The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0376 Patchen Road (2)SOUTI( JP,LINGTON 'ZONING BOA►:U OF ( JUSTM� LINT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j- (2) That because of such physical *circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1A lJ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; U��------�� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1 9 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ET Da t e f Appellant Vote: Yes No Q List findings below: Appeal # / 1 Sign SOUT1 JUPLINGTON •ZONING BOAi:U OF( JJUS'11i:�'NT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; D (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # / Date�� C� Appellant T Vote: Yes N � o El Sign T.iCt flnrlinrr- },�ln.r. 1. 2. 3 SOUT( SUP LINGTON ZONING BOAP I) OF( JJ U6,rM`_,NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; a (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; EY (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.1 character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently Impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and rv- (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. — Appeal # Da t e Appellant 4 Vote: Yes No List findings beloF: 1. 2 3 SOUT1 SUP LINGTON ZONING UOAi:ll OA jJ USTM" ,NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; [A (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; _ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and-j (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to E Appellant Vote: Yes List fin ings beloi -. OA AT o Q ' v 2. 3:- Appeal Sign SOUT� ,UP, LINGTON ZONING BOAP D OF( J USl'u�-NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 12 (2) That because of such physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 2 Lv (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; FLI (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and D' (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date � - 1- Appellant-6 Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 2 • /!:' r r:. ✓ , r (/r^1 �` /a . ! �i S%-%ram li .111 ') SOUI 13UP LINGTON "ZONING BOAP D J JJ US M' INT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently Impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and El (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Da t e �'6 Appellant C" 2 ,Q ol n t2 77( Vote: yes No Si g n Y " Q List findings below: Nn �-- — 2.0/�, �-7 ff-x�Y✓�1li;2z'� �S �-��n,