The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-75-0000 - Supplemental - 0001 Pavilion AvenueSOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In ac COrdiSCe with the South Fur;;ngton Z. ning k2,:ulaticns and C„apter 91, Title :. V._.A. the South Burlington Zo.aing Board of AdjuStT-ent will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on M.nday, June 2, 1975 at 5:00 p.m. to consider the following: 1. Appeal of Howard and Mary Shepard seCKing a variance, from Section 11.GO, Dimensional Requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for perm;scion to construct a 6' x 20' additon to within four (d) feet of the soutnerly siee yaro, at 28 Central Avenue, Queen City Park. 2. Appeal of Jeannette Perkins seeking a variance, from Section 11.00-Dimensional Requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 22' x 46' single family dwelling to within twenty nine (29) feet of the required front yard, eight (8) feet of the required rear yarc, five (5) feet of the northeriy side yard and two (2) feet of the southerly side yard at 1 Pavilion Avenue Queen City Park. 3. Appeal of Church of God, John St000ard, Agent seeking a variance, from Section 6.003, Permitted Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request 'is for permission to construct a 23' x 50' church, at600 Hinesburg Road. d. Appeal of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Peter Bergh seeKing a variance, from Section 13.00, Non- conforming Usesand StruCturesof the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct an 60' x 120' addition and a 75' x 120' addition to the westerly and easterly sides of the tennis facilities located Off Twin Oaks Drive. Richard A. Myette, Chairman Zoning Board of Adjustment May 17, 1975 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST ANT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development� Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in t e neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefo a necessary to enable the reasonable -use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date w f. Appellant sp Vote: `Yes Q List findings below: 1. 2. No Appeal #—L' SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 41+68 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; E (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 13 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be d,::trimental to the public welfare; and yj-''j ( 5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date C /�6 1-2 -)S- , Appellant Vote: Yes Q L I F Appeal #IA""- "/"- 7 No Sig SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there,"' is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; El (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential:'. character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date2.L Appellant Vote: Yes Q No Sig / / List findings below: 1. 2. 3. 'low NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance, decision of administrative officer. Property Owner Property location & description Variance of Section , t ,numberT title of section Basis of appeal I understand the regular meetings are held twice a month on Monday at 5:00 p.m. at the City Hall, Conference Room. The legal advertise- ment must appear in the Burlington Free Press a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing, I agree to pay a fee of $30.00 which fee is to off -set the costs of advertising and the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 91, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Offices, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on , at day of week month and date time to consider the following: Appeal of eeking -- a from Section // - -f.. �. �..�. of the South Burlington Zoning Regula- - \ tions. Request is for permission to u,, 0209 ',rV4' ,�� \ .Ma j,22t 1975 Jeanette Perkins F-,urf & 'ruf Restaurant Oearl Street urlingtong VT C 5401 Dear Ms. Perkins: Be I-Ildvised that the South Burlingt-n Zoning Foard of Adjust- ment will hold a public hearing at the South Purlington City Hall Conference 700m, 1175 Toad, 'outh 71urling-ton, Vermont on Ilionday, June 2, 1975 at 5:00 p.m. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly , Richard "',,"ard. Zoning Administrative Officer JEANETTE PERKINS :area in question is zoned R4 District. Section 11.00 Dimensional Requirements. Front anJ Rear yard 30 feet. Side yard 15 feet. Lot in existence prior to effedtive date of regulations - Section 1.1.40. In June 1974 a single family dwelling unit (converted cottage) was demolished by fire. Structure contained 493 square feet and had two enclosed porches containing 255 square feet. F.equest is to construct a 22' x 46' dwelling unit to wit'lin 29 feet of the front yard; F feet of the rear yard; 5 feet of the northerly side yard and 2 feet of the southerly side yard. V-