby agree that the sum of�P�'��SQt1d SPuer� {�1 Q�9� ( �, 7nZU, ) shall be sufficient to secure DEVELOPER's obli ations under this Agreement but shall not relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated cost. 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a copy of any draft it submits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. 2- 8. The MUNICIPALITY shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the MUNICIPALITY's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said wetter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANK, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the MUNICIPALITY has not delivered any written notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 13. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 14 This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 3 .s Dated at G "- ( -�,) Vermont, this day of IN v By: my Authorized Agent (DEVELOPER) o It ' Dated at 06, W(i Vermont, this day of JIM&._, ,, By. Duly Aut o ized Agent (BANK) Vermont, this day of By: Duly Authorized Agent (MUNICIPALITY) 4 RECEIVED JAN 16 2003 MOAp. Budingtcm This feature is designed to provide stormwater retta im. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions arc present. Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage 470/, 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 500% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information First floor size 5689 sf Second floor size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial Ist floor 1 space/200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spaces/unit 12 _ 1/4 units I Total spaces required i 41 spaces Current off site spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of 18 spaces Planting Schedule Key Common Nante .4cfenrifrc name Qry. Sne Pc CHANTICLEER Pyms 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B inermis 'Shademm t Nf Neon Flash Spires Spiraea 104 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" It. Rhododend on C8 Lilac Catawba Rhododendron Catawbien Gr'd 3 24" Mp Mugo Pine Pious mugd. 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light 1 Lumec "New Westminster" on 12' pole to match style of street lights Light ):�A Spaulding ST-MI00- - "Sofiitier" SYM-120-OP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted J I r INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte VT 05445 802-425-7717 O/F ted@indiana-wehitecture.com www.indiana-architecture. com Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 12.10.02 Scale: 1 A 0" =1'-0" Revisions 1. 13 -03 North & East elev. 1 Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 8641812 Job 0205 Sheet Al/A Description Floor plans 0 neaa ®."oem.am "r a tmm aRmtKa.. a a�o�. rai. =T=m wraw x won. mm,", nnn"<aR a nos" RECEIVED ►N 16 2003 'So. Budin®ton outheast perspective Northwest perspective North/south section �wrm„mmam C�e.,bmaa.xiwina North elevation East elevation ,3outn elevation West elevation East/west section INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte VT 05445 802-425-7717 O/F red@rdiana-architect racm .=ndiana-arehitech,. m Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: 12.10.02 Scale: 1 /10" =1'-0" Revisions 1. 13 -03 North & Fasr el — 1 Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo (hive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job 0205 Sheet A2/A Description Elevations & Sections n:. m..mnrw.em ee1a..� em:ameimme.ra:.waL<.. ie. a ""n:nmRbm:°�".00rn aa'inad n°m'we.ePOI°p.. n a..p"" c�nd. o mm � nmu.wo.. a omo, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: January 16, 2003 \sit\michaud\medapt.srp.doc Plans received December 11 2002 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP 02-62 & DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION #DR 01-19 Meeting date: January 21, 2003 Applicant Owner Bill Michaud Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Charlotte, VT 05445 Architect Property Information Ted Montgomery Tax Parcel 1490 00023 C Indiana Architectural Design Volume 471, Pages 356 477 Ten Stone Circle CD2 & Design District 2 Charlotte, VT 05445 22,356 Square Feet Location Ma 3w A San Remy give wet , r. o CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt srp doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bill Michaud, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting approval for 4089 sq. ft. of new construction to contain 2089 sq. ft. of medical use and two 1000 sq. ft. dwelling units. The subject property contains an existing 7200 sq. ft. structure including 3600 sq. ft. of medical office use and 4 dwelling units. The subject lot contains 22,356 sq. ft. and is located in the Central District 2 and Design Overlay District 2 at 23 San Remo Drive. Four Boys, LLC, is the record owner of the property. BACKGROUND Four Boys, LLC, received Site Plan approval from the South Burlington Development Review Board (DRB) on October 17, 2000, for the addition of two 1200 sq. ft. dwelling units and two 600 sq. ft. dwelling units to the existing structure, subject to 10 conditions. The existing structure contained 4888 sq. ft. of medical office use and two 1200 sq. ft. dwelling units. However, the applicant now proposes a new structure to contain 2 of the previously approved dwelling units along with 2089 sq. ft. of new medical office use. COMMENTS Associate Planner Janet Hurley and Administrative Officer Raymond Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the Site Plan submitted on December 11, 2002, and have the following comments. Density: The proposed density for the property is an F.A.R. of 0.5. This is the maximum allowed F.A.R. for the CD2 District. Coveraqe: The proposed building coverage for the lot is 25%. The maximum allowed building coverage for the CD2 District is 40%. The proposed overall coverage for the lot is 72%. The maximum allowed overall coverage for the CD2 District is 90%. Setback. Pursuant to Section 14.402(b) of the zoning regulations, allowable building envelopes along San Remo Drive shall be between 32 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way and 80 ft. from the nearest edge of the right-of-way. The building envelope is greater than 80 ft. from the San Remo Drive right-of-way, but this is a condition of the existing structure and not the proposed new structure. The plans indicate that the new structure is approximately 31 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way on the north side and approximately 33 ft. from the centerline of the right-of-way on the east side. 1. The plans will need to be revised to provide a minimum setback of at least 32 ft. from the centerline of San Remo Drive on the north side of the proposed structure. Building Height: The maximum height for a pitched roof in the CD2 District is 45 ft. The maximum height for a flat roof is 35 ft. The proposed structure will be 34 ft. 3'/2" to the top of the pitched stairwell roof. The flat roof will be 24 ft. high. Therefore, the proposed addition complies with the height requirements of the CD2 District. Access/Circulation: Access is provided via a 26 ft. ingress and egress curb cut, and a 13 ft. wide egress -only curb cut. Both access points are on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to an adjacent lot to the southwest. There are no proposed changes to access or circulation. Existing access and circulation conditions are adequate. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt srp_doc DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Consistent Design: The proposed addition is inventive and departs from the form of the existing structure. However, the architect incorporated many of the design elements of the existing structure into the proposed addition. In addition, the architect proposes a covered walkway along the western side of the existing structure, which matches the setback of the proposed addition and encloses a small garden space. Likewise, on the southeast corner, a garden wall extends out and matches the setback of the existing structure. The color palette, proposed textures, scale, and design elements of the addition function to integrate the two structures and create a unified look for the entire property. Materials: The applicant proposes to use faux wood grain siding (same as existing) on the first floor of the proposed addition. The second floor siding is 8" wide vinyl without a texture. The roof top garden wall and peak over an enclosed stairwell is sheeted in a synthetic insulating compound that resembles stucco (DrivitTM). The proposed materials comply with the requirements of Section 24.401 (b) of the zoning regulations. Colors & Textures: Colors of the new structure include teal, which will be applied to the synthetic stucco and is the color of the existing structure's roof, and light gray, which is the siding color of the existing Health South building. The applicant proposes another color, tan, for the 8" wide vinyl siding. The color swatches do not represent a specific manufactured brand of paint, but the intent is to match with the existing colors. The metal window frames on the first floor will be painted white to match the windows on the existing structure. Second floor window frames will be beige. Window frames within the upper portion of the new addition will be painted to match the siding color, teal. The textures proposed are a faux wood finish on the gray siding (again, same as existing), and the stucco texture of the roof top garden wall and stairwell peak. The proposed 8" vinyl siding is smooth. Windows and Doors. The fenestration of the addition mimics the paired metal frame windows of the existing Health South building. A continuation of the paired window openings is repeated within a garden wall allowing visual access to a small garden space. The proposed locations of windows and doorways respond to the interior layout of the addition. Human -scale Design Elements: The proposed addition provides human scale design features. The applicant proposes using metal awnings over the windows on the northern and eastern first floor elevation to help relate the 2'/z story building to the pedestrian. The location of an enclosed stairwell on the interior of the structure does not dominate a public side of the building. The synthetic stucco contains some windows to break up the massive wall found in the peak of the roof. These windows also allow natural light into the stairwell. The applicant proposes extensive plantings, which creates an inviting property scape. Roofs as Design Elements: The proposed roof over the stairwell contains a pitch of 7 on 12. The minimum requirement for a two story structure in the CD2 District is a 5 on 12 pitch. The maximum pitch for the CD2 District is 12 on 12. Therefore, the pitch of the stairwell roof complies with the requirements. However, the proposed pitch needs to be noted on the plans. Where flat roofs are used in the CD2 District on structures of 2 or more stories, they must include architectural elements to improve appearance and provide interest. The proposed flat roof will be a "green" roof containing a garden area. As noted already in this report, the garden CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt.srp doc wall will be sheeted with a teal colored stucco -like material, which mimics the roof color of the existing structure. Orient Buildings to Public Street: In the CD2 District, new buildings shall be built to the street property line. However, the configuration of the existing building does not conform to this requirement and the proposed addition does not extend to the property line. Pursuant to Section 24.401(g) of the zoning regulations, the DRB may approve buildings that are setback from the street property line provided that the overall site layout is in conformance with City Center goals. For existing buildings, improvements shall be designed to relate the building better to the public street. The proposal includes eight windows, in pairs of two, across the lower level fronting on San Remo Drive. The windows allow for visual access to the interior of the building from the public street. In addition, paired openings in a wall at the southern end of the proposed addition offer an inviting entryway from the public street into a garden area. An exterior door on the north side of the building opens into a foyer, which provides access to both the medical office space and the residences upstairs. This entrance is directly off the proposed public sidewalk. Staff believes that these design elements serve to relate the building better to the public street. Conceal Rooftop Devices: Air conditioning, vent stacks, and other mechanical elements necessary for the operation of the building are hidden from view on the roof of the building. However, these elements are not shown on the elevation plans. The Design Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the proposal on December 23, 2002, and requested that the air conditioning unit be shown on the elevation drawings. Staff notes that other mechanical elements should also be shown. 2. The elevation drawings should be revised to show rooftop mechanical elements of the proposed addition. Special Features: The proposal includes the relocation of utility lines underground. In addition, the applicant proposes to enlarge an electrical cabinet on the northern fagade to accommodate the addition. The enlarged cabinet may require the closure of one of the windows on this elevation (See Figure 1). The DRC requested that the plans be revised to show that the expanded electrical cabinet be covered in the same siding as the building. Figure 1. Electrical cabinet. 3. The Plans should be revised to show that the electrical cabinet will be covered with the same siding as the building. Energy Efficiency: Casement windows are proposed for the addition instead of the double hung windows that exist on the present structure. The architect believes this style of window is more energy efficient. Most windows are south and east facing. Deciduous trees and awnings provide summer shade of first floor windows. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt srp doc Landscape & Plantings: Landscape plantings and amenities should provide integral enhancements to the site. The proposal includes a rooftop garden and ground level gardens to enhance the site. Dumpsters: The property has a single dumpster (See Figure 2). It should be screened from view with the addition of a gate across the front of the enclosure. Figure 2. Dumpster storage area. 4. The plans should be revised to show that the dumpster will be screened with the addition of a gate across the front of the enclosure. Accessible Open Space: As indicated already, outdoor garden spaces are designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Benches and shade trees are included in the garden area designs. Garden areas are located to take advantage of sunlight. In addition, the ground level garden area is accessible to people with disabilities. Streetscape Improvements: Proposed streetscape improvements along San Remo Drive include the installation of seven (7) street trees, construction of a seven (7) foot wide sidewalk on the east side and widening the north sidewalk to eight (8) feet, and installation of three 12 ft. metal halide Lumec "New Westminster' lighting fixtures. The applicant proposes curved sidewalk at the corner of San Remo Drive to align with the building's curved facade. The Streetscape Plan for San Remo Drive includes a Honey Locust tree on the northern leg of San Remo Drive approximately 40 ft. from the corner. Instead, the applicant proposes two Chanticleer Callery pear trees of equivalent size. In addition, the applicant proposes two pear trees along the eastern leg of San Remo Drive in excess of the pear trees shown on the Streetscape Plan. Staff feels that the additional street trees are desirable, but the applicant should justify the use of pear instead of locust on the north leg of San Remo Drive. 5. The applicant needs to justify the use of pear instead of locust on the north leg of San Remo Drive. To meet conditions of a previous DRB approval, sidewalk was installed on the north side of the property along San Remo Drive. The sidewalk requirements for San Remo Drive have since changed. The applicant proposes widening the existing sidewalk on the north side of the property to comply with the current Streetscape Guidelines. On the north side of the property approximately 3 ft. of the sidewalk extends onto the Four Boys, LLC, property. On the east side, approximately 5 ft. of the proposed sidewalk extends onto the Four Boys, LLC, property. 6. The applicant will need to provide an easement to the City of South Burlington for the portions of sidewalk extending onto the Four Boys, LLC, property CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt srp doc The Streetscape Plan for San Remo Drive includes 16 ft. Lumec New Westminster poles and luminaries. The applicant's plans show 12 ft. poles. The plans need to be revised to show the streetlights will be mounted on16 ft. poles pursuant to the San Remo Drive Streetscape Plan. 7. The plans need to be revised to show that the streetlights will be mounted on16 ft. poles pursuant to the San Remo Drive Streetscape Plan. Exterior Lighting: The applicant also proposes using 100W recessed can lights (see attached cut sheets), two (2) wall mounted exterior light fixtures (see attached cut sheets), and one 12 ft. Lumec "New Westminster" light within the project parking lot. The DRC reviewed the proposal on December 23, 2002, and requested that the soffit lights be reduced in wattage such that the illumination at the sidewalk not exceed 5 foot candles. 8. The soffit lights should be reduced in wattage such that the illumination at the sidewalk not exceed 5 foot candles Provide for Nature's Events: The proposed rooftop garden is designed to provide stormwater retention. When saturation measures are achieved, two internal roof drains will provide flow. However, the plans do not indicate where these drains will discharge. City Engineer Bill Symanski has reviewed the proposed plans and also commented that stormwater drainage plans should be detailed in the plans. 9. The plans should be revised to indicate where the roof drains will discharge Signage: Signage is not part of this application, but the applicant should be aware that there is an illegal wall sign on the western elevation. No design review approval or permit has been issued for this sign. Staff recommends that the DRB require that this violation be corrected prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the proposed addition. 10. Staff recommends that the DRB require that the existing sign violation be corrected prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the proposed addition. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 26.102 of the zoning regulations, the DRB may consider the following in its review of a site plan application: (a) Pedestrian and vehicular access. Vehicular access to the site will remain unchanged. Pedestrian access will be enhanced with new sidewalks and inviting site design elements as discussed above. (b) Circulation. No changes to the existing traffic circulation patterns are proposed. (c) Parking. The Site Plan shows 31 parking spaces, including 4 reserved handicapped parking spaces and 7 on -street parking spaces. All but 3 of the off-street spaces are existing. Pursuant to Section 26.252 of the Zoning Regulations, the number of off-street parking spaces on the site must CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt srp doc meet the requirements in listed Table 1. Table 1. Off -Street Parkin_q Requirements Proposed Parking Area/ # Spaces Use Standard # Units Required Medical 1 per 200 ft.2 5698 ft. 28.5 Office 13.5 Multi -family 2 per unit + 1 6 units Residential per 4 units Therefore, a total of 42 parking spaces must be provided. This amounts to a shortfall of 18 off- street spaces or 43%. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the DRB may reduce the requirement by up to 50% if overlapping uses or other characteristics of the site cause the requirements to be unnecessarily stringent. Because the building contains a mix of office use with residential use, Staff believes it is likely that nighttime residential parking and daytime business parking will be compatible on the site. 11. Staff recommends that the DRB reduce the off-street parking requirements for the site; however, the applicant should justify the need for reduced off-street parking at the DRB meeting. Parking on the south side of the building is 60 degree angled parking. Pursuant to Section 26.251 of the Zoning Regulations, curb length for these spaces must be 9.8 ft. with a depth of 19.8 ft. The plans do not indicate the dimensions of these spaces, but they appear to meet the depth and aisle width requirements. 12. The plans need to be revised to show the dimensions of the angled parking on the south side of the building. The spaces must provide a minimum 9.8 ft. curb length. Pursuant to section 26.253(b), bicycle parking shall be provided for employees of residents on the subject property. Bicycle parking is provided on the north side on the enclosed stairwell. (d) Landscaping and screening. The applicant has provided an estimated construction cost of $300,000. Pursuant to Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations, minimum planting costs must exceed $6000. According to cost estimates listed in Table 2, plantings will cost about $3833. With installation, staff estimates a proposed landscaping cost estimate of $9582.50. Table 2. Landscaping Cost Estimate Quantity Size Species Unit Cost Total Cost 5 3" Chanticleer Pear $225 $1125 3 hademaster Locust $211 $633 100 15" h. Neon Flash S irea $13.25 $1325 10 18" h. PJM Rhododendron $26.50 $265 20 24" Mu o Pine $24.25 $485 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Traffic DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING \sit\michaud\medapt.srp.doc The calculation of impact fees will be based on increased trip generation for the site. According to data provided by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), medical offices generate an average of 5.18 trips per 1000 sq. ft. per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. Apartments generate 0.62 trips per dwelling unit. Existing approved uses (3600 sq. ft. of medical office and 4 dwelling units) generate approximately 21 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. The applicant proposes 2089 sq. ft. of medical office space and 2 additional dwelling units. Based on ITE data, with the proposed expansions 33 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street would be generated by the uses on the site. This results in an increase of 12 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. 13. According to ITE data, the proposal will likely generate approximately 33 trips per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street, and increase of 12 trip per weekday PM peak hour of an adjacent street. Other Water Superintendent Jay Nadeau has reviewed the plans and provided a number of comments regarding water service connection and sprinklering (see attached). 14. The applicant must meet the requirements outlined by Water Superintendent Jay Nadeau in his letter dated December 16, 2002. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve this Site Plan application, conditional upon the numbered items in the "Comments" Section of this report being completed within 60 days of the DRB's decision to the satisfaction of Staff. Respectfully submitte �*q- I�A* Jane'FM. Hurle , Associate lanner Copy to.. Applicant Ted Montgomery, Indiana Architecture & Design CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \sit\m i ch a ud\m ed apt.srp doc Zoning District — DC2 Required Provided ♦Min. Lot Area 25,000 ft.2 22,356 ft.2 Building Height 45 ft. pitched roof 35 ft. flat roof 34 ft. 3 112 in. 24 ft. Building Coverage 40% 25% �l Lot Coverage 90% 72% 4 Minimum Building Envelope 32 ft. from centerline +31 ft. ♦ Maximum Building Envelope 80 ft_ from ROW >80 ft. Max. Density 0.5 F.A.R. 0.5 F.A.R. J denotes zoning compliance ♦ denotes existing zoning discrepancy unaffected by current application denotes zoning discrepancy Adjacent Land Conditions N - Institutional S - Mixed -use E - Commercial W - Commercial SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT December 16, 2002 Indiana Architecture and Design 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte, VT 05445 RE: 23 San Remo Drive Dear Ted: 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 We have reviewed the set of plans for the above referenced project dated 12-6-02. Please find my comments below: 1. Per our phone conversations there will not be a significant increase in demand on the existing two-inch water supply for domestic service, so the existing water line should not be disturbed. 2. There may be an independent fire sprinkler system installed on the east side of the building. This system shall meet all fire department requirements as well as: a. A backflow prevention device approved for the appropriate degree of hazard shall be installed on the new fire sprinkler line and the existing domestic service plumbing line immediately after the meter. Please contact this department if you require more information on backflow protection devices. b. There shall be no connection between the fire sprinkler system and any part of the domestic plumbing system. c. A connection fee of $400 for the sprinkler line shall be paid to the SBWD prior to the tap taking place. 3. The South Burlington Water Department shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances and water line crossings. 4. This Department shall be notified of any changes that may occur during the permit process with revised, updated hard copy plans for further review. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me. Sincerely, South Burlin oQn, Water Department Jay Nadeau Superintendent Cc: Ray Belair Doug Brent Plan Review: 23 San Remo Dr 12-02 'k r( 1 t e c r u I. c November 22, 2002 Design Review Committee, City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington VT 05403 Re: Addition to 23 San Remo Drive Dear Members of the Design Review Committee, RECEIVED NOV 2 5 2002 City of So. Burlington It is my pleasure to present materials for your review of the proposed building addition to the property at 23 San Remo Drive. Building Description The existing property includes a 7200sf two-story structure that is used for commercial purposes on the first floor (currently HEATHSOUTH) and contains four apartments on the second floor. The construction is both wood and steel. We are proposing a 4000sf addition to the project. This would be another two-story structure housing a first floor commercial space and two apartments on the second floor. The building would be primarily steel construction and would be fully sprinkled. It is connected to the existing structure by a first floor, heated vestibule. We are considering the whole project to be one building both for zoning and fire prevention reasons. We have added three parking spaces to the project and are requesting a waiver of eight spaces. The design concepts have followed the "South Burlington City Center/ Streetscape Design Guidelines Handbook" and include those components (sidewalk, lights & trees) of the approved streetscape within the bounds of this project. The exterior of the building borrows color and texture from the existing structure while using one additional texture and color. We are planning to have the roof as a planted area available to residents, patients and tenants, budget allowing. The structure also recalls the roof pitches and exterior entry lighting from the medical complex at the south end of San Remo Drive. We hope our efforts help inspire the future infill buildings between these two pole projects! Our submission includes the following: 1. Application for Design Review 2. Application for Site Plan Review 3. Current Color Photos 4. Site Plan with Landscape Schedule (five copies, one 11 x 17 reduced) 5. Elevations of the four sides (five copies, one 11 x 17 reduced) 6. Color Perspectives of the proposed Addition 7. Suggested exterior colors • Siding texture samples • Window cut sheets 8. Exterior lighting cut sheets We will bring a laptop computer to the review meeting with a viewable virtual model of the project. Please feel free to call my office if there are any questions or additional needs. Keep Your Home to the Sun, Ted Montgomery Project Architect a4 v w;h is A e�4 WpWp v l k,., AI NW, NWS bu , II 4 Ids ' i',, f M d .4 If• I s � LUMEC BEGA o Wall mounted triangular luminaries • for direct or indirect illumination B '• from a fully shielded light source. Heavy pressed glass with internal textured surface. Captive socket A C head stainless steel screws. Color: Black or white / J Lamp Lumen A B C 2488 Wall 1 60W A•19 890 123/4 9 9 2489P Wall 1 13W PLC 860 123/4 9 9 2490 Wall 1 100W A•19 1750 16Ye 117/1e 117/1e 2491 P Wall 1 26W PLC 1800 161/e 11'/1a 117/1e A,rr. 2492M Wall 1 50W E•17 MV 1575 191/4 133/4 15 2492S Wall 1 50W E•17 HPS 4000 191/4 133/4 15 2492P Wall 2 26W PLC 3600 191/4 133/4 15 ' 2492MH Wall 1 70W ED•17 MH 5500 191/4 133/4 15 I � ^1 74e ' Wall mounted triangular luminaries 1 for asymmetrical illumination from a fully shielded light source. k A Internal optical system behind tempered glass lens. Die cast e aluminum construction with stainless steel fasteners, spacer k B arm and hinged access trim. Color: Black or white Lamp Lumen A B 2495MH Wall 1 100W ED•17 MH 8500 133/4 157% 2495S Wall 1 70W E•17 HPS 6000 133/4 157A 2496MH Wall 1 175W ED•17 MH 14000 16% 18�K 2496S Wall 1 100W E•17 HPS 9500 16% 183/4 61 SOFFIT19R ��� Square recessed luminaire for canopies, soffits, parking garages, and facades. • Square, formed aluminum housing • Thermal protector included. with integral trim flange. • Metal Halide and High Pressure • Aluminum lens frame with Sodium lamp sizes up to 175w. prismatic, flat glass lens, fully • Socket is enclosed medium gasketed to housing, hinged and porcelain, pulse rated, with spring secured with captive fastener. loaded, nickel plated center Optional drop prismatic acrylic, contact and reinforced lamp grip or drop prismatic polycarbonate screw shell. lenses. • Diffused, anodized aluminum • Ballast is CWA type, HPF, starting rated at -20°F. reflectors for horizontal or vertical lamp, provide asymmetric or • White color polyester paint finish. symmetric light pattern. • UL listed for damp location, and • Recessed mount provided with CUL listed. adjustable aluminum brackets. Designed for'/4" to %" thick ceiling with 141/4" square rough opening. r- i,10rdering information Order No. 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 Example ST - M100 - HL - SYM - 120 - QZ - SWT 0 Model ST © Lamp Type/Watts S70 (E-17) M70 (E-17) S100 (E-17) M100 (E-17) S150 (E-17) M175 (E-17) © Lamp Position HL - horizontal lamp VL - vertical lamp Dimensions 0 Reflector ASY - asymmetric SYM - symmetric © Voltage 120 208 240 277 MT - multi -tap (120/208/240/277v) (S70-120v only) �— ----- A-Sq. ------ ►� --- - -- C-Sq. Flange —� Options SF - single fuse (120v,277v,347v) DF - double fuse (208v,240v,480v) QZ - quartz standby (D.C. bayonet base lamp included) DA - drop acrylic lens DP - drop polycarbonate lens 0 Color SWT - white I A B C Wt./Lbs. ST 1 13.8" I 8" 1 16.6" 1 34 !M SPlAULDING -- _-�•-------`,�` --ate- ' ■ ---- _ . 23 San Remo Drive Scheme A I. I/ Indiana Architecture & Design/ November 8, 2002 23 San Remo Drive/ Scheme A l . l / Indiana Architecture & Design November S, 2002 No Text �Wt "Zi 1,111 � l jl '+i � nu ll� �II�1illli Ij�lllill!�� II�)I�!Iiilll!' ';jtlll4�, (Iljllll`I'!!1�1 yl!il,illil!�!lili� 1 ,1' lll!l!Il�llill'i1;j':' ,li,1 I' iilll 1!#i1i11{II%! �l I�'lll��'i I{ ( l I !llllll;il�{ll!I;Ilii; I!ly'1,ii�' + a' ,so vo�f• dr �aww�ar � •. • ` �� . ,� is 11• �. ` .. yy ... Y • � • �� � . L, a ,,., „ 1 +� Y • / K'I I� Y«• 1 yy •ter•• �' I � • I�•'' rf��. ' i �+4 �,r;,'4a;�' ,fir j�, �• �c: ,t�' t � �:' •,��.7irc' Jiii ��'Irr'� ��tII �,1�1'���� • _'.A►`:15_. ��; 4`G�=ti:.+4711':�•� �',�1t'�i'l�'''�'" : ��•'''T�'it�ir �:��� �' ,r -.TM. ., rt Nor • , 2L. Y sm W- Fiv M: tip, ,• a i� HE411HSOUTH �Ur11� ligillillillilllllllllllllllm- No Text 0 -------- S ------ fan RPmn Drives Light t approximate property line 162' Site Plan & First floor Note to Roof Garden: This feature is designed to provide stormwater retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions are present. zIario fa AC liv8 rarer r-r- Roof Garden ® O®® 0 0 0 O0(l/,;/ 1-- ) Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size -- - - 22356 sf Parking Lot Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf C Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 50% 11289 sf /� DE Existing Building size 7200 sf t (• t yH Additional Building area 4089 sf Parlung information O f First floor size — -- 5689 sf fs 0 e Second floor size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial lst floor 1 space(200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spacmimut 12 1/4 units I Total spaces required 41 spaces Current off site spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of d spaces' Planting Schedule _ Key Common Name Scientific name Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST ttiacanthos B&B memus 'Shademaster Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea 100 15" h. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron MP Mugo Pine Pinus mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting Schedule Light 1 Lumec "New Westmimster" on 12' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 C)A Spaulding ST-MI00-HL- "Soffitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted 1 -- INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte VT 05445 802-425-7717 O/F ted®lndlmw-cachitechuecorn www.Incbma-cxchitecture.com Structural engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Allontmction Management e: 12■ 10■02 Scale: 1 10" = P-0" Revisions Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job___ 0205 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans J lad--_..4cMirecrwe & I)ewgv ad is vw ro tr wed iv ..�ar w r.q rar w. ar,.> wce, vromr .,roan me ea per�,oa d Ieevm ARdrmare & n.Eip. coP„iµr s, roar tm�a ArcAMaart a rim®. City Center Design Review Committee Page 1 December 23, 2002 To: South Burlington Design Review Committee From: Julia Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning Re: December 23, 2002 agenda items Date: December 19, 2002 3) DesilEn Review Application #DR-02-19 of Bill Michaud, 23 San Remo Drive The application consists of amending a previously approved site plan consisting for a 7,200 square foot building including 1) 3,600 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 3,600 square feet with four (4) dwelling units. The amendment consists of a proposal for 4,089 square feet of new construction, including 1) 2,089 square feet of medical office use and two (2) 2,000 square foot dwelling units. The DRC last reviewed this project at their 6/5/01 meeting for approval of satellite dishes for the tenants of the building. This property located at 23 San Remo Drive lies within the Design Overlay District 2, and Central District 2. It is on the northeast corner of San Remo Drive. The property is bounded on the west by Christ Church, and on the south by mixed use retail. Densi .: The proposed density for the property is an F.A.R. of 0.5. This is the maximum allowed F.A.R. for the CD2 District. Lot Coverage: The proposed building coverage for the lot is 25% (maximum allowed is 40%). The proposed overall coverage is 72% (maximum allowed is 90%). Setback: The proposed setback meets the CD 2 requirement of 32 feet measured from centerline of San Remo Drive. The building envelope is greater then 80 feet from the measured setback, but this is due to a pre-existing structure. Per Section 14.606 the Development Review Board can modify this standard at their meeting. Access/circulation: Access is provided via a 26 foot ingress and egress curb cut, and a 13 foot wide egress only curb cut, both are on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to an adjacent lot to the southwest. There are no proposed changes to access or circulation. CIM OF SOUTH BUFd I GTON DEPART3= OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLLNGTOr_i, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number SP- - APPLICATION FOR. SITE PLAIN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information zither on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Four Boys LLC, 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte VT 05445, 425-3879 home phone, 862-8391 fax 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Michaud, 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte VI' 05445, 425-3879 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as aunlicant 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL TD # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1490 00023 C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (iaciuding description and size of each separate nee) First floor: Commercial (HealthSouth) 3600sf. Second floor: 4 apartments 3600sf b) Proposed Uses on property (indude description and size of each new use and exiling uses to remain) First floor: Commercial (medical tenant) 2089sf. Second floor: 2 apartments 2000sf. New additional sf. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and odsting buildings to remain) Proposed building: 4089sf new construction. Existing to remain: 7200sf. No demolition d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed hales ga and wdsdm hilaa to remoain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Existing bldg: 27' to roof ridge. New bldg: 34'-Y to roof ridge of stairwell. 2 floors n both buildings. Roof deck to be availahle to building tenants. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) t x isting bldg: 4 apartments on 2nd fl. New bldg: 2 apartments on 2nd fl. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) HeathSouth: 5 employees, 5 vehicles. New commercial tenant: 4 employecs, 4 vehicles. g) Othe: (List any other information pertinent to :his application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: E: istin& 1 h % Proposed b) Overall (building, paring, outside storage, etc) Existing 6I % Proposed 72 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing no change a/o Proposed no change % 9) COST EST2AATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 300,000 b) Landscaping: $ 8,500 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): hoof garden: $12,000 Benches (4): $3,000 10} ESTIMATED TRAFFIC 40 patient visits (existing) + 12 patient visits est. (new) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 5 staff (existing) + 4 staff est. (new) b) A.3/i Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 20 + 6 patient visits c) P241 Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 20 + 6 patient visits 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPE unnON 7-10 AM 5-7 PM 12) PEAK DAYS OF QPERATION: M thru F 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: One year from building permits 14) S= PLAIN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exlnbit A attached Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the Cite at the time of submits the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part or this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r SIGNA OF A,�'PIIICA�d'I V—fP1CGTXA"TU4RE0F PROPERTY C3 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and rind it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date City Center Design Review Committee Page 2 December 23, 2002 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA Consistent Design: The proposed addition is inventive and departs from the existing structure's form. The architect incorporated many of the existing design elements into the addition. The color palette, proposed textures, and the scale of the addition integrate the two structures in an innovative and attractive ways (please see enclosed renderings and letter from the architect dated 11/22/02). The architect proposes new features as well. One is a covered walkway along the western side of the existing structure. This walkway has the same setback as the proposed addition and encloses a small garden space. Likewise, on the southeast corner, a garden wall extends out and matches the existing setback. The architect used many design elements to create a unified look for the entire property. Materials: The applicant proposes to use faux wood grain siding (same as existing) on the first floor of the proposed addition. The second floor siding is 8" wide vinyl without a texture. The top portion of the addition (roof top garden wall and peak over enclosed stairwell) is a synthetic insulating compound that resembles stucco (DrivitTM ). The proposed materials comply with the requirements of Section 24.401 (b) of the zoning regulations. Colors & Textures: The proposed colors and textures include what is present on the existing structure with a couple of introductions. The colors include teal, which will be applied to the synthetic stucco and is the color of the existing structure's roof, and light gray, which is the existing siding color present on the Health South building. The applicant proposes another color, tan, for the 8" wide vinyl siding. The color swatches do not represent a specific manufactured brand of paint, but the intent is to match with the existing colors. The metal window frames on the first floor are painted white to match the windows on the existing structure, on the second floor they are beige, and within the upper portion of the new addition the windows frames will be painted to match the siding color, teal. The textures proposed are a faux wood finish on the gray siding (same as existing), and the nubby texture of the synthetic stucco. The proposed 8" vinyl siding has no texture. Windows and Doors: The fenestration of the addition mimics what is present on the Health South building (paired, metal framed windows, please see cut sheets). A continuation of the paired window openings extends within a garden wall that allows visual access into a small garden space. The proposed locations of windows and doorways respond to the interior layout of the addition (please review floor plans). Design Review Committee Memo November 25, 2002 Human -scale Design Elements: The proposed addition provides human scale design features. The applicant proposes using metal awnings over the windows on the northern and eastern first floor elevation to help relate the two and '/2 story building to the pedestrian. The location of an enclosed stairwell is on the interior of the structure so it does not dominate a public side of the building. The synthetic stucco (which is teal) contains some windows to break up the massive wall found in the peak of the roof. These windows also allow natural light into the stairwell. The applicant uses plant material for a more inviting landscape on the property. Roofs as a design element: The proposed roof over the stairwell is 7 on 12 (minimum requirement for the CD2 District is 5 on 12). This should be noted on the plans. Orient Buildings to Public Street: The proposal includes eight (8) windows, in pairs of two (2), across the lower level fronting on San Remo Drive. The windows allow for visual access to the interior of the building. A door on the north side of the building, facing San Remo Drive, opens into a foyer, which access both the medical office space and the residences upstairs. Building Height: The proposed structure meets the height requirements of the district. Conceal Rooftop Devices: The proposal includes locating AC, vent stacks, and other mechanical elements necessary for the operation of the building hidden from view on the roof of the building. Special Features: The applicant requests to enlarge an electrical cabinet on the northern fagade to accommodate the addition. The enlarged cabinet may require the closure of one below). Figure I electrical cabinet The proposal includes the relocation of utility lines underground. Energy Efficiency_: The application includes using casement windows instead of double hung windows (which exist on the present structure). The architect believes this style of window is more energy efficient. Design Review Committee Memo November 25, 2002 Dumpsters: The property has a single dumpster. It should be screened from view with the addition of a gate across the front of the enclosure. Figure 2 dumpster storage area Streetscape Improvements: Most streetscape improvements along San Remo Drive are included in the proposal including the installation of seven (7) street trees, the construction of a seven (7) foot wide sidewalk on the east side, and installation of 16 foot tall, metal halide, Lumec, Inc. "Westminster' fixture. The applicant proposes curved sidewalk at the corner of San Remo Drive to align with the building's curved facade. The Streetscape Plan for San Remo Drive shows Honey locust trees along the northern leg of San Remo Drive. The plan before the committee shows a Callery pear. This should be revised on the plan to reflect the correct species of tree. As part of a previous approval (minutes from October 19, 1999), the applicant installed a sidewalk on the north side of their property along San Remo Drive. At that time, they complied with the regulations. The applicant expressed reluctance to retrofit the sidewalk to comply with the current Streetscape Guidelines. Staff suggests the applicant explain this issue to the committee. Exterior Lighting_ The applicant proposes using 100W recessed can lights (cut sheets enclosed), two (2) wall mounted exterior light fixtures (cut sheets enclosed), and one of the Lumec, Inc. "Westminster" streetlights within the project parking lot. _Signage: Signage is not part of this application, but the applicant should be aware that there is an illegal wall sign on the western elevation. No design review approval or a permit has been issued for this sign. This violation should be corrected as soon as possible. 4) Individual Sign Pursuant to Master Sianne Permit # DR-02-10 The application consists of a request for an individual sign pursuant to Master Signage Permit #DR-02-10, 338-340 Dorset Street, Unit #2. Enclosed is the master signage permit decision on October 1, 2002, as well as, a letter from the applicant outlining the request. TRANSMITTAL IETTER INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN/ 477 Ten Stones Circles, Charlotte, Vermont 05445 802-425-7717 PROJECT: 23 San Remo Drive JOB NO. 0205 DATE: Wed, Dec 11, 2002 Bill Michaud/ Four Boys 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, Vermont05445 Phone ATTENTION: Stephanie Smith/ SBurl P&Z Fax If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: () Acknowledge receipt of enclosures () Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: ❑ via FAX number of sheets including this cover ® attached to this document ❑ under separate cover ❑ in accordance with your request ❑ by FEDEX, UPS or other express r) P P FOR YOUR: ❑ approval ® information ❑ distribution ❑ review & comment ❑ record ❑ resubmission THE FOLLOWING: ® drawings ❑ specifications ❑ change orders ❑ shop drawings ❑ samples ❑ product literature ❑ software ❑ letter copies dates rev.no. description action code 5 12110102 Sheet Al/A B 5 12110102 Sheet A2/A B 1 11x17 Sheet Al/A B 1 11x17 Sheet A2/A B REW&-, i EIED ACTION CODE: A. Action indicated on item transmitted DEC 1 ZEi�1Z B. No action required C. For signature & return to this office D. For signature and forwarding E. See REMARKS below REMARKS: For your review and comments. COPIES TO: SIGNED BY: /7- 575 Dorset Street Phone: 846-4106 Fax: 846-4101 Fax To: Ted Montgomery From: Stephanie A. Smith Fax: 425.7717 Date: December 5, 2002 Phone: Pages: Re: Site Plan application CC: Re: Site Plan application Dear Mr. Montgomery: Please find attached the comments from the city engineer on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled for consideration by the Design Review Committee on December 23, and by the Development Review Board on January 21, 2003. Please be sure someone is at the meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give the Planning and Zoning Office a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner City of South Burlington, Planning & Zoning CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS FOR 11 /21 /03 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING FOUR BOYS LLC SAN REMO DRIVE 1) STREETS SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE PLAN. 2) WATER AND SEWER SERVICES SHOULD BE SHOWN. ALSO MAINS IN THE STREET. 3) METHOD OF HANDLING THE STORMWATER FROM THE SITE SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 0 approximate property line 162' Site Plan & First floor S San RPmn Drive Note to Roof Garden: This feature is designed to provide stormwater retention. It will drain into two internal roof drains when saturation conditions are present. 0000� Incuia� fa AC �✓ _ <owi.i rowsr O O -}- Roof Garden , 51,01,40" Second floor Roof Garden plan Notes on Zoning Regulations Lot size 22356 st Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 50% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking inforMdOn - _-_ — First floor sift 5689 sf Second floor size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial lstfloor 1 space/200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spaceshmit 12 I/4 units 1 Total spaces required 41 spaces Current offsite spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of 8 spaces Planting Schedule _ Key Common Name Sctenllflc name Qty. Size Pc CHANTICLEER Pyrus 5 3" CALLERY PEAR calleryana B&B 'Chanticleer' Gt SHADEMASTER Gleditsia 3 3.5" HONEYLOCUST triacanthos B&B inermis 'Shademaster' Nf Neon Flash Spirea Spiraea 100 15" It. japonica PJM Rhododendron PJM 10 18" h. Rhododendron Mp Mugo Pine Pinus mugo 20 24" mugo B&B Lighting - _ Schedule Light I Lumec "New Westminster" on 12' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 3:�A Spaulding ST-M100-HL- "Soffitier" SYM-120-DP- SWT Light B BEGA wall 2492MH white mounted INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 477 Ten Stones Circle Choilotte VT 05445 802-425-7717 O/F ted0trialcira-circtdtecttue.com www.hidi=a•ar-htec ure.corn Strudurcil engineering Mechcauccd engineering Landscape architecture Const action Management Date: 12■6■02 Scale: 1 10" =1-U Revisions Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job 0205 Sheet A 1 Description Floor plans tnia ao�mnan ana �x e.,ra. aaa,aaa. o«, �.aw &rein as an r �f �.n-icc a r6e pa T 1"duu Art' �""r"@ Iknien. and i. oa �u M1c �eA in copynr� a zmz rmia., AreLnccrwa a rx.;r. No Text i! N approximate property line 162' Site Plan & First floor E 1 t '4-4--- tr II Second floor Notes on Zoning ReOulations Lot size 22356 sf Parking Lot coverage 47% 10554 sf Building coverage 25% 5600 sf F.A.R./total bldg 50% 11289 sf Existing Building size 7200 sf Additional Building area 4089 sf Parking information First floor size 5689 sf Second floor size 6 apartments 5600 sf Commercial Istfloor I space/200sf 28 Residential 2nd floor 2 spaces/unit 12 1/4 units I Total spaces required 41 spaces Current off site spaces 10 spaces Total on site spaces 23 spaces Request waiver of 8 spaces Panting Schedule Tree I CHANTICLEER Pynis calleryana Pc CALLERY PEAR 'Chanticleer' ------- 3"-3.5" B&B matched ---- Tree 2 — SHADEMASTER --- Gledit-sia Gt HONEYLOCUST triacanthos 3.5" - 4" B&B matched inennis 'Shademastet Shrub 1 Day Lily Shrub 2 Rhododendron Catawbievse Brousault 1AghtingScheduk Light I Lumec 'New Westminster" on 12' pole to match style of street lights Light 2 �D,A Spaulding "Soffitier" ST-M100-FlL- SYM-120-DP- S WT Light B BEGA wall mounted 2492MH white 1 INDIANA ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 477 Ten Stones Circle Charlotte VT 05445 802-425-7717 O/F tsamindtana-cactutecture.com www.indi=cKzcWtectm.com Struchual engineering Mechanical engineering Landscape architecture Construction Management Date: l l ■ 2l ■ 02 Scale: 1 8" = P-0" Revisions Four Boys LLC 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington VT 864-1812 Job 0205 Sheet A 1 A Description Floor plans 0 = deusde,mi—V huein ae an u�imiru daen is rAe poperry Iaduaa Archi¢c""e k rxsrv. uM ie M to M1e uud in ale w i" yart for Wiv a a"y other pmper rvnho.r We en permsrw d indiare Architature ffi peaige. <'ogright 9M lvduos Arch..— & Iksigx Draw deep, fresh breaths of air into your home with the Marvin Awning. The perfect MARVIN t ti'..�do� z .,.d Doo.z � companion for our Casemaster, this window is designed to circulate air without exposing your room to light rain. Since Awnings can be proportioned to almost any dimension, you can use them alone, stacked vertically or combined horizontally. All the features that make our Casemaster such a solid performer are also incorporated into our Awning including our smooth rotogear operator, concealed sash locks and full -perimeter sash and frame weather stripping. T Our Awning is designed to t. accompany Casemasters,0 picture windows and other Awnings, adding height, light and ventilation wherever you need it. Awning Options ` Crank, lever, flip or available in three finishes. F . PowerDrive arcessories.' available in two finishes." Coastal hardware. n Concealed sash lock with to v knish;' lever available in three J. Finish Options " You can replace the Hardware Selection Interior _bare wood or pnm crank handle with our Exterior— aluminum easy -to -operate lever clad in flvM1 standard colors, bare wood or P, operator, which has Lever Crank Handle Flip Handle For a complete selectioty` five different open Handle p locking positions. of options see pages 76-77 i Lock Lever 1 i Circle Handle PowerDrive fx t�i (Bronze and White only) z, I 000 , \, t kt3 Bronze White Bright Brass Exterior Clad Colors White Pebble Bahama Bronze Evergreen Gray Brown o � � r 3 i_'Y*1 I 2Tt.. Standard Features O Clear, one-lite insulating glass © Bronze crank handle © Concealed sash lock with bronze lock lever ® All wood brick mould casing (wood units) ® 4-9/16" (116 mm) jambs Vinyl drip cap and nailing fin (clad units) Screen with bronze surround Bare wood interior 71 M OPERATING/STATIONARY SIZES Mas.OPgmml 2-0%(622) 2-411,(z4) 2-8'G(826) 3-0%(927) 3-4/(1029) 4-0/(1232) Rgh.Opg. (mml. 2-1. (e3s) 2-5 (737) 2-9 (u38) 31 p40) 3-51iaa11 4-1 (1243) Frame Size (mm) 2-0(e1o) 2-41n1) 2-8(813) 3-O(s,.,l 3-4(m16) 4-0(12,e) Glass Size (mm) 19°/e"(ngn 23%."(59ey 2r/,."P00) 31%""(om( 35%""(so3) 43Xd"(lim) CANN2420 CAWN2820 CAWN3220 CAWN3620 CAWN4020 CAWN4820 CAWN2424 CAWN2824 CAWN3224 CAWN3624 CAWN4024 CAWN4824 mEl F hn N. N iV CAWN2428 CAWN2828 CAWN3228 CAWN3628 CAWN4028 CAWN4828 N " c LE5 n r•, nr N N N RS CAWN2432 CAWN2832 CAWN3232 CAWN3632 �CAWN4032 CAWN4832 aq s - 1pe� N N N N gg CANN2436 CAWN2836 CAWN3236 CAWN3636 CAWN4836 L c�i=c A 6 €2 CAWN2440 CAWN2840 CAWN3240 CAWN3640�CAWN4040 CAWN4840 M Ind, 17& CAWN2448 CAWN2848 CAWN3248 CAWN3648 CAWN4048 CAWN4848 CLAD AWNING OPERATOR/STATIONARY ENERGY DATA u-Faslor R-value SHCC K Enetov Star Ras Nan -Rea Res Nan -Res Ra Non -Rea - Non -Rea InsulatingGlass/Clear -Air 0.52 051 1.92 1.96 1 (153 053 (153 0.57 InsulatingGlass/HardcoatLowE - Air 042 040 2.38 2.50 G45 1 047 049 053 Insulating Glass/Hardcoat Low E - Argon 0.39 0.37 2.56 2.70 045 047 0.49 0.53 C Insulating Glass/Low E II - Air G40 0.38 2.50 2.63 0.30 10.31 10.47 050 SC Insulating Glass/Low E I I - Argon 0.37 0.34 2.70 IL4 0.30 1 (131 1 0.47 0.50 SC High R Tripane/Low E II - Air 0.36 034 2.78 2.94 0.25 10.26 1 0.37 040 SC High R Tripane/Low E II - Krypton U9 1 0.26 1 3.45 3.85 6.25 16.261 6.37 0.40 NCS I hermal and solar values are subject to update. Values are generated in accordance with NFRC 100-97 and other applicable NFRC procedures. Argon gas is not available for the attitudes that require capillary tubes. SHGC=Solar Heat Gain Coefficient. VT=Visible Light Transmittance. Energy Star codes: N=Northern, C=Central, S=Southern. NOTES: • Litepatternsshownare3W(19)grillesorTT(22)SDL.LitepatternsforlL8'(29)mayvary. • Awning Lints available as an operator or stationary Stationary units can be converted to an operating unit with the appropriate replacement parts. • Please contact your local Marvin representative for masonry openings including clad brick mould or flat casing. Construction Details OPERATOR HEAD JAMB & SILL {-Rough Opening -Frame Size V2" (13) V4'(6) +Opening' Masonry OPERATOR JAMB V4- (6) 1/2' (13) �o 5 a O N a r 'E� L ns- STATIONARY HEAD JAMB & SILL -Rough Opening-f V2' (13) #--Frame Size-: I 1/2' (13) V4' (6) MP asonry Opening STATIONARY JAMB Not To Scale 1 109 rr' 1 iU 1 i • ' � 7, '/mow � ��' � l' i -:y/Q'!> Y• it -----" - —� � •� l— rK' "ice " > ...... .' ++ti• �. „M 1 1 Permit Number DR- - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): (3 Design Plan Approval u Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Four Boys LLC, 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte VT 05445, 425-3879 home phone, 862-8391 fax 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Bill Michaud, 1408 Ferry Road, Charlotte VT 05445, 425-3879 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as applicant 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1490 00023 C 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. This is a 4000 sf addition to an existing building. It will have a commercial tenant on the first floor and two apartments on the second floor. The building will have a flat roof and will be connected to the existing building by a heated corridor. The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. e ��, (�� , ' Q � -Q IQ Do not write below this line DATE OF STJBNHSSI®IV: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning,& Zoning or Designee Date 9 LM# 5rlq� I � -,SDK)� -X -BODI-) N I IVEP-3) 31S, 5 3b , 3' 43.3 j� DK m ft qoL-f- CITY OF SOUTH BURL,INGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 15, 2001 Mostafa Daovdi 23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review Application, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr.Daovdi: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on June 5, 2001. (effective date June 12, 2001). Please note the conditions of approval, including that a Zoning Permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval will be null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner Enclosure 5/14/01 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL DAOVDI, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application 4DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding -a satellite dishlo the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive", with a stamped received date of 5111/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. II 2. Prior to obtaining a•zoffing-pit the plans sh �11be revised to show the changes listed below: A) The proposed satellite dish shall be ui f-t,._�� f fCw f4c�" 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) rdionths pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. ��'°, 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the4ddA c 1 • s h 5. Any change to the plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. D EVELOPA EN7 RI E7vI Wl BOARD -TVI NJO DUNE 5, 2001 IWEETING 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance .tom the Administrative Officer prior to use of the second satellite dish. 5. Any change to the plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. C) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION — FASTER SIGNAGE PLAN — MARGO BREEN, 350 DORSET STREET This project consists of a master signage plan application. The master signage plan consists of 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by 28" cut out letter "Met Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white 14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white 13' 5" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman" wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign, 6) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign on Dorset Street, and 7) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign on San Remo Drive, 350 Dorset Street. 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 3 . The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 4. Any change to the master signage plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. SITE PLAN APPLICATION — SITE AIVENDMENTS — 110-120 KINIBALL AVE LLC, 120 KIMBALL AVE This project consists of a site plan application to amend a previously approved site plan for a 27,616 square foot general office building. The amendment consists of site amendments, 120 Kimball Avenue. The site plan for this property was last approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1998 (minutes enclosed). DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JUKE 59 2001 MEETING 4. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 5. Any change to the master signage plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee and approved by the Development review Hoard excepting design review applications made for erection of freestanding sign panels and 40" by 70" wall sign at 340 Dorset Street. These specific design review applications shall require administrative review only by the Code Officer if they are determined to comply with both the master signage plan and the Sign Ordinance in effect at the time of submittal. B) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICAITION — SATELLITE DISK — MOSTAFA DAOVDI, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,858 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) satellite dashes to the exterior facade, 23 San Demo Drive. The City Center Design Review Committee reviewed this proposal at their 5/14/01 meeting. The Design Review Committee recommends that the Board approve the application with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: A) The proposed satellite dishes shall be located on the south facade or on the roofline, no higher than the peak of the roof approximate to the southwest corner of the building. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and. void. E CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 1, 2001 Mostafa Daovdi 23 San Remo Drive, #203 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review Application Dear Mr. Daovdi: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Committee meeting and my comments. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Associate Planner SM/ld Encs. CAMarie\My Documents\@DRB Reminder Form 6.1.0].doe Id CITY OF SOUTH TH BURLING`I ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH: BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 23, 200I Michael Dee Four Boys, LLC 14o8 Ferry Road Charlotte, Vermont 05445 Re: Dumpster, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: This is in regards to the dumpster you are using at 23 San Remo Drive. This dumpster is not shown on your approved site plan. You must either remove the dumpster from the premises or obtain approval for its placement on the property. There are also a couple of small green trash storage containers along the south side of the building. These containers also have not been approved. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss these violations. Sincerely,'. R ymo'nd J. Belair Administrative Officer Td DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 2, 2001 Mr. Mostafu Daovdi 23 San Remo Drive So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Fie: Design Review Application Dear Mr. Daovdi: Enclosed please find a copy of the May 14, 2001 Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, r Sarah MacCallum Associate planner Enclosure td E CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 The South Burlington Development Design Review Committee held a regular meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 2001 at 7:35 P.M. in the City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Timothy Duff, Mary Benoit, Donna Leban Others: Sarah MacCallum, Associate Plarr--,, 11.7ayne Gibson of Kershner Signs, John Jaeger of South Burlington Realty, Nigel Mucklow, Mostafa Daovdi, Greg Rabideau and Margo Breen 1. Minutes of April 10, 2001: Tabled 2. Sign Design, 340 Dorset Street Mr. Gibson introduced the application. He stated that it was the wish of the applicant to move toward 40" by 70" wooden oval signs that were painted. Mr. Duff stated that he didn't have a problem with the application. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve the design review application #DR-01-03 of John Kennedy to amend a previously approved master signage plan. The amendment consists of 1) removing one 16 inches by 3 foot wall sign totaling four square feet, and 2) erecting one 40 inches by 70 inches non -illuminated wall sign, 340 Dorset Street, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Master Signage Plan for 338,339, and 340 Dorset Street", dated April 4, 2001 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 3. Prior to review by the Development Review` tsoard, the applicant should revise the master signage plan to: a) Remove all reference to exterior lighting of the MacSphere and Caswell Credit Union signs. b) Remove 339 Dorset Street from the title of the Master Signage Plan. 4. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 5. Any change to the master signage plans shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee and approved by the Development Review Board excepting design review applications made for erection of freestanding sign panels and 40" by 70" oval wall sign at 340 Dorset Street These specific design review applications shall require administrative review only by the Code Officer if they are determined to comply with both the master signage plan and the Sign Ordinance in effect at the time of submittal. Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. 3. Design Review Application, 364-368 Dorset Street Mr. Rabideau introduced the application with updated site plans. He stated that the San Remo Drive hedge had inadvertently been left off the previous landscaping plans. He stated that there would also be gas meters on the north facade. He stated that a dark brown color would be used for the dominant color. Mr. Gibson asked where the free standing sign for the new building CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 would be. Mr. Jaeger provided possible locations for free standing signs but stressed that this was not a sign application at this time. Mr. Rabideau stated that the issue of street lighting was brought up, and the applicant did not feel that they could pursue the installation of street lighting at this time in exchange for a landscaping credit. Mr. Jaeger stated that the applicant might be interested in pursuing a couple of street lights, perhaps at the entrance. Mr. Duff stated that he didn't think it was advisable to just drop a couple of lights in. He was concerned that it would adversely affect the Streetscape plan. Ms. Benoit asked Mr. Rabideau to address the energy efficiency of the building. He stated that the envelope of the building would conform with state energy efficiency guidelines. He stated that the mechanicals for the building were not finalized yet. He stated that heat pumps would probably be used. Mr. Duff stated that h ..:.ips require large cooling towers on the site and asked staffto make note of heat pumps in the future. Ms. Leban suggested that the engineers work with Efficiency Vermont on finalizing mechanicals. She recommended that low e - glazing be used on the windows. Ms. Benoit was worried that the applicant would be immediately coming back for approval for a cooling tower. Ms. Leban asked if there were entrance canopies on the east facade. Mr. Rabideau stated that the entrances were pulled into the building and were not canopies. He stated that the entrances on the buildings did not project any finther than the other facade projected. The entrances were not porticos particles but rather like hood labels. Ms. Leban stated that there was a much different feel between the east and west facades. She recommended that the west facade should be more similar to the east facade in the center section. Mr. Duff raised concerns on the landscaping on the west facade of the existing building at 368 Dorset Street. Mr. Duff suggested repeating the landscaping around the transformer around the east facade. Mr. Duff stated that the applicant should work with staffto amend the western elevation of the proposed building and amend the landscaping around the eastern facade of the Phase I building at 368 Dorset Street. Mr. Duff then made a motion to the City Center Design Review Committee to recommend approval of the design review application #DR-01-02 of South Burlington Realty Company to amend a planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 4800 square foot building consisting of 3,600 square feet of convenience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twenty two (22) seats, 2) an 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3500 square feet of general office use and 4560 square feet used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, 3) an 8,944 square foot building (phase 1) and a 13,640 square foot building (phase 2) for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, 364, 366 and 368 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of. 1) reducing the 4,800 square foot building consisting of 3,600 square feet of convenience store use and a 1200 square foot fast food restaurant with twenty two (22) seats to 2,400 square feet used for retail at 364 Dorset Street, 2) removing the 13,640 square foot building (phase 2) at 368 Dorset Street used for a multiple number of commercial uses for a multiple number of tenants, and 3) constructing a 20,000 square foot medical office building along the eastern boundary of 364, 366, and 368 corset Street, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled "South Burlington Realty", prepared by Greg Rabideau, dated 4/24/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval ofthe proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The proposed Little Leaf Linden Trees proposed for the western east leg of San Remo Drive should be replaced with 3"- 3 1/2" Chanticleer Pear Trees. b) The plans shall be revised to illustrate a right-of-way dedication for the sidewalk. c) The center bay of the west facade should be redesigned in consultation with staff to make it similar to the center of the east facade. d) The applicant shall work with staffto incorporate a similar landscape design utilized around the transformer around the eastern facade of the Phase I building at 368 Dorset Street. CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 3. Prior to review permit issuance, cut sheets and specifications for all exterior lighting shall be submitted. 4. The applicant should be required to comply with the San Remo Drive Streetscape including, but not limited to, the planting of street trees, a sidewalk along all street frontage. 5. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 6. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision zF� norset Street shall not be exempted from Design Review associated with changes of use or facade modifications. 7. The applicant shall submit information on exterior and site plan impacts of the final design of mech systems prior to permit issuance for staff review. Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. 4. Design Review, 372 Dorset Street Mr. Mucklow introduced the proposal. He stated that when the Dorset Street widening project was completed, he was instructed to stop utilizing the existing door on Dorset Street. Mr. Mucklow stated that there were safety issues with sidewalk plows and people entering out onto the sidewalk. Mr. Duffwas worried that the applicant would be caught in a Catch 22 where the City may be requiring something different than the State of Vermont. Ms. Benoit asked the applicant if he had documentation to assist in deciphering this requirement. Ms. MacCallum suggested that the applicant research the matter and produce reasonable documentation on these state requirements prior to the Development Review Board's June 6, 2001 meeting. If documentation can not be furnished, the Design Review Committee should take up the application again at their June meeting. Ms. Benoit brought up the issue of screening the meter sockets on the north facade. Mr. Mucklow stated that it would not be a problem. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve the design review application #DR-01-05 of Nigel Mucklow to: 1) add three windows and a sign panel to the north facade, 2) remove the cast stone siding, the current window and door bays, and chimney stack from the west facade, 3) introduce a center side game to the west facade with three six over six pane windows underneath framed on the facade of the building by wooden pilaster strips and flanked on each side by three window bays each with one six over six pane window, and 4) reconfigure the three western most bays on the south facade, 372 Dorset Street, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plant, Page one entitled "372 Dorset St.", with a stamped received date of 5/3/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval ofthe proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The meter sockets on the north facade should be screened by exterior landscaping or a panel in conjunction with staff recommendations. 3. Prior to Development Review Board consideration, the applicant shall famish reasonable documentation to prove that the State of Vermont requires that all doors along the Dorset Street facade be eliminated. Should the applicant be unable to furnish reasonable documentation, the application shall be remanded to the Design Review Committee. 4. The proposed structure shall utilize a high quality vinyl that does not use a simulated grain. 5. For the purposes of zoning and subdivision, this property shall not be exempted from Design Review associated any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, phone meters, or other utilities on the exterior of the building. CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 Ms. Benoit seconded. Unanimously approved. Design review. 23 San Remo Drive Mr. Daovdi introduced the proposal. He stated that he was requesting an additional satellite dish to what was there. He was unsure where the location of the dish would be on the building. Ms. Benoit was concerned that there might be many more satellite dishes to follow, perhaps one for each tenant. Mr. Duff stated that dishes should be clustered together on a facade or hidden on the roof line. This should be a precedent for future review of satellite dishes. 'Mr. Daovdi stated that the Committee should review the issue of satellite dishes in its review of new projects in the future. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve design review application #DR-01-04 of Mostafa Daovdi to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two satellite dishes to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive", with a stamped received date of 5111/01 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed satellite dishes is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 2. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy the plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below: a) The proposed satellite dishes shall be located on the south facade or on the roofline, no higher then the peak of the roof, approximate to the southwest corner of the building. 3. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from th-- Administrative Officer prior to use of the second satellite dish. 5. Any change to the plans shall require rev; .. ;, 1Ze South Burlington Design Review Committee. Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. 6. Sign Design. 350 Dorset Street Ms. Breen stated that she had a couple of revisions to the stated application. There would be a "Merle Norman" sign above the door and the panel sign on the freestanding sign would read "Merle Norman Cosmetics/Sports Pro Shop". Ms. Leban stated that she did not have any issues with the sign. Ms. Benoit asked what the lighting would be. Ms. MacCallum stated that the existing lighting to be used is most likely incandescent. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve design review application #DR-01-06 of Margo Breen for a master signage plan. The master signage plan consists of 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by 28" cut out letter "Net Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white 14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white 13' 5" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman " wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign and 6) two indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign, 350 Dorset Street, as depicted on a seven (7) page set of plans, page one entitled "Merle Norman", dated 5/8/01 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. E m CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY 14, 2001 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Administrative Officer. 3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void. 4. Any change to the master signage plan shall require review by the South Burlington Design Review Committee. Mr. Duff made a motion to approve, Ms. Leban seconded. Unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Chair 62�;6t Date 9 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 their property being used as a jug handle if the connection were made. The Committee agreed. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz, MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use, 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled, "329 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a) The plans shall be revised to show a location for a potential ground mounted HVAC unit and method of screening. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South. Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Ms. Leban seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet). Mr. Kennedy presented the application. The plan presented at the meeting was slightly different than the plan submitted to staff. The plan was revised to address staff comments. Mr. Kennedy said they added some sidewalks out to the street and added street trees. They have added more windows to the first floor facade. He said windows along east side will be put in during phase I and then just relocated when phase II is built. Ms. Benoit was concerned about proposed 100 watt metal halide lights. Mr. Kennedy said that he would use 70 watt, but might have to come back to the City if they are not bright enough. Phase I will include parking lot and all landscaping. Committee recommended 20 foot high shoe box lights and 14 foot high decorative light on corner. Committee recommended that a San Remo Drive sidewalk along the north side of the building be constructed as part of Phase I. They were willing to wait three years before the San Remo Drive sidewalk along the east side of the building is constructed. Mr. Kennedy said the overhead wire serving the building will be put underground as part of Phase Il. Mr. Kennedy said that each apartment has at least 500 square feet. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the 2 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing_4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet) as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont, Elevations" prepared by Michael Dugan and dated 7/25/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24.401(aa)-(i) and 24.402(a) (i)). The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a. The elevation plan shall be revised to show the north and east first floor facades of the addition consisting of a majority of see -through glass as required by section 24.401(d) of the zoning regulations. b. The site plan shall show the sidewalks on the west and south side of the building extended out to San Remo Drive. A sidewalk shall be shown along San Remo Drive in a location to be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. C. The site plan shall show street trees along San Remo Drive at a spacing of 40 feet between trees. Several more trees shall also be included on the property. d. The dumoster shall be moved to the southwest corner of the prove rt e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. Proposed on -street parking spaces (8' x 22') shall be shown on the plan. g. The plans shall be revised so that the building footprint and architectural drawings are consistent. h. The elevations shall be revised to show buildinq _mounted lights and meters. 3 The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. 4 Specifications and cut sheets of proposed building mounted lights and new ornamental pole lights shall be submitted prior to review by the Development Review Board_ 5. The wattage of the soffit lights shall be 70 watts. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 9, 2001 Mostafa Daovdi 23 San Remo Drive #203 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Review Application, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Daovdi: Enclosed is the agenda for the next Tuesday's Design Review Committee meeting and my comments. Please be sure someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 14, 21001 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Associate Planner SMJmcp Encis -04 Permit Number CITY OF SOUTH BURLfNGTON APPLICATION FOR SREVIEW All information requested on this application must beeccompleted in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I) WNER OF*CORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phonp and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) -7 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 1 e 23 JW Rek `IX� E,-J02, S,. UT Q&Ubk 12L71 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2. SA^v ;i_6 ►-t C o) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION \�a4) Existing ses on Property (i luding des ription and size of each separate use) (L— b Pro osed Uses on DroD rtv 6 1 d d iz f h new use and xi c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) ,2 dq U � 15 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): (� 4v -� Ely n zoo g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): At - _ _ U 10 6,U "'X'U� CJ 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): J b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 1 L o • v J f ' 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): ky-\ c) P.M. Peak hour for entire propert 11) PEAK 14OURS OF OPERATIOI 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMF 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit Al s ptid�:'04 �� � crlr� . 6't'. , I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. OF APPLICANT TUBE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 11 CEIVED A.Y 20 Burlington Cl LU tNo > UJ C3 C/') Design Advisory Committee Memo May 14, 2001 required on the Dorset Street facade. Conceal Rooftop Devices: No rooftop devices are proposed. Landscape and Plantings: No changes are proposed. Efficient and Effective Circulation: No changes are proposed. Outdoor Lighting: No changes are proposed. Special Features: The applicant has not proposed any air conditioner units, new gas, electric, or phone meters on the exterior of the building. 6. Design Review Application— Satellite Dish - Mostafa Daovdi, 23 San Remo Drive This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of six (6) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding a satellite dish to the exterior facade, 23 San Remo Drive. The Committee should note that there is currently an illegal satellite dish installed on the east facade of the building. The applicant wishes to install a second dish in an unknown location. Consistent Design: There are currently no approved satellite dishes within the Design Review Districts. This will set a precedent for how the Committee handles review of satellite dishes. The Committee currently requires that all utilities are concealed or incorporated into the design of the building. Digital satellite dishes are hard to place on a building as the location of these dishes are often dictated by signal receptiveness. The consistent design criteria of Section 24.40 of the Zoning Regulations states that "building design shall promote consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design". It is staffs recommendation that if the Committee should permit satellite dishes within the Design Review Districts, these dishes should be treated similarly to other equipment or utilities and incorporated into the design of the building through roof decks or cupolas or otherwise concealed from view. Roof as a Design Element/ Conceal Roof Top Devices: It is unknown if the satellite dish will be added to the roofline or to the facade of the building. There are currently no roof top devices present on the building. Staff would recommend that if a dish is added to the roof top, a roof deck or cupola be added to screen the dish. IMPACT & PERMIT FEES WORK SHEET Zoning Permit @ $. of = "`�1 s/fib V Permit Recording Fee = Sewer Impact Fee =_ bedrooms x Ik gpd x $2.50 = School Impact Fee (#222) _ iy ` �g v, Recreation Impact Fee (#220) _ 7 Road Impact Fee (#221) _ q(,;> I 7 f Sewer Inspection Fee = Sewer Inspection Recording Fee = TOTAL Property address UITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENTOF 13L.ANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 10. 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 2408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan, Conditional Use and Design Review Applications for 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is a copy of the October 17, 2000 Development Review Board minutes on the above referenced projects. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp 1 Encl DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 OCTOBER 2000 Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 26 September as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 10 October as written. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Report on a recent site plan decision by the Director of Planning & Zoning: a. Site plan application #SP-00-42 of Benware & Company to 1) construct a twelve foot by fifteen foot soil clean up fenced enclosure, and 2) remove five parking spaces on a lot containing a 3420 sq. ft. fast food restaurant and 400 sq. ft. accessory structure, 1205 Williston Road. Approved. No issues were raised. 4. Public Hearing: Application #CU-00-22 of F- -:r Boys, LLC seeking Conditional Use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South B Iington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to add four dwelling units to a building with two dwelling units and medical office space, 23 San Remo Drive, and 5. Site plan application #SP-00-49 and design review appiica...d #DR-00-24 of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two phase 6,088 sq. ft. building used for: 1) 4888 sq. ft. of medical office use, and 2) 1200 sq. ft. of residential use consisting of two dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two 1200 sq. ft. dwelling units and two 600 sq. ft. dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive: Mr. Michaud said there had been a question of some windows and doors and also some elevations that were wrong. Mr. Dinklage suggested Mr. Belair review the new drawings and make sure they are accurate and don't contradict anything in the approval motion and plans. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP-00-49, conditional use application #CU-00-22, and design review application #DR-00-24 to amend a previously approved site plan for a two phase 6,088 sq. ft. building used for: 1) 4888 sq. ft. of medical office use, and 2) 1200 sq. ft. of residential use consisting of two dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two 1200 sq. ft. dwelling units and two 600 sq ft. dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled 1123 San Remo Drive South DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 OCTOBER 2000 Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 10/25/99, last revised on 8/25/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a. The applicant shall revise the elevations to depict either two or four skylights. b. The elevations shall be revised to reflect the windows as built. c. The plans shall be revised to reflect the San Remo Drive streetscape plan along the east property boundary. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the four proposed dwelling units will generate 2.48 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The building shall be sprinklered. 5. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a total of 32 parking spaces, which is a three space or 8.6% waiver. 6. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the Zoning Regulations, the Development Review Board approves a landscaping credit for the amount of $2,400. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the four additional residential units within six months and Phase II by January 18, 2002 pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy c, =he newly converted space. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the Soriih Burlington Development Review Board. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 OCTOBER 2000 10. This approval is contingent on staff review of the new drawings submitted tonight. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Bearing: Final Plat Application #SD-00-53 of John Illick to amend a previously approved 16-lot subdivision. The amendment consists of resubdividing 7 lots to make minor boundary adjustments, Kimball Avenue and Community Drive: Mr. Illick said the property was subdivided 4 or 5 years ago, and they now want to realign some of the lots. The still need to get correct information onto the plat with regard to the adjustment between lots 8B and 7. Mr. Dinklage asked if the function of the retention pond changed. Mr. Illick said no. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-53 of Technology Park Partners to amend a previously approved 16 lot subdivision. The amendment consists of resubdivia-tugseven lots to make minor boundary adjustments, Kimball Avenue and Community Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Subdivision Plat Technology Park 115 Kimball Avenue, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 2/1/96, last revised on 9/22/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall record new legal documents approved by the City Attorney which are changing as a result of the boundary adjustments. The subdivision plat shall be revised to show the boundary adjustment between 8B and 7. 3. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 4. The final plat plan (sheet 1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to --cording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the direc ;zr of Planning & Zoning. E 2 A0 7/cl0 -- 1,200 s c G � --k- # , 9 c No Text AQre5e7 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS le r vph� (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1, 0 0 0 ( From current tax assessment) a units I (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION s , t .�Z,vIJ✓t r/ �"' (5) TYPE OF USE / /J (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) L,-, 22) T- I I - ®1'3 j;-�-12 = 0 �j�ri3_ ,�2 FORM NR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE $ 226.00 / vte TRIP ENDS ( From form NR-1) 4 vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) $ �2, 2- (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 , r ` ���=�ue ( from line ( 3 ) of Form NR-1)�� units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND i Ll (From Table ST-9) $ / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) $ (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND Lj 2 (4) x (7) $ (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND 5 (From Table ST-11) $ d / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION L (From Table ST-12) $ / unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS G (4) x (11) $ (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE -- 1991 BOND �0 (From Table ST-13) $ / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND 7> 7 -� (13) X (14) $ > G (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND CB (13) x (16) $ / (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $� / unit (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) $ ( 22 ) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) D FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE ( 1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) ( 2 ) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION o v C (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) ( 6 ) LAND VALUE NO v Vecords) (From current: tat (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) ✓ $1,000 0 s.f. s.f. T $-9110 1 Ter C/ T �« units Xrlwo Al - FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: ,,F_ (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax C assessment) units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER r/ CONSTRUCTION s . f . ( 5 ) TYPE OF USE I G'( i (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ".0/ IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) FORM NR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) $ 226.00 / vte (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) $ (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE- units unit C vte CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND G ° (4) x (7) $ (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND-C (4) x (9) $ (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $ `�' / unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) `4 units 1 $ / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) / unit / unit / unit FORM RR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) �� (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1r. ( 3 ) TOTAL FLOOR AREA /U.l� (From line (4) on Form NR-1) s.f. (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT f, r (From Table ST-17) $ / s.f. (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) $ ( 6 ) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) $ 4 (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) 6 (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 ( 7 ) / $1,000 ��. b uai ` FCFM NR-1 Jre c 7 D COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES V �- / PROTECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax assessment) i N Vph� units f (4) TOTAL, FLOOR AREA AFTER t� CONSTRUCTION ! �U C, S.f. (5) TRIPE OF USE ILA, L "e (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) s 7 =10 = e0" =�1 - ®f3 �=�� - 0 FORM M-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END $ 226.00 / vte (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) 2, vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE $ ' �0102� (1) x (2) Ll (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ rU (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION T T nil7% M T n?,T A -?IV / unit $ 4-/ 1 c) / unit VALUE ANNUAL U Au TAX (From Table ST-12) unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN N UNITS OF $1,000 c), -7 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND 2— (From Table ST-13) / unit FCRM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST- / unit CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND c (13) x (18) $ (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ / unit (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) $ (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - 2,0 (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) $ FORM M-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) ( 6 ) LAND VALUE - > (From current tal ecords) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1, 000 (7) / $1,000 e 1(�oy s.f. s.f. got units �'G� Sq,� /�Emo �k � MAI 0� Coo dfo 5110 01// S-I-G�Q�e NqG� Ln --- 0 - 9 3 9 Ln Cx) 1. 3 P6— K-:�7 lcoo sjf4. Occupied X= a. L I 5— yro 0 s �AAtcai — Den,f-&,l O�rlcf 4 L4 3 -7 CX) -a 5�g x = ico 0 /� vies Io.�2, E Z, 3?-) 5 q 9V'e lncvv,asc -- 11 q.�Q a) The final plat plan shall be revised to include the land surveyor's signature and stamp. b) The final plat plan shall be revised to change note #6 to reflect the fact that a bike path easement does exist and indicate the recording information. 3) Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 4) The final plat plan shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Development Review Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Chair or Clerk South Burlington Development Review Board Date No Text revised site plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The applicant shall revise the plans to include the restoration of a paved area in the Conservation/Open Space District that shall be no less than the area of land occupied by the transformer within the C.O. District. b) The applicant shall revise the plans to substitute a continuous evergreen visual barrier consisting of a five to six foot high solid evergreen hedge for the proposed maples, burning bushes, and arborvitae in the portion of the C.O. District to be restored. The applicant may work with staff to select suitable evergreen landscaping. c) The applicant shall revise the plans to include evergreen screening around the existing transformer in the C.O. District. The applicant may work with staff to select suitable evergreen landscaping. d) The plans shall be revised to clearly show that all existing floodlights on the property will be removed and replaced with the approved downcasting and shielded fixtures. All existing building and pole -mounted floodlights shall be removed or replaced with approved light fixtures. e) The plans shall be revised to show concrete curbs on both sides of the proposed access drive in the C.O. District. f) The landscaping plan shall be yeyiked to substitute a continuous evergreen visual barrier consisting of a five (5) to si j6) f6ot higNsolid�(evergreen hedge for the proposed landscaping between the pro se access drive and the Interstate r.o.w. extending from the southerly portion of the access 4pad to the beginning of the hedge required in condition 42b above. �I 3. The applicant shall post a landscape bond, the amount to be determined by the Director of Planning and Zoning, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. The final plat plan (sheet 2 of 7) shall be recorded within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Chair or Clerk South Burlington Development Review Board Date 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 19, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan for 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is a copy of September 25, 2000 City Center Design Review Committee minutes. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp Encl Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was passed unanimously. 5. Four Boys, LLC - Four Residential Units, 23 San Remo Drive Ms. MacCallum introduced the proposal and stated that there would be subtle facade changes with the addition of two (2) skylights on the west facade, the removal of two (2) windows and creation of a third doorway on the west facade, and creation of a two (2) phase east elevation. Mr. Boehm asked if the parking was adequate. Ms. MacCallum stated that there was potential for shared parking and a request to waive four (4) parking spaces. Ms. MacCallum stated that there would be no changes to the site plan. Mr. Boehm asked if the sidewalk along the east facade would probably be installed after the second phase. Mr. Dee stated it would. Ms. Leban asked if the skylights on the east facade would be retained in Phase H. Mr. Dee stated that they would not. Mr. Clark motioned to recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-24 of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of. 1) constructing two (2)1,200 square foot apartments, 2) adding two (2) 600 square foot apartments in the second phase of the project, 3) adding two skylights to the west elevation, 4) removing two windows and creating a third doorway on the west facade, and 5) creating a two phase east elevation in which the first phase includes three first story one -over -one windows, two doors, two second story windows, and two skylights, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont", dated 7/25/99, last altered on 7/25/00 with a stamped received date of 9/8/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the applications compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The elevations should be revised to reflect the windows as built. Ms. Leban seconded. Ms. Leban then stated that the description should be revised to more accurately reflect the depicted windows. Mr. Boehm asked if the elevations should be resubmitted in the future years if the second phase was not built. Ms. Leban stated that the phase one elevation was not out of place. Mr. Boehm asked if the committee accepted the changes. Everyone agreed and the motion passed unanimously. 3 3. Section 23 of the Sign Ordinance requires that a master signage plan be submitted for any lot within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the applicant should revise the master signage plan to: a) Identify all illegal signs. The "Proprietor's" sign of the Outback Steakhouse was neither approved by the Design Review Board or the Development Review Board. A sign permit was never issued for this sign. This sign, as it is displayed on the exterior of the building, is an illegal sign. b) Include the "Natural Foods" sign of Moon Meadow Market in its approved location along the south facade of the northern wing. c) Identify the sign's location as South Burlington not Burlington. d) Include the height of the free standing sign and its distance from the edge of the Dorset Street right of way. Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was passed unanimously. 4. Four Boys, LLC - Signage, 23 San Remo Drive Ms. King introduced herself as representing the application. Mr. Boehm stated that the proposed signage will set a precedent for signage along San Remo Drive. He stated that the sign appeared to meet the intent of the ordinance with a dark background and white lettering. Mr. Dee stated that he wished to revise the request to move the wall signs on the north and south facades of the building. Mr. Boehm stated that the change would be nice as it would lend signage to the interior of the interior of the block. Mr. Dee stated that it would take some of the signage off the street and move it to the parking area. Mr. Clark motioned to approve the recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-22 of Twin State Signs for:1) erecting one (1) freestanding, 32 square foot, internally lit, "Healthsouth" sign which employs a burgundy background with white lettering, and 2) erecting two (2) internally lit, "Healthsouth" wall signs totaling 41.94 square feet which employ a burgundy background with white lettering, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled "Healthsouth, San Reno Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403," prepared by Twin State Signs, with a stamped received date of 9/6/00 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 2. The elevations shall be revised to depict the wall signs on the north and south facades of the building. 2 Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was passed unanimously. 5. Four Boys, LLC - Four Residential Units, 23 San Remo Drive Ms. MacCallum introduced the proposal and stated that there would be subtle facade changes with the addition of two (2) skylights on the west facade, the removal of two (2) windows and creation of a third doorway on the west facade, and creation of a two (2) phase east elevation. Mr. Boehm asked if the parking was adequate. Ms. MacCallum stated that there was potential for shared parking and a request to waive four (4) parking spaces. Ms. MacCallum stated that there would be no changes to the site plan. Mr. Boehm asked if the sidewalk along the east facade would probably be installed after the second phase. Mr. Dee stated it would. Ms. Leban asked if the skylights on the east facade would be retained in Phase H. Mr. Dee stated that they would not. Mr. Clark motioned to recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-24 of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of. 1) constructing two (2) 1,200 square foot apartments, 2) adding two (2) 600 square foot apartments in the second phase of the project, 3) adding two skylights to the west elevation, 4) removing two windows and creating a third doorway on the west facade, and 5) creating a two phase east elevation in which the first phase includes three first story one -over -one windows, two doors, two second story windows, and two skylights, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont", dated 7/25/99, last altered on 7/25/00 with a stamped received date of 9/8/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the applications compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The elevations should be revised to reflect the windows as built. Ms. Leban seconded. Ms. Leban then stated that the description should be revised to more accurately reflect the depicted windows. Mr. Boehm asked if the elevations should be resubmitted in the future years if the second phase was not built. Ms. Leban stated that the phase one elevation was not out of place. Mr. Boehm asked if the committee accepted the changes. Everyone agreed and the motion passed unanimously. 3 CITY OF SOUTH I URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PIJANNESIG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 22, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC. 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan & Conditional Use & Design Review Applications, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed please find a copy of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on October 17, 2000 (effective date November 21, 2000). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471 and V.R.C.P. 76, in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $150.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V. S.A. § 4472(d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 13, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan, Conditional Use and Design Review Application for 235 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 17, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 7 7 Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls LIU 10/17/00 MOTION OF APPROVAL FOUR BOYS, LLC - 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP- 00-49, conditional use application #CU-00-22, and design review application #DR-00-24 to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2)1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) 1,200 square foot dwelling units and two (2) 600 square foot dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 10/25/99, last revised on 8/25/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The applicant shall revise the elevations to depict either two (2) or four (4) skylights. b) The elevations shall be revised to reflect the windows as built. c) The plans shall be revised to reflect the San Remo Drive streetscape plan along the east property boundary. 3. For the purpose for calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the four (4) proposed dwelling units will generate 2.48 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The building shall be sprinklered. 5. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a total of 32 parking spaces, which is a three (3) space or 8.6% waiver. 6. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the Zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a landscaping credit for the amount c;f $2,400. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the four (4) additional residential units within six (6) months and Phase II by January 18, 2002 pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly converted spare. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 2 FY I' U 10 17 / /00 MOTION OF APPROVAL FOUR BOYS LLC - 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP- 00-49, conditional use application #CU-00-22, and design review application #DR-00-24 to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) 1,200 square foot dwelling units and two (2) 600 square foot dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 10/25/99, last revised on 8/25/00, with the following stipulations: I. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director prior to permit issuance. a) The applicant shall revise the elevations to depict either two (2) or four (4) skylights. b) The elevations shall be revised to reflect the windows as built. c) The plans shall be revised to reflect the San Remo Drive streetscape plan along the east property boundary. 3. For the purpose for calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the four (4) proposed dwelling units will generate 2.48 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The building shall be sprinklered. 5. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a total of 32 parking spaces, which is a three (3) space or 8.6% waiver. 6. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a) of the Zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves a landscaping credit for the amount ,; $2,400. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the four (4) additional residential units within six (6) months and Phase II by January 18, 2002 pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly converted space. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 2 m RCHITLCTURAL RLA IGHTING The Universe Collection of wall brackets provides a full palette of designs that complimenl any archileclural slyle. They can be combined wilh the larger scale Universe Collection of pole mounted fixtures. These wall brackets feature surface mounted ballast compartments for an uncomplicated installation. The fixtures are constructed of cast aluminum housings with spun aluminum shades. All models are available in a pendant version in pure polished copper. 1 r Universe Wall Brackets M t4A r i t Ring/StraightLuminous CURVED ARM STRAIGII I ARM ALLO 502S CA 26DDT ALLO 502S SS-26DDT ALLO 502S CA 50MH ALLO 502S SS - 50MH x ALLO 502S CA - 70MH ALLO 502S SS - 70MH ALLO 502S CA - 35HPS ALLO 502S SS - 35HPS ALLO 502S CA - 50HPS ALLO 502S SS - 50HPS ALLO 502S CA - 70HPS ALLO 502S SS - 70HPS i CURVED ARM STRAIGHT ARM ALLO 505S CA - 26DDT ALLO 505S CA - 50MH ALLO 505S CA - 70MH ALLO 505S SS - 26DDT ALLO 505S SS - 50MH ALLO 505S SS - 70MH ALLO 505S CA - 35HPS ALLO 505S SS - 35HPS ALLO 505S CA - 50HPS ALLO 505S SS - 50HPS ALLO 505S CA - 70HPS ALLO 505S S S- 70HPS agXz•aA;:,,f Straight CURVED ARM STRAIGHT ARM SL SH14 CA - 26DDT SL SH14 SS - 26DDT SL SH14 CA - 5OMH SL SH14 SS - 50MH SL SH14 CA - 70MH SL SH14 SS - 70MH SL SH14 CA - 35HPS _ SL SH14 SS - 35HPS SL SH14 CA - 50HPS SL SH14 SS - 50HPS SL SH14 CA - 70HPS SL SH14 SS - 70HPS ■ CURVED ARM STRAIGHT ARM SL FH15 CA - 26DDT SL FH15 SS - 26DDT SL FH15 CA - 50MH SL FH15 SS - 50MH SL FH15 CA - 70MH SL FH15 SS - 70MH SL FH15 CA - 35HPS SL FH15 SS - 35HPS SL FH15 CA - 50HPS SL FH15 SS - 50HPS SL FH15 CA - 70HPS SL FH15 SS - 70HPS Specifications HOUSING The lamp housing shall be cast aluminum with a spun aluminum shade.The opal lens shall be borosilicate glass and thread into the housing. A silicone gasket shall keep the lens interior free of dust and moisture. The edge lit rings shall be clear acrylic. The cast aluminum wall plate shall hold the ballast components for surface mounting. The ballast cover shall be cast aluminum, silicone gasketed, and attached to the wall plate with three stainless steel set screws. The curved arm, or the straight arm shall be welded to the fixture housing and the ballast cover. ELECTRICAL All electrical components and materials shall be U.L. recognized. Ballasts are high power factor rated for -300 starting. Medium base porcelain sockets are 4KV rated. The fluorescent ballast shall be elec- tronic rated for -50 starling. The lamp base shall be a G24g3 (four pin) configuration. The electrical assembly shall be prewired and mounted to the wall plate. MOUNTING The cast mounting plate shall be attached through three holes, 1200 apart on a 5" bolt circle. FINISH Fixture finish shall consist of cleaning, etching, and rinsing followed by a protective chromate primer, deionized water rinse, oven dry off and top coated with a thermoset TGIC super polyester powder coat finish, The finish shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. RELAMPING The lamp is accessed by unscrewing the glass lens. CERTIFICATION Fixtures shall be listed with E.T.L. Laboratories for wet location use. WARRANTY Fixture shall be warranted to be free of defects for three years. Ballast components shall carry the ballast manufacturer's limited warranty. WARNING: fixture must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electric Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. Photometrics CONVERSION FACTORS LAMP TYPE 8' 10, 12' 14' 26 w PL DTT .85 .55 .38 .28 50 w MH 1.56 1.00 .69 .51 X 70 w MH 2.36 1.51 1.05 .78 100 w MH 3.86 2.47 1.72 1.28 35 w HPS 1.07 .68 .47 .35 50 w HPS 1.89 1.21 .84 .62 70 w HPS 2.74 1.75 1.22 .90 100 w HPS 4.13 2.64 1.84 1.36 SL SH14 - 50MH Horizontal footcandles 10' mounting height 0 t 2 3 4 ALLI 0 1 2 3 DISTANCE IN MOUNTING HEIGHTS 13 in. 17 in. 13 in. ->I 12 in. MOUNTING PLATE 3 -.375" mounting holes, 120' on center, on a 5 inch bolt circle .75" wireway hole, F SL FH15 - 50MH Horizontal lootcand I es 10' mounting height 5 2 1 .5 .2 5 2 1 .5 .2 0 3 4 0 1 2 3 DISTANCE IN MOUNTING HEIGHTS 23 San Remo Drive lu 364 Dorset Street ♦ S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 ♦ Fax 863-2661 October 04, 1999 Property: 23 San Remo Drive Space: 2,400 square feet on first floor Specifications: 1/ Two entries - main entrance plus employee entrance 2/ Two handicapped specified bathrooms. 3/ Patient waiting room approximately 25' X 10'. 4/ Employee lounge approximately 12' X 9' with 12' of cabinets and single sink. 5/ Two therapy rooms approximately 12' X 9' each. 6/ Three administrative areas including patient reception, manager's office, back office, and filing. 7/ Lab area approximately 18' X 10'. 8/ Work unit/area including 12' of cabinets both base and wall with one double sink. Interior work to include: 1/ Installation of all party walls. 2/ Double 5/8" firewall separating leased space from remainder of building. 3/ Full suspension ceiling 8' in all office areas and 9'6" in main therapy area. 4/ No less than 9 exterior wall windows. 5/ No less than 4 interior wall windows. 6/ No less than 10 solid core interior doors with brush aluminum single lever hardware. 7/ No less than 22 drop -in 2X4 florescent light fixtures. 8/ No less than 50 duplex 20 amp outlets all GFI certified. 9/ No less than 4 simplex 208 volt 20 amp outlets. 10/ 200 amp service. 11/ Flooring allowance of $ 5,500.00. 12/ Specialty interior trim allowance of $ 3,000.00. 13/ Cabinet and wall rack allowance of $4,300.00. 14/ Gas fired hot air furnace with central air conditioner. 151 Separate lab HVAC with air exchange unit. Exterior work to include: 1/ Porch entrance to main door. 2/ New siding and trim - detail similar to orthepedic center. 3/ Paved parking to south of building. Total parking - 15 spaces. 4/ Landscaping allowance of 3,800.00. 23 San Remo Drive 340 Dorset Street 1 S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 1 Fax 863-2661 October 04, 1999 South Burlington Design Review Committee Re: Section 26.151 PUD Fr: John Kennedy - Agent for Edgar Welch and Bette Ann Welch - Owner 23 San Remo Drive General Standards (a) There will be no undue water pollution as tenants will be retail and City sewer will be available. The heating system will remain as it exist, namely gas heat. The land is above sea level and there presently exist a surface water runoff collection system. No retention structures are required. Labor and Industries has made an inspection, and recommendations are as follows; Firewalls between tenants, and handicapped bathroom to be installed. (b) The water requirements do not exceed present use. (c) Will not cause unreasonable soil erosion. (d) The proposed use will not increase traffic burden to either Dorset Street or San Remo Drive. (e) One of the two proposed businesses is an extension and/or transfer of business within the South Burlington area. The project should not cause an undue burden on the school facilities. (f) Will not cause an unreasonable burden on munincipal services. (g) Not applicable (h) This project should improve the scenic beauty of the area as it upgrades the existing condition of the property. Landscaping will improve the view along San Remo Drive. (i) Meets City's standards. 0) There will be a change to the exterior of the building and all materials will be up to City's standards. (k) We will provide additional access via an easement through 340 Dorset Street. (1) The project conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 23 San Remo Drive 340 Dorset Street S. Burlington, Vt 05403 To: South Burlington Design Review Committee Fr: John Kennedy - Agent for Edgar A. Welch and Bette A. Welch - Owner 23 San Remo Drive is presently a 3,600 square foot metal building used primarily for auto repair and storage. There are two apartments on the second floor comprising of 1,200 square feet. It is the intention to rehabilitate the structure in two phases. Phase I : I/ Replace windows and doors 2/ Add new siding and trim 3/ Redesign the exterior 4/ Provide new electrical service and exterior lighting 5/ Provide new parking lot and landscaping 6/ Redesign the interior to provide two (2) first floor tenancies one of 2,400 square feet to rent to Healthsouth and one of 1,200 square feet to rent to tenant unknown. 7/ Continue renting two (2) second floor apartments as is. Phase II: 1/ Add a 35' X 60' structure on the east side of the existing structure. This addition would accomodate future expansion plans for Healthsouth. At that time, we would replace the roof with a new standing seam roof similar to 340 Dorset Street. Please find the following specifications for renovation: Siding - We will applying horizontal siding over the existing metal panels. Material Specs - Norandex Sagebrush Super Premium Vinyl Siding Color - Woodsman Select Gray Installation Detail - Existing building has metal panels screwed to horizontal perlins. 1/2" plywood will be screwed to the panels and perlins where applicable. The vinyl siding will then be applied to the plywood. Tyvek will first be applied to the plywood prior to the installation of siding. All trim will be in white. The building is supported by metal columns 20' on center. Window modules will be installed between support columns. Where applicable, the metal panels will be removed, and framing with 2 X 6 studs will fill the void. This framing will hold the glazing modules. The framing will be advanced so as to form a plane with the new surface created with plywood. Gable Ends - A 12" facia board in white will be installed at an elevation of 10'6". Below this trim, horizontal siding will be applied. Above this trim, vinyl shakes will be applied. This detail is similar in nature to the Orthepedic Center and 340 Dorset Street design. Base Facia - the entire building will receive a 10" mop board at the base of the wall and this board will be flashed and painted white. 23 San Remo Drive 340 Dorset Street ♦ S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 1 Fax 863-2661 Roof - We are planning to cover the existing roof (industrial metal painted white 26 guage) with a standing seam 24 guage roof. Material Specs - Una -Clad by Copper Sales, Inc., Anoka, MN 24 Guage Kynar 500 Fluorocarbon Steel Painted Hartford Green - paint has 20 year fade warranty Installation Detail - Installer - Consumer Construction, Inc., Colchester, Vt. 802-660-9177 Basic Installation - Existing roof has 8" panels with rib 1" high - this void will be filled with 1" isocarnate insulation from ridge to eave. Metal hat channel 1.5" high will be installed horizontally approximately 16" on center, making certain that every perlin (approximately 5' on center) has a hat channel directly screwed to the perlin. Iscocarnate insulation 1.5" thick will then be installed between the hat channels horizontally. The roof will then be applied with metal clips. The roof will be screwed only at the eaves and will be clipped throughout the re- mainder of the surface. Eave Detail - At all edges of the roof, pressure treated lumber will be applied so as to secure eave trim. Attachments: Roof Sample, Uni-Clad Quick Reference Guide 23 San Name Drive 340 Dorset Street S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Glazing - We will be replacing windows and doors with new glazing. Material Specs - Pella Products, Inc., 17 Echo Place, Williston, Vermont 864-5435 ProLine, Clad, Model 1, White, 5/8" InsulShield IG Glazing, Low E White Exterior Vinyl with wood interior trim and jambs Installation Detail - Basic Installation - Within a 20' section between steel upright beams, framing with 2 X 6. All windows will be trimmed in 5/4 Pine in a picture frame concept. The trim will be painted in white and will be 6" stock. Attachments: Pella Specs, Window and Door Module Detail 28 Soo Sam® OrW 340 Dorset Street S. Burling"", Vt 05403 HVAC - The building is divided into two modules, one at 40' X 60' and one of 20' X. 60'. The north module will accomodate one tenant on the first floor and two apartments on the second floor. Provisions fbr air conditioning will be provided on the south end of the building on ground level for the south module. This unit (5 ton), will measure 3'6" X 3'6" and 32" high. The unit for the north module will be located on the north side of the building on ground level. This unit (2 ton), will measure 2'8" X 3'0" and 32" high. Each unit will be screened by a white PVC screen -type fence with an access door for service. Heat will be provided by gas hot air and vented through stacks on the roof. CITE' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 17, 2000 Suzanne King Twin State Signs 14 Gauthier Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: 150 Dorset Street & 23 San Remo Drive Dear Ms. King: Enclosed please copies of the Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on October 3, 2000 (effective date October 17, 2000). Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosures 1) Z� .sc'k--_4 � REt,.)EIVED OCT 16 2OW City of So. Burlington C Q C(A- 03 'L2 3 sC we Q,S . 1 l 23 San Rome Drive 340 Dorset Street S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Electrical - Electric Service - There will be four electric meters mounted to the northeast side of the building. This will provide independent readings and panels for up to two rental units and two apartments. Exterior Lighting - Two (2) 250 W Metal Halide pole mounted fixture Model BV2 Page 210. One will be installed on the south side next to the parking lot and the second will be installed on the northwest side of the entrance - locations shown on the diagram. Six (6) 100 W Metal Halide Model 100 MHC Page 126. Two will be installed in the new soffit on the west main entrance to I-lealthsouth, One in the new soffit to the west entrance to one of the apartments, Two will be installed in the new soffit on the south entrance to Healthsouth, and One on the east entrance to one of the apartments. These units will have safety glass in have white trim. Three (3) 100 W Metal Halide Model AK- 100HPS, wall mounted in each gable end of the building. Attars: Lighting Specifications - Lithonia Lighting MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Re: October 17, 2000 agenda items Date: October 13, 2000 3) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING'S REPORT Enclosed is the Findings of Fact and Decision for the following site plan application: a) Site plan application #SP-00-42 of Benware & Company to: 1) construct a twelve (12) foot by fifteen (15) foot soil clean up fenced enclosure, and 2) remove five (5) parking spaces on a lot containing a 3420 square foot fast food restaurant and 400 square foot accessory structure, 1205 Williston Road. Approved. 4 & 5) FOUR BOYS, LLC. —FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS— SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE & DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan and design review application for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of adding two (2) 1,200 square foot dwelling units and two (2) 600 square foot dwelling units, 23 San Remo Drive. The Development Review Board previously approved a site plan for this property on July 25, 2000 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 23 San Remo Drive lies within the Central 2 District. It is bounded on the north and east by San Remo Drive, on the south by Christ Church, and on the west by a retail building. Site Plan Criteria: Access/Circulation: Access is provided via a 26 foot ingress and egress curb cut on San Remo Drive and by a 13 foot egress only curb cut on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to the adjacent development via a driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Circulation on the site is adequate. No changes are proposed. Circulation/Setbacks: The building coverage is 23% (maximum 40%). Overall coverage is 62% (maximum 901/6). Setback requirements are met. Landscaping; The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $2400 which is not being met. Staff recommends a landscaping credit in the amount of $2,400 as the site is already well landscaped. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO OCTOBER 17, 2000 MEETING Sewer: No additional sewer allocation is requested. Traffic: This property was approved for 21.94 We's during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the four proposed dwelling units will generate 2.48 P.M. additional peak hour vte's. The applicant should expect to pay the applicable impact fee. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): The F.A.R. for this property is 0.23 (maximum 0.5). Lighting: No additional lighting is proposed. Parking_ The existing and proposed uses require a total of 35 spaces (two of which must be designated handicapped). A total of 20 on -site spaces, including three handicapped spaces, and 12 on -street spaces are provided. The applicant has requested a waiver of three parking spaces or an 8.6% parking waiver. Staff recommends that this waiver be granted as there is the potential to share parking with the office uses. Streetscape: One of the conditions of the previous Development Review Board approval was that the applicant would be expected to comply with the San Remo Drive Streetscape plan upon its completion. The plans should be revised to reflect the draft San Remo Drive Streetscape plan along the east property boundary. Approval Expiration: One of the conditions of the previous Development Review Board approval was that the applicant would have two years to obtain a permit for the second phase of the project. The effective date of this previous approval was January 18, 2000. City Center Design Review: This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on September 25, 2000 (minutes enclosed). The Design Review Committee recommended approval of this application subject to the conditions listed below: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Administrative Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The elevations should be revised to reflect the windows as built. Conditional Use Criteria: The proposed use complies with the stated purpose of Central District Two to encourage "the location of a balanced and coordinated mixture of residential, commercial, public, and private uses adjacent to Dorset Street". 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO OCTOBER 17, 2000 MEETING The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No affect expected. b) the character of the area affected. The proposed use will not affect the character of the neighborhood. c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. The proposed use is not expected to adversely impact traffic. d) bylaws in effect. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations. e) utilization of renewable energy resources. There is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. 0 general public health and welfare. No adverse affect expected. 6) TECHNOLOGY PARK PARTNERS — FINAL PLAT — BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS, LOTS # 1,2,3,4,6,14, & 8A This project consists of several boundary line adjustments between lots one, two, three, four, six, fourteen, and eight A of a previously approved 16 lot subdivision. The South Burlington Development Review Board previously considered the sketch plan for this property on September 19, 2000 (minutes enclosed). Technology Park is located within the Mixed Commercial and Industrial District. It is bounded on the north by Kimball Avenue, on the east by Muddy Brook, on the south by Interstate 89, and on the east by undeveloped lands. Boundary Line Adjustments: The boundary adjustments will result in several increases and decreases to those lots within the Community Drive circle. All proposed lots meet the minimum lot size. All of the lots, except for lot eight A, are currently undeveloped. Coverages: The only lot which currently has been developed is Lot 8A. The building coverage will increase from 20.2% to 21.2% (30% max). The total lot coverage will also increase from 51.1% to 53.5% (70% max). The front yard coverage will increase from 13% to 13.4% (30% max). Setbacks: The existing building has been delineated on the plans and satisfies setback requirements. Other: Wetlands have been delineated on an overall site plan. New legal documents including easements will be required as a result of this proposed project. . SITE PLAN nIu - -cZ 1" = 209_019 SEP 0 8 2000 City of So. Burlington TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGL: 22,356 100% BUILDING COVERAGE 5,210 23% PARKING LOT COVERAGE 8,498 38% GREENSPACE 89648 39% I POLE LIGHT 2 WALL LAMP 3 SOFFIT LAMP 4 HVAC LANDSCAPE LEGEND r KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC 4AMP __---QTI-_ S= TCP TRW TAXUS MEDIA HICKSIL S J-J' RPJM RHODODENDRON C'ATAWBIEVSE DROUSAULT -S IGAL • TON RUSSIAN ARBORVITAE MICROMOTA DECUSSATA S f42^ JCS JUNIPER JUNIPERIS COMMUNIS 4 4f^ BT ASH PENNSYLVANICA LANCE. 7 2.52^ EAC BURNING BUSH DICTAMNUS 2 4-4' AP • SUGAR MAPLE A. SACCHARUM ! . 2.S•T PC EUONYMUS BUONTMUS J 2-S' TCA CANADA HEMLOCK T. CA14ADLWSIS 2 2-14- 92 9MRLA SPIREAJAPONWA 2 J.4' TµB YEW TAXUS CUSPIDATA MAMA J 14' PARKING INFORMATION USE SF OR M OF UNITS RATIO AFOVIRED MEDICAL OEEILL NMI SF 1 SPACE PER" W 2i PHASE L• LIYDrc umr 2 uNrrs 2 PER DNrr 4 . PHASE 11. 1"G BITE Y UNITS MR URII 4- PARKING PROVIDED ON -UM (20) AND OFF -SITE (12) REIrUXVr WAIMOV 4 LVACKS Wei � d rOrMM., Fr V� U W xi o a M O A Jr •ss•zeers-.. �. - •RItAtAv�i'«rrosTM ...__.: Kowa 2•.,. =� - ,owo_ b•is •zaoc2 [Md e' �>;'. zoro �Javera �JraosF tin. fMnf iZ=$R A&vftcs~ _- P1 Ms. Leban seconded and the motion was passed unanimously. 5. Four Boys, LLC - Four Residential Units, 23 San nemo Drive Ms. MacCallum introduced the proposal and stated that there would be subtle facade changes with the addition of two (2) skylights on the west facade, the removal of two (2) windows and creation of a third doorway on the west facade, and creation of a two (2) phase east elevation. Mr. Boehm asked if the parking was adequate. Ms. MacCallum stated that there was potential for shared parking and a request to waive four (4) parking spaces. Ms. MacCallum stated that there would be no changes to the site plan. Mr. Boehm asked if the sidewalk along the east facade would probably be installed after the second phase. Mr. Dee stated it would. Ms. Leban asked if the skylights on the east facade would be retained in Phase 11. Mr. Dee stated that they would not. Ms. Lean stated that she thought they should be retained. Mr. Clark motioned to recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-24 of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of. 1) constructing two (2)1,200 square foot apartments, 2) adding two (2) 600 square foot apartments in the second phase of the project, 3) adding two skylights to the west elevation, 4) removing two windows and creating a third doorway on the west facade, and 5) creating a two phase east elevation in which the first phase includes three first story one -over -one windows, two doors, two second story windows, and two skylights, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont", dated 7/25/99, last altered on 7/25/00 with a stamped received date of 9/8/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on he applications compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The elevations should be revised to reflect the windows as built. Ms. Leban seconded. Ms. Leban then stated that the description should be revised to more accurately reflect the depicted windows. Mr. Boehm asked if the elevations should be resubmitted in the years if the second phase was not built. Ms. Leban stated that the phase one elevation was not out of place. Mr. Boehm asked if the committee accepted the changes. Everyone agreed and the motion passed unanimously. 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 25 JULY 2000 5. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 7. Prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance the parking lot shall be striped. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the addition. 9. Any change to the site plan shall requite approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Mr. Chamberland seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Site plan application #SP-00-32 and design review application #DR-00-10 of Four Boys LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two phase 6,088 sq ft. building used for: 1) 3,688 sq. ft. of medical office use, 2) 1,200 sq. ft. of retail or general office use, and 3) 1,200 sq. ft. of residential use consisting of two dwelling units. The amendment consists of converting 1,200 sq. ft. of retail or general office use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive: Mr. Dee explained that the original plan was to have 1200 sq. ft. of retail, but the proposed tenant moved across the road. The building will be all medical office now. The residential use on the second floor remain unchanged. Mr. Belair said the Design Review Board wants the windows that were supposed to be there put back in. Mr. Dee said this would be done. Mr. Farley moved the Development Review Board approve site plan application #SP-00-32 of Four Boys LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two phase 6,088 sq. ft. building used for: 1) 3,688 sq. ft. of medical office use, 2) 1,200 sq. ft. of retail or general office use, and 3) 1,200 sq. ft. of residential use consisting of two dwelling units. The amendment consists of converting 1,200 sq. ft. of retail or general office use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a one page set of plans entitled "23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 5/15/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 10 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 25 JULY 2000 2. The windows previously approved on October 25, 1999 for the east favade of the building shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. The Director of Planning & Zoning may approve minor changes. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate 2.124 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly convzrted space. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Clerk 11 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW SEP 0 8 2000 City of So..Bndington All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) FFfi, 2A Z'3 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S A2=& 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) s yyVV-� 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2 _ �S ►� `^-� O 7 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. ca- fo- �`d �� c I Loos (Us:ItJ.J The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to th , best of my knowledge. e� SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (ApformDR) EXHIBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design Plan Approval • One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. • A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. • Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: • architectural details • exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground • building height • existing and proposed grading • color, type and texture of building material • doors • siding cornices • entablatures • roofing material • moldings and trim • window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings Sign Design Approval • Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. • Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. • Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. • Master signage plan containing the following: • an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. • computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. • computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. • an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. City of South Burlington F' ,y 1' Application to Development Review Board S E P 0 8 2000 City of So. Burlington Name of applicant(s) O W4- (S U Address I TU{') t']QA ,.i {c,) U R Represented by f' j- Official Use APPLICATION # C LA, - O C, - 22 Z HEARING DATE FILING DATE Y//glG el' FEE AMOUNT 75- t . /0 S L L0— Telephone # 7 Z� Landowner (3'b VA' /�- I.-S d -/ S "I - - Location and description of property 3 5 a `L 2 �,,..,, Qom- s . � v. � .�� � � ��t �/ 2� �' Q.J .� Adjacent property owner(s) & Address c Qw '-L Type of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrator Officer ( ) request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing and I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Describe request: _M(Y (f �' �..wi t -I- 4� L.,,- T�- 4LL Other documentation: Su IT 2, ZS�t U. r\,\ l l ]I J1s�-c� 1Jn t s Az 2wA- V3On- I Signature SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, , at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Application of seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to r. P,��nyED � SEP 0 0 2000 City of So. Burlington CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Blame as shown on d ed, mailing address, phone and fax #) �w� 13 s L` c �. 4 Uk , w 2) APPLICANT (dame, mailing address, phone and fax #) :!�6,Q 3)/fCONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �� 14U :141. ki F - v (e Y-- o U `f EA 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 2 3 S 4 V�- % E k- 3 �, 2 a) TAX MAP MUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each se/Parat//}r / u/J�`�e)l nA- U© 'n t k,- 12li 1� 5Lrt L-,)3 r�II. .Q .�J VNLt 15- F(3J''L ( I13/ 1/ VV ;b) Proposed :uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 2f rV R w %4 c k b4- e-Lre/,�- 2-too s 4T-T ,c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Zoo d) Height of building & number of floou�s roposed buildings and existing building to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) 2- 4' a) Number of residential un (if- applicable, new units and existing units to remain) -jL 2- B n Number of employees (existing and proposed): !] CK : 5 �, - D Cr �-,� . g) Other (list any tither infermaticn pertinent to this application not specifically requested 7) LOT COVERAGE Building: Existing :�Z41 b %L� 3 �u� Proposed � Z) 0 % C2- a) 3) b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, et ) Existing % c�) 137) Proposed �`', % Ctei'P-D) c) Front yarn! (along each street) Existing � `� % Proposed -3 % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): J<S �' �✓� b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 4� c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): _ � C) 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DABS OF OPERATION: W\ - 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: f 2 / o.� 2 u 2 kWP' ..._ 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE 2y ej;)) ,,' . A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application flee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I I hereby certify that ail the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Ll W/1 SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line MATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board 11 Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be.- (Apfrmsp) 0 Complete ElIncomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: October 17, 2000 agenda items Date: October 11, 2000 1. Site Plan - 23 San Remo Drive The building should be sprinklered. 2. Site Plan and Conditional Uses, Kimball Avenue The building should be sprinklered and have a fire alarm. The site plan should be revised to note hydrant locations and work with the Fire Department to place any new hydrants. 3. Site Plan and Conditional Uses, 1110 Shelburne Road There should be an extinguishing system for the pump island. 4. Site Plan and Conditional Uses, Technology Park The building should have a sprinkler and fire alarm. The applicant should consult with the Fire Department on the location of fire hydrants. z -6 -+- 9 -::7 3-5- STITZE,L, PAGE & Fl—FTCHER,, P.C, ATI ORNF.YS A'1 LAw 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINUTON. VE,RMONT05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (Volu..'t Lp SUNEN F. gl'1TLFL FAX (302) 660.1552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PA(i1;1}MAU, (P1RK12555(�1+luMSI}F.COM) POLVA r L. F1,1701I:u murvivs &MAIL (At AC1 GRIY(<i11 Ut1N51 F.COM) i*ALSO AMI l 1'I;;) IN KV) VAUI1;R'5 FAX (801) W-2552 1•ACSIMILE TRANSM, 117AL SHEET Date: October 2, 2000 TO: Sarah MacGallum Fax: (802) 846-4101 R,:, Proposed Pesticide Ordinance Sendcr: rnaada Lafferty JOSL•P11 S. Mct,r"N 1 LM 011 IY M. Ct JS FACE MIA KARVONIUSS ANIANl)A S.S. LAIrlUt-1Y You should receive ----2— Pagc(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call (802) 660-2555, MESSAGE Transmitted herewith is a brief letter regarding the City's authority to regulate as proposed in the draft pesticide ordinance. Please call me tomorrow so I will know whether to continue research into the preemption issues. Thank you. This mc5sage is intended only for the use of the iddressee and mvL contain lnfonnaticri that is privileged and confiwlantial, tf you to-c liot U,e iulcadcd reclplent, you an, hereby notified that any dism-nination QF111i5 ceinimnicnian is stricUy prohibited. lfyou have received this conuhunieation in error, please not* us Immediately by telet hone (302-6c0-25$5), -ihlu* you. 0 'd c95Z09RO9 'ON XV3 Od 33HO1,313 3Nd '3Z1I1S Wd 8t: K NOW COM-20-100 To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: October 3, 2000 SP-00-49 & CU-00-22 Two residential units Previous Action: Design Review Committee considered this application on 9/25/00. Overview: The applicant has proposed adding two residential units. Issues: ■ The applicant should request a parking waiver for three spaces • The applicant should request a landscaping waiver of $2,400 as the site is well landscaped. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the site plan and conditional use applications with the exceptions noted above. The requested information should be submitted no later than October 10, 2000. Recommendation: Staff recommends that this application be authorized to proceed for site plan and conditional use review. P.O. Box 5U85 V� Burlington, VT 05402 Mike Hamlin 10 Bissette Drive Colchester, VT 05446 Joseph Farrell 1525 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Heather Kingg P.O. Box 5026 Essex Jct. VT 05452 Joanne Lyons 45 Commonwealth Drive #6 Colchester, VT 05446 Barbara Roberts 5 Gaines Court Essex Jct. VT 05452 Daniel & Tamera McFall P.O. Box 3317 Burlington, VT 05401 Alicia Carroll 5891 Shelburne Road Shelburne. VT 05482 Nancy Hoffman P.O. Box 8282 Burlington, VT 05402 Mike McNaneyy RR #1 Box 684 Grand Isle, VT 05458 Amber Bushey) RR 1 Box 1758 Waterville, VT 05492 September 30 & October 7, _000 NUTICE PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF BURLINGTON The City Council of Bur- lington will hold public hearings on the Code of Ordinances Appendix A, Zoning to change the City of Burlington s Zon- ing Ordinance to limit the number of unrelated people that may live in a dwelling unit, Residential Districts Established and chapter 28, Subdividi- sons, Appendix A, Zon- ng to change the Subdi- /ision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance to pro - ride for one review )oard for all projects in he City of Burlington, the Development Re- new Board, on Monday. Dctober 16, 2000 at 7:06 �.m. [approximate], in 'ontois Auditorium, City tali, to hear public corn- nents on the proposed ,oning amendments ap- ]roved by the Planning ;ommission. Material available to view by the tublic at the Department I Planning & Zoning, 35 Church Street or the 'lerk Treasurers Oficce. 49 Church Street. lepternber .30, 2000 1 NOTICE RFO ESSEX JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT A Classifieds work for ou. Call 6SO-3321 r+nrmar a uairy Industrie° Stat b t; Drawer � Montpelier. Vermont 05620-2901 September 30, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL The South Burlingto City Council will hold public hearing at th South Burlington Cit Hall, Conference Roorr 575 Dorset Street, Souti Burlington, Vermont of Monday, October 16 2000, at 7:30 P.M. tc consider the following: 11 Proposed amend ments to the South Bur lington Zoning Regula tions as follows: a] Article IV, Park and Recreation District. The purpose of this amend- ment is to allow a min- imurn ten [101 foot front, rear and side yard set- back for accessory rec- reational structures in the Park & Recreation District. The current front, rear and side yard setback requirement is 50. 30, and 25 feet, re- spectively. This amend- ment will affect all lands zoned Park and Recrea- tion District. Specific sec- tions to be arnended or added include Sections 4.301 and 4.302, b] Municipal, State a n d Federal Facilities - Amend Sections 14.10 and 14.20 [Central Dis- trict] to allow "municipal facility" as permitted use. and "state and fed- eral facilities" as a condi- tional use, in the Central District (CD]. This amendment also pro- poses to allow "munici- pal facility" as a condi- tional use in the following zoning districts: Institu- tional and Agricultural [Q12P1 Queen City Park (Q ], Airport Industrial Air-11, and Airport [Air]. he purpose of the amendment is to allow "municipal facility' and "state and federal facili- ties" as potential uses in the zoning districts stated above. This amendment affects all lands in the City that are zoned CD, IAg. QCP, Air- 1. and Air. Specific sec- tions to be amended in- clude Sections 14.101, 14.102, 14,201, 14.202, 2.20, 11.20, 16.20, and 17.20. c] Official Zonin 'Map - adopt a new Pfficial Zoning Map that ircludes Parcel data as 4 base. The Official Zoning Map depicts the botf daries of all zoning disthcts as described in the Zoning Regulations. The pur- pose of this amendment is to adopt a new Official Zoning Map that includes parcel data as a base. A note is proposed to be added that indicates t parcel data is for inh mational purposes or and that the City r serves the right to u date the Official Zonis Map with new pare data as it becomes ava able. This amendment a fects all land in the City. d] Southeast Ouadrai [SEQ] Official Zonin map - adopt a ne, Southeast Quadrant Oft cial Zoning Map that we prepared on compute and utilizes most recer parcel data as a base The SEC) Quadrant Oft cial Zoning Map is incor porated into the Zonim Regulations and depict' ''development areas and ' restricted areas' in the Southeast Quad rant District. The pur pose of the amendment is to adopt a more accu. rate and higher quality map that was prepared on computer The cur- rent SEQ Official Zoning Map is hand drawn. This amendment affects all land in the City zoned Southeast Quadrant Dis- trict. 21 Proposed adoption of a new Official Map The Official Map is a bylaw that shows the locations of existing and proposed public facilitjes including streets, parks, schools. recreation paths/pedes- trian trails, and public Parking facilities, The Purpose of this amend. merit is to adopt a more accurate and higher quality map that was pre- pared on computer. The current Official Map is hand drawn and of low quality. This amendment also propses to relocate a proposed school site in the Southeast Quadrant from the area east of Dorset Street and north )f Old Cross Road to a ;sty owned parcel lo- �ated north of Oak Creek /illage off of Hinesburg load. This amendment effects all land in the ;ity. :opies of the proposed mendments are avail- ble for public inspection t the South Burlington :ity Hall. chairman, South Burlington City Council :ember 30, 20()o PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD° The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington City Hall Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlingtc Vermont on Tuesdt October 17, 2000, at 7 P M. to consider the f, lowing: 1] Application #CU-0 24 of Mark Chaffee Lori Hayes seeking co ditional use approv from Section 26.05, Co, ditional Uses, and al proval from Sectio 3.506 of the South Bu lington Zoning Regult tions. Request is for pei mission to reconstruc and expand the sing) family dwelling at Lyons Avenue.. 2pplication #CU-002: of) AJolley Associate: seeking conditional usf approval from Sectior 26.05, conditional Uses and Section 26.65, Multi. pie Structures and Uses on Lots. of the South Burlington Zoning Regu. lations. Request Is fro permission to allow: 11 a 2500 foot convenience store, 21 a 2016 square foot canopy, and 31 four f41 pump islands, i 110 helburne Road. 3jAppllcatlon #CU-00-21 o FCC Atlantic d/b/a Cellular One seeking conditional use ap roval under Section 26.05, Cunclillonal Uses, and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Reqest is for per- mission to:u1) oonstruct a 10' x 20' equipment shel- ter, and 2] install three [31 mounting arms at the 80 foot level of the exist- ing tower to mount twelve [121 48 inch panel antennas and two [2] 20 inch whip antennas, 30 Joy Drive. 41 Application #CU-00- 22 of Four Boys, LLC seeking Conditional Use approved under Section 26,05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Multi - :le Structures and Uses )n Lots, of the South 3urlington Zoning Regu- ations. Request is for )ermission to add four 41 dwelling units to a wilding with two [2) swelling units and med- al office space, 23 San temo Drive. 51 Final plat appplication #SD-00-53 of Jolin Illick to amend a previously approved 16 lot subdivi- dison, The amendment consists of resubdividing seven [71 lots to make minor boundary adjust- ments. Kimball Avenue and Community Drive. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Sept. 30, 2000 & tl _ fmploymIl n EMPLOYMENT 12 2nd SHIFT CLERK Land —_ t Air Express of NE is Wall looking for an energetic, groi { well organized person to doll join our second shift reel staff, Duties include pro- or 1 cessing paperwork, data --- entry and some cus- tomer service. Hours are 1:00 to 9:30, No phone calls please. Send re- sumes to: Land Air Exppress of NE, PO Box PA 503. Williston, VT, 05494, The Attn Carmen Drost. Grot ente, & n paya, mclu keep ante com[° varis COUM oncilil known) court'; withr and i? requ';, hear work, berir leak i T 0 ACCOUNT MANAGER Immediate opportunity to join one of Vermont's leading Marketing Com- munications firms. This position is the primary li- aison with several major accounts having local, nation, and, internatlonat scopes. Demonstrated relationship and organiz- ation capabilities are Grit. ical; direct agency or re- Iate.d expr;r'ience, including an understand- ing of internet marketing is highly preferrable, Re- sume and cover letter to: Paul Kaza, President Paul Kaza Assoc., ". p Shelburne Rd. C-3. So. Burlington, VT 05403 or Cont pkaza@paulkaza.cdmNo phone calls please. A B Ser Bu 8L Aft: ff i DRIVE FOR EFUI =PRES EXPRE Be your own Work two to three a longer If you Wj Work a couple of hours a day Work weekdays�' por lvou decide).) Work earl}' mornings %Yol.t'1' 6 a.m. in time for school or # \,lust have a reliab Call FREE PRESS EXPRE,�' Bobbi Hart at (802) 6 +': iN3Wi61dW-3 j Z L IMMOidW3 I Z L iN3WAU1dW J G t, iNaW ALr laws I e, r lrrwrnv rortiu r SW ELEVATION tELEVATION IN WIN 0 © New illuminated wall sign. C Wall sign to be of aluminum extrusion construction with an aluminum retainer. Cabinet and retainer to be painted to match PMS cool gray #9. Wall sign to be illuminated with high output fluorescent lamps. Face to be 3/16" thick white lexan with 3M #3630-49 burgundy vinyl background. Copy to be weeded from background vinyl to expose white plex. (white copy) Wall sign to be mounted flush to wall. All electrical to be UL. One wall sign per elevation required. _ T 0 T b •— iL 8'-10 3/16" 4 O Sn&EWeddne o RehaWfitaVon Center T C� F. u�r;.. Jity of So. Burlingto m mo co O E CD in LnM N cn o� m o CM L •C Q1 y =3 rm L O a CO Y : C = O N s J uol?u!ljng 'oS jo �1!0 V) V' Sc� �{ �415ov�n ac,(7sv S� J N No Text No Text 9/25/00 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Four Boys, LLC, ADDITION OF FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS 23 San Remo Drive I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-24of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing two (2) 1,200 square foot apartments, 2) adding two (2) 600 square foot apartments in the second phase of the project, 3) adding two skylights to the west ele oon, 4) removing two windows and creating a third doorway on the west fagade, and 5) cr ng a two phase east elevation in which the first phase includes three first story one-e�ofwZindows, two doors, two second story windows, and two skylights, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont", dated 7/25/99, last altered on f2i&94 with a stamped received date of444�90, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. zoning permit for phase twoshall be obtained by January 1 or 7of-0ie 9/f -.,,-/ /� — s,�,.j,; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 1999 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 21 December 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: John Dinklage, Chair; Gayle Quimby, Dan O'Rourke, Garrison Roth, Roger Farley, Eric Schmidt, George Chamberland Also Present: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator; Lonnie Field, Gary Dean, Michael Dee, Terry Harris, Jim Fay, David Gravelin, Bill Miller, James McLane, John Magnus, Dave Marshall, Katy and Eli Lesser, John Kennedy, Steve Crampton, Stuart Chase, Skip McClellan; Susan Green, Free Press 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Continued site plan and design review application of Bette Welch to amend a plan for a 4800 sq. ft. building used for auto repair and storage (3600 sq. ft.) and two dwelling units (1200 sq. ft). The amendment consists of 1) converting 2400 sq. ft. to medical office use, 2) converting 1200 sq. ft. to retail or general office use, and 3) constructing a 1238 sq. ft. addition for medical office use. The two existing dwelling units will remain, 23 San Remo Drive: Mr. Kennedy said they are asking for more parking spaces than are allowed in the building envelope (11 instead of 7) but are eliminating some currently used parking. The applicant is proposing to put in a new carrier unit, which is much smaller than the original HVAC unit. The Design Review Board required that the Development Review Board approve the new unit. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board approve the site plan and design review applications of Bette Welch to amend a plan for a 4800 sq. ft. building used for auto repair and storage (3600 sq. ft.) and two dwelling units (1200 sq. ft.). The amendment consists of: 1) converting 2400 sq. ft. to medical office use, 2) converting 1200 sq. ft. to retail or general office use, and 3) constructing a 1288 sq. ft. addition for medical office use. The two existing dwelling units will remain, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont Medical Office Facility," dated 10/25/99, last revised on 12/6/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 1999 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a. The site plan shall be revised to add one street tree on the east side of the building and add one tree along the north side of the building. b. The site plan shall be revised to replace the sugar maple street trees with a more salt tolerant species. c. The building elevation plans shall be revised to show the building mounted lights. d. The building elevation plans shall be revised to indicate the slope of both the existing and proposed roofs or this information shall be provided in the specifications. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the addition and change in use will generate 9.1 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval by the Director prior to installation. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit additional information to the Director regarding the building mounted lights to be certain that the lamp is concealed. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $3720 landscape bond for Phase I and $2500 for Phase II. The bonds shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 576 gpd for Phase I and 364 of additional allocation for Phase II (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 7. Pursuant to Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves twelve spaces within the allowable building envelope, which are not hidden from view from the public street by a building. It is the Board's opinion that some of these spaces are currently existing and the new spaces meet the requirements of Section 14.402(i)-(iii) of the zoning regulations. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 21 DECEMBER 1999 8. prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit additional information for the specifications report which shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 9. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a design detail for the HVAC equipment screening. 10. The applicant shall construct the streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalk and street trees) as required by the Director. 11. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for Phase I within six months and Phase II within two years pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 12. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the newly converted space and addition. 13. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 6-0 with Mr. O'Rourke abstaining. 3. Public Hearing: Preliminary and final plat applications of Green Mountain Power Corporation, Humane Society of Chittenden County, and Chittenden Water District to subdivide two parcels resulting in a newly configured lot of 2.4 acres and two parcels of 4.2 acres and 4.0 acres which will be merged with two adjoining properties, 503 and 533 Queen City Park Road: Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from Lisa Yankowski expressing concern about runoff into the Lake. Mr. Dinklage also noted receipt of a letter from GMP regarding the easement. Mr. Dinklage directed attention to staff comments regarding the floodplain and the property lines between the parcels to be merged. Mr. Harris noted the city map is incorrect and does not show the correct location of Potash Brook. Mr. Belair said he understands that. The concern is that there be no development in the Humane Society piece that is in the floodplain. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ,SUN 1 4 2000. All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) you ri Z , j L-t-C 113 L, �y CZ. J , Cl,.w�(� �� \d � - v "1 925" 3J-1`t fn4g23 /) vs tl k.J b-, - fie 0�� 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) 5 4v-Q- 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address," phone and fax #) Sikw.t. �i �k � -UU,g5 vt.tq-Z-Iz3 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5 a K k;I 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including descriptiod siz�of each separate use) on an b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) C,� —L�.�` V9,- c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) C (Q, ta� e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) �Z. L . kj. - �C ,� —� 4- �c f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): -1 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically rejqu4. above): �1c� .2►. l,s ll �� y r 3 rC',I�w�4-0bis i211 `�tltu 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 23 % Proposed ` b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _(t I % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing Z % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): (-t Q W".6 b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): jo 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: UK - r- 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the b st of my knowledge. 'SIGNATURE� ) 0 ��� OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -A PLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Lj Development Review Board 11 Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 0 Complete El Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) No Text No Text No Text No Text �� �: i �' 6 ,.��. ��. �:� .. �� :�x1: < // 2 - .5, -1aa (?-? -&:;-V 4=0 Y F yl (7�7< - f •c Q SITE PLAN 2041-0" TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 22,356 100% BUILDING COVERAGE 5,210 23% PARKING LOT COVERAGE 8,498 38% GREENSPACE 8,648 i 39% I POLE LIGHT 2 WALL LAMP 3 SOFFIT LAMP 4 HVAC LANDSCAPE LEGEND I KF.V OMM/IN NAME. c!'IRNTTFI NAMF. _�Q�' TCF YEW TAXUS MEDIA HICKSH, SLF. 3.4' 5 RPJM RHODODENDRON CATAWDIEVSE DROUSAULT. '5 '.]GAL TON RUSSIAN ARBORVITAE MICROBIOTA DECUSSATA 5 912" JCS JUNIPER JUNIPERIS COMMUNIS 4 46" PP ASH PENNSYLVANICA LANCE. 7 2.S•3- LAC BURNING BUSH DICTAMN'US 2 46' 1 AP SUGAR MAPLE A. SACCHARUM {15 5 2.&3" PC EUONYMUS EUONYMUS 4 21' TCA CANADA HEMLOCK T. CANADEWSIS 2 2.5J" SB SPIREA SPHIEA JAPONICA 2 46' TMD YEW TAXUS CUSPIUATA NANA. 3 1-2' PARKING INFORMATION -j USE SF OR 11 OF UNITS RATIO PROVIDED 1 MEDICAL OFFICE 4M SP 1 SPACE PER 200SP 24 LIVING UNIT 2 UNr S 2 PER UNIT 4 PARKING PROVIDED ON -SITE (20) AND OFF -SITE (12) M�1 U 'S �r a 'U- of w z a Qn © O F H iF�jy`'i ram" U w 0 a N O A ro•25.9 i2. 6.9 Revtp • 13 2000 2aA'a Z•!I. E ecav sir • zom • ctsLra ismsF .ecn4rc. -Ael rzmsF'V dOn7g9 API WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = l'-0" NORTH ELEV�MON EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" RECE.M... OCT 2 5 1999 City of So. Burlingto?q ■n] 6/26/00 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL Four Boys, LLC — Conversion of 1200 sq. ft. from retail use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a 9800 square foot building with retail, medical and general office uses and two residential units. The amendment converting 1200 square feet of retail use to medical office use for a total of 3600 square feet of medical office use, as depicted on a one page set of plans, entitled "23 ) San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont", dated 10/25/99, last altered on 12/6/99 with a stamped received date of 6/14/00, with the following stipulations: All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. --c'j 4 �4-6,,',- 7 la "I Is -1/1 141-1 /�p 46' C 9 Proposed Phase II 1288 sq ft Proposed Retail 1200 sq ft HealthSouth 2400 sq ft 23 San Remo Drive 1st Floor CITY OF SOUTH BU WL,I19 G 1 ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 29, 2000 Suzanne King Twin State Signs 14 Gauthier Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Signage of 150 Dorset Street and 23 San Remo Drive Dear Ms. King: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 3, 2000 at 7:30 p.m, to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp Encls DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO OCTOBER 3, 2000 MEETING B) Design Review Application - Free Standing & Wall Signs- Four Boys, LLC —, 23 San Remo Drive: This project consists of: 1) erecting one (1) freestanding, 32 square foot, internally lit, "Healthsouth" sign which employs a burgundy background with white lettering, and 2) erecting two (2) internally lit, "Healthsouth" wall signs totaling 41.94 square feet which employ a burgundy background with white lettering, 23 San Remo Drive. The City Center Design Review Committee reviewed this proposal at their 9/25/00 meeting. The Design Review Committee recommends that the Board approve the application with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 2. The elevations shall be revised to depict the wall signs on the north and south facades of the building. Q Design Review Application— Wall Signs — John Kennedv, 340 Dorset Street: This project consists of erecting two wall signs: 1) a 3 foot by 9 foot wall sign in the west gable end of 338 Dorset Street, and 2) a 1 foot by 3 foot wall sign by the entry door of 338 Dorset Street. The City Center Design Review Committee reviewed this proposal at their 9/25/00 meeting. The Design Review Committee recommends that the Board approve the application with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 2. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 3. Section 23 of the Sign Ordinance requires that a master signage plan be submitted for any lot within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. The applicant must submit a master signage plan that includes the following: a) Identify the location of all signs on the property on a site plan. b) Identify all existing signs, the proposed two "Macsphere" signs, and all previously approved signs that the applicant will install in a short report detailing the signs size and proportions, the signable wall area, r Healthsouth San Reno Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Master Sign Plan Location Desgdplion Number Allowable Sq.Ft. New 1) Healthsouth Internally illuminated flourescent sign box, burgundy 2 41.94 40 total face and white letters Healthsouth Internally illuminated flourescent sign box, burgundy 1 32 32 total face and white letters RECEIVED SEP City of SQ. dui illib.vi TWIN STATE SIGNS, INC. 14 Gauthier Drive Essex Jet., VT 05452 Fax (802) 878-0200 (802) 872-8949 Internally illuminated sign box, top part is with burgundy face and white letters, base is grey Type of illumination Flourescent F96 lamps about 8 to 10 amps Internally illuminated sign box, top part is with burgundy face and white letters Type of illumination Flourescent F120 lamps about 8 to 10 amps Priority Sign wC�.�\ 'c';- South Burlington, VT 23 San Remo Drive ARTWORK NOT FOR PRODUCTION USE I SW ELEVATION 13~ �► W 1 � C; NM ELEVATION Ql M IDFlfl '� r -1a- 8'-10 3/16" ` I Medt!...lflt.' a Rehallirfitarl!1)n Gente ® New illuminated wall sign. C Wall sign to be of aluminum extrusion construction with an aluminum retainer. Cabinet and retainer to be painted to match PMS cool gray #9. Wall sign to be Illuminated with high output fluorescent lamps. Face to be W 61, thick white lexan. Copy to be 3M vinyl graphics as follows: (HEALTHSOUTH) to be 3M #3630-49 burgundy vinyl. (Tag line) to be 3M #3630-22 black vinyl. Wall sign to be mounted flush to wall. All electrical to be UL. One wall sign per elevation required. Aug-14-00 O2:37P Prior=ty Sign Inc. 920-2^ P.O3 2 7/S" --- 7/8° -� 81/411 V t- V s � o n o r-a•1�� r-s• ---� Q. Priority Sign OMwMMApp oft DAM 7-24-M Jeff Bubb, Priority Sign 7/24/00 11,01 AM C12838,dwg DM.r C128W Location - South Burlington, VT 23 San Remo Drive 4 Sc-lll� �\e r, qq a-,c' (7sV C7�v ,4' N MTRVW.'JrITjjjN- MI 1) Healthsouth Healthsouth Healthsouth San Reno Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Description Internally illuminated flourescent sign box, burgundy 2 face and white letters Internally illuminated flourescent sign box, burgundy I face and white letters p 0 6v -V 1OW Q-0 Udy Allowable Sq.Ft. New 41.94 40 total 32 32 total TWIN STATE SIGNS, INC. 14 Gauthier Drive Essex Jet., VT 05452 Fax (802) 878-0200 (802) 872-8949 Internally illuminated sign box, top part is with burgundy face and white letters, base is grey Type of illumination Flourescent F96 lamps about 8 to 10 amps 1 I . i A , I. Internally illuminated sign box, top part is with burgundy face and white letters Flourescent F120 lamps about 8 to 10 amps k u HEALINSOUTH Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Center .� :.At �f H LlL7MOUTH Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation center 14, �5 HFA� ISO Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Center �5 HFA� ISO Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation Center It O I J ELEVATION �. (,--s � ELEVATION IS GIr o- % *-,-ft -% ID U M ,Pc k :.-,� M © New illuminated wall sign. Wall sign to be of aluminum extrusion construction with an aluminum retainer. Cabinet and retainer to be painted to match PMS cool gray #9. Wall sign to be Illuminated with high output fluorescent lamps --- — Face to be 3/16" thick white lexan. Copy to be 3M vinyl graphics as follows. (HEALTHSOUTH) to be 3M #363049 _ burgundy vinyl. (Tag line) to be 3M #3630-22 black vinyl. Wall sign to — l be mounted flush to wall All electrical to be UL. One wall sign per elevation -- —= --required. Mr aD T -- 8'-10 3/16" Q T cow SnpiffModiche & Rehabifigation Gamer 7 BE 7^� mum Sc•����ts 11�� clip f� R -f� �ilit�t ors fj ® Install new OF illuminated monument R sign. FAruslon & retainer to be painted PMS Cool Gray A. Reveal painted to match 3M #3630 49 burgundy vinyl color. Faces to be 3116" white lexan with HEALTHSOUTH being 3M #363049 burgundy vinyl and tag line being 3M #3630-22 black vinyl. Illumination provided by HO fluorescent lamps. Monument to be direct set Into ground. 7 w e F1 <I- 111 \ L•\M, O w a \\ S sy\ No Text ,�- h \ , " , Pn.co�90 �9r.�A Qhal�o wcdl � �1 No Text DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 25, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan Application, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed please find a copy of the July 25, 2000 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 21, 2000 Suzanne King Twin State Signs 14 Gauthier Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Blue Mall and Health South Sign Applications Dear Ms. King: Enclosed is the agenda for the City Center Design Review Committee meeting and my comments to the Committee. Please be sure someone is present on Monday, September 25, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, J�'cr Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp Encls To: South Burlington Design Advisory Committee From: Sarah MacCallum, Planning and Zoning Assistant Re: August 28, 2000 agenda items Date: August 24, 2000 3. Continued: Dorset Square Associates- Free -Standing Sign, 150 Dorset Street This project consists of altering an existing 32 square foot, free standing sign 12 feet in height. The "Blue Mall" portion of the sign is internally illuminated while the rest of the sign is indirectly illuminated. The alteration consists of. 1) removing the existing 4' 2 1/2" by 1' 3/4" blue with white lettered "Softhome" sign panel, and 2) adding a 4' 2 1/2" by 1' 3/4"red with white lettered "Outback Steakhouse" sign panel. Consistent Design: The sign is one of the few directory style signs along Dorset Street. The sign is currently consistent with the colors of the shopping center (predominately blue and white). The sign will remain mostly unchanged. The proposed changes will introduce a red element to a sign that employs a blue background with white lettering. The sign is currently two shades of blue with white lettering. The red will create a transition between the two shades of blue, but will noticeable depart from existing the blue color scheme. City Center Goals: The sign promotes a human scale by the size of the font employed. The majority of the sign is not easily read by an automobilist traveling along Dorset Street. The sign is rather hard to read unless one slows down or is walking by the shopping center. The use of a combination of lighting helps to lessen the possibility of glare from a single light source. Color, Texture and Materials: The sign will remain mostly unchanged. The proposed sign panel will introduce a red color to a sign that already employs two shades of blue with white lettering. The Sign Ordinance discourages signs that employ more than three predominate colors. Since blue is technically one color, the proposed changes will create a three color sign: white, blue, and red. The new panel will be acrylic to match the existing acrylic panels. 9/25/00 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TWIN STATE SIGNS, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application #DR-00-22 of Twin State Signs for: 1) erecting one (1) freestanding, 32 square foot, internally lit, "Healthsouth" sign which employs a burgundy background with white lettering, and 2) erecting two (2) internally lit, "Healthsouth" wall signs totaling 41.94 square feet which employ a burgundy background with white lettering, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled "Healthsouth, San Reno Drive So. Burlington, VT05403", prepared by Twin State Signs, with a stamped received date of 9/6/00 with the following stipulations: 1. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. "'ACC CITE' OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 21, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan for 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is the agenda for the City Center Design Review Committee meeting and my comments to the Committee. Please be sure someone is present on Monday, September 25, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, •C- � Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp Encls To: South Burlington Design Advisory Committee From: Sarah MacCallum, Planning and Zoning Assistant Re: September 25, 2000 agenda items Date: September 21, 2000 3. Continued: Dorset Square Associates- Free Standing Sign,150 Dorset Street This application was continued from the Committee's August 28,2000 meeting as no one was available to represent this request (memo enclosed). 4. Four Boys, LLC — Free Standing & Wall Signs, 23 San Remo Drive This project consists of 1) erecting one (1) freestanding, 32 square foot, internally lit, "Healthsouth" sign which employs a burgundy background with white lettering, and 2) erecting two (2) internally lit, "Healthsouth" wall signs totaling 41.94 square feet which employ a burgundy background with white lettering, 23 San Remo Drive. There are no signs currently present on the property. The property at 23 San Remo Drive is located in Design District Two. It is bounded on the north and east by San Remo Drive, on the south by mixed retail, and on the west by a church. Consistent Design: Only a handful of the businesses along San Remo Drive have approved signs. The majority of the signs are pre-existing and on -conforming. Recently, the Committee approved free standing signs for the adjacent property, M.T. Bellies, and Pizzagali Realty on the southern end of San Remo Drive. Both of these signs are not internally lit and therefore are not good comparative models. The proposed signs are in keeping with newer signs within the City Center District such as the Fletcher Allen Replays sign and the Barnes & Noble signs. These signs similarly employ dark backgrounds with light colored lettering and are internally lit. The proposed signs are therefore consistent with other signs within the City Center District, but will perhaps be the precedent setting signs for San Remo Drive. City Center Goals: The proposed free standing sign will be only four feet from the ground and will be geared to the pedestrian. This promotes a human scale design element. The wall signs will be located midway up the east and west facades on the second floor level. These signs will be more geared to the motorist as they are at a higher elevation that is better observed from the parking area or the road. The proposed signs promote a balanced mix of signage geared to the motorist and the pedestrian. Color, Texture and Materials: The proposed signs will employ a dark background Design Advisory Committee Memo September 25, 2000 with white lettering as required of internally illuminated signs within the City Center District. The lettering will be legible and the burgundy background should prevent glare. The signs will likely employ luxan type facing and the light source will be fluorescent. While plastic, such as luxan, is not a high quality material, the Committee has recommended approval for previous luxan signs that are presented in an aesthetically pleasing manner that promotes a high visual quality. Recently approved luxan signs are the University Inn, Outback Steakhouse, and Fletcher Allen Replays. 5. Four Boys, LLC —Addition of Four Residential Units, 23 San Remo Drive This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 4,888 square feet of medical office use, and 2) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing two (2) 1,200 square foot apartments, and 2) adding two (2) 600 square foot apartments in the second phase of the project, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposed alterations will be within the existing building and the approved addition resulting in no exterior alterations. Consistent Design: No changes are proposed to the exterior of the building. There are already two approved residential units within the building. The proposed changes will help to introduce a substantial residential component to Design Review District Two. The City Center Design Review Overlay District defines District Two as a "unique and eclectic neighborhood with a wide variety in terms of color, materials, building shapes, and site layouts." Colors Textures. & Materials: No changes are proposed. Windows and Doors: No changes are proposed. Human Scale Design: No changes are proposed. Roof as a Design Element: No changes are proposed. Orientation of Building to the Street: No changes are proposed. Conceal Roof Top Devices: No additional hvac equipment is proposed. Energy Efficiency It is believed that no changes are proposed. The applicant should clarify if additional interior hvac appliances or insulation will be installed. Landscape and Plantings: No changes are proposed. Lighting: No changes are proposed. 6. John Kennedy — Wall Sign, 340 Dorset Street 2 Aug.22-00 03:27P P.02 P. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your applieSVIOn being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply), 0 Design Plan Approval M.r -�? f--2) c)"F. t OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing � t, : G( Sign Design Approval phone and fax #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �t �. f� S%A-Y %-Ir 0a S Y7L 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and tax #) 5 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a orief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval i{ being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) typo. size and height Auw22-00 03:28P - - - w`y1W6� I P.03 a The infonn0tion fisted on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., sit+e plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. n 1 �LIA�NT� IV SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (ApformDR) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 6, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed please find a copy of Finding of Facts for the above referenced project dated July 25, 2000. Please note the conditions of approval including that a permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 21, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Site Plan, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 25, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerelty, -ram lei iaymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls Psi 7/25/00 MOTION OF APPROVAL FOUR BOYS LLC - CONVERT RETAIL TO MEDICAL OFFICE, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board it n application #SP-00-32 of Four Boys, LLC. to amend a previously approved si a' -plan for a i.vvo (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 3,688 square feet of medical office use, 2) 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use, and 3) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of converting 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a one (1) page set of plans entitled "23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 5/15/00, with the following stipulations: All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The windows previously approved on October 25, 1999 for the east facade of the building shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. The Director of Planning & Zoning may approve minor changes. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate 2.124 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly converted space. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the \South Burlington Development Review Board. 7/25/00 MOTION OF APPROVAL FOUR BOYS, LLC - CONVERT RETAIL TO MEDICAL OFFICE, 23 SAN REMO DRIVE I move the South Burlington Development Review Board site plan application #SP-00-32 of Four Boys, LLC. to amend a previously approved site plan for a i.vvo (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 3,688 square feet of medical office use, 2) 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use, and 3) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of converting 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a one (1) page set of plans entitled "23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Michael Dugan, dated 5/15/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The windows previously approved on October 25, 1999 for the east facade of the building shall be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. The Director of Planning & Zoning may approve minor changes. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the building will generate 2.124 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the newly converted space. 6. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the \South Burlington Development Review Board. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 25, 2000 MEETING front yard coverage is 48 % (30% maximum). The project will result in the front yard coverage being decreased to 31%. Setback requirements are being met. Parking: A total of 31 spaces are provided and 26 spaces are required. Two handicapped parking spaces are required and only one is being provided. The plans should be revised to delineate an additional handicapped space. A bike rack should be provided and the parking lot striped. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $2,700 which is not being met. The applicant should revise the plans to include an additional $1,220 worth of landscaping. Proposed plantings are four Little Leaf Lindens. Traffic: This property is in Traffic Overlay Zone One which allows this property to generate a maximum of 10.2 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. This property was previously approved for 10.2 vte's. The ITE manual Sixth Edition estimates that the property now currently generates 5.5 P.M. peak vte's. The proposed addition will generate an additional 4.65 P.M. peak vte's for a total of 10.16 P.M. peak vte's. Since the applicant previously paid the impact fee for 10.2 vte's, no impact fee should be required. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation is requested. Lighting All lights must be downcasting and shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. The plans submitted do not call for any new exterior lights. If the applicant plans on erecting new lights, cut sheets must be submitted for approval by the Director. Dumpster: There are currently five unscreened dumpsters on this property. The plans provide a screened dumpster area in which these dumpsters must be located. Other: The site plan application states that the proposed addition will be 1,800 square feet. The plans depict the addition as being 2,000 square feet. The plans should be revised to illustrate the addition as being 1,800 square feet. The plans also must be revised to reflect current site conditions. The shed depicted on the plans no longer exists and should be removed from the plans. 10) FOUR BOYS, LLC. — CONVERT RETAIL TO MEDICAL OFFICE USE — SI'TE PLAN. 23 SAN REMO DRIVE This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a two (2) phase 6,088 square foot building used for: 1) 3,688 square feet of medical office use, 2) 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use, and 3) 1,200 square feet of residential use consisting of two (2) dwelling units. The amendment consists of converting 1,200 square feet of retail or general office use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive. This property located at 23 San Remo Drive lies within the Central 2 District. It is bounded on the north and east by San Remo Drive, on the south by Christ Church, and on 10 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 25, 2000 MEETING the west by a retail building. The Development Review Board previously approved a site plan for this property on December 21, 1999 (minutes enclosed). Access/Circulation: Access is provided via a 26 foot ingress and egress curb cut on San Remo Drive and by a 13 foot egress only curb cut on San- Remo Drive. The site also provides access to the adjacent development via a driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Circulation on the site is adequate. Circulation/Setbacks: The approved building coverage is 24% (maximum 40%). Overall coverage is 61% (maximum 90%). The plans should be revised to show the approved building coverage. Setback requirements are met. Landsca&ng; The minimum landscaping requirement is not applicable as there are no construction costs associated with this change in use. The site is already well landscaped. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation is requested. Traffic: This property was approved for 19.82 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The 1,200 square feet of retail space is estimated to generate 3.108 P.M. peak hour vte's. The proposed 1,200 medical office use is estimated to generate 5.232 P.M. peak hour vte's for an overall increase of 2.124 P.M. peak hour vte's. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): The F.A.R. for this property is 0.23 (maximum 0.5). Lighting: No additional lighting is proposed. Parking: The present uses require a total of 28 spaces (two of which must be designated handicapped). The proposed uses will require a total of 26 spaces (two of which must be designated handicapped). A total of 20 on -site spaces, including three handicapped spaces, and 12 on -street spaces are provided. Design Review: This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on June 26, 2000 (minutes enclosed). The Design Review Committee approved the application subject to the conditions listed below: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The windows previously approved on October 25, 199 for the east fagade of the building should be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. The Director of Planning & Zoning may approve minor changes. 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 25, 2000 MEETING Streetscape: One of the conditions of the previous Development Review Board approval was that the applicant would be expected to comply with the San Remo Drive Streetscape plan upon its completion. Approval Expiration: One of the conditions of the previous Development Review Board approval was that the applicant would have two years to obtain a permit for the second phase of the project. The effective date of this previous approval was January 18, 2000. 12 CITE' CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE .TUNE 26, 2000 Ms. Benoit seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. 6. University Inn,1 Dorset Street Mr. Gaydes introduced the proposal. He stated that the University Inn wished to remove the existing 78.5 square foot free-standing sign and replace it with an internally lit 56 square foot freestanding sign for a 28.6% reduction in size. Ms. MacCallum stated that the approval for a 32 square foot sign previously approved by the Committee had been withdrawn before being considered by the Development Review Board. Mr. Gaydes presented the Committee with a color rendering of the sign. It depicted a green background with white lettering and gold accents. Ms. Leban asked if the sign would be a bright green as depicted in the rendering. Mr. Gaydes stated that it would be a more subdued holly green. Ms. MacCallum noted that a planter was proposed for the base at the sign, but details had yet to be submitted. Mr. Gaydes stated that he believed the planter would be constructed of brick and utilizes Marigolds. Ms. Leban stated that the plants should be more hardy. She stated that she would like more details on the planter before considering approval. Mr. Clark stated that he also felt uncomfortable approving the proposal without knowing more about the planter. Mr. Boehm suggested that the Committee could approve the sign with. the requirement that the applicant be required to obtain approval for the planter at a later date. The applicants both agreed to the suggestion. Mr. Clark made the motion to recommend approval of the design review application of Signarama to remove the current 78.5 square foot Howard Johnson free-standing sign and replace it with an internally lit, 56 square foot freestanding sign for a 28.6% reduction in size, 1 Dorset Street. The sign will consist of a double sided five (5) foot by eight (8) foot internally illuminated box and two (2) two (2) foot by eight (8) foot internally illuminated reader signs supported by twin posts rising from a brick planter to a height of 12 feet, and employ a dark background, as depicted on a three page set of plans, University Inn, with a stamped received date of 6/19/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 3. The plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Development Review Board. 9 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUKE 26, 2000 5. Four Boys, LLC, 23 San Memo Drive Mr. Dee presented the project. He stated that he wished to convert 1200 square feet of retail use to medical office use for a total of 3600 square feet of medical office use in a 9800 square foot building approved for retail, medical, and general office uses. Ms. MacCallum stated that the Committee had previously approved the building with windows along the eastern facade as part of the first phase of the building. She asked if these windows would be installed soon. Mr. Dee stated that he was unaware of the requirement of windows along the eastern facade. He stated that it was not his intention to install the windows during phase one of this project. Ms. MacCallum shared the minutes of the October 25, 1999 Design Review Committee minutes with the Committee and Mr. Dee. Mr. Kennedy, who represented the project at this meeting, assured the Committee that the windows illustrated in elevation dated 7/25/99. Mr. Boehm asked if the was wall was load bearing. Mr. Dee stated that it was not. Mr. Boehm stated that placing windows in the wall therefore should not be a problem. Mr. Boehm stated that he believed no changes were proposed to the site as part of the change in use proposal, and therefore the windows should not be considered as part of this application. Mr. Dee stated that there could be problems installing windows along the east facade due to the nature of the medical office use. Ms. MacCallum suggested that the Committee could approve the project with the stipulation that Mr. Dee install windows along the east facade prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. She suggested that the Director of Planning & Zoning could approve minor changes to the previously approved plan. Mr. Clark made the motion to recommend approval of the design review application of Four Boys, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for a 9800 square foot building with retail, medical and general office uses and two residential units. The amendment converting 1200 square feet of retail use to medical office use for a total of 3600 square feet of medical office use, as depicted on a one page set of plans, entitled °23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont, dated 10/25/99, last altered on 12/6/99 with a stamped received date of 6/14/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed addition is based on the applications compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 24 of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. The Code Officer shall make the determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the zoning ordinance. 3. The windows previously approved on October 25, 1999 for the east facade at the building should be installed prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy; the Director of Planning & Zoning may approve minor changes. 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 26, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design Review Application —Retail to Medical Office Use, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed please find a copy of the June 26, 2000 Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCaffum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 SEPTEMBER 1999 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 7 September 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: John Dinklage, Chair; Garrison Roth, Gayle Quimby, Roger Farley, George Chamberland, Eric Schmidt Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; John Osgood, Bob Marcellino, Dave Marshall, Jeff Balard, Stephen Selin, Jeff Carr, John Magnus, Randall Kay, Robert Davis, Anne Geggis, Kathy Pepin, James McLaine, G. Donald Weaver, Elizabeth Dacey, Mark Sperry, John Hume, Donna Weissman, Pat LeBuda, Mike Weissman, Gregg Beldock 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 3 August and 17 August: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 3 August and 17 August as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Consent Agenda: a) Design Review application of the Bon Ton Stores, Inc., to install two 100 sq. ft. wall signs at the University Mall, 155 Dorset St. b) Design Review application of John Kennedy to modify the design of an approved 32 sq. ft. freestanding sign, 340 Dorset St. Mr. Farley moved to approve the consent agenda subject to the stipulations in the memorandum of the Director of Planning & Zoning dated 3 September 1999. Mr. Chamberland seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Public Hearing: Application of Derrick & Kathy Pepin seeking a variance from Section 25.00, Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow a 10' x 12' deck to project ten feet into the required 30 foot front yard setback requirement, 2 Sherry Road: Mr. Dinklage directed members' attention to a letter from the City Attorney regarding this issue. He noted that the essential item had been testimony from the appellant MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: December 7, 1999 agenda items Date: December 3, 1999 1) Jeffrey & Elizabeth Goldberg Dated 11/29/99 1760 Dorset Street Acceptable 2) Lowe's Companies, Inc. Dated 9/29/99 Hannaford Drive The building should be sprinklered and include an alarm, fire pump and knox boxes. 3) Waste Systems International, Inc. Dated 11/30/99 73 Ethan Allen Drive Acceptable 4) Bette Welch Dated 10/25/99 23 San Remo Drive There should be no parking along the west side for a fire lane, the access drive to the south should be 18 feet in width, the building should be sprinklered and include 4" storts at the northwest corner. 5) Katherine Lesser Dated 11/23/99 4 Market Street The building should be sprinklered and have an 18 - 20 foot access drive along the north-east and east sides of the builiding. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William 1. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: December 7, 1999 Agenda Items Date: December 3, 1999 32 SAN REMO DRIVE 1. The sidewalk (concrete) shall be constructed across the entrance drive and one foot from the lot line. 2. Water and sewer services should be shown on the plans. GOLDBERG 5 LOT SUBDIVISION - DORSET STREET Sewage disposal may be a problem if it is on -site. An engineer must perform the tests and design the system. LOWE'S - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Permanent structures within water and sewer easements are not allowed. This includes retaining walls. The retaining wall along the southerly drive is within a fifteen (15) foot sewer easement. There is a six (6) inch force main (pressure) within this easement which serves Queen City Park. This sewer must be protected from freezing even when the wall is moved outside of the easement. 2. Water and sewer services should be shown on the site plan. KELLEY PROPERTY - ETHAN ALLEN PARKWAY & COMMERCE AVENUE A depressed concrete curb shall be installed at entrance drives if none exists. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BL'RLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 3. 1999 John Kennedy 340 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Medical Office, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 7, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely- CA Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJ B/ mcp Encls No Text December 7, 1999 John H. Belter, Jr. 2 Country Club Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: White Rock Point Subdivision Dear Mr. Belter: I am writing in response to your recent inquiry regarding the above -referenced subdivision. Specifically, you have asked whether the subdivision approval granted by the City's Planning Commission on July 26, 1988 remains valid. As you are aware, my predecessor Richard Ward has previously addressed this issue in letters dated March 27, 1995 and November 18, 1997. At this time, over eleven (11) years have passed since you obtained approval for this subdivision and at least six (6) years have passed since you performed any work to construct the subdivision. It is my responsibility to ensure that land development does not occur in the City without necessary approvals under the City's zoning regulations or subdivision regulations. It is my opinion, as of this date, and assuming all information you have provided is accurate that I would not commence enforcement proceedings at this time if you commenced construction of the subdivision, as approved by the Planning Commission, and sale of the approved lots. It is my further opinion that Section 605 of the South Burlington Regulations requires the completion of approved subdivisions within a reasonable period of time. Such has not occurred in this case. Indeed, you performed only limited work between 1988 and 1993. Since then, you have not undertaken any further construction. In Mr. Ward's 1997 letter to you he made it clear that your failure to take further significant action to construct the subdivision could result in loss of the 1988 subdivision approval. Based on this prior notice, please be advised that if you fail to construct required infrastructure for the subdivision, including streets, sewer lines, water lines, and other utilities by October 31, 2000, (three years from the 1997 notice), it will be my position that the 1988 approval will have become null and void, as provided in Section 605. T(---IJFc _ (II S GPI John H. Belter, Jr. White Rock Point Subdivision December 7, 1999 Page 2 If you or any interested person disagree with my position as set forth in this letter, you or such person may appeal this letter to the Development Rview Board by filing a notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Development Review Board within fifteen (15) days of this letter. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp cc: Chuck Hafter ian Phase I 2nd Floor 23 San Remo Drive Phase I 1st Floor 23 San Remo Drive AGENDA South Burlington Development Review Board City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Meeting @7:30 P.M. 1) Other business. 2) Minutes of November 2, 1999. 3) Consent agenda: Tuesday, December 7, 1999 a) PUBLIC HEARING: Application of Alexander H. & Phyllis P. Rose seeking approval from Section 26.05, Con itiona Uses and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow auto sales use in conjunction with various other commercial uses, 3060 Williston Road. b) Site plan application of Alexander H. & Phyllis P. Rose to amend a previously approved plan for a 30,600 square foot building and 6,000 square foot building for multiple use and tenants. The amendment consists of adding automobile sales to the list of permitted uses, 3060 Williston Road. 4) Application of City of South Burlington for approval to alter and relocate a portion of Potash Brook, 1877 and 1891 Williston Road. 5) Sketch plan application of Jeffrey & Elizabeth Goldberg to subdivide a 12.92 acre parcel into five (5) lots, 1760 Dorset Street. 6) PUBLIC HEARING: Application of JoAnn Hough seeking a variance from Section 25.00, Area, Density and Dimension, Requirements, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow a 26' x 28' garage to project 25 feet into the 30 foot rear yard setback requirement, 46 Hinesburg Road. 7) PUBLIC HEARING: Final plat application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4 buildings. The amendment consists of adding 2105 square feet of mezzanine space (shopping center use3 resulting in a total square footage of 98,905 square feet, 4 Market Street. 8) PUBLIC HEARING: Application of Waste Systems International, Inc. seeking approval from Section 26.05, C—on—di—tional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to operate an automobile repair and service use, 73 Ethan Allen Drive. 9) Site plan application of Waste Systems International, Inc. to change the use of a 2937 square foot building from a contracting business to an auto service and repair business, 73 Ethan Allen Drive. 10) Sketch plan application of Lowe's Companies, Inc. to amend a 10 building planned unit development on a 38.9 acre lot consisting of 201,461 square feet of shopping center use, a 55,000 square foot supermarket, a 95 room hotel, and a 3585 square foot bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of: 1) eliminating building, B, (28,715 square feet), 2) increasing the size of building C from 107,806 square feet to 121,292 square feet, and 3) modifications to the parking lot layout for building C, Hannaford Drive. 11) Site plan and design review applications of Bette Welch to: 1 renovate and change the use of a 3600 square foot building used for auto service, storage and two (2) dwelling units to medical office, and 2) construct a 1610 square foot addition for medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive. ;� Respectfully submitted, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer F 1)- - - - - - - - - - - 340 Dorset Street 340 Dorwl Street S. BurlingLon, Vt 05403 "wr 23 San Remo Drive North to San Remo South to 340 Dorset zk �t­ 340 Dorset Street 340 Dorsd Stred S. Burlington, Nt 05403 23 San Remo Drive East Toward San Remo 340 Dorset Street 23 San Remo Drive West to Dorset Street 340 Dorsd Street S. Burlington, Vt 05403 C C+ion Loelo-blo,93 I�ocd©d��►�rc� Sussi�n Q(-60" +aP J o n-) pe C A )h 3ornln �, 1�Sh Sv a(_ Bpi C�►rr�6A 4e ro 5 cI' e5 JL)n if)ori�F-; comxuni5 C'.orntom5a Penns Ivan -a Ace SaCe.V)GnU n� C.ano 6e U-) �XOS CJ ' fl Cj Ck � L �a err C', Sze Pr�e , �� 43 4_�g o/ C-3 - � 4) 7G C I� 9�5 G�- QPO9 , T6 existing stone drain running along the east side of the path. Additional low -height dense shrubs will supplement the berming in the most probable points of interaction between the pedestrian path and the golf course. f) Additional traffic calming features at the Park Road pedestrian crossing together with additional signage in accordance with the recommendations of the manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Commission recommended that the applicant construct two (2) pocket parks. One (1) located at the south end overlooking the 15'' tee and one (1) at the north end in the City Park. These pocket parks would mitigate the loss of the views resulting from a depressed path and landscape screening. The plans should be revised to show these viewing parks and the plat revised to provide an easement for the viewing park near the 15'' tee. The plats should also be revised to show the easement for the revised bike path location. 2. Landscaping: Shrubs were proposed to be planted along the recreation path. A plan was submitted which shows the location of the plants and a planting schedule. The site layout plan (sheet R-4) should be revised to reflect the approved landscaping along the 15`' tee. The Planning Commission recommended that it retain the right to review the path after it has been constructed from a safety aspect and require changes if deemed necessary. 3. Legal documents: The legal documents (offer of dedication, deed, etc.) for the pocket park and recreation path easements should be approved by the City Attorney and recorded by September 1, 1999. DECISION AND CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the final plat application of Highlands Development Company, LLC and JAM Golf, LLC to amend a planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of relocating a recreation path easement located along the east ridge of Dorset Street, as depicted on a six (6) page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "Vermont National Country Club Proposed Recreation Path South Burlington Vermont", prepared by Civil Engineer Associates, Inc., dated September 1998, last revised on 7/14/99 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to recording the final plat plans, or September 1, 1999, whichever is sooner, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Attorney revised legal documents (ie. irrevocable offer of dedication, easement deed, etc.) for the revised recreation path and scenic overlook areas. 340 Dorset Street 340 Dorset Stred S. Burlington, Vt 05403 To: South Burlington Design Review Board Re: 23 San Remo Drive Revisions to Application submitted to DR Committee Dt: December 6, 1999 Parking - The parking has been revised to show 32 parking places, 3 of which are handicap spaces. The parking on the west side of the building was removed at the request of the Fire Chief for access in the event of fire. Glazing - The windows are Pella Pro Line. We have modified the plans to reflect a larger window area on the north and east elevations. These units will be composed of two (2) factory mulled 5359/5317 windows. This is basically two fixed glass windows measuring 4'5-3/4" X 4' 11" with awning type windows below each measuring 4'4-3/4" X 1'5". The overall height will be 81". The base of the window will be 20" above ground level. Total elevation will be 101". All windows will be trimmed in 5/4 pine in a picture frame concept. The trim will be painted in white. Soffit Lights - We have revised the specs on soffit lights to be reduced from 100 watt to 60 watt. Sidewalks - We have added a walk along the east side of San Remo Drive to reflect the wishes of the Committee. The walks will be constructed through the driveways so that they are continual. Signage - We will be adding a sign off the east drive of San Remo defining an "Exit Only". Sewer Allocation - The proposed tenant, Healthsouth, is presently seeing 45 patients per day at 45 minutes per patient. The addition, which is proposed to house Healthsouth of Shelburne Rd. (more medical rather than physical rehab) is seeing 35 patients per day at 15 minutes. 616�4 Landscaping - We have added trees along San Remo North and East as shown on plan. With these revisions in landscaping, we will be spending $5,800.00 on phase I and $1,000 on phase II. 340 Dorset Street Electrical - Electric Service - The building will be served by five (5) meters housed in an outside cabinet built on the northeast side of the building. These will be accessed by a 36" metal door painted grey. This will be similar to 340 Dorset Street. Exterior Lighting - Post Lamps - As defined on the print 250 W Metal Halide pole mounted fixture Model KRE1 on 20' poles. Soffit Lamps - As defined on the print 50M Metal Halide with white trim Wall Lamps - As defined on the print 250W Metal Halide Model TWH 250M CxftA /A, �� -�7 11) BETTE WELCH -CHANGE OF USE/ADDITION - 23 SAN RENT® DRIVE -SITE PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW This project consists of renovating, expanding and changing the use of an existing 3600 square foot. building. The existing building contains 2400 square feet of auto repair and storage use and 2 residential apartments (1200 square feet). The proposal is to construct a 1610 square foot addition and use the building for 4010 square feet of medical office space and to retain the two second floor apartments (1200 square feet). The total square footage of the new building will be 5210 square feet. Staff recommends that this application be continued until the next meeting due to lack of required information. This property located at 23 San Remo Drive lies within Central District 2. It is bounded on the north and east by San Remo Drive, on the south by a church, and on the west by a retail building. Access/circulation: Access is provided via a 26' ingress and egress curb cut on San Remo Drive and by a 13' egress only curb cut on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to the adjacent development via a driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Circulation on the site is not adequate. The parking aisles do not meet the minimum width requirements under Section 26.251 of the zoning regulations. There is insufficient space for two rows of angled parking. The applicant should consider alternative parking schemes, such as one row of perpendicular parking. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 24% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 61% (maximum allowed is 90%). As shown on the plan, it does not appear that the setback requirements have been met because the existing building projects outside of the required building envelope. However, the plan does not show the correct location of the 80' building envelope so it is not clear whether or not setback requirements have been met. The plan should show the correct location of the 80' building envelope which is measured 32' from the centerline of San Remo Drive and the building should meet setback requirements. Landscaping: The applicant should provide sizes and scientific names for proposed landscaping. The applicant is proposing only $2110 in landscaping (according to applicant's figures) and the required amount is $3720 for Phase I and $2580 for Phase II, totaling $6300 for the whole project. The applicant's proposal is $4190 or 67% short of the required amount. Staff recommends several more trees as well as street trees along San Remo Drive. 12 Sewer: The applicant should provide sewer allocation information. Traffic: The existing use consisting of 2400 square feet of auto repair and storage and 2 apartments (1200 square feet) generates 11A vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The proposed use consisting of 4010 square feet of medical office building and 2 apartments generates Z2:92 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. This represents an increase of 11:82- vte's or 106%. The applicant should be made aware that the road impact fee is approximately $2454. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): The F.A.R. for this property is 0.23 (maximum allowed is 0.5). Lighting: The applicant should provide details (cut -sheets) of exterior lighting. Parking: --- The location of surface parking on the property does not appear to comply with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. This section allows surface parking to be located within the 80' building envelope if it is hidden by a building OR the parking meets the following two standards: 1) no more than 25% of the building envelope area is taken up by surface parking, and 2) no more than 25% of the total parking required for the property is located within the building envelope. The second standard does not appear to have been met. The total parking required is 30 spaces. Therefore a total of 7 full and one half space or 25% of the total are permitted within the building envelope. --- The plan shows 8 full and 3 half spaces within the building envelope. The plan should be revised so that only 7 full and 1 half space are within the building envelope. --- The on street parking spaces and the parallel parking spaces do not meet the minimum size requirements under Section 26.251 of the zoning regulations. They should be increased to 22' in length. --- The angled spaces do not meet the minimum requirements for a 60 degree parking angle as required by Section 26.251 of the zoning regulations. --- The plan should show the proper right of way and pavement width for San Remo Drive. --- The plan should show the proper dimensions for the on street parking spaces (8'x22'). Design Review: This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on October 251, 1999 (see enclosed minutes). The Design Review Committee approved the application subject to a number of conditions. The applicant has not met all the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee: 13 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24.401(a)-(i) and 24.402(a)-(i)). The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the Design Review Committee required the applicant to revise the plans as follows: a. The elevation plan shall be revised to show the north and east first floor facades of the addition consisting of a majority of see -through glass as required by Section 24.401(d) of the zoning regulations. b. The site plan shall show the sidewalks on the west and south side of the building extended out to San Remo Drive. A sidewalk shall be shown along San Remo Drive in a location to be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. c. The site plan shall show street trees along San Remo Drive at a spacing of 40 feet between trees. Several more trees shall also be included on the property. e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. Proposed on - street parking spaces (8'x22') shall be shown on the plan. h. The elevations shall be revised to show building mounted lights and meters. I The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. 4. Specifications and cut sheets of proposed building mounted lights and new ornamental pole lights shall be submitted prior to review by the Development Review Board. The applicant has not submitted any new plans since design review and therefore has not met the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee. The applicant must make the changes required by the Design Review Committee. Other: 14 --- The plans should show the second floor of the building. --- It has been the policy of the Planning Commission to grant applicants a period of two years to obtain a permit for the second phase of projects which are constructed in phases. 15 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Raymond]. Belair;"I ministrative Officer Re: December 21, 1999 agenda items Date: December 10, 1999 2) BE17E WELCH - CHANGE OF USE/ADDITION - 23 SAN REMO DRIVE - SITE PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW This application was continued from the 12/7/99 meeting (minutes not available) to provide staff additional time to review the application. This project consists of amending a plan for a 9800 square foot building and used for auto repair and storage (3600 square feet) and two (2) dwelling units (1200 square feet). The amendment consists of: 1) converting 2400 square feet to medical office use, 2) converting 1200 square feet to retail or general office use, and 3) constructing a 1288 square foot addition for medical office use. The two (2) existing dwelling units will remain. This property located at 23 San Remo Drive lies within Central District 2. It is bounded on the north and east by San Remo Drive, on the south by a church, and on the west by a retail building. Access/circulation: Access is provided via a 26 foot ingress and egress curb cut on San Remo Drive and by a 13 foot egress only curb cut on San Remo Drive. The site also provides access to the adjacent development via a driveway on the southwest corner of the property. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 24% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 61% (maximum allowed is 90%). Setback requirements are met. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, for Phase I is $3720 and for Phase II is $2580, for a total of $6300. The minimum landscaping required is not being met. The proposed landscaping is $775 short of the requirement. Staff recommends one (1) additional street tree (east of building) and one (1) additional tree along the north side of the building. Applicant should replace the Sugar Maple street trees with a more salt tolerant species. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation needed for Phase I is 576 gpd and for Phase II is 364 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. Traffic: The existing use consisting of 2400 square feet of auto repair and storage and 2 apartments (1200 square feet) generates 10.72 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The proposed uses and two (2) apartments generates 19.82 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. This represents an increase of 9.1 vte's. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $1850. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): The F.A.R. for this property is 0.23 (maximum allowed is 0.5). Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting consists of: — three (3) 250 watt metal halide lamps mounted on twenty (20) foot poles with downcasting shielded fixtures. — two (2) 250 watt building mounted metal halide lamp with downcasting shielded fixture. The applicant needs to provide additional information regarding this fixture to be certain that the lamp is concealed. — three (3) 50 watt soffit lights. Parking: A total of twenty eight (28) spaces are required. Twenty (20) on -site and twelve (12) on -street spaces are proposed, including three (3) handicapped spaces and a bike rack. Approximately twelve (12) spaces are located within the allowable building envelope which are not hidden from view from the public street by a building. Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations states that the Development Review Board may "approve surface parking which is within the allowable building envelope and which is not hidden from view from the public street by a building, provided: (i) the subject parking represents a significantly minor portion of the total parking required for the property, (ii) the area encompassed by the subject surface parking represents a significantly minor portion of the total allowable building envelope area existing on the property, and (iii) the overall site design of the property is found to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Central District." It is the applicant's position that some of these spaces are existing and that the new spaces proposed which are in the allowable building envelope meet the above criteria. Design Review: 2 This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on October 25, 1999 (see enclosed minutes). The Design Review Committee approved the application subject to a number of conditions. The applicant has met most of the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee: The conditions yet to be met are as follows: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24.401(a)-(i) and 24.402(a)-(i)). The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the Design Review Committee required the applicant to revise the plans as follows: e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. Proposed on -street parking spaces (8'x22') shall be shown on the plan. h. The elevations shall be revised to show building mounted lights. 3. The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. Streetscape: The Planning Commission will be revising the streetscape standards along San Remo Drive in the next couple of months. Therefore, the exact location for street trees and sidewalk may be slightly different than the locations shown on the applicant's plan. In fact, it is likely that a portion of the sidewalk may need to be placed on the applicant's property since the San Remo Drive r.o.w. is only 50 feet. Approval of this application should include a condition that requires the applicant to construct the streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalk and street trees) as required by the Director of Planning & Zoning. Approval expiration: The applicant is requesting that the approval be effective for two (2) years. Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations allows the Board to approve this request. It has been the policy of the Planning Commission to grant applicants a period of two (2) years to obtain a permit for the second phase of projects which are constructed in phases. 3 _ f. T-�� i( ¢� ,�: �..._�. No Text F_/ccrQ%� ScWF/t — WArER W 2 W Q' Q N I SAN REMO DRIVE 1ae.es• . �( r► )Il ��I� `y(. ' • Ira/ tcll—' NEW ADDITION / H C — � •T y ""I EXISTING BUILDING 1 b, 3,600 SF I 81uN �� �• 1 13 i iI r 1 if 'r< HC F Ll SITE PLAN 1"=20' Total Square Footage 22,356 100% Building Coverage 5,210 23% Parking Lot Coverage 8,498 38% Greenspace 8,648 39% 1 Post Lamps 2 Wall Lamps 3 Soffit Lamps 4 HVAC Landscape Legend Key COMMON NAME TCR- Yew RPJM - Rhododendron TON - Russian Arborvitae JCS - Juniper FP - Ash EAC - Burning Bush AP- Sugar Maple PC - Euonymus TCA - Canada Hemlock SB - Spirea TMD - Yew SCIENTIFIC NAME COUNT SIZE Taxus media hleksll 6 3.4 ft Catawbievse Boursault 6 1 gal Microblots decussate 6 8 - 12 in Junlperius communis compressa 6 4 - 6 In Pennsytvanlca lanceoiata 4 2.6 - 3 in Dlctamnus 2 4 - 6 ft A. Saccharum 6 2.6 - 3 in Euonymus 4 2-6ft T. canadewsis 1 2.6 - 3 in Spiraea Japonica 2 4 - 6 ft Taxus cuspidate nana 2 1 - 2 ft RECEIV; DEC 0 7 1999 City of So. Btirlinati n NORTH WEST ELEVATION 1 /8" = 1 7 -0" SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1 -0" - -- NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" =19-0" ' EAST ELEVATION 1/811 = 1999 RECEfVc_; DFC 0 7 1999 City of So. BLirlinatral CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 16, 1999 John Kennedy 68 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Medical Office, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 21, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer JW/mcp Encls SAN REMO Dhi, E GAS 1 �� • ._____ - - - ----- ---F-- ---- ` NEW ADDITION � / A • l ~ EXISTING BUILDING 39600 SF ram, •--T -- _. -- _ ____ ____ ._ _ — I A►' 11 • w I � D HC 5� t � , R FCC I Ilc�o/99 w'dc 6 Te�icct,( Q�rf(ce�- s Qcel.� J I"eL} LJ I r"� ci ni q3 Z DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER1VI0NT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101. November 23 1999 John Kennedy 340 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site plan/23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project . Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, November 29, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lisa honey, Zoning & Planning Assistant LM/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: Applicants/Project Files From: Lisa J. Mahoney/Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: December 7', 1999 agenda items Date: November 23', 1999 WELCH - CHANGE OF USE & EXPANSION OF BUILDING - 23 SAN REMO DRIVE - SITE PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW - The applicant should provide sizes and scientific names for proposed landscaping. The applicant is proposing only $2110 in landscaping (according to applicant's figures) and the required amount is $3720 for Phase I and $2580 for Phase II, totaling $6300 for the whole project. The applicant's proposal is $4190 or 67% short of the required amount. Staff recommends several more trees as well as street trees along San Remo Drive. -The applicant should provide details (cut -sheets) of exterior lighting. -The plans should show the second floor of the building. -The plans should show the correct location of the 80' building envelope which is measured 32' from the centerline of San Remo Drive. -The location of surface parking on the property does not appear to comply with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. This section allows surface parking to be located within the 80' building envelope if it is hidden by a building OR the parking meets the following two standards: 1) no more than 25% of the building envelope area is taken up by surface parking, and 2) no more than 25% of the total parking required for the property is located within the building envelope. The second standard does not appear to have been met. The total parking required is 30 spaces. Therefore a total of 7 full and one half space or 25% of the total are permitted within the building envelope. The plan shows 11 full and 3 half spaces within the building envelope. The plan should be revised so that only 7 full and 1 half space are within the building envelope. -The on street parking spaces and the parallel parking spaces do not meet the minimum size requirements under Section 26.251 of the zoning regulations. They should be increased to 22' in length. -The angled spaces do not meet the minimum requirements for a 60' parking angle as required by Section 26.251 of the zoning regulations. -The parking aisle does not meet the minimum width requirements under Section 26.251 of the zoning requirements. It should be increased to 24' in width. -The plan should show the sidewalks to be constructed along the north and east sides of the building. The sidewalks can be marked Phase I and Phase II. -Staffs opinion is that the applicant has a period of two years to obtain a permit for this project since it is being constructed in phases. -The applicant should provide sewer allocation information. WASTE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (WSO - CONVERT USE FROM CONSTRUCTION TO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR/73 ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE - SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE -the applicant should clarify what is included in the building costs (ie. whether any new construction or renovations are being proposed). -the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping plan including location, number, species, and size of proposed plantings. The amount of landscaping required based on building costs is $2730. -the applicant should provide coverage information for both front yards. The front yard on Commerce Avenue does not appear to meet the zoning requirements. -the plans should show the proposed vehicle storage area with a 24' open aisle for access. Conditonal use: -the applicant should submit information addressing the criteria required for conditional use approval (see enclosed). GOLDBERG - 5 LOT SUBDIVISION/DORSET ST. - SKETCH PLAN -the preliminary plat submittal should include a location map showing the relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area -the scale should be revised to a more functional scale -the plan should show the district in which the property is located (SEQ) -the recreation path committee has requested a 20' path easement parallel to Dorset St. on the east side of Dorset St. and no closer than 10' to the road. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 7, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Application of JoAnn Hough seeking a variance from Section 25.00, Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow a 26' x 28' garage to project 25 feet into the 30 foot rear yard setback requirement, 46 Hinesburg Road. 2) Application of Waste Systems International, Inc. seeking approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to operate an automobile repair and service use, 73 Ethan Allen Drive. 3) Final plat application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings. The amendment consists of adding 2105 square feet of mezzanine space (shopping center use) resulting in a total of footage of 98,905 square feet, 4 Market Street. 4) Application of Alexander H. & Phyllis P. Rose seeking approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow auto sales use in conjunction with various other commercial uses, 3060 Williston Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board November 20, 1999 their property being used as a jug handle if the connection were made. The Committee agreed. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz, MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use, 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled, "329 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a) The plans shall be revised to show a location for a potential ground mounted HVAC unit and method of screening. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Ms. Leban seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet). Mr. Kennedy presented the application. The plan presented at the meeting was slightly different than the plan submitted to staff. The plan was revised to address staff comments. Mr. Kennedy said they added some sidewalks out to the street and added street trees. They have added more windows to the first floor facade. He said windows along east side will be put in during phase I and then just relocated when phase II is built. Ms. Benoit was concerned about proposed 100 watt metal halide lights. Mr. Kennedy said that he would use 70 watt, but might have to come back to the City if they are not bright enough. Phase I will include parking lot and all landscaping. Committee recommended 20 foot high shoe box lights and 14 foot high decorative light on comer. Committee recommended that a San .Remo Drive sidewalk along the north side of the building be constructed as part of Phase L. They were willing to wait three years before the San Remo Drive sidewalk along the east side of the building is constructed. Mr. Kennedy said the overhead wire serving the building will be put underground as part of Phase II. Mr. Kennedy said that each apartment has at least 500 square feet. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the R 2 I ii 3 CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE i OCTGEER 25, 1999 Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (~1200 square feet) as depicted on a two L2) page set of plans page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington Vermont, Elevations" prepared by Michael Dugan and dated 7125/99 with the following_ stipulations:_ 1 Prior to review by the Development Review Board the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24.401 (a)-(i) and 24 402(a)-(i)) The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 2 Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised as follows: a. The elevation plan shall be revised to show the north and east first floor facades of the addition consisting of a majority of see -through glass as required by section 24.401(d) of the zoning regulations. b. The site plan shall show the sidewalks on the west and south side of the building extended out to San Remo Drive A sidewalk shall be shown along San Remo Drive in a location to be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. c. The site plan shall show street trees along San Remo Drive at a spacing of 40 feet between trees Several more trees shall also be included on the property- d. The dumpster shall be moved to the southwest corner of the property. e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with section 14.402 of the zoning regulations Proposed on -street parking spaces (8' x 22') shall be shown on the plan. g. The plans shall be revised so that the building_ footprint and architectural drawings are consistent. h. The elevations shall be revised to show building mounted lights and meters. 3 The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. 4 Specifications and cut sheets of proposed building_ mounted lights and new ornamental pole lights shall be submitted prior to review by the Development Review Board. 5 The wattage of the soffit lights shall be 70 watts. CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, '1999 Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6) Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building. Ms. Lesser presented the application. She described the changes to the inside of the building. She said that the owner of the building and land was unwilling to work with her in terms of getting all dumpsters and outside storage moved back to the north side of the building into the enclosed dumpster area_ She said she would be willing to move her dumpsters and material to the north side, but could not move other tenants things. The Committee asked Mr. Weith if the Zoning Administrator would be able to issue Ms. Lesser a certificate of occupancy if only her dumpsters are moved in compliance with the approval. Mr. Weith was not sure. He said he would have to discuss this issue with the Zoning Administrator and the City Attorney. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend aoorovai of the Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,300 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of !mezzanine space inside the building as depicted on a two (2) ,page set of plans, page one entitled, "Judge Development Corp_, 2 Corporate Way, South Burlington, Vt" and dated 12/8/97, last revised 10/18/99, and as shown on a five (5) gage photo exhibit entitled "Healthy Living Natural Foods Market". Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed with 4 votes affirmative and one against. 7) Other Business Next meeting is scheduled for November 22 at 7:30 R.M. Clerk (DRCminutes) GI i No Text SA wrl ,-� s —�/ ,"Ox �/ (x C ft -4 � 4 F" o.F•.l S _S-�u1-7X roo L((�k, ��- - r e�-'s4� U_ "Oc �..Z� T l� CSC/ Y (/� ( �J L✓� L✓ cs � ell— . ce C/ d--- 0 to� T�� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOIPPII BURIANOTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 4, 1999 John Kennedy 69 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Freestanding Sign, 340 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is a copy of the September 7, 1999 Development Review minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJ B/ mcp 1 Encl 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 16, 1999 John Kennedy 68 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, VF 05403 Re: Change of Use, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is a draft copy of the October 25, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. -*" I rs i n c�e je, Y, itl Joe ith, Director Plann* g & Zoning �' g JW/mcp 1 Encl MEMO To: Design Review Applicants From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Re: Preliminary Staff Comments Date: October 18, 1999 Welch - 23 San Remo Drive Site Design - The location of surface parking on the property does not appear to comply with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. This section allows surface parking to be located within the 80 foot deep building envelope if it is hidden by a building OR the parking meets the following two standards: 1) no more than 25% of the building envelope area on the property is taken up by surface parking, and 2) no more than 25% of the total parking required for the property is located within the building envelope. The plan appears to comply with the first standard as only 24% of the building envelope area on the property will be taken up by parking. The second standard does not appear to be met. The plan shows 18 parking spaces within the building envelope area which represents 55% of required parking. Only 9 spaces (25%) are allowed within the building envelope area. It appears that this condition could be met if the plan were revised to show only 9 spaces in the building envelope area and the remaining spaces provided as on street parking spaces. - The footprint of the building shown on the site plan does not appear to match the architectural drawings. The addition appears to be more narrow than the existing building. Also, the site plan does not show covered doorways (ie, canopies). - Section 24.401(g) requires buildings undergoing renovation to include improvements that better relate the building to the public street. The provision states that "such improvements could include the installation of doors along the sides of the building facing the public street, or the construction of walkways between the building and street." This standard does not appear to be met. - The dumpster should not be located along the street or within the building envelope area. Staff suggests somewhere in the southwest corner of the property. Also, the report indicates that a HVAC unit will be located along the north side of the building, however, it is not shown on the plan. Staff recommends that this unit not be located along the public street. Section 24.402(b) requires that "HVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade". Can these units be incorporated inside the building? - Section 24.402(i) requires streetscape improvements within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. This includes sidewalk, street trees, street lighting, etc. At a minimum, a sidewalk and street trees should be provided. BuildingdL esio - application should include the roof pitch of both the existing roof and proposed roof. - Section 24.401(d) requires "for sides of buildings that front or face a public street, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see through glass..." This does appear to be met. It should be met at least on the addition. - details of the proposed 100 W metal halide model AK- 100HPS light fixtures must be submitted. Post -it® pages 1 To T, OCo./Dept.Phone ttr #Fax # &6L-54- ( t�� I D FWA LkL - -g.5t/ �� OIL. qt I JAL��w AS 7 ro----- --------- M. tv $Lot k 47Yji t M 0 R R I Z a T e Hroject Name 17 JUNE 1991 Ca I e ASSOC"IATES 1. Ac, KiATrn CAN =-Un nDitfr NORTH SAN REMO DRIVE Total Square Footage 22,356 - 100% Building Coverage 6,700 - 26% Parking Lot Coverage 10,529 - 46% Greenspace 6,127 - 28% 1 Post Lamps 2 Wall Lamps 3 Soffit Lamps 4 HVAC LANDSCAPE LEGEND KEY NAME TCP - DARK GREEN PYRAMIDAL YEW RPJM- RHODODENDRON TON - DARK AM, ARBORVITAE JCS - SEAGREEN JUNIPER FP - SUMMIT ASH EAC - COMPACT BURNING BUSH AP - EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE PC - PURPLE LEAF SANDCHERRY TCA - CANADA HEMLOCK SB - PINK SPIREA TMD - DENSE SPREADING YEW NORTH CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): Design Plan Approval Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD(Na 7e as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing addre,§s, phone and fax #) ape 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the bost�of my knowledge. SIG ICANT SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line /e DATE OF SUBMISSION: /0/ I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee (ApformDR) Date EXHIBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design Plan Approval • One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. • A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. • Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: • architectural details • exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground • building height • existing and proposed grading • color, type and texture of building material • doors • siding cornices • entablatures • roofing material • moldings and trim • window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings Sign Design Approval • Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. • Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. • Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. • Master signage plan containing the following: • an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. • computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. • computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. • an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. SfAMMSUM %0W SAtS'[GROW `�.. vWn tlMGL" (CSD Ll-LBtt ) GMM- t x 4 TS/M OaAM WEI 1 it B FARM MM" 0Sl14 VINYL WTOWW BASH-WIflTi — 1 x u SOtlifOlRAL xArtb 'wens 1 x 12 WMt9 IMAM CDM ` WRM _-.-- �— 1 x t7 CORT A SOARV WWrM VC MSULATtD GSAZAIrC SM x 4 WOOD TMM-Werra t1ASS[TtV TO tt"VT Vf"YL WNW' yp7y{, MFIOASDI-4" E7IlOSVRt --� If"JO. 1�11L'�1.AN COWRS19M11Cd14C, ! WSSnR t x 15 MCIST 90ASD W111'It L�..a BmLMALK II TYPICAL EXTERIOR FINISH DETAILS 3/4" — V-0 �tZ► Z. t fir x 12" LVL'S Co"""Ms E x 4 TIIM MfAMi t x S TASM loMd CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 their property being used as a jug handle if the connection were made. The Committee agreed. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans page one entitled "329 Dorset Street South Burlington VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1 Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a) The plans shall be revised to show a location for a potential ground mounted HVAC unit and method of screening. 2 This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Ms. Leban seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet). Mr. Kennedy presented the application. The plan presented at the meeting was slightly different than the plan submitted to staff. The plan was revised to address staff comments. Mr. Kennedy said they added some sidewalks out to the street and added street trees. They have added more windows to the first floor facade. He said windows along east side will be put in during phase I and then just relocated when phase II is built. Ms. Benoit was concerned about proposed 100 watt metal halide lights. Mr. Kennedy said that he would use 70 watt, but might have to come back to the City if they are not bright enough. Phase I will include parking lot and all landscaping. Committee recommended 20 foot high shoe box lights and 14 foot high decorative light on corner. Committee recommended that a San Remo Drive sidewalk along the north side of the building be constructed as part of Phase I. They were willing to wait three years before the San Remo Drive sidewalk along the east side of the building is constructed. Mr. Kennedy said the overhead wire serving the building will be put underground as part of Phase II. Mr. Kennedy said that each apartment has at least 500 square feet. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the 0i CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, '1999 Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet) as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington Vermont Elevations" prepared by Michael Dugan and dated 7/25/99 with the following stipulations: 1 Prior to review by the Development Review Board the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24 401(a)-(i) and 24 402(a)-(i)) The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials lighting windows/doors etc. 2 Prior to review by the Development Review Board the plans shall be revised as follows: a. The elevation plan shall be revised to show the north and east first floor facades of the addition consisting of a majority of see -through glass as required by section 24.401(d) of the zoning regulations. b. The site plan shall show the sidewalks on the west and south side of the building extended out to San Remo Drive A sidewalk shall be shown along San Remo Drive in a location to be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. C. The site plan shall show street trees along San Remo Drive at a spacing of 40 feet between trees Several more trees shall also be included on the property. d. The dumpster shall be moved to the southwest comer of the property. e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with section 14.402 of the zoning_ regulations. Proposed on -street parking spaces (8' x 22') shall be shown on the plan. g. The plans shall be revised so that the building footprint and architectural drawings are consistent. h. The elevations shall be revised to show building mounted lights and meters. 3 The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. 4 Specifications and cut sheets of proposed building mounted lights and new ornamental pole lights shall be submitted prior to review by the Development Review Board. 5 The wattage of the soffit lights shall be 70 watts. CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6) Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building. Ms. Lesser presented the application. She described the changes to the inside of the building. She said that the owner of the building and land was unwilling to work with her in terms of getting all dumpsters and outside storage moved back to the north side of the building into the enclosed dumpster area. She said she would be willing to move her dumpsters and material to the north side, but could not move other tenants things. The Committee asked Mr. Weith if the Zoning Administrator would be able to issue Ms. Lesser a certificate of occupancy if only her dumpsters are moved in compliance with the approval. Mr. Weith was not sure. He said he would have to discuss this issue with the Zoning Administrator and the City Attorney. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans page one entitled "Judge Development Corp 2 Corporate Way South Burlington Vt" and dated 12/8/97 last revised 10118/99, and as shown on a five (5) page photo exhibit entitled "Healthy Living Natural Foods Market". Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed with 4 votes affirmative and one against. 7) Other Business Next meeting is scheduled for November 22 at 7:30 P.M. (DRCminutes) Clerk 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 23, 2000 Mike Dee Four Boys, LLC 1408 Ferry Road Charlotte, VT 05445 Re: Design Review Application - 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Dee: Enclosed is the agenda for next Monday's City Center Design Review Committee meeting and my comments to the Committee. Please be sure someone is at the meeting on Monday, June 26, 2000, 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant JW/mcp Encls Design Advisory Committee Memo June 26, 2000 replace one side of the existing double door, will be a one over single pane over a paneled inset such as those currently on the building. The windows proposed for the east, or rear, fagade will break up a currently blank facade that faces San Remo Drive. These two pane casement windows will serve to make the rear facade more consistent with the existing facades as well as those of the neighboring structures. Materials: The applicant will replace the windows and doors in -kind. The doors will be metal with full-length panes. The window on the south facade will be a single pane over a panel inset that replicates those already represent along the south facade. The two new windows on the east facade will be double pane metal casement windows and will utilize materials similar to those on the south facade. Colors and Textures: The applicant will keep the same colors already present on the building. The windows and the doors will employ a bare metal gray color. The metal panel inset will be brown to match the existing panels. Human Scale Design: The door alterations will create an additional point of access along the south facade and thereby improve pedestrian access to the building. The addition. of two windows to the east facade will penetrate a currently blank facade. The east, or San Remo Drive, facade currently is characterized by utilities and FIVAC equipment. The addition of two windows will serve to introduce human scale elements to the east facade where there are currently no design elements that speak to a human scale. Roof as a Design Element: No changes are proposed to the existing roof Orientation of Building to the Street: No changes are proposed to the building's orientation to Dorset Street. The addition of two windows to the east facade will improve the building's communication with San Remo Drive by introducing design elements, points of visual penetration, to the building's frontage along San Remo Drive. Landscape and Plantings: No additional landscaping is proposed. 5. Four Boys, LLC — Conversion of 1200 so. ft. from retail use to medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 9800 square foot building with retail, medical and general office uses and two residential units. The amendment converting 1200 square feet of retail use to medical office use for a total of 3600 square feet of medical office use. The Design Review Committee previously approved a site plan for this property on October 25, 1999 (minutes enclosed). The Development Review Board approved the site plan at their December 21, 1999 meeting (findings of fact enclosed). Design Advisory Committee Menio June 26, 6000 Consistent Design: No changes are proposed. Materials: No changes are proposed. Colors and Textures: No changes are proposed. Human Scale Design: No changes are proposed. Roof as a Design Element: No changes are proposed. Orientation of Building to the Street: No changes are proposed. Landscape and Plantings: No additional landscaping is proposed. 6. University Inn - Freestanding Sign — Sign Design, 1 Dorset Street The project consists of removing the current 78.5 square foot Howard Johnson sign and replacing it with an internally lit, 56 square foot freestanding sign for a 28.6% reduction in size. The proposed sign will consist of a double sided five (5) foot by eight (8) foot internally illuminated box and two (2) two (2) foot by eight (8) foot internally illuminated reader signs supported by twin posts. The proposed sign employs a dark background and will have a brick planter base from which the sign will rise to 12 feet in height. The property is located at 1 Dorset Street. All signage must meet all criteria set forth in the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance as well as the criteria of the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District, Section 4, of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance. Design Review Criteria: Consistent Design: The proposed sign is consistent with sign designs immediately adjacent along Williston Road. It employs a dark green background with white lettering and gold accents. Two poles mounted in a brick planter will support the sign. Compatibility with City Center Goals: Signs within the Dorset Street/City Center District should promote pedestrian orientation, encourage the effectiveness and clarity of sign communication, and maintain and enhance the aesthetic quality within the district. The proposed sign will employ a brick planter and will be reduced in size from the current sign thereby promoting a greater level of pedestrian orientation than currently exists. The sign does possess clarity, as it appears to be legible and not incorporate illegible or small fonts. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW AN 1 4 2000. C; j, of So. Curlington All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): ( Design Plan Approval ❑ Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) (M- Gt Q�AQ 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) -� 4 U^- -e, 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) k t5 Li c%` - —00195 t;Q*--zcr23 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 7 Sw - n.,.�y O L 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the si n(s) type, size and height. k C-Q- �-, • 1 Uh 'k " (J v Z _ l-o i, G-V- c� �QS .� S c.`. C \n 11 "L ce `3 Q-jo fj Q-C,- 90 EXHIBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design Plan Approval • One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. 0 A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations. • Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: • architectural details • exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground • building height • existing and proposed grading • color, type and texture of building material • doors • siding cornices • entablatures • roofing material • moldings and trim • window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings Sign Design Approval Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground_ • Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. • Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. • Master signage plan containing the following: • an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. • computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. • computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. • an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate t 'the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (ApformDR) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 27, 2000 Michael Dee Healthsouth 6 San Remo Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Design Alteration Dear Mr. Dee: A review of the "record copy" plans for the renovations at 23 San Remo Drive submitted to obtain a zoning permit shows that the south and east elevations of the phase II addition have been revised. Specifically, a doorway shown on the approved plans has been eliminated. Please revise the site and building elevation plans to show this doorway as originally approved and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans for our records. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely,., Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp � I J CAl %100 c��jT�y�,C,.r 1 / SAN REMO DRIVE SAS _ •108.85' F-9 _ `Tr • - 7 � �� • -�' � �� /�',;,,_. �. i�. -ice �. �� ,��. �. NEW ADDITION - rb„o•• � 6 1 0 SF - i i • � � HC �Ii' � I I EXISTING BUILDING �y - 3,600 SF — — —( 41ATfR ._ i-� -•—.. --� i I , I •� I • ao' 1\ i V • W. O � I � 1 Z l 1 I r Q 0 r N HC f n 140.07 Fcucc SITE PLAN V = 20' -1411 NORTH I Total Square Footage 356 101 K .z,o :a'19" Building CoverageS,C S 37Y, 1 Parking Lot Cow _2 A, Grserlspses % 9P/ 37Z 1 Post Lamps 2 Wall Lamps 3 SoM t Lamps 4 KVAC LANDSCAPE LEGEND LEY NAME TCP • DARK GREEN PYRAMIDAL YEW RPJM • RHOOOOENORON TON • DARK AM. ARBORVITAE JCS • SEAGREEN JUNIPER FP. SUMMIT ASH EAC • COMPACT BURIONG BUSH AP. EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE PC. PURPLE LEAP SANDCHERRY TCA• CANADA HEMLOCK Be. PINK SPIREA TMD • DENSE SPREADING YEW RECEIVV74�, QF. F 2 5 1999 C►% of So. Bur[9nor-F, w LU O Z� 0 LL W ow tJ °C U- z o m U) M �x- N io-zs-77 Wall-Paks TWH Features Wall -Mounted Area Ligh, I Glass Refractor Use in outdoor storage areas, warehouse and factory perimeters and loading docks. Catalog Number Example: TWH 250S TB TWH 250S TB Designation Voltage Options/Accessories HIGH PRESSURESODIUM 120 For options and accessories, 35W TWH 35S 1.2 208' see pages 288-294. 50W TWH 50S 1 2401 70W TWH 70S 277 100W TWH 100S 347 150W TWH 150S 3 4807 20OW TWH 2O0S 25OW TWH 250S TBa 40OW TWH 400S 250/40OW TWH250/400S10 Housing: Rugged, corrosion -resistant die- cast aluminum housing. Corrosion resis- tant external hardware includes slotted hex -head fasteners. Standard finish is dark bronze polyester powder, electro- statically applied and oven -cured. Other architectural colors available as options. Optics: Reflector is specular anodized aluminum. Refractor is prismatic borosili cate glass. Lens is sealed and gasketed to inhibit the entrance of outside contaminants. Ballast: 70-15OW HPS: High -reactance, high -power factor. All others: Constant - wattage autotransformer. Encased -and - potted solid-state ignitors (HPS and 100MH). Ballast is copper wound and 100% factory tested. UL 1029 listed. Elec- trical components are mounted in hinged front cover that includes primary and sec- ondary electrical disconnect. Installation: Back housing is separated from front housing, eliminating ballast weight and promoting easy handling. Top 3/a' threaded wiring access. Back access through removable 3/4" knockout. Feed- thru wiring can be achieved by using a condulet tee. Mount on any flat vertical surface. Listings: UL listed suitable for wet loca- tions. IP65 rated (250W and below) or IP54 rated (400W) in accordance with IEC standard 529. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian and Mexican Standards (see options). Socket: Glazed porcelain (mogul base), horizontally oriented socket with copper alloy, nickel -plated screw shell and center contact. Medium -base: UL listed 660W, 600V, 4KV pulse rated. Mogul -base: UL listed 1500W, 600V, 4KV pulse rated. METAL HALIDE NOTES: 1 Not available TB. 100W TWH 100M 4 2 120V only. 3 Operates 55V lamp. Z�OW TWSM__. 4 Not available 480V. 5 Requires T-15, ED or BT 28 reduced jacket 40OW TWH 40OM 5 lamp. 6 Consult factory for availability in Canada. MERCURYVAPOR 7 Not available in Canada. 100W TWH 100H 8 Optional Multi -tap Ballast (120, 208, 240, 175W TWH 115H 277V) (120, 277, 347V in Canada.) 9 Other ballast types available. 25OW TWH 250H 10 Shipped as 250S. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless LOW PRESSURE SODIUM otherw se specified.35W TWH 35L 1 CANADIAN SHIPMENTS: Add CSA as suffix to catalog number. INCANDESCENT HID taMps avaiiable-with luminaires. Consult 30OW TWH 30012 factory. STANDARD PACKAGING Fixtures ship complete in unit cartons only. Example: ((lty 13) TWH 250S TB (13 cartons of 1 fixture) Accessories ship separately. Lamp/Fixture/Ballast Data' Weight Wattage Ballast Lbs. Kg. HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM (Med/Clear) 35 RHPF-RNPF 24 11 50 RHP 24 11 70 HX-HPF 24 11 100 HX-HPF 24 11 150 26 12 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM (Mog/Clear) 200 28 13 250 CWA 32 15 400 42 19 METAL HALIDE (Med(100) Mog/Clear) 100 XHP 26 12 175 26 12 250 CWA 32 15 400 42 19 MERCIdRYV•AP6R (Mog/Coated) 100 21 10 175 CWA 23 10 250 26 12 LOW PRESSURE SODIUM (D.C. Bay/Clear) 35 HX-HPF 25 11 I W 1 F—o—i x DIMENSIONS Height: 153/. (40) Width: 6,/, (42.6) Depth: 8 (20.3) 240 LITHONIA LIGHTING High- _,�rformance Floodlighting Use for airport aprons or parking areas. Catalog Number 170S 400S HPN Designation IES Distribution HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM HPN 250W 170S 250S 400W 170S 400S 750W 170S 750S 1000W 170S 1000S METAL HALIDE 400W 170S 400M 1000W 170S 1000M5 NOTES: 1 Multi -tap ballast (120,208,240,277V). 2 For use with VK mounting (standard) only. 3 MPB bracket ships separately with junction box and hinge mechanisms. Bracket weight: 121bs. 4 PER must be ordered with fixture. 5 Requires a BT-37 reduced jacket lamp. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. STANDARD PACKAGING Fixtures ship in unit cartons. Example: ((Ity 21) 170S 400S HPN 120 SF (21 cartons of 1 luminaire) DIMENSIONS Example:170S 400S HPN 120 SF 120 1 T__ Voltage Optional Mounting 120 (Shipped separately) 208 TS Tenon slipfitter2 240 HCA Cross arm adaptor' 277 WB Wall mount bracket' 347 480 EWB Extended wall bracket2 TB' MPB29 Mounting pole bracket for 2 fixtures at 90°3 MPB39 Mounting pole bracket for 3 fixtures at 90°3 MPB49 Mounting pole bracket for 4 fixtures at 90°3 Options/Accessories OPTIONS (Shipped installed) SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V, n/a TB) DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V, n/a TB) PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (120, 277, 347V only) ORS Quartz restrike For optional Architectural Colors, see page 285. ACCESSORIES (Shipped separately) UV Upper visor SC Shorting cap for PER option PEt NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (120, 208, 240V)4 PE3 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (347V)4 PE4 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (480V)4 PE7 NEMA Twist -lock photocontrol (277V)4 OUTDOOR REMOTE MR1 Nan -encapsulated MR2 Pitch -encapsulated MR3 Epoxy -encapsulated EPA: 2.7 ft.2 (.25m2) J` Length: 20-1/2 (52.0) Height: 17-1/4 (43.5) Fixture height: 19-7/8 (50.5) Depth: 12-3/4 (32.5) Fixture depth: 20 (51.0) Max. weight: 83 Ibs (37.6 kg) Floodlighting 170S Shown with TS mounting option. Features Housing: Rugged, heavy -gauge, aluminum housing. Continuous welded seams for weathertight integrity. Dark bronze poly- ester powder finish (DDB) standard; other architectural colors available. Architectural Class 1 anodize finish also available. Door Frame: Aluminum door frame secured with four stainless steel latches. Lens: Thermal -resistant and shock -resis- tant tempered flat lens. Mounting: Painted steel yoke, complete with vertical sector, angle stopper and 3- foot, 14/3 SEO cable is standard. Optics: Anodized aluminum reflector with internal glare control louver, painted matte black to provide an asymmetrical beam pat- tern with sharp vertical cutoff. Electrical System: Constant wattage au- totransformer ballast, copper wound and 100% factory tested. Socket: Horizontal, mogul -base porcelain socket(s) with copper alloy, nickel -plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W-600V. 4KV pulse rated. Listings: UL listed suitable for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). Poles: See pages 259-283. LITHONIA LIGHTING 239 Area Lighting KRES Symmetra° Features Housing: Miter -bend construction, extruded aluminum with permanently sealed and crimped -aluminum canopy. Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder; other architectural colors available. Anodizing available in dark bronze (ADB) and black (ABQ. Optics: Anodized segmented reflectors for superior uniformity and control. Reflectors are rotatable and interchangeable. Four cutoff distributions available: Type II (Roadway), Type III (Asymmetric), Type IV (Forward throw) and Type V (Symmetric). Lens Frame: Hinged, clear, anodized extruded aluminum with accurately mitered corners, extruded silicone rubber gasket and quick - release quarter -turn fasteners. Can be hinged from any of the four sides. Lens: Impact -resistant, thermal -resistant, clear, tempered glass. Mounting: Extruded 3" (KRES1) or 4" (KRES2) aluminum arm for pole mounting shipped in fixture carton. Optional mountings available. Electrical System: High -power factor, constant -wattage autotransformer ballast, copper wound and 100% factory tested. Removable power tray and positive -locking disconnect plug. Socket: Horizontally oriented, mogul -base porcelain socket with copper alloy, nickel - plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W-600V. 4KV pulse rated. Listings: UL listed for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). Poles: See pages 259-283. Arm -Mounted Premium L _ Off Use for car lots, street lighting or parking areas. Catalog Number Example: KRES2 400S R2120 SPSO4 PER KRES2400S R2 120 SPSO4 PER Distribution Designation (select one) Voltage Mounting HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 120 (Shipped included) 70W KRES1 70S R2 R3 R4 — 2082 KRES1 100W KRES1 100S R2 R3 R4 — 2401 SPS03 Square pole arm4 150W KRES1 150S R2 R3 R4 — 277 SPS09 Square pole arm 250W KRES2 250S R2 R3 R4 R5S 347 40OW KRES2 400S R2 R3 R4 R5S 4802 RPS03 Round pole arm4 p TB3 RPS09 Round pole arm METAL HALIDE 100W KRES1 100MB R2 R3 R4 — KRES2 175W KRES1 175M R2 R3 R4 — SPS09 Square pole arms 250W KRES1 250M R2 R3 R4 — SPS12 Square pole arm 40OW KRES2 400M1 R2 R3 R4 R5S RPSO4 Round pole arms RPS12 Round pole arm Options/Accessories STANDARD PACKAGING Fixture and arm ship in one carton. Example: (Qty 21) KRES2 400S R2 120 SPSO4 PER (21 cartons of 1 arm and 1 luminaire) OPTIONS (Shipped installed) SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) OF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) ORS Quartz restrike system (100W max., 120V lamp not included) PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only EC Emergency circuit CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards For optional Architectural Colors, see page 285. ACCESSORIES (Shipped separately) PE1 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (120, 208, 240V)6 PE3 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (347V)6 PE4 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (48OV)6 PE7 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (277V)6 SC Shorting cap for PER option KRESIHS House side shield (132, R3) KRES2HS House side shield (R2, R3) KRESIVG Vandal guard? KRESIVG Vandal guard? NOTES: 1 Reduced jacket lamp required. 2 Consult factory for availability in Canada. 3 Multi -tap ballast (120, 208, 240, 277V). 4 Use 9" arm when mounting two luminaires at 900. 5 Use 12" arm when mounting two luminaires at 90°. 6 PER must be ordered with fixture. 7 Must be ordered with luminaire. 8 Includes mounting arm. 9 Not available in 480V. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. DIMENSIONS Housing: KRES1 KRES2 EPA:' 1.2 ft' (.11 m2) 1.8 ft2 (.17 m2) Length: Width: 21-3/4 (55.3) 17-1/2 (44.5) 26-1/2 (67.3) 21-1/2 (54.6) Depth: 6-1/2 (16.5) 8 (20.3) 214 LITHONIA LIGHTING U Mounted Premium Cutoff Use for car lots, street lighting or parking areas. Catalog Number Example: KRE2 400S R2120 SPH12 PER KRE2 400S R2 120 Distribution 7 Designation (select one) Voltage HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 70W KRE1 70S 100W KRE► 100S 150W KRE► 150S 25OW KRE2 250S 40OW KRE2 400S METAL HALIDE 10OW KRE1100Ma 175 KRE ]j;>D 250W KRE► 250 40OW KRE2 400M1 120 R2 R3 R4 — 208 R2 R3 R4 — 240 R2 R3 R4 — 277 R2 R3 R4 R5S 347 R2 R3 R4 R5S 480 TB R2 R3 R4 — R2 R3 R4 — R2 R3 R4 — R2 R3 R4 R5S STANDARD PACKAGING Fixture and arm ship in one carton. Example: (Qty21) KRE2 400S R2 120 SPH12 PER (21 cartons of 1 arm and 1 luminaire) NOTES: 1 Reduced jacket I amp required. 2 Multi -tap ballast (120,208,240,277V). 3 PER must be ordered with fixture. 4 Must be ordered with luminaire. 5 Includes mounting arm. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. DIMENSIONS Housing: KRE1 EPA:' 1.2 ft2 (.11 m2) Length: 20 (50.8) Width: 16 (40.6) Depth: 6 (15.2) KRE2 2.2 ft2 (.20 m2) 25 (63.5) 20 (50.8) 8 (20.3) SPH12 Mounting (Shipped included) KRE► SPS08 Square pole arm RPS08 Round pole arm KRE2 SPH12 Square pole arm RPH12 Round pole arm Options/Accessories PER OPTIONS (Shipped installed) SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) OF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) ORS Quartz restrike system (100W max., 120V lamp not included) PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only EC Emergency circuit CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards For optional Architectural Colors, see page 285. ACCESSORIES (Shipped separately) PEt NEMA twist -lock photocontrol 020, 208, 240W PE3 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (3470 PE4 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (480W PE7 NEMA twist -lock photocontrol (2770 SC Shorting cap for PER option KREIHS House side shield (132, R3) KRE2HS House side shield (R2, R3) KREIVG Vandal guard° KRE2VG Vandal guard' Area Lighting KRE Symmetra° Features Housing: Miter -bend construction, extruded aluminum with permanently sealed and crimped aluminum canopy. Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder; other architectural colors available. Anodizing available in dark bronze (ADB) and black (ABQ. Optics: Anodized segmented reflectors for superior uniformity and control. Reflectors are rotatable and interchangeable. Four cutoff distributions available: Type II (Roadway), Type III (Asymmetric), Type IV (Forward throw) and Type V (Symmetric). Lens Frame: Hinged, clear anodized ex- truded aluminum with accurately mitered corners, extruded -silicone rubber gasket and quick -release quarter -turn fasteners. Can be hinged from any of the four sides. Lens: Impact -resistant, thermal -resistant, clear tempered glass. Mounting: Extruded 8" (KRE1) or 12" (KRE2) aluminum arm for pole or wall mounting shipped in fixture carton. Optional mountings available. Electrical System: High -power factor, constant -wattage autotransformer ballast, copper wound and 100% factory tested. Removable power tray and positive -locking disconnect plug. Socket: Horizontally oriented, mogul -base porcelain socket with copper alloy, nickel - plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W-600V. 4KV pulse rated. Listings: UL listed for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). Poles: See pages 259-283. LITHONIA LIGHTING 213 Lensed ,Minders, Vertical Lamp Gotham Downlighting Master Catalog Number Example: CFVL926TRT 7RW T73120 GE1310 DWHG Fluorescent jCFVL9 26TRT 7RW n3 120 GEB10 CFVL Series Series' Wattage/ Aperture Voltage Ballasts CFVL9 Lamp 2 73 120 GEB10 Electronic CFVL10 18TRT 91 277 ballast 26TRT 347 (standard) 32TRT 42TRT Door Frame Shielding Options/ I Accessories RW Regressed T73 Prismatic lens white door CHL5 Concave WU Wet SB Stepped Holophane* lens location black baffle FFL Flat Fresnel lens PMa Pendant FW Flush white D011.4 Drop opal lens mount door Holophane is a WM Wall mount registered trademark of Holophane Co. For all other options and accessories, see pages 154-159. NOTES 1 Matte white finish (DWHG) standard. 58 optional colors available. Refer to Architectural Colors brochure. 2 Tri-Tube (TRT). 3 Available with CFVL9 luminaire only. 4 Available with CFVL10 luminaire only. 5 Not available with 42TRT. 6 Ballast must be specified. 7 Wet location for non -covered ceilings. Wall mount units only. 8 3/8" thread mount. STANDARD PACKAGING Fixtures ship complete in unit cartons only. Example: (Qty 13) CFVL9 26TRT 7RW T73 120 GEB10 DWHG (13 cartons of 1 fixture) Cat. No. Lamp Type Cylinder Diameter Ceiling Mount Height (H) Wall Mount Height (H) Wall Mount Width (W) Reflector Aperture CFVL9 TRT 8-3/4(22.2) 14(35.6) 14(35.6) 12(30.5) 7-1/8(18.1) CFVL10 TRT 10-3/8(26.5) 14(35.6) 14(35.6) 13-5/8(34.6) 8-5/8(21.9) Features Lens: Available with Tempered Prismatic Lens (T73), Concave Holophane Lens (CHL), Flat Fresnel Lens (FFL), or Drop Opal Lens (DOL). Door: Regressed White Door (RW), Stepped Black Baffle (SB) and Flush White Door (FW) available. Door is retained by two self - aligning, torsion support springs. Reflector: Semi-specular clear anodized aluminum upper reflector. Housing: Aluminum housing with top deck for clean appearance. Reflector edge seats flush with cylinder wall for clean, one-piece appearance. Electrical System: Vertically -mounted, pos- itive -latch thermoplastic socket. Class P, thermally -protected, high power factor electronic ballast standard with end -of -life (EOL) component protection. Drawings for dimensional detail only. May not represent actual mechanical configuration. Dimensions are shown in inches (centimeters). Mounting: Standard ceiling mount offers patented quick -mount attachment plate for direct installation. Wall -mount or pen- -------- available with installation pat- ttJ terns provided. am H Listing: Fixtures are UL 1570 listed for wet locations and covered ceiling installa- tions. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards, I� cyl. --.I w Dia. U.S. Patent No. 4,300,190 (quick -mount at- tachment plate). LITHONIA LIGHTING 125 Gotham Downlighting Open Reflector H.I.D. AH Series - - -- 01 Features Optical System: Self -flanged, specular clear or semi -diffuse anodized reflector or microgroove baffle. Baffle flange painted white. Optical system optimally balances brightness control and high efficiency. Electrical System: Prewired, encased - and -potted, tray -mounted ballast module. Die-cast aluminum socket housing de- signed for effective heat dissipation and positive lamp positioning. Thermally acti- vated insulation detector. Porcelain socket. Mounting: 16-gauge galvanized steel mounting frame with thru-wire junction box. Expandable, self-locking mounting bars provide horizontal and vertical adjustment. Listing: Fixtures are UL 1572 listed for thru-branch wiring, recessed mounting and damp locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards. 126 Master Catalog Number Example: AH 100M 7AR 120 AH 100M 7AR 120 Series Wattage/Lamp' Aperture' Voltage Options/ AH Metal Halide 6 120 Accessories 50 2 70M2 7 277 See pages 154-159. 100M2 15OM2,3 9 347 175M4 250M4 10 Finish 12 Ceramic Metal (blank) Specular Halide2,5 Trim Color LD Semi -diffuse low iridescent 70MHC 10OMHC AR Clear NOTES 1 Recommended for use with coated lamps. High Pressure PR pewter SOd10m' 2 Open -rated luminaires with medium -base pro- UBR Umber tected lamp standard. For non -protected lamp, 50S 70S WTR Wheat safetyglassrequired; add GLsuffix toaperture/ trim color. Example: AH 100M 6ARGL 120. 100S 150S CR9 Champagne gold 3 Notavailablein347V. 250S GR9 Gold 4 Required safety glass provided. 5 Ceramic arc tube consistent -color lamp, Philips WhiteSon61 BC10 Black cone MasterColororGEConstantColor. 6 When glass lens is required, add GL suffix to WR10 White painted 50SDW 1U0$DW 10 aperture/trim color. Ex: AH 100S 6ARGL 120. MB Black micro- 7 120V ballast only; stepdown transformer pro - groove baffle vided when 277V is specified. 347V not available. 8 Refer to chart below for wattage/lampavailabil- WB10 White micro- ity. groove baffle 9 Not recommended for use with HID lamp sources. Consult factory. 10 Not available with finishes. ORDERING/PACKAGING OPTIONS To accommodate the product's physical configuration as well as a range of customer handling and processing needs, two alternative ordering/packaging methods are available. 1) STANDARD PACKAGING (optimized form) 2) COMPONENT PACKAGING To order, use a single master catalog number. Order housings and trims as unit pack only as per component Example: (13)AH 10OM7AR120. order guide listed below. Fixtures ship as multiple components using optimized Housing Only': packaging. Example above ships as: GRSH wattme.lamp type aperture voltaQe3MEX options HSG U (oty13) GRSHlOOM7120/277MEXHSGU (13housing cartons) Trim Only: (Dty13) AH 7AR TRIM U (13 trim cartons) AH aperture, trim color finish TRIM U NOTES 1 For 9" aperture, 150W or lower metal halide, with glass option, GLmust be added to the aperture. Ex: GRSH 150M 9GL 120/277 MOG HSG U. 2 175M and 250M requires safety glass. Remove MEXfrom housing description and add GLtotrim color. 3 Dual voltages listed on breakouts. Ex: 120/277orl20/347. Cat. No -I Wattage/Lamp Height Length Width Aperture Ceiling Overlap Socket (H) (L) (W) Opening Trim 50, 70, 100W M 6" AH 50, 70, 100W S 9-5/8 (24.4) 6-1/4 (15.9) (MED) 50, 10OW SDW BC/MB/WB: 18-1/2(47.0) 17-3/4(45.1) BC/MB/WB: 6-7/807.5) 7-1/209.1) 70, 100W MHC 9-1/4(23.5) 605.2) 50, 70, 100, 15OW M 10-5/8(27.0) 7-1/2(19.1) 7" AH 50, 70, 1DOW S (MED) 50, 10OW SDW BC/MB/WB: 19-1/2(49.5) 17-3/4(45.1) BC/MB/WB: 8-1/8(20.6) 8-3/4(22.2) 70, 100W MHC 10-3/8(26.4) 7-1/4(18.4) 9" AH* 100, 150, 175W,250W M 15-3/8 (39.1) 9(22.9) 10 (25.4) (MOG) 50, 70, 100, 150W S BC/MB/WB: 21-3/4(55.2) 17-3/4(45.1) BC/MB/WB: 9-3/4(24.8) BC/MB/WB: 16-3/8 41.6 8-7/8 22.5 10-1/8 25.7 10"AH 175, 250W M 15-1/8 (38.4) 9-3/4 (24.8) (MOG) 70, 100, 150W S BC/MB/WB: 23-3/4(60.3) 20-1/8(51.1) BC/MB/WB: 10-1/4(26.0) 10-7/8(27.6) 14-7/8 (37.8) 9-1/2 (24.1) 175, 2501�a) ) 11-11/16(29.7) 12-11/16(32.2) 150W: 23-3/4(60.3) 20-1/8(51.1) BC/MB/WB: 12-1/2(31.8) BC/MB/WB: 12" AH 11-1/2 29.2) 12-13/16 32.5 (MOG) 17-5/8(44.8) 11-11/16(29.7) 12-11/16(32.2) 250W S BC/MB/WB: 25-3/4(65.4) 22-1/2(57.2) BC/MB/WB: 12-1/2(31.8) BC/MB/WB: 19-1/4(48.9) 11-1/2(29.2) 12-13/16(32.5) *MED-base socket used with 15OW or lower metal halide lamps. Drawings for dimensional detail only. May not represent actual mechanical configuration. Dimensions are shown in inches (centimeters). =99- o w ® o v H a t LITHONIA LIGHTING 23 San Remo Drive 364 Dorset Street ♦ S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 ♦ Fax 863-2661 October 04, 1999 AMMENDED 15 FEBRUARY 2000 Property: 23 San Remo Drive Space: 2,400 square feet on first floor Specifications: l/ Two entries - main entrance plus employee entrance 2/ Two handicapped specified bathrooms. 3/ Patient waiting room approximately 25' X 10'. 4/ Employee lounge approximately 12' X 9' with 12' of cabinets and single sink. 5/ Two therapy rooms approximately 12' X 9' each. 6/ Three administrative areas including patient reception, manager's office, back office, and filing. ✓71 Lab area approximately 18' X 10'. 8/ Work unit/area including 12' of cabinets both base and wall with one double sink. Interior work to include: 1/ Installation of all party walls. 2/ Double 5/8" firewall separating leased space from remainder of building. 3/ Full suspension ceiling 8' in all office areas and 9'6" in main therapy area. 4/ No less than 9 exterior wall windows. 5/ No less than 4 interior wall windows. 6/ No less than 10 solid core interior doors with brush aluminum single lever hardware. 7/ No less than 22 drop -in 2X4 florescent light fixtures. 8/ No less than 50 duplex 20 amp outlets all GFI certified. 9/ No less than 4 simplex 208 volt 20 amp outlets. 10/ 200 amp service. IN Flooring allowance of $ 5,500.00. 12/ Specialty interior trim allowance of $ 3,000.00. IN Cabinet and wall rack allowance of $4,300.00. 14/ Gas fired hot air furnace with central air conditioner. 151 Separate lab HVAC with air exchange unit. Exterior work to include: 1/ Porch entrance to main door. 2/ New siding and trim - detail similar to orthepedic center. 3/ Paved parking to south of building. Total parking - 15 spaces. 4/ Landscaping allowance of 3,800.00. 23 San Remo Drive 340 Dorset Street 1 S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 ♦ Fax 863-2661 October 04, 1999 AMMENDED 15 FEBRUARY 2000 South Burlington Design Review Committee Re: Section 26.151 PUD Fr: John Kennedy - Agent for Edgar Welch and Bette Ann Welch - Owner 23 San Remo Drive General Standards (a) There will be no undue water pollution as tenants will be retail and City sewer will be available. The heating system will remain as it exist, namely gas heat. The land is above sea level and there presently exist a surface water runoff collection system. No retention structures are required. Labor and Industries has made an inspection, and recommendations are as follows; Firewalls between tenants, and handicapped bathroom to be installed. (b) The water requirements do not exceed present use. (c) Will not cause unreasonable soil erosion. (d) The proposed use will not increase traffic burden to either Dorset Street or San Remo Drive. (e) One of the two proposed businesses is an extension and/or transfer of business within the South Burlington area. The project should not cause an undue burden on the school facilities. (f) Will not cause an unreasonable burden on munincipal services. (g) Not applicable (h) This project should improve the scenic beauty of the area as it upgrades the existing condition of the property. Landscaping will improve the view along San Remo Drive. (i) Meets City's standards. 0) There will be a change to the exterior of the building and all materials will be up to City's standards. (k) We will provide additional access via an easement through 340 Dorset Street. (1) The project conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 23 San Rome Drive 340 Dorset Street S. Burlington, Vt 05403 To: South Burlington Design Review Committee Fr: John Kennedy - Agent for Edgar A. Welch and Bette A. Welch - Owner 23 San Remo Drive is presently a 3,600 square foot metal building used primarily for auto repair and storage. There are two apartments on the second floor comprising of 1,200 square feet. It is the intention to rehabilitate the structure in two phases. Phase I : 1/ Replace windows and doors 2/ Add new siding and trim 3/ Redesign the exterior 4/ Provide new electrical service and exterior lighting 5/ Provide new parking lot and landscaping 6/ Redesign the interior to provide two (2) first floor tenancies one of 2,400 square feet to rent to Healthsouth and one of 1,200 square feet to rent to tenant unknown. 7/ Continue renting two (2) second floor apartments as is. Phase II: 1/ Add a 35' X 60' structure on the east side of the existing structure. This addition would accomodate future expansion plans for Healthsouth. At that time, we would replace the roof with a new standing seam roof similar to 340 Dorset Street. Please find the following specifications for renovation: Siding - We will applying horizontal siding over the existing metal panels. Material Specs - Norandex Sagebrush Super Premium Vinyl Siding Color - Woodsman Select Gray Installation Detail - Existing building has metal panels screwed to horizontal perlins. 1/2" plywood will be screwed to the panels and perlins where applicable. The vinyl siding will then be applied to the plywood. Tyvek will first be applied to the plywood prior to the installation of siding. All trim will be in white. The building is supported by metal columns 20' on center. Window modules will be installed between support columns. Where applicable, the metal panels will be removed, and framing with 2 X 6 studs will fill the void. This framing will hold the glazing modules. The framing will be advanced so as to form a plane with the new surface created with plywood. Gable Ends - A 12" facia board in white will be installed at an elevation of 10'6". Below this trim, horizontal siding will be applied. Above this trim, vinyl shakes will be applied. This detail is similar in nature to the Orthepedic Center and 340 Dorset Street design. Base Facia - the entire building will receive a 10" mop board at the base of the wall and this board will be flashed and painted white. 23 San Remo Drive 340 Dorset Street ® S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Phone 863-8058 1 Fax 863-2661 Roof - We are planning to cover the existing roof (industrial metal painted white 26 guage) with a standing seam 24 guage roof. Material Specs - Una -Clad by Copper Sales, Inc., Anoka, MN 24 Guage Kynar 500 Fluorocarbon Steel Painted Hartford Green - paint has 20 year fade warranty Installation Detail - Installer - Consumer Construction, Inc., Colchester, Vt. 802-660-9177 Basic Installation - Existing roof has 8" panels with rib 1" high - this void will be filled with 1" isocarnate insulation from ridge to eave. Metal hat channel 1.5" high will be installed horizontally approximately 16" on center, making certain that every perlin (approximately 5' on center) has a hat channel directly screwed to the perlin. Iscocarnate insulation 1.5" thick will then be installed between the hat channels horizontally. The roof will then be applied with metal clips. The roof will be screwed only at the eaves and will be clipped throughout the re- mainder of the surface. Eave Detail - At all edges of the roof, pressure treated lumber will be applied so as to secure eave trim. Attachments: Roof Sample, Uni-Clad Quick Reference Guide 23 San Some Drive 340 Dorset Stream S. Burluigton, Vt 05403 Glazing - We will be replacing windows and doors with new glazing. Material Specs - Pella Products, Inc., 17 Echo Place, Williston, Vermont 864-5435 ProLine, Clad, Model 1, White, 5/8" InsulShield IG Glazing, Low E White Exterior Vinyl with wood interior trim and jambs Installation Detail - Basic Installation - Within a 20' section between steel upright beams, framing with 2 X 6. All windows will be trimmed in 5/4 Pine in a picture frame concept. The trim will be painted in white and will be 6" stock. Attachments: Pella Specs, Window and Door Module Detail 23 San Dome Drive 340 Dorset Street �tSyix� w S. Burlington, Vt 05403 Electrical - Electric Service - There will be four electric meters mounted to the northeast side of the building. This will provide independent readings and panels for up to two rental units and two apartments. Exterior Lighting - Two (2) 250 W Metal Halide pole mounted fixture Model BV2 One will be installed on the south side neKt to the -parking lot and the second will be installed on the northwest side of the entrance - kxations shown on the diagram. Six (6) 70 W Metal Halidf ' Two will be installed in the new soffit on the west main entrance to fealthsouth, One in the new soffit to the west entrance to one of the apartments, Two will be installed in the new soffit on the south entrance to Healthsouth, and One on the east entrance to one of the apartments. These units will have safety glass in have white trim. Three (3) 100 W Metal Halide Model AK- 100HPS, wall mounted in each gable end of the building. AttaLighting Specifications - Lithonia Lighting Gotham Downillghtiaig MaDd AH Siefies st 1 Features Optical System Self -flanged, specularr" clear or semi -diffuse anodized reflector or microgroove baffle. Baffle flange painted white. Optical system, optimallybalances brightness control and'` high efficiency. Electrical System: Prewired, encased - and -patted, ray -mounted ballast module. Die-cast aluminum socket housing de- igned for effective heat dissipation and positive lamp positioning. Thermally acti- vated insulation detector: Porcelain socket. Mounting; 16-gauge galvanized steel mounting, frame with thru-wire junction box. Expandable, self-locking mounting bars provide horizontal and vertical adjustment. Listing: Fixtures are UL 1572 listed for thru-branch wiring, recessed mounting and damp locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards. Open Reflector Master Catalog Number AH loom 7AR � =�= Nim AH Meta! Halide 6 NM2 70M2 7 10OM2 15OM2,3 9 175M4 250M4 10 12 Ceramic Metal' E,JJi&,5 70MHC 100MHC AR Clear Hiah Presstj PR Pewter SodiurrGs UBR Umber SOS 70S WTR Wheat tees 1505 CFO Champagne gold 250S GR9 Gold Dr+o7 BC10 Black cone White WR10 White painted 5OSDW 100SOW MBIo Black micro- groove baffle WB10 White micro- groove baffle Example: AH 100M 1AR 120 120 im- E--" - 120 277 See pages 154-159. 347 (blank) Specular LD Sarni -diffuse low iridescent NOTES Recommended for use with coated lamps. 2 Opon-rated luminaires with medium -base pro- tected lamp standard. For non -protected lamp, safety glass required; add GI -suffix to aperture/ trim color. Example: AH 100M SARGL 120. 3 Notavaileb(ein347V, 4 Requiredsafetyglass provided. 5 Ceramic arc tube consistem-color lamp, Philips MastaiColor or GE ConstantCoior. 6 When glass lens is required, add GL suffix to aperture/trimcolor. Ex: AH10OSSARGL120. 7 120V ballast only; stepdown transformer pro- vided when 277V is specified. 347V not available. 8 Refer to chart below for wattage/lampavailabit- ity. 9 Not recommended for use with HID lamp sources. Consult factory. 10 Notavailabiewith finishes. ORDERING/kCKAdING OPTIONS To accommodate the product's physical configuration as well as a range of customer handling and processing needs, two alternative ordering/packaging methods are available. : - 1) STANDARD PACKAGING (ap(iMt Md fQrM) 2) COMPQNENTPAiG=NG To order, use a single master ceta tog number. Order housings end trims as unit pack only as per component Exe mplu: i 13) AN INIIIII7AR 120. ordergufe, a listed below. Ftxteresship asmuldoler,,umpomntsusing ootlmiaed Nowngorwl p ackagi r g. Exam pie a bove shi ps a s: -- -- GMSN watthae lamntvae= q ygjiag MEX notions MSG U - (0tv 13) GIMH IO M 712VM MEX HSG U TmrrOnJya (13housing cartons) - (Gty131i' ANIARTRIMUII'strimcartons) AM 4pa,nure.trim cold rf1i.ii TRW U NOTES" ti 1 For 9" ape rt9ure,15OWorlowermetalhslide,with lasso pon,GLmustbeaddedeatheapertute, ' Ex: GRSH 150M981.12ry277 MOG MSG U:, 2 175MandMM requires safety glass. Remove MEXfromhousing description and add GLtotrim color 3 Dun ivoltages listed onbraskouts.Ex:1201277or120h,17. 070-100W M 01� 6"AH•"70;, 9.5/8(24.4) 6-1/4(15.9)(ME0;'1D0W SOW BC/MB/WB: 18 t/zi47.Bi 17 314445.1? BC,MB/MJB: 5-7/8(17.5) 7-1/2119.1) 70. WOW MNC 9-V4(Z3.5) 8(15.2) 50, 70,100. 15OW M I .5/B J27.0) 7-1/2 (19.11 T AH (MED) 50, 70, 10OW S 50. 1001V SDW BCiMBrMB 19-V2(495) 17.3/4(45.1) BCIMBJWB: 8-1/8(20.6} 8.214(22.2) i 70 1DOW MHC 10-3/8{26.4) 7-1/4(18.4) 15-3/8(39,1i I 9(22.9) 10(75.4) TAH"� 100,150,175W,250W1V18C,rMB/WB: 21-3/4i55-2)I17.3/4(45.1) BC1MB(Wt3: 9.3./4(24.8) BC/MBIWB: (MOG) 50, 70, 100, 150W S 1fi 8(41.6 8-7 8 22.5 10-1 B 25.7 15-1/8 (38.4) (24.8) 10"AH 175, 250W M BCJMB/WB: 23-3/4(60.3) 20-1/8(51.1)MB/WB'L12 �9-3/4 (26.0)I 10-7,8(27.6) iMOG) 70, i00, 150W S 1Q-7/6(37.8) /2112.4.11175, 17-518144.8) 1116(29.7)l16(3)150w 250111' M BC/MBJWB: 23-3,14160.3) 20-1/8151.1► BCl1vf81W8:A401W8:412" AH S 19-1/4 48.9` 11-1 2 29.21 16 32.5 (MOG) 17-5/B(44.8) 11-11/16(29.7)/16(32.2) 25OW S BC/M8;WB:25.3/4165.4) 22-1/2(57.2) 8CCB S:31 MBIWB AM** ,MEu-case socxet uses wnn ­1v Drawings for dimensional detail only. May not represent actual mechanical configuration. Dimensions are shown in inches Icentimeters). -T Ila II I 1 fA LITHONIA LIGHTING C irl .1 t =. $A W IL tc C 1*07'ej fow'wlc MDO Features Housing: Rugged, heavy -gauge, sheet alu- minum housing, continuous welded seams for weathertight integrity. Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder, Other architectural colors available. Lens Frame: Extruded and welded aluminum frame secured with a tool -less, quick -release fastener, Extruded silicone gasket provides a Weather-proof seal between housing and lens frame. Lens: Impact -resistant, tempered glass with silkscreened power door shield. Mounting: Cast, 4" aluminum arm for pole or wall mounting. Shipped in fixture carton, Optional mountings available. Optics: Anodized segmented reflectors pro- vide superior uniformity and control, Reflec- tors attach With tool -less fasteners and are rotatable and interchangeable. Three cutoff' distributions available: Type II (roadway), Type III (asymmetric), Type IV (forward throw). Electrical System: High -reactance or constant -wattage autotransformer, high - power factor ballast mounted on a unitized and removable power tray secured with tool - less latch. Positive -locking disconnect plugs (primary and secondary). Ballast is copper wound and 100% factory tested. Socket: Porcelain, horizontally oriented, mogul -base socket with copper alloy, nickel - plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed 1500W, 600V. Listings: LIL listed, suitable for wet locations. Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (see Options). IP55 rated (optional), Poles: See pages 259-283. veted AXe8 `sgareas. Arm. m our�din9 k� va ' parking lots and surr _ *®tied SE Catalog Number BV2150S Designation Example: ISV2150S R2 120 SP804 SF R2 120 N IES Distribution 'Voltage. (selectonet 12A HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM R21ESType 11 20B 70W av2 70S roadway 240 100W BW 100S R3 IES Type III 277 15OW BV2 150S asymmetric 25OW BW 2505 R4 IES Type IV 347 40OW BW 400S 1 forward throw 480 TB3 METAL HALIDE 100W BV2 MOM 175W BV2 175M 25OW BV2 250M 40OW BV2 41110111112 STANDARD PACKAGING Fixtures chip in unit cartons. Example: 10ty 2l l Bv2 160E R2 SP604 t20 SF (21 cartons of 1 housing and 1 erml NOTES. 1 Must use E-ta or ET-18 lamp. 2 Must use ED-28 reduced jacket lamo. 3 Optional multi -tap ballast (120, ,Oa. 240, 277VI. (120, 277, 347V In Canada). 4 For arm mounting, reter to technical data section in the outdoor border for drilling template. 5 The SPB12, RP812. SPBT12, and RPBT12 must be used when two or more luminaires are oriented on a 90` drilling pattern. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. SPB04 SF IViountirtg4 SPBOA Square pole arm (4")5 RPB04 Round pole arm (C5 SPB12 Square pole arm (12") RPS12 Round pole arm (121 SPBT04 Square pole arm w,10° tilt (4"15 RPBT04 Round pole arm w/10" tilt (4°)5 SPST12 Square pole arm w/101 tilt 02") RPOT12 Round pole arm w!10° tilt (12") WSP804 Wall bracket arm K) WSPST04 Wall bracket arm (4") w110° titt l�sXlkp�tit' xr Aptlalkl OPTIONS (Shipped installed) SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) n/a TB OF Double fuse (208, 240, 48OV) nia TB DRS Quartz restrike system 00001 maximum, 120V only, lamp not included► CSA Listed and labeled to comply with Canadian Standards (120, 277, 347V only) EC Emergency circuit PER NEMA twist -lock receptacle only (no photocontrol) PS Perfoma-Seal' (IP65 rated! CR Corrosion -resistant finish For optional Architectural Colors, see page 285. ACCESSORIES (Shipped separately) PEt NEIViA twist -lock PE photocontrol for 1120-240V PE3 NEMA twist -lock PE photocontrol for 347V PE4 NEMA twist -lock PE photocontrol for 480V PE7 NEMA twist -lock PE photocorarol 277V BV2NS House side shield (R2, R3 onty) BMG Vandal guard SC Shorting cap for PER option OPTIONAL MOUNTING (Shipped separately) BVKMA Mast arm adapter BVKMAT Mast arm adapter (100 tilt) (Arm j� 60 DIMENSIONS EPA. 1.a ft2 (.15m2) (incluctes artni 109ft-! Length: 27-112 (69.8) Width: 18-112C (45.8) Depth: 9-3/8 (24A) Arm length: 4 00.9) Max. weigh'i: 44 Iris, 09.8kg) 210 LlTHONIA LIGHTING 23 Son lose Ofn 340 Dort Strut Ilia S. $urlingott, A 05403 HVAC - The building is divided into two modules, one at 40' X 60' and one of20' X 60'. The north module wi$i accomodate one tenant on the first floor and two apartments on the second floor. Provisions fbr air conditioning will be provided on the south end of the building on ground level for the south module. This unit (5 ton), will measure 3'6" X 3'6" and 32" high. The unit for the north module will be located on the north side of the building on ground level. This unit (2 ton), will measure 2'8" X 3'0" and 32" high. Each unit will be screened by a white PVC screen -type fence with an access door for service. Meat will be provided by gas hot air and vented through stacks on the roof. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 20, 2000 John Kennedy 68 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Medical Office, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is a copy of the December 7, 1999 Development Review Board Minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, t--'Lisp. J„Mahoney �r Planning & Zoning Assistant LJM/mcp Encls DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 20, 2000 John Kennedy 340 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Medical Office, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr Kennedy: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on December 21, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lis T Mahoney Planning & Zoning Assistant LJM/mcp Encls , It V- 5f- 0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD ame as shown on deed, mailing address hone nd fax #) a O DOr. C- 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 3) CONTACT PERS N (Name, mailing address phone and fax #) 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) c C : a4 r-L- b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) �► �; s �� f, r-e c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) /dUo d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine),3 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): (/ O g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing V'l % Proposed X"J % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing fl2 v % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ o /Z,pr .L �L000 %�•E!�rc ,// � r b) Landscaping: $ e4 iio c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): -39 „ 'j b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): /9 c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 12Z. y 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE "�GD A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. G APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: [:] Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: DComplete Director of (Apfrmsp) 0 Director, Planning & Zoning ElIncomplete Id . ing & Zoning or Designee Date CRAFT MOTION OF APPROVA BETTE WELCH 12/21/99 I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve the site plan and design review applications of Bette Welch to amend a plan for a 4800 square foot building used for auto repair and storage (3600 square feet) and two (2) dwelling units (1200 square feet). The amendment consists of: 1) converting 2400 square feet to medical office use, 2) converting 1200 square feet to retail or general office use, and 3) constructing a 1288 square foot addition for medical office use. The two (2) existing dwelling units will remain, 23 San Remo Drive, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "23 San Remo Drive South Burlington, Vermont Medical Office Facility," dated 10/25/99, last revised on 12/6/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to add one (1) street tree on the east side of the building and add one (1) tree along the north side of the building. b) The site plan should be revised to replace the Sugar Maple street trees with a more salt tolerant species. c) The building elevation plans shall be revised to show the building mounted lights. d) The building elevation plans shall be revised to indicate the slope of both the existing and proposed roofs or this information shall be provided in the specifications. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the additon and change in use will generate 9.1 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval by the Director prior to installation. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit additonal information to the Director regarding the building mounted lights to be certain that the lamp is concealed. 5. Prior to issuance of zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $3720 landscape bond for Phase I and $2500 for Phase II. The bonds shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Development Review Board approves a sewer allocation of 576 gpd for Phase I and 364 gpd of additional allocation for Phase II (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. 7. Pursuant to Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations, the Development Review Board approves twelve (12) spaces within the allowable building envelope which are not hidden from view from the public street by a building. It is the Board's opinion that some of these spaces are currently existing and the new spaces meet the requirements of Section 14.402(i) - (iii) of the zoning regulations. 8. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit additonal information for the specifications report which shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 9. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a design detail for the HVAC equipment screening. 10. The applicant shall construct the streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalk and street trees) as required by the Director. 11. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for Phase I within six (6) months and Phase II within two (2) years pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 12. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the newly converted space and addition. 13. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 DECEMBER 1999 Mr. White said there will have to be a double left turn out of the project. Roger Dickinson is looking at that. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of a pedestrian way on the left side. Mr. White said there are steep slopes there and it would be very hard to work on. There will be a pedestrian way to Hannaford from the north. Mr. White then showed proposed drainage ponds and the proposed rec path. The city has a floating easement for the rec path, and the applicant will meet with the city to determine the exact location. A new lighting plan will be submitted, and they will try to be fully compatible with what is there. The trash compactor will be screened. Regarding noise, Mr. White showed the circulation problem if the road is not maintained as planned. It doesn't work as well, but they will consider it. They are willing to do a lot of plantings to help abate noise. The applicant is requesting a project time extension from the 5-year deadline. They want to do this in a 2-step process, sketch and final. Mr. Dinklage noted that the applicant and staff would have to be in total agreement in order to do that. Mr. White also noted they will put in a bike rack by the garden center. 11. Site plan and design review applications of Bette Welch to 1) renovate and change the use of a 3600 sq. ft. building used for auto service, storage and two dwelling units to medical office, and 2) construction of a 1610 sq. ft. addition for medical office use, 23 San Remo Drive: Mr. Kennedy said the building is on the northeast part of the block, next to the orthopedic center. The two apartments on the second floor will remain, and the first floor will be leased out to Health South. 1200 sq. ft. would be retained for retail. The building would be similar in look to the orthopedic building. The applicant agreed to put in the other sidewalk in a 3-year time. They will also add some trees. 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 DECEMBER 1999 They are asking for a 2ft. variance on parking aisle width. Mr. Belair said for the proposed parking arrangement, that is OK (one row is angled and 1 row is straight parking). There is a question of 11 parking spaces in the building envelope, but some are existing. The applicant could lose up to 4 spaces and still meet the requirement. Mr. Belair asked that the application be continued to allow staff to review changes brought in today. Mr. O'Rourke said he would like more input from staff of the parking in the building envelope. Mr. Roth moved to continue the application until 2.I, December. Mr. O'Rourke seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. 8 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 16, 1999 John Kennedy 68 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Design Review, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed please find a copy of the October 25, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe V�eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl City Center Design Review Committee Page 6 October 19, 1999 Streetsc=e Improvements: - Section 24.402(i) requires streetscape improvements within the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is proposed. This includes sidewalk, street trees, street lighting, etc. Staff recommends that a sidewalk be installed and street trees planted along the property's frontage on San Demo Drive. Staff is currently working on streetscape guidelines along this street. Also, on street parking should be provided (see comments under "other" below). Other: - The location of surface parking on the property does not appear to comply with Section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. This section allows surface parking to be located within the 80 foot deep building envelope if it is hidden by a building OR the parking meets the following two standards: 1) no more than 25% of the building envelope area on the property is taken up by surface parking, and 2) no more than 25% of the total parking required for the property is located within the building envelope. The plan appears to comply with the first standard as only 24% of the building envelope area on the property will be taken up by parking. The second standard does not appear to be met. The plan shows 18 parking spaces within the building envelope area which represents 55% of required parking. Only 9 spaces (25%) are allowed within the building envelope area. It appears that this condition could be met if the plan were revised to show only 9 spaces in the building envelope area and the remaining spaces provided as on street parking spaces. - The footprint of the building shown on the site plan does not appear to match the architectural drawings. The addition appears to be more narrow than the existing building. Also, the site plan does not show covered doorways (ie, canopies). AGENDA ITEM #6 - HEALTHY_ LIVING - 4 MARKET STREET This application involves an amendment to a planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four buildings located at 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building. An application to construct an addition on the east side of the 4 Market Street building was reviewed by the committee in July (see enclosed minutes). The applicant is not proposing any changes to the building or site, with the exception of possibly installing a double door in place of an existing single door and possibly constructing a paved sidewalk from the door to the driveway. A description of the existing building and site and how it relates to the design review standards was provided in the 8/18/99 staff memo. This memo is enclosed. Staff s only concern at this point is in relation to dumpsters and outside storage in the vicinity of the 4 Market Street building. Both the approved plan and the plan submitted by this applicant show only one dumpster location for the entire 4 Market Street building. This screened dumpster City Center Design Review Committee Page 5 October 19, 1999 the building facing the public street, or the construction of walkways between the building and street." This standard does not appear to be met. Rooftop Devices: The applicant should address whether there will be any rooftop devices. Energy Efficiency: Applicant should address this criterion. Pedestrian Promenade along Market Street: N/A SITE DESIGN Landscaping: The applicant is proposing mostly shrub type plants as well as a few trees (Emerald Queen Maple and Summit Ash. Staff recommends several more trees. Also, staff recommends that street trees be planted along San Remo Drive at a spacing of about 40 feet. Special Features, The dumpster should not be located along the street or within the building envelope area as proposed. Staff suggests somewhere in the southwest corner of the property. Also, the report indicates that a HVAC unit will be located along the north side of the building, however, it is not shown on the plan. Staff recommends that this unit not be located along the public street. Section 24.402(b) requires that "IIVAC equipment should not be pad mounted at grade". Can these units be incorporated inside the building? Accessible omen pace: None proposed. Circulation: Vehicular access is adequate. A connection to the property to the south is proposed. The sidewalk proposed along the west and south sides of the building should be extended out to the public street ROW. Staffrecommends that a sidewalk be constructed along San Remo Drive (see comments under streetscape improvements). Exterior Lighting; Details of the proposed building mounted light should be submitted. The applicant is proposing a pole mounted light fixture on the northeast comer of the property. Staff recommends an ornamental downcasting fixture rather than the proposed shoebox fixture. Nature's Events: Appears to be met. Security & Safety: Appears to be met. City Center Design Review Committee Page 4 October 19, 1999 design appears to comply with. all four (4) design criteria including consistent design, color and texture, materials, and promotion of city center goats. Staff recommends approval of this application with changes recommended above. AGENDA ITEM #5 - BETTE ANN WELCH - CHANGE OF USE AND EXPAND BUILDffG - 23 SAID REMO DRIVE This project involves renovation, expansion and changing the use of an existing 4,600 square foot building located at 23 San Memo Drive. The building is currently used for auto repair, storage and two residential apartment. The proposal is to change the use to medical office and two apartments and construct a 2100 square foot addition. The property is located on the southwest corner of San Remo Drive. It is in Design .District 2. Enclosed is a report from. the applicant describing design details. BUILDING DESIGN Consistent Design: The proposal promotes a consistent organization of major elements in terms of window and door arrangement and building materials. Materials: The proposal complies with the zoning as the vinyl clapboard siding will be used. Colors & Textures: Colors and textures appear to be harmonious. The applicant is proposing Woodsman Select Gray siding and white trim. The standing seam roof will be Hartford Green. Windows and Doors: Windows and doors are well organized and arranged in a pattern. Section 24.401(d) requires "for sides of buildings that front or face a public street, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see through glass..." This provision does not appear to be met. The north and east sides of the addition should meet this standard. Human -scale Design Elements: This appears to be promoted through the arrangement of the windows, doors, entrance ways and columns. Roofs: The existing and proposed roof pitches should be provided. Zoning requires a minimum 8 on 12 slope for single story and 5 on 12 slope for 2+ stories. Orient Buildings to public Street: The existing and proposed building does not appear to be well oriented to San Remo Drive. The maim accesses to the buildings will be from the parking lots on the west and south sides of the building. Section 24.401(g) requires buildings undergoing renovation to include improvements that better relate the building to the public street. The provision states that "such improvements could include the installation of doors along the sides of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 9, 2000 John Kennedy 68 Moss Glen Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Welch Site Plan and Design Review Application, 23 San Remo Drive Dear Mr. Kennedy: Enclosed is a copy of the December 21, 1999 Development Review Board Minutes on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval which include the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained for Phase I within six months. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Encls