Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCU-97-0000 - Supplemental - 0100 Old Farm RoadState of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Eric D. Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Kennaugh: Subject: Proposed Driving Range, Burlington, Vermont. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES 111 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Phone #(802) 879-6563 January 4, 1996 Kimball Avenue, South I reviewed your letter to me dated November 20, 1995 regarding the above subject. driving range. I also discussed the proposal with Mr. P. Howard Flanders, P.E., Chief of Engineering Services. Presently, the use of portable toilets are not specifically allowed under the Vermont Environmental Protection Rules or Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Permit. We are operating under a guidance policy which allows the use of non -conventional toilet facilities for buildings requiring a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit but occupancy and use do not need conventional toilets or water for cleanup (such as grey water which need to discharge to a wastewater treatment system). The toilets allowed under the guidance policy includes composting toilets, vault privies, and incineration toilets. Holding tanks and portable toilets are not allowed at this time. Your driving range would qualify for the alternative toilet. Mr. Flanders advised me that he is re-evaluating the appropriateness of the portable toilets for operations like yours but at this time we are only considering them on a case by case basis. He suggested that you could apply for a permit under the present toilet guidance policy and amend the permit if the portable toilets are allowed in the future. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer c P.-Howard Flanders Carolyn Root City of South Burlington 1 arr City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 3, 1997 Eric Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Kennaugh: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 In response to your letter dated 9/2/97, 1 am not aware of the City ever officially allotting a certain number of trip ends on any roadway. Therefore, the answer to your question is no, Kimball Avenue does not have an allotted number of trip ends. The City does typically allot a certain number of trip ends for lots within an approved subdivision. This number is derived based on expected development and a full traffic impact analysis on nearby streets and intersections. However, since this lot has never been approved as part of a larger subdivision project, there is not an approved number of trips for the parcel. Typically, developments are required to perform a traffic impact analysis. This involves analyzing a development's potential impact on nearby intersections. There are a number of traffic engineers in the area that routinely perform such analyses. This might be the type of information the Zoning Board is looking for. If you need the names of traffic engineers, I can provide them for you. I hope this letter adequately answers your questions. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need additional information. Jel , eith, anner SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the _I district in ^wphich�+��w the proposed is to be located; �y l-' � Yam✓\C_�W�_GL�/, L�1 W�v-"`^�T7 w-\. Q�UITC-fLIJ lM-0-y�..�%Qn'� S�R.�M�'��.Ci (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: !!!_��_��•�� a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; c. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Hearing # Date —gk "- Applicant Vote: Yes No Signed List findings below: •jai � • �. �� �_ � .� �� � +� - _— _ �_�MA1 r IVAMEM24Md �� .��.�..••�. (o . e (:) AJ21O"P-a.- so �: Sort s ✓n � � � 40 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; C. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Date Applicant Vote: Signed Dies List findings below: 2. L� 6 y4w, t Hearing 0 "�v No 3 . MA no C'AV11-v C v > SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; c. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Date ( " Applicant Vote: Yes Signed List findinds below: 1. C�1Lr/_/1"AIAKA i 3. Hearing * Z r ? l /? 7 No SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; c. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Hearing # CC Date I.44 `Z - Applicant V Vote: n Signed List findings below: 0!:%1tA.. G�) A11 P 2. 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; c. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Hearing # 2 Date Applicant O` .J Vote: Yes '^u�..��, ,� 1 No Signed List findings below 1 I r I i �- - .tea... a a.. • .. / FRI Lwj I i I 1 � �r ot w.:L-ft' - SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; b. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; C. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Hearing Date C Applicant 12411//.5 L i- Vote: Signed 41 IF,,, YvVe. I */,,;. 7-,mi, --''Wl List -„--- I.. -- -- 1. 2. 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW Findings in accordance with Section 26.05 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations: (1) That the proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed is to be located; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect: a. The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities; i�. The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor the ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses; C. Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity; d. Bylaws in effect; or e. Utilization of renewable energy resources. Hearing # ; Z //- q -7) Datel2 Applicant �e•G2' Vote: Yes No Signed List findings below: ffm 2. 3. s�3 �"4 STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD & MARKETS OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ANIMAL & DAIRY INDUSTRIES - DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY, LABORATORIES & CONSUMER ASSURANCE PERMIT TO APPLY PESTICIDES TO A GOLF COURSE p,,,---„ant- to Title 6 I7 c A and the recall at ons pursuant thereto for approval to conduct pesticide application on'a golf course in Vermont. Applicant: Kimball Ave. Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility 100 Old Farm Rd South Burlington, VT Permit No. G97-9 1. This permit authorizes the use of the specified pesticides for the maintenance of turf at the Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility located in South Burlington, Vermont. This permit is valid for.5 years from the date of issue. 2. The following Pre-screened pesticides may be applied, according to label rates and restrictions at the Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility: Benomyl, Chloroneb, Chlorothalinil, Iprodione, Mancozeb, PCNB, Thiophanate-Methyl, Trichoderma harzianum, Vinclozalin, Benefin, Dithiopyr, Fenoxyprop-ethyl, Oryzalin, Pendimethalin, Trifluralin, Isoxaben, MCPA ester Chlorpyrifos, Fonofos,•Fluvalinate, Steinernema carpocapsae and Bt var. kurstaki. a. Should any pre-screened pesticide be deleted from the pre- screened list the permit holder will be notified, additional conditions may be required for continued use. b. Should any pesticides be added to the pre-screened list the permit holder may add these pesticides to their permit by written request to the. Commissioner of Agriculture. I 3. The following additional pesticides may be applied, according to label rates and restrictions at the Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility with the following' restrictions: Roundup (active ingredient alyphosate): No more than 1.92 pounds active ingredient to be used annually. SEAL OF QUALITY 116 STATE STREET oErr. of +caicuLTuxe DRAWER 20 MONTPELIER, VT 05620-2901 (802) 828-2500 FAX: (802) 828-2361 Trimec (active ingredients MCPP, 2,4-D and dicamba): No more than 8.45 pounds MCPP, 15.99 pounds 2,4-D and 1.56 pounds dicamba to be applied annually. Suter Trimec (active ingredients 2.4-D and-2,4-DP and dicamba): No more than 6.5 pounds 2,4-D, 6.5 pounds 24-DP and 1.69 pounds dicamba to be applied annually. Banvel (active ingredient dicamba): No more than 6.5 pounds of active ingredient to be applied annually. An amended permit will be required for the use of any additional pesticides not listed on this permit or for usage amounts of active ingredient exceeding amounts described in this permit 4. Buffer zones as described on page IV-69 of the Golf Course Management Plan for the Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility shall be established and observed.' 5. At least one'certified applicator shall ,be on site when any and all pesticide applications are conducted. 6. Records shall be kept and submitted to the Commissioner according to the Vermont Regulations for the Control of Pesticides Section IVil and IVi2; 7.- Members of the public shall be informed of all pesticide applications according to the Vermont Regulations for the Control of Pesticides Section IV, 8b. 8. All pesticide operations shall be in accordance with the approved pesticide management plan for the Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range and Practice Facility as'reviewed by the Vermont IPesticide Advisory Council unless and until the approved plan is amended according to regulation. This application has been reviewed and recommendations were made by the Vermont Pesticide Advisory Council on March 10, 1997. Y, EFFECTIVE DATE: 30 April 1997 PERMIT EXPIRES: 1 MAY 2002 Leon C. Graves Commissioner of Agriculture Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1 Subchapter 7 — Sewage Disposal ESTABLISHMENT GALLONS/PERSON/DAY (unless otherwise noted) Laundries, self-service (gallons per machine) .......... 500 Mobile Home Parks: For disposal systems serving 4 or fewer trailers (per space) .. ........ . ......... 450 For disposal systems serving 5 or more trailers - (per space) ........ . ............... 250 Motels with bath, toilet` (per person sleeping space) .... 50 Picnic Parks (toilet wastes only/picnicker) ......... 5 Restaurants (toilet and kitchen wastes/seat, including restaurant and bar seats . ....... _ ... . ...... 30 Additional per seat for restaurant serving 3 meals per day ........... ...... 45 Restaurants (fast food - see cafeterias ........... . . . Schools: Boarding ... .......... _ ..... .... 100 Day, without gyms, cafeterias, or showers .... 15 Day,. with gyms, cafeterias, and showers ....... . 25 Day, with cafeteria, but without gyms or showers .. 20 Service Stations (first set of gas pumps) ............... S00 (each set thereafter) .. _ .......... ... 300 Sewer Line Infiltration (where applicable) 300 gal/in pipe/dia/mile/day **Shopping Centers/Stores: Large Dry Goods ................ . .... 5 G_PD/100 ftz Large Supermarkets with meat department without garbage grinder .. . ............... 7.5 GPD/100 ftz Large Supermarket with meat department with - . garbage grinder ................. 11 GPD/100 ftz . Small Dry Good Stores (in shopping centers) .... 100 GPD/store Shbdivision per lot (or 150 per- bedroom, whichever is greater ................. . .......... A50 Theaters: Movie (per auditorium seat) ............... 5 Drive-in (per car space) .:.......... . 5 Travel Trailer Parks without individual water & sewer hookups Comfort Station (per trailer space) . _ ......... 90 Dumping Station (per trailer space) ........... 35 Travel Trailer Parks with individual water & sewer hookups - (per trailer space) ................... 125 Veterinary Clinic (3 or less doctors)_ without animal boarding ................. 750/clinic with animal boarding . _ ...... , , , , 1,500/clinic Workers: Construction (at semi -permanent camps) ........ 50 Day at schools and offices (per shift) .. ` Use eighty (80) percent of above design flows for projects to be connected to Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Note that this design flow reduction applies only to the wastewater flow and DOES NOT apply for a project's associated water supply system design flows. Elderly housing may be calculated at 1.5 le peop per bedroom ` Does not include laundry or restaurant waste. 1 73 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 3, 1997 Eric Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Kennaugh: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 In response to your letter dated 9/2/97, 1 am not aware of the City ever officially allotting a certain number of trip ends on any roadway. Therefore, the answer to your question is no, Kimball Avenue does not have an allotted number of trip ends. The City does typically allot a certain number of trip ends for lots within an approved subdivision. This number is derived based on expected development and a full traffic impact analysis on nearby streets and intersections. However, since this lot has never been approved as part of a larger subdivision project, there is not an approved number of trips for the parcel. Typically, developments are required to perform a traffic impact analysis. This involves analyzing a development's potential impact on nearby intersections. There are a number of traffic engineers in the area that routinely perform such analyses. This might be the type of information the Zoning Board is looking for. If you need the names of traffic engineers, I can provide them for you. hope this letter adequately answers your questions. Please do not hesitate to contact _I _JJ'1'�.��1 ... t.. �4�� me if you neea additional information. mation. %,JncWrerely, i eith, anner 09/02 97 11:46 '$8028283983 SOV TRANS PLANK 2001 Initiating Traffic Impact Studies Data collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers indicate that the need to conduct a traffic impact study is currently being addressed in a variety of ways by jurisdictions throughout the country. A cross sampling of this data shows the following situations or thresholds commonly trigger a requirement for a traffic impact analysis. 1. When development will generate a specified number of peak hour trips. 2. When development will generate a specified number of daily trips. 3. When development contains a specified number of dwelling j units or square footage. 4. At the judgement or discretion of staff. 5. When development will occur in a sensitive area. 6. When financial assessments are required and the extent of impact must be determined. There is little consistency in specific threshold quantities for the first three criteria. A general guideline used by the Agency of Transportation is that a traffic impact study should be considered if the proposed development will generate 75 or more peak hour trips. However, there are situations where we may set a higher or lower threshold depending on such factors as directional distribution, peak hour of the generator or existing traffic conditions. We will normally expect that the geographic scope -of the study include those intersections or highway segments receiving 75 or more project generated peak hour trips, as well as the immediate access points. Post-RO Fax Note 7671 k of °ate `!, t - l i Payes b To T From �v <•; n f t Co./Dept . Co. Phone 8 Phone k� Fax A i �1�)'"?\ f; ism i iJr:l Fax N 2 No Text Hours Average # of trips 4:00-5:00 45.53 4:15-5:15 47.53 4:30-5:30 59.5 4:45-5:45 62.9 5:00-6:00 59.2 Sep-08-97 11:03A MUSCO OF NEW ENGLAND 603 594-9116 P.01 Monday, September 08, 1997 Eric Kennaugh Kennaugh/O'Brien Golf Facility 100 Old Farm Road S. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Eric: Sean Martin Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. Tel: 603/594-9108 800/989-2414 toll free Fax: 603/594 9116 E-mail: sean.mattindrnuscocom 347 Nashua Mall. Suite 298 Nashua. NH 03063-3218 Web site: Nip twww. musco com Enclosed please find information pertaining to the lighting system proposed for your golf facility. I have provided a copy of the photometrics report, prepared by an independent laboratory, for the fixtures to be used at your facility. I have also provided a drawing that shows candela readings at various distances away from the light pole. The fixtures will be tilted 30 degrees so that maximum candlepower is within 60 degrees perpendicular to the ground, per South Burlington zoning requirements. Also, independent studies have determined that the average candela output of a low beam headlight is approximately 12,000 candela. Also, we have assumed that pole locations will be approximately 2,900 feet away from Interstate 89 northbound. The interstate runs approximately perpendicular to the aiming direction of the fixtures, Assuming the average candela output of a low beam automobile headlight is 12,000 candels, the same candela readings from your lighting system will be attained at a distance of 271 feet from the pole location, This is still more than a half mile away from Interstate 89. The photometric report shows that 12,900 candela is achieved at an angle of 17.5 degrees above the center of the beam of light, or "zero", which in this case is actually 60 degrees from the vertical. I ran some calculations to determine what the candela readings would be at 2,900 feet from the pole location. At 2,900 feet from the pole location, the vertical angle of the light beam that is visible is 88.8 degrees from vertical, or 28.8 degrees from the "zero", or the beam center. In summary, the light from your facility that will be visible from the interstate will appear to be approximately 25% of the candela output of a car's low beam headlight. Eric, I hope this information is helpful to you. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. A complete scan from our engineering department depicting this information more precisely will be forthcoming. Thank you once again_ Sincerely, ,�s1...� s • �. v Sean Martin New England Manager Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. Post -It'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 +rot pogea ► c� TO fs'7ZlC ILCUN✓>U i FromSE7�� Co. Co. Dept. Phone Fax b Fax N •T�T.TM • lam' - • Sep-08-97 11:04A MUSCO OF NEW ENGLAND 603 594-9116 P.02 Reproduction or distnbution of the following phowneirc HEMA type 4 documents without the written permission of Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. is prohibited Sportscluster©-Z/L.evelwSTM *)40 lArtl optional spill 6 glare control boulder ,.t 114GMV [EMt(U W t g I%OVs+ra. FAX (303) 449-5274 INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. • 3386 LONGHORN ROAD. BOULDER, COLORADO W302 • PHONE (303) 442-1255 REPORT NUMBER: ITL35567 DATE: 5-02-1989 PREPARED FOR: MUSCO LIGHTTNG, TNC. CATALOG NUMBER: ENHANCED LEVEL-8 TYPE 4 LUMINAIRE: SPUN SEMI-SPECULAR REFLECTOR WITH 120 DEGREE, SIX SECTION SPECULAR INSERT, SEMI-SPECULAR BACK INSERT, BLACK ARC CAP, CLEAR FLAT GLASS ENCLOSURE WITH THREE TIERED SEMI-SPECULAR EXTERIOR SHIELD. LAMP: CLEAR 1500-WATT METAL HALIDE "Z", RATED 155000 LUMENS. FLOODLIGHT BEAM CHARACTERISTICS IES TYPE BEAM LUMENS BEAM EFFICIENCY AVG. MAXIMUM CANDLEPOWER MAXIMUM CANDLEPOWER HORIZONTAL BEAM SPREAD VERTICAL BEAM SPREAD TOTAL LUMENS TOTAL EFFICIENCY AXIAL CANDLEPOWER Checked ......��%`` Approved ...... . 4H X 4V 86853. 56.0% 291460. 357100. AT 0.0 H, -2.4 V 60.8 DEG 54.2 DEG 112301. 72.5% DEG HORIZ_ DEG VERT. 47.5 3200. 47.5 400. 42.5 12300. 42. 600. 37.5 17500. 37.5 800. 32.5 28200. 32.5 1600. 27.5 45900. 27. 22.5 67900. 22.5 6100. 17.5 98900. 12900. 12.5 162100. 12.5 42200. 7.5 262800. 7.5 146900. 2.5 331900. 2.5 292400. 0.0 343000. , 3430 -2.5 331900. -2.5 3 5100. -7.5 262800. -7.5 301000. -12.5 162100. -12.5 228900. -17.5 98900. -17.5 172300. -22.5 67900. -22.5 129500. -27.5 45900. -27.5 90200. -32.5 28200. -32.5 62500. -37.5 17500. -37.5 42600. -42.5 12300. -42.5 31300. -47.5 3200. -47.5 24200. ALL CANDELA AND LUMEN VALUES IN THIS REPORT ARE BASED ON RELATIVE PHOTOMETRY WHICH ASSUMES A BALLAST FACTOR= 1.000. ANY CALCULATIONS PREPARED FROM THESE DATA SHOULD INCLUDE AN APPROPRIATE BALLAST FACTOR. Sep-03-97 11:04A MUSCO OF NEW ENGLAND 603 594-9116 P_03 I r N Sep-OS-97 11:04A MUSCO OF NEW ENGLAND 603 S94-9116 P-04 Go 90 C) 4&e = cpp OFP = 164 1 OPIP off 72c) o 0 = 60 City of South Burlington Application to Board of Adjustment Official Use APPLICATION # Date 9 Applicant Er►L Owner ,�'leasee agent Address 10(aw4 F�,M Telephone # 50 - SkxL: NG i?m Landowner N"t" . Lem Locati�o/fn and description of�proo��p�erty PA HEARING DATE FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT c.5C' Address 150 Ze>y U LJ f l Ae-K 0A,r6) Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer(`-'4 )request for a conditional use ( ",k) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). month (second and fourth Mondays). That a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to hearing fee which is to off -set the cost required by State Law (Section Also that hearings are held twice a a legal advertisement must appeal the hearing. I agree to pay a of the h aring. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal R�c�(TpF„6 i P)(' n%.;TJbs RCS2lkJ ;(e nyiC�� i �• C .S'� The owner or applicant sh`buld submit along with this application (8 copies) plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which will serve as support evidence to the Board. `j c Hearing Date bignature of Appe Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices,, Conference 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week 117, hold Room, at to consider the following: Month and Date Time Appeal of �e :. r.r.4"00 .�, r -.� . ���—� t" "=.. f s e e k i ng ..► .�S�-O?O 4 }51W,�.�; .. � �. from Section of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission eoc to �� i _ "�r �„p;/-t .i► r s�p��;.�.,.... rd G,�-a'•�' /� tfrlwi„!„L,/+ �+'" �1/Jyf�t$.-�'_B'� i..t ;' f' ors-�-e�7�sy-� � � �'�— �" �c'�,.► � ,� y�,�`,' ,ea�.�c.� � «..�c.�. Eric D. Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) //8650-2734 l (p.� O - 500 September 2, 1997 Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: I have recently gone before the So. Burlington Zoning Board in regards to a proposed golf practice facility on Kimball Avenue. I have been asked to provide further data in regards to the roads maximum # of alloted "trips" or "trip ends" and how this allocated number will be impacted by the proposed business. My question is, does Kimball Avenue have an alloted number of trip or trip ends and, if so, what is that number? Any help in regards to this would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Eric D. Kennaugh M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative OfficerA_ Re: Appeal of #2 - August 11, 1997 Date: July 31, 1997 This appeal is warned for a variance from the performance standards, subsection 9 "Direct Glare." This section defines direct glare as illumination beyond property line. If after hearing testimony from the applicant, it is determined that direct glare is a issue then a variance for the height of poles is required. The opinion from Stitzel's office addresses foot candles. If the output excess an average of three (3) foot candles than height of poles shall not be place more than twenty (20) feet above ground level. The study submitted by Musco Lighting, Inc. indicates higher foot candles (maximum 22) within the tee -box area with an average minimum of 2.5 foot candles. The golf practice range will operate from a 15 acre parcel, however, the O'Brien's own a 78 acre parcel at the corner of Old Farm Road and Kimball Avenue. Lighting issues have not been a problem in the past, however, we are seeing major changes. Good luck, I will be on vacation and Ray Belair will cover this meeting. TRAFFIC DATA FOR PROPOSED SOUTH BURLINGTON GOLF CENTER Recorded traffic trip counts for peak hours of 4:00-6:00, on July 7,9, & 11, 1997 A similar Chittenden County golf range was used to derive these figures. 4:00-4:15 4:15-4:30 4:30-4:45 4:45-5:00 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 Mon 7/7 1 10 I 8 1 16 I 13 1 10 I 19 1 16 1 12 Wed 7/9 4 Fri 7/11 11 6 10 14 12 17 13 16 8 21 14 24 18 12 11 City of South Burlington WATER DEPARTMENT 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. 864-436 1 August 27, 1997 Mr. Eric Kennough 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT. 05403 Re: Act 250 Review; Kimball Avenue Golf Driving Range, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Mr. Kennough: In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the referenced proposed commercial property we submit the following: 1. The estimated demand of 30,000 gallons per day can be met by the existing water distribution system without encumbering the existing users. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SOUTH U N TON WATER DEPARTMENT A Brent J. Desranleau Superintendent CC: J. Weith C. Hafter P. Jacob J. Fay D. Pratt CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT Dedicated to Quality Water & Service 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-7454 August 12, 1997 Fax: (802) 864-0435 Mr. Eric Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Act 250 Review: Kimball Ave. Golf Driving Range, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Kennaugh: In response to your request for information regarding the Champlain Water District's capability to supply water to the referenced proposed project, we submit the following: 1. Water is supplied to the referenced area via a 24" transmission main. 2. Adequate water storage is located south of Dorset Street and Swift Street intersection, as provided by a 1,500,000 gallon water storage tank. 3. Your estimated demand of 30,000 gallons per day, for this proposed project could be furnished by the Champlain Water District without restricting or encumbering its present users on the CWD supply system. 4. Capability of the local water distribution system must be verified by the local water system official. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT r4d A 0,�, Richard A. Pratt Chief Engineer / Assistant General Manager cc: J. Fay B. Desranleau P. Jacob C. Hafter SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117. Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Mu- nicipal Offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington. Vermont on Monday, August 11, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Edward G. Hoehn seeking approval from Section 6.20 condi- tional uses, sub -section 6.201 Outdoor recre- tional facility of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. -Request is for permission to construct four (4) youth tennis courts, two (2) adult courts, a junior soccer field, a golf practice range and a 24'x48' swimming pool for the purpose of operating a Youth & Tennis Camp in conjunction with a single family residential use on a parcel containing ten (10) acres, located at 1700 Dorset Street. #2 Appeal of Daniel and Leo O'Brien, co -appli- cant Eric Kennaugh seeking approval from Section 15.20 Condi- tional uses sub -section 15.208 Outdoor recrea- tional facility of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Request is for'. permission to construct a golf practice range to in- clude a 25'x100' covered tee -box. Also requiring a' variance from the per- formance standards re- questing permission to install four (4) luminaries', at a height of sixty (60) feet on a parcel contain- ing fifteen acres located on Kimball Avenue', southerly of I.N.S. build- ing. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Plan- ning and Zoning Office, located at City Hall. 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer July 26, 1997 r City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 28, 1997 Mr. Eric Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Conditional Use Application Dear Mr. Kennaugh: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, August 8, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a conditional use. Please plan to attend this meeting and be prepared to address the enclosed review criteria. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. RW/mcp 1 Encl Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer r _ — s A400 4-11* Y, 46— �Aom 41.211C." Eric D. Kennaugh 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 865-2734 August 6, 1997 Mr. Dick Ward Zoning Administrator City of" South ;;urlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Ward: I would like to request a rescheduling of my August 1 lth Zoning Board hearing to the next available opening. A cancellation by a lighting design consultant necessitates this proposed change. Please let me know if I can answer any further questions and I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Sincerely, Eric Kennauah MUSCO LIGHTING, INC. Preliminary Information Package Prepared For: Private Golf Practice Facility I Driving Range Lighting Project South Burlington, Vermont Submitted By: MUSCO LIGHTING, INC. 2107 Stewart Road Post Office Box 14 Muscatine, Iowa 52761 800-756-1205 (C) COPYRIGHT MUSCO LIGHTING, INC. 1988, 1993 This information is provided by Musco as a planning tool for the exclusive use of Private Golf Practice Facility. The enclosed documents and information cannot be reproduced or distributed without the explicit written permission of Musco Lighting, Inc. 2107 Stewart Road / P.O. Box 14 / Muscatine, IA 52761 / 319/263-2281 / 800/756-1205 / Fax: 800/374-6402 / web site: http://www.musco.com Memo Date: June 25, 1997 To: Eric Kennaugh Private Golf Practice Facility 100 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 From: Sean Martin Musco of New England Lighting criteria presented in this prototype proposal are computer -generated from projects similar to yours, based on the following assumption: 1. Size of your fields - 340' x 710' 2. Level of play - Recreational 3. Light levels 15 footcandl.es maintained horizontal at the tee 4. 2000 PSF soil (the nationwide average) This package is provided to assist you during preliminary planning and to introduce the capabilities of Musco's products and services. Final criteria for the project will be formulated on a detailed analysis of your facility. As the project develops and exact standards are defined, I will be able to provide you with a project -specific design, which may differ in several aspects from this prototype. Once customized specifications have been developed, Pat will ensure that equipment is manufactured in accordance with project criteria and that delivery is timely. Throughout the project, we will be available to answer questions and to work with you in developing a final result that meets your requirements and budget. c: Pat Guertin, Sales Coordinator Lighting ... We Make It Happen. - Official Sports -Lighting System of Little League Baseball® LIGHT -STRUCTURE SYSTEM The following criteria are to be met by the product proposed to be provided for lighting Practice Golf Practice Facility for South Burlington, Vermont. 1. STRUCTURAL STEEL a. PRESSURES applied against all structural components shall be determined based upon 80 m.p.h. winds as defined by BOCA-C criteria. b. STRENGTH of the materials used in the structures shall be calculated based upon AASHTO Pole Structure Criteria. C. FOUNDATION design criteria are to be based upon BROMS Standards using a safety factor of 3. (Alternate UBC.) d. FINISH SHALL BE GALVANIZED by hot -dipping processing to ASTM A- 123 standards shall be used for pole, crossarms, braces, boxes, hubs, or any extensions attached to the pole. 2. CONCRETE BASE a. BASE is to be formed with concrete that obtains 9500 PSI strength and contains pre -stressed steel cable that is stressed to 28,910 lbs. (which shall be 70% of the ultimate yield strength of the cable). b. BACKFILL around the embedded base shall be achieved with concrete to assure the foundation design criteria. 3. ALUMINUM COMPONENTS ALUMINUM materials are to be anodized. Non -reflector grade aluminum materials must receive a polyurethane coating of paint in addition to anodizing to protect impurities in the aluminum that may not otherwise be protected by the anodizing process. 4. STAINLESS STEEL DEVICES STAINLESS STEEL materials shall be used for all fasteners, latches, hinges, and threaded devices. All stainless steel shall be coated with clear thermoset polymer coated. 5. ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS BRANCH CIRCUITS for each lighting structure shall be provided that include the following: a. DISCONNECT - Thermal -magnetic breaker type. b. LANDING LUGS for the feeder circuit as part of the disconnecting device. C. FUSE BLOCK for individual fusing for each load carrying conductor of each lamp circuit. (Neutral conductors are not fused.) d. PLUG IN OR LANDING PLUG CONNECTIONS - Manufacturer shall provide all branch circuits completed from the disconnecting device to the lamp with either plug-in or landing lug connections provided for completion of circuits during the field installation. This is to assure that the electrical equipment on the pole is in conformance with U.L. standards. e. WIRE HARNESS shall be provided with: (1) UNIFORMLY WOUND conductors to avoid excessive stress on any individual conductors. (2) MYLAR WRAPPED wire harness to prevent unraveling of the conductors. (3) WIRE SUPPORT GRIPS attached and TIED for mounting the wires inside the pole. (4) ABRASION BUMPERS attached to the wire harness to protect the harness from striking and being abraded by the interior surface of the pole. (5) PLUG-IN CONNECTIONS for each end of the wire harness to connect it to the electrical component enclosure near the base of the pole and to the lamps at the top of the pole to assure proper matching of circuits. f. ASSEMBLY and wiring of the fixtures to a plug-in connection is to be completed by the manufacturer who is to provide a warranty of the entire assembly. Manufacturer shall provide a schematic of the wiring on the inside of the door of the electrical component enclosure. g. GROUNDING of the electrical system and the equipment shall be provided throughout the pole structure for connection to ground rods and feeder circuit ground wires. h. MOUNTING of the NEMA 3R enclosure containing all electrical components, except the lamps, shall be near the base of the pole with the bottom of the enclosure 10 feet above the ground to allow for step ladder maintenance access. i. U.L. (UNDERWRITER LABORATORIES) LISTING REPORT shall be provided for the entire Light -Structure and its included electrical system in addition to the use of U.L. listed components within the system. 6. PHOTOMETRIC UNIT a. STRUCTURES for the luminaire assembly on each pole are to be completely assembled in the factory and aimed to form one single photometric unit with the alignment and performance to be guaranteed by the manufacturer. b. RECAPTURE OF THE AIMING after movement of the fixture during installation or relamping shall be achieved by a positive latching device. In addition there shall be stainless steel bolt and nut to secure the alignment. 7. LIGHT CONTROL a. ENERGY EFFICIENT LUMINAIRES which control light energy and resulting electrical energy use must be such that the reflector system design places more than 60% of the total light output in the lower portion of the projected light below the maximum candlepower point and thereby onto the field to be illuminated. b. SPILL light onto adjoining areas and into sky glow must also be restricted and shall meet the same criteria that more than 60% of the total light is in the lower portion of the projected light below the maximum candlepower. C. GLARE light as viewed from off -site locations shall also be controlled with a reflector system that projects more than 60% of the total light into the lower portion of the projected light below the maximum candlepower. 8. LIGHT LEVELS GUARANTEED footcandles of light as measured by a light meter on a horizontal plane shall be provided as follows: a. INITIAL light levels for entire playing area are to average: FIELD INITIAL LIGHT LEVELS Tee Area 18.75 footcandles horizontal 300' Down Range .61 footcandles vertical 600' Down Range .18 footcandles vertical These initial light levels are designed to provide MAINTAINED footcandles of 80 % of the initial and would produce an average of: FIELD MAINTAINED LIGHT LEVELS Tee Area 15 footcandles horizontal 300' Down Range .49 footcandles vertical 600' Down Range .14 footcandles vertical 9. WARRANTY 7-YEAR PERIOD of warranty shall be provided for the entire equipment package against failure due to manufacturing defect or fatigue. During the first 2 years of this time period the manufacturer will be responsible for the cost of materials and labor for any repairs which may be necessary. During the following 5 years the manufacturer will provide or pay for material necessary for any repairs. (The warranty does not apply to the consumable lamp and fuse, which are warranted to perform according to design criteria.) 10. PATENT RIGHTS AND INFRINGEMENT There are various established performance criteria throughout this request for products and services. There may exist patent coverage for some means and methods of achieving those performance criteria. Bidders are responsible for ascertaining that means and methods of the products and services which they are providing are not being provided in violation of any such patent rights. Bidders responsibilities are as follows: To hold harmless, the owner, as to any violation to include dollar amounts that could be owing as a result of damages for infringement including potential treble damages as provided for under U.S. Patent Law. b. Any and all costs that the owner would incur in replacing materials and services which are determined to infringe patent rights. All administrative, legal and other costs that would be incurred as a result of an infringement. If any product or services proposed to be provided by the bidder are known by the bidder to be subject to any existing claims of infringement, bidder shall notify owner of such claim and provide evidence of financial ability to perform on the above hold harmless requirements. 11. DOCUMENTATION COMPLIANCE with the criteria set out in this specification shall be demonstrated by the following documentation to be provided at least 10 days prior to bid as a condition for approval to bid: Ia. INITIAL HORIZONTAL LIGHT LEVELS at the number and location of points shown on the drawings. Ib. MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL LIGHT LEVELS at the number and location of points shown on the drawings. IC. POLE CALCULATIONS certified by a licensed structural engineer. d. FOUNDATION DESIGN with soils assumptions. e. U.L. REPORT for the Light -Structure, including the equipment and electrical system for the pole, crossarms, and fixtures. f. WARRANTY by manufacturer. g. STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS for the luminaire assembly with licensed structural engineer's certificate to verify that the fixtures and support will withstand 125 m.p.h. wind with 1.3 gust factor without damage or misalignment. h. PHOTOMETRIC REPORT by Independent Testing Laboratories showing that 60% of light energy is projected below maximum candlepower point. i. BRANCH ELECTRICAL circuit and drawings. j. CORROSION PROTECTION certification by the manufacturer that all latches, fasteners, hinges, and threaded devices, excluding those being used for electrical connections, for the pole and luminaire assembly are of stainless steel construction; that all aluminum is anodized; and that all steel not required to be stainless steel is hot -dip galvanized to ASTM A-123 standards. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - INITIAL FOOTCANDLES 10.2 8.4 9.1 13.7 16.5 13.2 9.5 11.4 15.6 15.6 11.4 9.5 13.2 16.5 13.7 9.1 8.4 10.2 15.6 13.2 14.3 19.0 21.9 18.8 14.2 17.3 21.4 21.4 17.3 14.2 18.8 21.9 19.0 14.3 13.2 15.6 18.6 18.1 19.0 21.0 21.9 22.4 19.8 21.4 22.0 22.0 21.4 19.8 22.4 21.9 21.0 19.0 18.1 18.6 17.9 20.1 20.6 18.6 18.7 22.2 21.4 22.2 19.3 19.3 22.2 21.4 22.2 18.7 18.6 20.6 20.1 17.9 12.6 14.8 14.8 12.7 12.8 15.2 16.0 15.5 13.2 13.2 15.5 16.0 15.2 12.8 12.7 14.8 14.8 12.6 5.9 7.7 7.5 6.3 5.9 7.5 8.6 7.8 6.3 6.3 7.8 8.6 7.5 5.9 6.3 7.5 7.7 5.9 Ti I 150.0' T2 50.0' 50.0'T3 -r 150.0' 1 T4 Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 O musco© GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: 108 Average: 15.18 Maximum: 22.37 Minimum: 5.92 Avg/Min: 2.566 Max/Min: 3.780 Number of Luminaires: 8 ' KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 " Maintenance Factor: x 1.000 ""Light Loss Factor: 0.994 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 RT MUSCO SPOLIGI ITING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point Qx 0 40 80 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES 8.1 6.7 7.3 11.0 13.2 10.6 7.6 9.1 12.5 12.5 9.1 7.6 3.0.6 13.2 11.0 7.3 6.7 8.1 12.5 10.6 11.4 15.2 17.5 15.0 11.4 13.9 17.1 17.1 13.9 11.4 15.0 17.5 15.2 11.4 10.6 12.5 14.9 14.5 15.2 16.8 17.5 17.9 15.8 17.1 17.6 17.6 17.1 15.8 17.9 17.5 16.8 15.2 14.5 14.9 0 14.3 16.1 16.5 14.9 15.0 17.7 17.1 17.8 15.5 15.5 17.8 17.1 17.7 15.0 14.9 16.5 16.1 14.3 10.1 11.8 11.8 10.1 10.3 12.1 12.8 12.4 10.6 10.6 12.4 12.8 12.1 10.3 10.1 11.8 11.8 10.1 4.7 6.1 6.0 5.0 4.7 6.0 6.9 o � o Ti I 150.0, T2 I 50.0, Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point Q, 6.3 5.1 5.1 6.3 6.9 6.0 4.7 5.0 6.0 50.0' T3 6.1 4.7 0 150.0, T4 Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 C= muscoo GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: 108 Average: 12.15 Maximum: 17.90 Minimum: 4.73 Avg/Min: 2.566 Max/Min: 3.780 Number of Luminaires: 8 * KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 ** Maintenance Factor: x 800 ***Light Loss Factor: �795 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 ORT MUSCO SPLIG$TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 300- .5 .6 1 1 -170 -140 .6 .6 1 1 -110 -80 .7 .7 1 1 50 -20 .7 .7 1 10 1 40 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - INITIAL FOOTCANDLES .7 .6 1 1 70 100 Left/right labels are X coordinates; up/down labels are Z coordinates. Meter orientation: 0° is positive y-direction, 90° is positive x-direction, etc. .6 .5 1 1 130 160 .5 1 190 Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 0= musco® GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES on vertical plane at y= 15 meter faces 180' Target Points: 13 Average: .61 Maximum: .70 Minimum: 0.47 Avg/Min: 1.297 Max/Min: 1.484 Number of Luminaires: 8 KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 ** Maintenance Factor: x 1.000 **'Light Loss Factor: —T994 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (Cz 1981 1997 RT) MUSCO SPOLIG$TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 300- .4 .5 1 1 -170 -140 .5 .5 1 1 -110 -80 .5 .6 1 1 -50 -20 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 .6 .5 1 10 1 40 .5 .5 1 1 70 100 Left/right labels are X coordinates; up/down labels are Z coordinates. Meter orientation: 0" is positive y-direction, 90° is positive x-direction, etc. .5 .4 1 1 130 160 W 1 190 O musco® GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES on vertical plane at y= 15 meter faces 180° Target Points: 13 Average: .49 Maximum: .56 Minimum: 0.38 Avg/Min: 1.297 Max/Min: 1.484 Number of Luminaires: 8 KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 Maintenance Factor: x .800 `'Light Loss Factor: �.755 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 ORT MUSCO SPLIG$TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point Qx .D .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ,0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .1 .2 .2 .1 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 ,1 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .3 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .6 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .4 .5 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .8 .8 .7 .7 .6 .5 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 .9 .8 .7 .9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 .9 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.3 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.2 3.6 3.3 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.2 2.4 2.0 2.0 3.1 3.0 3.5 4.9 6.0 5.0 4.1 4.4 5.6 5.6 4.4 4.1 5.0 6.0 4.9 3.5 3.0 3.1 5.3 4.7 5.4 7.8 9.6 7.6 5.9 6.6 9.0 9.0 6.6 5.9 7.6 9.6 7.8 5.4 4.7 5.3 13.1 10.8 11.4 16.9 19.7 16.3 11.7 14.4 19.0 19.0 14.4 11.7 16.3 19.7 16.9 11.4 10.8 13.1 16.6 14.6 15.8 19.8 22.3 20.0 15.7 18.7 22.1 22.1 18.7 15.7 20.0 22.3 19.8 15.8 14.6 16.6 18.6 18.1 19.0 21.0 21.9 22.4 19.8 21.4 22.0 22.0 21.4 19.8 22.4 21.9 21.0 19.0 18.1 18.6 18.5 20.1 20.6 19.5 19.4 22.8 21.7 22.6 20.1'20.1 22.6 21.7 22.8 19.4 19.5 20.6 20.1 18.5 15.9 18.5 18.7 16.0 16.2 19.5 19.7 19.9 16.7 16.7 19.9 19.7 19.5 16.2 16.0 18.7 18.5 15.9 10.9 12.5 12.5 10.9 10.9 13.0 13.3 13.2 11.2 11.2 13.2 13.3 13.0I 10.9 10.9 12.5 12.5 110..9I 7.1 � 7.1 6.1 1.1 f1 `Y' 8.6 7.8 6.3 6.3 7.8 8.6 5.9 6.3 7.5 7.7 `N - -7 T `Y - Ti i �, T� 1 - A, i T. ^, T4 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - INITIAL FOOTCANDLES Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 C= musco® GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: 864 Average: 3.02 Maximum: 22.77 Minimum: 0.01 Avg/Min: 222.081 Max/Min: 1676.399 Number of Luminaires: 8 * KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 Maintenance Factor: x 1.000 'Light Loss Factor:4 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 RT MUSCO SPOLIG$TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point 2). .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 ,0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2- .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .3 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4 .3 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .6 .6 .5 .5 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .9 .8 .7 .6 .5 .7 .8 .9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 .9 .8 _7 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.9 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 2.5 2.4 2.8 4.0 4.8 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.4 4.4 3.5 3.3 4.0 4.8 4.0 2.8 2.4 2.5 4.2 3.7 4.3 6.3 7.7 6.1 4.7 5.3 7.2 7.2 5.3 4.7 6.1 7.7 6.3 4.3 3.7 4.2 10.5 8.6 9.2 13.5 15.7 13.0 9.4 11.5 15.2 15.2 11.5 9.4 13.0 15.7 13.5 9.2 8.6 10.5 13.3 11.7 12.6 15.9 17.9 16.0 12.6 15.0 17.7 17.7 15.0 12.6 16.0 17.9 15.9 12.6 11.7 13.3 14.9 14.5 15.2 16.8 17.5 17.9 15.8 17.1 17.6 17.6 17.1 15.8 17.9 17.5 16.8 15.2 14.5 14.9 14.8 16.1 16.5 15.6 15.5 18.2 17.3 18.1 16. 1(6.1 18.1 17.3 18.2 15.5 15.6 16.5 16.1 14.8 12.7 14.8 15.0 12.8 13.0 15.6 15.7 15.9 13.3 13.3 15.9 15.7 15.6 13.0 12.8 15.0 14.8 12.7 10.0 10.0 8.7 8.7 10.4 10.6 10.6 9.0 9.0 10.6 10.6 110g0.�.4I 8.7 8.7 10.0 10.0 II8.7 A D 6.1 6.0 5.0 4 7 6 9 6.1 5.1 5 1 6.3 6.9 `-6' ❑ 4.7 gq8.�.7I 5.0 6.0 6.1 Tt 1 11 , T9 T 1,,,,, - �' I T.11 11-1 1 Ti SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 C= muscoa GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: 864 Average: 2.41 Maximum: 18.21 Minimum: 0.01 Avg/Min: 222.081 Max/Min: 1676.398 Number of Luminaires: 8 KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 Maintenance Factor: x .800 'Light Loss Factor: �755 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing "Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 ORT MUSCO SPLIGf4TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 80 160 600- .2 .2 1 1 -170 -140 .2 .2 1 1 -110 -80 .2 .2 1 1 -50 -20 .2 .2 1 10 1 40 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - INITIAL FOOTCANDLES .2 .2 1 1 70 100 Left/right labels are X coordinates; up/down labels are Z coordinates. Meter orientation: 0' is positive y-direction, 90° is positive x-direction, etc. .2 .2 1 1 130 160 .2 1 190 Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 C= muscoo GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES on vertical plane at y= 15 meter faces 180° Target Points: 13 Average: .17 Maximum: .18 Minimum: 0.16 Avg/Min: 1.082 Max/Min: 1.128 Number of Luminaires: 8 KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 " Maintenance Factor: x 1.000 "'Light Loss Factor:J�4 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (CZ 1981 1997 MUSCO SPORT LIG$TING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 600- -170 -140 .1 .1 -110 -80 .1 .1 -50 -20 .1 .1 10 40 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE COMPUTER LIGHT SCAN - MAINTAINED FOOTCANDLES .1 .1 70 100 Left/right labels are X coordinates; up/down labels are Z coordinates. Meter orientation: 0° is positive y-direction, 90° is positive x-direction, etc. .1 .1 130 160 .1 1 190 Fixture Type: SC-2 MZ Lamp Type: 1500 watt Metal Halide MZ Lumens: 155000 File Number: 22273R Date: 18-Jun-97 C= musco® GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE VERTICAL FOOTCANDLES on vertical plane at y= 15 meter faces 180° Target Points: 13 Average: .14 Maximum: .14 Minimum: 0.13 Avg/Min: 1.082 Max/Min: 1.128 Number of Luminaires: 8 KW Consumption: 12.80 Average Tilt Factor: 0.994 Maintenance Factor: x .800 ***Light Loss Factor: ­10.795 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C� 1981 1997 ORT MUSCO SPLIGI'ITING INC. - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 EQUIPMENT LISTING Pole count Pole location Mounting height Pole size Elev. Fixt. /unit Kilow /unit 4 Ti 70' 70' 0' 2 3.2 W_ Ti 150.0' Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point Qx SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT DRIVING RANGE T2 50.0' 50.0' T3 150.0' 1 T4 C= uscoo GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing **Maintenance factor = ambient temp. factor X voltage factor X ballast factor X lamp lumen depreciation X luminaire dirt depreciation(per IES Manual RP-6-88,p.92) ***Light Loss Factor(LLF) = average tilt factor X maintenance factor NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume +-3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3' of design locations COPYRIGHT (C) 1981 1997 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING INC. - Not to be reproduced In whole or part without the writ- ten consent of Musco Sports Lighting Inc. * = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 Removable Pole Cap Pole Top Ass( Steel Pole Se, 1, 2, 3 or 4 Piece - Wire Harness Inside Pole One Hamess For Each Electrical Ench Electrical End Ballasts Capacitors Fusing -Primary Landing Li • One Circuit Breake Per Light Structure Concrete Base Centrifigually Spun, Prestressed FRONT VIEW FIELD SIDE Wire Harness Inside Pole Electrical Enclosure Attachment Bracket Wire Access Hub 4" X 6-1/7' Handhole Location w/ Grounding Lug racket (typical) Lifting Bar Hole ' ' Above Ground Access Hole (approx.) I DI I i Ground level 01//_6nderground Access Hole Backfill SIDE VIEW Not to scale 'Note: Note: m 1993 Musco sports Lighting. Inc. Included with each project are the following: This dimension for reference only. Variances will occur depending on the following: (1) Installation lifting bar (1) Steel pole tolerances (1) Offset installation level (2) Concrete tolerances (3) Installation wedges (3) Galvanizing thicknesses Based upon these, a variance may be seen. Additional variances will occur depending on the hole depth accuracy. Light -Structure System' 2 Fixture Luminaire Assembly Engineered as a system ... complete from foundation to poletop 5 Easy Pieces • Poletop luminaire assembly • Wire harness (inside pole) • Steel pole sections • Electrical enclosure • Concrete base O 1993 Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. Light -Structure System is protected by one or more of the following U.S. patents: 4725934,4190881, D254694,4374407,D257891,4729077.4450507.4816974, 4947303. 4994718, 5016150, 5075828, 5134;,57, 5161883. Canada: 1114798,'Rd" 1992 Musco #70479. Other patents pending. Not to scale 5 Concrete base • Structural Strength Luminaire assembly will withstand forces 125 MPH wind with 1.3 gust factor withou damage or misalignment to assembly • UL Listing No. E33316, E132445 • Canadian Standards Association No. 81102 C= mus �a o � D a � We Make It Happen: Corporate Office: Musco Lighting, Inc. 100 1 st Ave. West / P.O. Box 808 Oskaloosa, Iowa 52577 Phone 515/673-0411 / 1-800/825-6030 / FAX 515/67 Manufacturing: 2107 Stewart Road / P.O. Box 14 Muscatine, Iowa 52761 Phone 319/263-2281 / 1-800/756-1205 FAX 1-800/374-6402 © 1992, revised 1997, Musco Lighting, Inc. BLSF2 Light -Structure SystemTM is protected by one or more of the following U.S. patents: 4190881; 4374407; 4450507; 4725934; 4729077; 4816974; 4947303; 4994718; 5016150; 5075828;5134557;5161883;5211473;5229681;5337221;5343374;5377611;5398478; 5402327; D337168; D353797; D353911. Canada Patents: 70479; 74939; 1114798; 1181380. Mexico Patent: 175863. Other patents pending. 31 Cost j • Fewer fixtures to buy j and maintain • Eliminates costly foundations "" • Simplifies installation, eliminates guesswork and callbacks I t' I i_ �. II li i I, All .,.... -%A A : c• :fill Niring item ice UGHTmraOTRUCTURE 5Y5TEMTM Complete from foundation to poletop 5 easy pieces 1 Poletop luminaire assembly 2Wire harness 3Steel pole 4Electrical c 5 important PnnP Energy efficiency • 25% more light per fixture • Fewer fixtures —less energy Z Durability • Comprehensive corrosion package Hot -dip galvanized Stainless steel • Designed and manufactured as system • Quality assurance tests • 7-year foundation -up warranty 3 Environmental sensitivity • Redirects wasted spill light • Up to 95% reduction in spill and glare light 4 safety • Entire system UL Listed • CSA Approved • Individual fixture fusing • Grounding features 0000 MU___. 7-year Foundation -Up Warranty Warranty Light -Structure SysteM EQUIPMENT — Musco warrants the Light -Structure SystemTM (excluding fuses and lamps) to be free from defect in materials and workmanship for a period of seven years starting from the date of delivery. Two Years Labor — Musco agrees to provide labor and materials for a period of two years to replace defective parts or repair defects in workmanship or, at its election, to pay reasonable cost of labor for such repairs. For the remainder of the warranty period, replacement materials will be provided at no charge. Labor costs will be the owner's expense. LAMPS — Lamps are warranted not to fail for two years from the date of delivery. Lamps which fail during the first year of the warranty period will be replaced and installed at no cost to the owner. Lamps which fail during the second year of the warranty period will be replaced by the manufacturer, but installation will be the owner's responsibility. Lamps damaged by physical trauma or electrical surges are not covered by this warranty. ALIGNMENT — Musco warrants accurate alignment of the luminaires on the luminaire assembly for a period of seven years starting from the date of delivery. LIMITATIONS — The following are not covered by this warranty: • Fuses • Weather condition events such as lightning or hail damage • Improper installation, vandalism or abuse • Unauthorized repairs or alterations Repair and/or replacement are the complete warranty and constitute the exclusive remedy. WLssI 0 1993, revised 1995 Musco Sports Lighting. Inc. 0000 mu o® s s I REFERENCES - New England Maine Lowell Spinners Alumni Field Field of Dreams Lowell, Massachusetts Harrison, Maine Greenfield High School Lewiston High School Greenfield, Massachusetts Lewiston, Maine Gloucester Little League Gloucester, Massachusetts Scarborough High School Scarborough, Maine New Hampshire Massabesic High School Gill Stadium Massabesic, Maine Baseball Manchester, New Hampshire Maine Maritime Academy Castine, Maine Rivier College Soccer and Softball Walton Field Nashua, New Hampshire Auburn, Maine Alvirne High School Football and Tennis Massabesic High School Hudson, New Hampshire Waterborough, Maine Winnacunnet High School Football/Soccer Massachusetts Hampton, New Hampshire Boston College Manchester Football North and South Little League Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts Manchester, New Hampshire Foxboro Stadium NFL Football - New England Patriots Vermont Foxboro, Massachusetts Brattleboro Union High School Northeastern University Brattleboro, Vermont ; Boston, Massachusetts Rutland Park and Recreation Lake Park Rutland, Vermont Worcester, Massachusetts Middlebury Parks and Recreation Bentley College Middlebury, Vermont Waltham, Massachusetts ,