Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0003 Pavilion AvenueSeptember 1, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: #MS-08-07 Expansion of 3 Pavilion Avenue Dear Board, I have reviewed the agenda of the meeting and I have received a written request from Yiota Ahladas as well as her partner Joni AvRutick on this expansion. I also had conversations with Joni AvRutick on the matter. I am in support of this expansion but voiced a concern I had in their plans. As their house sits a foot off their property line and 10 feet away from my house, I have requested that they would not put a window on the wall that faces my house. In order for my support, this is what I ask. I hope in this construction my privacy is considered and we can continue a friendly and neighborly relationship. Respectfully, ac 'e Quattlander 5 avilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 802-865-1743 PLAANING & ZONING October 9, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — #MS-08-07 Dear Ms. Ahladas: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved September 2, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset struat Saruth i3urting'ton. VT D5803 lei 80 ..0466 018 fax 002.. U.di0i wrraw.sburi.eam Ahlac�� s�� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 2 SEPTEMBER 2008 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 2 September 2008, at 7:30 p.m., in Cafeteria 3 at South Burlington High School, 550 Dorset Street. Members Present: M. Behr, Acting Chair; G. Quimby, R. Farley, P. Plumeau Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; T. Shaw, Y. Ahladas, D. Marshall, M. Abue, S. McIntyre, J. & M. Adler, M. J. & W. Stanley, R. & M. Jacobs, P.Thimm, R. Beaudin, J. Burleson, R. Surles, C. Moody, J. Crews, S. Longo, J. Brook, S. Clemmings, J. & T. Herstand, M. Kelley, F. Sullivan, R. McEwing, R. Pickle, C. Wheeler, J. Wilson, M. Holgate 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 19 August 2008: The Minutes of 19 August 2008 were not available. 3. iscellaneous Application #MS-08-07 of Yiota Ahladas to expand a non- complying single family dwelling by: 1) expanding the previously approved enclosure from 12' x 14' to 13.5' x 16', and 2) adding second story 13.5' x 16' addition, 3 Pavilion Avenue: Ms. Ahladas said the neighbor is OK with the plan but doesn't want windows on the north side. There will be no big windows on that side but there will be one or 2 small ones. Most of the windows are on the other side. Mr. Belair noted that the Board does not have authority to regulate windows. Ms. Ahladas said she will work this out with the neighbor. Staff had no issues with the application. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-07 of Yiota Ahladas subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site Plan Application #SP-08-73 of the Crate Escape Too to amend a previously approved plan for a 53,000 sq. ft. building consisting of 46,000 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use and 7,000 sq. ft. of pet day care use. The amendment consists of adding kennel use to the pet day care facility to allow overnight boarding of dogs, 68 Nesti Drive (old Bouyea Fassetts plant): Ms. Schey explained that they began operating in January, 2007. This was intended to -1- r �% V southburlington PLANNING & ZONING September 3, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-07, 3 Pavilion Avenue Dear Ms. Ahladas: Enclosed, please find the Findings of Fact and Decisions regarding the above referenced Miscellaneous Application. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6307 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com August 20, 2008 Jamie Mittendorf 12 Lyons Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the September 2, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. PLEASE NOTE A CHANGE IN LOCATION FOR THIS HEARING: The hearing will be held at South Burlington High School in Cafeteria 3, 550 Dorset Street. There will be signage directing you to Cafeteria 3 once inside the main entrance to the school. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 6ocxia-t Strad Goulh Burling Dn, YT 05403 tel 802_846A1,0$ lax 001.1146.4W www.abur@.coin August 20, 2008 Lynne Ogliano 1 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the September 2, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (wwvv.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. PLEASE NOTE A CHANGE IN LOCATION FOR THIS HEARING: The hearing will be held at South Burlington High School in Cafeteria 3, 550 Dorset Street. There will be signage directing you to Cafeteria 3 once inside the main entrance to the school. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Darset Street South Hurlington, YT 95403 Fed 5(t2..t46s t:ng lax: 8112.04fi.4i51 Wrr .1bUr1.0'arts August 20, 2008 Jackie Quatlander 5 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the Member 2, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.coin) by the Friday prior to the meeting. PLEASE NOTE A CHANGE IN LOCATION FOR THIS HEARING: The hearing will be held at South Burlington High School in Cafeteria 3, 550 Dorset Street. There will be signage directing you to Cafeteria 3 once inside the main entrance to the school. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, ��\ Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. M Dorset Street "Sauna Rarlinqtan, YT" 05403 tei 802- 4 ,i1,00 imx 002.. 4G 4101 veVeW--bu0,..cam August 20, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the September 2, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (w w.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. PLEASE NOTE A CHANGE IN LOCATION FOR THIS HEARING: The hearing will be held at South Burlington High School in Cafeteria 3, 550 Dorset Street. There will be signage directing you to Cafeteria 3 once inside the main entrance to the school. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. ?5 Dussr�,;t street Seioh 2-urlin tan, Yr 1)5463 tul 11'.€ ''Gib lam, 502_b4fiA if WW.W,1bU0,r M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD ( Report preparation date: August 27, 2008 drb\misc\ahladas\ahladas misc2.doc Application received: August 8, 2008 3 Pavilion Avenue Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-07 enda # 3 Applicants/Owners Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map Meeting date: September 2, 2008 Property Information Tax Parcel ID 1310-00003 Queen City Park (QCP) District Parcel Size: 2195 SF CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc Yiota Ahladas, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to expand a non -complying single family dwelling by 1) expanding the previously approved enclosure from 12' x 14' to 13.5' x 16', and 2) adding a second story 13.5' x 16' addition, 3 Pavilion Avenue. Associate Planner Cathyann La Rose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on May 21, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: QCP Zoning District Re uired Proposed Min. Lot Size 7500 S.F. 2195 S.F *** Max. Building Coverage 40% 39.3% ***Max. Overall Coverage 60% 45.2% .6 Min. Front Setback 10 ft 8 ft . in Side Setback 5 ft. Approx 2 ft. .6 Min. Rear Setback 10 ft. Approx 17 ft. � Max. Building Height 25 ft. 23 ft. �► Pre-existing non-compliance ****Many of the homes in the Queen City Park neighborhood are eligible for relief from setbacks and coverages under Section 3.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations for pre-existing non -compliant lots which existed prior to February 28, 1974. Lots smaller than 5000 square feet in size may exceed the maximum allowed for the district up to a maximum of forty percent (40%) for buildings and sixty percent (60%) for overall coverage. Staff has further reviewed the application under Section 4.08 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. A. Purpose: A Queen City Park District is herby formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversation of seasonal homes to year round residences. The proposed addition is in compliance with the purpose of the QCP Zoning District. B. Comprehensive Plan The proposed addition is harmonious with the City's Comprehensive plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc C. Permitted Use The proposed residential addition is a permitted use in the QCP district. D. Conditional Uses The proposed project does not require conditional use review. E. Area, Density, and Dimensional Requirements ****Many of the homes in the Queen City Park neighborhood are eligible for relief from setbacks and coverages under Section 3.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations for pre-existing non -compliant lots which existed prior to February 28, 1974. Lots smaller than 5000 square feet in size may exceed the maximum allowed for the district up to a maximum of forty percent (40%) for buildings and sixty percent (60%) for overall coverage. F. Height of Structures The maximum height for all structures shall be no more than twenty-five feet above the average pre -construction grade adjoining such structure. The existing height of the roof is 23'. This is within the standard allowable use in the district. This application does not seek to increase this height. G. Non -Complying Structures Structures in the Queen City Park District are not subject to all provisions of Article 3, non- complying structures shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions: (1) Any non -complying building or structure may be altered provided such work does not: a. Exceed in aggregate cost thirty-five percent for residential properties and twenty five percent for non-residential properties of the fair market value as determined by the City Assessor or by a separate independent appraisal approved by the Administrative Officer, or b. Involve an increase to the structures height or footprint, or otherwise involve an increase to the square footage of the building or structure. The applicant has proposed a building cost of $18,000 and is thus in compliance with part 'a' of this criterion. However, the square footage of the building will be increased. Therefore, Section 4.08(G)(2) applies: (2) The Development Review Board may approve any alteration which exceeds the thirty- five and twenty-five percent rule described above or which involves an increase to the structure's height, footprint, or square footage subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. Staff has evaluated compliance with the criteria in the section of this report titled `Conditional Use Review'. (3) In addition to the provisions set forth above, the DRB shall determine that the proposed CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc alteration or expansion will not adversely affect: a. Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; b. Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and c. Adequate on -site parking. These criteria are evaluated below as part of conditional use review. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Staff does not feel that the proposed addition is in conflict with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the QCP Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversation of seasonal homes to year round residences. Again, the proposed addition is in compliance with the proposed purpose of the district. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The proposed addition will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff does not feel that the proposed addition adversely affect the character of the neighborhood. The QCP district is historically a very dense neighborhood. The proposed addition is to the rear of the property and will be largely unseen. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed addition will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed addition adheres to the applicable regulations in all instances except for CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc consideration of the existing structure as a pre-existing non -conforming structure. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed addition will not affect renewable energy resources. (t) General public health and welfare. The proposed addition will not have an adverse affect on general public welfare. Pursuant to Section 3.060)(3) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed building expansion shall meet the following standards: (a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; It is difficult to assess how this proposal will affect the views of adjoining and/or nearby properties. This neighborhood is located very close to Lake Champlain and so it is possible that some favorable views exist. However, from Staff's site visit to the property, it does not appear that this addition would impact those views. The Board should consider any testimony on this matter presented from neighboring property owners who may present a clearer picture. (b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; It is also difficult to assess this criterion. This neighborhood is very dense and homes are very close together. However, from Staff's site visit to the property, it does not appear that this addition would deny neighboring property owners' access to sunlight. Again, the Board should consider any testimony on this matter presented from neighboring property owners. (c) adequate on -site parking; and The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on adequate on -site parking. (d) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on the safety of adjoining properties. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve miscellaneous application #MS-08-07. Respectfully submitted, AEa�ta LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Yiota Ahladas, Applicant No Text August 7, 2008 City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT Dear Development Review Board, At your June 17th, 2008 meeting you approved a one story 12x14 enclosure of our existing back deck. We are returning to you to expand the original proposal. We wish to slightly expand the dimensions from 12x14 to 13.5x16; and to add a 2"d story to the pre -approved project. We have provided a written notice of this change to all the neighboring property owners, and have had follow up discussions with them as well. All of the neighbors expressed their support for the project. The only neighbor who will be impacted by the addition of a 2"d story is Jackie Quatlander. Although she will by mildly impacted by the addition of a 2"d story she did not feel it would interfere with the sunlight for her yard and garden and as such is agreeable to the project. The scale and design of the project is in alignment with the existing structure and the neighborhood character. The proposed 2"d story roof will follow the existing shed roof line on the north side of the house which is well below the height of the Main gable peak. Thank you for your consideration. Sincer ly, Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Ave S. Burlington, VT 05403 No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit # &J -6eb - d APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use () quest for a variance ( Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): I/1) e �*1 -k- WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? AJA 1) OWI` ER QF REC IUDCt a e a shown on ed, m ding a ti () M` h �it -3 7a v I I1 v &"A 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax if different from above): ii r` o i--z.. .4 I•� (� � a S 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: C,, trv\ ` e- 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: ! 16 -C (5 6 d 3 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): ' B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): S �� i � � lc->Z �1S�1✓1� f���� � Lj r� rV-kC_ V, o S e 1427 "Ik R 0 '(? C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): j D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine)- / G Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): F. Number of employees & company ye icles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): l� A G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: �'� / / o Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing I (a % / r Sq. Ft Proposed % l :�5 6.3 Sq. Ft. ` v� V e b Ic- ova 5- y- e� closvt� /� lavv\ e � 2tA S i ou S C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing � %% / 1Z 5,, $ Sq. Ft. Proposed S. .'�Ic % Sq. Ft. h h V4,O-, 1 �� D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: t Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ C (� B. Landscaping $ C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: / A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): (v (kf let oc�`-c A -;-' s e i� Q ;-1)1)ar S + Co 1/\ ✓\e ` ssa f `o 0 J Rc,k­,�&,\ J V, �C., L, �10 In 71 C,vV- iz Oti S J are v a S/f i1-, E> 2� t V��. �S S 1 t`.Lv[ Ltl l L! VL [IF t`.L1tY VL-•LVTV'T1C.11 I •L.1•�CICt.lF IIE r•C ILI— r� �— j ,.F•�, ►� Ave F low S CL a S 1 J L S� ed r Re--J R ocA-s Pack - fie ?_ odk s O4 s 1 I vI 6) � 1.3 -7 ? , -- `-d 0 eN IA 10, 'd ZTT�S986 O1 TOTt?9t,8808 NI lam HinOS --:PD AlID:WOdA d2T : TO 8002-E T-Nnf I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of 4 knowledge. i SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT i SIGNATURE OF PRTERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: 0 Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: 0 COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee If- 4-11 Im No Text e August 7, 2008 City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT Dear Development Review Board, At your June 17th, 2008 meeting you approved a one story 12x14 enclosure of our existing back deck. We are returning to you to expand the original proposal. We wish to slightly expand the dimensions from 12x14 to 13.5x16; and to add a 2nd story to the pre -approved project. We have provided a written notice of this change to all the neighboring property owners, and have had follow up discussions with them as well. All of the neighbors expressed their support for the project. The only neighbor who will be impacted by the addition of a 2Id story is Jackie Quatlander. Although she will by mildly impacted by the addition of a 2nd story she did not feel it would interfere with the sunlight for her yard and garden and as such is agreeable to the project. The scale and design of the project is in alignment with the existing structure and the neighborhood character. The proposed 2nd story roof will follow the existing shed roof line on the north side of the house which is well below the height of the Main gable peak. Thank you for your consideration. SiTAhladas Yi 3 Pavilion Ave S. Burlington, VT 05403 CI�1 i� OF SOUTH BURLINUI'ON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit # 4 -" b - o APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use () quest for a variance ( Other, PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): 1AJ G ") -e- WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) OW4ER F RECQI�D (Nase a shown on coed m iun add s hon & f # CL IL _-ce - 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #) S ot- flA =:g 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax i different from above): \-i r` o tz. A _1A J Q S 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): ,� �.�((1�'1 � �" f�C�.fJ �`����►,� OL B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): _ S - 12� l �e�c-� S l� ►� f Z r �' D-P— c-L w,o C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): -663 D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine). / E-Number of residential Units (if applica le, new units & existing units to remain): F. Number of employees & company y vs. non-office.employees): N icles (existing & proposed, note office G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): - - - - - - 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: Z� / �' Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing 3 6, % / S Sq. Ft Proposed 3 f, j 1�% / Sq. Ft. o 2 6 o & r✓ buvZ Sir 2.Li c/oSv1� d� 6V G C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / Z S, $ Sq. Ft. Proposed t/ Z �o % �!g Sq. Ft. �,h h`1 �� " D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: �j SqFt. A * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ 4 2_q . 060 IF B. Landscaping $ 15-0 0 C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): / l ct / Ct Wl .�i �,r ) i f1 ®viA �� tom► �i U mot"' % ' - .. © G I/1 C� - S. P � C y� "Jo V 1^_ z L� Otl S �- Co ,� ✓y f �G� h'o 0 C�V 0 P C i G� tl,��► I' n r� ��� �re N IA 3 'r1 ITT1t^OOC 'i1' TfAT Lf'fLf��.��7 1IT 1•.1f1f1 11f.�A y-f 1 tT�.I n-itif f. T.T. ,�.�.-+'� r+r �i`1.� No Text TUN-13-2008 01:13P FRON:CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN 8028464101 AV P, C', TO:98657117 P.3 CA 7 2,005� tvi R-ev-ie� iloctri. I hereby certify that all the information req submitted and is accurate to the best of rr P as part of this application has been ledge. SIGNATL RE OF APP. SIGNATURE Do not write below this line T ER DATE OF SUBMISSION: 66" REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date j-4- Lea . . ....... . ( t ; No Text i ( phi l 0,u< 1 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JUNE 2008 building, and 2) constructing a two-story 15,880 sq. ft. mixed use building, 2040 Williston Rd: Mr. Jaeger said the property is owned by Munson Earth Moving, and the site had been a motel for many years. The motel was torn down a few years ago. A small bungalow now remains. This will be removed as will the remains of the motel. The proposed new building will be one story with a basement, 8000 sq. ft. footprint and will be for general office, personal service, and light retail use. It will probably be a 3 or 4 unit building with most of the parking in front. They are leaving a driveway to serve the back and may one day put something back there. Mr. Dinklage noted that S. Burlington Realty owns a property to the west and asked whether accesses from that rear lot to this rear lot could be combined in the future. Mr. Jaeger said it could legally happen but he didn't think it would. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will want the wetland and the buffers delineated. Mr. Dinklage noted that the proposed configuration is not what the Board wants to encourage. He asked if the applicant had considered other options. Mr. Jaeger said this is an industrial -commercial envelope with a large setback in front. It would be hard to require parking in the rear. Mr. Dinklage said the city is trying not to replicate the "strip mall" look. Ms. LaRose said it is an aesthetic issue and also a traffic calming issue. Mr. Jaeger showed three alternatives they had considered but these, he said, resulted in a loss of parking spaces and less viability for people to have to walk around the building for access. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to consider having one row instead of 2 rows of parking in front. Mr. Jaeger said they would look at that. Members agreed they would like to see more of a balance between front and rear parking. Mr. Dinklage said he would not support a setback waiver. Mr. Belair said if the Board allows parking in front, there would have to be a lot of landscaping, berms, etc. Mr. Jaeger said they were OK with that. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Sketch Plan #SD-08-26 until 15 July 2008. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-04 of Yiota Ahladas to expand a non- complying single family dwelling by enclosing an existing 12'x14' deck, 3 Pavilion Avenue: Mr. Dinklage raised the issue of possibly blocking sunlight and views of neighbors. The applicant said neighbors had raised no issues. Staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-04 of Yiota Ahladas subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -2- July 17, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — 3 Pavilion Ave Dear Ms. Ahladas: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved June 17, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dar.Ot 'Straatt Sauf% Surizng on, VT 0 403 lei 802 84b.*108 fax OD2.84t.4101 www-siaurl.aam A.,/-��, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 18, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 3 Pavilion Avenue Dear Ms. Ahladas: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board on June 17, 2008 (effective June 17, 2008). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, '-'6 &aok-� Bets Mc onoug h Brown Y Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5669 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com southburfington PLANNING 3 ZONING June 6, 2008 Yoita Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05402 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the June 17.2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 6C�4680-� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. southburfington PLANNING & ZONING June 6, 2008 Jackie Quatlander 5 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the Tune 17, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. PLANNING & ZONING June 6, 2008 Lynne Ogliano 1 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the June 17, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. June 6, 2008 Jamie Mittendorf 12 Lyons Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the June 17, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 6t64 &nj� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 13, 2008 drb\misc\ahladas\ahladas_misc.doc Application received: May 21, 2008 3 Pavilion Avenue Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-04 da#4 Applicants/Owners Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map Meeting date: June 17, 2008 Property Information Tax Parcel ID 1310-00003 Queen City Park (QCP) District Parcel Size: 2195 SF CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc Yiota Ahladas, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to expand a non -complying single family dwelling by enclosing an existing 12' x 14' deck, 3 Pavilion Avenue. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on May 21, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: QCP Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 7500 S.F. 2195 S.F *** Max. Building Coverage 40% 39.3% ***Max. Overall Coverage w► Min. Front Setback 60% 45.2% loft 8 ft Min. Side Setback 5 ft. A rox 2 ft. .6 Min. Rear Setback 10 ft. Approx 17 ft. � Max. Building Height 25 ft. 23 ft. A Pre-existing non-compliance ****Many of the homes in the Queen City Park neighborhood are eligible for relief from setbacks and coverages under Section 3.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations for pre-existing non -compliant lots which existed prior to February 28, 1974. Lots smaller than 5000 square feet in size may exceed the maximum allowed for the district up to a maximum of forty percent (40%) for buildings and sixty percent (60%) for overall coverage. Staff has further reviewed the application under Section 4.08 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. A. Purpose: A Queen City Park District is herby formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversation of seasonal homes to year round residences. The proposed addition is in compliance with the purpose of the QCP Zoning District. B. Comprehensive Plan The proposed addition is harmonious with the City's Comprehensive plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc C. Permitted Use The proposed residential addition is a permitted use in the QCP district. D. Conditional Uses The proposed project does not require conditional use review. E. Area, Density, and Dimensional Requirements ****Many of the homes in the Queen City Park neighborhood are eligible for relief from setbacks and coverages under Section 3.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations for pre-existing non -compliant lots which existed prior to February 28, 1974. Lots smaller than 5000 square feet in size may exceed the maximum allowed for the district up to a maximum of forty percent (40%) for buildings and sixty percent (60%) for overall coverage. F. Height of Structures The maximum height for all structures shall be no more than twenty-five feet above the average pre -construction grade adjoining such structure. The existing height of the roof is 23'. This is within the standard allowable use in the district. G. Non -Complying Structures Structures in the Queen City Park District are not subject to all provisions of Article 3, non- complying structures shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions: (1) Any non -complying building or structure may be altered provided such work does not: a. Exceed in aggregate cost thirty-five percent for residential properties and twenty five percent for non-residential properties of the fair market value as determined by the City Assessor or by a separate independent appraisal approved by the Administrative Officer; or b. Involve an increase to the structures height or footprint, or otherwise involve an increase to the square footage of the building or structure. The applicant has proposed a building cost of $18,000 and is thus in compliance with part 'a' of this criterion. However, the square footage of the building will be increased. Therefore, Section 4.08(G)(2) applies: (2) The Development Review Board may approve any alteration which exceeds the thirty- five and twenty-five percent rule described above or which involves an increase to the structure's height, footprint, or square footage subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. Staff has evaluated compliance with the criteria in the section of this report titled 'Conditional Use Review'. (3) In addition to the provisions set forth above, the DRB shall determine that the proposed alteration or expansion will not adversely affect: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMFNT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc a. Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; b. Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and c. Adequate on -site parking. These criteria are evaluated below as part of conditional use review. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Staff does not feel that the proposed addition is in conflict with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the QCP Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversation of seasonal homes to year round residences. Again, the proposed addition is in compliance with the proposed purpose of the district. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. The proposed addition will not adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff does not feel that the proposed addition adversely affect the character of the neighborhood. The QCP district is historically a very dense neighborhood. The proposed addition is to the rear of the property and will be largely unseen. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed addition will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed addition adheres to the applicable regulations in all instances except for consideration of the existing structure as a pre-existing non -conforming structure. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\ahladas misc.doc (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed addition will not affect renewable energy resources. (t) General public health and welfare. The proposed addition will not have an adverse affect on general public welfare. Pursuant to Section 3.06(J)(3) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed building expansion shall meet the following standards: (a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; It is difficult to assess how this proposal will affect the views of adjoining and/or nearby properties. This neighborhood is located very close to Lake Champlain and so it is possible that some favorable views exist. However, from Staff's site visit to the property, it does not appear that this addition would impact those views. The Board should consider any testimony on this matter presented from neighboring property owners who may present a clearer picture. (b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; It is also difficult to assess this criterion. This neighborhood is very dense and homes are very close together. However, from Staff's site visit to the property, it does not appear that this addition would deny neighboring property owners' access to sunlight. Again, the Board should consider any testimony on this matter presented from neighboring property owners. (c) adequate on -site parking; and The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on adequate on -site parking. (d) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on the safety of adjoining properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve miscellaneous application #MS-08-04. Respectfully submitted, Cathyahm LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Yiota Ahladas, Applicant TUN-13-2008 01 :37P FROP1: TO_:984541A1 P. 4- 5 ffJ ldiY- jl ] C17NJt1 ell ; . 3, ' Mu"; 1 1 IT i-r 'JU 1 M MIAL I N OUMZM)AilW l 0- vl Avt, t 3 l,.y. you h 3c,I- k e d m Iw 44 61) JUN-13-2008 01:37P FROM: JUN-13-2008 01:13P FROM:CITY OF JTH BURLIN 8029464101 R �k (I � # -) , `ri o 9" NI f lz ") Lci (, p c4 v,� Tt3 : 98464101 P . 5' 5 T( "%5711 T P.3 J,0 r r-4itti4:O,l southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 13, 2008 Yiota Ahladas 3 Pavilion Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 3 Pavilion Avenue Dear Ms. Ahladas: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 4 -'j BettyyDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit #- APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance her PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): Vv AJ Tz WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) O Nag OF A tgR�X me3as {i�o�/ gn�deed, mailing addres phon &fax #): 6SS'-.S /ZC 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) 3) APP ddress. phone and fax #) UN-13-200B 01_ 3GP FROM: V Y _. yL y TO:98464101 1 tJ • J V f�1J 1 1 1 1 P.2/ S 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name. maili g address, p ne & x # if different from above): q in A a 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Pk V-1 t r 0 8) TAX PARCEL ID #: _ f 3 ) U ' a 0 0 ?) PROJECT DESCRIPT!O.".' A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): _ C, v, c, 0 s / Z �- / `-f 15 a c�- lie c.,k C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain) 00 D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing bui)dipg�s to remain, specify if basement & me amine): !>�s L, � l ti-rapo5e � � � C/aJ �e � ►C � �� E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): _ '1 F. Number of employees & com any vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): Jy G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing. b, % ! Sq. Ft Proposed 1 S Sq. Ft. TUN-13-2008 01:36P FRCV: ....�.,. �.�. ..v_ T1:ge464101 P 5 C. Overall impervintar- coverage (buiie"-- -liking, outside storage, etc) Existing - Z G n� 1 _ -2 Sq. Ft. Proposed _ _ // / _ _ 9'F57.Sq. Ft. //�� �� D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: 0J Sq. Ft. Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): B. Landscaping $ 5-00 C. Other site improvements (please list with coat): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC - A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): �a H 2 B_ A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): C P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 1 '2) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE id) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS' (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including these across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary) <J_aC/c./'-* Ct7�a�-lar��e�- Mav''+�3o.�►�Jc��,-c� s J-0.+'Y71 e l Wl1 ��£Vt �ov/ QC(rb3S �hE 5 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge—, SIGNATURE OF A`-121JC'ANT IGNATURE OF PR )PE&TOWNE Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: �\ � 11b REVIEW AUTHORITY: Ed Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: 8" COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee ` D 7 ; jr':` e�f►` t, a t y,. ^t/ •�tt - � K� x. Nae. ' B �{p,`7, ra �yryr4t r, r �'Y' fi y} � �yvYY �.� 4 �� �R i�• _ �? �^• 3t•s'�����n+� .hB�� �y„q� e��Y' ^r k y \ "'�t i�. ,• • � 1 ,M,C,. 7� � v ,�. E ` J« ., �� � t+'r �' r� 9' a"*�'4"� � fir} {&�"r +x t , W��� � ,\ '.,� � I � '.. *� f.` r ��� .0 i.# rj. `Za, Y r � f .f �::r.M4�iu'�W �+f 'N"�. I ;•� �..•V `i 'r r ! ° - �' a \�;, �;y ra? f. X w � �k i'..( � r t Y r y ..I '4 �,v i u32�y 1 t. � 9 � � .E 1\ � y. � ,�r F � L• � rY' `'�''J 4W' - . •r� r as atT' ' .'fit ,/ �I J AYrY 4r' .ya. \ \f�' ^f 4•an ll'�T f T � H ` �� i y �.. 1 '.,,. f'- y _3 ° x "'; t�yy,�r«' + r • F� r p, c � y ;4 9 tl� rsy� r t ? Y r �yt Y `,2 ,' ?S rt �. y�. q�t�+{"t3 ^� t f d .r c�V`+ # f 4 a+e*�� t { c>' • i� �Y. t �" �t �'k:'w "cif"f n),�•: F k,.tr ��tJ - ! a-�:+. �'hK_' +� asY' ,dr .. ?q r ,•i' ' '. i r�r.;. y+) r� A CIL V ( t Oil 3 'l 0% ilk es - O%k No Text «� . .. � :�22°, � ��� : . .«� <\\ �.�. y«\\. a�� y\ \y� ».< ««� » v . `�� \ / \ :� t » « © � t� � � ��� � � � � � \