HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-14-42 - Decision - 0284 Meadowland Drive#SD-14-42
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
BLACKROCK CONSTRUCTION --- 284 MEADOWLAND DRIVE
PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-14-42
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Preliminary & Final Plat application #SD-14-42 of Adam Hergenrother for BlackRock Construction for a
planned unit development to construct two (2) general office buildings of 18,500 sq. ft. and 12,000 sq.
ft., 284 Meadowland Drive.
The Development Review Board held a public hearing on February 3, 2015, February 17, 2015 and
March 3, 2015. David Marshall represented the applicant.
Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Board finds,
concludes, and decides the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The project consists of Preliminary & Final Plat Application #SD-14-42 of Adam Hergenrother for
BlackRock Construction for a planned unit development to construct two (2) general office
buildings of 18,500 sq. ft. and 12,000 sq. ft., 284 Meadowland Drive.
2. The owner of record of the subject properties is SBRC Properties, LLC.
3. The subject property is located in the Industrial — Open Space District.
4. The application was received on December 22, 2014.
5. The plan set submitted consists of a twenty-four (24) page set of plans, page one (1) is entitled
"PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDINGS LOT 1-C MEADOWLAND BUSINESS PARK, VT. RTE. 116
MEADOWNLAND DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON VT, OVERALL SITE PLAN", prepared by Civil
Engineering Associates, dated Nov., 2014.
Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements:
10 Zoning District
Required
Existing
Proposed
Lot 1
Lot 1-C
Min. Lot Size
3 acres
39.5
3.47
acres
acres
Max. Building Coverage
30%
0%
10.4
Max. Overall Coverage
50%
5%
46.0
Max. Front Yard Coverage
30%
0%
5.0
(Meadowland Drive)
4 Max. Front Yard Coverage
30%
0%
6.3
(Randall Street)
� Min. Front Setback
50 ft.
n/a
>50 ft.
(Meadowland Drive)
SD_I4_42_284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstruction_two_blds_PrelimFinal ffd. doc
#SD-14-42
Min. Front Setback (New
50 ft.
n/a
>50 ft.
Street)
� Min. Side Setback
35 ft.
n/a
>35 ft.
Min. Rear Setback
50 ft.
n/a
>50 ft.
* Max. Building Height (flat roof)
35ft.
n/a
Building #1-40.5
ft / Building #2-
41.2 ft.
Zoning compliance
* Waivers for building height of 5.5 ft. for Building #1 and 6.2 ft for Building #2 are requested to
accommodate rooftop mechanical equipment and screening. See application for details.
The Board finds that the mechanical equipment will not be easily seen from the street.
The Board hereby approves waivers for building height of 5.5 ft. for Building #1 and 6.2 ft for Building #2 as
requested to accommodate rooftop mechanical equipment and screening.
Supplemental Standards for Industrial and Airport Districts
A. Site plan or PUD review required. Development according to industrial and airport district
regulations shall be subject to site plan or planned unit development review as specified above, the
purpose of which shall be to encourage innovation of design and layout, encourage more efficient use
of land for development, promote shared parking opportunities, provide coordinated access to and
from commercial developments via public roadways, and maintain service levels on public roadways
with a minimum of publicly financed roadway improvements.
See discussion under PUD standards starting on page 7. The Board finds this criterion to be met.
B. Multiple structures and uses permitted. Multiple structures, multiple uses within structures,
and multiple uses on a subject site may be allowed, if the Development Review Board determines that
the subject site has sufficient frontage, lot size, and lot depth. Area and frontage requirements may be
met by the consolidation of contiguous lots under separate ownership. Construction of a new public
street may serve as the minimum frontage requirements. Where multiple structures are proposed,
maximum lot coverage shall be the normal maximum for the applicable districts.
Two buildings are proposed for the lot and the site has sufficient frontage, lot size and lot depth. The
Board finds this criterion to be met.
C. Parking, Access, and Internal Circulation
(1) Parking requirements may be modified, depending in the extent of shared parking, the
presence of sidewalks or recreation paths, and residences lying within walking distance (defined
as no further than one -quarter (.) mile for purposes of these districts). Any requirements for
shared access and/or parking must be secured by permanent legal agreements acceptable to the
City Attorney.
The applicant is proposing more off-street parking spaces than required for both Phases of the project.
For Phase I the applicant is proposing 76 spaces while only 65 are required and after completion of
SD_14_42_284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstb•action_two_blds_PrelimFinal_ffd.doc 2
#SD-14-42
Phase II, the applicant is proposing an additional 39 spaces for a final total of 115 spaces while only 107
are required. In response to discussion at the February 17t" meeting concerning the construction of
more spaces than is required, the applicant revised its plans to add a bio-swale in one of the parking
islands to treat stormwater runoff.
The Board finds that this criterion is met.
(2) Parking shall be placed to the side or rear of the structures if possible.
Parking is located to the rear of the proposed structures. The Board finds this criterion to be met.
(3) Parking areas shall be designed for efficient internal circulation and the minimum number
of curb cuts onto the public roadway.
The parking lot accesses the proposed Randall Street by a single shared curb cut and access drive.
The Board finds this criterion to be met.
(4) Access improvements and curb cut consolidation may be required.
The proposed Lots 1- C and Lots 1-E will share a curb cut and access drive.
D. Buffer strip. Properties in the Airport, Mixed Industrial Commercial, Industrial Open Space and
Airport Industrial districts that abut residential districts shall provide a screen or buffer along the
abutting line, as per Section 3.06(I) (buffers).
The property does not abut a property in a residential district. This criterion is not applicable.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
14.06 General Review Standards
The following general criteria and standards shall be used by the Development Review Board in
reviewing applications for site plan approval. They are intended to provide a framework within which
the designer of the site development is free to exercise creativity, invention, and innovation while
improving the visual appearance of the City of South Burlington. The Development Review Board shall
not specify or favor any particular architectural style or design or assist in the design of any of the
buildings submitted for approval. The Development Review Board shall restrict itself to a reasonable,
professional review, and, except as otherwise provided in the following subsections, the applicant
shall retain full responsibility for design.
A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan.
The Board finds the applicant's proposal to be consistent with the goals, objectives and stated land use
policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas.
The Board finds the required transitions to be well -designed due to the use of sidewalks, paths and
plantings. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan that meets City requirements. Safe
SD_14 42_284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstruction two blds PrelimFinal ffd.doc
#SD-14-42
pedestrian movement is supported through the construction of several sidewalks as well as
recreation path segments. Based upon final construction of both buildings, the required number of
parking spaces is 107 and the applicant proposes to construct 115. The Board finds this criterion to
be met.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a
public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
The parking is located to the rear of the proposed buildings. The Board finds this criterion to be
met.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining
buildings.
There are similarly sized buildings in the area. The Board finds this criterion to be met.
(4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior
alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground.
The applicant has submitted plans detailing how they propose to meet this criterion. The
Department of Public Works has reviewed and accepted these plans. This criterion is met.
C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between
buildings of different architectural styles.
Elevations are only provided for building #1 at this time so this criterion is not applicable at this
time. The second building will need development review (site plan and/or PUD) prior to
construction and therefore adherence to this criterion will be addressed at that time.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
The project proposes ample landscaping. Building #1 is similar to others in the vicinity. The Board
finds this criterion to be met.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land maybe required on any lot for provision
of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb
cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
The Board finds that the reservation of land is not necessary as access to the adjacent lot is provided via
a shared driveway. The applicant has provided a copy of draft shared access agreement for the driveway
to be shared by the property owners of Lots 1-C and 1-E.
SD 14 42 284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstruction_two_blds_PrelimFinal_ ffd. doc 4
#SD-14-42
B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections
shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility
installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to
neighboring properties and to the site.
Noted above. This criterion is met.
C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened
with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles
intended for use by households or the public (i.e., non-dumpster, non -large drum) shall not be required
to be fenced or screened.
The applicant has provided detailed plans and elevations for a dumpster enclosure. The Board finds this
criterion to be met.
D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping,
Screening, and Street Trees.
The applicant has submitted a detailed landscaping plan and budget for Phase I and 11.
Based upon proposed construction costs of $2,500,000 for Building #1 the required minimum
landscaping value is $32,500.
Total Building Construction or
Building Improvement Cost
% of Total Construction/
Improvement Cost
Cost of proposed project (Building
#1 @ $2,500,000
$0 - $250,000
3%
$7,500
Next $250,000
2%
$5,000
Additional over $500,000
1%
$20,000
Minimum Landscaping $ >>
$32,500
The applicant is proposing to plant $42,875 worth of landscaping for Phase I. The Board finds this
criterion to be met for Phase I.
Based upon proposed construction costs of $2,000,000 for Building #2 and therefore a combined
construction cost for both buildings of $4,500,000, the required minimum landscaping value for the
entirety of the project is $52,500.
Total Building Construction or
Building Improvement Cost
% of Total Construction/
Improvement Cost
Cost of proposed project (Building
#1 & #2 @ $4,500,000
$0 - $250,000
3%
$7,500
Next $250,000
2%
$5,000
Additional over $500,000
190
$40,000
Minimum Landscaping $ >>
$52,500
The applicant is proposing to plant $9,975 worth of additional landscaping during Phase II construction
for a total combined value of $52,850. The Board finds this criterion to be met for Phase II.
SD 14 42 284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstruction two blds PrelimFinal_ffd.doc
#SD-14-42
E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in
complying with any of the standards above and waiver there from will not endanger the public health,
safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general
objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of
side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new
structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land
development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning
district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing
condition exceeds the applicable limit.
As noted above on page 1, the applicant sought waivers to the height restrictions for both buildings
which the Board granted.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with
the following standards and conditions:
(A)(1)Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the
project.
According to Section 15.13(B)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public
utility system shall be extended to provide the necessary quantity of water, at an acceptable pressure, to the
proposed dwelling units.
According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or
developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by
the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed.
Applicant shall obtain final water/ wastewater allocation approvals prior to submission of a zoning permit
application.
(A)(2)Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil
erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent
properties.
The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South
Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth
in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations.
Erosion control specifications and grading plans have been submitted with the application. The Board finds
this criterion to be met.
(A)(3)The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent
unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads.
SD_14_42_284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstruction_two_blds_PreliniFinalffd.doc 6
#SD-14-42
The project will construct a driveway / access road to access a new road to be constructed as part of a
concurrent subdivision application (#SD-14-41) of SBRC Properties. The driveway bifurcates the subject
lot (Lot 1-C) along its southern boundary shared with Lot 1-E. As noted in the January 14, 2015 revised
cover letter submitted by Civil Engineering Associates future development of Lot 1-E will share use of
this access road / driveway.
The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis for Lot 1-C prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson
dated November 24, 2014. The analysis indicates, in part, that
• after final construction of both buildings the project will generate 46 (forty-six) Weekday PM
Peak Hour Trip Ends with building #1 estimated to generate 28 Trip Ends and building #2 to
generate 18 Trip Ends;
• acceptable Levels of Service in 2020 will be maintained for the Hinesburg Road/Meadowland
Drive/Swift Street Extension intersection; and
• the project will not create adverse traffic congestion or unsafe conditions on adjacent roads or
intersections.
(A)(4)The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife
habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site.
Open space is maintained along the periphery of Lot 1-C especially along the northeast portion of the lot.
There are no wetlands, streams or wildlife habitat on the property or any unique natural features. The
Board finds this criterion to be met.
(A)(5)The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the
area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is
located.
Pursuant to 6.04 INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 10
A. Purpose. The Industrial -Open Space 10 District is established to provide suitable locations for high -
quality, large -lot office, light industrial and research uses in areas of the City with access to major arterial
routes and Burlington International Airport. The 10 District regulations and standards are intended to
allow high -quality planned developments that preserve the generally open character of the district,
minimize impacts on natural resources and water quality, and enhance the visual quality of approaches
to the City while providing suitable locations for employment and business growth. The location and
architectural design of buildings in a manner that preserves these qualities is strongly encouraged. Any
uses not expressly permitted are prohibited, except those which are allowed as conditional uses.
The proposed project will create two new office buildings in an area of the City that has existing and
locations for employment and business growth. Sufficient landscaping is proposed to enhance the overall
visual quality of this area. This project is consistent with the standards of the 10 District. The Board finds this
criterion to be met.
(A)(6)Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for
creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas.
The project will have a large portion of open space along its northern and eastern boundaries that will abut
existing open space on adjoining parcels. The Board finds this criterion to be met.
SD 14_42_284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstrzzction_two_blds_PrelimFinal_ffd.doc
#SD-14-42
(A)(7)The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that
adequate fire protection can be provided.
In a letter to staff dated February 6, 2015 the Fire Department commented as follows:
February 6, 2015
Mr. Ray Belair, Planning and Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Blackrock Construction, Meadowland Business Park
Dear Ray:
We have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the 2 story office/business project
in the Meadowland Business Park. We have the following recommendations:
1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Fire and Building Safety Codes and standards as
enforced by the South Burlington Fire Marshal's Office.
2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Fire and Building Safety Code.
3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD.
4. Fire Alarm panel and enunciator locations to be specified by SBFD.
5. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and
protection systems.
6. Provide an emergency key box(s), location to be specified by SBFD.
7. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the
deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting
equipment.
8. The parking area entrances and exits appear to be of a design that will be accessible to
fire and emergency apparatus. The developer should reaffirm that for turning radii,
all corners should meet the "WB 40 straight" standard.
9. The plan shows two fire hydrants. Appears to be 1 existing on Meadowland Drive and 1
new fire hydrant in front of the proposed structure. The new fire hydrant may need to be
moved slightly to be closer to the future building.
At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves
forward additional items may surface which can be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the
developer and South Burlington Fire Marshal's office. Should you need any further assistance on this
project please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Douglas S. Brent
Douglas S. Brent
SD_14_42_284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstrziction_two_blds_PrelimFinal_ffd.doc 8
#SD-14-42
Fire Chief
The Board finds that the applicant shall comply with the Fire Department's recommendations.
(A)(8)Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have
been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to
adjacent landowners.
Five (5) feet of a 20-foot wide recreation path easement occupies the north property line in the east -
west direction. The applicant has proposed a 10 ft. wide gravel recreation path along the northern edge
of Lot 1-C, a 5 ft. wide gravel recreation path along the western edge of Lot 1-C and Lot 1-E and a 5 ft.
sidewalk alongside the new proposed public roadway in lieu of providing a 10 ft. wide recreation path
along the proposed public roadway. The applicant also proposes a sidewalk to connect the buildings to
Randall Street.
With regards to stormwater the Department of Public Works provided the following comments on February
4, 2015 to Staff:
From: Justin Rabidoux
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:48 PM
To: ray
Subject: FW. Comments on Proposed Office Buildings Lot 1-C Meadowland Business Park
From: Tom Dipietro
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:47 PM
To: Justin Rabidoux
Subject: Comments on Proposed Office Buildings Lot 1-C Meadowland Business Park
Justin,
I reviewed plans for the Blackrock Construction LLC project titled "Proposed Office Buildings Lot 1-C
Meadowland Business Park" that were prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, dated November 2014
and last revised on 12112114. 1 would like to offer the following comments:
1. This project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater
impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
a. The project area appears to be covered under an existing State of Vermont stormwater permit (1-
1269). The applicant should confirm that the project complies with the requirements of this existing
permit.
b. The project will likely disturb greater than 1 acre of land and will therefore require a stormwater
construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit
before starting construction.
2. Update the site plan to show where runoff from rooftops will be discharged. Will this water flow
into the closed drainage system?
3. Consider an alternative pond outlet design. Placing the small low flow orifice inside the structure
SD_14_42 284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstruction two_blds PrelimFinal_ffd.doc
#SD-14-42
can create challenges during maintenance operations. The orifice and pipe cap can't be easily accessed
without entering the structure.
4. Will it be necessary to make improvements to the swale located downstream of the pond
emergency spillway? This area will also be receiving runoff from the west that is diverted around the site.
Has its capacity to convey this water to the culvert under Meadowland Drive been evaluated?
S. Sheet L1.O indicates that an existing Buckthorn hedgerow will be preserved. Buckthorn is an
invasive species. This area is also shown as proposed open space. Consider updating the site plan to
remove the Buckthorn and provide an alternative hedgerow planting.
6. A swale is proposed on the south side of the proposed access drive. Consider modifying the angle of
the drainage swale where it meets Randal Street so that water can more easily flow into the culvert
beneath the access drive. Alternatively, consider modifying the angle of the culvert to improve the flow
of water from the Swale to/through it.
7. It is recommended that silt fence be placed 10' from the toe of slope (see Vermont Low Risk site
handbook section 4). Will this be possible on this project? If so, please update the temporary stockpile
detail on sheet C3.2 to indicate this.
8. The DRB should consider including a condition that requires all stormwater treatment and
conveyance infrastructure be properly maintained.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
-Tom
Thomas J. DiPietro Jr.
Deputy Director
Department of Public Works
The applicant replied to the above comments and Tom DiPietro responded to staff in an email dated
February 24, 2015 that he was all set.
The Board finds that the applicant shall comply with the Public Works Department's recommendations.
(A)(9)Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent
with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards.
The Department of Public Works has reviewed and commented upon the plans. Assuming the applicant
complies with the Department's recommendations then this criterion will be met.
Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines
shall be underground. The plans submitted indicate that new utility lines will be underground.
(A)(1O)The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected
district(s).
SD_14_42_284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstruction_two olds PrelitnFinal ffd.doc 10
#SD-14-42
The applicant is proposing commercial development in a district planned for such activity. The Board finds
the project to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Board finds this criterion to be met.
OTHER - Lighting
Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more
than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average
of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect
glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an
average of 0.1 foot candles average.
The applicant has submitted a lighting plan for the property. Posts with heights of 20 ft. and 12 ft. are
shown. The maximum illumination shown does not exceed those specified in the Land Development
Regulations.
The Board finds this criterion to be met.
OTHER- Numbering of Plan Sheets
The Board finds that the numbering of the drawings is inconsistent between that shown on the Plan Sheet
Index on Drawing Number C.10: there appears to be two drawings labeled C1.6 and the Lighting Plan is
incorrectly labeled as C1.6.
OTHER- Phasing
Building #2, its footprint, a dedicated area around Building #2 and the western bay of the parking lot are
specified as Phase II improvements. Following the completion of Phase I and prior to the initiation of Phase
II construction, these will remain as green space areas. The Board finds this phasing plan acceptable.
DECISION
Motion by Bill Miller, seconded by David Parsons to approve preliminary & final plat application #SD-14-
42 of BlackRock Construction, LLC subject to the following stipulations:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect except as amended herein.
2. The applicant shall obtain final wastewater allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit.
3. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services,
and service modifications shall be underground.
4. The Board approves a 5.5 ft. height waiver for building #1 for a maximum height of 40.5 ft. and a height
waiver of 6.2 ft for building #2 for a maximum height of 41.2 ft.
SD_14_42 284MeadowlandDrive_BlackrockConstruction_two_blds Prelim Final ffd.doc 11
#SD-14-42
5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to the use
or occupancy of Building #1.
6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall provide confirmation to the Administrative
Officer from the Fire Chief that the fire truck access proposed is acceptable.
7. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of
the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan should meet the
standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The
South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure
compliance with this criterion.
8. All exterior lighting fixtures shall be downcasting and shielded.
9. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the
Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the
Administrative Officer prior to recording the final plat plan.
The plans shall be revised to show the new fire hydrant moved slightly to be closer to the
future building.
The plans shall be revised to assure accuracy between the Plan Sheet Index shown on the
Overall Site Plan and the individual drawing numbers.
10. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for Phase 1 within six (6) months of this approval or this
approval is null and void. The Development Review Board grants a period of five (5) years for approval
of Phase 2. At such time as the five years is reached and the applicant has not sought a zoning permit
for Phase 2, they shall be eligible, per Section 17.04 of the South Burlington Land Development
Regulations, for one (1) extension to an approval if the application takes place before the approval has
expired and if the Development Review Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged
from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Development Review Board
may specify a period of time up to one (1) year for the extension.
11. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance,
the Development Review Board estimates that Building #1 will generate twenty-eight (28) additional
vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour and that Building #2 will generate eighteen (18)
additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour.
12. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development
Review Board.
13. Prior to the issuance of the zoning permit, the applicant shall provide a complete set of approved
plans in a digital format as one (1) PDF format file.
14. The mylar shall be recorded prior to permit issuance.
15. The applicant shall regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure.
SD_14_42_284MeadowlandDrive BlackrockConstruction_two_blds PrelimFinal ffd.doc 12
I
#SD-14-42
16. The applicant shall comply with the Fire Department's recommendations as stated in a letter to staff
dated February 6, 2015.
17. Prior to zoning permit issuance for Building #1, the applicant shall post a $42,875 landscaping bond.
Prior to zoning permit issuance for Building #2, the applicant shall post a $9,975 landscaping bond.
These bonds shall each remain in full effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has
taken root and has a good chance of survival.
10. The final plat plan (sheet C1.2) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval
is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording.
Tim Barritt—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Mark Behr—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Brian Breslend —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Bill Miller—
yea
nay
abstain
not present
David Parsons —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Jennifer Smith —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
John Wilking —
yea
nay
abstain
not present
Motion carried by a vote of 7— 0 — 0.
// f� MqVCA Signed this b day of 2015, by
Tim Barritt, Chair
Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this
decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental
Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South
Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See
V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or
http://vermontiudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing
requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address.
The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state
permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist.
SD_14 42 284MeadowlandDrive 6lackrockConstrziction_two blds_PrelimFinal_ffd doc 13